Previous Article | Next Article 
Mol Cell Biol, February 1998, p. 967-977, Vol. 18, No. 2
0270-7306/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
A Dominant-Negative Inhibitor of CREB Reveals that It Is a
General Mediator of Stimulus-Dependent Transcription of
c-fos
Sohyun
Ahn,1
Michelle
Olive,2
Seema
Aggarwal,1
Dmitry
Krylov,2
David D.
Ginty,1,* and
Charles
Vinson2,*
Laboratory of Biochemistry, National Cancer
Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
20892,2 and
Department of Neuroscience,
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
212051
Received 7 July 1997/Returned for modification 5 September
1997/Accepted 20 November 1997
 |
ABSTRACT |
Several studies have characterized the upstream regulatory region
of c-fos, and identified cis-acting elements
termed the cyclic AMP (cAMP) response elements (CREs) that are critical
for c-fos transcription in response to a variety of
extracellular stimuli. Although several transcription factors can bind
to CREs in vitro, the identity of the transcription factor(s) that
activates the c-fos promoter via the CRE in vivo remains
unclear. To help identify the trans-acting factors that
regulate stimulus-dependent transcription of c-fos via the
CREs, dominant-negative (D-N) inhibitor proteins that function by
preventing DNA binding of B-ZIP proteins in a dimerization
domain-dependent fashion were developed. A D-N inhibitor of CREB,
termed A-CREB, was constructed by fusing a designed acidic amphipathic
extension onto the N terminus of the CREB leucine zipper domain. The
acidic extension of A-CREB interacts with the basic region of CREB
forming a coiled-coil extension of the leucine zipper and thus prevents
the basic region of wild-type CREB from binding to DNA. Other D-N
inhibitors generated in a similar manner with the dimerization domains
of Fos, Jun, C/EBP, ATF-2, or VBP did not block CREB DNA binding
activity, nor did they inhibit transcriptional activation of a minimal
promoter containing a single CRE in PC12 cells. A-CREB inhibited
activation of CRE-mediated transcription evoked by three distinct
stimuli: forskolin, which increases intracellular cAMP; membrane
depolarization, which promotes Ca2+ influx; and nerve
growth factor (NGF). A-CREB completely inhibited cAMP-mediated, but
only partially inhibited Ca2+- and NGF-mediated,
transcription of a reporter gene containing 750 bp of the native
c-fos promoter. Moreover, glutamate induction of
c-fos expression in primary cortical neurons was dependent on CREB. In contrast, induction of c-fos transcription by
UV light was not inhibited by A-CREB. Lastly, A-CREB attenuated NGF
induction of morphological differentiation in PC12 cells. These results suggest that CREB or its closely related family members are general mediators of stimulus-dependent transcription of c-fos and
are required for at least some of the long-term actions of NGF.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Extracellular stimuli promote, at
the transcriptional level, expression of a variety of
immediate-early-response genes (IEGs). Many IEGs encode transcription
factors which, in turn, influence the expression of secondary response
genes (52). The products of secondary response genes
contribute to the phenotypic response of the cell to extracellular
stimuli. The prototypical IEG, c-fos (24), is
activated by a variety of stimuli including activators of protein
kinase C (8, 19), agents that increase intracellular cyclic
AMP (cAMP) levels (3, 49), membrane depolarization or
excitatory neurotransmitters, such as glutamate, that trigger an
increase in intracellular levels of Ca2+ (1, 25, 38,
54), and peptide growth factors, such as nerve growth factor
(NGF), that activate receptor tyrosine kinases (20, 23). In
the upstream regulatory region of the c-fos gene, several
cis-acting DNA sequences that mediate stimulus-dependent transcription of c-fos have been identified. These include
at least three cAMP response elements (CREs) located 67, 293, and 343 nucleotides upstream of the transcriptional start site (3) and the serum response element (SRE) centered approximately 300 nucleotides upstream of the transcriptional start site (47, 59,
60). Transcription factors of the basic leucine zipper (B-ZIP)
family such as CREB (CRE-binding protein) can bind to CRE-like elements
(37). Likewise, the SRE can bind many factors (59); the best characterized is a ternary complex composed
of a serum response factor (SRF) dimer and one p62TCF
(ternary complex factor) molecule (reviewed in references
9 and 58). In transient
transfection experiments, CREB, SRF, and p62TCF were found
to be capable of mediating stimulus-dependent transcription of
c-fos.
While the CREs within the promoters of c-fos and other IEGs
are critical for stimulus-dependent transcription, it is unclear which
trans-acting factors bind to these cis elements
in vivo. The consensus CRE is 5'-TGAC:GTCA-3', where the center of the dyad is marked by a colon. This DNA sequence may be bound by homodimer or heterodimer combinations of a variety of B-ZIP transcription factors
including CREB homodimers (29), CREB-ATF heterodimers (37), and dimers consisting of other ATF family
transcription factors (26). In addition, structurally
related cis elements consisting of the same dyad half site
(XXX:GTCA) exist. A TPA response element (TRE), or AP-1 site, is
similar in sequence to the CRE with one of the central GC pairs of the
CRE deleted, resulting in a pseudopalindromic site (consensus:
TGA:GTCA). The TRE is thought to be bound by a B-ZIP heterodimer
consisting of a Fos family member and a Jun family member
(39).
Detailed experiments in vitro indicate that B-ZIP proteins are
promiscuous in their DNA binding. For example, a Fra1-JunD heterodimer,
a Jun-ATF-2 heterodimer, or a Jun-ATF-3 heterodimer can bind to a CRE
better than to a TRE (27, 48). ATF-4 can heterodimerize with
either Fos or Jun, and this complex preferentially binds to a CRE
(28). A Jun-ATF-2 heterodimer has been reported to
cooperate to form the enhanceosome on the human beta interferon gene
(16, 57). Moreover, CREB can inhibit Jun-mediated
transcription by competing for the same cis-acting elements
(35), and c-Jun can repress gene expression by acting
through a CRE (45). These results underscore the complexity
of cis elements and the B-ZIP factors that bind to them.
We have developed dominant-negative (D-N) inhibitor proteins, termed
A-ZIPs, which act by inhibiting the DNA binding of a B-ZIP protein in a
dimerization-dependent fashion (33, 43). With these reagents
in hand, we can establish in an intact cell or tissue the requirement
for a particular B-ZIP transcription factor that acts via any
cis element in response to extracellular stimuli to regulate
gene expression. We have initiated the use of these A-ZIPs by examining
the dimerization domains that are critical for mediating
transcriptional activation, in response to several extracellular
stimuli, of a minimal promoter with a single CRE and of the full-length
native c-fos promoter. A-CREB, the D-N inhibitor of CREB
used in this study, blocked transcription of a synthetic reporter gene
containing a single CRE when activated by extracellular stimuli
including forskolin, Ca2+ influx following membrane
depolarization, and NGF. When the native c-fos promoter was
examined, it was found that A-CREB completely inhibited cAMP-sensitive
transcription but only partially inhibited Ca2+- and
NGF-sensitive transcription. In contrast, A-CREB did not affect the
induction of c-fos transcription by UV light. Moreover, A-CREB partially blocked NGF induction of morphological differentiation of PC12 cells. These results support the idea that CREB or its closely
related family members play a general role in the regulation of IEG
transcription in response to a wide variety of extracellular signals
and that CREB-dependent gene expression contributes to the long-term
actions of NGF.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Proteins.
The amino acid sequence of A-CREB is as follows:
DYKDDDDK MASMTGGQQMGRDPDLEQQLEELAQENEELEKEAEELEQELAE LENRVAVLENQNKTLIEELKALKDLYCHKSD. The first 8 amino acids encode the FLAG epitope tag, the next 13 amino
acids are a
10 protein sequence, the next 31 amino acids are the
amphipathic acidic extension, and the final group of amino acids are
the mouse CREB leucine zipper, which continues to the natural C
terminus of the protein. The Leu residues of the leucine zipper domain
are in boldface. The mouse CREB B-ZIP domain spans from Leu-274 to
Asp-341, the natural C terminus. cDNAs encoding the different B-ZIP
leucine zippers and a stop codon were generated by PCR and ligated to
the C terminus of the acidic extension as XhoI-HindIII fragments in the prokaryotic
expression vector pT5. The XhoI site is the Leu and Glu
residues at the beginning of the leucine zipper. The recipient pT5
vector contained the
10 sequence and the acidic extension. The
entire open reading frame can be removed as an
NdeI-HindIII fragment.
Protein purification.
Proteins for circular dichroism (CD)
analysis and electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) were expressed
in Escherichia coli. The proteins with DNA binding domains
were purified over a heparin column and subsequently over a Rainin
high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) system, while the proteins
without DNA binding domains were purified over a hydroxylapatite column and eluted with a buffer containing 200 mM phosphate, pH 7.4. The
fractions enriched with the proteins were then purified on a Rainin
HPLC system with a C18 column and eluted with a gradient consisting of 0 to 100% acetonitrile in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. Protein concentrations were calculated at 230 nm as described previously (33). The full-length CREB was expressed and
purified from baculovirus (21).
CD.
All experiments were performed in 12.5 mM phosphate
buffer (pH 7.4) containing 150 mM KCl, 0.25 mM EDTA, and 1 mM
dithiothreitol. The concentration of each protein in the sample was 4 µM. Melting temperature (Tm) values were
calculated as described before (32) and converted into
values of Kd and
G at 25 and
37°C [Kd(25),
G(25),
Kd(37), and
G(37)] by using a
Cp of
1.25 kcal · mol
1
°C
1, which was calculated from a
Tm-versus-
H plot of the five
samples used in this study. Thermal denaturation was reversible in all cases.
DNA binding assay.
EMSA with recombinant proteins was
performed as described previously (43). EMSA with nuclear
extracts from HEK293-T cells was performed with a different reaction
buffer (150 mM KCl, 12.5 mM potassium phosphate buffer [pH 7.4], 0.25 mM EDTA, 1 mg of bovine serum albumin per ml, 50 mg of dIdC per ml, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 2% glycerol). The sequences of the
double-stranded DNA probes are as follows, with the DNA binding sites
in boldface: CRE probe, 5-GTCAGTCAGTGAC:GTCAATCGGTCA-3; AP-1 probe,
5-GTCAGTCAGTGA:CTCAATCGGTCA-3; C/EBP probe,
5-GTCAGTCAGATTGC:GCAATATCGGTCAG-3. The
-ATF-1,
-CREM, and
-CREB antibodies for supershift experiments were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
Eukaryotic plasmids.
The reporter constructs, which have
been described previously, were pF4 and pAF42CRE (53),
pAF42SRE (47), and pSV
-1 (51). The plasmid
constructs for the generation of the riboprobes used in RNase
protection assays, which have also been described previously, were
pSP6-cfos (60) and pSP6
133 (10). pEGFP was
obtained from Clontech.
A-ZIP coding sequences (A-CREB, A-C/EBP, A-Fos, A-Jun, A-ATF-2) were
inserted as NdeI-HindIII fragments into a
pRc/CMV vector (Invitrogen) which was modified to contain an N-terminal
FLAG epitope (DYKDDDDK) and a new polylinker (pRc/CMV500). The
NdeI-HindIII fragments were obtained from
prokaryotic expression vector pT5, in which the A-ZIPs had been cloned
previously (see Proteins). The A-C/EBP, A-VBP, A-Jun, and A-ATF-2
constructs contain an Asn in position a, while the A-CREB and A-Fos
constructs contained a Leu in the same position.
Cell culture.
PC12 cells were grown on 100-mm-diameter
tissue culture plates as described previously (6). Primary
cultures of cortical neurons were prepared from cortical tissue of E19
rats as described previously (20).
Transient transfection.
Approximately 6 × 106 PC12 cells per 100-mm-diameter plate were used for
transient transfection by a calcium phosphate precipitation technique
(6). Twenty micrograms of reporter plasmid, the indicated amounts of A-CREB plasmid or an empty vector (pRc/CMV500), or 3 µg of
acidic leucine zipper (A-ZIP) constructs and 4 µg of the internal-control
-globin expression vector (pSV
-1) were used. Primary rat cortical neurons were transfected by a modified calcium phosphate precipitation method as described previously (64). A total of 14 × 106 cortical neurons in
100-mm-diameter plates were transfected with 20 µg of reporter
plasmid, 4 µg of pSV
-1, and 5 µg of A-CREB expression vector or
empty vector. The expression of the transfected c-fos
reporter gene was calculated as the ratio of the amount of protected
32P-labeled c-fos transcripts to that of
-globin transcripts as quantified by a PhosphorImager.
For morphological differentiation studies, 2 × 106
PC12 cells in 100-mm-diameter plates were transfected with 18 µg of
Rous sarcoma virus lacZ and the indicated amounts of A-CREB
plasmid. One day after the transfection, cells were stimulated with NGF (100 ng/ml) in low-serum-level media (Dulbecco modified Eagle medium
plus 1% horse serum; Gibco-BRL). After an additional 3 days, cells
were fixed with 2% formaldehyde-0.2% glutaraldehyde in
phosphate-buffered saline for 5 min and then stained with X-Gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-
-D-galactopyranoside)
staining solution overnight at room temperature. A differentiated cell
was defined as one in which the length of processes was 1.5 times the
cell body diameter. Morphological differentiation was calculated as the
ratio of the differentiation of transfected cells to that of
untransfected cells in the same plate.
Approximately 4.5 × 106 HEK293-T cells per
15-cm-diameter plate were transfected by the calcium phosphate
precipitation method (4). Ten micrograms of pEGFP and 10 µg of either an empty vector or the A-CREB expression vector were
used. Two days later, nuclear extracts were obtained as described
previously (15).
RPA.
Two days after transfection, cells were either left
unstimulated or were stimulated with NGF (100 or 200 ng/ml, 45 min),
forskolin (10 µM, 1 h), KCl (50 mM, 45 min), glutamate (10 µM,
1 h), or UV light (400 J/m2, 45 min). Transfected
cells were harvested, and RNA was isolated by the guanidinium
isothiocyanate method (11). Thirty micrograms of RNA was
used for the analysis by RNase protection assay (RPA) as described
previously (51, 53). Quantification was done by
PhosphorImager. Fold induction is the ratio of stimulated to unstimulated values which were calculated by dividing the signal of
c-fosH by that of globin.
 |
RESULTS |
Design of A-CREB, a D-N inhibitor of CREB.
Previously, we
developed D-N inhibitors that selectively inhibit the DNA binding
activity of B-ZIP proteins C/EBP (33) and AP-1
(43) in equimolar competition assays. These D-N inhibitors, which we refer to as A-ZIPs, consist of an acidic amphipathic protein
sequence that replaces the natural basic region fused to the N terminus
of the dimerization domain (the leucine zipper). The rationale is that
the acidic extension electrostatically mimics DNA and provides the
B-ZIP basic region with an alternative interaction surface. We have
demonstrated that the acidic amphipathic protein sequence forms a
coiled-coil structure with the basic region of the endogenous B-ZIP
protein and stabilizes the heterodimeric complex by 2.5 to 5.0 kcal/mol. This prevents the basic region of the endogenous B-ZIP
protein from binding to DNA in a dimerization-dependent fashion.
We used this strategy to construct a D-N inhibitor of CREB, termed
A-CREB, by replacing the CREB basic region with an acidic amphipathic
protein sequence. Figure 1 depicts the
protein sequence of the CREB basic region, which is critical for
sequence-specific DNA binding, and the designed amphipathic acidic
residues that interact with the CREB basic region to form a coiled-coil
structure. The basic regions of B-ZIP proteins are highly conserved
(61), suggesting that the acidic extension may interact
similarly with all B-ZIP basic regions (33). We have
designed two acidic amphipathic extensions, differing by a single amino
acid, that preferentially interact with different B-ZIP basic regions.
The difference between these two acidic extensions is in the first a
position N terminal of the first d position of the leucine zipper. The
B-ZIP basic regions contain either a polar amino acid (e.g., C/EBP,
VBP, and GBF1 contain Asn, Glu, and Cys, respectively) or a hydrophobic amino acid (Jun and CREB contain Ile and Val, respectively) at position
a (Fig. 1). We have shown that an Asn in position a of the acidic
extension can interact well with polar amino acids in the basic region
(33). This type of interaction between polar amino acids is
seen in the GCN4 leucine zipper, which contains an Asn in position a
(44). To produce an interaction with the hydrophobic amino
acids in positions a in CREB and Jun, we have placed a Leu in position
a to create an acidic extension that will interact with B-ZIP basic
regions containing hydrophobic amino acids in the corresponding a
positions (Fig. 1).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Structure of A-CREB. Protein sequence of the acidic
amphipathic extension that was fused with the CREB leucine zipper
domain to produce A-CREB. The upper panel depicts the amino acid
sequence of the acidic amphipathic extension (4H) and the single amino
acid change in position a (N to L) needed to create the potent new
acidic extension (A) that interacts with the CREB basic region. The
lower panel shows the amino acid sequences of basic regions of CREB,
Jun, C/EBP, VBP, and GBF1. The box encloses the potential interacting
residues: Leu of the new acidic extension (A) and Val of the CREB basic
region. The first Leu of the zipper, the invariant Asn and Arg of the
basic region, and the position a amino acid which is critical for the
efficacy of the new acidic extension, are in boldface. The coiled-coil
nomenclature of the basic region extending from the leucine zipper is
indicated below, with hydrophobic positions a and d in boldface. The
numbering of the heptads in the acidic extension is indicated.
|
|
A-CREB heterodimerizes selectively with CREB.
The
-helical
content and thermal stability of the CREB B-ZIP domain and A-CREB,
either alone or together, were measured by CD spectroscopy (Fig.
2A, Table
1) in which the amplitude of ellipticity
at 222 nm is an indicator of
-helical structure. The CREB B-ZIP
domain clearly showed a two-state thermal denaturation; it was more
-helical at low temperatures and had a Tm of
47°C, representing a Kd(37) of 1.3 × 10
7 M. Although A-CREB had a 50% greater ellipticity at
6°C, suggesting that the acidic extension was
-helical, A-CREB was
less stable, as indicated by a Tm of 40°C or a
Kd(37) of 2.3 × 10
6 M. The
mixture of CREB and A-CREB also showed a two-state thermal transition
and was more stable than a CREB homodimer, as shown by a
Tm of 70°C or a Kd(37)
of 3.9 × 10
11 M (Fig. 2A). This demonstrates that
CREB and A-CREB formed a very stable heterodimer that was 3,300-fold
more stable than a CREB B-ZIP homodimer. The mixture of CREB and
4H-CREB, which contains an Asn instead of Leu in position a (Fig. 1),
is 4.5 kcal/mol less stable than the CREB-A-CREB mixture,
demonstrating the importance of the Leu in the acidic extension for the
heterodimerization with CREB. The mixture of CREB and A-CREB had more
ellipticity at 6°C than was expected from the simple sum of the two
homodimer samples, indicating that additional
-helical structure was
formed in the heterodimer. We interpret this as a continuation of the "zippering" of the leucine zipper into the basic region to form a
coiled-coil structure as represented in Fig. 2C.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Thermal stability of A-CREB mixed with CREB or VBP. (A)
CD thermal denaturation curves recorded at 222 nm for CREB (squares),
A-CREB (diamonds), and a mixture of CREB and A-CREB (circles). The
solid line labeled SUM is expected if CREB and A-CREB do not interact.
The line through each data set is a fitted curve that was used to
calculate Tm as described previously
(33), and the calculated Kd(37) is
shown. (B) CD thermal denaturation curves at 222 nm of VBP (squares),
A-CREB (diamonds), and a mixture of VBP and A-CREB (circles). The solid
line labeled SUM is expected if VBP and A-CREB do not interact. (C) A
schematic representation of an A-CREB-CREB dimer. The left panel shows
a CREB homodimer with unhelical basic regions. The right panel shows a
heterodimer of CREB and A-CREB resulting in an -helical formation of
the basic region.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Thermal stabilities of the CREB B-ZIP domain, two D-N
inhibitors, and mixtures of CREB and D-N inhibitorsa
|
|
Next, the interaction between A-CREB and other B-ZIP domains was
examined to address the specificity of the interaction between CREB and
A-CREB. The B-ZIP domains of Vitellogenin binding protein (VBP)
(31), the chicken homolog of mammalian TEF (18),
and A-CREB were thermally denatured, either alone or together (Fig. 2B). VBP had a Tm of 50°C, and the mixture of
VBP and A-CREB did not show an increase in Tm.
The observed ellipticity value of the mixture at low temperatures was
similar to the expected value assuming they do not interact, which
indicates that a new
-helical structure was not produced. VBP and
A-CREB presumably do not interact, which suggests that the acidic
amphipathic extension is able to interact with the basic region and
increase thermal stability only if the leucine zippers themselves can
physically interact.
A-CREB inhibits CREB DNA binding activity.
EMSAs were
performed to determine whether A-CREB could inhibit the ability of the
CREB B-ZIP domain to bind to its cognate DNA binding motif, the CRE. A
CREB B-ZIP homodimer retarded the mobility of the radiolabeled
double-stranded 25-bp oligonucleotide probe containing a single
consensus CRE (Fig. 3A, lane 2), and an
equimolar concentration of A-CREB (lane 3) effectively inhibited binding of the CREB B-ZIP domain to the CRE-containing oligonucleotide. In contrast, neither A-VBP (lane 4) nor A-Fos (lane 5), which contained
leucine zipper domains derived from VBP or Fos, respectively, was able
to modulate the DNA binding activity of CREB. These results demonstrate
that A-CREB, but not A-VBP or A-Fos, prevents CREB from binding to the
CRE.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
A-CREB inhibits DNA binding activity of CREB. The
inhibition of CREB DNA binding activity is leucine zipper specific. (A)
A-CREB, but not A-VBP or A-Fos, inhibits the DNA binding activity of
the DNA binding domain of CREB. An EMSA was performed with a 25-bp
double-stranded DNA oligonucleotide containing a consensus CRE and the
DNA binding domain of CREB (5 × 10 6 M; lane 2). The
binding reaction mixture contained 1.0 molar equivalent of A-CREB (lane
3), A-VBP (lane 4), or A-Fos (lane 5). (B) A-CREB, but not A-Fos,
A-C/EBP, or A-VBP, inhibits the DNA binding activity of full-length
CREB. Increasing concentrations (10 8 M, 3 × 10 7 M, 10 7 M, 3 × 10 6
M, and 10 6 M) of A-CREB, A-Fos, A-C/EBP, or A-VBP were
added to the reaction mixture containing CREB (2 × 10 7 M), and an EMSA was performed as for panel A. (C)
A-CREB does not inhibit a Fos-Jun complex from binding to the AP-1
site. An EMSA was performed with a probe containing an AP-1 site (lane
1). A Fos-Jun complex (5 × 10 7 M) binds DNA (lane
2), and 1 molar equivalent of A-Fos completely inhibits Fos-Jun DNA
binding (lane 3). Neither A-VBP (lane 4) nor A-CREB (lane 5) inhibits
AP-1 DNA binding activity. (D) A-CREB does not inhibit DNA binding
activity of C/EBP. An EMSA was performed with a probe containing a
C/EBP binding site (lane 1). C/EBP (10 8 M) was challenged
with A-C/EBP or A-CREB at 1, 3, and 10 molar excesses. A-C/EBP
completely inhibits C/EBP binding (lanes 3 to 5), while A-CREB has no
effect on C/EBP DNA binding activity (lanes 6 to 8).
|
|
The ability of A-CREB to specifically inhibit DNA binding of
full-length CREB was also examined (Fig. 3B). The full-length CREB
protein of 342 amino acids was produced in baculovirus and showed
CRE-specific DNA binding. Five different concentrations of A-CREB, at
half-log-unit concentration intervals, were used to compete the binding
of CREB (2 × 10
7 M) to the CRE probe. A-CREB, at a
concentration of 10
7 M (lane 6), effectively blocked CREB
from binding to the CRE. The ability of A-CREB to completely inhibit
CREB DNA binding at a molar ratio of 1:2 suggests that only 50% of the
baculovirus-expressed CREB protein was able to bind DNA. A-Fos,
A-C/EBP, and A-VBP proteins, which did inhibit the DNA binding of their
respective B-ZIP dimerization partners, did not inhibit CREB DNA
binding even at a 30-fold molar excess (Fig. 3D and data not shown).
We further addressed the specificity of A-CREB inhibition of CREB DNA
binding activity by determining whether A-CREB could nonspecifically
inhibit DNA binding of the AP-1 complex, which is a heterodimer of Fos
and Jun (Fig. 3C). For these experiments, a probe containing a single
AP-1 binding site was used (lane 1) and the migration of this probe was
retarded by the Fos-Jun complex (lane 2). A-Fos completely inhibited
DNA binding of the Fos-Jun complex in an equimolar challenge (lane 3).
However, neither A-VBP (lane 4) nor A-CREB (lane 5) had an effect on
the DNA binding activity of the Fos-Jun complex. The ability of A-CREB
to inhibit C/EBP DNA binding was also examined. A-C/EBP was able to
block the B-ZIP domain of C/EBP from binding to its cognate DNA binding element (Fig. 3D, lanes 3 to 5), while A-CREB did not inhibit the DNA
binding activity of C/EBP (lanes 6 to 8). These results suggest that
A-CREB selectively inhibited the DNA binding activity of B-ZIP proteins
containing the CREB leucine zipper domain. Together, these
data demonstrate a remarkable degree of specificity of the A-ZIP D-N
molecules via their respective leucine zipper domains.
A-CREB inhibits the DNA binding activity of CREB in extracts of
transfected cells.
To further demonstrate that A-CREB inhibits the
DNA binding activity of nuclear CREB in intact cells, nuclear extracts
prepared from HEK293-T cells that were transfected with either an empty vector or an A-CREB expression vector were used for EMSA (Fig. 4). Cotransfection of HEK293-T cells with
pEGFP allowed us to estimate a transfection efficiency of 60% by
fluorescence microscopy. When the probe containing a consensus CRE was
used for EMSA, three bands were observed with the nuclear extracts from
the empty-vector-transfected cells (lane 1), while only the upper band
was observed with nuclear extracts from A-CREB-expressing cells (lane
2). The disappearance of the two lower bands indicates that A-CREB
heterodimerized with CREB-like leucine zipper proteins in the nuclear
extracts and prevented them from binding to the CRE probe.

View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
A-CREB inhibits CREB DNA binding activity in extracts of
transfected cells. CREB DNA binding activity is inhibited in nuclear
extracts prepared from HEK293-T cells that were transfected with an
expression vector encoding A-CREB (lane 2) or the control vector (lane
1). For supershift analysis, antibodies against CREB (lanes 3 and 4),
CREM (lanes 5 and 6), and ATF-1 (lanes 7 and 8) were added to the DNA
binding reaction mixtures. A-CREB inhibited CREB and ATF-1 binding
activity; the supershifted products are indicated by a star. C/EBP DNA
binding activity is not inhibited in nuclear extracts from cells
transfected with A-CREB (lanes 9 and 10).
|
|
The identities of protein-DNA complexes in the two lower bands were
determined by supershift experiments using antibodies against CREB,
ATF-1, and CREM. The middle band was supershifted by the
-CREB
antibody (lane 3), while the lower band was supershifted by the
-ATF-1 antibody (lane 7). An antibody against CREM was without
effect, suggesting that CREM was not a component of any of the
CRE-protein complexes (lane 5). The identity of the protein(s) that
resulted in the upper band was not determined, and the protein is
thought to be a factor without a CREB-like leucine zipper domain. In
the presence of A-CREB, no supershift was observed with any of the
antibodies (lanes 4, 6, and 8), indicating that CREB-like proteins did
not bind to CRE-containing probes in extracts of A-CREB-transfected
cells. In contrast, C/EBP DNA binding activities present in cell
extracts prepared from vector- and A-CREB-transfected cells were the
same (lanes 9 and 10).
A-CREB inhibits cAMP-dependent, CRE-mediated
transcrip- tion.
Since CREB and A-CREB heterodimerize
with an affinity 3.3 orders of magnitude greater than that of CREB
homodimers (Fig. 2A) and since A-CREB effectively and selectively
inhibits CREB DNA binding activity in vitro (Fig. 3) and in vivo (Fig.
4), we next asked whether A-CREB can potently and specifically block
CRE-mediated transcription when expressed in intact cells. For these
experiments, the ability of A-CREB to influence the expression of a
transiently transfected reporter gene, termed pAF42CRE, which contains
a single consensus CRE upstream of the transcribed region of
the human c-fos gene, was determined (Fig.
5A). The pAF42CRE reporter gene was
cotransfected into pheochromocytoma PC12 cells along with expression
vectors encoding A-CREB and
-globin (pSV
-1). The expression of
-globin served as an internal control of transfection efficiency
since it is constitutively transcribed regardless of PC12 cell
treatment (Fig. 5). Transcription of the reporter genes was assessed by
an RPA. The protected RNA product of the pAF42CRE reporter gene,
c-fosH (296 nucleotides), is larger than the protected RNA
product of the endogenous rat c-fos gene (65 nucleotides),
which allowed us to distinguish between them when they were resolved on
denaturing gels. The presence of endogenous c-fosR
transcripts served as a positive indication that the cells responded to
the stimuli examined. Any effect of A-CREB on expression of endogenous
c-fosR was not detectable because the transfection
efficiency of PC12 cells is less than 5% by our protocol.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
A-CREB blocks cAMP-induced gene expression in a
dose-dependent manner. (A) A schematic representation of the pAF42CRE
reporter gene construct used in these experiments. (B) PC12 cells were
transfected with the reporter plasmid pAF42CRE, an -globin internal
control expression vector (pSV -1), and indicated amounts of A-CREB
expression vector as described in Materials and Methods. The total DNA
concentration was kept constant by including empty expression vector
DNA. After 48 h of transfection, cells were stimulated with
forskolin (Fsk) (10 µM, 1 h), and RNA was analyzed by an RPA.
c-fosH, protected RNA fragment from the transfected human
c-fos reporter gene; globin, fragment protected from the
-globin internal control plasmid; c-fosR, fragment
protected by the endogenous rat c-fos mRNA.
|
|
cAMP-dependent transcription of pAF42CRE induced by forskolin was
blocked by A-CREB in a dose-dependent manner; transfection of 3 µg of
A-CREB plasmid per 6 × 106 cells completely inhibited
cAMP induction of c-fosH transcription (Fig. 5). This
result demonstrates that A-CREB potently blocks CRE-mediated gene
transcription. Three micrograms of A-CREB plasmid was used for
all subsequent transfection experiments.
A-CREB inhibition of CRE-mediated transcription is leucine
zipper dependent.
In vitro, A-CREB abolished the DNA binding
activity of CREB, but not that of other B-ZIP proteins (Fig. 3). In
order to establish the specificity of A-CREB for inhibition of CREB DNA
binding and transactivation in intact cells, the ability of other
acidic leucine zippers (A-ZIPs) to influence CRE-mediated transcription
was assessed (Fig. 6). The A-ZIP proteins
have leucine zipper dimerization domains derived from different B-ZIP
proteins (C/EBP, Fos, Jun, ATF-2, and VBP). Three-microgram amounts of
the eukaryotic expression vectors encoding different A-ZIPs were
transfected into PC12 cells, and cAMP-sensitive transcription of
pAF42CRE was assessed by RPA. As before, A-CREB completely blocked
cAMP-sensitive expression of the reporter gene. In contrast, A-C/EBP,
A-Fos, A-Jun, A-ATF-2, and A-VBP had no inhibitory effect. Yet these
inhibitors were expressed (data not shown), and these A-ZIPs blocked
the DNA binding activities of the partners of their respective B-ZIP
domains (Fig. 3 and data not shown) (43). These results
demonstrate that A-CREB inhibition of cAMP-sensitive gene expression
was via the inhibition of the DNA binding activity of CREB and not via
the inhibition of any dimerization partner of the other tested B-ZIP
proteins.

View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
A-CREB, but not other acidic leucine-zippers (A-ZIPs),
inhibits cAMP activation of CRE-mediated gene expression.
Transcriptional activation of pAF42CRE was evoked by forskolin. For
this experiment, PC12 cells were transfected with pAF42CRE, -globin
expression vector, and expression vectors encoding the indicated A-ZIP
proteins (3 µg each). Two days later, cells were treated with
forskolin (Fsk; 10 µM, 1 h) or were left untreated and an RPA
was performed. This experiment was performed two times with similar
results.
|
|
To examine the cis element dependence of A-CREB inhibition
of CRE-mediated transcription, we employed an alternative reporter gene
in which the single CRE was replaced with a single copy of the SRE
(pAF42SRE) (Fig. 7). Previous studies
have shown that the SRE can mediate growth factor induction of
c-fos transcription (47, 60). However, A-CREB did
not block NGF induction of transcription of pAF42SRE (Fig. 6).
Taken together, these results demonstrate that A-CREB is a specific
inhibitor of CREB-mediated gene transcription.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
A-CREB does not inhibit SRE-mediated gene expression.
(A) A schematic representation of the pAF42SRE construct used in this
experiment. (B) PC12 cells were transfected with the pAF42SRE reporter
gene, an -globin expression vector, and an empty vector or the
A-CREB expression vector. Two days later, cells were treated with NGF
(100 ng/ml, 45 min) or were left untreated and an RPA was performed.
This experiment was performed three times with similar results.
|
|
CREB mediates CRE-dependent transcriptional activation of
c-fos in response to three distinct extracellular
stimuli.
After it was established that A-CREB specifically and
potently inhibits CREB function, the potential role of CREB in
mediating the expression of pAF42CRE evoked by multiple distinct
extracellular stimuli was analyzed. For these experiments, PC12
cells were cotransfected with pAF42CRE, pSV
-1, and an
expression vector encoding A-CREB. Subsequently, cells were exposed to
NGF, forskolin, or KCl, and the expression of the pAF42CRE reporter
gene was assessed by RPA (Fig. 8). As
seen previously, forskolin and KCl, which increase intracellular levels
of cAMP and Ca2+, respectively, were effective in
triggering expression of pAF42CRE (lanes 3 and 4), while NGF only
weakly induced expression of pAF42CRE (lane 2) (6).
Nevertheless, A-CREB completely blocked expression of the
reporter gene in response to all three stimuli (lanes 6 to 8). While
these results implicate CREB in CRE-mediated transcription, they
were obtained with a reporter gene containing a perfect consensus CRE
(TGAC:GTCA), whereas the CREs within the upstream regulatory region of c-fos are imperfect, nonpalindromic CRE-like
elements. Identical results were obtained with a reporter gene that
contained the
67 human c-fos CRE (TGAC:GTTT) placed in
front of a c-fos minimal promoter (data not shown). These
results demonstrate that CREB is essential for CRE-mediated
transcription of c-fos in PC12 cells.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
CREB is critical for cAMP, Ca2+, and NGF
induction of CRE-mediated gene expression. (A) A schematic
representation of the pAF42CRE reporter construct. (B) Transcriptional
activation of pAF42CRE by NGF, cAMP, or Ca2+. PC12 cells
were transfected with the pAF42CRE reporter gene, an -globin
expression vector, and either an empty vector or the A-CREB expression
vector (3 µg). Two days later, cells were either left unstimulated
(lanes 1 and 5) or were stimulated with NGF (100 ng/ml, 45 min; lanes 2 and 6) or forskolin (FSK) (10 µM, 1 h; lanes 3 and 7) or were
subjected to membrane depolarization with KCl (50 mM, 1 h; lanes 4 and 8) and an RPA was performed. A-CREB blocked NGF, forskolin, and KCl
induction of pAF42CRE by 95, 100, and 98%, respectively. The
quantification was done as described in Materials and Methods. This
experiment was performed two times with similar results.
|
|
CREB is critical for c-fos expression in response to
many, but not all, extracellular stimuli.
While CREB is critical
for stimulus-dependent transcription via the CRE, the full upstream
regulatory region of the c-fos gene contains binding sites
for CREB-ATFs, C/EBP, AP-1, SRF, p62TCF, STATs, and other
stimulus-sensitive transcription factors (reviewed in reference
17). Therefore, we sought to determine the
contribution of CREB to stimulus-dependent transcription of the intact,
full-length c-fos gene. For these experiments, we employed a
reporter gene, pF4, which contains 750 bp of the human c-fos
promoter with all cis elements known to be important for
inducible transcription of c-fos (Fig.
9A). A-CREB completely inhibited
cAMP-sensitive expression of pF4 (Fig. 9B, lane 8). However, CREB is
only partly responsible for Ca2+ and NGF induction of
c-fos in PC12 cells. Upon its expression in PC12 cells,
A-CREB inhibited Ca2+ and NGF induction of transcription of
pF4 by 50 to 75% (lanes 7 and 9, respectively). In contrast,
c-fos expression induced by UV light, which acts via the
stress pathway through stress-induced mitogen-activated protein kinases
(SAPK/JNKs and p38MAPK) and involves
SRE-p62TCF-dependent transcription (46), was not
inhibited by A-CREB (lane 10).

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
A-CREB inhibits NGF, cAMP, and Ca2+
induction of c-fos expression but not induction by UV light.
(A) A schematic representation of the pF4 reporter construct. (B)
Transcriptional activation of pF4 by various stimuli. PC12 cells were
transfected with reporter gene pF4, an -globin expression vector,
and either an empty vector or the A-CREB expression vector. After 2 days, cells were either left unstimulated (lanes 1 and 6) or were
stimulated with NGF (100 ng/ml, 45 min; lanes 2 and 7), forskolin (FSK)
(10 µM, 1 h; lanes 3 and 8), KCl (50 mM, 1 h; lanes 4 and
9), or UV light (400 J/m2; lanes 5 and 10) and an RPA was
performed. (C) Primary E19 rat cortical neurons were transfected as for
panel B. Two days later, cells were stimulated with glutamate (10 µM,
1 h) and an RPA was performed. A-CREB blocked NGF, forskolin, KCl,
and UV light induction of pF4 by 64, 99, 84, and 2%, respectively. The
quantification was done as described in Materials and Methods. These
experiments were performed three times with similar results.
|
|
Another extracellular stimulus, glutamate, induces
Ca2+-dependent activation of c-fos
expression in hippocampal and cortical neurons (1).
Dissociated cultures of E19 rat cortical neurons were transfected with
the pF4 reporter gene, the A-CREB expression vector, and
pSV
-1. A-CREB, but not the control vector, completely blocked glutamate-induced c-fos transcription (Fig. 9C).
These results demonstrate that CREB is critical for the activation of transcription of c-fos in response to many, but not
all, stimuli and that the contribution of CREB to c-fos
transcription depends on the nature of the extracellular stimulus.
Several studies have suggested that additional B-ZIP family members,
including C/EBP (36, 50), may contribute to c-fos expression. Therefore, we next sought to determine the involvement of
other B-ZIPs by transiently transfecting different A-ZIP expression vectors into PC12 cells and subsequently assessing the expression of
the pF4 reporter gene after NGF treatment (Fig.
10). As seen previously, A-CREB
attenuated NGF induction of the pF4 reporter gene. In contrast,
A-C/EBP, A-Fos, A-Jun, A-ATF-2, and A-VBP had no effect on
NGF-sensitive c-fos expression. Therefore, CREB is the only
B-ZIP transcription factor thus far tested that contributes to NGF
induction of c-fos expression.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 10.
A-CREB, but not other A-ZIPs, attenuates NGF induction
of c-fos expression. For this experiment, PC12 cells were
transfected with the pF4 reporter gene, -globin, and either an empty
vector or expression vectors encoding A-CREB, A-C/EBP, A-Fos, A-Jun,
A-ATF-2, or A-VBP. After 2 days, cells were either left untreated or
were treated with NGF (200 ng/ml, 45 min) and an RPA was performed. The
quantification was done as described in Materials and Methods. This
experiment was performed two times with similar results.
|
|
CREB is required for NGF induction of the morphological
differentiation of PC12 cells.
Since CREB contributes to
NGF-induced transcription of c-fos and since many
other NGF-induced genes contain putative CREB binding sites, we
investigated the role of CREB in NGF induction of the morphological
differentiation of PC12 cells (Fig.
11). For these experiments, PC12 cells
were cotransfected with a
-galactosidase-containing reporter gene
and either a control expression vector or an expression vector encoding
A-CREB. Cells were subsequently grown in the presence or absence of
NGF. Three days after NGF treatment, cells were fixed and stained for
-galactosidase activity to identify transfected cells, and cells
with processes greater than 1.5 times the cell body diameter were
scored as differentiated cells. The extent of morphological
differentiation of untransfected cells from the same plate served as an
internal control. Results shown in Fig. 11A demonstrate that A-CREB,
but not an empty vector, attenuated NGF-mediated morphological
differentiation of PC12 cells. Moreover, this effect was dose dependent
(Fig. 11B). In fact, the 50% inhibitory concentrations for A-CREB
inhibition of differentiation and for inhibition of CRE-mediated gene
transcription were identical (approximately 0.2 µg of A-CREB
expression vector), suggesting that A-CREB blocked differentiation via
inhibition of CREB-dependent gene transcription and not via some other
nonspecific effect. Therefore, in addition to its role in NGF induction
of c-fos expression, CREB contributes to NGF induction of
the morphological differentiation of PC12 cells.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 11.
CREB contributes to NGF induction of morphological
differentiation in PC12 cells. (A) PC12 cells were transfected with a
-galactosidase ( -Gal) plasmid and either an empty expression
vector or the A-CREB expression vector. Then, cells were stimulated
with NGF (100 ng/ml). After 3 days, cells were fixed and stained for
-Gal activity and the morphological differentiation of transfected
cells was calculated as described in the Materials and Methods (the
results shown are means ± the standard errors of the means;
n = 8). (B) A-CREB inhibition of morphological
differentiation is dose dependent, and the 50% inhibitory
concentration is equivalent to that seen for A-CREB inhibition of
CRE-mediated transcription (quantification of the results shown in Fig.
5B).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In many cases, the identities of the DNA sequences that are
critical for the function of a promoter have been determined by a
combination of cis element mutagenesis and the expression of D-N inhibitors of transcription factors that bind to these
cis elements. Many D-N inhibitors are created by a simple
deletion or point mutation of the transactivation domain; they function by binding to a cis element, thereby occluding the binding
of endogenous trans-acting factors. This approach is
valuable for the identification of a particular cis element
that is critical for gene expression. However, this
combination of methodologies reveals nothing about the oligomerization
properties of the actual transcription factors that mediate
transactivation events in vivo. The fact that multiple proteins
can bind to identical cis elements makes it difficult to
identify the protein(s) which mediates stimulus-dependent transcription
in vivo by these approaches. We have developed and characterized D-N
inhibitors that act via a novel mechanism; they inhibit the activity of
a transcription factor, not by occluding the DNA cis element
itself, but by heterodimerizing with endogenous transcription factors,
preventing them from binding to their cognate DNA elements. These D-N
inhibitors allow us to identify the B-ZIP transcription factors that
are critical for influencing transcription via a particular
cis element.
In the present study, we have shown that A-CREB, a novel D-N inhibitor
of the B-ZIP family member CREB, potently and selectively inhibits DNA
binding of CREB and CREB-mediated gene transcription. Using this
reagent, we show that CREB or its closely related family members are
critical for cAMP, Ca2+, and NGF induction of transcription
of a synthetic reporter gene containing a single consensus canonical
CRE (5'-TGAC:GTCA-3'). Moreover, our results demonstrate that CREB
contributes to the activation of the native c-fos gene
promoter in response to many, but not all, extracellular stimuli.
Another established approach to assess the function of a particular
gene is to use mice with deletions or mutations in that gene. Targeted
disruption of the CREB gene has been performed, and CREB hypomorphs
exist; these mice express a CREB protein that is competent to promote
transcription (5, 30). Moreover, in these mice, there are
elevated levels of expression of other members of the CREB/ATF family,
ATF-1 and CREM (CRE modulator), and these transcription factors may
compensate for CREB deficiency (30). However, a requirement
for CREB in stimulus-dependent gene transcription has not been
demonstrated in cells from mice with a targeted CREB mutation. Other
attempts to perturb CREB function include the use of an antisense
oligonucleotide for CREB (40), a CREB protein with a
mutation in the basic DNA binding domain (63), and a CREB
protein with a mutation at Ser-133 (2, 56). We propose that
A-CREB is a potent and specific tool that will be generally useful to
block CREB-dependent transcription.
The present study describes a useful alternative approach to gene
targeting to assess the roles of B-ZIP transcription factors in
stimulus-dependent gene expression. Since the CREB leucine zipper domain has a high degree of homology with those of ATF-1 and
CREM and since these proteins can form heterodimers with each other
(26), we expect that A-CREB has the capacity to dimerize with endogenous ATF-1 and CREM, thereby blocking their ability to bind
to DNA. Therefore, our approach most likely does not distinguish between the role of CREB and that of highly related ATF-1 and CREM-
as positive mediators of stimulus-dependent transcription. The gel
shift results shown in Fig. 4 underscore this point. However, our
results demonstrate that CREB or one of these very closely related
family members mediate stimulus-dependent transcription of
c-fos. A similar conclusion, however, may not be drawn from model systems in which upregulation of other ATF/CREB family members may compensate for CREB deficiency.
In addition to providing insight into CRE-mediated transcription, the
B-ZIP D-N inhibitors described in this study have allowed us to
distinguish between the importance of different B-ZIP transcription factors in the context of a promoter consisting of multiple distinct cis-acting elements. Several B-ZIP-containing transcription
factors have been implicated in the regulation of the expression of
c-fos and other IEGs. For example, it has been reported that
C/EBP
contributes to cAMP-dependent activation of c-fos
transcription by directly binding to an element within the 3' end of
the SRE (36). Moreover, Sealy et al. reported that C/EBP
may contribute to the serum activation of c-fos through the
SRE (50). Our data do not support a role for C/EBP in cAMP
or NGF induction of c-fos expression in PC12 cells (Fig. 6
and 10). While it is possible that B-ZIP transcription factors not
tested in the present study contribute to c-fos
transcription, our results demonstrate that CREB plays a major role in
the stimulus-dependent transcription of c-fos.
In addition to its role in cAMP regulation of gene expression, CREB
also contributes to Ca2+-induced gene expression. In the
nervous system, the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate modulates the
postsynaptic intracellular level of calcium through the ionotropic
glutamate receptor, the NMDA (N-methyl
D-aspartate) receptor. Ca2+ influx via the NMDA
receptor triggers the phosphorylation of CREB on Ser-133 (14,
21) and promotes the transcription of IEGs that contain potential
CREB binding sites, including c-fos (1).
Furthermore, the expression of IEGs may be critical for long-term
neuronal responses such as the expression of the late phase of
long-term potentiation and long-term depression (13, 34, 42,
55). Thus, glutamate- and Ca2+-sensitive genes may be
critical substrates for complex neurobiological phenomena including
learning and memory. Despite the observations that glutamatergic
stimuli that induce neuronal adaptive responses also trigger the
phosphorylation of CREB on Ser-133 and that the CREB hypomorph displays
a disrupted late phase of long-term potentiation and impaired spatial
learning and memory (7), a requirement for CREB during
trans-synaptic activation of gene expression in vivo has not
been demonstrated. Our results in the present study clearly show that
CREB or a closely related family member is indeed required for
glutamate-sensitive c-fos expression in cortical neurons.
A-CREB may be useful in future studies to determine the role of CREB in
trans-synaptic activation of gene expression and activity-dependent adaptive responses in vivo.
Our data also support a central role for CREB in growth
factor-dependent gene expression. Like agents that increase
intracellular levels of cAMP and Ca2+, NGF induces robust
phosphorylation of CREB on its transcriptional regulatory site, Ser-133
(20). In addition, many NGF-sensitive genes contain putative
CREs in their upstream regulatory regions; these include IEGs as well
as late-response genes such as those encoding vgf, tyrosine
hydroxylase, neurotensin, and CGRP (calcitonin gene-related peptide)
(6, 62). Lastly, A-CREB inhibits NGF induction of
c-fos. Although the specific genes responsible for NGF
induction of the biochemical and morphological differentiation of PC12
cells are not well characterized, CREB-dependent gene expression
contributes to this process since A-CREB was effective at inhibiting
NGF induction of morphological differentiation. However, a maximum dose
of A-CREB only partially blocked NGF induction of morphological
differentiation. This result suggests that there are CREB-dependent and
CREB-independent mechanisms responsible for NGF-mediated
differentiation. Likewise, our data demonstrate that CREB-dependent and
CREB-independent signaling pathways contribute to NGF induction of
c-fos expression.
The signal transduction pathways that influence CREB-mediated gene
activation in response to extracellular stimuli have been extensively
characterized. Several types of stimuli, including growth factors that
activate receptor tyrosine kinases and agents that increase
intracellular levels of cAMP and Ca2+, induce
phosphorylation of CREB on its transcriptional regulatory site, Ser-133
(20-22, 53). This phosphorylation event is critical for
stimulus-dependent, CREB-mediated transcription. Phosphorylation of
this residue promotes the association of CREB with coactivator protein
CBP (CREB-binding protein) or p300 (12). Interestingly, although NGF and agents that trigger an increase in intracellular levels of cAMP or Ca2+ induce the phosphorylation of CREB
Ser-133 to a similar extent, these stimuli influence the transcription
of genes containing CREs in distinct ways. For example, agents that
increase intracellular levels of cAMP or Ca2+ effectively
stimulate the transcription of pAF42CRE, a reporter gene that contains
only a single CRE in its upstream regulatory region (Fig. 8), while NGF
is ineffective in stimulating transcription of pAF42CRE (Fig. 8).
Rather, NGF induction of the transcription of c-fos requires
the CREs as well as other elements including the SRE (Fig. 7 and 9)
(6). Likewise, GAL4CREB can confer cAMP and
Ca2+, but not NGF, activation of a reporter gene containing
GAL4 binding sites (6). Thus, the phosphorylation of CREB on
Ser-133 alone is not sufficient to promote the transcription of genes
containing CREs. One possible explanation for these observations is
that, depending on the nature of the stimulus, distinct B-ZIP
transcription factors are responsible for the activation of
c-fos transcription. Our results presented in this study do
not support this possibility. Rather, our data support the idea that
CREB is the B-ZIP transcription factor responsible for cAMP as well as
NGF induction of c-fos expression. The mechanism by which
cAMP, Ca2+, and NGF influence CREB-mediated transcription
in distinct ways remains to be determined. One possibility is that CBP
or proteins that associate with CBP are differentially regulated
depending on the nature of the stimulus, as suggested by Nakajima et
al. (41).
Taken together with results of previous studies, our data demonstrate
that CREB is a general mediator of stimulus-dependent gene
transcription. First, many distinct extracellular stimuli that employ
different signal transduction pathways trigger the phosphorylation of
CREB on its transcriptional regulatory site, Ser-133. Second, many IEGs
and delayed response genes that are sensitive to these extracellular
stimuli contain CREs or CRE-like elements in their upstream regulatory
regions. Third, the present study demonstrates that A-CREB, a potent
inhibitor of the DNA binding activity of CREB, inhibits cAMP,
Ca2+, and NGF induction of the transcription of the
prototypical IEG, c-fos. Therefore, CREB and/or its closely
related family members are important for stimulus-dependent gene
expression and are likely to be critical mediators of the long-term
changes that underlie the growth, differentiation, and adaptive
responses of various cell types.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank L. Szilak for making the DNA probes, Susan Rutberg in
Stuart Yuspa's laboratory for the CREB and ATF-1 antibodies, and
J. Moitra and B. A. Pierchala for comments on the manuscript.
This work was supported by NIH grant N534814, March of Dimes Birth
Defects Foundation research grant 5-FY95-1114, a grant from The Esther
A. and Joseph Klingenstein Fund, and a Pew Scholars Award (D.D.G.).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address for David D. Ginty: Department of Neuroscience, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 725 North Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21205-2185. Phone: (410) 614-9494. Fax: (410) 614-8423. E-mail:
david_ginty{at}qmail.bs.jhu.edu. Mailing address for
Charles Vinson: Building 37, Room 4D06, Laboratory of Biochemistry,
National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
20892. Phone: (301) 496-8753. Fax: (301) 402-3095. E-mail:
VinsonC{at}dc37a.nci.nih.gov.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bading, H.,
D. D. Ginty, and M. E. Greenberg.
1993.
Regulation of gene expression in hippocampal neurons by distinct calcium signaling pathway.
Science
260:181-186[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Barton, H.,
M. Muthusamy,
C. Chanyangam,
C. Fischer,
C. Cledenin, and J. M. Leiden.
1996.
Defective thymocyte proliferation and IL-2 production in transgenic mice expressing a dominant-negative form of CREB.
Nature
379:81-85[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Berkowitz, L. A.,
K. T. Riabowal, and M. Z. Gilman.
1989.
Multiple sequence elements of a single functional class are required for cyclic AMP responsiveness of the mouse c-fos promoter.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9:4272-4281[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Blackstone, C. D.,
S. J. Moss,
L. J. Martin,
D. L. Price, and R. L. Huganir.
1992.
Biochemical characterization and localization of a non-NMDA receptor in rat brain.
J. Neurochem.
58:1118-1126[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Blendy, J. A.,
K. H. Kaestner,
W. Schmid,
P. Gass, and G. Schutz.
1996.
Targeting of the CREB gene leads to up-regulation of a novel CREB mRNA isoform.
EMBO J.
15:1098-1106[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Bonni, A.,
D. D. Ginty,
H. Dudek, and M. E. Greenberg.
1995.
Serine 133-phosphorylated CREB induces transcription via a cooperative mechanism that may confer specificity to neurotrophin signals.
Mol. Cell. Neurosci.
6:168-183[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Bourtchuladze, R.,
B. Frenguelli,
J. Blendy,
D. Cioffi,
G. Schutz, and A. J. Silva.
1994.
Deficient long-term memory in mice with a targeted mutation of the cAMP-responsive element-binding protein.
Cell
79:59-68[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Buscher, M.,
H. J. Rahmsdorf,
M. Litfin,
M. Karin, and P. Herrlich.
1988.
Activation of the c-fos gene by UV and phorbol ester: different signal pathways converge to the same enhancer element.
Oncogene
3:301-311[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Cahill, M. A.,
R. Janknecht, and A. Nordheim.
1996.
Signalling pathways: jack of all cascades.
Curr. Biol.
6:16-19[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Charnay, P.,
R. Treisman,
M. Mellon,
R. Chao,
R. Axel, and T. Maniatis.
1984.
Differences in human alpha- and beta-globin gene expression in mouse erythroleukemia cells: the role of intragenic sequences.
Cell
38:251-263[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Chomczynski, P., and N. Sacchi.
1987.
Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction.
Anal. Biochem.
162:156-159[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Chrivia, J. C.,
R. P. S. Kwok,
N. Lamb,
M. Hagiwara,
M. R. Montminy, and R. Goodman.
1993.
Phosphorylated CREB binds specifically to the nuclear protein CBP.
Nature
365:855-859[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Dash, P. K.,
B. Hochner, and E. R. Kandel.
1990.
Injection of the cAMP-responsive element into the nucleus of Aplysia sensory neurons blocks long-term facilitation.
Nature
345:718-721[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Deisseroth, K.,
H. Bito, and R. W. Tsien.
1996.
Signaling from synapse to nucleus: postsynaptic CREB phosphorylation during multiple forms of synaptic plasticity.
Neuron
16:89-101[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Dignam, J.,
R. Lebovitz, and R. Roeder.
1983.
Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei.
Nucleic Acids Res.
11:1475-1489[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Du, W.,
D. Thanos, and T. Maniatis.
1993.
Mechanisms of transcriptional synergism between distinct virus-inducible enhancer elements.
Cell
74:887-898[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Edwards, D. R.
1994.
Cell signaling and the control of gene transcription.
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
15:239-244[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Fonjallaz, P.,
V. Ossipow,
G. Wanner, and U. Schibler.
1996.
The two PAR leucine zipper proteins, TEF and DBP, display similar circadian and tissue-specific expression, but have different target promoter preferences.
EMBO J.
15:351-362[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Gilman, M. Z.
1988.
The c-fos serum response element responds to protein kinase C-dependent and -independent signals but not to cyclic AMP.
Genes Dev.
2:394-399[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Ginty, D. D.,
A. Bonni, and M. E. Greenberg.
1994.
Nerve growth factor activates a Ras-dependent protein kinase that stimulates c-fos transcription via phosphorylation of CREB.
Cell
77:713-725[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Ginty, D. D.,
J. M. Kornhauser,
M. A. Thompson,
H. Bading,
K. E. Mayo,
J. S. Takahashi, and M. E. Greenberg.
1993.
Regulation of CREB phosphorylation in the suprachiasmatic nucleus by light and a circadian clock.
Science
260:238-241[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Gonzalez, G. A., and M. R. Montminy.
1989.
Cyclic AMP stimulates somatostatin gene transcription by phosphorylation of CREB at serine 133.
Cell
59:675-680[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Greenberg, M. E.,
L. A. Greene, and E. B. Ziff.
1985.
Nerve growth factor and epidermal growth factor induce rapid transient changes in proto-oncogene transcription in PC12 cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
260:14101-14110[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Greenberg, M. E., and E. B. Ziff.
1984.
Stimulation of 3T3 cells induces transcription of the c-fos proto-oncogene.
Nature
311:433-438[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Greenberg, M. E.,
E. B. Ziff, and L. A. Greene.
1986.
Stimulation of neuronal acetylcholine receptors induces rapid gene transcription.
Science
234:80-83[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Habener, J. F.
1990.
Cyclic AMP response element binding proteins: a cornucopia of transcription factors.
Mol. Endocrinol.
4:1087-1094[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Hai, T., and T. Curran.
1991.
Cross-family dimerization of transcription factors Fos/Jun and ATF/CREB alters DNA binding specificity.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:3720-3724[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Hai, T.,
F. Liu,
W. Coukos, and M. Green.
1989.
Transcription factor ATF cDNA clones: an extensive family of leucine zipper proteins able to selectively form DNA-binding heterodimers.
Genes Dev.
3:2083-2090[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Hoeffler, J. P.,
T. E. Meyer,
Y. Yun,
J. L. Jameson, and J. F. Habener.
1988.
Cyclic-AMP responsive DNA-binding protein: structure based on a cloned placental DNA.
Science
242:1430-1433[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Hummler, E.,
T. J. Cole,
J. A. Blendy,
R. Ganss,
A. Aguzzi,
W. Schmid,
F. Beermann, and G. Schutz.
1994.
Targeted mutation of the CREB gene: compensation within the CREB/ATF family of transcription factors.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:5647-5651[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Iyer, S. V.,
D. L. Davis,
S. N. Seal, and J. B. E. Burch.
1991.
Chicken vitellogenin gene-binding protein, a leucine zipper transcription factor that binds to an important control element in the chicken vitellogenin II promoter, is related to rat DBP.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:4863-4875[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Krylov, D.,
I. Mikhailenko, and C. Vinson.
1994.
A thermodynamic scale for leucine zipper stability and dimerization specificity: e and g interhelical interactions.
EMBO J.
13:1849-1861.
|
| 33.
|
Krylov, D.,
M. Olive, and C. Vinson.
1995.
Extending dimerization interfaces: the bZIP basic region can form a coiled coil.
EMBO J.
14:5329-5337[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Linden, D. J.
1996.
A protein synthesis-dependent late phase of cerebellar long-term depression.
Neuron
17:483-490[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Masquilier, D., and P. Sassone-Corsi.
1992.
Transcriptional cross-talk: nuclear factors CREM and CREB bind to AP-1 sites and inhibit activation by Jun.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:22460-22466[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Metz, R., and E. Ziff.
1991.
cAMP stimulates the C/EBP-related transcription factor rNFIL-6 to trans-locate to the nucleus and induce c-fos transcription.
Genes Dev.
5:1754-1766[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Meyer, T. E., and J. F. Habener.
1993.
Cyclic AMP response element binding protein (CREB) and related transcription-activating DNA-binding proteins.
Endocr. Rev.
14:269-290[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Morgan, J. I., and T. Curran.
1986.
Role of ion fluxes in the control of c-fos expression.
Nature
322:552-555[Medline].
|
|