Mol Cell Biol, March 1998, p. 1266-1274, Vol. 18, No. 3
0270-7306/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Functional Interference of Sp1 and NF-
B
through the Same DNA Binding Site
Fuminori
Hirano,1
Hirotoshi
Tanaka,2
Yoshiko
Hirano,1
Masaki
Hiramoto,3
Hiroshi
Handa,3
Isao
Makino,2 and
Claus
Scheidereit1,*
Max Delbrück Center for Molecular
Medicine MDC, 13122 Berlin, Germany,1 and
Second Department of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical
College, Asahikawa 078,2 and
Faculty of
Bioscience and Biotechnology, Tokyo Institute of Technology,
Yokohama 228,3 Japan
Received 15 October 1997/Accepted 5 December 1997
 |
ABSTRACT |
Gene activation by NF-
B/Rel transcription factors is modulated
by synergistic or antagonistic interactions with other promoter-bound transcription factors. For example, Sp1 sites are often found in
NF-
B-regulated genes, and Sp1 can activate certain promoters in
synergism with NF-
B through nonoverlapping binding sites. Here we
report that Sp1 acts directly through a subset of NF-
B binding
sites. The DNA binding affinity of Sp1 to these NF-
B sites, as
determined by their relative dissociation constants and their relative
efficiencies as competitor DNAs or as binding site probes, is in the
order of that for a consensus GC box Sp1 site. In contrast, NF-
B
does not bind to a GC box Sp1 site. Sp1 can activate transcription
through immunoglobulin kappa-chain enhancer or P-selectin promoter
NF-
B sites. p50 homodimers replace Sp1 from the P-selectin promoter
by binding site competition and thereby either inhibit basal Sp1-driven
expression or, in concert with Bcl-3, stimulate expression. The
interaction of Sp1 with NF-
B sites thus provides a means to keep an
elevated basal expression of NF-
B-dependent genes in the absence of
activated nuclear NF-
B/Rel.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
A multitude of gene-specific
transcription factors which activate or repress transcription of their
target genes in a combinatorial fashion through their individual
binding sites have been identified. Synergistic protein-protein and
protein-DNA interactions among these proteins lead to a functional
cross-coupling that allows a high degree of complexity, since the
single regulators are individually regulated (see reference
58 for a review).
Members of the NF-
B/Rel family are involved in the transcriptional
regulation of a number of cellular and viral genes. Various hetero- and
homodimers are formed between the five mammalian subunits p50, p52, p65
(RelA), c-Rel, and RelB, which bind with different affinities to a
group of related NF-
B DNA binding sites with the consensus sequence
GGGRNNYYCC (17, 67). These proteins share a
stretch of 300 amino acids, termed the Rel homology domain (RHD), which
is highly conserved among NF-
B/Rel proteins, including the viral Rel
homolog v-Rel and the insect developmental and immune control proteins
Dorsal and Dif (see references 61 and
65 for reviews). The RHD is required entirely for
DNA binding, whereas only its C-terminal part is required for
dimerization. Only mammalian p65, c-Rel, and RelB contain transcription
activation domains in their unique sequences located carboxy terminally
to the RHD; p50 and p52 lack such domains. It is assumed that
homodimers of the latter repress transcription and that they require
nuclear cofactors, such as Bcl-3, to form ternary complexes which can activate transcription. Bcl-3 belongs to the I
B gene family, which
in vertebrates comprises I
B
, I
B
, I
B
, and the
precursor proteins for p50 and p52, p105, and p100, respectively. The
cytoplasmic I
Bs bind to dimerized NF-
B factors and thereby block
their nuclear translocation until signaling processes lead to induced
I
B degradation and nuclear translocation of NF-
B (see references
2, 4, 51, 61, and 65 for
reviews).
All NF-
B/Rel members have distinct physiological functions, as
evident from the outcome of gene targeting experiments in mice
(2). Both differential regulation by I
Bs in the cytoplasm and differential interaction with other transcription factors in the
nucleus are likely to establish specificity in the NF-
B system. It
is assumed that NF-
B/Rel dimers exert specific functions through
nonidentical DNA binding site preferences as well as through individual
interactions with other promoter-bound gene-specific or basal factors
(27, 53). As one example, Sp1 elements are often found in
the enhancers or promoters of NF-
B-regulated genes, including those
for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), intracellular adhesion
molecule 1, vascular adhesion molecule 1, or granulocyte-macrophage
colony-stimulating factor 1 (23, 41, 55, 56). Further
examples are the promoters for the cellular genes encoding
opioid
receptor, interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor alpha chain (IL-2R
),
manganese superoxide dismutase, NF-
B2, tissue factor 1, preprogalanin, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, c-Rel, and melanoma
growth-stimulating activity (1, 3, 24, 33, 36, 47, 48, 60, 62,
64).
The ubiquitous transcription factor Sp1 contains a three-zinc-finger
DNA binding domain and four transactivation domains (9, 10,
25) and binds to GC-rich sites (6, 8). BTEB, Sp3, and
Sp4 are related to Sp1 and share a highly conserved zinc finger domain
(18, 19, 22). Accordingly, Sp1-type GC (GGGGCGGGC) or GT (GGGTGTGGC) box DNA binding sites are also bound
by these proteins.
In the HIV-1 long terminal repeat (LTR), the actions of NF-
B and Sp1
are highly cooperative, involving effects on the DNA binding of both
factors to their adjacent binding sites, resulting in increased
transcriptional activation (45). Furthermore, binding of Sp1
with either p50 or p65 induces establishment of the nucleosomal arrangement of HIV-1 LTR DNA (44). A direct protein-protein association between Sp1 and NF-
B could be demonstrated even in the
absence of DNA. This interaction between Sp1 and NF-
B requires the
zinc finger region of Sp1 and an N-terminal part of the Rel homology
domain of p65, i.e., the DNA binding domains of both factors
(46). It has been shown that most vertebrate NF-
B/Rel factors interact with Sp1. v-Rel increases transcription from promoters
containing Sp1 sites by physically interacting with Sp1
(54). The interaction of v-Rel with Sp1 required the
N-terminal 147 amino acids of v-Rel. The interaction domain in Sp1 was
found to be in the N-terminal region of Sp1 containing transactivation domains. In this study, an Sp1 mutant, lacking the zinc finger region,
specifically bound to v-Rel, c-Rel, p50, p52, and p65 (RelA)
(54). At another level of functional cross talk, Sp1 regulates the p65 promoter, which, unlike the other genes encoding NF-
B/Rel proteins, is not subject to autoregulation (59).
Although Sp1 is widely regarded as a housekeeping-type nuclear
transcription factor with constitutive activity and ubiquitous occurrence, both its expression and activity are subject to regulation. The expression levels of Sp1 vary dramatically during embryonal development and differentiation (49). Several reports
indicate modification of Sp1 activity in response to cellular
signaling. It has been shown that okadaic acid treatment induces strong
phosphorylation of Sp1 in the nucleus (63), and
dephosphorylation of Sp1 by protein phosphatase 1 is involved in
glucose activation of acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase gene transcription
(12). Furthermore, cytomegalovirus infection enhances
the Sp1 activation function on the NF-
B-p65 gene promoter
(66). Gamma interferon induces phosphorylation and thereby
increases DNA binding activity of Sp1 (50).
We provide evidence for an unexpected level of functional coupling
between Sp1 and NF-
B. Sp1 binds with high affinity to a subset of
NF-
B DNA binding sites and thereby activates transcription. The
interactions of Sp1 and NF-
B with NF-
B sites are mutually exclusive. Sp1 may serve to provide an increased basal expression of
NF-
B-dependent genes in the absence of nuclear NF-
B. At elevated levels, Sp1 may also compete for the binding site and block access to
some NF-
B heteromers but not to others, and thus it may play a role
in the determination of gene-specific functions of various NF-
B
homo- and heterodimers which have distinct affinities for various
NF-
B binding sites.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell culture.
Adherent HeLa cells were grown in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium (BRL/GIBCO)-1 mM sodium pyruvate-100 U of
penicillin per ml-100 µg of streptomycin per ml-10% fetal calf
serum. Cells were stimulated with 1 to 25 ng of tumor necrosis factor
alpha (TNF-
; Biomol) per ml where indicated. Drosophila
SL2 cells were cultured with Schneider's medium (GIBCO)-10% fetal
bovine serum-10 U of penicillin-streptomycin per ml at 25°C without
CO2 in tightly closed flasks.
Plasmids and recombinant proteins.
For prokaryotic
expression, the pET system (Novagen) was used. pETp50(443) (amino acids
18 to 443) (30) was expressed in Escherichia coli
BL21(DE3)pLysS and purified as described previously (40).
Recombinant Sp1, purified from HeLa cells infected with recombinant
vaccinia virus containing the human Sp1 cDNA, was obtained from
Promega. For luciferase reporter experiments, p309LUC and
pmkB309LUC, containing P-selectin wild-type and mutant promoters, respectively (42), were provided by R. P. McEver
(University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center). The Sp1 reporter
plasmid pSp1HL was described by Hirano et al. (21). In
brief, six tandem Sp1 binding sites (KpnI-EcoRI
sites) and the
45 to +83 fragment of the HIV-1 promoter
(EcoRI-HindIII sites) were inserted into KpnI-HindIII sites of PGV-B (Toyo Ink Co.,
Tokyo, Japan). The oligonucleotide sequences for the Ig
-NF-
B
reporter plasmids were
CAGTTGAGGGGACTTTCCCAGATCTAGTTGAGGGGACTTTCCCAG-3' (tandem immunoglobulin kappa chain [Ig
] enhancer sequence) (2×
B-Luc) and CAGTTGAAGGGACTTTCCCAGATCTAGTTGAAGGGACTTTCCCAG-3' (2×
B-m1 Luc). These oligonucleotides were annealed to their
complementary counterparts and replaced into
KpnI/EcoRI sites of pSp1HL.
The pPacSp1 plasmid for Sp1 expression was kindly provided by G. Suske
(University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany). pPacSp1
C (amino acids 83 to 611) and pPacSp1DBD (amino acids 612 to 778) were constructed from
pPacSp1 by PCR using the appropriate primers. To construct vectors for
expression of p50 and p65 in SL2 cells (pPacp50 and pPacp65), the Sp1
cDNA insert was removed from pPacSp1 by
BamHI-XhoI cleavage and replaced by the
PCR-amplified complete cDNA inserts of pECEp50 or pECEp65
(40) with BamHI-XhoI ends. For
pPacBcl-3, the Bcl-3 cDNA insert from pcDNABcl-3 (40) was isolated by HindIII-XhoI cleavage. The
fragment was cloned into the pPac vector via a
BamHI-HindIII linker.
Antibodies.
Rabbit anti-p65, anti-c-Rel, and anti-Sp1
antisera (sc-109, sc-272, and sc-59, respectively) were from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology Inc. Rabbit anti-p50 serum was obtained from Rockland
Inc.
Preparation of nuclear extracts.
The cells were washed and
resuspended in buffer A, and 0.125% Nonidet P-40 was added. The cells
were left for 5 min on ice and centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 10 min. The pellet was treated with buffer C for 15 min to yield the nuclear extract as described previously
(39).
Silver staining of recombinant proteins.
Recombinant
proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide
electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Gels were preincubated in the fixing
solution (50% methanol, 12% acetic acid) for 30 min with gentle
shaking and then washed 4 times with distilled H2O
(dH2O). Gels were incubated in 0.8% AgNO3 for
15 min with gentle shaking and then washed three times with
dH2O. After treatment with a aqueous solution containing
0.005% sodium citrate and 0.02% formaldehyde, gels were incubated in
10% acetic acid, washed with dH2O, and dried.
Immunoblots.
Forty-microgram aliquots of nuclear extract
were separated by SDS-PAGE. Prior to transfer, gels were equilibrated
in ice-cold blotting buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.3], 0.01% SDS,
20% methanol). Proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene
difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore). All Western blots were analyzed
by chemiluminescence (Tropix) as described previously (29).
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA).
The following
oligonucleotides were annealed to complementary strands, resulting in
double-stranded probes with 5'-AATT and AGCT-3' overhanging ends on the
top strand (Sp1) or with 5'-GATC overhanging ends on both strands (all
other probes): Sp1 (5'-aattACCGGGCGGGCGGGCTACCGGGCGGGCTagct), P-selectin (5'-gatcCGAAGGGGGTGACCCCTTGCC), IL-6
(5'-gatcCTCAAATGTGGGATTTTCCCATGAGTCT), Ig
(5'-gatcCAACAGAGGGGACTTTCCGAGGCCATCTG), mutant Ig
(5'-gatcCAACAGAGGGGACTTTCCGAGGCCATCTG), IL-2R
(5'-gatcCGGCAGGGGAATCTCCCTCTCC), H2K
(5'-gatcCAGGGCTGGGGATTCCCCATCTCCACAGG), HIV proximal site
(5'-gatcTCCGCTGGGGACTTTCCAGG), HIV distal site (5'-gatcAAGGGACTTTCCGCTGCAGA), and IL-2
(5'-gatcCTAACAAAGAGGGATTTCACCTACAT). The quantitated probes
were 32P labeled with Klenow enzyme by fill-in reaction.
Standard DNA binding reactions were performed with nuclear extracts or
recombinant protein in 20 µl of binding buffer [20 mM HEPES (pH
8.4), 60 mM KCl, 4% Ficoll, 5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 1 µg of
bovine serum albumin (BSA), 2 µg of poly(dI-dC)] for 20 min at
30°C. The reaction mixtures were loaded onto 4% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels containing 1× Tris-borate-EDTA. Gels were run at
250 V for 1 h, dried, and visualized by autoradiography. The
standard binding reaction was modified for the experiments shown in
Fig. 2B and C as indicated. Radioactivity on the membrane was
quantified with a BAS-2000 bioimaging analyzer (Fujix, Tokyo, Japan).
Determination of dissociation constants.
KD values were determined by EMSAs as
described by Meisterernst et al. (35). Double-stranded
oligonucleotide probes were end labeled with
[
-32P]dATP and Klenow DNA polymerase. The DNA binding
reactions were performed in the presence of poly(dI-dC) for 20 min at
30°C followed by EMSA analysis. The counts/minute values of gel areas
corresponding to complexed and free DNA were determined with the
BAS-2000 bioimaging analyzer.
Shift-Western blotting.
DNA binding reaction mixtures
contained 10,000 cpm of 32P-labeled Ig
probe and 10 µg
of nuclear extract protein in 20 mM HEPES (pH 8.4)-60 mM KCl-4%
Ficoll-5 mM DTT-1 µg of BSA-2 µg of poly(dI-dC) in a total
volume of 10 µl. After 15 min at 30°C, the reaction mixtures were
loaded onto 5% nondenaturing acrylamide gels. Shift-Western blotting
was performed as described previously (13). In brief, after
electrophoretic separation, protein-DNA complexes were transferred onto
stacked nitrocellulose and PVDF membranes. The radiolabeled probe that
bound to the PVDF membrane was detected by autoradiography, whereas the
proteins in the complexes that bound to the nitrocellulose membrane
were detected by immunoblotting.
Transient transfection and luciferase assay.
SL2 cells were
transfected by calcium phosphate precipitation. Cells were plated in
60-mm-diameter collagen-coated dishes at a density of 5 × 105 cells/ml (5 ml) 24 h before transfection. Aliquots
of 0.25 ml of 250 mM CaCl2, containing 16 µg of plasmid
DNA were added drop by drops to an equal volume of 2× HeBS (16 g of
NaCl, 0.7 g of KCl, 0.4 g of Na2HPO4,
2 g of dextrose, 10 g of HEPES [pH 7.1] [all quantities
per liter]) in 12-well plates that were gently rocked by hand. After
30 min at room temperature, the suspension of calcium phosphate
complexes was gently pipetted into the 60-mm-diameter dish. After
48 h, cells were harvested by vigorous tapping, centrifuged at
1,000 × g, washed twice with phosphate-buffered
saline, and resuspended in a lysis buffer for the luciferase assay
system (Toyo Ink). Cells were sometimes prepared by freeze-thawing as an additional step, because cells were not destroyed by lysis buffer
alone, followed by the protocol of the luciferase assay system.
 |
RESULTS |
Sp1 specifically interacts with a subgroup of NF-
B binding
sites.
A DNA binding complex that migrated more slowly than the
NF-
B DNA complex was occasionally detected in EMSAs with NF-
B
binding site probes and nuclear extracts of HeLa or Jurkat cells. For example, the expected NF-
B complexes formed with an Ig
probe in
TNF-
-treated HeLa cells could be supershifted with either the
anti-p65 (RelA) or anti-p50 antibody (Fig.
1A, lanes 1 to 3, complex C2,
heterodimeric NF-
B) or only with anti-p50 antiserum (complex C3, p50
homodimers), whereas an additional complex (C1) remained refractory to
antisera raised against p50, p65, and c-Rel (lanes 2, 3, and 5). We
have assayed this complex with a panel of antibodies against known
transcription factors and found that an anti-Sp1 antibody specifically
inhibited C1 (lane 1 versus lane 4). Similarly, complex C1 was also
detected with a probe containing the
B site of the IL-6 gene, using
the same extract, and was supershifted with the anti-Sp1 antibody (Fig.
1B, lanes 3 and 4). Complexes C2 and C3 were sensitive to anti-p50 and
anti-p65 antibodies (not shown). An Sp1 binding site probe containing a consensus GC box and with the same length as the IL-6 probe showed an
Sp1-DNA complex migrating like the C1 complex formed with the IL-6
probe (lanes 1 and 2). As expected, this complex was supershifted with
the anti-Sp1 antibody (lanes 1 and 2). It is further noteworthy that
the efficiencies of Sp1 complex formation with both probes were similar
(compare C1 in lanes 1 and 3). To further confirm that Sp1 binds to the
Ig
NF-
B binding site, a DNA binding reaction was subjected to
shift-Western blotting analysis (13) (see Materials and
Methods for details). Nuclear extracts of untreated or
TNF-
-stimulated cells yielded C1 and C2 complexes on the DNA blot
(Fig. 1C, lanes 1 to 3, open and solid arrowheads, respectively). Only
C2 was induced by TNF-
(lanes 2 and 3), whereas C1 activity was
weakened after stimulation. On the protein blots, the inducible complex could be identified as heterodimeric NF-
B by blotting with either the anti-p50 or anti-p65 antibody (lanes 4 to 9). Only the upper complex reacted with the anti-Sp1 antibody (lanes 10 to 12). Thus, both
cellular Sp1 and NF-
B bind to the Ig
site. The reduction of Sp1
activity upon activation of NF-
B (Fig. 1C) suggests competition for
the same binding site.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Cellular Sp1 binds to Ig and IL-6 NF- B DNA binding
sites. (A) Complexes formed between nuclear extract proteins (5 µg)
of TNF- (1 ng/ml, 30 min)-stimulated HeLa cells and an Ig probe
were analyzed by EMSA. The reaction mixtures contained either no ( )
antibody (Ab) (lane 1) or antiserum directed against p65, p50, Sp1, or
c-Rel (lanes 2 to 5), as indicated. The reactivities with the
antibodies identify C1 as Sp1, C2 as p65-p50, and C3 as p50-p50. S,
supershifted complex; NS, nonspecific. (B) Complexes formed with an Sp1
(lanes 1 and 2) or IL-6 gene (lanes 3 and 4) NF- B binding site probe
without (lanes 1 and 3) or with (lanes 2 and 4) Sp1 antibody. C1, C2,
and C3 contain Sp1, p65-p65, and p50-p65 (not shown), respectively. (C)
Shift-Western blotting of complexes formed with the Ig probe and
nuclear extracts of adherent HeLa cells stimulated with TNF- (10 ng/ml) for the indicated times. EMSA gels were sandwich blotted with a
nitrocellulose membrane and then with a PVDF membrane, which were then
analyzed by immunoblotting and autoradiography, respectively, to
separately visualize bound proteins and labeled DNA of the complexes.
The DNAs of two differently migrating complexes (open and solid
arrowheads) (lanes 1 to 3) whose intensities were decreased and
induced, respectively, upon TNF- stimulation, were detected. The
slower complex (open arrowhead) was detected by an Sp1 antibody (lanes
10 to 12), and the faster one (solid arrowhead) was detected by both
p50 and p65 antibodies (lanes 4 to 9). Free DNA is not shown.
|
|
To assess whether Sp1 would recognize the conserved NF-
B binding
site motif or a part of it, complexes formed with the Ig
binding
site probe were challenged with competitor DNAs containing various
NF-
B binding sites with natural flanking sequences (Fig. 2A). Both Sp1 and p50-p65 complexes
formed with nuclear extract from TNF-
-stimulated HeLa cells were
competed by an unlabeled Ig
but not by a mutant Ig
oligonucleotide that differed by only one base in the quadruplet G of
the binding site motif (lane 1 compared to lanes 2 and 3). Furthermore,
the Sp1-Ig
complex was efficiently competed by oligonucleotides
containing the NF-
B binding sites of the major histocompatibility
complex H2K gene, the IL-2R
promoter, the P-selectin promoter, the
consensus Sp1 GC box, and the IL-6 gene promoter (lanes 4, 6 to 8, and
11). The HIV-1 LTR proximal site competed less efficiently, and both the distal LTR site and the IL-2 site were inactive (lanes 5, 9, and
10). As expected, all oligonucleotides except the Sp1 and P-selectin
competitors (lanes 7 and 8) competed for NF-
B complex formation. The
P-selectin site is known to bind p50-p65 with much lower affinity than
p50 homodimers (42). Next, the various Sp1 and NF-
B
binding sites were used as radiolabeled probes and assayed with
purified Sp1 from HeLa cells, bacterial p50, or nuclear extract from
TNF-
-stimulated HeLa cells (Fig. 2B). Purified Sp1 strongly bound to
the Sp1 GC box and to the P-selectin and IL-6 gene NF-
B binding
sites (lanes 1, 6, and 9) and with lower efficiency to the Ig
, H2K,
HIV proximal, and IL-2R
sites but not to the HIV distal or IL-2 site
(lanes 2 to 5, 7, and 8). Recombinant p50 bound with comparable
affinities to most NF-
B binding sites, as expected, but with reduced
affinity to the HIV distal site and not to the Sp1 binding site
oligonucleotide (lanes 10 to 18). When testing nuclear extract from
TNF-
-stimulated HeLa cells, we found strong complex formation
between Sp1 and the Sp1 GC box or the P-selectin and IL-6 binding sites
(lanes 19, 24, and 27). Strongly impaired binding, however, was
observed in this experiment with the other NF-
B binding sites,
possibly due to binding site competition of Sp1 with NF-
B p50-p65.
The latter bound efficiently to most NF-
B sites, except for the IL-2
site, but not to the Sp1 site (lanes 19 to 27).

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Differential interaction of Sp1 with various NF- B
binding sites. (A) Complexes formed between the Ig probe and nuclear
extracts (5 µg of protein/lane) of TNF- (1 ng/ml, 30 min)-stimulated HeLa cells were challenged without (lane 1) or with
(lanes 2 to 11) 50-fold molar amounts of competitor oligonucleotides
containing the indicated NF- B DNA binding sites or an Sp1 binding
site. The positions of Sp1 and p65-p50 DNA complexes are indicated;
free DNA is not shown. (B) Oligonucleotides containing various NF- B
binding sites or an Sp1 binding site, as indicated, were used as
radiolabeled probes in gel retardation assays either with
affinity-purified Sp1 (1 footprint-producing unit/lane) (lanes 1 to 9 and 28 to 36), with bacterially expressed p50 (20 ng/lane) (lanes 10 to
18), or with nuclear extract proteins (5 µg/lane) of TNF- (10 ng/ml, 30 min)-stimulated HeLa cells (lanes 19 to 27). Either NF- B
buffer conditions [20 mM HEPES (pH 8.4), 60 mM KCl, 5 mM DTT, 1 µg
of BSA, 2 µg of poly(dI-dC), 4% Ficoll] (lanes 1 to 27) or Sp1
buffer conditions [10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 50 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM
ZnCl2, 0.2 µg of poly(dA-dT), 10% glycerol] (lanes 28 to 36) were used. The positions of complexes are indicated. Free DNA is
not shown. (C) Effect of buffer components on Sp1 or NF- B complex
formation with the IL-6 gene NF- B site. Either nuclear extracts of
TNF- -stimulated HeLa cells (lanes 1 to 15) or purified Sp1 (lanes 16 to 30) were used in EMSA with the indicated components included in the
standard NF- B binding buffer. NP-40, Nonidet P-40.
|
|
The binding affinity of Sp1 to NF-
B sites was dependent on the
buffer conditions. When we used a buffer in the binding reaction previously used for Sp1 (31), the affinity to NF-
B sites
compared to the GC box sequence was reduced (lanes 28 to 36 versus
lanes 1 to 9), although the P-selectin and IL-6 sites were still bound efficiently (lanes 33 and 36). We tested the effects of various buffer
components on complex formation of cellular Sp1 and p50-p65 in nuclear
extracts or purified Sp1 with the IL-6 promoter site. In contrast to
NF-
B, cellular or purified Sp1 was strongly affected by EDTA (Fig.
2C, lanes 1 to 3 and 16 to 18), MgCl2 (lanes 8, 9, 23, and
24), or glycerol (lanes 12, 13, 27, and 28). Both factors were
sensitive to elevated salt concentrations (lanes 1 and 16 versus lanes
4 to 7 and 19 to 22). This sensitivity to various buffer components may
explain why Sp1 was not detected in previous studies with NF-
B
binding site probes.
Sp1 and NF-
B interact with the same DNA binding site in a
mutually exclusive fashion.
The ability of Sp1 to bind to several
NF-
B binding sites suggests that the conserved NF-
B motif is
recognized by Sp1. This possibility is also supported by the fact that
a one-base mutation in the Ig
site eliminates binding of Sp1 (Fig.
2A). Since NF-
B almost wraps around the contacted DNA (16,
38), little of the conserved DNA binding site is exposed to allow
excess amounts of other proteins to the same site simultaneously.
Therefore, it is likely that NF-
B and Sp1 compete for the common
binding site.
In fact, the Sp1 complex formed on the IL-6 probe with nuclear extracts
from HeLa cells was replaced by NF-
B p50-p65 after induction of the
latter with TNF-
(Fig. 3A). This loss
of Sp1 complexes with the NF-
B site was not due to effects of
TNF-
on Sp1 DNA binding affinity or protein amounts (Fig. 3B) and
thus should be due to binding site competition. Similarly, upon
incubation of the Ig
(Fig. 4A) or
P-selectin (Fig. 4B) site with purified Sp1 and increasing
concentrations of recombinant p50, Sp1 complexes were diminished (lanes
2 to 6). Competition on the Ig
site was more efficient than that on
the P-selectin site, suggesting a higher relative affinity of Sp1 for
the latter, consistent with its higher affinity for the P-selectin site
observed in Fig. 2A and B. The protein amounts used for Sp1 and p50
were in comparable order, as shown by silver staining (Fig. 4C).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Mutually exclusive interaction of Sp1 or NF- B with
the same site. (A) Gel retardation assay with the IL-6 probe and
nuclear extracts of adherent HeLa cells stimulated with TNF- (10 ng/ml) for the indicated times. The increase of NF- B complex
formation after induction and the concomitant decrease of Sp1 complex
formation are also visualized by quantitation of the counts/minute of
each complex with a BAS2000 phosphorimaging analyzer in arbitrary units
(bottom). NS, nonspecific. (B) The nuclear extracts used for panel A
were assayed for Sp1 complex formation with an Sp1 DNA probe in a gel
retardation assay (lanes 1 to 6; only complexes are shown) and for Sp1
protein amounts in a Western blot (lanes 7 to 12).
|
|

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Competition of Sp1 by p50 homodimers on Ig (A)
or P-selectin (B) NF- B binding sites, determined by EMSA using
purified Sp1 protein from HeLa cells (1 footprint-producing unit
(fpu)/lane) (A and B, lanes 2 to 6) and increasing amounts of
recombinant p50 (0, 5, 10, 20, and 40 ng/lane) (lanes 2 to 6, respectively). Lanes 1 in panels A and B, no protein added. (C)
Silver-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gel of 2 fpu of Sp1 and 20 ng of p50.
Sizes are indicated in kilodaltons.
|
|
The dissociation constants of Sp1 and NF-
B to consensus Sp1 and
NF-
B binding sites are in the same order.
We next determined
the dissociation constants for the Sp1- and p50-p65 interactions with
NF-
B or Sp1 GC box binding sites by Scatchard analysis of
quantitative EMSA using nuclear extracts of TNF-
-stimulated and
unstimulated extracts under the same experimental conditions (Fig. 5A).
The low-level nuclear NF-
B activity detected in unstimulated HeLa
cells with the IL-6 probe and the elevated NF-
B activity after
TNF-
stimulation revealed KDs in the
nanomolar range of 1.2 × 10
9 and 1.3 × 10
9 M, respectively (Fig.
5A). Sp1 bound to the IL-6 probe with
KDs of 2.4 × 10
9 and
2.7 × 10
9 M in extracts of stimulated and
unstimulated cells, i.e., with only twofold-lower affinity than
NF-
B. The KDs determined for Sp1 and NF-
B
with the P-selectin probe were almost equal, 1.6 × 10
9 and 1.4 × 10
9 M, respectively
(Fig. 5C). The consensus Sp1 GC box sequence revealed a dissociation
constant of 7 × 10
10 M for Sp1. The affinity of Sp1
to its GC box has also been determined to values in the
10
10 M range by others (32). The order of the
dissociation constants determined for the various sites matches very
well with the relative affinities observed when the sites were used as
probes (Fig. 2B) or as competitors (Fig. 2A) (see Fig. 5D for summary).
Our data thus indicate that Sp1 binds with a significant affinity to a subset of NF-
B binding sites. This suggests that Sp1 should interact functionally with some NF-
B binding sites and that the different relative binding strengths expected for various NF-
B hetero- and
homodimers may determine that some can compete with Sp1 whereas others
cannot. An inspection of the DNA sequences of the NF-
B sites
preferred by Sp1 did not reveal any obvious high similarity to Sp1
consensus sequences. Only the presence of the typical G3 or
G4 stretch found in both halves of the palindromic NF-
B
sites is similar to the G richness of Sp1 sites (Fig. 5D).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Determination of the dissociation constants for the
interaction of Sp1 and NF- B with Sp1 and NF- B binding sites by
quantitative EMSA and Scatchard analysis. (A and B) Binding curves
(left) and Scatchard plots (right) for complex formation of p65-p50 (A)
or Sp1 (B) with the IL-6 probe in nuclear extracts of nonstimulated and
TNF- (10 ng/ml, 30 min)-stimulated HeLa cells (open and closed
symbols, respectively). B/F, bound/free. (C) Summary of the
dissociation constants determined in HeLa cell nuclear extracts for the
interaction of Sp1 or NF- B with various NF- B and Sp1 sites, as
indicated. (D) Alignment of the Sp1 and NF- B binding sites used in
this study in order of relative affinity to Sp1. The left columns
indicate similar orders of affinity as determined when we used them as
probes, as competitors, or for KD determination.
ND, not determined.
|
|
Sp1 transactivates homologous and heterologous promoters through
NF-
B binding sites: functional interference between NF-
B and
Sp1.
To assess a functional role for the interaction of Sp1 with
NF-
B binding sites, we constructed luciferase reporter plasmids containing tandem Ig-
B sites in front of the HIV TATA box. These sites contained either the wild-type NF-
B binding site or a one-base mutation in the first residue of the G4 motif in the
binding site (Fig. 6A). These constructs
were cotransfected with increasing amounts of an Sp1 expression vector
into Drosophila SL2 cells, which are devoid of endogenous
Sp1 (9). Sp1 indeed strongly activated the promoter
containing the wild-type
B site in both a dose-dependent and
B
site-dependent manner (Fig. 6B); the mutant
B site, with only one
base mutated in the G4 stretch, was only very weakly
responsive. Under comparable conditions, the wild-type Ig-
B site
conferred a fourfold-higher activation by transfected p50-p65 compared
to Sp1 (data not shown). We furthermore tested the P-selectin promoter
and a mutant thereof containing only two base changes in its NF-
B
binding site (Fig. 6A). Sp1 potently activated transcription of the
wild-type promoter up to 40-fold (Fig. 6C). In contrast, the mutant
promoter was only weakly activated. Thus, Sp1 activates transcription
through NF-
B binding sites in both homologous and heterologous
promoter contexts. Transcriptional induction by Sp1 was dependent on
its transactivation domains and on the DNA binding domain. Activation
was lost when Sp1 mutant proteins which either lacked the
transactivation domains (in pPacSp1DBD) or the DNA binding domain (in
pPacSp1DC) were expressed (Fig. 6D).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Sp1 activates transcription through Ig and P-selectin
NF- B binding sites. Functional interference with p50 and Bcl-3 was
analyzed. (A) Schematic presentation of heterologous HIV-TATA
luciferase reporter genes containing two tandem wild-type or mutant
Ig NF- B binding sites and of the P-selectin luciferase promoter
constructs with either the wild-type or mutated NF- B binding site in
the context of the complete promoter sequence (42). (B) Sp1
activates through Ig NF- B binding sites. Drosophila
SL2 cells were transfected with reporter constructs containing
wild-type (2× B-Luc, 8 µg) or mutant (2× B-m1 Luc, 8 µg)
Ig NF- B binding sites with increasing amounts of pPacSp1
expression vector, as indicated. (C) Sp1 activates transcription
through a P-selectin promoter NF- B binding site. SL2 cells were
transfected with the P-selectin promoter luciferase construct (8 µg)
harboring a wild-type or mutated NF- B binding site along with
increasing amounts of Sp1 expression vector. (D) Activation through the
P-selectin NF- B site by Sp1 requires both DNA binding and
transactivation domains of Sp1. Cell were transfected with P-selectin
constructs as in panel C along with expression vectors encoding Sp1
(pPacSp1, amino acids 83 to 778) or Sp1 lacking the zinc finger region
(pPacSp1 C, amino acids 83 to 611) or containing only the DNA binding
domain of Sp1 (pPacSp1DBD, amino acids 612 to 778), as indicated. (E)
Functional interference between Sp1, p50, and Bcl-3 at the P-selectin
NF- B binding site. The P-selectin wild-type or mutant promoter was
transfected into SL2 cells with increasing amounts of p50 or constant
amounts of p50 and increasing amounts of Bcl-3. In addition, cells were
transfected without or with Sp1 expression vector, as indicated.
Relative luciferase activity is shown in panels B to E as mean values
with standard deviations of three to four independent experiments.
|
|
The P-selectin promoter NF-
B site preferentially binds homodimers of
p52 or p50 and is superactivated by Bcl-3 (42). Since binding of Sp1 or p50 should be mutually exclusive and p50 in fact
displaces Sp1 from this site (Fig. 4B), a functional interference between Sp1 and NF-
B-p50 is expected. To address this problem, P-selectin promoter constructs with a wild-type or mutated NF-
B site
were transfected into Drosophila SL2 cells. Without
transfected Sp1, transcription of both wild-type and mutant promoters
was severely impaired and very poorly responded to p50 or to p50 and Bcl-3 (Fig. 6E, left half). With transfected Sp1, the P-selectin promoter was strongly activated, and this activation was gradually decreased to the level of the mutant promoter when increasing amounts
of p50 were transfected (Fig. 6E). A strong activation could be
retrieved by cotransfection of increasing amounts of Bcl-3 in a
dose-dependent manner. In contrast, the mutant P-selectin promoter
showed an elevated level of transcription in the presence of Sp1,
presumably mediated by cryptic sites elsewhere in the promoter, but did
not respond to p50 or to p50 and Bcl-3.
Thus, the P-selectin NF-
B binding site can confer a complex
transcriptional regulation, depending on the relative affinities and
abundance of the activators. In the absence of p50 homodimers it can be
constitutively activated by Sp1, depending on the amount of Sp1. With
excess p50 it is repressed, and in the presence of p50 and Bcl-3 it is
strongly induced (Fig. 7).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Hypothetical scheme for the functional interaction of
Sp1 with NF- B sites. Sp1 occupies an NF- B site and constitutively
activates transcription in the absence of NF- B (top). The exchange
of Sp1 by NF- B/Rel at certain sites (e.g., P-selectin) allows a
switch from constitutive activation by Sp1 to repression by
transcriptionally inactive p50 homodimers (center). The repressed gene
can be induced depending on the availability of the Bcl-3 coactivator,
which forms a ternary complex (bottom).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have found a previously unrecognized mechanism of functional
interference between NF-
B and Sp1. Cellular and recombinant Sp1 bind
to a subset of NF-
B binding sites, including the elements in the
IL-6 and P-selectin promoters, with a high affinity. For the most
strongly interacting sites, a similar dissociation constant was
determined as for a bona fide GC box Sp1 binding site. Several experimental procedures were used to characterize the interaction between Sp1 and NF-
B sites. We could place the relative affinities of Sp1 to eight different NF-
B sites in comparison to a GC box Sp1
site into the same order when comparing them either as probes or as
competitors or when determining the dissociation constants. Cellular or
recombinant NF-
B proteins competed with Sp1 for the binding site,
implying overlapping base recognition of both factors. In transfected
cells, Sp1 could stimulate transcription through NF-
B sites, and
cotransfection of Sp1 with NF-
B-p50 indicated functional
competition for the same site. Mutated NF-
B sites used in in vitro
binding assays or in transfection experiments further supported the
conclusion that Sp1 recognizes an overlapping motif in the NF-
B
binding site. A one-base mutation in the Ig
site affecting a
G4 motif at its third position abrogated DNA binding of
both NF-
B and Sp1. Mutation in the first position strongly
diminished transcriptional activation by Sp1. Similarly, mutation of
the second or third guanine in a G5 motif in the P-selectin NF-
B site fully eliminated functional interaction with both Sp1 and
NF-
B-p50. Despite the clearly overlapping features recognized by
either Sp1 or NF-
B, it is unclear how Sp1 recognizes these sites.
The augmenting number of binding sites identified for Sp1 has led to
the deduction of increasingly degenerate consensus sequences (7,
8, 11, 23), but there is no perfect fit of these (e.g.,
[G/T][G/A]GG[C/A]G[G/T][G/A][G/A][C/T]) to any of the NF-
B sites preferentially bound by Sp1. In methylation interference experiments, we observed that methylation of all four G's
in the G4 motif of the Ig
site top strand blocked
binding of purified Sp1 (data not shown). It is therefore possible that consecutive strings of G residues in NF-
B sites are part of a degenerate Sp1 site bound by one molecule. Alternatively, two Sp1
molecules may bind cooperatively to the NF-
B site with contacts to
the strings of G residues on both sites of the palindrome.
The KDs for Sp1 bound to known Sp1 sites
determined in other studies via quantitative footprinting assays or
EMSAs were between 4.6 × 10
10 and 3.1 × 10
9 M (20, 32), in good agreement with our
KD for a GC box Sp1 site (7 × 10
10 M) and close to the KDs that
we measured for the Sp1 interaction with IL-6, P-selectin, or Ig
NF-
B binding sites (1.6 × 10
9 to 3.0 × 10
9 M). In contrast, the KDs
reported for NF-
B vary greatly, from 6.5 × 10
10
M to the extremely high affinity of 3 × 10
13 M
(15, 30, 34, 67). This wide range of affinities is largely
due to the different experimental conditions chosen. In this study, we
determined the relative dissociation constants of cellular Sp1 and
NF-
B measured under the same experimental conditions, e.g., in the
presence of the same competitor DNA and the same buffer components. The
KDs which we determined for p50-p65 were between
6 × 10
10 M (H2K site) and 1.4 × 10
9 M (P-selectin site).
Recently, the crystal structure of p50 homodimers bound to a
symmetrical NF-
B binding site has been determined (16,
38). The p50 homodimer wraps into the major groove, nearly
enclosing the 10-bp binding site. Bases including all guanine residues
in both half sites of the symmetrical binding site are contacted, and
most of the binding site, except for a small part of the minor groove,
is covered (16, 38). Sp1 is assumed to interact with guanine
residues in the major groove, covering 9 consecutive residues, as has
been derived from methylation protection and X-ray data (6,
43). The extended contacts made by Sp1 and NF-
B thus exclude
simultaneous binding. This is in contrast to the synergistic interaction of NF-
B and the high-mobility-group protein HMG I(Y) at
the virus-inducible enhancer element of the beta interferon gene
(57). HMG I(Y) binds to a central region in the NF-
B site in the minor groove which is accessible in p50-DNA complexes (16, 38, 57).
NF-
B binding sites have been shown to be recognized by further
transcription factors not belonging to the NF-
B/Rel family, including PRDII-BF1 (also called MBP-1 or HIV-EP1) and other highly related proteins (14, 37). PRDII-BF1 binds to NF-
B sites and contains several zinc finger structures, including the
C2H2 type also found in Sp1. The functional
role of PRDII-BF1 for the activity of NF-
B sites in vivo is unknown,
but studies with chimeric PRDII-BF1 proteins suggest that it may act as
a repressor (37). Furthermore, RBP-J
, also called RBP or
CBF1, the mammalian homolog of Drosophila Suppressor of
Hairless, binds to certain NF-
B sites and acts as a transcriptional
repressor (26, 52). Sp1 is thus the first case of a non-Rel
transcriptional activator that binds to a subset of NF-
B sites.
The recognition of subsets of NF-
B sites by Sp1 provides a number of
possibilities for combinatorial regulation (Fig. 7). The interaction of
these sites with Sp1 may raise the basal expression levels of
NF-
B-dependent genes in the absence of activated NF-
B. Alternatively, it may provide a means to silence NF-
B target genes
by competition for the binding site without functionally contributing
to the basal expression level. In the latter case, Sp1 could compete
selectively with specific NF-
B/Rel heteromers.
Although Sp1 is primarily regarded as a ubiquitous factor required in a
variety of cell types for the activation of essential genes, both its
expression levels and its activity are highly regulated. The expression
levels of Sp1 vary strongly, up to 100-fold, in different tissues of
the mouse as well as at different stages of development
(49). A potential physiological importance of the high
binding affinities determined here for Sp1 to certain NF-
B sites is
therefore possible. In fact, single NF-
B knockout experiments, such
as for p65 (RelA) or c-Rel, have demonstrated that basal expression
levels of NF-
B target genes are not affected (5, 28).
Although this may be largely due to compensation effects between the
various NF-
B/Rel family members, the role of ubiquitous
transcriptions factors such as Sp1 acting through certain NF-
B
binding sites may provide an additional explanation.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Guntram Suske (IMT, Philipps University Marburg) for
providing Sp1 expression vectors and for critical comments on the
manuscript and Rodger P. McEver (University of Oklahoma Health Sciences
Center) for the P-selectin constructs.
This work was in part supported by grant SFB 344 from the DFG to C.S.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Max
Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Robert-Rössle-Str.
10, 13122 Berlin, Germany. Phone: 49-30-9406-3816. Fax:
49-30-9406-3866. E-mail: scheidereit{at}mdc-berlin.de.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Augustin, L. B.,
R. F. Felsheim,
B. H. Min,
S. M. Fuchs,
J. A. Fuchs, and H. H. Loh.
1995.
Genomic structure of the mouse delta opioid receptor gene.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
207:111-119[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Baeuerle, P. A., and D. Baltimore.
1996.
NF- B: ten years after.
Cell
87:13-20[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Ballard, D. W.,
E. Bohnlein,
J. W. Lowenthal,
Y. Wano,
B. R. Franza, and W. C. Greene.
1988.
HTLV-I tax induces cellular proteins that activate the B element in the IL-2 receptor gene.
Science
241:1652-1655[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Beg, A. A., and A. S. Baldwin, Jr.
1993.
The I B proteins: multifunctional regulators of Rel/NF- B transcription factors.
Genes Dev.
7:2064-2070[Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Beg, A. A.,
W. C. Sha,
R. T. Bronson,
S. Ghosh, and D. Baltimore.
1995.
Embryonic lethality and liver degeneration in mice lacking the RelA component of NF- B.
Nature
376:167-170[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Berg, J. M.
1992.
Sp1 and the subfamily of zinc finger proteins with guanine-rich binding sites.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:11109-11110[Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Briggs, M. R.,
J. T. Kadonaga,
S. P. Bell, and R. Tjian.
1986.
Purification and biochemical characterization of the promoter-specific transcription factor, Sp1.
Science
234:47-52[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Bucher, P.
1990.
Weight matrix descriptions of four eukaryotic RNA polymerase II promoter elements derived from 502 unrelated promoter sequences.
J. Mol. Biol.
212:563-578[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Courey, A. J., and R. Tjian.
1988.
Analysis of Sp1 in vivo reveals multiple transcriptional domains, including a novel glutamine-rich activation motif.
Cell
55:887-898[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Courey, A. J.,
D. A. Holtzman,
S. P. Jackson, and R. Tjian.
1989.
Synergistic activation by the glutamine-rich domains of human transcription factor Sp1.
Cell
59:827-836[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Courey, A. J., and R. Tjian.
1992.
Mechanism of transcriptional control as revealed by studies of human transcription factor Sp1, p. 743-769. In
K. R. Yamamoto, and S. L. McKnight (ed.), Transcriptional regulation.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 12.
|
Daniel, S.,
S. Zhang,
A. A. DePaoli-Roach, and K. H. Kim.
1996.
Dephosphorylation of Sp1 by protein phosphatase 1 is involved in the glucose-mediated activation of the acetyl-CoA carboxylase gene.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:14692-14697[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Demczuk, S.,
M. Harbers, and B. Vennstrom.
1993.
Identification and analysis of all components of a gel retardation assay by combination with immunoblotting.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:2574-2578[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Fan, C. M., and T. Maniatis.
1990.
A DNA-binding protein containing two widely separated zinc finger motifs that recognize the same DNA sequence.
Genes Dev.
4:29-42[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Fujita, T.,
G. P. Nolan,
S. Ghosh, and D. Baltimore.
1992.
Independent modes of transcriptional activation by the p50 and p65 subunits of NF- B.
Genes Dev.
6:775-787[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Ghosh, G.,
G. van Duyne,
S. Ghosh, and P. B. Sigler.
1995.
Structure of NF- B p50 homodimer bound to a B site.
Nature
373:303-310[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Grilli, M.,
J. J. Chiu, and M. J. Lenardo.
1993.
NF- B and Rel: participants in an multiform transcriptional regulatory system.
Int. Rev. Cytol.
143:1-62[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Hagen, G.,
S. Muller,
M. Beato, and G. Suske.
1994.
Sp1-mediated transcriptional activation is repressed by Sp3.
EMBO J.
13:3843-3851[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Hagen, G.,
J. Dennig,
A. Preiss,
M. Beato, and G. Suske.
1995.
Functional analyses of the transcription factor Sp4 reveal properties distinct from Sp1 and Sp3.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:24989-24994[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Harrington, M. A.,
P. A. Jones,
M. Imagawa, and M. Karin.
1988.
Cytosine methylation does not affect binding of transcription factor Sp1.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:2066-2070[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Hirano, F.,
H. Tanaka,
Y. Makino,
K. Okamoto,
M. Hiramoto,
H. Handa, and I. Makino.
1996.
Induction of the transcription factor AP-1 in cultured human colon adenocarcinoma cells following exposure to bile acids.
Carcinogenesis
17:427-433[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Imataka, H.,
K. Sogawa,
K. Yasumoto,
Y. Kikuchi,
K. Sasano,
A. Kobayashi,
M. Hayami, and Y. Fujii-Kuriyama.
1992.
Two regulatory proteins that bind to the basic transcription element (BTE), a GC box sequence in the promoter region of the rat P-4501A1 gene.
EMBO J.
11:3663-3671[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Jones, K. A.,
J. T. Kadonaga,
P. A. Luciw, and R. Tjian.
1986.
Activation of the AIDS retrovirus promoter by the cellular transcription factor, Sp1.
Science
232:755-759[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Jones, P. L.,
G. Kucera,
H. Gordon, and J. M. Boss.
1995.
Cloning and characterization of the murine manganous superoxide dismutase-encoding gene.
Gene
153:155-161[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Kadonaga, J. T.,
K. R. Carner,
F. R. Masiarz, and R. Tjian.
1987.
Isolation of cDNA encoding transcription factor Sp1 and functional analysis of the DNA binding domain.
Cell
51:1079-1090[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Kannabiran, C.,
X. Zeng, and L. D. Vales.
1997.
The mammalian transcriptional repressor RBP CBF1 regulates interleukin-6 gene expression.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:1-9[Abstract].
|
| 27.
|
Kerr, L. D.,
L. J. Ransone,
P. Wamsley,
M. J. Schmitt,
T. G. Boyer,
Q. Zhou,
A. J. Berk, and I. M. Verma.
1993.
Association between proto-oncoprotein Rel and TATA-binding protein mediates transcriptional activation by NF- B.
Nature
365:412-419[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Kontgen, F.,
R. J. Grumont,
A. Strasser,
D. Metcalf,
R. Li,
D. Tarlinton, and S. Gerondakis.
1995.
Mice lacking the c-rel proto-oncogene exhibit defects in lymphocyte proliferation humoral immunity and interleukin-2 expression.
Genes Dev.
9:1965-1977[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Krappmann, D.,
F. G. Wulczyn, and C. Scheidereit.
1996.
Different mechanisms control signal-induced degradation and basal turnover of the NF- B inhibitor I B in vivo.
EMBO J.
15:6716-6726[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Kretzschmar, M.,
M. Meisterernst,
C. Scheidereit,
G. Li, and R. G. Roeder.
1992.
Transcriptional regulation of the HIV-1 promoter by NF- B in vitro.
Genes Dev.
6:761-774[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Kriwacki, R. V.,
S. C. Schultz,
T. M. Steitz, and J. P. Caradonna.
1992.
Sequence-specific recognition of DNA by zinc-finger peptides derived from the transcription factor Sp1.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:9759-9763[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Letovsky, J., and W. S. Dynan.
1989.
Measurement of the binding of transcription factor Sp1 to a single GC box recognition sequence.
Nucleic Acids Res.
17:2639-2653[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Lombardi, L.,
P. Ciana,
C. Cappellini,
D. Trecca,
L. Guerrini,
A. Migliazza,
A. T. Maiolo, and A. Neri.
1995.
Structural and functional characterization of the promoter regions of the NFKB2 gene.
Nucleic Acids Res.
23:2328-2336[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Matthews, J. R.,
W. Kaszubska,
G. Turcatti,
T. N. Wells, and R. T. Hay.
1993.
Role of cysteine62 in DNA recognition by the P50 subunit of NF- B.
Nucleic Acids Res.
21:1727-1734[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Meisterernst, M.,
I. Gander,
L. Rogge, and E.-L. Winnacker.
1988.
A quantitative analysis of nuclear factor I/DNA interactions.
Nucleic Acids Res.
16:4419-4435[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Moll, T.,
M. Czyz,
H. Holzmuller,
R. Hofer-Warbinek,
E. Wagner,
H. Winkler,
F. H. Bach, and E. Hofer.
1995.
Regulation of the tissue factor promoter in endothelial cells. Binding of NF- B-, AP-1-, and Sp1-like transcription factors.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:3849-3857[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Muchardt, C.,
J. S. Seeler,
A. Nirula,
D. L. Shurland, and R. B. Gaynor.
1992.
Regulation of human immunodeficiency virus enhancer function by PRDII-BF1 and c-rel gene products.
J. Virol.
66:244-250[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Muller, C. W.,
F. A. Rey,
M. Sodeoka,
G. L. Verdine, and S. C. Harrison.
1995.
Structure of the NF- B p50 homodimer bound to DNA.
Nature
373:311-317[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Naumann, M., and C. Scheidereit.
1994.
Activation of NF- B in vivo is regulated by multiple phosphorylations.
EMBO J.
13:4597-4607[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Naumann, M.,
F. G. Wulczyn, and C. Scheidereit.
1993.
The NF- B precursor p105 and the proto-oncogene product Bcl-3 are I B molecules and control nuclear translocation of NF- B.
EMBO J.
12:213-222[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Neish, A. S.,
A. J. Williams,
H. J. Palmer,
M. Z. Whitley, and T. Collins.
1992.
Functional analysis of the human vascular cell adhesion molecules 1 promoter.
J. Exp. Med.
176:1583-1593[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Pan, J., and R. P. McEver.
1995.
Regulation of the human P-selectin promoter by Bcl-3 and specific homodimeric members of the NF- B/Rel family.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:23077-23083[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Pavletich, N. P., and C. O. Pabo.
1991.
Zinc finger-DNA recognition: crystal structure of a Zif268-DNA complex at 2.1 A.
Science
252:809-817[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Pazin, M. J.,
P. L. Sheridan,
K. Cannon,
Z. Cao,
J. G. Keck,
J. T. Kadonaga, and K. A. Jones.
1996.
NF- B-mediated chromatin reconfiguration and transcriptional activation of the HIV-1 enhancer in vitro.
Genes Dev.
10:37-49[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Perkins, N. D.,
N. L. Edwards,
C. S. Duckett,
A. B. Agranoff,
R. M. Schmid, and G. J. Nabel.
1993.
A cooperative interaction between NF B and Sp1 is required for HIV-1 enhancer activation.
EMBO J.
12:3551-3558[Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Perkins, N. D.,
A. B. Agranoff,
E. Pascal, and G. J. Nabel.
1994.
An interaction between the DNA-binding domains of RelAp65 and Sp1 mediates human immunodeficiency virus gene activation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:6570-6583[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Rokaeus, A., and J. A. Waschek.
1994.
Primary sequence and functional analysis of the bovine galanin gene promoter in human neuroblastoma cells.
DNA Cell Biol.
8:845-855.
|
| 48.
|
Roman, D. G.,
M. B. Toledano, and W. J. Leonard.
1990.
Sp1 represses IL-2 receptor alpha chain gene expression.
New Biol.
2:642-647[Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Saffer, J. D.,
S. P. Jackson, and M. B. Annarella.
1991.
Developmental expression of Sp1 in the mouse.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:2189-2199[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Sanceau, J.,
T. Kaisho,
T. Hirano, and J. Wietzerbin.
1995.
Triggering of the human interleukin-6 gene by interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in monocytic cells involves cooperation between interferon regulatory factor-1, NF- B, and Sp1 transcription factors.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:27920-27931[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Scheidereit, C.,
D. Krappmann, and F. G. Wulczyn.
1996.
Regulation of the NF- B family of transcriptions factors by protein phosphorylation, p. 163-196. In
M. Clemens (ed.), Protein phosphorylation and cell growth regulation.
Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
|
| 52.
|
Shirakata, Y.,
J. D. Shuman, and J. E. Coligan.
1996.
Purification of a novel MHC class I element binding activity from th |