Previous Article | Next Article 
Mol Cell Biol, March 1998, p. 1303-1311, Vol. 18, No. 3
0270-7306/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
The Alpha Chain of the Nascent
Polypeptide-Associated Complex Functions as a Transcriptional
Coactivator
Wagner V.
Yotov,
Alain
Moreau,
and
René
St-Arnaud*
Genetics Unit, Shriners Hospital, and
Departments of Surgery and Human Genetics, McGill University,
Montréal, Québec H3G 1A6, Canada
Received 10 June 1997/Returned for modification 15 August
1997/Accepted 24 November 1997
 |
ABSTRACT |
We report the characterization of clone 1.9.2, a gene expressed in
mineralizing osteoblasts. Remarkably, clone 1.9.2 is the murine homolog
of the alpha chain of the nascent polypeptide-associated complex
(
-NAC). Based on sequence similarities between
-NAC/1.9.2 and
transcriptional regulatory proteins and the fact that the heterodimerization partner of
-NAC was identified as the
transcription factor BTF3b (B. Wiedmann, H. Sakai, T. A. Davis,
and M. Wiedmann, Nature 370:434-440, 1994), we investigated a putative
role for
-NAC/1.9.2 in transcriptional control. The
-NAC/1.9.2
protein potentiated by 10-fold the activity of the chimeric activator GAL4/VP-16 in vivo. The potentiation was shown to be mediated at the
level of gene transcription, because
-NAC/1.9.2 increased GAL4/VP-16-mediated mRNA synthesis without affecting the half-life of
the GAL4/VP-16 fusion protein. Moreover, the interaction of
-NAC/1.9.2 with a transcriptionally defective mutant of GAL4/VP-16 was severely compromised. Specific protein-protein interactions between
-NAC/1.9.2 and GAL4/VP-16 were demonstrated by gel retardation, affinity chromatography, and protein blotting assays, while
interactions with TATA box-binding protein (TBP) were detected by
immunoprecipitation, affinity chromatography, and protein blotting
assays. Based on these interactions that define the coactivator class
of proteins, we conclude that the
-NAC/1.9.2 gene product functions
as a transcriptional coactivator.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
In addition to the sequence-specific
DNA-binding transcription factors and the components of the basal
transcriptional machinery, the control of gene expression requires
another class of proteins that are involved in activated transcription.
These molecules have been ascribed different names, such as mediators,
adaptors, and coactivators (13). While further studies may
reveal that these semantic distinctions reflect true mechanistic
differences, the various names have been used indiscriminately in
various contexts. The term "coactivator" was first ascribed to the
TAFs (TATA-binding protein [TBP]-associated factors), a class of
proteins that contact TBP and interact with one or several
sequence-specific transcription factors to potentiate
activator-dependent transcription (9). We have utilized
these characteristics to define the function of coactivators herein.
These proteins provide interfaces to link the sequence- specific
factors to the basal transcriptional machinery (13, 33). Recent studies have identified specific enzymatic functions for some
coactivators, indicating that activated transcription does not merely
result from protein-protein contacts but also requires covalent
modification of the factors involved (2, 8, 12).
The TAFs represent a group of proteins tightly associated with TBP so
that they copurify with it in the chromatographic fraction TFIID
(9). Several human and Drosophila TAFs have now
been cloned (reference 4 and references therein).
Recent genetic evidence in yeast may question whether or not TAFs are
universally required for transcription (25, 35), but the
yeast results can perhaps be explained by the relative simplicity of
the yeast genome (33). Indeed, recent evidence suggests that
specific TAFs are implicated in the control of developmentally
restricted gene expression and tissue-specific transcriptional
activation in multicellular organisms (29). Coactivators
distinct from the TFIID fraction have also been identified and cloned
(reviewed in reference 13).
Several of the coactivators characterized to date share functional
properties. However, some of them also exhibit very unique functions.
For example, the Drosophila TAF with a molecular weight of
150,000 (dTAFII150) has been shown to possess specific DNA binding affinity (34), while hTAFII250 was shown
to act as a protein serine kinase (8). The CBP and p300
coactivators possess histone acetyltransferase activity
(2). Thus a diverse range of structural and functional
domains in coactivator proteins have been characterized.
We have used the technique of differential display of mRNA amplified by
PCR (differential display PCR) (19) to compare genes expressed in mineralizing osteoblasts with those expressed in dedifferentiated, nonmineralizing cells of the same lineage. We report
the characterization of clone 1.9.2, a 794-bp cDNA corresponding to a
transcript expressed in differentiated osteoblasts. Remarkably, clone
1.9.2 is the murine homolog of the alpha chain of the nascent polypeptide-associated complex (
-NAC) (GenBank accession no. X80909
[unpublished data]) and shall hereafter be referred to as
-NAC/1.9.2. NAC has been previously purified as a heterodimeric complex binding the newly synthesized polypeptide chains as they emerge
from the ribosome (37). The
-NAC subunit has been
identified as BTF3b (39), a protein involved in regulating
transcription in yeast (15) and in higher eukaryotes
(39). Based on sequence similarities between
-NAC/1.9.2
and transcriptional regulatory proteins and the identification of the
heterodimerization partner of
-NAC as the transcription factor BTF3b
(37), we investigated a putative role for
-NAC/1.9.2 in
transcriptional control. Additional work from our laboratory
characterizing the function of the muscle-specific isoform of
-NAC/1.9.2, skNAC, as a sequence-specific DNA-binding transcription
factor and demonstrating that
-NAC/1.9.2 has inherent DNA binding
activity in vitro (38) further supports a role for
-NAC/1.9.2 in the regulation of gene transcription.
We present evidence that the
-NAC/1.9.2 protein can potentiate the
activity of the chimeric activator GAL4/VP-16 in vivo. Specific
protein-protein interactions between
-NAC/1.9.2 and the activator
were demonstrated. The
-NAC/1.9.2 protein was also shown to interact
with TBP. Based on these interactions that define the coactivator class
of proteins, we conclude that the
-NAC/1.9.2 gene product functions
as a transcriptional coactivator.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cloning of 1.9.2 cDNA.
Differential display PCR of mRNA
isolated from terminally differentiated osteoblasts (10) and
passaged, dedifferentiated bone cells was performed as described
previously (19). Clone 1.9.2 was identified as a band
specific for differentiated osteoblasts, excised, reamplified, and used
to clone the full-length 1.9.2 cDNA from a primary osteoblast library
prepared in lambda-ZAPII (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.).
Immunolocalization of
-NAC/1.9.2.
Exponentially growing
or serum-starved MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells (32) were fixed
in 4% paraformaldehyde. Immunochemistry was performed according to
standard protocols (36) with the anti-
NAC antibody
(38) and a secondary goat anti-rabbit antibody conjugated to
fluorescein isothiocyanate (TAGO Immunologicals, Burlingame, Calif.).
Antibody dilutions were 1:1,000 and 1:50 for the primary and secondary
antibodies, respectively.
Transient transfection assays.
All vectors were constructed
by standard molecular biology procedures, and full details and
sequences are available on request. For assays using GAL4/VP-16, P19 EC
cells (24) were transfected with 0.8 µg of the reporter
plasmid 5Gal4-E1b-CAT (20), 0.1 µg of an expression
plasmid for GAL4/VP-16 (pSGVP [26]), and 2 µg of
either the BTF3b vector (39) or the cytomegalovirus (CMV)-1.9.2 expression vector. Fifty nanograms of the luciferase expression plasmid pGL2-control (Promega Corp., Madison, Wis.) was also
included as a reference to monitor for variations in transformation
efficiency. All transfections were performed with 5 µl of the
Lipofectamine reagent (Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, Md.) according to the
instructions of the manufacturer, and cells were harvested 24 h
posttransfection. Chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) and
luciferase activities were assayed as previously described (31).
Northern blot assay.
Total RNA from transiently transfected
cells was probed with a PCR-labeled fragment from the reporter CAT gene
by conventional protocols. The membrane was subsequently stripped and
rehybridized with a probe directed against the
-tubulin transcript
to monitor for variations in the quality and quantity of the loaded
mRNA.
Analysis of GAL4/VP-16 half-life.
We used the
cycloheximide-Western protocol of Maheswaran et al. (22) to
estimate the half-life of the GAL4/VP-16 activator. P19 EC cells
(24) were transfected as described above with 0.5 µg of
pSGVP (26) together with 0.5 µg of either an inert plasmid (pBKCMV; Stratagene Corp.) or the CMV-1.9.2 expression vector. Transfection efficiency was monitored with 0.1 µg of the luciferase expression plasmid pGL2-control. Transfected cells were pooled 24 h posttransfection and split in the appropriate number of dishes. Cycloheximide (30 µg/ml) was added to each dish 36 h
posttransfection, and cells were harvested at intervals. Protein
lysates were prepared, and 700 µg of total protein per sample was
analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
and Western blotting with an anti-GAL4/VP-16 antibody (Upstate
Biotechnology, Inc., Lake Placid, N.Y.).
Gel mobility shift assay.
The 17-bp GAL4 binding site
oligonucleotide (20) was labeled by Klenow filling in and
incubated with the purified recombinant proteins in binding buffer (12 mM HEPES-NaOH [pH 7.9], 4 mM Tris-Cl [pH 7.9], 60 mM KCl, 1 mM
CaCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 12% glycerol) for 30 min at
room temperature. The final reaction volume was 20 µl. The amounts of
protein used were 50 ng for GAL4/VP-16, 100 ng for GAL4(DBD-1-147
[DNA binding domain residues 1 to 147]), and 500 ng for
-NAC/1.9.2. The preimmune sera and anti-
NAC antibody (38) were used at a final dilution of 1:400; binding
reaction mixtures with antibodies were preincubated on ice for 30 min
prior to addition of the probe. Bound probe was separated from free oligonucleotide on 6% gels in binding buffer supplemented with 1 mM
EDTA. Samples were migrated at 150 V for 3 h with buffer recirculation. The gels were then dried and autoradiographed.
Affinity chromatography.
Crude nuclear extracts from
serum-starved P19 EC cells (24) were prepared as described
by Dignam et al. (7). Crude lysates from bacteria expressing
GAL4/VP-16 or GAL4/VP16
FP442 (1) were obtained by
sonication. The nuclear extracts (2 mg of total protein) or the
bacterial lysates (15 mg of total protein) were precleared on
glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads (Pharmacia Canada, Baie d'Urfé,
Quebec, Canada) and then passed on a glutathione-Sepharose 4B column
previously loaded with glutathione S-transferase
(GST)-1.9.2 (300-µl final bed volume). Bound proteins were eluted
with a step gradient of NaCl, precipitated with trichloroacetic acid,
and analyzed by Western blot assay (11). The antibodies
directed against GAL4/VP-16 and TBP were obtained from Upstate
Biotechnology, Inc. Recombinant human TBP was obtained from Upstate
Biotechnology, Inc.
Far-Western protein blot assay.
The
-NAC/1.9.2 cDNA was
subcloned into the pGEX-4T-3 vector (Pharmacia Canada), and the
GST-1.9.2 fusion protein was purified according to the manufacturer's
instructions and then was biotinylated with the protein biotinylation
system (Canadian Life Technologies, Burlington, Ontario, Canada) based
on the protocol supplied. The far-Western blot assay was performed as
described by Inostroza et al. (17), except that the blocked
membrane was exposed to the biotinylated protein for only 1 h.
GST-TBP was purchased from Santa Cruz BioTechnology (Santa Cruz,
Calif.), while purified GAL4/VP-16 was a generous gift of James T. Kadonaga (University of California
San Diego, La Jolla, Calif.).
The amount of purified protein loaded in each lane was 0.5 µg.
Immunoprecipitation.
Immunoprecipitation reactions were
performed according to standard protocols (28). Four hundred
microliters of crude nuclear extract from serum-starved P19 embryonal
carcinoma cells (4 µg/µl) was incubated with 4 µl of antibodies.
The subsequent immunoblotting step was performed by standard protocols
(11). The anti-RNA polymerase II antibody was from Santa
Cruz BioTechnology (Santa Cruz, Calif.). The antibody dilutions used
were 1:1,000 for the anti-
NAC antibody; 1:250 for the anti-TBP,
anti-RNA polymerase II, and preimmune sera; and 1:7,500 for the
alkaline phosphatase-conjugated second antibody.
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The GenBank accession
number for the sequence reported in this paper is U22151.
 |
RESULTS |
-NAC/1.9.2 localizes to the nucleus in G0-phase
cells.
The
-NAC/1.9.2 protein sequence features a putative
nuclear targeting sequence (RSEKKARK) located at residues 71 to 78 (not shown). This sequence motif, combined with the observation that the
dimerization partner of
-NAC has been identified as the
transcriptional regulatory protein BTF3b (37), prompted us
to investigate the putative nuclear localization of
-NAC/1.9.2 as
well as its possible involvement in the regulation of gene
transcription.
Immunocytochemical analysis with anti-
NAC antibodies (38)
revealed that the nuclear localization of the protein was cell cycle
dependent: in cells arrested at the G0/G1
border by serum deprivation, the
-NAC/1.9.2 protein was detected in
the nucleus of all cells, as well as in the cytoplasm (Fig.
1B). When the cells were challenged with
serum for 4 h, the protein mostly localized to the cytoplasm,
although some nuclear staining remained evident (Fig. 1C). When
serum-stimulated cells were subsequently serum deprived, the
-NAC/1.9.2 protein relocalized to the nucleus (Fig. 1D). Control
staining with preimmune sera showed a complete absence of signal (Fig.
1A).

View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
-NAC/1.9.2 localizes to the cytoplasm and nucleus in
serum-deprived osteoblasts. MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells were stained
with polyclonal antibodies raised against the fusion GST-1.9.2 protein.
(A) Control staining with preimmune sera. (B to D) Staining for
-NAC/1.9.2. A strong signal was observed in the cytoplasm and the
nucleus of serum-starved cells (B). Following stimulation with fetal
calf serum for 4 h, -NAC/1.9.2 localized mainly to the
cytoplasm (C). Removal of serum after the 4-h stimulation provoked
reentry of -NAC/1.9.2 into the nucleus (D).
|
|
-NAC/1.9.2 acts as a transcriptional coactivator with
GAL4/VP-16.
In order to assess the putative transcriptional
activation function of
-NAC/1.9.2, the full-length
-NAC/1.9.2
protein was linked in frame to the DBD of the yeast GAL4 transcription
factor (amino acids 1 to 147) (27) and assayed for its
capacity to activate the transcription of the 5Gal4-E1b-CAT reporter
plasmid (20). Under conditions in which the control chimeric
activator GAL4/VP-16 (26) strongly stimulated the
transcription of the reporter gene (Fig. 2A and
B), we found no evidence of increased transcription mediated through the GAL4/
-NAC/1.9.2 fusion protein (Fig. 2A and B), suggesting that
-NAC/1.9.2 could not transactivate. It is interesting that a C-terminal fragment of
-NAC/1.9.2 fused to
GAL4 [construct GAL4-1.9.2(111-215)] moderately increased
transcription of the 5Gal4-E1b-CAT reporter plasmid (about threefold)
in ROS 17/2.8 osteosarcoma cells, but not in P19 embryonal carcinoma cells or C2C12 myoblasts (data not shown). We surmise that this may be
due to the interaction of
-NAC/1.9.2 with TBP (see below).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
-NAC/1.9.2 acts as a transcriptional coactivator.
Transient transfection assays of the reporter plasmid 5Gal4-E1b-CAT
(20) with expression vectors for GAL4/VP-16, GAL4/1.9.2,
-NAC/1.9.2, and BTF3b alone or in combination. (A) Relative fold
induction levels of the CAT reporter gene in transfected cells. Vector
represents the parental pBK-CMV vector in which the -NAC/1.9.2 cDNA
was subcloned to generate CMV-1.9.2. The expression level detected in
cells transfected with the reporter alone was arbitrarily ascribed a
value of 1. Results are expressed as mean fold induction ± standard error of four independent transfections. (B) Northern blot
assays of total RNA from the transfected cells. The blot was first
hybridized to a CAT probe (upper panel) and then was stripped and
reprobed with an -tubulin probe (lower panel). (C) Half-life of the
GAL4/VP-16 protein in the presence or absence of -NAC/1.9.2. P19 EC
cells (24) were transfected with the GAL4/VP-16 expression
vector alone or in combination with the -NAC/1.9.2 expression
vector. Cycloheximide was added to each dish, and cells were harvested
at the indicated intervals. Samples were analyzed by Western blotting
with an anti-GAL4/VP-16 antibody.
|
|
Expression of the

-NAC/1.9.2 cDNA under the control of the CMV
promoter (construct CMV-1.9.2) also had no effect on the expression
of
the 5Gal4-E1b-CAT reporter gene (Fig.
2A). These results are
in
agreement with our previous findings showing that despite its
capacity
to bind the same DNA sequence as the muscle-specific
skNAC isoform,

-NAC/1.9.2 could not stimulate transcription from
promoters
containing the skNAC response element (
38).
However, when GAL4/VP-16 was cotransfected with construct CMV-1.9.2, a
10-fold enhancement of the response mediated by GAL4/VP-16
alone was
observed (Fig.
2A; (compare the 33.5 ± 3.5-fold activation
[mean ± standard error] observed with GAL4/VP-16 to the
339 ±
55-fold activation measured with GAL4/VP-16 together with
CMV-1.9.2).
The enhanced expression generated by the coexpression of
GAL4/VP-16
and

-NAC/1.9.2 was also observed at the level of the mRNA
of
the reporter gene (Fig.
2B), demonstrating that the potentiation
occurred at the transcriptional level and not through an increase
in
the translation, stability, or folding of the nascent CAT protein.
The
observed effect was specific to the

-NAC/1.9.2 protein, because
the
empty vector had no influence on the activity of the GAL4/VP-16
activator (Fig.
2A). Moreover, the coactivation function of

-NAC/1.9.2
was not observed when reporter templates devoid of GAL4
binding
sites were used or when

-NAC/1.9.2 was cotransfected with
vectors
expressing only the DBD of GAL4 (data not shown).

-NAC (
37), identified as BTF3b (
37,
39), was
also tested in this system. While it had no effect on the
transcriptional
activation function of GAL4/VP-16, BTF3b inhibited the
stimulation
of transcription mediated by

-NAC/1.9.2 when coexpressed
with

-NAC/1.9.2 and GAL4/VP-16 (Fig.
2A).
Similar levels of expression were achieved for each recombinant protein
(data not shown). Moreover, we used cycloheximide
treatment to estimate
the half-life of the GAL4/VP-16 activator
in the presence or absence of

-NAC/1.9.2. Figure
2C shows that
the coexpression of

-NAC/1.9.2
did not affect the level of expression
of the GAL4/VP-16 protein
(leftmost lane, zero hour time point),
nor did it influence the
stability of the chimeric activator.
-NAC/1.9.2 interacts with GAL4/VP-16.
Considering the
results presented above, we analyzed whether
-NAC/1.9.2 could
directly interact with GAL4/VP-16 as well as components of the basal
transcriptional machinery. We first used gel mobility shift assays with
purified recombinant proteins to assess direct contacts between
-NAC/1.9.2 and GAL4/VP-16. As shown in Fig.
3, both the GAL4 DBD [GAL4(DBD-1-147);
lane 2] and GAL4/VP-16 (lane 5) bound the labeled GAL4 probe.
GAL4(DBD-1-147) is a fusion with GST, thus explaining the reduced
mobility of the bound complex compared to that of GAL4/VP-16. When
-NAC/1.9.2 was added to the binding reaction mixture, the migration
of the bound GAL4/VP-16 complex was further retarded (lane 6), thus
demonstrating an interaction of
-NAC/1.9.2 with the GAL4/VP-16
protein bound to the GAL4 probe. Control reaction mixtures established
that
-NAC/1.9.2 interacted with the VP-16 moiety of the GAL4/VP-16 fusion protein:
-NAC/1.9.2 did not bind the labeled probe by itself
(lane 4) and did not interact with GAL4(DBD-1-147) (lane 3). The
migration of the bound complex in reaction mixtures containing GAL4/VP-16 together with
-NAC/1.9.2 was further altered by
antibodies directed against
-NAC/1.9.2 (supershifting; see lane 8),
further confirming the presence of
-NAC/1.9.2 in the bound complex.
The anti-
NAC antibodies had no effect on the binding of GAL4/VP-16 alone (lane 10), and preimmune sera did not influence the migration of
any of the bound complexes (lanes 7 and 9). These data demonstrate direct protein-protein interactions between
-NAC/1.9.2 and the acidic activator VP-16.

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
-NAC/1.9.2 interacts with GAL4/VP-16. Results from
gel mobility shift assays with purified recombinant proteins with a
labeled 17-mer GAL4 probe are shown. GAL4(DBD-1-147) is a fusion
protein between GST and the DBD (residues 1 to 147) of GAL4.
GAL4(1-147)-VP-16 is the same as GAL4/VP-16. -NAC denotes the
purified full-length -NAC/1.9.2 protein. Preimmune sera (lanes 7 and
8) and antibodies raised against -NAC/1.9.2 (anti- -NAC [lanes 8 and 10]) were added to some binding reaction mixtures.
|
|
We estimated the strength of the interaction between

-NAC/1.9.2 and
GAL4/VP-16 by using affinity chromatography with step
gradient elution.
As depicted in Fig.
4A, bacterially
expressed
GAL4/VP-16 was retained on a GST-

-NAC/1.9.2-loaded
glutathione-Sepharose
column. The recombinant GAL4/VP-16 did not
interact with a control
GST resin (not shown). The interaction of the
bound GAL4/VP-16
protein with

-NAC/1.9.2 was disrupted with
increasing concentrations
of salt, and the bulk of the bound protein
eluted in the 0.3 and
0.4 M fractions (Fig.
4A, lanes 5 and 6). These
results demonstrate
that the binding between

-NAC/1.9.2 and the
chimeric activator
is a strong interaction. A significant proportion of
the input
protein was recovered in the flowthrough fraction (compare
lanes
1 and 2), because these experiments were intentionally planned
with an excess of GAL4/VP-16 to ascertain that the affinity column
was
completely saturated.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Interactions between -NAC/1.9.2 and wild-type and
mutant GAL4/VP-16. (A) Affinity chromatography of crude lysates from
bacteria transformed with an expression vector for wild-type
GAL4/VP-16. Bound proteins were eluted with a step gradient of NaCl,
and the immunoblot (lanes 1 to 9) was probed with an anti-GAL4/VP-16
antibody. (B) Affinity chromatography of crude lysates from bacteria
expressing GAL4/VP16 FP442 eluted with a salt step gradient. In,
input (1/100 of total material loaded on column); F.T., flowthrough.
Molecular mass (kilodaltons) markers (M) are indicated to the left of
each panel.
|
|
We also tested the interaction of

-NAC/1.9.2 with a
transcriptionally compromised mutant of GAL4/VP-16, GAL4/VP16

FP442
(
1,
5,
21). While the mutant recombinant protein still bound
to the

-NAC/1.9.2 affinity resin (Fig.
4B), significantly less
protein was retained on the column, and most of it was eluted
with 0.3 M salt (lane 5). It is particularly striking that no
GAL4/VP16

FP442
protein could be detected in the 0.5 to 0.7 M
fractions, whereas some
of the wild-type GAL4/VP-16 fusion protein
was recovered in those
fractions (compare lanes 7 to 9, Fig.
4A
and B). Equal amounts of
recombinant proteins were loaded on each
column (lane 1). Similar
results were obtained in three separate
experiments and with
bacterial vectors that expressed only the
VP-16 or VP16

FP442 moiety
(not shown). Thus

-NAC/1.9.2 interacts
more strongly with
transcriptionally competent VP16 than with
transcriptionally
compromised mutants, supporting our interpretation
that the
potentiating effect of

-NAC/1.9.2 on GAL4/VP-16-dependent
gene
expression is mediated at the level of gene transcription.
-NAC/1.9.2 interacts with TBP.
We also examined whether
-NAC/1.9.2 could interact with components of the general
transcriptional machinery by performing affinity chromatography of
crude nuclear extracts on a glutathione-Sepharose column loaded with
recombinant GST-
-NAC/1.9.2 fusion protein, followed by
immunoblotting of the step gradient eluate. The data presented in Fig.
5A show that TBP bound to the column.
Testing for interactions between
-NAC/1.9.2 and other components of
the basal transcriptional apparatus revealed that
-NAC/1.9.2 did not
interact with RNA polymerase II, TFIIB, TFIIA, RAP30, RAP74, TAFII55, and TAFII70 (data not shown). As
illustrated in Fig. 5A, native TBP was retained on the
GST-
-NAC/1.9.2 affinity column and eluted with a peak in the 0.4 M
salt fraction (lane 8), confirming the strength of the interaction
between
-NAC/1.9.2 and TBP. The identity of the protein identified
in the fractions from the column was ascertained with two different
anti-TBP antibodies (not shown) as well as by running a control sample
of purified recombinant human TBP (lane 15 [the murine protein appears
to migrate slightly faster than the recombinant human homolog]). TBP
did not bind to a control column loaded with the GST moiety alone (Fig.
5B), confirming the specificity of the observed interaction.
Polypeptides in the range of 66 and 220 kDa were detected in every
fraction eluted from the GST-
-NAC/1.9.2 affinity columns (Fig. 5A).
These protein bands were also revealed by immunoblotting of the
fractions eluted from the control GST column (Fig. 5B), demonstrating
that they correspond to nonspecific interactions of abundant proteins with the GST moiety of the fusion protein, most likely detected as
background by the alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibody.

View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Interactions between -NAC/1.9.2 and TBP. (A) Affinity
chromatography of crude nuclear extracts eluted with a salt step
gradient. The immunoblot (lanes 3 to 15) was probed with the anti-TBP
antibody. Recombinant human TBP (rTBP) was migrated in lane 15. (B)
Control affinity chromatography column loaded with the GST moiety
alone. The same crude nuclear extract used in panel A was passed
through the column. Immunoblotting was with the anti-TBP antibody. In,
input (1/100 of total material loaded on column); F.T., flowthrough.
Lanes 1 and 2 contained Coomassie blue-stained molecular mass
(kilodaltons) markers (M) and input material, respectively.
|
|
The results shown in Fig.
4 and
5 demonstrate strong protein-protein
interactions between

-NAC/1.9.2 and the activator GAL4/VP-16,
as
well as between

-NAC/1.9.2 and TBP. Direct protein contacts
were
also detected with far-Western protein blotting assays with
purified
recombinant proteins. Figure
6, lane 4, shows that

-NAC/1.9.2
could interact with GAL4/VP-16 in the absence
of DNA. The interaction
was specific and was not mediated through the
GST portion of the
fusion protein, since GST-

-NAC/1.9.2 did not
interact with GST-1.9.2(111-215),
a fusion protein with an
Mr of 39,400, which comprises the C-terminal
half of

-NAC/1.9.2 fused to the DBD of GAL4 (Fig.
6, lane 1).
GST-

-NAC/1.9.2 also failed to bind the DBD of GAL4 in far-Western
assays (not shown). A direct interaction between GST-

-NAC/1.9.2
and
GST-TBP or its cleaved TBP moiety (Fig.
6, lanes 2 and 3)
was also
detected by the far-Western assay.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Protein-protein interactions between -NAC/1.9.2 and
GAL4/VP-16 and between -NAC/1.9.2 and TBP. Results of a far-Western
protein blot assay show the interaction of biotinylated GST-1.9.2 with
TBP (lanes 2 and 3) and GAL4/VP-16 (lane 4). The fusion protein
GST-1.9.2(111-215) (Mr, 39,400) served as a
negative control in this assay (lane 1). Asterisks point to the proper
molecular size of GST-TBP (lane 2), cleaved TBP (lane 3), and
GAL4/VP-16 (lane 4). Molecular mass (kilodaltons) markers are indicated
in the left-hand lane.
|
|
Immunoprecipitation experiments with crude nuclear extracts from
serum-starved cells further established that

-NAC/1.9.2
is
associated with TBP in vivo. Immunoprecipitation reactions
were
performed with anti-

NAC or anti-TBP antibodies, and the
immunocomplexes were then analyzed by immunoblotting with the
same
antibodies. Preimmune sera and antibodies directed against
the large
subunit of RNA polymerase II served as controls in these
experiments.
Figure
7A shows that complexes
immunoprecipitated
with the anti-

-NAC/1.9.2 antibody contained both

-NAC/1.9.2
(lane 4) and TBP (lane 7). Conversely, immunocomplexes
obtained
with the anti-TBP antibody contained TBP (lane 8),
TAF
II55 and
TAF
II70 (not shown), as well as

-NAC/1.9.2 (lane 5). The specificity
of these protein-protein
interactions was demonstrated with antibodies
directed against a
different component of the basal transcriptional
machinery, namely RNA
polymerase II. The anti-RNA polymerase II
antibody failed to
coimmunoprecipitate

-NAC/1.9.2 (Fig.
7B, lane
1) or TBP (lane 2).
Preimmune sera had no effect in these assays
(Fig.
7A, lanes 1 to 3, 6, and 9; and B, lane 3).

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
-NAC/1.9.2 is associated with TBP in vivo.
Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting assays demonstrating the
specific interaction of -NAC/1.9.2 with TBP in crude nuclear
extracts. Immunoprecipitation reactions were performed with preimmune
sera [lanes 3, 6, and 9]), anti-TBP antibodies (A [lanes 2, 5, and
8]), anti- NAC antibodies (A [lanes 1, 4, and 7]), or anti-RNA
polymerase II (pol. II) antibodies (B [lanes 1 to 4]). The
immunocomplexes were then analyzed by immunoblotting with the
antibodies indicated in the upper portion of each panel. TBP was
specifically associated with the anti- NAC immunocomplexes (A, lane
7). Similarly, -NAC/1.9.2 was specifically associated with the
anti-TBP immunocomplexes (A [lane 5]). M, molecular mass
(kilodaltons) markers (M). IgG, immunoglobulin G.
|
|
These data show that

-NAC/1.9.2 specifically interacted with
GAL4/VP-16 and TBP, resulting in enhanced transcriptional activation.
We interpret these results to mean that

-NAC/1.9.2 acted as a
transcriptional coactivator.
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have shown that clone 1.9.2 corresponds to
-NAC, a
heterodimeric complex previously implicated in binding nascent
polypeptide chains as they emerge from the ribosome (37).
Based on sequence similarity with DNA binding proteins and the
identification of the
-NAC dimerization partner as the transcription
factor BTF3b, we have examined the possibility that
-NAC/1.9.2 might
participate in transcriptional control. These studies were also
prompted by our previous observations that the muscle-specific isoform
of
-NAC/1.9.2, skNAC, acts as a DNA-binding transcription factor (38). We have shown that
-NAC/1.9.2 performs
protein-protein interactions with TBP and the chimeric transcriptional
activator GAL4/VP-16. Transient transfection assays have revealed that
-NAC/1.9.2 acts as a coactivator to enhance activated transcription.
Considering the apparent dual function of the protein, we propose a
different meaning for the
-NAC acronym:
nascent-polypeptide-associated complex and coactivator alpha.
Our data support the role of
-NAC/1.9.2 as a transcriptional
coactivator. Previous results from our laboratory have shown that
recombinant
-NAC/1.9.2 can bind DNA with sequence specificity in
vitro (38). However, the protein does not appear to
contain an intrinsic activation domain. This fact is supported by the following observations. (i) We could not demonstrate
transcriptional activation by
-NAC/1.9.2 through GAL4 binding sites
when full-length
-NAC/1.9.2 was expressed as a fusion protein with
the DBD of GAL4 (Fig. 2). (ii)
-NAC/1.9.2 also failed to activate
transcription from promoter templates containing its cognate response
element (38). Thus, the transcriptional role of
-NAC/1.9.2 is more consistent with the function of a coactivator
than a site-specific transcription factor. We have observed,
however, that the C-terminal domain of
-NAC/1.9.2 (residues 111 to
215), when fused to GAL4, could moderately increase transcription from
a GAL4-dependent reporter template (about threefold) in a subset of
bone cell lines (not shown). A possible explanation for this result
would be that the C-terminal domain of
-NAC/1.9.2 is the portion of
the molecule that contacts TBP. It has been shown that protein-protein
interactions with TBP are sufficient to activate transcription
(18). The apparent specificity of this response might be due
to the relative amount of TBP available to interact with
-NAC/1.9.2
in particular cell types.
It remains to be determined if the DNA binding function of
-NAC/1.9.2 is expressed or if it is masked in vivo. Interestingly, the simian virus 40 large T antigen, a known DNA binding protein, has
recently been shown to function as a TAF and to interact with TBP
(6). A possible role for a specific DNA binding function within a coactivator molecule would be to target it to particular promoters (12, 34), thus generating an increased degree of specificity to the transcriptional response to
-NAC/1.9.2 during development.
The interaction between VP16 and the transcriptional machinery is
highly specific: a phenylalanine-to-proline substitution at position
442 of VP16 (VP16
FP442) abolishes transcriptional activity in vivo
and correspondingly decreases binding of VP16 to TBP and TFIIB in vitro
(5, 16, 21). Similarly, the GAL4/VP16
FP442 fusion protein
is transcriptionally compromised regarding GAL4 binding site-dependent
transcriptional activation of reporter genes both in vivo and in vitro
(1). The interaction between GAL4/VP16
FP442 and the ADA5
transcriptional coactivator is accordingly weakened (23).
The weaker interaction observed between GAL4/VP16
FP442 and
-NAC/1.9.2 (Fig. 4), combined with the stimulation of reporter gene
mRNA synthesis and the lack of effect on the half-life of the activator
(Fig. 2B and C, respectively), demonstrates that
-NAC/1.9.2
potentiates GAL4/VP-16-dependent activation at the transcriptional
level and confirms our interpretation that
-NAC/1.9.2 functions as a
transcriptional coactivator.
The
-NAC/1.9.2 protein shares several functional features with the
previously characterized TAF class of transcriptional coactivators. The
coimmunoprecipitation data presented in Fig. 7 raise the question as to
why
-NAC/1.9.2 has not been previously identified as a component of
the multisubunit TFIID complex. The most likely possibility is related
to the fact that we observed nuclear localization of
-NAC/1.9.2 only
when cells were starved and arrested in their cell cycle progression
(Fig. 1). Nuclear extracts are normally prepared from cycling,
serum-fed cells, and the amounts of nuclear
-NAC/1.9.2 complexed to
TBP are probably undetectable under those conditions.
The
-NAC/1.9.2 protein is most abundant in the nucleus of cells
arrested at the G0/G1 border of the cell cycle.
Terminally differentiated cells are postmitotic; however, this does not
mean that they are transcriptionally inactive. Postmitotic neurons, for
example, can respond to a variety of signals by the induction of new
programs of gene expression (30). Thus, the observation that
-NAC/1.9.2 localizes to the nucleus mostly in noncycling cells is
not contradictory to a role in transcriptional regulation. We have
initiated experiments aimed at defining the signalling events involved
in the subcellular distribution of
-NAC/1.9.2.
It is difficult to reconcile the previously proposed role for
-NAC/1.9.2 in the binding of nascent chains as they emerge from the
ribosome (37) with the data presented herein. A similar conflict has recently been described for the yeast TAFII30
gene, Tfg3, which has been shown to be a component of the
SWI/SNF complex as well as the TFIIF and TFIID transcription complexes
(3), but was initially identified as ANC1, a gene
implicated in cytoskeletal function (14).
NAC has been purified as a heterodimeric protein (37). It is
conceivable, although unlikely, that the heterodimeric form of NAC is
implicated in protein translation while the
-NAC/1.9.2 monomer is
implicated in transcriptional control. Indeed, cotransfection of the
CMV-1.9.2 vector with a BTF3b expression vector (kindly supplied by
J.-M. Egly) inhibited the coactivation function of
-NAC/1.9.2 (Fig.
2). This observation is in accord with a recently reported inhibitory
role of yeast BTF3b in the transcription of various yeast genes
(15). Several parameters could modulate the association of
-NAC/1.9.2 with BTF3b. First, we have found evidence of
posttranslational modification of the protein in the form of variable
phosphorylation (not shown). Second, the subcellular localization of
-NAC/1.9.2 is modulated during the cell cycle (Fig. 1), suggesting
that
-NAC/1.9.2 may only be available to interact with BTF3b during
certain phases of the cycle. Finally, we have observed that the levels
of
-NAC/1.9.2 mRNA are far more abundant than the levels of BTF3b
transcripts in bone cells (not shown). Thus, the possible
stoichiometric excess of
-NAC/1.9.2 over BTF3b may leave a
proportion of
-NAC/1.9.2 molecules unassociated with BTF3b and able
to exert its coactivation function. Additional work will be required to
reconcile the transcriptional and putative translational regulatory
activities of
-NAC/1.9.2.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
W.V.Y. and A.M. participated equally in this study and should
both be considered first authors.
We express our gratitude to the following investigators for their
generous gift of plasmids or reagents: Michael Green (5Gal4-E1b-CAT), Mark Ptashne (pSGVP), James T. Kadonaga (purified GAL4/VP-16 fusion protein), Robert Tjian (pSV6tkCAT), Jean-Marc Egly (BTF3b), and Steven
J. Triezenberg (GAL4/VP16
FP442). We thank Edwin Wan for oligonucleotide synthesis and Jane Wishart and Mark Lepik for preparing
the figures.
This work was supported by a grant from the Shriners of North America.
W.V.Y. was a Shriners' Fellow, and R.S.-A. is a Chercheur-Boursier from the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Genetics Unit,
Shriners Hospital, 1529 Cedar Ave., Montréal, Québec H3G
1A6, Canada. Phone: (514) 842-5964. Fax: (514) 842-5581. E-mail:
rst-arnaud{at}shriners.mcgill.ca.
Present address: Centre de cancérologie Charles Bruneau,
Hôpital Ste-Justine, Montréal, Québec H3T 1C5,
Canada.
Present address: Laboratoire de génétique
moléculaire, Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal,
Montréal, Québec H2W 1R7, Canada.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Berger, S. L.,
W. D. Cress,
A. Cress,
S. J. Triezenberg, and L. Guarente.
1990.
Selective inhibition of activated but not basal transcription by the acidic activation domain of VP16: evidence for transcriptional adaptors.
Cell
61:1199-1208[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Brownell, J. E.,
J. Zhou,
T. Ranalli,
R. Kobayashi,
D. G. Edmondson,
S. Y. Roth, and C. D. Allis.
1996.
Tetrahymena histone acetyltransferase A: a homolog to yeast Gcn5p linking histone acetylation to gene activation.
Cell
84:843-851[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Cairns, B. R.,
N. L. Henry, and R. D. Kornberg.
1996.
TFG3/TAF30/ANC1, a component of the yeast SWI/SNF complex that is similar to the leukemogenic proteins ENL and AF-9.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:3308-3316[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Chen, J.-L.,
L. D. Attardi,
C. P. Verrijzer,
K. Yokomori, and R. Tjian.
1994.
Assembly of recombinant TFIID reveals differential coactivator requirements for distinct transcriptional activators.
Cell
79:93-105[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Cress, W. D., and S. J. Triezenberg.
1991.
Critical structural elements of the VP16 transcriptional activation domain.
Science
251:87-90[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Damania, B., and J. C. Alwine.
1996.
TAF-like function of SV40 large T antigen.
Genes Dev.
10:1369-1381[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Dignam, J. D.,
R. M. Lebovitz, and R. G. Roeder.
1983.
Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei.
Nucleic Acids Res.
11:1475-1489[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Dikstein, R.,
S. Ruppert, and R. Tjian.
1996.
TAFII250 is a bipartite protein kinase that phosphorylates the basal transcription factor RAP74.
Cell
84:781-790[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Dynlacht, B. D.,
T. Hoey, and R. Tjian.
1991.
Isolation of coactivators associated with the TATA-binding protein that mediate transcriptional activation.
Cell
66:563-576[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Ecarot-Charrier, B.,
F. H. Glorieux,
M. van der Rest, and G. Pereira.
1983.
Osteoblasts isolated from mouse calvaria initiate matrix mineralization in culture.
J. Cell Biol.
96:639-643[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Gallagher, S.,
S. E. Winston,
S. A. Fuller, and J. G. R. Hurrell.
1993.
Immunoblotting and immunodetection, p. 10.8.1-10.8.17. In
F. M. Ausubel, R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl (ed.), Current protocols in molecular biology.
John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
|
| 12.
|
Goodrich, J. A.,
G. Cutler, and R. Tjian.
1996.
Contacts in context: promoter specificity and macromolecular interactions in transcription.
Cell
84:825-830[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Guarente, L.
1995.
Transcriptional coactivators in yeast and beyond.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
20:517-521[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Henry, N. L.,
A. M. Campbell,
W. J. Feaver,
D. Poon,
P. A. Weil, and R. D. Kornberg.
1994.
TFIIF-TAF-RNA polymerase II connection.
Genes Dev.
8:2868-2878[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Hu, G.-Z., and H. Ronne.
1994.
Yeast BTF3 protein is encoded by duplicated genes and inhibits the expression of some genes in vivo.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:2740-2743[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Ingles, C. J.,
M. Shales,
W. D. Cress,
S. J. Triezenberg, and J. Greenblatt.
1991.
Reduced binding of TFIID to transcriptionally compromised mutants of VP16.
Nature
351:588-590[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Inostroza, J. A.,
F. H. Mermelstein,
I. Ha,
W. S. Lane, and D. Reinberg.
1992.
Dr1, a TATA-binding protein-associated phosphoprotein and inhibitor of class II gene transcription.
Cell
70:477-489[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Klages, N., and M. Strubin.
1995.
Stimulation of RNA polymerase II transcription initiation by recruitment of TBP in vivo.
Nature
374:822-823[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Liang, P., and A. B. Pardee.
1992.
Differential display of eukaryotic messenger RNA by means of the polymerase chain reaction.
Science
257:967-971[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Lillie, J. W., and M. R. Green.
1989.
Transcription activation by the adenovirus E1a protein.
Nature
338:39-44[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Lin, Y.-S., and M. R. Green.
1991.
Mechanism of action of an acidic transcriptional activator in vitro.
Cell
64:971-981[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Maheswaran, S.,
C. Inglert,
P. Bennett,
G. Heinrich, and D. A. Haber.
1995.
The WT1 gene product stabilizes p53 and inhibits p53-mediated apoptosis.
Genes Dev.
9:2143-2156[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Marcus, G. A.,
J. Horiuchi,
N. Silverman, and L. Guarente.
1996.
ADA5/SPT20 links the ADA and SPT genes, which are involved in yeast transcription.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:3197-3205[Abstract].
|
| 24.
|
McBurney, M. W.
1993.
P19 embryonal carcinoma cells.
Int. J. Dev. Biol.
37:135-140[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Moqtaderi, Z.,
Y. Bai,
D. Poon,
P. A. Weil, and K. Struhl.
1996.
TBP-associated factors are not generally required for transcriptional activation in yeast.
Nature
383:188-191[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Sadowski, I.,
J. Ma,
S. Triezenberg, and M. Ptashne.
1988.
GAL4-VP16 is an unusually potent transcriptional activator.
Nature
335:563-564[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Sadowski, I., and M. Ptashne.
1989.
A vector for expressing GAL4(1-147) fusions in mammalian cells.
Nucleic Acids Res.
17:7539[Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 29.
|
Sauer, F.,
D. A. Wassarman,
G. M. Rubin, and R. Tjian.
1996.
TAFIIs mediate activation of transcription in the Drosophila embryo.
Cell
87:1271-1284[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Sheng, M., and M. E. Greenberg.
1990.
The regulation and function of c-fos and other immediate early genes in the nervous system.
Neuron
4:477-485[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
St-Arnaud, R., and J. M. Moir.
1993.
Wnt-1-inducing factor-1: a novel G/C box-binding transcription factor regulating the expression of Wnt-1 during neuroectodermal differentiation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:1590-1598[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Sudo, H.,
H.-A. Kodama,
Y. Amagai,
S. Yamamoto, and S. Kasai.
1983.
In vitro differentiation and calcification in a new clonal osteogenic cell line derived from newborn mouse calvaria.
J. Cell Biol.
96:191-198[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Tansey, W. P., and W. Herr.
1997.
TAFs: guilt by association?
Cell
88:729-732[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Verrijzer, C. P.,
K. Yokomori,
J.-L. Chen, and R. Tjian.
1994.
Drosophila TAFII150: similarity to yeast gene TSM-1 and specific binding to core promoter DNA.
Science
264:933-941[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Walker, S. S.,
J. C. Reese,
L. M. Apone, and M. R. Green.
1996.
Transcription activation in cells lacking TAFIIs.
Nature
383:185-188[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Watkins, S.
1989.
Immunohistochemistry, p. 14.6.1-14.6.13. In
F. M. Ausubel, R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl (ed.), Current protocols in molecular biology.
John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
|
| 37.
|
Wiedmann, B.,
H. Sakai,
T. A. Davis, and M. Wiedmann.
1994.
A protein complex required for signal-sequence-specific sorting and translocation.
Nature
370:434-440[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Yotov, W. V., and R. St-Arnaud.
1996.
Differential splicing-in of a proline-rich exon converts NAC into a muscle-specific transcription factor.
Genes Dev.
10:1763-1772[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Zheng, X. M.,
D. Black,
P. Chambon, and J. M. Egly.
1990.
Sequencing and expression of complementary DNA for the general transcription factor BTF3.
Nature
344:556-559[Medline].
|
Mol Cell Biol, March 1998, p. 1303-1311, Vol. 18, No. 3
0270-7306/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Jiang, Y., Yang, B., Harris, N. S., Deyholos, M. K.
(2007). Comparative proteomic analysis of NaCl stress-responsive proteins in Arabidopsis roots. J Exp Bot
0: erm207v1-erm207
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yu, V. W.C., Ambartsoumian, G., Verlinden, L., Moir, J. M., Prud'homme, J., Gauthier, C., Roughley, P. J., St-Arnaud, R.
(2005). FIAT represses ATF4-mediated transcription to regulate bone mass in transgenic mice. JCB
169: 591-601
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Akhouayri, O., Quelo, I., St-Arnaud, R.
(2005). Sequence-Specific DNA Binding by the {alpha}NAC Coactivator Is Required for Potentiation of c-Jun-Dependent Transcription of the Osteocalcin Gene. Mol. Cell. Biol.
25: 3452-3460
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yoshida, K., Nogami, S., Satoh, S., Tanaka-Nakadate, S., Hiraishi, H., Terano, A., Shirataki, H.
(2005). Interaction of the taxilin family with the nascent polypeptide-associated complex that is involved in the transcriptional and translational processes. GENES CELLS
10: 465-476
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Spreter, T., Pech, M., Beatrix, B.
(2005). The Crystal Structure of Archaeal Nascent Polypeptide-associated Complex (NAC) Reveals a Unique Fold and the Presence of a Ubiquitin-associated Domain. J. Biol. Chem.
280: 15849-15854
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lopez, S., Stuhl, L., Fichelson, S., Dubart-Kupperschmitt, A., St Arnaud, R., Galindo, J.-R., Murati, A., Berda, N., Dubreuil, P., Gomez, S.
(2005). NACA is a positive regulator of human erythroid-cell differentiation. J. Cell Sci.
118: 1595-1605
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Quelo, I., Gauthier, C., Hannigan, G. E., Dedhar, S., St-Arnaud, R.
(2004). Integrin-linked Kinase Regulates the Nuclear Entry of the c-Jun Coactivator {alpha}-NAC and Its Coactivation Potency. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 43893-43899
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Goatley, L. C., Twigg, S. R. F., Miskin, J. E., Monaghan, P., St-Arnaud, R., Smith, G. L., Dixon, L. K.
(2002). The African Swine Fever Virus Protein j4R Binds to the Alpha Chain of Nascent Polypeptide-Associated Complex. J. Virol.
76: 9991-9999
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Franke, J., Reimann, B., Hartmann, E., Kohler, M., Wiedmann, B.
(2002). Evidence for a nuclear passage of nascent polypeptide-associated complex subunits in yeast. J. Cell Sci.
114: 2641-2648
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Akasaka, T., Ueda, C., Kurata, M., Akasaka, H., Yamabe, H., Uchiyama, T., Ohno, H.
(2000). Nonimmunoglobulin (non-Ig)/BCL6 gene fusion in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma results in worse prognosis than Ig/BCL6. Blood
96: 2907-2909
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Baghdoyan, S., Dubreuil, P., Eberle, F., Gomez, S.
(2000). Capture of cytokine-responsive genes (NACA and RBM3) using a gene trap approach. Blood
95: 3750-3757
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Akasaka, H., Akasaka, T., Kurata, M., Ueda, C., Shimizu, A., Uchiyama, T., Ohno, H.
(2000). Molecular Anatomy of BCL6 Translocations Revealed by Long-Distance Polymerase Chain Reaction-based Assays. Cancer Res.
60: 2335-2341
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Fünfschilling, U., Rospert, S.
(1999). Nascent Polypeptide-associated Complex Stimulates Protein Import into Yeast Mitochondria. Mol. Biol. Cell
10: 3289-3299
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cosper, N. J., Stalhandske, C. M. V., Iwasaki, H., Oshima, T., Scott, R. A., Iwasaki, T.
(1999). Structural Conservation of the Isolated Zinc Site in Archaeal Zinc-containing Ferredoxins as Revealed by X-ray Absorption Spectroscopic Analysis and Its Evolutionary Implications. J. Biol. Chem.
274: 23160-23168
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Makarova, K. S., Aravind, L., Galperin, M. Y., Grishin, N. V., Tatusov, R. L., Wolf, Y. I., Koonin, E. V.
(1999). Comparative Genomics of the Archaea (Euryarchaeota): Evolution of Conserved Protein Families, the Stable Core, and the Variable Shell. Genome Res
9: 608-628
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Moreau, A., Yotov, W. V., Glorieux, F. H., St-Arnaud, R.
(1998). Bone-Specific Expression of the Alpha Chain of the Nascent Polypeptide-Associated Complex, a Coactivator Potentiating c-Jun-Mediated Transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol.
18: 1312-1321
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Iborra, F. J., Jackson, D. A., Cook, P. R.
(2001). Coupled Transcription and Translation Within Nuclei of Mammalian Cells. Science
293: 1139-1142
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Beatrix, B., Sakai, H., Wiedmann, M.
(2000). The alpha and beta Subunit of the Nascent Polypeptide-associated Complex Have Distinct Functions. J. Biol. Chem.
275: 37838-37845
[Abstract]
[Full Text]