Previous Article | Next Article 
Mol Cell Biol, April 1998, p. 2108-2117, Vol. 18, No. 4
0270-7306/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Interleukin-6-Specific Activation of the C/EBP
Gene in Hepatocytes Is Mediated by Stat3 and Sp1
Carrie A.
Cantwell,
Esta
Sterneck, and
Peter F.
Johnson*
Eukaryotic Transcriptional Regulation Group,
ABL-Basic Research Program, NCI-Frederick Cancer Research and
Development Center, Frederick, Maryland 21702-1201
Received 15 July 1997/Returned for modification 3 September
1997/Accepted 9 January 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
C/EBP
(CCAAT/enhancer binding protein
) has been implicated
as a regulator of acute-phase response (APR) genes in hepatocytes. Its
expression increases dramatically in liver during the APR and can be
induced in hepatic cell lines by interleukin-6 (IL-6), an acute-phase
mediator that activates transcription of many APR genes. Here we have
investigated the mechanism by which C/EBP
expression is regulated by
IL-6 in hepatoma cells. C/EBP
promoter sequences to
125 bp are
sufficient for IL-6 inducibility of a reporter gene and include an APR
element (APRE) that is essential for IL-6 responsiveness. DNA binding
experiments and transactivation assays demonstrate that Stat3, but not
Stat1, interacts with this APRE. Two Sp1 sites, one of which is
adjacent to the APRE, are required for IL-6 induction and
transactivation by Stat3. Thus, Stat3 and Sp1 function cooperatively to
activate the C/EBP
promoter. Replacement of the APRE with Stat
binding elements (SBEs) from the ICAM-1 or C/EBP
promoter, both of
which recognize both Stat1 and Stat3, confers responsiveness to gamma
interferon, a cytokine that selectively activates Stat1. Sequence
comparisons suggest that the distinct Stat binding specificities of the
C/EBP
and C/EBP
SBEs are determined primarily by a single base
pair difference. Our findings indicate that the cytokine specificity of
C/EBP
gene expression is governed by the APRE sequence.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Inflammation is a physiological
response to tissue injury, trauma, or infection and consists of a
systemic reaction to combat further tissue damage, destroy infective
organisms, and activate repair processes. The early stage of
inflammation, during which metabolic and catabolic changes occur in
many organs, is known as the acute-phase response (APR). The APR is
characterized by changes in the levels of several serum acute-phase
(AP) proteins, which are synthesized primarily in the liver. Serum
concentrations of some AP proteins increase as much as 1,000-fold
several hours after onset of the APR (44). Activation of AP
genes in hepatocytes is triggered by several inflammatory signals,
including interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-1, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and
gamma interferon (IFN-
) (reviewed in references
29 and 34). Of the numerous cytokines and growth factors that are involved in the upregulation of
AP gene expression, IL-6 is considered to be the major mediator. This
conclusion is supported by (i) a correlation between increased serum
IL-6 levels and changes in AP gene expression during the inflammatory
response, (ii) the large number of AP proteins synthesized in response
to IL-6, and (iii) the observation that the APR is impaired in mice
lacking IL-6 (29).
A number of AP gene promoters have been characterized and shown to
contain cis-acting elements that mediate responsiveness to
IL-1, IL-6, or both. A small number of AP genes respond only to IL-1
and contain sequences that interact with the NF-
B family of
transcription factors. The majority of AP genes are activated by the
IL-6-type cytokines and are controlled by IL-6 responsive elements
(IL-6REs). The IL-6REs can be classified into two groups. The first are
recognized by members of the Stat (signal transducer and activator of
transcription) family of transcription factors and conform to the
consensus sequence TT(C/A)C(T/G)G(G/T)AA (15, 18, 47). These
sequences, also called APR elements (APREs), bind Stat3 (originally
designated APRF) in nuclear extracts from IL-6-treated hepatocytes
(1, 47, 52). Many APREs also bind Stat1, which is activated
by IL-6, IFN-
, and a variety of other cytokines (14).
The second group of IL-6REs is recognized by the C/EBP subfamily of
basis leucine zipper transcriptional activators and conform to the
consensus sequence (A/T)(G/A)T(G/T)(A/G)NGNAA (34). Three closely related members of the C/EBP family, C/EBP
, C/EBP
, and C/EBP
, are differentially expressed in multiple tissues during the
APR. Upon induction of the APR by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) administration in mice, the mRNA levels of C/EBP
decrease in liver,
lung, and fat. However, C/EBP
expression increases in tissues such
as the spleen, fat, heart, and kidney, and C/EBP
mRNA levels are
dramatically induced in the liver, kidney, spleen, heart, and brain
(2). Several lines of evidence implicate C/EBP
as the
most important member of the C/EBP family in activating transcription
of APR genes. For example, in an experimental AP model in rabbits,
C/EBP
is the major induced DNA binding activity in liver extracts
that binds to a critical cis-regulatory site in the serum
amyloid A gene promoter (37). C/EBP
mRNA is also rapidly
induced by IL-6 in human hepatoma Hep3B cells and is the predominant
IL-6-induced protein interacting with C/EBP sites in the promoters for
complement C3 (23), hemopexin, haptoglobin, and C-reactive
protein (36).
Based on these and other data, it has been proposed that both C/EBP
and C/EBP
contribute to AP gene induction in hepatocytes. However,
the two C/EBP proteins are activated by different mechanisms. C/EBP
is constitutively expressed in adult hepatocytes and appears to be
activated mainly by posttranslational modification in response to
mediators such as IL-6 (35). By contrast, expression of
C/EBP
mRNA and protein is negligible in normal liver tissue but is
markedly upregulated by IL-6 during the APR (2, 36, 37).
Despite this dramatic induction in the liver, however, little is known about the molecular mechanisms involved. Therefore, we have begun to
investigate the molecular control of C/EBP
gene transcription. Here
we describe an analysis of the C/EBP
promoter and the identification of cis-acting elements and cognate factors that regulate
C/EBP
expression in hepatic cells.
(Some of the research reported in this paper was originally published
in the master's degree thesis of Carrie A. Cantwell, sponsored by the
Department of Biomedical Science, Hood College, Frederick, Md.)
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cloning and sequencing of the C/EBP
promoter region.
The
C/EBP
promoter region was obtained from a mouse (B6/CBA hybrid)
partial Sau3AI genomic library in Lambda FIX II (Stratagene) as previously described (48). A 650-bp SmaI
fragment spanning the C/EBP
coding and promoter regions was
subcloned into pBlueScript (pBS) and sequenced by the dideoxy method,
using a commercial kit (U.S. Biochemicals). Additional sequences were
obtained by using specific primers (primer walking). The DNA used to
generate the C/EBP
promoter-reporter plasmids was cloned from a
mouse (129SV strain) partial Sau3AI genomic library in
Lambda FIX II (Stratagene). The sequence from
127 to +12 of the 129SV
allele was found to be identical to that from the B6/CBA strain.
C/EBP
promoter-reporter constructs.
Unique restriction
sites within the C/EBP
promoter region were used to generate a set
of progressive 5' deletion mutants. PCR was used to introduce a
BamHI site at position +12 relative to the C/EBP
transcription start site. A region between a unique SpeI
site at
322 bp and the +12-bp endpoint was amplified by using the
primers p3.22 (+12 primer; 5'-GCCGTCGGATCCTTGGGCTGTCACCTC-3') and p3.21 (SpeI primer;
5'-GACGGCTCTAGAGAACTGTTCTTGTAT-3'). The PCR product was
digested with SpeI and BamHI and used for
subsequent cloning steps.
(
729)-Luc.
A unique ScaI site at ~730 bp and
the SpeI site at
322 bp were used to generate an ~400-bp
fragment. This fragment, together with the
SpeI-BamHI PCR fragment, was inserted in a
three-way ligation into pBS digested with BamHI and
EcoRV. A SalI-BamHI fragment was then
released from this plasmid and inserted into the luciferase vector pXP2
(31), which had been digested with SalI and
BglII.
(
322)-Luc.
The SpeI-BamHI fragment
described above was inserted into pBS. This plasmid was digested with
SacI and BamHI to release a 334-bp fragment,
which was then cloned into pXP2 digested with SacI and
BglII.
Additional 5' deletion mutants [(
127)-Luc, (
81)-Luc, and
(
36)-Luc] were generated by PCR, using 5' primers that defined the
deletion endpoint and introduced a SalI site for subsequent cloning steps. The 3' primer was p3.22 and the 5' primers were
127
(5'-GACGGCGTCGACGGGCAGAGGGCGGGTCGTTCCCAGCAGC-ACCCCAG-3'),
81 (5'-GACGGCGTCGACTCCGGTCTCCGACCCACTGGGGCCGGGG-3'),
and
36 (5'-GACGGCGTCGACCTGGGGCTAGAAAAGGCGGCGGTCCGGC-3').
The PCR products were digested with SalI and
BamHI and ligated into pXP2 digested with SalI
and BglII. The sequences of all deletions and point mutants
were confirmed by dideoxy sequencing.
Point mutations were introduced into putative transcription factor
binding sites by using PCR mutagenesis.
APREm-Luc and Sp1(
117)m-Luc.
PCR
was performed with 5' mutagenic primers that introduce SalI
at
127 bp and mutate the APRE or
117 Sp1 site. The 3' primer was
p3.22, and the mutagenic primers were APREm
(5'-GACGGCGTCGACGGGCAGAGGGCGGGTCGTGTTTCACAGC-ACCCCAG-3') and Sp1(
117)m
(5'-GACGGCGTCGACGGGCAGAGAAGAAGTCGTTCCCAGCAGCACCCCAG-3'). The PCR products were digested with SalI and BamHI
and ligated into pXP2 digested with SalI and
BglII.
Sp1(
53)m-Luc.
This mutant was generated by two
rounds of PCR amplification, using the four-primer mutagenesis
procedure (19, 20). Reaction 1 used a 5' mutagenic primer
(21731; 5'-ACTGGGGCCGGAAGAAGGCGTGCG-3') to mutate the Sp1
site at
53 bp and the 3' primer p3.22. Reaction 2 used the 5' primer
127 and a 3' mutagenic primer (21732;
5'-CGCACGCCTTCTTCCGGCCCCAGT-3'). The PCR products from
reactions 1 and 2 were mixed and used as the template in a second round
of amplification using the
127 and p3.22 primers. The 139-bp product
was digested with SalI and BamHI and cloned into
pXP2 digested with SalI and BglII.
Sp1(
117/
53)m-Luc and
APREm/Sp1(
53)m-Luc.
The
Sp1(
53)m mutant was used as a template for PCR
amplification using Sp1(
117)m or APREm as the
5' primers and p3.22 as the 3' primer. The ~139-bp products were
digested with SalI and BamHI and cloned into pXP2
digested with SalI and BglII (BamHI at
+12).
Artificial promoter constructs.
Double-stranded
oligonucleotides containing either the C/EBP
or
2-macroglobulin (
2-m) APREs were
concatenated and inserted upstream of the thymidine kinase (TK)
promoter fused to luciferase (TK-Luc, which consists of pXP2 containing
the TK promoter truncated to position
81 [31]). The
oligonucleotides were designed to contain
XhoI-SalI or BamHI-BglII
ends to allow directional multimerization and cloning into the
luciferase vector. Oligonucleotides used to generate
(
APRE)1-TK-Luc and (
APRE)4-TK-Luc were
C/EBP
APRE top strand (5'-TCGACTCGTTCCCAGCAGCAC-3') and
C/EBP
APRE bottom strand (5'-TCGAGTGCTGCTGGGAACGAG-3').
Oligonucleotides used to construct
(
2-m)6-TK-Luc were
2-m APRE
top strand (5'-GATCCTTCTGGGAATTCCTA-3') and
2-m APRE bottom strand
(5'-GATCTAGGAATTCCCAGAAG-3').
APRE replacement mutants.
Constructs in which Stat binding
elements (SBEs) from C/EBP
or ICAM-1 were used to replace the
C/EBP
APRE [designated (
127)
-(C/EBP
)-Luc and
(
127)
-(ICAM)-Luc, respectively] were generated by PCR
mutagenesis. Primer A1829
(5'-GACGGCGTCGACGGGCAGAGGGCGGGTCTTTCCCAGAAG-CACCCCAG-3'), which changes the C/EBP
APRE to the C/EBP
Stat site, or
primer A1830
(5'-GACGGCGTCGACGGGCAGAGGGCGGGTCTTTCCCGGAAA-CACCCCAG-3'), which
converts the C/EBP
APRE to the ICAM SBE, was used with primer p3.22
to amplify the region between
127 and +12. The 139-bp products were
digested with SalI and BamHI and ligated into
pXP2 digested with SalI and BglII.
Stat expression vectors.
Expression vectors for Stat1
(5) and Stat3 (38) were kindly provided by David
E. Levy (New York University School of Medicine, New York, N.Y.).
Cell culture and transfection.
The human hepatoma cell lines
Hep3B and HepG2 were obtained from the American Type Culture
Collection. The cells were maintained in minimum essential Eagle's
medium (EMEM; BioWhittaker) supplemented with nonessential amino acids,
sodium pyruvate, and 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone Laboratories,
Inc.) in the presence of kanamycin, streptomycin, and penicillin
(complete medium) at 5% CO2. Hep3B cells were plated at
2 × 105 cells/6-cm-diameter dish 24 h before
transfection. One hour prior to transfection, the cells were fed with 3 ml of fresh medium. Transfections were performed by the Lipofectamine
procedure (Gibco-BRL). For each dish, 2 µg of reporter plasmid and
0.25 µg of pRSV
-gal (6) were combined with OptiMEM I
(Gibco-BRL) in a total volume of 300 µl. For cotransfection with the
Stat expression plasmids; 0.4 µg of the vector DNA was included in
the transfection. In a separate tube, 10 µl of Lipofectamine reagent
was mixed with 290 µl of OptiMEM I. The two mixtures were combined
and incubated at room temperature for 30 min, after which the cells
were washed with OptiMEM I. Then 2.4 ml of OptiMEM I was added to the
DNA-Lipofectamine, and the mixture was applied to the cells. The cells
were incubated for 4.5 h at 37°C, washed with unsupplemented
EMEM and fed with 3 ml of complete medium. Cells were incubated an
additional 24 h, washed with OptiMEM I, fed with 3 ml of OptiMEM
I, and incubated 16 to 18 h before IL-6 was added.
Cytokine treatments.
Recombinant human IL-6 (Peprotech) was
resuspended in water and added at a final concentration of 100 ng/ml
4 h before harvest (for transfection assays) or 15 min prior to
harvest (for nuclear extracts). Human IFN-
, a gift from Daniel W. McVicar (National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Md.), was added at 500 U/ml for 4 h.
Luciferase and
-galactosidase assays.
Transfected cells
were harvested for luciferase assays as follows. Plates were washed
twice with 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and 150 µl of
detergent lysis solution (100 mM potassium phosphate [pH 7.8], 0.2%
Triton X-100, 1 mM dithiothreitol [DTT]; Clontech Laboratories, Inc.)
was added per plate and incubated at room temperature for 5 to 10 min.
Lysates were scraped into microcentrifuge tubes and centrifuged at
16,000 × g for 2 min. To perform luciferase assays,
100 µl of substrate A (Analytical Luminescence Laboratory) was placed
in a cuvette, and 50 µl of cell extract was added, followed by 100 µl of substrate B. A tube luminometer (Monolight 2010 instrument;
Analytical Luminescence Laboratory) was used to record the light
emissions from the expressed luciferase at 10-s intervals. Background
reading was determined by measuring cell lysate from mock-transfected
cells from two independent dishes.
-Galactosidase activity, which
was used as an internal standard for transfection efficiency, was
assayed according to the protocol for Luminescent
-galactosidase
Genetic Reporter System II (Clontech Laboratories). The tube
luminometer was used to record the light emissions from the cleaved
galactoside at 5-s intervals. The linear range of the assay was
determined for each individual experiment by assaying 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 µl of a cell lysate from pRSV
-gal-transfected cells.
Background activity was determined by assaying mock-transfected cell
lysates from two independent dishes.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) and supershift
assays.
Nuclear extracts for Stat binding assays were prepared as
follows. HepG2 cells were seeded at 2 × 106 per
150-mm-diameter dish and allowed to grow for 72 h. The cells were
then washed with OptiMEM I, fed with 20 ml of OptiMEM I, and incubated
for an additional 24 h. Human IL-6 was added at 100 ng/ml for 15 min. Extracts were prepared essentially as described by Sadowski and
Gilman (39). The cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS
and once with ice-cold PBS containing 1 mM
Na3VO4 and 5 mM NaF. Cells were then washed
with hypotonic buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 20 mM NaF, 1 mM
Na3VO4, 1 mM
Na4P2O7, 0.125 µM okadaic acid, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 µg of leupeptin per ml, 1 µg of aprotinin per ml, 1 µg of
pepstatin per ml), and 300 µl of hypotonic buffer containing 0.2%
Nonidet P-40 was added. Lysates were scraped into microcentrifuge tubes, and the nuclei were pelleted by centrifugation at 16,000 × g for 20 s at 4°C. The supernatant was removed, and
the pellet was resuspended in 60 µl of high-salt buffer (420 mM NaCl,
20% glycerol, 20 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM
Na4P2O7, 0.125 µM okadaic acid, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 µg of leupeptin per ml, 1 µg of aprotinin per ml, 1 µg of
pepstatin per ml) and gently rocked at 4°C for 30 min. Nuclear debris
was removed by centrifugation at 16,000 × g and 4°C
for 20 min. The extracts were aliquoted and stored at
70°C.
Nuclear extracts to analyze Sp1 binding were prepared essentially as
described previously (
16). Nuclei were prepared from
HepG2
cells as described above and resuspended in nuclear lysis
buffer (10 mM
HEPES [pH 7.9], 100 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl
2, 0.1 mM EDTA,
1 mM
DTT, 10% glycerol) supplemented with the phosphatase and
protease
inhibitors indicated above; 1/10 volume of 4 M
(NH
4)
2SO
4 was then added, and the
nuclei were rocked at 4°C for 30 min.
Samples were centrifuged at
4°C and 14,000 ×
g for 15 min, and
the supernatants
were aliquoted and stored at

70°C. Recombinant
human Sp1 was
obtained from Promega.
Binding reactions for EMSAs experiments were as follows. Eight
micrograms (unless otherwise indicated) of nuclear protein
was mixed
with 4 µl of 5× binding buffer (65 mM HEPES [pH 7.9],
0.75 mM
EDTA, 40% glycerol, 0.1% Nonidet P-40 [
39]), 1 µg
of
poly(dI-dC) (Pharmacia Biotechnologies), 1 mM DTT, 0.06%
bromophenol
blue, and approximately 50,000 cpm (~0.2 ng) of
32P-labeled probe in a total volume of 20 µl. The binding
reactions
shown in Fig.
7B included 10 µg of bovine serum albumin.
The reaction
mixtures were incubated at room temperature for 20 min,
and 10
µl was loaded onto a 4% polyacrylamide gel in 0.25×
Tris-borate-EDTA.
Samples were separated by electrophoresis at 10 V/cm
for approximately
2 h, transferred to 3MM paper (Whatman), dried
under vacuum, and
exposed to X-ray film. For competition binding
assays, unlabeled
oligonucleotides were added to the reaction in 10×,
30×, and 100×
molar excess and incubated at room temperature for 5 min prior
to addition of the probe. For supershift experiments, the
antibodies
(1 to 2 µg) were added to the reaction mixtures, which
were then
incubated at 4°C for 1 h prior to addition of probe.
The following
antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology,
Inc.:
Stat1 p84/p91 (E-23), Stat3 (C-20), Sp1 (PEP2), and normal rabbit
immunoglobulin G (normal rabbit serum [NRS]). A second Stat1 antibody
(Stat1

p91), which was used in the experiment shown in Fig.
10A,
was
obtained from Chengrong Yu (NCI-Frederick Cancer Research
and
Development Center, Frederick, Md.).
The oligonucleotides used as EMSA probes were annealed and gel purified
prior to labeling. The sequences of the upper strands
of the
oligonucleotides used were as follows:
2-m,
5'-GATCCTTCTGGGAATTCCTA;

APRE,
5'-TCGACTCGTTCCCAGCAGCAC;

APRE
m,
5'-TCGACTCGTGTTTCACAGCAC;

APRE/Sp1,
5'-TCGACCAGAGGGCGGGTCGTTCCCAGCAGCACCC;
and C/EBP

Stat,
5'-GGGCATCTGTTTCCCAGAAGTTG. Double-stranded oligonucleotides
containing 5' overhanging ends (
2-m,
BamHI/
BglII;

APRE,

APRE
m, and

APRE/Sp1,
XhoI/
SalI; C/EBP

SBE, GGG) were
labeled with
Klenow polymerase and

[
32P]-dCTP.
RNA preparation and Northern blot analysis.
Hep3B and HepG2
cells were grown until approximately 75% confluent. Human IL-6 (100 ng/ml) or IFN-
(500 U/ml) was added for various time intervals, and
cells were harvested for RNA. For cycloheximide inhibition experiments,
the drug was resuspended in water and used at a final concentration of
100 µg/ml. For RNA preparation, the cells were washed twice with cold
PBS, scraped into PBS, transferred to a microcentrifuge tube, and
collected by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 5 min.
RNA preparation, electrophoresis, and blotting was performed
essentially as described previously (11, 45).
DNA fragments used as probes for Northern blotting were labeled with
[

-
32P]dCTP, using the Prime-It II kit (Stratagene).
The C/EBP

probe
was a
HinfI-
XhoI fragment
corresponding to the 3' untranslated
region from a human C/EBP

cDNA
clone (T69326; Research Genetics,
part of the IMAGE Consortium). The
human C/EBP

(NF-IL6) probe
was a
PstI-
EcoRI
fragment from a cDNA clone (kindly provided by
David Ron, New York
University Medical Center, New York, N.Y.).
The c-Fos probe fragment
was obtained from a cDNA clone (
40).
The cyclophilin probe
was isolated as an
EcoRI-
HindIII fragment
from plasmid pEMBL-cyclophilin (
13).
 |
RESULTS |
IL-6-specific induction of C/EBP
expression in hepatoma
cells.
RNA was harvested over a time course from IL-6- or
IFN-
-stimulated Hep3B or HepG2 hepatoma cells, and C/EBP
expression was analyzed by Northern blotting (Fig.
1A). C/EBP
transcripts were weakly
expressed in untreated cells but were highly induced within 1 h of
IL-6 treatment in both cell lines. The elevated level of C/EBP
expression was maintained for at least 8 h. C/EBP
was induced
much less efficiently and with delayed kinetics by another proinflammatory cytokine, IFN-
. In contrast, C/EBP
mRNA
expression was only weakly stimulated by IL-6 but was more strongly
activated by IFN-
. Thus, the data show that C/EBP
, but not
C/EBP
, mRNA levels increase in response to IL-6 in hepatic cells
(confirming previous observations [36]) and that
C/EBP
and C/EBP
respond differentially to IL-6 and IFN-
.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Induction of C/EBP and C/EBP mRNAs by IL-6 or
IFN- in hepatoma cell lines. (A) Northern blot analysis of 20 µg
of total RNA from Hep3B or HepG2 cells cells treated with IL-6 or
IFN- for the indicated times. Duplicate blots were hybridized with
C/EBP or C/EBP probes and then with cyclophilin. (B) Northern
blotting analysis of 20 µg of total RNAs from control Hep3B cells
(lane 1), cells treated with cycloheximide (CHX) for 30, 60, and 120 min (lanes 2 to 4), and cells pretreated with cycloheximide for 30, 60, and 120 min followed by the addition of IL-6 for 2 h (lanes 5 to
7), IL-6 alone for 2 h (lane 8), or cycloheximide and IL-6
concurrently for 2 h (lane 9). The blots were hybridized
sequentially with the indicated probes.
|
|
To determine if the increase in C/EBP

mRNA was due to increased
stability of C/EBP

mRNA, we performed a cycloheximide inhibition
experiment. Unstable messages, such as that of the c-
fos
gene,
are frequently stabilized by protein synthesis inhibitors
(
3),
presumably because proteins required for their
degradation are
labile. We therefore compared C/EBP

and c-Fos mRNA
expression
in Hep3B cells treated with cycloheximide for various times
in
the presence or absence of IL-6 (Fig.
1B). C/EBP

mRNA levels
were
only slightly increased upon the addition of cycloheximide
(lanes 1 to
4). By contrast, IL-6 elicited a much larger induction
(lane 8).
Pretreatment with cycloheximide did not inhibit induction
of C/EBP

expression by IL-6 but rather potentiated it slightly
(lanes 5 to 7).
The blot was reprobed for c-Fos, whose mRNA is
stabilized by
cycloheximide. In contrast to C/EBP

, c-Fos mRNA
levels increased
significantly in response to cycloheximide alone
(middle panel, lanes 1 to 4). Moreover, IL-6 induction of c-Fos
expression was dependent on
mRNA stabilization by cycloheximide
(lanes 5 to 8). These results allow
two conclusions. First, the
fact that cycloheximide alone had only a
modest effect on C/EBP
mRNA levels implies that the message is not
labile, particularly
in comparison to c-Fos mRNA. Second, the
observation that cycloheximide
failed to inhibit activation of C/EBP

expression by IL-6 indicates
that new protein synthesis is not required
for this response.
Although we have not assessed the transcription rate
of the C/EBP
gene directly, these data are consistent with the
notion that
increased expression of C/EBP

mRNA occurs at the
transcriptional
level and involves the activation of a latent
transcription factor(s).
Mapping an IL-6-responsive region in the C/EBP
promoter.
We
next undertook experiments to identify regulatory sequences that
mediate induction of C/EBP
expression by IL-6. Sequences 5' to the
C/EBP
coding region were cloned from a mouse genomic DNA library,
and approximately 750 bp were sequenced (Fig.
2). A set of 5' deletion mutants with
endpoints at
729,
322,
127,
81, and
36 bp relative to the
transcription start site were generated (Fig. 2) and fused to a
luciferase reporter gene. These constructs were transfected transiently
into Hep3B cells, which were subsequently treated with IL-6 and
harvested to assay luciferase activity. Luciferase expression was also
determined in the absence of IL-6 treatment to assess the basal
activity of the promoters.

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
DNA sequence of the murine C/EBP promoter and
identification of several putative regulatory elements. The sequence
extends from a ScaI site at 729 to position +12 relative
to the transcription startsite. Endpoints of 5' deletion mutants are
indicated by brackets at 729, 322, 127, 81, and 36. Sequences
corresponding to potential regulatory sites are boxed. The arrow
denotes the transcription startsite (25).
|
|
Expression from the promoter-reporter constructs is shown in Fig.
3. Basal expression was similar for the

729,

322, and

127 constructs, but deletion to position

81
decreased promoter
activity threefold. Removal of sequences to position

36, immediately
5' to the TATA box, eliminated basal expression
altogether. These
results confirm that the sequences upstream of the
coding region
constitute a functional promoter and identify a segment
between

127 and

36 that directs basal promoter activity. IL-6
treatment
increased expression from the

729,

322, and

127
constructs
approximately threefold. A similar level of induction was
obtained
with a construct containing ~10 kb of 5' flanking DNA (data
not
shown), indicating that distal regulatory sequences do not
contribute
to IL-6-dependent transcription. A significant decrease in
IL-6
inducibility was observed when the promoter was truncated to
position

81, and a similar reduction was seen with the

36 deletion.
These
data indicate that the region between

127 and

81 contains an
IL-6RE.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Identification of an IL-6-responsive region within the
C/EBP promoter. Luciferase reporter constructs containing the
indicated 5' promoter deletions were cotransfected with pRSV -gal
into Hep3B cells. The luciferase data were normalized to
-galactosidase values to control for differences in transfection
efficiencies. The values represent averages ± standard deviations
of three independent experiments. Basal luciferase expression levels
from each construct are shown relative to the value for ( 127)-Luc.
Basal expression from ( 36)-Luc was detectable but was rounded to 0.0. Fold induction represents luciferase activity after IL-6 treatment
relative to the basal level.
|
|
Identification of specific regulatory sites within the C/EBP
promoter.
Since the analysis of deletion mutants indicated the
presence of an IL-6RE between
127 and
81, this region was inspected for known IL-6RE motifs (Fig. 2). The sequence between
100 to
114
closely resembles an APRE, which is recognized by members of the Stat
family of proteins. Other potential transcription factor binding sites
in the proximal promoter region include a cyclic AMP response element
(CRE) at
40 bp and two sequences that match the consensus binding
site for the transcriptional activator Sp1. The first Sp1 site is
located at
53 bp, just 5' to the CRE, and the second is located at
117 bp, immediately 5' to the APRE.
To determine whether any of the aforementioned sites regulate basal or
IL-6-induced transcription, we introduced point mutations
into these
sequences within the context of the

127 deletion (Fig.
4A). The mutant and wild-type (

127)-Luc
plasmids were transfected
into Hep3B cells and tested for IL-6
inducibility. The CRE mutation
did not affect basal expression or IL-6
inducibility (data not
shown), and this site was not investigated
further. However, mutation
of the APRE significantly impaired IL-6
inducibility, as did alteration
of the Sp1 site adjacent to the APRE
[Sp1(

117)]. The Sp1(

53)
m mutation also diminished
IL-6 inducibility, although to a lesser
degree than the other mutants,
while a construct containing mutations
in both Sp1 sites displayed no
IL-6 response. Inactivation of
one or both Sp1 sites also reduced basal
promoter activity. A
construct containing mutations in both the APRE
and the proximal
Sp1 element
[APRE
m/Sp1(

53)
m] was also poorly activated
by IL-6. Thus, induction of C/EBP
promoter activity by IL-6 requires
the APRE and at least one of
the two Sp1 sites.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Analysis of APRE and Sp1 sites. (A) Diagram of
mutations. The mutations were introduced into the APRE at 106 bp and
the Sp1 sites at 117 and 53 bp. The wild-type sequences are
indicated at the top, and the mutated sequences are shown below. The
mutations were incorporated into the ( 127)-Luc deletion construct.
(B) Transient transfection assays of promoter mutants. The indicated
promoter-reporter constructs were cotransfected with pRSV -gal into
Hep3B cells. The luciferase data were normalized to -galactosidase
activity. The values represent the averages of three to six independent
experiments. The relative basal expression and fold induction values
were determined as described in the legend to Fig. 3.
|
|
Identification of factors binding to the putative APRE and Sp1
sites.
We next used the EMSA to identify proteins in IL-6-treated
cell extracts that bind to the C/EBP
APRE and Sp1 sites. HepG2 cells
were used for these experiments because Stat protein binding activity
was reported to be higher in these cells than in Hep3B cells
(50). We first examined whether the formation of Stat protein complexes bound to a probe containing the APRE from rat
2-m (12) could be competed by the C/EBP
APRE. The
2-m APRE has been shown to bind Stat3
homodimers, Stat1 homodimers, and Stat1-Stat3 heterodimers from
IL-6-stimulated HepG2 cells (26). Figure
5A shows that multiple
2-m
APRE binding complexes are induced by IL-6 in HepG2 cells. Antibody
supershift experiments confirmed that these complexes contain Stat3
(lane 4) and Stat1 (data not shown). Increasing amounts of unlabeled
C/EBP
APRE competitor inhibited formation of the Stat3 supershift
complex (Fig. 5B, lanes 3 to 5). However, a mutant C/EBP
APRE
(
APREm) did not compete for binding (lanes 6 to 8),
showing that the interaction between the C/EBP
APRE and Stat3 is
specific.

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
The C/EBP APRE competes for binding of Stat3 to the
2-m APRE. (A) EMSA using the rat 2-m
APRE, nuclear extracts (6.5 µg) from HepG2 cells, and NRS or
Stat3-specific antibody (Ab) as indicated. The HepG2 cells were treated
with IL-6 for 15 min. An upper complex (u) and a lower complex (l)
appear in the IL-6-treated extracts (lane 3). The Stat3 antibody
supershift complex (lane 4) is indicated. (B) Competition for Stat3
binding by the C/EBP APRE. Nuclear extracts (10 µg) from IL-6
treated HepG2 cells were incubated with Stat3-specific antibody and
10× (lanes 3 and 6), 30× (lanes 4 and 7), or 100× (lanes 5 and 8)
molar excess of unlabeled wild-type ( APRE) or mutant
( APREm) binding site, as indicated. The rat
2-m APRE was used as a probe. The film was overexposed
to emphasize the supershifted complex.
|
|
Using a labeled C/EBP

APRE oligonucleotide as an EMSA probe, we were
unable to observe a distinct DNA binding complex induced
by IL-6,
probably because the complex is obscured by a background
binding
activity (Fig.
6, lane 4). However, when
the Stat3-specific
antibody was included, a supershift complex appeared
in reactions
with extracts from IL-6-treated cells (lane 6) but not
from control
cells (lane 3). This Stat3 complex was not observed when a
mutant
C/EBP

APRE probe was used (lane 12). In addition, no
supershift
signal was observed with a Stat1-specific antibody (lane 5),
whereas
Stat1 antibodies did supershift Stat1 complexes formed with the
2-m APRE (data not shown) and an APRE-like element in
the C/EBP
promoter (see Fig.
10A). These results show that the
C/EBP

APRE
selectively binds Stat3, in contrast to the
2-m APRE, which binds
both Stat1 and Stat3.

View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Selective binding of Stat3 to the C/EBP APRE. Nuclear
extracts from control or IL-6-treated HepG2 cells were analyzed by EMSA
using the wild-type or mutant C/EBP APRE probes and control
antiserum or Stat1- or Stat3-specific antibody (Ab), as indicated. The
film was overexposed to emphasize the supershift signal.
|
|
Analysis of Sp1 site mutants indicated that both Sp1 sites contribute
to the activity of the C/EBP

promoter and are required
for IL-6
inducibility (Fig.
4). To determine whether Sp1 proteins
bind to the
distal Sp1 site [Sp1(

117)], EMSAs were performed
with probes
containing either the APRE and Sp1 sites (

APRE/Sp1)
or the APRE
alone (

APRE) and nuclear extracts from untreated
or IL-6-stimulated
cells (Fig.
7A). Several complexes that
were
not observed with the

APRE oligonucleotide were formed with the

APRE/Sp1 probe. These Sp1-specific bands may reflect the presence
of
multiple Sp1-like proteins in the nuclear extract (
24). A
supershifted species was detected when an antibody against human
Sp1
was added to the

APRE/Sp1 binding reaction (lanes 2 and 4).
However,
no supershift appeared with the

APRE probe (lanes 6
and 8) or when
control serum was used (lanes 1, 3, 5, and 8).
Addition of recombinant
human Sp1 to the nuclear extracts significantly
increased the intensity
of the slowest-migrating band (Fig.
7B,
lanes 3, 4, 8, and 9),
indicating that this complex corresponds
to Sp1. In addition,
recombinant Sp1 by itself also bound to the

APRE/Sp1 probe (lanes 5 and 10), whereas there was no evidence
of Sp1 binding to the

APRE
probe (Fig.
7C). Collectively, the
results of Fig.
7 show that the
Sp1(

117) element is a bona fide
Sp1 binding site.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Binding of nuclear proteins to the Sp1( 117) site. (A)
Supershift analysis using an antibody (Ab) against Sp1. Nuclear
extracts were prepared from control or IL-6-treated HepG2 cells by a
method that maximizes the extraction of Sp1 (see Materials and
Methods). The extracts were incubated with either NRS or an
Sp1-specific antibody and the APRE/Sp1 or APRE probe. The
supershift generated by the Sp1 antibody in lanes 2 and 4 is indicated.
(B and C) Binding of recombinant Sp1 to the APRE/Sp1 (B) and APRE
(C) probes. Recombinant human Sp1 (50 ng) was used alone (lanes 5 and
10) or mixed with 8 µg of HepG2 nuclear extract (optimized for Stat
protein extraction) from control or IL-6-treated cells. Stat3 antibody
was added to the indicated reactions. The lower panel is a longer
exposure of the top portion of the gel to emphasize the Stat3 antibody
supershift complex.
|
|
The existence of an Sp1 site adjacent to the APRE raised the
possibility that cooperative binding interactions may occur between
Stat3 and Sp1. Specifically, Sp1 might facilitate binding of Stat3
to
the APRE, as was observed for Sp1 and Stat1 on the ICAM-1 promoter
(
28). However, using Stat3 antibody supershifts to assess
binding,
the presence of the Sp1 site (

APRE/Sp1) did not increase
Stat3
binding to the

APRE (Fig.
7B and C, bottom panels). Thus,
cooperative
DNA binding between Sp1 and Stat3 is apparently not the
basis
for the synergism between the Sp1 and APRE sites observed in
transfection
assays.
The C/EBP
APRE confers IL-6 inducibility to a heterologous
promoter.
Having shown that the APRE is a critical regulatory
element that specifically binds Stat3, we next examined whether the
C/EBP
APRE could confer IL-6 inducibility to a heterologous
promoter. One or four copies of the APRE were inserted upstream of the
TK promoter driving the luciferase gene and the resulting constructs were tested for activation by IL-6 (Fig.
8). One copy of the C/EBP
APRE caused
a slight increase in IL-6 responsiveness compared to the parental
construct, TK-Luc. Multimerization of the C/EBP
APRE further
enhanced IL-6 induction of the reporter construct (1.9-fold) and also
caused a significant increase in basal expression (8.7-fold over
TK-Luc). By comparison, a construct bearing six copies of the
2-m APRE [(
2-m)6-TK-Luc]
was induced 2.6-fold by IL-6 and exhibited a 2.6-fold increase in basal
activity. It is unclear why the multimerized C/EBP
APRE should
function as a strong positive regulatory element in unstimulated cells,
although perhaps oligomerization of the APRE sequence created a
fortuitous binding site for an unidentified transcriptional regulator.
Nonetheless, the data demonstrate that the C/EBP
APRE functions as
an IL-6RE when fused to a heterologous promoter.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
The C/EBP APRE confers IL-6 responsiveness to a
heterologous promoter. One or four copies of the C/EBP APRE or six
copies of the 2-m APRE were inserted upstream of the TK
promoter. The constructs were tested for induction by IL-6 after
transfection into Hep3B cells as described in the legend to Fig. 3.
|
|
Stat3, but not Stat1, can transactivate the C/EBP
promoter in
IL-6-stimulated cells.
The in vitro binding data in Fig. 6 show
that the C/EBP
APRE preferentially interacts with Stat3 and not
Stat1. To extend this observation, we tested Stat1 and Stat3 expression
vectors (5, 38) for the ability to enhance IL-6 induction of
the (
127)-Luc construct in transfected Hep3B cells (Fig.
9A). In the absence of IL-6, neither Stat
protein stimulated C/EBP
promoter activity. However, in IL-6-treated
cells, Stat3 increased reporter expression 25-fold while Stat1 had no
effect. The Stat1 vector stimulated IFN-
-induced expression from a
promoter containing an SBE from the ICAM-1 promoter (data not shown),
demonstrating that a functional Stat1 protein is expressed from this
plasmid (see also reference 5). We conclude that
Stat3, but not Stat1, can transactivate the C/EBP
promoter.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
Stat3 mediates IL-6-induced expression from the C/EBP
promoter. (A) Stat3 but not Stat1 transactivates the C/EBP promoter.
The ( 127)-Luc construct was cotransfected into Hep3B cells with
expression vectors for Stat1 or Stat3 or the parental pCDNA1 vector,
together with pRSV -gal as an internal standard, and tested for
basal and IL-6-induced luciferase expression. (B) Stat3 transactivation
of C/EBP promoter mutants. The indicated deletion and point mutants
(Fig. 3 and 4) were cotransfected with the Stat3 expression vector into
Hep3B cells and tested for basal and IL-6-inducible luciferase
expression. (C) Stat3 transactivates a heterologous promoter containing
the C/EBP APRE. The indicated TK promoter-luciferase reporter
constructs (Fig. 8) were cotransfected with the Stat3 expression
plasmid into Hep3B cells and tested for basal and IL-6-inducible
expression. The cell extracts were assayed for luciferase and
-galactosidase activities as described in Fig. 3. The values
represent the averages of three to six independent experiments.
|
|
We next tested the ability of Stat3 to transactivate (

81)-Luc,
(

36)-Luc, and APRE
m-Luc, in which the APRE site was
either deleted or mutated, and
the Sp1 mutants
Sp1(

117)
m-Luc, Sp1(

53)
m-Luc,
Sp1(

117/

53)
m-Luc, and
APRE
m/Sp1(

53)
m-Luc (Fig.
9B). As the region
containing the APRE and the adjacent
Sp1 site was deleted, the ability
of Stat3 to transactivate the
promoter was severely decreased. Levels
of IL-6-induced expression
of (

81)-Luc and (

36)-Luc were reduced
5-fold and 10-fold, respectively,
while that of APRE
m-Luc
was reduced more than 3-fold. These results demonstrate that
Stat3 acts
primarily through the previously identified APRE site.
However, the
(

81)-Luc and the APRE
m constructs were still
significantly activated by IL-6 in Stat3-transfected
cells, compared to
no induction without Stat3 (Fig.
3). One possible
explanation is that
overexpression of Stat3 allows it to interact
with a cryptic
(low-affinity) site in the promoter or the luciferase
vector.
Alternatively, Stat3 overexpression could stimulate transcription
partly through interactions with proteins bound to the Sp1 sites,
independent of its ability to bind DNA.
When the Sp1 sites were mutated individually, transactivation by Stat3
decreased 1.6- to 2.7-fold. However, IL-6 induction
was almost
completely eliminated in the Sp1(

117/153)
m double mutant,
demonstrating that at least one Sp1 site is essential
for Stat3
transactivation. The APRE
m/Sp1(

53)
m mutant
was significantly less responsive to Stat3 transactivation
than either
of the single mutations, further supporting the notion
that the APRE
and Sp1 elements function cooperatively to mediate
IL-6 induction.
We also examined the ability of Stat3 to transactivate constructs
containing multiple copies of the C/EBP

APRE linked to
the TK
promoter (Fig.
9C). In the presence of IL-6, Stat3 weakly
stimulated
the TK-Luc expression (twofold) but enhanced expression
of
(

APRE)
1-TK-Luc and (

APRE)
4-TK-Luc 7- and
14-fold, respectively.
For comparison,
(
2-m)
6-TK-Luc expression was induced
12-fold.
Thus, the C/EBP

APRE confers Stat3 responsiveness to a
heterologous
promoter.
Cytokine specificity of the C/EBP
promoter is governed by the
APRE.
The data presented thus far show that IL-6 induction of the
C/EBP
promoter involves Stat3 activation and binding to the APRE. Another proinflammatory cytokine, IFN-
, was a poor activator of
C/EBP
expression but was a more potent inducer of C/EBP
mRNA than
IL-6 (Fig. 1A). IFN-
activates Stat1 but not Stat3 (53) and also did not stimulate expression from the (
127)-Luc construct (see below). To determine whether this cytokine specificity was dictated by the C/EBP
APRE, we replaced the APRE sequence with SBEs
from the intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM-1) or C/EBP
genes.
IFN-
activates the ICAM-1 gene through an interferon-responsive SBE
that binds Stat1 (28). An SBE-like sequence is also present in the promoter region of the C/EBP
gene, at position
366. As shown in Fig. 10A, the C/EBP
SBE
probe generated three EMSA complexes with nuclear extracts from
IL-6-treated HepG2 cells (lane 2). Antibody supershift analysis (lanes
3 and 4) identified these as Stat1 (fast complex) and Stat3 (slow
complex) homodimers and Stat1-Stat3 heterodimers (intermediate
complex). Thus, the C/EBP
SBE binds both Stat1 and Stat3 protein
complexes in vitro.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 10.
Replacement of the C/EBP APRE with SBEs from ICAM-1
or C/EBP renders the promoter responsive to IFN- . (A) The
C/EBP promoter contains an SBE that binds Stat1 and Stat3. A probe
containing the putative SBE from the C/EBP promoter and Stat1- or
-Stat3-specific antibody (Ab) (lanes 3 and 4, respectively) were
added to nuclear extracts from control (lane 1) or IL-6 treated (lanes
2 to 4) HepG2 cells and the reactions analyzed by EMSA. Antibody
supershift species are indicated. (B) Comparison of SBE sequences from
the C/EBP , C/EBP , and ICAM-1 promoters. Bases that differ from
the C/EBP APRE sequence are underlined. (C) IL-6 and IFN-
responsiveness of SBE swap mutants. Constructs in which the C/EBP
APRE was exchanged with SBEs from the C/EBP or ICAM-1 genes were
generated. These constructs and ( 127)-Luc were cotransfected with
pRSV -gal into Hep3B cells and assayed for basal expression and IL-6
or IFN- inducibility. The values represent the average of three
independent experiments. Relative basal expression was normalized to
the ( 127)-Luc level.
|
|
The C/EBP

APRE in (

127)-Luc was replaced by SBEs from the C/EBP

and ICAM-1 genes (Fig.
10B) to generate the constructs
(

127)

-(C/EBP

)-Luc
and (

127)

-(ICAM)-Luc, respectively.
These reporter genes were
tested for inducibility by IL-6 or IFN-

in
Hep3B cells (Fig.
10C). The wild-type (

127) promoter was activated by
IL-6 (2.8-fold)
but not by IFN-

(0.82-fold). The
(

127)

-(C/EBP

) promoter exhibited
an increased response to IL-6
(4.4-fold) and was also modestly
activated by IFN-

(2.2-fold). The
(

127)

-(ICAM) promoter was
more responsive to IL-6 (4.8-fold) than
the wild-type promoter.
In addition, expression from this construct was
strongly activated
by IFN-

(8.1-fold). These findings demonstrate
that the cytokine-specific
response of the C/EBP

promoter is
determined by the APRE sequence,
in particular its selective
interaction with Stat3.
 |
DISCUSSION |
C/EBP
expression is typically lacking in normal cells and
tissues but can be induced by a variety of stimuli, including stress and inflammatory signals. In this study, we have focused on the mechanism by which IL-6 activates C/EBP
gene expression in
hepatocytes. We show that IL-6 induces Stat3 to bind to an APRE-like
sequence in the C/EBP
promoter, thereby upregulating hepatic
expression of C/EBP
. The C/EBP
protein can subsequently bind to
C/EBP sites in target AP genes and thus contribute to their
transcriptional activation (23, 36, 37). C/EBP
is
therefore a component of a regulatory cascade that controls the
synthesis of specific AP proteins in the liver. Promoters of some AP
genes, such as C-reactive protein (50), may require both
C/EBP and Stat proteins for transcriptional activation. The extent to
which other AP genes are combinatorially regulated by these two classes
of activators remains to be established.
cis-regulatory sequences mediating induction by
IL-6.
IL-6 activation of the C/EBP
promoter involves sequences
located within the first 125 bp upstream of the transcription start site. At least three regulatory sites are required for induced transcription: an APRE centered at position
106 and a pair of Sp1
sites at
117 and
53 bp, respectively. Point mutations in the APRE
effectively eliminated IL-6 responsiveness, and four copies of the APRE
conferred IL-6 inducibility to a heterologous promoter. Mutation of the
Sp1(
117) site also eliminated IL-6 induction, and inactivation of
both Sp1 motifs or the APRE and Sp1(
53) sites abolished
transactivation by Stat3. Thus, the function of the APRE is strongly
dependent on nearby Sp1 elements in the promoter. In accordance with
these findings, we found that Stat3 binds to the APRE and Sp1
recognizes the adjacent Sp1 site.
Our data indicate that Sp1 proteins participate in transcriptional
synergism with Stat3 but do not promote its binding to
the C/EBP

promoter. It has been reported that Stat3 physically
interacts with
Sp1, as determined by coimmunoprecipitation assays
(
28).
Thus, transcriptional cooperativity between Sp1 and Stat3
on the
C/EBP

promoter could involve contact between these two
proteins,
perhaps eliciting conformational changes that expose
the activation
domains of Stat3 and/or Sp1.
Cytokine specificity results from selective binding of Stat3 to the
C/EBP
APRE.
The C/EBP
APRE competed for binding of Stat3 to
the
2-m APRE, and Stat3 but not Stat1 bound to the
C/EBP
APRE in an IL-6-inducible manner. Stat3 also transactivated
the C/EBP
promoter in response to IL-6, whereas Stat1 did not
exhibit this capability. These observations support the notion that
Stat3 mediates the induction of C/EBP
expression in cells exposed to
IL-6. Although it is activated by IL-6 in hepatic cells, Stat1
apparently does not functionally interact with the C/EBP
APRE. This
conclusion is supported by our finding that IL-6, but not IFN-
(which activates Stat1), induces C/EBP
expression in two hepatoma
cell lines. We propose that the preferential binding of Stat3, but not
Stat1, to the C/EBP
promoter limits the spectrum of cytokines and
growth factors that can elicit C/EBP
expression in hepatocytes.
What features of the C/EBP

APRE determine its selective interaction
with Stat3? A comparison of SBE sequences from C/EBP

,
C/EBP

and
several other Stat-regulated genes is shown in Table
1. Stat sites contain a core palindromic
TT-AA motif, with a
spacer of variable length between the TT and AA
dinucleotides.
It was previously proposed that the spacer length
determines the
specificity of Stat sites for the various Stat proteins
(
43).
Our studies show that replacing the C/EBP

APRE with
SBEs from
either ICAM-1 or C/EBP

enables the promoter to respond to
IFN-

,
presumably due to the ability of Stat1 to bind to the ICAM-1
(
28)
and C/EBP

SBEs. Analysis of the sequences within the
core palindromic
TT-AA motif of the C/EBP

and C/EBP

SBEs reveals
a single base
change in the AA half-site, from CA in C/EBP

to AA in
C/EBP
(a second difference in the C/EBP

sequence occurs 5' to the
core
palindrome [Fig.
10B]). The ICAM-1 SBE also features AA in this
position. These correlations suggest that the AA dinucleotide
is
important in determining the ability to bind Stat1. In support
of this
idea, an SBE in the
junB promoter also contains a CA
dinucleotide
and was found to bind Stat3 but not Stat1, as demonstrated
by
antibody supershift analysis and lack of a response of the promoter
to IFN-

(
12).
Table
1 shows that the hemopexin and c-
fos genes also
contain SBEs that feature the CA dinucleotide in one half of the
palindrome.
The hemopexin site binds an IL-6-induced complex from HepG2
cells,
although the selectivity of this site for Stat3 has not been
established.
The c-Fos serum-inducible element binds both Stat1 and
Stat3,
albeit with much lower affinity than a mutant version of the
site
(m67) in which the C has been converted to A. The ability of the
wild-type sequence to bind Stat1 is possibly due to the occurrence
of
an AA dinucleotide immediately following the C residue. Alternatively,
sequence differences at other positions may contribute to the
Stat
binding specificity of the serum-inducible element. However,
our
studies of the C/EBP

and C/EBP

SBEs suggest that a single
base in
a critical position within the TT-AA motif dictates specificity
for
Stat3 alone (CA) or both Stat1 and Stat3 (AA) and, correspondingly,
which cytokines are capable of stimulating promoter activity.
Thus, the
C/EBP

promoter is designed to respond specifically
to IL-6 but not
to IFN-

.
We predict that other cytokines or growth factors that activate Stat3
will also induce C/EBP

transcription. Indeed, granulocytic
differentiation of the 32D c13 cell line in response to granulocyte
colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is associated with increased
C/EBP

mRNA and protein expression (
42). Since activation of
the
G-CSF receptor stimulates Stat3 phosphorylation and DNA binding
activity (
46), we propose that Stat3 contributes to the
induction
of C/EBP

gene transcription in differentiating
granulocytes.
Because the C/EBP

and C/EBP

Stat elements differ in
their protein
binding properties, transcription of C/EBP

may be
regulated by
distinct, although partially overlapping, signals. The
functional
importance of the C/EBP

SBE remains to be demonstrated
and is
the subject of current investigation in our laboratory.
Multiple transcriptional regulatory elements in the C/EBP
promoter.
Our analysis has identified an APRE, two Sp1 sites, and
a CRE-like motif in the C/EBP
proximal promoter region. To date we have not observed additional positive regulation by sequences upstream
of position
127, including a construct containing 10 kb of 5' DNA.
Therefore, most or all of the relevant cis-regulatory signals that control basal and IL-6-induced transcription lie within
125 bp of the transcription start site. However, regulation by other
inductive signals in different cell types may involve upstream
sequences or other binding sites not identified in this study.
The CRE motif, which is located 8 bp 5' of the TATA box, exhibits a
five-of-eight-position match to a consensus CRE and includes
one
perfect half-site (GTCA). This element is similar to a pair
of
imperfect CREs recently identified in the C/EBP

promoter that
bind
CREB and mediate basal promoter activity, as well as induction
by the
protein kinase A pathway (
30). Point mutations inserted
into
the C/EBP

CRE did not diminish the ability of IL-6 to induce
C/EBP

promoter activity (data not shown), indicating that this
element does not participate in transcriptional regulation by
IL-6. The
neuropeptides vasoactive intestinal peptide and pituitary
adenylate
cyclase-activating peptide, in addition to the hormone
noradrenaline,
induce C/EBP

expression in cortical astrocytes
(
10).
Since each of these factors causes increased intracellular
cyclic AMP
levels, it is reasonable to propose that the C/EBP
CRE motif plays a
role in controlling C/EBP

induction in response
to these signals.
The C/EBP

gene responds to a variety of extracellular signals. For
example, C/EBP

mRNA levels in liver and several other
tissues
increase dramatically in mice injected with LPS (
2).
Primary
macrophages also induce C/EBP

expression in response
to LPS
treatment (
21). In addition, C/EBP

expression is
transiently
activated during hormonally-induced differentiation of
3T3-L1
preadipocytes (
9) and in mammary epithelial cells
upon growth
arrest elicited by serum withdrawal or contact inhibition
(
33).
In all cases in which it has been examined, induction
occurs at
the mRNA level, indicating that the C/EBP

gene promoter is
activated
by diverse signaling pathways. The C/EBP

promoter
constructs
described here should be useful in future studies to
elucidate
the regulatory mechanisms underlying C/EBP

induction by
these
various physiological signals.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We are indebted to David Levy for providing Stat1 and Stat3
expression vectors, Chengrong Yu for providing a Stat1 antibody, Daniel
McVicar for a gift of IFN-
, and David Ron for providing a human
C/EBP
(NF-IL6) probe. We also thank Carla Weinstock and Hilda
Marusiodis for expert secretarial assistance.
This research was sponsored by the National Cancer Institute under
contract with ABL.
 |
ADDENDUM IN PROOF |
We note that Yamada et al. (J. Biochem. 121:731-738,
1997) have also identified the APRE site in the C/EBP
promoter as an
IL-6-inducible element that binds Stat3.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Eukaryotic
Transcriptional Regulation Group, ABL-Basic Research Program,
NCI-Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, P.O. Box B,
Frederick, MD 21702-1201. Phone: (301) 846-1627. Fax: (301) 846-5991. E-mail: johnsopf{at}ncifcrf.gov.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Akira, S.,
Y. Nishio,
M. Inoue,
X. J. Wang,
S. Wei,
T. Matsusaka,
K. Yoshida,
T. Sudo,
M. Naruto, and T. Kishimoto.
1994.
Molecular cloning of APRF, a novel IFN-stimulated gene factor 3 p91-related transcription factor involved in the gp130-mediated signaling pathway.
Cell
77:63-71[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Alam, T.,
M. R. An, and J. Papaconstantinou.
1992.
Differential expression of three C/EBP isoforms in multiple tissues during the acute phase response.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:5021-5024[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Atwater, J. A.,
R. Wisdom, and I. M. Verma.
1990.
Regulated mRNA stability.
Annu. Rev. Genet.
24:519-541[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Bao, J. J.,
R. N. Sifers,
V. J. Kidd,
F. D. Ledley, and S. L. Woo.
1987.
Molecular evolution of serpins: homologous structure of the human alpha 1-antichymotrypsin and alpha 1-antitrypsin genes.
Biochemistry
26:7755-7759[Medline]. (Erratum, 27:8508, 1988.)
|
| 5.
|
Bluyssen, H. A.,
R. Muzaffar,
R. J. Vlieststra,
A. C. van der Made,
S. Leung,
G. R. Stark,
I. M. Kerr,
J. Trapman, and D. E. Levy.
1995.
Combinatorial association and abundance of components of interferon-stimulated gene factor 3 dictate the selectivity of interferon responses.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:5645-5649[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Bonnerot, C.,
D. Rocancourt,
P. Briand,
G. Grimber, and J. F. Nicolas.
1987.
A -galactosidase hybrid protein targeted to nuclei as a marker for developmental studies.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
84:6795-6799[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Caldenhoven, E.,
T. van Dijk,
J. A. Raaijmakers,
J. W. Lammers,
L. Koenderman, and R. P. De Groot.
1995.
Activation of the STAT3/acute phase response factor transcription factor by interleukin-5.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:25778-25784[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Campbell, G. S.,
D. J. Meyer,
R. Raz,
D. E. Levy,
J. Schwartz, and C. Carter-Su.
1995.
Activation of acute phase response factor (APRF)/Stat3 transcription factor by growth hormone.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:3974-3979[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Cao, Z.,
R. M. Umek, and S. L. McKnight.
1991.
Regulated expression of three C/EBP isoforms during adipose conversion of 3T3-L1 cells.
Genes Dev.
5:1538-1552[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Cardinaux, J. R., and P. J. Magistretti.
1996.
Vasoactive intestinal peptide, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide, and noradrenaline induce the transcription factors CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP)-beta and C/EBP delta in mouse cortical astrocytes: involvement in cAMP-regulated glycogen metabolism.
J. Neurosci.
16:919-929[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Chomczynski, P., and N. Sacchi.
1987.
Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction.
Anal. Biochem.
162:156-159[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Coffer, P.,
C. Lutticken,
A. van Puijenbroek,
M. Klop-de Jonge,
F. Horn, and W. Kruijer.
1995.
Transcriptional regulation of the junB promoter: analysis of STAT-mediated signal transduction.
Oncogene
10:985-994[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Danielson, P. E.,
S. Forss-Petter,
M. A. Brow,
L. Calvatta,
R. J. Milner, and J. G. Sutcliff.
1988.
p1B15: a cDNA clone of the rat mRNA encoding cyclophilin.
DNA
1:261-269.
|
| 14.
|
Darnell, J. E., Jr.
1996.
The JAK-STAT pathway: summary of initial studies and recent advances.
Recent Prog. Horm. Res.
51:391-403.
|
| 15.
|
Decker, T.,
P. Kovarik, and A. Meinke.
1997.
GAS elements: a few nucleotides with a major impact on cytokine-induced gene expression.
J. Interferon Cytokine Res.
17:121-134[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Gorski, K.,
M. Carneiro, and U. Schibler.
1986.
Tissue-specific in vitro transcription from the mouse albumin promoter.
Cell
47:767-776[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Harroch, S.,
M. Revel, and J. Chebath.
1994.
Interleukin-6 signaling via four transcription factors binding palindromic enhancers of different genes.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:26191-26195[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Hattori, M.,
L. J. Abraham,
W. Northemann, and G. H. Fey.
1990.
Acute-phase reaction induces a specific complex between hepatic nuclear proteins and the interleukin 6 response element of the rat alpha 2-macroglobulin gene.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:2364-2368[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Higuchi, R.,
B. Krummel, and R. K. Saiki.
1988.
A general method of in vitro preparation and specific mutagenesis of DNA fragments: study of protein and DNA interactions.
Nucleic Acids Res.
16:7351-7367[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Ho, S. N.,
H. D. Hunt,
R. M. Horton,
J. K. Pullen, and L. R. Pease.
1989.
Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction.
Gene
77:51-59[Medline].
|
| 21.
| Hu, H.-M., M. Baer, S. C. Williams,
P. F. Johnson, and R. C. Schwartz. Redundancy of
C/EBP , , and in supporting the lipopolysaccharide-induced
transcription of interleukin 6 and monocyte chemoattractant 1. J. Immunol., in press.
|
| 22.
|
Immenschuh, S.,
Y. Nagae,
H. Satoh,
H. Baumann, and U. Muller-Eberhard.
1994.
The rat and human hemopexin genes contain an identical interleukin-6 response element that is not a target of CAAT enhancer-binding protein isoforms.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:12654-12661[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Juan, T. S. C.,
D. R. Wilson,
M. D. Wilde, and G. J. Darlington.
1993.
Participation of the transcription factor-C/EBP- in the acute-phase regulation of the human gene for complement component C3.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:2584-2588[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Kingsley, C., and A. Winoto.
1992.
Cloning of GT box-binding proteins: a novel Sp1 multigene family regulating T-cell receptor gene expression.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:4251-4261[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Kinoshita, S.,
S. Akira, and T. Kishimoto.
1992.
A member of the C/EBP family, NF-IL6 beta, forms a heterodimer and transcriptionally synergizes with NF-IL6.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:1473-1476[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Kojima, H.,
K. Nakajima, and T. Hirano.
1996.
IL-6-inducible complexes on an IL-6 response element of the junB promoter contain Stat3 and 36 kDa CRE-like site binding protein(s).
Oncogene
12:547-554[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Liu, Z., and G. M. Fuller.
1995.
Detection of a novel transcription factor for the A alpha fibrinogen gene in response to interleukin-6.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:7580-7586[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Look, D. C.,
M. R. Pelletier,
R. M. Tidwell,
W. T. Roswit, and M. J. Holtzman.
1995.
Stat1 depends on transcriptional synergy with Sp1.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:30264-30267[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Mackiewicz, A.
1997.
Acute phase proteins and transformed cells.
Int. Rev. Cytol.
170:225-300[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Niehof, M.,
M. P. Manns, and C. Trautwein.
1997.
CREB controls LAP/C/EBP transcription.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:3600-3613[Abstract].
|
| 31.
|
Nordeen, S. K.
1988.
Luciferase reporter gene vectors for analysis of promoters and enhancers.
BioTechniques
6:454-457.
[Medline] |
| 32.
|
Oliviero, S., and R. Cortese.
1989.
The human haptoglobin gene promoter: interleukin-6-responsive elements interact with a DNA-binding protein induced by interleukin-6.
EMBO J.
8:1145-1151[Medline]. (Erratum, 8:2121.)
|
| 33.
|
O'Rourke, J.,
R. Yuan, and J. DeWille.
1997.
CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein- (C/EBP- ) is induced in growth-arrested mouse mammary epithelial cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:6291-6296[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Poli, V., and G. Ciliberto.
1994.
Transcriptional regulation of acute phase genes by IL-6 and related cytokines, p. 131-151. In
F. Tronche, and M. Yaniv (ed.), Liver gene expression. R. G.
Landes Company, Austin, Tex.
|
| 35.
|
Poli, V.,
F. P. Mancini, and R. Cortese.
1990.
IL-6DBP, a nuclear protein involved in interleukin-6 signal transduction, defines a new family of leucine zipper proteins related to C/EBP.
Cell
63:643-653[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Ramji, D. P.,
A. Vitelli,
F. Tronche,
R. Cortese, and G. Ciliberto.
1993.
The 2 C/EBP isoforms, IL-6DBP/NF-IL6 and C/EBPdelta/NF-IL6beta, are induced by IL-6 to promote acute phase gene transcription via different mechanisms.
Nucleic Acids Res.
21:289-294[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Ray, A., and B. K. Ray.
1994.
Serum amyloid A gene expression under acute-phase conditions involves participation of inducible C/EBP-beta and C/EBP-delta and their activation by phosphorylation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:4324-4332[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Raz, R.,
J. E. Durbin, and D. E. Levy.
1994.
Acute phase response factor and additional members of the interferon-stimulated gene factor 3 family integrate diverse signals from cytokines, interferons, and growth factors.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:24391-24395[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Sadowski, H. B., and M. Z. Gilman.
1993.
Cell-free activation of a DNA-binding protein by epidermal growth factor.
Nature
362:79-83[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Sambucetti, L. C.,
M. Schaber,
R. Kramer,
R. Crowl, and T. Curran.
1986.
The fos gene product undergoes extensive post-translational modification in eukaryotic but not in prokaryotic cells.
Gene
43:69-77[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Schumann, R. R.,
C. J. Kirschning,
A. Unbehaun,
H. P. Aberle,
H. P. Knope,
N. Lamping,
R. J. Ulevitch, and F. Herrmann.
1996.
The lipopolysaccharide-binding protein is a secretory class 1 acute-phase protein whose gene is transcriptionally activated by APRF/STAT/3 and other cytokine-inducible nuclear proteins.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:3490-3503[Abstract].
|
| 42.
|
Scott, L. M.,
C. I. Civin,
P. Rorth, and A. D. Friedman.
1992.
A novel temporal expression pattern of three C/EBP family members in differentiating myelomonocytic cells.
Blood
80:1725-1735[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Seidel, H. M.,
L. H. Milocco,
P. Lamb,
J. E. Darnell, Jr.,
R. B. Stein, and J. Rosen.
1995.
Spacing of palindromic half sites as a determinant of selective STAT (signal transducers and activators of transcription) DNA binding and transcriptional activity.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:3041-3045[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Steel, D. M., and A. S. Whitehead.
1994.
The major acute phase reactants: C-reactive protein, serum amyloid P component and serum amyloid A protein.
Immunol. Today
15:81-88[Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Sterneck, E.,
D. R. Kaplan, and P. F. Johnson.
1996.
Interleukin-6 induces expression of peripherin and cooperates with Trk receptor signaling to promote neuronal differentiation in PC12 cells.
J. Neurochem.
67:1365-1374[Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Tian, S. S.,
P. Lamb,
H. M. Seidel,
R. B. Stein, and J. Rosen.
1994.
Rapid activation of the STAT3 transcription factor by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.
Blood
84:1760-1764[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Wegenka, U. M.,
J. Buschmann,
C. Lutticken,
P. C. Heinrich, and F. Horn.
1993.
Acute-phase response factor, a nuclear factor binding to acute-phase response elements, is rapidly activated by interleukin-6 at the posttranslational level.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:276-288[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Williams, S. C.,
C. A. Cantwell, and P. F. Johnson.
1991.
A family of C/EBP-related proteins capable of forming covalently linked leucine zipper dimers in vitro.
Genes Dev.
5:1553-1567[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Won, K. A., and H. Baumann.
1990.
The cytokine response element of the rat alpha 1-acid glycoprotein gene is a complex of several interacting regulatory sequences.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10:3965-3978[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Zhang, D.,
M. Sun,
D. Samols, and I. Kushner.
1996.
STAT3 participates in transcriptional activation of the C-reactive protein gene by interleukin-6.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:9503-9509[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Zhang, Z.,
N. L. Fuentes, and G. M. Fuller.
1995.
Characterization of the IL-6 responsive elements in the gamma fibrinogen gene promoter.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:24287-24291[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 52.
|
Zhong, Z.,
Z. Wen, and J. E. Darnell, Jr.
1994.
Stat3: a STAT family member activated by tyrosine phosphorylation in response to epidermal growth factor and interleukin-6.
Science
264:95-98[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Zhong, Z.,
Z. L. Wen, and J. E. Darnell.
1994.
Stat3 and Stat4: members of the family of signal transducers and activators of transcription.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:4806-4810[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Mol Cell Biol, April 1998, p. 2108-2117, Vol. 18, No. 4
0270-7306/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Ranger, J. J., Levy, D. E., Shahalizadeh, S., Hallett, M., Muller, W. J.
(2009). Identification of a Stat3-Dependent Transcription Regulatory Network Involved in Metastatic Progression. Cancer Res.
69: 6823-6830
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Su, H.-W., Wang, S.-W., Ghishan, F. K., Kiela, P. R., Tang, M.-J.
(2009). Cell confluency-induced Stat3 activation regulates NHE3 expression by recruiting Sp1 and Sp3 to the proximal NHE3 promoter region during epithelial dome formation. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.
296: C13-C24
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhou, S., Si, J., Liu, T., DeWille, J. W.
(2008). PIASy Represses CCAAT/Enhancer-binding Protein {delta} (C/EBP{delta}) Transcriptional Activity by Sequestering C/EBP{delta} to the Nuclear Periphery. J. Biol. Chem.
283: 20137-20148
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Canaff, L., Zhou, X., Hendy, G. N.
(2008). The Proinflammatory Cytokine, Interleukin-6, Up-regulates Calcium-sensing Receptor Gene Transcription via Stat1/3 and Sp1/3. J. Biol. Chem.
283: 13586-13600
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Poree, B., Kypriotou, M., Chadjichristos, C., Beauchef, G., Renard, E., Legendre, F., Melin, M., Gueret, S., Hartmann, D.-J., Mallein-Gerin, F., Pujol, J.-P., Boumediene, K., Galera, P.
(2008). Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and/or Soluble IL-6 Receptor Down-regulation of Human Type II Collagen Gene Expression in Articular Chondrocytes Requires a Decrease of Sp1{middle dot}Sp3 Ratio and of the Binding Activity of Both Factors to the COL2A1 Promoter. J. Biol. Chem.
283: 4850-4865
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dutta, R., McDonough, J., Chang, A., Swamy, L., Siu, A., Kidd, G. J., Rudick, R., Mirnics, K., Trapp, B. D.
(2007). Activation of the ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) signalling pathway in cortical neurons of multiple sclerosis patients. Brain
130: 2566-2576
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Maitra, A., Shen, F., Hanel, W., Mossman, K., Tocker, J., Swart, D., Gaffen, S. L.
(2007). Distinct functional motifs within the IL-17 receptor regulate signal transduction and target gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
104: 7506-7511
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dong, J., Fujii, S., Imagawa, S., Matsumoto, S., Matsushita, M., Todo, S., Tsutsui, H., Sobel, B. E.
(2007). IL-1 and IL-6 induce hepatocyte plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression through independent signaling pathways converging on C/EBP{delta}. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.
292: C209-C215
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lin, S., Saxena, N. K., Ding, X., Stein, L. L., Anania, F. A.
(2006). Leptin Increases Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase I (TIMP-1) Gene Expression by a Specificity Protein 1/Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 Mechanism. Mol. Endocrinol.
20: 3376-3388
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yoshimura, T., Takeda, A., Hamano, S., Miyazaki, Y., Kinjyo, I., Ishibashi, T., Yoshimura, A., Yoshida, H.
(2006). Two-Sided Roles of IL-27: Induction of Th1 Differentiation on Naive CD4+ T Cells versus Suppression of Proinflammatory Cytokine Production Including IL-23-Induced IL-17 on Activated CD4+ T Cells Partially Through STAT3-Dependent Mechanism. J. Immunol.
177: 5377-5385
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sun, Y., Boyd, K., Xu, W., Ma, J., Jackson, C. W., Fu, A., Shillingford, J. M., Robinson, G. W., Hennighausen, L., Hitzler, J. K., Ma, Z., Morris, S. W.
(2006). Acute Myeloid Leukemia-Associated Mkl1 (Mrtf-a) Is a Key Regulator of Mammary Gland Function. Mol. Cell. Biol.
26: 5809-5826
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Monslow, J., Williams, J. D., Fraser, D. J., Michael, D. R., Foka, P., Kift-Morgan, A. P., Luo, D. D., Fielding, C. A., Craig, K. J., Topley, N., Jones, S. A., Ramji, D. P., Bowen, T.
(2006). Sp1 and Sp3 Mediate Constitutive Transcription of the Human Hyaluronan Synthase 2 Gene. J. Biol. Chem.
281: 18043-18050
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Leslie, K., Lang, C., Devgan, G., Azare, J., Berishaj, M., Gerald, W., Kim, Y. B., Paz, K., Darnell, J. E., Albanese, C., Sakamaki, T., Pestell, R., Bromberg, J.
(2006). Cyclin d1 is transcriptionally regulated by and required for transformation by activated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3.. Cancer Res.
66: 2544-2552
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Follettie, M. T., Pinard, M., Keith, J. C. Jr., Wang, L., Chelsky, D., Hayward, C., Kearney, P., Thibault, P., Paramithiotis, E., Dorner, A. J., Harris, H. A.
(2006). Organ Messenger Ribonucleic Acid and Plasma Proteome Changes in the Adjuvant-Induced Arthritis Model: Responses to Disease Induction and Therapy with the Estrogen Receptor-{beta} Selective Agonist ERB-041. Endocrinology
147: 714-723
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wu, Z., Kim, H.-P., Xue, H.-H., Liu, H., Zhao, K., Leonard, W. J.
(2005). Interleukin-21 Receptor Gene Induction in Human T Cells Is Mediated by T-Cell Receptor-Induced Sp1 Activity. Mol. Cell. Biol.
25: 9741-9752
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Thangaraju, M., Rudelius, M., Bierie, B., Raffeld, M., Sharan, S., Hennighausen, L., Huang, A-M., Sterneck, E.
(2005). C/EBP{delta} is a crucial regulator of pro-apoptotic gene expression during mammary gland involution. Development
132: 4675-4685
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Iacobelli-Martinez, M., Nepomuceno, R. R., Connolly, J., Nemerow, G. R.
(2005). CD46-Utilizing Adenoviruses Inhibit C/EBP{beta}-Dependent Expression of Proinflammatory Cytokines. J. Virol.
79: 11259-11268
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yang, X. P., Irani, K., Mattagajasingh, S., DiPaula, A., Khanday, F., Ozaki, M., Fox-Talbot, K., Baldwin, W. M. III, Becker, L. C.
(2005). Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3{alpha} and Specificity Protein 1 Interact to Upregulate Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 in Ischemic-Reperfused Myocardium and Vascular Endothelium. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.
25: 1395-1400
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wang, J.-M., Tseng, J. T., Chang, W.-C.
(2005). Induction of Human NF-IL6{beta} by Epidermal Growth Factor Is Mediated through the p38 Signaling Pathway and cAMP Response Element-binding Protein Activation in A431 Cells. Mol. Biol. Cell
16: 3365-3376
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dong, J., Fujii, S., Li, H., Nakabayashi, H., Sakai, M., Nishi, S., Goto, D., Furumoto, T., Imagawa, S., Zaman, T. A.K.M., Kitabatake, A.
(2005). Interleukin-6 and Mevastatin Regulate Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Through CCAAT/Enhancer-Binding Protein-{delta}. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.
25: 1078-1084
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chang, W., Rewari, A., Centrella, M., McCarthy, T. L.
(2004). Fos-related Antigen 2 Controls Protein Kinase A-induced CCAAT/Enhancer-binding Protein {beta} Expression in Osteoblasts. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 42438-42444
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Qing, Y., Stark, G. R.
(2004). Alternative Activation of STAT1 and STAT3 in Response to Interferon-{gamma}. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 41679-41685
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mangan, J. K., Rane, S. G., Kang, A. D., Amanullah, A., Wong, B. C., Reddy, E. P.
(2004). Mechanisms associated with IL-6-induced up-regulation of Jak3 and its role in monocytic differentiation. Blood
103: 4093-4101
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kamaraju, A. K., Adjalley, S., Zhang, P., Chebath, J., Revel, M.
(2004). C/EBP-{delta} Induction by gp130 Signaling: ROLE IN TRANSITION TO MYELIN GENE EXPRESSING PHENOTYPE IN A MELANOMA CELL LINE MODEL. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 3852-3861
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ruddy, M. J., Wong, G. C., Liu, X. K., Yamamoto, H., Kasayama, S., Kirkwood, K. L., Gaffen, S. L.
(2004). Functional Cooperation between Interleukin-17 and Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Is Mediated by CCAAT/Enhancer-binding Protein Family Members. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 2559-2567
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bai, L., Merchant, J. L.
(2003). Transcription factor ZBP-89 is required for STAT1 constitutive expression. Nucleic Acids Res
31: 7264-7270
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Duan, H. O., Simpson-Haidaris, P. J.
(2003). Functional Analysis of Interleukin 6 Response Elements (IL-6REs) on the Human {gamma}-Fibrinogen Promoter: BINDING OF HEPATIC Stat3 CORRELATES NEGATIVELY WITH TRANSACTIVATION POTENTIAL OF TYPE II IL-6REs. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 41270-41281
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wang, L., Walia, B., Evans, J., Gewirtz, A. T., Merlin, D., Sitaraman, S. V.
(2003). IL-6 Induces NF-{kappa}B Activation in the Intestinal Epithelia. J. Immunol.
171: 3194-3201
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Munzberg, H., Huo, L., Nillni, E. A., Hollenberg, A. N., Bjorbaek, C.
(2003). Role of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 in Regulation of Hypothalamic Proopiomelanocortin Gene Expression by Leptin. Endocrinology
144: 2121-2131
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mynard, V., Guignat, L., Devin-Leclerc, J., Bertagna, X., Catelli, M. G.
(2002). Different Mechanisms for Leukemia Inhibitory Factor-Dependent Activation of Two Proopiomelanocortin Promoter Regions. Endocrinology
143: 3916-3924
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hutt, J. A., DeWille, J. W.
(2002). Oncostatin M Induces Growth Arrest of Mammary Epithelium via a CCAAT/enhancer-binding Protein {delta}-dependent Pathway. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
1: 601-610
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
GIRI, S., JATANA, M., RATTAN, R., WON, J.-S., SINGH, I., SINGH, A. K.
(2002). Galactosylsphingosine (psychosine) -induced expression of cytokine-mediated inducible nitric oxide synthases via AP-1 and C/EBP: implications for Krabbe disease. FASEB J.
16: 661-672
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hughes, T. R., Tengku-Muhammad, T. S., Irvine, S. A., Ramji, D. P.
(2002). A Novel Role of Sp1 and Sp3 in the Interferon-gamma -mediated Suppression of Macrophage Lipoprotein Lipase Gene Transcription. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 11097-11106
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lacroix, I., Lipcey, C., Imbert, J., Kahn-Perles, B.
(2002). Sp1 Transcriptional Activity Is Up-regulated by Phosphatase 2A in Dividing T Lymphocytes. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 9598-9605
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Waris, G., Siddiqui, A.
(2002). Interaction between STAT-3 and HNF-3 Leads to the Activation of Liver-Specific Hepatitis B Virus Enhancer 1 Function. J. Virol.
76: 2721-2729
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Conze, D., Weiss, L., Regen, P. S., Bhushan, A., Weaver, D., Johnson, P., Rincon, M.
(2001). Autocrine Production of Interleukin 6 Causes Multidrug Resistance in Breast Cancer Cells. Cancer Res.
61: 8851-8858
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chen, H., Lee, J. M., Zong, Y., Borowitz, M., Ng, M. H., Ambinder, R. F., Hayward, S. D.
(2001). Linkage between STAT Regulation and Epstein-Barr Virus Gene Expression in Tumors. J. Virol.
75: 2929-2937
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Alonzi, T., Maritano, D., Gorgoni, B., Rizzuto, G., Libert, C., Poli, V.
(2001). Essential Role of STAT3 in the Control of the Acute-Phase Response as Revealed by Inducible Gene Activation in the Liver. Mol. Cell. Biol.
21: 1621-1632
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sawka-Verhelle, D., Tartare-Deckert, S., Decaux, J.-F., Girard, J., Van Obberghen, E.
(2000). Stat 5B, Activated by Insulin in a Jak-Independent Fashion, Plays a Role in Glucokinase Gene Transcription. Endocrinology
141: 1977-1988
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Feng, X., Teitelbaum, S. L., Quiroz, M. E., Cheng, S.-L., Lai, C.-F., Avioli, L. V., Ross, F. P.
(2000). Sp1/Sp3 and PU.1 Differentially Regulate beta 5 Integrin Gene Expression in Macrophages and Osteoblasts. J. Biol. Chem.
275: 8331-8340
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
McCarthy, T. L., Changhua Ji, , Centrella, M.
(2000). Links Among Growth Factors, Hormones, and Nuclear Factors With Essential Roles in Bone Formation. CROBM
11: 409-422
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Poli, V.
(1998). The Role of C/EBP Isoforms in the Control of Inflammatory and Native Immunity Functions. J. Biol. Chem.
273: 29279-29282
[Full Text]
-
Sterneck, E., Paylor, R., Jackson-Lewis, V., Libbey, M., Przedborski, S., Tessarollo, L., Crawley, J. N., Johnson, P. F.
(1998). Selectively enhanced contextual fear conditioning in mice lacking the transcriptional regulator CCAAT/enhancer binding protein delta. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95: 10908-10913
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ehret, G. B., Reichenbach, P., Schindler, U., Horvath, C. M., Fritz, S., Nabholz, M., Bucher, P.
(2001). DNA Binding Specificity of Different STAT Proteins. COMPARISON OF IN VITRO SPECIFICITY WITH NATURAL TARGET SITES. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 6675-6688
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
McCarthy, T. L., Ji, C., Chen, Y., Kim, K. K., Imagawa, M., Ito, Y., Centrella, M.
(2000). Runt Domain Factor (Runx)-dependent Effects on CCAAT/ Enhancer-binding Protein delta Expression and Activity in Osteoblasts. J. Biol. Chem.
275: 21746-21753
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hutt, J. A., O'Rourke, J. P., DeWille, J.
(2000). Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 Activates CCAAT Enhancer-binding Protein delta Gene Transcription in G0 Growth-arrested Mouse Mammary Epithelial Cells and in Involuting Mouse Mammary Gland. J. Biol. Chem.
275: 29123-29131
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Roy, J., Audette, M., Tremblay, M. J.
(2001). Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1) Gene Expression in Human T Cells Is Regulated by Phosphotyrosyl Phosphatase Activity. INVOLVEMENT OF NF-kappa B, Ets, AND PALINDROMIC INTERFERON-gamma -RESPONSIVE ELEMENT-BINDING SITES. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 14553-14561
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Niehof, M., Streetz, K., Rakemann, T., Bischoff, S. C., Manns, M. P., Horn, F., Trautwein, C.
(2001). Interleukin-6-induced Tethering of STAT3 to the LAP/C/EBPbeta Promoter Suggests a New Mechanism of Transcriptional Regulation by STAT3. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 9016-9027
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Xiao, W., Wang, L., Yang, X., Chen, T., Hodge, D., Johnson, P. F., Farrar, W.
(2001). CCAAT/Enhancer-binding Protein beta Mediates Interferon-gamma -induced p48 (ISGF3-gamma ) Gene Transcription in Human Monocytic Cells. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 23275-23281
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Caivano, M., Gorgoni, B., Cohen, P., Poli, V.
(2001). The Induction of Cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA in Macrophages Is Biphasic and Requires both CCAAT Enhancer-binding protein beta (C/EBPbeta ) and C/EBPdelta Transcription Factors. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 48693-48701
[Abstract]
[Full Text]