Previous Article | Next Article 
Mol Cell Biol, April 1998, p. 2130-2142, Vol. 18, No. 4
0270-7306/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Functions of the N- and C-Terminal Domains of Human
RAP74 in Transcriptional Initiation, Elongation, and Recycling of
RNA Polymerase II
Lei
Lei,
Delin
Ren,
Ann
Finkelstein, and
Zachary
F.
Burton*
Department of Biochemistry, Michigan State
University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1319
Received 4 November 1997/Returned for modification 11 December
1997/Accepted 14 January 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Transcription factor IIF (TFIIF) cooperates with RNA polymerase II
(pol II) during multiple stages of the transcription cycle including
preinitiation complex assembly, initiation, elongation, and possibly
termination and recycling. Human TFIIF appears to be an
2
2 heterotetramer of RNA polymerase
II-associating protein 74- and 30-kDa subunits (RAP74 and RAP30). From
inspection of its 517-amino-acid (aa) sequence, the RAP74 subunit
appears to comprise separate N- and C-terminal domains connected by a
flexible loop. In this study, we present functional data that strongly support this model for RAP74 architecture and further show that the N-
and C-terminal domains and the central loop of RAP74 have distinct
roles during separate phases of the transcription cycle. The N-terminal
domain of RAP74 (minimally aa 1 to 172) is sufficient to deliver pol II
into a complex formed on the adenovirus major late promoter with the
TATA-binding protein, TFIIB, and RAP30. A more complete N-terminal
domain fragment (aa 1 to 217) strongly stimulates both accurate
initiation and elongation by pol II. The region of RAP74 between aa 172 and 205 and a subregion between aa 170 and 178 are critical for both
accurate initiation and elongation, and mutations in these regions have
similar effects on initiation and elongation. Based on these
observations, RAP74 appears to have similar functions in initiation and
elongation. The central region and the C-terminal domain of RAP74 do
not contribute strongly to single-round accurate initiation or
elongation stimulation but do stimulate multiple-round transcription in
an extract system.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
RNA polymerase II (pol II) interacts
with a number of general and regulatory factors to initiate
transcription accurately from a promoter (reviewed in references
34 and 56). In the pathway toward
initiation, promoter DNA is bent, and DNA may be wrapped around pol II
(24, 40). General factors TATA-binding protein (TBP) (or
transcription factor IID [TFIID]), TFIIB, TFIIF, and TFIIE cooperate
with pol II to strain the DNA helix around the transcriptional start
site before ATP-driven helix opening by TFIIH (34, 56).
After initiation, pol II releases from the promoter (promoter clearance
or promoter escape), elongates the RNA chain, terminates transcription,
and recycles. TFIIF, made up of RAP30 (RNA polymerase II-associating
protein of 30 kDa) and RAP74 (58 kDa) subunits, may participate in each
of these stages of the transcription cycle.
Inspection of its 517-amino-acid (aa) sequence indicates that human
RAP74 can be divided into three regions: (i) a highly basic N-terminal
domain with significant globular structure (aa 1 to 217); (ii) an
overall acidic, highly charged central region lacking in hydrophobic
amino acids but rich in E, D, K, R, S, T, G, and P (aa 218 to 398); and
(iii) a very basic C-terminal domain (CTD) with globular structure (aa
399 to 517) (2, 15). The N-terminal domain is important for
RAP30 binding (54, 55), preinitiation complex assembly (this
report), and elongation stimulation (reference 21
and this report). The CTD of RAP74 makes contact with TFIIB
(13) and pol II (54) and stimulates the activity of a pol II CTD phosphatase that may have roles in initiation, elongation, termination, and recycling (8).
A pathway for assembly of preinitiation complexes on TATA
box-containing promoters has been defined (34, 56). The TBP subunit of TFIID binds to the TATA sequence. Insertion of TBP into the
DNA minor groove at TATA induces a 95° bend (23, 25). TFIIB can then enter to form the DB complex, made up of TBP (or TFIID),
TFIIB, and promoter DNA. The C-terminal repeats of TFIIB bind DNA
upstream and downstream of TATA, stabilizing the DNA bend (26,
33). The N-terminal domain of TFIIB may extend toward the
transcriptional start site as a scaffold on which to assemble pol II
and TFIIF (34).
To bind efficiently to the promoter, pol II must first bind TFIIF
(10, 16, 22). In some cases, the RAP30 subunit has been
sufficient to deliver pol II to the promoter (16, 22, 51),
but the RAP74 subunit contributes to proper assembly, complex stability, and initiation. For promoters with weak TATA boxes, both
RAP30 and RAP74 contribute to template commitment of TFIID, TFIIB, and
pol II (49). Furthermore, RAP74 strongly stimulates initiation from supercoiled and premelted templates that are dependent only on TBP, TFIIB, pol II, and TFIIF for accurate transcription (35, 36). In most contexts, therefore, both the RAP30 and RAP74 subunits are important for TFIIF function in complex assembly and
initiation.
After fulfilling its role in initiation, TFIIF stimulates the
elongation rate of pol II (4, 20, 21, 38, 49). On nonchromatin DNA templates and in the absence of other general factors,
TFIIF can accelerate polymerization to up to 1,500 nucleotides per min,
close to the estimated physiological rate (20). TFIIF suppresses pausing by pol II (4, 20, 38), but whether this is a cause or effect of rate stimulation is not known. Both the RAP30
and RAP74 subunits of TFIIF are required for elongation stimulation
(21, 49), and preliminary mapping studies indicate that the
N-terminal domain of RAP74 is most important for elongation (21). Tan et al. (50) identified a class of RAP30
mutants that are impaired for both elongation stimulation and accurate initiation, and these mutants are also defective for binding RAP74, consistent with the requirement of both subunits for elongation. They
have also identified classes of RAP30 mutants that are defective only
for elongation stimulation or for initiation, not for both. In contrast
to their results with RAP30, however, we find that a region within the
N-terminal domain of RAP74, that is not essential for RAP30 binding, is
nonetheless strongly stimulatory for both initiation and elongation
(this report).
An intriguing feature of the RPB1 subunit of pol II is the CTD which
has the consensus sequence YSPTSPS tandemly repeated 52 times in human
pol II (reviewed in reference 12). Phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of the CTD by the regulated activities of CTD
kinases (14, 29, 31, 45, 46) and phosphatases (7) appear to control progression through the transcription cycle. Pol II
enters the preinitiation complex with its CTD in a largely unmodified
form designated pol IIa (27, 28). During elongation, pol II
is converted to the pol IIo form (3, 27), which is heavily
phosphorylated on the SP serines of the YSPTSPS consensus sequence, and
so hyperphosphorylation of the CTD is thought to be important to
establish and maintain the elongation complex. Removal of phosphates
from the CTD may be a signal to terminate transcription and recycle pol
II to a promoter.
A recently identified CTD phosphatase that catalyzes the
dephosphorylation of pol IIo to pol IIa is stimulated by the C-terminal domain of the RAP74 subunit of TFIIF (8). Interestingly,
RAP74-dependent stimulation of CTD phosphatase activity is blocked by
addition of TFIIB. The C-terminal domain of RAP74 binds to TFIIB
(13) and pol II (54), and so TFIIF, TFIIB, and
the CTD phosphatase may be components of a multiprotein complex that
binds pol II and regulates pol II recycling. In this report, we
demonstrate that the central region and the CTD of RAP74 stimulate
multiple-round transcription in an extract system consistent with a
role for RAP74 in transcriptional recycling.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Transcription factors and extracts.
Recombinant
Saccharomyces cerevisiae TBP and human recombinant TFIIB
were the kind gifts of Steven Triezenberg and Fan Shen. The clone for
production of TFIIB was the kind gift of Danny Reinberg. Recombinant
human RAP30, RAP74, and RAP74 mutants were prepared and quantitated as
described elsewhere (13, 52, 53, 54). Construction of new
mutants is described below. Calf thymus pol II used in electrophoretic
mobility shift experiments was prepared by the method of Hodo and
Blatti (19) and was primarily in the IIb form, lacking the
CTD. Gel mobility shift experiments with calf thymus pol IIa (the kind
gift of Richard Burgess) gave similar results (data not shown).
Human HeLa cells were purchased from the National Cell Culture Center
(Minneapolis, Minn.). Extracts of HeLa cell nuclei were prepared as
described previously (47). A TFIIF-depleted extract was
prepared by immunoprecipitation of TFIIF with anti-RAP30 and anti-RAP74
antibodies (6, 15). The TFIIF-depleted extract was
completely dependent on the readdition of RAP30 for activity and was
strongly stimulated by addition of RAP74.
Construction of RAP74 mutants.
RAP74(1-217) was constructed
by PCR amplification of a plasmid clone encoding RAP74 with primers
5'-CATATGGCGGCCCTAGGCCCT-3' and
5'-CTCGAGAGACATTTCCAGGT-3' and subcloning
between the NdeI and XhoI sites (cloning sites
are underlined) of pET21a (Novagen). Internal deletion mutants
RAP74(
306-351), RAP74(
276-351), and RAP74(
219-351) were
constructed by using a Quick Change site-directed mutagenesis kit
(Stratagene). All mutants were made by using the same primer for the aa
351 position,
5'-GACATTGACAGCGAGGCCTCCTCAGCCCTCTTCATGGCG-3'. For the second oligonucleotide primers,
5'-GGAGGCCTCGCTGTCAATGTCGCTCTGCTCATCGACACCATTGGG-3', 5'-GGAGGCCTCGCTGTCAATGTCTGACATGTAGTCCACCTCTTGGCC-3',
and
5'-GGAGGCCTCGCTGTCAATGTCGGAGGACATTTCCAGGTCGTCTTCAAGGTC-3', respectively, were used. The underlined sequences represent the complementary overlap between the two mutant primers.
Three triple-alanine mutations were constructed in RAP74(1-217), using
a Quick Change site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) and
appropriate primers. These mutant proteins are named RAP74(1-217)170A3, -173A3, and -176A3. Each of these mutant proteins has the sequence AAA
beginning at the indicated amino acid; for example, 170A3 carries
V170A, L171A, and N172A (Fig. 4). Mutated RAP74 genes were confirmed by
DNA sequencing.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay.
The DNA probe for the
gel shift assay was the adenovirus major late promoter from positions
53 to +14 relative to the transcriptional start site. The probe was
synthesized by PCR, using the primers 5'-32P-CAGGTGTTCCTGAAGG-3' and
5'-ATGCGGAAGAGAGTGA-3'. The upstream primer was radiolabeled
by using [
-32P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase. After
amplification, the DNA probe was gel purified by using a Qiaex kit
(Qiagen). Mobility shifts were performed as described by Wang and
Burton (54), with some modifications. The reaction mixtures
(15 µl) contained 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 20 mM Tris (pH 7.9), 50 mM
KCl, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mg of BSA (bovine serum albumin) per ml,
10% (vol/vol) glycerol, radiolabeled DNA probe, and proteins,
incubated at 30°C. S. cerevisiae TBP (0.3 pmol) was
combined with the DNA template (approximately 40 fmol) for 15 min.
Recombinant human TFIIB (0.3 pmol) was then added, and the mixture was
incubated for 15 min. Calf thymus pol II (0.15 pmol) was incubated with
human recombinant TFIIF (0.1 pmol) for at least 5 min prior to addition
to the DB complex. For reactions involving separate TFIIF subunits, pol
II was incubated with RAP30 for 5 min and then mixed with RAP74 or a
RAP74 mutant and preincubated for an additional 5 min before addition
to DB and further incubation for 15 min. It appeared that prior
addition of RAP30 to pol II aided assembly of RAP74 into DBPolF
(defined in Results). Reaction mixtures were loaded onto a 4%
polyacrylamide gel containing 0.09% bisacrylamide, 2.5% glycerol, and
0.5× TBE (tris-borate-EDTA). Dried gels were analyzed by
autoradiography.
Transcription assays.
Preparation of immobilized templates
was adapted from published methods (1, 30). DNA containing
the adenovirus major late promoter was synthesized by PCR, using an
upstream 5'-biotinylated primer. The template for amplification was a
pBluescript II SK(
) vector (Stratagene) containing the adenovirus
major late promoter (
258 to +196) subcloned between the
XhoI and HindIII sites of the plasmid. The
sequence of the upstream primer was
5'-biotin-CCCTCGAGCGGTGTTCCGCGGTCCTCCTCG-3', and the
sequence of the downstream primer was
5'-CGGTGGCGGCCGCTCTAGAACTAGTGGATC-3'. The template extended
from positions
263 to +251. Biotinylated DNA was incubated with
streptavidin paramagnetic beads (CPG) in 2 M NaCl-1 mM EDTA-10 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) for 15 min at room temperature. Immobilized templates
were collected with a magnetic particle separator (CPG), washed four
times, and stored at 4°C in phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2)
containing 1 mg of BSA per ml and 0.03% NaN3.
Pulse-spin and pulse-chase single-round assays.
A 20-µl
reaction mixture consisted of 2 µl of paramagnetic beads (about 0.6 µg of DNA) carrying the adenovirus major late promoter and
TFIIF-depleted transcription extract (72 µg of total protein)
supplemented with recombinant RAP30 and RAP74 or a RAP74 mutant (10 pmol of each), in transcription buffer (12 mM HEPES [pH 7.4], 12%
glycerol, 0.12 mM EDTA, 0.12 mM EGTA, 1.2 mM dithiothreitol) containing
60 mM KCl and 12 mM MgCl2. Preinitiation complexes were
formed for 60 min at 30°C; 100 µM ATP, CTP, and GTP and 1 µM
[
32P]UTP (10 µCi per reaction) were added to
initiate transcription for 1 min. For the pulse-spin protocol,
template-associated complexes were diluted with 200 µl of
transcription buffer containing 60 mM KCl and 1 mg/ml BSA, isolated by
centrifugation, and extracted from beads by boiling in 20 µl of 90%
(vol/vol) formamide-1% sodium dodecyl sulfate-10 mM Tris (pH
7.9)-1% mM EDTA-0.01% bromophenol blue-0.01% xylene cyanol. For
the pulse-chase protocol, instead of dilution and centrifugation of
samples, 1 mM ATP, UTP, GTP, and CTP were added 1 min after addition of
nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs), and elongation continued for 10 min.
Reactions were stopped by addition of 200 µl of 0.1 M sodium acetate
(pH 5.4)-0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate-2 mM EDTA-100 µg of tRNA per
ml, followed by phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation.
Samples were electrophoresed in a 10% polyacrylamide gel containing
1× TBE and 50% (wt/vol) urea. For quantitation of the gel, the signal
in the presence of RAP30 and the absence of added RAP74 was used to
estimate background (Fig. 2, lanes 21 and 22). The weak signal obtained
in the absence of added RAP74 was attributed to residual RAP74
remaining in the TFIIF-depleted extract.
Elongation stimulation assay.
Stimulation of pol II
elongation was determined by adding TFIIF subunits to transcriptionally
engaged pol II molecules that were washed free of associated elongation
factors. A 20-µl reaction mixture consisted of 2 µl of paramagnetic
beads carrying the adenovirus major late promoter, transcription
extract derived from HeLa cell nuclei (108 µg of total protein), and
transcription buffer containing 60 mM KCl and 12 mM MgCl2.
Samples were incubated for 60 min at 30°C to form preinitiation
complexes. Transcription was initiated by addition of 100 µM ATP,
GTP, CTP, and 1 µM (10 µCi) [
-32P]UTP (2-µl
volume). After 1 min, elongation complexes were diluted in 200 µl of
transcription buffer containing 500 mM KCl and 1 mg of BSA per ml and
isolated by centrifugation. The purpose of this treatment was to remove
accessory factors from the elongation complex. The 500 mM KCl wash
appeared to be effective because elongation rate stimulation was highly
dependent on addition of both RAP30 and RAP74 (Fig. 3). Complexes were
diluted with transcription buffer containing 60 mM KCl and 1 mg of BSA
per ml and isolated by centrifugation two times. Complexes were then
resuspended in 20 µl of transcription buffer containing 60 mM KCl and
12 mM MgCl2; recombinant RAP30 and RAP74 or a RAP74 mutant
was added (10 pmol each), and the mixture was incubated for 5 min; 100 µM ATP, GTP, CTP, and UTP were added in 2 µl, and transcripts were
elongated for 2 min. By using this protocol but allowing 5 min to
elongate RNA chains, most of the observed pol II transcripts were
extended to close to the +251 runoff position (data not shown).
Transcripts were isolated by phenol extraction and ethanol
precipitation and electrophoresed in a 6% polyacrylamide gel, as
described above. Accurate transcription was quantitated for all of the
transcripts from +122 to +251. Elongation stimulation was determined by
subtracting the average value for samples containing RAP30 but no RAP74
as background (Fig. 3A, lanes 14 and 15) and expressed as a percentage of the highest signal obtained for RAP74 (lane 3).
Multiple-round and Sarkosyl block assays.
Transcription was
initiated from an adenovirus major late promoter template digested with
SmaI to produce a 217-base runoff transcript. The source of
transcription factors was TFIIF-depleted extract (72 µg of total
protein) supplemented with recombinant RAP30 and RAP74 (10 pmol of
each, except as noted). For all reactions, preinitiation complexes were
formed for 60 min at 30°C. For the multiple-round assay, 600 µM
ATP, CTP, and GTP and 25 µM [
32P]UTP (10 µCi per
reaction) were added, and transcription continued for the indicated
times (Fig. 5 and 6). For the 10-min cold-multiple-round assay, 600 µM ATP, CTP, and GTP and 25 µM UTP were added and incubated for 10 min, and then [
-32P]UTP (10 µCi per reaction) was
added and transcription continued for 60 min (Fig. 5). For the
single-round Sarkosyl block assay (18), 600 µM ATP and CTP
and 25 µM [
32P]UTP (10 µCi per reaction) were
added and incubated for 1 min; 600 µM GTP and 0.25% (wt/vol)
Sarkosyl were added and transcription continued for 59 min (Fig. 5), 79 min (Fig. 6B and C), or 99 min (Fig. 6D). Since 0.05% Sarkosyl was
previously shown to be sufficient to block new initiation by pol II
(18), Sarkosyl was added in fivefold excess over the amount
necessary to constrain transcription to a single round. As a control,
Sarkosyl was added to reactions before NTPs, causing initiation to be
completely blocked, indicating that the level of detergent added in
experiments was sufficient to block reinitiation (data not shown).
For the experiment shown in Fig. 6A, using the multiple-round
transcription protocol, 0.25% Sarkosyl was added at the indicated times to block new initiation, and transcription was continued for an
additional 30 min to complete all previously initiated chains
(18). This was a control experiment to demonstrate that new
initiation occurs throughout the course of the reaction. Transcription was quantitated and background was selected as described above.
G-less cassette pol II trap.
To characterize multiple-round
transcription in the extract system, a G-less cassette trap for pol II
was used (48). The template was plasmid
pML(C2AT)19, the kind gift of Michele Sawadogo, containing
the adenovirus major late promoter fused to a G-less cassette at
position +11 (42, 43). Preinitiation complexes were formed
for 1 h. Reactions contained TFIIF-depleted extract supplemented
with 10 pmol of recombinant RAP30 and RAP74; 600 µM ATP, GTP, and
CTP, 1 mM 3'-O-methyl-GTP, and 25 µM
[
32P]UTP (10 µCi per reaction) were added to
reactions as indicated in Fig. 7. At t = +1 min, 0.05%
Sarkosyl was added to some reactions to estimate single-round
transcription. In the presence of ATP, CTP, UTP, and
3'-O-methyl-GTP, a transcript of 390 bases was synthesized. Under this condition, pol II stalled after insertion of
3'-O-methyl-GMP into the RNA chain at position +390. The
template was digested with PvuII to allow simultaneous
detection of stalled transcription at +390 and runoff transcription at
position +602. In control experiments, 0.05% Sarkosyl was found to be
sufficient to constrain transcription to a single round (data not
shown); 0.05% sarkosyl was used in this experiment because,
unexpectedly, the early elongation complex formed from the G-less
cassette template was much more sensitive to disruption with Sarkosyl
than that initiated from the wild-type promoter (data not shown). The
promoters in these two plasmids are identical from positions
256 to
+10, and we do not know the explanation for the observed difference in
Sarkosyl sensitivity. For chase reactions, 1 mM GTP and UTP were added and elongation continued for 10 or 60 min, as indicated in Fig. 7.
 |
RESULTS |
The N-terminal domain of RAP74 supports preinitiation complex
assembly.
A primary function of TFIIF in accurate initiation is to
deliver pol II to the promoter; therefore, we used an electrophoresis mobility shift assay to determine which regions of RAP74 were required
to bring pol II into a stable complex with adenovirus major late
promoter DNA, TBP, TFIIB, and RAP30 (DBPolF complex) (Fig.
1). By itself, TBP did not efficiently
induce a shift of the promoter fragment (lane 2). Upon addition of
TFIIB, however, a DB complex consisting of TBP, TFIIB, and promoter DNA
was observed (lane 3). When pol II was added to DB, a weak DBPol shift
was seen (lane 4). RAP30 alone did not stimulate pol II binding to DB
(lane 6), nor did RAP74 (data not shown). The TFIIF complex and
separately added RAP30 and RAP74 subunits, however, supported assembly
of DBPolF (lanes 5 and 7). RAP74(1-172) was minimally required to
support assembly (lane 10). A number of RAP74 mutants that have been
shown to be defective for RAP30 binding (54, 55) failed to
support formation of DBPolF (lanes 11 to 15). The different mobilities
of complexes containing RAP74 deletion mutants may be attributable to
differences in the charge or the degree of DNA bending or flexibility
in the complex. Because RAP74(1-517), RAP74(1-296), RAP74(1-205), and
RAP74(1-172) are predicted to carry charges of 0,
4, +6, and +7;
however, it is difficult to account for all observed mobility
differences solely on the basis of charge. For instance, RAP74(1-172)
is predicted to be more basic than RAP74(1-205) and yet supported a
DBPolF complex with a higher mobility. Furthermore, RAP74(1-205) and
(1-172) have different transcriptional activities (see below).

View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay to analyze the
requirement for RAP74 to form DBPolF. The probe was the adenovirus
major late promoter between positions 53 and +14. D, recombinant
yeast TBP (0.3 pmol); B, recombinant human TFIIB (0.3 pmol); Pol, calf
thymus pol II (0.15 pmol); F, recombinant human TFIIF complex or RAP30
and RAP74 or a RAP74 mutant, added separately (0.1 pmol). DBPolF*
indicates the different mobilities of complexes containing different
RAP74 mutants.
|
|
Tyree et al. (51) reported DBPolF30 and DBPolF74 complexes,
which formed with only the RAP30 or the RAP74 subunit of TFIIF, but
these investigators used a different promoter and Drosophila TBP, TFIIB, pol II, and human TFIIF rather than yeast TBP, human TFIIB,
human TFIIF, and bovine pol II, as used in this study. Killeen et al.
(22) and Flores et al. (16) also found DBPol30 and DABPol30 complexes under buffer conditions very different from
those used here. Although RAP74 was not essential for assembly in those
studies, it was strongly stimulatory. This paper is the first report
that shows the minimal region of RAP74 that stimulates incorporation of
pol II into DBPolF.
The N-terminal domain of RAP74 supports accurate initiation.
To determine which regions of RAP74 are most important for initiation,
RAP74 mutants were tested for accurate initiation and runoff
transcription from the adenovirus major late promoter (Fig. 2). RNA within the early elongation
complex was visualized directly on gels in the pulse-spin protocol or
extended to the runoff position in the pulse-chase protocol. Both
protocols limited transcription to a single round. In the pulse-spin
protocol, pol II remained close to the promoter, blocking a second
round of transcription. In the pulse-chase protocol, a 1,000-fold
excess of unlabeled UTP was added during the chase; so, although
reinitiation could occur, it was not detected.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Regions of RAP74 required for accurate initiation. (A)
Short and runoff RNAs accurately initiated from the adenovirus major
late promoter. All lanes contained TFIIF-depleted extract (DE; 72 µg
of total protein), recombinant human RAP30 (10 pmol), and RAP74 or a
RAP74 mutant (10 pmol), preincubated with immobilized template for 60 min. Transcripts were initiated with all four NTPs and radiolabeled
with [ -32P]UTP (ACGU*) for 1 min. For the pulse-chase
protocol, samples were chased by addition of 1 mM each NTP for 10 min
(+). For the pulse-spin protocol, initiated complexes were diluted with
transcription buffer and centrifuged briefly to isolate short,
template-associated RNAs ( ). The approximate sizes of short RNAs can
be estimated by comparison to 5'-phosphorylated 16- and 18-nucleotide
(nt) DNA markers. In lane 1, AMPPCP (a - nonhydrolyzable ATP
analog) and 2',3'-dideoxy-ATP (ddA) were substituted for ATP. In lane
2, AMPPCP was substituted for ATP. In lane 3, 1 µg of -amanitin
per ml was included in the reaction. The gel band indicated with an
asterisk is not a pol II transcript because it is synthesized in the
presence of 1 µg of -amanitin per ml (data not shown). (B)
PhosphorImager quantitation of the data shown in panel A combined with
data from two other experiments, reported as average ± standard
deviation. Short transcripts generated in the presence of RAP74 are
expressed as 100%.
|
|
By several criteria, short transcripts produced in the pulse-spin
protocol were inferred to be accurately initiated from the adenovirus
major late promoter. Short RNAs were template associated because they
could be isolated by centrifugation with beads (lanes designated
"
" for no chase). Short RNAs were chased to the predicted runoff
position of +251 with addition of NTPs (lanes designated "+"). As
expected for pol II transcripts, synthesis of short RNAs was completely
dependent on ATP with a hydrolyzable
-
bond (compare lanes 1 and
2). Synthesis of short RNAs was sensitive to 1 µg of
-amanitin per
ml (compare lanes 3 and 4) and was RAP30 and RAP74 dependent (lane 21 and data not shown).
RAP74 supported synthesis of the highest yield of short RNAs (lane 4),
but RAP74(1-409), RAP74(1-356), RAP74(1-296), and RAP74(1-217) also
supported transcription (lanes 7, 9, 11, and 13). RAP74(1-205) supported a lower yield of short RNA than RAP74(1-217) (compare lanes
13 and 15). RAP74(1-172) was barely active, and RAP74(1-136) was
inactive (lanes 17 and 19). RAP74(74-517) and RAP74(87-517) were also
inactive (reference 54 and data not shown). For
accurate initiation, therefore, the region of RAP74 between aa 1 and
205 was necessary, and the region between aa 205 and 217 was
stimulatory. Comparison of the activities of deletion mutants showed
that the regions between aa 136 and 217 and aa 1 and 74 were very
important for initiation.
A very similar conclusion was reached from inspection of runoff
transcripts (Fig. 2A, lanes designated "+"; Fig. 2B, white bars).
Because RNA was labeled by comparable procedures in the pulse-chase and
pulse-spin reactions, yields of transcript in the pulse-chase reactions
are reported as percentage of the highest signal observed using the
pulse-spin protocol. RAP74 had the highest activity in runoff
transcription (lanes 5 and 6). RAP74(1-296) and RAP74(1-217) were about
75% as active as RAP74 (lanes 12 and 14). RAP74(1-205) had reduced
activity (lane 16). RAP74(1-172) was almost inactive (lane 18), and
RAP74(1-136) was inactive (lane 20). These data confirmed that the most
important region of RAP74 for supporting accurate initiation was
located within aa 1 to 217 and that the region between aa 172 and 217 was critical for activity.
RAP74(1-409) and RAP74(1-356) had surprisingly low activities in runoff
transcription (lanes 8 and 10), a result that has been reproduced in
several experiments. RAP74(1-409) also has a partial defect in
elongation stimulation (data not shown). Deletion of sequence between
aa 296 and 356 relieves these defects, because RAP74(1-296) and
RAP74(1-217) have higher activities than RAP74(1-409) and RAP74(1-356)
in runoff transcription (compare lanes 8, 10, 12, and 14). Because
RAP74(1-409) and RAP74(1-356) appeared to initiate more efficiently
than to form runoff transcripts, these mutants may form complexes with
a tendency to release abortive transcripts.
Background transcription in this and other experiments
appeared to be due to residual RAP74 in the TFIIF-depleted extract (lanes 19 to 22). Accurate transcription was not detected when RAP30
was omitted from the reaction (data not shown), indicating that RAP30
was more efficiently depleted than RAP74. Another observation was that
a significant proportion of short RNAs were released as abortive
transcripts. Comparing the ratio of accurately initiated transcripts in
the pulse-spin protocol (Fig. 2B, black bars) to runoff products
observed in the pulse-chase protocol (white bars), we found that less
than half of the short transcripts were recovered at the runoff
position.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
The region of RAP74 between aa 172 and 217 is critical
for both accurate initiation and elongation stimulation. (A) Elongation
stimulation assay. 32P-labeled short RNAs were accurately
initiated from the adenovirus major late promoter immobilized on beads.
Complexes were washed with 0.5 M KCl to remove associated elongation
factors from pol II. RAP30 (10 pmol) and RAP74 or a RAP74 mutant (10 pmol) were added and incubated for 5 min. All four NTPs (100 µM each)
were added, and RNA chains were allowed to elongate for 2 min. NE,
nuclear extract. (B) PhosphorImager quantitation of the data shown in
panel A for transcripts between +137 and +251 in length. (C) Comparison
of elongation stimulation (B), pulse-spin, and pulse-chase data (from
Fig. 2). Values for RAP74(1-296) are reported as 100% of signal.
|
|
The N-terminal domain of RAP74 stimulates elongation by pol
II.
Because preinitiation complex assembly (Fig. 1) and
single-round initiation (Fig. 2) were supported by the N-terminal
domain of RAP74, we wondered whether the same or distinct regions might stimulate elongation by pol II (Fig. 3).
Consistent with previous reports (21, 49), both RAP30 and
RAP74 were required to stimulate elongation (Fig. 3A, lanes 1 and 14 to
17). RAP74(1-217) stimulated elongation to about the same extent as
RAP74(1-296) and RAP74. RAP74(1-205), however, stimulated elongation at
a reduced level, and RAP74(1-172) was inactive or nearly so. The region
between aa 1 and 205, therefore, appeared to be essential for
elongation stimulation, and the region between aa 205 and 217 was
strongly stimulatory. RAP74(74-517) and RAP74(87-517), from which
N-terminal sequences were deleted, did not stimulate pol II elongation
(reference 21 and data not shown).
The activities of the RAP74 mutants for elongation stimulation (Fig.
3B) appeared to be very similar to the activities obtained for accurate
initiation and runoff transcription (Fig. 2B), as if very similar RAP74
N-terminal domain sequences were important for both processes. To
challenge this idea, pulse-spin, pulse-chase, and elongation
stimulation data were plotted on the same graph, using the sample
containing RAP30 but no RAP74 as background and the sample containing
RAP74(1-296) as 100% signal. The RAP74(1-296) sample was selected as
the highest value in order to eliminate the influence of the CTD on
initiation from the comparison. As can be seen in Fig. 3C, the region
of RAP74 required to support accurate initiation, runoff transcription,
and elongation stimulation was the same.
To investigate this issue in more detail, three triple-alanine
substitution mutants were constructed within this critical region (Fig.
4). The target for mutation, between aa
170 and 178, was selected because this region is evolutionarily
conserved (54), and interestingly, this sequence is strongly
predicted to be
-helical for diverse eukaryotic species,
including S. cerevisae, Drosophila melanogaster,
Xenopus laevis, and humans. RAP74(1-217)170A3, -173A3, and
-176A3 were constructed in the RAP74(1-217) deletion mutant. The
triple-alanine mutants showed significant defects in both accurate
initiation and elongation stimulation (Fig. 4), as expected from the
results with deletion mutants (Fig. 3C). The region of RAP74 between aa
170 and 178, therefore, was very important for both accurate initiation
and elongation.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
A conserved region of RAP74 between amino acids 170 and
178 is important for both initiation and elongation. (A) Triple-alanine
substitutions 170A3, 173A3, and 176A3, constructed in RAP74(1-217), are
indicated. Related sequences from human (hRAP74), Xenopus
(xRAP74), Drosophila (dF5a), and yeast (ySsu71/Tfgl) cells
are shown. (B) RAP74(1-217)170A3, -173A3, and -176A3 were compared with
RAP74(1-517) and RAP74(1-217) in pulse-chase initiation (top panel) and
in elongation stimulation (lower panel) assays. RAP74 samples were
reconstituted with RAP30 in vitro prior to assay. Pulse-chase
initiation reactions contained TFIIF-depleted extract with the
indicated TFIIF or TFIIF mutant (10 pmol of TFIIF complex) combined
with an adenovirus major late promoter template digested with
SmaI at position +217. The protocol for the initiation assay
was as in Fig. 2 except that the DNA template was not immobilized and
the elongation time was 30 min. Elongation stimulation reactions
contained salt-washed elongation complexes supplemented with the
indicated TFIIF or TFIIF mutant protein (20 pmol) (as in Fig. 3). Lane
1 contains reconstituted TFIIF and -amanitin 1 µg/ml. Lane 14 contains no added TFIIF. Lanes 2 and 3 contain 10 pmol and lanes 15 and
16 contain 20 pmol of RAP30 but no added RAP74. All other lanes are as
indicated above both panels. (C) PhosphorImager quantitation of the
data shown in panel B. Elongation stimulation was calculated for the
+192 to +251 transcripts.
|
|
The central region and CTD of RAP74 stimulate multiple-round
transcription.
RAP74 mutants were next tested for the ability to
support multiple-round transcription in vitro (Fig.
5). In one protocol, NTPs were added with
[
32P]UTP radiolabel, and transcription was allowed to
continue for 60 min. In a modified protocol, unlabeled NTPs were added
for 10 min before addition of radiolabel (10-min cold-multiple round), and transcription continued for 60 min. For comparison, we performed a
single-round protocol in which Sarkosyl (0.25%) was added 1 min after
addition of NTPs to block new initiation (18). The final
specific activity of radiolabel was the same in all three procedures,
and so the intensities of transcription signals can be compared
directly. For the Sarkosyl block assay (Fig. 5A), the observed
transcriptional activities of RAP74 mutants were very similar to those
determined in the pulse-spin initiation assay (Fig. 2).

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
The CTD of RAP74 stimulates multiple-round
transcription. (A) Single-round and multiple-round transcription
assays. All samples contained TFIIF-depleted extract (DE; 72 µg of
protein), recombinant human RAP30 (10 pmol), and RAP74 or a RAP74
mutant (10 pmol). In the single-round protocol (s), reinitiation was
blocked by addition of the anionic detergent sarkosyl. In the
multiple-round protocol (m), transcription was allowed to proceed for
60 min. In the 10-min cold-multiple-round protocol, (c), transcription
with all four NTPs was allowed to proceed for 10 min before addition of
radiolabel and incubation for 60 min. Reactions labeled A contained
RAP74 and 1 µg of -amanitin per ml. (B) PhosphorImager
quantitation of the data in panel A.
|
|
Cycles of transcription were estimated by dividing the yield of
transcripts in the absence of Sarkosyl (multiple round) by the yield of
transcripts in the presence of sarkosyl (single round). By this
estimation, full-length RAP74 supported approximately four cycles of
transcription in 60 min (Fig. 5B). However, RAP74(1-409), RAP74(1-356),
RAP74(1-296), and RAP74(1-217) supported only about two rounds of
accurate transcription. The region between aa 409 and 517, therefore,
was important for multiple-round transcription. For RAP74(1-517),
RAP74(1-409), and RAP74(1-356), cycles of transcription were not
diminished in the 10-min cold-multiple-round protocol. The
transcription system, therefore, did not become limiting for factors or
substrates within 70 min. In contrast, RAP74(1-217) and RAP74(1-205)
had a reduced ability to support multiple rounds of transcription after
a 10-min incubation with unlabeled NTPs. In the presence of
RAP74(1-217) and RAP74(1-205), therefore, some transcription factor(s)
appeared to become limiting for initiation at later reaction times.
To characterize new initiation in the extract, the yield of transcripts
was determined at different times after addition of NTPs, and
transcripts continued to accumulate for more than 90 min (Fig.
6A). The increase in transcription was
due to new initiation rather than slow elongation of chains initiated
at earlier times, because when Sarkosyl was added to rescue all
previously initiated chains, transcripts nonetheless continued to
accumulate for the entire 90 min. If chains were initiated at early
times and slowly elongated, the Sarkosyl rescue curve would achieve its
maximal value at an early time, instead of tracking the curve without Sarkosyl, as observed.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
The central region and the CTD of RAP74 cooperate to
stimulate multiple-round transcription. (A) New initiation occurred
throughout the 90-min course of the reaction. Assays were done by the
multiple-round protocol (Fig. 5) and stopped at the indicated times
(filled squares), or instead of stopping the reactions, sarkosyl was
added to block new initiation and transcription continued for an
additional 30 min to complete any previously initiated chains (open
squares). (B and C) Both the central region and the CTD of RAP74
contributed to multiple-round transcription. Multiple-round
transcription was determined by the protocol used for Fig. 5 except
that reactions were stopped at the indicated times. Single-round
transcription was estimated by using a Sarkosyl block procedure with a
79-min elongation. Cycles of transcription were estimated as
transcription in the absence (time indicated) or presence (79-min
elongation) of Sarkosyl. (D and E) TFIIF containing RAP74(1-217)
(abbreviated F217) and F172 competed with TFIIF (F) for transcription
complex formation and inhibited multiple-round transcription. The
reaction protocol was the same as used for panels B and C except that
the reaction time after NTP addition was 100 min. TFIIF or mutants were
added to the reaction at 60 min or +10 min, as indicated. (D)
Reactions in columns 1 to 6 contained 2 pmol of TFIIF; reactions in
columns 2 and 5 also contained 2, 4, 10, or 20 pmol F217 (data points
were combined within the error bar because the effect was essentially
maximal with 2 pmol of F217); reactions in columns 3 and 6 contained 2 or 20 pmol of F172. (E) The reaction in column 1 contained 2 pmol of
TFIIF; reactions in columns 2 to 8 contained 2 pmol of F217; reactions
in columns 3, 4, and 5 contained 2, 4, or 10 pmol of TFIIF added at +10
min; reactions in columns 6, 7, and 8 contained 10 pmol of RAP30,
RAP74, or F217 added at +10 min.
|
|
To better understand the activities of RAP74 mutants in multiple-round
transcription, cycles of transcription were determined as a function of
time for RAP74 mutants (Fig. 6B and C). Mutants for which the graph has
a positive slope at the +40- and +80-min time points were judged to be
capable of supporting multiple-round transcription. By this criterion,
RAP74 was most active, followed by RAP74(1-409) and RAP74(1-356).
RAP74(1-296) had a very weak capacity to support multiple-round
transcription, and RAP74(1-217) and RAP74(1-205) were inactive.
Although defective for multiple-round transcription, RAP74(1-296) and
RAP74(1-217) were highly active in single-round transcription (Fig. 2).
The region of RAP74 between aa 409 to 517 was important for
multiple-round transcription, but the region between aa 217 and 356 stimulated multiple-round transcription, even in the absence of the
CTD. To further test the importance of the central region, three
internal deletion mutants were constructed and tested (Fig. 6C).
RAP74(
306-351), RAP74(
276-351), and RAP74(
219-351) all were
shown to support multiple-round transcription at a reduced level
compared to RAP74. Each of these mutants, however, supported
single-round transcription almost as well as RAP74 [about 75%
wild-type activity (data not shown), similarly to RAP74(1-217)].
RAP74(
306-351) was most active for multiple-round transcription, and
RAP74(
276-351) and RAP74(
219-351) had lower activity.
Although the central region stimulated multiple-round transcription,
the CTD supported this activity in the absence of aa 219 to 351, as
indicated by the positive slope of the graph for RAP74(
276-351) and
RAP74(
219-351) at late time points (Fig. 6C). Therefore, both the
CTD and the central region of RAP74 contributed to multiple-round
transcription.
An alternative explanation for the observed defects of RAP74 deletion
mutants in multiple-round transcription might be that mutants were less
stable than RAP74 during the reaction time course. We did not believe
that this would be the case because the central loop of RAP74 appears
to be the region that is most sensitive to proteolysis (data not
shown), and RAP74(1-296) and RAP74(1-217), which show the most dramatic
defects in multiple-round transcription, have most or all of the
central region removed. Also, a spectrum of defects in multiple-round
transcription was noted (Fig. 6B and C); thus, different mutants would
have to have different stabilities in approximate proportion to their
length, which seemed unlikely. Furthermore, a 5- to 10-fold functional
excess of each mutant protein was added to reactions during a 1-h
preincubation; thus, RAP74 mutants would have to be stable in the
extract under reaction conditions during the preincubation but not
after addition of NTPs, which seemed unlikely. In a Western blot
analysis, RAP74(1-517), RAP74(1-217), RAP74(1-172), and RAP30 remained
intact throughout the reaction time course (data not shown). Most
convincingly, experiments shown in Fig. 6D and E demonstrated the
stability of RAP74 mutants during the reaction and the selective defect of RAP74(1-217) in multiple-round transcription. The experiment shown
in Fig. 6D demonstrated that F217 [TFIIF complexes containing RAP74(1-217)] and F172 appeared to compete with TFIIF for formation of
transcription complexes. Addition of F217 to a reaction containing TFIIF inhibited multiple-round transcription (compare columns 1 and 2)
but not single-round transcription (compare columns 4 and 5). This was
expected because RAP74(1-217) is active for single-round but not
multiple-round transcription (Fig. 6B). Since RAP74(1-172) was nearly
inactive for transcription (Fig. 2), this mutant inhibited both
multiple-round (compare columns 1 and 3) and single-round (compare
columns 4 and 6) transcription. The inhibitory effect of RAP74(1-172)
was consistent with our observation that this mutant assembled into the
DBPolF complex (Fig. 1). The competitive effects of RAP74(1-217) and
(1-172) persisted during the 100-min time course, indicating that these
proteins remained active for complex assembly. The experiment shown in
Fig. 6E shows that late addition of TFIIF rescued a reaction containing
F217 for multiple-round transcription (compare column 1 to columns 3 to
5) but that readdition of F217 did not (compare columns 2 and 8).
Rescue of the reaction with TFIIF was not complete because of
inhibition by F217 (Fig. 6D). If the defect of F217 at late reaction
times were due to degradation or inactivation, readdition of F217 would
be expected to rescue transcription, but this was not observed (column
8). Furthermore, because readdition of TFIIF did rescue multiple-round transcription, the presence of F217 did not cause the irreversible inactivation of another general factor, such as TFIIB or pol II. Therefore, these data demonstrated that RAP74(1-217) had a specific defect in multiple- but not single-round transcription and that this
defect was not attributable to degradation or inactivation of the
mutant protein. These experiments strengthen our argument that the CTD
and central region of RAP74 have a specific role in transcriptional
recycling.
New initiation resulted from previously unused pol II molecules
initiating from previously unused promoters.
In the extract
system, new initiation events could involve reuse of promoters, reuse
of pol II, or initiation from many promoters from which pol II is
enabled to initiate at various times. We used a G-less cassette
template as a pol II trap to discriminate between these possibilities
(48). With the G-less cassette, an adenovirus major late
promoter transcript can be synthesized with only ATP, CTP, and UTP,
omitting GTP (42). Pol II stalls at the first position at
which GMP must be incorporated. If promoters are reused, multiple pol
II molecules pile up at the end of the G-less cassette, resulting in a
ladder of transcripts each one shorter by about 30 nucleotides
(48). The number of rungs on the ladder corresponds to the
number of pol II molecules that have stalled on the template. If pol II
must be reused for new initiation at later reaction times, trapping pol
II at the end of the G-less cassette is expected to inhibit new
initiation.
We have therefore considered three models to characterize
multiple-round transcription in the extract system: (i) promoter limitation (promoter reuse), (ii) pol II limitation (pol II reuse), and
(iii) kinetic limitation (new initiation from different promoters using
different pol II molecules at various times). Promoter limitation results if only a small number of promoters are bound by the necessary set of DNA-binding transcription factors (TFIID, major late
transcription factor, etc.), and these factors remain committed to the
same promoter through multiple transcription rounds. Sawadogo's
laboratory has set up a transcription system with purified and
recombinant components in which functional promoter limitation was
demonstrated (48). Alternatively, in the pol II limitation
model, only a small fraction of pol II molecules have the capacity to
accurately initiate and reinitiate. If pol II is limiting in
concentration and if pol II molecules are trapped at the end of the
G-less cassette, multiple-round transcription will be inhibited. Pol II
limitation can arise by functional limitation of any transcription
factor that remains tightly associated with pol II through the
transcription cycle. A third possibility is the kinetic limitation
model. If a transcription factor has to be in a particular form (i.e.,
phosphorylation state) to be active, then the availability of active
transcription complexes at any one time might be controlled.
To discriminate between these models, we did the experiment shown in
Fig. 7. The template contained the
adenovirus major late promoter fused to a G-less cassette
(43). We anticipated that a low level of GTP in the extract
might allow elongation past the end of the cassette, and in fact, this
is what we observed (data not shown). This problem was overcome by
addition of the chain terminator 3'-O-methyl-GTP. Because
the plasmid template was digested with PvuII at position
+602, stalling at the end of the cassette could be compared to runoff
transcription.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Multiple-round transcription in an extract system can be
described by a kinetic limitation model. The template contains the
adenovirus major late promoter (AdMLP) fused to a G-less cassette that
extends to position +389. The template was digested with
PvuII at position +602. Transcripts formed in the presence
of the chain terminator 3'-O-methyl-GTP (mG) and in the
absence of GTP stalled at the end of the G-less cassette. When GTP was
included in the reaction, pol II continued transcription to the +602
runoff position. The template and protocols are summarized at the top.
Expected results for the promoter limitation, pol II limitation, and
kinetic limitation models are shown on the left and discussed in the
text. Experimental data are shown on the right.
|
|
Simulated results based on the three models are indicated with
experimental data that are most consistent with a kinetic limitation model (Fig. 7). RAP74 supported approximately 4 to 10 rounds of initiation in 80 min (Fig. 5 and 6B to E), and this result was confirmed for the G-less cassette template by comparing multiple-round (without Sarkosyl) and single-round (with Sarkosyl) runoff
transcription (Fig. 7; compare lanes 1 and 2). When
3'-O-methyl-GTP was included in the reaction, multiple-round
transcription was not noticeably inhibited (compare lanes 3 and 4 with
lanes 1 and 2). These data most closely resemble the results expected
for the kinetic limitation model. Stalling of pol II at the end of the
G-less cassette was efficient, because the runoff transcript was barely
detectable in the presence of the chain terminator (lane 3). A single
pile-up product corresponding to approximately 10% of stalled
transcripts was observed above background. This gel band appears to be
a pile-up product because it was chased to the runoff position with
addition of GTP (compare lane 3 with lanes 5 and 6), and it was not
observed in lanes 1, 5, and 6, as expected for a terminated transcript. We have not detected a second pile-up product (which would be expected
at a level of only 1% of the stalled transcript), and so few promoters
appear to be used as many as three times (lane 3). Because about four
cycles of transcription were observed and only 10% of promoters were
used even twice, the extract system was generally in active promoter
excess. Because new initiation was not inhibited by trapping pol II,
the data were not consistent with a pol II limitation model (compare
lanes 3 and 4 with lanes 1 and 2). A very slow rate of true pol II
recycling may occur in this system, but most new initiation required
the recruitment of unused pol II molecules.
About 20% of the transcripts stalled at the end of the G-less cassette
were terminated or arrested, because they were not chased with addition
of GTP (compare lane 3 with lanes 5 and 6). This low frequency of
escape from the pol II trap was not sufficient to complicate
interpretation of the experimental results because escape of 20% of
pol II molecules cannot account for four rounds of new initiation.
Also, the sample in lane 7 showed that inclusion of
3'-O-methyl-GTP in the reaction did not affect
multiple-round transcription.
 |
DISCUSSION |
From primary sequence (2, 15), RAP74 is proposed to
have highly basic N- and C-terminal domains separated by a highly charged, overall acidic, and flexible central region that is rich in
charged amino acids, E, D, K, and R, and also S, T, P, and G. In this
report, we show that these primary sequence features correspond to
distinct N- and C-terminal functional domains (Fig. 8). The N-terminal domain is sufficient
to support preinitiation complex assembly, single-round initiation, and
elongation by pol II. The central region and CTD of RAP74 have a small
stimulatory effect on initiation, but their most important function is
in multiple-round transcription. Deletion of just the central region or
just the CTD of RAP74 creates a protein with partial function in
multiple-round transcription.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
N- and C-terminal domains of RAP74, which were
originally proposed from sequence analysis (2, 15),
correspond to distinct functional domains. The N-terminal domain has
most of the functions required for single-round initiation and
elongation. The central region and CTD of RAP74 function in
multiple-round transcription. Regions shaded dark are very important
for activity. IIB, TFIIB; CTDP, CTD phosphatase; PIC, preinitiation
complex.
|
|
The N-terminal domain of RAP74 stimulates initiation and
elongation.
The RAP74 N-terminal domain extending from aa 1 to 217 supports most RAP74 functions for preinitiation complex assembly (Fig. 1), accurate initiation (Fig. 2), and elongation stimulation (Fig. 3
and 4). In this work, we have mapped a critical region for these functions between aa 136 and 217. RAP74(1-172) binds tightly to the
RAP30 subunit, but RAP74(1-136) does not (54, 55).
Consistent with its capacity to bind RAP30, RAP74(1-172) is minimally
sufficient to support pol II assembly into DBPolF (Fig. 1). Fulfilling
this role in assembly, however, is not sufficient to support TFIIF function in initiation or elongation, which minimally requires RAP74(1-205) (Fig. 2). RAP74(1-217) is significantly more active than
RAP74(1-205) in both accurate initiation and elongation stimulation (Fig. 2 and 3).
Recent site-specific DNA photo-cross-linking studies show that RAP74
induces a significant conformational change within the DBPolFE
preinitiation complex (17, 39, 40). This conformational change is referred to as isomerization to compare it with isomerization of the Escherichia coli preinitiation complex, which
involves similar changes in protein conformation (41) and
wrapping of promoter DNA around RNA polymerase (11, 37).
Interestingly, RAP74(1-205), which is minimally required for accurate
initiation, also minimally supports isomerization of DBPolFE, as
indicated by development of a number of specific DNA photo-cross-links
with the RPB1 and RPB2 subunits of pol II, with RAP30, and with TFIIE34 (17, 39, 40). Because RAP74(1-172) is sufficient for tight RAP30 binding and DBPolF assembly but insufficient for isomerization of
DBPolFE, accurate initiation or elongation stimulation,
RAP74(1-217) and RAP74(1-205) appear to have functions that are not
communicated to pol II directly through the RAP30 subunit.
Photo-cross-linking studies have indicated that RAP74 approaches the
adenovirus major late promoter at numerous positions extending all the
way from
56 to
61 upstream of TATA to +26 downstream of +1 (about
280 Å of B-form DNA) (17, 40). This extensive cross-linking
footprint is the basis for one argument in favor of DNA wrapping around pol II in DBPolFE and also for an
2
2
heterotetrameric form of TFIIF in the complex (40). Because
RAP74 interacts with promoter DNA and induces isomerization of
DBPolFE, RAP74 appears to support DNA wrapping both by contacting DNA
directly and by modifying the contacts of RAP30, pol II, and TFIIE34
with DNA (17, 39, 40). The region of RAP74 between aa 172 and 205, therefore, appears to stimulate transcription by helping DNA
to wrap around pol II. Wrapping may result from direct interactions
between DNA and aa 172 to 205, or this region may be involved in
protein-protein interactions that facilitate wrapping. Recent work
indicates that the region from aa 172 to 205 is involved in
dimerization of RAP74 (40). It is not clear whether the
adjacent region of RAP74 from aa 205 to 217, which also stimulated
initiation and elongation, contributed to DNA wrapping or another
function. It is interesting that DBPolF complexes containing
RAP74(1-517), RAP74(1-296), RAP74(1-205), and RAP74(1-172) had
different electrophoretic mobilities that could have been caused by
differences in the degree of DNA bending or flexibility (Fig. 1).
Differences in mobility might relate to the degree of DNA bending
caused by partial or complete isomerization of DBPolFE in the
presence of TFIIF mutants.
RAP74(1-217), RAP74(1-205), and RAP74(1-172) showed a spectrum of
decreasing activities in both accurate initiation and elongation stimulation (Fig. 3C). Triple alanine mutants in this region, RAP74(1-217)170A3, -173A3, and -176A3, were also significantly affected
for both initiation and elongation (Fig. 4). The 170A3 mutant was more
defective in initiation than 173A3, but they had very similar defects
in elongation. Perhaps more interestingly, the 176A3 mutant was
partially active in initiation but inactive for elongation stimulation.
The initiation assay is more complex than the elongation assay, because
initiation is influenced by all of the general transcription factors
and some regulatory factors in the extract system, and the elongation
assay may involve only elongating pol II and TFIIF. In the
initiation assay, therefore, general or regulatory factors
could partially complement TFIIF activity. 176A3, therefore, might be
partially complemented for its function in initiation by interaction
with a general or regulatory transcription factor, which is present in
the cell extract but absent in salt-washed elongation complexes.
Conceivably, readdition of such a factor to the elongation complex
might relieve the 176A3 defect in elongation.
Because the same region of RAP74 contributed strongly to both
initiation and elongation, RAP74 may perform similar roles in the two
processes. In preinitiation complex assembly, the role of RAP74 appears
to be to wrap DNA around pol II and to isomerize the complex
(40). If RAP74 has a similar role in elongation, it is also
likely to involve DNA wrapping around pol II. In initiation, DNA
wrapping is induced around eukaryotic RNA polymerase I (44), RNA polymerase II (24, 40), and prokaryotic RNA polymerase (11, 37).
It was somewhat surprising that the sequence requirements for RAP74
were so similar for initiation and elongation, because a very different
conclusion was reached for the RAP30 subunit of TFIIF (50).
Although RAP30 mutations that fail to bind RAP74 were found to be
severely defective for both initiation and elongation, mutations in
other regions of RAP30 affected initiation and elongation in different
ways. RAP30 mutations within a presumed pol II binding region were
defective in elongation stimulation but not in initiation. RAP30
mutations within a DNA-interacting region were defective for accurate
initiation but not elongation stimulation (50). These
results may indicate that RAP30 has distinct roles in initiation and
elongation, although RAP74 appears to fulfill a common role in both
processes. Because DNA-binding regions of RAP30 appear to be critical
for initiation but dispensable for elongation, RAP30 might interact
specifically with DNA in the preinitiation complex. During elongation,
the DNA sequence encountered by pol II is in flux, and RAP30 may make
less extensive template contacts. RAP30 is also likely to make reduced
protein-protein contacts as initiation factors dissociate from the
elongation complex.
The central region and CTD of RAP74 stimulate multiple-round
transcription.
When cycles of transcription were plotted against
time for multiple-round transcription reactions, the resulting curve
showed a high initial rate of RNA synthesis followed by a lower rate (Fig. 6B and C). The initial burst of synthesis persisted for 10 to 15 min, and then the lower rate dominated the reaction. This lower rate
represents multiple-round transcription and is likely to represent a
recycling mechanism for pol II or an essential pol II transcription
factor. RAP74 mutants from which C-terminal and/or central regions were
removed were found to be defective for this low rate of transcription
at later reaction times.
In Fig. 7, we showed that multiple-round transcription in the extract
conformed to what we call a kinetic limitation model. If this system
had fit the pol II limitation model, this would have demonstrated true
pol II recycling, because release of pol II from the template would
then have been required to support new initiation. Establishment of a
pol II limited system that can support multiple-round transcription
will require that recycling be much more efficient than in the extract
system. According to the kinetic limitation model, new initiation
events at later reaction times were largely dependent on unused pol II
molecules that were recruited to (or activated at) previously unused
promoters. The extract system was found to have an excess of active
promoters, and pol II and general factors were estimated to be in
significant excess over the level of adenovirus major late promoter
transcripts that were produced (references 5, 9, and
29 and our unpublished data). In a system that
contains an excess of active promoters and a presumed excess of
transcription factors, it is somewhat difficult to understand why all
the active promoters are not occupied and utilized at once. One way to
view this kind of regulation is that a particular factor may require
modification (i.e., phosphorylation or dephosphorylation) to be
activated for initiation, such that although the factor is not limiting
in concentration, it is limiting in activity.
In the extract system, the rate at which CTD phosphatases convert pol
IIo to pol IIa may become limiting for initiation. When ATP and GTP are
added, CTD kinases such as TFIIH (14, 29, 45, 46) and P-TEFb
(31) can phosphorylate pol IIa to pol IIo. If this
conversion is efficient, most pol II will be in the pol IIo form, but
only the small fraction that remains in the initiating pol IIa form is
expected to assemble into preinitiation complexes (7, 27).
Pol IIo requires a CTD phosphatase to convert it to the pol IIa form
for new initiation. The initial burst of RNA synthesis observed in Fig.
6B and C may reflect utilization of the pool of pol IIa in the extract.
The low rate of RNA accumulation at later reaction times may reflect
the rate of conversion from pol IIo to pol IIa. In our system, true
recycling of pol II after template runoff was not efficient, because
trapping pol II at the end of a G-less cassette did not inhibit
multiple-round transcription (Fig. 7). On the other hand,
multiple-round transcription in the extract appeared to reflect a
physiological recycling system, because this process involved
activation of transcription complexes as a function of time.
Additionally, multiple-round transcription was completely dependent on
the presence of either the central region or CTD of RAP74 (Fig. 6B and
C). As an example, RAP74(1-217) was completely inactive for
multiple-round transcription because this mutant failed to support new
initiation at late reaction times, but RAP74(1-217) was highly active
for the initial burst of transcription (Fig. 6B).
RAP74, TFIIB, and the CTD phosphatase may be components of a pol II
recycling mechanism. The CTD of RAP74 stimulates a CTD phosphatase
(8), and this region of RAP74 binds TFIIB (13) and pol II (54). TFIIB blocks stimulation of CTD phosphatase activity by RAP74 (8). Dephosphorylated pol IIa
preferentially enters the preinitiation complex, and CTD kinases
phosphorylate pol II within the preinitiation complex or shortly after
initiation (7, 27). During elongation, pol II is
hyperphosphorylated on the CTD (7, 28). Because RAP74
stimulates and TFIIB blocks stimulation of CTD phosphatase activity
(8), we suggest that TFIIB may be present in elongation
complexes to block CTD dephosphorylation in order to prevent premature
termination. RNA processing beyond the 3' mRNA cleavage and
polyadenylation sequence (AAUAAA) may provide a signal to relieve the
TFIIB block to CTD phosphatase activity, allowing RAP74 to stimulate
conversion of pol IIo to pol IIa. Interestingly, the 3'-end cleavage
factor complex (CPSF-CstF) interacts with the CTD and associates with
elongating pol II (32). We suggest that conversion of
transcriptionally engaged pol IIo molecules to the pol IIa form may
induce termination, with pol IIa released in the appropriate form to
recycle to a promoter.
RAP74 has distinct functions in bringing pol II to the promoter, in
isomerization of the preinitiation complex, in elongation stimulation,
perhaps in termination, and in pol II recycling. These specialized
functions must be regulated for progression through the transcription
cycle. For instance, RAP74 is unlikely to stimulate elongation rate and
the activity of the CTD phosphatase during elongation, because this
would simultaneously stimulate elongation and induce premature
termination. It will be of great interest to identify all of the
components of the initiation, elongation, termination, and recycling
complexes to begin to unravel how pol II monitors its progress through
the transcription cycle.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Steven Triezenberg, Fan Shen, Richard Burgess, and
Stephan Reimers for proteins and Danny Reinberg and Michelle Sawadogo for clones. We gratefully acknowledge David Arnosti, Benoit Coulombe, James Geiger, and Steven Triezenberg for providing valuable criticisms of the manuscript. Augen Pioszak, Victoria Sutton, Jessica
Metcalf-Burton, Hiroe Taki, Julia Clay, and Nadine Kobty helped with
production of RAP74 mutants as part of undergraduate internship
programs. Julia Xiaozhu Pan helped with purification of proteins.
This work was supported by a grant from the American Cancer Society, by
Michigan State University, and by the Michigan State University
Agricultural Experiment Station. Verna C. Finkelstein also contributed
funds to support this work.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Biochemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1319. Phone: (517) 353-0859. Fax: (517) 353-9334. E-mail:
burton{at}pilot.msu.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Arias, J., and W. S. Dynan.
1989.
Promoter-dependent transcription by RNA polymerase II using immobilized enzyme complexes.
J. Biol. Chem.
264:3223-3229[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Aso, T.,
H. A. Vasavada,
T. Kawaguchi,
F. J. Germino,
S. Ganguly,
S. Kitajima,
S. M. Weissman, and Y. Yasukochi.
1992.
Characterization of cDNA for the large subunit of the transcription initiation factor TFIIF.
Nature
355:461-464[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Bartholomew, B.,
M. E. Dahmus, and C. F. Meares.
1986.
RNA contacts subunits IIo and IIc in HeLa RNA polymerase II transcription complexes.
J. Biol. Chem.
261:14226-14231[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Bengal, E.,
O. Flores,
A. Krauskopf,
D. Reinberg, and Y. Aloni.
1991.
Role of the mammalian transcription factors IIF, IIS, and IIX during elongation by RNA polymerase II.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:1195-1206[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Burton, Z. F.,
L. G. Ortolan, and J. Greenblatt.
1986.
Proteins that bind to RNA polymerase II are required for accurate initiation of transcription from the adenovirus 2 major late promoter.
EMBO J.
5:2923-2930[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Burton, Z. F.,
M. Killeen,
M. Sopta,
L. G. Ortolan, and J. Greenblatt.
1988.
RAP30/74: a general initiation factor that binds to RNA polymerase II.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8:1602-1613[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Chambers, R. S., and M. E. Dahmus.
1994.
Purification and characterization of a phosphatase from HeLa cells which dephosphorylates the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II.
J. Biol. Chem.
69:26243-26248.
|
| 8.
|
Chambers, R. S.,
B. Q. Wang,
Z. F. Burton, and M. E. Dahmus.
1995.
The activity of COOH-terminal domain phosphatase is regulated by a docking site on RNA polymerase II and by the general transcription factors IIF and IIB.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:14962-14969[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Cochet-Meilhac, M.,
P. Nuret,
J. C. Courvalin, and P. Chambon.
1974.
Animal DNA-dependent RNA polymerases. 12. Determination of the cellular number of RNA polymerase B molecules.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta.
353:185-192[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Conaway, R. C.,
P. Garrett,
J. P. Hanley, and J. W. Conaway.
1991.
Mechanism of promoter selection by RNA polymerase II: mammalian transcription factors and  promote entry of polymerase into the preinitiation complex.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:6205-6209[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Craig, M. L.,
W.-C. Suh, and M. T. Record.
1995.
HO · and DNase I probing of E 70 RNA polymerase- PR promoter open complexes: Mg2+ binding and its structural consequences at the transcription start site.
Biochemistry
34:15624-15632[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Dahmus, M. E.
1996.
Reversible phosphorylation of the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:19009-19012[Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Fang, S. M., and Z. F. Burton.
1996.
RNA polymerase II-associated protein (RAP) 74 binds transcription factor (TF)IIB and blocks TFIIB-RAP30 binding.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:11703-11709[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Feaver, W. J.,
O. Gileadi,
Y. Li, and R. D. Kornberg.
1991.
CTD kinase associated with yeast RNA polymerase II initiation factor b.
Cell
67:1223-1230[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Finkelstein, A.,
C. F. Kostrub,
J. Li,
D. P. Chavez,
B. Q. Wang,
S. M. Fang,
J. Greenblatt, and Z. F. Burton.
1992.
A cDNA encoding RAP74, a general initiation factor for transcription by RNA polymerase II.
Nature
355:464-467[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Flores, O.,
H. Lu,
M. Killeen,
J. Greenblatt,
Z. F. Burton, and D. Reinberg.
1991.
The small subunit of transcription factor IIF recruits RNA polymerase II into the preinitiation complex.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:9999-10003[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Forget, D.,
F. Robert,
G. Grondin,
Z. F. Burton,
J. Greenblatt, and B. Coulombe.
1997.
RAP74 induces promoter contacts by RNA polymerase II upstream and downstream of a DNA bend centered on the TATA box.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:7150-7155[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Hawley, D. K., and R. G. Roeder.
1985.
Separation and partial characterization of three functional steps in transcription initiation by human RNA polymerase II.
J. Biol. Chem.
260:8163-8172[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Hodo, H. G., III, and S. P. Blatti.
1977.
Purification using polyethylenimine precipitation and low molecular weight subunit analyses of calf thymus and wheat germ DNA-dependent RNA polymerase II.
Biochemistry
16:2334-2343[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Izban, M. G., and D. S. Luse.
1992.
Factor-stimulated RNA polymerase II transcribes at physiological elongation rates on naked DNA but very poorly on chromatin templates.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:13647-13655 |