Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Mol Cell Biol, May 1998, p. 2835-2844, Vol. 18, No. 5
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center,
University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North
Carolina 27599
Received 24 November 1997/Returned for modification 7 January
1998/Accepted 17 February 1998
The Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) oncoprotein
causes multiple cellular changes, including induction of epidermal
growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression and activation of the NF- The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-encoded
latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) is essential for immortalization of B
lymphocytes infected in vitro with EBV and is expressed in lymphomas
which develop in immunocompromised individuals (32, 47, 66).
LMP1 is also expressed in all cases of premalignant lesions related to
the human malignancy nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and in a majority of NPC biopsies (12, 46, 67). LMP1 is the only EBV protein shown to have transforming properties in rodent fibroblasts,
highlighting the importance of this viral oncoprotein in cellular
transformation associated with EBV infection (1, 43, 60).
The function of LMP1 and the involvement of LMP1 in the activation of
cellular signal transduction pathways are just beginning to be
understood. Expression of LMP1 in B lymphocytes induces the
transcription of many genes, including those encoding activation
antigens such as CD23 and CD40, adhesion molecules such as ICAM-1,
LFA-1, and LFA-3, and molecules which inhibit programmed cell death
such as Bcl-2, Mch-1, and A20 (16, 22, 33, 35, 36, 62-64). Expression of LMP1 in epithelial cells induces expression of the genes
encoding the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the A20
molecule (38-40). Induction of these genes is likely to play an important role in the transformation of epithelial cells by
LMP1. LMP1 activates the NF- LMP1 consists of a 24-amino-acid cytoplasmic domain located at the
amino terminus, a membrane-spanning hydrophobic domain consisting of
six transmembrane domains connected by short turns between amino acids
25 and 187, followed by a 200-amino-acid cytoplasmic domain at the
carboxy terminus (Fig. 1) (13,
23). The six transmembrane domains of LMP1 are essential for the
activation of signaling pathways, indicating that proper aggregation in
the plasma membrane is required for LMP1 function (25, 37,
40). Mutational analysis of LMP1 with respect to activation of
cellular signaling pathways further divides the carboxy-terminal domain into three regions. Carboxy-terminal activation region 1 (CTAR1), located between amino acids 187 and 231, is essential for EGFR induction and is a relatively weak activator of NF-
0270-7306/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Interaction of Tumor Necrosis Factor
Receptor-Associated Factor Signaling Proteins with the Latent
Membrane Protein 1 PXQXT Motif Is Essential for Induction of Epidermal
Growth Factor Receptor Expression
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
B
transcription factor. LMP1 and the cellular protein CD40, which also
induces EGFR expression, interact with the tumor necrosis factor
receptor-associated factor (TRAF) proteins. The LMP1 carboxy-terminal
activation region 1 signaling domain interacts specifically with the
TRAFs and is essential for EGFR induction through a mechanism
independent of NF-
B alone. LMP1 and CD40 share a common TRAF binding
motif, PXQXT. In this study, the PXQXT motifs in both LMP1 and CD40
were altered and mutant proteins were analyzed for induction of EGFR
expression. Replacement of the T residue with A in CD40 completely
blocked induction of the EGFR, while the same mutation in LMP1 did not
affect EGFR induction. Replacement of both P and Q residues with A's
in LMP1 reduced EGFR induction by >75%, while deletion of PXQXT
blocked EGFR induction. These results genetically link EGFR induction
by LMP1 to the TRAF signaling pathway. Overexpression of TRAF2 potently
activates NF-
B, although TRAF2 did not induce expression of the EGFR
either alone or in combination with TRAF1 and TRAF3. In vivo analyses of the interaction of the TRAFs with LMP1 variants mutated in the PXQXT
domain indicate that high-level induction of EGFR expression requires
interaction with TRAF1, -2, and -3. However, exogenous expression of
TRAF3 decreased EGFR induction mediated by either LMP1 or CD40. These
data suggest that TRAF-mediated activation of EGFR expression requires
assembly of a complex containing the appropriate stoichiometry of TRAF
proteins clustered at the cell membrane with LMP1.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
B transcription factor and also activates the N-terminal Jun kinase (JNK1) (19, 21, 25, 34, 42,
45). Activation of these pathways is likely to mediate some but
not all of the LMP1-induced changes in gene expression described above.
B (25, 40, 42). CTAR2, located between amino acids 352 and 386, is
responsible for activation of JNK and is the major NF-
B activation
domain (6, 25, 34, 40, 42). The amino acids separating these two domains (amino acids 232 to 351) are not associated with any known
function.

View larger version (46K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Model depicting the molecular structures and locations
of functional domains in LMP1. LMP1 contains a 24-amino-acid
cytoplasmic amino terminus, a transmembrane hydrophobic domain, and a
200-amino-acid cytoplasmic carboxy terminus. The carboxy terminus
contains the major signaling domains in LMP1. CTAR1 mediates
interaction with the TRAFs, induces EGFR expression, and is the minor
NF-
B-activating region; CTAR2 is the major NF-
B-activating
region. The location of the TRAF-interacting motif, PXQXT, is also
indicated.
LMP1 has many similarities to the tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) superfamily. The TNFR superfamily comprises a large group of transmembrane proteins including CD40 and CD30 that transmit extracellular signals but do not contain the intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity often associated with membrane receptors (56, 58, 59). Instead, the TNFR family members initiate signaling events through interaction of their cytoplasmic domains with the recently identified tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factors (TRAFs) (8, 44, 48, 49, 53). The mechanisms by which the TRAFs activate signaling cascades are just beginning to be understood.
Several lines of evidence indicate that LMP1 functions as a
constitutively activated member of the TNFR superfamily. First, expression of LMP1 in B-lymphoid cells induces many of the phenotypic changes characteristic of EBV immortalization (4, 5, 11, 17,
52). Activation of CD40, in conjunction with interleukin-4 stimulation, can mimic EBV-induced immortalization of human lymphocytes in short-term culture, suggesting parallel roles for CD40 and LMP1 in
signal transduction pathways (4, 17, 50). CD40, like LMP1,
can induce expression of the EGFR in epithelial cells, which also
indicates a similarity between LMP1 and CD40 signaling (40).
Second, signaling from CTAR1 involves the TRAF signaling pathway, and
LMP1 interacts with TRAF1, -2, -3, and -5 (6, 10, 44, 51).
The precise TRAF interaction motif in CTAR1 has been identified by
homology with the TNFR family members CD40 and CD30 (7, 18,
24). The TRAFs bind to the PXQXT motif located between amino
acids 204 and 208 of LMP1 (10, 15, 51). TRAF2 appears to be
a positive regulator of TRAF-mediated NF-
B activation; in support of
this finding, NF-
B activation by CTAR1 in LMP1 involves interactions
with TRAF1 and TRAF2 (10, 31). In contrast, TRAF3 appears to
be a negative regulator of the TRAF pathway, and accordingly,
overexpression of TRAF3 blocks NF-
B activation from CTAR1 but not
CTAR2 (10, 11, 40, 48). The mechanism of NF-
B activation
by CTAR2 may involve interaction with the TNFR-associated death domain
protein (TRADD) and studies have localized CTAR2 to amino acids 379 to
384 (14, 29). Although the interaction with TRADD may
activate NF-
B through the interaction with TRAF2, the details of
CTAR2 signaling remain unknown (10, 29, 31).
Recent experiments indicate that the CTAR1 domain in LMP1 is essential
for induction of EGFR expression (40). This induction of
EGFR expression by LMP1 occurred at the RNA level, indicating that LMP1
either activates the EGFR promoter or stabilizes the EGFR mRNA
(39, 40). Expression of an LMP1 mutant deleted for CTAR2,
LMP1(1-231), induced high levels of EGFR expression. In contrast, an
LMP1 mutant deleted for CTAR1, LMP1(
187-351), activated NF-
B to
high levels in both transient and stable assays but was completely
defective for EGFR induction (40). These results indicate
that NF-
B activation alone is unable to induce EGFR expression.
However, since the CTAR1 signaling domain is linked to both EGFR
induction and NF-
B activation, the contribution of NF-
B to the
induction of EGFR expression could not be determined.
The experiments presented in this study were designed to determine the
contribution of NF-
B activation from CTAR1 to the induction of EGFR
expression, to analyze the roles of the TRAF proteins in these
signaling pathways, and to identify residues in the PXQXT motif in
CTAR1 which are responsible for EGFR induction and interaction with the
TRAFs.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell lines and establishment of derivatives. C33A epithelial cells, derived from a human cervical carcinoma (human papillomavirus negative), were grown at 37°C in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM-H) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco-BRL) and antibiotics. Cells were routinely grown in 150-mm-diameter cell culture dishes and subcultured three times weekly. C33A cell lines expressing CD40, wild-type LMP1 [LMP1(WT)], and mutants of LMP1 were obtained by selection in 600 µg of G418 (Geneticin; Gibco-BRL) following transfection with an expression construct containing the appropriate gene. Briefly, 5 × 105 cells were seeded in 60-mm-diameter tissue culture dishes and Lipofectin transfected as specified by the manufacturer (Gibco-BRL) with 5 µg of DNA. Cells were fed with fresh medium 24 h posttransfection, and 48 h posttransfection, the medium was replaced with fresh medium containing G418. Cell lines were created by pooling >50 G418-resistant colonies.
Plasmids and expression vectors.
The expression vector used
for most of the constructs in this study is pcDNA3 (Invitrogen), which
contains the cytomegalovirus (CMV) immediate-early promoter,
polyadenylation sequence from the bovine growth hormone gene, and
neomycin resistance cassette. The LMP1 cDNA was subcloned into the
EcoRI site of pcDNA3. The construction of pcDNA3 vectors
expressing FLAG-tagged LMP1 and LMP1 mutants has been described
previously (40). The CD40 cDNA was subcloned into the
HindIII and XhoI sites of pcDNA3. pSG5- and
pcDNA3-based expression vectors for TRAF1, TRAF2, and TRAF3 were kindly
provided by Elliott Kieff. The pSG5 vector contains the simian virus
early promoter and intron sequences from the rabbit
-globin gene
(Stratagene). TRAF3 was also subcloned into the pMEP4 expression vector
(Invitrogen). The pMEP4 vector contains the human metallothionein
promoter, herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase polyadenylation
sequence, and hygromycin resistance cassette. pMEP4 and pMEP4-TRAF3
were transfected into C33A cells as described above and selected
48 h following transfection in medium containing 100 µg of
hygromycin (Boehringer Mannheim) per ml. To coexpress TRAF3 with either
LMP1 or CD40, pcDNA3-based vectors for LMP1 or CD40 were transfected
into the pMEP4-TRAF3 cell line and selected in G418. Transfection of a
fivefold excess of pSG5-TRAF1 with pcDNA3-TRAF2 in the pMEP4-TRAF3 cell
lines, followed by selection in G418, created a cell line
overexpressing all three TRAFs. The CMV-I
B
(S32/36A) expression
vector, which encodes an I
B
molecule in which serines 32 and 36 have been replaced by alanines, was a kind gift of Dean Ballard
(55). Cell lines expressing I
B
(S32/36A) were created
by transfecting a fivefold excess of CMV-I
B
(S32/36A) with
pcDNA3-based plasmids and selected in G418.
Construction of TRAF interaction domain LMP1 and CD40
mutants.
The LMP1 cDNA was subcloned into the EcoRI
site of the pGEM3Z vector to facilitate construction of LMP1 mutants.
PCR using Vent polymerase (New England Biolabs) was used to produce all mutant sequences. For the LMP1 mutants, following PCR amplification, the PCR products were digested with BsaBI and
MscI and ligated into pGEM3Z-LMP1 which was digested with
the same enzymes (except for EGRHH221-225AGAAA, which was digested with
BsaBI and NaeI). The nucleotides representing the
mutated codons are boldfaced in the sequences below. The sense
oligonucleotide used in the PCR was
5'-AACAAAACTGGTGGACTCTATTGGTTGATCTCCTTTGGC-3'. For the P204A mutant, the antisense oligonucleotide was
5'-ATTCATGGCCAGAATCATCGGTAGCTTGTTGAGCGTGCG-3'. For the PQ204/206AA mutant, the antisense oligonucleotide was 5'-ATTCATGGCCAGAATCATCGGTAGCTGCTTGAGCGTGCG-3'.
For the T208A mutant, the antisense oligonucleotide was
5'-ATTCATGGCCAGAATCATCGGCAGCTTGTTGAGGGTGCG-3'. For
the DD209/210AA mutant, the antisense oligonucleotide was 5'-ATTCATGGCCAGAAGCAGCGGTAGCTTGTTGAGGGGCCG-3'.
For the
204-208 mutant, the antisense oligonucleotide was
5'-TTCATGGCCAGAATCATCGTGCGGGAGGGAGTCATC-3'). For the
204-208AAAAA mutant, the antisense oligonucleotide was 5'-ATTCATGGCCAGAATCATCGGCAGCTGCTGCAGCGTGCG-3'.
For the EGRH221-225AGAAA mutant, the antisense oligonucleotide
was
5'-GTCGCCGGCTCCACTCACGAGCAGGGCGGCTGCGCCCGCGTTGGA-3'. The mutated LMP1 cDNAs were then subcloned into the
EcoRI sites of pcDNA3. To construct FLAG-LMP1(WT) expression
constructs containing these point mutants, the
SfiI-BstEII fragments from the full-length constructs was subcloned into FLAG-LMP1(WT) cut with the same enzymes.
To construct FLAG-LMP1(1-231) expression constructs containing the
point mutations, the SfiI-MscI fragment from the
full-length constructs was subcloned into the same sites in
FLAG-LMP1(1-231).
Immunoprecipitations.
C33A cells were transfected in
duplicate with each of the mutated FLAG-LMP1 molecules (full length).
Briefly, 1.5 × 106 cells were seeded in
100-mm-diameter tissue culture dishes and 24 h later cells were
Lipofectin treated as specified by the manufacturer with 15 µg of
each plasmid. Six plates were transfected with each of the LMP1
mutants; 24 h after lipofection, DMEM-H containing 10% fetal
bovine serum was added, and 48 h after lipofection, cells were
harvested. Whole-cell extracts were prepared by washing cells once in
cold phosphate-buffered saline and then lysing cells in 900 µl of
lysis buffer (20 mM HEPES, 0.5% Nonidet P-40 [NP-40], 250 mM NaCl,
10% glycerol, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF],
2.5 µg of aprotinin per ml, 25 µg of leupeptin per ml) for 20 min
at 4°C. The supernatant was clarified by centrifugation and was
stored at
80°C until use. FLAG-LMP1 and associated proteins were
immunopurified with 100 µl of anti-FLAG M2 affinity gel (Sigma) for
>3 h with constant rocking at 4°C. Immunocomplexes were washed three
times in lysis buffer, diluted in 2× sample buffer, boiled for 5 min,
and electrophoresed on sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-10% polyacrylamide gels. Bound LMP1 and TRAF proteins were detected by
immunoblotting as described below. For experiments with overexpression of TRAF1 or TRAF3, 5 × 105 cells were seeded in
60-mm-diameter tissue culture dishes and 24 h later were subjected
to lipofection in duplicate with 2.5 µg of LMP1 construct and 2.5 µg of either TRAF1 or TRAF3 construct. For experiments with TRAF2
overexpression, 1.5 × 106 cells were seeded in
100-mm-diameter tissue culture dishes and transfected with 7.5 µg of
mutant LMP1 constructs and 7.5 µg of TRAF2. Duplicate plates were
combined, and whole-cell extracts were prepared by lysing cells in 250 µl of lysis buffer. FLAG-LMP1 and associated proteins were
immunopurified with 25 µl of anti-FLAG M2 affinity gel. Bound LMP1
and TRAF proteins were detected by immunoblotting as described below.
Nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts. Cell lines expressing various derivatives of LMP1 were seeded in 100-mm-diameter dishes and were harvested for extract preparation when the cells were ~75% confluent. Extracts were prepared by a method described previously (9, 38). Briefly, cells were washed once with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, scraped from the dishes, collected in microcentrifuge tubes, and lysed for 3 min on ice in 5 pellet volumes of cytoplasmic extraction buffer (10 mM HEPES [pH 7.6], 60 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% NP-40, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM PMSF, 2.5 µg each of aprotinin, leupeptin, and pepstatin per ml). Nuclei were collected (1,500 rpm, 4°C, 5 min), and the supernatants containing the cytoplasmic fraction were transferred to fresh tubes. Nuclei were washed with 300 µl of cytoplasmic extraction buffer without NP-40, collected as before, and lysed in 3 pellet volumes of nuclear extraction buffer (20 mM Tris [pH 8.0], 420 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM PMSF, 25% glycerol, 2.5 µg each of aprotinin, leupeptin, and pepstatin per ml). The final salt concentration was adjusted to ~400 mM with NaCl, and nuclear pellets were vortexed and incubated on ice for 10 min. Cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts were cleared (14,000 rpm, 4°C, 10 min) and transferred to fresh tubes. Glycerol was added to the cytoplasmic extracts to a final concentration of 20%, and protein concentrations were determined with the Bio-Rad protein assay dye reagent.
Immunoblot analysis.
Cytoplasmic or whole-cell extracts (100 µg) were solubilized in 2× sample buffer, boiled for 10 min,
separated on SDS-8 or 10% polyacrylamide gels, and transferred to
supported nitrocellulose filters (Schleicher & Schuell), using a
Bio-Rad Trans-blot wet electrophoretic transfer apparatus. Filters were
stained with Ponceau S stain to visualize equal loading of protein in
all lanes. Nonspecific reactivity was blocked by incubation overnight
in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20 and 5% nonfat dried milk (BLOTTO). Supernatant from the S12 monoclonal antibody (generous gift of David A. Thorley-Lawson) was used at a 1:10 dilution in BLOTTO
for the detection of LMP1. A rabbit antiserum raised against the
carboxy-terminal 100 amino acids of the EGFR fused to glutathione S-transferase (GST) (ERCT) was used at a 1:1,500 dilution in
BLOTTO for the detection of the EGFR (kind gift of H. Shelton Earp). Rabbit antisera directed against TRAF1 (S-19), TRAF2 (C-20), TRAF3 (C-20), and CD40 (C-20) were used at a 1:200 dilution as specified by
the manufacturer (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). Antiserum directed
against the A20 protein (generous gift of Vishva Dixit) was used at
1:500. Antiserum directed against I
B
(Rockland) was used at
1:2,000. Appropriate secondary anti-mouse or anti-rabbit antibodies
(Amersham) were used at a dilution of 1:2,000 in BLOTTO to detect bound
primary antibody. Reactive proteins were detected by incubation of
washed filters (TBST) in the Amersham enhanced chemiluminescence system
followed by exposure to autoradiographic film.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs).
Nuclear
extracts (10 µg) were incubated for 15 min at room temperature with a
32P-labeled probe containing a
B site from the class I
major histocompatibility complex promoter
(5'-CAGGGCTGGGGATTCCCCATCTCCACAGTTTCACTTC-3') in
binding buffer (10 mM Tris [pH 7.7], 50 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 10% glycerol) with 2 µg of poly(dI-dC) · poly(dI-dC) (Pharmacia Biotech) (2, 3, 20, 54). Complexes were separated on 5% polyacrylamide gels in high-ionic-strength Tris-glycine-EDTA buffer (25 mM Tris, 190 mM glycine, 1 mM EDTA), dried, and subjected to autoradiography. For supershift experiments, 1- to 5-µl aliquots of rabbit polyclonal antibodies against the NF-
B
subunits p50 (sc-114; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), p52 (catalog no.
100-4185; Rockland), and p65 (catalog no. 100-4165; Rockland) were
incubated with nuclear extracts for 15 min prior to the addition of
poly(dI-dC) · poly(dI-dC) and 32P-labeled probe.
Complexes were then analyzed as described above.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
LMP1 signaling domains induce different NF-
B complexes.
Previous analysis of the function of LMP1 mutants has indicated that
two different signaling domains can activate the NF-
B transcription
factor (Fig. 1) (6, 10, 25, 31, 40, 42). However, only the
TRAF signaling domain, CTAR1, can induce expression of the EGFR. This
finding suggested that a specific component of the TRAF signaling
pathway that is not activated by CTAR2 is essential for the induction
of EGFR expression.
B components
distinct from CTAR2, the LMP1 mutants described in Fig. 2A were stably transfected into C33A
epithelial cells. LMP1(
187-351) lacks the TRAF interaction domain,
CTAR1, but retains the major NF-
B activation domain, CTAR2.
LMP1(129-386) is deleted for the first four transmembrane domains and
is unable to insert properly into the cell membrane (37,
61). LMP1(1-187) is deleted for the entire carboxy-terminal
cytoplasmic domain and therefore does not contain either CTAR1 or
CTAR2. LMP1(1-231) retains CTAR1 but is deleted for CTAR2. Nuclear
extracts from C33A cell lines expressing individual LMP1 mutants were
analyzed by EMSA (Fig. 2B). As expected LMP1(WT), LMP1(
187-351),
and LMP1(1-231) each induced the translocation of NF-
B components
into the nucleus. The LMP1 mutants LMP1(129-386) and LMP1(1-187), which
have been described as unable to activate NF-
B in transient reporter
gene assays, did not induce the translocation of NF-
B components
into the nucleus. Full-length LMP1(WT) induced three different NF-
B
complexes (complexes 1, 2, and 3). Interestingly, while LMP1(1-231)
induced the same three NF-
B complexes, LMP1(
187-351) induced only
complex 1 and minimal or undetectable levels of complex 3. Immunoblot
analyses of the expression levels of LMP1(1-231) and LMP1(
187-351)
indicated that these mutants were expressed at equal levels (data not
shown) (40). Supershift analyses of these complexes
indicated that complex 3 contains p50-p50 homodimers, complex 2 contains p50-p52 heterodimers, and complex 1 contains p52 and p65 as
well as additional unknown components as previously described (38,
45). Since CTAR1 and CTAR2 induced different NF-
B complexes,
the repertoire of NF-
B complexes induced by LMP1 was compared to
those of CD40 and TRAF2, which activate NF-
B through the TRAF
pathway. EMSA analysis indicated that LMP1, CD40, and TRAF2 all induced
three NF-
B complexes in C33A cells (Fig. 2C). Thus, CTAR1-mediated
activation of complexes 1, 2, and 3 parallels the activation of NF-
B
mediated by the TRAF signaling pathway. These results further
distinguish the unique nature of CTAR2-mediated activation of NF-
B
since this signaling domain activates complex 1 only.
|
Inhibition of NF-
B activation with a constitutively active
I
B
reduces EGFR induction by LMP1 and CD40.
To determine if
the specific NF-
B complexes induced by CTAR1 contribute to EGFR
induction, C33A cell lines which express LMP1(WT) or CD40 either in the
presence or in the absence of a constitutively active I
B
inhibitor of NF-
B were established (55). This I
B
molecule contains serine-to-alanine mutations at amino acids 32 and 36, I
B
(SS32/36AA), and is unable to be phosphorylated and degraded
(55). Extracts from these cell lines were analyzed by
immunoblotting for EGFR induction (Fig. 3,
top). In control cells, LMP1 and CD40
induced high levels of EGFR expression as expected. However, in the
presence of I
B
(SS32/36AA), LMP1- and CD40-mediated induction of
EGFR expression was reduced by approximately 50 to 70%.
I
B
(SS32/36AA) expression in these cell lines was confirmed by
immunoblot analysis (Fig. 3, bottom). Since the antibody also reacts
with endogenous I
B
, low-level expression of I
B
was also
detected and was particularly evident in the CD40-expressing cell line.
These results indicate that although NF-
B by itself is insufficient
to induce EGFR expression, activation of NF-
B by the TRAF pathway
contributes to high levels of EGFR induction.
|
Activation of NF-
B and induction of EGFR expression by
full-length LMP1 containing mutations in the TRAF binding domain
PXQXT.
LMP1 contains a five-amino-acid sequence, PQQAT, which
constitutes the minimal TRAF binding core (Fig.
4A). LMP1 shares this motif with the
other TRAF-interacting proteins, and the consensus sequence is defined
as PXQXT (Fig. 5A). Alanine
substitution mutations were made in this motif and in surrounding
residues, and the locations of residues mutated in the core PXQXT motif
are indicated by asterisks in Fig. 4A. Each of the LMP1 mutant
constructs was transfected into C33A cells, and cell lines expressing
individual LMP1 constructs were established following selection in
G418.
|
|
B (Fig. 4B). Total
disruption of the PXQXT domain, in mutants LMP1(
204-208) and
LMP1(204-208AAAAA), greatly reduced induction of complexes 2 and 3. The
complexes induced by these mutants were very similar to those induced
by LMP1(
187-351), indicating that complete disruption of the TRAF
domain in CTAR1 eliminates NF-
B activation from this domain, leaving
only activity due to CTAR2 signaling (compare Fig. 4B and 2B). Mutation
of proline 204 to alanine, LMP1(P204A), slightly decreased the levels
of complexes 2 and 3, while mutation of proline 204 and glutamine 206 to alanines, LMP1(PQ204/206AA), further decreased the levels of
complexes 2 and 3. These results indicate that increasingly disruptive
mutations of the PXQXT motif (P204A the least and
204-208 the
strongest) reduces the strength of the TRAF signal which activates
NF-
B complexes 2 and 3. Interestingly, mutation of threonine 208 to
alanine, LMP1(T208A), did not reduce the TRAF-mediated component of
NF-
B activation. This result was somewhat surprising since this
position appears to be conserved in the TRAF-interacting proteins and
the analogous mutation in CD40 abolishes TRAF binding and NF-
B
activation (24, 26-28, 52). Two additional substitution
mutants in CTAR1 which are located outside the PXQXT motif were also
tested for activation of NF-
B. Replacement of aspartic acid residues
209 and 210 [LMP1(DD209/210AA)] or of residues between amino acids
221 and 225 [LMP1(221-225AGAAA)] has been shown to reduce TRAF
binding to GST-LMP1 proteins (10, 51). Mutation of these
residues did not reduce the TRAF-mediated component of NF-
B
activation, indicating that these mutants retain sufficient TRAF
interaction to activate NF-
B (Fig. 4B).
These cell lines were also analyzed by immunoblotting for induction of
EGFR expression (Fig. 4C, top). Mutations of amino acids in the PXQXT
motif also reduced the ability of LMP1 to induce EGFR expression.
Specifically the LMP1(P204A) mutant had slightly reduced EGFR
induction, while the double mutant, LMP1(PQ204/206AA), had greatly
reduced EGFR induction. Interestingly, the LMP1(T208A) mutant induced
levels of EGFR expression comparably to LMP1(WT). The
LMP1(DD209/210) and LMP1(221-225AGAAA) mutants also induced EGFR
expression comparably to LMP1(WT). As would be predicted, the two
mutants with completely mutated PXQXT motifs, LMP1(
204-208) and
LMP1(204-208AAAAA), were incapable of inducing EGFR expression.
The effect of mutations in the PXQXT motif were also analyzed in the
context of an LMP1 mutant consisting of amino acids 1 to 231. FLAG-LMP1(1-231) containing either a single substitution of alanine for
proline 204 (P204A) or a double substitution of alanines for proline
204 and glutamine 206 (PQ204/206AA) was defective for induction of EGFR
expression, while substitution of alanine for threonine 208 (T208A) did
not affect EGFR induction (data not shown). These results reveal that
PXQXT mutations in LMP1(1-231) have a more severe effect than mutations
in the full-length molecule and indicate that the overall structure of
LMP1 contributes to the signaling capacity of LMP1 as well as the
stability of LMP1-TRAF interactions.
Since all of these LMP1 mutants retain CTAR2, mutations in the PXQXT
motif should disrupt TRAF signaling but should not completely block
activation of NF-
B. Immunoblot analysis of the expression of the A20
protein, whose expression is regulated by NF-
B, indicated that
CTAR2-mediated activation of NF-
B complex 1 was sufficient to induce
expression of A20 despite the presence of disruptive mutations in the
CTAR1 PXQXT motif (Fig. 4C, middle). Immunoblot analysis of LMP1
expression indicated that the mutants were all expressed at
approximately equal levels (Fig. 4C, bottom). Importantly, these
results demonstrate that mutations in the PXQXT motif in CTAR1 can
specifically disrupt TRAF-mediated NF-
B activation and TRAF-mediated
EGFR induction but do not affect the stability of LMP1 or NF-
B
activation mediated by CTAR2.
Induction of EGFR expression by CD40 is blocked by mutation of the PXQXT motif. Alignment of the TRAF interaction domains of several TRAF binding proteins including LMP1 and CD40 revealed a homology limited to the PXQXT motif which does not extend to amino acids surrounding this core motif (Fig. 5A). Substitution of threonine 234 with alanine (T234A) not only disrupts interaction with TRAF3 but also prevents CD40-mediated signaling (24, 26, 52). Expression constructs for wild-type [CD40(WT)] and mutant [CD40(T234A)] proteins were transfected into C33A cells, and cell lines were established. Previous studies have indicated that overexpression of CD40 can activate signaling pathways in the absence of ligand, which is most likely due to the clustering of CD40 in the cell membrane (48). Therefore the experiments with overexpressed CD40 in C33A cells were analyzed in the absence of ligand. These cell lines were analyzed by immunoblot for EGFR expression (Fig. 5B, top) and CD40 expression (Fig. 5B, bottom). As expected, CD40(WT) was a potent inducer of EGFR expression whereas CD40(T234A) was incapable of inducing EGFR expression. Expression of wild-type and mutant CD40 proteins was confirmed in both cell lines, and the two proteins were expressed at similar levels. These data indicate that the TRAF signaling pathway activated by CD40 is essential for EGFR induction. Interestingly, while the T234A mutation in the TRAF binding motif in CD40 completely blocked EGFR induction (Fig. 5B), the parallel mutation T208A in LMP1 (Fig. 4C) did not block LMP1-mediated induction of EGFR expression. These results suggest that while the core PXQXT motif in both of these proteins is essential for TRAF signaling, other residues surrounding the motif may contribute to TRAF interaction and activation of signaling pathways.
Interaction of LMP1 PXQXT mutants with TRAF1, TRAF2, and
TRAF3.
The results presented in Fig. 4C reveal that the PXQXT
motif in CTAR1 is essential for LMP1 to induce expression of the EGFR. To further explore this unique TRAF-mediated signal, the ability of
each of the full-length LMP1 constructs with point mutations in the
TRAF binding PXQXT motif to interact with TRAF1, TRAF2, and TRAF3 was
analyzed. Expression constructs for FLAG-LMP1(WT) and FLAG-LMP1
containing the point mutations described above were transfected into
C33A cells. Wild-type and mutant FLAG-LMP1 constructs were
immunopurified with anti-FLAG affinity gel, immunocomplexes were
subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and bound TRAF
proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting (Fig.
6A). TRAF1 and TRAF3 strongly interacted
with FLAG-LMP1(WT), but an interaction between FLAG-LMP1(WT) and TRAF2
could not be detected. Compared to FLAG-LMP1(WT), the interaction of
FLAG-LMP1(P204A) with TRAF3 was slightly weaker, FLAG-LMP1(PQ204/206AA)
interacted very weakly with TRAF3, and FLAG-LMP1(
204-208) was unable
to interact with TRAF3. Interestingly, the interaction of
FLAG-LMP1(T208A) with TRAF3 was similar to that of
FLAG-LMP1(WT). FLAG-LMP1(P204A) and FLAG-LMP1(T208A) interacted
very weakly with TRAF1, while FLAG-LMP1(PQ204/206AA) and
FLAG-LMP1(
204-208) were unable to interact with TRAF1. As for
FLAG-LMP1(WT), an interaction between the LMP1 mutants and TRAF2 was
not detected. Reprobing of the immunoblots with anti-LMP1 antibody
indicated that all LMP1 mutants were present at equal levels in the
immunoprecipitation reactions (a representative immunoblot is shown in
the lowest panel of Fig. 6A). These results indicated that mutations in
the LMP1 TRAF binding motif PXQXT distinctly affect interaction
with TRAF1 and TRAF3.
|
204-208) did not interact with TRAF2. As described
above, reprobing of the immunoblots with anti-LMP1 antibody indicated
that all LMP1 mutants were present at equal levels in the
immunoprecipitation reactions (a representative immunoblot is shown in
the lowest panel of Fig. 6B). These results indicated that TRAF2 can
also interact with the PXQXT motif in CTAR1 and that TRAF1, TRAF2, and
TRAF3 each bind to LMP1 in a unique manner. The interaction between
FLAG-LMP1 and the various point mutants with overexpressed TRAF1 and
TRAF3 was identical to that observed with endogenous TRAF1 and TRAF3 (compare Fig. 6B and A). Analysis of the strength of binding between LMP1 and overexpressed TRAF proteins indicated that only 4% of total
TRAF2 interacted with LMP1, while at least 25% of TRAF1 and 50% of
TRAF3 were bound to LMP1 (data not shown). The lack of detectable
interaction between LMP1 and endogenous TRAF2 could therefore reflect
the very weak interaction with TRAF2 or could indicate that TRAF2
expression in C33A cells is very low.
Interestingly, the interaction of TRAF3 with LMP1 specifically
correlated with the ability of LMP1 to induce expression of the EGFR
(compare the uppermost panels in Fig. 4C and 6A). Mutants P204A,
PQ204/206AA, and
204-208 were increasingly more defective in EGFR
induction (Fig. 4C) and in TRAF3 binding (Fig. 6A), while the T208A
mutation decreased binding of TRAF1 and TRAF2 but did not affect TRAF3
binding or EGFR induction. However, LMP1(WT) and LMP1(T208A), which
both induced high levels of EGFR expression, retained binding to TRAF1,
-2, and -3, suggesting that all three TRAF proteins contribute to EGFR
induction.
Effect of overexpression of individual TRAF proteins on EGFR
induction.
Previous reports have indicated that overexpressed
TRAF2 acts as a positive regulator and overexpressed TRAF3 acts as a
negative regulator of TRAF-mediated activation of NF-
B (7, 8,
48, 57). To analyze the effects of these molecules on the
induction of EGFR expression, cell lines overexpressing these proteins
were established. The pMEP4 expression vector with the inducible
metallothionein promoter was used to establish a stable cell line
overexpressing TRAF3 (pMEP4-TRAF3), in which TRAF3 expression could be
further induced with CdCl2 (Fig.
7A). pMEP4 and pMEP4-TRAF3 cell lines were stably transfected with expression vectors for CD40, or a combination of TRAF1 and TRAF2, and the resulting cell lines were analyzed by immunoblotting for induction of the EGFR (Fig. 7B, top).
Expression of CD40 in the control pMEP4 cell line clearly resulted in
the induction of EGFR expression. Coexpression of TRAF1 and TRAF2 in
the control pMEP4 cell line did not induce EGFR expression, although
expression of TRAF2 activated the same NF-
B complexes as CD40 (Fig.
2C). Expression of TRAF1 and TRAF2 in these cell lines was confirmed by
immunobloting (Fig. 7B, lower two panels). Expression of TRAF1 or TRAF2
individually did not induce EGFR expression (data not shown).
Coexpression of TRAF1 and TRAF2 in the TRAF3-overexpressing cell line
also did not induce EGFR expression (Fig. 7B, top). Therefore,
overexpression of TRAF1, TRAF2, and TRAF3 is unable to induce EGFR
expression. These data suggest that a proper complex of multiple TRAF
proteins must assemble at the plasma membrane with LMP1 or CD40 in
order to mediate EGFR induction.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Of the two signaling domains in the LMP1 carboxy-terminal
cytoplasmic terminus, only CTAR1 is capable of inducing EGFR expression (40). Both domains activate NF-
B, although CTAR1 is a
weaker activator (25% of the wild-type level) in transient reporter
gene assays compared to CTAR2 (75% of the wild-type level) (25,
40, 42). Since only CTAR1 is capable of inducing EGFR expression, the specific NF-
B components induced by CTAR1 and CTAR2 were analyzed. The data presented here indicate that in C33A cells, CTAR1
activates a more diverse and robust nuclear mobilization of NF-
B
components as determined by EMSA (Fig. 2B). LMP1(WT) induces three
specific NF-
B complexes (complexes 1, 2, and 3). LMP1(1-231), which
retains CTAR1, induces the same three complexes, while
LMP1(
187-351), which retains CTAR2, induces only complex 1. The data
suggest that in C33A cells, the difference in NF-
B activation
potential by CTAR1 and CTAR2 in transient reporter gene assays may be
reflected in the different repertoires of NF-
B complexes induced by
these domains. The relatively stronger activation of NF-
B by CTAR2
in transient reporter gene assays may result from activation of only
complex 1 (p52-p65). Complex 3 (p50-p50), which is induced strongly by
CTAR1, may dampen the NF-
B-activating effects of p52-p65 by
competing for
B sites in the reporter gene. This could effectively
lower the amount of CTAR1-mediated NF-
B activity in reporter gene
assays without reflecting the effects of the individual NF-
B
components on specific gene activation. It is possible that complex 2 (p50-p52), which is induced by CTAR1, contributes to EGFR induction
mediated by the TRAF domain. The NF-
B-regulated A20 gene is induced
to equal levels by either LMP1 signaling domain; therefore, activation
of complex 1 in C33A cells by mutants deleted in CTAR1, such as like
LMP1(
204-208) or LMP1(
187-351), is sufficient to induce
expression of A20. The data presented here indicate that one of the
distinct NF-
B complexes induced by CTAR1-mediated TRAF signaling may
contribute to high-level induction of EGFR expression.
Mutational analyses of the PXQXT motif in CTAR1 revealed that the
presence of these amino acids in LMP1 is essential for induction of
EGFR expression. Complete deletion of the motif or substitution with
alanines eliminated induction of EGFR expression as well as the
CTAR1-specific NF-
B complexes. These experiments reveal that
LMP1(
204-208) is functionally identical to LMP1(
187-351). LMP1(PQ204/206AA) induced low levels of complex 2 and reduced levels of complex 3 compared to LMP1(WT) and also induced low levels of
EGFR expression. The induction of EGFR expression and activation of
NF-
B complexes 2 and 3 by LMP1 in C33A cells are the first defined
biochemical events that are specific for TRAF activation through the
TRAF-interacting PXQXT motif.
These studies are also the first to analyze the effects of mutations in
the PXQXT motif on the ability of LMP1 to interact with the TRAFs in
vivo in comparison with EGFR induction and NF-
B activation.
LMP1(P204A) and LMP1(PQ204/206AA) were reduced in the ability to
induce EGFR expression and the TRAF-specific NF-
B complexes. In
contrast, LMP1(T208A) induced EGFR expression and activated NF-
B
comparably to LMP1(WT). Analysis of LMP1 interaction with the TRAFs
indicated that there was a close correlation between EGFR induction and
TRAF3 association with LMP1. LMP1(P204A) and LMP1(PQ204/206AA) were
reduced in the ability to interact with TRAF3 comparably with their
ability to induce EGFR expression. LMP1(T208A) associated strongly with
TRAF3 and induced EGFR expression comparably to LMP1(WT). While
interaction of LMP1 with TRAF3 appears to directly correlate with EGFR
induction, TRAF2 and TRAF1 apparently contribute to high-level
induction of EGFR expression. LMP1(T208A) still interacted weakly with
TRAF1 and TRAF2 and induced high levels of EGFR expression, while
LMP1(PQ204/206AA) was unable to interact with TRAF1 and TRAF2 and
induced low levels of EGFR expression. These results suggest that
interaction of TRAF1, -2, and -3 with LMP1 contributes to
induction of EGFR expression. It is also possible that the interaction
of TRAF1 and TRAF2 with LMP1 contributes to high-level EGFR
induction through the activation of NF-
B. The activation of NF-
B
and augmentation of EGFR induction by TRAF1 and TRAF2 is also indicated
by the finding that EGFR induction was decreased in the presence of a
constitutively activate I
B
(SS32/36AA) molecule which behaves as
an NF-
B repressor.
Overexpression of TRAF2 in C33A cells either alone or in combination
with TRAF1 or TRAF3 does not induce EGFR expression even though
overexpression of TRAF2 resulted in activation of the same three
NF-
B complexes induced by LMP1 and CD40. These results suggest that
induction of EGFR expression requires clustering of the TRAFs through
the action of a membrane-bound receptor such as LMP1 or CD40 and also
that the activation of NF-
B complexes 2 and 3 by TRAF2 is
insufficient to induce EGFR expression. The interaction of LMP1 with
TRAF3 appears to be required for EGFR induction; however, interaction
of TRAF3 with LMP1 is not the sole signaling molecule required for
LMP1-mediated EGFR induction, since overexpression of TRAF3 decreases
LMP1-mediated EGFR induction. Studies have shown that overexpression of
TRAF3 could displace more weakly interacting TRAF molecules, which
would effectively block the LMP1 signal; thus, it is likely that TRAF3
overexpression displaces a TRAF which is also essential for EGFR
induction (10, 51). These results indicate that activation
of this signaling pathway requires the correct assembly and
stoichiometry of the TRAF molecules with LMP1 at the cell membrane.
The involvement of TRAF3 in LMP1-mediated induction of EGFR expression
suggests that although TRAF2 appears to be the major regulator of
NF-
B activation, the other TRAFs also mediate distinct TRAF
signaling events. Interestingly, recent studies with TRAF3-deficient mice suggest a positive role for TRAF3 in TRAF signaling pathways (65). These mice become increasingly runted with age,
correlating with a depletion of peripheral leukocytes and death by day
10. These results suggest that TRAF3 may play a critical role in
survival of B precursor cells (65). The importance of TRAF3
in EGFR induction also suggests that TRAF3 is a positive factor during
TRAF signaling events. TRAF3 is likely to be particularly important for
the growth-promoting effects of LMP1 on epithelial cells, where EGFR
expression is necessary for proliferation (39).
Although the PXQXT motif is the sole TRAF binding site in LMP1, surrounding residues in LMP1 contribute to the strength of interaction with the TRAFs (10). Specifically, GST-LMP1(199-214) with the P204A mutation decreased TRAF1, -2, and -3 binding by >99%, while GST-LMP1(187-231) or FLAG-LMP1(1-231) with the P204A mutation demonstrated strong binding to TRAF3, reduced binding to TRAF1, and little or no binding to TRAF2 (10). In the context of full-length LMP1(WT) proteins, the results presented here confirm the previous observations and extend the analysis to include mutations in other residues in the PXQXT motif. Particularly interesting is the strength with which LMP1(T208A) binds to the TRAFs. Full-length LMP1(T208A) retained TRAF3 binding comparably to LMP1(WT) and retained the ability to interact with TRAF1 and TRAF2 (Fig. 6). The same mutation in GST-LMP1(199-214) abrogated binding to TRAF1, -2, and -3 by greater then 95% (10). Comparison of functional LMP1 signaling with regard to EGFR induction also highlights the differences between full-length LMP1 and LMP1(1-231). While LMP1(1-231) mutated in either P204A or PQ204/206AA is completely unable to induce EGFR expression, full-length LMP1 proteins with these same mutations are still able to induce intermediate to low levels of EGFR expression. These results confirm the suggestion that amino acids surrounding the PXQXT motif in LMP1 contribute to the strength of interactions with the TRAFs and also enhance the functional effects of signaling from CTAR1.
LMP1 has many of the same signaling properties as the TNFR family members CD40 and CD30, which share the core TRAF binding motif PXQXT (7, 10, 18, 24). In agreement with this observation is the finding that CD40, like LMP1, can interact with the TRAF molecules and induce expression of the EGFR (8, 24, 40, 53). CD40 has been shown to interact with TRAF2, -3, -5, and -6 (24, 26-28, 52). These studies revealed that the T234A mutation in the PXQXT motif of CD40 prevented interaction with TRAF2, -3, and -5 and prevented CD40 signaling. The data presented in this study indicate that the T234A mutant was completely deficient in EGFR induction, although the analogous mutation in LMP1 did not block EGFR induction. These results and the data for the LMP1(1-231) mutants indicate that each amino acid in the PXQXT motif, as well as surrounding residues, contributes to TRAF interaction and reveals that the TRAFs interact differently with the CD40 and LMP1 TRAF domains. This is an important difference and may facilitate the design of specific inhibitors that could affect LMP1 signaling while leaving TRAF signaling pathways from cellular proteins like CD30 and CD40 largely unaffected.
Activation of TRAF signaling pathways by LMP1 is essential for the
immortalization of lymphocytes in vitro by EBV and probably also in the
establishment of epithelial malignancies like NPC (30).
Activation of NF-
B by LMP1 mediates important aspects of the
transformation process; however, pathways other than NF-
B activated
by the TRAF signaling pathway are also likely to be important in
mediating the transforming effects of LMP1. Deletion of the PXQXT motif
in LMP1 abolishes interaction with the TRAF proteins and prevents
transformation of lymphocytes in vitro although the mutated LMP1
induces high levels of NF-
B (30). The data presented in
this study demonstrate that deletion of the PXQXT motif prevents
induction of EGFR expression in epithelial cells. The recruitment of a
proper combination of TRAF molecules to CTAR1 in LMP1 results in the
activation of signaling pathways, leading to activation of NF-
B and
induction of molecules like the EGFR. Recent studies indicate that
induction of E-selectin by the TRAF pathway involves activation of both
the c-Jun and NF-
B transcription factors (41). However,
these two essential pathways were both activated by TRAF2
(41). High-level EGFR induction by the TRAF pathway also
requires two signals; one requires activation of NF-
B through
LMP1-TRAF2 interaction, and the second is dependent on assembly of an
LMP1 complex containing TRAF1, -2, and -3. The study of pathways
activated by LMP1-TRAF interactions is essential to further understand
LMP1 function and is likely to identify signaling pathways and
downstream targets which are critical to lymphoid and epithelial cell
transformation.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Katherine Fries and Frank Scholle for critical reading
of the manuscript, H. Shelton Earp for the anti-ERCT rabbit antiserum,
D. A. Thorley Lawson for the anti-LMP1 monoclonal antibody S12,
Vishva Dixit for the anti-A20 monoclonal antibody, Dean Ballard for the
I
B(SS32/36AA) construct, George Mosialos for TRAF1 and TRAF3
constructs, Ken Kaye for the TRAF2 construct, and Hitoshi Kikutani for
the CD40 cDNA construct. J.L.C. acknowledges the support of A. S. Baldwin, Jr.
This work was supported by Public Health Service grants CA19014, CA32979, and CA52406 from the National Institutes of Health to N.R.-T. and CA72771 to A.S.B. W.E.M. was supported in part by predoctoral NIH National Service Award AI07419-02, and J.L.C. was supported by NIH/NRSA fellowship 1 F32 AG05745-01.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599. Phone: (919) 966-1701. Fax: (919) 966-3015. E-mail: nrt{at}med.unc.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Baichwal, V. R., and B. Sugden. 1989. The multiple membrane-spanning segments of the BNLF-1 oncogene from Epstein-Barr virus are required for transformation. Oncogene 4:67-74[Medline]. |
| 2. |
Baldwin, A. S., Jr., and P. A. Sharp.
1987.
Binding of a nuclear factor to a regulatory sequence in the promoter of the mouse H-2kb class I major histocompatibility gene.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7:305-313 |
| 3. |
Baldwin, A. S., Jr., and P. A. Sharp.
1988.
Two transcription factors, NF-kappa B and H2TF1, interact with a single regulatory sequence in the class I major histocompatibility complex promoter.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:723-727 |
| 4. |
Banchereau, J.,
P. de Paoli,
A. Valle,
E. Garcia, and F. Rousset.
1991.
Long-term human B cell lines dependent on interleukin-4 and antibody to CD40.
Science
251:70-72 |
| 5. | Berberich, I., G. Shu, and E. A. Clark. 1994. Cross-linking CD40 on B-cells rapidly activates nuclear factor-kB. J. Immunol. 153:4357-4366[Abstract]. |
| 6. |
Brodeur, S. R.,
G. Cheng,
D. Baltimore, and D. Thorley-Lawson.
1997.
Localization of the major NF- B-activating site and the sole TRAF3 binding site site of LMP1 defines two distinct signaling motifs.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:19777-19784 |
| 7. |
Cheng, G., and D. Baltimore.
1996.
TANK, a co-inducer with TRAF2 of TNF-and CD40L-mediated NF- B activation.
Genes Dev.
10:963-973 |
| 8. |
Cheng, G.,
A. L. Cleary,
Z.-S. Ye,
D. I. Hong,
S. Lederman, and D. Baltimore.
1995.
Involvement of CRAF1, a relative of TRAF, in CD40 signaling.
Science
267:1494-1498 |
| 9. |
Cheshire, J. L., and A. S. Baldwin, Jr.
1997.
Synergistic activation of NF- B by tumor necrosis factor alpha and gamma interferon via enhanced I B degradation and de novo I B degradation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:6746-6754[Abstract].
|
| 10. |
Devergne, O.,
E. Hatzivassiliou,
K. Izumi,
K. Kaye,
M. Kleijnen,
E. Kieff, and G. Mosialos.
1996.
TRAF1, TRAF2, and TRAF3 effect NF- B activation by an Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 domain important for B-lymphocyte transformation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:7098-7108[Abstract].
|
| 11. |
Eliopoulus, A. G.,
M. Stack,
C. Dawson,
K. Kaye,
L. Hodgkin,
S. Sihota,
M. Rowe, and L. Young.
1997.
Epstein-Barr virus-encoded LMP1 and CD40 mediate IL-6 production in epithelial cells via an NF- B pathway involving TNF receptor-associated factors.
Oncogene
14:2899-2916[Medline].
|
| 12. | Fahraeus, R., H. L. Fu, I. Ernberg, J. Finke, M. Rowe, G. Klein, K. Falk, E. Nilsson, M. Yadav, P. Busson, et al. 1988. Expression of Epstein-Barr virus-encoded proteins in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer. 42:329-338[Medline]. |
| 13. |
Fennewald, S.,
V. van Santen, and E. Kieff.
1984.
The nucleotide sequence of a messenger RNA transcribed in latent growth transforming virus infection indicates that it may encode a membrane protein.
J. Virol.
51:411-419 |
| 14. |
Floettmann, J. E., and M. Rowe.
1997.
Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein-1 (LMP1) C-terminus activation region 2 (CTAR2) maps to the far C-terminus and requires oligomerization for NF- B activation.
Oncogene
15:1851-1858[Medline].
|
| 15. | Franken, M., O. Devergne, M. Rosenzweig, B. Annis, E. Kieff, and F. Wang. 1996. Comparative analysis identifies conserved tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 3 binding sites in the human and simian Epstein-Barr virus oncogene LMP1. J. Virol. 70:7819-7826[Abstract]. |
| 16. | Fries, K. L., W. E. Miller, and N. Raab-Traub. 1996. Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 blocks p53-mediated apoptosis through the induction of the A20 gene. J. Virol. 70:8653-8659[Abstract]. |
| 17. | Galibert, L., I. Durand, J. Banchereau, and F. Rousset. 1994. CD40-activated surface IgD-positive lymphocytes constitute the long term IL-4-dependent proliferating B cell pool. J. Immunol. 152:22-29[Abstract]. |
| 18. |
Gedrich, R. W.,
M. C. Gilfillan,
C. S. Duckett,
J. L. Dongen, and C. B. Thompson.
1996.
CD30 contains two binding sites with different specificities for members of the tumor necrosis factor-receptor-associated factor family of signal transducing proteins.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:12852-12858 |
| 19. |
Hammarskjold, M. L., and M. C. Simurda.
1992.
Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein transactivates the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 long terminal repeat through induction of NF- B activity.
J. Virol.
66:6496-6501 |
| 20. | Haskill, S., A. A. Beg, S. M. Tompkins, J. M. Morris, A. D. Yurochko, A. Sampson-Johanes, K. Mondal, P. Ralph, and A. S. Baldwin, Jr. 1991. Characterization of an immediate-early gene induced in adherent monocytes that encodes I kappa B-like activity. Cell 65:1281-1289[Medline]. |
| 21. |
Hatzivassiliou, E.,
W. E. Miller,
N. Raab-Traub,
E. Kieff, and G. Mosialos.
1998.
A fusion of the Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) transmembrane domains to the CD40 cytoplasmic domain is similar to LMP1 in constitutive activation of epidermal growth factor expression, NF- B, and stress activated protein kinase.
J. Immunol.
160:1116-1121 |
| 22. | Henderson, S., M. Rowe, C. Gregory, D. Croom-Carter, F. Wang, R. Longnecker, E. Kieff, and A. Rickinson. 1991. Induction of bcl-2 expression by Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 protects infected B cells from programmed cell death. Cell 65:1107-1115[Medline]. |
| 23. | Hennessy, K., S. Fennewald, M. Hummel, T. Cole, and E. Kieff. 1984. A membrane protein encoded by Epstein-Barr virus in latent growth-transforming infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:7201-7211. |
| 24. |
Hu, H. M.,
K. O'Rourke,
M. S. Boguski, and V. M. Dixit.
1994.
A novel RING finger protein interacts with the cytoplasmic domain of CD40.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:30069-30072 |
| 25. | Huen, D. S., S. A. Henderson, S. Croom-Carter, and M. Rowe. 1995. The Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein-1 (LMP1) mediates activation of NF-kB and cell surface phenotype via two effector regions in its carboxy-terminal cytoplasmic domain. Oncogene 10:549-560[Medline]. |
| 26. | Inui, S., T. Kaisho, H. Kikutani, I. Stamenkovic, B. Seed, E. Clark, and T. Kishimoto. 1990. Identification of the intracytoplasmic region essential for signal transduction through a B-cell activation molecule, CD40. Eur. J. Immunol. 20:1747-1753[Medline]. |
| 27. |
Ishida, T.,
S. Mizushima,
S. Azuma,
N. Kobayshi,
T. Tojo,
K. Suzuki,
S. Aizawa,
T. Watanabe,
G. Mosialos,
E. Kieff,
T. Yamamoto, and J. Inoue.
1996.
Identification of TRAF6, a novel tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor protein that mediates signaling from an amino-terminal domain of the CD40 cytoplasmic domain.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:28745-28748 |
| 28. |
Ishida, T.,
T. Tojo,
T. Aoki,
N. Kobayashi,
T. Ohishi,
T. Watanabe,
T. Yamamoto, and J. Inoue.
1996.
TRAF5, a novel tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor family protein, mediated CD40 signaling.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:9437-9442 |
| 29. |
Izumi, K., and E. Kieff.
1997.
The Epstein-Barr virus oncogene product latent membrane protein 1 engages the tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated death domain protein to mediate B-lymphocyte growth transformation and activate NF- B.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:12592-12597 |
| 30. |
Izumi, K. M.,
K. M. Kaye, and E. D. Kieff.
1997.
The Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 amino acid sequence that engages tumor necrosis factor receptor associated factors is critical for primary B lymphocyts growth transformation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:1447-1452 |
| 31. |
Kaye, K.,
O. Devergne,
J. Harada,
K. Izumi,
R. Yalamanchili,
E. Kieff, and G. Mosialos.
1996.
Tumor necrosis receptor associated factor 2 is a mediator of NF-kB activation by latent infection membrane protein 1, the Epstein-Barr virus transforming protein.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:11085-11090 |
| 32. |
Kaye, K. M.,
K. M. Izumi, and E. Kieff.
1993.
Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 is essential for B-lymphocyte growth transformation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:9150-9154 |
| 33. | Kieff, E. 1996. Epstein-Barr virus and its replication, p. 2343-2396. In B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley (ed.), Virology, 3rd ed. Lippinscott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, Pa. |
| 34. | Kieser, A., E. Kilger, O. Gires, M. Ueffing, W. Kolch, and W. Hammerschmidt. 1997. Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein-1 triggers AP-1 activity via the c-Jun N-terminal kinase cascade. EMBO J. 16:6478-6485[Medline]. |
| 35. |
Laherty, C. D.,
H. M. Hu,
A. W. Opipari,
F. Wang, and V. M. Dixit.
1992.
The Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 gene product induces A20 zinc finger protein expression by activating NF- B.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:24157-24160 |
| 36. |
Liebowitz, D., and E. Kieff.
1989.
Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein: induction of B-cell activation antigens and membrane patch formation does not require vimentin.
J. Virol.
63:4051-4054 |
| 37. |
Liebowitz, D.,
J. Mannick,
K. Takada, and E. Kieff.
1992.
Phenotypes of Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 deletion mutants indicate transmembrane and amino-terminal cytoplasmic domains necessary for effects in B-lymphoma cells.
J. Virol.
66:4612-4616 |
| 38. | Miller, W. E., J. L. Cheshire, A. S. Baldwin, Jr., and N. Raab-Traub. The NPC derived C15 LMP1 protein
confers enhanced activation of NF- B and induction of the EGFR in
epithelial cells. Oncogene, in press.
|
| 39. | Miller, W. E., H. S. Earp, and N. Raab-Traub. 1995. The Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein1 induces expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor. J. Virol. 69:4390-4398[Abstract]. |
| 40. |
Miller, W. E.,
G. Mosialos,
E. Kieff, and N. Raab-Traub.
1997.
Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 induction of the EGFR is mediated through a TRAF signaling pathway distinct from NF- B activation.
J. Virol.
71:586-594[Abstract].
|
| 41. | Min, W., and J. Pober. 1997. TNF initiates E-selectin transcription in human endothelial cells through parallel TRAF-NF-kB and TRAF-RAC/CDC42-JNK-c-Jun/ATF-2 pathways. J. Immunol. 159:3508-3518[Abstract]. |
| 42. |
Mitchell, T., and B. Sugden.
1995.
Stimulation of NF- B-mediated transcription by mutant derivatives of the latent membrane protein of Epstein-Barr virus.
J. Virol.
69:2968-2976[Abstract].
|
| 43. |
Moorthy, R. K., and D. A. Thorley-Lawson.
1993.
All three domains of the Epstein-Barr virus-encoded latent membrane protein LMP-1 are required for transformation of rat-1 fibroblasts.
J. Virol.
67:1638-1646 |
| 44. | Mosialos, G., M. Birkenbach, R. Yalamanchili, T. VanArsdale, C. Ware, and E. Kieff. 1995. The Epstein-Barr virus transforming protein LMP1 engages signalling proteins for the tumor necrosis factor receptor family. Cell 80:389-399[Medline]. |
| 45. |
Paine, E.,
R. I. Scheinman,
A. S. Baldwin, Jr., and N. Raab-Traub.
1995.
Expression of LMP1 in epithelial cells leads to the activation of a select subset of NF- B/Rel family proteins.
J. Virol.
69:4572-4576[Abstract].
|
| 46. |
Rajadurai, P.,
U. Prasad,
R. Sadler,
K. Flynn, and N. Raab-Traub.
1995.
Clonal proliferations of cells infected with Epstein-Barr virus in preinvasive lesions related to nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
N. Engl. J. Med.
333:693-698 |
| 47. | Rickinson, A. B., and E. Kieff. 1996. Epstein-Barr virus, p. 2397-2446. In B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley (ed.), Virology, 3rd ed. Lippinscott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, Pa. |
| 48. |
Rothe, M.,
V. Sarma,
V. M. Dixit, and D. V. Goeddel.
1995.
TRAF-2 mediated activation of NF- B by TNF receptor 2 and CD40.
Science
269:1424-1427 |
| 49. | Rothe, M., S. C. Wong, W. J. Henzel, and D. V. Goeddel. 1994. A novel family of putative signal transducers associated with the cytoplasmic domain of the 75 kDa tumor necrosis factor receptor. Cell 78:681-692[Medline]. |
| 50. |
Saeland, S.,
V. Duvert,
I. Moreau, and J. Banchereau.
1993.
Human B cell precursors proliferate and express CD23 after CD40 ligation.
J. Exp. Med.
178:113-120 |
| 51. | Sandberg, M., W. Hammerschmidt, and B. Sugden. 1997. Characterization of LMP1's association with TRAF1, TRAF2, and TRAF3. J. Virol. 71:4649-4656[Abstract]. |
| 52. |
Sarma, V.,
Z. Lin,
L. Clark,
B. M. Rust,
M. Tewari,
R. J. Noelle, and V. M. Dixit.
1995.
Activation of the B-cell surface receptor CD40 induces A20, a novel zinc finger protein that inhibits apoptosis.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:12343-12346 |
| 53. | Sato, T., S. Irie, and J. C. Reed. 1995. A novel member of the TRAF family of putative signal transducing proteins binds to the cytosolic domain of CD40. FEBS Lett. 358:113-118[Medline]. |
| 54. |
Scheinman, R. I.,
A. A. Begg, and A. S. Baldwin, Jr.
1993.
NF- B p100 (Lyt-10) is a component of H2TF1 and can function as an I B-like molecule.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:6089-6101 |
| 55. |
Scherer, D. C.,
J. A. Brockman,
Z. Chen,
T. Maniatis, and D. Ballard.
1995.
Signal-induced degradation of I B requires site-specific ubiquitination.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:11259-11263 |
| 56. | Smith, C., T. Farrah, and R. Goodwin. 1994. The TNF receptor superfamily of cellular and viral proteins: activation, costimulation, and death. Cell 76:959-962[Medline]. |
| 57. |
Takeuchi, M.,
M. Rothe, and D. V. Goeddel.
1996.
Anatomy of TRAF2.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:19935-19942 |
| 58. | Tartaglia, L. V., and D. V. Goeddel. 1992. Two TNF receptors. Immunol. Today 13:151-153[Medline]. |
| 59. | Vandenabeele, P., W. Declercq, R. Beyaert, and W. Fiers. 1995. Two tumour necrosis factor receptors: structure and function. Trends Cell Biol. 5:392-399. [Medline] |
| 60. | Wang, D., D. Liebowitz, and E. Kieff. 1985. An EBV membrane protein expressed in immortalized lymphocytes transforms established rodent cells. Cell 43:831-840[Medline]. |
| 61. |
Wang, D.,
D. Liebowitz, and E. Kieff.
1988.
The truncated form of the Epstein-Barr virus latent-infection membrane protein expressed in virus replication does not transform rodent fibroblasts.
J. Virol.
62:2337-2346 |
| 62. |
Wang, D.,
D. Liebowitz,
F. Wang,
C. Gregory,
A. Rickinson,
R. Larson,
T. Springer, and E. Kieff.
1988.
Epstein-Barr virus latent infection membrane protein alters the human B-lymphocyte phenotype: deletion of the amino terminus abolishes activity.
J. Virol.
62:4173-4184 |
| 63. |
Wang, F.,
C. Gregory,
C. Sample,
M. Rowe,
D. Liebowitz,
R. Murray,
A. Rickinson, and E. Kieff.
1990.
Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein (LMP1) and nuclear proteins 2 and 3C are effectors of phenotypic changes in B lymphocytes: EBNA-2 and LMP1 cooperatively induce CD23.
J. Virol.
64:2309-2318 |
| 64. |
Wang, S.,
M. Rowe, and E. Lundgren.
1996.
Expression of the Epstein-Barr virus transforming protein LMP1 causes a rapid and transient stimulation of the bcl-2 homologue Mcl-1 levels in B-cell lines.
Cancer Res.
56:4610-4613 |
| 65. | Xu, Y., G. Cheng, and D. Baltimore. 1996. Targeted disruption of TRAF3 leads to postnatal lethality and defective T-lymphocyte immune responses. Immunity 5:407-415[Medline]. |
| 66. | Young, L., C. Alfieri, K. Hennessy, H. Evans, C. OHara, K. C. Anderson, J. Ritz, R. S. Shapiro, A. Rickinson, E. Kieff, and J. I. Cohen. 1989. Expression of Epstein-Barr virus transformation-associated genes in tissues of patients with EBV lymphoproliferative disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 321:1080-1085[Abstract]. |
| 67. |
Young, L.,
C. Dawson,
D. Clark,
H. Rupani,
P. Busson,
T. Tursz,
A. Johnson, and A. Rickinson.
1988.
Epstein-Barr virus gene expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
J. Gen. Virol.
69:1051-1065 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»