Previous Article | Next Article 
Mol Cell Biol, June 1998, p. 3580-3585, Vol. 18, No. 6
0270-7306/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
The Nucleic Acid Binding Activity of Bleomycin
Hydrolase Is Involved in Bleomycin Detoxification
Wenjin
Zheng and
Stephen Albert
Johnston*
Departments of Medicine and Biochemistry,
Graduate Program in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University
of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235-8573
Received 1 December 1997/Returned for modification 14 January
1998/Accepted 26 February 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Yeast bleomycin hydrolase, Gal6p, is a cysteine peptidase that
detoxifies the anticancer drug bleomycin. Gal6p is a dual-function protein capable of both nucleic acid binding and peptide cleavage. We
now demonstrate that Gal6p exhibits sequence-independent, high-affinity binding to single-stranded DNA, nicked double-stranded DNA, and RNA. A
region of the protein that is involved in binding both RNA and DNA
substrates is delineated. Immunolocalization reveals that the Gal6
protein is chiefly cytoplasmic and thus may be involved in binding
cellular RNAs. Variant Gal6 proteins that fail to bind nucleic acid
also exhibit reduced ability to protect cells from bleomycin toxicity,
suggesting that the nucleic acid binding activity of Gal6p is important
in bleomycin detoxification and may be involved in its normal
biological functions.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Bleomycin hydrolase is a cysteine
peptidase that can cleave the glycopeptide bleomycin, which has been
used widely as an anticancer drug in chemotherapy. Bleomycin
hydrolase is highly conserved in organisms ranging from bacteria to
humans (3, 12). The yeast form of this enzyme has been
purified, and its crystal structure has been solved (12). We
designated the yeast form of bleomycin hydrolase Gal6, as its
expression is regulated by galactose (12, 35). We first
identified Gal6p by virtue of its DNA binding property. It binds
single-stranded DNA with high affinity (10 nM) and double-stranded DNA
with much lower affinity (1 µM) (33).
The crystal structure of Gal6p revealed that it is a hexamers, its six
subunits forming a ring with a central channel of about 20-Å diameter
at the entrance. The peptidase active sites are located deep inside
this tunnel, sequestered from the exterior. Other nucleic acid-binding
proteins with a ring structure, e.g., Escherichia coli DNA
polymerase
subunit (16), eukaryotic proliferating cell nuclear antigen (17), and Bacillus subtilis
Trp RNA-binding attenuation protein (2), have been
identified, as have other proteases with ring structures, e.g., the
proteasome and tricorn, which form a unique self-compartmentalizing
protease family (18, 21). However, Gal6 is the only ring
protein with both of these activities.
Although a role for Gal6p in bleomycin detoxification has been well
documented (7, 13, 25, 33), there is no evidence to date
that its nucleic acid binding activity plays a role in this
detoxification. The fact that bleomycin itself cleaves nucleic acids
(14, 28) suggests that the peptidase and nucleic acid binding activities of Gal6p may be functionally linked. On the other
hand, the DNA binding activity of Gal6p could be an in vitro artifact
and may not reflect a biologically relevant function.
We report here the characterization of the nucleic acid binding
activity of Gal6p. It binds to single-stranded DNA as well as
single-stranded RNA. Immunolocalization demonstrates that most of the
Gal6 protein is located in the cytoplasm, indicating that it may
function mainly as an RNA-binding protein. Mutation studies show that
the
-hairpin structure at the opening of the channel in Gal6 protein
plays an essential role in the nucleic acid binding activity but has no
effect on the peptidase activity. Cells bearing this mutation are more
sensitive to bleomycin toxicity, implying that this binding activity is
functional in vivo.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Strains and media.
E. coli TG1 was used for plasmid
amplification and single-stranded DNA plasmid production. E. coli BL21(DE3) was used for protein production. Bacteria were
grown in L broth plus the necessary antibiotics. The
Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains used were W303 (MAT
ura3 leu2 his3 trp1) and Sc377 (MAT
ura3
leu2 his3 TRP1::
gal6). Cells were grown in rich
medium (YEP) or selective medium and supplied with appropriate carbon
sources. Yeast cells were transformed by the LiCl method
(11).
Plasmids.
Plasmids pUC118 (31), YEP352
(8), and pVTU101 (30) have been described
previously. Plasmid pWZ1-3 is pUC118 containing the GAL6
gene and HIS3 gene fragments cloned into the
BamHI site. It was the source of single-stranded DNA for
site-directed mutagenesis. The same parental plasmid containing the
gal6 DNA-binding mutation (gal6db) was designated
pWZ1-3a. Two oligonucleotides, each containing a BamHI site,
were used for PCR with the GAL6 or gal6db gene
from pWZ1-3 and pWZ1-3a. The PCR fragments were digested by
BamHI and cloned into the BamHI site in pVTU102
such that the GAL6 and gal6db genes are
controlled by the ADH1 promoter in the plasmid. These two
plasmids were named pWZ1-4 and pWZ1-4a, respectively. Plasmid pKM260
was used for protein production in E. coli. It contains a T7
promoter followed by a six-histidine (His6) tag. Downstream of the His6 tag is a TEV protease cleavage sequence
followed by an NcoI site (24). Two primers were
used for PCR with the GAL6 or mutated gal6 gene.
The PCR fragments were digested by NcoI/BamHI and
cloned in frame into the NcoI/BamHI site in
pKM260 and were designated pWZ1-5 and pWZ1-5a. Plasmid pGAL1/10 was
constructed by cloning the fragment that contains four Gal4p binding
sites from GAL1 and GAL10 (bp 340 to 540, based
on the numbering by Yocum et al. [34]) into the
SalI site of pUC118. The same fragment was also used to test
whether Gal6p can bind to a Gal4p binding site in a gel mobility shift
assay.
Protein purification.
E. coli BL21 was transformed
with pWZ1-5 and pWZ1-5a. The resulting strains were grown at 37°C
overnight in 2-ml cultures, each containing 25 µg of ampicillin and
chloramphenicol per ml. Each culture then was inoculated into 1 liter
of L broth with the same antibiotics and grown to an optical density at
600 nm of 0.6 to 1.0. Isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside
was added to a final concentration of 200 µg/ml. Cells were grown for
another 8 h and then harvested. Proteins were purified by using
Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid resin according to the standard protocol
provided by Qiagen. Each protein from Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid beads
was extensively dialyzed against buffer A (25 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.5],
10% glycerol, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 7 mM 2-mercaptoethanol) and
applied to a Bio-Scale Q5 column (Bio-Rad) that had been equilibrated
with buffer A. The column was washed with 3 to 4 column volumes of buffer A before the protein was eluted with a 0 to 0.5 M KCl gradient in buffer A. The peak fractions were pooled, dialyzed against buffer A,
and concentrated in a Centricon30 (Ambion). The protein was stored in
this buffer plus 50% glycerol at
20°C.
Site-directed mutagenesis.
pWZ1-3 was transformed into
E. coli TG1, and the single-stranded DNA was prepared by the
standard protocol. The GAL6 gene in pWZ1-3 was mutated by
using the Amersham Sculptor in vitro mutagenesis system. To make
gal6db, the oligonucleotide
5'-AGTGTGGATTGCCGCGTCTGCGTCTACGTATTCCC-3' was used for
changing each of Lys242, Lys244, and Lys245 to alanine. The mutant was
identified and confirmed by sequencing.
Gel mobility shift assay.
The single-stranded DNA and RNA
oligonucleotides UASL (5'-AGCTTAGCGGAAATTTGTGGTCCGAGC-3')
were end labeled with 32P by using T4 kinase. Unless
specified, the assay for each sample contained 1 ng of labeled
oligonucleotide, 1 µg of sheared salmon sperm DNA, and 30 ng of
purified protein in buffer A. The gel shift procedure has been
described elsewhere (3). For competitive gel mobility shift
assays, different amounts of competitive DNA were added to the standard
reaction mixtures. For nicked DNA preparation, 1 µg of either
single-stranded or double-stranded DNA was digested with 2 ng of DNase
I for different times. EDTA was added to inactivate the DNase I. The
resulting nicked DNAs were subjected to competitive gel mobility shift
assays. Five different oligonucleotides were used to test the DNA
binding specificity of Gal6p.
Immunolocalization.
Yeast strain W303 was transformed by
pPS118, the plasmid that expresses the Gal4(1-72)-LacZ fusion protein.
This fusion protein contains the nuclear localization signal of Gal4p
and thus serves as a positive control for a nuclear-localized protein
(27). Antibody to Gal6 protein was affinity purified by
using highly purified Gal6p. This antibody detected only a single band
with the predicted size of Gal6p in crude yeast extracts and did not cross-react with any other proteins in the extracts (data not shown).
Antibody against LacZ protein was obtained from Cappel. Cells were
grown in medium lacking uracil and containing 2% galactose to mid-log
phase. Immunolocalization was accomplished as described by Rose et al.
(26).
Enzyme assay.
Two substrates were used to measure the
peptidase activity of Gal6p and its variant. A synthetic substrate,
Arg-AMC (L-arginine 7-amido-4-methylcoumarin; Bachem), was
used to determine the enzyme activity as previously described
(33). Zeocin (Invitrogen) is a copper-chelated phleomycin D1
(a bleomycin family member), which, like bleomycin, is isolated from
Streptomyces verticillus. It was also used in assays as
previously described (33) except that 5 mM Zeocin was used.
At different times, the reaction was stopped by adding 80 µl of
running buffer (100 mM NaH2PO4 [pH 2.3]). The product was
then resolved by using a Beckman P/ACE System 2000 as described by
McCormick (23). The amount of product was quantitated and
plotted.
Bleomycin and cisplatin sensitivity assay.
S.
cerevisiae Sc377 was transformed with pWZ1-6, pWZ1-6a, or pVTU102.
Bleomycin sensitivity was determined essentially by the method of Lim
et al. (19); cisplatin sensitivity was determined by the
method of McA'Nulty and Lippard (22).
 |
RESULTS |
Characterization of Gal6p DNA binding activity.
Previous
studies showed that Gal6p is a DNA-binding protein which can bind to
single-stranded DNA with high affinity and to double-stranded DNA with
lower affinity. The protein was originally identified by virtue of its
binding to a 27-base nucleotide that contains the UAS binding site of
the Gal4 regulatory protein in an in vitro binding assay
(33). We first tested whether Gal6 protein can bind to the
Gal4 binding sites in a more natural context, using a 250-bp DNA
fragment that contains four natural Gal4 binding sites. As shown in
Fig. 1A, purified Gal4-VP16 protein can
bind to this fragment at a concentration of 100 nM. In contrast, the binding of Gal6 protein to this fragment cannot be detected even at a
concentration of 10 µM. We also tested the ability of Gal6p to
protect the Gal4 sites in this 250-bp fragment by footprinting and
found no evidence of protection even at 166 µM (data not shown).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Gal6p binds to single-stranded DNA. (A) A gel mobility
shift assay shows that Gal6p does not bind to double-stranded GAL4
binding sites. The DNA used for each reaction was 20 ng of a 200-bp PCR
fragment from the GAL1-GAL10 promoter which contains four
Gal4p binding sites. Lane 1, free DNA; lane 2, DNA plus 100 nM purified
GAL4-VP16 protein; lanes 3 to 5, DNA plus 100 nM, 1 µM, and 10 µM,
respectively, Gal6p. (B) Gal6p binds to single-stranded
oligonucleotides without apparent sequence specificity. A gel mobility
shift assay shows that Gal6p can bind to various single-stranded
oligonucleotides. For each reaction, 30 ng of purified recombinant
Gal6p along with 1 ng of single-stranded oligonucleotide was used. Note
that lane 3 is with the LexA oligonucleotide. Arrowheads 1 and 2 indicate the protein-DNA complex and free DNA, respectively. Sequences
of the oligonucleotides used: lane 1, 5'-GGCAAACAACCAAGCTCTACCAGAGCT-3'; lane 2, 5'-CCTTTTTCTGTTTTATGAGCTATTT-3'; lane 3, 5'-TCGAGTACTGTATGTACATACAGTAC-3' (LexA oligonucleotide); lane 4, 5'-CGGGATCCAGAGCTGCTGAAACTATTTA-3'; lane 5, 5'-AGCTTAGCGGAAATTTGTGGTCCGAGC-3'.
|
|
A previous study had shown that a single-stranded oligonucleotide with
the LexA binding site (26 bp) had lower affinity for
Gal6p than for a
single-stranded oligonucleotide (27 bp) from
a Gal4 binding site
(
33). To further explore whether Gal6p binds
single-stranded
DNA with selectivity, we tested five unrelated
oligonucleotides,
including the LexA oligonucleotide. We found
that Gal6p binds equally
well to four of the oligonucleotides.
Only the LexA oligonucleotide had
significantly lower affinity.
We surmise that the LexA oligonucleotide
self-anneals to form
enough double-stranded DNA to decrease the
apparent Gal6p binding
(Fig.
1B). Therefore, we conclude that Gal6p
does not bind to
double-stranded Gal4p binding sites, nor does it bind
single-stranded
oligonucleotides with selectivity.
Gal6p binds to single-stranded DNA and RNA.
The structure of
Gal6p reveals no obvious DNA binding motif (12). The six
subunits form a tunnel with a diameter of 20 Å. Though the net charge
of the protein is neutral, there are 60 lysines located in the inside
wall of the tunnel. At each end of the tunnel, each subunit has a
-hairpin structure, with three lysines (Lys242, Lys244, and Lys245)
in each. Thus, nine lysines form a positively charged ring at both ends
of the tunnel (marked in black in Fig.
2A). If the protein binds to DNA through
the tunnel, the charged residues at each end of the tunnel may act as
DNA-contacting residues. We tested this by changing each of these
lysines to alanine to produce gal6db. This variant is stable in vivo
and has wild-type peptidase activity (see Fig. 5C). As shown in Fig.
2B, this variant is severely compromised in its ability to bind
single-stranded DNA. We estimate that the mutant protein gal6db has
approximately a 1,000-fold decrease in affinity for DNA, i.e., from
10
8 to 10
5 M (Fig. 2B) (33).
This finding is consistent with our observation for crude extracts
(unpublished data).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Lys242, Lys244, and Lys245 are important for DNA and RNA
binding. (A) The structure of Gal6p as seen looking down the central
tunnel. Black indicates Lys242, Lys244, and Lys245 (three lysines in
each turn), which are in the portal of the tunnel. The structure is
derived from reference 12. (B) Changing Lys242,
Lys244, and Lys245 to alanines disrupts the DNA binding activity of
Gal6p. A gel mobility shift assay shows that the mutant protein does
not bind to single-stranded DNA. In lanes 1 to 4 and 5 to 8, 30, 100, 300, and 1,000 ng of purified protein were used with 1 ng of
32P-labeled UASL; lane 9 is DNA alone. The small amounts of
protein-DNA complexes present in the gal6db binding reactions (lanes 3 and 4) have higher mobility than that of wild type because gal6db
protein has 18 fewer positive charges. (C) A gel mobility shift assay
shows that Gal6p is an RNA-binding protein. The DNA-binding mutant does
not bind to RNA. In lanes 1 to 4 and 5 to 8, 30, 100, 300, and 1,000 ng
of purified protein were used; lane 9 is RNA alone. In each reaction, 1 ng of an RNA corresponding to the same sequence as the UASL DNA
oligonucleotide was used. Arrowheads 1 and 2 indicate protein-nucleic
acid complexes and free oligonucleotides, respectively.
|
|
To investigate whether Gal6p can also bind RNA, we used an RNA
oligonucleotide with the same sequence as the DNA oligonucleotide
used
above (UASL) in a gel mobility shift assay. As shown in Fig.
2C, Gal6p
also binds this RNA. We estimate the affinity of the
wild-type protein
for RNA is 10 nM, which is in the same range
as that for
single-stranded DNA. To characterize whether Gal6p
uses the same motif
for DNA and RNA binding, we tested the ability
of the
DNA-binding-defective protein to bind to RNA. This protein
binds
single-stranded DNA and RNA with comparable low affinities
(Fig.
2C).
These results indicate that Gal6 protein requires the
same amino acids
for both DNA and RNA binding and that these include
the lysines at the
portal of the tunnel.
Gal6p binds to the ends of nucleic acid.
The finding that the
portal lysines are important for nucleic acid binding suggests two
mechanisms for binding. One model is that Gal6p binds to a DNA fragment
as the DNA end penetrates into the tunnel, with the positive charges in
the
-hairpins playing an important role in stabilizing the
protein-DNA complex (Fig. 3A, top).
Alternatively, the protein may sit on the DNA through charge-charge
interaction, and the three
-hairpins at the opening of the tunnel
may act as a clamp to bind single-stranded DNA. In the latter case, the
prediction follows that Gal6p may bind to single-stranded DNA other
than through its ends (Fig. 3A, bottom).

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Gal6p binds to single-stranded DNA with ends and nicked
DNA. (A) Two possible models of how Gal6p may bind to single-stranded
DNA. Top, the protein binds through the ends of single-stranded DNA
entering the tunnel; bottom, the three -hairpins may bind DNA
independent of the ends. (B) A single-stranded circular DNA does not
compete with single-stranded oligonucleotide (oligo) for Gal6p binding.
The amounts of Gal6p and DNA used are 30 ng (10 nM) and 1 ng (UASL),
respectively. The amounts of circular single-stranded DNA (pUC118
construct, 3.5 kb) used in lanes 1 to 5 are 0, 1, 10, 100, and 1,000 ng. (C) A circular single-stranded DNA treated with DNase I can
effectively compete with single-stranded oligonucleotide for Gal6p
binding. One microgram of circular, single-stranded DNA was digested
with 2 ng of DNase I for 0 (lane 1), 6 (lane 2), 12 (lane 3), 18 (lane
4), and 24 (lane 5) min. The resulting DNA samples were used in a
competitive gel mobility shift assay as for panel B. (D) Circular
double-stranded DNA (pUC118) does not compete with single-stranded
oligonucleotide for Gal6p binding. The amounts of double-stranded DNA
used for the assay are 0 (lane 1), 1 (lane 2), 10 (lane 3), 100 (lane
3), and 1,000 (lane 4) ng. (E) Double-stranded DNA treated with DNase I
can compete effectively with single-stranded oligonucleotide for Gal6p
binding. The double-stranded DNA was treated with 2 ng of DNase I for 0 (lane 1), 5 (lane 2), 10 (lane 3), 20 (lane 4), 30 (lane 5), and 40 (lane 6) min.
|
|
To help distinguish between these two models, we examined whether
circular, single-stranded DNA is effectively bound by Gal6p.
Different
amounts of single-stranded, circular DNA were used to
compete UASL
(single-stranded DNA oligonucleotide) for Gal6p binding.
As shown in
Fig.
3B, circular, single-stranded DNA cannot compete
with
single-stranded UASL for Gal6p binding even at a 1,000-fold
mass
excess. This result suggests that circular, single-stranded
DNA is not
an efficient substrate for Gal6p binding. However,
this DNA becomes a
strong competitor for Gal6p binding after it
is digested by DNase I. The binding activity is proportional to
the concentration of ends
introduced by DNase I (Fig.
3C). This
finding indicates that the Gal6p
protein binds to the ends of
single-stranded DNA.
Although Gal6p binds single-stranded DNA with high affinity,
single-stranded DNA ends are not abundant in living cells. One
possible
source of single-stranded DNA in the cell is nicked DNA.
Since the
peptide substrate of Gal6p, bleomycin, is a DNA-cleaving
agent, it is
possible that Gal6p binds to nicked templates that
arise from bleomycin
cleavage. We tested whether Gal6p binds to
nicks in double-stranded DNA
by treating pUC118 double-stranded
DNA with DNase I to generate nicked
substrates, and the ability
of this nicked DNA to compete the
single-stranded UASL was determined.
As shown in Fig.
3D, untreated
double-stranded DNA does not compete
with the single-stranded
oligonucleotide for Gal6p binding. However,
the double-stranded DNA
treated with DNase I is a good competitor
(Fig.
3E). More extensive
treatment with DNase I increased competition
for Gal6p binding. This
result suggests that Gal6p can bind to
nicked double-stranded DNA.
Immunolocalization.
As shown above, Gal6p can bind to
single-stranded DNA and RNA with high affinity in vitro. To help
resolve which nucleic acid (if any) is the natural substrate in vivo,
we immunolocalized Gal6p. In yeast, many proteolytic enzymes are
located in vacuoles, functional counterparts of lysosomes in mammalian
cells. If Gal6p is vacuolarly localized, it is likely that the nucleic
acid binding activity of Gal6p is an artifact. On the other hand,
nuclear localization would suggest DNA, and cytoplasmic localization
would suggest RNA, as the substrate. Yeast cells with or without the
GAL6 gene were grown to mid-log phase, and affinity purified
anti-Gal6p antibody was used to determine the subcellular location of
the Gal6 protein by immunolocalization. As shown in Fig.
4A and D, Gal6p is predominantly located
in the cytoplasm and appears to be excluded from the nucleus. Though
not apparent in Fig. 4, staining for Gal6p was absent in the vacuoles
(data not shown). A nucleus-localized
-galactosidase protein was
used as a positive control for nuclear localization (Fig. 4B and E).
Only background staining is evident in a strain with GAL6
deleted (Fig. 4C and F). Treatment of the cells with bleomycin did not
alter the localization of the Gal6 protein, nor did the localization
change with cell cycle (data not shown). Although the possibility that
some portion of Gal6p is located in the nucleus cannot be excluded,
this result shows that a majority of Gal6 protein is in the cytoplasm,
suggesting that RNA may be its predominant target if it does bind
nucleic acid in vivo.

View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Immunolocalization shows that most of the Gal6 protein
is located in the cytoplasm. (A) Localization of Gal6p. Immunopurified
antibody against Gal6p was used as described in Materials and Methods.
Note the lack of staining in nuclei. (B) Nuclear localized
-galactosidase. Antibody to -galactosidase was used, with cells
expressing a GAL4- -galactosidase fusion protein treated in the same
manner as for panel A. (C) gal6 control. A strain with
GAL6 deleted was treated as for panel A and probed with Gal6
antibody. (D to F) 4',6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole staining of nuclei in
the same cells of the corresponding panel.
|
|
The nucleic acid binding activity of Gal6p is involved in bleomycin
detoxification.
To determine whether the observed nucleic acid
binding activity of Gal6p is biologically active, we tested the
bleomycin sensitivity of strains that express either wild-type Gal6
protein or the variant Gal6 protein that lacks nucleic acid binding
activity. As shown in Fig. 5A, a strain
that expresses the nucleic acid-binding-defective protein is more
sensitive to bleomycin than a congenic strain that expresses wild-type
protein. However, the binding-defective variant GAL6 strain
displays slightly more bleomycin resistance than a strain with
GAL6 deleted, presumably because the binding-defective Gal6p
retains normal peptidase activity. These three strains have similar
sensitivities to another DNA-damaging agent, cisplatin (Fig. 5B),
implying that the effect of DNA binding is specifically related to
bleomycin detoxification. Relative to this point, Fig. 5C (top)
indicates that crude extracts of the two strains have essentially the
same peptidase activity toward the synthetic substrate Arg-AMC and that
the proteins are produced at the same levels in yeast (bottom). As
shown in Fig. 5D, the purified wild-type and mutant proteins also have
the same activity toward bleomycin (Zeocin), demonstrating that the
alterations affecting nucleic acid binding did not decrease the
intrinsic bleomycin detoxification activity in vitro. These data
indicate that the nucleic acid binding activity is involved in, but not
essential for, bleomycin detoxification and is probably specific for
bleomycin. These data are also consistent with the observation that
Gal6 protein can hydrolyze bleomycin in the absence of nucleic acid
(33).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
The nucleic acid binding activity of Gal6p is involved
in bleomycin detoxification. (A) The nucleic acid-binding mutant
(gal6db) strain is more sensitive to Zeocin than the
wild-type GAL6 strain but less sensitive than the
gal6 deletion strain. , GAL6; ,
gal6db; , gal6. (B) The gal6db
strain has the same sensitivity to cisplatin as the wild-type
GAL6 strain and the deletion strain. , GAL6;
, gal6db; , gal6. (C) A peptidase assay
shows that extracts from the wild-type and nucleic acid-binding mutant
strains have the same peptidase specific activity on the Arg-AMC
substrate, and a Western blot shows that the wild-type and mutant
strains express the same amount of protein. (D) Purified wild-type
Gal6p ( ) and gal6db ( ) have the same enzyme activity toward
Zeocin. For all assays, 5 mM Zeocin was incubated with 0.1 µM Gal6p
or gal6dbp in a 20-µl reaction. The amount of conversion of Zeocin to
products was determined by capillary electrophoresis.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, we have characterized the nucleic acid binding
activity of Gal6p, showing that Gal6p can bind to RNA, single-stranded DNA, and nicked DNA. Immunolocalization of Gal6p demonstrates that Gal6
protein is predominantly located in the cytoplasm. Finally, the nucleic
acid binding activity of Gal6p was shown to affect the ability of yeast
to detoxify bleomycin. Gal6p was originally isolated as a DNA-binding
protein and characterized as having strong single-stranded and weak
double-stranded DNA affinity (33). We now show that Gal6p
also binds to nicked double-stranded DNA and RNA with comparable
affinities. We find that Gal6p can bind with equal affinity to a
variety of oligonucleotides of random sequence, indicating it has no
specific sequence requirements.
The structure of Gal6p is a hollow cylinder with a positively charged
channel (12). This structure resembles those of other well-characterized DNA-binding proteins (for a review, see reference 15) and peptidases (for a review, see reference
18). The diameter of the channel at the entrance in
Gal6p is about 20 Å, which is enough to accommodate single-stranded or
double-stranded DNA, as shown from modeling (11a). Our
results show that Gal6p binding requires the ends of single-stranded
DNA, supporting the model that DNA ends may insert into the channel.
The requirement for the lysines at the entrance of the channel suggests
that charge-charge interactions are important for this binding. We have
shown that Gal6p also binds RNA. Immunolocalization data reveal that
most of the Gal6 protein is located in the cytoplasm, supporting the conclusion that RNA may be the predominant binding substrate of Gal6p
in the cell. Since the DNA-binding mutant cannot bind to RNA, it is
very likely that Gal6p binds DNA and RNA in the same way. The
cytoplasmic localization of Gal6p may also reflect its possible role as
a peptidase involved in the turnover of amino acids.
Based on the Gal6 protein structure, the channel is the only obvious
access to the peptidase active sites of Gal6p (1). As the
only known natural substrate of Gal6p is bleomycin, a nucleic acid-binding and -cleaving agent, it is possible that Gal6p binds to
the nucleic acid and cleaves bleomycin bound to it. This proposal is
supported by our data showing that the nucleic acid-binding mutant is
more sensitive to bleomycin than wild-type cells. We have also observed
that single-stranded DNA can stimulate the hydrolysis of a substrate,
Arg-AMC, by Gal6p twofold (data not shown). However, the relatively
small size of the substrate and the potential interactions between the
positively charged arginine and DNA may influence the interpretation of
this result. It has been shown that bleomycin can cleave
double-stranded regions of tRNA (9), mRNA (4, 5),
and rRNA (10). As these RNAs are abundant in the cytoplasm,
it seems likely that RNA molecules in the cytoplasm would bind much of
the bleomycin as it first enters the cell. Most of the detoxification
of bleomycin may therefore take place in the cytoplasm, though the
toxicity itself may arise primarily from damage to DNA. However, other
RNA-damaging and -modifying agents such as ricin (6),
aminoglycoside antibiotics (32), and onconase
(20) are strong growth inhibitors. Thus, it is possible that
the RNA cleaving activity of bleomycin plays a role in its cytotoxicity
and Gal6p protects RNA.
We have provided evidence that RNA may be a physiological binding
substrate for Gal6p. However, it is still possible that a small amount
of Gal6p is present in the nucleus, where it is able to cleave
bleomycin bound to DNA. The affinity of Gal6p for single-stranded DNA
ends is 10 nM, and we estimate that there are 18,000 to 67,000 Gal6
monomers per cell, depending on growth conditions (unpublished data).
Therefore, it is reasonable to expect that a small amount of Gal6p can
efficiently bind nicks in DNA caused by bleomycin. Studies from other
groups have shown that strains defective in double-stranded DNA break
repair are more sensitive to bleomycin than wild-type cells whereas
nuclear excision repair-defective cells have the same bleomycin
sensitivity as wild-type cells (1). These data indicate that
double-stranded DNA breaks caused by bleomycin are much more
detrimental. It is possible that when bleomycin binds to DNA and
cleaves the first strand, the single-stranded DNA ends are exposed and
recruit bleomycin hydrolase to provide a high local concentration of
detoxification activity to block the occurrence of the second break. In
this way, bleomycin hydrolase could prevent lethal double-stranded DNA
breaks.
We have shown that the mutations in GAL6 which inactivate
nucleic acid binding also make yeast cells more sensitive to bleomycin but have no significant effect on its cisplatin sensitivity. While this
correlation argues that the nucleic acid binding plays a role in
bleomycin detoxification, it is also possible that this binding is
merely correlative. For example, the positive charges of Gal6p may be
important for binding some other targets such as acidic peptides.
Arguing that the nucleic acid binding is not an artifact is the recent
finding that the less positively charged rat bleomycin hydrolase also
binds DNA (29).
By sequence comparison, bleomycin hydrolase is highly conserved from
bacteria to mammals (3, 12). It would not be a surprise to
find that all bleomycin hydrolases have the same mechanism to detoxify
bleomycin. Supporting this idea, we have found that the bacterial
homolog PepC, like the mammalian homolog (29), is a
single-stranded DNA-binding protein (unpublished data). Further investigation of whether other mammalian Gal6-like proteins are nucleic
acid-binding proteins and whether the nucleic acid binding activity is
important for bleomycin detoxification may provide useful information
for bleomycin chemotherapy. Also remaining to be determined are the
normal cellular function of Gal6p and its nucleic acid binding
activity. Regardless, these studies provide the first evidence that the
nucleic acid binding activity of Gal6p functions in vivo.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Leemor Joshua-Tor and the Johnston lab for helpful
discussions.
This work was supported by grants from NIH (CA67982) and the Council
for Tobacco Research (4247R1) to S.A.J. and a molecular cardiology
training fellowship to W.Z.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Medicine, UT-Southwestern, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX
75235-8573. Phone: (214) 648-1415. Fax: (214) 648-1450. E-mail:
johnston{at}ryburn.swmed.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Abe, H.,
M. Wada,
K. Kohno, and M. Kuwano.
1994.
Altered drug sensitivities to anticancer agents in radiation-sensitive DNA repair deficient yeast mutants.
Anticancer Res.
14:1807-1810[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Antson, A. A.,
J. Otridge,
A. M. Brzozowski,
E. J. Dodson,
G. G. Dodson,
K. S. Wilson,
T. M. Smith,
M. Yang,
T. Kurecki, and P. Gollnick.
1995.
The structure of trp RNA-binding attenuation protein.
Nature
374:693-700[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Berti, P. J., and A. C. Storer.
1995.
Alignment/phylogeny of the papain superfamily of cysteine proteases.
J. Mol. Biol.
246:273-283[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Carter, B. J.,
E. de Vroom,
E. C. Long,
G. A. van der Marel,
J. H. van Boom, and S. M. Hecht.
1990.
Site-specific cleavage of RNA by Fe(II) · bleomycin.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:9373-9377[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Dix, D. J.,
P. N. Lin,
A. R. McKenzie,
W. E. Walden, and E. C. Theil.
1993.
The influence of the base-paired flanking region on structure and function of the ferritin mRNA iron regulatory element.
J. Mol. Biol.
231:230-240[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Endo, Y.,
K. Mitsui,
M. Motizuki, and K. Tsurugi.
1987.
The mechanism of action of ricin and related toxic lectins on eukaryotic ribosomes. The site and the characteristics of the modification in 28 S ribosomal RNA caused by the toxins.
J. Biol. Chem.
262:5908-5912[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Enenkel, C., and D. H. Wolf.
1993.
BLH1 codes for a yeast thiol aminopeptidase, the equivalent of mammalian bleomycin hydrolase.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:7036-7043[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Hill, J. E.,
A. M. Myers,
T. J. Koerner, and A. Tzagoloff.
1986.
Yeast/E. coli shuttle vectors with multiple unique restriction sites.
Yeast
2:163-167[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Holmes, C.,
A. Abraham,
S. Hecht,
C. Florentz, and R. Giege.
1996.
Fe-bleomycin as a probe of RNA conformation.
Nucleic Acids Res.
24:3399-3406[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Holmes, C. E.,
B. J. Carter, and S. M. Hecht.
1993.
Characterization of iron (II) · bleomycin-mediated RNA strand scission.
Biochemistry
32:4293-4307[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Ito, H.,
Y. Fukuda,
K. Murata, and A. Kimura.
1983.
Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations.
J. Bacteriol.
153:163-168[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11a.
| Joshua-Tor, L. Personal communication.
|
| 12.
|
Joshua-Tor, L.,
H. E. Xu,
S. A. Johnston, and D. C. Rees.
1995.
Crystal structure of a conserved protease that binds DNA: the bleomycin hydrolase, Gal6.
Science
269:945-950[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Kambouris, N. G.,
D. J. Burke, and C. E. Creutz.
1992.
Cloning and characterization of a cysteine proteinase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:21570-21576[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Kane, S. A., and S. M. Hecht.
1994.
Polynucleotide recognition and degradation by bleomycin.
Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol.
49:313-352[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Kelman, Z.,
J. Finkelstein, and M. O'Donnell.
1995.
Protein structure. Why have six-fold symmetry?
Curr. Biol.
5:1239-1242[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Kong, X. P.,
R. Onrust,
M. O'Donnell, and J. Kuriyan.
1992.
Three-dimensional structure of the beta subunit of E. coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme: a sliding DNA clamp.
Cell
69:425-437[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Krishna, T. S.,
X. P. Kong,
S. Gary,
P. M. Burgers, and J. Kuriyan.
1994.
Crystal structure of the eukaryotic DNA polymerase processivity factor PCNA.
Cell
79:1233-1243[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Larsen, C. N., and D. Finley.
1997.
Protein translocation channels in the proteasome and other proteases.
Cell
91:431-434[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Lim, S. T.,
C. K. Jue,
C. W. Moore, and P. N. Lipke.
1995.
Oxidative cell wall damage mediated by bleomycin-Fe(II) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Bacteriol.
177:3534-3539[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Lin, J. J.,
D. L. Newton,
S. M. Mikulski,
H. F. Kung,
R. J. Youle, and S. M. Rybak.
1994.
Characterization of the mechanism of cellular and cell free protein synthesis inhibition by an anti-tumor ribonuclease.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
204:156-162[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Lupas, A.,
J. M. Flanagan,
T. Tamura, and W. Baumeister.
1997.
Self-compartmentalizing proteases.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
22:399-404[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
McA'Nulty, M. M., and S. J. Lippard.
1996.
The HMG-domain protein Ixr1 blocks excision repair of cisplatin-DNA adducts in yeast.
Mutat. Res.
362:75-86[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
McCormick, R. M.
1988.
Capillary zone electrophoretic separation of peptides and proteins using low pH buffers in modified silica capillaries.
Anal. Chem.
60:2322-2328[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Melcher, K. A., and S. A. Johnston.
1995.
Gal4 interacts with TATA-binding protein and coactivators.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:2839-2848[Abstract].
|
| 25.
|
Pei, Z.,
T. P. Calmels,
C. E. Creutz, and S. M. Sebti.
1995.
Yeast cysteine proteinase gene ycp1 induces resistance to bleomycin in mammalian cells.
Mol. Pharmacol.
48:676-681[Abstract].
|
| 26.
|
Rose, M. D.,
F. Winston, and P. Hieter.
1990.
In
Methods in yeast genetics: a laboratory course manual.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 27.
|
Silver, P. A.,
A. Chiang, and I. Sadler.
1988.
Mutations that alter both localization and production of a yeast nuclear protein.
Genes Dev.
2:707-717[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Stubbe, J., and J. W. Kozarich.
1987.
Mechanisms of bleomycin-induced DNA degradation.
Chem. Rev.
87:1107-1136.
|
| 29.
|
Takeda, A.,
Y. Masuda,
T. Yamamoto,
T. Hirabayashi,
Y. Nakamura, and K. Nakaya.
1996.
Cloning and analysis of cDNA encoding rat bleomycin hydrolase, a DNA-binding cysteine protease.
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
120:353-359[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Vernet, T.,
D. Dignard, and D. Y. Thomas.
1987.
A family of yeast expression vectors containing the phage f1 intergenic region.
Gene
52:225-233[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Vieira, J., and J. Messing.
1987.
Production of single-stranded plasmid DNA.
Methods Enzymol.
153:3-11[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Wang, Y.,
J. Killian,
K. Hamasaki, and R. R. Rando.
1996.
RNA molecules that specifically and stoichiometrically bind aminoglycoside antibiotics with high affinities.
Biochemistry
35:12338-12346[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Xu, H. E., and S. A. Johnston.
1994.
Yeast bleomycin hydrolase is a DNA-binding cysteine protease. Identification, purification, biochemical characterization.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:21177-21183[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Yocum, R. R.,
S. Hanley,
R. West, Jr., and M. Ptashne.
1984.
Use of lacZ fusions to delimit regulatory elements of the inducible divergent GAL1-GAL10 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
4:1985-1998[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Zheng, W.,
H. Xu, Eric, and S. A. Johnston.
1997.
The cysteine-protease bleomycin hydrolase is a new component of the galactose regulon in yeast.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:30350-30355[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Mol Cell Biol, June 1998, p. 3580-3585, Vol. 18, No. 6
0270-7306/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Zimny, J., Sikora, M., Guranowski, A., Jakubowski, H.
(2006). Protective Mechanisms against Homocysteine Toxicity: THE ROLE OF BLEOMYCIN HYDROLASE. J. Biol. Chem.
281: 22485-22492
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Liu, T., Lu, B., Lee, I., Ondrovicova, G., Kutejova, E., Suzuki, C. K.
(2004). DNA and RNA Binding by the Mitochondrial Lon Protease Is Regulated by Nucleotide and Protein Substrate. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 13902-13910
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schaus, S. E., Cavalieri, D., Myers, A. G.
(2001). Gene transcription analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to neocarzinostatin protein- chromophore complex reveals evidence of DNA damage, a potential mechanism of resistance, and consequences of prolonged exposure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
10.1073/pnas.191340698v1
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Russell, S. J., Steger, K. A., Johnston, S. A.
(1999). Subcellular Localization, Stoichiometry, and Protein Levels of 26 S Proteasome Subunits in Yeast. J. Biol. Chem.
274: 21943-21952
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schaus, S. E., Cavalieri, D., Myers, A. G.
(2001). Gene transcription analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to neocarzinostatin protein- chromophore complex reveals evidence of DNA damage, a potential mechanism of resistance, and consequences of prolonged exposure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
98: 11075-11080
[Abstract]
[Full Text]