Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Mol Cell Biol, July 1998, p. 4301-4314, Vol. 18, No. 7
Hematology/Oncology Division,
Received 11 November 1997/Returned for modification 4 January
1998/Accepted 24 March 1998
0270-7306/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
CCAAT/Enhancer Binding Protein
Is a Regulatory
Switch Sufficient for Induction of Granulocytic Development from
Bipotential Myeloid Progenitors
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
SUMMARY
|
|
|---|
The transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer binding protein
(C/EBP
) regulates a number of myeloid cell-specific genes. To
delineate the role of C/EBP
in human granulopoiesis, we studied its
expression and function in human primary cells and bipotential
(granulocytic/monocytic) myeloid cell lines. We show that the
expression of C/EBP
initiates with the commitment of multipotential
precursors to the myeloid lineage, is specifically upregulated during
granulocytic differentiation, and is rapidly downregulated during the
alternative monocytic pathway. Conditional expression of C/EBP
alone
in stably transfected bipotential cells triggers neutrophilic
differentiation, concomitant with upregulation of the
granulocyte-specific granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor and
secondary granule protein genes. Moreover, induced expression of
C/EBP
in bipotential precursors blocks their monocytic
differentiation program. These results indicate that C/EBP
serves as
a myeloid differentiation switch acting on bipotential precursors and
directing them to mature to granulocytes.
INTRODUCTION
|
|
|---|
According to the current view of hematopoiesis, all blood cell types derive from a common pluripotent stem cell (65). In the adult, the stem cells are found in bone marrow, where they divide to produce more stem cells (self-renewal) and various precursor cells committed to a single lineage which terminally differentiate to morphologically and functionally distinct erythroid, myeloid, or lymphoid cells. Within the myeloid compartment, the same committed precursor can give rise to monocytic or granulocytic cells. This raises a question: what are the molecular mechanisms that dictate the fate of the common precursor to one or the other of these two diverse myeloid lineages?
Genetic manipulations such as gene knockout and gene transfer experiments provide increasing evidence that transcription factors are involved in execution of the differentiation program of a cell. Determination of the developmental role of a number of transcription factors in blood development has been achieved by gene disruption experiments. These studies indicated that the GATA-1 and GATA-2, SCL, PU.1, Ikaros, c-myb, and AML1 genes, among others, are key regulators of hematopoiesis (reviewed in references 63 and 68). Inactivation of these genes had multilineage effects. Complementary to these knockout experiments are expression studies which identified certain transcription factors as master regulators of development, defined as genes which once activated would establish a specific cell type. For example, ectopic expression of MyoD in diverse cell types converts them to muscle cells (17). Similarly, expression of the B-cell transcription factor Oct-2 or the helix-loop-helix protein E47 in non-B cells induces B cell-like phenotypes (55, 59). In addition, thanks to advances in cell and molecular biological techniques, isolation and analysis of single primary cells, including functional stem cells, is feasible, and their developmental patterns can be studied as well (12).
CCAAT/enhancer binding protein
(C/EBP
) was initially identified
in liver and adipose tissue, where it was found to be important for
terminal differentiation (8, 16, 22, 39, 44, 75). More
recently it was shown to be also expressed in early myeloid cells
(12, 61, 68). In addition, a number of granulocyte-specific genes, including granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) receptor
(64), neutrophil elastase (52), and
myeloperoxidase (23, 52) genes, have been shown to be
regulated by C/EBP
. Gene targeting experiments revealed a specific
defect in the hematopoietic system of C/EBP
knockout mice. The
C/EBP
null phenotype was characterized by lack of mature
granulocytes, with all the other blood cell types present, including
monocytes and peritoneal macrophages (81). These results
strongly point to a critical role of C/EBP
in granulocytic
differentiation (reviewed in reference 68).
In the present study, we have investigated the expression pattern of
C/EBP
in the hematopoietic system during monocytic and granulocytic
differentiation. We also examined the effect of induced overexpression
of C/EBP
on the differentiation program of early bipotential myeloid
cells. Our results demonstrate that the C/EBP
gene is activated at
the stage of myeloid commitment and is specifically expressed in
granulocytic cells. Increased levels of C/EBP
expressed from an
inducible promoter construct directed differentiation along the
granulocytic pathway, as determined by morphological criteria.
Furthermore, ectopic expression of C/EBP
resulted in upregulation of
mRNA of the granulocyte-restricted genes encoding the G-CSF receptor
and C/EBP
, as well as secondary granule protein genes lactoferrin
and human neutrophil collagenase. Our findings identify C/EBP
as the
molecular switch during early hematopoietic developmental events that
directs cells to the granulocytic pathway.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
|
|
|---|
Cell lines. Human myeloid U937 (American Type Culture Collection [ATCC] no. CRL 1593; ATCC, Rockville, Md.) and Mono Mac 6 (82), promyelocytic HL-60 (ATCC no. CCL 240) and NB4 (40), erythroleukemic K562 (ATCC no. CCL 246), immature myeloid KG1a (ATCC no. CCL 246.1), T-cell Jurkat (ATCC no. TIB 152), and B-cell Raji (ATCC no. CCL 86) and BJA-B (34) cell lines were grown in RPMI 1604 medium (Gibco, Grand Island, N.Y.) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone, Logan, Utah) and 2 mM L-glutamine. Human cervical carcinoma HeLa cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS and 2 mM L-glutamine. The murine myeloid progenitor line 416B (19) was cultured in DMEM with 15% FBS. Interleukin-3 (IL-3)-dependent murine BaF3 cells (54) were grown in DMEM (Gibco)-10% FBS (HyClone) with 10% WEHI-3 conditioned medium as a source of murine IL-3.
Primary cell purification.
Human single bone marrow cells,
G0 phase arrested, CD34+ CD33
,
CD34+ CD33+, CD11b+,
CD3+, and CD19+, were purified as described
previously (6). Peripheral blood monocytes and neutrophils
were isolated from healthy donors by passage through a Ficoll-Hypaque
gradient followed by erythrocyte lysis according to a procedure
described earlier (11).
In vitro differentiation.
To induce erythrocytic
differentiation, K562 cells were cultured in medium supplemented with
1.5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) for up to 5 days. U937 and HL-60 cells
were treated for 2 days with 1.3 × 10
7 M
tetradecanoyl phorbol acetate (TPA) (for monocytic differentiation) or
with 10
6 M all-trans-retinoic acid (Sigma) for
4 days (granulocytic differentiation). Stock solutions of TPA and
retinoic acid were prepared in DMSO; to yield working concentrations,
they were diluted 1:7,700 (TPA) and 1:1,000 (retinoic acid) in media.
Similar dilutions of vehicle (DMSO) alone did not induce morphologic
differentiation. At the end of each differentiation experiment,
approximately 104 cells were centrifuged at 500 rpm for 5 min onto a glass slide and stained with Wright-Giemsa stain, and
differential cell counts were performed.
Reverse transcription-PCR and Southern blot analysis.
cDNA
synthesis from isolated single bone marrow cells, amplification, and
Southern blotting procedures were described previously (6, 7,
12). The human C/EBP
3' untranslated region was used as a
probe (see below). Hybridization conditions were as for Northern blots
(see below) except that the last wash was with 0.2× SSC (1× SSC is
0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate)-0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate
(SDS).
Plasmids and transfections.
The expression vector pPC22
containing the rat C/EBP
cDNA under the control of the human
metallothionein promoter, as well as the empty vector pPC18, was
described previously (76). Both plasmids contained a
neomycin phosphotransferase gene as a selectable marker. DNA for stable
transfections was purified on cesium chloride gradients. A total of
2 × 107 cells were electroporated in a Gene Pulser
apparatus (Bio-Rad, Melville, N.Y.) with 10 µg of
XmnI-linearized plasmid at 960 µF in 0.4-cm cuvettes
(BTX). Voltages were 250 V for U937 and HL-60 cells and 270 V for 416B
cells. Cells were plated on 96-well plates at 105
cells/well. Selection with G418 (850 µg/ml [active concentration]) began 48 h posttransfection. The expression of rat C/EBP
gene was induced by adding 100 µM ZnSO4 to the culture medium.
Apoptosis assay. Programmed cell death (apoptosis) was detected by the terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay (27) (In Situ Cell Death Detection kit; Boehringer Mannheim) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
NBT assay. Reduction of the nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) by respiratory burst products was performed by a slide test as described previously (51).
RNA isolation and Northern blot analysis.
Total RNA was
isolated by the guanidinium thiocyanate method (13). In each
lane, 20 µg of RNA was denatured in formamide and fractionated on 1%
agarose-2.2 M formaldehyde gels (58). RNA was transferred
to Biotrans (ICN, East Hills, N.Y.) or MagnaGraph (Micron Separations,
Inc., Westborough, Mass.) membranes in 20× SSC, and the blots were
hybridized at 40°C in 50% formamide-7.5× Denhardt's solution
(50× Denhardt's solution is 5 g of Ficoll, 5 g of
polyvinylpyrrolidone, and 5 g of bovine serum albumin in 500 ml)-5× SSC-50 mM NaPO4 (pH 6.8)-100 µg of salmon
sperm DNA per ml-0.5% SDS. DNA fragments were labeled by the random
primer method (21). The blots were washed once in 1×
SSC-0.5% SDS for 15 min at room temperature, once in 1× SSC-0.5%
SDS for 15 min at 42°C, and once in 0.1× SSC-1% SDS for 30 min at
65°C. The 700-bp EcoRI-HindIII fragment of
pG28B5.0 (4) and a fragment encompassing bp 289 to 1024 of
the human G-CSF receptor cDNA (25, 64) served as probes for
human C/EBP
and G-CSF receptor mRNAs, respectively. The IL-8
receptor B probe was a 1.8-kb XhoI-EcoRI fragment
of pIL8RB (1, 10), and the CD18 probe was a 2.7-kb
BamHI-ClaI insert of clone J9 (41,
57). Rat C/EBP
mRNA was detected with a
HincII-BamHI 300-bp fragment from pPC22
(76). The human lactoferrin probe was a 2.3-kb
EcoRI cDNA insert (plasmid 39) (32), the human
neutrophil collagenase probe was a 2.4-kb
BamHI-EcoRI cDNA insert (plasmid 59)
(18), and the human C/EBP
probe was a 0.5-kb
PstI fragment of the pJurkat1 clone (3). To
ensure uniform levels and integrity of RNA samples loaded in each lane, the blot was stripped and rehybridized to probes specific for 18S and
28S RNAs. The oligonucleotide for the 18S RNA corresponded to bp 938 to
921 of the human 18S rRNA gene (5'-TCGGGCCTGCTTTGAACA-3') (71). 28S RNA was detected with an oligonucleotide
containing bp 4036 to 4020 (5'-AGGTAGCCAAATGCCTC-3') of the
human 28S rRNA gene (5). Autoradiography was performed by
using Kodak XAR-5 film at
80°C with Dupont Cronex Lightning Plus
screens except as otherwise noted. Quantitation of relative mRNA levels
was performed with a Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager and software.
Protein extract preparation and Western blotting.
Nuclear
extracts were prepared as described (20) with minor
modifications. Briefly, 5 × 107 cells were washed
twice with 1× phosphate-buffered saline, resuspended in 1 volume of
packed cells of ice-cold buffer A (10 mM HEPES [pH 7.9], 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF]), and allowed to swell on ice
for 15 min. Cells were lysed by vortexing for 10 s and centrifuged
in a microcentrifuge at 14,000 rpm for 10 s at 4°C. After
removal of the supernatant, nuclei were lysed by addition of 80 µl of
buffer C (20 mM HEPES [pH 7.9], 25% glycerol, 0.42 M NaCl, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM PMSF) for
30 min at 4°C. After centrifugation in a microcentrifuge at 14,000 for 5 min, supernatants were aliquoted and frozen at
80°C. For
whole-cell extracts, 5 × 107 cells were harvested by
centrifugation, washed twice in phosphate-buffered saline, and lysed by
addition of 300 µl of radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (150 mM
NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 50 mM Tris [pH
7.5], 0.5 mM PMSF, 1% aprotinin), passaged twice through an 18-gauge
needle, and placed on ice. DNA was digested by adding 0.1 volume of
DNase I digestion buffer and 30 U of DNase I (both reagents from
Boehringer Mannheim). The digestion was allowed to proceed for 30 min
on ice, and the resulting lysate was vortexed for 10 s, aliquoted,
and stored frozen at
70°C. Alternatively, washed cells (3 × 106) were lysed directly in 10 µl of 1× Laemmli sample
buffer.
proteins were detected after 1 h
of incubation with a 1:1,000 dilution of a rabbit polyclonal anti-rat
C/EBP
antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, Calif.) or a
1:2,000 dilution of C103 antibody (kindly provided by Pernille Rorth) and visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL kit; Amersham) according to the manufacturer's protocol, using a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (diluted 1:1,000).
Quantitation of relative protein levels was performed with a Molecular
Dynamics PhosphorImager. Equivalent loading of lanes was determined by Ponceau S staining and staining of the membranes with anti-
-tubulin antibody (1 µg/µl; Boehringer Mannheim) followed by sheep
anti-mouse immunoglobulin G-horseradish peroxidase (1:1,000 dilution;
Amersham).
RESULTS
|
|
|---|
C/EBP
mRNA is present in myeloid but not in lymphoid cells.
C/EBP
mRNA is expressed in a number of different tissues
(4), and within the hematopoietic system it had been shown
by Western blot analysis that C/EBP
is regulated during
differentiation of myelomonocytic cells (61). We extended
these analyses and examined the mRNA expression of C/EBP
by using a
panel of myeloid and lymphoid cell lines. As shown in Fig.
1a, Northern blot hybridization to a
specific human C/EBP
3' untranslated region probe (4) revealed human C/EBP
transcripts of 2.9 kb in myeloid cell lines Mono Mac 6, U937, and HL-60. Very low levels of C/EBP
were detected in KG1a cells, which represent a very immature myeloid line (26, 35) (data not shown), as well as in the nonhematopoietic cervical carcinoma line, HeLa (Fig. 1a and c). In contrast, no C/EBP
mRNA was
seen in Jurkat T cells, BJA-B and Raji B cells, or erythroleukemic K562
cells. These results complement previous studies using Western blot
analysis (61) and demonstrate that C/EBP
mRNA is
specifically expressed in myeloid and not lymphoid lines.
|
C/EBP
gene expression is initiated at the time of commitment of
stem cells to differentiate to the myeloid lineage.
We examined
how early during normal hematopoiesis is C/EBP
expressed. To do
this, we examined cDNA synthesized from RNA of single isolated human
bone marrow cells. Individual quiescent (G0-arrested)
multipotent hematopoietic stem cells were selected by treatment of bone
marrow cells with stem cell factor, IL-3, and the antimetabolite
5-fluorouracil (6, 12). Cells representing various stages of
hematopoietic differentiation were isolated by fluorescence-activated
cell sorting (FACS) using antibodies against specific antigens. CD34 is
a marker of stem cells and precursors (2, 36). Concurrent
expression of CD34 and early myeloid marker, CD33, distinguishes
progenitors committed to the myeloid lineage (28). CD11b,
CD3, and CD19 are the markers of mature myeloid, T, and committed B
lymphoid cells, respectively (28, 66, 74). Each panel in
Fig. 1b contains cDNA synthesized from five individual FACS-sorted
cells representing each group. Hybridization to a human
C/EBP
-specific probe demonstrates that C/EBP
is not
expressed in G0-arrested stem cells or uncommitted progenitors (CD34+ CD33
). However, all
five committed myeloid (CD34+ CD33+) precursor
cells had detectable C/EBP
mRNA. CD11b+ mature
myeloid cells (which in bone marrow are almost entirely neutrophils
with rare monocytes) showed the highest expression of C/EBP
.
Background levels of C/EBP
were observed in CD3+ T cells
and CD19+ B cells. These results indicate that C/EBP
is
first expressed at the time of commitment of myeloid precursors and
persists in mature myeloid but not lymphoid cells.
C/EBP
mRNA is highly expressed in granulocytes but not
peripheral blood monocytes.
Our studies (see above) showed that
C/EBP
was highly expressed in mature myeloid cells
(CD11b+) but did not indicate whether there was
preferential expression in monocytes or granulocytes. To address the
question of how C/EBP
mRNA is expressed in terminally differentiated
primary cells, we purified peripheral blood human monocytes and
neutrophils and analyzed total RNA by Northern blotting as shown in
Fig. 1c. Very high levels of C/EBP
were detected in neutrophils.
Control hybridization to the neutrophil-specific IL-8 receptor B probe
confirmed the identity of neutrophil RNA (1, 10). No
C/EBP
transcripts were noted in purified human peripheral blood
monocytes, which express mRNA of the late-stage monocytic marker, CD14
(data not shown). We conclude that C/EBP
is expressed at high levels
in mature neutrophils and is undetectable in mature peripheral blood monocytes.
Granulocyte-specific upregulation of C/EBP
expression is
recapitulated in myeloid cell lines.
We were interested in whether
the granulocyte-restricted pattern of C/EBP
expression observed in
primary cells would also be found in myeloid cell lines, which are good
models for studying differentiation (35). K562
erythroleukemia cells were induced to erythroid differentiation with
DMSO. U937 and HL-60 promyelocytic cells were treated with TPA to
induce monocytic differentiation or with retinoic acid to stimulate
granulocytic differentiation. At different time points, cell aliquots
were withdrawn for preparation of cytocentrifuged slides for
morphologic analysis and preparation of total RNA. The effectiveness of
each differentiation induction was verified by microscopic inspection
of Wright-Giemsa-stained slides, which showed that at the final time
points over 90% of U937 and HL-60 cells were differentiated to
monocytic and granulocytic lineages, respectively. To determine whether
the morphological changes observed were associated with alterations in
C/EBP
gene expression, we measured C/EBP
mRNA (Fig. 1d). A clear
decrease in C/EBP
mRNA was apparent in U937 and HL-60 cells
undergoing in vitro monocytic differentiation (compare lane 5 to lanes
3 and 4 and lane 12 to lanes 10 and 11). Normalization of the C/EBP
hybridization signals to the 18S RNA internal control revealed that TPA
treatment of HL-60 cells led to a decrease of C/EBP
mRNA levels by
approximately 90%. The same treatment of U937 cells resulted in a
reduction of expression by 70%. Control hybridization showed a
significant increase in accumulation of mRNA for CD18, a marker of
myeloid maturation, demonstrating induction of differentiation of the
cultures.
mRNA following 1 day of culture in the
presence of retinoic acid (Fig. 1d). Maximum levels of C/EBP
mRNA
were noted during the first 2 to 8 h of treatment of HL-60 cells
(Fig. 1d, lanes 14 to 16), and they decreased to original levels
at 48 h of treatment (Fig. 1d; compare lanes 13 and 18). A similar
pattern of C/EBP
mRNA expression was observed during granulocytic
differentiation of another promyelocytic cell line, NB4 (Fig. 1d, lanes
19 to 23). In the case of U937 cells, C/EBP
mRNA was upregulated on
day 1 of granulocytic differentiation, followed by a slight
downregulation on day 2 and then by a gradual increase after an
additional 2 days of culture with retinoic acid. This biphasic pattern
of expression was observed repeatedly. As a control for induction of
myeloid differentiation, the amount of CD18 mRNA was noted to increase
(Fig. 1d). As shown earlier (Fig. 1a, lane 8), no C/EBP
transcripts
were seen in unstimulated K562 cells, and no upregulation was observed
during DMSO-induced erythrocytic differentiation (Fig. 1d). In addition
to investigating C/EBP
mRNA, we also determined the expression of
C/EBP
protein during monocytic and granulocytic differentiation by
Western blot analysis. C/EBP
protein was downregulated (fivefold at
day 1) with TPA-induced monocytic differentiation. In contrast,
C/EBP
protein levels were increased twofold after 1 day of retinoic acid treatment in both HL-60 and U937 cells. At later time points, protein levels were maintained at initial levels (Fig. 1e). In addition, C/EBP DNA binding activity (as assessed by gel shift assays)
was upregulated 3-fold with retinoic acid and downregulated 2.5-fold
with TPA treatment (55a). In summary, the
granulocyte-specific pattern of C/EBP
expression seen in
primary human cells was observed in bipotential cell lines induced to
differentiate along the two major myeloid pathways. Specifically,
C/EBP
was highly expressed during retinoic acid-induced
granulocytic differentiation and rapidly downregulated with respect to
mRNA and protein levels and DNA binding activity with TPA-induced
monocytic differentiation.
Conditional expression of C/EBP
is sufficient to induce
granulocytic differentiation of bipotential cells.
Recently we
reported that mice homozygous for a C/EBP
null mutation have an
absolute lack of mature neutrophils but not monocytes (81).
This effect together with granulocyte-limited expression of C/EBP
suggested that this transcription factor is essential for
granulopoiesis. To investigate the possibility that C/EBP
acts as a
molecular switch, directing bipotential cells to granulocytic differentiation, we generated stable lines of U937 and HL-60 cells containing a rat C/EBP
cDNA expressed by the zinc-inducible human metallothionein promoter. For controls, the same cell lines were also
stably transfected with a C/EBP
-deficient plasmid containing the
promoter only. Stable clones were isolated by resistance to G418.
Several individual clones were cultured in regular growth medium
or medium supplemented with 100 µM ZnSO4 for up to 20 days. Cell morphology was monitored at various times by observation of Wright-Giemsa-stained cytocentrifuged cells. Figure
2 shows representative cytospin
preparations. Cells from two independent clones of U937 with an empty
vector [U937(vect)#1 and U937(vect)#3] grown in zinc-containing
medium for 17 days showed no gross morphological changes compared to
the untransfected parental line (Fig. 2A and B and data not shown).
These cells had characteristics of myeloblasts: relatively large,
rather oblong nuclei with finely granular chromatin and surrounded by
narrow rims of deeply staining cytoplasm (Fig. 2A and B). Actively
dividing cells representing various stages of mitosis were encountered
frequently. U937 cells transfected with the inducible C/EBP
expression vector (U937
#2) and maintained for several weeks in
medium without zinc resembled promyelocytes (Fig. 2C). They were
somewhat larger than U937(vect)#1 and U937(vect)#3 cells and had
slightly more abundant cytoplasm. Overall, however, they still had an
appearance of immature myeloid cells (promyelocytes or myelocytes).
Addition of zinc into the medium and culture for 17 days caused a
remarkable change in cell morphology of this clone (Fig. 2D). The great
majority of cells represented terminal stages of granulocytic
differentiation. Typical mature neutrophilic cells with segmented
nuclei and faintly stained cytoplasm were predominant. In addition,
cells were positive for neutrophil-specific respiratory burst enzyme
activity as assessed by the NBT assay (data not shown). Mitotic cells
were decreased over 80% compared to cells cultured in the absence of
zinc. Two additional independent lines of U937 with the C/EBP
expression vector (U937
#3 and U937
#5 [Fig. 2E and F,
respectively]) also exhibited the morphological characteristics of
polymorphonuclear neutrophils upon induction with zinc. The same
phenomenon was seen with HL-60 stable clones, although the
morphological changes were slightly less dramatic (data not shown). The
murine multipotential progenitor cell line 416B, stably transfected
with the metallothionein-C/EBP
construct and treated with 100 µM
ZnSO4, also underwent granulocytic differentiation as
judged by lobular nuclei and lightly stained cytoplasm (data not
shown). Since C/EBP
has been shown to possess growth-inhibitory activity (29, 70, 76), we also compared the proliferation rates of C/EBP
transfectants cultured in zinc-containing and zinc-deficient media. The U937(vect)#1 and U937(vect)#3 clones grew
indistinguishably regardless of the presence or absence of zinc
throughout the entire 20-day culture period. In contrast, the C/EBP
transfectants U937
#2 and U937
#5 showed a moderate reduction in
proliferation beginning at day 17 of the zinc treatment, consistent
with their morphological differentiation at that time (data not shown).
It could be argued that the lower rate of proliferation together with
the increased convolution of the nucleus might be a result of apoptosis
rather than genuine granulocytic maturation. Accordingly, we
performed a TUNEL assay (27) using one
C/EBP
-transfected U937 line (U937
#2) and one clone with
the empty expression vector [U937(vect)#1]. As shown in Fig.
3, no apoptotic cells were noted in the
culture of U937 cells containing the empty expression vector for 17 days in the zinc-supplemented medium or in the culture of
U937
#2 cells (containing the rat C/EBP
expression cDNA) in the absence of zinc. When U937
#2 cells were grown in the presence of
zinc, only a very few cells became apoptotic (indicated by a red arrow
in Fig. 3F). The darker shadows of the nuclei of the nonapoptotic cells
clearly show their granulocytic morphology. Therefore, we conclude that
the morphologic changes we observe are not secondary to increased
apoptosis. In summary, following zinc treatment, bipotential myeloid
cells stably transfected with a zinc-inducible C/EBP
expression
vector underwent morphological changes indicative of terminal stages of
granulocytic differentiation.
|
|
expression, cells were harvested for RNA after 13 days
of culture in zinc-free and zinc-supplemented media. After 13 days of
zinc treatment, most of the cells resembled metamyelocytes (bands) or
polymorphonuclear neutrophils, whereas none of the cells in the absence
of zinc had this morphology. Low levels of rat C/EBP
expression were
detectable even in some clones grown in zinc-deficient medium. However,
addition of zinc augmented expression of the transfected C/EBP
considerably. There were in U937
#2 over 100-fold, in U937
#3
almost 3-fold, and in an HL-60 transfectant (HL60
#5) nearly 9-fold
more rat C/EBP
transcripts after zinc induction (Fig.
4a and data not shown). Overall, the highest induced expression was seen in clone U937
#2, which reached approximately fourfold-higher expression of rat C/EBP
mRNA than did
clones U937
#3 and HL60
#5. The latter two lines produced roughly
equivalent amounts of rat C/EBP
mRNA.
|
protein showed that untransfected U937 and HL-60 cells expressed low but detectable levels of endogenous C/EBP
protein (Fig. 4b, lanes 2 and 9). In zinc-deficient medium, all three stable
clones tested (U937
#2, U937
#3, and HL60
#5) produced threefold
more total (endogenous human and ectopic rat) C/EBP
protein than the
corresponding untransfected parental lines (Fig. 4b; compare lanes 3 and 6 with lane 2 and lane 10 with lane 9). This result was expected
since leaky rat C/EBP
mRNA expression was noted by Northern blot
analysis (Fig. 4a and data not shown). However, after 2 days of culture
in the presence of zinc, U937
#2 and U937
#3 cells produced 10-fold
more total C/EBP
protein than the parental untransfected U937
line (Fig. 4b; compare lanes 4 and 7 to lane 2). Approximately
eightfold more C/EBP
protein was detected in HL60
#5 cells
treated with zinc for 24 h (compare lane 11 to lane 9; 40 µg of
protein extract was loaded in lane 9, while all other lanes
contain 20 µg).
The upregulation of exogenous C/EBP
was paralleled by an increase of
endogenous G-CSF receptor mRNA levels. The magnitude of G-CSF receptor
mRNA correlated with the extent of rat C/EBP
mRNA induction,
suggesting a dosage-dependent effect (Fig. 4a and data not shown). In
contrast, upregulation of ectopic C/EBP
had no significant effect on
the expression of endogenous C/EBP
mRNA in our stable lines (the
C/EBP
mRNA levels correlated exactly with the amount of total RNA
loaded in each lane as assessed by hybridization to the 18S rRNA
probe). In addition, induction of ectopic C/EBP
expression also
paralleled with the upregulation of another C/EBP family member,
C/EBP
. C/EBP
was shown recently to exhibit a
granulocyte-restricted pattern of expression (14, 79) and to
be essential for late-stage (metamyelocyte-to-segmented granulocyte)
differentiation of neutrophils (78), and therefore acts
downstream of C/EBP
function. Most interestingly, however, increased
expression of C/EBP
resulted in activation of the
neutrophil-specific genes lactoferrin and human neutrophil collagenase
(Fig. 4a), which were shown to remain silent in human leukemic cell
lines even after induction of their granulocytic differentiation by retinoic acid or DMSO (32, 33). In summary, overexpression of C/EBP
alone had an impact on the genetic program of the U937 and
HL-60 cells by acting as a molecular switch, which triggered their
granulocytic differentiation program through upregulation of myeloid
genes such as those encoding G-CSF receptor, C/EBP
, and secondary
granule proteins, and was associated with marked neutrophilic
morphologic changes.
Provisionally expressed C/EBP
prevents TPA-induced
macrophage differentiation.
The data described above
suggest a fundamental role of C/EBP
as a granulocytic
differentiation determinant. The following experiment was performed to
establish whether the expression of C/EBP
can prevent macrophage
differentiation. The stable clone U937
#2 was chosen because the
transfected C/EBP
gene was the least active in zinc-deficient medium
and the addition of zinc to this cell line induced the highest levels
of rat C/EBP
among all stable clones tested (Fig. 4 and data not
shown). U937
#2 cells were grown in zinc-supplemented medium, and at
2- to 3-day intervals TPA was added to individual cell cultures. The
cultures were allowed to grow in the continued presence of zinc for 2 more days. Changes in cell morphology were monitored by observation of
Wright-Giemsa-stained cytospin preparations. As shown in Fig. 5B, 9 days of culture in the presence of zinc did not bring any discernible
changes in cell morphology compared to untreated immature cells (Fig.
5A). When U937
#2 cells were pretreated
with zinc for 7 days and then induced with TPA (in the continuous
presence of zinc) for 2 days, no mature macrophages were observed and
all cells resembled neutrophils (Fig. 5C and D). Interestingly,
although TPA has been known exclusively as a macrophage differentiation inducer, in the latter experiment it enhanced neutrophil maturation (compare Fig. 5C and D to Fig. 5B). In contrast, TPA
treatment alone led to terminal macrophage differentiation of U937
#2
cells grown in zinc-deficient medium (Fig. 5E and F); the morphological changes observed here were indistinguishable from those observed in
TPA-stimulated parental U937 cells (data not shown). Simultaneous addition of zinc and TPA or 3-day zinc pretreatment prior to TPA stimulation did not prevent macrophage differentiation (data not shown). After zinc treatment for 5 days and thereafter with TPA, a mixture of phenotypically different cells
emerged; among the predominantly macrophage-like cells,
occasional polymorphonuclear neutrophils were also apparent (data
not shown). These results indicate that forced C/EBP
expression
can block the monocytic differentiation pathway and that 5 to 7 days of zinc pretreatment was required to obtain this effect.
|
Transient overexpression of C/EBP
is sufficient for induction
and progress of granulocytic differentiation.
Northern and Western
blot data shown in Fig. 1d and e indicate that retinoic
acid-prompted granulocytic differentiation of myeloid cell lines
(NB4, HL-60, and U937) resulted initially in a twofold increase in
endogenous C/EBP
levels during the first 24 h, which
subsequently decreased to the original levels. We wanted to
determine whether such transient upregulation of C/EBP
expression was sufficient to trigger granulocytic
differentiation. To test this, we cultured the exogenous
C/EBP
-expressing U937
#2 cells in the presence of zinc for
1, 2, or 3 days, subsequently washed them twice in zinc-deficient
medium, and then continued culture in the absence of zinc.
Granulocytic differentiation was assessed by monitoring
morphological changes at various time points. Figure
6 shows Wright-Giemsa-stained cytospin
preparations. Morphological changes in U937
#2 cells were first noted
on day 16 of continued culture in the presence of zinc. When U937
#2
cells were treated with zinc for 1 to 3 days, granulocytic morphologic
changes (appearance of polymorphonuclear cells) took place at
progressively shorter intervals. As little as 1 day of zinc treatment
induced granulocytic differentiation, although it occurred 1 week later
(23 to 24 days of culture in total) than in the parallel culture in the
continued presence of zinc. Differentiated cells induced by transient
expression of C/EBP
showed the same decreases in mitotic activity
(fivefold) as was observed for continually induced cells. No changes in
the endogenous C/EBP
mRNA expression levels were noted. Again, no differentiation was observed in zinc-treated cells transfected with the
empty vector. Therefore, continued induced expression of C/EBP
is
not necessary to induce granulocytic differentiation; only a brief
exposure can set the differentiation program in motion.
|
DISCUSSION
|
|
|---|
In this report we have investigated the role of C/EBP
as a
regulatory switch in hematopoietic cells. Earlier studies in a murine
granulocytic cell line, 32Dcl3, had suggested early upregulation and
subsequent downregulation of C/EBP
with granulocytic differentiation (61). We have extended these studies to primary
hematopoietic cells and shown that the C/EBP
gene is activated
during commitment of multipotential cells to the myeloid lineage. In
addition, we demonstrated that as bipotential myeloid progenitors are
stimulated toward monocyte/macrophage differentiation, C/EBP
is
consistently and rapidly downregulated to undetectable levels (Fig. 1).
This finding is in agreement with the increase in C/EBP
seen in
developing granulocytic but not monocytic colonies in culture
(12). In contrast, induction to the granulocytic pathway
results in initial upregulation and then subsequent slight
downregulation of C/EBP
expression, consistently seen in multiple
human and murine cell lines (Fig. 1) (61). Consistent with
this pattern of C/EBP
expression is the finding that a short pulse
of C/EBP
expression can induce morphologic granulocyte
differentiation weeks later (Fig. 6). Relatively high levels of
C/EBP
mRNA were noted in primary mature neutrophils (Fig. 1d),
suggesting that C/EBP
is further upregulated with terminal
differentiation. This observation is consistent with the secondary
upregulation of C/EBP
mRNA observed during retinoic acid-mediated
granulocytic differentiation of U937 cells (Fig. 1d). This biphasic
pattern of C/EBP
mRNA expression and the effects of induced
expression in myeloid lines suggest that C/EBP
might serve different
functions in early multipotential cells, in which it induces a switch
in differentiation to granulocytes versus monocytes, than in terminally
differentiated granulocytes, in which it might serve as an
antiproliferation factor (29, 70, 76).
These expression data, combined with studies of C/EBP
knockout
mice (81), in which granulocytic but not monocytic
differentiation is blocked, lead to the question of whether
C/EBP
gene activation is a prerequisite for or a consequence of
granulocytic differentiation. The C/EBP
knockout model does not
completely answer this question, and therefore we turned our attention
to studies in which C/EBP
was overexpressed in early bipotential
myeloid precursors. We estimated that a threefold increase in total
C/EBP
(endogenous human plus exogenous rat) protein was sufficient
to induce terminal polymorphonuclear differentiation (Fig. 4b). The
time required for granulocytic maturation (17 days) is similar to the
time estimated for myeloid maturation in normal bone marrow (9,
49). Moreover, the extent of differentiation among individual
clones correlated with the degree of induction of C/EBP
mRNA. Since
the forced expression of C/EBP
instructed bipotential myeloid cells
to granulocytes rather than monocytes, these results showed that
C/EBP
expression is a necessary prerequisite for this process.
Conditional expression of ectopic C/EBP
can induce differentiation
of bipotential myeloid cells and adipogenesis (24, 44, 73,
80). However, one possible difference between the adipocyte and
granulocyte differentiation systems is that it is thought that in the
case of adipocyte differentiation, a critical early event is induction
of C/EBP
expression prior to subsequent activation of C/EBP
(60, 77, 80), indicating the importance of C/EBP
function
in adipocyte development. In contrast, gene targeting of C/EBP
(62, 67) and conditional expression of avian C/EBP
(NF-M)
in a multipotential hematopoietic cell line (47) indicate that it is neither necessary nor sufficient for development of monocytes and neutrophils. Another difference between these systems is
that the retinoic acid receptor pathway blocks adipogenesis by blocking
C/EBP-mediated transcription (60) but is a positive regulator of granulocyte development (15, 72), and it will be of interest to investigate the effects of liganded retinoic acid
receptor on C/EBP
transcriptional activation of myeloid target
genes, such as those encoding the G-CSF receptor (64) and
C/EBP
itself (69). In bipotential myeloid cell lines,
retinoic acid signaling itself leads to upregulation of C/EBP
expression (Fig. 1), and this could be the primary mechanism of
retinoic acid-induced granulocyte differentiation.
While we clearly observe upregulation of C/EBP
mRNA and protein with
retinoic acid-induced differentiation of myeloid cell lines, other
possible mechanisms of granulocytic induction of myeloid cell lines
exist. For example, neutrophilic differentiation of HL-60 cells with
DMSO treatment was reported to lead to a decrease in C/EBP
protein
(61), and we observed the same results in Western blots of
the HL-60 cells used in our studies (data not shown). Clearly, DMSO and
retinoic acid evoke granulocytic differentiation by different molecular
pathways and C/EBP
upregulation is not essential for DMSO-induced
differentiation. For example, the lack of upregulation of C/EBP
in
DMSO-treated HL-60 cells might be compensated by some other
transcription factor(s), such as the granulocyte-specific C/EBP
(79) or by C/EBP
, which is also highly upregulated during
granulocytic differentiation (55a). Whether the mechanisms
observed in DMSO-induced HL-60 granulocytic differentiation extend to
primary cells is not known, since C/EBP
is clearly critical for
granulocyte maturation in vivo (81). We also observed a
decrease in C/EBP
mRNA and protein levels with TPA-induced monocytic
differentiation of cell lines. We and others (9a) also
observed no mRNA detectable by Northern blot analysis of peripheral
blood monocytes. However, it is clear that C/EBP
can be expressed in
murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (31), murine
peritoneal macrophages (81a), and human alveolar macrophages
(9b), raising the possibility that C/EBP
is downregulated as multipotential myeloid precursors differentiate into monocytes but
upregulated as monocytes further differentiate to macrophages.
Induced expression of exogenous C/EBP
also enhanced expression of
the granulocyte-specific G-CSF receptor (Fig. 4a). This finding is
consistent with the findings that the G-CSF receptor promoter is
regulated by C/EBP
(64), and G-CSF receptor mRNA is
selectively absent in C/EBP
knockout mice (81). Induction of G-CSF receptor expression in immature granulocytic cells is critical
for early proliferation and viability, as removal of growth factors can
lead to apoptosis (56), which was not observed in our cells
(Fig. 3). Another set of important granulocytic mRNAs which are induced
in these cells (and absent from C/EBP
/
murine fetal
liver cells) are those encoding neutrophil-specific secondary granule
proteins (such as lactoferrin and collagenase [Fig. 4a]). These genes
could not previously be induced during granulocytic differentiation of
myeloid cells lines by using retinoic acid alone (32, 33),
suggesting that induced expression of C/EBP
leads to a stage of
maturation more similar to actual neutrophils.
In the absence of C/EBP
, granulocytes did not develop in C/EBP
knockout mice (81), and provision of high levels of C/EBP
to bipotential myeloid precursors directed them to differentiate along
the granulocytic pathway (this report). Taken together, these studies
show that expression of C/EBP
is sufficient and necessary for
granulocytic differentiation and suggest a model of how bipotential
myeloid precursors are induced to become either monocytes or
granulocytes (Fig. 7). Myeloid precursors
can develop into either granulocytes or monocytes. If they encounter a
stimulus which induces upregulation of C/EBP
expression, then the
outcome will result in granulocyte development. One possible stimulus is signaling through the G-CSF receptor itself, which can induce upregulation of C/EBP
mRNA in multipotential cell lines
(64a). Conversely, a different stimulus might induce
expression of a monocytic factor resulting in monocytic development
(Fig. 7). One candidate for such a monocytic factor is egr-1
(37, 48), although the finding that egr-1
knockout mice can make macrophages demonstrates that in contrast to
C/EBP
-induced granulocytic development, egr-1 is not
absolutely necessary for monocytic differentiation (42).
Another candidate monocyte regulator is PU.1, since PU.1 knockout mice
have an absolute block in monocyte development but can make
neutrophilic cells, albeit their development is delayed (46).
|
During TPA stimulation of monocytic development, endogenous C/EBP
was downregulated, and it is likely that this downregulation is
required in order for the cells to differentiate along the monocytic
pathway. Subsequent to the ectopic C/EBP
induction for 7 days,
treatment with TPA was unable to downregulate the endogenous C/EBP
expression. As a result, forced expression of C/EBP
prevented
monocytic differentiation normally achieved by TPA treatment alone
(Fig. 5). This block is likely due to the cells having been committed
to the granulocytic pathway, rather than elevated levels of C/EBP
protein per se. It might be possible that C/EBP
acts as a repressor
of genes which play a role in monocytic differentiation, such as
egr-1. Moreover, if ectopic C/EBP
was induced and allowed
to be expressed for a sufficient time (7 days), TPA treatment
accelerated granulocytic maturation. This observation suggests that
C/EBP
is a particularly powerful differentiation factor, as it has
been shown that HL-60 cells which had been treated for 5 days with DMSO
to induce granulocytic cells could be still differentiated to
macrophages by subsequent treatment with TPA (43). One
possible explanation could be that C/EBP
expression affects the
expression of other factors fundamental for granulocytic
maturation which act either independently or in cooperation with
C/EBP
. A likely candidate for such cooperative interactions might be
the recently cloned and predominantly granulocytic-specific factor
C/EBP
(3, 14, 79). C/EBP
appears to act
downstream of C/EBP
, in that in C/EBP
/
mice, granulocytic differentiation proceeds beyond the immature blast
stage observed in C/EBP
/
mice but is blocked at the
very terminal stages of metamyelocyte-to-segmented granulocyte
differentiation (78).
Our results suggest that genetic changes toward irreversible
granulocytic differentiation occur during the first week of C/EBP
expression, and it will be of great importance to identify which presently unknown C/EBP
target genes are upregulated in these C/EBP
cells during the neutrophilic commitment period, prior to the
switch point (Fig. 7). In addition, complete myeloid maturation takes
at least another 10 days beyond this first 7-day commitment phase; the
total time required (17 days) is similar to the time estimated for
myeloid maturation in normal bone marrow (9, 49). TPA
itself, normally a monocytic inducer, can accelerate granulocytic
maturation of cells in which C/EBP
has been expressed at increased
levels for 7 days to induce granulocytic commitment (Fig. 5).
Therefore, it will also be of great interest to identify which genes
are differentially induced during TPA-mediated monocytic differentiation of these lines versus TPA-induced granulocytic maturation of cells in which C/EBP
has already been expressed for 7 days to trigger granulocytic commitment but not maturation. The cell
lines used in these studies should be of great value in dissecting the
genetic and signaling pathways leading from bipotential myeloid
precursors to granulocytes, as well as the mechanisms leading to the
differentiation block observed in leukemic cells.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
|
|
|---|
We acknowledge the assistance of Jeff Marx of Baxter Healthcare
Corporation for his generous gifts of purified cells and cell culture
reagents; J. Patrick Condreay for his kind gift of plasmids pPC18 and
pPC22 and valuable discussions; Mathieu Cellier for allowing us to cite
his unpublished data; Kleanthis Xanthopoulos for the human C/EBP
cDNA probe; Jane Visvader for 416B cells; Pernille Rorth for C103
anti-C/EBP
antibody; David Gonzalez, Laura T. Smith, Kristina
Rhoades, and Chaker N. Adra for assistance with the expression studies;
Stuart Orkin, Kleanthis Xanthopoulos, Gretchen Darlington, Len Zon,
Claus Nerlov, Laura Smith, Atsushi Iwama, and Milton Datta for critical
reading of the manuscript; and all members of the Tenen laboratory who
contributed to this work by numerous discussions and helpful
suggestions.
This work was supported by fellowship award DK09721 from the National Institutes of Health to H.S.R. and grants CA41456 and HL56745 (to D.G.T.) and HL44851 and DK50234 (to D.T.S.). C.S.H. is a recipient of a fellowship from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Harvard Institutes of Medicine, Room 954, 77 Ave. Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115. Phone: (617) 667-5561. Fax: (617) 667-3299. E-mail: dtenen{at}bidmc.harvard.edu.
REFERENCES
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Ahuja, S. K.,
A. Shetty,
H. L. Tiffany, and P. M. Murphy.
1994.
Comparison of the genomic organization and promoter function for human interleukin-8 receptors A and B.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:26381-26389 |
| 2. |
Andrews, R. G.,
E. M. Bryant,
S. H. Bartelmez,
D. Y. Muirhead,
G. H. Knitter,
W. Bensinger,
D. M. Strong, and I. D. Bernstein.
1992.
CD34+ marrow cells, devoid of T and B lymphocytes, reconstitute stable lymphopoiesis and myelopoiesis in lethally irradiated allogeneic baboons.
Blood
80:1693-1701 |
| 3. |
Antonson, P.,
B. Stellan,
R. Yamanaka, and K. G. Xanthopoulos.
1996.
A novel human CCAAT/enhancer binding protein gene, C/EBP , is expressed in cells of lymphoid and myeloid lineages and is localized on chromosome 14q11.2 close to the T-cell receptor / locus.
Genomics
35:30-38[Medline].
|
| 4. |
Antonson, P., and K. G. Xanthopoulos.
1995.
Molecular cloning, sequence, and expression patterns of the human gene encoding CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP ).
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
215:106-113[Medline].
|
| 5. |
Barbu, V., and F. Dautry.
1989.
Northern blot normalization with a 28S rRNA oligonucleotide probe.
Nucleic Acids Res.
17:7115 |
| 6. |
Berardi, A. C.,
A. L. Wang,
J. D. Levine,
P. Lopez, and D. T. Scadden.
1995.
Functional isolation and characterization of human hematopoietic stem cells.
Science
267:104-108 |
| 7. | Brady, G., M. Barbara, and N. N. Iscove. 1990. Representative in vitro cDNA amplification from individual hemopoietic cells and colonies. Methods Mol. Cell. Biol. 2:17-25. |
| 8. |
Cao, Z.,
R. M. Umek, and S. L. McKnight.
1991.
Regulated expression of three C/EBP isoforms during adipose conversion of 3T3-L1 cells.
Genes Dev.
5:1538-1552 |
| 9. |
Cartwright, G. E.,
J. W. Athens, and M. M. Wintrobe.
1964.
The kinetics of granulopoiesis in normal man.
Blood
24:780-803 |
| 9a. | Cellier, M. Personal communication. |
| 9b. | Cellier, M. Unpublished data. |
| 10. | Cellier, M., C. Shustik, W. Dalton, E. Rich, J. X. Hu, D. Malo, E. Schurr, and P. Gros. 1997. Expression of the human NRAMP1 gene in professional primary phagocytes: studies in blood cells and in HL-60 promyelocytic leukemia. J. Leukocyte Biol. 61:96-105[Abstract]. |
| 11. |
Chen, H. M.,
P. Zhang,
M. T. Voso,
S. Hohaus,
D. A. Gonzalez,
C. K. Glass,
D.-E. Zhang, and D. G. Tenen.
1995.
Neutrophils and monocytes express high levels of PU.1 (Spi-1) but not Spi-B.
Blood
85:2918-2928 |
| 12. |
Cheng, T.,
H. Shen,
D. Giokas,
J. Gere,
D. G. Tenen, and D. T. Scadden.
1996.
Temporal mapping of gene expression levels during the differentiation of individual primary hematopoietic cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:13158-13163 |
| 13. | Chomczynski, P., and N. Sacchi. 1987. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal. Biochem. 162:156-159[Medline]. |
| 14. | Chumakov, A. M., I. Grillier, E. Chumakova, D. Chih, J. Slater, and H. P. Koeffler. 1997. Cloning of the novel human myeloid-cell-specific C/EBP-epsilon transcription factor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:1375-1386[Abstract]. |
| 15. |
Collins, S. J.,
K. A. Robertson, and L. Mueller.
1990.
Retinoic acid-induced granulocytic differentiation of HL-60 myeloid leukemia cells is mediated directly through the retinoic acid receptor (RAR ).
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10:2154-2163 |
| 16. |
Costa, R. H.,
D. R. Grayson,
K. G. Xanthopoulos, and J. E. Darnell, Jr.
1988.
A liver-specific DNA-binding protein recognizes multiple nucleotide sites in regulatory regions of transthyretin, 1-antitrypsin, albumin, and simian virus 40 genes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:3840-3844 |
| 17. | Davis, R. L., H. Weintraub, and A. B. Lassar. 1987. Expression of a single transfected cDNA converts fibroblasts to myoblasts. Cell 51:987-1000[Medline]. |
| 18. |
Devarajan, P.,
K. Mookhtiar,
H. Van Wart, and N. Berliner.
1991.
Structure and expression of the cDNA encoding human neutrophil collagenase.
Blood
77:2731-2738 |
| 19. | Dexter, T. M., T. D. Allen, D. Scott, and N. M. Teich. 1979. Isolation and characterisation of a bipotential haematopoietic cell line. Nature 277:471-474[Medline]. |
| 20. |
Dignam, J. D.,
R. M. Lebovitz, and R. G. Roeder.
1983.
Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei.
Nucleic Acids Res.
11:1475-1489 |
| 21. | Feinberg, A. P., and B. Vogelstein. 1983. A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal. Biochem. 132:6-13[Medline]. |
| 22. |
Flodby, P.,
C. Barlow,
H. Kylefjord,
L. Ahrlund-Richter, and K. G. Xanthopoulos.
1996.
Increased hepatic cell proliferation and lung abnormalities in mice deficient in CCAAT/enhancer binding protein .
J. Biol. Chem.
271:24753-24760 |
| 23. |
Ford, A. M.,
C. A. Bennett,
L. E. Healy,
M. Towatari,
M. F. Greaves, and T. Enver.
1996.
Regulation of the myeloperoxidase enhancer binding proteins PU.1, CEBP , , and during granulocytic-lineage specification.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:10838-10843 |
| 24. |
Freytag, S. O., and T. J. Geddes.
1992.
Reciprocal regulation of adipogenesis by Myc and C/EBP alpha.
Science
256:379-382 |
| 25. |
Fukunaga, R.,
Y. Seto,
S. Mizushima, and S. Nagata.
1990.
Three different mRNAs encoding human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:8702-8706 |
| 26. |
Furley, A. J.,
B. R. Reeves,
S. Mizutani,
L. J. Altass,
S. M. Watt,
M. C. Jacob,
P. van den Elsen,
C. Terhorst, and M. F. Greaves.
1986.
Divergent molecular phenotypes of KG1 and KG1a myeloid cell lines.
Blood
68:1101-1107 |
| 27. |
Gavrieli, Y.,
Y. Sherman, and S. A. Ben-Sasson.
1992.
Identification of programmed cell death in situ via specific labeling of nuclear DNA fragmentation.
J. Cell Biol.
119:493-501 |
| 28. | Griffin, J. D., J. Ritz, L. M. Nadler, and S. F. Schlossman. 1981. Expression of myeloid differentiation antigens on normal and malignant myeloid cells. J. Clin. Invest. 68:932-941. |
| 29. |
Hendricks-Taylor, L. R., and G. J. Darlington.
1995.
Inhibition of cell proliferation by C/EBP occurs in many cell types, does not require the presence of p53 or Rb, and is not affected by large T-antigen.
Nucleic Acids Res.
23:4726-4733 |
| 30. |
Henkel, G. W.,
S. R. McKercher,
H. Yamamoto,
K. L. Anderson,
R. G. Oshima, and R. A. Maki.
1996.
PU.1 but not Ets-2 is essential for macrophage development from ES cells.
Blood
88:2917-2926 |
| 31. |
Hu, H.-M.,
M. Baer,
S. C. Williams,
P. F. Johnson, and R. C. Schwartz.
1998.
Redundancy of C/EBP , - , and - in supporting the lipopolysaccharide-induced transcription of IL-6 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1.
J. Immunol.
160:2334-2342 |
| 32. |
Johnston, J. J.,
P. Rintels,
J. Chung,
J. Sather,
E. J. Benz, Jr., and N. Berliner.
1992.
Lactoferrin gene promoter: structural integrity and nonexpression in HL60 cells.
Blood
79:2998-3006 |
| 33. |
Khanna-Gupta, A.,
K. Kolibaba,
T. A. Zibello, and N. Berliner.
1994.
NB4 cells show bilineage potential and an aberrant pattern of neutrophil secondary granule protein gene expression.
Blood
84:294-302 |
| 34. |
Klein, G.,
T. Lindahl,
M. Jondal,
W. Leibold,
J. Menezes,
K. Nilsson, and C. Sundstrom.
1974.
Continuous lymphoid cell lines with characteristics of B cells (bone-marrow-derived), lacking the Epstein-Barr virus genome and derived from three human lymphomas.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
71:3283-3286 |
| 35. |
Koeffler, H. P., and D. W. Golde.
1980.
Human myeloid leukemia cell lines: a review.
Blood
56:344-350 |
| 36. |
Krause, D. S.,
M. J. Fackler,
C. I. Civin, and W. S. May.
1996.
CD34: structure, biology, and clinical utility.
Blood
87:1-13 |
| 37. | Krishnaraju, K., H. Q. Nguyen, D. A. Liebermann, and B. Hoffman. 1995. The zinc finger transcription factor Egr-1 potentiates macrophage differentiation of hematopoietic cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:5499-5507[Abstract]. |
| 38. | Laemmli, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680-685[Medline]. |
| 39. |
Landschulz, W. H.,
P. F. Johnson,
E. Y. Adashi,
B. J. Graves, and S. L. McKnight.
1988.
Isolation of a recombinant copy of the gene encoding C/EBP.
Genes Dev.
2:786-800 |
| 40. |
Lanotte, M.,
V. Martin-Thouvenin,
S. Najman,
P. Balerini,
F. Valensi, and R. Berger.
1991.
NB4, a maturation inducible cell line with t(15;17) marker isolated from a human acute promyelocytic leukemia (M3).
Blood
77:1080-1086 |
| 41. | Law, S. K., J. Gagnon, J. E. Hildreth, C. E. Wells, A. C. Willis, and A. J. Wong. 1987. The primary structure of the beta-subunit of the cell surface adhesion glycoproteins LFA-1, CR3 and p150,95 and its relationship to the fibronectin receptor. EMBO J. 6:915-919[Medline]. |
| 42. | Lee, S. L., Y. Wang, and J. Milbrandt. 1996. Unimpaired macrophage differentiation and activation in mice lacking the zinc finger transactivation factor NGFI-A (EGR1). Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:4566-4572[Abstract]. |
| 43. | Liebermann, D., B. Hoffman-Liebermann, and L. Sachs. 1981. Regulation of gene expression by tumor promoters. II. Control of cell shape and developmental programs for macrophages and granulocytes in human myeloid leukemic cells. Int. J. Cancer 28:285-291[Medline]. |
| 44. |
Lin, F. T., and M. D. Lane.
1994.
CCAAT/enhancer binding protein is sufficient to initiate the 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation program.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:8757-8761 |
| 45. |
Lin, F. T.,
O. A. MacDougald,
A. M. Diehl, and M. D. Lane.
1993.
A 30-kDa alternative translation product of the CCAAT/enhancer binding protein message: transcriptional activator lacking antimitotic activity.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:9606-9610 |
| 46. | McKercher, S. R., B. E. Torbett, K. L. Anderson, G. W. Henkel, D. J. Vestal, H. Baribault, M. Klemsz, A. J. Feeney, G. E. Wu, C. J. Paige, and R. A. Maki. 1996. Targeted disruption of the PU.1 gene results in multiple hematopoietic abnormalities. EMBO J. 15:5647-5658[Medline]. |
| 47. |
Muller, C.,
E. Kowenz-Leutz,
S. Grieser-Ade,
T. Graf, and A. Leutz.
1995.
NF-M (chicken C/EBP ) induces eosinophilic differentiation and apoptosis in a hematopoietic progenitor cell line.
EMBO J.
14:6127-6135[Medline].
|
| 48. | Nguyen, H. Q., B. Hoffman-Liebermann, and D. A. Liebermann. 1993. The zinc finger transcription factor Egr-1 is essential for and restricts differentiation along the macrophage lineage. Cell 72:197-209[Medline]. |
| 49. | Nimer, S. D., and D. W. Golde. 1995. Molecular, cellular, and clinical biology of phagocytic cells, p. 513-541. In R. I. Handin, S. E. Lux, and T. P. Stossel (ed.), Blood: principles and practice of hematology. J. B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, Pa. |
| 50. | Oberg, F., J. Botling, and K. Nilsson. 1993. Functional antagonism between vitamin-D3 and retinoic acid in the regulation of CD14 and CD23 expression during monocytic differentiation of U937 cells. J. Immunol. 150:3487-3495[Abstract]. |
| 51. | Ochs, H. D., and R. P. Igo. 1973. The NBT slide test: a simple screening method for detecting chronic granulomatous disease and female carriers. J. Pediatr. 83:77-82[Medline]. |
| 52. | Oelgeschlager, M., I. Nuchprayoon, B. Luscher, and A. D. Friedman. 1996. C/EBP, c-Myb, and PU.1 cooperate to regulate the neutrophil elastase promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:4717-4725[Abstract]. |
| 53. |
Ossipow, V.,
P. Descombes, and U. Schibler.
1993.
CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein mRNA is translated into multiple proteins with different transcription activation potentials.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:8219-8223 |
| 54. | Palacios, R., and M. Steinmetz. 1985. Il-3-dependent mouse clones that express B-220 surface antigen, contain Ig genes in germ-line configuration, and generate B lymphocytes in vivo. Cell 41:727-734[Medline]. |
| 55. | Radomska, H. S., C. P. Shen, T. Kadesch, and L. A. Eckhardt. 1994. Constitutively expressed Oct-2 prevents immunoglobulin gene silencing in myeloma × T cell hybrids. Immunity 1:623-634[Medline]. |
| 55a. | Radomska, H. S., and D. G. Tenen. Unpublished data. |
| 56. |
Rodel, J. E., and D. C. Link.
1996.
Suppression of apoptosis during cytokine deprivation of 32D cells is not sufficient to induce complete granulocytic differentiation.
Blood
87:858-864 |
| 57. |
Rosmarin, A. G.,
S. C. Weil,
G. L. Rosner,
J. D. Griffin,
M. A. Arnaout, and D. G. Tenen.
1989.
Differential expression of CD11b/CD18 (Mo1) and myeloperoxidase genes during myeloid differentiation.
Blood
73:131-136 |
| 58. | Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. In Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 59. |
Schlissel, M.,
A. Voronova, and D. Baltimore.
1991.
Helix-loop-helix transcription factor E47 activates germ-line immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene transcription and rearrangement in a pre-T-cell line.
Genes Dev.
5:1367-1376 |
| 60. |
Schwarz, E. J.,
M. J. Reginato,
D. Shao,
S. L. Krakow, and M. A. Lazar.
1997.
Retinoic acid blocks adipogenesis by inhibiting C/EBP -mediated transcription.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:1552-1561[Abstract].
|
| 61. |
Scott, L. M.,
C. I. Civin,
P. Rorth, and A. D. Friedman.
1992.
A novel temporal expression pattern of three C/EBP family members in differentiating myelomonocytic cells.
Blood
80:1725-1735 |
| 62. |
Screpanti, I.,
L. Romani,
P. Musiani,
A. Modesti,
E. Fattori,
D. Lazzaro,
C. Sellitto,
S. Scarpa,
D. Bellavia,
G. Lattanzio,
F. Bistoni,
L. Frati,
R. Cortese,
A. Gulino,
G. Ciliberto,
F. Costantini, and V. Poli.
1995.
Lymphoproliferative disorder and imbalanced T-helper response in C/EBP -deficient mice.
EMBO J.
14:1932-1941[Medline].
|
| 63. |
Shivdasani, R. A., and S. H. Orkin.
1996.
The transcriptional control of hematopoiesis.
Blood
87:4025-4039 |
| 64. |
Smith, L. T.,
S. Hohaus,
D. A. Gonzalez,
S. E. Dziennis, and D. G. Tenen.
1996.
PU.1 (Spi-1) and C/EBP regulate the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor promoter in myeloid cells.
Blood
88:1234-1247 |
| 64a. | Smith, L. T., and D. G. Tenen. Unpublished data. |
| 65. |
Spangrude, G. J.,
L. Smith,
N. Uchida,
K. Ikuta,
S. Heimfeld,
J. Friedman, and I. L. Weissman.
1991.
Mouse hematopoietic stem cells.
Blood
78:1395-1402 |
| 66. |
Stamenkovic, I., and B. Seed.
1988.
CD19, the earliest differentiation antigen of the B cell lineage, bears three extracellular immunoglobulin-like domains and an Epstein-Barr virus-related cytoplasmic tail.
J. Exp. Med.
168:1205-1210 |
| 67. | Tanaka, T., S. Akira, K. Yoshida, M. Umemoto, Y. Yoneda, N. Shirafuji, H. Fujiwara, S. Suematsu, N. Yoshida, and T. Kishimoto. 1995. Targeted disruption of the NF-IL6 gene discloses its essential role in bacteria killing and tumor cytotoxicity by macrophages. Cell 80:353-361[Medline]. |
| 68. |
Tenen, D. G.,
R. Hromas,
J. D. Licht, and D.-E. Zhang.
1997.
Transcription factors, normal myeloid development, and leukemia.
Blood
90:489-519 |
| 69. |
Timchenko, N.,
D. R. Wilson,
L. R. Taylor,
S. Abdelsayed,
M. Wilde,
M. Sawadogo, and G. J. Darlington.
1995.
Autoregulation of the human C/EBP gene by stimulation of upstream stimulatory factor binding.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:1192-1202[Abstract].
|
| 70. |
Timchenko, N. A.,
M. Wilde,
M. Nakanishi,
J. R. Smith, and G. J. Darlington.
1996.
CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP ) inhibits cell proliferation through the p21 (WAF-1/CIP-1/SDI-1) protein.
Genes Dev.
10:804-815 |
| 71. | Torczynski, R. M., M. Fuke, and A. P. Bollon. 1985. Cloning and sequencing of a human 18S ribosomal RNA gene. DNA 4:283-291[Medline]. |
| 72. |
Tsai, S., and S. J. Collins.
1993.
A dominant negative retinoic acid receptor blocks neutrophil differentiation at the promyelocyte stage.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:7153-7157 |
| 73. |
Umek, R. M.,
A. D. Friedman, and S. L. McKnight.
1991.
CCAAT-enhancer binding protein: a component of a differentiation switch.
Science
251:288-292 |
| 74. | van den Elsen, P., B. A. Shepley, J. Borst, J. E. Coligan, A. F. Markham, S. Orkin, and C. Terhorst. 1984. Isolation of cDNA clones encoding the 20K T3 glycoprotein of human T-cell receptor complex. Nature 312:413-418[Medline]. |
| 75. |
Wang, N. D.,
M. J. Finegold,
A. Bradley,
C. N. Ou,
S. V. Abdelsayed,
M. D. Wilde,
L. R. Taylor,
D. R. Wilson, and G. J. Darlington.
1995.
Impaired energy homeostasis in C/EBP knockout mice.
Science
269:1108-1112 |
| 76. |
Watkins, P. J.,
J. P. Condreay,
B. E. Huber,
S. J. Jacobs, and D. J. Adams.
1996.
Impaired proliferation and tumorigenicity induced by CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein.
Cancer Res.
56:1063-1067 |
| 77. |
Wu, Z.,
Y. Xie,
N. L. R. Bucher, and S. R. Farmer.
1995.
Conditional ectopic expression of C/EBP in NIH-3T3 cells induces PPAR and stimulates adipogenesis.
Genes Dev.
9:2350-2363 |
| 78. |
Yamanaka, R.,
C. Barlow,
J. Lekstrom-Himes,
L. H. Castilia,
P. P. Liu,
M. Eckhaus,
T. Decker,
A. Wynshaw-Boris, and K. G. Xanthopoulos.
1997.
Impaired granulopoiesis, myelodysplasia and early lethality in CCAAT/enhancer binding protein -deficient mice.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:13187-13192 |
| 79. |
Yamanaka, R.,
G.-D. Kim,
H. S. Radomska,
J. Lekstrom-Himes,
L. T. Smith,
P. Antonson,
D. G. Tenen, and K. G. Xanthopoulos.
1997.
CCAAT/enhancer binding protein is preferentially upregulated during granulocytic differentiation and its functional versatility is determined by alternative use of promoters and differential splicing.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:6462-6467 |
| 80. |
Yeh, W. C.,
Z. Cao,
M. Classon, and S. L. McKnight.
1995.
Cascade regulation of terminal adipocyte differentiation by three members of the C/EBP family of leucine zipper proteins.
Genes Dev.
9:168-181 |
| 81. |
Zhang, D.-E.,
P. Zhang,
N. D. Wang,
C. J. Hetherington,
G. J. Darlington, and D. G. Tenen.
1997.
Absence of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor signaling and neutrophil development in CCAAT enhancer binding protein -deficient mice.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:569-574 |
| 81a. | Zhang, P., and D. G. Tenen. Unpublished data. |
| 82. | Ziegler-Heitbrock, H. W., E. Thiel, A. Futterer, V. Herzog, A. Wirtz, and G. Riethmuller. 1988. Establishment of a human cell line (Mono Mac 6) with characteristics of mature monocytes. Int. J. Cancer 41:456-461[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»