Department of Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka
University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
Received 25 March 1998/Returned for modification 8 May
1998/Accepted 20 May 1998
 |
INTRODUCTION |
In the yeast Saccharomyces
cerevisiae, three distinct DNA polymerases, I (
), II (
), and
III (
), are required for chromosomal DNA replication (7,
35). It has been believed that polymerase I (
)-DNA primase
complex is required to initiate the synthesis of the leading strand and
to prime each Okazaki fragment during the synthesis of the lagging
strand, while polymerase II (
) and polymerase III (
) participate
in the subsequent elongation step of DNA replication (28,
35). To switch DNA synthesis from polymerase
to polymerase
or polymerase
, two accessory proteins, proliferating cell
nuclear antigen (PCNA) and replication factor C (RF-C), are believed to
be required. PCNA is a processivity factor for polymerases
and
,
and RF-C is an auxiliary protein for DNA polymerases
and
that
recognizes the primer-template junction, binds to the primer terminus,
and helps load PCNA onto the DNA template (7, 12, 36).
Subsequently, either polymerase
or polymerase
binds to primed
DNA template through PCNA and processively elongates a DNA strand.
Yeast RF-C complex consists of five different polypeptides
(12-14). Recently, the genes for all RF-C subunits
(CDC44/RFC1, RFC2, RFC3,
RFC4, and RFC5) were cloned and sequenced
(9, 13, 20, 24, 25, 30). The deduced amino acid sequences
show significant homology with each other. Despite this sequence
similarity, each subunit is essential for cell proliferation,
suggesting that each subunit plays an important role in RF-C function
during DNA replication (9, 13, 20, 24, 25, 30). Besides its role in DNA replication, the RF-C complex might be required for other
cellular processes, such as DNA repair and recombination. It is also
possible that some of the RF-C subunits are a target for regulatory
mechanisms acting at the S- to M-phase transition during the cell
cycle.
Isolation of conditionally lethal mutations in the RF-C genes might be
helpful to understand the function of each subunit in vivo. Cells
having a cold-sensitive mutation in the CDC44 gene, which
encodes the largest subunit of RF-C, showed the terminal morphology
that is typical of DNA replication mutants, arresting as a large-budded
cell with a single undivided nucleus at restrictive temperatures
(20). The mutant cells also exhibited spontaneous mutator- and hyperrecombinogenic phenotypes and were more sensitive than a wild-type strain to DNA-damaging agents. Thus, it was
concluded that the largest subunit of RF-C is required not only
for DNA replication but also for DNA repair (20, 26, 27).
Growth defects of cold-sensitive cdc44 mutant cells could be
suppressed by point mutations in the POL30/PCNA gene,
suggesting that the largest subunit of the RF-C complex interacts with
PCNA (26).
A temperature-sensitive mutant (rfc5-1) in the
RFC5 gene encoding the second-largest subunit of RF-C has
been isolated during screening for conditionally lethal mutations that
can be suppressed by a multicopy plasmid of the SPK1
(RAD53/SAD1/MEC2) protein kinase gene (34). In
rfc5-1 mutant cells, DNA replication was also stalled at
restrictive temperatures, but in contrast to cdc44 mutants
as well as other DNA replication mutants, rfc5-1 mutant cells proceeded through the cell cycle without arresting at the G2 phase and subsequently died. Furthermore, mutant cells
started mitosis in the presence of a DNA synthesis inhibitor,
hydroxyurea (HU). Thus, it was concluded that the rfc5-1
mutant has defects in both DNA replication and an S-phase checkpoint.
Growth defects, but not cell-cycle checkpoint defects of the mutant
could be suppressed by a multicopy plasmid of POL30/PCNA,
similar to defects in the cdc44 mutants (33, 34).
In this study we describe the isolation and characterization of a
thermosensitive mutation (rfc2-1) of the RFC2
gene, encoding the third-largest subunit of the RF-C complex. Our
results suggest that the rfc2-1 mutant has defects in both
DNA replication and a cell cycle checkpoint. The phenotypes of
rfc2-1 mutant cells are very similar to those of
rfc5-1 mutant cells. Moreover, both growth and checkpoint
defects of thermosensitive rfc2-1 mutant cells can be
suppressed by a multicopy plasmid of the RFC5 gene, suggesting that Rfc2 interacts with Rfc5 in the RF-C complex and is in
the same pathway as the cell cycle checkpoint. However, unlike the
rfc5-1 mutation, the mutation was not suppressed by overproduction of SPK1 (RAD53/MEC2/SAD1).
Synthetic lethality analysis with the rfc2-1
mutation strongly supports the notion that Rfc2 interacts with
Rfc1/Cdc44, Rfc5, and DNA polymerases
and
during chromosomal
DNA replication.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Yeast strains and media.
The S. cerevisiae
strains used in this study are listed in Table
1. Strain YVN1 was constructed from
strain YHA1 by transformation with plasmid YEpRFC2, followed by
one-step replacement of one copy of the RFC2 gene with the
LEU2 gene. The correct gene replacement was verified by
Southern blot hybridization. Strain YVN2 is a meiotic segregant of
diploid YVN1. Strains YVN3 and YVN4 were derived from strain YVN2 by
plasmid shuffling. Strain YVN11 is a meiotic segregant of diploid
created by crossing YVN2 with 15D
u. Strains YVN12 and YVN13
were derived from strain YVN11 by plasmid shuffling. Strain YVN21 was
obtained from strain SLD101 by transformation with plasmid YEprfc2-1,
followed by disruption of one copy of the chromosomal
RFC2 gene with the LEU2 gene. Strain YVN22 is a
mitotic segregant of YVN21 strain. Strain YVN23 was derived from strain
YVN22 by plasmid shuffling. The remaining strains are meiotic
segregants isolated from the following crosses: CH609 × 15Dau
(9B-YVN15), 9B-YVN15 × YVN11 (7C-YVN16), SS111-pol2-11 × L1-CG379 (4B-YVN25), 4B-YVN25 × YVN11 (3C-YVN27), 2749-2-2 × L1-CG379 (3D-YVN26), 3D-YVN26 × YVN11 (1B-YVN28),
SS111-pol1-17 × L1-CG379 (1A-YVN29), 1A-YVN29 × YVN11
(12C-YVN30), and KSC766 × YVN11 (6B-YVN31).
Standard rich (yeast extract-peptone-dextrose [YPD]) and synthetic
dextrose minimal (SD) media were used (21). SD medium supplemented with 40 µg of L-canavanine sulfate (Sigma)
per ml was used for selection of can1 mutants. Medium
containing 5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA) (3) was used for
plasmid shuffling.
Plasmids and yeast genomic DNA library.
Vectors pBluescript
II SK(+), YEplac195, and YCplac22 (15) were used for plasmid
construction. The plasmid for disruption of the RFC2 gene,
pBS rfc2
::LEU2, was constructed as follows. To remove the
SspI sites from the vector, pBluescript IISK(+) DNA was
digested with SspI and SmaI and then self
ligated. To the resulting plasmid DNA, the 2.5-kb
HindIII-XhoI fragment from originally
isolated RFC2 clone (30) was inserted. Finally,
the SspI fragment in the RFC2 gene was
substituted with the 2.0-kb HpaI fragment of the
LEU2 gene. Plasmids YEpRFC2 and YCpRFC2 were constructed by
inserting the 1.24-kb HindIII-BamHI fragment
containing the RFC2 gene into a respective vector. Both
HindIII and BamHI restriction sites were
introduced into both ends of the RFC2 gene when it was
amplified by PCR. Plasmids YEprfc2-1 and YCprfc2-1 were constructed the
same way as plasmids YEpRFC2 and YCpRFC2 except that the mutant
rfc2-1 gene was used. Plasmids YEpRFC1, YEpRFC3, and YEpRFC4
were constructed by subcloning the RFC1, RFC2,
and RFC3 genes (9), obtained from G. Cullman and
B. Stillman (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor,
N.Y.), into vector YEplac195. YEpRFC1 contains the
RFC1 gene on the 3.5-kb SacI-KpnI
fragment from plasmid pKSRFC1; YEpRFC3 contains the RFC3
gene on the 2.3-kb SphI-PstI fragment from
plasmid pSKRFC3; and YEpRFC4 contains the RFC4 gene on the
1.3-kb HindIII fragment from plasmid pSKRFC4H-1.
Plasmids YEpSPK1 (34), pRS426-TEL1, and pRS426-MEC1 were
gifts from K. Sugimoto (Nagoya University). Yeast genomic DNA library
for plasmid YEp24 was provided by H. Ogawa (Osaka University).
Random mutagenesis of the RFC2 gene.
The
RFC2 gene was mutagenized by modified PCR (23).
Oligonucleotides N-1,
5'-ATCAGGAAGCTTCTCAAGCGAACAAGTCAA-3'
(corresponding to nucleotides 776 to 805) (GenBank accession no.
D28499) and N-2,
5'-AGGTACCGGATCCGATAAGAGGAATTATGGATAGA-3'
(corresponding to nucleotides 2020 to 1998 of the sequence
[GenBank accession no. 28499]) were used to amplify the
RFC2 gene (35 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 50°C for 1 min,
and 72°C for 3 min) with the cloned RFC2 gene
(30) as a template. The HindIII and
BamHI restriction sites introduced into the oligonucleotides
are underlined. The resulting 1,258-bp PCR product was digested with
HindIII and BamHI, ligated with the
HindIII-BamHI-digested vector YCplac22, and
used for Escherichia coli transformation. Approximately
5,000 ampicillin-resistant transformants were obtained. Plasmid DNA was
extracted from them and used to transform yeast strain YVN2 to
Trp+. The transformants were tested for their
temperature-sensitive cell growth by replica plating onto three sets of
SD-Trp-Ura plates, which were then incubated either at 16, 25, or
37°C. No temperature-sensitive colonies were observed. Then the
transformants grown at 25°C were replica plated onto medium
containing 5-FOA to select colonies containing only the mutagenized
RFC2 gene. Of the 2,000 5-FOA-resistant colonies assayed,
one transformant which was able to grow at 25 and 16°C, but not at
37°C, was obtained. From this transformant, plasmid DNA was recovered
and named YCprfc2-1.
Measurement of DNA synthesis.
YVN4 (rfc2-1) cells
grown in YPD medium at 25°C to 3 × 106 cells/ml
were divided into two portions. Each portion was incubated at either 25 or 37°C, and a 10-ml aliquot was withdrawn at 1-hour intervals. Cells
were then harvested by centrifugation, and total DNA was measured by
the diphenylamine procedure (32, 32a).
Measurement of spontaneous mutation and recombination rates.
The frequency of spontaneous mutation at CAN was measured as
previously described (31). Spontaneous frequency of gene
conversion events in the HIS4 locus was determined as
follows. Nine independent colonies of each strain were inoculated into
5 ml of YPD medium and incubated at 25°C for 2 days. Cells were
collected by centrifugation, resuspended in distilled water, and
sonicated. After appropriate dilutions, cells were plated onto SD-His
and YPD medium and incubated at 25°C for 5 days. Frequencies of
His+ appearance in nine independent cultures from one
strain were compared with those of a wild-type strain by the
Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney nonparametric criterion (10).
Measurement of EMS-induced mutation frequencies.
Strains to
be tested were grown in YPD medium overnight at 25°C. Cells were
harvested by centrifugation, resuspended in fresh YPD medium to 2 × 107 cells/ml, and divided into portions of 5 ml each.
Ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) was added into cell suspensions. Cells
were incubated at 25°C for 4 h with extensive shaking, collected
by centrifugation, and washed twice with distilled water. Finally, the
cells were resuspended in 0.5 ml of water, sonicated, and plated onto
canavanine-containing SD and YPD plates, which were incubated at 25°C
for 5 days.
Other procedures.
Cells were prepared for
fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis and stained with propidium
iodide as previously described (2, 34). All media and growth
conditions were as described previously (2, 34) unless
otherwise noted.
 |
RESULTS |
Isolation of thermosensitive rfc2 mutants.
To
generate temperature-sensitive mutations in the RFC2 gene
encoding the third-largest subunit of the RF-C complex, we used a
random PCR mutagenesis procedure (see Materials and Methods). A
mutagenized RFC2 gene library was used to transform S. cerevisiae strain YVN2, in which the RFC2 gene is
deleted from the chromosome but is on a multicopy plasmid. After
plasmid shuffling, the transformants carrying the mutagenized
RFC2 gene on the centromere plasmid were selected and
examined for temperature sensitivity for cell growth. Among 2,000 transformants tested, only one colony which was able to grow at 16°C
and 25°C, but not at 37°C, was obtained. From this transformant,
plasmid DNA was isolated and named YCprfc2-1. To confirm
that the mutation conferring thermosensitive growth is in
the RFC2 gene but not in the vector DNA, the 1.24-kb
HindIII-BamHI fragment from plasmid
YCprfc2-1 was recloned into vector YCplac22. The resulting
plasmid was used to transform strain YVN2. Transformants were replica
plated onto the 5-FOA medium to select for the transformants containing
only YCprfc2-1. All 5-FOA-resistant colonies were able to grow at
25°C but not at 37°C. Thus, the rfc2-1 mutation
conferring thermosensitive cell growth was in the
HindIII-BamHI fragment.
DNA sequencing of the rfc2-1 allele revealed a
single-base-pair substitution, AT
GC, resulting in an amino acid
change of Leu304 to Pro304 (Fig.
1) in the coding region of
RFC2 (30). This region of the RFC2
gene shows no significant homology with other subunits of the yeast
RF-C (9). However, it has extensive similarity with the
37-kDa subunit of human RF-C (9, 30), suggesting that this
region is important for its specific function. In this context, it is
interesting to note that the Leu304 residue in this region
is conserved in RFC5 (Fig. 1).

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Amino acid change caused by the rfc2-1
mutation. The mutation converts leucine at position 304 into proline.
The region of S. cerevisiae (Sc) Rfc2p in the vicinity of
the mutation site has a high level of similarity with an appropriate
region of the 37-kDa RF-C subunit of human (h). The corresponding
regions of amino acid sequence of other subunits of both human and
S. cerevisiae RF-C complex are shown. Identical amino acids
are shown by red boxes. Amino acid sequence is shown by the
single-letter code.
|
|
Phenotype of the rfc2-1 mutant.
It has been shown
that DNA polymerases
and
require RF-C activity together with
PCNA and replication protein A (RP-A) when they elongate a DNA strand
on a singly primed single-stranded DNA in vitro (6).
Therefore, together with the fact that the gene encoding each subunit
of the RF-C complex is essential for cell growth, it has been believed
that they are required for chromosomal DNA replication. To examine
whether DNA replication is defective in the rfc2-1 mutant,
rfc2-1 cells grown at 25°C were divided into two portions,
and each was incubated at either 25 or 37°C. During incubation, cell
number, amount of DNA, and cell viability were measured. As shown in
Fig. 2A, the growth rate of the mutant was faster at 37°C than at 25°C, and the number of cells in the mutant increased sevenfold at 37°C before leveling off, indicating that mutant cells undergo cell division two or three times after temperature shifts up. On the other hand, the total amount of DNA in
the mutant cells was consistently lower at 37°C than that at 25°C
after the temperature shifted up (Fig. 2B), but the increase in the
total DNA in the mutant cells ceased in about 8 h at 37°C. Cell
viability measurement indicated that mutant cells quickly lost their
viability during incubation at the restrictive temperature (only 16%
of the cells were viable after 6 h) (Fig. 2C). This quick loss of
viability was prevented by treating mutant cells with
-factor (late
G1 arrest) or benomyl (G2 arrest) before
shifting to the restrictive temperature. After 6 h of incubation
at 37°C, viabilities of the G1-arrested cells and the
benomyl-treated cells were 55 and 85%, respectively, suggesting that
loss of viability is associated with cell cycle progression, either
from M to G1 phase and/or from S to M phase. The viability
of cells arrested at G1 was lower than that of cells
arrested at G2 because of the poor synchronization of
the mutant with the
-factor (data not shown).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Growth characteristics of the rfc2 mutant at
restrictive temperatures. YVN3 (RFC2) and YVN4
(rfc2-1) cells grown at 25°C were divided and
incubated either at 25 or 37°C. An aliquot of cell suspension was
withdrawn every hour, the number of cells was counted, and total amount
of DNA, cell viability, and cell morphology were assessed. (A) Growth
rate of yeast cells at 25 and 37°C was measured with an automated
Coulter counter. (B) DNA synthesis in rfc2 cells at 25 and
37°C was measured as described in Materials and Methods. (C)
Viability of the rfc2 mutant at 25 and 37°C was determined
by plating diluted cell suspension onto YPD medium at 25°C. (D)
Cell morphology (unbudded cell, small-budded cell, and
large-budded [dumbbell-shaped]) was monitored with a microscope.
|
|
Cell morphology of the mutant was also observed by microscopy. Although
the population of dumbbell-shaped cells increased at the restrictive
temperature, mutant cells did not exhibit any distinct terminal cell
morphology, unlike mutants in the typical cell cycle. After 10 h
at 37°C, about 60% of rfc2-1 cells arrested as
large-budded cells, and cell viability rapidly dropped to 1% (Fig.
2D).
We also examined cell sensitivity to a DNA synthesis inhibitor, HU, and
to DNA-damaging agents methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and UV light. As
shown in Fig. 3,
rfc2-1 mutant cells were extremely sensitive to HU and MMS
and moderately sensitive to UV light.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
The rfc2 mutant is sensitive to HU and
DNA-damaging agents. (A) Sensitivity of YVN3 (RFC2) and YVN4
(rfc2-1) strains to HU. Both strains were grown at 25°C to
a density of 2 × 106 cells/ml, and 0.2 M HU was
added. During incubation in the presence of HU, 1-ml aliquots were
withdrawn every hour, and the total number of cells was determined with
an automated Coulter counter. Viable cell number was estimated by
plating diluted cell suspension onto YPD medium and incubating at
25°C for 3 days. (B) Sensitivity of strains YVN3 and YVN4 to MMS.
Cells grown at 25°C were harvested and resuspended in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, and MMS was added to the
suspension at a final concentration of 0.1%. One-milliliter aliquots
were withdrawn every 30 min at 25°C, washed with distilled water,
made into various dilutions, and plated onto YPD plates. The plates
were incubated at 25°C for 3 days, and the colonies were counted. (C)
Sensitivities of strains YVN3 and YVN4 to UV light. Cell suspensions
grown at 25°C were diluted and spread onto YPD plates. The plates
were exposed to UV irradiation as indicated and incubated at 25°C for
3 days.
|
|
rfc2-1 mutant has a defect in DNA integrity.
As
shown in Fig. 2B, we could not detect any obvious defect in DNA
synthesis in rfc2-1 mutant cells at the restrictive
temperature. Nevertheless, chromosomal DNA from rfc2-1
mutant cells was also analyzed by pulsed-field agarose gel
electrophoresis. In this assay, only fully replicated chromosomes
enter the gel and migrate properly (19). Chromosomes
prepared from the rfc2-1 strain incubated at the restrictive
temperature entered into the gel with reduced efficiency compared with
that of the chromosomes prepared from wild-type cells grown at 25 or
37°C. In a control, chromosomes of wild-type cells in the presence of
HU did not enter into the gel (data not shown). These results
suggest that mutant rfc2-1 shows no obvious change in
DNA synthesis but has a defect in DNA integrity at the restrictive
temperature.
rfc2-1 mutant has a defect in S-phase checkpoint.
Wild-type and rfc2-1 mutant cells grown at 25°C were
arrested with
-factor released at 37°C. Aliquots of cells were
withdrawn, and DNA content was analyzed by flow cytometry. As shown in
Fig. 4, mutant cells proceeded through
the cell cycle as well as wild-type cells, and no significant defect in
the mutant's DNA synthesis could be detected during the first round of
the cell cycle at 37°C. Taken together with the results of the
pulsed-field agarose gel electrophoresis, these results suggest that
the S-phase checkpoint is defective in the mutant at the restrictive
temperature. This S-phase checkpoint defect was tested more directly
with the DNA synthesis inhibitor HU. Wild-type and rfc2-1
mutant cells grown at 25°C were arrested with
-factor released
into HU at 37°C. HU-treated cells defective at the S-phase checkpoint
should enter into mitosis, as evidenced by partial spindle elongation
before completion of DNA replication. DNA replication was efficiently blocked in wild-type and rfc2-1 mutant cells 2 h after
release into HU (data not shown). Under these conditions, most
wild-type cells (90%) arrested as large-budded cells with short
spindles, and more than 80% of the cells remained viable for 6 h
after release (Fig. 5). In contrast,
50% of rfc2-1 cells exhibited partially elongated spindles,
and less than 1% of mutant cells were variable during the incubation
(Fig. 5). These results support the notion that the
rfc2-1 mutation is defective in the S-phase checkpoint in response to HU.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
YVN3 (RFC2) and YVN4 (rfc2-1)
cells were grown at 25°C and treated with 5 µg of -factor per ml
for 2.5 h. Then 0.1 mg of actinase per ml was added to the cell
culture, and the culture was incubated at 37°C. At the indicated
times, aliquots of cells were withdrawn, cells were collected by
centrifugation and fixed with ethanol, and DNA was stained as described
previously (34). The DNA content of cells was analyzed with
a Becton Dickinson fluorescence-activated cell sorter. Arrows indicate
the positions of 1C and 2C cells.
|
|

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Spindle abnormalities observed in the rfc2-1
mutant during incubation in the presence of HU. YVN3 (RFC2)
and YVN4 (rfc2-1) cells were synchronized by -factor
(5 µg/ml) for 2.5 h and released from the factor by treatment
with actinase (0.1 mg/ml), and 0.2 M HU was added to the culture. Cells
were divided into two portions and cultivated at 25 or 37°C. At the
indicated time after release from -factor treatment, aliquots were
withdrawn to examine cell viability (A) and nuclear and spindle
morphologies (B and C). Nuclear and microtubulin structures were
visualized with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and anti-tubulin
antibodies, respectively, as before (32, 34). (A and B) Open
and closed circles, mutant cells grown at 25 and 37°C, respectively;
open and closed squares, wild-type (wt) cells grown at 25 and 37°C, respectively.
|
|
Spontaneous and EMS-induced mutagenesis.
Since the
rfc2-1 mutant was more sensitive to DNA-damaging agents
than a wild-type strain, it is possible that Rfc2p is also involved in
DNA repair. We therefore examined the effect of the rfc2-1
mutation on spontaneous and EMS-induced mutagenesis. To determine
whether the rfc2-1 mutation affects spontaneous mutagenesis, we measured mutation frequency at the CAN1 locus in
rfc2-1 (YVN13) mutant and isogenic wild-type (YVN12)
cells. The results of the fluctuation test are summarized in
Table 2. Statistical analysis indicated
that the difference in spontaneous mutation frequencies between the two
strains is not significant (P > 0.05).
As shown in Table 3, although EMS was
more toxic to the rfc2 mutant than to the wild-type strain,
the frequency of can1 mutation in the mutant was not
significantly different from that in a wild-type strain. These results
suggest that the rfc2-1 mutant is not defective in the
repair of EMS-induced DNA damage. Rather, the increased sensitivity of
the rfc2-1 mutant to EMS may be attributed to its deficiency
at the DNA damage checkpoint.
Mitotic recombination and chromosome stability.
To compare the
level of spontaneous mitotic recombination in the HIS4 locus
in the rfc2-1 mutant (YVN22) and an isogenic wild-type strain (YVN23), we performed the fluctuation test. As shown in Table 2,
the median value of recombination frequencies was 4.1-fold higher in
rfc2-1 mutant cells than in wild-type cells. Although this
increase was relatively small compared with that observed for mutants
with other replication defects (20), the difference was
statistically significant (P < 0.05).
To estimate the frequency of chromosome loss in rfc2-1
mutant cells, we crossed independent clones of YVN22 diploid strain homozygous for the rfc2-1 mutation and transformants of
YVN22 strain harboring plasmid YCpRFC2 with
MATa and MAT
testers. As shown in Fig.
6, the rfc2-1 diploid strain
could efficiently mate with both tester strains, while the addition of
a wild-type copy of the RFC2 gene greatly reduced its
efficiency. Since the mating ability of the mutant is likely due to
chromosome III loss (17), these results imply that
chromosomes in rfc2-1 mutant cells are unstable even at the
permissive temperature of 25°C.

View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
rfc2-1 mutation causes a chromosome loss. Two
clones of the YVN22 (rfc2-1) diploid strain (streaks 1 and
2) and two transformants of YVN22 harboring YCpRFC2 plasmid
(streaks 3 and 4) were crossed with MATa lys2
and MAT lys2 tester strains. Crosses were grown at 25°C
overnight on complete YPD medium, replica plated on minimal SD medium,
and incubated at 25°C for 2 days. Growth of colonies suggests loss of
chromosome III.
|
|
Multicopy suppressor of the rfc2-1 mutation.
To
identify proteins interacting with the RFC2 gene
product, we looked for genes on a multicopy plasmid which suppress the thermosensitive growth phenotype of the rfc2-1 mutant.
Strain YVN4 having the rfc2-1 mutation was
transformed with a multicopy-based yeast genomic DNA library,
plated onto SD-Ura medium, and incubated at 25°C until small colonies
appeared. Then the plates were further incubated at 34.5°C for
another 4 days. Of approximately 5,000 Ura+ transformants,
two colonies were able to grow at 34.5°C. Plasmids recovered
from these two transformants were subjected to restriction endonuclease analysis. It was revealed that both plasmids contain overlapping regions of a yeast DNA insert. The overlapping region of
the insert DNA contained two genes, POL30 (PCNA)
and RFC5 (Fig. 7A).
Deletion analysis of the region revealed that the RFC5 gene, but not POL30 (PCNA), was responsible for
the suppression (Fig. 7A). The RFC5 gene on a
low-copy-number plasmid could also rescue the thermosensitivity of the
rfc2-1 mutation, but the suppression was much less than that
of the RFC5 gene on a multicopy plasmid (Fig. 7B). Thus,
suppression of the rfc2-1 mutation was dependent on the copy
number of the RFC5 gene. The RFC5 gene on a
multicopy plasmid also suppressed the sensitivity of the
rfc2-1 mutant to HU and MMS (data not shown). These results
are consistent with the notion that the RFC2 gene product
(Rfc2p) is in the RF-C complex and interacts with the RFC5
gene product.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
The RFC5 gene can suppress thermosensitive
growth caused by the rfc2-1 mutation. (A) The insert DNA
fragment carrying a suppressor which was originally isolated and its
deletion derivatives are represented by open rectangles. The
representative restriction enzyme sites and the open reading frames
predicted from the nucleotide sequence of the region are also
indicated. The growth phenotype of strain YVN4 (rfc2-1)
transformed with different plasmids is shown at the right. (B)
Dependence of efficiency of suppression on a copy number of the
RFC5 gene. Strains YVN12 (wild type) and YVN13
(rfc2-1) and two transformants of YVN13 harboring either
plasmid YCpRFC5 or plasmid YEpRFC5 were streaked
onto YPD plates and incubated at different temperatures for 4 days.
|
|
As yeast RF-C complex consists of five different polypeptides
(Rfc1/Cdc44, Rfc2, Rfc3, Rfc4, and Rfc5), we also examined whether overproduction of other RF-C subunits could suppress the
temperature sensitivity of the rfc2-1 mutation. The
YVN4 strain was transformed with either plasmid YEpRFC1, YEpRFC3,
or YEpRFC4, and transformants were tested for growth on YPD plates at
various temperatures, as were those with the RFC5 gene. None
of these genes on a multicopy plasmid was able to suppress the
temperature-sensitive growth phenotype of the
rfc2-1 mutation. Thus, the suppression is specific for the
RFC5 gene.
A thermosensitive mutation in the RFC5 gene
(rfc5-1) can be suppressed by a multicopy plasmid of the
SPK1 gene. Furthermore, the thermosensitive-growth
phenotype, but not the S-phase checkpoint defect, was suppressed by
PCNA on a multicopy plasmid (34). Therefore,
we also tested whether overproduction of Spk1 or PCNA suppresses
the rfc2-1 mutation. It was found that neither
SPK1 nor PCNA suppresses the
thermosensitive-growth phenotype, S-phase checkpoint defects, and
sensitivities of the rfc2-1 mutant to HU, MMS, and UV light
(data not shown). We also tested whether TEL1 and
MEC1 on a multicopy plasmid suppress the rfc2-1
mutation. These two genes failed to suppress either
temperature-sensitive cell growth or HU, MMS, or UV light sensitivities
of the mutation (data not shown).
The rfc2-1 mutation is synthetically lethal with either
the cdc44-1, rfc5-1, cdc2-2, or
pol2-11 mutations.
It was shown that the cell cycle
arrest of cdc44-1 mutant cells at restrictive temperatures
requires the RAD9, MEC1, and MEC2 checkpoint genes (20). To determine whether the cell cycle
arrest of the cdc44-1 mutant under restrictive conditions is
RFC2 gene dependent, we attempted to construct a double
mutant carrying the cdc44-1 and rfc2-1 mutations.
Strain 7C-YVN16, in which disruption of the chromosomal copy of the
RFC2 gene is complemented by YEpRFC2, was transformed with
either plasmid YCpRFC2 or plasmid YCprfc2-1. Transformants were
transferred onto 5-FOA plates and incubated at either 20, 25, or 30°C
for 5 days. Although all transformants carrying plasmid YCpRFC2 yielded
5-FOA-resistant colonies at 25 and 30°C, the transformants carrying
plasmid YCprfc2-1 did not grow on 5-FOA plates at all temperatures
tested. Therefore, it was concluded that cdc44-1 is
synthetically lethal with the rfc2-1 mutation at all
temperatures.
We further tested the synthetic lethality of the rfc2-1
mutation in combination with the rfc5-1, pol2-11,
cdc2-2, and pol1-17 mutations. As shown in
Table 4, double mutant rfc2-1
rfc5-1 was inviable at all temperatures tested. Furthermore, the
restrictive temperature of the rfc2-1 mutant was lowered by
introduction of either the pol2-11 or the cdc2-2
mutation but not by the pol1-17 mutation. At 25°C, the
double mutants pol2-11 rfc2-1 and cdc2-2 rfc2-1
did not grow, while a single mutant was able to grow at the same
temperature. These double mutants, however, could grow at 20°C,
unlike double mutants rfc2-1 rfc5-1 and rfc2-1
cdc44-1, which did not grow at all temperatures. These results are
consistent with biochemical data indicating that the RF-C complex
interacts with each subunit of the complex and with both DNA
polymerases
and
during yeast chromosomal DNA replication.
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, we have generated and characterized a
temperature-sensitive mutation (rfc2-1) in the
RFC2 gene, encoding the third-largest subunit of the RF-C
complex of S. cerevisiae. Based on the biochemical
properties of the RF-C complex (6, 12), it was expected that
a temperature-sensitive mutation in the RF-C complex would cause a
severe defect in the elongation step of chromosomal DNA replication and
that DNA synthesis would cease quickly after the restrictive
temperatures were reached. However, the temperature-sensitive
rfc2-1 mutation we obtained showed only a modest defect in
chromosomal DNA replication at restrictive temperatures (Fig. 2B), as
did the rfc5-1 mutation, which has a mutation in the
RFC5 gene, encoding the second-largest subunit of the RF-C
complex (34). This result might be explained by the
leakiness of the mutation. Alternatively, it is possible that once the
complex is formed, it becomes more temperature resistant, although the
mutation is tight. This result may also be explained by a partial
takeover of its function by other subunits of the complex, as they have
extensive similarity to the amino acid sequence in the protein.
However, the specific function of each subunit cannot be taken over
genetically by other subunits, since each protein is essential for cell
growth (9, 13, 20, 24, 25, 30). Thus, this last possibility
is less likely. The chromosomes from mutant cells at restrictive
temperatures did not enter into the gel during electrophoresis (data
not shown). This result suggests that chromosomal DNA synthesized
in rfc2-1 mutant cells accumulates structures which prevent
entry of the chromosomal DNA into a gel, presumably nicks, gaps, and/or
stalled replication forks. These structures should be recognized by the
S-phase checkpoint machinery in which polymerase
(29),
Dpb11 (2), and Rfc5 (32, 34) are involved.
Alternatively, these structures might be analogous to those
generated by treatment with DNA-damaging agents and may be
recognized by the DNA damage checkpoint machinery. Thus, it would be
expected that the terminal phenotype of mutant cells is a dumbbell
shape, which is typical for DNA replication mutants. Although an
increase in dumbbell-shaped cells was observed at restrictive
temperatures, rfc2-1 mutant cells proceeded through the cell
cycle without completion of chromosomal DNA replication, resulting in a
rapid loss of their viability (Fig. 2 and 4). Furthermore, HU-treated
mutant cells entered into mitosis, as evidenced by partial spindle
elongation before completion of DNA replication (Fig. 5). These results
suggest that Rfc2 has a direct role in sensing incomplete DNA
replication and transmitting the signal to the checkpoint machinery. In
a previous study, we showed that the rfc2 deletion mutant
spores germinated, divided two to three times, and generated
microcolonies (30). This phenotype of the deletion mutant
can be explained by loss of a cell cycle checkpoint. Consistent with
this notion, mutant cells were very sensitive to HU and MMS and
moderately sensitive to UV light (Fig. 3), and a loss of cell viability
was prevented by either G1 arrest with
-factor or
G2 arrest with benomyl treatment before temperature shift.
Furthermore, this sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents of the mutant
might not be due to a defect in DNA repair or recombination, as
mutagenesis induced by EMS damage was as normal in mutant cells as in
wild-type cells.
To date, many genes which are involved in the control of the S-phase
checkpoint have been identified and characterized in the yeast S. cerevisiae (2, 11, 29, 34). These are POL2, which encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase II
(
), DPB11, which interacts with DNA polymerase II (
),
and RFC5, which encodes the second-largest subunit of the
RF-C complex. The RFC2 gene seems also to be involved in the
S phase checkpoint as demonstrated in this study. The
temperature-sensitive growth phenotype of the rfc5-1
mutant was suppressed by a multicopy plasmid of yeast PCNA and SPK1, while the HU and DNA-damaging sensitivities were
suppressed by overproduction of either the SPK1
(RAD53) or the TEL1 gene but not by that of
PCNA (32, 34). It remains unclear how
overexpression of SPK1 (RAD53) and
TEL1 suppresses the growth defect of rfc5-1. Since TEL1 overexpression restored Rad53 modification and
RNR3 induction in response to MMS in the rfc5-1
mutant, the suppression could be regulated by the checkpoint control
(34). These results suggest that the checkpoint
pathway in which Rfc5 is involved has regulatory components
overlapping with those of the DNA damage checkpoint (34). On
the other hand, the temperature-sensitive growth phenotype and
HU- and DNA-sensitive phenotypes of the rfc2-1 mutant
were suppressed by a multicopy plasmid containing the
RFC5 gene, but neither phenotype was suppressed by a
multicopy plasmid containing either PCNA, SPK1,
TEL1, or MEC1. Thus, the RFC2 gene may
be located upstream of Rfc5 in the checkpoint pathway. Nevertheless, it
becomes clear that there are many replication proteins which recognize
a stalled replication fork and generate an S-phase checkpoint signal in
S. cerevisiae. However, the nature of the stalled
replication structure which is recognized by each protein is not yet
known. Furthermore, it is not known whether each protein recognizes the same structure, although the structure generated by HU treatment is recognized by each protein.
So far, a limited number of conditionally lethal mutations in the
RFC1/CDC44, RFC2, and RFC5 genes in
the RF-C complex have been identified. However, our synthetic lethality
experiments described in this study strongly suggest that Rfc2p
interacts with both Rfc1p and Rfc5p in the RF-C complex. Further, the
introduction of either the cdc2-2 or the pol2-11
mutation, but not the pol1-17 mutation, into the
rfc2-1 strain lowered its restrictive temperature. This
partial synthetic lethality of double mutants rfc2-1 cdc2-2 and rfc2-1 pol2-11 is the first genetic evidence that the
RF-C complex is required for the chromosomal DNA replication catalyzed by both DNA polymerases
and
. This evidence is consistent with the in vitro data that the RF-C complex is required for a processive DNA synthesis catalyzed by both DNA polymerases on a singly primed single-stranded circular template DNA (6).
The RF-C complex consists of five different polypeptides (Rfc1 to
Rfc5) and has primer-template DNA-dependent ATPase activity which is stimulated by PCNA (12, 36). Interestingly, the
deduced amino acid sequences, among them the nucleotide-binding
consensus sequence motif, show significant homology to each other.
Among those polypeptide subunits, Rfc3p has been shown to have ATPase activity (24), while Rfc2 has the activity which
preferentially binds to primed single-stranded DNA and weak
ATP-binding activity (30). The thermosensitive
rfc5-1 mutation causes a Gly-to-Glu substitution just within
the ATP-binding consensus, Gly X X Gly X Gly Lys, suggesting
that the mutation likely affects the ATPase or ATP-binding activity of
Rfc5 (34). A similar mutation was introduced into the
RFC2 gene, resulting in cell lethality (data not shown).
This result strongly suggests that the ATP-binding consensus
sequence of Rfc2 plays a crucial role in chromosomal DNA replication.
We thank K. Sugimoto and K. Matsumoto for unpublished data, yeast
strains, and plasmid DNA. We also thank G. Cullman, B. Stillman, C. Holm, and H. Ogawa for yeast strains and plasmid DNA.
This work was supported by grants-in-aid for scientific research on
priority areas from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and
Culture of Japan. V. Noskov was supported by a fellowship from the
Ciba-Geigy Research Foundation.
| 1.
|
Araki, H.,
P. A. Ropp, and A. Sugino.
1991.
DPB2, the gene encoding DNA polymerase II subunit B, is required for chromosome replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:4601-4605[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Araki, H.,
S.-H. Leem,
A. Phongdara, and A. Sugino.
1995.
Dpb11, which interacts with DNA polymerase II ( ) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, has a dual role in S-phase progression and at a cell cycle checkpoint.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:11791-11795[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Boeke, J. D.,
F. Lacroute, and G. R. Fink.
1984.
A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-5'-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoroorotic acid resistance.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
197:345-346[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Budd, M. E., and J. L. Campbell.
1987.
Temperature-sensitive mutations in the yeast DNA polymerase I gene.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
84:2838-2842[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Budd, M. E., and J. L. Campbell.
1993.
DNA polymerases and are required for chromosomal replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:496-505[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Burgers, P. M. J.
1991.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication factor C. II. Formation and activity of complexes with proliferating cell nuclear antigen and with DNA polymerases and .
J. Biol. Chem.
266:22698-22706[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Campbell, J. L.
1993.
Yeast DNA replication.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:25261-25264[Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Cole, G. M.,
D. E. Stone, and S. I. Reed.
1990.
Stoichiometry of G protein subunits affects the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mating pheromone signal transduction pathway.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10:510-517[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Cullmann, G.,
K. Fien,
R. Kobayashi, and B. Stillman.
1995.
Characterization of the five replication factor C genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:4661-4671[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Dixon, W. J., and F. J. Massey, Jr.
1969.
Introduction to statistical analysis.
McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 11.
|
Elledge, S. J.
1997.
Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis.
Science
274:1664-1671[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Fien, K., and B. Stillman.
1992.
Identification of replication factor C from Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a component of the leading-strand DNA replication complex.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:155-163[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Gary, S. L., and P. M. J. Burgers.
1995.
Identification of the fifth subunit of Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication factor C.
Nucleic Acids Res.
23:4986-4991[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Gerik, K. J.,
S. L. Garry, and P. M. J. Burgers.
1997.
Overproduction and affinity purification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication factor C.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:1256-1262[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Gietz, R. D., and A. Sugino.
1988.
New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites.
Gene
74:527-534[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Gordenin, D. A.,
A. L. Malkova,
A. Petersen,
V. N. Kulikov,
Y. I. Pavlov,
A. Perkins, and M. A. Resnick.
1992.
Transposon Tn5 excision in yeast: influence of DNA polymerase , and and DNA repair genes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:3785-3789[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Haber, J. E.
1974.
Bisexual mating behavior in diploid of S. cerevisiae: evidence for genetically controlled non-random chromosome loss during vegetative growth.
Genetics
78:843-858[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Hartwell, L. H., and D. Smith.
1985.
Altered fidelity of mitotic chromosome transmission in cell cycle mutants of S. cerevisiae.
Genetics
110:381-395[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Hennessy, K. M.,
A. Lee,
E. Chen, and D. Botstein.
1991.
A group of interacting yeast DNA replication genes.
Genes Dev.
5:958-969[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Howell, E. A.,
M. A. McAlear,
D. Rose, and C. Holm.
1994.
CDC44: a putative nucleotide-binding protein required for cell cycle progression that has homology to subunits of replication factor C.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:255-267[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Kaiser, C.,
S. Michaelis, and A. Mitchell.
1994.
Methods in yeast genetics. A laboratory course manual.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 22.
|
Leem, S.-H.,
P. A. Ropp, and A. Sugino.
1994.
The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase IV: possible involvement in double strand break DNA repair.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:3011-3017[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Leung, D. W.,
E. Chen, and D. V. Goeddel.
1989.
Method for random mutagenesis of defined DNA segment using a modified polymerase chain reaction.
Technique
1:11-15.
|
| 24.
|
Li, X., and P. M. J. Burgers.
1994.
Molecular cloning and expression of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RFC3 gene, an essential component of replication factor C.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:868-872[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Li, X., and P. M. J. Burgers.
1994.
Cloning and characterization of the essential Saccharomyces cerevisiae RFC4 gene encoding the 37-kDa subunit of replication factor C.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:21880-21884[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
McAlear, M. A.,
E. A. Howell,
K. K. Espenshade, and C. Holm.
1994.
Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (pol30) mutations suppress cdc 44 mutations and identify potential regions of interaction between the two encoded proteins.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:4390-4397[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
McAlear, M. A.,
K. Tuffo, and C. Holm.
1996.
The large subunit of replication factor C (Rfc1p/Cdc44p) is required for DNA replication and DNA repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genetics
142:65-78[Abstract].
|
| 28.
|
Morrison, A., and A. Sugino.
1994.
The 3' 5' exonucleases of both DNA polymerases and participate in correcting errors of DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
242:289-296[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Navas, T. A.,
Z. Zhou, and S. J. Elledge.
1995.
DNA polymerase links the DNA replication machinery to the S phase checkpoint.
Cell
80:29-39[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Noskov, V.,
S. Maki,
Y. Kawasaki,
S.-H. Leem,
B.-I. Ono,
H. Araki,
Y. Pavlov, and A. Sugino.
1994.
The RFC2 gene encoding a subunit of replication factor C of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:1527-1535[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Noskov, V. N.,
K. Staak,
P. V. Shcherbakova,
S. G. Kosmin,
K. Negishi,
B.-I. Ono,
H. Hayatsu, and Y. I. Pavlov.
1996.
HAM1, the gene controlling 6-N-hydroxylaminopurine sensitivity and mutagenesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Yeast
12:17-29[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Stewart, P. R.
1975.
Analytical methods for yeast, p. 122-123.
In
D. M. Prescott (ed.), Methods in cell biology., vol. XII. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 32a.
|
Subden, R. E., and A. Krizus.
1985.
Correction factors for the diphenylamine test for deoxyribonucleic acid in yeast.
Microbios
43:233-243[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Sugimoto, K.,
S. Ando,
T. Shimomura, and K. Matsumoto.
1997.
Rfc5, a replication factor C component, is required for regulation of Rad53 protein kinase in the yeast checkpoint pathway.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:5905-5914[Abstract].
|
| 34.
|
Sugimoto, K.,
T. Shimomura,
K. Hashimoto,
H. Araki,
A. Sugino, and K. Matsumoto.
1996.
Rfc5, a small subunit of replication factor C complex, couples DNA replication and mitosis in budding yeast.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:7048-7052[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Sugino, A.
1995.
Yeast DNA polymerases and their role at the replication fork.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
20:319-323[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Yoder, B. L., and P. M. J. Burgers.
1991.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication factor C. I. Purification and characterization of its ATPase activity.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:22689-22697[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|