Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, September 1998, p. 5609-5619, Vol. 18, No. 9
Division of Neuroscience,
Received 19 November 1997/Returned for modification 4 January
1998/Accepted 25 June 1998
Expression of the fos family of transcription factors
is stimulated by growth factors that induce quiescent cells to reenter the cell cycle, but the cellular targets of the Fos family that regulate cell cycle reentry have not been identified. To address this
issue, mice that lack two members of the fos family,
c-fos and fosB, were derived. The
fosB The intricate mechanism by which a
cell exactly replicates its DNA and divides into two cells has long
been a subject of fascination. Recent studies have revealed a complex
layering of control mechanisms that ensure that the DNA synthesis and
mitosis phases of the cycle occur only at appropriate times. This
exquisite regulation is mediated by the sequential activation of
members of a family of serine-threonine kinases called cyclin-dependent
kinases (cdk's) (26, 39, 40). As the cell cycle progresses,
particular cdk's become activated by associating with an appropriate
cyclin. One crucial step for G1 progression appears to be
the induction of cyclin D1 expression during growth factor-stimulated
cell cycle reentry (19, 27, 32, 33, 44). Cyclin D1 mRNA
expression is significantly enhanced 4 to 6 h after growth factor
addition, and a minimum level of cyclin D1 protein appears to be
required for progression through G1 (19, 24, 27,
44). During growth factor-stimulated cell cycle reentry, the
induction of cyclin D1 mRNA expression requires activation of the
Ras-dependent mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway (1, 2,
42) and is temporally preceded by the activation of a class of
genes known as immediate-early genes (IEGs) (16). Several
IEGs encode transcription factors that may regulate transcription of
genes such as the cyclin D1 gene.
Among the best-characterized IEGs are members of the c-fos
proto-oncogene family. Expression of fos family genes, which
include c-fos, fosB, fra-1, and
fra-2, is induced within minutes of growth factor addition
to quiescent cells (16). Fos family proteins form
heterodimers with members of the Jun or ATF family, and these complexes
bind to the sequence element TGA(G/C)TCA (AP-1 site) or
TGACGTCA (ATF site), respectively (5, 13, 14). By
binding to specific sites within the regulatory region of target genes, these Fos complexes may regulate the transcription of late-response genes whose expression might be critical for cell cycle reentry.
Specific Fos family targets that could control cell cycle progression
and the mechanism by which these targets might couple to the cell cycle
machinery are unknown, although indirect evidence suggests that the
cyclin D1 gene could be a target of the Fos family (15, 25,
44). Overexpression of c-Fos in fibroblasts was found to enhance
the level of cyclin D1 mRNA (25), and conditions such as
cellular senescence which lead to reduced levels of c-fos transcription also lead to reduced levels of cyclin D1 expression (44). Cyclin D1 promoter analysis has also suggested that
c-Jun may activate cyclin D1 expression through a cyclic AMP response element (CRE) site at Despite this suggestive data, the importance of fos family
gene induction for cell cycle reentry and progression into S phase has
been difficult to establish. Early experiments with antibody microinjection and antisense RNA suggested that blocking
c-fos function inhibited fibroblast proliferation (17,
28, 34). However, no growth abnormalities have since been found
in c-fos Generation of fosB Preparation of primary embryonic fibroblast cultures.
On day
14.5 after plug, pregnant females were sacrificed by cervical
dislocation and each embryo was trypsinized by standard techniques
(35) and plated onto one gelatinized 10-cm dish in Dulbecco
modified Eagle medium (DMEM) with 15% fetal bovine serum (FBS),
glutamine, antibiotics, and nonessential amino acids. One day after
plating, each dish was harvested, counted, and split into 4.6 × 106 cells per 10-cm dish. Four days later, dishes derived
from one embryo were harvested, pooled, counted, and frozen as passage 2 with 4 × 106 cells per vial.
Growth curves.
For low-density growth, fibroblasts at
passage 3 were plated at 10,600 cells/cm2 on approximately
12 duplicate plates (day 0). On days 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11, two plates
of each genotype were trypsinized and counted with a hemacytometer. All
remaining plates were refed every 3 days. For sixfold-higher density,
cells were plated at 62,000 cells/cm2 and counted only
until day 9. The low-density experiment was performed seven times, and
the high-density experiment was performed four times.
[3H]thymidine incorporation.
Cells were plated
at a density of 300,000 per well of a six-well plate. Twenty-four hours
later, the cells were starved in DMEM with 0.5% FBS. After 24 to
30 h of starvation, the fibroblasts were stimulated with 20% FBS,
pulsed with 1 µCi of [3H]thymidine per ml for the last
hour, and harvested. Each well was washed, scraped in 0.5 ml of
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), transferred to 5 ml of 0.1 mg of
bovine serum albumin, and incubated on ice. Five milliliters of 20%
trichloroacetic acid was added, and the tube was vortexed for 20 s
prior to incubation on ice for 30 min. The solution was vacuum filtered
onto a glass filter, washed with 10% trichloroacetic acid followed by
100% ethyl alcohol, and dried in air for 20 to 30 min prior to
counting. This experiment was performed four times.
Incorporation of 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU).
A total of
5.5 × 104 cells were plated on a 12-mm glass
coverslip in one well of a 24-well plate. Twenty-four hours later, the
cells were starved and stimulated as described above. The cells were
pulsed with 10 µM BrdU for the last 2 h prior to fixation in
75% methanol-25% acetic acid. The coverslips were removed and stored
in PBS-Triton-glycine. For staining, the coverslips were postfixed in
70% ethyl alcohol, washed, permeabilized in 0.5% Triton X-100 for 30 min, washed, treated with 2 N HCl for 30 min, neutralized in 0.1 M
sodium borate (pH 8.5) for 10 min, and washed. Blocking was for 1 to
2 h in 3% bovine serum albumin-0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS. Each
coverslip was incubated overnight at 4°C in anti-BrdU antibody
(Becton Dickinson 347580) diluted 1:10 in blocking buffer plus 1%
normal goat serum. The coverslips were washed and incubated in
fluorescein-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody for 1 to 2 h
at room temperature. The coverslips were washed, stained with freshly
diluted Hoechst stain at 10 ng/ml in PBS for 8 min, and washed. Each
coverslip was mounted with glycerol gelatin plus
para-phenylenediamine at 100 µg/ml.
0270-7306/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Fos Family Members Induce Cell Cycle Entry by Activating
Cyclin D1
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
/
c-fos
/
mice are similar in phenotype to c-fos
/
mice but are 30% smaller. This decrease in size is consistent with an
abnormality in cell proliferation. Fibroblasts derived from
fosB
/
c-fos
/
mice were found to have a defect in proliferation that results at least
in part from a failure to induce cyclin D1 following serum-stimulated
cell cycle reentry. Although definitive evidence that c-Fos and FosB
directly induce cyclin D1 transcription will require further analysis,
these findings raise the possibility that c-Fos and FosB are either
direct or indirect transcriptional regulators of the cyclin D1 gene and
may function as a critical link between serum stimulation and cell
cycle progression.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
52, though no role for c-Fos was reported (15).
/
embryonic stem cells
(10) or in primary or 3T3 c-fos
/
fibroblasts (4, 18). In addition, the growth of
fosB
/
fibroblasts was found to be unimpaired
(12). Evidence that multiple fos family genes
cooperate to induce S-phase progression was provided by antibody
microinjection studies which showed that the inhibition of
c-fos or fosB or fra-1 function alone
only partially blocked cell cycle reentry, while inhibiting all three
genes together effectively abolished cell cycle progression
(22). These results raised the possibility that several
fos family members together play a critical role in growth
factor-stimulated cell cycle reentry. Experiments were therefore
initiated to determine whether disruption of two fos family
members, c-fos and fosB, would uncover a role for
the fos family in cell proliferation and facilitate the
identification of the cell cycle targets of Fos proteins.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
/
c-fos
/
mice.
c-fos+/
(C57BL/6 × 129Sv) mice were bred
to fosB+/
(BALB/c × 129Sv) mice to
generate double heterozygotes that were interbred. Weights were
determined for an entire litter simultaneously between the ages of 19 and 23 days.
/
, for
which only one line was obtained) was represented by at least two
independent fibroblast lines, and usually three.
-galactosidase, was added at 1:250.
The additional secondary antibody was Texas Red-conjugated anti-rabbit
antibody, at 1:100.
Cyclin D1 immune complex kinase assays.
Cyclin D1
immunoprecipitation kinase assays were performed as previously
described (42, 43). Cells were harvested in ice-cold PBS and
extracted in lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM HEPES [pH 7.2], 1 mM
EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1% Tween 20, 0.1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2.5 µg of leupeptin per ml, and 0.1 mM
sodium orthovanadate [Sigma Chemicals, St. Louis, Mo.]) at 4°C.
Lysates were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 5 min. Protein content was normalized by the Bio-Rad protein assay, and 100 µg was used for each sample. The supernatants were precipitated for
12 h at 4°C with protein A-agarose beads precoated with
saturating amounts of the cyclin D1 antibody, DCS-11 (NeoMarkers,
Fremont, Calif.). Immunoprecipitated proteins on beads were washed
twice with 750 µl of lysis buffer and twice with kinase buffer (50 mM HEPES [pH 7.0], 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM MnCl2, 1 mM
dithiothreitol). The beads were then resuspended in 40 µl of kinase
buffer containing the protein substrate (2 µg of soluble glutathione
S-transferase-RB fusion protein), 10 µM ATP, and 5 µCi
of [
-32P]ATP (6,000 Ci/mmol; 1 Ci = 37 GBq
[Amersham Corp., Arlington Heights, Ill.]). The samples were
incubated for 25 min at 30°C with occasional mixing. The samples were
boiled in polyacrylamide gel sample buffer containing sodium dodecyl
sulfate and separated by electrophoresis. Phosphorylated proteins were
quantified after exposure to autoradiographic film (Labscientific Inc.,
Livingston, N.J.) by densitometry with ImageQuant version 1.2 (Molecular Dynamics Computing Densitometer [Sunnyvale, Calif.]).
Cell cycle antibodies. Antibodies against cyclin D1 were a gift from Michael Rivkin and Li-Huei Tsai. Polyclonal antibodies against cyclins D1, D2, and D3 were obtained from Chuck Sherr. Antibodies against cyclins E and A were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
Transfection of mouse embryo fibroblasts for rescue of growth
defect.
Fibroblasts were plated at 3 × 105 cells
on 12-mm glass coverslips in 3.5-cm dishes. Plasmids employed in
transfections were prepared by double banding on CsCl gradients and
included pON260 (cytomegalovirus [CMV]-lacZ)
(6), pRcCMV, CMVfos
Xho (7), and
pBBB and pF4 (38). pF4 contains the c-fos gene
under the control of its native promoter; pBBB contains the
-globin
gene under the control of the c-fos promoter. For rescue,
0.5 µg of pON260 was mixed with 1.5 µg of pRcCMV+/
expression gene in 100 µl of Opti-Mem buffer. Six microliters of
Lipofectamine (Gibco) was mixed with 100 µl of Opti-Mem buffer, transferred to the DNA mix, and incubated for 45 min at room
temperature prior to addition of 0.8 ml of serum-free DMEM. The
fibroblasts were washed in serum-free DMEM, and the transfection mix
was added. The fibroblasts were incubated for 5 h at 37°C and
washed in complete medium. Medium was changed again approximately
4 h following transfection. For continuous cycling conditions, the
fibroblasts were refed complete medium 4 h after transfection.
Twenty-four hours later, BrdU was added to a 10 µM concentration and
incubation at 37°C was continued for an additional 16 h. The
coverslips were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde-8% sucrose in PBS
prewarmed to 37°C and were stored at 4°C in PBS-Triton-glycine.
Cyclin D1 promoter analysis.
Cyclin D1 promoter constructs
employed included
1745CD1LUC,
964CD1LUC,
964CD1LUCmtAP-1,
163CD1LUC,
66CD1LUC,
66CD1LUCmtATF, and pA3LUC
(2, 42). Fibroblasts of the appropriate genotype were plated
at 2 × 105 to 2.5 × 105 cells per
3.5-cm dish. Twenty-four hours later, each well was transfected with
1.5 to 2 µg of DNA with 10 µl of Lipofectamine as described above.
Luciferase construct (0.75 to 1 µg) was transfected with 0.5 to 0.75 µg of empty vector (pRcCMV or pBBB) or c-fos expression
vector (CMVfos
Xho or pF4). In early experiments, 0.5 µg
of elongation factor-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase was included as
a control for variations in transfection efficiency. Four hours after
transfection, the fibroblasts were placed in starvation medium (0.5%
FBS) for 12 to 14 h. Each well was then left unstimulated or
stimulated for 7 h with 20% FBS. The fibroblasts were harvested
and luciferase readings were obtained as described in Promega Technical
Bulletin no. 161.
Electrophoretic mobility gel shift assays. Electrophoretic mobility gel shift assays with nuclear extracts or in vitro-translated proteins were performed as described previously (2, 14, 31). Nuclear extracts were prepared according to the method of Albanese et al. (2), and c-Fos and c-Jun proteins were generated with a rabbit reticulocyte lysate system (Promega).
Statistical analysis. Data analysis was performed with the program StatView. All data were analyzed by repeated-measures analysis of variance or paired t tests.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To generate mice carrying mutations in the c-fos and
fosB genes, mice heterozygous for each single mutation were
interbred (3, 20). fosB
/
c-fos
/
mice were born at the normal
Mendelian frequency and found to have the same defects previously
detected in the c-fos
/
mouse, namely,
osteopetrosis, small size, and a failure of tooth eruption (data not
shown). The survival of c-fos
/
mice was not
influenced by their fosB genotype, and no obvious anatomic
or pathologic differences were observed when
c-fos
/
and fosB
/
c-fos
/
mice were compared (data not shown).
However, the measurement of body weight of
c-fos
/
and fosB
/
c-fos
/
mice revealed that
fosB
/
c-fos
/
mice
are significantly smaller than c-fos
/
mice.
On average, the fosB
/
c-fos
/
mice are 30% smaller than
c-fos
/
mice at approximately 3 weeks of age
(Fig. 1). One possibility is that the
decreased size of the fosB
/
c-fos
/
mice is due to an impairment in cell
proliferation. Although we have not established whether impaired
proliferation during development is the explanation for the decreased
size of the fosB
/
c-fos
/
mice, the analysis described below of
fibroblasts from these mice revealed that they are defective in their
ability to reenter the cell cycle after growth arrest.
|
As previously shown, wild-type, fosB
/
c-fos+/+, and fosB+/+
c-fos
/
fibroblasts were found to proliferate
exponentially in culture and to efficiently reenter the cell cycle from
G0 upon serum stimulation (Fig.
2a). In contrast,
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts proliferated very poorly in continuous culture (Fig. 2a)
and, upon serum stimulation following G0 arrest, traversed G1 inefficiently and failed to enter S phase at a
significant rate as shown by BrdU staining and
[3H]thymidine incorporation (Fig. 2b and c). This defect
in S-phase entry was also observed with BrdU staining in
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts in continuous cycling conditions (see Fig. 3c and 5b).
Despite their failure to proliferate, fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts remained attached to the
tissue culture dish, showed no evidence of apoptotic cell death, and
appeared healthy for up to 2 weeks (data not shown). Interestingly,
fosB
/
c-fos+/
fibroblasts proliferated normally in culture, while
fosB+/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts were as defective in their proliferative capacity as
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts (Fig. 2a and c). This difference in the efficacy with which
a single copy of c-fos or fosB promotes
fibroblast proliferation may be due to a difference between
c-fos and fosB either in their specific functions
or in their levels of expression.
|
In contrast to fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts plated at low to moderate
density, fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts plated at high density
proliferate normally in culture (Fig. 2d). This observation suggests
that, at lower plating densities, a c-fos- and
fosB-dependent pathway is critical for G1
progression and entry into S phase but that at high plating densities,
other pathways that can substitute for the c-fos- and
fosB-dependent pathway may be activated.
The failure of fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts grown at lower densities
to efficiently enter S phase was not due to a general impairment in the
response of these cells to serum. Northern analyses indicated that the
patterns of gene expression that characterize the proliferative response to serum are intact in fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts grown at low density. The
timing and extent of induction of the IEGs c-myc,
nur77, zif268, and junB are similar in
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts and in wild-type fibroblasts, although IEG expression did
remain elevated for a longer period of time in the mutant fibroblasts
(Fig. 3a and data not shown). This
prolonged elevation in IEG levels in fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts is consistent with the
results of transient transfection studies showing that c-Fos and FosB
regulate the shutoff of IEG transcription (11, 29). The
sustained induction of IEGs is unlikely to be related to our finding
that S-phase entry is impaired because elevated levels of IEGs usually
correlate with improved entry into S phase (25, 37, 45).
|
In addition to IEG induction, several later events in G1
occur normally in the fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts. The delayed-response
genes encoding cyclin D2 and the protease transin are induced normally
when quiescent fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts are exposed to serum
(Fig. 3b). Growth factor stimulation of transin has been shown
previously to be mediated by an AP-1 site that is present within the
regulatory region of the transin gene (8, 21). The induction
of transin in response to platelet-derived growth factor and epidermal
growth factor, but not 12-O-tetradecanoyl phorbol-13-acetate
(TPA), was found to be impaired in a c-fos
/
established 3T3 cell line (18). Our finding that serum
induces transin normally in fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts is most likely consistent
with these observations, since addition of serum to
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts probably mimics the effect of factors such as TPA that are
capable of inducing normal transin expression in the established
c-fos
/
cell line used by Hu et al.
(18). The efficacy with which transin and other
delayed-response genes are induced in fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts may reflect the ability
of fra-1, fra-2, or other genes to compensate for
the loss of c-fos and fosB. Taken together, these
experiments suggest that the program of gene expression induced during
serum stimulation of wild-type fibroblasts is primarily intact in
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts and that the growth abnormality in the mutant fibroblasts may be due to a specific rather than a global defect.
If, as expected, the growth defect in fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts is a direct result of the
loss of c-fos and fosB, and not secondary to a
developmental defect or a random mutation, the expression of
c-fos or fosB in fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts should restore the
ability of these double mutant fibroblasts to enter S phase. To explore
this possibility, c-fos was reintroduced into the
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts. c-fos was chosen because the presence of a
single allele of c-fos, but not fosB, was
sufficient for normal cell proliferation in the cell cycle studies
described above. Fibroblasts were transfected with either a
CMV-c-fos expression vector or an empty CMV expression
vector, together with CMV-lacZ to mark the transfected
cells. DNA synthesis was assessed in two experimental paradigms, one in
which the fibroblasts were continually cycling for approximately
42 h after transfection (Fig. 3c) and another in which the
fibroblasts were serum starved for 12 h and then stimulated by the
addition of 20% FBS (data not shown). The results were the same in
both paradigms. Transfection of fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts with
CMV-c-fos led to a significant increase in the percentage
of fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts incorporating BrdU while having little effect on BrdU
incorporation in wild-type fibroblasts. The
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts transfected with CMV-c-fos entered S phase at a
rate similar to that of the wild-type fibroblasts (Fig. 3c). These findings suggest that c-fos expressed by transfection can
act in G1 to rescue the growth defect of
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts. Thus, the defect in cell cycle progression in the fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts is strictly due to the absence of c-fos and
fosB and is not secondary to some other perturbation of
these cells.
To identify the critical targets of c-Fos and FosB, we investigated
whether the regulation of components of the cell cycle machinery was
altered in fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts during the G1
phase of the cell cycle. We found that, although the levels of cyclin
D1 mRNA and protein are induced in wild-type fibroblasts within a few
hours of serum stimulation (Fig. 4a), the
exposure of fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts to serum failed to induce
cyclin D1 mRNA or protein (Fig. 4a and c), even though cyclin D2 was
induced in the mutant cells (Fig. 3b). We therefore assessed the level
of cyclin D1-associated kinase activity with a truncated retinoblastoma
protein as substrate. In wild-type fibroblasts, kinase activity was
induced approximately fourfold by 8 to 12 h of serum stimulation,
while no induction was seen in the fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts (Fig. 4d). Although
cyclin D1-associated kinase activity in wild-type fibroblasts falls at
18 h before rising again at 24 to 28 h (Fig. 4d and data not
shown), cyclin D1 mRNA levels remain elevated throughout this period.
This prolonged elevation in cyclin D1 mRNA may reflect an effect on
mRNA stability or a loss of synchrony of the serum-stimulated cell
population.
|
The failure of serum to induce cyclin D1 mRNA, protein, and associated
cdk activity in fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts may explain the defect in
cell cycle progression observed in these mutant cells. In support of
this possibility, the failure of serum to induce cell cycle reentry
correlated with the failure of serum to induce cyclin D1 mRNA
expression. Serum stimulation of single mutant
fosB
/
or c-fos
/
fibroblasts effectively induced cyclin D1 mRNA expression and cell
cycle reentry (data not shown). By contrast,
fosB+/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts failed to induce either cyclin D1 mRNA expression or cell
cycle reentry in response to serum (data not shown).
To determine whether the decreased expression of cyclin D1 in
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts is specific, the levels of expression of several additional
cyclins were determined in wild-type and
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts. Both cyclin D2 and cyclin E proteins were expressed at
similar levels in wild-type and fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts (data not shown).
However, the induction of cyclin A protein was delayed for several
hours in fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts, and its peak level was
substantially reduced relative to the level detected in wild-type cells
(Fig. 4c). Since the induction of cyclin A protein is reduced in
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts, the levels of cyclin A mRNA in wild-type fibroblasts and
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts were compared. No difference was seen in levels of cyclin A
mRNA (Fig. 4b) between the mutant and wild-type cells, suggesting that
the disruption of c-fos and fosB does not affect cyclin A transcription. Thus, the effect of the c-fos and
fosB mutations on cyclin A protein expression may be a
secondary consequence of the alteration in cyclin D1 mRNA and protein
expression that occurs earlier in G1.
The analysis of cyclin expression in wild-type and
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts suggests that a critical function of c-fos and
fosB in wild-type fibroblasts is to promote cell cycle
progression by either directly or indirectly stimulating the expression
of cyclin D1 mRNA and protein. If the failure to induce cyclin D1 mRNA
during cell cycle reentry is the primary explanation for the defect in
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts, expression of cyclin D1 should be able to rescue the
fibroblasts' defect in cell cycle progression. To address this
question, fibroblasts were transiently transfected with a CMV-cyclin D1
or empty CMV expression vector and studied both while they were
continuously cycling and following serum starvation and stimulation.
Transfection of the cyclin D1 expression vector, but not the empty
vector, effectively rescued S-phase entry in fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts following serum stimulation (data not shown) or while they
were continuously growing (Fig. 5b).
Expression of cyclin D1 was not sufficient to initiate S-phase entry in
serum-starved fibroblasts of either genotype (data not shown),
suggesting that cyclin D1 acts together with other serum-inducible
factors to regulate S-phase entry. Ectopic expression of cyclin D1 also
significantly increased the percentage of wild-type fibroblasts
entering S phase (Fig. 5b). Since increasing the level of cyclin D1 in
wild-type fibroblasts also stimulates cell cycle reentry, the effect of ectopic cyclin D1 expression on the fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts may reflect a function of
cyclin D1 other than cyclin D1's ability to rescue the defect in
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts. Nevertheless, the ability of cyclin D1 to enhance S-phase
entry in fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts is consistent with our
hypothesis that loss of cyclin D1 induction in
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts is a significant contributor to their proliferation defect.
|
If the low level of cyclin D1 expression in
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts is a determining factor that prevents these fibroblasts from entering S phase, then fibroblasts from a cyclin D1-deficient mouse (9, 41) should display a similar defect in
proliferation when cultured in vitro. Although a previous study failed
to identify such a defect (9), our analysis revealed that
when cyclin D1
/
fibroblasts are plated at lower
densities, they proliferate poorly and reenter the cell cycle
inefficiently, as was seen with fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts (Fig. 5a). Our
preliminary results suggest that plating cyclin D1
/
fibroblasts at higher densities improves their ability to grow (data
not shown), similar to our findings with
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts. These observations indicate that, at least under certain
conditions of growth in culture, cyclin D1 expression is critical for
efficient cell cycle reentry. Taken together, these results suggest
that the proliferative defect detected in fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts is due at least in part to the failure to induce cyclin D1
expression as the mutant fibroblasts traverse G1.
Since serum induction of c-Fos and FosB proteins occurs within 1 to
2 h and persists for at least several hours (data not shown), the
temporal course of Fos family protein and cyclin D1 induction is such
that Fos family members are active for a significant period prior to
cyclin D1 induction. Experiments were therefore undertaken to determine
if a reporter gene driven by the cyclin D1 promoter was differentially
responsive to serum when transfected into wild-type versus
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts. A reporter plasmid containing 1,745 bp of the cyclin D1
upstream regulatory region linked to the firefly luciferase gene
(
1745CD1LUC) was transfected into wild-type and
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts together with the appropriate Fos expression constructs or
empty vector controls. In wild-type fibroblasts, the cyclin D1 promoter
was reproducibly induced by serum within 6 h (Fig. 6a). Although the induction of luciferase
activity is only approximately twofold, this effect is similar in
magnitude to the induction of cyclin D1 seen with Northern blotting
(Fig. 4a) and is highly reproducible. In the
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts, basal expression from the cyclin D1 promoter-driven luciferase gene was reduced by 30% compared to that for wild-type fibroblasts, and serum failed to induce the promoter (Fig. 6a). However, expression from
1745CD1LUC could be rescued in
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts by cotransfection with c-fos, indicating that
cyclin D1 promoter induction can be restored by c-fos
function (Fig. 6a). The absolute levels of luciferase activity in
c-fos-transfected and serum-stimulated
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts were generally comparable to the absolute levels of
luciferase activity in stimulated wild-type fibroblasts. These results
are consistent with the hypothesis that c-Fos and FosB induce the
cyclin D1 promoter, either directly or indirectly via activation of
other transcriptional regulators. However, these findings do not rule
out the existence of other mechanisms of cyclin D1 induction or the
possibility that additional Fos family targets contribute to cell cycle
progression.
|
The cyclin D1 promoter contains two sites that could potentially
mediate a direct induction by Fos family proteins in response to serum;
a classic AP-1 site at approximately
950 and a CRE/ATF site at
approximately
60. To identify the serum-responsive element in these
primary fibroblasts, a series of cyclin D1 promoter deletion constructs
were transfected into wild-type and mutant fibroblasts (2,
42). Although the absolute level of expression decreased incrementally as the promoter was shortened, the serum inducibility of
the cyclin D1 promoter constructs in wild-type fibroblasts was
reproducibly maintained for each of the constructs tested, including a
construct (
66CD1LUC) that contained only 66 nucleotides 5' of the
start site of initiation of cyclin D1 mRNA synthesis (Fig. 6b). In
contrast to the results with wild-type fibroblasts, the
66CD1LUC
construct was only minimally induced when transfected fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts were stimulated with serum (Fig. 6b). The failure of serum
to induce the
66CD1LUC construct in the
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts was due to the disruption of c-fos, since
cotransfection of fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts with the c-fos
expression plasmid pF4 restored the inducibility of the
66CD1LUC
construct (Fig. 6b).
The proximal 66 nucleotides of the cyclin D1 promoter include the
CRE/ATF-like sequence 5' TAACGTCA 3', which is capable of binding CREB/CREM proteins in electrophoretic mobility shift assays (42). Fos-Jun complexes are known to bind to a similar
sequence, 5' TGA(C/G)TCA 3' (5). The CRE/ATF
element of the cyclin D1 promoter differs by only one nucleotide from a
sequence that binds heterodimers of Fos family members and the
CREB-related transcription factor ATF4 (14). To examine the
importance of the CRE/ATF element for serum induction, clustered point
mutations were introduced into the region of the
66CD1LUC construct
that binds CREB proteins (42). The basal activity of this
66CD1LUC-ATF mutant reporter construct was reduced by 90%, and its
inducibility was decreased, although some induction remained (Fig. 6b).
These results indicate that the CRE/ATF element at
60 contributes to
basal expression and may contribute to serum induction of cyclin D1.
Although these experiments suggest that the Fos family may directly
regulate cyclin D1 via the proximal 66 nucleotides of the cyclin D1
promoter, the findings should be viewed with caution. Given the
complexity of the cyclin D1 promoter, the incremental decrease in
absolute promoter induction that is observed as the cyclin D1 promoter is truncated, and the small magnitude of the effect of c-Fos expression on
66CD1LUC, it is likely that transcription factors in addition to
Fos regulate cyclin D1 transcription. In addition, although the cyclin
D1 promoter truncation experiments did not provide evidence for the
involvement of the AP-1 site at
950 in serum induction of cyclin D1
transcription (data not shown), it remains possible that the AP-1 site
and/or other promoter sites may play a role in the induction of
endogenous cyclin D1 expression.
To determine if Fos family members might be capable of regulating
cyclin D1 transcription by interacting directly with the CRE/ATF
element, we characterized the nature of the complexes present in
fibroblast nuclear extracts that bind to this cyclin D1 promoter
element and assessed whether these complexes contain c-Fos.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays were performed with a 23-bp
double-stranded oligonucleotide that encompasses the CRE/ATF site. Two
protein complexes, which were present at very low levels in extracts
from serum-starved wild-type fibroblasts but were expressed at higher
levels following serum stimulation and bound specifically to the
CRE/ATF site, were identified (Fig. 6c, complexes C and F). By
contrast, extracts from serum-stimulated
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts expressed very low levels of these protein complexes (Fig.
6c). Addition of anti-c-Fos specific antibodies to the extracts of
wild-type fibroblasts significantly reduced the formation of both
complex C and complex F (Fig. 6c), suggesting that both complexes contain c-Fos. One of the complexes also contains Jun family proteins, since anti-c-Jun antibodies were able to cause a supershift. Complex C
contains CREB-related proteins since anti-CREM/CREB antibodies both
reduced the abundance of and caused a partial supershift of complex C. Since multiple protein complexes clearly interact with the 5'
TAACGTCA 3' element, verification of the significance of Fos
family-containing complexes detected in vitro will require further
analysis. However, our observation that among the protein complexes
that bind to the CRE/ATF element there are some that are serum
inducible and are recognized by anti-c-Fos antibodies suggests that
members of the Fos family, c-Fos and FosB, can bind directly to the
cyclin D1 promoter. The capacity of Fos-containing complexes to bind
this promoter site in vitro was demonstrated by mobility shift analysis
with in vitro-transcribed and -translated c-Fos and c-Jun. While
neither c-Fos nor c-Jun alone nor a mixture of c-Fos and ATF4 bound to
the CRE/ATF element, c-Fos and c-Jun together bound specifically to
this sequence (Fig. 6d). Taken together, these DNA mobility shift
analyses suggest that Fos family members are capable of binding to the
cyclin D1 CRE/ATF element in vitro, albeit more weakly than to an AP-1
site. Given the complexity of the cyclin D1 promoter, the probability
that multiple factors are binding to the cyclin D1 promoter
simultaneously, and the relatively weak binding of Fos family proteins
to the CRE/ATF site, further experimentation will be needed to
determine definitively whether the Fos family plays a role directly in
the regulation of the cyclin D1 gene.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, we have described the generation and initial
characterization of fosB
/
c-fos
/
mice, which are similar in phenotype
to c-fos
/
mice but significantly smaller in
size. Their smaller size does not appear to reflect worsened
osteopetrosis or other organ dysfunction. Further studies will be
required to determine whether the size of
fosB
/
c-fos
/
mice
reflects a cell-autonomous effect on cell growth or proliferation or a
nonspecific effect. However, the decreased size of the
fosB
/
c-fos
/
mice
may be a manifestation in vivo of a mild impairment in cell proliferation. Consistent with this hypothesis is our observation that
dense cultures of
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts grow normally in culture, while the growth of lower-density fosB
/
c-fos
/
and
fosB+/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts is severely impaired. This impairment in the growth of
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts is due to a defect in S-phase entry which correlates with a
specific loss of cyclin D1 induction following serum stimulation.
The loss of normal cyclin D1 expression and D1-associated kinase
activity in fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts may explain the growth
impairment seen in these cells. Our observations that cyclin
D1
/
fibroblasts have a proliferation defect and that
cyclin D1 expression in fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts restores proliferation
are consistent with a significant role for cyclin D1 in the growth
deficiency of fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts. Assays of cyclin D1
promoter activity suggest that serum induction of the cyclin D1
promoter in primary fibroblasts is dependent on intact c-fos
and fosB genes. These findings establish a functional role
for c-Fos and FosB in the cell cycle and suggest that one mechanism by
which these two IEGs promote S-phase entry is via cyclin D1.
It remains unclear whether the failure of cyclin D1 induction in
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts is sufficient to explain the severe growth defect detected
in these cells. fos family genes may have
as-yet-unidentified targets which are also critical for S-phase entry.
In addition, other pathways may converge on the activation of cyclin
D1. Nonetheless, a number of lines of evidence support our hypothesis
that failure of cyclin D1 induction is a major contributor to growth
failure in fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts. First, the only other
cell cycle-related molecular abnormality that we have identified in
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts is the reduced level of cyclin A protein. Since the reduction in cyclin D1 precedes the reduction in cyclin A, the cyclin A
changes may be secondary to the changes in cyclin D1. Second, we have
found that expression of cyclin D1 in fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts is sufficient to restore
their progression through the cell cycle, consistent with the
hypothesis that c-Fos and FosB activate cell cycle progression via
cyclin D1. Third, we have shown that fibroblasts that lack cyclin D1
show a similar density-dependent defect in cell cycle progression.
Given that a threshold abundance of cyclin D1 is known to be critical
for G1 progression (30, 32, 33), the reduction
in basal and serum-induced cyclin D1 expression in the
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts could be responsible for their failure to progress into S
phase. That the reduction in cyclin D1 levels is due to the loss of
c-Fos and FosB is consistent with previous studies, which have shown
that Fos overexpression induces cyclin D1 (25). In addition,
promoter analyses have suggested a role for Fos and/or Jun family
proteins in the activation of cyclin D1 (30, 44).
The only other molecular defect observed to date in the
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts is a prolonged elevation in IEG levels following serum
stimulation. The down-regulation of IEGs has been proposed to be
important for effective cell cycle control, since increased IEG levels
due to overexpression have been associated with enhanced S-phase entry.
In fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts where the induction of cyclin D1 expression is compromised, this prolonged elevation of IEGs is not sufficient to lead to enhanced
cell proliferation. However, the fact that IEG transcription remains
elevated in fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts provides evidence that
c-Fos and FosB play a critical role in the shutoff of transcription of
multiple IEGs, as has been suggested by transfection assays in which
both c-Fos and FosB were shown to repress the activity of the
c-fos and fosB promoters (11, 23).
Our observation that fosB+/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts are as impaired as
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts suggests that a single allele of fosB is not
sufficient to lead to activation of cyclin D1 or other target genes to
levels high enough to restore cell cycle progression. The observation that the gene dosage of fosB is critically important is
interesting but not unprecedented. In the case of MyoD and
myf-5, although MyoD
/
myf-5+/+ mice are normal, MyoD
/
myf-5+/
mice show a partial impairment in
muscle formation that is severe enough to result in their perinatal
death (36). The apparent difference in the potency of single
alleles of c-fos and fosB implies that the two
loci must have some functional difference(s). One possibility is that
the alternatively spliced short fosB mRNA encodes a protein
that acts in a dominant negative manner and therefore reduces the net
activity of full-length FosB. Alternatively, it may be that a certain
minimum total amount of c-Fos and FosB is required and that c-Fos is
expressed at a higher level than FosB.
Our observation that the growth defect of
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts can be overcome by plating at very high densities raises interesting questions. First, it is important to note that the lowest
plating density used in our experiments is comparable to or higher than
the plating densities used in many previously described studies of cell
cycle progression (4, 18), and our observation of impaired
growth is quite obvious and dramatic under standard experimental
conditions. Why this proliferation defect would be overcome at high
cell density is unclear: the cells may secrete more growth factors to
condition the medium, or they may be stimulated by cell-cell contact. A
preliminary experiment suggested that conditioned medium from cells
growing at high density was not sufficient to rescue the growth of
cells at low density (27a). Furthermore, in BrdU
incorporation experiments we have noticed a sometimes striking local
effect of cell density, where individual cells within clumps have a
higher rate of S-phase entry than do well-spread cells. These
observations suggest that cell-cell interactions may be critical to the
ability of fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts to effectively progress
into S phase. Whatever the mechanism, S-phase entry occurs in a
fos-independent manner in dense cultures. Interestingly, we
have observed that the growth of cyclin D1
/
fibroblasts
also appears to be improved by plating them at high density (data not
shown). This result suggests that the mechanism of S-phase entry at
high density is not only fos independent, but also cyclin D1
independent, and may instead involve the activation of other cyclins.
Since the growth deficiencies of cyclin D1
/
and
fosB
/
c-fos
/
fibroblasts may share some properties, it is of interest that both cyclin D1
/
and fosB
/
c-fos
/
mice are substantially growth
impaired. At approximately 3 weeks of age, both cyclin
D1
/
and fosB
/
c-fos
/
mice are approximately 50 to 60%
smaller than wild-type mice (9, 41). Although the
interpretation of this result is complicated by osteopetrosis in the
fosB
/
c-fos
/
mice, the finding is striking and suggests the possibility that Fos
family-mediated activation of cyclin D1 may have significance in vivo.
Nevertheless, there are clearly alternative pathways for activating
cyclin D1, as evidenced by retinal and mammary defects in cyclin
D1
/
mice that have not as yet been detected in the
fosB
/
c-fos
/
mice
(27b). The lack of coincidence of the retinal defects in the
two different mutant mice may be explained by the continued expression
of other Fos family members in the retina of the
fosB
/
c-fos
/
mice
or by an alternative Fos family-independent mechanism for the
upregulation of cyclin D1 in retinal cells. It would not be surprising
if the mechanisms of activation of cell cycle genes were cell type
specific or if the cell-type-specific abundance of particular Fos
family proteins dictated the phenotype observed in animals lacking one
or two family members. In support of this hypothesis, distinct protein
complexes bind to the serum-responsive regions of the cyclin D1
promoter in different cell types (31a).
Given the striking effect on fibroblast proliferation, the phenotype of
the fosB
/
c-fos
/
mouse is relatively subtle. Although the size difference between c-fos
/
and fosB
/
c-fos
/
mice is significant and suggestive of
an effect on cell proliferation in vivo, any associated loss of
viability seems minimal. It may be that compensation by
fos-independent pathways exists in vivo just as it does at
high cell density in vitro. If so, additional experiments might
identify other manifestations of this proliferative defect in vivo. For
example, wound healing may be an in vivo equivalent of low growth
density and might therefore be abnormal in the
fosB
/
c-fos
/
mice. In addition, fosB
/
c-fos
/
mice may be found to be unusually
resistant to tumorigenesis or to show impaired proliferation in other
cell types such as lymphocytes. Further experiments will be required to
identify the full range of manifestations of the defect in cell
proliferation in fosB
/
c-fos
/
mice.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to the following investigators for reagents: Tom Curran and Tom Kerppola (anti-Fos antibody), Michael Rivkin and Li-Huei Tsai (cdk/cyclin antibodies), and Chuck Sherr (anticyclin antibodies). We thank Chaoyong Ma and Connie Cepko for supplying cyclin D1 knockout mice. We thank members of the Greenberg laboratory for many helpful discussions and advice.
Work at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine was supported by Cancer Center Core National Institutes of Health grant 5-P30-CA13330-26 and by grants 1R29CA70897-02, R01CA75503, and P50-HL 56399 and an Award from the Susan Komen Foundation (to R.G.P.). F.S. was supported by INSERM and ARC. E.N. was supported by an NSF Predoctoral Fellowship. Work at the Children's Hospital was supported by Mental Retardation Research Center Grant NIH P30-HD 18655 and by National Institutes of Health grant DK49216 awarded to M.E.G. as part of a Center of Excellence in Molecular Hematology.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Neuroscience, Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115. Phone: (617) 355-8344. Fax: (617) 738-1542. E-mail: greenberg{at}a1.tch.harvard.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Aktas, H., H. Cai, and G. M. Cooper. 1997. Ras links growth factor signaling to the cell cycle machinery via regulation of cyclin D1 and the Cdk inhibitor p27KIP1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:3850-3857[Abstract]. |
| 2. |
Albanese, C.,
J. Johnson,
G. Watanabe,
N. Eklund,
D. Vu,
A. Arnold, and R. G. Pestell.
1995.
Transforming p21ras mutants and c-Ets-2 activate the cyclin D1 promoter through distinguishable regions.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:23589-23597 |
| 3. | Brown, J. R., H. Ye, R. T. Bronson, P. Dikkes, and M. E. Greenberg. 1996. A defect in nurturing in mice lacking the immediate early gene fosB. Cell 86:297-309[Medline]. |
| 4. | Bruesselbach, S., U. Moehle-Steinlein, Z.-Q. Wang, M. Schreiber, F. C. Lucibello, R. Mueller, and E. F. Wagner. 1995. Cell proliferation and cell cycle progression are not impaired in fibroblasts and ES cells lacking c-Fos. Oncogene 10:79-86[Medline]. |
| 5. | Busch, S. J., and P. Sassone-Corsi. 1990. Dimers, leucine zippers and DNA-binding domains. Trends Genet. 6:36-40[Medline]. |
| 6. |
Cherrington, J. M., and E. S. Mocarski.
1989.
Human cytomegalovirus ie1 transactivates the promoter-enhancer via an 18-base-pair repeat element.
J. Virol.
63:1435-1440 |
| 7. | Curran, T., M. B. Gordon, K. L. Rubino, and L. C. Sambucetti. 1987. Isolation and characterization of the c-fos (rat) cDNA and analysis of post-translational modification in vitro. Oncogene 2:79-84[Medline]. |
| 8. |
deSouza, S.,
J. Lochner,
C. M. Machida,
L. M. Matrisian, and G. Ciment.
1995.
A novel nerve growth factor-responsive element in the stromelysin-1 (transin) gene that is necessary and sufficient for gene expression in PC12 cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:9106-9114 |
| 9. |
Fantl, V.,
G. Stamp,
A. Andrews,
I. Rosewell, and C. Dickson.
1995.
Mice lacking cyclin D1 are small and show defects in eye and mammary gland development.
Genes Dev.
9:2364-2372 |
| 10. |
Field, S. J.,
R. S. Johnson,
R. M. Mortensen,
V. E. Papaioannou,
B. M. Spiegelman, and M. E. Greenberg.
1992.
Growth and differentiation of embryonic stem cells that lack an intact c-fos gene.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:9306-9310 |
| 11. |
Gius, D.,
X. Cao,
F. J. Rauscher III,
D. R. Cohen,
T. Curran, and V. P. Sukhatme.
1990.
Transcriptional activation and repression by Fos are independent functions: the C terminus represses immediate-early gene expression via CArG elements.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10:4243-4255 |
| 12. | Gruda, M. C., J. van Amsterdam, C. A. Rizzo, S. Durham, S. Lidra, and R. Bravo. 1996. Expression of FosB during mouse development: normal development of FosB knockout mice. Oncogene 12:2177-2185[Medline]. |
| 13. | Hadman, M., M. Loo, and T. J. Bos. 1993. In vivo viral and cellular Jun complexes exhibit differential interaction with a number of in vitro generated `AP-1- and CREB-like' target sequences. Oncogene 8:1895-1903[Medline]. |
| 14. |
Hai, T., and T. Curran.
1991.
Cross-family dimerization of transcription factors Fos/Jun and ATF/CREB alters DNA binding specificity.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:3720-3724 |
| 15. | Herber, B., M. Truss, M. Beato, and R. Mueller. 1994. Inducible regulatory elements in the human cyclin D1 promoter. Oncogene 9:1295-1304[Medline]. |
| 16. | Herschman, H. R. 1991. Primary response genes induced by growth factors and tumor promoters. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 60:281-319[Medline]. |
| 17. |
Holt, J. T.
1986.
Inducible production of c-fos antisense RNA inhibits 3T3 cell proliferation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83:4794-4798 |
| 18. | Hu, E., E. Mueller, S. Oliviero, V. E. Papaioannou, R. Johnson, and B. M. Spiegelman. 1994. Targeted disruption of the c-fos gene demonstrates c-fos-dependent and -independent pathways for gene expression stimulated by growth factors or oncogenes. EMBO J. 13:3094-3103[Medline]. |
| 19. | Jiang, W., S. M. Kahn, P. Zhou, Y.-J. Zhang, A. M. Cacace, A. S. Infante, S. Doi, R. M. Santella, and I. B. Weinstein. 1993. Overexpression of cyclin D1 in rat fibroblasts causes abnormalities in growth control, cell cycle progression and gene expression. Oncogene 8:3447-3457[Medline]. |
| 20. | Johnson, R. S., B. M. Spiegelman, and V. Papaioannou. 1992. Pleiotropic effects of a null mutation in the c-fos proto-oncogene. Cell 71:577-586[Medline]. |
| 21. | Kerr, L. D., B. E. Magun, and L. M. Matrisian. 1992. The role of c-Fos in growth factor regulation of stromelysin/transin gene expression. Matrix Suppl. 1:176-183[Medline]. |
| 22. |
Kovary, K., and R. Bravo.
1991.
The Jun and Fos protein families are both required for cell cycle progression in fibroblasts.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:4466-4472 |
| 23. |
Lazo, P. S.,
K. Dorfman,
T. Noguchi,
M.-G. Mattei, and R. Bravo.
1992.
Structure and mapping of the fosB gene. FosB downregulates the activity of the fosB promoter.
Nucleic Acids Res.
20:343-350 |
| 24. | Lukas, J., J. Bartkova, M. Rohde, M. Strauss, and J. Bartek. 1995. Cyclin D1 is dispensable for G1 control in retinoblastoma gene-deficient cells independently of cdk4 activity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:2600-2611[Abstract]. |
| 25. |
Miao, G. G., and T. Curran.
1994.
Cell transformation by c-fos requires an extended period of expression and is independent of the cell cycle.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:4295-4310 |
| 26. | Morgan, D. O. 1995. Principles of CDK regulation. Nature 374:131-134[Medline]. |
| 27. |
Musgrove, E. A.,
C. S. L. Lee,
M. F. Buckley, and R. L. Sutherland.
1994.
Cyclin D1 induction in breast cancer cells shortens G1 and is sufficient for cells arrested in G1 to complete the cell cycle.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:8022-8026 |
| 27a. | Nigh, E., and M. E. Greenberg. Unpublished results. |
| 27b. | Nigh, E., F. Saudou, and M. E. Greenberg. Unpublished observations. |
| 28. |
Nishikura, K., and J. M. Murray.
1987.
Antisense RNA of proto-oncogene c-fos blocks renewed growth of quiescent 3T3 cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7:639-649 |
| 29. | Ofir, R., V. J. Dwarki, D. Rashid, and I. M. Verma. 1990. Phosphorylation of the C terminus of Fos protein is required for transcriptional transrepression of the c-Fos promoter. Nature 348:80-82[Medline]. |
| 30. |
Ohtsubo, M., and J. M. Roberts.
1993.
Cyclin-dependent regulation of G1 in mammalian cells.
Science
259:1908-1912 |
| 31. |
Pestell, R. G.,
A. N. Hollenberg,
C. Albanese, and J. L. Jameson.
1994.
c-Jun represses transcription of the human chorionic gonadotropin alpha and beta genes through distinct types of CREs.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:31090-31096 |
| 31a. | Pestell, R. G., and R. J. Lee. Unpublished observations. |
| 32. |
Quelle, D. E.,
R. A. Ashmun,
S. A. Shurtleff,
J. Kato,
D. Bar-Sagi,
M. F. Roussel, and C. J. Sherr.
1993.
Overexpression of mouse D-type cyclins accelerates G1 phase in rodent fibroblasts.
Genes Dev.
7:1559-1571 |
| 33. |
Resnitzky, D.,
M. Gossen,
H. Bujard, and S. I. Reed.
1994.
Acceleration of the G1/S phase transition by expression of cyclins D1 and E with an inducible system.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:1669-1679 |
| 34. |
Riabowol, K. T.
1988.
Microinjection of Fos-specific antibodies blocks DNA synthesis in fibroblast cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8:1670-1676 |
| 35. | Robertson, E. J. (ed.). 1987. Teratocarcinomas and embryonic stem cells: a practical approach. IRL Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. |
| 36. | Rudnicki, M. A., P. N. Schnegelsberg, R. H. Stead, T. Braun, H. H. Arnold, and R. Jaenisch. 1993. MyoD or Myf-5 is required for the formation of skeletal muscle. Cell 75:1351-1359[Medline]. |
| 37. | Ruther, U., W. Muller, T. Sumida, T. Tokuhisa, K. Rajewsky, and E. F. Wagner. 1988. c-fos expression interferes with thymus development in transgenic mice. Cell 53:847-856[Medline]. |
| 38. |
Sheng, M.,
S. T. Dougan,
G. McFadden, and M. E. Greenberg.
1988.
Calcium and growth factor pathways of c-fos transcriptional activation require distinct upstream regulatory sequences.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8:2787-2796 |
| 39. | Sherr, C. J. 1994. G1 phase progression: cycling on cue. Cell 79:551-555[Medline]. |
| 40. | Sherr, C. J. 1995. D-type cyclins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20:187-190[Medline]. |
| 41. | Sicinski, P., J. L. Donaher, S. B. Parker, T. Li, A. Fazeli, H. Gardner, S. Z. Haslam, R. T. Bronson, S. J. Elledge, and R. A. Weinberg. 1995. Cyclin D1 provides a link between development and oncogenesis in the retina and breast. Cell 82:621-630[Medline]. |
| 42. |
Watanabe, G.,
A. Howe,
R. J. Lee,
C. Albanese,
I.-W. Shu,
A. N. Karnezis,
L. Zon,
J. Kyriakis,
K. Rundell, and R. G. Pestell.
1996.
Induction of cyclin D1 by simian virus 40 small tumor antigen.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:12861-12866 |
| 43. |
Watanabe, G.,
R. J. Lee,
C. Albanese,
W. E. Rainey,
D. Batlle, and R. G. Pestell.
1996.
Angiotensin II (AII) activation of cyclin D1-dependent kinase activity.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:22570-22577 |
| 44. |
Won, K.-A.,
Y. Xiong,
D. Beach, and M. Z. Gilman.
1992.
Growth-regulated expression of D-type cyclin genes in human diploid fibroblasts.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:9910-9914 |
| 45. |
Yen, J.,
R. M. Wisdom,
I. Tratner, and I. M. Verma.
1991.
An alternative spliced form of FosB is a negative regulator of transcriptional activation and transformation by Fos proteins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:5077-5081 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»