Molecular and Cellular Biology, January 1999, p. 173-181, Vol. 19, No. 1
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Subunit of Eukaryotic Translation
Initiation Factor 2 Binds mRNA through the Lysine Repeats and a Region
Comprising the C2-C2 Motif
Departamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia e Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, São Paulo 04023-062, Brazil
Received 5 August 1998/Accepted 15 September 1998
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2) has been
implicated in the selection of the AUG codon as the start site for
eukaryotic translation initiation, since mutations in its three
subunits in yeast that allow the recognition of a UUG codon by the
anticodon of the initiator Met-tRNAMet have been
identified. All such mutations in the beta subunit of eIF2 (eIF2
)
mapped to a region containing a putative zinc finger structure of the
C2-C2 type, indicating that these sequences could be involved in RNA recognition. Another feature of eIF2
that
could mediate an interaction with RNA is located in the amino-terminal sequences and is composed of three repeats of seven lysine residues which are highly conserved in other species. We show here the ability
of eIF2
, purified from Escherichia coli as a fusion to glutathione S-transferase, to bind mRNA in vitro. Through a
deletion analysis, mRNA binding was found to be dependent on the lysine repeats and a region encompassing the C2-C2
motif. Strong mRNA binding in vitro could be maintained by the presence
of only one lysine or one arginine run but not one alanine run. We
further show that only one run of lysine residues is sufficient for the in vivo function of eIF2
, probably through charge interaction, since
its replacement by arginines did not impair cell viability, whereas
substitution for alanines resulted in inviable cells. mRNA binding, but
not GTP-dependent initiator Met-tRNAMet binding, by the
eIF2 complex was determined to be dependent on the presence of the
lysine runs of the beta subunit.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Eukaryotic translation initiation
factor 2 (eIF2) is responsible for one of the earliest steps in the
initiation of protein synthesis. It forms a ternary complex with the
initiator Met-tRNAMet and GTP, which then binds to the 40S
ribosomal subunit associated with eIF3, forming the preinitiation 43S
complex. This, in turn, binds to the 5' end of mRNAs with the aid of
eIF4F and eIF4B and migrates down the message, scanning for the first
AUG codon. At this point, in a reaction requiring eIF5, GTP is
hydrolyzed to GDP, and eIF2 · GDP is released, along with other
initiation factors. The 60S ribosomal subunit then joins the complex,
and elongation of the new polypeptide chain ensues [for reviews, see
references 19 and 24]. Thus, a
major role of eIF2 in this pathway is to bring the charged initiator
tRNAMet to the 40S subunit. However, eIF2 is also thought
to participate in the recognition of the initiator AUG codon. Evidence
for this role was obtained from a genetic analysis carried out in
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, where mutations in the alpha and
beta subunits of eIF2 (eIF2
and eIF2
) were found to allow
initiation of translation to occur at a UUG codon in a HIS4
message devoid of the normal AUG initiator triplet (4, 9,
11). The His4 protein synthesized in the presence of these
suppressor mutations in eIF2 contained a methionine residue at the
amino terminus, indicating that the altered eIF2 was allowing a
mismatched interaction between the initiator Met-tRNAMet
and the UUG codon. More recently, mutations in the gamma subunit of
eIF2 (eIF2
) were also found to result in initiation taking place at
UUG codons (12, 22).
eIF2
is the major site of regulation of overall protein synthesis in
eukaryotic cells. It is phosphorylated by specific kinases activated,
for example, upon heme deprivation in reticulocytes or by
double-stranded RNA in other cell types (19). In yeast, it
is responsible for the regulation of amino acid biosynthesis by being
the target of the Gcn2 kinase that is activated as a result of amino
acid starvation (21). Phosphorylation of eIF2
on
Ser51 inhibits the initiation step of translation by
blocking the exchange of GDP to GTP on eIF2 catalyzed by the guanine
nucleotide exchange factor eIF2B (6, 28).
The gamma subunit contains a consensus sequence for GTP binding; it has sequence homologies to the elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) of eubacteria in a region that has been shown for this factor to bind tRNA (17). In vivo and in vitro studies have suggested that the gamma subunit might provide EF-Tu-like functions to the eIF2 complex (13, 22). Both gamma and beta subunits can be cross-linked to guanine nucleotides and to the initiator Met-tRNAMet (1, 24).
The role played by the beta subunit in the function of eIF2 is not
clear. It contains two features that might be involved in nucleic acid
interactions. In the amino-terminal half of the protein there are three
runs of seven lysine residues which are conserved in yeast, human, and
Drosophila sequences (11, 27, 32). Except for
these repeats, the sequences in this half of the protein are
considerably divergent in evolutionary terms. The carboxyl half of the
protein is highly conserved, especially near the C terminus, where
there is a C2-C2 motif reminiscent of a
potential zinc finger structure. However, no zinc could be detected on
purified eIF2 (27), and zinc is not required for the
GTP-dependent initiator Met-tRNAMet binding activity of
eIF2 (11). An extensive mutational analysis of the
C2-C2 motif of yeast eIF2
indicated the
essential role of the cysteine residues for the in vivo function of the
protein, since mutations that altered these residues, changed their
spacing, or removed the motif altogether abolished function
(3). Mutations found in this subunit in yeast that allow the
utilization of a UUG codon for protein synthesis initiation altered
residues located in or adjacent to this C2-C2
motif (3, 11). Of 13 independently isolated suppressor
alleles of the SUI3 gene, which codes for eIF2
in yeast,
6 mapped to the region encompassed by the two pairs of cysteine
residues and 7 mapped to residues located immediately next to it; all
mutations altered residues that are identical or conserved in the three
species. eIF2 containing suppressor forms of the beta subunit were
shown to have decreased levels of GTP-dependent binding of initiator
Met-tRNAMet (11). Recently, it was determined
that this defect is due to an increase in the rates of intrinsic,
spontaneous GTPase activity in suppressor eIF2 complexes
(22).
eIF2 is also capable of binding mRNA in vitro, although the significance of this binding during the process of protein synthesis in vivo remains to be defined (14, 15). The binding to mRNA was described to be a property of the beta subunit, based on cross-linking studies of purified eIF2 from mammalian cells (14).
To better define the role of eIF2
in the process of translation
initiation, and more specifically to address in detail its potential
for RNA interaction, we used a purified recombinant eIF2
in RNA
binding studies. We report here the ability of eIF2
to bind mRNA in
vitro and show that this binding is dependent on both the amino and
carboxyl domains of the protein, involving the lysine repeats and the
C2-C2 domain. We further show that the RNA
binding detected in vitro for the beta subunit is required in vivo for
the function of eIF2 in yeast. Surprisingly, given the evolutionary
conservation of the three lysine runs, only one of them was found to be
sufficient to provide function to the protein in vivo.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Strains and genetic methods.
Strains BCV59
(MATa/MAT
ura3-52/ura3-52
leu2-3,112/leu2-3,112
his4UUG-306/his4UUG-306
SUI3/sui3::URA3) and 167-3C
(MAT
ura3-52 leu2-3,112
his4UUG-306 ino1-13) have been described
elsewhere (3). Standard genetic techniques and media were as
described elsewhere (16). YPGal and SGal media contained
galactose (4%) in place of glucose.
Plasmid constructions.
For the expression in
Escherichia coli of eIF2
fused to glutathione
S-transferase (GST), a BamHI site was created at
the initiator codon of the SUI3 gene, cloned as a
HindIII fragment in the HindIII site of
M13-mp10, by site-directed mutagenesis (Amersham), using the
oligonucleotide 5'-ACGCACGAGGGATCCTCCGAT-3'. The
BamHI fragment containing the complete coding sequence of SUI3 was transferred to pGEX2T (30) digested with
BamHI, creating plasmid pBE149.
fusion for expression in yeast was constructed by using
plasmid pEG(KG) (26), which contains a
GAL1-10/CYC1 hybrid promoter, to direct the regulated
synthesis of the fusion protein. The SUI3 gene was fused to
GST in this vector by ligating the BamHI fragment from
pBE149, containing the SUI3 coding sequence, into the
BamHI site of pEG(KG), creating plasmid pBE153. To eliminate the URA3 gene in this construction, the fusion was
transferred to plasmid pRS315 (29) by isolating a
StuI-HindIII fragment of 2.7 kb from pBE153
and ligating it into pRS315 cut with
SmaI-HindIII, giving rise to plasmid pBE195.
The GST fusion with eIF2
lacking the lysine repeats for expression
in yeast was obtained by ligating an MscI-BglII
fragment from pBE195 with an MscI-BglII fragment from pBE242, resulting in plasmid pBE256.
The GST-eIF
fusion was obtained by subcloning an AccI
fragment, containing the complete coding region of GCD11,
made blunt ended by Klenow enzyme, into the SmaI site of pGEX2.
Plasmid pBE189 contains the genes coding for the alpha
(SUI2) and gamma (GCD11) subunits of eIF-2
(9, 17) cloned in the HindIII and
BamHI sites, respectively, of YEp352 (20).
Protein expression and purification.
Overnight cultures of
E. coli carrying the plasmids for expression of GST fusions
were diluted 10-fold in LB medium with ampicillin (100 µg/ml) and
incubated for 5 h at 37°C. Induction of expression of the fusion
proteins was obtained by adding 1 mM
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside to the cultures and
incubating the cultures for 2 h at 37°C. The cells were
collected, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and resuspended
in 1 ml of double-distilled water (ddH2O). The cells were
frozen for 16 h. Breaking buffer (10% sucrose, 0.2 M NaCl, 50 mM
Tris-HCl [pH 7.5]) was added (3.5 ml) with 130 µl of a 10-mg/ml
lysozyme solution, followed by incubation on ice for 1 h and
incubation at 37°C for 6 min. The tubes were then centrifuged for
1 h at 15,300 × g. The supernatant was
transferred to another tube, 5 ml of 0.85% NaCl was added, and the
tube was centrifuged for 40 min at 17,000 × g. The
supernatant was mixed with 1.5 ml of glutathione-agarose beads (50%)
(Sigma) for 15 min on ice. The beads were washed five times with
ice-cold PBS, and the fusion proteins were eluted with 50 mM Trisma
base-40 mM glutathione (reduced) on ice. The proteins were
concentrated to 1 ml in a Speed-Vac, and the free glutathione was
removed by dialysis against 50 mM KCl-20 mM Tris (pH 7.8)-2 mM
magnesium acetate (MgOAc)-6 mM 2-mercaptoethanol-1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). The purified proteins were stored
at
80°C. For the purification of protein 158, cell extract was
prepared in the presence of the protease inhibitors aprotinin (2 µg/ml), EDTA (10 mM), PMSF (1 mM), benzamidine (1 mM), and E-64 (2.8 µM); for solubilization of the protein, Sarkosyl was added to 1.5%.
20°C
overnight. The lysate was thawed on ice, without agitation. The bottom
part was collected, 3 ml of PBS-1 mM PMSF was added, and the
suspension was frozen again for 18 h. After thawing without
agitation, the intermediate phase was collected and submitted to
preparative sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(SDS-PAGE). After a strip of the gel was stained, the band
corresponding to eIF2
in the unstained part of the gel was cut out,
and the protein was eluted in 4 ml of ddH2O at 4°C
overnight. The solution was concentrated to 1 ml in a Speed-Vac.
For the purification of eIF2 complexes from yeast cells, strain 167-3C
carrying pBE189 and either pBE195 or pBE256 was grown to saturation in
minimal medium with raffinose in place of glucose, supplemented with
histidine and inositol and diluted 1:25 in 1 liter of the same medium
containing galactose instead of raffinose for induction of the
galactose-inducible promoter, and incubated for 16 h. The cells
were collected, resuspended in breaking buffer (10 mM Tris [pH 7.5],
100 mM NaCl, 30 mM MgCl2, 1 mM PMSF) (1:1, wt/vol), and
broken by agitation with glass beads. After two centrifugations at
10,000 rpm, the supernatant was incubated with 500 µl of
glutathione-Sepharose beads for 10 min. The beads were extensively
washed with STE (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 1 mM EDTA, 75 mM NaCl), and
the bound material was eluted with 600 µl of 50 mM Trisma base-40 mM
glutathione (reduced). The eluate was then incubated with 300 µl of
protein A-Sepharose beads which had been coupled to anti-eIF2
antibodies, as described below for the immunoprecipitations with the
appropriate scale-up. The beads were washed thoroughly in STE and used
for RNA binding assays.
Polysome analysis. Sucrose gradients were prepared, and the cell extracts were fractionated essentially as described previously (7). Cultures were diluted 100-fold in minimal medium supplemented with the necessary amino acids and incubated at 30°C overnight to an A610 of 0.5 to 1.0. All subsequent steps were performed at 4°C or on ice. The cells were collected by centrifugation and washed twice with lysis buffer (10 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 100 mM NaCl, 30 mM MgCl2, 200 µg of heparin per ml, 0.2% diethyl pyrocarbonate [DEPC]). The cells were resuspended in 1 ml of lysis buffer and broken by agitation with glass beads. The supernatant was submitted to centrifugation at 3,300 × g for 5 min, and the supernatant of this step was centrifuged again for 5 min at top speed in a microcentrifuge. The final supernatant was used for the sucrose gradients. These were prepared as a step gradient consisting of five solutions (2 ml of each) of 7, 17, 27, 37, and 47% sucrose in 50 mM Tris-acetate (pH 7.0)-50 mM NH4Cl-12 mM MgCl2-1 mM DTT-0.1% DEPC-1 mM PMSF, applied to polyallomer tubes (14 by 98 mm; Beckman), and left at 4°C overnight. The volume of extract equivalent to 10 A280 units was brought to 800 µl with lysis buffer and applied to the top of the gradient, which was then submitted to centrifugation in an SW41Ti rotor (Beckman) at 39,000 rpm for 3 h at 4°C. The gradient was collected with a Beckman gradient collector adapted to the top of the tubes, and the gradients were forced up by the injection of a 60% sucrose solution to the bottom of the tubes with a Bio-Rad peristaltic pump at 40% maximum speed. The gradient was monitored on a Bio-Rad Econo UV monitor at A254; fractions of 0.5 ml were collected, precipitated on ice with 10% trichloroacetic acid, subjected to SDS-PAGE, and analyzed on Western blots (31) by the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection method (ECL kit; Amersham).
Antisera. Sera against the three subunits of eIF2 were raised in female New Zealand rabbits immunized with proteins expressed in E. coli and purified as described above. Proteins (100 to 200 µg) were injected subcutaneously with complete Freund's adjuvant; 30 and 60 days later, 100 to 200 µg of protein was injected in incomplete Freund's adjuvant. The rabbits were bled 10 days after the second and third injections.
Western blots. After SDS-PAGE, the proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond-C Extra; Amersham) (31). The membrane was blocked with 10% low-fat milk for 30 min, washed extensively with ddH2O, and incubated with the primary antibodies in the appropriate dilutions (1:100, 1:500, and 1:200 for antibodies against the alpha, beta, and gamma subunits, respectively) in Tris-buffered saline (TBS; 150 mM NaCl, 50M mM Tris [pH 7.4]) for 60 min at room temperature. The membrane was washed in TBS-Tween 20 (0.05%) for 10 min, washed with water, and incubated for 1 h with protein A coupled to peroxidase (Sigma), diluted 1:2,000. The membrane was washed three times with TBS-Tween for 10 min and twice for 5 min in 26 mM sodium carbonate-35 mM sodium bicarbonate, followed by detection with an ECL kit (Amersham). For the immunoprecipitation studies, the bands corresponding to immunoglobulin G heavy chain bound to the beads were cut from the nitrocellulose filters after staining with Ponceau stain.
Immunoprecipitations. Agarose beads coupled to protein A (Amersham) were washed five times with coimmunoprecipitation buffer (COIP buffer; 20 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 50 mM KCl, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1 mM PMSF) and resuspended 1:1 (vol/vol) in the same buffer. Beads (5 µl) were incubated with 5 µl of serum and 190 µl of COIP buffer for 1 h at room temperature with gentle agitation. The beads were washed three times with COIP buffer; cell extracts (100 µg of total protein) were added to the beads, bringing the volume to 200 µl with COIP buffer, and incubated for 2 h at 4°C with gentle mixing. The beads were collected by centrifugation, washed three times in 200 µl of COIP buffer, resuspended in 10 µl of sample buffer, boiled for 3 min, and submitted to SDS-PAGE for immunoblotting.
RNA synthesis and labeling. A 555-bp EcoRI-BamHI fragment from plasmid pBE9, containing 53 nucleotides from the untranslated leader region and 502 nucleotides of the coding region of the HIS4 gene (8), was cloned into the XhoI and BamHI sites of plasmid pSP72 (Promega), after fill-in of the EcoRI and XhoI termini with the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase, creating plasmid pBE155. The transcription reaction used as the template 1 µg of plasmid pBE155 linearized with HindIII and was carried out in a volume of 20 µl in the presence of 0.02 mM GTP-0.4 mM ATP-0.4 mM CTP-0.1 mM UTP-20 µCi of [32P]UTP-0.5 mM m7GpppG (Boehringer Mannheim)-20 U of RNase inhibitor (Boehringer Mannheim)-7.5 U of SP6 polymerase-40 mM Tris (pH 7.9)-6 mM MgCl2-2 mM spermidine-2 mM DTT for 15 min at 37°C, followed by the addition of 0.4 mM GTP and incubation for 2 h at 37°C. The template was eliminated by digestion with 2 U of DNase (free of RNase; Boehringer Mannheim) for 10 min at 37°C. The enzymes were removed by phenol extraction, and excess nucleotides were eliminated by four ethanol precipitations. The RNA was resuspended in 100 µl of DEPC-treated ddH2O. Charged initiator tRNAMet was prepared essentially as described elsewhere (11) except that [35S]methionine (1,175 Ci/mmol; Amersham) was used; the specific activity of initiator [35S]Met-tRNAMet was 142,000 cpm/pmol.
RNA binding assays. Proteins immobilized on nitrocellulose filters (Hybond-C; Amersham) were incubated in blocking buffer (2.5 mM EDTA, 0.05% Triton X-100, 0.04% Ficoll, 0.04% polyvinylpyrrolidone) for 1 h at room temperature. The filters were then incubated in binding buffer (150 mM KCl, 20 mM Tris [pH 7.8], 2 mM MgOAc, 2.5 mM EDTA, 0.05% Triton X-100, 0.04% Ficoll, 0.04% polyvinylpyrrolidone) for 1 h at room temperature, and binding was performed in the same solution supplemented with 20 µg of denatured salmon sperm DNA per ml and RNA at 125,000 cpm/ml (average specific activity of 2.4 × 106 cpm/µg) for 1 h at room temperature. After binding, the filter was washed three times in washing buffer (50 mM KCl, 20 mM Tris [pH 7.8], 2 mM MgOAc) for 10 min each and dried at room temperature, and the bound radioactivity was measured on a Molecular Imager system (Bio-Rad), using the Molecular Analyst software (Bio-Rad). The relative quantification of the proteins was done by staining the immobilized proteins with amido black, scanning the filter on an Epson ES-1000C scanner, and analyzing the intensity of the bands with the Molecular Analyst software (Bio-Rad). For solution binding assays of purified GST fusions, approximately 1 µg of each protein was incubated with 50 µl of glutathione-Sepharose beads. After being washed with STE buffer, the beads were washed with blocking buffer. Labeled mRNA (32,000 cpm) was added in 300 µl of binding buffer. After incubation for 1 h at room temperature, the beads were washed thoroughly in washing buffer, and the radioactivity retained on the beads was counted. The beads were then submitted to SDS-PAGE for quantitation of the bound proteins. The assay conditions for the determination of GTP-dependent binding of initiator Met-tRNAMet by eIF2 or by purified GST fusion proteins were essentially as described previously (11).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RNA binding by the wild-type yeast eIF2
fused to GST.
The
GST-eIF2
fusion protein was isolated from E. coli as a
highly purified, soluble protein and assayed for its ability to bind
RNA in vitro. The RNA used in this study was derived from a 555-bp
fragment of the S. cerevisiae HIS4 sequences, comprising 53 nucleotides of the leader sequence and 502 nucleotides from the coding
region, transcribed in vitro from the SP6 promoter. The labeled mRNA
was used for the binding assays with proteins immobilized on
nitrocellulose membranes (Northwestern blots). As shown in Fig.
1, the wild-type protein fused to GST was
capable of binding this RNA, while GST alone retained no radioactivity. In this figure, the fast-migrating protein stained with amido black in
the GST-eIF2
preparation is a degradation product, always present in
this purification procedure, composed mostly of the GST moiety; it does
not interact with RNA. For these binding reactions a large excess of
DNA over labeled RNA was added, and this was shown not to interfere
with or compete for RNA binding; in addition, capped and uncapped RNAs
were bound equally well (results not shown). This fusion protein did
not bind initiator Met-tRNAMet in solution assays (data not
shown).
|
and -
, expressed
in E. coli as the intact protein and a GST fusion protein, respectively. No RNA binding activity was detected for these two subunits (Fig. 1). Therefore, the beta subunit seems to be the only
subunit of eIF2 that binds strongly to mRNA.
Mapping regions in eIF2
required for RNA binding.
To map
sequences in eIF2
that mediate the RNA binding activity of this
subunit, several truncated forms of GST-eIF2
were constructed (Fig.
2) and expressed in E. coli.
The purified proteins were assayed for RNA binding on Northwestern
blots. The binding activity of each protein was quantitated relative to
the RNA binding displayed by the wild-type fusion and normalized for
the amount of protein present on the filter relative to the wild-type
fusion (Fig. 3).
|
|
is not required for RNA binding, as was
shown for protein 217, which lacks residues 95 to 180.
Only one lysine run is required for function in vivo.
The in
vitro data indicating an important role for the N-terminal sequences in
RNA binding, and the probable role played by the lysine repeats in this
interaction, prompted us to perform a mutational analysis of this
feature to address its in vivo function. Therefore, the three lysine
repeats were removed, independently or in several combinations, from
the wild-type SUI3 gene (Table 1). The deleted alleles were assayed for
function in vivo by the ability to rescue a lethal disruption of a
chromosomal copy of SUI3. They were transferred to a
LEU2 centromeric plasmid and used to transform the diploid
strain BCV59 to leucine prototrophy. The transformants underwent
meiosis, and the viability of the spores in each tetrad was determined.
The results of this analysis are shown in Table 1. Removal of any one
of the lysine blocks or of any combination of two of them did not
affect the function of the protein, since germination of three and four
spores was obtained. All Ura+ spores were also
Leu+, indicating that the source of the complementing
SUI3 gene was the deleted allele present in the
LEU2 plasmid. Only when the three lysine blocks were
eliminated from the protein did it lose function, leading to the
germination of only two spores in all tetrads dissected, all being
Ura
. The presence of the deleted proteins in the
Ura+ Leu+ ascospores was verified by Western
blotting (22a). Therefore, only one run of lysines,
irrespective of its position, is sufficient to provide function to
eIF2
.
|
and -
in vivo. Furthermore,
eIF2 complexes containing this deleted beta subunit can form
preinitiation complexes, as determined from the observation that the
deleted eIF2
protein accumulates in fractions corresponding to the
43S-48S region of a sucrose gradient of whole-cell extracts prepared in
the absence of cycloheximide (Fig. 4B). Moreover, these results also
indicate that the lack of the lysine runs does not interfere with the
interaction of eIF2 with the 40S ribosomal particle. These data are
supported by observations of dominant negative phenotypes of this
mutant protein: (i) when expressed from high-copy-number plasmids, it causes a severe retardation in the growth of the cells, with the generation time fourfold longer than in cells overexpressing the wild-type protein (data not shown); (ii) the presence of this mutant
eIF2
in the cells, even in low copy numbers, leads to derepression
of GCN4 translation (22a).
|
. Because this recovery of function could simply be
due to a conformational effect, we used a control where a run of
alanines (A3) was inserted in the place of the arginines. In this case,
the cells were not viable. These results strongly suggested that the
role of the lysine runs is to provide charge to the N-terminal region
of eIF2
.
The lack of any obvious deleterious effects caused by the deletion of
one or two lysine blocks in the proteins was rather surprising, given
the evolutionary conservation of this motif. To further evaluate any
subtle alteration in function, we introduced a suppressor mutation
(Ser264Tyr) in eIF2
(K1K2) and in eIF2
(K1K2)R3
and evaluated the ability of the mutants to allow translation
initiation at a HIS4 message lacking the initiator AUG. The
original suppressor allele, SUI3-2, containing all three
lysine runs, allows these cells to grow in the absence of histidine,
because initiation takes place at a UUG codon in the HIS4
message. The lack of two lysine blocks led to an extremely weak
suppressor activity, and the protein carrying the arginine run in place
of the third lysine block could not support growth of this strain on
medium lacking histidine, as shown in Fig.
5. These results suggested that the
lysine runs may strengthen a weak interaction between the initiator
Met-tRNAMet and the UUG codon on the mRNA. The presence of
only one lysine run may not suffice to maintain this erroneous
interaction. The arginine residue substitution may interfere with the
proper conformation of the protein, as discussed below.
|
In vitro RNA binding by eIF2
requires at least one run of basic
residues.
The results of the in vivo experiments prompted us to
analyze the deleted proteins for the ability to bind RNA. Since the lack of all lysine repeats led to a nonfunctional protein, a GST fusion
of this protein (protein 242) was purified and first assayed on a
Northwestern blot for its RNA binding activity (Fig. 2). This protein
was completely unable to bind RNA (Fig. 3). No radioactivity was
detected even after prolonged exposure of the filter. The complete
inability of this protein to bind RNA was unexpected, given that
proteins lacking all N-terminal sequences (proteins 191, 192, and 193)
still show low levels of RNA binding, associated with the C-terminal
half. The increase in binding observed when the central portion of the
protein was removed indicated that these sequences in some of the
constructs may have been hindering the refolding of the protein on the
nitrocellulose filter, thus perhaps causing the lack of RNA interaction
observed for protein 242. Therefore, mRNA binding assays were performed
in solution with the fusion proteins coupled to glutathione beads (Fig.
6). In this assay, the protein lacking
the three lysine residues was able to bind RNA at 26% of the wild-type
level, a result consistent with the RNA binding activity provided by
the C-terminal sequences as measured on the Northwestern blots and
confirmed for protein 193 in solution binding assays (data not shown).
The protein containing only K3 and those derivatives in which K3 was
replaced by R3 or A3 were also expressed in and purified from E. coli as GST fusions and then tested for RNA binding in solution
(Fig. 6). The presence of only one lysine block increased binding to
approximately 80% of the wild-type value, and the arginine run
increased binding to wild-type values, whereas the alanine substitution
kept the low RNA binding activity of the protein lacking all three
lysine repeats. The stronger binding provided by the arginine run
relative to that provided by the lysine run may reflect its higher
potential for interacting with nucleic acids and further attests to the importance of the lysine motifs, and not another feature in the N-terminal region, in maintaining the interaction with mRNA. These results are strong evidence for the role played by the lysine repeats
in RNA recognition and binding by eIF2
. Furthermore, they reflect
the in vivo results for cell viability.
|
Binding of mRNA, but not Met-tRNAMet, by eIF2 requires
the lysine runs.
We next examined whether the ability of the eIF2
complex to bind mRNA was dependent on the lysine blocks of the beta
subunit. The GST-eIF2
protein was expressed in yeast from a
centromeric plasmid under the control of the galactose-inducible
GAL1-CYC1 promoter (plasmid pBE195). The function of the
fusion protein in vivo was determined by its ability to allow growth of
cells containing a disrupted SUI3 gene. Plasmid pBE195 was
introduced into the diploid strain BCV59, and the transformants
underwent meiosis. The asci were dissected on plates containing either
glucose or galactose. In the presence of glucose, the diploids gave
rise to only two viable spores, as expected, since SUI3 is
an essential gene and the expression of the GST-eIF2
fusion is
repressed. When dissected on plates containing galactose, three or four
viable meiotic products were obtained from the asci (data not shown).
(plasmid pBE195) or GST-eIF2
(K1K2K3) (plasmid pBE256) fusion
proteins, and the alpha and gamma subunits were expressed from a
high-copy-number plasmid (pBE189). The complex was purified by affinity
chromatography of whole-cell extracts on glutathione-Sepharose beads
followed by the binding of the eluted material to anti-eIF2
antibodies coupled to Sepharose-protein A beads, to ensure the absence
of free eIF2
on the assays. The immobilized eIF2 complexes were
assayed for the ability to bind mRNA and for GTP-dependent Met-tRNAMet binding activity (Fig.
7). As expected, the lack of the lysine residues resulted in a dramatic decrease of mRNA binding by eIF2, reflecting exactly the results of assays using the purified beta subunit. On the other hand, when these complexes were assayed for
GTP-dependent initiator Met-tRNAMet binding, no defect was
detected for the eIF2 complex formed with the beta subunit lacking the
three lysine runs.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This work provides direct evidence for the mRNA binding activity
of eIF2
. The deletion analysis performed here indicates a crucial
role for the lysine residues and the C2-C2
motif in providing strong binding of eIF2
to RNA. The results
showing that the removal of the lysine repeats resulted in the
inability of the protein to rescue a lethal mutation in SUI3
indicate that the lysine residues are also required in vivo.
Furthermore, the fact that a run of arginine, but not alanine, residues
can recover wild-type levels of mRNA binding in vitro and function in
vivo provides strong evidence for the physiological relevance of this interaction. Motifs rich in basic residues, mainly arginine, present in
a number of eukaryotic and prokaryotic proteins, such as the human
immunodeficiency virus Tat and Rev proteins, antiterminators of phages
lambda and P22, and ribosomal proteins, have been shown to direct
binding of neighboring residues on these proteins to specific sites on
their RNA targets (2, 5, 18, 23). Arginine-rich motifs in
the translation initiation factor eIF4B have also been implicated in
RNA binding (25). eIF2
, however, is unusual in that it is
the only case where a polylysine run has been found to be involved in
RNA binding.
Because no other conserved sequences are found in the N-terminal
portion of eIF2
, it is reasonable to assume that the lysine clusters
in eIF2
are probably required for a nonspecific interaction with the
backbone of an RNA component of the translation initiation apparatus.
This motif might therefore function as a facilitator for a secondary
binding through the sequences located in the carboxyl half of eIF2
.
The finding that the triple-deletion mutant still associates with the 40S ribosomal subunit even though it is unable to bind RNA efficiently in vitro argues against a role of the lysine runs in providing an interaction of eIF2 with rRNA. This result also makes it unlikely that the lysine blocks are involved with initiator Met-tRNAMet binding, because 43S complexes can form only in the presence of the complete ternary complex (24). Indeed, we have shown that eIF2 complexes lacking the lysine residues bind this tRNA species as well as the wild type. Therefore, these charged clusters might serve in a later step in the process of translation initiation, such as in the binding of mRNA, as the specificity of these in vitro binding assays indicates.
The involvement of the lysine repeats with a strong mRNA binding
activity is in contrast to cross-linking data for intact eIF2, where
only the C-terminal portion of the beta subunit was found to be
covalently bound to mRNA (14). It is possible that the
interaction of mRNA with the lysine blocks of eIF2
in the intact
eIF2 factor in vivo occurs during a specific point during the
translation initiation process which was not mirrored in the cross-linking experiments, such as after the joining of some other factor(s) which would have to be present in our eIF2 preparation. This
is a rather intriguing possibility, given that eIF2 is known to be
involved in many allosteric interactions. However, it cannot be ruled
out that the physical proximity of the N-terminal region of the beta
subunit and mRNA could not be detected by the UV-induced cross-linking
method used by Flynn et al.
The mRNA binding region detected in this work involving the C-terminal
domain of eIF2
agrees entirely with the cross-linking data obtained
with purified eIF2 (14). From the results shown in this
work, a large segment of the carboxyl half of eIF2
, including the
C2-C2 motif, seems to participate in this
interaction. The C2-C2 region of eIF2
is
apparently involved in interactions with GTP and the initiator
Met-tRNAMet, as suppressor mutations that map in this
region lead to eIF2 complexes with a high intrinsic rate of spontaneous
GTP hydrolysis and to a high rate of initiator Met-tRNAMet
dissociation (22). Because the gamma subunit contains
sequence motifs suggestive of a tRNA binding element, as deduced from
its similarity to EF-Tu, the interaction with Met-tRNAMet
might be an intrinsic property of this subunit. However, the beta
subunit, through its C-terminal portion, could also compose the
Met-tRNAMet binding pocket. Evidence from Donahue's group
indicates that in the presence of a nonhydrolyzable GTP analogue, eIF2
containing a suppressor beta subunit binds the initiator
Met-tRNAMet with lower affinity than the wild-type eIF2
complex, suggesting that eIF2
participates in the binding to this
tRNA species (22). Even though we did not detect binding of
the initiator Met-tRNAMet to the purified beta subunit, the
RNA binding activity of the C-terminal half of eIF2
may reflect a
potential Met-tRNAMet pocket of the eIF2 complex, with the
specificity being given by the interaction with the other subunits.
Alternatively, as the available data taken together indicate, the
C2-C2 region of eIF2
would make the
codon-anticodon interaction possible by providing a scaffold for the
binding of mRNA and the initiator tRNA, with the latter being mostly,
but not completely, maintained in the appropriate position by a
specific interaction with the gamma subunit. The participation of this
region in interacting with eIF2
is suggested by the observation that
the deletion of the C2-C2 motif impaired the
association of the mutant eIF2
with the other two subunits of eIF2,
as determined from coimmunoprecipitation studies (26a). For
this reason, we could not address in more detail the participation of
this motif in mRNA binding by the eIF2 complex. However, we have
performed mRNA binding assays with the C-terminal half of eIF2
proteins containing different suppressor mutations and found no
difference relative to the wild-type protein (data not shown). This
observation indicates that the positions altered in these mutant
proteins are not primarily involved in establishing interaction with
mRNA and supports the observations by Donahue's group that these
mutant eIF2 complexes have impaired tRNA binding activities
(22).
It is interesting that only one block of lysine residues was found to
be required for function, both in vitro and in vivo. We have shown that
the single deletions and the double deletions, except the one which
leaves only K2, do not derepress translation of GCN4, an
assay that is widely used to detect defects in translation initiation
factors, including eIF2
(22a). This lack of any
deleterious effect when most of the lysine runs are missing is
surprising, considering the evolutionary conservation of the three
copies of this motif. It is possible that they are required under
growth conditions that have not been tested and that do not cause
derepression of GCN4 translation.
It has recently been reported that K2 of eIF2
is required for the
interaction of eIF2 with eIF5 (10). Our results showing that
all single or double deletions involving the lysine runs result in
functional proteins, taken together with data indicating that eIF5 is
an essential protein in yeast, suggest that the interaction between the
two factors must occur elsewhere. The interaction of eIF5 with eIF2
may occur through sequences neighboring K2, which are made inaccessible
for interaction by the deletion of the lysine residues in the in vitro
conditions used by that group. It is clear, then, that a more detailed
study of the sites of interaction between eIF5 and eIF2
in vivo is
needed. The indications that eIF5 interacts with eIF2
through the
amino-terminal region may suggest an alternative mechanism by which the
suppressor form of eIF2
containing only one lysine run is not able
to initiate translation at a UUG codon as efficiently as the suppressor
protein containing all three lysine repeats. It has been recently
demonstrated that this same suppressor mutation confers to the eIF2
complex an increased intrinsic GTPase activity, which might lead to a premature hydrolysis of GTP when the scanning ribosome encounters a
UUG codon, therefore initiating translation at this triplet (22). If interaction with eIF5 is defective in
eIF2
(K1K2), eIF5-dependent GTP hydrolysis will also be deficient,
thus decreasing the efficiency of utilization of UUG codons by the
suppressor derivative. It is reasonable to suppose that both a
defective interaction with eIF5 and a decreased affinity for mRNA could cause the near inability of this deleted protein to allow initiation of
translation at a UUG codon. The hypothesis of a defective, but not
null, eIF5 interaction with proteins lacking K1 and K2 would also
explain the total lack of suppression activity by eIF2
(K1K2)R3, which is capable of binding mRNA in vitro at wild-type levels.
This work provides strong evidence for mRNA binding by eIF2
.
Previous data regarding a potential ability of eIF2
to interact with
RNA were based on cross-linking studies, which can determine only
physical proximity. Biochemical analyses of the RNA binding by eIF2
always relied on preparations of this complex, which can be
contaminated with other factors and often contain degradation products
of the beta subunit, which is notoriously unstable. Therefore, the
binding data shown here are relevant to the characterization of a
possible role of eIF2
in the formation of the initiation complex in eukaryotes.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by grants from FAPESP and CNPq. J.P.L. and E.P. were supported by fellowships from CAPES, and G.M.T. was supported by CNPq.
J.P.L. and G.M.T. contributed equally to this work.
We thank Lucia Viotto for excellent technical assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Disciplina de Microbiologia, UNIFESP, Rua Botucatú, 862 3° andar, São Paulo, SP 04023-062, Brazil. Phone: 55-11-576-4537. Fax: 55-11-571 6504. E-mail: bac.dmip{at}epm.br.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Bommer, J. A.,
R. Kraft,
T. V. Kurzchalia,
N. T. Price, and C. G. Proud.
1991.
Amino acid sequence analysis of the and subunits of eucaryotic initiation factor eIF-2. Identification of regions interacting with GTP.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1079:308-315[Medline].
|
| 2. |
Burd, C. G., and G. Dreyfuss.
1994.
Conserved structures and diversity of functions of RNA-binding proteins.
Science
265:615-621 |
| 3. |
Castilho-Valavicius, B.,
G. M. Thompson, and T. F. Donahue.
1992.
Mutation analysis of the Cys-X2-Cys-X19-Cys-X2-Cys motif on the subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2.
Gene Expr.
2:297-309[Medline].
|
| 4. | Castilho-Valavicius, B., J. Yoon, and T. F. Donahue. 1990. Genetic characterization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae translational initiation suppressors sui1, sui2 and SUI3 and their effects on HIS4 expression. Genetics 124:483-495[Abstract]. |
| 5. | Chen, L., and A. D. Frankel. 1994. An RNA-binding peptide from bovine immunodeficiency virus Tat protein recognizes an unsusual RNA structure. Biochemistry 33:2708-2715[Medline]. |
| 6. |
Cigan, A. M.,
J. L. Bushman,
T. R. Boal, and A. G. Hinnebusch.
1993.
A protein complex of translational regulators of GCN4 mRNA is the guanine nucleotide-exchange factor for translation initiation factor 2 in yeast.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:5350-5354 |
| 7. |
Cigan, A. M.,
M. Foiani,
E. M. Hannig, and A. G. Hinnebusch.
1991.
Complex formation by positive and negative translational regulators of GCN4.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:3217-3228 |
| 8. |
Cigan, A. M.,
E. K. Pabich, and T. F. Donahue.
1988.
Mutational analysis of the HIS4 translational initiator region in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8:2964-2975 |
| 9. |
Cigan, A. M.,
E. K. Pabich,
L. Feng, and T. F. Donahue.
1989.
Yeast translation initiation suppressor sui2 encodes the subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 and shares sequence identity with the human subunit.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:2784-2788 |
| 10. |
Das, S.,
T. Maiti,
K. Das, and U. Maitra.
1997.
Specific interaction of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5 (eIF5) with the -subunit of eIF2.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:31712-31718 |
| 11. |
Donahue, T. F.,
A. M. Cigan,
E. K. Pabich, and B. Castilho-Valavicius.
1988.
Mutations at a Zn(II) finger motif in the yeast eIF-2 gene alter ribosomal start-site selection during the scanning process.
Cell
54:621-632[Medline].
|
| 12. |
Dorris, D. R.,
F. L. Erickson, and E. M. Hannig.
1995.
Mutations in GCD11, the structural gene for eIF-2 in yeast, alter translational regulation of GCN4 and the selection of the start site for protein synthesis.
EMBO J.
14:2239-2249[Medline].
|
| 13. |
Erickson, F. L., and E. M. Hannig.
1996.
Ligand interactions with eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2: role of the -subunit.
EMBO J.
15:6311-6320[Medline].
|
| 14. | Flynn, A., I. N. Shatsky, C. G. Proud, and A. Kaminski. 1994. The RNA-binding properties of protein synthesis initiation factor eIF-2. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1219:293-301[Medline]. |
| 15. |
Gonsky, R.,
D. Itamar,
R. Harary, and R. Kaempfer.
1992.
Binding of ATP and messenger RNA by the -subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2.
Biochimie
74:427-434[Medline].
|
| 16. | Guthrie, C., and G. R. Fink (ed.). 1991. Guide to yeast genetics and molecular biology. Academic Press, Inc., New York, N.Y. |
| 17. |
Hannig, E. M.,
A. M. Cigan,
B. A. Freeman, and T. G. Kinzy.
1993.
GCD11, a negative regulator of GCN4 expression, encodes the subunit of eIF-2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:506-520 |
| 18. |
Hemmerich, P.,
S. Bosbach,
A. Von Mikecz, and U. Krawinkel.
1997.
Human ribosomal protein L7 binds RNA with an -helical arginine-rich and lysine-rich domain.
Eur. J. Biochem.
245:549-556[Medline].
|
| 19. | Hershey, J. W. B. 1991. Translational control in mammalian cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 60:717-755[Medline]. |
| 20. | Hill, J. E., A. M. Myers, T. J. Koerner, and A. Tzagoloff. 1986. Yeast/E. coli shuttle vectors with multiple unique restriction sites. Yeast 2:163-167[Medline]. |
| 21. | Hinnebush, A. G. 1993. Gene-specific translational control of the yeast GCN4 gene by phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2. Mol. Microbiol. 10:215-223[Medline]. |
| 22. |
Huang, H.,
H. Yoon,
E. M. Hannig, and T. F. Donahue.
1997.
GTP hydrolysis controls stringent selection of the AUG start codon during translation initation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genes Dev.
11:2396-2413 |
| 22a. | Laurino, J. P., and B. A. Castilho. Submitted for publication. |
| 23. | Lazinsky, D., E. Gradzielska, and A. Das. 1989. Sequence-specific recognition of RNA hairpins by bacteriophage antiterminators requires a conserved arginine rich motif. Cell 59:207-218[Medline]. |
| 24. |
Merrick, W. C.
1992.
Mechanism and regulation of eukaryotic protein synthesis.
Microbiol. Rev.
56:291-315 |
| 25. |
Methot, N.,
A. Pause,
J. W. B. Hershey, and N. Sonenberg.
1994.
The translation initiation factor eIF-4B contains an RNA-binding region that is distinct and independent from its ribonucleoprotein consensus sequence.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:2307-2316 |
| 26. | Mitchell, D. A., T. K. Marshall, and R. J. Deschenes. 1993. Vectors for the inducible overexpression of glutathione-S-transferase fusion proteins in yeast. Yeast 9:715-723[Medline]. |
| 26a. | Pacheco, E., E. O. Melo, and B. A. Castilho. Unpublished observations. |
| 27. |
Pathak, V. K.,
P. J. Nielsen,
H. Trachsel, and J. W. B. Hershey.
1988.
Structure of the subunit of translational initiation factor eIF-2.
Cell
54:633-639[Medline].
|
| 28. |
Rhoads, R. E.
1993.
Regulation of eukaryotic protein synthesis by initiation factors.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:3017-3020 |
| 29. | Sikorsky, R. S., and P. Hieter. 1989. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122:10-27. |
| 30. | Smith, D. B., and K. Johnson. 1988. Single-step purification of polypeptides expressed in Escherichia coli as fusions with glutathione S-transferase. Gene 67:31-40[Medline]. |
| 31. |
Towbin, N.,
T. Staehelin, and J. Gordon.
1979.
Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
76:4350-4354 |
| 32. |
Ye, X., and D. R. Cavener.
1994.
Isolation and characterization of the Drosophila melanogaster gene encoding translation initiation factor eIF2 .
Gene
142:271-274[Medline].
|
This article has been cited by other articles: