Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, January 1999, p. 194-204, Vol. 19, No. 1
Institute for Pathology, University of
Regensburg Medical School, D-93042 Regensburg,
Germany1
Received 27 April 1998/Returned for modification 15 July
1998/Accepted 28 September 1998
AP-2 transcription factors have been suggested to exert key
regulatory functions in vertebrate embryonic development, in
tumorigenicity of various cancer cell types, and in controlling cell
cycle and apoptotic effector genes. In this study, we investigated
transcriptional regulation of the AP-2 AP-2 transcription factors represent
a family of three closely related and evolutionarily conserved
sequence-specific DNA binding proteins, AP-2 Spatially and temporally restricted expression patterns of all three
AP-2 genes were observed and associated with embryonic differentiation
of neuroectodermal, urogenital, and ectodermal tissues (7,
14-16). More recently, studies of AP-2-deficient mice have
revealed essential roles of AP-2 Molecular functions of AP-2 were identified in transcriptional
regulation of a number of prototypic genes during ectodermal, neural,
and urogenital differentiation (1, 6, 22) and also in
regulation of growth factors and growth factor receptor genes (10,
24). Further, overexpression of AP-2 in breast cancer cells
directs high levels of c-erb-B2 mRNA expression and was
linked to a hormone-independent, highly aggressive tumor phenotype (4). Besides these functions in transcriptional regulation, a specific interaction of AP-2 with the c-Myc-Max heterodimer was
found to negatively regulate c-myc target genes and
c-myc-induced apoptotic cell death (9, 17). It
has therefore been speculated that AP-2 genes play an important role in
programming cell survival, particular in fast-proliferating cells under
conditions of limited external growth factor supply which occur both
during embryonic development and in neoplastic tissues.
Previous studies analyzing the 5' flanking sequence of the human
AP-2 Therefore, we have extended our AP-2 Cell culture and transient transfections.
HeLa cells were
cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, and Neuro2A, LNZ-308,
and PA-1 cells were grown in Earle's modified Eagle's medium, both
supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany).
Transient transfections were performed by using a standard calcium
phosphate coprecipitation protocol as described previously
(5). Luciferase activity was assayed as recommended by the
manufacturer (Promega, Mannheim, Germany) in a Luminometer ML 3000 (Dynatech). Relative light units were normalized to Reporter and expression plasmids.
A 1.7-kb promoter fragment
spanning nucleotides
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Transcriptional Regulation of the AP-2
Promoter
by BTEB-1 and AP-2rep, a Novel wt-1/egr-Related Zinc Finger
Repressor

and
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References
gene promoter mediated by an
autoregulatory element (referred to as A32) with a core consensus AP-2
binding site at position
336 relative to the mRNA initiation site.
AP-2 and multiple different nuclear proteins in HeLa and Neuro2A cell extracts form specific bandshifts with the A32 element. By screening a
mouse brain cDNA expression library, we isolated two different cDNAs
encoding the transcription factor BTEB-1 and a novel zinc finger
protein, AP-2rep. AP-2rep reveals a modular structure with homology to
transcription factors of the wt-1/egr-1-family. AP-2rep, BTEB-1, and
AP-2 interact in a mutually exclusive manner with overlapping binding
sites in the A32 element. Transfection studies revealed that BTEB-1 is
a strong activator of AP-2
promoter activity, whereas cotransfected
AP-2
resulted in moderate autoactivation of promoter activity. In
contrast, AP-2rep confers strong transcriptional repression to the
AP-2
gene, and we observed an excellent correlation between
induction of AP-2rep mRNA expression and downregulation of AP-2
mRNA
during development of the kidney. In summary, we have identified
multiple transcription factors and cloned from an expression library a
novel zinc finger silencing factor, AP-2rep, mediating positive and
negative regulation of AP-2
expression through a set of overlapping
cis-regulatory promoter elements.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References
, -
, and -
(15, 18, 25). The three proteins share a unique C-terminal
basic helix-span-helix dimerization and DNA binding motif harboring a
basic and
-helical core which is almost identical from
Drosophila to mammalian species. A much less conserved
N-terminal proline- and glutamine-rich domain was found to mediate
transcriptional activation (26, 27). AP-2 proteins interact
with the palindromic consensus recognition site GCCN3GGC detected in promoters of numerous gene
promoters, including genes that are expressed specifically in neural,
glial, urogenital, and epidermal cells.
in cranial closure and craniofacial
development and of AP-2
in programmed cell death of renal epithelial
cells (17, 21, 28). Thus, AP-2 genes encode key regulatory
factors programming specific patterns of gene expression and cell
survival during embryonic development.
gene provided initial insights in transcriptional regulation of
AP-2
expression. TATA-box-independent mRNA initiation occurs at the
main start site (referred to as position +1) 283 bases upstream of the
ATG protein start codon. An initiator element encompassing the AP-2
start site and an octamer motif located between nucleic acid residues
53 and
44 were found to be indispensable for basal promoter
activity (8). Further upstream, AP-2 binding sites were
identified at positions
336,
165, and
95. We have analyzed
previously the most distal AP-2 binding site at
336, designated A32,
by footprinting, gel mobility shift assays, and transient
cotransfections and shown that it confers positive autoregulation to
the promoter (2). However, factors activating AP-2
transcription in the absence of AP-2
protein as well as factors
silencing the promoter during later stages of development in the
presence of AP-2 protein have not been identified.
promoter studies and show here
that a network of three transcription factors, BTEB-1, AP-2
, and a
novel zinc finger protein, AP-2rep, mediate positive and negative
regulation of AP-2
expression involving mutually exclusive binding
to overlapping sites within the A32 element.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References
-galactosidase
activity and protein concentration. All experiments were repeated at
least four times, with standard deviations of <10%.
1728 to +283 with respect to the major mRNA
initiation site was excised from the previously described pBLCAT3
promoter construct (2) and ligated into the BglII
site of plasmid pGL2-basic (Promega, Madison, Wis.). 5' promoter
fragments were deleted from the 1.7kb Luc reporter by using an internal
SacII and two internal XhoI fragments to generate
1.0kb Luc, 0.5kb, Luc and 0.2kb Luc, respectively. The 0.1-kb promoter
fragment was PCR amplified by using the 5' primer GCA GAG CTG GGT ACT
GGC GAG CAA TTG GAC and the 3' primer CCC GGA TCC TTT TCA TGG ATC GGC
GTG AAC and ligated into the BglII site of pGL2-basic to
generate 0.1kb Luc.
expression plasmid
AP-2
-pCMX has been described previously (15). The same pCMX vector was used to construct BTEB-1 and AP-2rep expression plasmids. The entire coding sequence of BTEB-1 was amplified from 2 µg of brain RNA by using the 5' and 3' primers GCG AAT TCA TGT CCG
CGG CCG CCT ACA TGG and GGG AAT TCT CAC AAG GGG CAG GCA AGA GCC; the
sequence of AP-2rep was amplified by using the primers GCG AAT TCA TGA
ATA TCC ATA TGA AGA GG and GCG AAT TCG CTG GAC CGG AGC CTT CCT CAC. The
PCR fragments were digested with EcoRI, ligated into pCMX,
and verified by sequencing the entire open reading frames.
EMSA.
Preparation of nuclear extracts and purification of
bacterially expressed glutathione S-transferase
(GST)-AP-2
fusion protein have been described in detail previously
(5). The partial BTEB-1 cDNA obtained from phage expression
screening (Fig. 3A) and the fully encoding AP-2rep cDNA amplified by
reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) were ligated into the
EcoRI site of pGEX-4T1 (Pharmacia, Freiburg, Germany). Then
0.1 to 1 µg of GST fusion protein or 5 µl of crude nuclear extract
was mixed with electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) buffer [10
mM HEPES (pH 7.8) 80 mM KCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 µg of poly(dI-dC)] and incubated for 15 min
at room temperature with 1 ng of phospholabeled binding site. For
supershift experiments, 1 µl of polyclonal rabbit antiserum raised
against a C-terminal AP-2
peptide (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa
Cruz, Calif.) was included in the reaction. Finally, the reactions were
separated on 4% polyacrylamide gels in 0.5× Tris-borate-EDTA, and the
gels were dried and exposed for autoradiography at
70°C overnight.
Double-stranded synthetic binding sites with the sequences shown in
Fig. 2A (wt [wild type], MI, MII, and MIII) or with the AP-2rep
binding site GGCGTGGCGC and the specific point mutations
indicated in Fig. 4D were used for gel shifts.
Screening a
gt11 cDNA expression library.
A total of
2 × 105 phage plaques of a commercially available
mouse brain cDNA library in the vector
gt11 (Clontech, Palo Alto, Calif.) were screened with the trimerized phospholabeled MIII binding
site exactly as described in a previous study (19). Briefly,
after infection, culture plates were grown for 3.5 h at 42°C and
then overlaid for 5.5 h with nitrocellulose filters soaked with 10 mM isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside. Next, duplicate filters were prepared and overlaid for another 2 h. Then the
filters were air dried, subjected to a denaturation-renaturation cycle from 6 to 0.19 M guanidine hydrochloride in binding buffer (50 mM KCl,
5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 20 mM HEPES [pH 7.8]), and blocked for 30 min in 5% nonfat dry milk. Binding was performed for 12 h in binding buffer supplemented with 0.25% nonfat dry milk, salmon sperm DNA (5 µg/ml), poly(dI-dC) (2 µg/ml), and
phospholabeled probe (1.5 × 106 cpm/ml). Filters were
washed three times with binding buffer-0.25% nonfat dry milk for 5 min and autoradiographed overnight. Double-positive signals were plaque
purified, and the specificity of the binding reaction was confirmed by
competition with a 100-fold excess of the unlabeled binding site.
Northern blotting, RT-PCR, RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends)-PCR. RNA isolation and Northern transfer were performed by standard protocols (20), and the blots were probed with fully encoding cDNA probes excised from the pCMX expression plasmids. Final washes were done in 0.5% SSC (1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate)-0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) at 62°C for 20 min.
Quantitative AP-2rep RT-PCR was performed on a Taqman LS-50B Detection PCR system, using the Taqman PCR Core Reagent kit as instructed by the manufacturer (Perkin-Elmer). For AP-2rep, forward primer 5'-ACC AGA CAC TAC CGC AAA CAC A-3', reverse primer 5'-GGT CTG ACC TCG AGA ACC TGC-3', and 150 nM AP-2rep probe (5'-CCA TTC AAG TGC GCG GAC TGG ACC-3') labeled with 5-carboxy-fluorescein and with N,N,N',N',-tetramethyl-6-carboxyrhodamin as quenchers were used; for AP-2
, forward primer 5'-AAT TTC TCA ACC GAC AAC ATT-3',
reverse primer 5'-ATC TGT TTT GTG GCC AGG AGC-3', and 150 nM probe
(5'-TCC CAA TGA GCA AGT GGC AAG AAA AAA C-3') were used. The PCR mix
was incubated for 2 min at 50°C and 10 min at 95°C, and then 45 cycles of 1 min at 95°C and 15 s at 60°C were performed. To
obtain a standard curve, control reactions were performed with 1,000, 5,000, 10,000, 50,000, and 100,000 template molecules of AP-2rep or
AP-2
cDNA.
For RACE-PCR of the 5' AP-2rep cDNA from brain mRNA, the first PCR
primer CAA CCG GCA CTG ACT GTA CCA CCA C and the nestled primer GGA GGC
GGA CCC TGT CAT GGA GAC were used. For the first PCR, cycles were as
follows: 1 for 1 min at 94°C; 20 for 30 s at 94°C, 30 s
at 62°C, and 3 min at 68°C; 1 for 10 min at 68°C. Cycles for the
nested PCR were as follows: 1 for 2 min at 94°C; 30 for 45 s at
94°C, 45 s at 60°C, and 2 min at 72°C); 1 for 10 min at
72°C.
Western blotting. Equal amounts of protein were loaded onto SDS-12.5% polyacrylamide gels and electroblotted. Filters were soaked for 1 h in 5% nonfat dry milk-phosphate-buffered saline. AP-2 antiserum (Santa Cruz) was diluted 1:8,000 in phosphate-buffered saline and incubated overnight at room temperature. Then blots were washed three times for 10 min each, incubated for another 2 h with 1:3,000-diluted phosphatase-coupled anti-rabbit immunoglobulin antiserum, and developed with a chemiluminescence kit (Amersham, Braunschweig, Germany). To reprobe blots, the membranes were washed three times for 10 min each, incubated with a 1:3,000 dilution of phosphotyrosine phosphatase type 2 (PTP1D) antiserum (Dianova, Hamburg, Germany) overnight, and then further processed with a 1:3,000 dilution of rabbit anti-mouse serum.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. Sequences of the two PCR clones and of AP-2rep have been submitted to the EMBL database and assigned accession no. Y14296 and Y14295, respectively.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Activity of AP-2
promoter fragments.
A series of human
genomic DNA fragments spanning kb
1.728 to +282 with respect to the
major AP-2
mRNA initiation site (8) was fused to a
firefly luciferase reporter gene to determine cis-regulatory elements modulating basal promoter activity. Transcriptional activity of these promoter constructs was monitored following transient transfection into human embryonic PA-1 clone 9117 and mouse
neuroblastoma Neuro2A cells, which have been shown previously to
express AP-2
mRNA (reference 13 and data not
shown). The reporter construct
1.7kb Luc supported high levels of
reporter expression in both 9117 and Neuro2A cells. Subsequent deletion
of 5' sequences to kb
0.5 did not reduce significantly promoter
strength. In contrast, deletion of sequences between kb
0.5 and
0.2, including a previously mapped autoregulatory AP-2 consensus
binding site at
336, caused a more than 60% reduction of reporter
expression (Fig. 1), suggesting that this
promoter region harbors important enhancer elements. Further deletion
to
0.1 had no effect on promoter strength. Activity of the basal
0.1-kb AP-2
promoter fragment has been analyzed in detail
previously and was shown to depend critically on an octamer protein
binding site and an initiator element (8).
|
protein, we have
detected previously a footprint protecting a region of 32 bases around
the AP-2 site at
336 (2). Hence, this AP-2 binding element
was designated the A32 site. Based on our results from transient
transfections, we examined whether the A32 site at
336 is important
for enhanced promoter activity; to this end, we generated a small
scanning mutation deleting the entire footprint-protected region from
the 1.0kb Luc reporter plasmid. As illustrated in Fig. 1, this mutation
caused a decrease in AP-2
promoter activity almost as much as
truncation to kb
0.2. In summary, we concluded from these transient
transfections that the A32 site is a critical cis-regulatory
element involved in conferring enhanced activity to the basal AP-2
promoter.
Multiple proteins interact with the A32 site in the AP-2
promoter.
To analyze nuclear proteins interacting with the A32
site, we performed EMSAs with a synthetic phospholabeled oligomeric
binding site spanning nucleotides
324 to
353 of the AP-2
promoter (binding site wt shown in Fig.
2A). Two specific bandshifts, designated SA-1 and SA-2 in Fig. 2B, were observed. Bandshift SA-2 was very sensitive to proteolytic degradation since only two cycles of repeated
thawing and freezing drastically diminished the shift activity and
resulted in the appearance of multiple smaller bandshifts. Testing the
binding specificity of these DNA-protein complexes, we found that the
faster-migrating bandshift, SA-2, was eliminated by mutating the left
AP-2 consensus half site from GCC to AAA (binding site MIII) and that
the slower bandshift, SA-1, was drastically diminished by mutating the
residues GTG 3' adjacent to the AP-2 consensus site to CTC (binding
site MI). As a control, a three-base mutation 5' adjacent to the AP-2
consensus binding motif (MII) which did not alter any of the bandshift
complexes was introduced. Interestingly, abolishing bandshift activity
SA-2 by mutation MIII increased bandshift SA-1, and vice versa,
impairing SA-2 by mutation MI improved formation of complex SA-2 Fig.
2B, lanes 2 and 4). These results suggested that two or more different
proteins compete for binding to overlapping sites within the wild-type A32 sequence.
|
Expression cloning of BTEB-1 and AP-2rep cDNAs.
To identify
and clone proteins present in bandshift SA-1, we used the trimerized
mutated binding site MIII as a phospholabeled probe to screen a murine
brain
gt11 expression cDNA library. We identified and purified four
different phages after screening 2 × 105 plaques
(Fig. 3A). Sequencing the
phage inserts revealed that one phage contained almost the entire open
reading frame of the previously identified transcription factor BTEB-1,
missing only the first N-terminal 40 amino acids (11). Three
other phage inserts (P6, P7, and P8 [Fig. 3A]) represented
overlapping cDNA fragments of a novel gene, designated AP-2rep. The
predicted AP-2rep open reading frame (Fig. 3B) and BTEB-1 harbor highly
homologous domains of three zinc fingers which are also conserved among
SP-1 and wt-1/egr-1 transcription factors (Fig. 3C). Outside the zinc finger domain, no match between BTEB-1 and AP-2rep was detected.
|
BTEB-1 and AP-2rep bind in a mutually exclusive manner with AP-2 to
the A32 element.
To study DNA binding properties of AP-2
,
BTEB-1, and AP-2rep, we performed gel shift assays with the
phospholabeled A32 binding site and bacterially purified GST fusion
proteins. As observed in a previous study (23), both
bacterially expressed and in vitro-translated full-length BTEB-1
protein did not bind to DNA in gel shift assays; therefore, we used a
GST fusion clone with an N-terminal truncation of 40 amino acids
representing precisely the clone that was isolated from the
gt11
expression library. In the case of AP-2
and AP-2rep, full-length
proteins were fused with GST. As shown in Fig.
4A, all three fusion
proteins formed with the A32 site distinct retarded complexes which
were completed with a 50-fold molar excess of the unlabeled homologous
binding site. As expected, the mutant binding site MIII, harboring a
defective AP-2 binding site, did not interact with AP-2
protein but
was shifted strongly by BTEB-1 and AP-2rep (data not shown). We further tested the two other, less conserved AP-2 binding sites at positions
165 and
95 in the AP-2
promoter for interaction with the fusion proteins. Weak bandshifts were observed only with AP-2
; both BTEB-1
and AP-2rep did not interact with any of the two sites (Fig. 4B).
|
was reacted with the
oligonucleotide in the presence of increasing amounts of BTEB-1 or
AP-2rep, only the two distinct bandshifts, not an intermediate shift or
supershift activity, were observed (Fig. 4C). Further, a 20- to 50-fold
molar excess of BTEB-1 or AP-2rep competed entirely for binding of the
oligonucleotide to AP-2
. These results indicate that BTEB-1 and
AP-2rep bind in a mutually exclusive manner with AP-2
to the A32
site. A detailed inspection of the A32 sequence revealed that it is
composed of a consensus AP-2 site (GCCNNNGGC) overlapping
with a basal transcription element (BTE) site (AGGCGTGGC),
which was used in a study by Imataka et al. to clone BTEB-1 from
an expression library (11). The authors further identified a
large footprint covering 22 bases around the BTE site. Therefore, we
compared the footprint patterns resulting from binding of recombinant
AP-2
, BTEB-1, and AP-2rep to the A32 element. Our data indicate that
BTEB-1 and AP-2rep form a footprint of 22 to 24 protected bases which
overlap with most of the previously characterized AP-2 footprint of 32 bases (data not shown). In conclusion, both gel shift and footprint
data reveal that the A32 element represents a composite DNA binding
site allowing AP-2
, BTEB-1, and AP-2rep to bind in a mutually
exclusive manner.
To define in detail the nature of the DNA sequence motif that AP-2rep
recognizes, a synthetic binding site spanning the core footprint and
the entire BTE site (GGCGTGGCGC) was subjected to fine
mutational analysis. Ten binding sites with single nucleic acid
exchanges of every residue to an A were tested for the ability to
compete with interaction between the wild-type A32 binding site and
AP-2rep. A single mutation of the G at position 6 abolished binding to
AP-2rep. Further, mutations of the guanines at positions 1 and 4 and
the thymidine and cytidine at positions 5 and 8, respectively, impaired
significantly the ability to compete for AP-2rep binding. In sum, our
data define the minimal requirement of the AP-2rep DNA binding sequence
as GNNGTGNCNN. Consistently, every residue that is essential
for binding to AP-2rep is conserved between the A32 and BTE sites.
BTEB-1, AP-2, and AP-2rep mediate positive and negative regulation
of AP-2a promoter activity.
To investigate the effects of AP-2
,
BTEB-1, and AP-2rep on AP-2
promoter activity, CMV expression
plasmids were cotransfected with the 1.0kb Luc reporter into the human
(LNZ-308) and murine (Neuro2A) neuroblastoma cell lines and into the
human teratocarcinoma cell line PA-1 clone 9117. As shown in Fig.
5A, very consistent effects in all three
cell lines were observed when 50 to 100 ng of AP-2
, BTEB-1, or
AP-2rep expression plasmid was cotransfected with 100 ng of reporter
plasmid into 20,000 cells cultured in six-well plates. We measured a
three- to sixfold increase in promoter activity, dependent on the cell
line, 24 h after BTEB-1 coexpression and two- to threefold
repression after AP-2rep coexpression. In contrast, moderate effects
varying from 2.5-fold activation in Neuro2A cells to almost no effect
in LNZ cells resulted from AP-2
transfection. Comparison of results
for Neuro2A and LNZ-308 cells revealed identical patterns of AP-2
promoter regulation by BTEB-1 and AP-2rep in both human and murine
neuroblastoma cells.
|
was detected only at low amounts (10 and 50 ng), and transfection of higher amounts (100 ng) of expression
plasmid resulted in quenching of activation. In contrast, coexpression
of AP-2rep caused significant and dose-dependent repression of promoter
activity; in the presence of 100 ng of cotransfected AP-2rep, we did
not observe significant activation by BTEB-1 (Fig. 5B). Importantly,
none of the expression plasmids altered the activity of the
promoterless pGL2 luciferase construct (data not shown).
An identical pattern of luciferase expression was measured when a
dimeric A32 binding site was cloned in front of a minimal TK-Luc
reporter, indicating that the A32 site is sufficient to mediate the
effects of AP-2
, BTEB-1, and AP-2rep in the context of a different
promoter. Consistently, repression was not observed with mutation MI,
which fails to bind AP-2rep, but was observed with the functional
AP-2rep binding site MIII. Finally, repression of promoter activity by
AP-2rep was dependent on DNA binding and not supported by expression of
the truncated N-terminal region of AP-2rep (Fig. 5B). These data
suggest strongly that competition of an activating factor by mutually
exclusive binding involves sequence-specific binding by AP-2rep to the
A32 element.
To substantiate further a significant function of AP-2rep as a negative
transcriptional regulator of endogenous AP-2
gene activity, we
determined the effect of AP-2rep transfection on endogenous AP-2
mRNA and protein levels. One microgram of AP-2rep CMV expression
plasmid was transfected into HeLa cells in parallel to transfection of
the empty parental CMV expression plasmid. We chose HeLa cells because
they are highly transfectable by calcium phosphate precipitation,
allowing for examination of endogenous AP-2
mRNA in parallel to
-actin amplification (Fig. 5C), and immunoblotting of the
transfected HeLa cells (Fig. 5D) indicates approximately fivefold
downregulation of both AP-2
mRNA and protein in the
AP-2rep-transfected cells. Two controls were performed to verify equal
protein transfer onto the immunoblots: SDS-gels were Coomassie stained,
and the Western blot membranes were reprobed with anti-PTP1D
(3), resulting in equal signal intensities (Fig. 5D).
In summary, we conclude that AP-2
expression can be activated by
BTEB-1 and silenced by AP-2rep in both embryonic and neural cell lines.
Further, moderate autoregulatory effects of AP-2
on its own
promoter, varying from moderate activation at low levels to repression
at higher levels, were observed.
Expression patterns of BTEB-1 and AP-2rep.
Finally, we
performed a series of mRNA expression studies to investigate whether
the patterns of BTEB-1 and AP-2rep expression in vivo overlap with the
previously determined sites of AP-2
regulation. A single 5-kb BTEB-1
mRNA was visualized on a multiple-tissue Northern blot prepared from
7-day-old C57B6 mice and also in the human cell line HeLa (data not
shown). BTEB-1 expression was prominent in skin, kidney, lung, brain,
skeletal, and heart muscle and lower in liver, gut, and spleen,
agreeing well with data reported previously for rat tissues
(12).
mRNA is highly
regulated in developing neural and renal tissues and we had isolated
AP-2rep clones from a brain cDNA expression library, we determined
AP-2rep mRNA expression more carefully, using quantitative RT-PCR
(Taqman PCR system). Data shown in Fig. 6C confirmed expression of
AP-2rep transcripts in E15.5 and E19.5 (embryonic days 15.5 and 19.5)
brain and kidney. Expression in kidney but not in heart tissue was
upregulated between 3- and 10-fold at postnatal days 4 and 10 (pn4 and
pn10), coinciding with downregulation of AP-2
expression (Fig. 6D).
Complex expression patterns of both AP-2rep and AP-2
were measured
in the brain, with highest levels of AP-2rep transcripts shortly after
birth. Expression of AP-2rep was not detected in the heart, and we have consistently shown previously that embryonic heart development does not
involve specific expression patterns of AP-2 transcripts (15,
16). In summary, these data clearly establish an inverse relationship between AP-2
mRNA expression pattern and AP-2rep mRNA
in kidney and complex patterns of regulation during development of the
central nervous system.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, we have extended previous preliminary studies of
the AP-2
gene promoter and show that a 1.7-kb genomic DNA fragment
flanking the major mRNA initiation site mediates enhanced reporter gene
expression in neuroblast and embryonic teratocarcinoma cell lines. We
here identify a combined AP-2-BTE binding element at position
336 as
a critical cis-regulatory element allowing both positive and
negative regulation of promoter activity.
A number of studies have described temporally and spatially highly
restricted AP-2
expression patterns in embryonic neuroectodermal, ectodermal, and urogenital tissues (14-16). In parallel,
functional studies have established AP-2 genes as key factors
activating specific gene expression programs and providing critical
signals for embryonic cell survival (6, 17). With the
exception of skin, AP-2
mRNA expression ceases in most tissues after
completion of embryonic differentiation. On the other hand, unregulated
overexpression of AP-2 genes has been identified as a pathogenic
mechanism in breast cancers and shown to cause activation of the
c-erbB-2 gene promoter (4). Suppression of
apoptotic cell death by AP-2 and activation of growth factor receptors
may contribute to the pathogenesis of not only breast cancers but also
cancers of other cell types, since we have observed very high AP-2
mRNA levels also in renal cell cancers (unpublished observation).
Further, AP-2
overexpression has been shown to be involved in
ras oncogene-mediated transformation and can induce
anchorage-independent growth in vitro and tumor formation by PA-1
teratocarcinoma cells in nude mice (13). Thus, different
lines of evidence clearly indicate that a precisely regulated pattern
of AP-2
expression is essential for proper embryonic development and
that downregulation is required for maintenance of adult differentiated
cell phenotypes.
Consistent with in vitro results pointing to dual functions of AP-2
transcription factors in regulating gene expression and myc-mediated programmed cell death (17),
AP-2
-deficient mice reveal severe and complex developmental
abnormalities, including defects of the facial neuroectoderm, failure
to close the anterior neurotube and the anterior body wall, and
hypoplastic kidneys, which coincide with enhanced apoptotic cell death
(21, 28).
Our studies clearly indicate that the AP-2-BTE binding element
interacts with multiple proteins present in nuclear extracts of HeLa
and other cell lines that express AP-2
mRNA and further that two
different transcription factors, BTEB-1 and AP-2rep, isolated by an
expression screening approach bind specifically to the BTE site. BTEB-1
was isolated previously from a rat liver cDNA expression library by
using the BTE site of the cytochrome P-450IA1 gene and shown to repress
transcriptional activity when cotransfected with a reporter plasmid
containing a single-copy BTE (11). BTEB-1 mRNA is strongly
expressed in many tissues; however, it was shown later that the 5'
untranslated region of the BTEB-1 mRNA contains cell-specific
translational control elements restricting BTEB-1 mRNA translation to
the brain and neuroblasts (12). Thus, our results showing
that BTEB-1 strongly activates AP-2
expression in neuroblast and
embryonal cell lines suggest a novel role of BTEB-1 as a key regulatory
factor involved in embryonal differentiation of neural tissues.
We further show that a novel protein zinc finger, AP-2rep, binds
specifically to the BTE site, causing significant transcriptional repression of AP-2
promoter activity. Importantly, transcriptional repression was detected by measuring not only the activity of a
transiently cotransfected luciferase reporter but also the amount of
AP-2
mRNA and protein expression from the endogenous gene. Both
BTEB-1 and AP-2rep are highly homologous to the wt-1/egr family with
respect to their DNA binding domains, but unlike BTEB-1, AP-2rep
harbors N-terminal serine-threonine and proline-glutamine motifs
revealing structural homology to wt-1. It may therefore be speculated
that AP-2rep belongs to a family of transcriptional repressors that are
activated to silence embryonic gene expression and play important roles
in terminal cell differentiation.
This hypothesis is further supported by the observation of highly
restricted AP-2rep expression patterns in the brains and kidneys of
adult humans and mice. At the end of embryonic development, AP-2
expression is downregulated in brain and kidney but not in skin.
Therefore, the temporal and spatial patterns of AP-2rep expression
overlap with negative regulation of AP-2
expression in vivo. Since
AP-2
overexpression has been demonstrated in several human cancers,
it remains to be investigated whether a loss of AP-2rep expression
leading to reexpression of embryonic gene programs plays a role in
developmental abnormalities or tumorigenesis, especially of brain and
kidney cancers.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by grants from the DFG and the Wilhelm Sander-Stiftung to R.B. and represents a part of projects performed in the DFG-Forschergruppe "Molecular Mechanisms of Cell Death in Neuronal Systems." A.I. was supported as a predoctoral fellow from the DFG.
A.I., M.S., and O.W. made equal contributions to this study.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute for Pathology, University of Regensburg Medical School, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee, D-93042 Regensburg, Germany. Phone: (49) 941-9446627. Fax: (49) 941-9446602. E-mail: Reinhart.Buettner{at}klinik.uni-regensburg.de.
Present address: Laboratory of Molecular Embryology, National
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, Bethesda, MD
20892-5430.
Present address: Department of Tumor Biology, The University of
Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Baskin, F., Y. P. Li, L. B. Hersh, R. M. Davis, and R. N. Rosenberg. 1997. An AP-2 binding sequence within exon 1 of human and porcine choline acetyltransferase genes enhances transcription in neural cells. Neuroscience 76:821-827[Medline]. |
| 2. |
Bauer, R.,
A. Pscherer,
A. Imhof,
M. Moser,
H. Kopp,
S. Seegers,
M. Kerscher,
M. A. Tainsky,
F. Hofstaedter, and R. Buettner.
1994.
The genomic structure of the human AP-2 gene.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:1413-1420 |
| 3. |
Bennett, A. M.,
T. L. Tang,
S. Sugimoto,
C. T. Walsh, and B. G. Neel.
1994.
Protein tyrosine phosphatase SHPTP-2 couples platelet-derived growth factor receptor to ras.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:7335-7339 |
| 4. |
Bosher, J. M.,
T. Williams, and H. C. Hurst.
1995.
The developmentally regulated transcription factor AP-2 is involved in c-erbB2 overexpression in human mammary carcinoma.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:744-747 |
| 5. |
Buettner, R.,
P. Kannan,
A. Imhof,
R. Bauer,
S. O. Yim,
R. Glockshuber,
M. W. VanDyke, and M. A. Tainsky.
1993.
An alternatively spliced mRNA from the AP-2 gene encodes a negative regulator of transcriptional activation by AP-2.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:4174-4185 |
| 6. |
Byrne, C.,
M. A. Tainsky, and E. Fuchs.
1994.
Programming gene expression in developing epidermis.
Development
120:2369-2383 |
| 7. | Chazaud, C., M. Oulad-Abdelghani, P. Bouillet, D. Decimo, P. Chambon, and P. Dolle. 1996. AP-2.2, a novel gene related to AP-2, is expressed in the formbrain, limbs and face during mouse embryogenesis. Mech. Dev. 54:83-94[Medline]. |
| 8. | Creaser, P. C., D. A. D'Argenio, and T. Williams. 1996. Comparative and functional analysis of the AP-2 promoter indicates that conserved octamer and initiator elements are critical for activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 13:2597-2605. |
| 9. | Gaubatz, S., A. Imhof, R. Dosch, O. Werner, P. Mitchell, R. Buettner, and M. Eilers. 1995. Transcription factor AP-2 negatively regulates gene activation by myc. EMBO J. 14:1508-1519[Medline]. |
| 10. | Gille, J., R. A. Swerlick, and S. W. Caughman. 1997. Transforming growth factor-alpha-induced transcriptional activation of the vascular permeability factor (VPF/VEGF) gene requires AP-2-dependent DNA binding and transactivation. EMBO J. 16:750-759[Medline]. |
| 11. | Imataka, H., K. Sofawa, K. Yasumoto, Y. Kikuchi, K. Sasano, A. Kobayashi, M. Hayami, and Y. Fujii-Kuriyama. 1992. Two regulatory proteins that bind to the basic transcription element (BTE), a GC box sequence in the promoter region of the rat P-450 1A1 gene. EMBO J. 11:3663-3671[Medline]. |
| 12. |
Imataka, H.,
K. Nakayama,
K. Yasumoto,
A. Mizuno,
Y. Fujii-Kuriyama, and M. Hayami.
1994.
Cell-specific translational control of transcription factor BTEB expression.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:20668-20673 |
| 13. |
Kannan, P.,
R. Buettner,
P. J. Chiao,
S. O. Yim,
M. Sarkiss, and M. A. Tainsky.
1994.
N-ras oncogene causes AP-2 transcriptional self-interference, which leads to transformation.
Genes Dev.
8:1258-1269 |
| 14. |
Mitchell, P. J.,
P. M. Timmons,
J. M. Hebert,
P. W. Rigby, and R. Tjian.
1991.
Transcription factor AP-2 is expressed in neural crest lineages during mouse embryogenesis.
Genes Dev.
5:105-119 |
| 15. |
Moser, M.,
A. Pscherer,
A. Imhof,
R. Bauer,
M. Kerscher,
W. Amselgruber,
F. Sinowatz,
F. Hofstaedter,
R. Schüle, and R. Buettner.
1995.
Molecular cloning and characterization of a second AP-2 transcription activator gene, AP-2 .
Development
121:2779-2788[Abstract].
|
| 16. |
Moser, M.,
J. Rüschof, and R. Buettner.
1997.
Comparative analysis of AP-2a and AP-2 gene expression during murine embryogenesis.
Dev. Dyn.
208:115-124[Medline].
|
| 17. |
Moser, M.,
A. Pscherer,
C. Roth,
J. Becker,
G. Mücher,
K. Zerres,
C. Dixkens,
J. Weis,
L. Guay-Woodford,
R. Buettner, and R. Fässler.
1997.
Enhanced apoptotic cell death of renal epithelial cells in mice lacking transcription factor AP-2 .
Genes Dev.
11:1938-1948 |
| 18. | Oulad-Abdelghani, M., P. Bouillet, C. Chazaud, P. Dollé, and P. Chambon. 1996. AP-2.2: a novel AP-2 related transcription factor induced by retinoic acid during differentiation of P19 embryonal carcinoma cells. Exp. Cell Res. 225:338-347[Medline]. |
| 19. | Pscherer, A., U. Dörflinger, J. Kirfel, K. Gawlas, J. Rüschoff, R. Buettner, and R. Schüle. 1996. The helix-loop-helix transcription factor SEF-2 regulates the activity of a novel initiator element in the promoter of the human somatostating receptor II gene. EMBO J. 15:6680-6690[Medline]. |
| 20. | Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 21. | Schorle, H., P. Meier, M. Buchert, R. Jaenisch, and P. J. Mitchell. 1996. Transcription factor AP-2 essential for cranial closure and craniofacial development. Nature 381:235-238[Medline]. |
| 22. |
Sepulveda, A. R.,
S. L. Huang,
R. M. Lebovitz, and M. W. Lieberman.
1997.
A 346-base pair region of the mouse gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase type II promoter contains sufficient cis-acting elements for kidney-restricted expression in transgenic mice.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:11959-11967 |
| 23. |
Sogawa, K.,
Y. Kikuchi,
H. Imataka, and Y. Fujii-Kariyama.
1993.
Comparison of DNA-binding properties between BTEB and SP-1.
J. Biochem.
114:605-609 |
| 24. |
Wang, D.,
T. H. Shin, and J. E. Kudlow.
1997.
Transcription factor AP-2 controls transcription of the human transforming growth factor-alpha gene.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:14244-14250 |
| 25. |
Williams, T.,
A. Admon,
B. Lüscher, and R. Tjian.
1988.
Cloning and expression of AP-2, a cell-type-specific transcription factor that activates inducible enhancer elements.
Genes Dev.
2:1557-1569 |
| 26. |
Williams, T., and R. Tjian.
1991.
Analysis of the DNA-binding and activation properties of the human transcription factor AP-2.
Genes Dev.
5:670-682 |
| 27. |
Williams, T., and R. Tjian.
1991.
Characterization of a dimerization motif in AP-2 and its function in heterologous DNA-binding proteins.
Science
251:1067-1071 |
| 28. | Zhang, J., S. Hagopian-Donaldson, G. Serbedzija, J. Elsemore, D. Plehn-Dujowich, A. P. McMahon, R. A. Flavell, and T. Williams. 1996. Neural tube, skeletal and body wall defects in mice lacking transcription factor AP-2. Nature 381:238-241[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»