Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, January 1999, p. 547-555, Vol. 19, No. 1
Mitsubishi Kasei Institute of Life Sciences,
Received 13 July 1998/Returned for modification 17 September
1998/Accepted 19 October 1998
In the early stage of Drosophila embryogenesis, DNA
replication initiates at unspecified sites in the chromosome. In
contrast, DNA replication initiates in specified regions in cultured
cells. We investigated when and where the initiation regions are
specified during embryogenesis and compared them with those observed in cultured cells by two-dimensional gel methods. In the DNA polymerase Many observations indicate that DNA
replication is not initiated at random sites but rather within
specified chromosomal regions in metazoan somatic cells or cultured
cells, although the DNA structures essential for initiation of DNA
replication in higher eukaryotes remain to be clarified (see reference
8 for a review). In contrast, initiation sites are
not specified to the same degree in early embryos of Drosophila
melanogaster (36) and Xenopus laevis
(23).
We previously identified an initiation zone of replication,
oriD After syncytium formation by 13 cycles of nuclear division, cytokinesis
takes place to form a cellular blastoderm. The first G2
phase appears from the 14th cell cycle. Zygotic transcription is first
detectable during cycle 11 or 12 but reaches maximal activation during
late cycle 14 (11). Thereafter, the cell cycle time and
duration of the S phase within each cell cycle lengthen and become
diverse. After the 16th mitosis, most cells stop proliferation and are
arrested in G1 phase, which is about 7 h after
fertilization at 25°C (17, 32).
These observations prompted us to examine when specification of the
initiation regions starts and is established during
Drosophila embryogenesis and whether or not the initiation
regions selected in embryos are the same as those observed in cultured
Kc cells. The chromosomal region initially studied in this work was the DNApol Drosophila eggs and cultured cells.
Wild-type
D. melanogaster Oregon R eggs were collected and stored
essentially as described previously (36). Eggs were
collected for 1 h at 25°C and staged for several hours at
25°C. For convenience, eggs staged for x h after 1-h
collection were called x-h embryos. According to Foe and
Alberts (17), 1-h embryos are syncytia in the stages from
mitotic cycles 8 to 13 and 2-h embryos are mainly cellular blastoderms
in cycle 14. The 14th mitosis takes place from 3 to 4 h after
fertilization, the 15th from 4 to 5 h after fertilization,
and the 16th from 4.5 to 6.5 h after fertilization (Fig.
1).
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Specification of Regions of DNA Replication
Initiation during Embryogenesis in the 65-Kilobase
DNApol
-dE2F Locus of Drosophila
melanogaster

![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References
gene (DNApol
) locus, where an initiation region,
oriD
, had been identified in cultured Kc cells,
repression of origin activity in the coding region was detected after
formation of cellular blastoderms, and the range of the initiation
region had become confined by 5 h after fertilization. During this
work we identified other initiation regions between oriD
and the Drosophila E2F gene (dE2F) downstream
of DNApol
. At least four initiation regions showing
replication bubbles were identified in the 65-kb
DNApol
-dE2F locus in 5-h embryos, but only two were
observed in Kc cells. These results suggest that the specification
levels of origin usage in 5-h embryos are in the intermediate state
compared to those in more differentiated cells. Further, we found a
spatial correlation between the active promoter regions for
dE2F and the active initiation zones of replication. In 5-h
embryos, two known transcripts differing in their first exons were
expressed, and two regions close to the respective promoter regions for
both transcripts functioned as replication origins. In Kc cells, only one transcript was expressed and functional replication origins were
observed only in the region including the promoter region for this transcript.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References
, located downstream of the gene encoding the 180-kDa
subunit of DNA polymerase
(DNApol
) in cultured Kc
cells from D. melanogaster (38). We were unable
to find other initiation regions within the 40-kb region from
oriD
to DNApol
and its upstream region (35, 38). While cultured Kc cells duplicate in approximately 24 h and their S phase lasts for about 8 h, nuclei in early
embryos of Drosophila duplicate their DNA in 10 min.
Embryogenesis of Drosophila is started by fertilization that
occurs at the time of oviposition. The first 2 h of embryogenesis
consists of 13 cycles of rapid and almost synchronous nuclear divisions
that have only M and S phases (32) (see Fig. 1). In this
syncytium stage, the whole genome must be replicated within 5 to 6 min
(17), but the rate of replication fork movement does not
change from that in cultured cells (4). One solution to this
problem is that rapidly dividing nuclei shorten their replicons by
using many more replication origins than do slowly replicating cells. Replicon size in the syncytium stage of embryos was estimated to be
about 8 kb, while that in Kc cells was about 40 kb (4). Our
previous data, obtained by two-dimensional (2D) gel electrophoresis, coincided with this notion (36). No specific initiation
sites were detected within the 5-kb repeating unit of the histone
genes, and the average spacing between replication origins in the
histone gene repeats was estimated to be about 8 kb in embryos
collected between 1 and 2 h after oviposition. Replication bubbles
were observed in most fragments derived from a 40-kb single-copy
chromosomal region. Thus, DNA replication in the early stages of
embryogenesis seems to initiate at numerous sites with little local specificity.
locus, where we had identified a replication
initiation region (oriD
) in Kc cells (38).
During this work, we found that the Drosophila homologue of
the E2F gene (dE2F) was located downstream of
DNApol
. Initiation sites in the dE2F locus
were also compared between embryos and cultured cells.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
References

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Early embryogenesis of D. melanogaster. The
stages of embryos analyzed in this work are shown. (A) Time after
fertilization. Eggs were staged for x h after 1-h collection
at 25°C (see text). (B) Mitotic cycles at 25°C. Mitotic phases are
shown by filled rectangles, and interphases are represented by open
rectangles. (C) Developmental stages as defined by Foe and Alberts
(17).
75°C until use.
DNA clones.
Lambda clones (
124 and
141) containing the
region next to the oriD
region were screened from a
genomic library of D. melanogaster Oregon R provided by Y. Nishida. The previously isolated
102 (38) was used as a
probe to isolate
124, and then
124 was used for the isolation of
141. Subfragments were recloned into pBluescript II SK
plasmids.
The locations of these clones are shown in Fig.
2B.
|
DNA sequencing.
DNA fragments to be sequenced were cloned
into pBluescript II SK
, and their nested deletions were generated
with a double-strand Nested Deletion Kit (Pharmacia) for both
directions. Plasmid DNA was prepared with a QIAprep Spin Plasmid
Miniprep Kit (Qiagen). Double-stranded DNA was directly submitted to a
dideoxy reaction with primer M3 or RV (Takara Shuzo) and an
ABI PRISM Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Perkin-Elmer). DNA
sequencing was conducted with an ABI PRISM 377 DNA sequencer
(Perkin-Elmer), and the sequence data were assembled with the
program AutoAssembler (Perkin-Elmer).
, a 5.7-kb genomic sequence of
DNApol
(nucleotides 1 to 5737 from accession no.
D90310), a new 4.1-kb sequence including a gap between D90310 and
D28563, a 21-kb sequence which includes oriD
(accession no. D28563), and a new 27-kb sequence which includes
dE2F.
2D gel electrophoresis.
DNA from 1-h embryos was prepared by
protocol A, as described previously (37). Total DNA was
subjected to 2D gel analysis without enrichment of replication
intermediates. DNA from older embryos was prepared as follows. Embryos
were suspended in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 25 mM
KCl, 5 mM magnesium acetate, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.35 M sucrose and
homogenized by a Dounce-type homogenizer (pestle B) at 4°C to release
the cells. The homogenates were filtered through two layers of
Miracloth (Calbiochem), and the cells were collected by centrifugation
at 700 × g for 15 min at 4°C. These cells were
washed once with buffer A, consisting of 50 mM KCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.05 mM spermine, 0.125 mM spermidine, 0.5%
-thiodiglycol, and 5 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), and then suspended in 50 volumes of buffer A to a
cell density of about 5 × 107 cells/ml. Kc cells
cultured and stored as described above were suspended in buffer A at
5 × 107 cells/ml. Cells prepared from embryos and Kc
cells were encapsulated in micro-agarose beads, and DNA was prepared by
protocol B, as described in a previous paper (37). DNA of Kc
cells and older embryos was enriched for replication intermediates by
chromatography on benzoylated naphthoylated DEAE cellulose (Sigma)
columns before 2D gel analysis.
-32P]dCTP to a specific activity of 1 × 109 to 2 × 109 dpm/µg of DNA by using a
Random Primer DNA labeling kit, version 2 (Takara Shuzo), and purified
through a ProbeQuant G-50 Micro Column (Pharmacia). Probes used
in N/N 2D gel analysis were restriction fragments to be detected (Fig.
2C) or their subfragments. The probes used in N/A 2D gel
analysis are shown in Fig. 2D, and the left, central, and right
probes for the respective restriction fragments were as
follows: BB5.5, K (BamHI-HindIII, 2.1 kb), J (HindIII-HindIII, 1.6 kb), and A
(HindIII-BamHI, 1.2 kb); HH6.1, A, B
(BamHI-BamHI, 1.3 kb), and C
(BamHI-HindIII, 1.2 kb); HH6.3, D
(HindIII-EcoRI, 2.3 kb), E
(PstI-PstI, 1.7 kb), and F
(PstI-HindIII, 1.85 kb); SB6.5, SBx2.1
(SalI-BstXI, 2.1 kb), BxE1.4
(BstXI-EcoRI, 1.4 kb), and I
(EcoRI-EcoRI, 2.1 kb); EE5.7, EB0.8
(EcoRI-BamHI, 0.8 kb), O
(BamHI-BamHI, 2.3 kb), and P2
(SalI-EcoRI, 1.8 kb); SS6.7, P2, P3
(EcoRI-EcoRI, 1.45 kb), and P4
(PstI-SalI, 2.2 kb); EE7.0, P1
(EcoRI-SalI, 3.4 kb), Q2
(SalI-BanIII, 2.3 kb), and Q1
(BanIII-EcoRI, 2.1 kb); HH6.0, Q2, Q1, and R
(EcoRI-BamHI, 1.8 kb); EE4.5, R, W1
(BamHI-BamHI, 1.4 kb), and W2
(BamHI-EcoRI, 1.25 kb); EE5.0, ES0.47
(EcoRI-SalI, 0.47 kb), SpBx2.5
(SpeI-BstXI, 2.5 kb), and X6
(BstXI-EcoRI, 0.4 kb); EE3.2, X7
(EcoRI-EagI, 1.6 kb), X8
(EagI-HindIII, 0.9 kb), and X9
(HindIII-EcoRI, 0.7 kb); HH3.3, X9, Y0
(EcoRI-SalI, 1.9 kb), and SS0.6
(SalI-SalI, 0.6 kb); SE3.1, a1
(SalI-XbaI, 1.0 kb), a2
(XbaI-BanIII, 1.0 kb), and a3
(BanIII-EcoRI, 1.0 kb); ES3.9, b1
(EcoRI-BstXI, 1.2 kb), b2
(BstXI-SacII, 1.5 kb), and b3
(SacII-SalI, 1.2 kb).
Images were taken by exposing membranes to phosphorimaging plates (Fuji
Photo Film) for 5 to 50 h and analyzed with a BAS2000 Bio Image
Analyzer (Fuji Photo Film).
Northern blotting.
Total RNA was isolated from embryos or Kc
cells with Trizol reagent (GIBCO) according to the manufacturer's
protocol. Twenty micrograms of total RNA was run in a 0.8% agarose gel
containing formaldehyde. After electrophoresis, RNA was blotted onto
Duralon UV membranes (Stratagene) and mRNAs were detected by
hybridization with probes labeled with [
-32P]dCTP
by using a Random Primer DNA labeling kit, version 2 (Takara Shuzo).
Probes specific for the first exon of each dE2F transcript were 264- and 260-bp fragments prepared by PCR amplification of Drosophila total genomic DNA with the following primer
pairs, respectively; 5'-TTGTTCAAAATTGTTCTGCAAC-3' and
5'-GAAGCCTTGATGAACAATTTTC-3' for Ohtani's transcript
(31) (dE2F-a) and 5'-GACTGCCTCTGCAAGTAAAAGA-3' and 5'-TTGACTCAGTCTGTGTGTGTGC-3' for Dynlacht's
transcript (9) (dE2F-b). The probe specific for
DNApol
was a mixture of probes C and D, as used for N/A
2D gel analysis.
Image processing. Images were processed with Photoshop (Adobe) and Canvas (Deneba) and printed with Pictrography 3000 (Fuji Photo Film).
Nucleotide sequence accession number. The sequence data determined in this study have been deposited in the DDBJ, EMBL, and GenBank databases under accession no. AB011813.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Unspecified distribution of replication origins in syncytial
embryos.
One of our previous studies showed that DNA replication
initiates at numerous sites with little site specificity in the histone gene repeats and in a single-copy chromosomal region on
chromosome II in 1-h embryos (36). In order to confirm that
the origins are distributed broadly also in the
DNApol
locus, N/N 2D gel analysis of the 40-kb region
surrounding DNApol
was performed (Fig.
3). The N/N 2D gel method permits
distinction between fragments containing internal origins (bubbles) and
fragments passively replicated by forks moving through one end to the
other (simple Y) by their different electrophoretic mobilities in the
second-dimension electrophoresis (5). If replication forks
enter a given fragment from both ends and meet within this fragment,
the replication intermediates are detected as double Ys. In contrast to
the results from Kc cells, for which no bubble arcs were detected
in fragments other than EE5.7, bubble arcs were detected in all
fragments in 1-h embryos. Double Y arcs were also observed in all
fragments in the 1-h embryos, consistent with the presence of numerous
initiation sites. Thus, we conclude that DNA replication initiates at
numerous unspecified sites also in the DNApol
locus in
the syncytium stage of embryos collected from 1 to 2 h after
fertilization.
|
Specification of origin usage during embryogenesis.
Next we
studied when the initiation region and the noninitiation region of DNA
replication were specified during embryogenesis. We approached this
problem by attempting to determine at what stage of embryogenesis the
direction of the replication forks changes in the fragments near
oriD
, based on the data analyzed by the N/A 2D gel
method. The rationale for this approach is illustrated in Fig. 4A and
B. If multiple replication origins
located both inside and outside of a given fragment contribute to
replicate the fragment as in early embryos described above, replication forks traveling this fragment are a mixture of those entering the
fragment from its left and right and those emanating from the inside
origins. In this case, the lengths of the shortest nascent strands
detected by the probes located in the right, center, or left portions
of the fragment do not change unidirectionally (Fig. 4A). After origin
specification, the directions of the replication fork movement become
biased in the fragment located outside of the specified initiation
region, and the lengths of the shortest nascent strands detected by
short probes will become different depending on the distance between
the probes and replication origins (Fig. 4B).
|
and represents the noninitiation region in Kc
cells. Fragment SB6.5 contains the left half of the initiation region,
oriD
(38).
In 2-h embryos, replication forks moving in both directions were
detected both in HH6.1 and SB6.5 and in all other fragments tested.
These results suggest that origin usage has not yet become specified in
2-h embryos, which mainly consist of blastoderms in cycle 14. In 3-h
embryos, however, the replication forks in HH6.1 had become
unidirectional. This means that replication origins active in the
earlier embryos become repressed in 3-h embryos. In SB6.5, replication
forks moving in both directions were still observed even in 4-h embryos
but became predominantly unidirectional in 5-h embryos. The predominant
direction of replication fork progression in SB6.5 in 5-h embryos was
from right to left, consistent with the expectation that the region was
mainly replicated by origins in oriD
or to its right.
These results suggest that replication origins in the coding region of
DNApol
become repressed after cellularization of the blastoderm, which occurs from 2 to 3 h after fertilization, and that the range of the initiation region oriD
becomes
confined by 5 h after fertilization.
N/A 2D gel analysis of initiation regions in 5-h embryos. To determine if the initiation regions established in 5-h embryos are the same as those observed in cultured cells, replication patterns in 5-h embryos were further analyzed by N/A and N/N 2D gel methods. The N/A 2D gel patterns are shown in Fig. 5.
|
proceed
unidirectionally through DNApol
in cultured Kc cells, and
replication in HH6.3 is unidirectional (38). Because the
direction of replication fork movement in 5-h embryos is predominantly
from right to left in both HH6.1 and SB6.5 (Fig. 4C), the bidirectional
replication fork movement in HH6.3 can be explained by assuming the
presence of initiation sites within and/or around the HH6.3 region.
The major difference in the replication patterns between 5-h embryos
and Kc cells was found in the downstream region to the right of
oriD
. As described above, replication forks move
predominantly from right to left in SB6.5 in 5-h embryos, supporting
the observation that this fragment is mainly replicated by the
replication origins located in its right-end portion and/or the
external origins located on its right. In fact, replication forks
moving in both directions were detected in EE5.7, which is located in
the center of oriD
(Fig. 5). This result is consistent
with the notion that EE5.7 is included in the broad initiation region
corresponding to oriD
in 5-h embryos, as in Kc cells
(38). However, the replication patterns in the region on the
right of EE5.7 were different from those observed in cultured cells. In
Kc cells, replication forks move bidirectionally from
oriD
, and then replication fork movement in the fragments
located on the right of EE5.7 is predominantly from left to right,
opposite to the direction in SB6.5 (38). However, in 5-h
embryos, the replication forks proceeded toward EE5.7 in fragments
EE7.0, SS6.7, and HH5.0, which were located on the right of EE5.7 (Fig.
5). Taken together, these results suggest that replication origins in
the oriD
region are actually active in 5-h embryos
but that there are other initiation sites in the genomic region
downstream of, although not far from, oriD
.
To search for the putative initiation sites located on the right of
oriD
, the 27-kb genomic region adjacent to the
oriD
locus was cloned and its nucleotide sequence was
determined. The newly isolated region included the gene encoding the
Drosophila homologue of transcription factor E2F
(dE2F). Two kinds of cDNAs differing only in the 5'
nontranslated regions have been reported (9, 31). Comparison
of the genomic sequence of the dE2F locus with those of the
cDNAs revealed two genomic sequences corresponding to the diverged
sequences of two dE2F cDNAs. Thus, there are at least two
kinds of transcripts of dE2F that differ in the
nontranslated first exon but share the other exons, as shown in the map
in Fig. 5.
The N/A 2D gel patterns of fragments in the dE2F locus
observed in 5-h embryos are also shown in Fig. 5. Replication forks moving in both directions were observed in most fragments except HH3.3.
In HH3.3, the direction of replication fork movement was primarily from
left to right. Thus, the replication patterns in the
dE2F locus seem to be rather complex, and the results
suggest that the putative initiation sites adjacent to
oriD
are located in the region between EE7.0 and HH3.3.
This region includes the promoter regions for both transcripts of
dE2F. The finding that the direction of replication fork
movement is bidirectional in ES3.9 suggests that still other
replication origins are present in the 3' portion or 3' downstream
region of dE2F.
N/N 2D gel analysis of initiation regions in 5-h embryos and Kc
cells.
The above N/A 2D gel analysis suggested the existence of
initiation sites in the following regions in 5-h embryos: the 3' downstream region of DNApol
, the oriD
region, the 5' upstream region of dE2F, and the 3'
downstream region of dE2F. To confirm the regions that
definitely contain replication origins in 5-h embryos, N/N 2D gel
analysis was performed and the results were compared with those
observed in Kc cells (Fig. 6).
|
region (EE5.7), the 5' upstream regions of dE2F (HH6.0 and EE5.0), and the 3' downstream region of
dE2F(ES3.9) was confirmed. Replication bubbles, however,
were not detected in HH6.3. Bubble arcs also were not detected in other
fragments overlapping HH6.3 (data not shown). If replication origins
are present in the HH6.3 region, as suggested from the N/A 2D pattern of HH6.3, the frequency of their firing may be too low or the replication bubbles formed may be too short lived to be detected as
bubble arcs.
Among the fragments that showed bubble arcs in 5-h embryos, only EE5.7
and EE5.0 exhibited bubble arcs in Kc cells as well (Fig. 6). These
results suggest that origin usage in 5-h embryos is in the intermediate
state between earlier embryos and Kc cells. Interestingly, while the
two fragments (HH6.0 and EE5.0) corresponding to the respective 5'
upstream regions for two transcripts of dE2F showed bubble
arcs in 5-h embryos, bubble arcs were detected only in EE5.0 in Kc cells.
Double Y arcs were observed in most fragments from the dE2F
locus in 5-h embryos. These results might account for the observation in the N/A 2D gel analysis (Fig. 5) of replication forks moving in both
directions in most fragments. Bidirectional replication fork movement
and the formation of double Y replication intermediates in the
initiation regions might be due to a broad distribution of replication
origins, as in oriD
(38). We were unable to discriminate between the following two possible explanations for the
complex situations in the regions where replication bubbles were not
detected. Replication origins belonging to different initiation regions
may fire in different cells, resulting in a mixture of the direction of
replication fork movement and termination at diverse sites.
Alternatively, complex replication patterns may also be caused by the
presence of minor initiation sites throughout the regions where bubble
arcs were not detected by N/N 2D gel analysis.
Differential expression of the dE2F gene. Recently it has been shown that among two kinds of transcripts of dE2F, the transcript corresponding to the cDNA reported by Dynlacht et al. (9) was expressed throughout embryogenesis and in other stages of development, while the transcript reported by Ohtani and Nevins (31) was expressed in a specific stage of embryos, highest in 4- to 8-h embryos (33). As for the initiation region of DNA replication, the upstream regions of both transcripts were active in 5-h embryos (HH6.0 and EE5.0) while only one (EE5.0) was active in Kc cells (Fig. 6). These observations led us to examine whether the two transcripts are expressed differently between 5-h embryos and Kc cells. By Northern blotting analysis with specific probes for each of the first exons, both transcripts (dE2F-a and -b) were detected in 5-h embryos but only one (dE2F-b), ubiquitously expressed throughout development, was detected in Kc cells (Fig. 7). Thus, there seems to be a spatial correlation between active initiation regions of DNA replication and active promoter regions for transcription of dE2F.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DNA replication initiated at unspecified chromosomal sites in
preblastoderm embryos, but the initiation regions in the
oriD
locus were specified by 5 h after fertilization
during Drosophila embryogenesis. Replication origins in the
coding region of DNApol
were already repressed in 3-h
embryos after completion of cellularization of the blastoderms, but
confinement of the range of oriD
was clear in 5-h
embryos. A comparison of the replication patterns in the
DNApol
-dE2F locus between 5-h embryos and Kc cells (Fig. 8) suggested that specification of origin
usage in 5-h embryos was still in the intermediate state between the
younger embryos and the more differentiated cells. We also noticed a
spatial correlation between the active initiation regions of DNA
replication and the active promoter regions for transcription in the
upstream region of dE2F.
|
As observed in Drosophila embryos, replication initiation occurs at unspecified sites in ribosomal DNA of Xenopus early embryos (23) but becomes confined to the intergenic spacers at the late blastula and early gastrula stage (22). What restricts the initiation region during embryogenesis? One apparent factor that changes during Drosophila embryogenesis is the concentration of nuclei in syncytial cytoplasm (10). In a Xenopus cell-free replication system, it was reported that the nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio affects both S-phase length and replicon size (40). The concentration of nuclei at which the S phase lengthens in vitro is similar to the concentration of nuclei in Xenopus embryos at the midblastula transition, and the changes in replicon size are very similar in vitro and in vivo. This indicates that a quantitative change in some factor(s) causes a preference in origin usage. Origin recognition complex (ORC) proteins and minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins are believed to play important roles in DNA replication and are the likeliest candidates for such limiting factors. In the Xenopus cell-free system, however, they are abundant and thus are not thought to be a limiting factor of origin usage (40). In Drosophila embryos, ORC and MCM proteins are maternally supplied, and the maternal supply is sufficient for embryonic mitoses because homozygous mutants of some of their genes survive until late larval or pupal stage (14, 24, 39). In wild-type embryos, the amounts of the transcript of the dpa gene encoding a homologue of the MCM4 protein were maximum in 6- to 9-h embryos and reduced remarkably in 9- to 12-h embryos (14). Thus, the MCM proteins (and also ORC proteins) may not be the limiting factor for specification of origin usage in Drosophila embryos either. It is possible, however, that factors to modify and regulate the activities of ORC and MCM proteins or factors to recruit them to the replication origins are limiting factors that specify replication origins.
In addition to the quantitative factors, there are factors whose qualitative change during embryogenesis influences origin usage. Chromatin structures change in various aspects during embryogenesis. For example, chromatin of the blastoderm stage of embryos (0 to 2 h) differs significantly from that of older embryos (6 to 8 h), and histone H1 is absent in the blastoderm chromatin (12). Lack of histone H1 contributes to the decrease in nucleosome spacing in chromatin reconstituted in vitro from cell extract prepared from preblastoderms of Drosophila embryos (3). Recently it was reported that the addition of histone H1 reduces the frequency of replication initiation in Xenopus egg extract, most likely by limiting the assembly of prereplication complexes on sperm chromatin, even when sufficient amounts of proteins necessary for formation of prereplication complexes, such as ORC and MCM, are present in extract (26).
A Drosophila homologue of the HMG 1 protein, HMG-D, is
associated with condensed chromatin structures in the nuclear cleavage cycles of Drosophila embryos (29). It is thought
that HMG-D, either by itself or in conjunction with other chromosomal
proteins, induces a condensed state of chromatin that is distinct from
and less compact than chromatin with histone H1. Histone H1 is absent in the chromatin in early embryos and is first detected in cycle 7, and
its level dramatically increases after stage 7 (cycle 14) due to
activation of zygotic transcription. Because HMG-D is present at a
constant level at all stages of development, HMG-D/H1 ratios decrease
as embryogenesis progresses and there is a temporal correlation between
the switch in HMG-D/H1 ratios and the changes that occur during the
midblastula transition. The data shown in Fig. 4 suggest that
replication origins in the coding regions of DNApol
(fragment HH6.1) are active in 2-h embryos (mainly cycle 14) but become inactive in 3-h embryos. Thus, the stage at which the repression of
origin activities is first detected corresponds to the stage just after
a dramatic increase in the histone H1 level.
The nucleosome structure without histone H1 in earlier embryos itself may be sufficiently loose to permit access of the initiation factors to random sequences without a high specificity of origin selection. Further, the importance of the higher structure of chromatin in DNA replication has been demonstrated in a system with CHO nuclei reconstituted in Xenopus extract (25). The chromatin structure without histone H1 would cause a difference in the higher-order structure of chromatin, including chromosome condensation in mitosis, which may permit the selection of origins which are different from those of chromatin associated with histone H1. Thus, the linker histone may play an important role in specifying origin usage in early embryogenesis both in Drosophila and Xenopus.
Another factor which may affect the origin activity is the activation
of transcription. In Drosophila embryos, the activation of
zygotic transcription is first detectable during cycle 11 or 12 and
reaches maximal activation during late cycle 14 (11). Replication is initiated outside of the transcription units after activation of zygotic transcription in the DNApol
and
dE2F loci. Changes occurring at midblastula
transition, like the change in chromatin structure discussed
above, will affect both activation of transcription and origin usage,
but transcription itself and/or factors controlling transcription may
influence origin activity.
Though initiation and noninitiation regions become separated 5 h
after fertilization, the initiation regions observed in 5-h embryos
still appear to be less specified than those observed in Kc cells. The
potential initiation regions in the DNApol
-dE2F locus
observed in 5-h embryos and Kc cells are schematically presented in
Fig. 8. In Kc cells, an initiation region (oriD
) was
newly identified about 20 kb away (a center-to-center distance between fragments EE5.7 and EE5.0) from the previously identified
oriD
. In addition to these initiation regions, two
initiation sites, one between oriD
and oriD
and another around the 3' portion of dE2F, were observed in
5-h embryos. The N/A 2D gel data suggested the presence of some
initiation sites also around the 3' portion of DNApol
.
Thus, the replication origins in 5-h embryos consist of those in Kc
cells plus some other regions, and the average center-to-center
distance of the initiation regions in 5-h embryos is about 10 kb. The
complex N/A and N/N gel patterns observed in 5-h embryos (Fig. 5 and 6)
must result from such short spacing of the initiation regions and/or
incomplete repression of origin activity in the regions where
replication bubbles were not detected. These results suggest that the
initiation regions in 5-h embryos are in the intermediate state of
origin specification between preblastoderm embryos and cells in
the later stages of development. During embryogenesis in
Drosophila, most cells stop proliferation after the 16th
cell cycle; later, in the larval stage, cells resume proliferation. Though the cell line Kc was originally established from
embryonic cells (2), cells established as a cell line are
thought to have chromatin structures corresponding to those of more
differentiated cells. The possibility that usage of different initiation regions depending on cell type, e.g., mitotic domains (16), resulted in an apparent shortening of spacing between initiation regions cannot be excluded.
The results suggest that initiation of DNA replication and activation
of transcription are correlated in the 5' upstream region of
dE2F in both embryos and Kc cells. It was recently
demonstrated (33) that the two transcripts of
dE2F have separate promoter regions and that their
expression is differentially regulated. One transcript was ubiquitously
detected at all stages of development and in cultured cells, while the
other was detected only in embryos, maximally in 4- to 8-h embryos. In
accordance with these expression patterns of dE2F, origin
activities were observed in the 5' upstream region of the ubiquitously
expressed transcript in both 5-h embryos and Kc cells, but those in the
5' upstream region of the transcript expressed only in embryos were
detected only in 5-h embryos. The influence of transcription and/or
transcription factors on replication in viral systems (reviewed in
reference 7), bacterial systems (1), ARS1
of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (27), and an in vitro transcription-replication model system (30) has been
extensively discussed. Confocal microscopic observation indicated that
replication sites and transcription sites colocalize in nuclei
(18). A well-known example of the effect of transcription on
DNA replication in higher eukaryotes is that activation of
transcription of tissue-specific genes frequently accompanies
activation of nearby replication origins. For example, replication of
the murine immunoglobulin H (IgH) locus is related to the
transcriptional activity of the locus; replication origins that are
inactive in non-B cells are active in B cells and pre-B cells in which
the IgH genes are expressed (6). Similarly, the activity of
the replication origin at the promoter region of the
-globin gene
seems to be correlated with the transcriptional activity of the
-globin gene (13, 19). The dE2F gene, however,
is expressed in any proliferating cell because the E2F protein is an
important transcriptional regulator necessary for expression of many
proliferation-related genes. It would be the first example suggesting a
correlation between active promoter regions and active replication
origins in a gene transcribed from promoters which are different
depending on the cell type, although the relationship between the
replication origins and promoters must be clarified at higher resolution.
In contrast to the replication origins observed upstream of
dE2F, origin activity of oriD
does not seem to
be correlated with transcriptional activity. Our preliminary Northern
analysis (data not shown) suggested the presence of mRNAs detectable by probes in the adjacent regions of oriD
but not by a probe
encompassing its 10-kb initiation region. These mRNAs were detected in
early embryos until 2 h, but neither in later embryos nor in Kc
cells. These mRNAs may correspond to expressed sequence tag (EST)
sequences recently registered in the databases (GenBank accession no.
LD33721, etc.). Because these EST sequences have a part of the second
exon of the known two transcripts of dE2F, they may be the
third transcript of dE2F. Their 5' portion, corresponding to
the first exon of the known transcripts, is composed of two exons, and
oriD
is located within the 15-kb intron between these
exons. Even if the mRNAs described above were the transcript
corresponding to these EST clones, this transcript was expressed
neither in Kc cells nor in later embryos, where oriD
was active. Therefore, the origin activity of oriD
seems to be independent of activation of this transcript.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
|---|
This work was supported in part by a grant-in-aid for scientific research on priority areas from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Mitsubishi Kasei Institute of Life Sciences, 11 Minami-oya, Machida, Tokyo 194-8511, Japan. Phone: 81-427-24-6251. Fax: 81-427-24-6317. E-mail: tomo{at}libra.ls.m-kagaku.co.jp.
Present address: Horikoshi Gene Selector Project, ERATO, JST,
Tsukuba, Ibaraki 300-2635, Japan.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Asai, T., M. Takanami, and M. Imai. 1990. The AT richness and gid transcription determine the left border of the replication origin of the E. coli chromosome. EMBO J. 9:4065-4072[Medline]. |
| 2. | Ashburner, M. 1989. Drosophila: a laboratory handbook. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 3. |
Becker, P. B., and C. Wu.
1992.
Cell-free system for assembly of transcriptionally repressed chromatin from Drosophila embryos.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:2241-2249 |
| 4. |
Blumenthal, A. B.,
H. J. Kriegstein, and D. S. Hogness.
1974.
The units of DNA replication in Drosophila melanogaster chromosomes.
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
38:205-223 |
| 5. | Brewer, B. J., and W. L. Fangman. 1987. The localization of replication origins on ARS plasmids in S. cerevisiae. Cell 51:463-471[Medline]. |
| 6. |
Brown, E. H.,
M. A. Iqbal,
S. Stuart,
K. S. Hatton,
J. Valinsky, and C. L. Schildkraut.
1987.
Rate of replication of the murine immunoglobulin heavy-chain locus: evidence that the region is part of a single replicon.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7:450-457 |
| 7. | DePamphilis, M. L. 1993. Eukaryotic DNA replication: anatomy of an origin. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 62:29-63[Medline]. |
| 8. | DePamphilis, M. L. 1996. Origins of DNA replication, p. 45-86. In M. L. DePamphilis (ed.), DNA replication in eukaryotic cells, vol. 31. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 9. |
Dynlacht, B. D.,
A. Brook,
M. Dembski,
L. Yenush, and N. Dyson.
1994.
DNA-binding and trans-activation properties of Drosophila E2F and DP proteins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:6359-6363 |
| 10. | Edgar, B. A., C. P. Kiehle, and G. Schubiger. 1986. Cell cycle control by the nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio in early Drosophila development. Cell 44:365-372[Medline]. |
| 11. | Edgar, B. A., and G. Schubiger. 1986. Parameters controlling transcriptional activation during early Drosophila development. Cell 44:871-877[Medline]. |
| 12. | Elgin, S. C. R., and L. E. Hood. 1973. Chromosomal proteins of Drosophila embryos. Biochemistry 12:4984-4991[Medline]. |
| 13. |
Epner, E.,
W. C. Forrester, and M. Groudine.
1988.
Asynchronous DNA replication within the human beta-globin gene locus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:8081-8085 |
| 14. | Feger, G., H. Vaessin, T. T. Su, E. Wolff, L. Y. Jan, and Y. N. Jan. 1995. dpa, a member of the MCM family, is required for mitotic DNA replication but not endoreplication in Drosophila. EMBO J. 14:5387-5398[Medline]. |
| 15. | FlyBase: a database of the Drosophila genome. 1997. [Online.] Genetics Society of America. http://flybase.bio.indiana.edu/ [1 July 1998, last date accessed.] |
| 16. | Foe, V. E. 1989. Mitotic domains reveal early commitment of cells in Drosophila embryos. Development 107:1-22[Abstract]. |
| 17. | Foe, V. E., and B. M. Alberts. 1983. Studies of nuclear and cytoplasmic behaviour during the five mitotic cycles that precede gastrulation in Drosophila embryogenesis. J. Cell Sci. 61:31-70[Abstract]. |
| 18. | Hassan, A. B., R. J. Errington, N. S. White, D. A. Jackson, and P. R. Cook. 1994. Replication and transcription sites are colocalized in human cells. J. Cell Sci. 107:425-434[Abstract]. |
| 19. |
Hatton, K. S.,
V. Dhar,
E. H. Brown,
M. A. Iqbal,
S. Stuart,
V. T. Didamo, and C. L. Schildkraut.
1988.
Replication program of active and inactive multigene families in mammalian cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8:2149-2158 |
| 20. |
Hirose, F.,
M. Yamaguchi,
Y. Nishida,
M. Masutani,
H. Miyazawa,
F. Hanaoka, and A. Matsukage.
1991.
Structure and expression during development of Drosophila melanogaster gene for DNA polymerase .
Nucleic Acids Res.
19:4991-4998 |
| 21. | Huberman, J. A., L. D. Spotila, K. A. Nawotka, S. M. El-Assouli, and L. R. Davis. 1987. The in vivo replication origin of the yeast 2µm plasmid. Cell 51:473-481[Medline]. |
| 22. |
Hyrien, O.,
C. Maric, and M. Méchali.
1995.
Transition in specification of embryonic metazoan DNA replication origins.
Science
270:994-997 |
| 23. | Hyrien, O., and M. Méchali. 1993. Chromosomal replication initiates and terminates at random sequences but at regular intervals in the ribosomal DNA of Xenopus early embryos. EMBO J. 12:4511-4520[Medline]. |
| 24. |
Landis, G.,
R. Kelley,
A. Spradling, and J. Tower.
1997.
The k-43 gene, required for chorion gene amplification and diploid cell chromosome replication, encodes the Drosophila homolog of yeast origin recognition complex subunit 2.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:3888-3892 |
| 25. |
Lawlis, S. J.,
S. M. Keezer,
J. R. Wu, and D. M. Gilbert.
1996.
Chromosome architecture can dictate site-specific initiation of DNA replication in Xenopus egg extracts.
J. Cell Biol.
135:1207-1218 |
| 26. |
Lu, Z. H.,
D. B. Sittman,
P. Romanowski, and G. H. Leno.
1998.
Histone H1 reduces the frequency of initiation in Xenopus egg extract by limiting the assembly of prereplication complexes on sperm chromatin.
Mol. Biol. Cell
9:1163-1176 |
| 27. |
Marahrens, Y., and B. Stillman.
1992.
A yeast chromosomal origin of DNA replication defined by multiple functional elements.
Science
255:817-823 |
| 28. |
Melov, S.,
H. Vaughan, and S. Cotterill.
1992.
Molecular characterisation of the gene for the 180 kDa subunit of the DNA polymerase-primase of Drosophila melanogaster.
J. Cell Sci.
102:847-856 |
| 29. | Ner, S. S., and A. A. Travers. 1994. HMG-D, the Drosophila melanogaster homologue of HMG 1 protein, is associated with early embryonic chromatin in the absence of histone H1. EMBO J. 13:1817-1822[Medline]. |
| 30. | Ohba, R., K. Matsumoto, and Y. Ishimi. 1996. Induction of DNA replication by transcription in the region upstream of the human c-myc gene in a model replication system. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:5754-5763[Abstract]. |
| 31. |
Ohtani, K., and J. R. Nevins.
1994.
Functional properties of a Drosophila homolog of the E2F1 gene.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:1603-1612 |
| 32. | Orr-Weaver, T. L. 1994. Developmental modification of the Drosophila cell cycle. Trends Genet. 10:321-327[Medline]. |
| 33. |
Sawado, T.,
F. Hirose,
Y. Takahashi,
T. Sasaki,
T. Shinomiya,
K. Sakaguchi,
A. Matsukage, and M. Yamaguchi.
1998.
The DNA replication-related element (DRE)/DRE-binding factor system is a transcriptional regulator of the Drosophila E2F gene.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:26042-26051 |
| 34. | Seum, C., A. Spierer, D. Pauli, J. Szidonya, G. Reuter, and P. Spierer. 1996. Position-effect variegation in Drosophila depends on dose of the gene encoding the E2F transcriptional activator and cell cycle regulator. Development 122:1949-1956[Abstract]. |
| 35. | Shinomiya, T. Unpublished data. |
| 36. |
Shinomiya, T., and S. Ina.
1991.
Analysis of chromosomal replicons in early embryos of Drosophila melanogaster by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis.
Nucleic Acids Res.
19:3935-3941 |
| 37. |
Shinomiya, T., and S. Ina.
1993.
DNA replication of histone gene repeats in Drosophila melanogaster tissue culture cells: multiple initiation sites and replication pause sites.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:4098-4106 |
| 38. |
Shinomiya, T., and S. Ina.
1994.
Mapping an initiation region of DNA replication at a single-copy chromosomal locus in Drosophila melanogaster cells by two-dimensional gel methods and PCR-mediated nascent-strand analysis: multiple replication origins in a broad zone.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:7394-7403 |
| 39. |
Treisman, J. E.,
P. J. Follette,
P. H. O'Farrell, and G. M. Rubin.
1995.
Cell proliferation and DNA replication defects in a Drosophila MCM2 mutant.
Genes Dev.
9:1709-1715 |
| 40. |
Walter, J., and J. W. Newport.
1997.
Regulation of replicon size in Xenopus egg extracts.
Science
275:993-995 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»