Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, January 1999, p. 594-601, Vol. 19, No. 1
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
The Oncogenic Potential of the Pax3-FKHR Fusion
Protein Requires the Pax3 Homeodomain Recognition Helix but Not the
Pax3 Paired-Box DNA Binding Domain
Paula Y. P.
Lam,1,
Jack E.
Sublett,2
Andrew D.
Hollenbach,3 and
Martine F.
Roussel4,*
Departments of Experimental
Oncology,1
Developmental
Neurobiology,2
Genetics,3 and
Tumor Cell
Biology,4 St. Jude Children's Research
Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105
Received 4 February 1998/Returned for modification 17 March
1998/Accepted 1 October 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
The chimeric transcription factor Pax3-FKHR, produced by the
t(2;13)(q35;q14) chromosomal translocation in alveolar
rhabdomyosarcoma, consists of the two Pax3 DNA binding domains (paired
box and homeodomain) fused to the C-terminal forkhead (FKHR) sequences
that contain a potent transcriptional activation domain. To determine
which of these domains are required for cellular transformation, Pax3, Pax3-FKHR, and selected mutants were retrovirally expressed in NIH 3T3
cells and evaluated for their capacity to promote anchorage-independent cell growth. Mutational analysis revealed that both the third
-helix
of the homeodomain and a small region of the FKHR transactivation domain are absolutely required for efficient transformation by the
Pax3-FKHR fusion protein. Surprisingly, point mutations in the paired
domain that abrogate sequence-specific DNA binding retained
transformation potential equivalent to that of the wild-type protein.
This finding suggests that DNA binding mediated through the Pax3 paired
box is not required for transformation. Our results demonstrate that
the integrity of the Pax3 homeodomain recognition helix and the FKHR
transactivation domain is necessary for efficient cellular
transformation by the Pax3-FKHR fusion protein.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Chromosomal translocations, which
are hallmarks of both hematopoietic and solid malignancies
(28), frequently involve the fusion of two independent genes
to encode a novel chimeric protein with aberrant functions. Alveolar
rhabdomyosarcoma, characterized by the t(2;13)(q35;q14) translocation
(14, 31), is a malignant tumor of skeletal muscle and is one
of the most common soft tissue sarcomas of childhood, accounting for
more than half of such cases in pediatric patients (27).
This translocation creates the Pax3-FKHR fusion gene. This gene, which
encodes a protein of 837 amino acids, comprises the 5' sequences of the
Pax3 gene, a member of the paired class homeodomain family of
transcription factors (32, 33), and the 3' sequences of the
FKHR gene, which encodes a member of the forkhead family of
transcription factors (6). The fusion protein maintains the
integrity of the Pax3 DNA binding motifs (paired domain and
homeodomain), but the transactivation domain of Pax3 is replaced by the
bisected FKHR DNA binding domain and transcriptional activation domain.
As a result, the Pax3-FKHR fusion protein exhibits higher
transcriptional activity than does Pax3 alone (13),
suggesting that the oncogenic potential of Pax3-FKHR results from this
gain-of-function mutation.
Many chromosomal translocations result in fusion proteins that involve
transcription factors. A DNA binding-independent model has been
described to explain the oncogenicity of the fusion protein E2a-Pbx1.
In acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the t(1;19)(q23;p13) translocation
fuses the N-terminal transcriptional activation domains of E2a to the
C-terminal region of the homeodomain protein Pbx1 (21, 26).
Transformation by the E2a-Pbx1 fusion protein is dependent on
protein-protein interactions via the homeodomain cooperativity motif of
Pbx1 (9) and is independent of DNA binding by the
homeodomain of Pbx1 (23).
Pax3-FKHR has been demonstrated to transform chicken embryo fibroblasts
in culture (30), but the structural requirements for its
oncogenicity have not yet been defined. In the present study, we have
analyzed the structure-function relationship of the Pax3-FKHR domains
necessary for transcriptional activation and transformation. Our
results show that paired domain-mediated DNA binding is not necessary
for transformation. However, the integrity of the third
-helix of
the Pax3 homeodomain, in conjunction with a region of the FKHR
transactivation domain, is essential for Pax3-FKHR-mediated
oncogenicity. These results suggest a model in which
homeodomain-mediated DNA binding, with an additional role of
homeodomain-mediated protein-protein interactions, is important for the
oncogenic potential of Pax3-FKHR.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Expression constructs and mutagenesis.
All expression
plasmids were constructed in the mammalian expression vector pcDNA3
(Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.). The murine Pax3 cDNA, pBH3.2, kindly
provided by Peter Gruss (Max Planck Institute, Göttingen,
Germany), encodes a protein that has over 98% homology with human Pax3
and is completely identical in its DNA binding regions (15,
20). The isolation of the Pax3-FKHR fusion protein cDNA was
previously reported (14, 31). The Pax3-FKHR point mutants
Un-1, BU35, V265A, S268A, N269A, and S268N269A were created by standard
PCR site-directed mutagenesis (18). The internal deletion
mutants
PD-NH2,
HD-C, and
HD were constructed by overlap
extension PCR (19), and the C-terminal deletion mutants
772,
728, and
672 were generated by PCR amplification and
standard cloning techniques. All mutants were confirmed by sequence
analysis. Further C-terminal truncation proteins (
503 and
606)
were constructed by using restriction enzyme sites ScaI and
NdeI at nucleotide positions 1497 and 1805, respectively
(Fig. 1). The chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) reporter
construct (pTK-CAT) containing six direct repeats of both the paired
domain and homeodomain consensus binding sequences (PRS-9)
[(PRS-9) PTKCAT] was a gift from Martyn Goulding (The Salk
Institute, San Diego, Calif.).
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay.
Protein-DNA binding
reaction mixtures (20 µl) included 2 µl of in vitro-translated
protein (Promega) and 3 µg of poly(dI-dC) in buffer containing 20 mM
HEPES (pH 7.6), 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM
dithiothreitol, and 10% glycerol (13). Protein expression was confirmed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) with detection by autoradiography of
[35S]methionine-labeled protein. Unlabeled protein was
incubated at room temperature for 20 min with 105 dpm of
the oligonucleotide probe PRS-9, which contains both the paired domain
and the homeodomain recognition sequences (7); this probe
was labeled with [
-32P]dCTP (6,000 Ci/mmol; Amersham,
Arlington, Ill.). Incubation of protein with competitor (1,500-fold
molar excess of unlabeled PRS-9 probe) or with 1 µl of Pax3 rabbit
antiserum was performed at room temperature for 10 min prior to the
addition of labeled probe. DNA-protein complexes were resolved on a 6%
native polyacrylamide gel, containing 2.5% glycerol in 25 mM Tris-HCl
(pH 8.3) and 190 mM glycine, at 35 mA for 1.5 h. Gels were fixed
in 10% acetic acid and dried, and labeled oligonucleotides were
visualized by autoradiography.
Retroviral stocks and transformation assays.
The various
forms of Pax3-FKHR cDNA were cloned into the EcoRI site of
the vector pSR
(
HindIII)-tk-Neo (29), kindly provided by Charles Sawyers (UCLA Medical School, Los Angeles, Calif.). Retroviral stocks were generated by calcium phosphate cotransfection (16) of 293T cells, kindly provided by David Baltimore
(California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Calif.), with various
constructs and an ecotropic packaging plasmid (
2), as described
previously (24). Culture supernatants containing virus were
collected between 36 and 72 h posttransfection, filtered, and
subsequently used to infect NIH 3T3 cells, which were demonstrated to
be transformed by EWS-FLI, kindly provided by Christopher Denny
(University of California at Los Angeles). Soft agar assays were
performed by resuspending 2 × 104 cells in 1 ml of
1× Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium containing 15% fetal bovine
serum and 0.3% Noble agar (Difco). The cell suspension was then
layered over 2 ml of 0.6% bottom agar in 35-mm-diameter dishes.
Colonies were scored 2 and 3 weeks after seeding.
Antibody production and immunoprecipitation.
The Pax3
antiserum was produced by immunization of rabbits with a bacterially
expressed, His6 epitope-tagged Pax3 protein (a
six-histidine-tagged Pax3 protein containing only the paired domain and
the homeodomain). To confirm overexpression of the Pax3-FKHR
constructs, NIH 3T3 cells infected with high-titer retroviruses encoding either Pax3-FKHR or the Pax3-FKHR mutant derivatives were
metabolically labeled at 48 h after infection with
[35S]methionine (0.5 mCi/ml; New England Nuclear,
Beverly, Mass.) for 2 h, lysed in dissociation buffer (0.5% SDS,
1 mM dithiothreitol, 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 1 mM EDTA), and boiled
for 5 min. Cell lysates were diluted fourfold with
radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1.0%
Nonidet P-40, 0.5% deoxycholic acid, 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 1 mM
EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). The lysate supernatants were
then centrifuged for 30 min at 4°C at 10,000 × g and
incubated with the Pax3 rabbit polyclonal antiserum for 2 h, at
4°C, on a rotary shaker. Immune complexes were collected with protein
A-Sepharose (Pharmacia, Piscataway, N.J.) and washed four times with
radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer containing 0.1% SDS. Pellets
were resuspended in 30 µl of 2× Laemmli SDS-PAGE buffer, boiled for
5 min, and centrifuged to remove debris. Proteins were resolved on an
SDS-10% PAGE gel. The gel was incubated in ENHANCE (New England
Nuclear), dried, and autoradiographed at
80°C overnight.
Immunofluorescence.
NIH 3T3 cells were infected with
retroviruses encoding either Pax3-FKHR or the Pax3-FKHR mutant
derivatives. At 24 h postinfection, 2 × 104
cells were replated onto coverslips in 35-mm-diameter dishes and
cultured for an additional 24 h. Cells were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature, rinsed twice with
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and permeabilized for 10 min in 2%
paraformaldehyde containing 1% Triton X-100. The fixed cells were
incubated for 1 h with a 1:200 dilution of the Pax3 rabbit
polyclonal antiserum. After being washed with PBS, the cells were
incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit
antibody (1:1,000; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.) for 30 min,
washed with PBS, and mounted with Vectashield mounting medium (Vector
Laboratories, Burlingame, Calif.). Slides were examined with an Olympus
BH2 fluorescent microscope.
Transient transfections and transactivation assays.
NIH 3T3
cells (3 × 105) were plated in 60-mm-diameter dishes
and transfected the following day, at approximately 70% confluency, by
the Lipofectamine method (Gibco/BRL, Grand Island, N.Y.), in accordance
with the manufacturer's specifications. The Lipofectamine-DNA precipitate was formed in a total of 600 µl of serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 2 mM glutamine. The
precipitate consisted of 1 µg of the (PRS-9)pTK-CAT reporter plasmid
described above (7), 250 ng of expression plasmid
(containing Pax3, Pax3-FKHR, or the mutant derivatives), and 1 µg of
the secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) control plasmid under control
of the MAP1 promoter (5). The Lipofectamine-DNA precipitate
was incubated on the cell monolayer for 5 h in 3.0 ml of DMEM
supplemented with only 2 mM glutamine, after which the cell monolayer
was fed with 5 ml of DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and 2 mM glutamine. After 48 h, the medium was assayed for SEAP
activity, as previously described (5), and the cells were
harvested and assayed for CAT activity, as previously described
(1). The percentage of [14C]chloramphenicol
acetylation was quantitated from thin-layer chromatography plates by
using a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics). The transfection
efficiency was normalized relative to the SEAP activity. Each
experiment was repeated three times in duplicate plates.
 |
RESULTS |
Pax3-FKHR mutant constructs and DNA binding activity.
To
define the Pax3-FKHR domains required for transformation, we generated
a series of Pax3-FKHR mutants (Fig. 1).
We made three mutants that disrupt DNA binding through the Pax3 paired domain: Un-1 contains a glycine-to-serine mutation at codon 48 (G48S),
which is analogous to the mutation in the Pax1 paired domain of the
undulated mouse mutant (2); BU35 contains an arginine-to-leucine mutation at codon 56 (R56L), which has been reported in a family with Waardenburg syndrome type 1 (20); and
PD-NH2 has a deletion in the N-terminal
-helices of the paired domain that are involved in making DNA contacts (35). We also constructed six mutants involving the homeodomain: S268A contains a serine-to-alanine mutation within the third
-helix of the
homeodomain of Pax3-FKHR, which reduces Pax3 homodimerization upon
binding to DNA (12); V265A, N269A, and S268N269A contain point mutations of amino acids within the homeodomain recognition helix
that were demonstrated to be involved in making direct DNA contacts
(35).
HD-C lacks the entire third
-helix from glutamic acid 260 to lysine 276 (
E260-K276) of the
homeodomain. This helix, called the recognition helix, is believed to
mediate homeodomain-DNA contacts, homeodomain-mediated protein-protein
interactions, and Pax3 homodimerization on DNA (12, 34).
HD represents an in-frame deletion of the entire homeodomain from
glutamine 219 to glycine 279 (
Q219-G279).
Finally, we made progressive C-terminal deletions in the FKHR transactivation domain (
772 to
503 as shown in Fig. 1).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Schematic representation of the Pax3, Pax3-FKHR, and
Pax3-FKHR mutant proteins. Two mutants containing a single amino acid
change in the paired domain were constructed: Un-1 (G48S) and BU35
(R56L), which recapitulate naturally occurring mutations in Pax1 and
Pax3, respectively (2, 20). PD-NH2 contains an in-frame
deletion of the paired-domain helices that are involved in DNA contacts
(Asn53 to Thr93). S268A contains a single amino
acid change in the homeodomain, which mediates Pax3 dimerization
(12). V265A, N269A, and S268N269A contain single or double
amino acid changes in the homeodomain recognition helix that have been
shown to make direct DNA contacts (35). HD-C and HD
contain in-frame deletions of the homeodomain DNA recognition helix
(Glu269 to Lys276) and of the entire
homeodomain (Gln219 to Gly279), respectively.
772, 728, 672, 606, and 503 contain progressive
C-terminal deletions in the FKHR transactivation domain (see Materials
and Methods. bi., bisected.
|
|
The DNA binding capabilities of the Pax3-FKHR mutant constructs were
analyzed by gel retardation analysis. Deletions or point
mutations
which were introduced into either the DNA binding region
of the paired
domain (Un-1, BU35, and

PD-NH2) or the homeodomain
(

HD-C and

HD) disrupted Pax3-FKHR binding to the PRS-9 probe.
In the same
manner, mutation of the homeodomain amino acids involved
in making
direct DNA contacts (V265A, N269A, and S268N269A) greatly
reduced the
binding capability of Pax3-FKHR to DNA. However, mutation
of a single
amino acid in the homeodomain (S268A) had no apparent
negative effect
on the ability of Pax3-FKHR to bind DNA. All mutants
with deletions in
the forkhead region (

503,

606,

672,

728,
and

772)
shifted the probe to a similar extent as wild-type Pax3-FKHR,
consistent with the requirement of intact paired and homeobox
domains
for efficient DNA binding activity (Fig.
2A). Equivalent
amounts of in
vitro-translated protein were used for this analysis
(Fig.
2B).

View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Gel retardation analysis with the paired recognition
sequence (PRS-9) oligonucleotide probe, which contains both the paired
domain and the homeodomain recognition sequences. (A) Only the
Pax3-FKHR mutants containing an intact paired domain and homeodomain
are able to efficiently bind to the probe. In vitro-translated Pax3,
Pax3-FKHR, or Pax3-FKHR mutant proteins (2 µl) were each incubated
with end-labeled PRS-9 oligonucleotide by using the binding conditions
described in Materials and Methods. Protein-DNA complexes were
separated on a 6% nondenaturing gel. The mobility of the Pax3 protein
is indicated by an open arrowhead, and the mobility of the Pax3-FKHR,
S268A, 772, 728 and 672 proteins is indicated by a closed
arrowhead. 606 and 503 show a slightly lower mobility than that
of Pax3-FKHR, as expected. The Pax3-FKHR and Pax3 protein-DNA complexes
could be competed with a molar excess of unlabeled PRS-9
oligonucleotide probe. (B) Pilot in vitro translation reactions were
performed with [35S]methionine-labeled proteins to
confirm that comparable amounts of Pax3, Pax3-FKHR, and the Pax3-FKHR
mutants were synthesized. The labeled proteins were separated by
SDS-10% PAGE, and their molecular sizes were estimated by comparison
with the rainbow protein molecular size markers (Amersham), whose
positions are indicated to the left of the gel. Molecular sizes of the
proteins are as follows: Pax3, 56 kDa; Pax3-FKHR, Un-1, BU35, V265A,
S268A, N269A, and S268N269A, 97 kDa; PD-NH2, 90 kDa; HD-C, 94 kDa; HD, 90 kDa; 503, 56 kDa; 606, 67 kDa; 672, 75 kDa;
728, 81 kDa; and 772, 86 kDa.
|
|
Oncogenic potential of Pax3-FKHR and its mutant derivatives.
To examine the transforming properties of the Pax3-FKHR protein,
wild-type Pax3-FKHR and its mutant derivatives were individually cloned
into the retroviral vector pSR
(
HindIII)-tk-Neo
(29). NIH 3T3 fibroblasts were infected with
replication-deficient retroviral stocks and subsequently assayed for
their ability to exhibit anchorage-independent growth in soft agar.
Cells infected with the Pax3-FKHR virus displayed macroscopically
visible colonies in soft agar (Fig. 3B
and 4E) and possessed a highly
refractile, spindle-shaped morphology under cell culture conditions
(Fig. 4F). In contrast, cells infected with either the vector (Fig. 3A
and 4A) or with Pax3 alone (Fig. 4C) showed no visible colony formation
and displayed a flat morphology when grown on plastic (Fig. 4B and D,
respectively). Immunoprecipitation with the Pax3 antiserum of Pax3-FKHR
and the Pax3-FKHR mutant derivatives from metabolically labeled cell
lysates confirmed that all cells expressed similar amounts of mutant
proteins and that none of the mutations interfered with the expression
of the Pax3-FKHR fusion (Fig. 5).

View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Soft agar assays to assess the tumorigenicity of
Pax3-FKHR and the Pax3-FKHR mutants. NIH 3T3 fibroblasts were infected
with high-titer retroviral stocks containing pSR ( HindIII)-tk-Neo
(A), Pax3-FKHR (B), Un-1 (C), PD-NH2 (D), HD-C (E), HD (F),
728 (G), or 772 (H) and cloned in 0.3% soft agar. Colonies were
visualized and counted 2 to 3 weeks after plating.
|
|

View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Cell morphology of NIH 3T3 cells infected with
high-titer retroviral stocks containing pSR ( HindIII)-tk-Neo (A
and B), Pax3 (C and D), or Pax3-FKHR (E and F). Cells were grown on
plastic, and colonies were visually scored 2 and 3 weeks after plating.
Colonies shown are representative of the total population.
|
|

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Overexpression of Pax3, Pax3-FKHR, and Pax3-FKHR
deletion mutants in retrovirally infected NIH 3T3 fibroblasts.
Retrovirally infected NIH 3T3 cells were metabolically labeled with
[35S]methionine and lysed as described in Materials and
Methods. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with Pax3 antiserum,
separated on an SDS-10% PAGE gel, and visualized by autoradiography.
Molecular sizes were estimated by comparison with protein molecular
size markers (see legend to Fig. 2), which are indicated, in
kilodaltons, to the left of the gel.
|
|
Surprisingly, cells that overexpressed mutant proteins that disrupt
paired domain-mediated DNA binding (Un-1, BU35, and

PD-NH2)
retained
the ability to transform NIH 3T3 cells and did so with
an efficiency
similar to that of the wild-type Pax3-FKHR (Fig.
3C and D; see Fig.
7).
To confirm that residual DNA binding activity
from the bisected
forkhead DNA-binding domain does not contribute
to the transforming
ability of the paired domain mutants, we constructed
a recombinant
retroviral vector containing only the forkhead portion
of Pax3-FKHR.
Cells expressing this bisected forkhead protein
were not transformed
(data not shown). This result suggested that
Pax3 sequences outside of
the paired domain were necessary for
the oncogenic potential of
Pax3-FKHR and that the transforming
ability of the chimeric protein was
independent of paired domain-mediated
DNA
binding.
This conclusion is in keeping with the fact that cells overexpressing
proteins with deletions in the homeodomain (

HD-C and

HD) were
unable to transform NIH 3T3 cells (Fig.
3E and F and
see Fig.
7). This
finding suggests that deletion of all or part
of the homeodomain
removes an element required for efficient cellular
transformation.
Because deletion of the homeodomain removes the
last two amino acids of
the Pax3 nuclear localization signal (
11),
immunofluorescence was used to confirm that the

HD mutant protein
was nuclear. Cells overexpressing the Pax3,

HD, and Pax3-FKHR
proteins demonstrated strong nuclear staining consistent with
proper
localization of these proteins (Fig.
6).

View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Determination of the nuclear localization of Pax3,
Pax3-FKHR, and HD by immunofluorescence. NIH 3T3 cells (2 × 104) infected with either pSR ( HindIII)-to-Neo (A),
Pax3 (B), HD (C), or Pax3-FKHR (D) were plated on glass coverslips.
After 48 h, the cells were fixed, permeabilized, immunostained
with Pax3 antiserum, and incubated with fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit antibody, as described in
Materials and Methods.
|
|
The third

-helix of the homeodomain is involved in making both
protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions (
12,
34).
To
determine which of these interactions is important for transformation,
cells overexpressing proteins with point mutations of homeodomain
amino
acids that are involved in making DNA contacts were tested
for their
oncogenic potential in soft agar assays. These point
mutations either
destroyed the transforming ability of Pax3-FKHR
(N269A and S268N269A)
(Fig.
7) or demonstrated a decreased
transforming
ability with a reduced colony size (V265A) (Fig.
7 and
data not
shown). The oncogenic potentials of these mutants appeared to
be directly related to their respective DNA binding abilities
(Fig.
2A), suggesting that homeodomain-mediated DNA binding is
important for
efficient transformation. However the S268A mutant
demonstrated
wild-type transforming ability, indicating that Pax3
homodimerization
was not necessary for Pax3-FKHR-mediated oncogenicity
(Fig.
7).

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Transformation and transcriptional activity of Pax3,
Pax3-FKHR, and Pax3-FKHR mutants. Pax3, Pax3-FKHR, and Pax3-FKHR mutant
proteins (as described in the legend to Fig. 1) are represented
schematically (left column). To determine transformation (right
column), NIH 3T3 fibroblasts were infected with high-titer retroviral
stocks containing Pax3, Pax3-FKHR, or Pax3-FKHR mutant proteins and
grown on 0.3% soft agar. Cell colonies were counted 2 to 3 weeks after
plating. The values represent the number of colonies present on a
35-mm-diameter dish and an average of two independent determinations.
To determine transactivation (Transact.) activity (right column), NIH
3T3 cells were transfected with 1 µg of the (PRS-9) pTK-CAT reporter
construct, 1 µg of MAP1-SEAP, and 250 ng of an expression plasmid
encoding either Pax3, Pax3-FKHR, or a Pax3-FKHR mutant protein.
Quantification of the CAT activity was performed as described in
Materials and Methods. Transfection efficiency was normalized relative
to SEAP activity as described previously (5). The CAT
activity in the presence of Pax3-FKHR was assigned a value of 100%,
and all other activities are reported relative to this value. The error
bars represent the standard deviation from the average value of three
individual experiments performed in duplicate.
|
|
The FKHR deletion mutant

772 maintained near-wild-type transforming
ability but produced colonies that were slightly smaller
than those
produced by cells retrovirally infected with Pax3-FKHR
(Fig.
3H and
7).
This transforming ability was completely lost,
however, on further
deletion of the FKHR protein (Fig.
3G and
7), demonstrating that the
oncogenicity of Pax3-FKHR requires
a region of the FKHR transactivation
domain between amino acids
728 and
772.
Transcriptional activity of Pax3-FKHR mutants.
To relate
transformation to transcriptional activity, wild-type Pax3-FKHR and its
mutant derivatives were tested in transient-transfection assays using a
Pax3-responsive reporter plasmid (see Materials and Methods). Pax3-FKHR
demonstrated approximately ninefold greater transcriptional activity
than Pax3 did (Fig. 7), consistent with previous reports (3,
13). Proteins mutated in the paired domain and deletion mutants
of the homeodomain of Pax3 (Un-1, BU35,
PD-NH2,
HD, and
HD-C),
which had no detectable DNA binding ability, were all transcriptionally
inactive in NIH 3T3 cells (Fig. 7). Given that the S268A mutant retains
its DNA binding potential (Fig. 2A), these results are consistent with
the requirement of DNA binding for transcriptional activity.
Surprisingly, proteins with point mutations in the homeodomain (V265A,
N269A, and S268N269A), which retained only residual DNA binding
capability, maintained nearly wild-type transcriptional activity. This
finding suggests that in addition to affecting the DNA binding
abilities of Pax3-FKHR, these point mutants may also interfere with the
reported inhibitory action of the homeodomain (4) (see below).
The

772 FKHR mutant retained approximately 35% of wild-type
transcriptional activity (Fig.
7) even though it lacked the reported
transactivation domain (
3). Thus, the complete
transactivation
domain may extend more N-terminally than was previously
thought.
Progressive FKHR deletion mutants showed even less
transcriptional
activity than

772, with

606 and

503 being
transcriptionally
inactive (Fig.
7), indicating that the FKHR
transactivation domain
extends N-terminally to a region between amino
acids 606 and 672.
These results demonstrate that both DNA binding and
an intact
FKHR transactivation domain are necessary for complete
Pax3-FKHR
transcriptional
activity.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The oncogenic potential of Pax3-FKHR is independent of its
transcriptional activity.
By creating a series of mutations
targeting key structural regions of Pax3-FKHR, we have identified the
domains necessary for transformation and transactivation by the fusion
protein. We found that both the integrity of the third
-helix of the
Pax3 homeodomain and a small region of the FKHR transactivation domain are absolutely required for effective transformation of NIH 3T3 mouse
fibroblasts. However, the paired domain-mediated DNA binding is dispensable.
The observed oncogenic potential of Pax3-FKHR represents a
gain-of-function mutation of Pax3 because neither Pax3 nor FKHR
alone
was transforming when overexpressed in rodent fibroblasts.
The
inability of Pax3 to transform NIH 3T3 cells in this study
is
inconsistent with previous reports in which Pax3 was found
to be
oncogenic (
22). This apparent inconsistency may be
attributable
to differences between the two NIH 3T3 cell lines.
Overexpression
of the Pax3-FKHR fusion protein may be required to
deregulate
Pax3 target genes or to effectively compete for interactions
between
Pax3 and other proteins. This model would be consistent with a
recent report that the t(2;13)(q35;q14) translocation is associated
with overexpression of the fusion transcript (
10). Such
events
might then establish an overall growth advantage for transformed
cells.
We demonstrate that the majority of the transcriptional activity of
Pax3-FKHR lies within the FKHR transactivation domain
between amino
acids 728 to 837, confirming a previous study that
mapped the
transactivation domain between amino acids 764 and
837 (
3).
However, the transcriptional activity of Pax3-FKHR
does not appear to
be directly responsible for the transforming
capacity of the chimeric
protein. First, there is no direct correlation
between the oncogenic
potentials of the FKHR deletion mutants
and their respective
transcriptional activities (Fig.
7, compare

772 and

728). Second,
mutants of the paired box (UN-1, Bu35,
and

PD-NH2) that are
transcriptionally inactive exhibit a wild-type
oncogenic potential.
Finally, point mutant proteins of the homeodomain
(N269A and S268N269A)
that have lost their transforming ability
retain nearly wild-type
transcriptional activity. We therefore
conclude that Pax3-FKHR
transforming ability is largely independent
of transcriptional
activity.
Although it may seem unusual that homeodomain point mutants with
minimal DNA binding (V265A, N269A, and S268N269A) transactivate
with
near-wild-type activity, this result is consistent with a
previous
report which identified a putative transcriptional inhibitory
function
associated with the Pax3 homeodomain (
4). This inhibitory
action is presumably mediated through protein-protein interactions.
In
the absence of structural data, the possible effect of the
homeodomain
point mutations on protein-protein interactions could
not be
determined. Therefore, in addition to decreasing the DNA
binding
ability of Pax3-FKHR, these point mutants may also disrupt
protein-protein interactions, interfering with the reported inhibitory
action of the homeodomain and resulting in near-wild-type
transcriptional
activity.
Pax3 homeodomain-mediated DNA binding is essential for
transformation.
The two point mutants BU35 and Un-1 recapitulate
naturally occurring mutations in the paired domains of Pax3 and Pax1,
respectively (2, 20). These point mutations occur in the
region of the paired domain that is involved in making DNA contacts
(35) and prevent Pax3 and Pax1 from binding DNA
(22). Introduction of these point mutations into the
chimeric protein, as well as deletion of the region of the paired
domain that is involved in making DNA contacts (
PD-NH2), destroyed
the ability of Pax3-FKHR to bind DNA. Surprisingly, these mutants
transformed cells as efficiently as did wild-type Pax3-FKHR. From this
we conclude that Pax3 paired domain-mediated DNA binding is not
required for the transformation by the fusion protein.
In contrast, removal of the third

-helix of the homeodomain, or
removal of the entire homeodomain, prevents not only DNA
binding and
transcriptional activity but also transformation by
Pax3-FKHR. In
addition, mutation of key amino acids that are critical
for
making homeodomain-mediated DNA contacts greatly reduced DNA
binding by Pax3-FKHR and either reduced (V265A) or destroyed
(N269A
and S268N269A) transformation by Pax3-FKHR. Therefore,
homeodomain-mediated
DNA binding is essential for the oncogenic
potential of the chimeric
protein.
Transformation requires the proximity of a small region of the FKHR
transactivation domain.
Mutant proteins containing an intact FKHR
transactivation domain and a mutated homeodomain (N269A, S268N269A,
HD-C, and
HD) or an intact homeodomain and a mutated FKHR
transactivation domain (
728,
672,
606, and
503) were unable
to transform NIH 3T3 cells, indicating that both the third
-helix of
the Pax3 homeodomain and an element that lies between amino acids 728 and 772 of the FKHR transactivation domain must be present for
efficient transformation by Pax3-FKHR. This gain-of-function mutation,
in which transformation activity is critically dependent on the
presence of two independent, nontransforming domains being brought into
proximity in the fusion protein, is similar to the mechanism by which
another homeodomain-containing fusion protein, E2a-Pbx1, induces
transformation (26). E2a-Pbx1-mediated transformation is
dependent on the homeodomain cooperativity motif, a small region
proximal to the homeodomain in Pbx1 (9), and on two
transcriptional activation domains in E2a being brought close to one
another in the fusion protein (23).
The additional role of homeodomain-mediated protein-protein
interactions.
In addition to making homeodomain-mediated DNA
contacts, the Pax3 recognition helix also mediates protein-protein
interactions (34). Several pieces of evidence support an
additional role of protein-protein interactions in the oncogenic
potential of Pax3-FKHR. First, Pax3-FKHR mutants that are unable to
bind DNA (UN-1, BU35, and
PD-NH2) exhibit a wild-type oncogenic
potential. These mutants contain the homeodomain structural components
necessary for protein-protein interactions that would enable them to
transform NIH 3T3 fibroblasts in the absence of DNA binding. Second,
the reported inhibitory action of the homeodomain is no longer present in the nontransforming homeodomain point mutants N269A and S268N269A. This indicates that these point mutants disrupt homeodomain-mediated protein-protein interactions that are necessary for the inhibitory action of the homeodomain and which may be necessary for Pax3-FKHR's oncogenic potential. Finally, protein-protein interactions have been
implicated in the regulation of the biological activity of several
homeodomain-containing proteins. For example, the homeodomain protein
Msx-2 represses transcription by interacting with the basal
transcriptional machinery in a DNA binding-independent manner (25). The Drosophila homeodomain protein
fushi tarazu, through specific protein-protein interactions
with the orphan nuclear receptor Ftz-F1, mediates the regulation of the
genes engrailed and wingless (17).
Finally, protein interactions between the homeodomain protein Pbx and
several Hox proteins modulate the DNA binding specificity and
transcriptional regulation of the Hox proteins (8).
Therefore, protein-protein interactions, mediated through the
homeodomain, may assist in the transforming ability of Pax3-FKHR.
Our results conclusively demonstrate the necessity of the integrity of
the Pax3 homeodomain recognition helix and a small
region of the FKHR
transactivation domain for the efficient transformation
by Pax3-FKHR.
The oncogenic potential of Pax3-FKHR requires both
homeodomain-mediated
protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions
and the proximity of the
Pax3 homeodomain to the essential transforming
element of the FKHR
transactivation domain. We propose a model
in which the Pax3
homeodomain recognition helix would be responsible
for directing DNA
contacts. The recognition helix would then recruit
cellular proteins
that, in conjunction with the FKHR transactivation
domain, would
improperly regulate Pax3 target genes. No binding
partners for either
Pax3 or FKHR have yet been identified, but
the identification of such
proteins will be essential to our understanding
of how Pax3-FKHR
transforms
cells.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Peter Gruss, Max Planck Institute, for the
murine Pax3 cDNA, pBH3.2; Charles Sawyers, UCLA Medical Center, for the pSR
(
HindIII)-tk-Neo retroviral vector; Martyn Goulding, the Salk
Institute for Biological Studies, for the pTK-CAT vector; David
Baltimore, California Institute of Technology, for the 293T cells; and
Christopher Denny, University of California at Los Angeles, for the NIH
3T3 cells. We also thank Carol Bockhold, Craig McPherson and Rose
Mathew for their expert technical assistance. Finally, we thank Suzanne
Baker, Thomas Curran, Gerard Grosveld, and Susan Watson for their
critical reading of the manuscript.
This work was supported, in part, by NIH grants CA-56819 and
PO1-CA-71907 (M.F.R.), the Cancer Center (CORE) support grant CA21765,
and the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC) of St.
Jude Children's Research Hospital.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Tumor Cell Biology, 332 North Lauderdale, Memphis, TN 38105. Phone:
(901) 495-3481. Fax: (901) 495-2381. E-mail:
martine.roussel{at}stjude.org.
Present address: Molecular Neurogenetics Unit, Departments of
Neurology and Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA 02129.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Ausubel, F. M.,
R. Brent,
R. E. Kingston,
D. D. Moore,
J. G. Seidman,
J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl.
1996.
Current protocols in molecular biology.
John Wiley & Sons, Boston, Mass.
|
| 2.
|
Balling, R.,
U. Deutsch, and P. Gruss.
1988.
Undulated, a mutation affecting the development of the mouse skeleton, has a point mutation in the paired box of Pax1.
Cell
55:531-535[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Bennicelli, J. L.,
W. J. Fredericks,
R. B. Wilson,
F. J. Rauscher III, and F. G. Barr.
1995.
Wild type Pax3 protein and the Pax3-FKHR fusion protein of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma contain potent, structurally distinct transcriptional activation domains.
Oncogene
11:119-130[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Bennicelli, J. L.,
R. H. Edwards, and F. G. Barr.
1996.
Mechanism for transcriptional gain of function resulting from chromosomal translocation in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:5455-5459[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Braum, R. J.,
D. T. Hung,
P. K. Martin,
S. L. Schreiber, and G. R. Crabtree.
1993.
Identification of the immunophilins capable of mediating inhibition of signal transduction by cyclosporin A and FK506: roles of calcineurin binding and cellular location.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:4760-4769[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Brennan, R. G.
1993.
The winged-helix DNA-binding motif: another helix-turn-helix takeoff.
Cell
74:773-776[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Chalepakis, G.,
R. Fritsch,
H. R. Fickenscher,
U. Deutsch,
M. Goulding, and P. Gruss.
1991.
The molecular basis of the undulated/Pax1 mutation.
Cell
66:873-884[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Chang, C.-P.,
L. Brocchieri,
W.-F. Shen,
C. Largman, and M. L. Cleary.
1996.
Pbx modulation of Hox homeodomain amino-terminal arms establishes different DNA-binding specificities across the Hox locus.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:1734-1745[Abstract].
|
| 9.
|
Chang, C.-P.,
I. de Vivo, and M. L. Cleary.
1997.
The Hox cooperativity motif of the chimeric oncoprotein E2a-Pbx1 is necessary and sufficient for oncogenesis.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:81-88[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Davis, R. J., and F. G. Barr.
1997.
Fusion genes resulting from alternative chromosomal translocations are overexpressed by gene-specific mechanisms in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:8047-8051[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Dingwall, C., and R. Laskey.
1992.
The nuclear membrane.
Science
258:942-947[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Epstein, J. A.,
P. Lam,
L. Jepeal,
R. L. Maas, and D. N. Shapiro.
1995.
Pax3 inhibits myogenic differentiation of cultured myoblast cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:11719-11722[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Fredericks, W. J.,
N. Galili,
S. Mukhopadhyay,
G. Rovera,
J. Bennicelli,
F. G. Barr, and F. J. I. Rauscher, III.
1995.
The Pax3-FKHR fusion protein created by the t(2;13) translocation in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma is a more potent transcriptional activator than Pax3.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:1522-1535[Abstract].
|
| 14.
|
Galili, N.,
R. J. Davis,
W. J. Fredericks,
S. Mukhopadhyay,
F. J. Rauscher III,
B. S. Emanuel,
G. Rovera, and F. G. Barr.
1993.
Fusion of a forkhead domain gene to Pax3 in the solid tumor alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma.
Nature
5:230-235.
|
| 15.
|
Goulding, M. D.,
G. Chalepakis,
U. Deutsch,
J. R. Erselius, and P. Gruss.
1991.
Pax3, a novel murine DNA binding protein expressed during early neurogenesis.
EMBO J.
10:1135-1147[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Graham, F. L., and A. J. van der Eb.
1973.
A new technique for the assay of infectivity of human adenovirus 5 DNA.
Virology
52:456-467[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Guichet, A.,
J. W. R. Copeland,
M. Erdelyi,
D. Hlousek,
P. Zavorsky,
J. Ho,
S. Brown,
A. Percival-Smith,
H. M. Krause, and A. Ephrussi.
1997.
The nuclear receptor homologue Ftz-F1 and the homeodomain protein Ftz are mutually dependent cofactors.
Nature
385:552-555[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Ho, S.,
H. D. Hunt,
R. M. Horton,
J. K. Pullen, and L. R. Pease.
1989.
Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction.
Gene
77:51-59[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Horton, R. M.,
H. D. Hunt,
S. N. Ho,
J. K. Pullen, and L. R. Pease.
1989.
Engineering hybrid genes without the use of restriction enzymes: gene splicing by overlap extension.
Gene
77:61-68[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Hoth, C. F.,
A. Milunsky,
N. Lipsky,
R. Sheffer,
S. K. Clarren, and C. T. Baldwin.
1993.
Mutations in the paired domain of the human Pax3 gene cause Klein-Waardenburg Syndrome (WS-III) as well as Waardenburg syndrome type I (WS-I).
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
52:455-462[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Kamps, M. P.,
C. Murre,
X.-H. Sun, and D. Baltimore.
1990.
A new homeobox gene contributes the DNA binding domain of the t(1;19) translocation protein in pre-B ALL.
Cell
60:547-555[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Maulbecker, C. C., and P. Gruss.
1993.
The oncogenic potential of Pax genes.
EMBO J.
12:2361-2367[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Monica, K.,
D. P. LeBrun,
D. A. Dedera,
R. Brown, and M. L. Cleary.
1994.
Transformation properties of the E2a-Pbx1 chimeric oncoprotein: fusion with E2a is essential, but the Pbx1 homeodomain is dispensable.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:8304-8314[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Muller, A. J.,
J. C. Young,
A.-M. Pendergast,
M. Pondel,
N. R. Landau,
D. R. Littman, and O. N. Witte.
1991.
BCR first exon sequences specifically activate the BCR/ABL tyrosine kinase oncogene of Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:1785-1792[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Newberry, E. P.,
T. Latifi,
J. T. Battaile, and D. A. Towler.
1997.
Structure-function analysis of Msx2-mediated transcriptional suppression.
Biochemistry
36:10451-10462[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Nourse, J.,
J. D. Mellentin,
N. Galili,
J. Wilkinson,
E. Stanbridge,
S. D. Smith, and M. L. Cleary.
1990.
Chromosomal translocation t(1;19) results in synthesis of a homeobox fusion mRNA that codes for a potential chimeric transcription factor.
Cell
60:535-545[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Pappo, A. S.,
D. N. Shapiro,
W. M. Crist, and H. M. Maurer.
1995.
Biology and therapy of pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma.
J. Clin. Oncol.
13:2123-2139[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Rabbitts, T. H.
1994.
Chromosomal translocations in human cancer.
Nature
372:143-149[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Roussel, M. F.,
A. M. Theodoras,
M. Pagano, and C. J. Sherr.
1995.
Rescue of defective mitogenic signaling by D-type cyclins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:6837-6841[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Scheidler, S.,
W. J. Fredericks,
F. J. Rauscher III,
F. G. Barr, and P. K. Vogt.
1996.
The hybrid Pax3-FKHR fusion protein of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma transforms fibroblasts in culture.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:9805-9809[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Shapiro, D. N.,
J. E. Sublett,
B. Li,
J. R. Downing, and C. W. Naeve.
1993.
Fusion of Pax3 to a member of the forkhead family of transcription factors in human alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma.
Cancer Res.
53:5108-5112[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Strachan, T., and A. P. Read.
1994.
Pax genes.
Curr. Opin. Gen. Dev.
4:427-438[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Stuart, E. T.,
C. Kioussi, and P. Gruss.
1993.
Mammalian Pax genes.
Annu. Rev. Genet.
27:219-236.
|
| 34.
|
Wilson, D. S.,
B. Guenther,
C. Desplan, and J. Kuriyan.
1995.
High resolution crystal structure of a paired (Pax) class cooperative homodomain dimer on DNA.
Cell
82:709-719[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Xu, W.,
M. A. Rold,
S. Jun,
C. Desplan, and C. O. Pabo.
1995.
Crystal structure of a paired domain-DNA complex at 2.5 angstrom resolution reveals structural basis of Pax developmental mutations.
Cell
80:639-650[Medline].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, January 1999, p. 594-601, Vol. 19, No. 1
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Wang, Q., Kumar, S., Slevin, M., Kumar, P.
(2006). Functional Analysis of Alternative Isoforms of the Transcription Factor PAX3 in Melanocytes In vitro.. Cancer Res.
66: 8574-8580
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nabarro, S., Himoudi, N., Papanastasiou, A., Gilmour, K., Gibson, S., Sebire, N., Thrasher, A., Blundell, M. P., Hubank, M., Canderan, G., Anderson, J.
(2005). Coordinated oncogenic transformation and inhibition of host immune responses by the PAX3-FKHR fusion oncoprotein. JEM
202: 1399-1410
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bois, P. R.J., Izeradjene, K., Houghton, P. J., Cleveland, J. L., Houghton, J. A., Grosveld, G. C.
(2005). FOXO1a acts as a selective tumor suppressor in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. JCB
170: 903-912
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tran, H., Brunet, A., Griffith, E. C., Greenberg, M. E.
(2003). The Many Forks in FOXO's Road. Sci Signal
2003: re5-re5
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kortylewski, M., Feld, F., Kruger, K.-D., Bahrenberg, G., Roth, R. A., Joost, H.-G., Heinrich, P. C., Behrmann, I., Barthel, A.
(2003). Akt Modulates STAT3-mediated Gene Expression through a FKHR (FOXO1a)-dependent Mechanism. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 5242-5249
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
So, C. W., Cleary, M. L.
(2003). Common mechanism for oncogenic activation of MLL by forkhead family proteins. Blood
101: 633-639
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhang, L., Wang, C.
(2003). PAX3-FKHR Transformation Increases 26 S Proteasome-dependent Degradation of p27Kip1, a Potential Role for Elevated Skp2 Expression. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 27-36
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lagutina, I., Conway, S. J., Sublett, J., Grosveld, G. C.
(2002). Pax3-FKHR Knock-In Mice Show Developmental Aberrations but Do Not Develop Tumors. Mol. Cell. Biol.
22: 7204-7216
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
So, C. W., Cleary, M. L.
(2002). MLL-AFX Requires the Transcriptional Effector Domains of AFX To Transform Myeloid Progenitors and Transdominantly Interfere with Forkhead Protein Function. Mol. Cell. Biol.
22: 6542-6552
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Barr, F. G., Qualman, S. J., Macris, M. H., Melnyk, N., Lawlor, E. R., Strzelecki, D. M., Triche, T. J., Bridge, J. A., Sorensen, P. H. B.
(2002). Genetic Heterogeneity in the Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma Subset without Typical Gene Fusions. Cancer Res.
62: 4704-4710
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hollenbach, A. D., McPherson, C. J., Mientjes, E. J., Iyengar, R., Grosveld, G.
(2002). Daxx and histone deacetylase II associate with chromatin through an interaction with core histones and the chromatin-associated protein Dek. J. Cell Sci.
115: 3319-3330
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Buijs, A., van Rompaey, L., Molijn, A. C., Davis, J. N., Vertegaal, A. C. O., Potter, M. D., Adams, C., van Baal, S., Zwarthoff, E. C., Roussel, M. F., Grosveld, G. C.
(2000). The MN1-TEL Fusion Protein, Encoded by the Translocation (12;22)(p13;q11) in Myeloid Leukemia, Is a Transcription Factor with Transforming Activity. Mol. Cell. Biol.
20: 9281-9293
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cao, Y., Wang, C.
(2000). The COOH-terminal Transactivation Domain Plays a Key Role in Regulating the in Vitro and in Vivo Function of Pax3 Homeodomain. J. Biol. Chem.
275: 9854-9862
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bosilevac, J. M., Olsen, R. J., Bridge, J. A., Hinrichs, S. H.
(1999). Tumor Cell Viability in Clear Cell Sarcoma Requires DNA Binding Activity of the EWS/ATF1 Fusion Protein. J. Biol. Chem.
274: 34811-34818
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kempf, B. E., Vogt, P. K.
(1999). A Genetic Analysis of PAX3-FKHR, the Oncogene of Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma. Cell Growth Differ.
10: 813-818
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Khan, J., Bittner, M. L., Saal, L. H., Teichmann, U., Azorsa, D. O., Gooden, G. C., Pavan, W. J., Trent, J. M., Meltzer, P. S.
(1999). cDNA microarrays detect activation of a myogenic transcription program by the PAX3-FKHR fusion oncogene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96: 13264-13269
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Galibert, M.-D., Yavuzer, U., Dexter, T. J., Goding, C. R.
(1999). Pax3 and Regulation of the Melanocyte-specific Tyrosinase-related Protein-1 Promoter. J. Biol. Chem.
274: 26894-26900
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Planque, N., Leconte, L., Coquelle, F. M., Martin, P., Saule, S.
(2001). Specific Pax-6/Microphthalmia Transcription Factor Interactions Involve Their DNA-binding Domains and Inhibit Transcriptional Properties of Both Proteins. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 29330-29337
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mayanil, C. S. K., George, D., Freilich, L., Miljan, E. J., Mania-Farnell, B., McLone, D. G., Bremer, E. G.
(2001). Microarray Analysis Detects Novel Pax3 Downstream Target Genes. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 49299-49309
[Abstract]
[Full Text]