Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, October 1999, p. 6953-6962, Vol. 19, No. 10
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Cas Mediates Transcriptional Activation of the
Serum Response Element by Src
Yaron
Hakak and
G. Steven
Martin*
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology,
University of California
Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720-3204
Received 29 March 1999/Returned for modification 3 May
1999/Accepted 6 July 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
The Src substrate p130Cas is a docking protein
containing an SH3 domain, a substrate domain that contains multiple
consensus SH2 binding sites, and a Src binding region. We have examined the possibility that Cas plays a role in the transcriptional activation of immediate early genes (IEGs) by v-Src. Transcriptional activation of
IEGs by v-Src occurs through distinct transcriptional control elements
such as the serum response element (SRE). An SRE transcriptional reporter was used to study the ability of Cas to mediate Src-induced SRE activation. Coexpression of v-Src and Cas led to a threefold increase in SRE-dependent transcription over the level induced by v-Src
alone. Cas-dependent activation of the SRE was dependent on the kinase
activity of v-Src and the Src binding region of Cas. Signaling to the
SRE is promoted by a serine-rich region within Cas and inhibited by the
Cas SH3 domain. Cas-dependent SRE activation was accompanied by an
increase in the level of active Ras and in the activity of the
mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) Erk2; these changes were
blocked by coexpression of dominant-negative mutants of the adapter
protein Grb2. SRE activation was abrogated by coexpression of
dominant-negative mutants of Ras, MAPK kinase (Mek1), and Grb2.
Coexpression of Cas with v-Src enhanced the association of Grb2 with
the adapter protein Shc and the protein tyrosine phosphatase Shp-2;
coexpression of Shc or Shp-2 mutants significantly reduced SRE
activation by Cas and v-Src. Cas-induced Grb2 association with Shp-2
and Shc may account for the Cas-dependent activation of the Ras/Mek/Erk pathway and SRE-dependent transcription. 14-3-3 proteins may also play
a role in Cas-mediated signaling to the SRE. Overexpression of Cas was
found to modestly enhance epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced activation of the SRE. A Cas mutant lacking the Src binding region did
not potentiate the EGF response, suggesting that Cas enhances EGF
signaling by binding to endogenous cellular Src or another Src family
member. These observations implicate Cas as a mediator of Src-induced
transcriptional activation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Tyrosine phosphorylation of cellular
proteins is important for signaling by c-Src and for transformation by
v-Src (20, 50). One of these proteins, p130Cas
(Crk-associated substrate), was identified as a tyrosine-phosphorylated protein in v-Crk- and v-Src-transformed cells (40). Cas is a member of a new family of docking proteins that includes HEF1 (23) and Sin (2). The structure of Cas suggests
that it plays a role in the formation of multiprotein signaling
complexes. Cas contains an SH3 domain, a substrate domain (SD), a
serine-rich region, and a Src binding (SB) site. The N-terminal SH3
domain mediates the interaction of Cas with several proteins, including FAK (focal adhesion kinase) (14, 36), a tyrosine kinase that has been implicated in signaling to the Erk mitogen-activated protein
kinase (MAPK) pathway (42, 43); the protein tyrosine phosphatases PTP1B (25) and PTP-PEST (12), which
have been shown to promote the dephosphorylation of Cas; and the
guanine nucleotide exchange factor C3G (22), which may
mediate signaling to the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) MAPK pathway
(49). The SD contains multiple tyrosine residues which, upon
phosphorylation, generate consensus binding sequences for the SH2
domains of other proteins. A glutathione S-transferase
(GST)-SD fusion protein has been shown to bind several proteins,
including Crk, in lysates from v-Src- and v-Crk-transformed cells
(6). The serine-rich region has no known function but is
conserved in HEF1. The C-terminal SB region contains binding sites for
the SH3 and SH2 domains of Src (33). This region is required
for extensive tyrosine phosphorylation of Cas in cells expressing
activated c-Src. Its presence, together with other data, implies that
Cas is a direct substrate of Src (33, 41, 52).
Although the function of Cas is unclear, it has been suggested that it
plays a role in signaling and cellular transformation by Src.
Integrin-mediated cell adhesion results in c-Src-dependent tyrosine
phosphorylation of Cas and induces its association with the SH2 domains
of phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase (PI3-kinase), the adapter proteins
Crk, Grb2, and Nck, phospholipase C
, and the protein tyrosine
phosphatase Shp-2 (28, 41, 52). Likewise, v-Src expression
stimulates the association of Cas with Crk (33). Formation
of such signaling complexes could mediate the activation of multiple
signaling cascades. Expression of Cas antisense mRNA results in partial
reversion of the morphological phenotype of v-Src-transformed cells
(3). More recently, Honda et al. generated cas
/
mice and observed that expression of
activated c-Src in cas
/
primary fibroblasts
resulted in incomplete transformation: the transformed cells displayed
a spindle-like morphology, in contrast to the rounded morphology
characteristic of wild-type fibroblasts expressing activated c-Src, and
were unable to grow in suspension culture (17).
Various mitogens including epidermal growth factor (EGF),
platelet-derived growth factor, and lysophosphatidic acid can also induce tyrosine phosphorylation of Cas (8, 35). Exposure to
mitogens and v-Src expression both result in transcriptional activation
of immediate-early genes (IEGs). IFGs play a role in mitogenesis and
contribute to transformation by v-Src (30, 46, 51).
Transcriptional activation of IEGs involves transcriptional control
elements (7, 15, 50), one of which, the serum response element (SRE), responds to multiple signaling cascades. Activation of
the Erk MAPK or the JNK MAPK pathway can result in SRE-dependent transcription (7). In addition, Qureshi et al. have shown
that in 3T3 cells, Erk MAPK pathway components, the small GTPase Ras and the serine-threonine kinase Raf, are required for SRE-dependent gene expression induced by v-Src (37). It has thus been
suggested that Cas, through association with other proteins, could
signal through the Erk and JNK MAPK pathways (5, 22, 41, 52) to SRES.
Activation of the Erk and JNK MAPK pathways is known to be initiated by
small GTPases such as Ras, Rac, and Cdc42, which in turn can be
regulated by multiple pathways. Activation of Ras may be mediated by a
family of adapter proteins containing SH2 and SH3 domains, such as
Grb2. These adapter proteins associate with the Ras GTP exchange factor
SOS and can transduce signals from tyrosine kinases to Ras (18,
29, 47). Various stimuli have been shown to induce the
association of Grb2 with the adapter protein Shc and the protein
tyrosine phosphatase Shp-2 (also known as SHPTP2, Syp, and PTP1D).
Formation of Grb2-Shc (39, 44) or Grb2-Shp-2 (24,
34) complexes presumably targets SOS to the plasma membrane,
where it can activate Ras. Activation of the JNK MAPK pathway, on the
other hand, may involve the GTPases Rac and Cdc42 and the JNK kinase
Mkk4 (7).
We have used an SRE reporter assay to examine the role of Cas in
Src-induced transcriptional activation. We report here that Cas
promotes Src signaling to the SRE through a Grb2/Ras/Erk MAPK pathway.
Cas appears to activate the Ras/Erk MAPK pathway by inducing the
association of Grb2 with Shc and Shp-2.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plasmids.
D. Foster (Hunter College, New York, N.Y.)
provided the SRE-luciferase reporter construct, pSREtkLuc, in which the
luciferase gene is downstream of a thymidine kinase minimal promoter
and four SREs (9). pUHD16.1, a lacZ plasmid
expressing
-galactosidase, was obtained from M. Gossen (University
of California, Berkeley [U.C. Berkeley]). Wild-type and K295M v-Src
were subcloned into the murine retroviral vector pBabe-Puro
(32). Cas and hemagglutinin epitope (HA)-tagged wild-type
Cas (Caswt), Cas
SH3, Cas
SD, and Cas
SB inserted into the
mammalian expression vector pSSR
were obtained from H. Hirai
(University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan) (33).
pSSR
-HA-Cas
Ser, lacking bp 1330 to 1669, was constructed by PCR
as follows. A PCR product containing Cas bp 1027 to 1330 with a
BlpI restriction site inserted at the 3' end was digested with NdeI and BlpI. This fragment was then
subcloned into pSSR
-HA-Caswt from which bp 1027 to 1669 had been
removed by digestion with NdeI and BlpI. For
construction of Cas point mutants, the megaprimer method was used to
perform site-directed mutagenesis (54). Y106, Y751, and Y913
were replaced with phenylalanine residues. The triple-point mutant was
constructed by subcloning techniques using the single-point mutants.
Constructs were verified by DNA sequencing. For Cas antibody
production, a pGEX-1 plasmid containing nucleotides 1403 to 2106 of the
p130 cDNA was obtained from H. Hirai (40). H-Ras in the
mammalian expression vector pEXV was obtained from D. Aftab (U.C.
Berkeley). pcDNA3-N17Ras was previously described (1). An
HA-tagged Erk2 plasmid, pLNC-MK-EA, was obtained from M. Weber
(University of Virginia). pSR
3-K97M-Mek1, a construct expressing
dominant-negative Mek1, was obtained from N. Ahn (University of
Colorado). A construct expressing dominant-negative Mkk4,
pcDNA3-Mkk4-Ala, was obtained from R. Davis (University of
Massachusetts Medical Center). The dominant-negative adapter mutants
Grb2K86, Grb2K36,193, NckSH3all, Crk1K170, and Crk2K170, each inserted
into the vector pEBB, were obtained from B. Mayer (The Children's
Hospital, Boston, Mass.) (48). pGEX-GNH was previously
described (16). pGEX-KG Grb2wt, Grb2K86, and Grb2K36,193
were constructed by subcloning Grb2 DNA from the pEBB constructs into
pGEX-KG. pcDNA3 ShcY317F was obtained from T. Pawson (Mount Sinai
Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada). A construct expressing
catalytically inactive Shp-2, pcDNA3 Shp-2 C463S, was obtained from
G. S. Feng (Indiana University).
Cell culture and reporter assays.
Human embryonic kidney 293 cells were grown in a mixture of Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium
(DMEM) (1 part) and Ham's F-10 nutrient mixture (2 parts) supplemented
with 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin (100 U/ml), and streptomycin
(100 µg/ml). Cells were plated in 60-mm-diameter dishes 20 to 24 h prior to transfection. Cells were transiently transfected by the
calcium phosphate method with 0.1 µg of pSREtkLuc, 0.2 µg of
pBabe-Puro v-Src, and 8.0 µg of a Cas expression construct. The total
amount of DNA transfected was kept constant by including the
appropriate empty vector where needed. Constructs encoding
dominant-negative mutants (3.0 µg of DNA) were included in the
transfections where indicated. LY294002 and GF109203X (Calbiochem) were
added posttransfection to 4.0 and 0.4 µM, respectively; 0.15 µg of
pUHD16.1 was included in samples to normalize for the transfection
efficiency. Cells were transfected for 6 to 8 h and subsequently
cultured for ~40 h. Cells were lysed, and extracts were assayed for
luciferase activity, using a Promega kit, and for
-galactosidase
activity. Results are the means and standard deviations of three
independent experiments.
For EGF stimulation, transfected (with 20 ng of pSREtkLuc) cells were
cultured 20 h posttransfection and then serum starved in DMEM
containing 0.5% fetal calf serum for 24 h. Cells were either left
unstimulated or stimulated with EGF (10 ng/ml) for 5 h. The
statistical significance of data was analyzed with a one-tailed
Student's t test.
Antibodies.
The anti-Cas2 antibody was generated by
immunizing rabbits with a GST-Cas fusion protein purified from
Escherichia coli (40). Polyclonal anti-GST
antiserum was provided by S. H. Kim (U.C. Berkeley). The following
antibodies were purchased: anti-HA rat monoclonal (Boehringer
Mannheim), anti-Grb2 and anti-14-3-3
(K-19) (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc.), anti-pan Ras (Ab-2; Oncogene Research Products),
antiphosphotyrosine (4G10; Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.), and anti-Shc
and anti-Shp-2 (Transduction Laboratories).
Detection of Ras[GTP].
Cells were transfected with the
indicated constructs and pEXV-H-Ras and lysed in 0.5 ml of lysis buffer
(50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM MgCl2, 1%
Nonidet P-40, protease inhibitors [1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
10 µM benzamidine, 5 µM phenanthroline, and 0.5 µg each of
antipain, leupeptin, pepstatin, aprotinin, and chymostatin per ml])
per 10-cm-diameter dish. Samples were adjusted to equal protein levels
(2 mg/ml). GST-RafRBD (GST-GNH) was purified from bacteria expressing
pGEX-GNH (encoding the Ras interaction domain of Raf), with
glutathione-Sepharose beads. Lysates were incubated with 5 µl of
packed beads for 1 h at 4°C with mixing. The beads were then
washed four times in lysis buffer, subjected to sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) on a 15%
acrylamide gel, and blotted onto Immobilon-P transfer membrane
(Millipore). Ras was detected by immunoblotting with an anti-pan Ras
antibody followed by a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary
antibody to mouse immunoglobulin (Pierce). Bands were visualized with
Western Blot Chemiluminescence Reagent Plus (NEN).
MAPK assay.
The activity of Erk2 was measured essentially as
described previously (1), with the following modifications.
Cells were transfected with the indicated constructs and the HA-tagged
Erk2 plasmid and lysed in MAPK lysis buffer (1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 50 mM HEPES [pH 7.4], 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM
Na3VO4, 50 mM NaF, 40 mM
NaP2O7, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, protease
inhibitors). Then 400 µg of lysate was precleared with a 30-µl bed
volume of protein G-Sepharose beads, and HA-Erk2 was immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibodies. Immunoprecipitates were washed three times
with lysis buffer and once with 100 mM NaCl-25 mM Tris (pH 7.5) and
then resuspended in 25 µl of kinase buffer (20 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 20 mM MgCl2, 2 mM dithiothreitol) containing 10 µg of myelin
basic protein (MBP). Kinase reactions were initiated by the addition of
10 µl of 50 µM [
-32P]ATP (10 Ci/mmol), allowed to
proceed at room temperature for 20 min, and terminated by the addition
of 2× SDS-PAGE sample buffer. Samples were resolved on a 12.5%
low-bis (0.07%)-15% step-gradient acrylamide gel. The 12.5% low-bis
portion of the gel was used for immunoblot analysis of HA-Erk2; the
15% portion of the gel was used to visualize phosphorylated MBP by
autoradiography. The radiolabel in the MBP band was quantitated by
scanning densitometry with NIH Image software.
Immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis.
Transfected
cells were lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (10 mM
Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% SDS, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1% sodium
deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM Na3VO4, protease inhibitors). Lysates were cleared by centrifugation (14,000 × g for 10 min) and adjusted to equal protein concentrations (1.5 to 2.5 mg/ml). For Grb2 immunoprecipitation, lysates were incubated with agarose-conjugated anti-Grb2 antibodies (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology). Immunoprecipitates were washed three times with
radioimmunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer, subjected to SDS-PAGE on a
7.5%-15% step-gradient acrylamide gel, and examined by immunoblot
analysis. Immunoprecipitated Grb2 was detected by blotting with
anti-Grb2 antibody followed by a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
-chain-specific secondary antibody to rabbit immunoglobulin G
(Sigma). Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblot analysis using 7.5%
acrylamide gels and the indicated antibodies.
Overlay assay.
Cas was immunoprecipitated from 200 µg of
lysate with anti-Cas2 antibodies, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and blotted
onto Immobilon-P transfer membrane. Blots were blocked with 5% milk
powder-5% bovine serum albumin in Tris-buffered saline for 1 h
and then probed with blocking buffer containing 2 µg of GST,
GST-Grb2wt, GST-Grb2K86, or GST-Grb2K36,193 per ml purified from
bacteria expressing the corresponding pGEX-KG construct. The blots were
subsequently washed with 5% bovine serum albumin in Tris-buffered
saline, probed with anti-GST antiserum, and washed three times, and
bands were detected as described above.
 |
RESULTS |
Cas cooperates with v-Src in SRE-dependent transcriptional
activation.
We used a transcriptional reporter assay to determine
whether Cas promotes v-Src signaling to the SRE. 293 cells were
transiently transfected with increasing amounts of Cas DNA, with or
without v-Src DNA, and a luciferase reporter plasmid. The reporter
construct contains, upstream of the luciferase gene, a minimal
thymidine kinase promoter, plus four SREs from the Egr-1 promoter,
which have previously been shown to mediate Egr-1 expression induced by
v-Src (38). Because multiple signaling pathways may mediate v-Src-induced SRE activation, a limiting amount of v-Src DNA was used
to decrease the contribution of pathways that are not dependent on Cas.
In the absence of v-Src, the expression of Cas did not enhance the
level of luciferase activity (Fig. 1A).
Expression of v-Src alone resulted in a ~4-fold increase in
luciferase activity. Coexpression of Cas with the same amount of v-Src
increased the levels of luciferase activity in a dose-dependent manner;
the maximum level of stimulation was ~6-fold above the levels induced by v-Src alone. Overexpression of Cas did not affect total v-Src kinase
activity, as judged by immunoblot analysis of cell lysates with
antiphosphotyrosine antibody; two phosphotyrosine bands (87 and 100 kDa) were enhanced by cotransfection with Cas, possibly reflecting an
alteration in Src substrate specificity or intracellular targeting
(Fig. 1B). Therefore, Cas synergizes with v-Src in SRE-dependent transcriptional activation.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Src and Cas signaling to the SRE. (A) 293 cells were
transiently transfected with the SRE-luciferase reporter construct
pSREtkLuc and indicated amounts of Cas DNA (pSSR -Cas) together with
DNA encoding v-Src (pBabe-Puro v-Src; closed circles) or empty vector
(pBabe-Puro; open squares). Luciferase activity was measured as
described in Materials and Methods and normalized to a vector control
set to a value of 1. (B) Immunoblot analysis of cell lysates with
antiphosphotyrosine antibody ( -PY). Lysates are of cells transfected
with empty vectors (lane 1), 0.2 µg of v-Src DNA (lane 2), or 0.2 µg of v-Src and 8 µg of Cas DNA (lane 3).
|
|
Src association and kinase activity are required for Cas-mediated
transcriptional activation.
To identify determinants of Cas which
are required for this cooperation in signaling to the SRE, reporter
assays were carried out with HA-tagged deletion mutants of Cas.
Expression of v-Src alone gave a 5-fold increase in luciferase
activity, while coexpression of v-Src with Caswt induced a 15-fold
response (Fig. 2B). Transfection of equal amounts of Cas
SH3 DNA gave
similar levels of luciferase activity in the presence of v-Src.
However, immunoblot analysis with either anti-HA (Fig. 2B,
inset) or anti-Cas2 (data not shown) antibodies indicated that the level of expression of Cas
SH3 protein was lower than that of Caswt. When a higher amount of Cas
SH3 DNA was
transfected (Fig. 2B,
SH3h) to give the same level of protein
expression as Caswt, a 40-fold increase in luciferase activity was
observed, suggesting that the SH3 domain plays a negative regulatory
role. Coexpression of v-Src with the substrate domain deletion mutant
Cas
SD resulted in levels of luciferase activity equivalent to that
induced by Caswt. This implies that proteins bound to Cas via the SD
are not responsible for mediating SRE activation. Coexpression of v-Src
with the Cas
SB mutant, which lacks a region containing the Src SH2
and SH3 binding sites, elicited levels of luciferase activity similar
to those induced by v-Src alone. Caswt and mutants were expressed at
similar protein levels and did not induce luciferase activity in the
absence of v-Src (Fig. 2B). These data suggest that the association of
Cas with Src is required for Cas-dependent SRE activation. However, we
cannot rule out the formal possibility that Cas-dependent SRE activation requires the interaction of the Cas SB region with proteins
other than Src.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Activation of the SRE by Cas and Src mutants. (A)
Schematic representation of Cas. (B and C) Luciferase activity in cells
cotransfected with pSREtkLuc, pSSR with insertion of HA-tagged
wild-type or mutant Cas, and either empty vector (pBabe-Puro),
pBabe-Puro v-Src, or pBabe-Puro K295M v-Src. Transfection conditions
were as described in Materials and Methods except that in transfections
designated SH3h, 15 µg of HA-Cas SH3 DNA was used. Relative
expression levels of Cas proteins (inset panels) were detected by
immunoblot analysis of cell lysates using anti-HA antibody ( -HA).
|
|
To determine whether Src kinase activity is required for Cas-mediated
signaling, reporter assays were carried out with a catalytically
inactive mutant of v-Src, K295M (Fig.
2B). Expression of K295M
v-Src in
the absence or presence of Caswt failed to induce SRE-dependent
transcriptional activation. Therefore, Cas-mediated transcriptional
regulation appears to require direct interaction of Cas with
catalytically
active
Src.
A serine-rich region lies between the SD and the SB region (Fig.
2A).
Coexpression of v-Src with a Cas mutant lacking the
serine-rich region
(Cas

Ser) induced transcriptional activation
to approximately half of
the level induced by coexpression of
v-Src with Caswt (Fig.
2C). The
wild-type and

Ser forms of Cas
protein were expressed at similar
levels (Fig.
2C, inset), and
coimmunoprecipitation experiments revealed
that v-Src associates
with Cas

Ser to the same extent as with Caswt
(data not shown).
These findings indicate that the serine-rich region
of Cas promotes
Cas-dependent SRE activation. The serine-rich region
contains
a putative 14-3-3 binding sequence, RSXSXP, but in
coimmunoprecipitation
experiments we could not detect any association
of Cas with 14-3-3
proteins (data not shown). However, our inability to
detect an
association between the two proteins could be due to the
sensitivity
of the assay. Indeed, it has recently been shown that Cas
associates
with 14-3-3 proteins in 293 cells (
11). The role
of this serine-rich
region in signaling remains unclear: it is possible
that deletion
of this region in some way affects the overall charge and
conformation
of Cas; alternatively, this segment may contain binding
sites
for a 14-3-3 protein or some other signaling
protein.
The Ras/Mek pathway is required for Cas-dependent activation of the
SRE.
Activation of the Erk or JNK MAPK pathways by various stimuli
results in SRE-dependent transcription (7). Activation of the Erk MAPK pathway may be mediated by Ras, PI3-kinase, or protein kinase C (PKC), while activation of the JNK MAPK pathway may be mediated by the Rho family members Rac and Cdc42 (7, 13). To
identify the signaling cascade transducing Cas-mediated SRE activation,
dominant-negative mutants or pharmacological inhibitors of various
signaling molecules were incorporated into the reporter assay. When
either dominant-negative Ras, N17Ras, or dominant-negative Erk MAPK
kinase (Mek1), K97M-Mek1, was coexpressed with v-Src and Cas,
SRE-dependent transcriptional activation was abolished (Fig.
3). On the other hand, when Mkk4-Ala, a
dominant-negative form of the JNK MAPK kinase (Mkk4), was coexpressed
with v-Src and Cas, the level of luciferase activity was not
significantly decreased. Transcriptional activation was not blocked
when cells coexpressing v-Src and Cas were treated with LY294002 (an
inhibitor of PI3-kinase), with GF109203X (an inhibitor of PKC), or
both. Therefore, the Ras/Mek/Erk pathway is required for
Src/Cas-dependent signaling to the SRE, while PI3-kinase, PKC, and the
JNK MAPK pathway do not appear to be involved.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Effects of dominant-negative mutants of signaling
proteins or pharmacological inhibitors on Src- and Cas-dependent SRE
activation. Luciferase activity was determined in cells transfected
with either empty vectors, pBabe-Puro v-Src, or pBabe-Puro v-Src and
pSSR -HA-Cas. Where indicated, the cells were also cotransfected with
dominant-negative mutant constructs or treated with LY294002,
GF109203X, or both.
|
|
Grb2 is necessary for Src and Cas signaling to the SRE.
The
adapter proteins Grb2, Nck, CrkI, and CrkII, which contain SH2 and SH3
domains but no catalytic domain, are known to mediate Ras/MAPK
activation. This activation occurs by association of the adapter
protein with the Ras guanine nucleotide exchange factor SOS. To
determine if one or more of these adapter proteins plays a role in
Cas-dependent Ras activation, we used dominant-negative mutants
containing point mutations that render the SH3 and SH2 domains
nonfunctional (48). Coexpression of either SH3 (Grb2K36,193) or SH2 (Grb2K86) point mutants of Grb2 abrogated Src- and Cas-dependent SRE activation (Fig. 4). Coexpression of
Nck, CrkI, or CrkII SH3 mutants with v-Src and Cas did not
significantly decrease the levels of luciferase activity. Similarly,
SH2 point mutants of Nck, CrkI, or CrkII did not suppress luciferase
activity (data not shown). The suppression of Cas/Src-dependent SRE
activation by the Grb2 point mutants was reversed by coexpression of
wild-type Grb2, suggesting that the Grb2 mutants were acting as
specific Grb2 dominant-negative forms rather than titrating some other required signaling component (data not shown). Thus, functional Grb2 is
necessary for Src- and Cas-dependent signaling to the SRE.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Effects of dominant-negative mutants of the adapter
proteins Grb2, Nck, and Crk on Src- and Cas-dependent SRE activation.
The reporter assay was performed on cells transfected with empty
vectors, pBabe-Puro v-Src, or pBabe-Puro v-Src and pSSR -HA-Cas.
Where indicated, the cells were also cotransfected with
dominant-negative adapter proteins.
|
|
Src induces Ras and Erk2 activation through Cas and Grb2.
The
findings described above indicate that Grb2, Ras, and Erk MAPK are
required for Cas/Src-dependent activation of the SRE. These
observations suggest that Grb2 could mediate Cas-dependent activation
of the Ras/MAPK pathway. Alternatively, the Grb2/Ras/MAPK pathway might
represent a parallel pathway required for Cas/Src signaling to the SRE.
To distinguish between these models, we examined the effects of Cas and
dominant-negative mutants of Grb2 on the activation of the Ras/Erk MAPK
pathway by v-Src. GTP-bound Ras was selectively precipitated with a
GST-RafRBD fusion protein containing the Ras binding domain of Raf and
quantitated by immunoblot analysis of the GST-RafRBD precipitates
(16). Cells were transfected with DNA encoding H-Ras in the
presence or absence of cotransfected v-Src and Cas. Overexpression of
Cas alone did not increase the level of Ras-GTP, while expression of
Src alone resulted in a moderate increase over the vector control (Fig.
5A, upper panel). Cotransfection of v-Src
and Cas DNA increased the level of Ras-GTP over the level observed
following transfection with v-Src alone. The level of H-Ras expression
was not affected by coexpression of Src and Cas, separately or in
combination (Fig. 5B, lower panel). As expected, coexpression of
dominant-negative Ras, N17Ras, dramatically decreased the level of
Ras-GTP. Coexpression of a Grb2 dominant-negative mutant, either
Grb2K86 or Grb2K36,193, similarly abrogated the cooperative activation
of Ras by v-Src and Cas.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Cas and Grb2 regulation of Ras and Erk2 activation by
v-Src. (A) Activation of Ras in cells cotransfected with DNA encoding
H-Ras and the indicated proteins. GST-RafRBD bound to
glutathione-Sepharose beads was incubated with cell lysates and
precipitated. Coprecipitated Ras[GTP] was detected by immunoblot
analysis with anti-Ras antibody ( -Ras) (upper panel). The lower
panel shows immunoblot detection of Ras protein in cell lysates. (B)
Activation of Erk2 in cells cotransfected with DNAs encoding HA-Erk2
and the indicated proteins. HA-Erk2 was immunoprecipitated (IP) with
anti-HA antibody ( -HA) and was used in an immune complex kinase
assay with MBP as a substrate. The samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE
and immunoblotted with anti-HA antibody (upper panel); autoradiography
was performed to detect phosphorylated MBP (middle panel). MBP
phosphorylation was quantitated by scanning densitometry of
autoradiograms (lower panel). Results are the means and standard
deviations of three independent experiments.
|
|
Erk2 activation was measured by immune complex kinase assays using
immunoprecipitated HA-Erk2 and MBP as a substrate (Fig.
5B, middle
panel). Activated Erk2 was also detected as an electrophoretically
retarded species in anti-HA immunoprecipitates immunoblotted with
the
same anti-HA antibody (Fig.
5B, upper panel). Overexpression
of Cas
resulted in a very slight increase in the activation of
Erk2, while
v-Src alone stimulated activation ~6-fold relative
to a vector
control (Fig.
5B, middle and lower panels). Coexpression
of v-Src and
Cas resulted in a ~25-fold stimulation of Erk2 activity.
Coexpression
of N17Ras, Grb2K86, or Grb2K36,193 reduced this stimulation
to ~1- to
4-fold. Therefore, Cas requires Grb2 to mediate Ras-dependent
Erk2
activation induced by v-Src.
Grb2 directly associates with Cas, but this association is not
responsible for signaling to the SRE.
Upon integrin stimulation,
Grb2 can associate with Cas in vitro through its SH2 domain
(52). Direct association between Grb2 and Cas might be
responsible for SRE activation. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments were
therefore carried out to define the association between Grb2 and Cas in
vivo. Lysates of cells overexpressing Grb2, HA-Cas, and/or v-Src were
subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-Grb2 antibody, and the
immunoprecipitates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with
anti-Grb2 and anti-HA antibodies (Fig.
6A, upper and lower panels). HA-Cas was
found to coprecipitate with Grb2 when coexpressed with v-Src (Fig. 6A,
upper panel). To identify the region of Cas required for its
association with Grb2, we cotransfected HA-tagged Cas mutants with Grb2
and v-Src DNAs and performed coimmunoprecipitation experiments. The
level of Cas
SD coprecipitated with Grb2 was comparable to that
observed with Caswt (Fig. 6A, upper panel), indicating that the
substrate domain is not necessary for association. We found a higher
level of Cas
SH3 associated with Grb2 than with Caswt (Fig. 6A, upper panel), despite the lower expression level observed in cell lysates (Fig. 6A, middle panel). This indicates that the association of Grb2
with Cas is not mediated by proteins, such as FAK, which bind Cas
through the SH3 domain. Cas
SB did not coprecipitate with Grb2,
suggesting that the association of Src with Cas is required for the
coprecipitation and/or that Grb2 binds within this region. To identify
the domain of Grb2 which mediates its association with Cas,
coimmunoprecipitation experiments were performed with Grb2 SH2 and SH3
domain point mutants. In the presence of coexpressed v-Src, Cas did not
coprecipitate with Grb2K86, suggesting that a functional Grb2 SH2
domain is required for the association with Cas (Fig. 6B, upper panel).
Cas was able to associate with Grb2K36,193, although to a lesser degree
than Grb2wt.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Grb2 association with Cas. (A) Coprecipitation of
wild-type and mutant forms of HA-Cas with Grb2wt. Lysates were prepared
from cells transfected with DNA constructs expressing Grb2 in the
presence or absence of coexpressed v-Src, plus the wild-type or mutant
forms of HA-Cas. Lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP)
with anti-Grb2 antibody ( -Grb2) and the immunoprecipitates were
analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-HA antibody (upper panel). The
expression of HA-Cas mutants was monitored by immunoblot analysis of
cell lysates with anti-HA antibody ( -HA) (middle panel).
Immunoprecipitated Grb2 proteins were detected by immunoblotting with
anti-Grb2 antibody (lower panel). Sizes are indicated in kilodaltons.
(B) Coprecipitation of Caswt with wild-type and mutant forms of Grb2.
Lysates were prepared from cells transfected with DNA constructs
expressing Caswt, in the presence or absence of coexpressed v-Src, plus
the indicated forms of Grb2. Lysates were subjected to
immunoprecipitation with anti-Grb2 antibody, and the immunoprecipitates
were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-Cas2 antibody (upper panel)
or anti-Grb2 antibody (lower panel). (C) Association between Cas and
Grb2 in vitro. Cas was immunoprecipitated with anti-Cas2 antibody from
lysates of cells transfected with DNAs expressing Cas and/or v-Src.
Samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to an Immobilon-P
membrane, and probed with GST fusion proteins containing wild-type or
mutant forms of Grb2. Bound GST-Grb2 was detected with anti-GST
antibody. (D) Effects of Y F mutations on SRE activation by Cas and
the association of Cas with Grb2. Upper panel, cells were cotransfected
with the SRE reporter construct pSREtkLuc and DNA constructs expressing
HA-Cas point mutants and v-Src as indicated. Luciferase activity was
analyzed as described in the legend to Fig. 1. Lower panel, cells were
cotransfected with DNA constructs expressing Grb2wt, v-Src, and the Cas
point mutants as indicated. Grb2 was immunoprecipitated and
coprecipitating Cas detected by immunoblotting with anti-HA antibody.
|
|
To determine whether Cas and Grb2 can associate directly, Cas
immunoprecipitates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and blotted onto
a
transfer membrane which was then incubated with GST fusions
of
wild-type or mutant forms of Grb2; bound fusion proteins were
detected
by immunoblot analysis using anti-GST antibody. GST-Grb2
and
GST-Grb2K36,193 both bound to electrophoretically retarded
(tyrosine-phosphorylated) Cas from lysates of cells coexpressing
Src
(Fig.
6C, panels a and c). Such binding was not detected when
Cas was
immunoprecipitated from cells not coexpressing Src. The
GST-Grb2
proteins also bound, probably nonspecifically, to the
unshifted
(non-tyrosine-phosphorylated) form of Cas. GST-Grb2K86
and GST were
unable to bind the shifted form of Cas (Fig.
6C,
panels b and d). Thus,
Grb2 appears to directly associate with
tyrosine-phosphorylated Cas
through its SH2
domain.
Three consensus Grb2 SH2 domain binding sites containing a YXNX motif
(
45) are present in Cas at tyrosine residues 106,
751, and
913 (YDNV, YENS, and YSNL, respectively). To determine
which of these
sites mediate direct association between Grb2 and
Cas and whether this
association is important for signaling to
the SRE, we generated
HA-tagged Cas constructs with phenylalanine
in place of one or all
three of these tyrosine residues. Coimmunoprecipitation
experiments
were carried out to determine the effects of these
mutations on the
association between Grb2 and Cas. Cells coexpressing
v-Src, Grb2, and
wild-type or mutant forms of Cas were lysed,
and immunoprecipitates
were prepared with anti-Grb2 antibody;
the immunoprecipitates were
resolved by SDS-PAGE and subjected
to immunoblotting with anti-HA
antibody to detect coprecipitating
HA-Cas. Neither the F751 nor the
triple-point mutant (F106,751,913)
of Cas coprecipitated with Grb2
(Fig.
6D, lower panel). The SH2
domain of Grb2 therefore associates
with Cas through Y751. However,
in the reporter assay, coexpression of
v-Src with Cas F751 or
the Cas triple-point mutant induced similar
levels of luciferase
activity as Caswt (Fig.
6D). Taken together, these
data imply
that the direct association between Cas and Grb2 is not
responsible
for Cas-mediated signaling to the SRE. Thus, Cas-dependent
signaling
to the SRE is likely be mediated by another Cas/Grb2
pathway.
Shc and Shp-2 promote Cas-mediated signaling to the SRE.
The
association of Grb2 with Shc or the tyrosine phosphatase Shp-2 has been
implicated in activation of the Ras/Erk MAPK pathway (24, 34, 39,
44). We therefore carried out coimmunoprecipitation experiments
to examine the effect of Cas and v-Src expression on the association of
Grb2 with Shc and Shp-2. Grb2 immunoprecipitates were prepared from
lysates of cells cotransfected with Grb2, v-Src, and Cas DNAs. The
levels of coprecipitating Shc and Shp-2 were determined by immunoblot
analysis. v-Src expression induced the association of Grb2 with both
Shp-2 and the 52-kDa form of Shc, whereas the expression of Cas alone
did not (Fig. 7A). Coexpression of Cas
with v-Src enhanced the amount of coprecipitating Shp-2 and Shc. To
determine if the formation of these complexes correlated with SRE
activation, we coexpressed v-Src with Cas
Ser and Cas
SB and
assessed the association of Grb2 with Shc and Shp-2 by
coimmunoprecipitation. Coexpression of either Cas mutant with v-Src did
not enhance the association between Shc and Grb2 over the level
observed upon expression of v-Src alone. Coprecipitation of Shp-2 was
somewhat reduced by the
Ser mutation. Cas
SB expression did not
enhance the level of coprecipitating Shp-2 over the level observed upon expression of Src alone. Thus, the formation of Grb2-Shc and
Grb2-Shp-2 complexes appears to parallel SRE activation. We could not
detect any association of Cas with either Shc or Shp-2 by
coimmunoprecipitation experiments (data not shown), suggesting that
Grb2 does not form a ternary complex with both Cas and Shc or Shp-2.
Since the serine-rich region of Cas contains a putative 14-3-3 binding
motif and affects Grb2 association with Shc and Shp-2, we carried out
coimmunoprecipitation experiments to determine whether 14-3-3 proteins
associate with Grb2, which we observed also contains putative 14-3-3 binding motifs. These coimmunoprecipitation assays revealed that Grb2 associates with 14-3-3 proteins in vivo (data not shown). 14-3-3 proteins may therefore play a role in signaling from Cas to Grb2. These
data suggest that coexpression of Cas and Src induces the association
of Grb2 with Shc and Shp-2 by some indirect mechanism. To determine if
Shc and Shp-2 play a role in Cas-mediated SRE activation,
dominant-negative mutants of each protein were incorporated into the
reporter assay. Src and Cas were coexpressed with either Shc 317F, in
which a Y
F mutation blocks binding of the Grb2 SH2 domain, or Shp-2
463S, in which a C
S mutation renders Shp-2 catalytically inactive.
Coexpression of either mutant significantly reduced the levels of SRE
activation by Src and Cas (Fig. 7B).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Shc and Shp-2 promote Cas-mediated signaling to the SRE.
(A) Grb2 was immunoprecipitated (IP) from lysates of cells transfected
with DNA constructs expressing Grb2, v-Src, and wild-type or mutant
( Ser or SB) forms of Cas. Coimmunoprecipitating Shc (upper panel)
and Shp-2 (middle panel) were detected by immunoblot analysis using
anti-Shc and anti-Shp-2 antibodies. The immunoprecipitated Grb2 was
detected by immunoblot analysis with anti-Grb2 antibody (lower panel).
(B) The reporter assay was performed on cells cotransfected with
constructs encoding v-Src, Cas, and mutants of Shc (Y317F) or Shp-2
(C463S) as indicated.
|
|
Cas enhances EGF-stimulated activation of the SRE.
Various
mitogens such as EGF induce immediate-early responses and
phosphorylation of Cas. We tested the ability of Cas to mediate
EGF-induced SRE activation. Cells were cotransfected with the
SRE-luciferase reporter construct and either an empty vector, Caswt, or
Cas
SB DNA. After serum starvation, cells remained unstimulated or
were stimulated with EGF. Overexpression of Caswt enhanced EGF-induced
SRE activation (Fig. 8). Expression of
Cas
SB did not enhance SRE activation, suggesting that association of
Cas with Src is required for this enhancement. The modest level of SRE
activation upon overexpression of Cas may reflect the ability of
endogenous Cas to support Cas-dependent signaling or the fact that
multiple signaling pathways mediate the EGF response (4, 31,
53).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Role of Cas in EGF-induced SRE activation. Cells were
cotransfected with pSREtkLuc and either vector DNA (pSSR ) or
constructs expressing Caswt or Cas SB. Twenty hours after
transfection, the cells were serum starved for 24 h. Cells were
either left unstimulated or stimulated with EGF (10 ng/ml) for 5 h. The cells were lysed and luciferase activity determined. *,
P = 0.01.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Mitogenic stimuli and v-Src expression both result in
transcriptional activation of IEGs through specific transcriptional control elements. Both stimuli also enhance the tyrosine
phosphorylation of Cas, a docking protein that interacts with multiple
signaling molecules. We hypothesized that Cas may mediate signaling to
the transcriptional control elements that regulate the expression of
IEGs. The findings reported here demonstrate that Cas cooperates with
Src in inducing SRE-dependent transcriptional activation and that this
activation occurs via a Grb2/Ras/Mek/MAPK pathway. The cooperation
between Cas and Src required the SB region of Cas and the kinase
activity of Src, indicating that signaling requires the association of
Cas with catalytically active Src.
Surprisingly, deletion of the SD did not affect SRE activation.
However, deletion of the serine-rich region in Cas did not affect the
association of Cas with Src but significantly decreased signaling to
the SRE. The function of this region remains unclear. It has previously
been shown that Cas becomes serine phosphorylated in cells expressing
v-Src (21). Phosphorylation of the serine residues may
create a binding site for other proteins or modulate the charge and
conformation of Cas. This region contains a motif which upon serine
phosphorylation would form a binding site for 14-3-3 proteins. 14-3-3 proteins form homo- and heterodimeric complexes and are implicated in
mediating interactions between a wide array of signaling molecules
(19). Recently Cas was also shown to associate with 14-3-3 proteins (11), although we could not detect such an
association, possibly due to the limited sensitivity of our assay. We
did identify putative 14-3-3 binding motifs in Grb2 and have
demonstrated that the two proteins are associated in vivo. These
observations suggest a role for 14-3-3 proteins in Cas-dependent
signaling to the SRE, perhaps in mediating signaling from Cas to Grb2.
We are currently studying the possible requirements for 14-3-3 proteins
in signaling by Cas.
Another segment of Cas that appears to be involved in signaling to the
SRE is the SH3 domain. When Cas
SH3 was expressed with v-Src, it
signaled to the SRE almost three times as strongly as Caswt. The SH3
domain of Cas mediates its association with the tyrosine phosphatases
PTP1B and PTP-PEST, which both dephosphorylate Cas (12, 25).
Thus, one function of the SH3 domain may be to downregulate signaling
by mediating the association of Cas with tyrosine phosphatases.
Consistent with this, we noticed that in the presence of v-Src,
Cas
SH3 was more hyperphosphorylated than Caswt. Interestingly,
coexpression of PTP1B inhibited the transformation of 3Y1 fibroblasts
by v-Src and reduced the tyrosine phosphorylation of Cas; this
inhibition did not occur upon coexpression of a PTP1B mutant defective
in Cas association (26). Thus, the serine-rich region of Cas
promotes signaling, while the SH3 domain downregulates it.
A possible mechanism of signaling to the SRE by Cas is through FAK. Cas
is known to be associated with FAK, and FAK has been implicated in the
activation of the Erk MAPK pathway via a direct association with Grb2
(42, 43). These observations raise the possibility that
association of Cas with FAK may somehow facilitate Erk activation. One
mode of association between Cas and FAK is direct binding mediated by
the Cas SH3 domain to a proline-rich region in FAK. However, expression
of a Cas mutant lacking the SH3 domain did not decrease signaling to
the SRE, suggesting that direct binding of Cas to FAK is not required
for signaling. An alternative mode of interaction between Cas and FAK
has been suggested by the observation that in Src-deficient cells
Cas-FAK association is enhanced by overexpression of c-Src or a
truncated form of Src lacking the kinase domain. Schlaepfer et al. have
proposed that Src may bridge these two proteins by binding FAK through its SH2 domain and Cas through its SH3 domain (41). Yet,
this mode of association does not appear to be responsible for SRE activation, since coimmunoprecipitation experiments did not reveal an
increase in Cas-FAK association when v-Src was expressed
(13a). Furthermore, the kinase-dead mutant of v-Src, which
would mimic the truncated form of c-Src, did not signal to the SRE.
These data imply that Cas-mediated signaling to the SRE is FAK independent.
Cas-mediated signaling to the SRE is transduced by the Ras/Mek/Erk
pathway. Cas enhanced Ras and Erk activation induced by v-Src, while
dominant-negative mutants of Ras and Mek1 abrogated Cas-dependent
signaling to the SRE. These data are in agreement with the finding of
Qureshi et al. that v-Src-induced activation of the SRE requires Ras
and Raf (37). Dominant-negative Grb2 mutants blocked
Cas-dependent activation of Ras and Erk2 and signaling to the SRE,
indicating that signaling from Cas to the Ras/MAPK pathway is
transmitted by Grb2. In cells coexpressing v-Src, Grb2 was found to
directly associate with Cas via an interaction between the SH2 domain
of Grb2 and Cas pY751. However, a Y751F mutation in Cas blocked the
association of Cas with Grb2 but had no detectable effects on SRE
activation. The role of this Cas-Grb2 complex remains unclear, although
it might contribute to activation of the SRE at quantitatively
insignificant levels. Overexpression of Cas did, however, enhance the
association of Grb2 with two signaling molecules, Shc and Shp-2.
Binding of Grb2 to these proteins has been implicated in the activation
of the Ras/Erk MAPK pathway (24, 34, 39, 44). We could not
detect association of Cas with either Shc or Shp-2, implying that the
effect on Grb2 complex formation is indirect. Expression of Shc and
Shp-2 mutants significantly reduced Cas-mediated SRE activation,
indicating that they are involved in the signaling pathway. These data
suggest that Grb2 is downstream of Cas and transmits signaling to Ras.
We propose a model in which Cas mediates a pathway that results in
SRE-dependent transcriptional activation induced by Src (Fig.
9). Cas first associates with Src. The
kinase-active Src may then phosphorylate Cas and/or a proximal
substrate. This initiates a yet unidentified signal leading to the
association of Grb2 with Shc and Shp-2. Formation of either complex may
lead to activation of Ras and the Erk MAPK cascade, which in turn
signals to the SRE. The Cas-dependent signaling pathway activated in
cells expressing v-Src may also be activated upon mitogen stimulation.
Several mitogenic stimuli have been shown to signal to the SRE and
enhance the level of tyrosine phosphorylation of Cas. Src may itself
participate in the EGF response (27, 55). We did observe a
modest increase in EGF-induced SRE activation in cells overexpressing
Caswt but not in cells expressing a Cas
SB mutant. Cas may,
therefore, mediate Src-dependent transcriptional regulation in response
to various stimuli.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
Model for Cas-mediated activation of the SRE.
Kinase-active Src directly binds to Cas. This association leads to the
coupling of Grb2 with Shc and Shp-2 by yet undetermined means. The
induced association of Grb2 with Shc and/or Shp-2 may signal to the
Ras/Mek/Erk pathway. Activation of the Erk MAPK pathway can then lead
to SRE-dependent transcriptional activation. Other Src-dependent
signaling pathways that are not shown may also result in activation of
Ras and signaling to SREs.
|
|
Several studies have suggested that transcriptional activation is
required for complete transformation of cells by v-Src (10, 30,
46, 51). Honda et al. demonstrated that Cas-deficient mouse
embryo fibroblasts are not fully transformed by v-Src (17), while Auvinen et al. have shown that expression of antisense Cas partially reverts the morphological transformation of rat fibroblasts by v-Src (3). Thus, one can speculate that Cas-mediated
transcriptional activation of certain genes may contribute to
transformation by v-Src. However, it is likely that Cas has additional
biochemical functions which are important for oncogenic transformation
or mitogenic responses. Moreover, many other proteins have been
implicated in activation of the Ras/MAPK pathway. The complex signaling
network which converges on Ras remains to be fully elucidated.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank H. Hirai, D. Foster, B. Mayer, M. Weber, N. Ahn, G. S. Feng, T. Pawson, and R. Davis for constructs and reagents. We also
thank F. Hofer, M. Gossen, and members of the Martin lab for helpful
discussions and Y. Hsu for technical assistance.
This work was supported by NIH grant CA17542 and by the facilities of
the University of California Cancer Research Laboratory.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Department of Molecular and Cell
Biology, University of California
Berkeley, 401 Barker Hall #3204,
Berkeley, CA 94720-3204. Phone: (510) 642-1508. Fax: (510) 643-1729. E-mail: smartin{at}socrates.berkeley.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Aftab, D. T.,
J. Kwan, and G. S. Martin.
1997.
Ras-independent transformation by v-Src.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:3028-3033[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Alexandropoulos, K., and D. Baltimore.
1996.
Coordinate activation of c-Src by SH3- and SH2-binding sites on a novel p130Cas-related protein, Sin.
Genes Dev.
10:1341-1355[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Auvinen, M.,
A. Paasinen-Sohns,
H. Hirai,
L. C. Andersson, and E. Hölttä.
1995.
Ornithine decarboxylase- and Ras-induced cell transformations: reversal by protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors and role of pp130CAS.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:6513-6525[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Bennett, A. M.,
S. F. Hausdorff,
A. M. O'Reilly,
R. M. Freeman, and B. G. Neel.
1996.
Multiple requirements for SHPTP2 in epidermal growth factor-mediated cell cycle progression.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:1189-1202[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Brugge, J. S.
1998.
Casting light on focal adhesions.
Nat. Genet.
19:309-311[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Burnham, M. R.,
M. T. Harte,
A. Richardson,
J. T. Parsons, and A. H. Bouton.
1996.
The identification of p130cas-binding proteins and their role in cellular transformation.
Oncogene
12:2467-2472[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Cahill, M. A.,
R. Janknecht, and A. Nordheim.
1996.
Signalling pathways: jack of all cascades.
Curr. Biol.
6:16-19[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Casamassima, A., and E. Rozengurt.
1997.
Tyrosine phosphorylation of p130(cas) by bombesin, lysophosphatidic acid, phorbol esters, and platelet-derived growth factor. Signaling pathways and formation of a p130(cas)-Crk complex.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:9363-9370[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Curto, M.,
A. Carrero,
P. Frankel, and D. A. Foster.
1997.
Activation of gene expression by a non-transforming unmyristylated-SH3-deleted mutant of Src is dependent upon Tyr-527.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
239:681-687[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Frame, M. C.,
K. Simpson,
V. J. Fincham, and D. H. Crouch.
1994.
Separation of v-Src-induced mitogenesis and morphological transformation by inhibition of AP-1.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
5:1177-1184.
|
| 11.
|
Garcia-Guzman, M.,
F. Dolfi,
M. Russello, and K. Vuori.
1999.
Cell adhesion regulates the interaction between the docking protein p130(Cas) and the 14-3-3 proteins.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:5762-5768[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Garton, A. J.,
M. R. Burnham,
A. H. Bouton, and N. K. Tonks.
1997.
Association of PTP-PEST with the SH3 domain of p130cas; a novel mechanism of protein tyrosine phosphatase substrate recognition.
Oncogene
15:877-885[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Grammer, T. C., and J. Blenis.
1997.
Evidence for MEK-independent pathways regulating the prolonged activation of the ERK-MAP kinases.
Oncogene
14:1635-1642[Medline].
|
| 13a.
| Hakak, Y., and G. S. Martin. Unpublished
results.
|
| 14.
|
Harte, M. T.,
J. D. Hildebrand,
M. R. Burnham,
A. H. Bouton, and J. T. Parsons.
1996.
p130Cas, a substrate associated with v-Src and v-Crk, localizes to focal adhesions and binds to focal adhesion kinase.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:13649-13655[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Herschman, H. R.
1991.
Primary response genes induced by growth factors and tumor promoters.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
60:281-319[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Hofer, F.,
R. Berdeaux, and G. S. Martin.
1998.
Ras-independent activation of Ral by a Ca(2+)-dependent pathway.
Curr. Biol.
8:839-842[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Honda, H.,
H. Oda,
T. Nakamoto,
Z. Honda,
R. Sakai,
T. Suzuki,
T. Saito,
K. Nakamura,
K. Nakao,
T. Ishikawa,
M. Katsuki,
Y. Yazaki, and H. Hirai.
1998.
Cardiovascular anomaly, impaired actin bundling and resistance to Src-induced transformation in mice lacking p130(Cas).
Nat. Genet.
19:361-365[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Hu, Q.,
D. Milfay, and L. T. Williams.
1995.
Binding of NCK to SOS and activation of ras-dependent gene expression.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:1169-1174[Abstract].
|
| 19.
|
Jones, D. H.,
S. Ley, and A. Aitken.
1995.
Isoforms of 14-3-3 protein can form homo- and heterodimers in vivo and in vitro: implications for function as adapter proteins.
FEBS Lett.
368:55-58[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Jove, R., and H. Hanafusa.
1987.
Cell transformation by the viral src oncogene.
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
3:31-56.
|
| 21.
|
Kanner, S. B.,
A. B. Reynolds,
H. C. Wang,
R. R. Vines, and J. T. Parsons.
1991.
The SH2 and SH3 domains of pp60src direct stable association with tyrosine phosphorylated proteins p130 and p110.
EMBO J.
10:1689-1698[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Kirsch, K. H.,
M. M. Georgescu, and H. Hanafusa.
1998.
Direct binding of p130(Cas) to the guanine nucleotide exchange factor C3G.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:25673-25679[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Law, S. F.,
J. Estojak,
B. Wang,
T. Mysliwiec,
G. Kruh, and E. A. Golemis.
1996.
Human enhancer of filamentation 1, a novel p130cas-like docking protein, associates with focal adhesion kinase and induces pseudohyphal growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:3327-3337[Abstract].
|
| 24.
|
Li, W.,
R. Nishimura,
A. Kashishian,
A. G. Batzer,
W. J. Kim,
J. A. Cooper, and J. Schlessinger.
1994.
A new function for a phosphotyrosine phosphatase: linking GRB2-Sos to a receptor tyrosine kinase.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:509-517[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Liu, F.,
D. E. Hill, and J. Chernoff.
1996.
Direct binding of the proline-rich region of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B to the Src homology 3 domain of p130(Cas).
J. Biol. Chem.
271:31290-31299[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Liu, F.,
M. A. Sells, and J. Chernoff.
1998.
Transformation suppression by protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B requires a functional SH3 ligand.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:250-259[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Luttrell, D. K.,
L. M. Luttrell, and S. J. Parsons.
1988.
Augmented mitogenic responsiveness to epidermal growth factor in murine fibroblasts that overexpress pp60c-src.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8:497-501[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Manié, S. N.,
A. Astier,
N. Haghayeghi,
T. Canty,
B. J. Druker,
H. Hirai, and A. S. Freedman.
1997.
Regulation of integrin-mediated p130(Cas) tyrosine phosphorylation in human B cells. A role for p59(Fyn) and SHP2.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:15636-15641[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Matsuda, M.,
Y. Hashimoto,
K. Muroya,
H. Hasegawa,
T. Kurata,
S. Tanaka,
S. Nakamura, and S. Hattori.
1994.
CRK protein binds to two guanine nucleotide-releasing proteins for the Ras family and modulates nerve growth factor-induced activation of Ras in PC12 cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:5495-5500[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Meijne, A. M.,
L. Ruuls-Van Stalle,
C. A. Feltkamp,
J. B. McCarthy, and E. Roos.
1997.
v-src-induced cell shape changes in rat fibroblasts require new gene transcription and precede loss of focal adhesions.
Exp. Cell Res.
234:477-485[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Migliaccio, E.,
S. Mele,
A. E. Salcini,
G. Pelicci,
K. M. Lai,
G. Superti-Furga,
T. Pawson,
P. P. Di Fiore,
L. Lanfrancone, and P. G. Pelicci.
1997.
Opposite effects of the p52shc/p46shc and p66shc splicing isoforms on the EGF receptor-MAP kinase-fos signalling pathway.
EMBO J.
16:706-736[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Morgenstern, J. P., and H. Land.
1990.
Advanced mammalian gene transfer: high titre retroviral vectors with multiple drug selection markers and a complementary helper-free packaging cell line.
Nucleic Acids Res.
18:3587-3596[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Nakamoto, T.,
R. Sakai,
K. Ozawa,
Y. Yazaki, and H. Hirai.
1996.
Direct binding of C-terminal region of p130Cas to SH2 and SH3 domains of Src kinase.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:8959-8965[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Noguchi, T.,
T. Matozaki,
K. Horita,
Y. Fujioka, and M. Kasuga.
1994.
Role of SH-PTP2, a protein-tyrosine phosphatase with Src homology 2 domains, in insulin-stimulated Ras activation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:6674-6682[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Ojaniemi, M., and K. Vuori.
1997.
Epidermal growth factor modulates tyrosine phosphorylation of p130Cas. Involvement of phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase and actin cytoskeleton.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:25993-25998[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Polte, T. R., and S. K. Hanks.
1995.
Interaction between focal adhesion kinase and Crk-associated tyrosine kinase substrate p130Cas.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:10678-10682[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Qureshi, S. A.,
K. Alexandropoulos,
M. Rim,
C. K. Joseph,
J. T. Bruder,
U. R. Rapp, and D. A. Foster.
1992.
Evidence that Ha-Ras mediates two distinguishable intracellular signals activated by v-Src.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:17635-17639[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Qureshi, S. A.,
X. M. Cao,
V. P. Sukhatme, and D. A. Foster.
1991.
v-Src activates mitogen-responsive transcription factor Egr-1 via serum response elements.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:10802-10806[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Rozakis-Adcock, M.,
J. McGlade,
G. Mbamalu,
G. Pelicci,
R. Daly,
W. Li,
A. Batzer,
S. Thomas,
J. Brugge,
P. G. Pelicci, et al.
1992.
Association of the Shc and Grb2/Sem5 SH2-containing proteins is implicated in activation of the Ras pathway by tyrosine kinases.
Nature
360:689-692[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Sakai, R.,
A. Iwamatsu,
N. Hirano,
S. Ogawa,
T. Tanaka,
H. Mano,
Y. Yazaki, and H. Hirai.
1994.
A novel signaling molecule, p130, forms stable complexes in vivo with v-Crk and v-Src in a tyrosine phosphorylation-dependent manner.
EMBO J.
13:3748-3756[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Schlaepfer, D. D.,
M. A. Broome, and T. Hunter.
1997.
Fibronectin-stimulated signaling from a focal adhesion kinase-c-Src complex: involvement of the Grb2, p130cas, and Nck adaptor proteins.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:1702-1713[Abstract].
|
| 42.
|
Schlaepfer, D. D.,
S. K. Hanks,
T. Hunter, and P. van der Geer.
1994.
Integrin-mediated signal transduction linked to Ras pathway by GRB2 binding to focal adhesion kinase.
Nature
372:786-791[Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Schlaepfer, D. D.,
K. C. Jones, and T. Hunter.
1998.
Multiple Grb2-mediated integrin-stimulated signaling pathways to ERK2/mitogen-activated protein kinase: summation of both c-Src- and focal adhesion kinase-initiated tyrosine phosphorylation events.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:2571-2585[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Skolnik, E. Y.,
A. Batzer,
N. Li,
C. H. Lee,
E. Lowenstein,
M. Mohammadi,
B. Margolis, and J. Schlessinger.
1993.
The function of GRB2 in linking the insulin receptor to Ras signaling pathways.
Science
260:1953-1955[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Songyang, Z.,
S. E. Shoelson,
J. McGlade,
P. Olivier,
T. Pawson,
X. R. Bustelo,
M. Barbacid,
H. Sabe,
H. Hanafusa,
T. Yi,
R. Ren,
D. Baltimore,
S. Ratnofsky,
R. A. Feldman, and L. C. Cantley.
1994.
Specific motifs recognized by the SH2 domains of Csk, 3BP2, fps/fes, GRB-2, HCP, SHC, Syk, and Vav.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:2777-2785[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Suzuki, T.,
M. Murakami,
N. Onai,
E. Fukuda,
Y. Hashimoto,
M. H. Sonobe,
T. Kameda,
M. Ichinose,
K. Miki, and H. Iba.
1994.
Analysis of AP-1 function in cellular transformation pathways.
J. Virol.
68:3527-3535[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Takenawa, T.,
H. Miki, and K. Matuoka.
1998.
Signaling through Grb2/Ash-control of the Ras pathway and cytoskeleton.
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
228:325-342[Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Tanaka, M.,
R. Gupta, and B. J. Mayer.
1995.
Differential inhibition of signaling pathways by dominant-negative SH2/SH3 adapter proteins.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:6829-6837[Abstract].
|
| 49.
|
Tanaka, S.,
T. Ouchi, and H. Hanafusa.
1997.
Downstream of Crk adaptor signaling pathway: activation of Jun kinase by v-Crk through the guanine nucleotide exchange protein C3G.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:2356-2361[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Thomas, S. M., and J. S. Brugge.
1997.
Cellular functions regulated by Src family kinases.
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
13:513-609[Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Turkson, J.,
T. Bowman,
R. Garcia,
E. Caldenhoven,
R. P. De Groot, and R. Jove.
1998.
Stat3 activation by Src induces specific gene regulation and is required for cell transformation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:2545-2552[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 52.
|
Vuori, K.,
H. Hirai,
S. Aizawa, and E. Ruoslahti.
1996.
Induction of p130cas signaling complex formation upon integrin-mediated cell adhesion: a role for Src family kinases.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:2606-2613[Abstract].
|
| 53.
|
Wang, Z.,
S. Glück,
L. Zhang, and M. F. Moran.
1998.
Requirement for phospholipase C- 1 enzymatic activity in growth factor-induced mitogenesis.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:590-597[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 54.
|
White, B. A.
1993.
PCR protocols: current methods and applications.
Humana Press, Totowa, N.J.
|
| 55.
|
Wilson, L. K.,
D. K. Luttrell,
J. T. Parsons, and S. J. Parsons.
1989.
pp60c-src tyrosine kinase, myristylation, and modulatory domains are required for enhanced mitogenic responsiveness to epidermal growth factor seen in cells overexpressing c-src.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9:1536-1544[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, October 1999, p. 6953-6962, Vol. 19, No. 10
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Giehl, K., Graness, A., Goppelt-Struebe, M.
(2008). The small GTPase Rac-1 is a regulator of mesangial cell morphology and thrombospondin-1 expression. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.
294: F407-F413
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Xu, J., Bai, X.-H., Lodyga, M., Han, B., Xiao, H., Keshavjee, S., Hu, J., Zhang, H., Yang, B. B., Liu, M.
(2007). XB130, a Novel Adaptor Protein for Signal Transduction. J. Biol. Chem.
282: 16401-16412
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ambrogio, C., Voena, C., Manazza, A. D., Piva, R., Riera, L., Barberis, L., Costa, C., Tarone, G., Defilippi, P., Hirsch, E., Erba, E. B., Mohammed, S., Jensen, O. N., Palestro, G., Inghirami, G., Chiarle, R.
(2005). p130Cas mediates the transforming properties of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase. Blood
106: 3907-3916
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Goldberg, G. S., Alexander, D. B., Pellicena, P., Zhang, Z.-Y., Tsuda, H., Miller, W. T.
(2003). Src Phosphorylates Cas on Tyrosine 253 to Promote Migration of Transformed Cells. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 46533-46540
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chan, P.-C., Liang, C.-C., Yu, K.-C., Chang, M.-C., Ho, W. L., Chen, B.-H., Chen, H.-C.
(2002). Synergistic Effect of Focal Adhesion Kinase Overexpression and Hepatocyte Growth Factor Stimulation on Cell Transformation. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 50373-50379
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schmitt, J. M., Stork, P. J. S.
(2002). Galpha and Gbeta gamma Require Distinct Src-dependent Pathways to Activate Rap1 and Ras. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 43024-43032
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kim, J.-T., Joo, C.-K.
(2002). Involvement of Cell-Cell Interactions in the Rapid Stimulation of Cas Tyrosine Phosphorylation and Src Kinase Activity by Transforming Growth Factor-beta 1. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 31938-31948
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cheriyath, V., Desgranges, Z. P., Roy, A. L.
(2002). c-Src-dependent Transcriptional Activation of TFII-I. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 22798-22805
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yang, L.-T., Alexandropoulos, K., Sap, J.
(2002). c-SRC Mediates Neurite Outgrowth through Recruitment of Crk to the Scaffolding Protein Sin/Efs without Altering the Kinetics of ERK Activation. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 17406-17414
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wang, Z., Tseng, C.-P., Pong, R.-C., Chen, H., McConnell, J. D., Navone, N., Hsieh, J.-T.
(2002). The Mechanism of Growth-inhibitory Effect of DOC-2/DAB2 in Prostate Cancer. CHARACTERIZATION OF A NOVEL GTPase-ACTIVATING PROTEIN ASSOCIATED WITH N-TERMINAL DOMAIN OF DOC-2/DAB2. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 12622-12631
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schlesinger, T. K., Bonvin, C., Jarpe, M. B., Fanger, G. R., Cardinaux, J.-R., Johnson, G. L., Widmann, C.
(2002). Apoptosis Stimulated by the 91-kDa Caspase Cleavage MEKK1 Fragment Requires Translocation to Soluble Cellular Compartments. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 10283-10291
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Samarakoon, R., Higgins, P. J.
(2002). MEK/ERK pathway mediates cell-shape-dependent plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 gene expression upon drug-induced disruption of the microfilament and microtubule networks. J. Cell Sci.
115: 3093-3103
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Fashena, S. J., Einarson, M. B., O'Neill, G. M., Patriotis, C., Golemis, E. A.
(2002). Dissection of HEF1-dependent functions in motility and transcriptional regulation. J. Cell Sci.
115: 99-111
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Xing, L., Ge, C., Zeltser, R., Maskevitch, G., Mayer, B. J., Alexandropoulos, K.
(2000). c-Src Signaling Induced by the Adapters Sin and Cas Is Mediated by Rap1 GTPase. Mol. Cell. Biol.
20: 7363-7377
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Burnham, M. R., Bruce-Staskal, P. J., Harte, M. T., Weidow, C. L., Ma, A., Weed, S. A., Bouton, A. H.
(2000). Regulation of c-SRC Activity and Function by the Adapter Protein CAS. Mol. Cell. Biol.
20: 5865-5878
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gotoh, T., Cai, D., Tian, X., Feig, L. A., Lerner, A.
(2000). p130Cas Regulates the Activity of AND-34, a Novel Ral, Rap1, and R-Ras Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor. J. Biol. Chem.
275: 30118-30123
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sanders, M. A., Basson, M. D.
(2000). Collagen IV-dependent ERK Activation in Human Caco-2 Intestinal Epithelial Cells Requires Focal Adhesion Kinase. J. Biol. Chem.
275: 38040-38047
[Abstract]
[Full Text]