Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, October 1999, p. 7001-7010, Vol. 19, No. 10
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Multifunctional Role of the Pitx2 Homeodomain
Protein C-Terminal Tail
Brad A.
Amendt,*
Lillian B.
Sutherland, and
Andrew F.
Russo
Department of Physiology and Biophysics,
University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Received 21 August 1998/Returned for modification 2 February
1999/Accepted 26 July 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Pitx2 is a newly described bicoid-like homeodomain transcription
factor that is defective in Rieger syndrome and shows a striking leftward developmental asymmetry. We have previously shown that Pitx2
(also called Ptx2 and RIEG) transactivates a reporter gene containing a
bicoid enhancer and synergistically transactivates the
prolactin promoter in the presence of the POU homeodomain protein
Pit-1. In this report, we focused on the C-terminal region which is
mutated in some Rieger patients and contains a highly conserved
14-amino-acid element. Deletion analysis of Pitx2 revealed that the
C-terminal 39-amino-acid tail represses DNA binding activity and is
required for Pitx2-Pit-1 interaction and Pit-1 synergism. Pit-1
interaction with the Pitx2 C terminus masks the inhibitory effect and
promotes increased DNA binding activity. Interestingly, cotransfection
of an expression vector encoding the C-terminal 39 amino acids of Pitx2
specifically inhibits Pitx2 transactivation activity. In contrast, the
C-terminal 39-amino-acid peptide interacts with Pitx2 to increase its
DNA binding activity. These data suggest that the C-terminal tail
intrinsically inhibits the Pitx2 protein and that this inhibition can
be overcome by interaction with other transcription factors to allow
activation during development.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Human Pitx2 (also called
Ptx2 and RIEG) is a member of the
bicoid-like homeobox transcription factor family
(30). The homeobox gene family has been extensively studied,
and the members play fundamental roles in the genetic control of
development, including pattern formation and determination of cell fate
(for reviews, see references 11, 18, and
23). The homeodomain of Pitx2 has a high degree of
homology to another Bicoid-like homeodomain protein, P-OTX/Ptx1/Pitx1
(19, 36), and to Pitx3 (31) and, to a lesser
extent, unc-30, Otx-1, Otx-2, otd, and goosecoid (30). The
homeobox proteins contain a 60-amino-acid homeodomain that binds DNA.
Pitx2 contains a lysine at position 50 in the third helix of the
homeodomain that is characteristic of the Bicoid-related proteins
(14, 17, 33). This lysine residue selectively recognizes the
3'CC dinucleotide adjacent to the TAAT core (11, 40). Consistent with this phylogenetic relationship, we have demonstrated that Pitx2 can bind the DNA sequence 5'TAATCC3'
(2), which is also recognized by the Bicoid protein
(8).
The Pitx2 gene has point mutations in Rieger syndrome
patients (30). Rieger syndrome was first defined as a
genetic disorder in 1935 (27). It is an autosomal dominant
human disorder characterized by dental hypoplasia, mild craniofacial
dysmorphism, ocular anterior chamber anomalies causing glaucoma, and
umbilical stump abnormalities. The dental hypoplasia is manifested as
missing, small, and/or malformed teeth (30). Other features
associated with Rieger syndrome include abnormal cardiac, limb, and
anterior pituitary development. We have recently reported that point
mutations in the homeodomain of Pitx2 associated with Rieger
syndrome affect DNA binding and transactivation activities
(2). Another interesting feature of Pitx2 is that it
displays left-right asymmetric expression during early embryogenesis
(1, 21, 26, 28, 41). Pitx2 is unique because it has a
function in developmental left-right asymmetry and is not simply a
marker of leftward organ development. In the chick embryo, asymmetric
expression of Pitx2 was detected at stage 7 and restricted
to the left-sided lateral mesoderm, the left-sided precardiac mesoderm,
and the left half epimyocardium of the primitive heart (1).
Pitx2 is also expressed in the left heart and gut of mouse
and Xenopus embryos (28). Recently, several
investigators have shown that Pitx2 is involved in a Lefty signaling
pathway and is transcriptionally responsive to sonic hedgehog and nodal
(21, 26, 28, 41).
Pitx2 expression in Rathke's pouch suggests that this new family also
plays an important role in anterior pituitary gland development. Mouse
Pitx2 was independently cloned and shown to be a potential
regulator of anterior structure formation (10). Both Pitx2
and the related P-OTX protein were shown to interact with the POU
homeodomain protein Pit-1 (2, 36). Pit-1 is an important
transcription factor that regulates pituitary cell differentiation and
expression of the thyroid-stimulating hormone, the growth hormone, and
prolactin (34). The C terminus of P-OTX was further shown to
bind the family of LIM domain-associated cofactors, P-Lim and CLIM 1a
(3). These results suggest that protein-protein interactions
may also occur in the corresponding region of Pitx2. While most of the
C-terminal sequences of P-OTX and Pitx2 are divergent, Pitx2 has a
14-amino-acid conserved sequence found in P-OTX. This sequence was
identified in other homeodomain proteins and speculated to be involved
in protein-protein interactions (30).
The C-terminal tails of homeodomain proteins have been shown to be
involved in autoregulation (7, 9, 15, 35). Interestingly, in
some Rieger syndrome patients, Pitx2 has a truncated C-terminal tail.
Thus, we wanted to determine the function of the Pitx2 C-terminal tail.
We report that Pitx2 activity is regulated by its C-terminal tail. In
this study, we have identified a small region of Pitx2 that inhibits
DNA binding and is involved in protein-protein interactions. Protein
binding to this region stimulates Pitx2 DNA binding and transcriptional
activation, presumably by masking the inhibitory domain. This
repression is relieved when the Pit-1 transcription factor binds to the
Pitx2 C terminus. We propose a novel mechanism for the regulation of
Pitx2 during development.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Expression and purification of GST-Pitx2 fusion proteins.
The human Pitx2 and deletion constructs were PCR amplified
from a cDNA clone provided by Elena Semina and Jeffery Murray
(Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa) as previously described
(2). A schematic of the wild-type Pitx2 and the different
truncations are shown in Fig. 1. To make
plasmid pGST-Pitx2C
39, which has the C-terminal 39 amino acids
deleted, an antisense primer (nucleotides 1280 to 1262) with a unique
NotI site (5'GTACTGCAGATGCGGCCGCGTTACACGTGTCCCTATA3') was used with the previous 5' sense primer (2). For
plasmid pGST-Pitx2C
78, a C-terminal truncation with the last 78 amino acids deleted, an antisense primer (nucleotides 1163 to 1145) with a NotI site
(5'GTACTGCAGATGCGGCCGCGAGACTGGAGCCCGGGAC3') was used with
the previous 5' sense primer to make the truncated DNA product. For
plasmid pGST-Pitx2C
173, which has the C-terminal 173 amino acids
deleted, an antisense primer (nucleotides 881 to 863) with a unique
NotI site (5'GTACTGCAGATGCGGCCGCGCGCTCCCTCTTTCTCCA3') was used with the previous 5' sense primer. For plasmid
pGST-Pitx2N
16, which has the N-terminal 16 amino acids deleted, the
sense primer (nucleotides 632 to 650) with a unique SalI
site (5'CGTCGTCGACTAAAGATAAAAGCCAGCAG3') and the previous
antisense primer used to make pGST-Pitx2 (2) were used.
pGST-Pitx2N
38 was made by using the sense primer (nucleotides 699 to
720) containing a unique SalI site
(5'GCGGGATCCCGAACGGGGAAATGCAAAGGCGGCAGCGGACTCAC3') and the
antisense primer for pGST-Pitx2. To make pGST-Pitx2HD, the
pGST-Pitx2N
38 sense primer and the pGST-Pitx2C
173 antisense primers were used. The plasmids pGST-Pitx2C39, pGST-Pitx2C78, and
pGST-Pitx2C173 were made by using the above-mentioned wild-type antisense primer and the sense primers starting at nucleotides 1280, 1163, and 881, respectively, with a unique SalI site 5' of
the Pitx2 sequence. The PCR profile consisted of 94°C for 2 min,
60°C for 2 min, and 72°C for 3 min for 30 cycles with
Pfu DNA polymerase (Stratagene). The PCR products were
digested with SalI and NotI, cloned into pGex6P-2
(Pharmacia Biotech), and confirmed by DNA sequencing. The plasmids were
transformed into BL21 cells. Protein was isolated as previously
described (2). Pitx2 proteins were cleaved from the
glutathione S-transferase (GST) moiety by using 80 U of
PreScission protease (Pharmacia Biotech) per ml of glutathione
Sepharose. Purified proteins used in the binding assays are shown in
Fig. 1B. The Sepharose beads were spun down, and the supernatant was
aliquoted and stored at
80°C in 10% glycerol. The cleaved proteins
were analyzed on sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gels and
quantitated by the Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Schematic of Pitx2 constructs. (A) Proteins used in this
study with the homeodomain (HD) and the conserved 14-amino-acid (14AA)
C-terminal element. (B) The proteins were expressed in bacteria as GST
fusions, and the GST moiety was cleaved from the Pitx2 proteins with
PreScission protease. Equal molar amounts of each protein (~5 µg)
were resolved on an SDS-12.5% polyacrylamide glycine gel (left panel)
or an SDS-10% polyacrylamide tricine gel (right panel). Proteins were
visualized by Coomassie blue staining. Molecular mass markers (in
kilodaltons) are shown to the left of each panel.
|
|
EMSA.
Complementary oligonucleotides containing a
Drosophila bicoid site (8) with flanking partial
BamHI ends were annealed and filled with Klenow polymerase
to generate 32P-labeled probes for electrophoretic mobility
shift assays (EMSAs), as previously described (39). For
standard binding assays, the oligonucleotide (1.0 pmol) was incubated
in a 20-µl reaction mixture containing binding buffer (20 mM HEPES
[pH 7.5], 5% glycerol, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM
dithiothreitol), 0.1 µg of poly(dI-dC), 80 to 160 ng of Pitx2, and
Pitx2 truncated proteins on ice for 15 min. For competition assays,
unlabeled double-stranded end-filled oligonucleotides were preincubated
with the protein for 15 min on ice prior to addition of the probe.
Sequences of the bicoid probe and competitor
oligonucleotides, all with flanking partial BamHI ends, have
been previously described (2). Pit-1 (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc.) (200 ng) was added to the EMSA experiments prior
to addition of the probe. The samples were electrophoresed for 2 h
at 250 V on an 8% polyacrylamide gel with 0.25× TBE (22.5 mM Tris-HCl
[pH 8.5], 28 mM boric acid, 0.7 mM EDTA) at 4°C following preelectrophoresis of the gels for 1 h at 200 V. The dried gels were visualized by exposure to autoradiographic film. For quantitative analyses to establish binding constants and relative competitions, the
amounts of bound and free radioactive probes were measured from dried
gels with an InstantImager (Packard). For determination of the amount
of binding competition, the ratio of bound to free probes was
normalized to the absence of competitor DNA.
In vitro Pit-1 binding and Western blot analyses.
Immobilized GST fusion proteins were prepared as described above and
suspended in binding buffer (20 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 5% glycerol, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1% milk, and 400 µg of
ethidium bromide per ml). Pit-1 (Santa Cruz) (40 ng) was added to 10 µg of immobilized GST fusion proteins or GST in a total volume of 100 µl and incubated for 30 min at 4°C. The beads were pelleted and
washed four times with 200 µl of binding buffer. The bound Pit-1 was
eluted by boiling in SDS sample buffer and was separated on an
SDS-12.5% polyacrylamide gel. Following SDS gel electrophoresis, the
proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride filters
(Millipore), immunoblotted, and detected by using Pit-1 antibody (Santa
Cruz) and enhanced chemiluminescence reagents from Amersham.
Expression and reporter constructs.
Expression plasmids
containing the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter linked to the Pitx2 and
Pitx2 truncated DNA were constructed in pcDNA 3.1 MycHisC (Invitrogen).
The c-myc epitope is in frame with the C terminus of Pitx2, allowing
detection of the expressed protein by the c-myc antibody. The
N-terminally deleted plasmids contain the Pitx2 translation initiation
sequences. The bicoid-thymidine kinase (TK)-luc reporter
plasmid has bicoid elements (underlined) (5'gatccGCACGGCCCATCTAATCCCGTGg3' annealed to
5'gatccCACGGGATTAGATGGGCCGTGCg3') ligated into
the unique BamHI site (lowercased) upstream of the TK
promoter in the TK-luc plasmid (39).
Bicoid-TK-luc contains four inserts, three in the sense
orientation and one in the antisense orientation (+, +,
, and +).
Prolactin-luc contains 2,500 bases of the rat prolactin
enhancer-promoter linked to the luciferase gene (22). The
Pit-1 expression vector contains full-length rat Pit-1 cDNA with the
Rous sarcoma virus promoter or enhancer (16). A CMV
-galactosidase reporter plasmid (Clontech) was cotransfected in all
experiments as a control for transfection efficiency.
Cell culture, transient transfections, luciferase, and
-galactosidase assays.
COS-7 cells were cultured as previously
described (20) in 60-mm dishes and were transfected by a
modification of the calcium phosphate method (12). The cells
were fed 2 h prior to transfection. Plasmid DNA (5 µg each of
expression and reporter vectors) in 1 ml of 1× HBS (140 mM NaCl, 0.8 mM Na2HPO4, 25 mM HEPES [pH 7.1]) and 125 mM
calcium chloride were added to the medium and allowed to precipitate
overnight; fresh medium was added for 4 h prior to harvest. Cells
were incubated for 24 h and then lysed and assayed for reporter
activities and protein content by the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad).
Luciferase activity was measured by using reagents from Promega.
-Galactosidase activity was measured by using Galacto-Light Plus
reagents (Tropix Inc.). All luciferase activities were normalized to
-galactosidase activity. Pitx2 proteins transiently expressed in
COS-7 cells were detected by immunoblotting with a c-myc monoclonal antibody (9E10; Santa Cruz), as described above.
 |
RESULTS |
The C terminus of Pitx2 represses DNA binding activity.
Since
the 14-amino-acid sequence in the C-terminal end of Pitx2 is highly
conserved among this family of homeobox proteins, we asked if it
affected DNA binding. A 39-amino-acid deletion was engineered to remove
the conserved 14 amino acids and flanking residues from Pitx2
(Pitx2C
39) (Fig. 1). EMSAs with Pitx2 and the Pitx2C
39 truncated
protein demonstrated a two- to threefold increase in binding of
Pitx2C
39 to the bicoid element (Fig.
2A and C). Deletion of the C-terminal 39 residues also allowed formation of homodimers. A competition analysis
with oligonucleotides containing the Nkx class
(5'CAAGTG3'), ftz class (5'TAATGG3'),
prd class (5'TTTGACGT3'), Mu9
(5'TAATAT3'), and other homeodomain binding sites revealed
comparable binding specificity for Pitx2 and Pitx2C
39 to the
bicoid probe (Fig. 2). Thus, deletion of the C-terminal 39 residues did not affect the binding specificity of Pitx2 but did
increase binding of monomers and dimer formation.


View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
The C terminus of Pitx2 inhibits DNA binding activity.
(A) Pitx2 proteins (~160 ng) (40 ng of Pitx2HD) were incubated with
the bicoid consensus sequence as the radioactive probe in
the absence (No Comp.) or presence of 50-fold molar excess unlabeled
oligonucleotides as competitor DNA. Approximately 160 ng of
Pitx2C 173 was used in the EMSA that would reflect a twofold increase
in the molar amount of Pitx2C 173 compared to that of Pitx2C 39.
Similar results were seen using 80 ng of Pitx2C 173 (not shown). The
EMSA experiments were analyzed on native 8% polyacrylamide gels. The
free probe and bound complexes are indicated: D, dimer; M, monomer; and
F, free. (B) Quantitation of the DNA binding of Pitx2 and truncated
Pitx2 proteins from the EMSA experiments. The free and bound DNA
radioactivity was measured, and the inhibition of the bound complex
from the 50-fold excess of each competitor DNA was determined. The
values were normalized to 100% binding without competitor DNA, with
means and standard errors of the means from 5 to 10 independent
experiments. (C) Quantitation of bound DNA (monomer and dimer forms)
from EMSA experiments with Pitx2 and Pitx2 truncated proteins. The
radioactive bound DNA was measured from 5 to 10 independent
experiments, and the error bars are standard errors of the means.
|
|
We have previously shown by Scatchard plots that the apparent
KD for Pitx2 binding to the bicoid
element is 50 nM (2). We determined that the apparent
KD of Pitx2C
39 binding to the bicoid sequence is similar, 58 nM, with a twofold increase
in the Bmax (data not shown). Interestingly, when we measured the binding affinities of these two proteins as GST fusions, an
astonishingly 750-fold increase in the binding capacity of
GST-Pitx2C
39 over GST-Pitx2 was observed (data not shown). While the
basis for this is not known, the GST moiety appears to enhance the
effect of the C-terminal deletion.
Deletion of the entire C terminus, Pitx2C
173, did not further
increase the binding compared to that of Pitx2C
39 (Fig. 2C). Pitx2C
173 also bound to the bicoid element as a dimer
without a loss in specificity (Fig. 2 and data not shown). We next
asked if the homeodomain by itself would bind the bicoid
site with the same increase in DNA binding activity. We used a molar
amount of Pitx2HD equal to that of the wild type in our EMSA
experiments. Pitx2HD bound the bicoid site with the same
specificity as Pitx2 and Pitx2C
39 (Fig. 2). The binding of Pitx2HD
similarly resulted in the formation of homodimers, suggesting that
dimerization occurs through the homeodomain of Pitx2.
We further wanted to determine if the N terminus had an effect on Pitx2
DNA binding activity. Removal of the entire N-terminal region,
Pitx2N
38, revealed an approximately twofold increase in binding to
the bicoid probe compared to that of the wild type (Fig. 2A
and C). Thus, deletion of either the N or C terminus flanking the
homeodomain increases Pitx2 DNA binding activity. These deletions did
not significantly affect the specificity of binding, as revealed by
competition assays with a panel of competitor DNA (Fig. 2B).
Deletion of either the N or C terminus affects Pitx2
transactivation of the bicoid promoter.
We have
investigated the transactivation potential of Pitx2 with a
TK-luciferase reporter containing four bicoid sites upstream of the TK promoter. We have previously shown that this reporter is
activated by Pitx2 (2). Cotransfection of a wild-type Pitx2 expression vector yielded a fourfold activation of the
bicoid reporter in COS-7 cells (Fig.
3A). As a control, Pitx2 did not transactivate the parental TK-luciferase reporter plasmid or the CMV
-galactosidase reporter gene used to normalize for transfection efficiency (Fig. 3A). HeLa transfections yielded similar results (data
not shown). Since Pitx2C
39 had increased DNA binding, we expected
that this protein might also have increased transactivation activity.
Instead, the C-terminal truncation, Pitx2C
39, transactivated this
reporter in a manner comparable to that of the wild type (Fig. 3A).
Thus, other factors present in COS and HeLa cells may interact with the
C terminus of wild-type Pitx2 to reduce the inhibitory binding effect
and allow for basal transcription. Pitx2C
173 demonstrated a modest
decrease in transactivation of the bicoid reporter (Fig.
3A). Pitx2N
16 transactivated this reporter at a slightly higher
level than the wild type, whereas Pitx2N
38 demonstrated a decrease
in activity similar to that of Pitx2C
173 (Fig. 3A). Transient
transfection of the homeodomain alone, Pitx2HD, did not transactivate
the reporter (data not shown). However, we were unable to detect
Pitx2HD protein in transfected cells, indicating that this truncated
protein may be unstable. We confirmed expression of all other
transfected proteins by Western blot analysis (Fig. 3B). A
representative blot is shown in Fig. 3B, and data from 6 to 10 independent experiments were quantitated and are shown in Fig. 3C.
Thus, Pitx2 and Pitx2 truncated proteins were all expressed at similar
levels. These data suggest that the N- and C-terminal regions contain
transcriptional activity.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Transcriptional activation of a
TK-bicoid-luciferase reporter by Pitx2 and Pitx2 truncations
in COS-7 cells. (A) COS-7 cells were transfected with either the
TK-bicoid-luciferase reporter gene containing four copies of
the Pitx2 binding site (dashed boxes) or the parental TK-luciferase
reporter without the bicoid sites. The cells were
cotransfected with either the CMV Pitx2, Pitx2C 39, Pitx2C 173,
Pitx2N 16, or Pitx2N 38 expression plasmid or the CMV plasmid
without Pitx2 ( ). To control for transfection efficiency, all
transfections included the CMV -galactosidase reporter. Cells were
incubated for 24 h and then were assayed for luciferase and
-galactosidase activities. The activities are shown as mean fold
activations compared to that of TK-bicoid-luciferase without
Pitx2 expression (± standard errors of the means from four independent
experiments). The mean TK-bicoid-luciferase activity with
Pitx2 expression was about 15,000 light units per 15 µg of protein,
and the -galactosidase activity was about 100,000 light units per 15 µg of protein. (B) Proteins were expressed in mammalian cells with a
C-terminal myc epitope and detected by using a c-myc monoclonal
antibody (9E10; Santa Cruz). Specific protein bands are denoted with an
asterisk. (C) Quantitation of 6 to 10 independent Western blot
experiments. Error bars are standard errors of the mean. Specific band
intensities from the Western blots were measured by using NIH Image,
with the bundled macros provided for gel analysis to measure band
densities relative to the average background. Measurements are reported
as relative intensity units.
|
|
C-terminal Pitx2 truncations reduce synergistic transactivation of
the prolactin promoter.
To determine if the Pitx2 C terminus was
required for synergistic transactivation, we tested our C-terminal
truncations in cotransfection experiments with the prolactin promoter
reporter. We have previously shown that Pitx2 transactivates this
promoter in a synergistic manner with Pit-1 (2). Transient
transfection of the prolactin promoter luciferase reporter with Pitx2
in HeLa (data not shown) and COS-7 cells resulted in a fivefold
increase in luciferase activity (Fig. 4).
Similarly, Pitx2C
39 transactivated the prolactin promoter threefold
(Fig. 4). Transfection of Pit-1 demonstrated a modest two- to threefold
activation (Fig. 4). Cotransfection of Pitx2 and Pit-1 resulted in a
65-fold synergistic activation of the prolactin promoter (Fig. 4).
However, cotransfection of Pitx2C
39 and Pit-1 yielded only a 10-fold
activation (Fig. 4). These data indicate that the Pitx2 C-terminal 39 residues are required for maximal synergistic transactivation of the
prolactin promoter by Pit-1. Transfection of Pitx2N
16, with and
without Pit-1, yielded activation similar to that of wild-type Pitx2
(Fig. 4). In contrast, Pitx2N
38 transactivated only the prolactin
promoter ~2-fold, similar to the decreased activity seen with the
TK-bicoid promoter (Fig. 4). Cotransfection of Pitx2N
38
with Pit-1 also resulted in decreased synergistic transactivation (Fig.
4). Similar to the transactivation data with the TK-bicoid
reporter (Fig. 3), removal of either N- or C-terminal Pitx2 residues
reduced Pitx2 activity. Most importantly, these data demonstrate that the C-terminal 39 residues are required for synergism between Pitx2 and
Pit-1.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Pitx2 C-terminal truncations reduce the Pit-1
synergistic transactivation of the prolactin promoter. COS-7 cells were
transfected with the prolactin 2.5-luciferase reporter gene and
cotransfected with either the CMV Pitx2, Pitx2C 39, Pitx2N 16,
Pitx2N 38, and Pitx2HD expression plasmids (+) or the CMV plasmid
without Pitx2 ( ). Pit-1 was cotransfected with the expression
plasmids. To control for transfection efficiency, all transfections
included the CMV -galactosidase reporter. Cells were incubated for
24 h and then assayed for luciferase and -galactosidase
activities. The activities are shown as mean fold activations compared
to activation of prolactin 2.5-luciferase without Pitx2 expression (± standard errors of the means from three independent experiments).
|
|
Pit-1 interacts with the Pitx2 C terminus to increase its DNA
binding capacity.
To determine the region of Pitx2 required for
Pit-1-enhanced Pitx2 binding, we assayed several N-terminal and
C-terminal truncations by EMSA. Addition of Pit-1 to the binding
reaction increased the amount of Pitx2 DNA-bound complex approximately
fourfold (Fig. 5A and B). We have
previously shown that Pit-1 is not in this Pitx2 DNA- bound complex
(2). Pit-1 had little or no effect on the binding activity
of the C-terminal mutants Pitx2C
39 and Pitx2C
173 or Pitx2HD (Fig.
5). Since Pitx2C
39 and Pitx2C
173 binding was unaffected by Pit-1,
these data suggest that the C-terminal 39 amino acids of Pitx2 interact
with Pit-1 to facilitate binding to DNA. The binding of the wild type
in the presence of Pit-1 is quantitatively similar to the binding of
Pitx2C
39 without Pit-1 (Fig. 5). Hence, Pit-1 reduces the inhibitory
effect of the C-terminal tail on Pitx2 binding to DNA.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Pit-1 increases the binding capacity of Pitx2 in vitro.
(A) Pitx2 DNA binding activity in the presence of Pit-1 protein was
measured by EMSA. The labeled probe was the bicoid
oligonucleotide. Totals of 80 ng of Pitx2, Pitx2C 39, and
Pitx2C 173 and 40 ng of Pitx2HD proteins were incubated with Pit-1
before addition of the probe. D, dimer; M, monomer; F, free probe. (B)
Quantitation of bound DNA (monomer and dimer forms) from EMSA
experiments with Pitx2 and Pitx2 truncated proteins in the presence or
absence of Pit-1. The radioactive bound DNA was measured from three to
five independent experiments, and the error bars are standard errors of
the mean.
|
|
The C-terminal 39 amino acids of Pitx2 are required and sufficient
for binding Pit-1.
To determine whether the C-terminal tail of
Pitx2 is required to bind Pit-1, we performed in vitro solution binding
assays with immobilized GST-Pitx2 and GST-Pitx2 truncated proteins.
After incubating the immobilized proteins with Pit-1, we measured Pit-1 binding by Western blot analysis using a Pit-1 antibody. Pit-1 bound to
wild-type GST-Pitx2 but not to the GST control (Fig. 6). For comparison, the same amount of
Pit-1 used in the binding assay was immunoblotted (Fig. 6). The
C-terminally deleted GST fusion proteins, GST-Pitx2C
173, and
Pitx2C
78 did not bind Pit-1, and GST-Pitx2C
39 bound only a
small amount of Pit-1 (Fig. 6). To test whether these residues were
sufficient for Pit-1 binding, we made GST fusion proteins of the
C-terminal 173, 78, and 39 residues. All of the C-terminal GST fusion
proteins bound Pit-1 at levels comparable to that of the full-length
Pitx2 protein (Fig. 6). Thus, Pit-1 physically interacts with the
C-terminal 39 amino acids of Pitx2.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
The C-terminal 39 amino acids of Pitx2 contain a
protein-protein interaction domain. Immobilized GST-Pitx2,
GST-Pitx2C 39, GST-Pitx2C 78, GST-Pitx2C 173, GST-Pitx2C39,
GST-Pitx2C78, and GST-Pitx2C173 or GST proteins were incubated with 40 ng of Pit-1, washed, and analyzed for their interaction with Pit-1. The
immobilized proteins were run out on an SDS-12.5% polyacrylamide gel,
transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, and immunoblotted
with Pit-1 polyclonal antibody. A total of 40 ng of Pit-1 was loaded
directly on the gel as a positive control (Pit-1 input).
|
|
Pitx2 C-terminal 39 amino acids inhibit Pitx2 transactivation.
Having shown that the C-terminal tail alone was capable of binding
Pit-1 in vitro, we then asked whether it could act in trans to regulate Pitx2 activity. We reasoned that since it is a site for
protein-protein interaction it might bind and sequester essential transcription cofactors required for Pitx2 transactivation. We found
that cotransfection of an expression vector encoding the C-terminal 39 amino acids did indeed inhibit Pitx2 transactivation of the
bicoid reporter to basal levels (Fig.
7A). The C39 peptide also decreased Pitx2
transactivation of the prolactin promoter and decreased synergistic
transactivation by Pitx2 and Pit-1 (Fig. 7A). As a control, we
determined that C39 had no effect on the bicoid or prolactin
promoters in the absence of Pitx2. Furthermore, the C39 peptide did not
repress Pit-1 activation of the prolactin promoter. Finally, the C39
peptide had no effect on the CMV
-galactosidase reporter used to
normalize for transfection efficiency (Fig. 7A). To rule out the
possibility that this inhibition was due to reduced Pitx2 levels, we
measured Pitx2 expression in transfected cell lysates (Fig. 7B). Using
an antibody that recognizes the c-myc epitope on the expressed Pitx2
proteins, we demonstrated that the C39 peptide had no effect on Pitx2
expression (Fig. 7B). Since the C-terminal 39 residues contain a
protein-protein interaction site that is required for Pit-1 binding, we
speculate that these residues may also bind other factors. However, the
C39 peptide did not affect CMV
-galactosidase, bicoid, or
prolactin reporter luciferase activity, suggesting that it was not
binding a general transcription factor. Thus, the C39 peptide might be
interacting with Pitx2 to inhibit transactivation.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
The Pitx2 C39 peptide inhibits Pitx2 transactivation of
the bicoid and prolactin promoters. (A) Transient
transfection of COS-7 cells was done as described in the legends for
Fig. 3 and 4. Equal amounts (3 µg) of the CMV Pitx2C39 expression
plasmid and the CMV Pitx2 plasmid were cotransfected with the indicated
reporter plasmid. Pit-1 was cotransfected as described in the legend to
Fig. 4. The activities are shown as mean fold activations compared to
those of TK-bicoid-luciferase and prolactin 2.5-luciferase
without Pitx2 expression (± standard errors of the means from four
independent experiments). (B) Western blot of transfected cell lysates
with the c-myc antibody that recognizes the myc epitope fused to the
expressed Pitx2 protein.
|
|
Pitx2 N terminus is required for the inhibition of transactivation
by the C39 peptide.
To determine the mechanism of the C39 peptide
repression of Pitx2 transactivation, we transiently cotransfected the
Pitx2 deletion plasmids with the C39 expression vector in COS-7 cells. The C39 peptide inhibited the wild type, Pitx2N
16, and all of the
C-terminal deletion constructs (Fig. 8
and data not shown). In contrast, C39 peptide did not affect
Pitx2N
38 transactivation of the bicoid reporter (Fig. 8).
This indicates that N-terminal residues 16 to 38 are required for
inhibition by the C39 peptide. These results suggest that the
C-terminal 39 amino acids may interact with the N terminus to attenuate
Pitx2 transcription activity.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
The Pitx2 N-terminal amino acids 16 to 38 are required
for the C39 peptide inhibition of Pitx2 transactivation activity.
Transient transfection of COS-7 cells was performed as previously
described in the legend for Fig. 3 for the CMV Pitx2 expression
plasmids (+), the bicoid reporter, and the CMV Pitx2C39
expression vector. The activities are shown as mean fold activations
compared to that of TK-bicoid-luciferase without Pitx2
expression (± standard errors of the means from three independent
experiments).
|
|
C39 peptide increases the DNA binding of Pitx2.
Since the C39
peptide had no effect on Pitx2N
38 transactivation, these results
suggested that the C39 peptide binds to the N terminus of Pitx2.
Similar to our studies with Pit-1 binding, we used EMSA to demonstrate
a functional interaction of the C39 peptide with Pitx2. The addition of
160 ng of C39 peptide to the EMSA binding reaction increased the level
of Pitx2 binding approximately threefold, compared to Pitx2 binding
without C39, and resulted in homodimer formation (Fig.
9A and C). The C39 peptide had no effect
on the binding activities of Pitx2C
39, Pitx2C
173, or Pitx2HD
(Fig. 9A and C). Although transactivation of the C-terminal truncations
were repressed by the C39 peptide, the DNA binding activities were not
affected. This would be expected since the C-terminal truncated
proteins have the inhibitory domain deleted, resulting in maximal
levels of DNA binding activity. Furthermore, the C39 peptide had no
effect on the DNA binding of the N-terminal truncated protein
Pitx2N
38; however, the C39 peptide increased the binding of
Pitx2N
16 and facilitated the formation of homodimers (Fig. 9A and
C). Since Pitx2N
38 does not form dimers by itself (Fig. 2 and 9), we
cannot rule out the possibility that the C terminus of Pitx2 may also
be interacting with part of the homeodomain. However, our data indicate
that the Pitx2 C terminus does not interact with residues C terminal to
the homeodomain. The C39 peptide did not bind the bicoid DNA
element by itself (data not shown). We tested two other peptides on
their ability to stimulate Pitx2 binding. The calcitonin gene-related
peptide (CGRP; 37 amino acids) and brain natriuretic peptide-45
(BNP-45; 45 amino acids) had no effect on Pitx2 DNA binding (Fig. 9B).
The BNP-45 peptide is very similar in amino acid composition to the C39
peptide. Taken together with the transfection data, these results
suggest that the C39 peptide binds to N-terminal amino acids 16 to 38 to allow increased DNA binding in vitro.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
The C39 peptide facilitates Pitx2 binding to DNA. (A)
EMSAs were done essentially as described in the legend for Fig. 5 with
the addition of ~160 ng of Pitx2C39 peptide and ~160 ng of Pitx2
proteins (40 ng of Pitx2HD). Shown are the results of EMSA experiments
with the C-terminally deleted and N-terminally deleted proteins and the
homeodomain alone with and without the C39 peptide. For this
experiment, we show a less exposed autoradiograph than that in Fig. 2.
This was done to more clearly visualize the dimers in the presence of
the C39 peptide. D, dimer; M, monomer; F, free probe. (B) As a control,
molar amounts of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP; ~160 ng;
Sigma) or BNP-45 (~184 ng; Sigma) equal to that of the C39 peptide
were added to Pitx2 in an EMSA experiment. (C) Quantitation of bound
DNA (monomer and dimer forms) from EMSA experiments with Pitx2 and
Pitx2 truncated proteins in the presence or absence of the C39 peptide.
The radioactive bound DNA was measured from three to five independent
experiments, and the error bars are standard errors of the means.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
This study has described a novel mechanism for the regulation of a
homeodomain protein expressed during embryogenesis. Deletion of the
C-terminal 39 residues increases binding of the monomer form of Pitx2
and allows the formation of homodimers. Our data are consistent with
this region containing a DNA binding inhibitory element. There is
precedence for intrinsic regulation among homeodomain proteins. For
example, the Nkx2.5 homeobox protein also contains a C-terminal DNA
binding inhibitory element that inhibits transactivation (6,
9). Deletion of 115 residues in the C terminus of Nkx2.5 increased DNA binding activity, similar to our finding with Pitx2 (32). However, Pitx2 differs from Nkx2.5 in that the Pitx2
C-terminal region is also the site of interaction with other
transcription factors. In the Pax family of proteins, an inhibitory
element is also in the C terminus, although it is not known if it acts at the level of DNA binding (7). In contrast to Nkx2.5 and the Pax proteins, deletion of the Pitx2 C-terminal inhibitory domain
does not result in a stimulation of transcriptional activity. This is
consistent with our proposal that this region is also the site for
protein-protein interactions required for optimal transcriptional
activity. In support of this prediction, we demonstrated that Pit-1
binds the C-terminal 39 amino acids and that there was little or no
synergism with Pit-1 in the absence of the C-terminal domain.
A recurring theme among homeodomain proteins is the important role of
protein-protein interactions in modulating activity. Some of these
interactions can stimulate transcriptional activity (3, 4, 9,
38), while others act to inhibit it (5, 15, 35, 37,
43). A mechanism for regulating the transcriptional actions of
Pitx2 is its interaction with other transcription factors. We have
shown that the C-terminal region of Pitx2 can directly bind the POU
homeodomain protein, Pit-1. Pit-1 is well-known for its regulation of
pituitary cell differentiation and expression of pituitary hormones,
including prolactin (29). At least one manifestation of this
interaction is increased Pitx2 DNA binding in vitro. There is
precedence for protein interactions yielding increased DNA binding
activity (13, 35, 42). For example, Pbx can increase the DNA
binding of Hox proteins and the engrailed homeodomain protein (24,
25). Likewise, Prospero (Pros) has been shown to increase the DNA
binding of Deformed (Dfd) and Hoxa-5 (15). Interestingly,
Pros is not part of the Dfd-DNA complex (15), similar to our
finding with Pit-1 and Pitx2 (2). Pit-1 binding to Pitx2
also results in a synergistic activation of the prolactin promoter.
Thus, the C-terminal protein-protein interaction domain of Pitx2
regulates DNA binding and transcriptional activities in response to
specific factors, such as Pit-1.
We propose that intramolecular folding of the full-length Pitx2 protein
brings the C-terminal tail in direct contact with the N-terminal domain
(Fig. 10). This folding would interfere
with DNA binding by the homeodomain. However, after Pitx2 binds DNA, this disrupts the C-terminal tail interaction with the N terminus. We
have shown that the C39 peptide inhibits transactivation by wild-type
Pitx2 but not by Pitx2N
38. This indicates that the C39 peptide
interacts with Pitx2 through N-terminal residues 16 to 38. We used a
GST-Pitx2C39 and -Pitx2C78 peptide pull-down assay to bind Pitx2 and
the C-terminal truncations, demonstrating that the C-terminal tail
interacts with the N terminus of Pitx2 (data not shown). From these
data, we speculate that in the absence of a cofactor, the C-terminal 39 residues interact with a domain in the N terminus of Pitx2 to modulate
the DNA binding and transcriptional activities of Pitx2. When a
specific cofactor such as Pit-1 binds to the C terminus, it relieves
this inhibition. Pit-1 binding to Pitx2 may cause a conformational
change in the C-terminal tail that unmasks the homeodomain and a
potential transactivation domain. Our model predicts that Pitx2 may not
be fully activated until expression of the appropriate cofactors.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 10.
Model for the multifunctional role of the Pitx2
C-terminal tail. The Pitx2 protein is shown as an intramolecular folded
species. The folding interferes with DNA binding of Pitx2. Pit-1 binds
to the C-terminal tail of Pitx2 and disrupts the inhibitory function of
the C terminus. This allows for a more efficient homeodomain
interaction with the target DNA and transactivation. The Pitx2 C39
peptide interaction with the N terminus of Pitx2 displaces the
C-terminal tail and increases its binding activity. However, the C39
peptide masks an N-terminal transactivation domain that results in
repressed transcriptional transactivation. N, N-terminal end; C,
C-terminal end; HD, homeodomain.
|
|
In Rieger syndrome, a C-terminal truncation at amino acid 133 causes
several developmental defects. Thus, in addition to its expression in
the pituitary, Pitx2 is also required for eye and tooth development,
suggesting that Pitx2 is regulated in multiple tissues by a combination
of interacting factors (30). The ability of Pitx2 to be
activated during development could be a function of factors interacting
with its C terminus to increase DNA binding and transcriptional
activity. The C-terminal tail contains a 14-amino-acid stretch that is
conserved among the Pitx family members and several other homeodomain
proteins (30). Many of these proteins, such as prx1, prx2,
Cart1, aristaless, chx10, otp, and Pitx1, are expressed at high levels
in the craniofacial region, suggesting an important role for this
multifunctional C-terminal regulatory mechanism in craniofacial development.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank J. Murray and E. Semina for providing the Pitx2 cDNA and
helpful discussions.
National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant DE09170 to A.F.R., with
tissue culture support from DK25295, and NIH Postdoctoral Training
Fellowship DK07018 to B.A.A. supported this work.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Present address: Department of
Biological Science, The University of Tulsa, 600 S. College Ave.,
Tulsa, OK 74104-3189. Phone: (918) 631-2204. Fax: (918) 631-2762. E-mail: brad-amendt{at}utulsa.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Amand, T. R. S.,
J. Ra,
Y. Zhang,
Y. Hu,
S. I. Baber,
M. Qiu, and Y. P. Chen.
1998.
Cloning and expression pattern of chicken Pitx2: a new component in the SHH signaling pathway controlling embryonic heart looping.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
247:100-105[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Amendt, B. A.,
L. B. Sutherland,
E. Semina, and A. F. Russo.
1998.
The molecular basis of Rieger syndrome: analysis of Pitx2 homeodomain protein activities.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:20066-20072[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Bach, I.,
C. Carriere,
H. P. Ostendorff,
B. Andersen, and M. G. Rosenfeld.
1997.
A family of LIM domain-associated cofactors confer transcriptional synergism between LIM and Otx homeodomain proteins.
Genes Dev.
11:1370-1380[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Bradford, A. P.,
C. Wasylyk,
B. Wasylyk, and A. Gutierrez-Hartmann.
1997.
Interaction of Ets-1 and the POU-homeodomain protein GHF-1/Pit-1 reconstitutes pituitary-specific gene expression.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:1065-1074[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Budhram-Mahadeo, V.,
M. Parker, and D. S. Latchman.
1998.
POU transcription factors Brn-3a and Brn-3b interact with the estrogen receptor and differentially regulate transcriptional activity via an estrogen response element.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:1029-1041[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Chen, C., and R. J. Schwartz.
1995.
Identification of novel binding targets and regulatory domains of a murine tinman homeodomain factor, nkx-2.5.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:15628-15633[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Dorfler, P., and M. Busslinger.
1996.
C-terminal activating and inhibitory domains determine the transactivation potential of BSAP (Pax-5), Pax-2 and Pax-8.
EMBO J.
15:1971-1982[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Driever, W., and C. Nusslein-Volhard.
1989.
The bicoid protein is a positive regulator of hunchback transcription in the early Drosophila embryo.
Nature
337:138-143[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Durocher, D.,
F. Charron,
R. Warren,
R. J. Schwartz, and M. Nemer.
1997.
The cardiac transcription factors Nkx2-5 and GATA-4 are mutual cofactors.
EMBO J.
16:5687-5696[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Gage, P. J., and S. A. Camper.
1997.
Pituitary homeobox 2, a novel member of the bicoid-related family of homeobox genes, is a potential regulator of anterior structure formation.
Hum. Mol. Genet.
6:457-464[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Gehring, W. J.,
Y. Q. Qian,
M. Billeter,
K. F. Tokunaga,
A. F. Schier,
D. R. Perez,
M. Affolter,
G. Otting, and K. Wuthrich.
1994.
Homeodomain-DNA recognition.
Cell
78:211-223[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Graham, F. J., and A. J. Van der Eb.
1973.
A new technique for the assay of infectivity of human adenovirus 5 DNA.
Virology
52:456-460[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Guichet, A.,
J. W. R. Copeland,
M. Erdelyl,
D. Hlousek,
P. Zavorszky,
J. Ho,
S. Brown,
A. Percival-Smith,
H. M. Krause, and A. Ephrussi.
1997.
The nuclear receptor homologue Ftz-F1 and the homeodomain protein Ftz are mutually dependent cofactors.
Nature
385:548-552[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Hanes, S. D., and R. Brent.
1989.
DNA specificity of the bicoid activator protein is determined by homeodomain recognition helix residue 9.
Cell
57:1275-1283[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Hassan, B.,
L. Li,
K. A. Bremer,
W. Chang,
J. Pinsonneault, and H. Vaessin.
1997.
Prospero is a panneural transcription factor that modulates homeodomain protein activity.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:10991-10996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Iverson, R. A.,
K. H. Day,
M. d'Emden,
R. N. Day, and R. A. Maurer.
1990.
Clustered point mutation analysis of the rat prolactin promoter.
Mol. Endocrinol.
4:1564-1571[Abstract].
|
| 17.
|
Jin, Y.,
R. Hoskins, and H. R. Horvitz.
1994.
Control of type-D GABAergic neuron differentiation by C. elegans UNC-30 homeodomain protein.
Nature
372:780-783[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Kumar, J., and K. Moses.
1997.
Transcription factors in eye development: a gorgeous mosaic?
Genes Dev.
11:2023-2028[Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Lamonerie, T.,
J. J. Tremblay,
C. Lanctot,
M. Therrien,
Y. Gauthier, and J. Drouin.
1996.
Ptx1, a bicoid-related homeo box transcription factor involved in transcription of the pro-opiomelanocortin gene.
Genes Dev.
10:1284-1295[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Lanigan, T. M., and A. F. Russo.
1997.
Binding of upstream stimulatory factor and a cell-specific activator to the calcitonin gene-related peptide enhancer.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:18316-18324[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Logan, M.,
S. M. Pagan-Westphal,
D. M. Smith,
L. Paganessi, and C. J. Tabin.
1998.
The transcription factor Pitx2 mediates situs-specific morphogenesis in response to left-right asymmetric signals.
Cell
94:307-317[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Maurer, R. A., and A. C. Notides.
1987.
Identification of an estrogen-responsive element from the 5'-flanking region of the rat prolactin gene.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7:4247-4254[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
McGinnis, W., and R. Krumlauf.
1992.
Homeobox genes and axial patterning.
Cell
68:283-302[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Neuteboom, S. T. C., and C. Murre.
1997.
Pbx raises the DNA binding specificity but not the selectivity of antennapedia Hox proteins.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:4696-4706[Abstract].
|
| 25.
|
Peltenburg, L. T. C., and C. Murre.
1997.
Specific residues in the Pbx homeodomain differentially modulate the DNA-binding activity of Hox and Engrailed proteins.
Development
124:1089-1098[Abstract].
|
| 26.
|
Piedra, M. E.,
J. M. Icardo,
M. Albajar,
J. C. Rodriguez-Rey, and M. A. Ros.
1998.
Pitx2 participates in the late phase of the pathway controlling left-right asymmetry.
Cell
94:319-324[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Rieger, H.
1935.
Dysgenesis mesodermalis coreneal et iridis.
Z. Augenheilk
86:333.
|
| 28.
|
Ryan, A. K.,
B. Blumberg,
C. Rodriguez-Esteban,
S. Yonei-Tamura,
K. Tamura,
T. Tsukui,
J. de la Pena,
W. Sabbagh,
J. Greenwald,
S. Choe,
D. P. Norris,
E. J. Robertson,
R. M. Evans,
M. G. Rosenfeld, and J. C. I. Belmonte.
1998.
Pitx2 determines left-right asymmetry of internal organs in vertebrates.
Nature
394:545-551[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Ryan, A. K., and M. G. Rosenfeld.
1997.
POU domain family values: flexibility, partnerships, and developmental codes.
Genes Dev.
11:1207-1225[Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Semina, E. V.,
R. Reiter,
N. J. Leysens,
L. M. Alward,
K. W. Small,
N. A. Datson,
J. Siegel-Bartelt,
D. Bierke-Nelson,
P. Bitoun,
B. U. Zabel,
J. C. Carey, and J. C. Murray.
1996.
Cloning and characterization of a novel bicoid-related homeobox transcription factor gene, RIEG, involved in Rieger syndrome.
Nat. Genet.
14:392-399[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Semina, E. V.,
R. S. Reiter, and J. C. Murray.
1997.
Isolation of a new homeobox gene belonging to the Pitx/Rieg family: expression during lens development and mapping to the aphakia region on mouse chromosome 19.
Hum. Mol. Genet.
6:2109-2116[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Sepulveda, J. L.,
N. Belaguli,
V. Nigam,
C. Chen,
M. Nemer, and R. J. Schwartz.
1998.
GATA-4 and Nkx-2.5 coactivate Nkx-2 DNA binding targets: role for regulating early cardiac gene expression.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:3405-3415[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Simeone, A.,
D. Acampora,
A. Mallamaci,
A. Stornaiuolo,
M. R. D'Apice,
V. Nigro, and E. Boncinelli.
1993.
A vertebrate gene related to orthodenticle contains a homeodomain of the bicoid class and demarcates anterior neurectoderm in the gastrulating mouse embryo.
EMBO J.
12:2735-2747[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Simmons, D. M.,
J. W. Voss,
H. A. Ingraham,
J. M. Holloway,
R. S. Broide,
M. G. Rosenfeld, and L. W. Swanson.
1990.
Pituitary cell phenotypes involve cell-specific Pit-1 mRNA translation and synergistic interactions with other classes of transcription factors.
Genes Dev.
4:695-711[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Stark, M. R., and A. D. Johnson.
1994.
Interaction between two homeodomain proteins is specified by a short C-terminal tail.
Nature
371:429-432[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Szeto, D. P.,
A. K. Ryan,
S. M. O'Connell, and M. G. Rosenfeld.
1996.
P-OTX: a PIT-1-interacting homeodomain factor expressed during anterior pituitary gland development.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:7706-7710[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Tolkunova, E. N.,
M. Fujioka,
M. Kobayashi,
D. Deka, and J. B. Jaynes.
1998.
Two distinct types of repression domain in engrailed: one interacts with the groucho corepressor and is preferentially active on integrated target genes.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:2804-2814[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Tremblay, J. J.,
C. Lanctot, and J. Drouin.
1998.
The pan-pituitary activator of transcription, Ptx1 (pituitary homeobox 1), acts in synergy with SF-1 and Pit1 and is an upstream regulator of the Lim-homeodomain gene Lim3/Lhx3.
Mol. Endocrinol.
12:428-441[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Tverberg, L. A., and A. F. Russo.
1993.
Regulation of the calcitonin/calcitonin gene-related peptide gene by cell-specific synergy between helix-loop-helix and octamer-binding transcription factors.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:15965-15973[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Wilson, D. S.,
G. Sheng,
S. Jun, and C. Desplan.
1996.
Conservation and diversification in homeodomain-DNA interactions: a comparative genetic analysis.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:6886-6891[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Yoshioka, H.,
C. Meno,
K. Koshiba,
M. Sugihara,
H. Itoh,
Y. Ishimaru,
T. Inoue,
H. Ohuchi,
E. V. Semina,
J. C. Murray,
H. Hamada, and S. Noji.
1998.
Pitx2, a bicoid-type homeobox gene, is involved in a lefty-signaling pathway in determination of left-right asymmetry.
Cell
94:299-305[Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Yu, Y.,
W. Li,
K. Su,
M. Yussa,
W. Han,
N. Perrimon, and L. Pick.
1997.
The nuclear hormone receptor Ftz-F1 is a cofactor for the Drosophila homeodomain protein Ftz.
Nature
385:552-555[Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Zhang, H.,
G. Hu,
H. Wang,
P. Sciavolino,
N. Iler,
M. M. Shen, and C. Abate-Shen.
1997.
Heterodimerization of Msx and Dlx homeoproteins results in functional antagonism.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:2920-2932[Abstract].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, October 1999, p. 7001-7010, Vol. 19, No. 10
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Lamba, P., Khivansara, V., D'Alessio, A. C., Santos, M. M., Bernard, D. J.
(2008). Paired-Like Homeodomain Transcription Factors 1 and 2 Regulate Follicle-Stimulating Hormone {beta}-Subunit Transcription through a Conserved cis-Element. Endocrinology
149: 3095-3108
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Amen, M., Espinoza, H. M., Cox, C., Liang, X., Wang, J., Link, T. M. E., Brennan, R. G., Martin, J. F., Amendt, B. A.
(2008). Chromatin-associated HMG-17 is a major regulator of homeodomain transcription factor activity modulated by Wnt/{beta}-catenin signaling. Nucleic Acids Res
36: 462-476
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Amen, M., Liu, X., Vadlamudi, U., Elizondo, G., Diamond, E., Engelhardt, J. F., Amendt, B. A.
(2007). PITX2 and {beta}-Catenin Interactions Regulate Lef-1 Isoform Expression. Mol. Cell. Biol.
27: 7560-7573
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhu, X., Gleiberman, A. S., Rosenfeld, M. G.
(2007). Molecular Physiology of Pituitary Development: Signaling and Transcriptional Networks. Physiol. Rev.
87: 933-963
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Diamond, E., Amen, M., Hu, Q., Espinoza, H. M., Amendt, B. A.
(2006). Functional interactions between Dlx2 and lymphoid enhancer factor regulate Msx2. Nucleic Acids Res
34: 5951-5965
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bidinost, C., Matsumoto, M., Chung, D., Salem, N., Zhang, K., Stockton, D. W., Khoury, A., Megarbane, A., Bejjani, B. A., Traboulsi, E. I.
(2006). Heterozygous and Homozygous Mutations in PITX3 in a Large Lebanese Family with Posterior Polar Cataracts and Neurodevelopmental Abnormalities.. IOVS
47: 1274-1280
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Vadlamudi, U., Espinoza, H. M., Ganga, M., Martin, D. M., Liu, X., Engelhardt, J. F., Amendt, B. A.
(2005). PITX2, {beta}-catenin and LEF-1 interact to synergistically regulate the LEF-1 promoter. J. Cell Sci.
118: 1129-1137
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schubert, S. W., Kardash, E., Khan, M. A., Cheusova, T., Kilian, K., Wegner, M., Hashemolhosseini, S.
(2004). Interaction, Cooperative Promoter Modulation, and Renal Colocalization of GCMa and Pitx2. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 50358-50365
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Perez-Villamil, B., Mirasierra, M., Vallejo, M.
(2004). The Homeoprotein Alx3 Contains Discrete Functional Domains and Exhibits Cell-specific and Selective Monomeric Binding and Transactivation. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 38062-38071
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lines, M. A., Kozlowski, K., Kulak, S. C., Allingham, R. R., Heon, E., Ritch, R., Levin, A. V., Shields, M. B., Damji, K. F., Newlin, A., Walter, M. A.
(2004). Characterization and Prevalence of PITX2 Microdeletions and Mutations in Axenfeld-Rieger Malformations. IOVS
45: 828-833
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ettensohn, C. A., Illies, M. R., Oliveri, P., De Jong, D. L.
(2003). Alx1, a member of the Cart1/Alx3/Alx4 subfamily of Paired-class homeodomain proteins, is an essential component of the gene network controlling skeletogenic fate specification in the sea urchin embryo. Development
130: 2917-2928
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ganga, M., Espinoza, H. M., Cox, C. J., Morton, L., Hjalt, T. A., Lee, Y., Amendt, B. A.
(2003). PITX2 Isoform-specific Regulation of Atrial Natriuretic Factor Expression: SYNERGISM AND REPRESSION WITH Nkx2.5. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 22437-22445
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Saadi, I., Kuburas, A., Engle, J. J., Russo, A. F.
(2003). Dominant Negative Dimerization of a Mutant Homeodomain Protein in Axenfeld-Rieger Syndrome. Mol. Cell. Biol.
23: 1968-1982
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Keegan, C. E., Camper, S. A.
(2003). Mouse knockout solves endocrine puzzle and promotes new pituitary lineage model. Genes Dev.
17: 677-682
[Full Text]
-
Quentien, M.-H., Manfroid, I., Moncet, D., Gunz, G., Muller, M., Grino, M., Enjalbert, A., Pellegrini, I.
(2002). Pitx Factors Are Involved in Basal and Hormone-regulated Activity of the Human Prolactin Promoter. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 44408-44416
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cox, C. J., Espinoza, H. M., McWilliams, B., Chappell, K., Morton, L., Hjalt, T. A., Semina, E. V., Amendt, B. A.
(2002). Differential Regulation of Gene Expression by PITX2 Isoforms. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 25001-25010
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lines, M. A., Kozlowski, K., Walter, M. A.
(2002). Molecular genetics of Axenfeld-Rieger malformations. Hum Mol Genet
11: 1177-1187
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Espinoza, H. M., Cox, C. J., Semina, E. V., Amendt, B. A.
(2002). A molecular basis for differential developmental anomalies in Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome. Hum Mol Genet
11: 743-753
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhao, C., York, A., Yang, F., Forsthoefel, D. J., Dave, V., Fu, D., Zhang, D., Corado, M. S., Small, S., Seeger, M. A., Ma, J.
(2002). The activity of the Drosophila morphogenetic protein Bicoid is inhibited by a domain located outside its homeodomain. Development
129: 1669-1680
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Westmoreland, J. J., McEwen, J., Moore, B. A., Jin, Y., Condie, B. G.
(2001). Conserved Function of Caenorhabditis elegans UNC-30 and Mouse Pitx2 in Controlling GABAergic Neuron Differentiation. J. Neurosci.
21: 6810-6819
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Liu, C., Liu, W., Lu, M.-F., Brown, N. A., Martin, J. F.
(2001). Regulation of left-right asymmetry by thresholds of Pitx2c activity. Development
128: 2039-2048
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hjalt, T. A., Amendt, B. A., Murray, J. C.
(2001). PITX2 Regulates Procollagen Lysyl Hydroxylase (PLOD) Gene Expression: Implications for the Pathology of Rieger Syndrome. J. Cell Biol.
152: 545-552
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Andersen, B., Rosenfeld, M. G.
(2001). POU Domain Factors in the Neuroendocrine System: Lessons from Developmental Biology Provide Insights into Human Disease. Endocr. Rev.
22: 2-35
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yu, X, St Amand, T., Wang, S, Li, G, Zhang, Y, Hu, Y., Nguyen, L, Qiu, M., Chen, Y.
(2001). Differential expression and functional analysis of Pitx2 isoforms in regulation of heart looping in the chick. Development
128: 1005-1013
[Abstract]
-
Keller, S. A., Mao, Y., Struffi, P., Margulies, C., Yurk, C. E., Anderson, A. R., Amey, R. L., Moore, S., Ebels, J. M., Foley, K., Corado, M., Arnosti, D. N.
(2000). dCtBP-Dependent and -Independent Repression Activities of the Drosophila Knirps Protein. Mol. Cell. Biol.
20: 7247-7258
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mirmira, R. G., Watada, H., German, M. S.
(2000). beta -Cell Differentiation Factor Nkx6.1 Contains Distinct DNA Binding Interference and Transcriptional Repression Domains. J. Biol. Chem.
275: 14743-14751
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Saadi, I., Semina, E. V., Amendt, B. A., Harris, D. J., Murphy, K. P., Murray, J. C., Russo, A. F.
(2001). Identification of a Dominant Negative Homeodomain Mutation in Rieger Syndrome. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 23034-23041
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Norris, R. A., Kern, M. J.
(2001). The Identification of Prx1 Transcription Regulatory Domains Provides a Mechanism for Unequal Compensation by the Prx1 and Prx2 Loci. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 26829-26837
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wei, Q., Adelstein, R. S.
(2002). Pitx2a Expression Alters Actin-Myosin Cytoskeleton and Migration of HeLa Cells through Rho GTPase Signaling. Mol. Biol. Cell
13: 683-697
[Abstract]
[Full Text]