Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, November 1999, p. 7501-7510, Vol. 19, No. 11
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
An ATP/ADP-Dependent Molecular Switch Regulates the
Stability of p53-DNA Complexes
Andrei L.
Okorokov and
Jo
Milner*
YCR P53 Research Group, Department of
Biology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom
Received 14 May 1999/Returned for modification 9 July 1999/Accepted 27 July 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Interaction with DNA is essential for the tumor suppressor
functions of p53. We now show, for the first time, that the interaction of p53 with DNA can be stabilized by small molecules, such as ADP and
dADP. Our results also indicate an ATP/ADP molecular switch mechanism
which determines the off-on states for p53-DNA binding. This ATP/ADP
molecular switch requires dimer-dimer interaction of the p53 tetramer.
Dissociation of p53-DNA complexes by ATP is independent of ATP
hydrolysis. Low-level ATPase activity is nonetheless associated with
ATP-p53 interaction and may serve to regenerate ADP-p53, thus recycling
the high-affinity DNA binding form of p53. The ATP/ADP regulatory
mechanism applies to two distinct types of p53 interaction with DNA,
namely, sequence-specific DNA binding (via the core domain of the p53
protein) and binding to sites of DNA damage (via the C-terminal
domain). Further studies indicate that ADP not only stabilizes p53-DNA
complexes but also renders the complexes susceptible to dissociation by
specific p53 binding proteins. We propose a model in which the DNA
binding functions of p53 are regulated by an ATP/ADP molecular switch, and we suggest that this mechanism may function during the cellular response to DNA damage.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The p53 tumor suppressor plays a
central role in the cellular response to DNA damage and blocks the
proliferation of cells which have undergone genomic damage. Exposure of
cells to genotoxic stress activates p53 as a transcription factor
capable of regulating a wide range of downstream genes involved in
G1 arrest, in DNA repair, and in apoptosis (for recent
reviews, see references 13, 20, and
26). The p53 protein has two separate domains
involved in DNA binding. The central core domain (residues 98 to 303)
is responsible for binding to sequence-specific DNA elements located near promoters of downstream target genes (3, 39, 49). p53
can also form stable complexes with "nonspecific" DNA targets, including mismatched DNA (or lesion DNA [L-DNA]), double-strand breaks, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), and Holliday junction
structures (1, 16, 22, 23, 36, 37, 40). Interaction with
abnormal DNA involves the carboxyl-terminal domain of p53 (residues 363 to 392), and the p53-DNA complexes may serve to recruit other proteins
which function in DNA repair. Interaction with sites of DNA damage may
also contribute to the activation of p53 by inducing proteolytic
cleavage with removal of negative regulatory domains from the protein
(38).
Treatment of cells with inhibitors of nucleotide biosynthesis can also
activate a p53 response with induction of G1 arrest (27; reviewed in reference 19).
This suggests that p53 can respond to altered levels of nucleotides
within cells. The mechanism of p53 activation under such conditions is
unknown. One possibility is that limiting levels of nucleoside
triphosphates (or their precursors) lead to abnormal DNA and/or RNA
within the cell, thus indirectly activating a p53 response. Another
possibility is that p53 directly interacts with ribonucleotides and, in
nondamaged cells, this contributes to the normal cellular function(s)
of p53. Indeed, there is some evidence that p53 may play a role in the
maintenance of cellular nucleotide pools. p53 was identified as a
possible regulator of guanine synthesis at the step of IMP conversion
to XMP (42). A link with adenosine metabolism is also
indicated since a functional p53 response element is located in the
first intron of the adenosine deaminase gene (21). In addition, a direct interaction between p53 and nucleotides is possible,
and p53 protein binds ATP at its C terminus (4) and ATP
facilitates the release of p53 from sites of DNA damage (34, 38).
In the present study, we have examined the effects of nucleotides on
p53-DNA interactions in more detail by using murine and human p53s and
specific and nonspecific DNA targets. The experimental model used
p53-DNA complexes that were formed in vitro and incubated with
different nucleotides. We observed that ATP, dATP, GTP, and dGTP
facilitated the release of p53 from both sequence-specific and
nonspecific DNA targets but, importantly, did not interfere with p53
binding to the DNA. In contrast, ADP and dADP stabilized p53-DNA
complexes, and we demonstrated that tetramerization of p53 was required
for this effect. Further experiments showed that p53, purified from a
baculovirus expression system, was associated with
Mg2+-dependent ATPase and GTPase activities: however,
hydrolysis was not required for the release of p53 from DNA. The
characteristics of the system bear a striking resemblance to the human
mismatch recognition complex hMSH2-hMSH6, which functions as an
ATP/ADP-dependent molecular switch. Thus, the hMSH2-hMSH6 complex binds
mismatched DNA in the ADP-bound form (on) but not in the ATP-bound form
(off) (14; reviewed in reference
10). Our results indicate that DNA binding by p53 is
also on when bound to ADP and off when bound to ATP. Moreover, we also
show that ADP-p53 can be dissociated from DNA by specific
protein-protein interactions, raising the possibility that ADP-p53
functions as a molecular matchmaker for recruiting protein complexes to
specific sites on DNA, followed by dissociation of p53 from the complex.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Construction of p53 derivatives and mutants.
Wild-type
murine p53 cDNA was used as a template to produce the truncated p53
derivatives. PCR primers were designed to generate cDNAs 50
N
(residues 24 to 392), 50
C (residues 1 to 363), and 40
NC (residues
67 to 363) and C-terminal peptide (residues 323 to 363). All generated
PCR fragments were His tagged at the amino terminus and cloned under
the T7 promoter into the pBluescript II SK(+) vector. Plasmids
containing p53 cDNAs coding for R273H, R175H, and M340Q/L344R mutants
were kindly made available by Trevor Mee. All cloned cDNAs were
verified by DNA sequencing.
p53 produced in vitro.
Transcription and translation were
carried out as described previously (33) with plasmids
encoding wild-type human p53, murine p53, or its derivatives under the
SP6 or T7 promoters. The produced proteins were checked by
immunoprecipitation with anti-p53 monoclonal antibodies PAb248, PAb246,
PAb1620, PAb240, and PAb421 as described previously (33).
Expression, purification, and analysis of baculovirus-produced
p53.
Recombinant baculovirus coding for His-tagged murine p53 was
expressed in Sf9 insect cells as described previously (34) and p53 was purified as described previously (38). The final buffer used for the purified p53 contained 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0), and 5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT). p53 protein was quantitated by
the Bradford assay (compared to a bovine serum albumin standard [Boehringer Mannheim]), and its purity was checked by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) followed by
either Coomassie or silver staining. A single band corresponding to p53
was observed in all cases (for an example, see Fig. 4A). For
immunoblotting, protein samples were separated by SDS-PAGE (15%
polyacrylamide) and probed with PAb240 anti-p53 monoclonal antibody as
described previously (38). Detection was performed with the
Boehringer Mannheim chemiluminescence blotting kit.
Oligonucleotides for binding assays.
The following
biotinylated oligonucleotides were used: p53-consensus (CON; 20 bases,
biotinylated at the 5' end) (5'-GGACATGCCCGGGCATGTCC-3') (12) and L-DNA
(5'-GGCTCGAAC CCGTTCTCGGAGCACCCCTGCCCCAGCCCAACCGCTTTGGCCGCCG CCCAGCC-3')
(62 bases) (22), where triple cytosine lesions are underlined. The oligonucleotides were annealed as follows: CON to
itself and L-DNA oligonucleotide to the reverse sequence
5'-GGCTGGGCGGCGGCCAAAGCGGTTCTGCAGTGCTCCGAGAACGGGTTCGAGCC-3' (53 bases). The latter was used also as an ssDNA template for binding assays. For NL-DNA (dsDNA with blunt double-strand ends), we
used oligonucleotides with the same sequence as L-DNA but missing the
triple cytosine lesions.
DNA binding and release assay with magnetic beads.
Streptavidin-coated magnetic beads (M-280 Dynabeads; Dynal) were used
to harvest biotinylated DNA-protein complexes. dsDNA or ssDNA
oligonucleotides were bound to the beads (typically 75 pmol of
oligonucleotide per 40 µl of beads for each reaction) in Tris-EDTA
(pH 7.5)-1 M NaCl (TE-NaCl) for 15 min at 20°C and washed twice with
400 µl of TE-NaCl and twice with 400 µl of DNA binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 100 mM NaCl, 0.1% NP-40, 10% glycerol, 5 mM
DTT) to remove nonbound DNA. The supernatant was replaced with fresh 50 µl of DNA binding buffer containing either 25 pmol of purified p53
(in buffer [50 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl at pH 7.0, 5 mM DTT]) or a
10-µl aliquot of an in vitro translation reaction mixture. Typically,
40 µl of beads was used in a total reaction volume of 50 µl. After
a 20-min incubation at room temperature, the p53-DNA complexes were
collected on a magnetic harvester, washed four times with 400 µl of
DNA binding buffer to remove all free p53, resuspended in 50 µl of
DNA binding buffer, and incubated under the conditions of the
experiment. When nucleotides were present, the final concentration of
each was 5 mM. After addition of the nucleotide, samples were incubated
for 10 min at 37°C (unless otherwise stated). The ATP-regenerating
system, when present, contained 4mM ATP, 0.025 U of creatine
phosphokinase per ml, 5 mM phosphate creatine, and 0.25 mg of bovine
serum albumin per ml. For experiments studying the effect of magnesium,
the final concentration of MgCl2 was 5 mM. No difference in
the efficiency of initial p53 binding to DNA was observed in the
presence or absence of Mg2+ or in the presence of an
ATP-regenerating system.
After incubation, released and DNA-bound p53 fractions (see Fig. 1A)
were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (15% polyacrylamide) and immunoblotted (for
baculovirus-produced protein). For in vitro-produced p53 proteins,
equal aliquots were taken from bound and released fractions and
analyzed by scintillation counting and SDS-PAGE (15% polyacrylamide) followed by autoradiography.
Hydrolysis assay and TLC.
Purified p53 (5 pM) was added to
the reaction mixture containing [33P]ATP,
[33P]dATP, or [33P]GTP. The reactions were
typically carried out in a total volume of 21 µl, comprising 10 µl
of protein sample, 10 µl of the reaction buffer (50 mM NaCl, 10 mM
Tris-HCl [pH 7.0]), and 1 µl of radiolabelled nucleoside
triphosphate either neat (5 pM) or diluted 1:5 (1 pM). When magnesium
was present, the final concentration was 5 mM MgCl2. All
reaction mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 1 h (except the time course samples). Aliquots (4 µl) from each reaction mixture were
analyzed by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) on PEI cellulose F plates
(Merck) with 0.3 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 3.5) as the mobile
phase. After the chromatography, the TLC plates were air dried and
analyzed by autoradiography. The autoradiography image was used to
locate the zones of the TLC plate corresponding to the initial
substrates and products of hydrolysis, these zones were cut out, and
radioactivity was quantitated by scintillation counting.
Gel mobility shift assay.
Equal aliquots of in
vitro-translated p53 were incubated with 5 ng of
32P-5'-end-labelled self-annealed double-stranded CON-DNA,
in DNA binding buffer in a final volume of 50 µl. After 20 min of
incubation at a room temperature, appropriate amounts of adenosine
nucleotides were added (see Fig. 6) and incubation was continued for
another 10 min. Where stated, 20 µl of hybridoma supernatant of
anti-p53 monoclonal antibody was added and the mixture was incubated
for another 5 min. If the antibody was not added, the final volume of
the reaction mixture was adjusted by addition of 20 µl of DNA binding
buffer. Complexes were loaded onto a native 4% polyacrylamide gel in
TBE (containing 1 mM EDTA) and electrophoresed for 4 h at 120 V
with water cooling (8 to 12°C). The gels were exposed for
autoradiography at
70°C with aluminum foil placed between the gel
and the X-ray film to cut out the signal from the
[35S]methionine.
 |
RESULTS |
Previously we have shown that addition of ATP induces the release
of p53 from mismatched DNA and ssDNA (34, 38). We have now
studied in more detail the effects of ATP and other nucleotides on the
interaction of p53 with DNA, by using both sequence-specific and
nonspecific DNA targets. The results presented are for
sequence-specific DNA (CON-DNA [12]) and mismatched
DNA targets (22). Other nonspecific DNA targets included
ssDNA and dsDNA with double-strand breaks (see Materials and Methods
for details).
ATP and ADP have opposing effects on the stability of p53-DNA
complexes.
Radiolabelled p53 protein was obtained by in vitro
translation with rabbit reticulocyte lysate (see Materials and
Methods). The experimental assay used p53-DNA comlexes formed in
vitro with biotinylated oligonucleotides bound to
streptavidin-coated magnetic beads (Fig.
1A). p53-DNA beads were incubated at
37°C in the presence of different nucleotides. Both supernatant
(released p53) and beads (DNA-bound p53) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE
(15% polyacrylamide) plus autoradiography. Examples of p53 binding to
different oligonucleotide targets are shown in Fig. 1B. In general, the
observed binding efficiency was 25 to 30% of the total input
radiolabelled p53. The lower efficiency of binding to ssDNA (Fig. 1B)
is consistent with previously published results from other laboratories
(23, 37). Control incubations demonstrated that there was no
binding of radiolabelled p53 to the beads alone (i.e., in the absence of oligonucleotide [Fig. 1B, beads lane]).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Scheme of the DNA binding and release assay. (A)
Streptavidin-coated magnetic beads were used to bind biotinylated
oligonucleotide targets. After washing, the DNA-bound beads were
incubated with p53. Bound p53-DNA complexes on the beads were washed
(to remove nonbound p53) and incubated in fresh buffer, with or without
nucleotides, for 10 min at 37°C (or longer for time course
experiments). Subsequently the released p53 (in solution) and DNA-bound
p53 were analyzed by scintillation counting (for radiolabelled p53) and
PAGE (15% polyacrylamide) followed by immunoblotting or
autoradiography. (B) Binding of 35S-labelled p53 to
magnetic beads coated with different oligonucleotides (detailed in
Materials and Methods). An aliquot of beads without DNA was included as
negative control (beads lane). Other lanes: CON-DNA, beads prebound
with a consensus sequence-specific p53 DNA binding site; L-DNA, dsDNA
containing triple insertion-deletion lesion; NL-DNA, dsDNA with blunt
ends (the bottom strand of NL-DNA alone was used as ssDNA target) (see
Materials and Methods). RNA was obtained by in vitro transcription from
p53 cDNA under the T7 promoter by using biotinylated UTP. The
faster-migrating band (below p53) represents a truncated p53 product
that is routinely observed for in vitro-translated p53. wt, wild
type.
|
|
Further controls showed that only a small amount of protein, 5%
of the total for CON-DNA and approximately 10% for L-DNA,
was released
from the preformed p53-DNA complexes during 10 min
of incubation at
37°C. The effect of different nucleotides on
the stability of
the p53-DNA complexes was next examined. When
the nucleoside
triphosphates ATP or GTP (and dATP or dGTP) were
added, the release of
p53 was enhanced more than threefold, with
17 to 20% release from
CON-DNA and 32 to 34% from the L-DNA target
(represented graphically
in Fig.
2A, with actual examples shown
in
Fig.
2B and C). Only a marginal effect was observed with the
pyrimidine
triphosphates CTP and UTP (Fig.
2A), indicating that
the release of p53
from DNA is preferentially induced by purine-based
triphosphates.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Nucleotide-induced release of 35S-labelled
p53 from specific (CON-DNA) and nonspecific (L-DNA) targets. (A) In
vitro-translated p53 was bound to either CON-DNA or L-DNA beads as
indicated and incubated in the presence of different nucleotides (Fig.
1). DNA-bound p53 and released p53 were quantitated by scintillation
counting. Bars represent the percentage of released p53 with respect to
released plus bound p53. (B and C) Comparison of the release of p53
from specific and nonspecific DNA targets incubated with either
adenosine or guanosine nucleotides. Equal aliquots of p53 bound to
DNA-beads were incubated in the presence of adenosine nucleotides (B)
or guanosine nucleotides (C). (D) Release of p53 from CON-DNA-beads
after incubation with different nucleotides in the presence or absence
of an ATP-regenerating system. p53 released from the DNA was analyzed
by PAGE (15% polyacrylamide). The control consisted of p53 released in
the absence of nucleotide addition.
|
|
ADP, on the other hand, appeared to block the dissociation of p53-DNA
complexes, and dADP had a similar effect (Fig.
2A to
C). This was
unexpected and indicates that the ATP-induced release
of p53 from the
DNA described above was not the result of competition
between DNA and
nucleotides for the DNA binding surface of p53.
To determine if the
stabilizing effect of ADP is reversible, we
incubated p53-DNA complexes
in the presence of nucleoside tri-
or diphosphates with or without an
ATP regeneration system. As
shown in Fig.
2D, addition of an ATP
regeneration system partially
restores p53 release from CON-DNA in the
presence of
ADP.
These overall results indicate that purine triphosphates enhance the
dissociation of p53-DNA complexes whereas ADP stabilizes
p53-DNA
complexes. Similar results were obtained for recombinant
p53, for human
and murine p53 proteins, and for each of the DNA
targets (listed in
Materials and Methods). Thus, the observed
ATP/ADP effect applies to
two distinct types of p53 interaction
with DNA, namely,
sequence-specific DNA binding (via the core
domain of the p53 protein)
and binding to sites that imitate DNA
damage (via the C-terminal
domain).
Other proteins involved in the recognition and binding of sites of DNA
damage are also influenced by ATP. However, in general,
ATP stimulates
protein-DNA binding (
10,
41). For p53, we found
the
opposite: ATP released p53 from DNA, while ADP stabilized
the
protein-DNA
complex.
One possible explanation for these observations is that ATP and GTP
chelate divalent cations much more efficiently than ADP
and GDP do,
thereby causing differential effects on the structural
stability of the
DNA target. However, this can be excluded on
a number of grounds. (i)
No divalent cations were present in the
incubation buffers (see
Materials and Methods). Nucleotides were
used at 5 mM (see Materials
and Methods), and it is already established
that EGTA (5 mM) has no
effect on p53-DNA binding in vitro (reference
34 and
unpublished observations). (ii) Chelation of divalent
cations by the
phosphates of 5'-adenylylimidodiphosphate (AMP-PNP)
and
5'-guanylylimidodiphosphate (GMP-PNP) would be expected to
give results
similar to those for ATP and GTP: this was not observed.
Instead,
AMP-PNP and GMP-PNP had little, if any, effect on the
release of p53
from DNA (Fig.
2; see also Discussion). (iii) If
the observed effect is
due to chelation by the base rings of the
nucleotides, it follows that
each of the purine nucleotides should
give similar effects independent
of the number of phosphate groups.
This was not observed (Fig.
2). We
therefore conclude that the
opposing effects of ATP and ADP on the
stability of p53-DNA complexes
cannot simply be attributed to chelation
of divalent
cations.
Tetramerization is required for nucleotide-dependent regulation of
the stability of p53-DNA complexes.
Our next experiments were
designed to identify the domain(s) of p53 required for
ATP/ADP-dependent regulation of p53-DNA interaction. For this purpose,
we compared the following series of p53 constructs: Arg175His,
Arg273His, a C-terminal peptide (residues 323 to 392), p53
N50
(residues 24 to 392), p53
C50 (residues 1 to 363), and p53 40
NC
(residues 67 to 363). Throughout this series of p53 mutants, the
oligomerization domain was intact. To ask if modification of the
oligomerization domain can affect ATP-induced dissociation and/or ADP
stabilization of p53-DNA complexes, we also included a double mutant,
M340Q/L344R, which is dimeric but retains "wild-type" p53
immunological conformation, reactive with PAb1620 and nonreactive with
PAb240 (8, 31).
Each of the above p53 mutants was tested with CON-DNA and/or mismatched
DNA, bearing in mind that mutants lacking an intact
core domain do not
bind CON-DNA and those lacking the C terminus
do not bind mismatched
DNA. All, with the exception of the dimeric
p53 mutant, were similar to
wild-type p53 in that ATP induced
the release of the p53 protein from
DNA and, conversely, ADP stabilized
the p53-DNA complex (Fig.
3A, summarized in Fig.
3B). With dimeric
p53, however, ADP failed to stabilize the protein-DNA complexes
(Fig.
3A). Dimeric p53-DNA complexes are more labile than tetrameric
wild-type p53-DNA (reference
30 and observations in
this study).
This explains the higher level of p53 dimer released from
DNA
in the control incubation, and ATP did not induce any additional
release under these conditions (Fig.
3A).


View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Release of p53 from DNA: effects of nucleotides on
different p53 mutants. (A) Nucleotide-induced release of
35S-labelled p53 mutants from DNA targets (see the text for
details). Equal aliquots for each p53 mutant were bound to DNA-beads
and were incubated in the presence of different nucleotides as detailed
in the legend to Fig. 1 and Materials and Methods. No nucleotide was
added in the control lane. (B) Summary of results obtained from four
independent experiments with each p53 protein. The major structural
domains of p53 are also indicated. Nt, N terminus; Ct, C terminus; 4×,
tetramerization domain. Sites of point mutations are indicated by
crosses. *, dimeric p53 forms DNA complexes with a shorter half-life
than that of wild-type p53 (see the text).
|
|
Taken together, these results indicate that tetramerization is
necessary for the observed off-on effects of ATP/ADP on the
stability
of p53-DNA complexes. We suggest (i) that certain dimer-dimer
interactions of the p53 tetramer are important for regulating
the
stability of p53-DNA complexes and (ii) that ATP/ADP may destabilize
or
stabilize p53-DNA complexes at the level of dimer-dimer interactions.
It is interesting that naturally occurring oligomerization mutants
of
p53 are defective for function and are linked with cancer
predisposition
in humans (
9,
28). Our present results raise
the possibility
that this defective functioning in vivo involves the
loss of ADP/ATP
regulation of p53-DNA
interactions.
p53 can hydrolyze ATP and GTP.
Having demonstrated that ATP
and GTP induce the release of p53 from p53-DNA complexes (Fig. 2), we
wished to determine whether p53 has the capacity to hydrolyze ATP
and/or GTP. For this purpose, we used nucleoside triphosphates
radiolabelled at the
-phosphate position
([
-33P]ATP) or the
-phosphate position
([
-33P]GTP) and p53 purified from a
baculovirus expression system (Fig. 4A)
(see Materials and Methods). Radiolabelled ATP or GTP was incubated
with p53 for 60 min at 37°C. The release of radiolabel was determined
by TLC and autoradiography. In all cases, we observed hydrolysis of the
nucleoside triphosphates, with the release of radiolabelled
Pi for [
-33P]ATP (Fig. 4B) and
radiolabelled GDP for [
-33P]GTP (Fig. 4C). This
indicates cleavage at the
-
phosphoanhydride bond of the
triphosphate. Hydrolysis was Mg2+ dependent and copurified
with p53 (results not shown). Negative control incubations included
an extract from the Sf9 cells infected with wild-type baculovirus
and subjected to the same purification scheme as the p53-producing cell
extract. These controls showed no evidence of ATP or GTP
hydrolysis (Fig. 4B and C, control lanes).

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
p53 is able to hydrolyze ATP and GTP. (A) Recombinant
p53 was purified, and increasing amounts of purified protein were
separated by PAGE (15% polyacrylamide) and stained with Coomassie
blue. Lanes: 1, 0.5 µg of recombinant p53; 2, 4 µg; 3, 8 µg. The
positions of molecular weight standards are indicated in thousands. (B
and C) Equal amounts of purified p53 were incubated in the presence of
[ -33P]ATP (B) or [ -33P]GTP
(C). Samples were incubated for 60 min at 37°C and analyzed by TLC
(see Materials and Methods). The amount of labelled ATP (GTP) was 5 pM
or, for a 1:5 dilution, 1 pM. The amount of the p53 added, when
indicated, was approximately 5 pM (calculated for the tetrameric
protein). The negative control was an equivalent aliquot of cell lysate
from cells infected with wild-type virus (see the text for details). (D
and E) Experiment where equal amounts (1 pM) of
[ -33P]ATP (D) or [ -33P]GTP
(E) were incubated in the presence of decreasing concentrations of
purified p53, as indicated. Approximately 5 pM p53 was used as the
initial concentration (lane 1), providing a protein-to-substrate ratio
of 5:1 (for tetrameric protein). Arrows indicate the positions of
radiolabelled substrates and products. (F) Time course analysis of the
efficiency of nucleoside triphosphate hydrolysis by p53. Equal amounts
of p53 were incubated in the presence of radiolabelled nucleotides
(protein-to-substrate ratio, 5:1). After the indicated times, aliquots
of the reaction products were loaded onto a TLC plate and the products
were separated by TLC and quantitated by scintillation counting (see
Materials and Methods).
|
|
The efficiency of hydrolysis in the presence of p53 was low, and we
were able to detect reaction products only under conditions
when the
enzyme concentration ([E]) was similar to or greater
than the
substrate concentration ([S]). Moreover, for both ATP
or GTP, only
part of the substrate was hydrolyzed by p53 within
1 h, even when
the substrate was diluted up to 1:5 (Fig.
4B and
C).
Additional experiments showed that when the amount of p53 protein was
decreased relative to that of ATP or GTP, hydrolysis
decreased in
proportion to the amount of p53 present in the reaction
(Fig.
4D and
E). The starting protein to substrate ratio was 5:1
(picomoles of
tetrameric p53 per picomole of nucleoside biphosphate),
and
quantitative analysis revealed that the efficiency of GTP
hydrolysis
was half that of ATP hydrolysis. Time course studies
showed a slow
steady-state process, reaching 75% of initial substrate
hydrolyzed
within 1 h for ATP and 40% for GTP (Fig.
4F). From
our data, the
ATP turnover number by p53 could be calculated as
0.012 molecule
min
1. This low turnover is consistent with the activities
of other
molecular-switch proteins (see
Discussion).
Hydrolysis of ATP is not required for p53-DNA dissociation.
Having demonstrated that p53 has intrinsic ATPase and GTPase activities
(Fig. 4), we asked whether this activity is coupled with the ability of
ATP and GTP to dissociate p53-DNA complexes (Fig. 2). We reasoned that
if hydrolysis is required for dissociation, the ATP analogue ATP-
-S
should not support dissociation, since this compound cannot be
efficiently hydrolyzed at the
-
phosphoanhydride bond. However,
ATP-
-S and ATP gave virtually identical results over a period of 60 min (Fig. 5A), indicating that ATP
hydrolysis is not required for dissociation of p53-DNA complexes. This
suggests that the ability of ATP to dissociate p53-DNA complexes may
involve allosteric changes induced by ATP (and ATP-
-S) in the p53
protein.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Hydrolysis of ATP is not required for dissociation of
p53-DNA complexes. (A) Time course analysis of p53 release from
sequence-specific DNA. Samples were incubated with ATP, ATP- -S, or
ADP. Controls involve incubations without nucleotide addition. After
the given times (5, 10, 20, 30, and 60 min), fractions of released and
DNA-bound p53 were quantitated by scintillation counting. (B) p53-DNA
complexes were initially stabilized with ADP and subsequently incubated
with nucleotides as described above. For both experiments, the data
represent an average of four independent experiments. "beads,"
control incubation of beads, to which p53 was bound without DNA and
subsequently washed (see Fig. 1A and Materials and Methods) to remove
unbound protein before the incubation.
|
|
ADP stabilized p53-DNA complexes during the above time course
experiments (Fig.
5A), consistent with the results in Fig.
2.
Given the
opposing effects of ATP and ADP, we were interested
in determining if
ATP could overcome the stabilization of p53-DNA
complexes induced by
ADP. Preformed ADP-p53-DNA complexes were
incubated with ATP or
ATP-

-S, and the release of p53 from the
DNA over 60 min was assayed.
The results show that both ATP and
ATP-

-S dissociate ADP-p53-DNA
complexes but that dissociation
was similar to the levels observed for
control incubations (with
no addition to the p53-DNA incubation [Fig.
5B]). Thus, in the
presence of ADP, addition of ATP is unable to
enhance the dissociation
of p53-DNA complexes over control
levels.
ADP-p53-DNA complexes can be dissociated by protein-protein
interaction.
The results shown in Fig. 2, 3, and 5 indicate that
ADP stabilizes p53-DNA complexes. This was investigated further by gel shift analysis with in vitro-translated p53 and radiolabelled CON-DNA.
The anti-p53 monoclonal antibody PAb421 is routinely added to stabilize
p53-DNA complexes for gel shift analysis (12). We now asked
if ADP can substitute for PAb421 to give stable p53-DNA complexes
detectable by a gel shift assay. Our results show that ADP stabilizes
the p53-DNA complexes and that the effect is concentration dependent,
with no further increase observed between 2.5 and 5.0 mM ADP (Fig.
6A, lanes 1 to 4).

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Stabilization of the p53-CON-DNA complex by ADP and
comparison of wild-type tetrameric p53 with dimeric p53. (A) Gel
mobility shift assay of wild-type (wt) p53-CON-DNA complexes in the
presence of increasing amounts of ADP (lanes 1 to 4, as indicated) or
with a constant amount of ADP (5 mM; lanes 5 to 9). Where relevant, the
addition of different monoclonal antibodies or 10 mM ATP is indicated.
Upper bands in lanes with PAb421 and PAb248 represent antibody
supershifts of the p53-DNA complexes. (B) Gel mobility shift assay of
dimeric p53 complexed with CON-DNA in the presence of 5 mM ADP (lane
10) or PAb421 (lane 11). Results obtained in the absence of ADP and
PAb421 are equivalent to those obtained in the presence of ADP. The
faster-migrating band, below the p53-DNA complexes, is derived from a
component present in the rabbit reticulocyte lysate. It is routinely
observed in negative control translations (without mRNA [not shown])
and is reduced by addition of certain hybridoma supernatants, including
PAb1620.
|
|
Interestingly, the p53-CON complex stabilized by ADP was dissociated by
anti-p53 monoclonal antibodies PAb246 and PAb1620
(Fig.
6A, lanes 5 and
6). These antibodies detect conformation-dependent
epitopes in the core
domain of p53, and PAb1620 (but not PAb246)
dissociates DNA complexes
of murine p53 in the presence of PAb421
(
15). The fact that
both PAb246 and PAb1620 dissociate ADP-p53-DNA
complexes (Fig.
6A)
indicates that the mechanism of stabilization
by ADP may be distinct
from that of stabilization by PAb421, since
the latter is not sensitive
to PAb246 dissociation (
15). PAb421
or PAb248 formed
additive complexes with ADP-p53-DNA and did not
cause dissociation
(Fig.
6A, lanes 7 and 8). When a twofold excess
of ATP was
added to the complex stabilized by ADP, a partial decrease
in the
amounts of ADP-p53-DNA complexes was observed (lane 9).
This is
consistent with the results presented in Fig.
5B.
The results shown in Fig.
3 indicate that dimer-dimer interaction is
important for the stabilization of p53-DNA complexes
by ADP. This was
investigated further under gel shift conditions,
and the results are
shown in Fig.
6B. Dimeric p53-DNA complexes
are clearly evident and can
be stabilized by PAb421. However,
in marked contrast to wild-type p53,
the dimeric mutant-DNA complexes
could not be stabilized in the
presence of ADP alone (Fig.
6B,
lane 10, compared with Fig.
6A, lane
4). These results confirm
that an intact p53 oligomerization domain is
required to provide
the necessary quaternary environment for
ADP-induced stabilization
of p53-DNA
complexes.
 |
DISCUSSION |
p53 functions as a molecular switch.
Our present results
demonstrate that ATP and ADP have opposing effects on the interaction
of p53 with DNA: ATP dissociates p53-DNA complexes, whereas ADP blocks
dissociation (Fig. 2 and 6). We also show that p53 has ATPase activity
and that this activity is not coupled to the dissociation of p53-DNA
complexes (Fig. 4 and 5). Although ATP can dissociate p53-DNA
complexes, it does not block the binding of p53 to ssDNA
(38). We now show that ATP is able to induce only partial
release of p53 from dsDNA (sequence-specific or nonspecific with
mismatches). Considering the amounts of ATP in the reaction mixture (up
to 5 mM) relative to DNA (100 pmol) and p53 (approximately 10 pmol for
purified protein and in the femtomolar range for in vitro translated
p53), we cannot explain the ATP-induced release of p53 by competition
between ATP and DNA for the DNA-binding surface on p53. These overall
observations lead us to suggest that the ATPase activity of p53 may
serve to convert ATP-p53 to ADP-p53 and thus promote stable DNA binding (represented schematically in Fig. 7).
The DNA-bound form of p53 can subsequently be dissociated by ATP,
possibly by an allosteric mechanism (see below). In this model, the
ATP- and ADP-bound p53 represent the off and on forms of p53 for DNA
binding, respectively.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Schematic representation of the ATP/ADP-dependent
molecular switch for p53-DNA binding (see Discussion).
|
|
These results bear a number of striking similarities to the novel type
of molecular-switch mechanism recently described for
the human mismatch
recognition complex hMSH2-hMSH6 (
10,
14).
First, both the
hMSH2-hMSH6 heterodimer and the p53 protein bind
mismatched DNA
and possess low-level steady-state ATPase activity.
Second, the effects
of ATP on p53 and hMSH2-hMSH6 are similar
in that when ATP is
bound, both p53 and hMSH2-hMSH6 are in the
"off" form, with low
affinity for DNA. Moreover, ATP can release
both p53 and hMSH2-hMSH6
from DNA without itself being hydrolyzed.
However, when the ATP-protein
complex is released from the DNA
template, the intrinsic ATPase
activity of the protein can regenerate
the ADP-bound, "on" form
thus completing the cycle of molecular
switch regulation
(
14; see above). Third, for both p53 and
hMSH2-hMSH6,
the rate-limiting step in the ATP/ADP exchange appears to
be the
replacement of the adenosine nucleotide in the active centre.
Thus, an excess of ATP did not dissociate all p53-DNA complexes
(Fig.
2,
3,
5 and
6) and p53 protein hydrolyzes ATP with the same
efficiency
in the presence or absence of DNA (results not shown).
Limiting the
molecular switch at the step of nucleotide exchange
will provide a
situation where ADP-p53 (on) has a longer half-life
than the opposing
ATP-p53 (off) form of the molecular switch.
It is interesting that
neither hMSH2-hMSH6 nor p53 is released
from DNA by AMP-PNP
(
14; see above) (Fig.
2). This suggests
a similar
spatial organization of the active-site centers between
these two
proteins and the importance of the O3

atom between
P

and P

in
a mechanism involved in the
switch.
Despite the above similarities to hMSH2-hMSH6, additional observations
serve to distinguish the p53 molecular switch and identify
it as a
novel mechanism for the regulation of the protein-DNA
interaction.
First, analysis of the p53 protein sequence does
not reveal any
homology to known ATP or GTP binding motifs (
43,
46).
Second, the ATP/ADP switch regulates the binding of p53
to two distinct
types of DNA target, nonspecific DNA and sequence-specific
DNA targets
(binding to these targets involves different structural
domains of the
p53 protein [see Introduction]). Perhaps the positioning
of the
ATP/ADP regulatory switch within the oligomerization domain
may provide
a structural basis which allows a common regulatory
mechanism to
operate with different DNA targets (see Results,
Fig.
3, and the
following discussion). A third property thus far
unique to p53 is that
it can also use GTP as a release factor
to dissociate p53-DNA complexes
(Fig.
2C). This places p53 as
a link between the two groups of other
known molecular switch
proteins, which are regulated exclusively either
by ATP/ADP or
by GTP/GDP mechanisms (reviewed in reference
10).
The regulation of molecular-switch proteins is determined by specific
protein-protein or protein-DNA interactions. When alone,
they exhibit marginal catalytic activity. ATP or GTP turnover
rates for
molecular-switch proteins span from 1 ATP molecule per
min for MuB
(
51) to 0.03 per min for Ras (
44) and as low
as
0.003 per min for EF-Tu (
18). Although the rate of p53
ATPase
activity is low and is approximately 0.012 molecule
min
1, it is within the range of turnover rates of known
molecular-switch
proteins (
10,
43). However, interaction
with specific protein
partners can dramatically increase the
turnover. For example,
hydrolysis by Ras-type G proteins may be
accelerated by 4 to 5
orders of magnitude by GTPase-activating proteins
(GAPs) (
43).
For
ras, it has been suggested that
GAPs may provide a catalytic
residue that
ras itself lacks
(
43). Our future studies will
investigate the possibility
that ATPase and/or GTPase activity
is similarly stimulated by p53
binding proteins present in the
cell.
A possible mechanism of ATP/ADP-dependent modulation of p53.
Our results demonstrate that ATP/ADP operate a molecular switch to
regulate DNA binding by p53. We also identify p53 dimer-dimer interaction as possibly important for this regulation. As yet, we do
not know how ATP influences p53 at the structural level. One
possibility is that ATP binding modifies the interhelical angles within
the C-terminal tetramerization domain, with knock-on effects on the
overall quaternary structure of the protein and its DNA binding
properties. This would be consistent with the observed variation in the
angles of subunit interaction at the dimer-dimer interface of the
tetramerization domain (6, 7, 17, 24, 32) and with ATP
interaction at a C-terminal DNA binding site (4). It would
also accommodate the hypothesis that to form a stable complex with
specific DNA, p53 must switch from dihedral symmetry with low affinity
for DNA binding to an asymmetric state with high-affinity binding
(50). Dihedral symmetry of the p53 tetramer is provided by
the oligomerization domain. We now show evidence that the quaternary
structure provided by this domain is required for ATP/ADP-dependent
modulation of p53-DNA stability (Fig. 3). The switch from a dihedral to
an asymmetric form may help to relieve possible steric clashes between
protein subunits within the tetramer, allowing tetrameric p53 to
accommodate itself to the structure of the DNA site (2, 35).
Interaction between p53 and DNA is essential for p53 function, and
evidence from genetic studies indicates that p53 may play
an important
role in DNA repair as well as in the transcription
of p53 target genes
(
11,
25,
29,
45,
47,
48). Any
regulatory mechanism affecting
the interaction of p53 and DNA
is likely to be fundamentally important
for maintenance of genetic
integrity. We now present evidence that
ATP/ADP can modulate p53-DNA
interaction.
We also demonstrate that ADP-p53-DNA complexes retain accessible p53
binding sites for other proteins, namely, anti-p53 antibodies
which
bind epitopes at the N and C termini of p53 (PAb248 and
PAb421)
and within the core domain (PAb246 and PAb1620 [Fig.
6]).
Antibodies
binding at the N and C termini of p53 form additive
complexes with
ADP-p53-DNA, whereas the antibody-binding interaction
within the core
domain causes the dissociation of the ADP-p53-DNA
complex (Fig.
6).
These various characteristics raise the possibility
that p53 functions
as a "matchmaker" (
41) for assembly of multiprotein
complexes on
DNA.
In summary, our experimental data show that p53 exhibits low ATPase
activity and bears the hallmarks of an ATP/ADP-dependent
molecular
switch which regulates the stability of p53-DNA complexes.
It is
possible that stabilization by ADP is important to allow
time for the
ADP-p53-DNA complexes to mark DNA sites for correct
assembly of
macromolecular structures involved in repair and/or
transcription in
response to genotoxic
stress.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Carlos Rubbi and Trevor Mee for many helpful discussions
and critical reading of the manuscript, and we thank Meg Stark for
photographic work.
This work was supported by Yorkshire Cancer Research.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: YCR P53 Research
Group, Department of Biology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom. Phone: (44) 01904 432891. Fax: (44) 01904 432808. E-mail: ajm24{at}york.ac.uk.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bakalkin, G.,
G. Selivanova,
T. Yakovleva,
E. Kiseleva,
E. Kashuba,
K. Magnusson,
L. Szekely,
G. Klein,
L. Terenius, and K. Wiman.
1995.
p53 binds single-stranded DNA ends through the C-terminal domain and internal DNA segments via the middle domain.
Nucleic Acids Res.
23:362-369[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Balagurumoorthy, P.,
H. Sakamoto,
M. S. Lewis,
N. Zambrano,
G. M. Clore,
A. M. Gronenborn,
E. Appella, and R. E. Harrington.
1995.
Four p53 DNA-binding domain peptides bind natural p53-response elements and bend the DNA.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:8591-8595[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Bargonetti, J.,
J. J. Manfredi,
X. Chen,
D. R. Marshak, and C. Prives.
1993.
A proteolytic fragment from the central region of p53 has marked sequence-specific DNA-binding activity when generated from wild-type but not from oncogenic mutant p53 protein.
Genes Dev.
7:2565-2574[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Brain, R., and J. R. Jenkins.
1994.
Human p53 directs DNA strand reassociation and is photolabelled by 8-azido ATP.
Oncogene
9:1775-1780[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Cho, Y.,
S. Gorina,
P. D. Jeffrey, and N. P. Pavletich.
1994.
Crystal structure of a p53 tumor suppressor-DNA complex: understanding tumorigenicmutations.
Science
265:346-355[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Clore, G. M.,
J. Ernst,
R. Clubb,
J. G. Omichinski,
W. M. Kennedy,
K. Sakaguchi,
E. Appella, and A. M. Gronenborn.
1995.
Refined solution structure of the oligomerization domain of the tumour suppressor p53.
Nat. Struct. Biol.
2:321-333[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Clore, G. M.,
J. G. Omichinski,
K. Sakaguchi,
N. Zambrano,
H. Sakamoto,
E. Appella, and A. M. Gronenborn.
1994.
High-resolution structure of the oligomerization domain of p53 by multidimensional NMR.
Science
265:386-391[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Davison, T. S.,
P. Yin,
E. Nie, and C. H. Arrowsmith.
1998.
Oligomerisation and p53 function, p. 40.
In
Abstracts of the 9th p53 Workshop 1998.
|
| 9.
|
Davison, T. S.,
P. Yin,
E. Nie,
C. Kay, and C. H. Arrowsmith.
1998.
Characterisation of the oligomerisation defects of two p53 mutants found in families with Li-Fraumeni and Li-Fraumeni-like syndrome.
Oncogene
17:651-656[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Fishel, R.
1998.
Mismatch repair, molecular switches, and signal transduction.
Genes Dev.
12:2096-2101[Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Ford, J. M., and P. C. Hanawalt.
1995.
Li-Fraumeni syndrome fibroblasts homozygous for p53 mutations are deficient in global DNA-repair but exhibit normal transcription-coupled repair and enhanced UV resistance.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:8876-8880[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Funk, W. D.,
D. J. Pak,
R. H. Karas,
W. E. Wright, and J. W. Shay.
1992.
A transcriptionally active DNA-binding site for human p53 protein complexes.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:2866-2871[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Gottlieb, T., and M. Oren.
1996.
p53 in growth-control and neoplasia.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer
1287:77-102[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Gradia, S.,
S. Acharya, and R. Fishel.
1997.
The human mismatch recognition complex hMSH2-hMSH6 functions as a novel molecular switch.
Cell
91:995-1005[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Hall, A. R., and J. Milner.
1997.
Specific p53-DNA complexes contain an mdm2-related protein.
Oncogene
14:1371-1376[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Jayaraman, L., and C. Prives.
1995.
Activation of p53 sequence-specific DNA binding by short single strands of DNA requires the C-terminus.
Cell
81:1021-1029[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Jeffry, P. D.,
S. Gorina, and N. P. Pavletich.
1995.
Crystal structure of the tetramerization domain of the p53 tumor suppressor at 1.7 angstroms.
Science
267:1498-1502[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Kalbitzer, H. R.,
R. S. Goody, and A. Wittinghofer.
1984.
Electron-paramagnetic-resonance studies of manganese(II) complexes with elongation factor Tu from Bacillus stearothermophilus. Observation of a GTP hydrolysis intermediate state complex.
Eur. J. Biochem.
141:591-597[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Kastan, M.
1996.
Signalling to p53 where does it all start.
Bioessays
18:617-619[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Ko, L. J., and C. Prives.
1996.
p53 puzzle and paradigm.
Genes Dev.
10:1054-1072[Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Kondratov, R. V.,
E. N. Pugacheva,
N. V. Kuznetsov,
V. S. Prasolov,
B. P. Kopnin, and P. M. Chumakov.
1996.
Human adenosine-deaminase gene contains p53-responsive element.
Proc. Russian Acad. Sci.
346:260-262.
|
| 22.
|
Lee, S.,
B. Elenbaas,
A. Levine, and J. Griffith.
1995.
p53 and its 14 kDa C-terminal domain recognize primary DNA-damage in the form of insertion/deletion mismatches.
Cell
81:1013-1020[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Lee, S. M.,
L. Cavallo, and J. Griffith.
1997.
Human p53 binds Holliday junctions strongly and facilitates their cleavage.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:7532-7539[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Lee, W.,
T. S. Harvey,
Y. Yin,
P. Yau,
D. Litchfield, and C. H. Arrowsmith.
1994.
Solution structure of the tetrameric minimum transforming domain of p53.
Nat. Struct. Biol.
1:877-890[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Leveillard, T.,
L. Andera,
N. Bissonnette,
L. Schaeffer,
L. Bracco,
J. M. Egly, and B. Wasylyk.
1996.
Functional interactions between p53 and the TFIIH complex are affected by tumor-associated mutations.
EMBO J.
15:1615-1624[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Levine, A. J.
1997.
p53, the cellular gatekeeper for growth and division.
Cell
88:323-331[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Linke, S.,
K. Clarkin,
A. Dileonardo,
A. Tsou, and G. Wahl.
1996.
A reversible, p53-dependent G(0)/G(1) cell-cycle arrest induced by ribonucleotide depletion in the absence of detectable DNA damage.
Genes Dev.
10:934-947[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Lomax, M. E.,
D. M. Barnes,
T. R. Hupp,
S. M. Picksley, and R. S. Camplejohn.
1998.
Characterisation of p53 oligomerisation domain mutations isolated from Li-Fraumeni and Li-Fraumeni like family members.
Oncogene
17:643-649[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
McKay, B. C.,
M. A. Francis, and A. J. Rainbow.
1997.
Wildtype p53 is required for heat shock and ultraviolet light enhanced repair of a UV-damaged reporter gene.
Carcinogenesis
18:245-249[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
McLure, K. G., and P. W. K. Lee.
1998.
How p53 binds DNA as a tetramer.
EMBO J.
17:3342-3350[Medline].
|
| 31.
| Mee, T., and J. Milner. 1998. Unpublished data.
|
| 32.
|
Miller, M.,
J. Lubkowski,
J. K. M. Rao,
A. T. Danishefsky,
J. G. Omichinski,
K. Sakaguchi,
H. Sakamoto,
E. Appella,
A. M. Gronenborn, and G. M. Clore.
1996.
The oligomerization domain of p53: crystal structure of the trigonal form.
FEBS Lett.
99:166-170.
|
| 33.
|
Milner, J.,
E. A. Medcalf, and A. Cook.
1991.
The tumor suppressor p53: analysis of wild-type and mutant complexes.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:12-19[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Molinari, M.,
A. L. Okorokov, and J. Milner.
1996.
Interaction with damaged DNA induces selective proteolytic cleavage of p53 to yield 40 kDa and 35 kDa fragments competent for sequence-specific DNA binding.
Oncogene
13:2077-2086[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Nagaich, A. K.,
V. B. Zhurkin,
H. Sakamoto,
A. A. Gorin,
G. M. Clore,
A. M. Gronenborn,
E. Appella, and R. E. Harrington.
1997.
Architectural accommodation in the complex of four p53 DNA binding domain peptides with the p21/waf1/cip1 DNA response element.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:14830-14841[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Nelson, W. G., and M. B. Kastan.
1994.
DNA strand breaks: the DNA template alterations that trigger p53-dependent DNA damage response pathways.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:1815-1823[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Oberosler, P.,
P. Hloch,
U. Ramsperger, and H. Stahl.
1993.
p53-catalyzed annealing of complementary single-stranded nucleic acids.
EMBO J.
12:2389-2396[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Okorokov, A. L.,
F. Ponchel, and J. Milner.
1997.
Induced N- and C-terminal cleavage of p53: a core fragment of p53, generated by interaction with damaged DNA, promotes cleavage of the N-terminus of full-length p53, whereas ssDNA induces C-terminal cleavage of p53
EMBO J.
16:6008-6017[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Pavletich, N. P.,
K. A. Chambers, and C. O. Pabo.
1993.
The DNA-binding domain of p53 contains the four conserved regions and the major mutation hot spots.
Genes Dev.
7:2556-2564[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Reed, M.,
B. Woelker,
P. Wang,
Y. Wang,
M. Anderson, and P. Tegtmeyer.
1995.
The C-terminal domain of p53 recognizes DNA damaged by ionizing radiation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:9455-9459[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Sancar, A., and J. E. Hearst.
1993.
Molecular matchmakers.
Science
259:1415-1420[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Sherley, J. L.
1991.
Guanine nucleotide biosynthesis is regulated by the cellular p53 concentration.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:24815-24828[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Sprang, S. R.
1997.
G protein mechanisms: insights from structural analysis.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
66:639-678[Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Temeles, G. L.,
J. B. Gibs,
J. S. D'Alonzo,
I. S. Sigal, and E. M. Scolnick.
1985.
Yeast and mammalian ras proteins have conserved biochemical properties.
Nature
313:700-703[Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Venkatachalam, S.,
S. Yu-Ping,
S. N. Jones,
H. Vogel,
A. Bradley,
D. Pinkel, and L. A. Donehower.
1998.
Retention of wild-type p53 in tumors from p53 heterozygous mice: reduction of p53 dosage can promote cancer formation.
EMBO J.
17:4657-4667[Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Walker, J. E.,
M. Saraste,
M. J. Runswick, and N. G. Gay.
1982.
Distantly related sequences in the alpha- and beta-subunits of ATP synthase, myosin, kinases and other ATP-requiring enzymes and a common nucleotide binding fold.
EMBO J.
1:945-951[Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Wang, X.,
W. Vermeulen,
J. D. Coursen,
M. Gibson,
S. E. Lupold,
K. Forrester,
G. W. Xu,
L. Elmore,
H. Yeh,
J. H. J. Hoeijmakers, and C. C. Harris.
1996.
The XPB and XPD DNA helicases are components of the p53-mediated apoptosis pathway.
Genes Dev.
10:1219-1232[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Wang, X. W.,
H. Yeh,
L. Schaeffer,
R. Roy,
V. Moncollin,
J. M. Egly,
Z. Wang,
E. C. Friedberg,
M. K. Evans,
B. G. Taffe,
V. A. Bohr,
G. Weeda,
J. H. J. Hoeijmakers,
K. Forrester, and C. C. Harris.
1995.
p53 modulation of TFIIH-associated nucleotide excision-repair activity.
Nat. Genet.
10:188-195[Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Wang, Y.,
M. Reed,
P. Wang,
J. E. Stenger,
G. Mayr,
M. E. Anderson,
J. F. Schwedes, and P. Tegtmeyer.
1993.
p53 domains: identification and characterization of two autonomous DNA-binding regions.
Genes Dev.
7:2575-2586[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Waterman, J.,
J. Shenk, and T. Halazonetis.
1995.
The dihedral symmetry of the p53 tetramerization domain mandates a conformational switch upon DNA-binding.
EMBO J.
14:512-519[Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Yamauchi, M., and T. A. Baker.
1998.
An ATP-ADP switch in MuB controls progression of the Mu transposition pathway.
EMBO J.
15:5509-5518.
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, November 1999, p. 7501-7510, Vol. 19, No. 11
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
McLure, K. G., Takagi, M., Kastan, M. B.
(2004). NAD+ Modulates p53 DNA Binding Specificity and Function. Mol. Cell. Biol.
24: 9958-9967
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Okorokov, A. L., Warnock, L., Milner, J.
(2002). Effect of wild-type, S15D and R175H p53 proteins on DNA end joining in vitro: potential mechanism of DNA double-strand break repair modulation. Carcinogenesis
23: 549-557
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Degtyareva, N., Subramanian, D., Griffith, J. D.
(2001). Analysis of the Binding of p53 to DNAs Containing Mismatched and Bulged Bases. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 8778-8784
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yakovleva, T., Pramanik, A., Kawasaki, T., Tan-No, K., Gileva, I., Lindegren, H., Langel, U., Ekstrom, T. J., Rigler, R., Terenius, L., Bakalkin, G.
(2001). p53 Latency. C-TERMINAL DOMAIN PREVENTS BINDING OF p53 CORE TO TARGET BUT NOT TO NONSPECIFIC DNA SEQUENCES. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 15650-15658
[Abstract]
[Full Text]