INTRODUCTION

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways regulate growth, development, and the response to stress in eukaryotes (2, 11, 28, 30, 36, 77). These pathways regulate mitosis and differentiation in vertebrates, vulval development in Caenorhabditis elegans, and photoreceptor development in Drosophila melanogaster (42). In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, six different MAPK pathways regulate mating, osmosensing, pseudohyphal growth, invasive growth, spore formation, and cell wall biosynthesis (28, 44). The proper regulation of MAPK pathways is important since mutations that alter their activity cause defects in growth and development. Mutations that hyperactivate MAPK modules lead to cell transformation in vertebrates, developmental defects in C. elegans and Drosophila, and growth defects in S. cerevisiae (12, 30, 33, 45, 68, 71, 73, 77). Common to all MAPK pathways are MAPK modules comprising three sequentially acting kinases termed MEK kinase (MEKK), MEK, and MAPK (11). MEKK activates MEK, which in turn activates MAPK by phosphorylating a conserved threonine and tyrosine residue in the phosphorylation lip sequence (11, 42, 74).

Although the activation of MAPK pathways has been intensively investigated, the inactivation of these pathways is less well understood. Most is known about the inactivation of MAPKs. Since MAPKs require phosphorylation of both a Thr and a Tyr for full activity (11, 42), it is possible to inactivate them by dephosphorylating either phosphothreonine, phosphotyrosine (pY), or both residues. Dual-specificity phosphatases, capable of dephosphorylating both phosphothreonine and pY residues, inactivate MAPKs in vertebrates, Drosophila, and S. cerevisiae (17, 25, 41, 42, 47, 70). In vertebrates, there are at least nine dual-specificity phosphatases that inactivate the three MAPK family members, ERK, JNK/SAPK, and p38, with variable specificity (42). In Drosophila, a dual-specificity phosphatase, puckered, has been identified as a negative regulator of JNK in a developmental pathway (47). In the S. cerevisiae genome, six genes encode proteins similar to dual-specificity phosphatases. One of these, Msg5, has been shown to inactivate the MAPK, Fus3, in the pheromone response pathway (17, 76).

In yeasts, MAPKs have also been shown to be inactivated by a novel mechanism involving protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) specific for pY (33, 50, 66, 73). The S. cerevisiae MAPKs, Hog1, in the osmotic stress-activated high-osmolarity glycerol (HOG) pathway, and Fus3, in the pheromone response pathway, are inactivated by two protein tyrosine phosphatases, Ptp2 and Ptp3 (33, 73, 76). These two PTPs contain a catalytic domain of ~400 residues 57% similar to each other and significantly similar to vertebrate PTPs (5, 7, 9). Analysis of human PTP1B showed that the Cys residue in the conserved sequence, (I/V)HCXAGXXR(S/T)G, acts as a nucleophile in pY hydrolysis (26). Mutation of the corresponding residue in Ptp2 and Ptp3 inactivates them in vivo and in vitro (33, 73, 76). In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, two protein tyrosine phosphatases, Pyp1 and Pyp2, have been shown to inactivate a MAPK, Spc1/Sty1, in a stress response pathway analogous to the HOG pathway (14, 50, 66).

Protein phosphatases that regulate MAPKs show variable levels of specificity for their substrates. For example, the vertebrate dual-specificity phosphatase, MKP-3/PYST1 (23, 53, 56), is highly specific for ERK, while other dual-specificity phosphatases, MKP-1, MKP-2, and MKP-4, inactivate multiple MAPKs (3, 10, 42, 54, 70). Part of this specificity is due to noncatalytic domains that recognize their substrates through tight binding interactions (55). PTPs also show different specificities for MAPKs. For example, the S. cerevisiae Ptp2 is a more effective negative regulator of Hog1 than Ptp3 (33, 73). We have shown that Ptp2 binds Hog1 more effectively than Ptp3 (33), and this likely contributes to its greater ability to inactivate Hog1. In contrast, Ptp3 is a more effective negative regulator of Fus3 than Ptp2 (76), but the reason for this is unknown.

To further explore the functions of S. cerevisiae Ptp2 and Ptp3 in MAPK signaling and their different specificities for MAPKs, we examined whether these phosphatases could inactivate Mpk1, a MAPK in the cell wall integrity pathway (37). This pathway activates the biosynthesis of the yeast cell wall during vegetative growth, during mating, and in response to stresses such as heat and hypo-osmotic shock (6, 13, 22, 34, 40, 43, 46, 49, 52, 75). The activation of this pathway has been well characterized, but its inactivation is poorly understood. The transmembrane proteins Hcs77, Mid2, and Mtl1 signal to Rho1, protein kinase C, and a MAPK module comprising a MEKK called Bck1, redundant MEKs called Mkk1 and Mkk2, and a single MAPK, Mpk1 (22, 32, 35, 37, 38, 40, 58, 61). MSG5 was isolated as a multicopy suppressor of growth defects due to the hyperactive MEK mutant, MKK1-386; however, it has not been established whether it is a physiologically relevant regulator of Mpk1 (71).

In this work, we show that both Ptp2 and Ptp3 inactivate Mpk1; however, Ptp2 is a more potent negative regulator than Ptp3. The difference in their activities is likely explained by at least three factors. First, Ptp2 binds Mpk1 and dephosphorylates Mpk1-pY more effectively than Ptp3. Second, these PTPs show differences in subcellular localization; Ptp2 is predominantly nuclear, while Ptp3 is cytoplasmic. The nuclear localization of Ptp2 may account for its greater effectiveness, since activation of MAPKs often results in their translocation to the nucleus. Last, heat shock increased the level of PTP2 transcript in a Mpk1-dependent manner, suggesting that Ptp2 acts in a negative feedback loop to inactivate Mpk1. Thus, Ptp2 and Ptp3 are global regulators of MAPK signaling, inactivating the HOG, pheromone response, and cell wall integrity pathways but show differences in specificity toward the MAPKs in these pathways.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

Strains, media, and genetic techniques. All strains were derived from the wild-type haploid strain BBY48 (MAT trp1-1 ura3-52 his3-200 leu2-3,112 lys2-801) (1) unless otherwise noted. A strain bearing a deletion of the MPK1 gene was produced by transformation of BBY48 with an MPK1 deletion construct in plasmid pJL2, described below. This plasmid was digested with BamHI and EcoRI and transformed into BBY48, and His⁺ transformants were selected. Southern analysis identified transformants bearing the deletion allele at the MPK1 locus (63). Briefly, genomic DNA was digested with KpnI, and a Southern blot was probed with a 522-bp BamHI-SmaI fragment corresponding to the 5' end of MPK1. A 5.2-kb fragment characteristic of the mpk1::HIS3 allele integrated at the correct locus was detected in several transformants. Backcrossing mpk1::HIS3 strains to the isogenic wild-type strain BBY45 (1), sporulation, and dissection resulted in a 2:2 segregation of His⁺:His spore clones. All His⁺ spore clones were temperature sensitive for growth as expected for a mpk1 strain (37). Strains lacking MPK1 and HOG1, PTP2, PTP3, or PTP2 and PTP3 were produced by crossing the mpk1 strain to a hog1 (33), ptp2 (33), or ptp3 (33) strain. The resulting strains were CMY3 (MAT mpk1::HIS3), CMY5 (MAT mpk1::HIS3 hog1::TRP1), CMY6 (MAT mpk1::HIS3 ptp2::HIS3), CMY7 (MAT mpk1::HIS3 ptp3::TRP1), and CMY8 (MAT mpk1::HIS3 ptp2::HIS3 ptp3::TRP1).

ptp2::HIS3 trp1-63 ura3-52 his3-200 leu2-3,112 lys2-801 GAL

/MAT trp1-63/trp1-63 ura3-52/ura3-52 his3-200/his3-200 leu2-3,112/leu2-3,112 lys2-801/lys2-801 GAL

ptp2::HIS3

MAT ptp3::HIS3 trp1-63 ura3-52 his3-200 leu2-3,112 lys2-801 GAL

ptp3::HIS3

ptp3::HIS3

ptp3::HIS3/PTP3

ptp2::HIS3 ptp3::HIS3 trp1-63 ura3-52 his3-200 leu2-3,112 lys2-801 GAL

Plasmids. The PTP2-green fluorescent protein (GFP) and PTP3-GFP fusion proteins were constructed by using a 750-bp NotI GFP fragment from pSF-GP1, kindly provided by J. Hirsch (Columbia University). Plasmid pPTP2GFP, where GFP is fused to the carboxy terminus of Ptp2, was constructed by replacing the PTP2 stop codon with a NotI site, using PCR. The oligonucleotide containing the NotI site, 5'-TCTAGAGCGGCCGCAACAAGGTAACGCGTTC-3', was paired with another oligonucleotide, 5'-GCGCTCGAGCAACAAGCACTAAGTCCCTAGCG-3', 462 bp upstream of the PTP2 start codon. The resulting 2.7-kb PCR product was digested with NotI and XhoI and ligated into pSK (Stratagene) to generate pSKXNPTP2. Plasmid pSKXNPTP2 digested with NotI was ligated to the 750-bp NotI fragment of GFP, and the orientation of the GFP insert was determined by digestion with SpeI. The resulting plasmid, pSKPTP2-GFP, was digested with KpnI and SacI, and the ~3.5-kb PTP2-GFP fragment was cloned into YEplac181, a plasmid containing a 2µm origin of replication and bearing the LEU2 gene (20), to produce pPTP2-GFP. The Ptp2-GFP fusion is functional since it suppressed lethality of a sln1 strain which hyperactivates the HOG pathway, as determined by the 5-fluoro-orotic acid assay described previously (33, 59). Briefly, functional PTP2 carried on a low-copy-number or multicopy plasmid allows an sln1 strain, IMY101 (MATa sln1::HIS3 + pSLN1-URA3) to grow on media containing 5-fluoro-orotic acid (59). The pPTP2-GFP plasmid produced a single protein of expected size, ~111 kDa, that cross-reacted with the monoclonal anti-GFP antibody (Clontech).

mpk1::HIS3

mpk1::HIS3

Yeast dilution assay. To assess the ability of Ptp2 and Ptp3 to suppress growth defects due to the hyperactive MKK1 allele, MKK1-386, pNV7MKK1386 and the multicopy plasmids bearing PTPs were cotransformed into galactose-inducible yeast strains, wild-type strain JD52 (MATa trp1-63 ura3-52 his3-200 leu2-3,112 lys2-801 GAL⁺) (16) and PTP deletion strains CMY1 (ptp2), CMY2 (ptp3), and CMY23 (ptp2 ptp3). The strains were cultured in synthetic medium lacking uracil and tryptophan for 48 h at 30°C and diluted to 3.5 U (A₆₀₀), and fivefold serial dilutions were aliquoted into microtiter dishes. Dilutions were spotted by using a stainless steel pin replicator onto selective medium containing either glucose or galactose and lacking uracil and tryptophan. The plates were incubated at 30°C for 3 days.

Immunoblot analysis. The level of Mpk1-pY was monitored by immunoblotting. Cultures of mpk1, mpk1 ptp2, mpk1 ptp3, and mpk1 ptp2 ptp3 strains (in the BBY48 background) carrying p181-MPK1HA were grown to exponential phase at 25°C, heat shocked by the addition of an equal volume of medium at 53°C, and further incubated at 39°C. Cells from 10 ml of culture were harvested by centrifugation, resuspended in 60 µl of L1 buffer (29) (90 mM Na-HEPES [pH 7.5], 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 1 mM dithiothreitol [DTT]), and heated at 100°C for 3 min. On ice, 60 µl of L2 buffer (29) (50 mM Na-HEPES [pH 7.5], 5 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100) with protease inhibitors (leupeptin, pepstatin A, antipain, aprotinin, and chymostatin [each at 20 µg/ml] and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF; 35 µg/ml]) and protein phosphatase inhibitors (1 mM sodium orthovanadate and 40 mM -glycerophosphate) was added. Protein samples, 100 µg for anti-pY blots and 10 µg for anti-hemagglutinin (HA) blots, were boiled in sample buffer, and Western analysis was performed as described previously (33). Mpk1-pY was detected by immunoblotting with anti-pY antibody PY-99 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and Mpk1-HA was detected with anti-HA antibody 12CA5 (BAbCo). The secondary antibody was rabbit anti-mouse alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antibody (Promega). Immunoreactivity was visualized with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate and nitroblue tetrazolium (Promega).

Coprecipitation assay. Binding between mutant PTPs and Mpk1 was detected as follows. The catalytically inactive PTP mutants, Ptp2-C666S and Ptp3-C804A, were fused to the C terminus of GST under regulation of the GAL1-10 promoter in the vector pEG(KT). Plasmids pGST-PTP2-C666S (33), pGST-PTP3-C804A (33), and pEG(KT) were coexpressed with p181-MPK1HA in S. cerevisiae 334 (31). Yeast cells were grown at 30°C in synthetic medium lacking uracil and leucine and containing 2% galactose. Cells from 100 ml of culture grown at 30°C to ~1 U (A₆₀₀) were heat shocked by the addition of an equal volume of selective medium at 48°C and further incubated at 39°C for 25 min in prewarmed flasks. Cells were harvested by centrifugation and lysed by glass beading in ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl₂, 0.2% Triton X-100, 0.1% 2-mercaptoethanol, 50 mM -glycerophosphate) with protease inhibitors (leupeptin, pepstatin A, antipain, aprotinin, and chymostatin [each at 20 µg/ml] and 35 µg of PMSF per ml). The lysates were centrifuged, and the resulting supernatant was incubated with 45 µl of a 1:1 slurry of glutathione-Sepharose beads (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.). The beads were washed three times with 600 µl of lysis buffer and then three times with lysis buffer containing 400 mM NaCl. The beads were boiled in sample buffer and analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and immunoblotting.

Purification of Ptp2 and Ptp3 from E. coli. His₆-Ptp2 and His₆-Ptp3 were expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3)pLysS (Novagen) by using an inducible T7-based expression system. Cells were grown in 2× YT medium to early log phase, 0.3 U (A₆₀₀), cooled to 23°C for 1 h, induced with 0.5 mM isopropyl--D-thiogalactopyranoside, and grown to 1.0 U (A₆₀₀). To isolate His₆-PTPs, cells were lysed in sonication buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8], 100 mM NaCl), and the lysate was centrifuged at 17,000 × g for 15 min. The supernatant was incubated with 1.5 ml of Co²⁺ immobilized metal affinity resin (Talon; Clontech) for 4 h at 4°C. After binding, the beads were washed twice with 30 ml of sonication buffer. The resin was transferred to a column, washed with 3 bed volumes of 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8)-100 mM NaCl-10 mM imidazole, and eluted with 2 bed volumes of 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8)-100 mM NaCl-75 mM imidazole. Fractions containing His₆-PTPs were identified by immunoblotting with anti-His₆ antibody (BAbCo). Assays with the small-molecule phosphatase substrate p-nitrophenyl phosphate (PNPP) showed that PTPs had comparable but low activity. Incubation of 2.3 µg of PTPs with 20 mM PNPP in 50 mM imidazole (pH 7.5) and 1 mM DTT for 2.5 h at 30°C led to changes in A₄₀₅ of 0.263 for Ptp2 and 0.163 for Ptp3.

Ptp2 dephosphorylation of Mpk1-pY in vitro. GST-Mpk1 was isolated from the wild-type strain 334 (31), transformed with plasmid pGST-MPK1. The strain was grown to ~1 U (A₆₀₀) at 23°C in synthetic medium lacking uracil and containing 2% galactose. To activate GST-Mpk1, the culture was heat shocked by adding an equal volume of media heated to 55°C, which brought the final temperature to 39°C. After 1 h of incubation at 39°C, cells were harvested by centrifugation and ~1.2 × 10⁹ cells were lysed in 800 µl of buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM EGTA, 5 mM MgCl₂, 0.1% Triton X-100, 2.5 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM DTT, 50 mM -glycerophosphate, 35 µg of PMSF per ml, 20 µg each of aprotinin, leupeptin, pepstatin, chymostatin, and antipain per ml). The lysate was clarified by centrifugation and mixed with 70 µl of a 1:1 slurry of glutathione-Sepharose (Pharmacia) for 1 h at 4°C. The beads were washed twice with 1 ml of buffer A, twice with 1 ml of buffer B (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 250 mM NaCl, 5 mM EGTA, 5 mM MgCl₂, 2.5 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM DTT, 50 mM -glycerophosphate), twice with 500 µl of 1× phosphatase buffer (50 mM imidazole [pH 7.5], 3 mM DTT), and once with 300 µl of 2× phosphatase buffer. GST-Mpk1 bound to resin was resuspended in 2× phosphatase buffer and aliquoted into four 20-µl fractions, each containing ~100 ng of GST-Mpk1. Aliquots of bound GST-Mpk1 were incubated at 30°C for 1 h with 0 to 1 µg of Ptp2, with or without sodium orthovanadate (15 mM). The reaction was terminated by adding 300 µl of ice-cold buffer B and boiling in sample buffer. The samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. Half of the sample was immunoblotted with anti-pY antibody PY-99 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and the other half was immunoblotted with anti-GST antibody (Pharmacia).

RNA analysis. Yeast strains grown in YPD at 30°C to 1 U (A₆₀₀) were untreated or heat shocked by the addition of an equal volume of YPD prewarmed to 48°C. Heat-shocked cultures were further incubated for 2 h at 39°C in prewarmed flasks. Cells were harvested by centrifugation, and RNA was prepared by freezing in phenol and SDS (64). Total RNA, ~40 µg, was electrophoresed in formaldehyde-containing agarose gels, and hybridization was performed by standard methods (63). The blot was hybridized with ³²P-labeled probes to PTP2, PTP3, and TUB1. A 750-bp PstI fragment internal to the PTP2 open reading frame, a 1-kb ClaI fragment internal to the PTP3 open reading frame, and a 1.1-kb BglII-ClaI fragment from TUB1 were used to produce ³²P-labeled probes (63). The blots were quantified by PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics) analysis.

Fluorescence microscopy. Strains expressing GFP fusion proteins were grown to 1 U (A₆₀₀) in synthetic medium lacking leucine to select for plasmids. To visualize the nucleus, cultures were diluted to 0.5 U (A₆₀₀), 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) was added to a concentration of 2.5 µg/ml, and the cultures were grown under low-light conditions for 30 min at 30°C (27). Cells were adsorbed to polylysine-coated slides for 10 min and covered with coverslips. Fluorescence images were captured by using a Zeiss Axioplan fluorescence microscope with a Photometrics Sensys digital charge-coupled device camera system. Images were processed by using IP-LAB Spectrum software.

	RESULTS

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

Ptp2 and Ptp3 inactivate the cell wall integrity pathway in yeast. To test whether Ptp2 and Ptp3 could inactivate the cell wall integrity pathway, we determined whether overexpression of these phosphatases could alleviate growth defects due to mutations that hyperactivate this pathway. The MEKK mutation, BCK1-20, which leads to constitutive activation of this pathway, conferred a modest growth defect, where the doubling time in rich medium at 30°C was 110 min, compared to 90 min for the wild type (38). This growth defect is likely due to constitutive activation of the downstream MEKs, Mkk1 and Mkk2, and the MAPK, Mpk1 (32, 37). Multicopy plasmids bearing PTP2 or PTP3 were transformed into a strain expressing BCK1-20, and the growth of these strains was monitored in selective media at 30°C. Although only slight changes in doubling times were observed during exponential growth, overexpression of PTP2, but not PTP3, allowed BCK1-20 strains to reach a higher culture density after 24 h of growth (Fig. 1). Neither overexpression of PTP2 nor overexpression of PTP3 altered the growth of the wild type.

View larger version (5K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 1.   Ptp2 but not Ptp3 suppresses growth defects due to constitutive activation of the cell wall integrity pathway by the hyperactive MEKK mutation BCK1-20. DL245, a strain bearing a hyperactive MEKK allele, BCK1-20, and EG123, the isogenic wild-type strain, were transformed with a multicopy plasmid carrying PTP2 (p112PTP2), PTP3 (p112PTP3), or empty vector YEplac112. Cultures of these strains were diluted in selective medium and incubated at 30°C. The increase in optical density of the cultures at 600 nm was measured at the indicated times with a photoelectric colorimeter. Data shown are the average of at least two independent experiments. Strains: DL245/p112PTP2 (closed squares); DL245/p112PTP3 (closed triangles); DL245/YEplac112 (closed circles); EG123/YEplac112 (open circles); EG123/p112PTP3 (open triangles); EG123/p112PTP2 (open squares).

View larger version (25K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 2.   Growth defects associated with overexpression of a constitutively active MEK allele are altered by PTP expression level. (A) Overexpression of PTP2 suppressed the growth defect due to expression of the constitutively active MKK1 allele, MKK1-386, while strains lacking PTPs exacerbated these growth defects. Wild-type, ptp2, ptp3, and ptp2 ptp3 strains carrying pNV7MKK1386 and either YEplac112, p112PTP2, or p112PTP3 were grown in selective medium containing glucose. The cultures were normalized to 3.5 U (A600); fivefold serial dilutions were made, spotted onto synthetic medium containing galactose (left panel) or glucose (right panel), and incubated at 30°C. (B) The catalytic activity of Ptp2 is important for suppression of the growth defect due to MKK1-386. Wild-type JD52 carrying pNV7MKK1386 and either p22PTP2C666A, p112PTP2C666A, or p22PTP2 was grown in synthetic medium containing glucose, and growth was examined as for panel A.

ptp2 ptp3

Ptp2 and Ptp3 regulate Mpk1 Tyr phosphorylation in vivo. Overexpression of PTP2 suppressed growth defects due to constitutively active MEKK and MEK in this pathway. Thus, MAPK is the likely target of this phosphatase, since it requires phosphorylation of both a Thr and a Tyr residue in the phosphorylation lip sequence for activation (11, 42). Therefore, we examined whether Ptp2 and possibly Ptp3 could inactivate the pathway by dephosphorylating Mpk1-pY. To test this, the level of Mpk1-pY was monitored in wild-type and PTP deletion strains by using an anti-pY antibody, since it most directly assesses the role of PTPs. If the PTPs dephosphorylate Mpk1-pY, then PTP deletion strains should show higher levels of Mpk1-pY compared to the wild type after heat shock activation of Mpk1.

ptp2 ptp3

ptp2 ptp3

View larger version (6K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 3.   Ptp2 and Ptp3 regulate the level of Mpk1-pY in vivo. The level of Mpk1-pY was assessed in strains lacking either Ptp2, Ptp3, or both PTPs before and during continuous exposure to heat stress. Cultures were grown at 25°C, heat shocked at 39°C, and harvested at the indicated times. The samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-pY and anti-HA antibodies.

ptp2 ptp3

ptp2 ptp3

ptp2 ptp3

PTPs physically associate with Mpk1. If Mpk1 is a substrate for Ptp2 and Ptp3, it should be able to bind the PTPs. To test this, we used catalytically inactive PTPs since such mutants have been shown to bind their substrates with greater affinity than their wild-type counterparts (17, 66, 70, 73). Presumably, tighter binding occurs because the tyrosine-phosphorylated substrate is not hydrolyzed and as a result is not readily released from the enzyme (19, 70). Catalytically inactive Ptp2 (Ptp2-C666S) or Ptp3 (Ptp3-C804A) fused to GST was coexpressed with Mpk1-HA in yeast. Cells were heat shocked for 25 min at 39°C to activate Mpk1 and the GST-PTP proteins isolated on glutathione-Sepharose beads. Both GST-Ptp2-C666S and GST-Ptp3-C804A bound Mpk1-HA (Fig. 4). GST-PTP mutants also bound Mpk1 when cells were untreated, suggesting that Mpk1 phosphorylation is not required to bind PTPs (data not shown). Binding between PTPs and Mpk1 was specific since GST alone did not coprecipitate with Mpk1-HA (Fig. 4). In multiple experiments, the Ptp2 mutant bound more Mpk1-HA than the Ptp3 mutant. In addition, the interaction between GST-Ptp2-C666S and Mpk1 was more resistant to disruption by washing with buffer containing high concentrations of sodium chloride than the complex between Mpk1 and GST-Ptp3-C804A. These differences in binding are not due to differences in Mpk1-HA levels since they were the same in all strains (Fig. 4). That GST-Ptp2-C666S bound more Mpk1-HA than GST-Ptp3-C804A provides a possible biochemical mechanism for Ptp2 being a more effective negative regulator than Ptp3.

View larger version (53K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 4.   Ptp2 and Ptp3 bind Mpk1 in vitro. GST fusions to the catalytically inactive PTP mutants, GST-Ptp2C666S and GST-Ptp3C804A, or GST alone were coexpressed with Mpk1-HA in S. cerevisiae 334. After 25 min of heat stress at 39°C, cells were lysed by glass beading, and the GST-containing proteins were isolated by binding to glutathione-Sepharose. Following extensive washing, the bound proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-GST and anti-HA antibodies. Data shown are representative of three independent experiments.

Ptp2 dephosphorylates Mpk1-pY in vitro. Since the results above suggested that Ptp2 and Ptp3 inactivate Mpk1 directly, we tested whether they could dephosphorylate Mpk1-pY in vitro. Ptp2 and Ptp3 tagged with six His repeats at the amino terminus were expressed in E. coli and isolated by immobilized metal affinity chromatography. The PTPs were incubated with activated GST-Mpk1 isolated from heat-shocked yeast. Treatment of GST-Mpk1-pY with Ptp2 resulted in dephosphorylation of the pY residue in Mpk1, as judged by immunoblotting with anti-pY antibody (Fig. 5). Dephosphorylation was due to PTP activity since orthovanadate, an inhibitor of PTPs and dual-specificity phosphatases (26, 70), prevented dephosphorylation of Mpk1-pY. Dephosphorylation required the presence of a reducing agent, DTT (Fig. 5) or 2-mercaptoethanol (data not shown), which likely prevents oxidation of Cys666 in Ptp2, which acts as a nucleophile during dephosphorylation (26, 33, 73). Compared to Ptp2, Ptp3 had significantly weaker PTP activity toward GST-Mpk1-pY. Ptp2 and Ptp3 had similar abilities to dephosphorylate the small-molecule substrate, PNPP (see Materials and Methods). Approximately 3.3 times more PNPP units of Ptp3 did not dephosphorylate Mpk1-pY as well as Ptp2 (data not shown). Thus, Ptp2 but not Ptp3 is an effective protein phosphatase for Mpk1-pY in vitro.

View larger version (3K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 5.   Ptp2 dephosphorylates Mpk1-pY in vitro. Inactive GST-Mpk1 isolated from yeast grown at 23°C (lane 1) and active GST-Mpk1 isolated from yeast heat shocked at 39°C (lanes 2 to 6) were incubated for 1 h at 30°C with buffer alone (lanes 1 and 2), Ptp2 (lanes 3 and 4), Ptp2 in the presence of vanadate (lane 5), and Ptp2 in buffer lacking DTT (lane 6). The samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. Half of the sample was immunoblotted with anti-pY antibody, and the other half was immunoblotted with anti-GST antibody.

PTP2 transcript is elevated by heat shock in a Mpk1-dependent manner. Activation of MAPK pathways often leads to an increase in phosphatase transcript levels (24, 33, 50) and is generally thought to be required for adaptation. Therefore, we tested whether the cell wall integrity pathway upregulates the expression of PTPs. Since it was previously shown that the PTP2 transcript is upregulated in response to heat stress (59), we tested whether PTP2 and possibly PTP3 transcripts might be regulated in a Mpk1-dependent manner. In addition, since Hog1 is required for upregulation of PTP2 and PTP3 transcripts in response to osmotic stress (33), we tested whether Hog1 might also be required to induce PTPs in response to heat stress. Northern analysis was performed to examine the steady-state levels of PTP2 and PTP3 transcripts before and after heat shock for 2 h at 39°C (Fig. 6). Heat shock elevated the PTP2 transcript ~6-fold above the basal level in the wild-type and hog1 strains but not in the mpk1 or mpk1 hog1 strain. Thus, Mpk1, but not Hog1, is required to upregulate PTP2 expression in response to heat stress. No obvious increase in the level of PTP3 transcript was observed in response to heat stress. Since it was difficult to detect PTP3 by Northern analysis, a PTP3 promoter-lacZ fusion was constructed and integrated at the PTP3 locus. Heat shock did not alter the expression of PTP3::lacZ, as judged by assaying -galactosidase activity. Therefore, heat shock activation of the cell wall integrity pathway upregulates PTP2 but not PTP3 expression.

View larger version (10K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 6.   PTP2 transcript increases in response to heat shock in a Mpk1-dependent manner. The effect of heat shock on the steady-state level of PTP2 transcript was examined in wild-type, mpk1, hog1, and mpk1 hog1 strains by Northern analysis. Total RNA was isolated from untreated cells grown at 30°C or cells heat shocked at 39°C for 2 h. The Northern blot was probed with 32P-labeled PTP2 and TUB1 fragments and visualized by PhosphorImager analysis.

Ptp2 and Ptp3 are localized in different subcellular compartments. Ptp2 and Ptp3 show differences in the ability to inactivate the cell wall integrity pathway and other MAPK pathways. For example, Ptp2 is a more potent negative regulator of Mpk1 and Hog1 than Ptp3 (33, 73). In the pheromone response pathway, the opposite is true: Ptp3 has a greater influence than Ptp2 (76). We have shown that Ptp2 has greater activity toward Mpk1-pY in vitro than Ptp3. In vivo, an additional factor may be that Ptp2 and Ptp3 are localized in different compartments in the cell. This seems a reasonable hypothesis since Mpk1 is present in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm (34).

View larger version (10K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIG. 7.   Subcellular localization of Ptp2 and Ptp3. Exponentially growing cells of a ptp2 strain carrying pPTP2-GFP or a ptp3 strain carrying pPTP3-GFP were grown in the presence of DAPI (2.5 µg/ml) for 30 min under low-light conditions. GFP and DAPI were visualized by fluorescence microscopy.

	DISCUSSION

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

Protein phosphatases can be nonspecific or specific regulators of MAPK signaling pathways. For example, the vertebrate dual-specificity phosphatases MKP-1 and MKP-2 are nonspecific regulators, inactivating ERK, JNK/SAPK, and p38 (3, 4, 10, 42, 70). Other dual-specificity phosphatases, such as PAC1, recognize a subset of MAPK substrates, ERK and p38 (10). One vertebrate dual-specificity phosphatase, MKP-3, is highly specific for ERK (23, 53, 55, 56). In S. cerevisiae, the protein tyrosine-specific phosphatases Ptp2 and Ptp3 show differences in the ability to inactivate MAPK pathways. Ptp2 is a more effective negative regulator of Hog1 than Ptp3, while Ptp3 is a more effective negative regulator of Fus3 than Ptp2 (33, 73, 76).

To further examine the substrate specificities of Ptp2 and Ptp3, we tested whether they could inactivate another MAPK in yeast called Mpk1 and, if so, whether they would differ in the ability to inactivate Mpk1. We predicted that Ptp3 would be a more potent negative regulator of Mpk1 than Ptp2, since the phosphorylation lip sequences in Mpk1 and Fus3 are nearly identical but different from that in Hog1 (11). Our data show that both PTPs inactivate Mpk1, demonstrating that Ptp2 and Ptp3 regulate multiple MAPK pathways in yeast. Contrary to our prediction, however, Ptp2 is a more effective negative regulator of Mpk1 than Ptp3.

Genetic and biochemical data show that Ptp2 inactivates the cell wall integrity pathway by inactivating Mpk1. Multicopy expression of PTP2 suppressed growth defects due to the MEKK mutation, BCK1-20, and the MEK mutation, MKK1-386, that hyperactivate this pathway. In addition, deletion of PTP2 exacerbated growth defects due to MKK1-386 (Fig. 2). These results suggested that Ptp2 acts downstream of Mkk1. Since the catalytically inactive Ptp2 mutant, Ptp2-C666S, bound Mpk1-pY, and wild-type Ptp2 dephosphorylated Mpk1-pY in vitro, Ptp2 likely inactivates this pathway by dephosphorylating Mpk1-pY in vivo. Consistent with this, the level of Mpk1-pY in response to heat stress was higher in the ptp2 strain than in the wild-type strain.

Ptp3 also inactivates this pathway but is a weaker negative regulator than Ptp2. For example, multicopy expression of PTP2 suppressed growth defects due to the hyperactive MEKK and MEK alleles, but multicopy expression of PTP3 did not. Genetic interactions were observed, however, when PTP3 was deleted together with PTP2. Expression of the hyperactive MEK allele, MKK1-386, was lethal in the ptp2 ptp3 strain but not in either single PTP deletion strain. Biochemical data also support a role for Ptp3 in this pathway. Heat stress induced Mpk1-pY to a higher level in the ptp2 ptp3 strain compared to either single ptp mutant or the wild type. Coprecipitation and activity assays also indicate that Ptp3 inactivates Mpk1 but not as efficiently as Ptp2. Ptp3-C804A coprecipitated with Mpk1-pY, but it bound less Mpk1-pY than mutant Ptp2. Furthermore, Ptp3 was less effective than Ptp2 at dephosphorylating Mpk1-pY in vitro. These results taken together show that Ptp3 is a weaker negative regulator of Mpk1 than Ptp2 but has an important role in this pathway.

The differential localization of PTPs may also explain why Ptp2 is a more effective negative regulator than Ptp3. Fluorescence localization of Ptp2-GFP indicates that it is predominantly nuclear whereas Ptp3-GFP is chiefly cytoplasmic. This difference in localization is significant because MAPKs are present in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm, with activation of MAPKs often leading to their nuclear accumulation (8, 39). MAPK activation, however, does not always result in their nuclear translocation. For example, a significant fraction of active ERK has been shown to remain cytoplasmic after activation (21, 62). Interestingly, Mpk1 is concentrated in the nucleus at 24°C and becomes more uniformly distributed between the cytoplasm and the nucleus after 30 min of heat stress at 39°C (34). Thus, active Mpk1 may be present in both compartments. We speculate that at least some active Mpk1 is nuclear and that this nuclear Mpk1 is responsible for growth defects. This would explain why altering the expression level of PTP2 has a greater effect on the activity of this pathway than altering the expression of PTP3 (Fig. 1 and 2). Since we cannot rule out the possibility that some Ptp2 is cytoplasmic, Ptp2 may have a greater effect on this pathway for other reasons. As described above, Ptp2 binds Mpk1 more effectively than Ptp3 and dephosphorylates Mpk1-pY more efficiently than Ptp3. The combination of these effects likely accounts for the greater activity of Ptp2 on this pathway.

A further implication of the differential localization of Ptp2 and Ptp3 is that Mpk1-pY freely distributes between the nucleus and the cytoplasm. For example, the ptp2 and ptp3 strains dephosphorylate Mpk1-pY nearly as well as the wild type, although the ptp2 ptp3 strain shows a severe defect. Since nuclear Ptp2 can compensate for cytoplasmic Ptp3 in the ptp3 strain, this would suggest that cytoplasmic Mpk1-pY translocates to the nucleus to be dephosphorylated by nuclear Ptp2. In the ptp2 strain, nuclear Mpk1-pY becomes available to cytoplasmic Ptp3 upon Mpk1-pY redistribution to the cytoplasm. Thus, contrary to current hypotheses, dephosphorylation of MAPK may not be required for its export from the nucleus.

Analysis of the level of Mpk1-pY during heat shock activation suggests three roles for Ptp2 and Ptp3. One role is in maintaining a low basal activity of Mpk1. In the absence of heat stress, a low level of Mpk1-pY was observed in wild-type, ptp2, and ptp3 strains. The ptp2 ptp3 mutant, however, showed a significantly higher basal level of Mpk1-pY. These results are similar to those observed for Hog1 and Fus3. The ptp2 and ptp2 ptp3 strains had a high basal level of Hog1-pY (33, 73), and the ptp3 and ptp2 ptp3 strains had an increased basal level of Fus3-pY (76). Therefore, PTPs may prevent the activation of MAPKs in the absence of signal. A second role of PTPs, not seen in other MAPK pathways, is to set an upper limit on Mpk1 Tyr phosphorylation. Mpk1-pY reached a higher level in the single PTP deletion strains and in the ptp2 ptp3 strain compared to the wild type. Perhaps this mechanism prevents growth defects due to activation of a large fraction of Mpk1.

A third role for Ptp2 and Ptp3 is in adaptation, or inactivating Mpk1-pY during prolonged exposure to heat stress. Previously, it was reported that the level of Mpk1-pY remains high and shows no obvious decrease for up to 2 h of heat stress (75). In our strain background, however, heat stress induced Mpk1-pY to a maximum at ~15 min but began decreasing by 30 min. The reasons for these differences are not known but may be due to strain-specific effects. Since the level of Mpk1-pY decreased in our strain background, the role of PTPs in adaptation could be examined. We find that the level of Mpk1-pY remained high in both ptp2 and ptp2 ptp3 strains compared to the wild type, consistent with a role for PTPs in adaptation. The residual dephosphorylation of Mpk1-pY observed in the ptp2 ptp3 strain may be due to Msg5, a dual-specificity phosphatase isolated as a multicopy suppressor of MKK1-386 growth defects (71). That Msg5 acts as a negative regulator in this pathway is further supported by genetic evidence. Although ptp2 and msg5 strains are not lethal when MKK1-386 is overexpressed, it is lethal in a ptp2 msg5 strain (48). Whether Msg5 dephosphorylates Mpk1 remains to be tested.

Transcriptional activation of PTP2 may also play a role in adaptation. In this work, we showed that the PTP2 transcript is upregulated by heat shock in a Mpk1-dependent manner, suggesting that an increase in the level of Ptp2 is required to inactivate Mpk1. Similarly, osmotic stress elevates PTP2 and PTP3 transcripts in a Hog1-dependent manner (33). In S. pombe, osmotic stress induces expression of the protein tyrosine phosphatase, pyp2⁺, and this is dependent on the MAPK, Spc1 (50). This regulation is not limited to PTPs since dual-specificity phosphatases have also been shown to be induced by MAPK pathways in S. cerevisiae and vertebrates (3, 17, 47). Upregulation of protein phosphatases may therefore be a universal mechanism for MAPK pathway adaptation.

In summary, Ptp2 and Ptp3 are global regulators of MAPK signaling pathways since they inactivate at least three MAPKs, Hog1, Fus3, and Mpk1. These phosphatases show distinct preferences for MAPKs, as has been observed for dual-specificity phosphatases in vertebrates (42). Ptp2 is a more effective negative regulator of Mpk1 and Hog1 than Ptp3 (33, 73). In contrast, Ptp3 is a more potent negative regulator of Fus3 than Ptp2 (76). These differences are likely due to at least two factors. First, PTPs that are better able to bind their substrates more efficiently dephosphorylate their substrates. Ptp2 binds more Mpk1 and Hog1 than Ptp3, and Ptp2 more efficiently dephosphorylates Mpk1 (Fig. 4) and Hog1 (67) in vitro. Based on these results, we would predict that Ptp3 is better able to bind and dephosphorylate Fus3 than Ptp2. Second, the localization of PTPs likely influences their ability to inactivate MAPKs. We propose that the nuclear localization of Ptp2 contributes to its greater ability to dephosphorylate Mpk1 and Hog1, because a fraction of active Mpk1 and Hog1 accumulates in the nucleus (18, 34, 48). Further examination of how PTP localization influences their ability to inactivate MAPKs and identification of regions within PTPs responsible for discrimination between MAPKs is under way.