Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, November 1999, p. 7688-7696, Vol. 19, No. 11
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
RelB Modulation of I
B
Stability as a Mechanism of
Transcription Suppression of Interleukin-1
(IL-1
), IL-1
, and
Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha in Fibroblasts
Yiyang
Xia,1
Shizhong
Chen,1
Yibin
Wang,2
Nigel
Mackman,1
George
Ku,3
David
Lo,1 and
Lili
Feng1,*
Department of Immunology, The Scripps
Research Institute, La Jolla, California 920371;
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La
Jolla, California 920932; and Vertex
Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts
021393
Received 3 March 1999/Returned for modification 8 April
1999/Accepted 10 August 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Members of the NF-
B/RelB family of transcription factors play
important roles in the regulation of inflammatory and immune responses.
RelB, a member of this family, has been characterized as a
transcription activator and is involved in the constitutive NF-
B
activity in lymphoid tissues. However, in a previous study we observed
an overexpression of chemokines in RelB-deficient fibroblasts. Here we
show that RelB is an important transcription suppressor in fibroblasts
which limits the expression of proinflammatory mediators and may exert
its function by modulating the stability of I
B
protein.
Fibroblasts from relb
/
mice overexpress
interleukin-1
(IL-1
), IL-1
, and tumor necrosis factor alpha in
response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. These cells have an
augmented and prolonged LPS-inducible IKK activity and an accelerated
degradation which results in a diminished level of I
B
protein,
despite an upregulated I
B
mRNA expression. Consequently, NF-
B
activity was augmented and postinduction repression of NF-
B activity
was impaired in these cells. The increased
B-binding activity and
cytokine overexpression was suppressed by introducing RelB cDNA or a
dominant negative I
B
into relb
/
fibroblasts. Our findings suggest a novel transcription suppression function of RelB in fibroblasts.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Members of the Rel/NF-
B family of
transcription factors play a central role in the regulation of
inflammatory and immune responses (for recent reviews, please see
(1, 3, 4, 25, 46, 54). In vertebrates, NF-
B
consists of homo- or heterodimers of Rel (c-Rel), p65 (RelA), RelB, p50
(NFKB1), and p52 (NFKB2), all of which contain a conserved N-terminal
Rel homology domain that contains the DNA-binding and dimerization
domains and the nuclear localization signal. In most unstimulated
cells, a large portion of NF-
B is retained in the cytoplasm as
inactive complexes by a family of inhibitory proteins called I
B that
bind to the Rel homology domain and mask the nuclear localization
signal. There are at least five distinct I
B proteins, I
B
,
I
B
, I
B
, I
B
, and bcl-3; both the p105 precursor of p50
and the p100 precursor of p52 possess domains that function as I
Bs
as well. Upon cell stimulation by a wide variety of stimuli,
signal-responsive I
B kinases (IKK)
and
are activated and
phosphorylate two serine residues in the I
B proteins (14, 19,
36, 42, 43, 61, 63, 64). For I
B
and I
B
, the inducible
phosphorylation sites are serines 32 and 36 and serines 19 and 23, respectively (9, 10, 18, 51). The phosphorylated I
Bs are
subsequently ubiquitinated and targeted for degradation by the 26S
proteosome, releasing the NF-
B dimers to translocate to the nucleus
to activate the transcription of genes containing the so-called
B-binding site (2, 26, 48). Among the NF-
B-inducible
genes are I
B members, and the newly synthesized I
Bs quickly
interact with and inactivate NF-
B, leading to an autoregulation of
the NF-
B system (11, 45, 50). Both I
B
and I
B
function not only in the cytoplasm but also in the nucleus to inhibit
NF-
B activity; however, only I
B
is required for postinduction
repression of NF-
B (5, 52).
RelB shares many common features of the NF-
B family, and is a strong
transcriptional activator (7, 8, 21, 44). Unlike other
NF-
B members, however, RelB cannot form homodimers and only
associates efficiently with p50 and p52 (22). The RelB heterodimers have a much lower affinity for I
B
than other NF-
B complexes do and are less susceptible to inhibition by I
B
(22, 32). As a result, it is predicted that RelB will be
located in the nucleus and represent the constitutive NF-
B activity. Indeed, RelB heterodimers represent the major constitutive NF-
B activity in lymphoid tissues and are expressed at high levels in the
nuclei of interdigitating dendritic cells, suggesting an important role
for RelB in the constitutive expression of
B-regulated genes in
lymphoid tissues (13, 32, 33, 40, 56).
The implicated in vivo function of RelB in lymphoid tissues is
supported by studies of relb
/
mice (12,
17, 34, 57-60, 62). Mice deficient in RelB have a dramatic
reduction in constitutive
B-binding activity and specific defects in
lymphoid tissues, including the absence of mature lymphoid dendritic
cells, myeloid hyperplasia, and splenomegaly (12, 57).
relb
/
mice also have multifocal defects in
immune responses and fail to mount inflammatory reactions against a
number of pathogens (17, 60). Surprisingly,
relb
/
mice spontaneously develop a
persistent noninfectious multiorgan inflammatory syndrome (12, 34,
57). This apparent discrepancy suggests additional defects in
nonlymphoid tissues in relb
/
mice. In this
regard, we showed in our previous report that the multifocal
inflammation is due to non-bone-marrow-derived cells, that
lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated relb
/
fibroblasts overexpress chemokines and induce leukocyte recruitment into tissues, and that RelB, while being a transcriptional activator for
B-regulated genes in macrophages, acts as a transcription suppressor in fibroblasts (62). Our findings may provide
hints about the role that fibroblasts might play in the initial
leukocyte infiltration and how RelB might be involved in the regulation of this process (49, 62). Additional pathological changes, however, must be involved in the development of multiorgan inflammation in relb
/
mice. Cytokines which promote
inflammatory effector functions, including tumor necrosis factor alpha
(TNF-
), interleukin-1
(IL-1
), IL-1
, and gamma interferon,
are expressed at increased levels in the nonlymphoid organs of
relb
/
mice but have either normal or reduced
expression in lymphoid tissues; in particular, isolated
relb
/
macrophages are impaired in the
production of TNF-
(60, 62). Since macrophages are
normally the major source of TNF-
production, one wonders what the
probable cellular source of TNF-
and other cytokines in the
nonlymphoid organs of the relb
/
mice might
be, what molecular mechanisms are involved, and, especially, how RelB
may function in this process. In this report, we show that RelB is a
key transcriptional suppressor of cytokine expression in fibroblasts
and that its absence leads to the dysregulation of IL-1
, IL-1
,
and TNF-
expression in relb
/
fibroblasts.
We further demonstrate that RelB exerts its transcriptional suppressor
function through the stabilization of I
B
protein. These data
suggest new physiological roles for the NF-
B/Rel factors in the
regulation of inflammatory and immune responses and may provide
insights to uncover novel intra- and interfamily interactions of the
NF-
B/Rel and I
B regulatory molecules.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Animals.
relb
/
mice were generated and
characterized as previously described (12). The mice were
generated on an inbred C57BL/6J background and bred onto a B10.D2
background. The control mice were of B10.D2 origin. All experimental
procedures were carried out according to the guidelines listed in the
National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of
Laboratory Animals.
Cell culture and in vitro LPS stimulation.
Fibroblasts were
isolated from the kidneys of normal control and
relb
/
mice as previously described
(62) and were cultured in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium
(DMEM) plus 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Stable transfection of
fibroblasts with a RelB cDNA construct was performed as described
previously (62). For LPS stimulation, cells were serum
starved for 24 h and then treated with 1 µg of LPS (List
Biological Laboratories, Campbell, Calif.) per ml in DMEM plus 0.5%
FBS. The cells were harvested at different time points for RNA and
protein extraction.
RNA extraction and RNase protection assay.
Total RNA was
isolated from fibroblasts by a single-step method (16). cDNA
fragments of mouse IL-1
(bp 172 to 362; accession no. X01450),
IL-1
(bp 500 to 672; accession no. M15131), TNF-
(bp 429 to 556;
accession no. M11731), RelB (bp 1350 to 1603; accession no. M83380),
and I
B
(bp 372 to 632; accession no. U36277) were generated by
reverse transcription-PCR or by PCR amplification of cDNA templates.
The PCR products were cloned into pGEM4Z (Promega Corp., Madison, Wis.)
for the generation of
-32P-incorporated riboprobes.
RNase protection assays were performed as previously described
(62).
Luciferase assay.
The luciferase reporter plasmids
containing the wild-type or mutant TNF promoter were constructed as
described by others (23, 27) except that the chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase reporter vector was replaced by luciferase reporter
vector pGL2-Basic (Promega). The plasmids were transfected into
fibroblasts by electroporation with the setting of 280 V, 600 µF and
48
(BTX Electro Cell Manipulator 600; Genetronics, San Diego,
Calif.). At 48 h after the transfection, the cells were stimulated
with LPS for 12 h and were harvested for the luciferase assay.
This assay was performed with a luciferase assay kit (Promega), and the
light production was measured with a Monolight 2010 luminometer
(Analytical Luminescence Laboratory, San Diego, Calif.).
Nuclear extract and EMSA.
Nuclear extracts were prepared by
a published procedure (20). Electrophoretic mobility shift
assay (EMSA) was performed as described previously (62).
Briefly, 2 µg of nuclear extract was incubated for 15 min at 25°C
with a 32P-labeled oligonucleotide containing the
B site
from the murine intronic
chain
(5'-AGTTGAGGGGACTTTCCCAGG-3' [the NF-
B
consensus DNA binding motif is underlined]; Santa Cruz Biotechnology,
Inc., Santa Cruz, Calif.), and the reaction mixtures were
electrophoresed in a 6% polyacrylamide sequencing gel. For supershift
assays, the nuclear extract was preincubated with 1 µg of rabbit
anti-RelA serum for 20 min at 25°C before the addition of oligonucleotides.
Western blot analysis and ELISA.
The cytoplasm and nuclear
proteins from LPS-stimulated fibroblasts (5 µg per sample) were
electrophoresed in a NuPAGE gel (Novex, San Diego, Calif.) and
electroblotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The protein blots were
probed with rabbit antibodies against mouse RelA, RelB, I
B
,
I
B
(Santa Cruz), actin (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.), or
NF-
B-inducing kinase (NIK) (Torrey Pines Biolabs, San Marcos,
Calif.). The bound antibodies were detected with horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G antibody
(Pierce, Rockford, Ill.) and the SuperSignal Kit (Pierce). TNF-
protein was measured with a mouse enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
(ELISA) kit (Biosource International, Inc., Camarillo, Calif.).
Metabolic labeling and immunoprecipitation.
Prior to the
metabolic labeling, 2 × 106 fibroblasts were treated
with 1 µg of LPS per ml for 1 h. The cells were transferred to 1 ml of methionine- and cysteine-free DMEM plus 5% dialyzed FCS for
1 h, and then 0.2 mCi of Tran[35S] (ICN, Costa Mesa,
Calif.) was added to the medium. After 30 min, the cells were washed
with phosphate-buffered saline and incubated with the regular medium of
DMEM plus 10% FBS. The cells were harvested at different time points
and were lysed in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4)-100 mM NaCl-1 mM
EDTA-0.2% Nonidet P-40-0.1% Triton X-100. The cell lysates were
incubated with 1 µg of normal rabbit immunoglobulin G (Sigma) at
4°C for 1 h and with 10 µl of protein A-Sepharose (Pharmacia,
Piscataway, N.J.) for 30 min and then centrifuged for 10 min. The
precleared lysates were reacted with 1 µl of rabbit anti-I
B
antibody (Santa Cruz) at 4°C for 1 h and then with 10 µl of
protein A-Sepharose for 8 h. The immune complexes were
centrifuged, washed twice in phosphate-buffered saline, electrophoresed
in a Nu-PAGE gel (Novex), and visualized by autoradiography.
Production of adenovirus vectors and infection of
fibroblasts.
cDNA fragments containing the coding region of the
murine I
B
or a dominant negative mutant I
B
(53)
were subcloned into the shuttle plasmid pAdv/CMV (55). The
resulting plasmids, pAdv/CMV-I
Bwt and pAdv/CMV-I
Bmut, were each
cotransfected with a helper plasmid, pJM17, into 293T cells to generate
recombinant adenoviruses by a previously described method
(55). Recombinant adenoviruses confirmed by PCR analysis
were plaque purified and amplified in 293T cells. Concentrated
adenoviruses were prepared by CsCl gradient ultracentrifugation. The
titer of adenovirus was determined from DNA content of the viral
solution, with 1.0 optical density at 260 nm unit being equivalent to
1.0 × 1012 viral particles/ml. The adenovirus
construct Adv/
-gal, containing the
-galactosidase (
-Gal) cDNA,
was generated by a similar strategy. Infection of fibroblasts was done
by adding adenoviruses to the culture medium to a titer of 5,000 viral
particles/cell.
I
B
kinase assay.
The activities of I
B kinases of
fibroblasts were determined by an immunokinase assay (19,
39). After 24 h of serum starvation, the fibroblasts were
stimulated with LPS at 1 µg/ml of medium and collected at 0, 15, and
30 min and 1 and 4 h. The cells were disrupted in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 500 mM NaCl, 0.25% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 10 mM
-glycerophosphate, 10 mM NaF, 10 mM PNPP, 300 µM
Na3VO4, 1 mM benzamidine, 1 mM dithiothreitol, proteinase inhibitors) by repeated aspiration through a 21-gauge needle. The supernatant was incubated with 1.0 µg of anti-mouse IKK
polyclonal antibody (M280; Santa Cruz) at 4°C for 1 h and then with 20 µl of protein A-Sepharose (Pierce) for 8 h. The
immunocomplexes were then collected, washed, and suspended in 30 µl
of kinase buffer (20 mM HEPES [pH 7.6], 100 mM NaCl, 20 mM
-glycerophosphate, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM
P-nitrophenyl phosphate, 100 µM
Na3VO4, 10 µg of aprotinin per ml, 2 mM
dithiothreitol, 20 µM ATP, 5 µCi of [
-32P]ATP
[ICN]) with 5 µg of glutathione
S-transferase-I
B-
(1-54) as a substrate (19,
39). The reaction was stopped by adding 10 µl of 4× sodium
dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis sample buffer after
a 30-min incubation at 30°C. The samples were subjected to sodium
dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (12%
polyacrylamide) (Novex) and exposed to a film.
 |
RESULTS |
IL-1
, IL-1
, and TNF-
overexpression and TNF-
promoter
activation in LPS-stimulated relb
/
fibroblasts.
Normal fibroblasts do not express IL-1
, IL-1
,
and TNF-
, even when treated with LPS (Fig.
1A) (31). However, when
relb
/
fibroblasts were stimulated with LPS,
the mRNA expression of all three cytokines was dramatically induced
(Fig. 1A). The induction was readily detectable at 1 h after the
LPS stimulation, peaked at 4 to 8 h, and persisted through 24 h. To examine the expression of cytokine proteins, the
relb
/
fibroblasts culture medium was
analyzed by ELISA. We chose to analyze the TNF-
protein level
because its synthesis is regulated at both the transcription and
translation levels (6). The expression of TNF-
protein in
LPS-stimulated fibroblasts correlated well with its mRNA expression
(Fig. 1B).

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Expression of proinflammatory cytokines in normal and
relb / fibroblasts. (A) IL-1 , IL-1 ,
and TNF- mRNA expression in normal (N) and mutant (M) fibroblasts.
Total RNA from fibroblasts treated with LPS for the indicated times was
analyzed by the RNase protection assay. Riboprobes contain polylinker
sequences and are longer than the protected bands. The mouse L32 gene
was used as a housekeeping gene. (B) TNF- protein expression in
normal and mutant fibroblasts. Fibroblasts were treated with LPS, and
the culture medium was collected at the indicated time points for ELISA
analysis. (C) TNF- promoter activity in fibroblasts as determined by
the luciferase assay. Normal and relb /
fibroblasts were transfected with TNF- promoter-luciferase plasmids,
and the transfected cells were treated with LPS for 12 h and then
assayed for luciferase activities (arbitrary units), as described in
Materials and Methods. The results are from three independent
experiments (means ± standard deviations). Columns 1 and 2, normal and
relb / fibroblasts transfected with TNF
promoter-luciferase plasmid; column 3, relb /
fibroblasts transfected with a mutant TNF- promoter-luciferase
plasmid. (D) RelB cDNA-transfection of relb /
fibroblasts. The expression vector pcDNA, containing a RelB cDNA, was
used to transfect relb / fibroblasts. Total
RNA from positive clones was analyzed for RelB mRNA expression (a).
relb / fibroblasts transfected with pcDNA
vector only (b) and normal fibroblasts (c) were used as controls. (E)
Reversal of LPS-induced cytokine overexpression in
relb / fibroblasts by RelB cDNA transfection.
Normal fibroblasts (a), relb / fibroblasts
(b), relb / fibroblasts transfected with
pcDNA plasmid (c), and relb / fibroblasts
transfected with pcDNA vector containing a mouse RelB cDNA fragment (d)
were treated with LPS for the indicated times and then analyzed for
cytokine expression by the RNase protection assay.
|
|
To examine the effect of RelB deficiency on the promoter activity of
proinflammatory cytokine genes in fibroblasts, we transfected
into
normal and
relb
/
fibroblasts a reporter
plasmid of a luciferase gene under the
control of the TNF-

promoter.
The TNF-

promoter was chosen because
the TNF-

gene is
irreversibly silenced in the fibroblasts (
6).
After
treatment with LPS for 12 h, no luciferase activity was
detected
in the transfected normal fibroblasts; in contrast, a
significant level
of luciferase activity was induced in the transfected
relb
/
fibroblasts (Fig.
1C). A reporter
plasmid with a mutation in
one of the four

B sites in the TNF-

promoter had less than 50%
luciferase activity induced by LPS in
relb
/
fibroblasts (Fig.
1C), indicating that
the promoter activation
was related to NF-

B-mediated transcription
upregulation. These
results suggest that the RelB-deficient environment
has a direct
effect on LPS induction of cytokine promoters in
relb
/
fibroblasts, and excludes alterations
in cytokine genes as the
cause of cytokine expression these
cells.
Reverse of cytokine overexpression in
relb
/
fibroblasts by RelB cDNA
transfection.
Since the relb
/
fibroblasts were isolated from the kidneys of
relb
/
mice, the dysregulation of
proinflammatory cytokine expression in these cells could be the result
of developmental changes that were secondary to the RelB deficiency. To
verify the casual effect of RelB on the suppression of cytokine
expression in fibroblasts, RelB cDNA was transfected into
relb
/
fibroblasts. The expression of the
transfected RelB in relb
/
fibroblasts (Fig.
1D) completely abolished the overexpression of IL-1
, IL-1
, and
TNF-
mRNA induced by LPS (Fig. 1E). This result strongly suggests an
indispensable role of RelB in the transcription suppression of
proinflammatory cytokines in fibroblasts.
Augmented I
B
mRNA expression in
relb
/
fibroblasts.
The mutual
regulations of NF-
B and I
B activities play a primary role in the
control of NF-
B-activated genes. Since NF-
B molecules interact
with I
B molecules differently, this could lead to a hierarchy or
mutual regulation among different NF-
B members (22). In
particular, RelB is relatively resistant to I
B
inhibition and can
strongly induce the expression of I
B
. In our previous study, we
showed that LPS treatment of relb
/
fibroblasts led to an exaggerated and persistent activation of NF-
B
activity that was mainly attributed to RelA/p50 (62). Since
I
B
is the major inhibitor of RelA/p50 activity, RelB may exert
its transcriptional suppressor function in fibroblasts through the
regulation of I
B
activities. The mRNA expression of I
B
in
normal and relb
/
fibroblasts was therefore
analyzed. While I
B
mRNA was induced in both type of cells by LPS,
the induction was significantly augmented in mutants (Fig.
2A), probably the result of enhanced RelA/p50 activity. We then examined the stability of I
B
mRNA but
found no significant difference in the half-life of I
B
mRNAs in
normal and mutant fibroblasts (Fig. 2B and C). These results indicate
that I
B
mRNA expression is not down-regulated by RelB deficiency
in relb
/
fibroblasts.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Analysis of I B mRNA expression in fibroblasts. (A)
I B mRNA expression in normal (N) and
relb / (M) fibroblasts treated with LPS for
different periods. (B) Analysis of I B mRNA stability in
LPS-treated fibroblasts. Normal and mutant fibroblasts were treated
with LPS for 1 h before actinomycin D was added to stop mRNA
synthesis. Cells were harvested at 5, 10, 20, 30, and 60 min after the
addition of actinomycin D and analyzed for I B mRNA levels by an
RNase protection assay. (C) Graphic representation of the I B mRNA
half-life. The I B and L32 bands in panel B were quantitated by
phosphorimager scanning. The count of each I B band was factored
by that of the corresponding L32 band. The final value of each time
point is expressed as a percentage of that at time zero.
|
|
Rapid degradation of I
B
protein in
relb
/
fibroblasts.
Analysis of
I
B
protein levels, however, revealed a dramatic difference
between normal and relb
/
fibroblasts (Fig.
3A). The down-regulation of I
B
protein in relb
/
fibroblasts in the presence
of higher mRNA levels could be due to either translation suppression or
a decrease in protein stability. A metabolic labeling experiment was
carried out with LPS-stimulated normal and mutant cells to determine
the actual mechanism. The level of metabolically labeled I
B
protein in relbsup
/
fibroblasts at the
initial time point after a pulse-labeling was comparable to that in
normal fibroblasts (Fig. 3B), suggesting that the I
B
mRNA in
relb
/
fibroblasts can be translated and that
translational suppression is not the primary cause of I
B
protein
down-regulation in these cells. However, as early as 30 min after the
pulse-labeling, most of the newly synthesized I
B
protein
disappeared in the relb
/
fibroblasts (Fig.
3B), indicating a very rapid degradation. In contrast, the observed
half-life of I
B
in normal fibroblasts was on the order of 2 to
3 h, significantly longer than that in the mutant cells. This
indicated that the accelerated degradation of I
B
protein was
responsible for the decreased I
B
protein in
relb
/
fibroblasts.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Analysis of I B protein level in fibroblasts. (A)
I B protein level in normal (N) and mutant (M) fibroblasts.
Fibroblasts were treated with LPS for the indicated times. The cell
lysates were analyzed for I B protein by Western blotting. A total
of 5 µg of protein was used for each sample. The same blot was probed
for actin to ensure even loading. (B) Pulse-chase experiment to
determine the stability of I B in normal and
relb / fibroblasts. Cells were treated with
LPS for 1 h before being pulse-labeled for 1 h with
[35S]Met-[35S]Cys. The cells were then
chased with cold medium for the indicated times. The cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated with anti-I B antibody and analyzed as
described in Materials and Methods. (C) Western blot analysis of
different I B family members in normal (N) and
relb / (M) fibroblasts. Cells were treated
with LPS for the times shown. The cell lysates were analyzed for
I B , I B , and I B protein levels by Western blotting.
The same blots were reprobed with anti-actin antibody to show
comparable amounts of proteins in different lanes.
|
|
We also examined the protein levels of I

B

and I

B

in
LPS-stimulated normal and
relb
/
fibroblasts.
The I

B

protein level was also down-regulated in
relb
/
fibroblasts (Fig.
3C). I

B

protein was expressed at low levels
in both normal and
relb
/
fibroblasts and appeared to be
down-regulated in the mutant cells
(Fig.
3C). Since there is a
functional redundancy between I

B
and I

B

(
15) and
since the main functional difference between
I

B

and I

B

is
their divergent expression control, we focused
the rest of our study on
I

B

.
Impaired postinduction repression of NF-
B activity by I
B
in relb
/1
fibroblasts.
One
irreplaceable function of I
B
is the postinduction repression of
NF-
B activation, whereas its cytoplasmic retention of NF-
B can be
compensated for by other I
B proteins (5, 52). Newly
synthesized I
B
not only stops cytoplasmic NF-
B from entering the nucleus but also enters the nucleus to dissociate NF-
B binding to DNA and exports the bound NF-
B to the cytoplasm. The accelerated degradation may preempt the I
B
in LPS-stimulated
relb
/
fibroblasts from carrying out its
function in the postinduction repression, and this may be the
underlying cause of the prolonged activation of NF-
B activity and
persistent expression of cytokine mRNAs in LPS-stimulated
relb
/
fibroblasts. Since LPS-induced NF-
B
activity in fibroblasts consists mainly of p50 and RelA, we assessed
the pattern of RelA translocation in LPS-stimulated normal and
relb
/
fibroblasts by Western blot analysis.
In resting normal and mutant fibroblasts, RelA was located in the
cytoplasm. LPS stimulation induced a rapid RelA translocation from
cytoplasm to nucleus in both types of cells, peaking 30 min after LPS
stimulation. At 1 h after LPS stimulation, nuclear RelA in normal
fibroblasts was significantly reduced, and 3 h later it was much
lower than that in the cytoplasm (Fig. 4A,
top). In mutant cell, however, the
nuclear localization of RelA in relb
/
fibroblasts was significantly prolonged. A large portion of RelA persisted in the nucleus even at 3 h after the LPS stimulation (Fig. 4A, bottom), indicating an impaired postinduction termination of
RelA nuclear localization in the mutant cells.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
LPS induction and postinduction repression of NF- B
nuclear localization. Normal and relb /
fibroblasts were treated with LPS for the times shown. Cytoplasmic (cy)
and nuclear (nu) extracts were prepared for Western blot analysis of
RelA protein (A) or RelB protein (B).
|
|
RelB has a low affinity for I

B

and is less susceptible to
inhibition by I

B

(
22). Compared to RelA, RelB has a
very different
subcellular distribution (Fig.
4B), with a major portion
being
located in the nucleus even in unstimulated fibroblasts. LPS
stimulation
may slightly increase the nuclear translocation of RelB in
these
cells.
Presence of I
B
in the nucleus of normal fibroblasts.
A
similar level of nuclear translocation of RelA during the first 30 min
of LPS stimulation of normal and relb
/
fibroblasts suggests a difference in the RelA activity in these cells:
the
B-binding of RelA is much lower in the normal cells than in the
mutants (62). In the presence of proteosome inhibitor, I
B
has been detected in the nucleus in unstimulated endothelial cells (41). To investigate whether I
B
localizes in the
nuclei of unstimulated fibroblasts, we performed Western blot analysis of subcellular fractions of normal fibroblasts. As shown in Fig. 5, I
B
was clearly detectable in the
nucleus, albeit at a lower level than in the cytoplasm. To rule out the
possibility of contamination of the nuclear fraction by cytoplasm, the
same blot was reprobed with antiserum to NIK, a cytoplasmic protein
(35). The exclusive localization of NIK in the cytoplasm
indicated that our preparation of the nuclear fraction was free of
cytoplasmic input. The preexistence of I
B
in the nuclei of normal
fibroblasts may account for the low
B-binding activity of RelA in
these cells.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Analysis subcellular distribution of I B protein in
fibroblasts. Cytoplasmic (cy) and nuclear (nu) extracts were prepared
from resting normal fibroblasts and analyzed by Western blotting.
I B protein can be detected in both the cytoplasmic and nuclear
extracts. The same blot was reprobed with anti-NIK antibody to ensure
that the nuclear extract was free of cytosolic proteins.
|
|
Reverse of cytokine overexpression in
relb
/
fibroblasts by a dominant negative
mutant of I
B
.
Our data presented above suggested the
importance of I
B
stability in the regulation of NK-
B activity
in fibroblasts as well as a connection between I
B
destabilization
in relb
/
fibroblasts and the overexpression
of cytokines in these cells. To further demonstrate the relationship
between the I
B
stability and the regulation of cytokine
expression in fibroblasts, we used an adenovirus vector carrying a
dominant negative mutant of I
B
(Adv/I
M) (53). In
this I
B
variant, serines 32 and 36 were substituted with
alanines. I
M is therefore resistant to phosphorylation-induced degradation and is a potent and specific inhibitor of NF-
B.
Adv/I
M and a control adenovirus vector, Adv/
-Gal, were used to
infect normal and relb
/
fibroblasts, and the
infected cells were studied for LPS stimulation. Infection of Adv/I
M
resulted in a high level of I
B
mRNA in both normal and mutant
fibroblasts, indicating that the infection was successful (data not
shown). Adv/I
M infection of relb
/
fibroblasts recovered I
B
protein to a level comparable to that in
the normal fibroblasts (Fig. 6A). The
overexpression of cytokine mRNAs in LPS-stimulated
relb
/
fibroblasts was dramatically reversed
by Adv/I
M infection, although a weak induction of IL-1
and
IL-1
mRNAs was still detectable compared with that in the normal
fibroblasts (Fig. 6B). This indicates that the transcription
suppression of cytokines by RelB in fibroblasts can be partially
compensated by the expression of a stable I
B
.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Effects of a dominant negative mutant I B (I M)
on cytokine expression and NF- B activity in fibroblasts. (A)
Analysis of I B and I B proteins in resting or LPS-treated
normal fibroblasts, relb / fibroblasts, and
Adv/I M-infected relb / fibroblasts. Cells
were treated with LPS for 3 h or left untreated. Cytoplasmic (Cy)
and nuclear (nu) extracts were prepared and analyzed by Western
immunoblotting. (B) Suppression of LPS-induced cytokine overexpression
in relb / fibroblasts by Adv/I M infection.
Normal and relb / fibroblasts with no
adenovirus infection (N), Adv/ -Gal infection (G), or Adv/I M
infection (I M) were treated with LPS for 4 h. IL-1 , IL-1 ,
and TNF- mRNA expression in these cells were analyzed by an RNase
protection assay. (C) Effect of I M on RelA nuclear localization.
Adv/I M- or Adv/ -Gal-infected relb /
fibroblasts were treated with LPS for the indicated times. Cytoplasmic
(cy) and nuclear (nu) extracts of these cells were prepared and
analyzed for RelA protein by Western blotting. (D) Effect of I M on
NF- B activity in fibroblasts. Normal fibroblasts (a)
relb / fibroblasts (b),
relb / fibroblasts infected with Adv/ -Gal
(c), or relb / fibroblasts infected with
Adv/I M (d) were treated with LPS for 2 h or left untreated.
Nuclear extracts of these cells were analyzed by EMSA or supershift
EMSA, as described in Materials and Methods.
|
|
To study NF-

B activation and postinduction repression in the
infected fibroblasts, we examined RelA nuclear translocation
in these
cells. Adv/I

M- and Adv/

-Gal-infected
relb
/
fibroblasts all showed a 30-min peak
of RelA nuclear translocation
similar to that observed in normal and
relb
/
fibroblasts (compare Fig.
6C and
4A).
The RelA nuclear translocation
in Adv/I

M-infected
relb
/
fibroblasts was probably due to the
degradation of endogenous
I

B

, while the higher proportion of RelA
retained in the cytoplasm
in these cells implicated the effect of
I

M. Compared with
relb
/
fibroblasts and
Adv/

-Gal-infected
relb
/
fibroblasts, the
nuclear portion of RelA was reduced in Adv/I

M-infected
relB
/
fibroblasts at 1 and 3 h after
LPS stimulation; however, a significant
amount of RelA still existed in
Adv/I

M-infected
relb
/
fibroblasts. We
then analyzed the

B-binding activity of NF-

B
in these cells by
EMSA. The basal and LPS-induced NF-

B activity
was increased in
relb
/
fibroblasts compared to normal
fibroblasts (Fig.
6D), as we reported
previously (
62). The
increase was further augmented in Adv/

-Gal-infect
relb
/
fibroblasts, probably in response to
adenovirus infection. Supershift
experiments showed that the increased
DNA-binding activity was
mostly attributed to RelA. Adv/I

M infection
of
relb
/
fibroblasts, on the other hand,
reduced DNA-binding activity
in these cells (Fig.
6D). Despite the
significant presence of
RelA in the nuclei of Adv/I

M-infected
relb
/
fibroblasts, the

B-binding activity
in these cells was suppressed,
implicating a function of I

B

in
the nucleus of
fibroblasts.
Increased I
B
phosphorylation by I
B kinases.
IKK
phosphorylation of I
B
is the key step in LPS-induced I
B
degradation. To address the potential cause of accelerated degradation
of I
B
protein in LPS-treated relb
/
fibroblasts, we compared the expression level and activity of IKK
and IKK
in normal and mutant cells. We did not detect a difference
in IKK
or IKK
mRNA (data not shown) and protein levels in normal
and relb
/
fibroblasts (Fig.
7). In resting cells, the basal IKK
activity was low and comparable in normal and mutant cells (Fig. 7).
However, after LPS stimulation, the IKK activity was significantly
augmented and prolonged in relb
/
fibroblasts
compared with normal fibroblasts, causing an increased and persistent
I
B
phosphorylation (Fig. 7). This prolonged activation of IKK may
explain the observed destabilization of I
B
, I
B
, and
I
B
in relb
/
fibroblasts.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
LPS-induced IKK activity in normal and
relb / (mutant) fibroblasts. Fibroblasts were
stimulated with 1 µg of LPS per ml for the indicated times, and cell
lysate was prepared. I B kinase complex was immunoprecipitated from
400 µg of lysate, and kinase activity was determined by using
GST-I B (top). The same samples (10-µg portions) were used for
Western blot analysis by anti-mouse IKK polyclonal antibody
(bottom).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, we have shown that RelB plays an indispensable role
in the suppression of cytokine expression in fibroblasts. IL-1
,
IL-1
, and TNF-
expression are dysregulated in LPS-stimulated relb
/
fibroblasts, and this dysregulation
can be reversed by RelB cDNA transfection. This result is consistent
with our previous observation of overexpression of chemokines in
activated relb
/
fibroblasts. Together, our
findings provide a plausible explanation for the multiorgan
inflammation of relb
/
mice. We have also
provided evidence that the overexpression of NF-
B-activated genes in
relb
/
fibroblasts is a result of I
B
destabilization in these cells, suggesting that RelB exerts its effect
in normal fibroblasts by affecting the inhibitory function of I
B
on RelA or other NF-
B molecules. These results ascribe a
transcription suppression function to the NF-
B/Rel family of
transcription factors previously thought of exclusively as activators,
and they suggest a new mode of intra- and interfamily interaction among
the NF-
B/Rel and its coevolved I
B families of regulators.
Multiorgan inflammation in relb
/
mice
as the result of RelB deficiency-associated defects in lymphoid and
nonlymphoid tissues.
By virtue of its low affinity with I
B
(22), RelB is unique among the NF-
B/Rel family of
transcription factors in that it is located in the nucleus and has
constitutive NF-
B activity in lymphoid tissues (13, 32, 33,
56). As a result, RelB is believed to be responsible for the
constitutive expression of NF-
B-regulated genes in the lymphoid
organs and to play important housekeeping roles in the immune system.
Indeed, when RelB genes are disrupted in transgenic mice, multifocal
defects develop in the lymphoid organs of
relb
/
mice, including the disappearance of
thymic medulla and dendritic cells, dramatically enlarged spleen, and
loss of lymph nodes and Peyer's patches (12, 34, 57).
Inflammatory and immune functions are also affected in these mice
(17, 58, 60). Interestingly, relb
/
mice develop overwhelming inflammation
in multiple nonlymphoid organs (12, 34, 57). The multiorgan
inflammation is T-cell dependent and may be caused by autoreactive
T-cell clones in these mice (17, 58). However, adoptive
transfer and bone marrow chimera studies reveal that the inflammation
is not dependent on the defects in relb
/
T
cells (17, 62). We then, after careful examination of the lymphoid system, looked into possible defects in nonlymphoid tissues and investigated whether the multiorgan inflammation might be rooted in
nonimmune cells.
The finding that
relb
/
fibroblasts
overexpress chemokines in response to LPS and TNF-

stimulation
provided the first hint
of RelB deficiency-related defects in nonimmune
cells (
62).
Chemokine overexpression is associated with an
exaggerated and
prolonged activation of NF-

B activity, attributed
mainly to p50
and RelA. This prompted us to examine other
NF-

B-regulated genes.
Unlike chemokines, IL-1

, IL-1

, and
TNF-

are not expressed in
fibroblasts, even when stimulated with
LPS. Kruys et al. had shown
that TNF-

gene locus is extinct in
fibroblasts (
31). We found
that IL-1

, IL-1

, and
TNF-

are dramatically and persistently
induced in LPS-stimulated
relb
/
fibroblasts (Fig.
1A), suggesting an
important role of RelB in
the extinction of cytokine expression in
fibroblasts. The overexpression
of both chemokines and cytokines can be
reversed by RelB cDNA
transfection (Fig.
2) (
62), proving
that the dysregulation of
gene expression in
relb
/
fibroblasts is a direct result of RelB
deficiency. RelB-mediated
gene suppression does not seem to be gene
dose dependent. Fibroblasts
from heterozygotic
relb
/
mice express less RelB but behave in
the same manner as wild-type
fibroblasts in terms of cytokine
expression; in addition, RelB
antisense oligonucleotides and anti-RelB
antibody to did not change
the extinction of IL-1

, IL-1

, and
TNF-

expression in these
cells (data not shown). It remains to be
investigated whether
RelB alone can account for the mechanism of
TNF extinction in
fibroblasts, as demonstrated by Kruys et al.
(
31); our findings
nonetheless provide an example of how
such extinction can be
altered.
Kruys et al. also anticipated that disruption of proper inactivation of
the TNF locus may lead to diseases with inflammatory
characteristics
(
31). Our results seem to substantiate this
prediction. In
an in vivo leukocyte recruitment analysis (
62),
LPS-stimulated
relb
/
fibroblasts elicited a
significantly greater granulocytic infiltrate
than did similarly
treated normal fibroblasts, suggesting that
the overexpression of
proinflammatory mediators in
relb
/
fibroblasts is physiopathologically relevant. We, along with
others,
have observed increased cytokine expression in nonlymphoid
tissues in
relb
/
mice, but the cytokine expression in
lymphoid tissue was either
normal or reduced and TNF-

production was
impaired in
relb
/
macrophages (
57,
60,
62). The mutant fibroblasts may in
part account for the increased
expression of cytokines and play
a role in multiorgan inflammation in
relb
/
mice. Autoreactive (
17) or
otherwise defective (
58) T cells
may activate fibroblasts to
release chemokines and cytokines.
Once activated, the fibroblasts
attract more leukocytes into the
affected tissues and enter a prolonged
activation state until
the animals
succumb.
RelB modulation of I
B
stability in fibroblasts.
Our
studies further suggest that the suppressive effect of RelB on cytokine
expression in fibroblasts is mediated, at least in part, by modulating
the stability of I
B
protein. When stimulated by LPS, normal and
relb
/
fibroblasts have a similar pattern of
RelA nuclear translocation (Fig. 4A). The
B-binding activity of RelA
in normal fibroblasts, however, is much lower than that in mutant cells
(Fig. 6D) (62), perhaps due to preexisting I
B
in the
nucleus (Fig. 5). I
B
is the primary inhibitor of NF-
B
activity. It has been shown previously that while not efficiently
inhibited by I
B
, RelB can strongly induce the expression of
I
B
and may inhibit RelA or c-Rel activities by driving the
expression of I
B
(22, 24). In normal fibroblasts, a
large portion of RelB is located in the nucleus (Fig. 4B). Intuitively,
one would suspect the overexpression of proinflammatory mediators in
relb
/
fibroblasts to be the result of
insufficient I
B
expression in these cells. However, we have found
no reduction in the I
B
mRNA level in the mutant cells; in fact,
I
B
mRNA expression in LPS-stimulated
relb
/
fibroblasts was increased compared
with that in similarly treated normal fibroblasts.
Surprisingly, with a normal or increased mRNA level, the I

B

protein level was markedly decreased in
relb
/
fibroblasts, indicating either a
suppressed translation of I

B
mRNA or an accelerated degradation
of I

B

protein in the mutant
cells. Pulse-chase experiments
revealed that the de novo I

B
protein synthesis was comparable in
LPS-treated normal and
relb
/
fibroblasts.
However, the newly synthesized I

B

protein was
very unstable in
the mutant cells. The half-life of I

B

in LPS-stimulated
normal
fibroblasts is on the order of 2 to 3 h, but the half-life
in
LPS-stimulated mutant cells is less than 30 min. The rapid
degradation
of I

B

in LPS-stimulated
relb
/
fibroblasts not only leads to a dramatic induction of NF-

B activity
and RelA nuclear localization but also impairs the postinduction
repression of NF-

B activity. The persistent NF-

B activation,
rapid I

B

degradation, and overexpression of IL-1

, IL-1

, and
TNF-

can be all reversed by RelB cDNA transfection (Fig.
1D and
data
not shown), strongly implicating a connection between RelB
deficiency,
I

B

destabilization, and NF-

B-activated cytokine
expression in
relb
/
fibroblasts. The relationship between
I

B

destabilization and
overexpression of cytokines in
relb
/
fibroblasts is further demonstrated by
the introduction of I

M,
a dominant negative mutant of I

B

, into
relb
/
fibroblasts. I

M is stable in
relb
/
fibroblasts and, significantly, is
able to reverse the overexpression
of cytokines in these cells (Fig.
6B).
The mechanism of I

B

destabilization in
relb
/
fibroblast, and therefore its
corresponding mechanism of I

B

stabilization
by RelB in normal
fibroblasts, may be direct or indirect. In normal
fibroblasts, both
RelB and I

B

exist in the nucleus, and so an
interaction between
the two proteins is a formal possibility.
On the other hand, RelB is
known to have a low affinity for I

B

,
and it is the inefficient
binding with I

B

that allows RelB to
enter and remain in the
nucleus (
22). We have not been able
to detect any direct
association of I

B

with RelB in fibroblasts.
Alternatively, RelB
may affect the stability of I

B

indirectly.
Enhanced constitutive
I

B

degradation has been reported by several
groups (
37,
47), and a number of different I

B

degradation
pathways have
been identified (
28,
38). Our data from the
I

M experiment
suggest that I

B

degradation in
relb
/
fibroblasts is Ser-32/36 dependent, hence implicating the prototypic
I

B

degradation pathway (
54). Since unstimulated
relb
/
fibroblasts do not express cytokines
and chemokines constitutively,
an inducible phosphorylation step may be
involved in initiating
the breakdown of I

B

. Since the inducible
phosphorylation of
Ser-32/36 of I

B

is triggered by IKKs, the
expression level and
activities of IKK were examined. We did not detect
a difference
in IKK mRNA (data not shown) and protein levels in
LPS-stimulated
normal and
relb
/
fibroblasts
(Fig.
7), suggesting that IKK up-regulation may not
be the cause of
accelerated degradation of I

B

in the mutant
cells. The basal IKK
activity was low and comparable in both normal
and mutant cells.
However, LPS-induced IKK activity was significantly
higher and more
prolonged in mutant cells than in normal cells
(Fig.
7). The kinetics
of LPS-induced IKK activity in
relb
/
fibroblasts coincides with the degradation of I

B

(Fig.
3B)
and
the overexpression of cytokine mRNA (Fig.
1A). This result
suggests
that the effect of RelB on I

B

stability is mediated
at least
partially by affecting IKK activity. Since IKK activity
in normal
fibroblasts was also induced by LPS, the relative importance
of the
augmented IKK activation in mutant cells to the cytokine
overexpression
remains to be investigated, perhaps by using kinase-inactive
forms of
IKKs. The postphosphorylation steps may play important
roles in the
degradation of I

B

in fibroblasts. RelB may affect
these steps
indirectly, either by up-regulation of a stabilizing
protein(s) that
binds to or modifies I

B

or by down-regulation
of a protein(s)
that participates in the degradation of I

B

(
54).
It is
noteworthy that I

B

in LPS-stimulated
relb
/
fibroblasts is unstable despite a
significantly increased RelA
level, a condition that generally promotes
binding and the subsequent
stabilization of I

B

(
45).
Perhaps a factor facilitating the
I

B

/RelA interaction is missing
in the mutant cells due to the
RelB deficiency. Regardless of the
actual mechanism of RelB stabilization
of I

B, our results suggest
that by modulating the protein stability
of I

B

, a hierarchy
control of one NF-

B by another NF-

B member
may be
achieved.
Besides the stabilization of I

B

, RelB seems to have additional
effects on the suppression of cytokine expression in fibroblasts.
While
the expression of I

M significantly suppresses cytokine
expression in
LPS-stimulated
relb
/
fibroblasts, the effect
is not as complete as RelB cDNA transfection
(compare Fig.
1E and
6A).
It is also important to note the in
vitro nature of our system in this
study, and the findings need
to be confirmed in vivo, preferably by
tissue-specific knockout
of the
relb gene in mice. Moreover,
the developmental programs
or pathways that determine how RelB would
function have yet to
be investigated. We, along with others, have shown
that RelB is
a transcription activator of chemokines and TNF-

in
macrophages
(
60,
62). In fibroblasts, however, RelB plays
the role of
transcription suppressor of these genes. Is RelB
differentially
modified in different cells? When RAW 264.7 macrophages
were fused
with NIH 3T3 fibroblasts to generate a stable hybrid, Kruys
et
al. noted that
trans-dominant factors contributed by the
fibroblasts
act to silence the TNF genes contributed by macrophages
(
31).
What is the nature of such
trans-dominant
factors? DNA methylation
plays a critical role in the extinction of
TNF-

genes in the
macrophage-fibroblast hybrid (
31). RelB
is a key player for

B-dependent gene demethylation in B cells
(
29,
30) but functions
differently in DNA methylation in
fibroblasts (
61a). What might
be the molecular basis for
this tissue-specific function of RelB?
Our experimental system may
provide a tool to address these novel
and fundamental issues concerning
the NF-

B/Rel family of transcription
factors and their regulators,
the I

Bs. In particular, ours is
the first to address the
transcription suppression function of
the NF-

B molecules. Our data
further suggest a new mode of interfamily
interaction between the
NF-

B/Rel and I

B molecules and a resultant
hierarchy structure in
the intrafamily regulation of NF-

B
activity.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We are grateful to Jiahuai Han for the luciferase assay
construct, to Carole Banka and Curtis B. Wilson for helpful
suggestions, and to Pauline Pess for secretarial assistance.
This work was supported in part by NIH grants AR40770, DK49832 (L. Feng), AI 38375 (D. Lo), and 5T32 A107244 (S. Chen). Y. Xia was the
recipient of a fellowship from the National Kidney Foundation of
Southern California.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Immunology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037. Phone: (858) 784-8262. Fax: (858) 784-8558. E-mail:
llfimm{at}scripps.edu.
Publication 12172-IMM from the Department of Immunology, The
Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, Calif.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Baeuerle, P. A., and D. Baltimore.
1996.
NF- B: ten years after.
Cell
87:13-20[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Baeuerle, P. A., and T. Henkel.
1994.
Function and activation of NF- B in the immune system.
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
12:141-179[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Baldwin, A. S., Jr.
1996.
The NF- B and I B proteins: new discoveries and insights.
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
14:649-683[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Barnes, P. J., and M. Karin.
1997.
Nuclear factor- B: a pivotal transcription factor in chronic inflammatory diseases.
N. Engl. Med.
336:1066-1071[Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Beg, A. A.,
W. C. Sha,
R. T. Bronson, and D. Baltimore.
1995.
Constitutive NF- B activation, enhanced granulopoiesis, and neonatal lethality in I B -deficient mice.
Genes Dev.
9:2736-2746[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Beutler, B., and V. Kruys.
1995.
Lipopolysaccharide signal transduction, regulation of tumor necrosis factor biosynthesis, and signaling by tumor necrosis factor itself.
J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol.
25(Suppl. 2):S1-S8.
|
| 7.
|
Bours, V.,
V. Azarenko,
E. Dejardin, and U. Siebenlist.
1994.
Human RelB (I-Rel) functions as a B site-dependent transactivating member of the family of Rel-related proteins.
Oncogene
9:1699-1702[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Bours, V.,
P. R. Burd,
K. Brown,
J. Villalobos,
S. Park,
R. P. Ryseck,
R. Bravo,
K. Kelly, and U. Siebenlist.
1992.
A novel mitogen-inducible gene product related to p50/p105-NF- B participates in transactivation through a B site.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:685-695[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Brockman, J. A.,
D. C. Scherer,
T. A. McKinsey,
S. M. Hall,
X. Qi,
W. Y. Lee, and D. W. Ballard.
1995.
Coupling of a signal response domain in I B to multiple pathways for NF- B activation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:2809-2818[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Brown, K.,
S. Gerstberger,
L. Carlson,
G. Franzoso, and U. Siebenlist.
1995.
Control of I B- proteolysis by site-specific, signal-induced phosphorylation.
Science
267:1485-1488[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Brown, K.,
S. Park,
T. Kanno,
G. Franzoso, and U. Siebenlist.
1993.
Mutual regulation of the transcriptional activator NF- B and its inhibitor, I B- .
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:2532-2536[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Burkly, L.,
C. Hession,
L. Ogata,
C. Reilly,
L. A. Marconi,
D. Olson,
R. Tizard,
R. Cate, and D. Lo.
1995.
Expression of relB is required for the development of thymic medulla and dendritic cells.
Nature
373:531-536[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Carrasco, D.,
R. P. Ryseck, and R. Bravo.
1993.
Expression of relB transcripts during lymphoid organ development: specific expression in dendritic antigen-presenting cells.
Development
118:1221-1231[Abstract].
|
| 14.
|
Chen, Z. J.,
L. Parent, and T. Maniatis.
1996.
Site-specific phosphorylation of I B by a novel ubiquitination-dependent protein kinase activity.
Cell
84:853-862[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Cheng, J. D.,
R. P. Ryseck,
R. M. Attar,
D. Dambach, and R. Bravo.
1998.
Functional redundancy of the nuclear factor B inhibitors I B and I B .
J. Exp. Med.
188:1055-1062[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Chomczynski, P., and N. Sacchi.
1987.
Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction.
Anal. Biochem.
162:156-159[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
DeKoning, J.,
L. DiMolfetto,
C. Reilly,
Q. Wei,
W. L. Havran, and D. Lo.
1997.
Thymic cortical epithelium is sufficient for the development of mature T cells in relB-deficient mice.
J. Immunol.
158:2558-2566[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
DiDonato, J.,
F. Mercurio,
C. Rosette,
J. Wu-Li,
H. Suyang,
S. Ghosh, and M. Karin.
1996.
Mapping of the inducible I B phosphorylation sites that signal its ubiquitination and degradation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:1295-1304[Abstract].
|
| 19.
|
DiDonato, J. A.,
M. Hayakawa,
D. M. Rothwarf,
E. Zandi, and M. Karin.
1997.
A cytokine-responsive I B kinase that activates the transcription factor NK- B.
Nature
388:548-554[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Dignam, J. D.,
R. M. Lebovitz, and R. G. Roeder.
1983.
Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei.
Nucleic Acids Res.
11:1475-1489[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Dobrzanski, P.,
R. P. Ryseck, and R. Bravo.
1993.
Both N- and C-terminal domains of RelB are required for full transactivation: role of the N-terminal leucine zipper-like motif.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:1572-1582[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Dobrzanski, P.,
R. P. Ryseck, and R. Bravo.
1994.
Differential interactions of Rel-NF- B complexes with I B determine pools of constitutive and inducible NF- B activity.
EMBO J.
13:4608-4616[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Drouet, C.,
A. N. Shakhov, and C. V. Jongeneel.
1991.
Enhancers and transcription factors controlling the inducibility of the tumor necrosis factor- promoter in primary macrophages.
J. Immunol.
147:1694-1700[Abstract].
|
| 24.
|
Ferreira, V.,
N. Tarantino, and M. Korner.
1998.
Discrimination between RelA and RelB transcriptional regulation by a dominant negative mutant of I B .
J. Biol. Chem.
273:592-599[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Ghosh, S.,
M. J. May, and E. B. Kopp.
1998.
NF- B and rel proteins: evolutionarily conserved mediators of immune responses.
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
16:225-260[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Grilli, M.,
J. J. Chiu, and M. J. Lenardo.
1993.
NF- B and Rel: participants in a multiform transcriptional regulatory system.
Int. Rev. Cytol.
143:1-62[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Han, J.,
G. Huez, and B. Beutler.
1991.
Interactive effects of the tumor necrosis factor promoter and 3'-untranslated regions.
J. Immunol.
146:1843-1848[Abstract].
|
| 28.
|
Imbert, V.,
R. A. Rupec,
A. Livolsi,
H. L. Pahl,
E. B. Traenckner,
C. Mueller-Dieckmann,
D. Farahifar,
B. Rossi,
P. Auberger,
P. A. Baeuerle, and J. F. Peyron.
1996.
Tyrosine phosphorylation of I B- activates NF- B without proteolytic degradation of I B- .
Cell
86:787-798[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Kirillov, A.,
B. Kistler,
R. Mostoslavsky,
H. Cedar,
T. Wirth, and Y. Bergman.
1996.
A role for nuclear NF- B in B-cell-specific demethylation of the Ig locus.
Nat. Genet.
13:435-441[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Kistler, B.,
B. Baumann,
Y. Bergman, and T. Wirth.
1997.
RelB is a key player for both B-dependent transcription and demethylation in B cells.
Immunobiology
198:24-34[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Kruys, V.,
P. Thompson, and B. Beutler.
1993.
Extinction of the tumor necrosis factor locus, and of genes encoding the lipopolysaccharide signaling pathway.
J. Exp. Med.
177:1383-1390[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Lernbecher, T.,
B. Kistler, and T. Wirth.
1994.
Two distinct mechanisms contribute to the constitutive activation of RelB in lymphoid cells.
EMBO J.
13:4060-4069[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Lernbecher, T.,
U. Muller, and T. Wirth.
1993.
Distinct NF- B/Rel transcription factors are responsible for tissue-specific and inducible gene activation.
Nature
365:767-770[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Lo, D.,
H. Quill,
L. Burkly,
B. Scott,
R. D. Palmiter, and R. L. Brinster.
1992.
A recessive defect in lymphocyte or granulocyte function caused by an integrated transgene.
Am. J. Pathol.
141:1237-1246[Abstract].
|
| 35.
|
Malinin, N. L.,
M. P. Boldin,
A. V. Kovalenko, and D. Wallach.
1997.
MAP3K-related kinase involved in NF- B induction by TNF, CD95 and IL-1.
Nature
385:540-544[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Mercurio, F.,
H. Zhu,
B. W. Murray,
A. Shevchenko,
B. L. Bennett,
J. Li,
D. B. Young,
M. Barbosa,
M. Mann,
A. Manning, and A. Rao.
1997.
IKK-1 and IKK-2: cytokine-activated I B kinases essential for NF- B activation.
Science
278:860-866[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Miyamoto, S.,
P. J. Chiao, and I. M. Verma.
1994.
Enhanced I B degradation is responsible for constitutive NF- B activity in mature murine B-cell lines.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:3276-3282[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Miyamoto, S.,
B. J. Seufzer, and S. D. Shumway.
1998.
Novel I B proteolytic pathway in WEHI231 immature B cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:19-29[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
O'Connell, M. A.,
B. L. Bennett,
F. Mercurio,
A. M. Manning, and N. Mackman.
1998.
Role of IKK1 and IKK2 in lipopolysaccharide signaling in human monocytic cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:30410-30414[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Pettit, A. R.,
C. Quinn,
K. P. MacDonald,
L. L. Cavanagh,
G. Thomas,
W. Townsend,
M. Handel, and R. Thomas.
1997.
Nuclear localization of RelB is associated with effective antigen-presenting cell function.
J. Immunol.
159:3681-3691[Abstract].
|
| 41.
|
Read, M. A.,
A. S. Neish,
M. E. Gerritsen, and T. Collins.
1996.
Postinduction transcriptional repression of E-selectin and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1.
J. Immunol.
157:3472-3479[Abstract].
|
| 42.
|
Regnier, C. H.,
H. Y. Song,
X. Gao,
D. V. Goeddel,
Z. Cao, and M. Rothe.
1997.
Identification and characterization of an I B kinase.
Cell
90:373-383[Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Rothwarf, D. M.,
E. Zandi,
G. Natoli, and M. Karin.
1998.
IKK- is an essential regulatory subunit of the I B kinase complex.
Nature
395:297-300[Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Ryseck, R. P.,
P. Bull,
M. Takamiya,
V. Bours,
U. Siebenlist,
P. Dobrzanski, and R. Bravo.
1992.
RelB, a new Rel family transcription activator that can interact with p50-NF- B.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:674-684[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Scott, M. L.,
T. Fujita,
H. C. Liou,
G. P. Nolan, and D. Baltimore.
1993.
The p65 subunit of NF- B regulates I B by two distinct mechanisms.
Genes Dev.
7:1266-1276[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Sha, W. C.
1998.
Regulation of immune responses by NF- B/Rel transcription factor.
J. Exp. Med.
187:143-146[Free Full Text]. (Erratum, 187:661.)
|
| 47.
|
Shattuck-Brandt, R. L., and A. Richmond.
1997.
Enhanced degradation of I- B contributes to endogenous activation of NF- B in Hs294T melanoma cells.
Cancer Res.
57:3032-3039[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Siebenlist, U.,
G. Franzoso, and K. Brown.
1994.
Structure, regulation and function of NF- B.
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
10:405-455.
|
| 49.
|
Smith, R. S.,
T. J. Smith,
T. M. Blieden, and R. P. Phipps.
1997.
Fibroblasts as sentinel cells. Synthesis of chemokines and regulation of inflammation.
Am. J. Pathol.
151:317-322[Abstract].
|
| 50.
|
Sun, S. C.,
P. A. Ganchi,
D. W. Ballard, and W. C. Greene.
1993.
NF- B controls expression of inhibitor I B : evidence for an inducible autoregulatory pathway.
Science
259:1912-1915[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Traenckner, E. B.,
H. L. Pahl,
T. Henkel,
K. N. Schmidt,
S. Wilk, and P. A. Baeuerle.
1995.
Phosphorylation of human I B- on serines 32 and 36 controls I B- proteolysis and NF- B activation in response to diverse stimuli.
EMBO J.
14:2876-2883[Medline].
|
| 52.
|
Tran, K.,
M. Merika, and D. Thanos.
1997.
Distinct functional properties of I B and I B .
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:5386-5399[Abstract].
|
| 53.
|
Van Antwerp, D. J.,
S. J. Martin,
T. Kafri,
D. R. Green, and I. M. Verma.
1996.
Suppression of TNF- -induced apoptosis by NF- B.
Science
274:787-789[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 54.
|
Verma, I. M.,
J. K. Stevenson,
E. M. Schwarz,
D. Van Antwerp, and S. Miyamoto.
1995.
Rel/NF- B/I B family: intimate tales of association and dissociation.
Genes Dev.
9:2723-2735[Free Full Text].
|
| 55.
|
Wang, Y.,
L. A. Krushel, and G. M. Edelman.
1996.
Targeted DNA recombination in vivo using an adenovirus carrying the cre recombinase gene.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:3932-3936[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 56.
|
Weih, F.,
D. Carrasco, and R. Bravo.
1994.
Constitutive and inducible Rel/NF- B activities in mouse thymus and spleen.
Oncogene
9:3289-3297[Medline].
|
| 57.
|
Weih, F.,
D. Carrasco,
S. K. Durham,
D. S. Barton,
C. A. Rizzo,
R. P. Ryseck,
S. A. Lira, and R. Bravo.
1995.
Multiorgan inflammation and hematopoietic abnormalities in mice with a targeted disruption of RelB, a member of the NF- B/Rel family.
Cell
80:331-340[Medline].
|
| 58.
|
Weih, F.,
S. K. Durham,
D. S. Barton,
W. C. Sha,
D. Baltimore, and R. Bravo.
1996.
Both multiorgan inflammation and myeloid hyperplasia in RelB-deficient mice are T cell dependent.
J. Immunol.
157:3974-3979[Abstract].
|
| 59.
|
Weih, F.,
S. K. Durham,
D. S. Barton,
W. C. Sha,
D. Baltimore, and R. Bravo.
1997.
p50-NF- B complexes partially compensate for the absence of RelB: severely increased pathology in p50( / )relB( / ) double-knockout mice.
J. Exp. Med.
185:1359-1370[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 60.
|
Weih, F.,
G. Warr,
H. Yang, and R. Bravo.
1997.
Multifocal defects in immune responses in RelB-deficient mice.
J. Immunol.
158:5211-5218[Abstract].
|
| 61.
|
Woronicz, J. D.,
X. Gao,
Z. Cao,
M. Rothe, and D. V. Goeddel.
1997.
I B kinase- : NF- B activation and complex formation with I B kinase- and NIK.
Science
278:866-869[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 61a.
| Xia, Y., and L. Feng. Unpublished observations.
|
| 62.
|
Xia, Y.,
M. E. Pauza,
L. Feng, and D. Lo.
1997.
RelB regulation of chemokine expression modulates local inflammation.
Am. J. Pathol.
151:375-387[Abstract].
|
| 63.
|
Zandi, E.,
Y. Chen, and M. Karin.
1998.
Direct phosphorylation of I B by IKK and IKK : discrimination between free and NF- B-bound substrate.
Science
281:1360-1363[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 64.
|
Zandi, E.,
D. M. Rothwarf,
M. Delhase,
M. Hayakawa, and M. Karin.
1997.
The I B kinase complex (IKK) contains two kinase subunits, IKK and IKK , necessary for I B phosphorylation and NF- B activation.
Cell
91:243-252[Medline].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, November 1999, p. 7688-7696, Vol. 19, No. 11
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Chen, X., El Gazzar, M., Yoza, B. K., McCall, C. E.
(2009). The NF-{kappa}B Factor RelB and Histone H3 Lysine Methyltransferase G9a Directly Interact to Generate Epigenetic Silencing in Endotoxin Tolerance. J. Biol. Chem.
284: 27857-27865
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wang, X., Belguise, K., O'Neill, C. F., Sanchez-Morgan, N., Romagnoli, M., Eddy, S. F., Mineva, N. D., Yu, Z., Min, C., Trinkaus-Randall, V., Chalbos, D., Sonenshein, G. E.
(2009). RelB NF-{kappa}B Represses Estrogen Receptor {alpha} Expression via Induction of the Zinc Finger Protein Blimp1. Mol. Cell. Biol.
29: 3832-3844
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yang, S.-R., Yao, H., Rajendrasozhan, S., Chung, S., Edirisinghe, I., Valvo, S., Fromm, G., McCabe, M. J. Jr., Sime, P. J., Phipps, R. P., Li, J.-D., Bulger, M., Rahman, I.
(2009). RelB Is Differentially Regulated by I{kappa}B Kinase-{alpha} in B Cells and Mouse Lung by Cigarette Smoke. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.
40: 147-158
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wright, C. W., Duckett, C. S.
(2009). The Aryl Hydrocarbon Nuclear Translocator Alters CD30-Mediated NF-{kappa}B-Dependent Transcription. Science
323: 251-255
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Baglole, C. J., Maggirwar, S. B., Gasiewicz, T. A., Thatcher, T. H., Phipps, R. P., Sime, P. J.
(2008). The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Attenuates Tobacco Smoke-induced Cyclooxygenase-2 and Prostaglandin Production in Lung Fibroblasts through Regulation of the NF-{kappa}B Family Member RelB. J. Biol. Chem.
283: 28944-28957
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gazzar, M. E., Yoza, B. K., Hu, J. Y.-Q., Cousart, S. L., McCall, C. E.
(2007). Epigenetic Silencing of Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha} during Endotoxin Tolerance. J. Biol. Chem.
282: 26857-26864
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jorgl, A., Platzer, B., Taschner, S., Heinz, L. X., Hocher, B., Reisner, P. M., Gobel, F., Strobl, H.
(2007). Human Langerhans-cell activation triggered in vitro by conditionally expressed MKK6 is counterregulated by the downstream effector RelB. Blood
109: 185-193
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yoza, B. K., Hu, J. Y.-Q., Cousart, S. L., Forrest, L. M., McCall, C. E.
(2006). Induction of RelB Participates in Endotoxin Tolerance. J. Immunol.
177: 4080-4085
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Starkey, J. M., Haidacher, S. J., LeJeune, W. S., Zhang, X., Tieu, B. C., Choudhary, S., Brasier, A. R., Denner, L. A., Tilton, R. G.
(2006). Diabetes-Induced Activation of Canonical and Noncanonical Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Pathways in Renal Cortex.. Diabetes
55: 1252-1259
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jacque, E., Tchenio, T., Piton, G., Romeo, P.-H., Baud, V.
(2005). RelA repression of RelB activity induces selective gene activation downstream of TNF receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
102: 14635-14640
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Oakley, F., Mann, J., Nailard, S., Smart, D. E., Mungalsingh, N., Constandinou, C., Ali, S., Wilson, S. J., Millward-Sadler, H., Iredale, J. P., Mann, D. A.
(2005). Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B1 (p50) Limits the Inflammatory and Fibrogenic Responses to Chronic Injury. Am. J. Pathol.
166: 695-708
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wang, X., Li, X., Xu, L., Zhan, Y., Yaish-Ohad, S., Erhardt, J. A., Barone, F. C., Feuerstein, G. Z.
(2003). Up-Regulation of Secretory Leukocyte Protease Inhibitor (SLPI) in the Brain after Ischemic Stroke: Adenoviral Expression of SLPI Protects Brain from Ischemic Injury. Mol. Pharmacol.
64: 833-840
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Derudder, E., Dejardin, E., Pritchard, L. L., Green, D. R., Korner, M., Baud, V.
(2003). RelB/p50 Dimers Are Differentially Regulated by Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} and Lymphotoxin-{beta} Receptor Activation: CRITICAL ROLES FOR p100. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 23278-23284
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Elewaut, D., Shaikh, R. B., Hammond, K. J. L., De Winter, H., Leishman, A. J., Sidobre, S., Turovskaya, O., Prigozy, T. I., Ma, L., Banks, T. A., Lo, D., Ware, C. F., Cheroutre, H., Kronenberg, M.
(2003). NIK-dependent RelB Activation Defines a Unique Signaling Pathway for the Development of V{alpha}14i NKT Cells. JEM
197: 1623-1633
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Marienfeld, R., May, M. J., Berberich, I., Serfling, E., Ghosh, S., Neumann, M.
(2003). RelB Forms Transcriptionally Inactive Complexes with RelA/p65. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 19852-19860
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Weaver, D. J. Jr., Poligone, B., Bui, T., Abdel-Motal, U. M., Baldwin, A. S. Jr., Tisch, R.
(2001). Dendritic Cells from Nonobese Diabetic Mice Exhibit a Defect in NF-{kappa}B Regulation Due to a Hyperactive I{kappa}B Kinase. J. Immunol.
167: 1461-1468
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yoo, C.-G., Lee, S., Lee, C.-T., Kim, Y. W., Han, S. K., Shim, Y.-S.
(2000). Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Heat Shock Protein Induction Is Related to Stabilization of I{kappa}B{alpha} Through Preventing I{kappa}B Kinase Activation in Respiratory Epithelial Cells. J. Immunol.
164: 5416-5423
[Abstract]
[Full Text]