Received 13 May 1999/Returned for modification 23 June
1999/Accepted 23 August 1999
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The posttranscriptional acquisition
of a poly(A) tail on the 3' ends of eukaryotic mRNAs is an essential
process which promotes transcription termination (7) and
transport of the mRNA from the nucleus (14). The poly(A)
tail is also important for optimal translation and for regulating mRNA
stability (10, 32, 36, 41). Polyadenylation requires two
events
site-specific endonucleolytic cleavage of primary transcripts
followed by poly(A) addition to the upstream fragment. While these two
steps are closely coupled in vivo, they can be experimentally uncoupled
in vitro and assayed separately, allowing biochemical characterization
of the protein components required for each individual step. Such
studies have revealed a remarkable conservation in the factors needed
for polyadenylation in mammals and in the yeast Saccharomyces
cerevisiae, in spite of differences in the sequence and
organization of RNA signals which specify this processing event (for
recent reviews, see references 25, 40, and
42).
However, differences have been found in the composition of the various
factors which make up the basic polyadenylation machinery of these
organisms. Some proteins appear to be unique to one or the other
system. For example, in yeast, three factors (CF IA, CF IB, and CF II)
are sufficient for accurate cleavage of precursor. CF IA consists of
four polypeptides: Rna14, Rna15, Pcf11, and p50 (19, 33). CF
IB is the Hrp1 protein (18). Rna14 and Rna15 are thought to
be homologs of the p77 and p64 subunits of the mammalian CstF cleavage
factor (39). On the other hand, counterparts to Pcf11 and
Hrp1 have not yet been found in the mammalian system.
We recently described the purification of the yeast CF II by use of its
ability to reconstitute the cleavage reaction in the presence of CF IA
and CF IB (43). It contains four polypeptides, Cft1/Yhh1,
Cft2/Ydh1, Brr5/Ysh1, and a 90-kDa protein whose identity was not
determined. The three known proteins are homologs to the three largest
subunits of the mammalian cleavage-polyadenylation specificity factor
(CPSF), an activity required for both cleavage and poly(A) addition. In
yeast, the poly(A) addition step needs CF IA, CF IB, polyadenylation
factor I (PF I), and the yeast poly(A) polymerase, Pap1 (6,
19). In these studies, CF II activity was not required for
poly(A) addition, raising the possibility that it might not be a strict
functional analog of CPSF. However, extracts depleted of Brr5/Ysh1 or
Cft1/Yhh1 by immunoprecipitation were defective for both cleavage and
poly(A) addition (5, 38). Resolution of this apparent
difference has come with the recent purification of a multiprotein
complex from yeast containing PF I activity (33). This
complex contained Pap1, Fip1 (a protein which interacts directly with
Pap1), Yth1 (a yeast homolog of the CPSF 30-kDa subunit), Pta1 (an
essential gene affecting pre-tRNA splicing), several uncharacterized
proteins, and, surprisingly, the Cft1/Yhh1, Cft2/Ydh1, and Brr5/Ysh1
subunits of CF II. A mutation in Pta1 was also shown to affect the
poly(A) addition step in vitro (33).
The requirement of specific components of CF II in cleavage and/or
poly(A) addition of yeast mRNA precursor can be fully addressed only
once an active factor composed of recombinant subunits is available.
Until that time, it is important to thoroughly probe the functions of
these subunits through the analysis of in vitro systems derived from
wild-type and mutant cells. In this report, we use this approach to
characterize new properties of Pta1, i.e., its copurification with the
CF II cleavage factor, its previously unsuspected contribution to the
cleavage step, and the requirement of Pta1 for accumulation of complex
containing the other CF II subunits.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Yeast strains, media, and genetic techniques.
Yeast strains
and their relevant genotypes were FY41 (MATa ura3-52
leu2-
1 trp1
63 his4-917
; F. Winston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.), FY1284 (MATa pta1-2 ura3-52
ade8 his4-917
; F. Winston), POC8-23d (MATa
pta1-1 ade2-1 leu2-
1 lys2 trp1-
101 ura3-52
[31]), LM113 (MATa ran14-1
his3-11,15 ade2-1 ura3-1 [26]), YSN399
(brr5-1 MAT
ura3-52 his3-
200 ade2-1000 leu2-
1 lys2-801a TRP1 [30]), and LM96
(fip1-1 ade2-1 his3-11 leu2-3,112 trp1-1 ura3-1
[34]).
Cell culturing and extract preparation.
S. cerevisiae
strains were cultured in YPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2%
glucose) supplemented with ampicillin (50 mg/liter) at 30°C to reach
an optical density at 600 nm of 1.0 to 1.5. Whole-cell extracts were
prepared by a modification of the method previously described by
Kessler et al. (19). The cultured cells were harvested by
centrifugation at 5,000 × g at 25°C for 15 min,
weighed, and resuspended at 5 ml/g of cells in buffer A (1 M sorbitol,
50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.8], 10 mM MgCl2, 30 mM
-mercaptoethanol). Usually, 3 to 4 g of cells was obtained from
1 liter of culture. The cell suspensions were rotated at 30°C for 30 min and collected by centrifugation at 5,000 × g for
10 min at 4°C. The cell pellets were weighed and resuspended at 2 ml/g of cells in buffer B (10 mM HEPES-KOH [pH 7.0], 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol [DTT], 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.6 µM leupeptin, and 2 µM pepstatin
A). The cells were disrupted with an equal volume of glass beads
(0.5-mm diameter) by four cycles of 30 s of agitation with 1 min
of cooling on ice between cycles. The extracts were then adjusted to
0.2 M KCl, rotated gently for 30 min at 4°C, and cleared by
centrifugation at 35,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C. Additional insoluble material was removed by centrifugation at 225,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C. Solid ammonium sulfate was then added to 40% saturation and stirred for 30 min at 4°C. Precipitated proteins were collected by centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 20 min; resuspended in 300 µl of buffer C (20 mM
Tris-HCl [pH 7.90], 0.2 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 0.5 mM DTT) with 50 mM KCl, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.6 µM leupeptin, and 2 µM pepstatin A; and dialyzed against the same buffer (1 liter with
one change) for 2 h.
mRNA substrates.
Capped, 32P-labeled mRNAs used
as substrates in the processing assays were prepared from the following
plasmids by in vitro transcription of linearized DNAs as described by
Chen and Moore (6). Full-length GAL7-1 RNA
containing the GAL7 poly(A) site and flanking sequences was
prepared from pJCGAL7-1 (6). Precleaved substrate
GAL7-9 lacking sequences downstream of the poly(A) site was
prepared from pJCGAL7-9 (6). CYC1 pre-mRNA was
transcribed from pGYC1 (4). All precursor RNAs were purified
from 5% acrylamide-8.3 M urea gels (37), precipitated
twice with ethanol, and stored frozen at
20°C in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.0.
Protein isolation and analysis.
CF II was purified from
yeast crude whole-cell extracts as described previously
(43). The CF II samples used for assays in this study were
from the poly(A)-Sepharose step of the published purification protocol
(43). The CF I fraction from the heparin-Sepharose step was
obtained as described elsewhere (19).
The CF II-containing sample from the poly(A)-Sepharose step was
separated on a sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel, and the
gel was stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. The 90-kDa protein band
was excised from the gel and submitted for microsequencing at the
Harvard University Microchemistry Facility (Cambridge, Mass.), by using
collisionally activated dissociation on a Finnigan TSO 7000 triple
quadruple mass spectrometer.
SDS-polyacrylamide gels were prepared and run according to the method
of Laemmli (21). Silver staining was performed according to
the method of Gottlieb and Chavko (12) with the Silver
Staining Plus kit from Bio-Rad.
Antibodies, Western blotting, and immunoprecipitations.
Polyclonal antibodies against Cft2 were produced from mice immunized
with recombinant protein made in Escherichia coli, by a
method described by Kessler et al. (19). Rabbit antisera to Cft1 (38), Brr5/Ysh1 (16), and Fip1
(34) were gifts from the respective authors. The monoclonal
antibody directed against Pap1 was prepared as tissue culture
supernatant (20). For Pta1 antibody, the
EcoRI-XhoI fragment of PTA1 was cloned
into the same sites in pET23c (Novagen). Recombinant protein was made
in the BL21(DE3) strain of E. coli and purified with nickel
agarose according to standard protocols from Novagen. Hybridomas
secreting monoclonal antibodies directed against Pta1 were produced by
immunizing BALB/c mice with this fragment of Pta1. Ascites fluid was
made by intraperitoneal injection of hybridoma cell lines into
pristane-treated BALB/c mice by standard techniques. The Yth1
polyclonal antibody was produced in mice as described elsewhere
(19) with a recombinant glutathione
S-transferase-Yth1 fusion protein (Pharmacia), which had
been expressed and purified according to the manufacturer's specifications.
Immunoblotting assays were done according to standard procedures
(37). Monoclonal antibodies specific for Pap1 and Pta1 were
used at dilutions of 1:50 and 1:1,000, respectively, in
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with 2% bovine serum albumin.
Polyclonal antibodies were diluted 1:1,000 in the above buffer.
For coimmunoprecipitation experiments, 20 µl of protein A-agarose
beads (Gibco) was equilibrated in PBS buffer, mixed with 1 to 2 µl of
polyclonal antibodies against Fip1 or Cft1 in a final volume of 40 µl
or with 50 µl of monoclonal anti-Pap1 antibody, and incubated at room
temperature for 2 h to allow antibodies to bind to beads. The
beads were then washed once with 1 ml of PBS and twice with 1 ml of 0.2 M sodium borate, pH 9.0. Antibodies were cross-linked to the beads by
adding 0.2 ml of 20 mM dimethylsuberimidate (Sigma) in 0.2 M sodium
borate, pH 9.0, followed by incubation at room temperature for 30 min
(13). The coupling reaction was stopped by washing the beads
with 1 ml of 0.2 M ethanolamine (pH 8.0) and incubation of the beads in
the same solution for 2 h at room temperature. The beads were then
washed once with immunoprecipitation (IP) buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH
7.9], 150 mM KCl, and 0.1% NP-40) followed by washing in sequence
with the following solutions to remove uncoupled antibodies (once with
20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.9]-150 mM KCl-2 M NaCl and then with 1 ml of
50 mM glycine [pH 3.0]-500 mM NaCl and finally equilibrated with IP
buffer). In some experiments, the Pap1 antibody was coupled to protein
A-Sepharose beads by using anti-immunoglobulin G antibody as a bridge.
Whole-cell extract (10 µl, ~50 µg of protein) or fractions
containing CF II [30 µl, ~20 µg of protein from the Q-Sepharose fraction, or 100 µl, ~3 µg of protein from the poly(A)-Sepharose fraction] were preadsorbed to 200 µl of a 15% protein A-Sepharose slurry in IP buffer to remove proteins that bind to the affinity resin
nonspecifically. After incubation on a roller at 4°C for 30 min, the
beads were pelleted and the supernatant was recovered. Two hundred
microliters of the preadsorbed sample was combined with the antibody
beads, and the mixture was incubated for 2 h at 4°C. The
supernatant was removed, and the pellet was washed three times with TBS
buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.9], 150 mM KCl). Proteins present in the
pellet were eluted from the beads by being boiled in 2× sample buffer
(21), separated by electrophoresis on 8% polyacrylamide
gels containing SDS, and either directly stained with silver or
transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane for immunoblotting.
3'-end processing assays.
Processing assays were done as
described elsewhere (6, 19, 43). Reaction mixtures were
assembled on ice in a volume of 12 µl containing 1 mM magnesium
acetate, 75 mM potassium acetate, 2% polyethylene glycol 8000 (Fisher), 2 mM ATP, 10 nM radioactive GAL7 RNA or
CYC1 (8 ng), 1.5 µM (0.6 µg) tRNA, 1 mM DTT, 0.4 U of
RNasin (Promega), and 0.1 mg of bovine serum albumin per ml, 1 to 2 µl of CF I or CF II sample, or whole-cell extracts (~15 µg of
protein). Reaction mixtures were incubated at 30°C for 20 to 30 min,
reactions were stopped with proteinase K and SDS as described elsewhere
(6), reaction mixtures were diluted to 30 µl with 50 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.0) and extracted once with phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1), and 1/10 of the reaction mixture was separated by
electrophoresis on a 5% acrylamide-8.3 M urea gel and visualized by autoradiography.
 |
RESULTS |
Pta1 is a component of CF II.
We have recently purified and
characterized CF II from yeast (43). A 5,300-fold
purification of CF II indicated that four polypeptides of 150, 105, 100, and 90 kDa copurify with CF II activity. The 150-kDa protein was
recognized by antibodies against Cft1/Yhh1, the yeast homolog of the
160-kDa subunit of the mammalian CPSF (38). Protein
sequencing showed that the 105-kDa protein, designated Cft2/Ydh1
(cleavage factor 2), exhibits significant homology to the CPSF 100-kDa
subunit (15) and that the 100-kDa subunit of CF II was
identical to Brr5/Ysh1 (5, 15), a yeast protein with
striking similarity to the 73-kDa subunit of CPSF.
To identify the smallest subunit of CF II, the band at 90 kDa was
excised from an SDS-polyacrylamide gel stained with Coomassie blue and
subjected to microsequencing. The sequence derived from one of the
tryptic peptides of the 90-kDa protein was QLSALLSTLGVSTKT. A search of
the yeast protein database revealed that this peptide is encoded by the
essential gene PTA1. PTA1 was initially defined by a
conditional growth mutation, pta1-1, that affects pre-tRNA processing in vivo (31).
To further confirm the composition of the CF II complex, CF
II-containing fractions were subjected to immunoprecipitation with
antibodies against Cft1/Yhh1. These samples were obtained from a
Q-Sepharose fractionation, an early step during purification (Fig.
1A, lane 3), or poly(A)-Sepharose
chromatography, a late step during purification (Fig. 1A, lane 4).
Analysis of the immunoprecipitated proteins on an SDS-polyacrylamide
gel stained with silver shows four prominent bands which are not found
when a control resin coupled to preimmune serum is used (Fig. 1A, lanes
2, 5, and 6). The molecular weights of these proteins exactly match
those reported for our previous purification of CF II (43).
Two of the immunoprecipitated proteins were recognized by a mixture of
anti-Brr5/Ysh1 and anti-Pta1 antibodies, respectively (Fig. 1B, lane
3), and the same two proteins are also present in the purified CF II
eluted from a Superose 6 column, the final step of purification (Fig.
1B, lane 2). The anti-Pta1 and anti-Ysh1/Brr5 antibodies do not
cross-react with their respective antigens when tested individually
against recombinant Brr5/Ysh1 and Pta1 (data not shown). In agreement
with the biochemical purification of CF II, the coimmunoprecipitation
results show that CF II is a stable complex of four proteins and
further establish that the previously uncharacterized 90-kDa subunit is
Pta1.

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Pta1 is tightly associated with the CF II complex. (A)
Fractions containing CF II from Q-Sepharose (QS) and poly(A)-Sepharose
(PA) fractionations were subjected to immunoprecipitation with
anti-Cft1 antibodies. The immunoprecipitated proteins were resolved on
an SDS-8% polyacrylamide gel, and the gel was stained with silver.
Four polypeptides, with sizes corresponding to those of CF II subunits,
were coprecipitated (lanes 5 and 6). Lanes 3 and 4 are the unbound
proteins from the supernatant. Lane 1 contains molecular mass standards
(in kilodaltons), and lane 2 is an immunoprecipitation of the
Q-Sepharose fraction with preimmune serum. The positions of the light
and heavy chains of the immunoglobulins in lanes 2, 5, and 6 are
indicated. (B) Immunoblot analysis of the CF II fraction from the
Superose 6 step of CF II purification (lane 2) and proteins
immunoprecipitated from the Q-Sepharose fraction with anti-Cft1
antibodies (lane 3). Blots were stained with a mixture of Brr5/Ysh1
polyclonal antibodies and a monoclonal antibody against Pta1.
|
|
CF II directly associates with a Pap1-PF I complex.
Three
subunits of CF II are homologous to subunits of the mammalian CPSF.
CPSF-160 (the 160-kDa subunit of CPSF) contacts poly(A) polymerase
directly (29). To determine whether yeast CF II interacts
with Pap1, we examined the proteins in extracts which
coimmunoprecipitate with a monoclonal antibody against a C-terminal
epitope in Pap1 (20). In addition to Pap1, the precipitate contains all four subunits of CF II, Fip1, and several other proteins (p58, p53, p38, p33, and p24) which are not found when preimmune serum
is used (Fig. 2A, lanes 2 and 3). The
identities of Pap1, Fip1, and the CF II subunits were confirmed by
Western blotting (data not shown). An immunoprecipitation experiment
with anti-Fip1 antibodies brought down a set of proteins with a pattern
almost identical to that from the immunoprecipitation with anti-Pap1 antibody (Fig. 2B, lane 1).

View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
CF II interacts with Pap1 and Fip1. Whole-yeast-cell
extract was used for coimmunoprecipitation. Samples were analyzed by
electrophoresis on an SDS-8% polyacrylamide gel and stained with
silver. (A) Immunoprecipitation assay with antibody against Pap1 (lane
3) or with preimmune serum (lane 2). (B) Immunoprecipitation with
antibodies against Fip1 brought down the same set of proteins as shown
in panel A (lane 1). Treatment with preimmune serum is shown in lane 2. (C) Immunoprecipitation assay with antibody against Pap1, followed by a
more stringent wash step. All CF II subunits were retained along with
Fip1 and Pap1 (lane 3). Numbers to the left of panels A and C indicate
molecular masses in kilodaltons.
|
|
The composition of the Pap1 and Fip1 immunoprecipitates is similar to
that of a multiprotein complex obtained in a recent purification of PF
I activity (33). This complex contains, in addition to Pap1
and Fip1, the entire CF II complex, Yth1 (the yeast homolog of the
mammalian CPSF 30-kDa subunit), and two uncharacterized proteins, Pfs1
and Pfs2 (17, 33). The size of the 24-kDa polypeptide in the
precipitate from our experiment corresponds to that of Yth1, and the
sizes of 58- and 53-kDa polypeptides are close to those of Pfs1 and
Pfs2. Two unknown proteins of 35 and 36 kDa also copurify with the PF I
complex and may be related to the 33- and 38-kDa polypeptides which
coimmunoprecipitate with Pap1 and Fip1 in our study. If the anti-Pap1
immunoprecipitate is washed more stringently with TBS buffer plus 0.1%
NP-40, the three smallest peptides are removed (Fig. 2C, lane 3). The
retention of Fip1 and the CF II subunits under these conditions
indicates that these proteins are more strongly associated with Pap1
than are the smaller ones.
The Yth1 homolog, CPSF-30, is not always found in active preparations
of CPSF (11, 28). We have not observed Yth1 in purified CF
II (43), a result consistent with the fact that a mutation in Yth1 caused a defect in poly(A) addition but not cleavage
(2). However, Yth1 is known to stain poorly with silver
(2), and we cannot rule out the possibility that it is
present in substoichiometric amounts. To further investigate this
issue, we probed various immunoprecipitates with antibody against Yth1.
By Western blotting, Yth1 is readily detected as a protein
immunoprecipitated from extract with Fip1 antibodies (Fig.
3, lane 3), in agreement with the direct
physical interaction of these two proteins (2). As expected
given the results shown in Fig. 2, Yth1 and Pap1 are present when
extract is treated with Cft1 antibodies (Fig. 3, lane 4). However,
neither it nor Pap1 is observed when a CF II fraction is
immunoprecipitated with the same antibody (Fig. 3, lane 4). Equivalent
amounts of Cft1 are found in the Cft1 precipitates from extract or CF
II. These results suggest that Yth1 may not interact directly or
strongly with any of the CF II subunits and is likely not to be
essential for precursor cleavage in yeast.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Yth1 is not detected in Cft1 immunoprecipitates of CF
II. Cell extract (lanes 2 to 4) or a CF II phosphocellulose fraction
(lane 5) was immunoprecipitated with the indicated antibodies, and
blots of the immunoprecipitates were probed with antibody against Cft1,
Pap1, or Yth1. Recombinant Yth1 produced in E. coli is shown
in lane 1, and an immunoprecipitation with preimmune serum is shown in
lane 2.
|
|
The levels of Pta1 and other CF II subunits are reduced in strains
containing pta1 mutations.
Two pta1
conditional mutants, the pta1-1 and pta1-2
strains, were employed to further characterize Pta1. Both of the mutant strains show slow growth at 30°C and lack of growth at 37°C
(22, 31). To determine the level of the Pta1 protein in
these mutant cells, a direct immunoblot analysis of cell extracts was
carried out with monoclonal antibody against Pta1. The extracts were
prepared from cells cultured at 30°C. Pta1 protein of normal size
could not be detected in either of the pta1 mutant extracts.
Instead, a set of several shorter peptides were stained by the Pta1
antibody in both pta1-1 and pta1-2 mutant
extracts (Fig. 4A, lanes 3 and 4). These
species are probably degraded fragments or short translation products.
O'Connor and Peebles (31) observed that both the
temperature-sensitive growth defect and the tRNA splicing defect of the
pta1-1 strain could be suppressed by the ochre suppressor
tRNA gene SUP11, indicating that a termination codon had
been created within the protein reading frame. Because PTA1
is an essential gene, the pta1-1 allele cannot be a null
mutation. Thus, a pta1-1 ochre fragment is adequate for Pta1
function, or translational read-through of the ochre stop codon might
produce sufficient full-length protein for viability.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Immunoblot analysis of cell extract from wild-type and
pta1 mutant strains. Equal amounts of protein (15 µg) from
wild-type (lanes 1 and 2), pta1-1 (lane 3), or
pta1-2 (lane 4) extracts were separated on an SDS-8%
polyacrylamide gel, transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride
membrane, and immunoblotted with a monoclonal antibody against Pta1
(A), Cft1/Yhh1 (B), Brr5/Ysh1 (C), or Pap1 (D). Lane 1 is a control
blot probed with preimmune antiserum from a mouse subsequently
immunized with Pap1 antigen.
|
|
The immunoblot assay was also used to analyze the presence of other
subunits of CF II and Pap1 in the yeast extracts. The amount of Cft1
and Brr5/Ysh1 was reduced in pta1 mutants in comparison with
that from wild-type extract (Fig. 4B and C, lanes 2 to 4), while the
amount of Pap1 protein remained constant in the wild type and the two
pta1 mutants (Fig. 4D, lanes 2 to 4).
To further investigate whether the pta1 mutation influenced
the assembly of CF II complex and the interaction with Pap1, we immunoprecipitated Pap1 from extracts of wild-type and mutant pta1-1 strains. Precipitated proteins were resolved by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotted with
antibodies against components of CF II. Interestingly, a small amount
of full-length Pta1 protein was now detectable in the precipitate from
the pta1-1 mutant (Fig. 5A,
lane 2). Analysis of the cultures used for extract preparation did not
reveal cells which could now grow at the nonpermissive temperature, as
might be expected if reversion or suppression of the pta1
alleles had occurred. Instead, the full-length Pta1 was more likely the
result of a low-level translational read-through of the mutated
pta1 transcripts. The amount of other components of CF II in
the Pap1 immunoprecipitate was also reduced in comparison with that
from the wild-type strain (Fig. 5B and C, lanes 1 and 2), while the
amount of precipitated Pap1 protein from the pta1-1 mutant
was similar to that from wild type (Fig. 5D, lanes 1 and 2), consistent
with the relative levels of these proteins in the respective extracts.
The short fragments of Pta1 were not found in immunoprecipitates (data
not shown), suggesting that only full-length Pta1 can be assembled into
complex.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Full-length Pta1 protein is found in a Pap1-containing
complex. An equal amount of extract from wild-type (WT) or
pta1-1 mutant cells was subjected to immunoprecipitation
with monoclonal antibody against Pap1. The immunoprecipitated proteins
were fractionated on an SDS-8% polyacrylamide gel, transferred to a
polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and immunostained with antibody
against Pta1 (A), Cft1/Yhh1 (B), Brr5/Ysh1 (C), or Pap1 (D). Lane 1, wild-type extract; lane 2, pta1-1 mutant extract; lane 3, wild-type extract immunoprecipitated with anti-immunoglobulin G (IgG)
antibody.
|
|
Pta1 is required for both cleavage and poly(A) addition.
Pta1
has been shown elsewhere to be necessary for efficient poly(A)
addition (33). Because of the presence of Pta1 in CF II, we
wanted to investigate its role in cleavage. We tested extracts from the two pta1 temperature-sensitive mutant strains, the
pta1-1 and pta1-2 strains, for processing of
full-length GAL7 pre-mRNA. Extracts from both
pta1 mutant strains failed to process the
GAL7 substrate (Fig. 6A, lane
2). In comparison, extract from wild-type cells cleaved the full-length
RNA substrate and polyadenylated the upstream cleavage product (Fig.
6A, lane 2). These reactions were performed for 20 min, and under these
conditions, the maximal amount of processing in wild-type extracts
occurred by 40 min. In the pta1-1 mutant extracts, there was
no accumulation of product even after 60 min of incubation (data not
shown), indicating that the defect was not simply due to a lower rate
of processing. Both cleavage and poly(A) addition could be restored to
the pta1 extracts by addition of CF II from a
poly(A)-Sepharose column, the penultimate step in the published
purification protocol (43). The activity of
pta1-1 extract was recovered more efficiently than that of pta1-2 extract (Fig. 6A, lanes 5 and 6). CF II alone
exhibited no activity (Fig. 6A, lane 7). The rescue by CF II indicates
that the non-CF II activities needed for 3'-end processing are not affected by the pta1 mutations. Furthermore, it is
consistent with Pta1 being an important subunit of CF II.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Pta1 is required for both cleavage and poly(A) addition
of GAL7 pre-mRNA substrate. Equal amounts of protein were
mixed with 32P-labeled GAL7 substrate and
incubated at 30°C for 20 min as described in Materials and Methods.
Products were resolved on denaturing polyacrylamide gels and visualized
by autoradiography. (A) Processing assay with full-length
GAL7-1 RNA substrate and ATP. (B) Cleavage assay in which
ATP is replaced with 2'-dATP to block the poly(A) addition step. (C)
Poly(A) addition assay with precleaved RNA substrate GAL7-9.
Lanes 1, precursor; lanes 2, wild-type (WT) extract; lanes 3, pta1-1 mutant extract; lanes 4, pta1-2 mutant
extract; lanes 5, pta1-1 extract supplemented with CF II;
lanes 6, pta1-2 extract supplemented with CF II; lanes 7, reaction with CF II only. The positions of the full-length
GAL7-1 precursor RNA, poly(A)+ RNA, upstream and
downstream cleavage products, and precleaved GAL7-9
precursor (top to bottom, respectively) are indicated by the bars on
the left of each panel.
|
|
Cleavage and poly(A) addition assays were then carried out separately
with the mutant extracts, in order to examine both steps of the
reaction independently. For the cleavage assay, the poly(A) addition
step was blocked by replacement of ATP with 2'-dATP. Both
pta1 mutant extracts were defective for cleavage (Fig. 6B, lanes 3 and 4). The cleavage in pta1-1 extract was almost
fully restored by addition of CF II, and in pta1-2 extract,
it was partially recovered (Fig. 6B, lanes 5 and 6). The poly(A)
addition assay was carried out with a precleaved RNA substrate,
GAL7-9. As in the case of cleavage, both mutant extracts
failed to polyadenylate the substrate RNA (Fig. 6C, lanes 3 and 4), and
the poly(A) addition could be recovered by adding CF II (Fig. 6C, lanes
5 and 6). Again, the poly(A) addition activity with GAL7-9
substrate was recovered more efficiently in pta1-1 extract
than in pta1-2 extract. We do not know the nature of the
pta1-2 mutation, but the higher level of short Pta1
fragments in the pta1-2 mutant than in the pta1-1
mutant (Fig. 4) may have an inhibitory effect.
To examine the functional interaction of Pta1 with other proteins
involved in 3'-end processing, extracts from strains containing conditional mutations in CF II, CF IA, or PF I subunits were prepared and tested for processing activity and the ability to complement the
defect of the pta1-1 extract. Rna14, a subunit of CF IA, is required for both cleavage and poly(A) addition (26).
Extract from an rna14-1 strain is defective for processing
of CYC1 pre-mRNA (26). Consistent with this
finding, extract from the rna14-1 strain was unable to
process GAL7-1 pre-mRNA (Fig.
7, lane 5), but processing could be
restored by the addition of a CF I-containing fraction (Fig. 7, lane
15). The fip1-1 extract is defective in the poly(A) addition
of CYC1 substrate (33). Similarly, we found that
this extract could cleave the GAL7 precursor but failed to polyadenylate the upstream cleavage product (Fig. 7, lane 6), a result
expected for a subunit of PF I. Although Brr5/Ysh1 was first identified
as a subunit of PF I (16), it has also been found to be a
component of CF II (43). The brr5-1 extract shows a very low level of activity, as indicated by a small amount of the
polyadenylated product, but with no accumulation of cleavage product
(Fig. 7, lane 4), indicating that Brr5 is also involved in cleavage.

View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Complementation of polyadenylation activity in the
pta1-1 mutant extract. Reactions were performed as described
in the legend to Fig. 6, and reaction mixtures were incubated at 30°C
for 30 min. 32P-labeled GAL7-1 RNA was incubated
with extracts of wild-type (WT) (lane 2), pta1-1 (lane 3),
brr5-1 (lane 4), rna14-1 (lane 5), and
fip1-1 (lane 6) strains. Lanes 7 to 9 are reaction mixtures
containing pta1-1 extracts combined with other mutant
extracts as indicated. Lanes 10 to 14 are reaction mixtures containing
different mutant extracts or buffer as indicated and supplemented with
CF II. The reaction mixture of rna14-1 extract in the
presence of a CF I fraction (from the heparin-Sepharose step) is shown
in lane 15. See the Fig. 6 legend for symbol definitions.
|
|
The defective processing of the pta1-1 extract could be
enhanced significantly by addition of rna14-1 mutant extract
but not by addition of brr5-1 and fip1-1 extracts
(Fig. 7, lanes 3 and 7 to 9), supporting the idea that Pta1 is
associated with Brr5/Ysh1 and Fip1 in complexes required for processing
of mRNA precursor. Addition of CF II efficiently restored the
processing activities of pta1-1 and brr5-1 mutant
extracts (Fig. 7, lanes 11 and 12), confirming that these two proteins
are in the CF II complex. A small amount of product with a longer
poly(A) tail is visible in the reaction with the fip1-1
mutant extract which has been supplemented with CF II (Fig. 7, lane
14). This could be due to a low level of PF I activity in this CF II
fraction or could reflect the possibility that the levels of CF II are
limiting in the fip1-1 extract and that increasing the
amount of CF II can partially suppress the fip1-1 defect.
In a previous study, extract from the pta1-1 mutant was
found to be normal in cleavage and defective in poly(A) addition with CYC1 pre-mRNA (33). To determine if the defects
that we were observing were substrate specific, we also tested
pta1 mutants with full-length CYC1 RNA as
substrate. Similar to the results found with the GAL7
pre-mRNA, extracts from pta1 mutants failed to process
CYC1 RNA in complete reactions containing ATP (Fig. 8A, lanes 3 and 4) or cleavage-only
reactions in which ATP was replaced by 2'-dATP (Fig. 8B, lanes 3 and
4). For CYC1, a low level of cleavage in mutant extracts may
be evident from the appearance of a small amount of RNA migrating at
the position of the downstream cleavage product (Fig. 8, lanes 3 and
4). The processing activities can be restored to pta1 mutant
extracts when they are supplemented with CF II (Fig. 8, lanes 5 and 6).
In contrast to the GAL7 substrate, the processing of
CYC1 precursor in both mutant extracts was recovered almost
equally efficiently. In coupled cleavage-poly(A) addition assays with
either substrate, there is often more accumulation of cleaved products
and less polyadenylated RNA in pta1 mutant extracts
complemented with CF II than in wild-type extract (Fig. 6A and 8A,
lanes 2, 5, and 6), suggesting that cleavage activity is recovered more
efficiently than is poly(A) addition. Taken together, these results
strongly argue that Pta1 is required for both cleavage and poly(A)
addition in yeast mRNA 3'-end formation.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Pta1 is required for both cleavage and poly(A) addition
of CYC1 pre-mRNA substrate. Reactions were carried out as
described in the legend to Fig. 6. (A) Coupled cleavage-polyadenylation
assays in the presence of ATP. (B) Cleavage assays with 2'-dATP.
32P-labeled CYC1 substrates were combined with
extracts of wild-type (WT) (lane 2), pta1-1 (lane 3), and
pta1-2 (lane 4) strains and pta1-1 and
pta1-2 strains plus CF II (lanes 5 and 6, respectively). In
lane 6, a reaction was performed with CF II only. See the Fig. 6 legend
for symbol definitions.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this report, we demonstrate that Pta1 is the previously
uncharacterized 90-kDa subunit of the CF II cleavage factor needed for
mRNA 3'-end formation in the yeast S. cerevisiae. This
protein had been found in the most highly purified preparations of CF II, in which only four polypeptide bands were visible when the preparation was assayed on an SDS-polyacrylamide gel stained with silver (43). Consistent with this chromatographic behavior, we also show that Pta1 and the other three CF II subunits of CF II are
immunoprecipitated from CF II-containing fractions with antibodies
against Cft1/Yhh1. This result confirms that CF II is a tightly
associated complex of Cft1/Yhh1, Cft2/Ydh1, Brr5/Ysh1, and Pta1.
CF II subunits also copurify with PF I (33), an activity
necessary for poly(A) addition but not for cleavage of yeast precursor (6). In support of this finding, our coimmunoprecipitation experiments indicate that the CF II in processing extract can be found
in a stable complex containing Pap1, CF II, and the Fip1 and Yth1
subunits of PF I. Purified CF II does not appear to retain the
association with these other factors and is sufficient for cleavage
activity. The fact that unpolyadenylated product often accumulates in
reactions containing ATP suggests that two forms of CF II (free and
associated with PF I-specific subunits) may also exist in extracts, and
it is not yet clear whether these factors work together in vivo only as
a preassembled complex. In any event, the interactions which recruit CF
II to a CF II-PF I-Pap1 complex are not known. CPSF-160, the mammalian
homolog of Cft1/Yhh1, has been shown elsewhere to bind poly(A)
polymerase (29). However, in yeast, this function may have
been assumed by Fip1, a protein without a mammalian homolog but with
some similarity to CPSF-160 in sequence (29). Like CPSF-160,
Fip1 interacts directly with the poly(A) polymerase (34, 44)
and inhibits the enzyme's activity (29, 44). A physical
interaction has also been demonstrated between Fip1 and the CF IA
subunit Rna14 (34), as has been shown elsewhere for CPSF-160
and the Rna14 homolog CstF-77 (29).
When the PTA1 gene is mutated and the production of
full-length Pta1 protein is highly reduced, the amount of other CF II subunits recruited into a complex with Pap1 is decreased. Thus, it is
possible that Pta1 facilitates the assembly of this complex. However,
the total amounts of other CF II components in a pta1-1 mutant extract are also reduced, whereas the amount of Pap1 is not
affected. These observations suggest that free CF II subunits or ones
assembled into a partial complex without Pta1 may not be stable.
Alternatively, the reduced Pta1 production or the short Pta1 fragments
may inhibit the synthesis of other CF II components. In either case,
Pta1 seems necessary for the accumulation of CF II. A previous study
showed that the amount of the CF IA subunit Rna15 was severely reduced
not only in an rna15 mutant strain but also in
rna14 and pap1 mutant cells (1), a
finding in agreement with the idea that levels of some of the proteins
involved in 3'-end processing may be coordinately regulated in yeast.
The interactions described above indicate a role for CF II subunits in
both cleavage and polyadenylation. Support for Pta1 function in 3'-end
processing is provided by the in vitro analysis of cell extracts from
pta1 conditional mutants. In our experiments, extracts from
the pta1-1 and pta1-2 strains are defective in
the cleavage and the poly(A) addition of at least two pre-mRNA
substrates, GAL7 and CYC1. This defect can be
restored by addition of CF II. Our data differs from that of Preker et
al. (33), which showed that a pta1-1 mutant
extract failed to polyadenylate CYC1 substrate but still
gave normal cleavage. We observed no processing in pta1 mutant extracts, and cleavage product did not accumulate even after
prolonged incubation. If poly(A) addition is more sensitive to limiting
amounts of CF II than is the cleavage step, the discrepancy in these
two studies could be accounted for by differences in extract
preparation or culture conditions which might affect the concentration
of full-length Pta1 in the mutant extract and thus the quantity of
assembled CF II.
We have also found that the extract from the brr5-1 mutant
is impaired in both cleavage and poly(A) addition, similar to what we
found for the pta1-1 mutant. Consistent with Brr5/Ysh1 and Pta1 being part of the same complex, the brr5-1 and
pta1-1 extracts could not complement each other, but their
processing activities could be restored by addition of
rna14-1 extract or the CF II fraction. Chanfreau et al.
(5) have shown that extracts from this brr5-1
mutant strain were defective in poly(A) addition but not in cleavage,
while wild-type extracts immunodepleted of Brr5/Ysh1 exhibited
loss of cleavage activity as well. In a different study, extracts
depleted of this protein by transcriptional repression of the
gene were impaired in both cleavage and poly(A) addition, though more
severely affected for poly(A) addition (16). Depletion of
extract with antibodies to Cft1/Yhh1 abolished both cleavage and
poly(A) addition (38). Restoration of cleavage required only
the addition of the CF II-containing fraction, while poly(A) addition
needed the further addition of Pap1 and a fraction containing PF I
(38). While a functional analysis of Cft2/Ydh2 has not been
performed, its presence in highly purified CF II strongly supports the
idea that it participates with the other three CF II subunits in 3'-end formation.
The three largest subunits of yeast CF II are homologous to ones in
mammalian CPSF, a complex needed for both the cleavage and the poly(A)
addition phases of the reaction. One of the functions of CPSF is to
recognize the AAUAAA signal element in the pre-mRNA, and an
analogous role for CF II is suggested by the finding that the
interaction of CF II with RNA substrate depends on the UAUAUA type of polyadenylation signal (43). The yeast CF I
factor was originally proposed as the functional homolog of mammalian
CPSF in that, like CPSF, it was required for cleavage and
polyadenylation (19), even though some of its subunits bear
a resemblance to subunits of the mammalian cleavage factor CstF. It has
now been shown that even CstF can behave as a poly(A) addition factor, if the pre-mRNA has a CstF binding site upstream of the AAUAAA sequence (27). However, our current work and the
studies described above indicate that CF II is the genuine yeast
counterpart of mammalian CPSF, with homology in both function and
sequence. Like CPSF, it plays a central role in yeast pre-mRNA 3'-end
processing, recognizing critical cis-acting signals and
interacting with other factors to facilitate cleavage and poly(A) addition.
A mammalian homolog of the fourth subunit of CF II, Pta1, has not been
found in the known cleavage-polyadenylation factors. A mammalian
homolog may have evolved to have a greater role in other cell processes
and less of a role in mRNA 3'-end formation, as perhaps suggested by
the observations that mutations in Pta1 also lead to defects in the
splicing of pre-tRNA or cause synthetic lethality in combination with a
disruption of the gene encoding Spt3 (22), a polymerase II
(Pol II) transcription factor which interacts with the TATA-binding
protein (TBP) (9). The cause of the tRNA splicing defect in
yeast is not known. However, in this regard, it is intriguing that a
genetic interaction has been discovered between PAP1 and
RET1, which encodes the second largest subunit of Pol
III (3), and that a mutation in a tRNA synthetase gene has
been shown to affect transcription termination downstream of yeast
poly(A) sites (23).
The genetic linkage of PTA1 and SPT3 is also very
interesting, in light of much recent evidence supporting the coupling
of Pol II transcription and mRNA 3'-end formation (for a review, see
references 25, 40, and 42). Two
findings are particularly relevant to the Pta1-Spt3 interaction. First,
CPSF, the mammalian homolog of yeast CF II, is recruited to the
mammalian preinitiation complex by TFIID, which is composed of TBP and
TBP-associated factors (8). Second, Pta1 has been shown to
associate specifically with the phosphorylated carboxyl-terminal domain
of Pol II, and mutations in Kin28, the TFIIH-associated C-terminal
domain kinase, result in reduced levels of Pta1 in the cell
(35). Further work is needed to define the exact role of
Pta1 in yeast mRNA 3'-end processing and explore other cellular
functions which might be provided by this protein.
This work was supported by U.S. Public Health Service grant RO1 GM41752
from the National Institutes of Health to C. Moore.
| 1.
|
Amrani, N.,
M. E. Dufour,
N. Bonneaud, and F. Lacroute.
1996.
Mutations in STS1 suppress the defect in 3' mRNA processing caused by the rna15-2 mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
252:552-562[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Barabino, S. M.,
W. Hubner,
A. Jenny,
L. Minvielle-Sebastia, and W. Keller.
1997.
The 30-kD subunit of mammalian cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor and its yeast homolog are RNA-binding zinc finger proteins.
Genes Dev.
11:1703-1716[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Briggs, M. W., and J. S. Butler.
1996.
RNA polymerase III defects suppress a conditional-lethal poly(A) polymerase mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genetics
143:1149-1161[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Butler, J. S., and T. Platt.
1988.
RNA processing generates the mature 3' ends of yeast CYC1 mRNA in vitro.
Science
242:1270-1274[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Chanfreau, G.,
S. M. Noble, and C. Guthrie.
1996.
Essential yeast protein with unexpected similarity to subunits of mammalian cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor (CPSF).
Science
274:1511-1514[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Chen, J., and C. L. Moore.
1992.
Separation of factors required for cleavage and polyadenylation of yeast pre-mRNA.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:3470-3481[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Colgan, D., and J. Manley.
1997.
Mechanism and regulation of mRNA polyadenylation.
Genes Dev.
11:2755-2766[Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Dantonel, J. C.,
K. G. Murthy,
J. L. Manley, and L. Tora.
1997.
Transcription factor TFIID recruits factor CPSF for formation of 3' end of mRNA.
Nature
389:399-402[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Eisenmann, D. M.,
K. M. Arndt,
S. L. Ricupero,
J. W. Rooney, and F. Winston.
1992.
SPT3 interacts with TFIID to allow normal transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genes Dev.
6:1319-1331[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Ford, L. P.,
P. S. Bagga, and J. Wilusz.
1997.
The poly(A) tail inhibits the assembly of a 3'-to-5' exonuclease in an in vitro RNA stability system.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:398-406[Abstract].
|
| 11.
|
Gilmartin, G. M.,
E. S. Fleming,
J. Oetjen, and B. R. Graveley.
1995.
CPSF recognition of an HIV-1 mRNA 3'-end processing enhancer: multiple sequence contacts involved in poly(A) site definition.
Genes Dev.
9:72-83[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Gottlieb, M., and M. Chavko.
1981.
Silver staining of native and denatured eucaryotic DNA in agarose gels.
Anal. Biochem.
165:33-37.
|
| 13.
|
Harlow, E., and D. Lane.
1988.
Antibodies: a laboratory manual.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 14.
|
Huang, Y., and G. Carmichael.
1996.
Role of polyadenylation in nucleocytoplasmic transport of mRNA.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:1534-1542[Abstract].
|
| 15.
|
Jenny, A.,
H.-P. Hauri, and W. Keller.
1994.
Characterization of cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor and cloning of its 100-kilodalton subunit.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:8183-8190[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Jenny, A.,
L. Minvielle-Sebastia,
P. Preker, and W. Keller.
1996.
Sequence similarity between the 73-kilodalton protein of mammalian CPSF and a subunit of yeast polyadenylation factor I.
Science
274:1514-1517[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Keller, W., and L. Minvielle-Sebastia.
1997.
A comparison of mammalian and yeast pre-mRNA 3' end processing.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9:329-336[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Kessler, M.,
M. Henry,
S. Gross,
E. Shen,
J. Zhao,
P. Silver, and C. Moore.
1997.
Hrp1, a sequence-specific RNA-binding protein that shuttles between the nucleus and the cytoplasm, is required for mRNA 3'-end formation in yeast.
Genes Dev.
11:2545-2556[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Kessler, M. M.,
J. Zhao, and C. L. Moore.
1996.
Purification of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cleavage/polyadenylation factor I.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:27167-27175[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Kessler, M. M.,
A. M. Zhelkovsky,
A. Skvorak, and C. L. Moore.
1995.
Monoclonal antibodies to yeast poly(A) polymerase (PAP) provide evidence for association of PAP with cleavage factor I.
Biochemistry
34:1750-1759[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
1970.
Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.
Nature
227:680-685[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Madison, J., and F. Winston.
1997.
Evidence that Spt3 functionally interacts with Mot1, TFIIA, and TATA-binding protein to confer promoter-specific transcriptional control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:287-295[Abstract].
|
| 23.
|
Magrath, C., and L. Hyman.
1999.
A mutation in Grs1, a glycine tRNA synthetase, affects mRNA 3' end formation in S. cerevisiae.
Genetics
152:129-141[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Minvielle-Sebastia, L.,
K. Beyer,
A. Krecic,
R. E. Hector,
M. S. Swanson, and W. Keller.
1998.
Control of cleavage site selection during mRNA 3' end formation by a yeast hnRNP.
EMBO J.
17:7454-7468[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Minvielle-Sebastia, L., and W. Keller.
1999.
mRNA polyadenylation and its coupling to other RNA processing reactions and to transcription.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
11:352-357[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Minvielle-Sebastia, L.,
P. J. Preker, and W. Keller.
1994.
RNA14 and RNA15 proteins as components of a yeast pre-mRNA 3'-end processing factor.
Science
266:1702-1705[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Moreira, A.,
Y. Takagaki,
S. Brackenridge,
M. Wollerton,
J. L. Manley, and N. J. Proudfoot.
1998.
The upstream sequence element of the C2 complement poly(A) signal activates mRNA 3' end formation by two distinct mechanisms.
Genes Dev.
12:2522-2534[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Murthy, K. G., and J. L. Manley.
1992.
Characterization of the multisubunit cleavage-polyadenylation specificity factor.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:14804-14811[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Murthy, K. G. K., and J. L. Manley.
1995.
The 160 kD subunit of human cleavage-polyadenylation specificity factor coordinates pre-mRNA 3' end formation.
Genes Dev.
9:2672-2683[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Noble, S. M., and C. Guthrie.
1996.
Identification of novel genes required for yeast pre-mRNA splicing by means of cold-sensitive mutations.
Genetics
143:67-80[Abstract].
|
| 31.
|
O'Connor, J., and C. Peebles.
1992.
PTA1, an essential gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae affecting pre-tRNA processing.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:3843-3856[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Preiss, T., and M. W. Hentze.
1998.
Dual function of the messenger RNA cap structure in poly(A)-tail-promoted translation in yeast.
Nature
392:516-520[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Preker, P.,
M. Ohnacker,
L. Minvielle-Sebastia, and W. Keller.
1997.
A multisubunit 3' end processing factor from yeast containing poly(A) polymerase and homologues of the subunits of mammalian cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor.
EMBO J.
16:4727-4737[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Preker, P. J.,
J. Lingner,
L. Minvielle-Sebastia, and W. Keller.
1995.
The FIP1 gene encodes a component of a yeast pre-mRNA polyadenylation factor that directly interacts with poly(A) polymerase.
Cell
81:379-389[Medline].
|
| 35.
| Rodriguez, C. R., E.-J. Cho, M. C. Keogh, C. L. Moore, A. L. Greenleaf, and S. Buratowski. Kin28, the TFIIH-associated CTD kinase, facilitates
the recruitment of mRNA processing machinery to RNA polymerase II.
Submitted for publication.
|
| 36.
|
Sachs, A.,
P. Sarnow, and M. Hentze.
1997.
Starting at the beginning, middle, and end: translation initiation in eukaryotes.
Cell
89:831-838[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 38.
|
Stumpf, G., and H. Domdey.
1996.
Dependence of yeast pre-mRNA 3'-end processing on Cft1: a sequence homolog of the mammalian AAUAAA binding factor.
Science
274:1517-1520[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Takagaki, Y., and J. L. Manley.
1994.
A polyadenylation factor subunit is the human homologue of the Drosophila suppressor of forked protein.
Nature
372:471-474[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Wahle, E., and U. Ruegsegger.
1999.
3'-end processing of pre-mRNA in eukaryotes.
FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
23:277-295[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Wickens, M.,
P. Anderson, and R. J. Jackson.
1997.
Life and death in the cytoplasm: messages from the 3' end.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
7:220-232[Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Zhao, J.,
L. Hyman, and C. Moore.
1999.
Formation of mRNA 3' ends in eukaryotes: mechanism, regulation, and interrelationships with other steps in mRNA synthesis.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
63:405-445[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Zhao, J.,
M. Kessler, and C. Moore.
1997.
Cleavage factor II of S. cerevisiae contains homologues to subunits of the mammalian cleavage/polyadenylation specificity factor and exhibits sequence-specific, ATP-dependent interaction with precursor RNA.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:10831-10838[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Zhelkovsky, A.,
S. Helmling, and C. Moore.
1998.
Processivity of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae poly(A) polymerase requires interactions at the carboxyl-terminal RNA binding domain.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:5942-5951[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|