Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, November 1999, p. 7857-7869, Vol. 19, No. 11
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Mutagenesis of SNM1, Which Encodes a Protein Component
of the Yeast RNase MRP, Reveals a Role for This Ribonucleoprotein
Endoribonuclease in Plasmid Segregation
Ti
Cai,
Tracey R.
Reilly,
Michael
Cerio, and
Mark E.
Schmitt*
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology, State University of New York Health Science Center at
Syracuse, Syracuse, New York 13210
Received 1 June 1999/Returned for modification 19 July
1999/Accepted 29 July 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
RNase MRP is a ribonucleoprotein endoribonuclease that has been
shown to have roles in both mitochondrial DNA replication and nuclear
5.8S rRNA processing. SNM1 encodes an essential 22.5-kDa protein that is a component of yeast RNase MRP. It is an RNA binding protein that binds the MRP RNA specifically. This 198-amino-acid protein can be divided into three structural regions: a potential leucine zipper near the amino terminus, a binuclear zinc cluster in the
middle region, and a serine- and lysine-rich region near the carboxy
terminus. We have performed PCR mutagenesis of the SNM1
gene to produce 17 mutants that have a conditional phenotype for growth
at different temperatures. Yeast strains carrying any of these
mutations as the only copy of snm1 display an rRNA
processing defect identical to that in MRP RNA mutants. We have
characterized these mutant proteins for RNase MRP function by examining
5.8S rRNA processing, MRP RNA binding in vivo, and the stability of the
RNase MRP RNA. The results indicate two separate functional domains of
the protein, one responsible for binding the MRP RNA and a second that
promotes substrate cleavage. The Snm1 protein appears not to be
required for the stability of the MRP RNA, but very low levels of the
protein are required for processing of the 5.8S rRNA. Surprisingly, a
large number of conditional mutations that resulted from nonsense and
frameshift mutations throughout the coding regions were identified. The
most severe of these was a frameshift at amino acid 7. These mutations
were found to be undergoing translational suppression, resulting in a
small amount of full-length Snm1 protein. This small amount of Snm1
protein was sufficient to maintain enough RNase MRP activity to support viability. Translational suppression was accomplished in two ways. First, CEN plasmid missegregation leads to plasmid
amplification, which in turn leads to SNM1 mRNA
overexpression. Translational suppression of a small amount of the
superabundant SNM1 mRNA results in sufficient Snm1 protein
to support viability. CEN plasmid missegregation is
believed to be the result of a prolonged telophase arrest that has been
recently identified in RNase MRP mutants. Either the SNM1
gene is inherently susceptible to translational suppression or
extremely small amounts of Snm1 protein are sufficient to maintain essential levels of MRP activity.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
RNase MRP was first identified in
mouse cells as an endoribonuclease involved in mitochondrial DNA
replication (4-6). It cleaves RNA transcripts from
mitochondrial origins of replication in a manner consistent with the
formation of the primer for the initiation of DNA synthesis
(23-25, 60), hence, the name MRP, for mitochondrial RNA
processing. Like the mammalian RNase MRP, the yeast enzyme cleaves an
RNA substrate complementary to a yeast mitochondrial origin of
replication at an exact site of RNA-to-DNA linkage (2, 52,
57). However, the majority of RNase MRP is localized in the
nucleus (20, 26, 39), where it directly processes the rRNA
precursor at the A3 site (7, 9, 28, 44). The loss of RNase
MRP activity leads to the loss of the production of one of two
different species of 5.8S rRNA (41, 44). Some question has
arisen as to whether the loss of processing of the rRNAs is the
essential function of RNase MRP (28, 32). Recent work has
identified a late cell cycle arrest in RNase MRP mutants, and it is
some function in the control of the cell cycle that may be responsible
for the essentiality of RNase MRP (2a).
RNase MRP is a ribonucleoprotein complex with a single RNA component
and several protein subunits (3, 8, 10, 29, 43, 45). The
340-nucleotide (nt) RNA component of RNase MRP is encoded by an
essential nuclear gene, NME1 (43). RNase MRP shares many functional and structural similarities with another ribonucleoprotein complex, RNase P, which is involved in pre-tRNA processing (14, 37, 38, 46). Both ribonucleoproteins have sequence-specific endoribonuclease activity and have functions in both
the mitochondria and the nucleus. The RNA components of both complexes
can be folded into similar secondary structures (14, 46). In
the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, RNase P and RNase MRP
share several protein components: Pop1p (100.5 kDa), Pop3p (22.6 kDa),
Pop4p (32.8 kDa), Pop5p (19.6 kDa), Pop6p (18.2 kDa), Pop7p (15.8 kDa),
Pop8p (15.5 kDa), and Rpp1p (32.2 kDa) (3, 8, 10, 29, 53).
Pop1p, Pop3p, and Pop4p were identified by genetic screening. Rpp1p was
identified as a protein subunit of RNase P by virtue of its homology
with a human scleroderma autoimmune antigen, Rpp30, which copurifies
with human RNase P. Yeast RNase P has been purified biochemically to
apparent homogeneity. Four more proteins that purify with RNase P
activity, Pop5p (19.6 kDa), Pop6p (18.2 kDa), Pop7p/Rpp2p (15.8 kDa),
and Pop8p (15.5 kDa), have been demonstrated to be shared by RNase P
and RNase MRP (3).
Snm1p, the only protein component unique to the RNase MRP complex (not
shared with RNase P), was identified as a high-copy-number suppressor
of a temperature-sensitive nme1 mutant (45).
SNM1 at a high copy number can fully complement the
rRNA-processing defect of this nme1 mutant at the
nonpermissive temperature. Snm1p binds the RNase MRP RNA but not the
RNase P RNA. The SNM1 gene encodes an essential protein of
198 amino acids with a predicted molecular mass of 22.5 kDa. The
primary sequence reveals three possible structural motifs. The
amino-terminal portion of the protein contains a series of leucines
spaced 6 to 8 amino acids apart that could potentially form a
coiled-coil domain. The central portion of the protein contains two
cysteine clusters that may function in binding zinc ions. Similar
cysteine clusters can be found in a binuclear cluster arrangement seen
in DNA-binding proteins (31, 54). The carboxy-terminal
portion of the protein is rich in serines and lysines. Of the last 63 amino acids, 15 are serines and 16 are lysines. There is no obvious RNA
binding motif in Snm1p, although it was found to specifically bind the
MRP RNA (45). In order to learn more about the function of
this protein that is exclusive to the RNase MRP enzyme complex, we
undertook mutagenesis screening of the SNM1 gene. Here we
report the isolation and characterization of a number of
temperature-conditional SNM1 mutants. These mutants have led
us to find a previously undiscovered role for the yeast RNase MRP in
chromosomal segregation.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Strains and media.
Yeast media and genetic manipulations
have been described elsewhere (48). The Escherichia
coli strain used for cloning, DH5
, has the genotype
psi80dlacZ
M15 endA1 recA1 hsdR17
(rK
mK+) supE44
thi-1 
gyrA96 relA1
(lacZYA-argF)U169 F
.
Basic molecular biology techniques were performed as described elsewhere (42).
PCR mutagenesis of SNM1.
PCR mutagenesis was performed
as described by Muhlrad et al. (34). Plasmid DNA carrying a
full-length SNM1 gene was used as a template. The PCR
mixtures (total reaction volume, 100 µl) contained 1 µg of DNA
template (pMES193 [pBS containing SNM1]) (45);
Vent DNA polymerase buffer (New England Biolabs, Beverly, Mass.);
either 1.0 mM each dGTP, dCTP, and dTTP and 0.2 mM dATP or 1.0 mM each
dATP, dCTP, and dTTP and 0.2 mM dGTP; 3 U of Deep VentR
(exo
) DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs); 0.5 mM
MnCl2; and 1 µg each of primers O-SNM-2 (5'-CTG CAG GCA
AGG CGT ACA TGG CGT G-3') and O-SNM-5 (5'-GAT GAG TAC TAC TAG TGG
CTA-3'). Thirty cycles were completed at an annealing temperature of
40°C. PCR products of the correct size (~845 bp) were purified from
agarose gels by filter centrifugation.
Plasmid pTHR100 is a derivative of plasmid pMES194 (45). To
remove BamHI and SpeI from the polylinker of
pMES194, the plasmid was digested with SmaI and
XbaI, and the ends were filled in with the Klenow fragment
and ligated together to generate plasmid pTHR100. Plasmid pTHR100
(pRS315 containing LEU2, CEN, and
SNM1) was used to remove from between the BamHI
and NsiI sites a 696-bp fragment which contained 100% of
the SNM1 open reading frame (45). The purified
mutagenized snm1 PCR product and the gap-containing pTHR100 plasmid were cotransformed into the haploid strain THR200
(MATa ade2-1 leu2-3,112 his3-
200 trp1-
1 ura3-52
snm1-
1::HIS3 pTHR101 [URA3 CEN SNM1])
for in vivo gap repair of pTHR100 (11). Transformants were
selected on SD plates without leucine (0.67% yeast nitrogen base
containing ammonium sulfate, 2% dextrose, and 2% Bacto-Agar and
supplemented with 20 mg each of adenine, uracil, and tryptophan per
liter) and then transferred to SCD-5FOA plates (0.67% yeast nitrogen
base containing ammonium sulfate, 2% dextrose, 0.5% Casamino Acids,
and 2% Bacto-Agar and supplemented with 20 mg each of adenine, uracil,
tryptophan, and 0.2% 5-fluoro-orotic acid [5-FOA] per liter). Two
transfers to 5-FOA-containing plates were performed to ensure that the
URA3-containing plasmid was lost (50).
Transformants were then replicated to SCD plates without 5-FOA at 17, 24, 30, or 37°C to screen for mutants.
Growth testing of yeast mutants.
Mutant yeast strains were
analyzed for temperature-conditional growth on SCD plates at 17, 24, 30, and 37°C. One hundred microliters of sterile water was
distributed into the wells of a 96-well Falcon tissue culture plate.
Two fresh colonies of each mutant yeast strain were mixed into the
first-row wells. Tenfold serial dilutions of these cell mixtures were
placed into the second-, third-, and fourth-row wells. A 48-pin Frogger
(Dan-kar Corp.) was used to transfer diluted cell mixtures to SCD
plates. The cells were grown at the temperatures specified for 2 days
or at 17°C for 5 days.
Analysis of yeast RNA.
RNA was extracted as previously
described (47). Approximately 10 µg of whole-cell RNA was
separated on 6% acrylamide-7 M urea gels. The gels were stained with
ethidium bromide to visualize the 5.8S rRNA, or Northern blot analysis
was performed (44). The probes used were SNM1 (a
705-bp BamHI-NsiI fragment of the SNM1
gene), NME1 (a 1,042-bp EcoRI fragment), and
SCR1 (a 736-bp EcoRI-SpeI fragment)
(20, 21, 39). Probes were radiolabeled for hybridization
with [
-32P]dCTP by use of the Prime-It Kit
(Stratagene, Inc.). Radioactive blots were analyzed on a Molecular
Dynamics PhosphorImager.
Preparation of yeast cell extracts.
Yeast cells were grown
in 50 ml of liquid SCD at 30°C until they reached exponential growth
(107 cells/ml). The cultures were then shifted to the
nonpermissive temperature and grown for 6 h. The cells were
collected, washed with 1 ml of buffer A (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8], 150 mM KCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 1 mM
dithiothreitol [DTT], 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF]),
pelleted in a microcentrifuge, and resuspended in 400 µl of buffer A. Two hundred milligrams of glass beads was added to the cell mixture,
which was then vortexed for 15 min at 4°C and centrifuged at
16,000 × g for 2 min at 4°C. The supernatant was
transferred to a clean tube and centrifuged at 16,000 × g for an additional 15 min. Three hundred microliters of the
supernatant was collected, and the protein concentration was determined
(30).
Immunoprecipitation by anti-Snm1p antibody.
Immunoprecipitation was performed as described before (45).
Fifty microliters of protein A-Sepharose CL4B beads (200 mg/ml) was
incubated with 3 µl of rabbit serum containing anti-Snm1p antibody
for 1 h at 4°C, and the mixture was washed three times with
buffer A. The bead volume was brought up to 1.25 ml with buffer A, and
the mixture was incubated with 375 µg of yeast extract for 1 h
at 4°C. The samples were washed four times with 1 ml of buffer A, the
volume of each sample was brought up to 100 µl with buffer A, 100 µl of 5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-10%
-mercaptoethanol was
added, and the samples were heated to 95°C for 5 min. After the beads
were removed by centrifugation, the RNA was extracted with
phenol-chloroform equilibrated to pH 5.3, precipitated with ethanol,
and examined by Northern analysis.
Affinity purification of anti-Snm1p antibody.
Snm1p was
expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) cells by use of a T7 promoter
system as described before (45). After induction with
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside, (IPTG), cells were
pelleted and washed with lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 100 mM KCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF). Cells were then sonicated and
washed with lysis buffer containing 0.5% Triton X-100. Inclusion bodies were pelleted, solubilized in 6 M guanidine chloride, and diluted in 50 mM Tris-HCl-0.5 mM DTT-10 µM ZnCl2; about
60% of Snm1p was soluble. Snm1p was concentrated by use of an Amicon concentrator with a molecular mass cutoff of 10,000 Da. Approximately 10 mg of Snm1p was coupled to 6 ml of Affi-Gel 10 (Bio-Rad Corp., Hercules, Calif.) according to the instructions of the manufacturer, and 25 ml of serum was loaded on an Snm1p column and washed with 25 column volumes of 10 mM Tris (pH 7.5) and then with 25 column volumes
of 10 mM Tris (pH 7.5)-0.5 M NaCl. Antibody was eluted with 10 column
volumes of 100 mM glycine (pH 2.5). The column was equilibrated with 10 mM Tris (pH 8.8), and antibody was eluted with 10 column volumes of 100 mM triethylamine (pH 11.5). The two eluates were combined and dialyzed
overnight against phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The antibody was
precipitated with 50% ammonium sulfate, resuspended in 10 ml of PBS,
and dialyzed against PBS.
Western blot analysis.
SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (PAGE) was performed as previously described
(47). Forty micrograms of yeast protein extract was
denatured in 2% SDS-5%
-mercaptoethanol for 5 min at 95°C and
resolved on a 15% polyacrylamide gel. The separated proteins were
electrophoretically transferred to a BA-S NC-supported nitrocellulose
membrane (Schleicher & Schuell, Inc., Keene, N.H.) by use of a Bio-Rad
semidry transfer cell. The membrane was stained for 10 min with Ponceau
S solution (0.1% Ponceau S, 5% acetic acid) to ensure proper
transfer. The membrane was blocked with 5% milk-TBST (20 mM Tris-Cl
[pH 7.6], 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20) for 1 h at 24°C,
incubated with affinity-purified anti-Snm1p antibody (1:500 dilution in
5% milk-TBST) for 1 h, washed with TBST three times for 10 min
each time, incubated with peroxidase-anti-rabbit antibody (1:10,000
dilution in TBST; Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals, Indianapolis, Ind.)
for 30 min, and washed with TBST three times for 10 min each time. The
peroxidase-anti-rabbit antibody was detected with a Boehringer
chemiluminescence Western blotting kit and exposed to film for 10 min
and then again overnight.
Plasmid segregation assay.
A 3.6-kb BamHI
fragment containing the ADE2 gene was cloned into the pRS316
and YCPlac33 vectors to make the reporter plasmids pTC185 and pTC186,
respectively (15, 51). Both reporter plasmids were
transformed into THR200-derived yeast strains carrying the appropriate
SNM1 allele by selecting for the URA3 marker on
the plasmids (11). snm1 mutant strains carrying
an ADE2 reporter plasmid were grown at 30°C in SCD
overnight and diluted in sterile water, and 500 cells of each yeast
strain were plated onto 150-mm YPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2%
dextrose) plates. The plates were scanned by use of a Linotype Hell
JADE2 scanner after 3 days of growth at 30°C, when the
color was fully developed.
Tubulin immunofluorescence.
Cells were prepared for
immunofluorescence as previously described (36). Rat
monoclonal antitubulin antibody YOL1/34 and indocarbocyanine
(Cy3)-conjugated rabbit anti-rat secondary antibody were obtained from
Accurate Chemical Corp., Westbury, N.Y. Cells were viewed by use of a
Ziess Axioskop microscope equipped with epifluorescence and Narmoski
optics and a Zeiss Plan-Apochromat 100× objective. Images were
captured in real time by use of a Diagnostics Instruments Spot Camera 2 directly linked to a Macintosh PowerMac G3 computer.
 |
RESULTS |
Isolation of conditional mutations in the SNM1
gene.
Random PCR mutagenesis of the SNM1 gene was
performed to further define the functional regions of the Snm1 protein.
Plasmid pTHR100 (pRS315 containing SNM1) was digested with
restriction enzymes BamHI and NsiI to remove a
696-bp fragment containing the SNM1 coding region. At the
same time, plasmid pMES193 (pBS containing SNM1) was used as
a template to produce a linear fragment containing the SNM1
gene by use of PCR. The nucleotide concentrations in the PCR were made
unequal to encourage mutations. The mutagenized snm1 PCR
product was cotransformed with gap-containing plasmid pTHR100 into
haploid yeast strain THR200, with selection for the LEU2
gene. Yeast cells will repair the gap-containing plasmid with the PCR
product by recombining homologous regions found at the ends of the PCR
product and the ends of the gap-containing plasmid. Yeast strain THR200
contains a chromosomal deletion of the SNM1 gene and a
wild-type copy of SNM1 on a URA3-based
CEN plasmid (YCp50) (40). Transformants were
replicated to two successive 5-FOA plates and then replicated to SCD
plates at various temperatures between 17 and 37°C.
Approximately 8,000 separate yeast transformants were screened for a
growth phenotype due to the presence of the mutagenized
snm1
gene. Strains that displayed either cold- or temperature-sensitive
growth were selected. Growth phenotypes were verified by testing
a
second time on SCD plates at various temperatures. Two hundred
possible
mutants that showed defective growth phenotypes were
selected.
We then confirmed that the growth phenotypes seen were due to the
presence of the pTHR100 plasmid repaired with the mutagenized
snm1 gene. The plasmids from 180 of the original
transformants
were rescued into
E. coli and retransformed
back into THR200 to
confirm that the initial growth phenotype seen was
linked to the
plasmid. Mutants were then more closely screened for
temperature-conditional
phenotypes. They were grown on dextrose-based
medium plates at
17, 24, 30, or 37°C. Eighteen conditional
plasmid-linked mutations
of the
snm1 gene were isolated in
this way. Fourteen were cold
sensitive (p2, p3, p9, p10, p11, p21, p22,
p24, S8, p31, p39,
p50, S53, and S64), 1 was temperature sensitive
(S33), and 2 were
both cold sensitive and temperature sensitive (p14
and p18) (Fig.
1). One showed slightly
slower growth at elevated temperatures
(S56).

View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Growth phenotypes of yeast strains carrying a mutant
snm1 gene. Two colonies from each mutant yeast strain were
mixed with 100 µl of sterile double-distilled H2O in the
first-row wells of a 96-well Falcon tissue culture plate; 10-fold
serial dilutions of these cell mixtures were placed in the second-,
third-, and fourth-row wells. A 48-pin Frogger was used to transfer
diluted cell mixtures to SCD plates. The cells were grown for 2 days at
24, 30, and 37°C and for 4 days at 17°C. SNM1 alleles
are listed in Table 1. All SNM1 alleles are carried on
LEU2 CEN vector pRS315 (51) in strain THR200. WT,
wild type.
|
|
The
snm1 insert in all 18 mutant plasmids was sequenced on
both strands. Fifteen of the plasmids showed mutations within the
snm1 coding region. Several transitions, transversions,
insertions,
and deletions were found. In addition to the formation of
missense
mutants, several frameshift and nonsense mutants were
identified.
Sequence changes identified in the mutants are listed in
Table
1.
Two site-directed mutations were created to specifically change
cysteines 64 and 106, which are believed to be involved in
zinc binding
(
snm1-170 and
snm1-172, respectively). The 170 mutant
displayed no growth defect from 17 to 37°C, while the 172 mutant
was temperature
sensitive.
Defects in 5.8S rRNA processing in snm1 mutants.
The severity of the mutations and the resulting growth phenotypes
suggested that the defects in Snm1p affected the function of the RNase
MRP enzyme complex. Although Snm1p has been shown to be an essential
protein that is closely associated with the MRP RNA, it has not been
directly shown to be required for the function of the MRP enzyme
(45). Mutations in nme1, the gene for the MRP
RNA, or in Pop1p, another protein component of yeast RNase MRP, lead to
defective 5.8S rRNA processing (7, 29, 44). In addition,
transcriptional depletion of mRNAs for other RNase MRP protein
components leads to a similar phenotype (3, 8). Two species
of 5.8S rRNA that differ in length by only 7 nucleotides exist in yeast
(41). Normally, they are present at a ratio of 10:1, small
to large. Loss of yeast RNase MRP components results in a loss of
processing of the smaller 5.8S rRNA. To see if mutations in the
snm1 gene produce the same result, mutants were screened for
anomalies in 5.8S rRNA processing. The mutants were grown at 30°C
until they reached the exponential phase and then were shifted to the
nonpermissive temperature to determine the effect of growth at the
nonpermissive temperature on 5.8S rRNA processing. Whole-cell RNA
extracts from the mutants were analyzed on 6% acrylamide-7 M urea
gels. Nearly all the mutants displayed some defect in 5.8S rRNA
processing. The severity of the temperature-dependent growth seen in
the mutants closely coincided with the severity of the defect seen in
5.8S rRNA processing (Fig. 2A). In
addition, nearly all of the mutants displayed some loss of 5.8S rRNA
processing at the permissive temperature (data not shown). These
results demonstrate that Snm1p is required for the function of the
RNase MRP enzyme in rRNA processing.

View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
rRNA processing, RNase MRP RNA association, and Northern
analysis of MRP RNA in snm1 mutant strains. Yeast strains
were grown to 107 cells/ml at 30°C in YPD and then
shifted to the nonpermissive temperature for 6 h. Cells were
harvested, total RNA was isolated from one-half of the culture, and
whole-cell protein extracts were made from the other half (see
Materials and Methods). SNM1 alleles are listed in Table 1.
All SNM1 alleles are carried on LEU2 CEN vector
pRS315 (51) in strain THR200. (A) Ten micrograms of total
RNA from the indicated strains was separated on 6% acrylamide-7 M
urea gels and examined by staining with ethidium bromide. The locations
of the relevant 5.8S(S), 5.8S(L), and 5.8Sb RNAs are shown. The ratios
of the two 5.8S bands are provided in Table 1. WT, wild type. (B)
Northern analysis of the RNase MRP RNA that coimmunoprecipitated with
the anti-Snm1p antibody. Four hundred micrograms of protein extract
from each mutant was incubated with polyclonal anti-Snm1p antibody.
Antibody-protein RNA complexes were collected as described in Materials
and Methods. RNA that coimmunoprecipitated with the antibody was
separated on 6% acrylamide-7 M urea gels, and the MRP RNA was
detected by hybridization with a 32P-labeled probe
corresponding to a 1,042-bp EcoRI fragment containing the
NME1 gene (43). (C) Northern analysis of the
RNase MRP RNA in yeast snm1 mutant strains. Ten micrograms
of whole-cell RNA isolated from yeast snm1 mutant strains
was separated on 6% acrylamide-7 M urea gels and blotted to nylon
membranes. The MRP RNA was visualized by hybridization with
32P-labeled probes corresponding to a 1,042-bp
EcoRI fragment containing the NME1 gene
(43) and a 736-bp EcoRI-SpeI fragment
containing the SCR1 gene as a loading control
(12).
|
|
The stability of the MRP RNA is not affected in snm1
mutants.
The RNA component of yeast RNase MRP is essential for the
proper functioning of the enzyme and cellular viability. It is known that Snm1p is associated with the MRP RNA in vivo (45). It
was postulated that mutations in Snm1p could compromise the stability of the RNA component, explaining the mutant phenotypes seen. To test
this possibility, Northern analyses were performed on whole-cell RNAs
isolated from the mutant yeast strains after they were shifted to
nonpermissive temperatures. Whole-cell RNA extracts from the mutants
were analyzed for the presence of the MRP RNA and SCR1 RNA,
an abundant cytoplasmic RNA, used as a loading control (12). As indicated in Fig. 2C, MRP RNA stability was unaffected in all of the
snm1 mutants. This result is in contrast to the rapid loss of MRP RNA stability caused by a mutation in the pop1 gene
(29).
The association of Snm1p with the MRP RNA changes in the
mutants.
Antibody against Snm1p has been previously shown to
coimmunoprecipitate the MRP RNA. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments with mutant Snm1 proteins were performed to test if this interaction was
maintained (45). Anti-Snm1p antibody was bound to protein A-Sepharose beads. Whole-cell mutant yeast extracts were incubated with
the anti-Snm1p antibody attached to protein A-Sepharose beads and
washed several times. The RNA was removed from the beads and analyzed
by Northern analysis for the presence of both the MRP RNA and
SCR1 RNA as a negative control. As shown in the Northern blot analyses of the coimmunoprecipitation experiments (Fig. 2B), wild-type controls were able to precipitate the MRP RNA by use of the
anti-Snm1p antibody. However, many of the snm1 mutants failed to precipitate appreciable amounts of the MRP RNA, indicating that these mutants have a reduced MRP RNA association in vivo. Similar
results were seen whether extracts were made from cells at either the
permissive or the nonpermissive temperature (data not shown).
Immunoprecipitations were repeated at least three times for each
mutant, with similar results each time. In addition, degradation of
nonprecipitated MRP RNA was never seen. Precipitated MRP RNA was
undetectable in this assay for the p3, p9, p21, p22, p39, p31, p50,
S56, p14, S33, 172, and p10 mutants. Mutants p2, S53, S8, S64, and 170 were able to precipitate some MRP RNA, although to a lesser extent than
the wild type. The p18 mutant consistently precipitated more MRP RNA
than the wild type. Unlike the processing of the 5.8S rRNA, there was
no discernable correlation between Snm1p binding to the MRP RNA and the
growth phenotype of the mutant. Many mutant strains, such as S56, grew
quite well but still failed to bind any detectable RNase MRP RNA, while
the p18 mutant appeared to bind more MRP RNA than the wild type yet
grew slowly at most temperatures and had a severe rRNA-processing defect.
Essentiality testing of the SNM1 gene.
In the
snm1 mutants isolated, several frameshift and nonsense
mutations were found. Some of these mutations were so severe (p14 had a
frameshift mutation at Lys8, p3 had a nonsense mutation at Gln84, and
S8 had a nonsense mutation at Glu53) that we expected no functional
Snm1p was being made. However, all of these mutants, regardless of the
severity of the mutations, could grow at least moderately well, if not
as well as the wild type, at 30°C, despite little or no detectable
MRP RNA binding. This result suggests that Snm1p may not be essential
for the viability of yeast cells at 30°C. This notion would be in
conflict with a previous deletion analysis of the SNM1 gene
(45) and suggested the possibility that some other gene is
tightly linked to the SNM1 gene and that a loss of the
function of the linked gene is responsible for the lack of viability
observed for snm1 deletion strains. We tested this
possibility by using three different approaches. First, we placed the
SNM1 coding sequence (from ATG to TAG) in between an ACT1 promoter and terminator and transformed this construct
into yeast strain THR200, which has a chromosomal deletion of the
SNM1 gene and is maintained by a wild-type SNM1
gene on a URA3-based plasmid. After removal of the wild-type
SNM1 plasmid by growth on 5-FOA plates, we found that the
heterologous promoter construct could fully complement the chromosomal
deletion of the SNM1 gene at all temperatures (data not
shown). This result indicated that the SNM1 coding region
was required for viability. Second, we combined three different
snm1 nonsense and frameshift mutations (p14, S8, and p18) to
make all of the possible double and triple mutations. All of these
mutations were unable to complement the chromosomal deletion,
demonstrating that Snm1p was required and eliminating the possibility
that the SNM1 RNA transcript was required for cell
viability. Indeed, this result suggested that the snm1 mutants were translationally suppressed. Third, we had previously constructed a carboxy-terminal hemagglutonin (3×HA)-tagged version of
the SNM1 gene. This tagged version complemented an
snm1 deletion, but with reduced protein levels. We combined
this 3×HA-tagged version of SNM1 with snm1
nonsense and frameshift mutations (p3 and p14). Neither of these tagged
mutations could complement a chromosomal snm1 deletion,
indicating that translational readthrough to the carboxy-terminal end
of Snm1p was required for complementation of these mutations.
Reduction in Snm1p levels in snm1 mutants.
An
affinity-purified anti-Snm1p antibody was used in the Western analysis
to examine Snm1p levels in snm1 mutants (45). As
shown in Fig. 3, this antibody readily
detects Snm1p in yeast cell extracts. In addition, this antibody
cross-reacts with another protein of approximately 27 kDa, providing a
convenient loading control. A yeast strain with the SNM1
gene on a high-copy-number plasmid (WT/2µ) produces a signal with an
intensity stronger than that of a wild-type single-copy SNM1
strain (wild type or WT/CEN), confirming that this band is Snm1p. In
all the mutants shown (S8, p3, p14, p18, and p21), Snm1p levels are
very low. However, after a long exposure, a full-length Snm1p band is
detected for most of these nonsense and frameshift mutations. This
result suggests that very little Snm1p is required for cell viability
and that these nonsense and frameshift mutations are translationally
suppressed, but at a very low rate. Surprisingly, very little p18
protein is detected despite increased immunoprecipitation of the MRP
RNA from this mutant. A low-abundance band with the molecular weight expected for the truncated p18 protein can be reproducibly seen in the
Western analysis. This low-abundance protein may have a higher affinity
than the wild-type protein for the MRP RNA and/or polyclonal anti-Snm1
antibodies when in its native configuration. The results obtained with
mutant p18 show that the last third of Snm1p is dispensable for MRP RNA
binding but not for RNase activity.

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Western analysis of snm1 mutants. Whole-cell
protein extracts were made from yeast strains grown to 107
cells/ml at 30°C in SCD (see Materials and Methods). Forty micrograms
of protein extracts was denatured in 2% SDS-5% -mercaptoethanol
for 5 min at 95°C. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE through a 15%
polyacrylamide gel. Proteins were subsequently transferred to a
nitrocellulose membrane and probed with an affinity-purified polyclonal
anti-Snm1p antibody at a 1:500 dilution. The blot was probed with a
secondary peroxidase-anti-rabbit antibody and visualized with the
Boehringer chemiluminescence kit. The Snm1p band is indicated. The band
above Snm1p is a nonspecific protein that serves as a convenient
loading control. SNM1 alleles are listed in Table 1.
SNM1 alleles WT/CEN, S8, S56, p3, p14, p18, p21, and 172 are
carried on LEU2 CEN vector pRS315 (51) in strain
THR200. The WT/2µ strain is identical to the other strains, except
that the wild-type SNM1 gene is maintained on yeast 2µm
plasmid YEp351 (18). WT is DBY2006, which contains a
wild-type chromosomal SNM1 gene (43).
|
|
Other genes are not translationally suppressed in snm1
mutants.
Since Snm1p and the RNase MRP enzyme are involved in
ribosome biogenesis, we suspected that defects in RNase MRP could lead to the production of ribosomes that have compromised translational fidelity (55). To test this possibility, we looked for cross suppression of the yeast nonsense mutations lys1-1 (UAA),
trp1-1 (UAG), tyr7-1 (UAG), ilv1-1
(UAG), ade3-26 (UAG), and met8-1 (UAG) (27) both by snm1 mutations and by mutations in
the MRP RNA (NME1) (44). We were unable to detect
translational suppression of any of these mutations by snm1
or nme1 mutations (data not shown). This result indicated
that the translational suppression was specific for the SNM1
gene and that there is no general compromise of translational fidelity
in snm1 mutants.
Increase in snm1 mRNA levels in snm1
mutants.
Since we unexpectedly found translational suppression of
the snm1 mutants, we decided to perform Northern analysis on
the suppressed snm1 mutants. As shown in Fig.
4, the 800-nucleotide SNM1
transcript was barely detectable in a wild-type yeast strain (WT/CEN).
However, in most of the mutants examined, snm1 mRNA levels
were increased between 7- and 25-fold, to levels even higher than the
level of expression from a wild-type SNM1 2µm plasmid (WT/2µ). This result suggests that high snm1 mRNA levels
in nonsense and frameshift mutants may lead to sufficient translational
suppression to sustain cell viability.

View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Northern analysis of SNM1 mRNA. Total RNA was
isolated from yeast snm1 mutant strains grown to
107 cells/ml at 30°C in SCD (see Materials and Methods).
Twenty micrograms of total RNA per lane was loaded on a 6%
acrylamide-7 M urea gel and blotted to a nylon membrane. The mRNA
corresponding to transcripts from the SNM1 allele was
detected by hybridization with a 32P-labeled probe
corresponding to the 696-bp BamHI-NsiI fragment
containing the SNM1 coding region. The lower panel shows the
location of the SNM1 transcripts. The upper panel shows the
signal corresponding to the SNM1 mRNA, measured with a
PhosphorImager and normalized to the mRNA level in WT/CEN, which was
assigned a level of 1. SNM1 alleles are listed in Table 1.
The WT/CEN and mutant SNM1 genes (S8, p3, p18, p21, and p31)
are carried on LEU2 CEN vector YCplac111 (15) in
strain THR200. The WT/2µ strain is identical to the other strains,
except that the wild-type SNM1 gene is maintained on yeast
2µm plasmid YEp351 (18). I, the given allele was
integrated into the yeast chromosome at the LEU2 gene in
THR200 (see Materials and Methods).
|
|
Plasmid specificity of snm1 mutants.
The mutant
snm1 genes were maintained on a CEN LEU2 (pRS315)
plasmid in all of the mutants (51). To examine if the mRNA level increase was plasmid specific, we transferred several of the
snm1 mutations into plasmid YCplac111 and tested them for replacement of a wild-type SNM1 gene (15). All of
the mutations still complemented a deletion strain at 30°C, except
for the p14 mutation (frameshift at amino acid 8) (data not shown). We
also placed several of the mutant snm1 genes into plasmid
YIplac128 and integrated them into the chromosomal LEU2
gene. After integration, only the nonsense mutations were still able to
complement the snm1 deletion at 30°C, and most of these
nonsense mutants grew very slowly (only p18 grew at a rate comparable
to that when maintained on a plasmid). None of the frameshift mutations
were able to complement when integrated. These results were consistent
with the placement of SNM1 on the plasmid playing a direct
role in snm1 mRNA amplification and with past reports that
frameshift mutations are more difficult to suppress than nonsense
mutations (33).
Increase in plasmid copy number in snm1 mutants.
To test if the large increase in mRNA expression was caused by plasmid
amplification, copy numbers of the snm1-carrying plasmids were examined by Southern analysis. The signal was normalized to the
single chromosomal copy of SNM1 in strain DBY2006 and
normalized between strains by use of the single chromosomal copy of the
SCR1 gene. This strategy allowed us to estimate plasmid copy
numbers in the various strains. All the mutants showed increased
snm1 plasmid copy numbers compared to the wild type, ranging
from 5 to 15 copies per cell (Fig. 5).
The wild-type CEN plasmid was estimated at about 1.5 copies
per cell, and the wild-type 2µm plasmid was estimated at about 6 copies. However, most of the plasmids containing mutant snm1
genes were highly amplified even when CEN was present. We
were able to find no other reports in the literature of this type of
CEN-containing plasmid amplification and suppression. These
results suggest that mutations in the snm1 gene may cause
plasmid amplification, either by directly causing overreplication or
missegregation because of a defective RNase MRP enzyme or by selecting
for yeast that missegregates or overreplicates or by both methods. The
integrated snm1 mutations were all maintained at one copy
per cell.

View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Southern analysis of SNM1 gene copy number in
various mutants. (A) Genomic DNA was isolated from yeast
snm1 mutant strains grown to 2 × 107
cells/ml at 30°C in SCD (see Materials and Methods). Ten micrograms
of genomic DNA per lane was digested with EcoRI and
SpeI overnight, separated on a 1% agarose gel, transferred
to a nylon membrane, and hybridized with 32P-labeled
SNM1 probe and SCR1 probe for standardization.
The locations of the SNM1 and SCR1 genes are
indicated. (B) Band intensity was measured with a PhosphorImager and
standardized against the intensities of the SCR1 and DBY2006
SNM1 bands as single-copy controls to calculate copy number.
Copy numbers were plotted against mRNA levels from Fig. 4.
SNM1 alleles are listed in Table 1. The WT/CEN and mutant
SNM1 genes (S8, p3, p18, p21, and p31) are carried on
LEU2 CEN vector YCplac111 (15). The WT/2µ
strain is identical to the other strains, except that the wild-type
SNM1 gene is maintained on yeast 2µm plasmid YEp351
(18). I, the given allele was integrated into the yeast
chromosome at the LEU2 gene in THR200 (see Materials and
Methods).
|
|
Plasmid missegregation in snm1 mutants.
If the
plasmid amplification is directly due to selection to amplify the
mutant snm1 gene on the plasmid, maintenance of a separate
plasmid should be normal. To test plasmid segregation in
snm1 mutant strains, we constructed reporter plasmid pTC185. It contains a wild-type ADE2 gene in the CEN URA3
vector pRS316 (51) that is independent of the mutant
snm1 gene. All the snm1 mutant strains have an
ade2-1 mutation on the chromosome and form red colonies on
YPD plates. After having been transformed with plasmid pTC185
containing a wild-type ADE2 gene, they form white colonies.
Upon loss of the plasmid, red sectors are formed in white colonies. If
there is a segregation problem, more red sectors will be seen.
Yeast strains with the reporter plasmid were grown in nonselective
media overnight. The cells were counted, diluted, plated
at 500 cells
per 150-mm petri dish, and grown at 30°C for several
days. The
results are shown in Fig.
6. Most
wild-type cells are
white, although a small number of red colonies are
seen due to
plasmid loss during nonselective growth. A very small
number of
sectoring colonies are found; most of these have fewer than
three
small sectors. In the
snm1 mutant strains, we see a
clear increase
in plasmid missegregation. The p18, p3, and S8 mutants
have more
sectoring colonies than the wild type, and the sectoring
colonies
usually have more than three sectors, indicating more frequent
missegregation during colony formation. The p21 strain has more
sectoring colonies than p18, p3, and S8 strains, consistent with
a
higher plasmid copy number. The p14 strain, which grows slowly
even at
30°C, has an extreme sectoring phenotype and an increase
in the
number of all red colonies. These results show that defects
in Snm1p
function can cause plasmid missegregation.

View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Plasmid segregation in snm1 mutants. The
yeast snm1 mutant strains were transformed with a plasmid
carrying a wild-type ADE2 gene as a reporter for plasmid
maintenance. These mutants were grown at 30°C in SCD with uracil to
remove selection for the plasmid for 18 h and were diluted in
sterile water, and 500 cells of each yeast strain were plated on 150-mm
petri dishes. Pictures were taken after 3 days of growth at 30°C,
when the color was fully developed. Strain p14 is shown at twice the
magnification, since it grows slower than the other strains at 30°C.
SNM1 alleles are listed in Table 1. All SNM1
alleles are carried on LEU2 CEN vector pRS315
(51) in strain THR200. WT, wild type.
|
|
To confirm that missegregation was not specific for the pRS vectors, we
also used the YCplac vectors, which have a
CEN4-ARS1 cassette for plasmid maintenance (
15); similar results were
obtained (data not
shown).
We wanted to rule out the possibility that the high-copy-number
CEN maintenance in the mutant strains was not causing the
missegregation of the independent
ADE2-containing plasmid.
We
did this by examining plasmid segregation in strains with an
integrated
mutant
SNM1 gene. These strains have no plasmids
other than the
introduced
ADE2-containing plasmid and should
have no selection
for or against the presence of this plasmid. As shown
in Fig.
7, strains with an integrated
mutant
SNM1 gene still have a large
increase in plasmid
instability compared to the wild-type strain.
This result rules out the
possibility that plasmid instability
is caused by plasmid competition.
We also tested an MRP RNA mutant
in the segregation assay and obtained
identical results, indicating
that the missegregation phenotype is due
to the loss of RNase
MRP activity and is not
SNM1 specific
(data not shown).

View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Plasmid missegregation is independent of
high-copy-number plasmid maintenance or a need to amplify the
SNM1 gene. Yeast strains with snm1 mutations
integrated into the LEU2 locus on chromosome III were
transformed with a plasmid carrying a wild-type ADE2 gene as
a reporter for plasmid maintenance. These mutants were grown at 30°C
in SCD with uracil to remove selection for the plasmid for 18 h
and were diluted in sterile water, and 500 cells of each yeast strain
were plated on 150-mm petri dishes. Pictures were taken after 3 days of
growth at 30°C, when the color was fully developed. SNM1
alleles are listed in Table 1.
|
|
Recent results have identified a role for the RNase MRP enzyme in a
late stage of the cell cycle (
2a). RNase MRP RNA mutants
showed a cell cycle arrest, with large-bud cells, a long mitotic
spindle, and divided nuclei (M to G
1 arrest). This
phenotype is
characteristic of the late-telophase arrest seen in the
cdc15 class of mutants (
16,
19,
56). Many of
these mutants have
also been found to have chromosome segregation
problems. We tested
an
snm1 mutant for a similar
arrest phenotype. Using the p18 mutant,
we examined the mitotic spindle
by using an antitubulin antibody
and immunofluorescence when this
mutant was grown at either the
permissive or the nonpermissive
temperature (
21). As shown in
Fig.
8, the p18 mutant displayed a clear
telophase arrest when
grown at the nonpermissive temperature for 3 h. In addition, even
at the permissive temperature, we found cells that
looked delayed
at this stage of the cell cycle. The appearance of this
defect
in the p18 mutant (maintained by a low plasmid copy number)
indicates
that the arrest is not the result of a problem with
segregating
the many
CEN plasmids found in some
snm1 mutants. Other
snm1 mutants,
including 172 and p14, displayed an identical arrest phenotype.
These data, along
with a similar arrest phenotype in MRP RNA mutants
(
2a),
indicate an RNase MRP-specific defect as opposed to an
SNM1-specific or an
SNM1-allele-specific defect.

View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Immunolocalization of mitotic spindles. Yeast strains
were grown to 2 × 106 cells/ml at 30°C in YPD and
either maintained at 30°C for an additional 3 h or shifted to
37°C for 3 h. Cells were fixed, and the mitotic spindle and DNA
were localized as described in Materials and Methods.
4',6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining of DNA is shown in blue,
and Cy3 staining of tubulin is shown in red. The wild-type gene and the
p18 mutation are carried on LEU2 CEN vector pRS315
(51) in strain THR200.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Generation of snm1 mutations.
Random PCR
mutagenesis of the SNM1 gene yielded 18 mutants with various
temperature-conditional growth phenotypes. DNA sequence analysis of the
mutants revealed mutations located throughout the gene and ranging from
missense mutations to frameshift and nonsense mutations. Because the
SNM1 gene is essential, such serious frameshift and nonsense
mutations were not expected. The phenotypes of most of the frameshift
and nonsense mutants were very similar. They all displayed
cold-sensitive growth (except for p18 and p14, which are also
temperature sensitive), a decrease in 5.8S rRNA production, a decrease
in Snm1p levels, and a decrease in Snm1p associated with MRP RNA
(except for p18). There have been no other reports of cold-sensitive
translational suppression, so the cold sensitivity may be the result of
a reduction in binding of the MRP RNA by Snm1p at colder temperatures.
Translational suppressors of frameshift and nonsense mutations have
been reported for yeast (
33,
59). However, these extragenic
suppressors usually lead to cross suppression of similar mutations
in
different genes, a finding which was not obtained in this study
(
27). Yeast can read through nonsense mutations in the
absence
of translational suppressors, but at a low rate
(
13). Nonsense
mutations in the
HSF1 gene were
found to be subject to translational
readthrough without second-site
translational suppressors; however,
the copy number of the
HSF1 centromere plasmid in that study was
not determined
(
22). It also has been demonstrated that the
overexpression
of nonsense
HSF1 mutations on a 2µm plasmid can
provide
full viability, indicating that a high copy number is
able to suppress
at least some nonsense mutations (
22). In this
study, all
the frameshift and nonsense mutations isolated conferred
viability,
suggesting that suppression does occur. Observation
of the full-length
readthrough product in Western analyses and
the lethality of the
mutations when combined with a carboxy-terminal
3×HA tag also advocate
readthrough. After examining mRNA levels
and plasmid copy numbers in
the
snm1 mutants, we found that nonsense
and frameshift
mutations in the
snm1 gene are suppressed by amplification
of the plasmid carrying the
snm1 gene. In the mutants
studied,
plasmid copy number is amplified 5- to 15-fold, with a
parallel
increase in mRNA levels. At high mRNA levels, it is postulated
that a small portion of the mRNA can be read through by the ribosomes,
resulting in the translation of full-length products. These experiments
indicate that very little full-length Snm1p is required for cell
viability. A careful search of the literature revealed no other
reports
of translational suppression conferred by
CEN plasmid
amplification.
Function of Snm1p in RNase MRP.
We show for the first time
that mutations in the snm1 gene can adversely effect RNase
MRP activity, causing a loss of 5.8S rRNA processing. Since it has been
previously established that Snm1p interacts with the MRP RNA and that
it is a component of the RNase MRP enzyme complex, one role for Snm1p
may be to stabilize the MRP RNA component. This possibility was
explored by analyzing whole-cell RNA isolated from the snm1
mutants for the presence of the MRP RNA. Northern analyses of the RNA
isolated from the snm1 mutants showed that the stability of
the MRP RNA was unaffected in all of the mutants. The stability of the
MRP RNA is crucial for maintaining proper RNase MRP activity and yeast
cell viability. Depletion of other known protein components of the
yeast RNase MRP enzyme complex, Pop1p, Pop4p, Pop5p, Pop6p, Pop7/Rpp2p,
Pop8p, and Rpp1p, results in a loss of the stability of the RNA
component (3, 8, 53). The only other known protein component
that has no role in MRP RNA stability is the Pop3 protein, which is believed to be loosely associated with RNase MRP and tightly associated with RNase P (10). Since Snm1p is the only unique protein
component of RNase MRP, we speculate that the function of Snm1p may
involve substrate recognition and/or binding. The eight other protein components shared by RNase MRP and RNase P probably have functions in
stabilizing the component RNAs, assembling, transporting, and localizing the ribonucleoprotein complexes, and potentially catalyzing the RNA cleavage reactions. Either Rpr2p, which is a unique component of RNase P, or Pop3p may play the counterpart role of Snm1p in RNase P.
Although not required for the stability of the MRP RNA in vivo, Snm1p
appears to be required to produce a fully functional
RNase MRP complex
capable of processing rRNAs. To test if a direct
interaction with the
MRP RNA is required for function, mutants
were tested in
coimmunoprecipitation experiments with anti-Snm1p
antibody to see if
mutant Snm1p still associates with the MRP
RNA. Almost all mutants
showed reduced or undetectable levels
of immunoprecipitable MRP RNA,
implying that these mutants have
levels of Snm1p in association with
MRP RNA that are below the
range of the detection system used in these
experiments (approximately
<2% the wild-type level). Western analysis
showed that most
snm1 mutants produced full-length Snm1p,
but at a very low level. These
low levels of Snm1p explain the low
levels of MRP RNA coimmunoprecipitated
with Snm1p. Interestingly, the
p18 mutant could consistently coimmunoprecipitate
more MRP RNA than the
wild type. In addition, this is the only
nonsense mutation that was
unaffected by the carboxy-terminal
3×HA tag, indicating that the
truncated version is active in this
case. p18 has a Lys151 nonsense
mutation that is predicted to
produce a truncated protein (about two
thirds the size of the
full-length protein) without the lysine- and
serine-rich tail.
This protein appears to associate more tightly with
the MRP RNA
or has a higher affinity for the antibody than the
full-length
protein, therefore allowing more MRP RNA to be
immunoprecipitated
in this mutant. A higher antibody affinity would
also necessitate
the antibody binding better to the native protein than
to the
denatured protein, since Western analysis detected very little
mutant p18 protein. The p18 mutant has a very strong rRNA-processing
defect and similar growth defects when found on a plasmid or integrated
into the chromosome. The immunoprecipitation results imply that
Snm1p
binding to the MRP RNA requires the zinc cluster half of
the protein
and that this interaction is not sufficient for the
function of Snm1p.
Indeed, point mutations that fell within the
predicted zinc binding
site failed to bind appreciable levels
of the MRP RNA (170, S56, and
S33), demonstrating the essentiality
of this region for RNA binding.
The 170 and S56 mutants, despite
minimal MRP RNA binding, were still
nearly wild type for both
growth and rRNA processing. Conversely,
mutations in the last
third of the protein (p18, S53, S64, and p2) were
all capable
of MRP RNA binding but were deficient in RNase MRP
activity, as
measured by rRNA processing. These results suggest that
Snm1p
has two functionally independent domains, one domain (zinc
cluster)
being required for association with the MRP RNA and a second
domain
(lysine- and serine-rich tail) being required for the activity
of the enzyme, potentially in binding the substrate or folding
the
substrate into a conformation that can be cleaved. The binding
of Snm1p
to the MRP RNA may not be essential for the function
of the second
domain in RNase MRP
activity.
The essential function of RNase MRP.
RNase MRP was first found
as an enzyme involved in mitochondria DNA replication (4)
and subsequently has been found to have a direct role in rRNA
processing (44). However, yeast cells without mitochondrial
DNA are viable, and others have questioned whether the role of RNase
MRP in rRNA processing is essential (1, 17). The RNA
component and all the protein components of yeast RNase MRP identified
so far are essential, indicating that the RNase MRP complex has a
function which is essential for normal cell growth.
In these studies of the
snm1 mutants, we found that plasmids
carrying the nonsense and frameshift mutations were amplified
and that
this amplification is due to plasmid missegregation.
Initially, we used
the pRS set of vectors in our mutagenesis experiments
(
51);
these vectors use a
CEN6-ARS4 cassette for plasmid
maintenance.
To confirm that missegregation was not caused by the pRS
vectors,
we also used the YCplac set of vectors; these vectors use a
CEN4-ARS1 cassette for plasmid maintenance. Similar results
were obtained
(data not shown) (
15). The YCplac vectors were
found to be more
stable than the pRS vectors in both the wild type and
various
snm1 mutants; however, a higher rate of
missegregation was always
seen in the
snm1 mutants. This was
also the case when the mutations
were integrated into the chromosome,
indicating that the missegregation
was not the result of a cell trying
to maintain too many
CEN plasmids
and was independent of the
need to amplify the
SNM1-containing
plasmid. We also
performed plasmid segregation experiments on
the
nme1-P6
mutant (
44,
45), which has a point mutation at
position 122 in the MRP RNA. A high rate of missegregation was
also observed in this
mutant compared to the isogenic wild-type
strain. These results
indicate that defects in Snm1p resulting
in plasmid missegregation are
directly caused by a defect in RNase
MRP function and not by direct
selection for the
plasmid.
Other experiments from our laboratory have identified a role for the
RNase MRP enzyme late in the mitotic cell cycle, in the
breakdown of
the mitotic spindle and in movement out of mitosis
(
2a,
35).
Yeast cells with RNase MRP defects arrest during
telophase with
large-bud cells, divided nuclei, and a long mitotic
spindle. This is
also clearly the case for
snm1 mutants. The essential
function of RNase MRP may be in cell division cycle control. The
arrest
phenotype may be the cause of the plasmid missegregation
observed,
since a prolonged period of anaphase or improper disassembly
of the
mitotic spindle could easily be expected to lead to improper
segregation of
CEN plasmids or even potentially of
chromosomes.
The exact role of RNase MRP in exit from mitosis is
unknown but
may be associated with the release of
Cdc14
phosphatase from the
nucleolus (
49,
58).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank M. Hale, B. A. Morisseau, P. Kane, and D. Amberg
for comments and helpful discussions during the preparation of the manuscript.
This work was supported by grant NP-936 from the American Cancer Society.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, State University of New York Health Science Center at Syracuse, 750 East Adams St., Syracuse, NY 13210. Phone: (315) 464-8713. Fax: (315) 464-8750. E-mail:
schmittm{at}hscsyr.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Allmang, C.,
Y. Henry,
J. P. Morrissey,
H. Wood,
E. Petfalski, and D. Tollervey.
1996.
Processing of the yeast pre-rRNA at sites A(2) and A(3) is linked.
RNA
2:63-73[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Baldacci, G.,
B. Chérif-Zahar, and G. Bernardi.
1984.
The initiation of DNA replication in the mitochondrial genome of yeast.
EMBO J.
3:2115-2120[Medline].
|
| 2a.
| Cerio, M., and M. E. Schmitt. Unpublished
data.
|
| 3.
|
Chamberlain, J. R.,
Y. Lee,
W. S. Lane, and D. R. Engelke.
1998.
Purification and characterization of the nuclear RNase P holoenzyme complex reveals extensive subunit overlap with RNase MRP.
Genes Dev.
12:1678-1690[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Chang, D. D., and D. A. Clayton.
1987.
A mammalian mitochondrial RNA processing activity contains nucleus-encoded RNA.
Science
235:1178-1184[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Chang, D. D., and D. A. Clayton.
1987.
A novel endoribonuclease cleaves at a priming site of mouse mitochondrial DNA replication.
EMBO J.
6:409-417[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Chang, D. D., and D. A. Clayton.
1989.
Mouse RNAase MRP RNA is encoded by a nuclear gene and contains a decamer sequence complementary to a conserved region of mitochondrial RNA substrate.
Cell
56:131-139[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Chu, S.,
R. H. Archer,
J. M. Zengel, and L. Lindahl.
1994.
The RNA of RNase MRP is required for normal processing of ribosomal RNA.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
18:659-663.
|
| 8.
|
Chu, S.,
J. M. Zengel, and L. Lindahl.
1997.
A novel protein shared by RNase MRP and RNase P.
RNA
3:382-391[Abstract].
|
| 9.
|
Clayton, D. A.
1994.
A nuclear function for RNase MRP.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:4615-4617[Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Dichtl, B., and D. Tollervey.
1997.
Pop3p is essential for the activity of the RNase MRP and RNase P.
EMBO J.
16:417-429[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Dunn, B.,
P. Szauter,
M. L. Pardue, and J. W. Szostak.
1984.
Transfer of yeast telomeres to linear plasmids by recombination.
Cell
39:191-201[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Felici, F.,
G. Cesareni, and J. M. X. Hughes.
1989.
The most abundant small cytoplasmic RNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae has an important function required for normal growth.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9:3260-3268[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Firoozan, M.,
C. M. Grant,
J. A. Duarte, and M. F. Tuite.
1991.
Quantitation of readthrough of termination codons in yeast using a novel gene fusion assay.
Yeast
7:173-183[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Forster, A. C., and S. Altman.
1990.
Similar cage-shaped structure for the RNA components of all ribonuclease P and ribonuclease MRP enzymes.
Cell
62:407-409[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Gietz, R., and A. Sugino.
1988.
New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites.
Gene
74:527-534[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Hardy, C. F., and A. Pautz.
1996.
A novel role for Cdc5p in DNA replication.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:6775-6782[Abstract].
|
| 17.
|
Henry, Y.,
H. Wood,
J. P. Morrissey,
E. Petfalski,
S. Kearsey, and D. Tollervey.
1994.
The 5' end of yeast 5.8S rRNA is generated by exonucleases from an upstream cleavage site.
EMBO J.
13:2452-2463[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Hill, J. H.,
A. M. Meyers,
T. J. Koerner, and A. Tzagoloff.
1986.
Yeast/E. coli shuttle vectors with multiple unique restriction sites.
Yeast
2:163-167[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Hogan, E., and D. Koshland.
1992.
Addition of extra origins of replication to a minichromosome suppresses its mitotic loss in cdc6 and cdc14 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:3098-3102[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Jacobson, M. R.,
L. G. Cao,
Y. L. Wang, and T. Pederson.
1995.
Dynamic localization of RNase MRP RNA in the nucleolus observed by fluorescent RNA cytochemistry in living cells.
J. Cell Biol.
131:1649-1658[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Kilmartin, J. V.,
B. Wright, and C. Milstein.
1982.
Rat monoclonal antitubulin antibodies derived by using a new nonsecreting rat cell line.
J. Cell Biol.
93:576-582[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Kopczynski, J. B.,
A. C. Raff, and J. J. Bonner.
1992.
Translational readthrough at nonsense mutations in the HSF1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
234:369-378[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Lee, D. Y., and D. A. Clayton.
1996.
Properties of a primer RNA-DNA hybrid at the mouse mitochondrial DNA leading-strand origin of replication.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:24262-24269[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Lee, D. Y., and D. A. Clayton.
1997.
RNase mitochondrial RNA processing correctly cleaves a novel R loop at the mitochondrial DNA leading-strand origin of replication.
Genes Dev.
11:582-592[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Lee, D. Y., and D. A. Clayton.
1998.
Initiation of mitochondrial DNA replication by transcription and R-loop processing.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:30614-30621[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Li, K.,
C. S. Smagula,
W. J. Parsons,
J. A. Richardson,
M. Gonzalez,
H. K. Hagler, and R. S. Williams.
1994.
Subcellular partitioning of MRP RNA assessed by ultrastructural and biochemical analysis.
J. Cell Biol.
124:871-882[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Liebman, S. W.,
F. Sherman, and J. W. Stewart.
1976.
Isolation and characterization of amber suppressors in yeast.
Genetics
82:251-272[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Lygerou, Z.,
C. Allmang,
D. Tollervey, and B. Seraphin.
1996.
Accurate processing of a eukaryotic precursor ribosomal RNA by ribonuclease MRP in vitro.
Science
272:268-270[Abstract].
|
| 29.
|
Lygerou, Z.,
P. Mitchell,
E. Petfalski,
B. Seraphin, and D. Tollervey.
1994.
The POP1 gene encodes a protein component common to the RNase MRP and RNase P ribonucleoproteins.
Genes Dev.
8:1423-1433[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Markwell, M. A. K.,
S. M. Haas,
L. L. Bieber, and N. E. Tolbert.
1978.
A modification of the Lowry procedure to simplify protein determination in membrane and lipoprotein samples.
Anal. Biochem.
87:206-210[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Marmorstein, R.,
M. Carey,
M. Ptashne, and S. C. Harrison.
1992.
DNA recognition by GAL4: structure of a protein-DNA complex.
Nature
356:408-414[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Morrissey, J. P., and D. Tollervey.
1995.
Birth of the snoRNPs: the evolution of RNase MRP and the eukaryotic pre-rRNA-processing system.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
20:78-82[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Mortimer, R. K., and R. A. Gilmore.
1968.
Suppressors and suppressible mutations in yeast.
Adv. Biol. Med. Phys.
12:319-331[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Muhlrad, D.,
R. Hunter, and R. Parker.
1992.
A rapid method for localized mutagenesis of yeast genes.
Yeast
8:79-82[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Paluh, J. L., and D. A. Clayton.
1996.
A functional dominant mutation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe RNase MRP RNA affects nuclear RNA processing and requires the mitochondrial-associated nuclear mutation ptp1-1 for viability.
EMBO J.
15:4723-4733[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Pringle, J. R.,
R. A. Preston,
E. M. Adams,
T. Sterns,
D. G. Drubin,
B. K. Haarer, and E. W. Jones.
1989.
Fluorescence microscopy methods for yeast.
Methods Cell Biol.
31:357-435[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Reddy, R., and S. Shimba.
1995.
-1996. Structural and functional similarities between MRP and RNase P.
Mol. Biol. Rep.
22:81-85[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Reilly, T. H., and M. E. Schmitt.
1995.
-1996. The yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, RNase P/MRP ribonucleoprotein endoribonuclease family.
Mol. Biol. Rep.
22:87-93[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Reimer, G.,
I. Raska,
V. Scheer, and E. M. Tan.
1988.
Immunolocalization of 7-2 ribonucleoprotein in the granular component of the nucleolus.
Exp. Cell Res.
176:117-128[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Rose, M.,
P. Novick,
J. H. Thomas,
D. Botstein, and G. R. Fink.
1987.
A Saccharomyces cerevisiae genomic plasmid bank based on a centromere-containing shuttle vector.
Gene
60:237-243[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Rubin, G. M.
1974.
Three forms of the 5.8S ribosomal RNA species in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Eur. J. Biochem.
41:197-202[Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 43.
|
Schmitt, M. E., and D. A. Clayton.
1992.
Yeast site-specific ribonucleoprotein endoribonuclease MRP contains an RNA component homologous to mammalian RNase MRP RNA and essential for cell viability.
Genes Dev.
6:1975-1985[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Schmitt, M. E., and D. A. Clayton.
1993.
Nuclear RNase MRP is required for correct processing of pre-5.8S rRNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:7935-7941[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Schmitt, M. E., and D. A. Clayton.
1994.
Isolation of a unique protein component of the yeast RNase MRP: an RNA-binding protein with a zinc-cluster domain.
Genes Dev.
8:2617-2628[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Schmitt, M. E.,
J. L. Bennett,
D. J. Dairaghi, and D. A. Clayton.
1993.
Secondary structure of RNase MRP RNA as predicted by phylogenetic comparison.
FASEB J.
7:208-213[Abstract].
|
| 47.
|
Schmitt, M. E.,
T. A. Brown, and B. L. Trumpower.
1990.
A rapid, improved method for isolation of RNA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Nucleic Acids Res.
18:3091-3092[Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Sherman, F.
1991.
Getting started with yeast.
Methods Enzymol.
194:3-21[Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Shou, W.,
J. H. Seol,
A. Shevchenko,
C. Baskerville,
D. Moazed,
Z. W. S. Chen,
J. Jang,
A. Shevchenko,
H. Charbonneau, and R. J. Deshaies.
1999.
Exit from mitosis is triggered by Tem1-dependent release of the protein phosphatase Cdc14 from nucleolar RENT complex.
Cell
97:233-244[Medline].
|
| 50.
|
Sikorski, R. S., and J. D. Boeke.
1991.
In vitro mutagenesis and plasmid shuffling: from cloned gene to mutant yeast.
Methods Enzymol.
194:302-318[Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Sikorski, R. S., and P. Hieter.
1989.
A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genetics
122:19-27[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 52.
|
Stohl, L. L., and D. A. Clayton.
1992.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains an RNase MRP that cleaves at a conserved mitochondrial RNA sequence implicated in replication priming.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:2561-2569[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Stolc, V., and S. Altman.
1997.
Rpp1, an essential protein subunit of nuclear RNase P required for processing of precursor tRNA and 35S precursor rRNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genes Dev.
11:2414-2425[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 54.
|
Swaminathan, K.,
P. Flynn,
R. J. Reece, and R. Marmorstein.
1997.
Crystal structure of a PUT3-DNA complex reveals a novel mechanism for DNA recognition by a protein containing a Zn2Cys6 binuclear cluster.
Nat. Struct. Biol.
4:751-759[Medline].
|
| 55.
|
Tavernarakis, N.,
D. Alexandraki,
P. Liodis,
D. Tzamarias, and G. Thireos.
1996.
Gene overexpression reveals alternative mechanisms that induce GCN4 mRNA translation.
Gene
179:271-277[Medline].
|
| 56.
|
Toyn, J. H., and L. H. Johnston.
1993.
Spo12 is a limiting factor that interacts with the cell cycle protein kinases Dbf2 and Dbf20, which are involved in mitotic chromatid disjunction.
Genetics
135:963-971[Abstract].
|
| 57.
|
Van Dyck, E., and D. A. Clayton.
1998.
Transcription-dependent DNA transactions in the mitochondrial genome of a yeast hypersuppressive petite mutant.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:2976-2985[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 58.
|
Visintin, R.,
E. Hwang, and A. Amon.
1999.
Cfi1 prevents premature exit from mitosis by anchoring Cdc14 phosphatase in the nucleolus.
Nature
398:818-823[Medline].
|
| 59.
|
Wickner, R. B.
1996.
Prions and RNA viruses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Annu. Rev. Genet.
30:109-139[Medline].
|
| 60.
|
Xu, B., and D. A. Clayton.
1995.
A persistent RNA-DNA hybrid is formed during transcription at a phylogenetically conserved mitochondrial DNA sequence.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:580-589[Abstract].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, November 1999, p. 7857-7869, Vol. 19, No. 11
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Aspinall, T. V., Gordon, J. M.B., Bennett, H. J., Karahalios, P., Bukowski, J.-P., Walker, S. C., Engelke, D. R., Avis, J. M.
(2007). Interactions between subunits of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNase MRP support a conserved eukaryotic RNase P/MRP architecture. Nucleic Acids Res
35: 6439-6450
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gill, T., Aulds, J., Schmitt, M. E.
(2006). A specialized processing body that is temporally and asymmetrically regulated during the cell cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. JCB
173: 35-45
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hermanns, P., Bertuch, A. A., Bertin, T. K., Dawson, B., Schmitt, M. E., Shaw, C., Zabel, B., Lee, B.
(2005). Consequences of mutations in the non-coding RMRP RNA in cartilage-hair hypoplasia. Hum Mol Genet
14: 3723-3740
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Salinas, K., Wierzbicki, S., Zhou, L., Schmitt, M. E.
(2005). Characterization and Purification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNase MRP Reveals a New Unique Protein Component. J. Biol. Chem.
280: 11352-11360
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pertschy, B., Zisser, G., Schein, H., Koffel, R., Rauch, G., Grillitsch, K., Morgenstern, C., Durchschlag, M., Hogenauer, G., Bergler, H.
(2004). Diazaborine Treatment of Yeast Cells Inhibits Maturation of the 60S Ribosomal Subunit. Mol. Cell. Biol.
24: 6476-6487
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gill, T., Cai, T., Aulds, J., Wierzbicki, S., Schmitt, M. E.
(2004). RNase MRP Cleaves the CLB2 mRNA To Promote Cell Cycle Progression: Novel Method of mRNA Degradation. Mol. Cell. Biol.
24: 945-953
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ridanpaa, M, Ward, L M, Rockas, S, Sarkioja, M, Makela, H, Susic, M, Glorieux, F H, Cole, W G, Makitie, O
(2003). Genetic changes in the RNA components of RNase MRP and RNase P in Schmid metaphyseal chondrodysplasia. J. Med. Genet.
40: 741-746
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cai, T., Aulds, J., Gill, T., Cerio, M., Schmitt, M. E.
(2002). The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNase Mitochondrial RNA Processing Is Critical for Cell Cycle Progression at the End of Mitosis. Genetics
161: 1029-1042
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cosson, B., Couturier, A., Chabelskaya, S., Kiktev, D., Inge-Vechtomov, S., Philippe, M., Zhouravleva, G.
(2002). Poly(A)-Binding Protein Acts in Translation Termination via Eukaryotic Release Factor 3 Interaction and Does Not Influence [PSI+] Propagation. Mol. Cell. Biol.
22: 3301-3315
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hong, B., Wu, K., Brockenbrough, J. S., Wu, P., Aris, J. P.
(2001). Temperature sensitive nop2 alleles defective in synthesis of 25S rRNA and large ribosomal subunits in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res
29: 2927-2937
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wu, K., Wu, P., Aris, J. P.
(2001). Nucleolar protein Nop12p participates in synthesis of 25S rRNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res
29: 2938-2949
[Abstract]
[Full Text]