Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, December 1999, p. 7983-7994, Vol. 19, No. 12
Sinsheimer Laboratories, Department of
Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064
Received 20 May 1999/Returned for modification 23 June
1999/Accepted 2 September 1999
In budding yeast, the Clb2 mitotic cyclin initiates a signaling
network that negatively regulates polar bud growth during mitosis. This
signaling network appears to require the function of a Clb2-binding
protein called Nap1, the Cdc42 GTPase, and two protein kinases called
Gin4 and Cla4. In this study, we demonstrate that the Elm1 kinase also
plays a role in the control of bud growth during mitosis. Cells
carrying a deletion of the ELM1 gene undergo a prolonged
mitotic delay, fail to negatively regulate polar bud growth during
mitosis, and show defects in septin organization. In addition, Elm1 is
required in vivo for the proper regulation of both the Cla4 and Gin4
kinases and interacts genetically with Cla4, Gin4, and the mitotic
cyclins. Previous studies have suggested that Elm1 may function to
negatively regulate the Swe1 kinase. To further understand the
functional relationship between Elm1 and Swe1, we have characterized
the phenotype of Members of a family of proteins
called cyclin-dependent kinases control the events of the eukaryotic
cell cycle (33, 34). These proteins associate with members
of the cyclin family of proteins to form active kinase complexes that
induce specific cell cycle events. The events leading to activation of
cyclin-dependent kinase complexes are well understood; however, little
is known about the molecular pathways that are initiated by
cyclin-dependent kinases to control specific cell cycle events. One
possibility is that cyclin-dependent kinases act to directly
phosphorylate proteins involved in specific cell cycle events, such as
nuclear lamins, components of the DNA replication machinery, or
microtubule-associated proteins. Alternatively, cyclin-dependent
kinases may activate intricate signaling pathways involving multiple
additional kinases that are ultimately responsible for phosphorylating
the many proteins involved in cell cycle events.
The control of bud growth during mitosis in Saccharomyces
cerevisiae provides an excellent model system in which to
understand the pathways used by cyclin-dependent kinases to induce
specific cell cycle events (1, 8, 21, 25, 44). A new bud
emerges from the mother cell during interphase and grows in a polar
manner with actin localized at the bud tip. Upon entry into mitosis, the mitotic cyclins induce a reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton that causes the bud to grow over its entire surface, and cells that
lack the function of the mitotic cyclins therefore develop highly
elongated buds (2, 37). This switch in the pattern of bud
growth is not necessary for viability, and mutations that disrupt the
switch can be easily identified because they cause cells to have highly
elongated buds and to form colonies with an unusual morphology (1,
5). Although cellular division by budding does not occur in all
organisms, many of the proteins that function in the pathway that
controls bud growth during mitosis are highly conserved, suggesting
that similar pathways are used by other organisms to control mitotic events.
The switch in the pattern of bud growth that occurs during mitosis is
primarily under the control of the Clb2 mitotic cyclin, although it is
clear that the switch can also be induced by other redundant mitotic
cyclins, perhaps through independent pathways (20, 24, 25).
We have used a combination of genetics and biochemistry to identify
proteins that are required for the mitotic switch in the pattern of bud
growth (1, 8, 21, 44). These experiments have provided
evidence for the existence of an intricate signaling network that
includes a Clb2-binding protein called Nap1, the Cdc42 GTPase, members
of the septin family, and two protein kinases called Cla4 and Gin4. The
Gin4 kinase binds tightly to Nap1 and is activated by
hyperphosphorylation during mitosis. The mitosis-specific activation of
Gin4 is dependent in vivo upon the function Nap1, Cla4, the GTP-bound
form of Cdc42, and the septins (1, 44). The Cla4 kinase is
also hyperphosphorylated during mitosis, and hyperphosphorylation
requires the activity of Clb2, Cdc28, Nap1, and the GTP-bound form of
Cdc42, but not Gin4 (44). The hyperphosphorylated form of
Cla4 appears to be responsible for relaying the signal to activate the
Gin4 kinase (44).
We do not yet understand how the Clb2-Cdc28 kinase complex may relay
the signal to activate the Cla4/Gin4 pathway, nor do we understand the
molecular mechanisms underlying the mitosis-specific regulation of the
Gin4 and Cla4 kinases. To learn more about this signaling network, we
have used a genetic approach to identify new mutations that disrupt the
switch from polar to isotropic bud growth. This work has demonstrated
that a protein kinase called Elm1 functions in the signaling network
that controls bud growth during mitosis. In addition, we have found
evidence suggesting that the Swe1 kinase functions in a checkpoint that
delays nuclear division in response to defects in the pathway that
includes Elm1. Our results are consistent with previous work that has
suggested a role for Swe1 in a checkpoint that monitors the proper
organization of actin and/or septin filaments during the cell cycle
(4, 23, 24).
Strains and culture conditions.
Except where noted, all
cells were grown in yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) media. All
strains are in the W303 strain background (leu2-3,112
ura3-52 can1-100 ade2-1 his3-11 trp1-1 ssd ho). The additional
features of the strains used in this study are listed in Table
1.
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
The Elm1 Kinase Functions in a Mitotic Signaling
Network in Budding Yeast
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
elm1
swe1 cells. We
found that
elm1
swe1 cells are inviable
at 37°C and that a large proportion of
elm1
swe1 cells grown at 30°C contain multiple nuclei,
suggesting severe defects in cytokinesis. In addition, we found that
Elm1 is required for the normal hyperphosphorylation of Swe1 during
mitosis. We propose a model in which the Elm1 kinase functions in
a mitotic signaling network that controls events required for normal
bud growth and cytokinesis, while the Swe1 kinase functions in a
checkpoint pathway that delays nuclear division in response to defects
in these events.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
TABLE 1.
Features of the strains used in this study
Mutagenesis and screening. Mutagenesis with ethylmethane sulfate was carried out as previously described with strain DK133 (22). After mutagenesis, half of the mutagenized culture was plated on YPD medium at a density of 1,000 colonies per 100-mm plate and screened for rough colonies. The other half of the mutagenized culture was used to inoculate 1 liter of YPD liquid medium overnight at 30°C. This culture was then passed through a 5-µm-pore-size mesh screen to separate severely clumpy cells from single cells and small clumps (15a). The cells that remained on the screen were washed into YPD and were then plated onto YPD medium at a density of 1,000 colonies per 100-mm plate and were grown at 30°C for 2 days before screening for rough colonies with a dissecting microscope. A total of 125,000 colonies were screened. Cells producing rough colonies were screened with phase-contrast optics to identify mutations that cause the formation of elongated buds.
Cloning of the ELM1 gene and construction of strains. To clone the gene corresponding to the ecm41 mutation, we transformed mutant cells with a genomic library carried in a CEN-containing vector and screened for rescue of both the rough colony morphology and the elongated bud morphology. We obtained one rescuing plasmid, and sequencing revealed that it contained the ELM1 gene. The ELM1 gene was first identified in a similar screen for mutants that exhibited an elongated bud morphology (5). To delete the ELM1 gene, we used PCR to amplify the TRP1 gene from the pRS304 vector with short regions of homology to the ELM1 5' and 3' ends of the open reading frame at each end (oligonucleotides: ACTTACTCGCATAGATATTATTTTTTGAACGCCAGGTTAACAATAATTACTTAGCATGAAATGCGGCATCAGAGCAGA and CACATCGGCTATACGATTATCAGCTAACCCAATCCGACAGATATCATCCTGTAGTTTCATTCTGTGCGGTATTTCACA). The PCR product was transformed into a wild-type strain (DK186), and transformants that carry a deletion of the ELM1 gene were identified by their rough colony morphology and elongated buds and confirmed by PCR. Meiotic linkage experiments were used to demonstrate that the original ecm41 mutation cosegregates with the ELM1 gene deletion.
Double-mutant strains were generated by mating strain AS1 with RA5, HT1, AS19, or DK96, followed by sporulation and tetrad analysis. In each case 16 tetrads were dissected and analyzed for each double mutant.Immunofluorescence methods and FACS analysis. Fixation and staining of cells with antibodies were carried out as previously described (36). For the data shown in Fig. 3, more than 200 cells were counted for each time point. For fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis (FACS), strains were grown overnight at 30°C to an optical density (OD) of 0.6, fixed in 70% ethanol for 1 h, and treated with 1 mg of RNase per ml overnight at 4°C and 5 mg of proteinase K per ml for 5 min at 30°C. The cells were then stained with propidium iodide, and DNA content was measured by flow cytometry.
Cell cycle arrests, Western blotting, and kinase assays.
For
all experiments, strains that are
bar1 are arrested with
1 to 2 µg of
-factor per ml. Arrest with
-factor was carried out for 3 to 3.5 h at room temperature, with the exception of the
experiment shown in Fig. 4, which was carried out for 5 h at
30°C. Arrest with benomyl is carried out for 3.5 h at room temperature at a final concentration of 30 µg/ml in YPD liquid medium. For all Western blotting experiments, 1.6-ml samples of culture
were taken at each of the indicated time points. The cells were then
rapidly pelleted in a 1.8-ml screw-top tube, the supernatant was
removed, and the tube is frozen on liquid nitrogen. After all of the
samples are collected, 300 ul of glass beads were added to each tube,
followed by 130 µl of 1× protein gel sample buffer (65 mM Tris-HCl,
pH 6.8; 3% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 5%
mercaptoethanol,
10% glycerol, bromphenol blue, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride
[PMSF], and 2 µg of leupeptin, 2 µg of pepstatin, and 2 µg of
chymotrypsin per ml). The protease inhibitors were added immediately
before the sample buffer was used. The tubes were immediately placed in
a Biospec Multibeater-8 and beaten at top speed for 2 min, centrifuged
briefly, and immediately incubated in a boiling water bath for 5 min.
Then, 10 µl of each sample is loaded onto an SDS-containing
polyacrylamide gel, and Western blotting was carried out as previously
described. To see the phosphorylation-induced shift in the
electrophoretic mobility of Gin4, samples were electrophoresed for
3 h at 180 V on 9% polyacrylamide gels (3). To observe the phosphorylation induced shift in the electrophoretic mobility of
Swe1, samples were electrophoresed for 2 h at 180 V on 10% polyacrylamide gels. Cla4 and Clb2 Western blots and Gin4- and Clb2-associated kinase assays were done as previously described (21, 44).
Overexpression of Clb2
176 and
Cdc42V12.
Plasmid pHT19, which expresses
Clb2
176 and Cdc42V12 from the Gal1 and Gal10
promoters, respectively, was integrated into
elm1 strains as previously described (44). To induce expression of
proteins in cells arrested in interphase, the cells were first grown
overnight at 25°C to an OD600 of 0.7 in YEP medium
containing 2% glycerol and 2% ethanol. The cells were then arrested
in interphase by the addition of
-factor to 2 µg/ml, followed by
incubation at 30°C for 2 h. Protein expression was induced by
the addition of galactose to 2%, and 1.6 ml samples of the culture
were taken at the indicated times and prepared for electrophoresis and
Western blotting as described above.
Generation of anti-Swe1 antibodies. Antibodies that recognize Swe1 were raised by immunizing rabbits with a glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion that included the C terminus of Swe1. The GST fusion was made by amplifying the C terminus of Swe1 by PCR (primers GCGGGATCCATGAGTT-CTTTGGACGAGG and AACCGAATTCCTTGCTCTTTT) and cloning into the BamHI and EcoRI sites of the pGEX-4T3 vector. The second primer incorporates an EcoRI site found 900 bases from the 5' end of the SWE1 gene. The GST fusion is expressed in bacteria and purified by glutathione affinity chromatography as previously described (8).
A full-length MBP-Swe1 fusion was constructed by PCR amplification of the full-length SWE1 gene, followed by cloning into the vector pMal-C2 (primers GCGGGATCCATGAGTTCTTTGGACGAGG and CGCGCTGCAGTCATATAAAAAATTTTGGCTTAG). To purify the MBP-Swe1 fusion, cells carrying the MBP-Swe1 expression construct were grown in 6 liters of 2XYT media containing 100 µg of ampicillin per ml at room temperature until an OD of 0.7 was reached. IPTG (isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside) was then added to a
final concentration of 0.1 mM, and the cells were incubated for another
3 to 4 h at room temperature. The cells were harvested by
centrifugation at room temperature, and the pellet was scraped out of
the bottles and frozen directly in liquid nitrogen. We have found that
proteolysis of fusion proteins is minimized if the cells are rapidly
lysed into a high-salt buffer that inhibits proteases. Therefore, the
frozen pellet was ground to a fine powder under liquid nitrogen with a
mortar and pestle (total grinding time, ca. 10 min). The powder was
transferred to a beaker that had been prechilled with liquid nitrogen
and was then allowed to warm at room temperature until the powder was
just beginning to thaw around the edges. An 80-ml portion of room
temperature buffer containing 80 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.8 M NaCl,
0.2% Tween 20, 5 mM
-mercaptoethanol (BME), and 1 mM PMSF was added
to the powder and rapidly stirred at 4°C until a uniform suspension
was obtained. The extract was sonicated for 1 min, allowed to cool on
ice, and then sonicated again for 1 min. All of the remaining steps
were carried out at 4°C. The extract was centrifuged at 20,000 rpm
for 10 min and then at 40,000 rpm for 1 h. The supernatant was
diluted by adding 3 volumes of ice-cold H2O and loaded onto a 5-ml amylose column over a period of 4 to 5 h. The column was washed at a flow rate of 10 column volumes/h with buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 200 mM NaCl, and 5 mM BME. The column was eluted
with 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 200 mM NaCl, 5 mM BME, and 10 mM maltose,
and the presence of the fusion protein was determined by Bradford
assay. The peak fractions were pooled and dialyzed extensively into
buffer containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.6), 0.25 M KCl, and 30% glycerol.
The purified protein was frozen on liquid nitrogen and stored at
80°C. More-detailed protocols for the purification of GST and MBP
fusions are available on the Kellogg lab website (21a).
Antibodies generated against GST-Swe1 were affinity purified against
MBP-Swe1 as previously described (19). The affinity-purified antibodies do not recognize any proteins in extracts from strains carrying a deletion of the SWE1 gene.
Treatment of Swe1 with phosphatase. Swe1 was immunoprecipitated from wild-type (DK186) cells by using the anti-Swe1 polyclonal antibody and treated with lambda phosphatase as previously described for Gin4 (1).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Identification of mutations that disrupt the mitotic control of bud growth. In previous work we demonstrated that a simple genetic screen can be used to identify mutations that disrupt the switch from polar to isotropic bud growth (1). This screen relies on the fact that such mutations cause cells to develop highly elongated buds, leading to the formation of colonies that have an unusual rough morphology that can easily be identified. In our original screen, we wanted to focus on the identification of genes encoding proteins that function in pathways used by the Clb2 mitotic cyclin to control bud growth. We therefore carried out the screen in a strain that is dependent solely upon the Clb2 cyclin for the control of mitotic events because it carries deletions of the genes for the other redundant mitotic cyclins (CLB1, CLB3, and CLB4). This screen led to the identification of the Gin4 and Cla4 protein kinases and to members of the septin family of proteins (1, 8, 44).
To identify additional genes required for the mitotic control of bud growth, we have performed a similar screen to identify mutations that cause an elongated bud phenotype in a wild-type background. Such mutations should identify proteins that play a role both in the Clb2-dependent pathway and in redundant pathways used by the other mitotic cyclins to control bud growth. Since mutations that disrupt the mitotic control of bud growth cause the formation of clumpy cells, we were able to enrich for the desired mutants by passing the mutagenized cells through a 5-µm-pore-size mesh screen (15a). Using this method we isolated 53 mutant strains, which we have called ecm mutants (elongated cell morphology). These mutants fell into five complementation groups that include 2 alleles of CLA4 and 22 alleles of a gene that did not correspond to any of the genes that we had previously identified as playing a role in the mitotic control of bud growth. An example of the elongated bud phenotype observed for a representative of the latter complementation group (ecm41) is shown in Fig. 1A. A low-copy-number plasmid library was used to clone the gene corresponding to the ecm41 mutation, and sequence analysis of a plasmid that rescues the ecm41 mutation revealed that it contained the ELM1 gene. Meiotic linkage analysis confirmed that the original mutation was in the ELM1 gene. The ELM1 gene was first identified in a similar screen for mutants that exhibit an elongated bud morphology (5).
|
Elm1 is required for the proper control of bud growth during
mitosis.
To determine whether Elm1 functions in mitotic control
pathways, we first generated a strain that carries a deletion of the ELM1 gene. We found that deletion of the ELM1
gene in a wild-type background results in an elongated bud phenotype
that is identical to the phenotype caused by the elm1
mutations isolated in our screen (Fig. 1B). We also deleted the
ELM1 gene in a Clb2-dependent strain, since we found in
previous work that deletion of the genes for proteins that function in
Clb2-dependent mitotic control pathways causes a much more severe
phenotype in Clb2-dependent cells than in wild-type cells (1, 8,
21, 44). We found that deletion of the ELM1 gene in
Clb2-dependent cells results in an elongated bud phenotype that is
significantly more severe than the phenotype observed in a wild-type
background (Fig. 1C). In addition,
elm1
clb1,3,4 cells grow at a much slower rate than
elm1 cells at 30°C and are nearly inviable at 37°C
(Fig. 1D). Previous work has demonstrated that Clb2-dependent cells
have no obvious morphological defects (12, 37).
ELM1 exhibits genetic interactions with the
CLA4 and GIN4 genes.
To further establish
that Elm1 functions to control bud growth during mitosis, we determined
whether ELM1 interacts genetically with the GIN4
or CLA4 kinases. We found that
elm1
cla4 cells grow extremely slowly, while cells carrying
either single deletion form colonies at a normal or nearly normal rate
(Fig. 2A). In addition,
elm1
cla4 cells are nearly inviable at
37°C and have extremely elongated buds when grown at 30°C (Fig.
2B). Previous work has demonstrated that deletion of the
CLA4 gene causes an elongated bud phenotype that is more
mild than the phenotype caused by deletion of the ELM1 gene
(10a, 44). We also found that
elm1
gin4 cells grow more slowly than cells carrying either single deletion; however, this phenotype is not as severe as the phenotype of the
elm1
cla4 cells (data not
shown). These results suggest that Elm1, Cla4, and Gin4 share related
functions within the cell.
|
Elm1 is required for normal progression through mitosis.
Loss
of function of Cla4, Gin4, Nap1, or septins in cells that are dependent
upon Clb2 causes a prolonged delay early in mitosis at the short
spindle stage (1, 8, 10a, 21). To determine whether
elm1 cells undergo a similar mitotic delay we used
-factor to synchronize
elm1 cells in G1,
released the cells from the arrest, and then collected samples every 10 min during the cell cycle and determined the fraction of cells with a
short mitotic spindle (Fig. 3A). We found
that the control cells begin to form short spindles at 60 min, while
the
elm1 cells form short spindles at 70 min, exhibiting
a slight delay. The
elm1 cells then undergo a prolonged
delay at the short spindle stage (Fig. 3A). We also measured Clb2
protein levels in both the control cells and in the
elm1
cells (Fig. 3B). We found that the Clb2 protein in the control cells
appears at 70 min, reaches peak levels at 90 min, and then begins to
disappear. In
elm1 cells, the Clb2 protein appears at the
same time as in the control cells but then persists at high levels
throughout the remainder of the time course, a result consistent with a
prolonged mitotic delay.
|
elm1
clb1,3,4 cells also undergo a mitotic
delay. We found, however, that even after treatment of
elm1
clb1,3,4 cells with
-factor for
more than 3 h many cells still carry high levels of the Clb2 protein, suggesting that they are arrested in mitosis. We were therefore unable to synchronize
elm1
clb1,3,4 cells in G1. As an alternative means
of assaying the delay in mitosis, we added
-factor to log-phase
cultures of
elm1
clb1,3,4 cells and to control cells and then used Western blotting to follow the levels of
the Clb2 protein (Fig. 3C). After 90 min of treatment with
-factor,
the control cells become synchronously arrested in G1 with
no Clb2 protein, as expected for an
-factor-induced arrest. In
comparison, the Clb2 protein levels in the
elm1
clb1,3,4 strain remain essentially constant for 5 h,
suggesting that the majority of the
elm1
clb1,3,4 cells are arrested in mitosis. The fact that
elm1 cells and
elm1
clb1,3,4
cells undergo prolonged mitotic delays provides further evidence that
Elm1 plays a role in the control of mitosis.
Elm1 is not required for the formation of active Clb2-Cdc28 kinase
complexes.
The previous experiments demonstrate that Elm1 is
required for normal progression through mitosis. A possible explanation for these results might be that Elm1 is required for the formation of
active Clb2-Cdc28 kinase complexes. To determine whether this is the
case, we assayed the activity of Clb2-Cdc28 kinase complexes during the
cell cycle in
elm1 cells and in control cells. We found
that Clb2-associated kinase activity rises to nearly normal levels in
elm1 cells, although the kinase activity reaches peak levels slightly later than in the control cells (Fig.
4). Loss of function of Nap1 or Gin4 also
causes a slight delay in the appearance of Clb2-associated kinase
activity (1, 21). These results demonstrate that Elm1 is not
required for the activation of Clb2-Cdc28 kinase complexes but is
required for the timely appearance of kinase activity.
|
Elm1 is required for the mitosis-specific activation of the Gin4
kinase.
The Gin4 kinase undergoes mitosis-specific activation and
plays an important role in the pathway used by Clb2 to control bud growth during mitosis (1). We therefore wanted to determine whether the activation of Gin4 during mitosis is dependent upon Elm1 in
vivo. Gin4 is activated during mitosis by hyperphosphorylation, and
activation can be readily assayed by Western blotting to detect a shift
in the electrophoretic mobility of Gin4 that is caused by
hyperphosphorylation (1). We synchronized
elm1
cells and wild-type cells in G1 with the mating pheromone
-factor and then released the cells from the cell cycle block and
assayed Gin4 hyperphosphorylation as the cells progressed through a
single cell cycle. We found that the mitosis-specific
hyperphosphorylation of the Gin4 kinase completely fails to occur in
elm1 cells, indicating that Elm1 is required in vivo for
activation of the Gin4 kinase (Fig. 5A).
We have also assayed Gin4 kinase activity in
elm1 cells,
which has further demonstrated that Gin4 is not activated in
elm1 cells (see below).
|
Elm1 is required for the Clb2- and Cdc42-dependent
hyperphosphorylation of the Cla4 kinase.
The Cla4 protein is
required in vivo for the activation of Gin4 and undergoes
hyperphosphorylation that is dependent upon Clb2, Cdc28, Nap1, and the
GTP-bound form of Cdc42 (44). The hyperphosphorylation of
Cla4 can be induced experimentally by expression of Clb2 and the
GTP-bound form of Cdc42 (44). For these experiments, the
Gal10 promoter was used to drive expression of a mutant form of Cdc42
that is locked in the GTP-bound state (called Cdc42V12),
and the Gal1 promoter was used to drive expression of a truncated form
of the Clb2 cyclin that lacks the destruction box that targets Clb2 for
degradation during interphase (called Clb2
176). Before
expression of Cdc42V12 and Clb2
176 was
induced, cells were arrested in interphase so that the effects of
expression of Clb2
176 could be studied without the
complication of other cyclins being present. As with Gin4, the
hyperphosphorylation of Cla4 can be assayed by Western blotting to
detect an electrophoretic mobility shift. In previous studies, we were
able to use this system to demonstrate that Clb2 and the GTP-bound form
of Cdc42 act synergistically to induce hyperphosphorylation of both
Cla4 and Gin4 (44).
elm1 strain that expresses
Cdc42V12 and Clb2
176 under the control of
the Gal1 and Gal10 promoters. We arrested the cells in interphase and
then induced the expression of Clb2
176 and
Cdc42V12 by adding galactose. We found that the
hyperphosphorylation of Cla4 is significantly reduced in
elm1 cells, providing further evidence that Elm1 plays a
role in the control of mitotic events by Clb2 (Fig. 5B).
Elm1 does not activate the Gin4/Cla4 signaling pathway by
inhibiting Swe1 activity.
These experiments demonstrated that the
normal regulation of the Cla4 and Gin4 kinases is dependent upon the
Elm1 kinase. One possible explanation for these results is that Elm1
functions to inhibit the activity of a negative regulator of the
Clb2-Cdc28 kinase complex. For example, although Clb2-Cdc28-associated
kinase activity rises to normal levels in
elm1 cells,
perhaps a negative regulator prevents the active kinase complex from
signaling the activation of Gin4. If this model were correct, deletion
of the gene for the negative regulator that Elm1 is inhibiting should result in a suppression of the
elm1 phenotype. A known
negative regulator of mitotic cyclin-dependent kinase complexes is the Wee1 kinase, which is referred to as Swe1 in budding yeast (6, 35). Furthermore, previous work has demonstrated that the
elongated bud phenotype caused by deletion of the ELM1 gene
can be suppressed by deletion of the SWE1 gene, suggesting
that Elm1 is a negative regulator of Swe1 (11, 27).
elm1 phenotype, we tested whether the
mitosis-specific hyperphosphorylation of the Gin4 kinase is restored in
elm1
swe1 double mutants. For this
experiment, we arrested cells in either interphase or mitosis and then
used Western blotting to assay Gin4 hyperphosphorylation (Fig.
6). We also immunoprecipitated the Gin4
kinase using an anti-Gin4 polyclonal antibody and assayed its kinase
activity in vitro. We found that both the hyperphosphorylation and the
activation of the Gin4 kinase fail to occur in
elm1
swe1 cells, just as in
elm1 cells. As a
control, we probed the same samples for the Clb2 protein to demonstrate
that the cells were arrested in interphase or mitosis. These results
demonstrate that deletion of the SWE1 gene does not fully
suppress the
elm1 phenotype and are inconsistent with the
idea that Elm1 functions simply to allow entry into mitosis by
negatively regulating Swe1. Note also that the hyperphosphorylation of
Cla4 in response to the activity of Clb2 and the GTP-bound form of
Cdc42 is defective in
elm1 cells arrested in interphase
(Fig. 5B). Since there is no Swe1 protein present during interphase
(29, 42; see also data presented below), these
results are inconsistent with the idea that Elm1 exerts its effects on
Cla4 by negatively regulating Swe1.
|
elm1
swe1 cells
more closely, we stained the cells with antitubulin antibodies and a
DNA stain (Fig. 7A and B). We found that
a large proportion of
elm1
swe1 cells grown
at 30°C are multinucleate and contain multiple microtubule organizing
centers (Fig. 7A and B). In log-phase cells, we observed that 12% (25 of 205) of the
elm1
swe1 cells are
unambiguously multinucleate. However, if we synchronize cells by
-factor arrest and release, we find that 52% (104 of 200) of the
cells in mitosis are multinucleate. We suspect that it is easier to
detect multinucleate cells during mitosis because
microtubule-organizing centers and nuclei are pushed apart by
microtubule-based mechanisms. Only 4% (8 of 210) of the cells in a
elm1 log-phase population are clearly multinucleate,
although the abnormal cell morphology makes it somewhat difficult to
define single cells. We did not observe cells with more than two nuclei
in the
elm1 strain, whereas we frequently observed
elm1
swe1 cells with at least five nuclei. To further confirm the presence of multiple nuclei, we performed flow
cytometry to analyze the DNA content of log-phase cultures of
wild-type,
swe1,
elm1, and
elm1
swe1 cells. We found that a large
percentage of
elm1
swe1 cells have a DNA
content greater than 2 N, supporting the idea that these cells contain
more than one nucleus (Fig. 7C). Note that a large proportion of the
elm1 cells have a 2 N DNA content, providing further
evidence for the existence of a prolonged mitotic delay in these cells.
Deletion of the SWE1 gene appears to partially eliminate the mitotic
delay in the
elm1 strain, as indicated by the
reappearance of a 1 N peak in the
elm1
swe1
cells. In addition to showing defects in cytokinesis, we found that
elm1
swe1 cells are inviable at 37°C
(Fig. 8A).
|
|
elm1 cells are defective in
executing mitotic events that are required for cytokinesis and that Swe1 functions in a checkpoint that detects these defects and delays
nuclear division until cytokinesis can be carried out properly. Previous work has suggested the existence of a Swe1-dependent checkpoint that delays nuclear division in response to perturbations in
the organization of actin and/or septin filaments (4, 23, 29). We did find that deletion of the SWE1 gene causes
a partial suppression of the elongated bud phenotype of
elm1 cells, as previously described (Fig. 8B)
(11). This partial suppression also occurs when the
SWE1 gene is deleted in
cla4 cells (data not
shown). Although the elongated bud phenotype of the double deletion is
less severe than the single
elm1 deletion, there are
still numerous cells with elongated buds and aberrant morphologies in
the
elm1
swe1 strain, indicating that
deletion of the SWE1 gene does not entirely suppress the
elm1 morphological phenotype.
Septin organization is abnormal in
elm1 cells and in
elm1
swe1 cells.
Previous work has
demonstrated that the Gin4 kinase is required for the normal
localization of the septins and that the septins are required for the
activation and localization of the Gin4 kinase (8, 26). In
addition, Elm1 is localized to the bud neck and the
elm1
phenotype strongly resembles the phenotype caused by loss of septin
function (8, 13, 14, 31). We were therefore interested in
determining whether septin organization is normal in
elm1
and
elm1
swe1 cells. We used a polyclonal
antibody that recognizes Cdc11 to localize the septins in log-phase
populations of wild-type cells,
elm1 cells,
swe1 cells, and
elm1
swe1 cells. In wild-type cells, Cdc11 is found at the tip of the emerging bud and as a tight double ring at the bud neck (Fig.
9). In the
elm1 strain,
many cells no longer have tight double rings at the bud neck and there
are often additional diffuse septin rings along the length of the
elongated buds (Fig. 9). We observed the same defects in
elm1
swe1 cells, although at a lower
frequency. In both
elm1 and
elm1
swe1 strains, we observed that some cells have apparently
normal septin localization at the bud neck. Cells carrying a deletion
of the GIN4 gene also show weak and diffuse septin rings at
the bud neck, as well as some cells with normal septin localization
(26).
|
Swe1 hyperphosphorylation is dependent upon Elm1. To further investigate the relationship between Swe1 and the pathway that includes Elm1, Cla4, and Gin4, we used an anti-Swe1 polyclonal antibody to follow the behavior of the Swe1 protein during the cell cycle by Western blotting (Fig. 10A). In addition, we monitored the behavior of the Clb2 protein in the same samples as a marker for when the cells enter mitosis (Fig. 10A). We found that the Swe1 protein is absent during interphase and then appears slightly before Clb2 and immediately undergoes a dramatic electrophoretic mobility shift that is suggestive of hyperphosphorylation. Mitosis-specific hyperphosphorylation of Wee1 has also been observed in Xenopus embryo extracts (32, 43). In order to ensure that the Swe1 mobility shift is due to hyperphosphorylation, we immunoprecipitated Swe1 from mitotic cells and then treated the protein with phosphatase. We found that the electrophoretic mobility shift collapses in samples treated with phosphatase, indicating that it is indeed due to hyperphosphorylation (Fig. 10B). Note that hyperphosphorylation of Swe1 is correlated with the appearance of the Clb2 protein and peaks when Clb2 protein levels peak, suggesting a causative relationship.
|
elm1
cells. We found that Swe1 hyperphosphorylation is significantly decreased in
elm1 cells, and it appears as though a
specific subset of Swe1 hyperphosphorylations is lost (Fig. 10A). We
observed an identical loss of Swe1 hyperphosphorylation in
cla4 cells, in
gin4
clb1,3,4
cells, in
nap1
clb1,3,4 cells, and in a
temperature-sensitive cdc11 strain at the restrictive
temperature (data not shown).
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Clb2-Cdc28 cyclin-dependent kinase complex functions in budding yeast to control the events of mitosis, including a switch in the pattern of bud growth that occurs as cells enter mitosis. Our previous work has suggested that the Clb2-Cdc28 kinase complex controls this switch through a signaling network that includes a Clb2-binding protein called Nap1, as well as the Cdc42 GTPase and two protein kinases called Cla4 and Gin4 (1, 21, 44). In the present study, we demonstrate that the Elm1 kinase also plays a role in this signaling network. Furthermore, our data suggests that the Elm1 kinase may also play a role in cytokinesis and that the Swe1 kinase may function to delay the cell cycle in response to defects caused by loss of Elm1 function. These results provide further evidence for the existence of intricate signaling networks that function to control mitotic events.
The Elm1 kinase functions in a mitotic signaling network that
controls bud growth during mitosis.
The Elm1 kinase was originally
identified in a screen for mutations that cause an elongated cell
morphology, which led to the suggestion that Elm1 is a negative
regulator of pseudohyphal growth (5). A number of the
experiments that we have carried out suggest that Elm1 plays a critical
role in signaling pathways that control mitotic events. First, we
identified the ELM1 gene in a screen for mutations that
cause defects in the control of polar bud growth during mitosis, and we
found that the elongated bud phenotype caused by loss of Elm1 function
is similar to the phenotype caused by mutations that inactivate other
proteins known to function in the mitotic control of polar bud growth.
Second, the phenotype caused by deletion of the ELM1 gene is
considerably more severe in cells that are dependent upon Clb2 for
survival than it is in wild-type cells, suggesting that Elm1 plays a
critical role in the control of mitotic events by Clb2. Third, Elm1
interacts genetically with both Cla4 and Gin4. Fourth,
elm1 cells undergo a prolonged mitotic delay with short
spindles and active Clb2-Cdc28 kinase complexes, similar to the delay
caused by deletion of the genes for other proteins that function in the
pathway that controls polar bud growth during mitosis. Finally, Elm1 is
required in vivo for the proper regulation of both Gin4 and Cla4. Taken
together, these results demonstrate that Elm1 plays an important role
in mitotic control pathways.
elm1 cells and many
elm1
swe1 cells are multinucleate suggests
that Elm1 may also play an important role in cytokinesis, although it
is possible that defects in cytokinesis may be a secondary defect
caused by hyperpolarization of actin to the tip of the highly elongated
buds observed in cells that fail to make the switch from polar to
isotropic bud growth (21).
Elm1 is required for the mitosis-specific hyperphosphorylation of the Gin4 and Cla4 kinases. In previous work, we found that the Gin4 and Cla4 kinases undergo mitosis-specific hyperphosphorylations that are dependent upon the function of Clb2, Cdc28, Nap1, and the GTP-bound form of Cdc42 (1, 44). The hyperphosphorylation of Gin4 requires Cla4 and appears to be signaled by the hyperphosphorylated form of Cla4. Importantly, it has been shown that Clb2 and the GTP-bound form of Cdc42 can act synergistically to induce the hyperphosphorylation of Cla4 and Gin4 in cells arrested in interphase. Furthermore, the hyperphosphorylation of Cla4 and Gin4 in this context is dependent upon Cdc28 (44). These results argue that hyperphosphorylation of Cla4 and Gin4 is induced by the activity of the Clb2-Cdc28 kinase complex and that hyperphosphorylation can be induced in a manner that is largely independent of the events of mitosis.
In this study, we have found that the Elm1 kinase is required in vivo for the complete hyperphosphorylation of both Cla4 and Gin4. One possible model for these results is that Elm1 functions upstream of the Cla4 and Gin4 kinases in a mitotic signaling pathway initiated by the Clb2-Cdc28 kinase complex. A second possible model is that Elm1 functions in a parallel signaling pathway that is required for the proper regulation of Gin4 and Cla4. A third model is that Elm1 is required to inactivate an inhibitor of the pathway that leads to activation of Cla4 and Gin4. A number of experiments demonstrate that Elm1 does not function simply to inhibit the activity of Swe1, a known negative regulator of mitosis (discussed below). However, our experiments do not rule out the possibility that Elm1 allows activation of Cla4 and Gin4 through the inactivation of an unknown inhibitor.Elm1 is required for proper progression through mitosis.
Clb2-associated kinase activity rises to normal levels in
elm1 cells, indicating that Elm1 is not required for
formation of active Clb2-Cdc28 kinase complexes. However, there is a
slight delay in the appearance of Clb2-associated kinase activity and the cells undergo a prolonged delay in mitosis at the short spindle stage even though Clb2-associated kinase activity is present. A very
severe mitotic delay is observed when the ELM1 gene is deleted in cells that are dependent upon the Clb2 cyclin for control of
mitotic events. In this case, the cells are barely viable, and it
appears that the majority of the cells never exit mitosis. Since the
Clb2 protein and Clb2-associated kinase activity rise to normal levels
in the
elm1 mutants, the failure to activate Gin4 does
not appear to be due simply to a failure to enter mitosis, although it
is possible that the Clb2-Cdc28 kinase complex in
elm1
cells has a lower specific activity and therefore has difficulty promoting mitotic events.
elm1
cells is unclear. One possibility is that Elm1 plays a critical role in
pathways used by Clb2 to control many different mitotic events and that
without Elm1 the cells are simply unable to execute these events.
Another possibility is that Elm1 functions in a pathway that is
required only for one specific event and that the failure of this event
activates a checkpoint that delays the other events of mitosis. We
found that the septins are not properly localized in
elm1
cells, which may lead to activation of a checkpoint that is the primary
cause of the mitotic delay observed in
elm1 cells. At
this point, however, it is difficult to rule out the possibility that
Elm1 functions to control other mitotic events, such as elongation of
the mitotic spindle. For example, although we observe that spindle
elongation eventually occurs in
elm1 cells after a
prolonged delay, this may be due to the existence of a partially
redundant pathway that can compensate for a lack of Elm1 function in
this event. It is also possible that Elm1 plays a role in pathways that
regulate mitotic cyclin destruction, which could contribute to the
mitotic delays observed in
elm1 cells.
elm1
swe1 cells have severe defects
in cell cycle control.
The Wee1 kinase was first identified
genetically in fission yeast as a negative regulator of entry into
mitosis, and evidence from a variety of systems has suggested that Wee1
phosphorylates mitotic cyclin-dependent kinases on a tyrosine residue
near the N terminus of the protein, resulting in the inactivation of
cyclin-dependent kinase activity (35, 39). Recent work in
budding yeast cells has demonstrated that Swe1, the budding yeast
homolog of Wee1, functions as part of a checkpoint that delays entry
into mitosis in response to defects in the organization of actin and/or
septin filaments (4, 23, 29). Work in budding yeast cells
has also demonstrated that loss of function of the Hsl1 kinase causes a
mitotic delay and an elongated bud phenotype that can be suppressed by
deletion of the SWE1 gene (4, 27). Similarly, it
has been reported that the elongated bud phenotype of
elm1 cells can be suppressed by deletion of the
SWE1 gene (11). These results suggest that Elm1
and Hsl1 are negative regulators of Swe1 and that at least some of the
defects observed in
elm1 cells and
hsl1
cells could be due to failure to inactivate Swe1.
elm1
swe1 cells. Consistent with previous reports, we found that deletion of the SWE1 gene partially suppresses the
elongated bud phenotype of
elm1 cells (11).
However, we found that deletion of the SWE1 gene does not
suppress the defects that we observed in the regulation of the Gin4
kinase in
elm1 cells. Specifically, we observed that the
mitosis-specific hyperphosphorylation and activation of Gin4 fail to
occur in
elm1
swe1 cells, just as in
elm1 cells. We also found that hyperphosphorylation of
Cla4 in response to Clb2 and the GTP-bound form of Cdc42 is defective in interphase cells, which lack Swe1. Finally, we observed that
elm1
swe1 cells are temperature sensitive
for growth and that a large proportion of
elm1
swe1 cells grown at a permissive temperature contain
multiple nuclei, suggesting severe defects in cytokinesis. Taken
together, these results demonstrate that the
elm1
phenotype is not rescued by loss of Swe1. In addition, these results
are inconsistent with a model in which Elm1 exerts its effects on Gin4
and Cla4 simply by negatively regulating Swe1.
Elm1 is required for proper localization of the septins.
Previous work has shown that the Gin4 kinase is required for the normal
localization of the septins, and that the septins are required for the
localization and activation of Gin4 (8, 26). It has also
been shown that the septins are mislocalized in cla4 mutant
strains (10a). In this study we have demonstrated that the
Elm1 kinase is also required for the proper localization of the
septins. The septin rings at the bud neck in
elm1 and
elm1
swe1 strains are often more diffuse,
and the septins frequently form additional ring-like structures along
the length of the elongated buds observed in these cells. These
results, when combined with previous results, demonstrate that at least
three different kinases are required for normal localization of the septins.
The Swe1 kinase undergoes complex regulation during the cell cycle that is dependent upon the function of Elm1. Using a polyclonal antibody that recognizes Swe1, we found that Swe1 undergoes complex regulation during the cell cycle. Specifically, the Swe1 protein is absent during interphase and then begins to appear slightly before the Clb2 mitotic cyclin as cells enter mitosis. When Swe1 first appears it migrates as a single band on polyacrylamide gels, and then it rapidly shifts to a series of higher-molecular-weight bands as Swe1 undergoes dramatic hyperphosphorylation during mitosis. These results are consistent with previous studies showing that the Xenopus and S. pombe Wee1 homologs undergo dramatic hyperphosphorylation during mitosis in Xenopus embryo extracts and that human Wee1 protein levels peak during mitosis and decline sometime during late mitosis or early G1 (28, 32, 43, 45). These results are also consistent with previous experiments in budding yeast cells demonstrating that Swe1 protein levels fluctuate during the cell cycle (23, 42). However, our results differ somewhat from previous work in that we find that the Swe1 protein undergoes dramatic hyperphosphorylation and that protein levels peak during mitosis (as judged by levels of the Clb2 mitotic cyclin) and then decline as cells exit mitosis. Previous studies on Swe1 did not detect a dramatic hyperphosphorylation of Swe1 and found that protein levels peak during S/G2 and then decline prior to and during nuclear division (as judged by bud emergence and nuclear division) (23, 42). It is likely that the apparent differences in Swe1 behavior are due to differences in the methods used to detect Swe1 and to assess cell cycle progression.
Interestingly, we found that a subset of Swe1 hyperphosphorylations appears to be lost in
elm1 cells, in
cla4
cells, in
gin4
clb1,3,4 cells, in
nap1
clb1,3,4 cells, and in a
temperature-sensitive cdc11 strain at the restrictive
temperature (Fig. 8 and reference 42a). Studies
carried out in Xenopus embryo extracts have demonstrated that Wee1 is phosphorylated on both the N terminus and the C terminus and that at least two distinct kinases are responsible for
hyperphosphorylation of Wee1 (10, 43). It seems possible,
therefore, that inactivation of Elm1 results in a loss of the
hyperphosphorylations occurring at either the N terminus or the C
terminus of Swe1. Studies carried out in Xenopus embryo
extracts have also demonstrated that full hyperphosphorylation of Wee1
results in a 7- to 20-fold reduction in its ability to phosphorylate
cyclin-dependent kinases in vitro (32, 43). The failure to
fully hyperphosphorylate Swe1 in
elm1 cells may therefore
result in persistence of Swe1 kinase activity during mitosis.
These results suggest that Swe1 may be a direct target of mitotic
signaling pathways that require the function of Elm1, Cla4, Gin4, and
the septins. Alternatively, inactivation of Elm1, Cla4, Gin4, or the
septins pathway may cause defects in specific mitotic events that lead
to activation of a checkpoint that delays passage through mitosis by
preventing the full hyperphosphorylation of Swe1. These possibilities
are not mutually exclusive. For example, it is possible that the Elm1,
Cla4, and Gin4 kinases function to control mitotic events and to
maintain Swe1 in a hyperphosphorylated state as long as these events
are occurring properly. It is interesting to note that the
hyperphosphorylation of Swe1 is correlated with the appearance of the
Clb2 protein, perhaps suggesting that Swe1 is hyperphosphorylated in
response to activation of an Elm1/Cla4/Gin4 pathway by the Clb2-Cdc28
kinase complex. Recent coimmunoprecipitation experiments have
demonstrated an interaction between the S. pombe homologs of
Swe1 and Gin4, suggesting that the Gin4 kinase may play a direct role
in the hyperphosphorylation of Swe1 (18).
Roles of the Elm1 and Swe1 kinases in the control of mitotic
events.
To explain the results that we have obtained, we propose
that the Elm1 kinase functions in a mitosis-specific signaling network that controls the reorganization of actin filaments that is necessary both for the switch from polar to isotropic bud growth and for cytokinesis. In the absence of Elm1, these events fail to occur properly and a Swe1-dependent checkpoint detects the defects and induces a delay in nuclear division. Thus, in
elm1
swe1 cells nuclear division continues in the absence of
proper cytokinesis, leading to the formation of multinucleate cells.
elm1
swe1 cells by monitoring Clb2 protein
levels in cells synchronized with
-factor. However, we found that
significant levels of the Clb2 protein are still present in
elm1
swe1 cells after prolonged treatment
with
-factor, indicating that many cells have difficulty passing
through mitosis. Furthermore, we found that Clb2 levels remain high in
elm1
swe1 cells for a prolonged period
after cells enter mitosis, a finding inconsistent with elimination of
the mitotic delay. We are concerned, however, that the presence of
multiple nuclei in
elm1
swe1 cells may lead
to the activation of other checkpoints, such as the spindle assembly
checkpoint, that delay the cell cycle in an Swe1-independent manner.
The generation of temperature-sensitive elm1 mutants will be
required to conclusively determine whether Swe1 functions to induce a
mitotic delay in response to inactivation of Elm1.
Our results demonstrate that the normal regulation of Cla4 and Gin4 is
dependent upon Elm1. To determine whether Elm1 regulation is dependent
upon Cdc28, Cla4, or Gin4, we generated an antibody against Elm1 and
used it to assay the kinase activity of Elm1 in immunoprecipitates
during the cell cycle. However, we were unable to detect any
significant changes in the in vitro kinase activity of Elm1 during the
cell cycle (42a). We were also unable to detect any cell
cycle-dependent changes in the electrophoretic mobility of Elm1 that
might suggest posttranslational modifications. These results do not
rule out the possibility that Elm1 kinase activity is highly regulated
in vivo.
The results that we have obtained for Elm1 and Swe1 are similar to the
results of previous studies on the fission yeast homologs of Swe1 and
Gin4, called Wee1 and Cdr2 (7). In those experiments, it was
found that deletion of the gene for Cdr2 causes a G2 delay, as well as
defects in cell morphology and cytokinesis. Inactivation of the Wee1
gene in cdr2
cells eliminates the mitotic
delay but does not eliminate the defects in cytokinesis and cell morphology.
Our model does not explain why deletion of the SWE1 gene
causes partial suppression of the elongated bud phenotype of
elm1 cells. One possibility is that Swe1 has targets
other than Cdc28, and the importance of Swe1 in regulating these
targets is only seen in
elm1 cells.
Control of mitotic events by intricate signaling pathways. The finding that the Elm1 kinase works with Cla4 and Gin4 to control specific mitotic events provides further evidence for an intricate signaling network that functions during mitosis. A large number of highly conserved kinases have now been demonstrated to function during mitosis and cytokinesis in budding yeast, including Cdc28, Swe1, Elm1, Cla4, Ste20, Gin4, Hsl1, Kcc4, Cdc5, Ipl1, Cdc15, Mps1, Bub1, and Dbf2 (1, 4, 6, 8a, 9, 10a, 15-17, 27, 35a, 38, 40, 46). In addition, several highly conserved GTPases have been demonstrated to function in the control of mitotic events and cytokinesis in budding yeast, including Cdc42, Tem1, and Ras (30, 41, 44). It seems likely, therefore, that many mitotic events will be controlled by intricate and highly conserved signaling networks. Elucidation of these networks represents an important challenge for our future understanding of the cell cycle.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by NIH grant GM53959 and by the California Biotechnology Training program.
We thank Grant Hartzog, Hendri Tjandra, Tin Tin Su, and Roger Altman for critical reading of the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Sinsheimer Laboratories, Department of Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064. Phone: (831) 459-5659. Fax: (831) 459-3139. E-mail: kellogg{at}darwin.ucsc.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Altman, R., and D. R. Kellogg.
1997.
Control of mitotic events by Nap1 and the Gin4 kinase.
J. Cell Biol.
138:119-130 |
| 2. | Amon, A., M. Tyers, B. Futcher, and K. Nasmyth. 1993. Mechanisms that help the yeast cell cycle clock tick: G2 cyclins transcriptionally activate G2 cyclins and repress G1 cyclins. Cell 74:993-1007[Medline]. |
| 3. |
Anderson, C. W.,
P. R. Baum, and R. F. Gesteland.
1973.
Processing of adenovirus 2-induced proteins.
J. Virol.
12:241-252 |
| 4. |
Barral, Y.,
M. Parra,
S. Bidlingmaier, and M. Snyder.
1999.
Nim1-related kinases coordinate cell cycle progression with the organization of the peripheral cytoskeleton in yeast.
Genes Dev.
13:176-187 |
| 5. |
Blacketer, M. J.,
C. M. Koehler,
S. G. Coats,
A. M. Myers, and P. Madaule.
1993.
Regulation of dimorphism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: involvement of the novel protein kinase homolog Elm1p and protein phosphatase 2A.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:5567-5581 |
| 6. | Booher, R. N., R. J. Deshaies, and M. W. Kirschner. 1992. Properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wee1 and its differential regulation of p34CDC28 in response to G1 and G2 cyclins. EMBO J. 12:3417-3426[Medline]. |
| 7. |
Breeding, C. S.,
J. Hudson,
M. K. Balasubramanian,
S. M. Hemmingsen,
P. G. Young, and K. L. Gould.
1998.
The cdr2+ gene encodes a regulator of G2/M progression and cytokinesis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
Mol. Biol. Cell
9:3399-3415 |
| 8. |
Carroll, C.,
R. Altman,
D. Schieltz,
J. Yates, and D. R. Kellogg.
1998.
The septins are required for the mitosis-specific activation of the Gin4 kinase.
J. Cell Biol.
143:709-717 |
| 8a. | Chan, C. S., and D. Botstein. 1993. Isolation and characterization of chromosome-gain and increase-in-ploidy mutants in yeast. Genetics 135:677-691[Abstract]. |
| 9. | Charles, J. F., S. L. Jaspersen, R. L. Tinker-Kulberg, L. Hwang, A. Szidon, and D. O. Morgan. 1998. The Polo-related kinase Cdc5 activates and is destroyed by the mitotic cyclin destruction machinery in S. cerevisiae. Curr. Biol. 8:497-507[Medline]. |
| 10. | Coleman, T. R., Z. Tang, and W. G. Dunphy. 1993. Negative regulation of the Wee1 protein kinase by direct action of the Nim1/Cdr1 mitotic inducer. Cell 72:919-929[Medline]. |
| 10a. |
Cvrckova, F.,
C. De Virgilio,
E. Manser,
J. R. Pringle, and K. Nasmyth.
1995.
Ste20-like protein kinases are required for normal localization of cell growth and for cytokinesis in budding yeast.
Genes Dev.
9:1817-1830 |
| 11. |
Edgington, N. P.,
M. J. Blacketer,
T. A. Bierwagen, and A. M. Myers.
1999.
Control of Saccharomyces cerevisiae filamentous growth by cyclin-dependent kinase Cdc28.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:1369-1380 |
| 12. | Fitch, I., C. Dahmann, U. Surana, A. Amon, K. Nasmyth, L. Goetsch, B. Byers, and B. Futcher. 1992. Characterization of four B-type cyclin genes of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell. 3:805-818[Abstract]. |
| 13. |
Haarer, B. K., and J. R. Pringle.
1987.
Immunofluorescence localization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae CDC12 gene product to the vicinity of the 10-nm filaments in the mother-bud neck.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7:3678-3687 |
| 14. | Hartwell, L. 1971. Genetic control of the cell cycle in yeast. Genes controlling bud emergence and cytokinesis. Exp. Cell Res. 69:265-276[Medline]. |
| 15. | Hartwell, L. H. 1991. Twenty-five years of cell cycle genetics. Genetics 129:975-980[Medline]. |
| 15a. |
Hartwell, L. H.,
J. Culotti,
J. R. Pringle, and B. J. Reid.
1974.
Genetic control of cell division cycle in yeast.
Science
183:46-51 |
| 16. |
Jaspersen, S. L.,
J. F. Charles,
R. L. Tinker-Kulberg, and D. Morgan.
1998.
A late mitotic regulatory network controlling cyclin destruction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Biol. Cell.
9:2803-2817 |
| 17. |
Johnston, L. H.,
S. L. Eberly,
J. W. Chapman,
H. Araki, and A. Sugino.
1990.
The product of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle gene DBF2 has homology with protein kinases and is periodically expressed in the cell cycle.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10:1358-1366 |
| 18. |
Kanoh, J., and P. Russell.
1998.
The protein kinase Cdr2, related to Nim1/Cdr1 mitotic inducer, regulates the onset of mitosis in fission yeast.
Mol. Biol. Cell.
9:3321-3334 |
| 19. | Kellogg, D. R., and B. M. Alberts. 1992. Purification of a multiprotein complex containing centrosomal proteins from the Drosophila embryo by chromatography with low-affinity polyclonal antibodies. Mol. Biol. Cell. 3:1-11[Abstract]. |
| 20. |
Kellogg, D. R.,
A. Kikuchi,
T. Fujii-Nakata,
C. W. Turck, and A. Murray.
1995.
Members of the NAP/SET family of proteins interact specifically with B-type cyclins.
J. Cell Biol.
130:661-673 |
| 21. |
Kellogg, D. R., and A. W. Murray.
1995.
NAP1 acts with Clb2 to perform mitotic functions and suppress polar bud growth in budding yeast.
J. Cell Biol.
130:675-685 |
| 21a. | Kellogg lab website. Not copyrighted. [Online.] http://www.biology.ucsc.edu /people/kellogg. [5 October 1999, last date accessed.] |
| 22. | Lawrence, C. W. 1991. Classical mutagenesis techniques. Methods Enzymol. 194:273-281[Medline]. |
| 23. |
Lew, D., and S. I. Reed.
1995.
A cell cycle checkpoint monitors cell morphogenesis in budding yeast.
J. Cell Biol.
129:739-749 |
| 24. |
Lew, D. J., and S. I. Reed.
1993.
Morphogenesis in the yeast cell cycle: regulation by Cdc28 and cyclins.
J. Cell Biol.
120:1305-1320 |
| 25. | Lew, D. J., and S. I. Reed. 1995. Cell cycle control of morphogenesis in budding yeast. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 5:17-23[Medline]. |
| 26. |
Longtine, M. S.,
H. Fares, and J. Pringle.
1998.
Role of the yeast Gin4p protein kinase in septin assembly and the relationship between septin assembly and septin function.
J. Cell Biol.
143:719-736 |
| 27. |
Ma, J. X.,
Q. Lu, and M. Grunstein.
1996.
A search for proteins that interact genetically with histone H3 and H4 amino termini uncovers novel regulators of the Swe1 kinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genes Dev.
10:1327-1340 |
| 28. | McGowan, C., and P. Russell. 1995. Cell cycle regulation of human Wee1. EMBO J. 14:2166-2175[Medline]. |
| 29. |
McMillan, J. N.,
R. A. L. Sia, and D. J. Lew.
1998.
A morphogenesis checkpoint monitors the actin cytoskeleton in yeast.
J. Cell Biol.
142:1487-1499 |
| 30. |
Morishita, T.,
H. Mitsuzawa,
M. Nakafuku,
S. Nakamura,
S. Hattori, and Y. Anraku.
1995.
Requirement of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ras for completion of mitosis.
Science
270:1213-1215 |
| 31. | Moriya, H., and K. Isono. 1999. Analysis of genetic interactions between DHH1, SSD1 and ELM1 indicates their involvement in cellular morphology determination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 15:481-496[Medline]. |
| 32. | Mueller, P. R., T. R. Coleman, and W. G. Dunphy. 1995. Cell cycle regulation of a xenopus wee1-like kinase. Mol. Biol. Cell. 6:119-134[Abstract]. |
| 33. | Murray, A., and T. Hunt. 1993. The cell cycle: an introduction. Oxford University Press, New York, N.Y |
| 34. | Norbury, C., and P. Nurse. 1992. Animal cell cycles and their control. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 61:441-470[Medline]. |
| 35. | Nurse, P. 1975. Genetic control of cell size at cell division in yeast. Nature 256:547-551[Medline]. |
| 35a. | Okuzaki, D., S. Tanaka, H. Kanazawa, and H. Nojima. 1997. Gin4 of S. cerevisiae is a bud neck protein that interacts with the Cdc28 complex. Genes Cells 2:753-770[Abstract]. |
| 36. | Pringle, J. R., A. E. M. Adams, D. G. Drubin, and B. K. Haarer. 1991. Immunofluorescence methods for yeast. Methods Enzymol. 194:565-602[Medline]. |
| 37. |
Richardson, H.,
D. J. Lew,
M. Henze,
K. Sugimoto, and S. Reed.
1992.
Cyclin B homologs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae function in S phase and in G2.
Genes Dev.
6:2021-2034 |
| 38. |
Roberts, R. T.,
K. A. Farr, and M. A. Hoyt.
1994.
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint gene BUB1 encodes a novel protein kinase.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:8282-8291 |
| 39. | Russell, P., and P. Nurse. 1987. Negative regulation of mitosis by wee1+, a gene encoding a protein kinase homolog. Cell 49:559-567[Medline]. |
| 40. | Schweitzer, B., and P. Philippsen. 1991. CDC15, an essential cell cycle gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, encodes a protein kinase domain. Yeast 7:265-273[Medline]. |
| 41. |
Shirayama, M.,
Y. Matsui, and A. Toh-E.
1994.
The yeast TEM1 gene, which encodes a GTP-binding protein, is involved in termination of M phase.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:7476-7482 |
| 42. | Sia, R. A. L., E. S. G. Bardes, and D. J. Lew. 1998. Control of Swe1p degradation by the morphogenesis checkpoint. EMBO J. 17:6678-6688[Medline]. |
| 42a. | Sreenivasan, A. Unpublished data. |
| 43. | Tang, Z., T. R. Coleman, and W. G. Dunphy. 1993. Two distinct mechanisms for the negative regulation of the Wee1 protein kinase. EMBO J. 12:3427-3436[Medline]. |
| 44. | Tjandra, H., J. Compton, and D. R. Kellogg. 1998. Control of mitotic events by the Cdc42 GTPase, the Clb2 cyclin and a member of the PAK kinase family. Curr. Biol. 8:991-1000[Medline]. |
| 45. | Watanabe, N., M. Broome, and T. Hunter. 1995. Regulation of the human Wee1Hu CDK tyrosine 15-kinase during the cell cycle. EMBO J. 14:1878-1891[Medline]. |
| 46. |
Weiss, E., and M. Winey.
1996.
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle pole body duplication gene MPS1 is part of a mitotic checkpoint.
J. Cell Biol.
132:111-123 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»