Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, December 1999, p. 8353-8360, Vol. 19, No. 12
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Multiple Pathways for Repair of DNA Double-Strand
Breaks in Mammalian Chromosomes
Yunfu
Lin,
Tamas
Lukacsovich, and
Alan S.
Waldman*
Department of Biological Sciences, University
of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208
Received 30 April 1999/Returned for modification 10 June
1999/Accepted 9 September 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
To study repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in mammalian
chromosomes, we designed DNA substrates containing a thymidine kinase
(TK) gene disrupted by the 18-bp recognition site for yeast endonuclease I-SceI. Some substrates also contained a
second defective TK gene sequence to serve as a genetic donor in
recombinational repair. A genomic DSB was induced by introducing
endonuclease I-SceI into cells containing a stably
integrated DNA substrate. DSB repair was monitored by selection for
TK-positive segregants. We observed that intrachromosomal DSB repair is
accomplished with nearly equal efficiencies in either the presence or
absence of a homologous donor sequence. DSB repair is achieved by
nonhomologous end-joining or homologous recombination, but rarely by
nonconservative single-strand annealing. Repair of a chromosomal DSB by
homologous recombination occurs mainly by gene conversion and appears
to require a donor sequence greater than a few hundred base pairs in
length. Nonhomologous end-joining events typically involve loss of very
few nucleotides, and some events are associated with gene amplification
at the repaired locus. Additional studies revealed that precise
religation of DNA ends with no other concomitant sequence alteration is
a viable mode for repair of DSBs in a mammalian genome.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Chromosomes suffer a variety of
types of damage that may result in loss or alteration of genetic
information, or death, if left unrepaired. The double-strand break
(DSB) is one type of damage that can arise spontaneously or that may be
induced by a variety of agents (1, 3, 37, 49). Several
pathways for DSB repair in eukaryotes have been described. DSB repair
in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is generally viewed as
occurring almost exclusively through homologous recombination (HR) when a homolog is available (8, 9, 11, 20, 27). In one model for
recombinational repair, termed DSBR (30, 41), broken DNA
ends are degraded to form a double-stranded gap. This is followed by
invasion of an unbroken homologous template by a broken end, which
primes DNA synthesis that ultimately leads to repair of the gap with
information contributed by the homologous template. In this model,
recombination is conservative and proceeds through the formation of two
Holliday junctions, which may be resolved to generate either a
crossover or a noncrossover product. A distinct type of pathway termed
single-strand annealing (SSA) (15) has also been proposed
for recombination between repeated sequences. In SSA, DNA ends are
degraded bidirectionally from a DSB by a strand-specific exonuclease
until complementary (homologous) sequences are exposed. Following
annealing of the complementary sequences, nonhomologous DNA tails are
trimmed, single-strand gaps are repaired, and nicks are ligated to
produce recombination products that look like crossovers. SSA is
nonconservative in the sense that sequence information between the
annealed complementary sequences is lost.
In contrast to yeast, mammalian cells have been reported to be
efficient at joining any two noncognate DNA ends with essentially no
requirement for sequence homology (5, 10, 32, 33, 36) in a
process often referred to as nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ). Some
studies have suggested that NHEJ in higher eukaryotes may be
facilitated by the annealing of short complementary sequences one or a
few bases in length at or near the DNA termini (5, 19, 23-25, 28,
32, 33, 43). Since this process is reminiscent of SSA, NHEJ
events involving the annealing of short complementary sequences have
been referred to as micro-SSA (42). (Throughout this paper,
we use the term micro-SSA specifically to refer to a type of
nonconservative NHEJ event that is facilitated by the annealing of
short complementary sequences that are exposed by strand degradation,
or unwinding, originating from a DSB. This definition does not include
religation, in the absence of strand degradation, of complementary
single-strand overhang sequences generated by a staggered DSB.)
In recent years, we (19) and several other groups (4,
7, 14, 22, 31, 35, 36, 42) have developed experimental systems
using the rare-cutting endonuclease I-SceI from S. cerevisiae to induce a specific DSB within a mammalian chromosome
in order to study the repair of the induced DSB. Although there have
been differences in some of the details of the reported results from such studies, it has been demonstrated that DSBs in mammalian chromosomes can be repaired by either HR or NHEJ and that DSBs stimulate HR as well as illegitimate genetic rearrangements in mammalian chromosomes. There has been little or no information presented on what factors may influence the balance between DSB-induced HR and NHEJ, nor has there been any reported investigation of how often
a genomic DSB may be precisely religated with no concomitant alteration
of the DNA sequence.
To assess the last two issues and investigate several other aspects of
intrachromosomal repair of DSBs in mammalian cells, we introduced DNA
constructs containing a herpes simplex virus (HSV) thymidine kinase
(TK) gene disrupted by a recognition site for yeast endonuclease
I-SceI into TK-deficient mouse cells. Some constructs
additionally contained a second TK gene sequence to potentially act as
a genetic donor in recombinational repair of an
I-SceI-induced DSB. A DSB was introduced into each DNA
substrate by treatment with I-SceI after the DNA substrate
had stably integrated into the genome. DSB repair was monitored by
selecting for cells in which a functional TK gene had been reconstructed.
In this report we draw some comparisons between spontaneous and
DSB-induced HR in mammalian chromosomes and we present evidence that
precise religation is a viable pathway for healing a genomic DSB. Our
studies contribute to an expanding paradigm in which multiple pathways
function to achieve DSB repair in a mammalian genome while often, but
not always, producing minimal change to the genome.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell culture.
Mouse L cells and derivatives deficient in TK
were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 0.1 mM minimal essential
medium nonessential amino acids (GIBCO), and 50 µg of gentamicin
sulfate/ml. Cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere
of 5% CO2. The parental cell line used in this study has
been reported to express functional p53 (40).
Plasmid substrates.
Plasmids (Fig.
1) are based on the vector pJS-1
(13, 17), which is a derivative of pSV2neo (38).
Plasmid pTK1 (19) contains the wild-type HSV type 1 (HSV-1)
(strain F) TK gene on a 2.5-kb BamHI fragment inserted into
the unique BamHI site of the vector. Into the
SstI site at position 963 of the TK gene coding region
(numbering as described by Wagner et al. [44]) was
inserted a double-stranded oligonucleotide containing the 18-bp
recognition sequence for yeast endonuclease I-SceI.
Insertion of the oligonucleotide introduced a frameshift (net gain of
22 nucleotides), inactivating the TK gene. Insertion of the
oligonucleotide also resulted in a duplication of the 4-bp
SstI overhang sequence (5'-AGCT-3') flanking the
I-SceI recognition site (see Fig. 2). The plasmid containing
the TK gene disrupted by the I-SceI recognition site was
named pTKSce (Fig. 1B) and has been described previously as pTK1-Sce
(19).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
DNA substrates for DSB repair. (A) Schematic of a
generic substrate. For simplicity, the DNA construct is shown in linear
form as if linearized at the unique ClaI site in the vector.
Inserted between two BamHI (B) sites is a 2.5-kb DNA
fragment containing a TK gene disrupted by a 22-bp oligonucleotide
(stippled segment) containing the 18-bp recognition site for yeast
endonuclease I-SceI (S). The TK gene is referred to as
"recipient" since it is intended to receive information in the
recombinational repair of an I-SceI-induced DSB. Some
substrates also contain a TK gene sequence inserted between two
HindIII (H) sites to act as a genetic donor in
recombinational DSB repair. In all substrates, the orientation of the
TK gene coding sequences is from left to right. All constructs also
contain the neo gene, transcribed from right to left. (B)
Schematics of specific DNA substrates. Only recipient and donor (if
any) TK gene sequences are shown for each substrate, but all DNA
constructs have the general configuration shown in panel A. The 360-bp
donor TK gene sequence on pTKSce-360 has 5' and 3' truncations of
coding sequences. The 2-kb donor sequence on pTKSce-26 contains a
complete TK gene disrupted by an 8-bp XhoI linker insertion
(X). Indicated on the two donor sequences is the position of the
SstI site (Ss) corresponding to the site into which the
I-SceI oligonucleotide was inserted in the recipient TK gene
sequence. The 2.5-kb recipient sequence on pTKSce2 is disrupted by a
47-bp oligonucleotide containing two I-SceI sites flanking
an XbaI (Xb) site. See Materials and Methods for further
details.
|
|
Plasmid pTKSce-360 (Fig.
1B) is identical to pTKSce except that it
contains a 360-bp donor fragment (nucleotides 805 to 1165)
of the HSV-1
TK gene inserted into the unique
HindIII site of
pJS-1.
The mutant 26 HSV-1 TK gene contains an 8-bp
XhoI linker
inserted after nucleotide 737 and has been described previously
(
17).
Plasmid pTKSce-26 (Fig.
1B) is identical to pTKSce
except that
it contains a 2.0-kb fragment harboring the mutant 26 HSV-1
TK
gene inserted at the
HindIII
site.
Plasmid pTKSce2 (Fig.
1B) is identical to pTKSce except that the TK
gene contains a 47-bp oligonucleotide containing two I-
SceI
recognition sites inserted into the
SstI
site.
Assay for intrachromosomal DSB repair.
To establish stably
transfected experimental cells lines, the appropriate DNA construct was
linearized with ClaI and introduced into cells by
electroporation (19). Stable transformants were isolated
following selection in G418, 200 µg of active drug/ml, as previously
described (46). Plasmid pCMV-I-SceI (obtained from M. Jasin), which encodes endonuclease I-SceI under
control of the cytomegalovirus promoter and which is expressible in
mouse cells (34), was introduced into cell lines as follows.
Cells (5 × 106 or 107) and 10 µg of
pCMV-I-SceI were resuspended at room temperature in 800 µl
of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and were electroporated in a Bio-Rad
Gene Pulser set to 1,000 V and 25 µF. Following electroporation, cells were plated at a density of 106 cells per
75-cm2 flask. After 2 days of incubation at 37°C under no
selection, medium was changed to hypoxanthine-aminopterin-thymidine
(HAT) medium to select for TK-positive clones. Colonies were counted and harvested 14 days later.
In experiments involving cell lines containing pTKSce-26, it was
necessary to reduce the background of TK-positive segregants
produced
by spontaneous intrachromosomal HR between the TK gene
sequences on the
integrated copy of pTKSce-26 in order to measure
the effect of the
I-
SceI-induced DSB. This was accomplished by
growing cells
in DMEM supplemented with 5 µg of trifluorothymidine
(TFT) per ml for
5 days followed by 2 days of growth in DMEM supplemented
with 150 µM
thymidine to dilute the intracellular pools of TFT.
Cells were then
electroporated with pCMV-I-
SceI and selected in
HAT medium
as described above except that a supplement of 150
µM thymidine was
maintained in the medium throughout selection
in
HAT.
In all experiments, mock electroporations of cells in PBS alone were
performed as
controls.
PCR and sequence analysis of products of intrachromosomal DSB
repair.
A DNA segment encompassing the original location of the
I-SceI site was amplified by PCR from the genome of
HAT-resistant clones with primer AL-1
(5'-CCAGCGTCTTGTCATTGGCG-3'), nucleotides 308 through 327 of
the coding strand of the HSV-1 TK gene, and primer s1134
(5'-CGGTGGGGTATCGACAGAGT-3'), nucleotides 1786 through 1767 of the noncoding TK gene strand. PCR products were sequenced directly
without cloning with a Sequence, version 2.0, kit (Amersham) following
treatment of PCR products with a PCR product presequencing kit (Amersham).
 |
RESULTS |
Experimental design.
To study DSB repair within mammalian
chromosomes, cell lines were derived from mouse L TK-negative
fibroblasts containing a variety of DNA substrates (Fig. 1) stably
integrated in the genome. Each substrate contained a TK gene disrupted
by an inserted oligonucleotide containing one or more copies of the
18-bp recognition sequence for endonuclease I-SceI. Some DNA
substrates contained an additional defective TK gene sequence to serve
as a potential donor in recombinational DSB repair. Endonuclease
I-SceI was introduced into cells to induce a DSB within the
integrated substrate, and HAT selection was subsequently applied in
order to recover clones in which a functional TK gene had been
reconstructed via DSB repair. The gain of TK gene function required
correction of the frameshift caused by the inserted oligonucleotide but
not necessarily the precise reconstruction of the wild-type TK gene
sequence. The 360-bp TK gene donor on pTKSce-360 was deleted at both
the 5' and 3' ends, and so gene conversions, but not crossovers, could produce a functional TK gene. For pTKSce-26, both gene conversions and
crossovers could produce a functional TK gene.
Intrachromosomal DSB repair in the absence of an homologous genetic
donor.
Stably transfected cell lines containing one or more copies
of pTKSce (Fig. 1B) were isolated. One such cell line, designated Sce-3, previously described (19) contains a single
integrated copy of pTKSce. Endonuclease I-SceI or plasmid
pCMV-I-SceI was electroporated into Sce-3 cells, and
HAT-resistant colonies were selected (Table
1). Electroporation with the expression
plasmid pCMV-I-SceI, rather than endonuclease
I-SceI itself, was a more efficient means for inducing DSB
repair events (Table 1), and so pCMV-I-SceI was used in
subsequent experiments. DNA sequences surrounding the
I-SceI-induced DSB were amplified by PCR from 51 HAT-resistant clones, and nucleotide sequences were determined (Fig.
2). Fifty of the 51 clones displayed
small deletions of 1 to 19 nucleotides (Fig. 2). Each deletion restored
the reading frame of the TK gene. Smaller deletions were more common
than larger ones, with one-base deletions comprising 23 of the 51 (45%) recovered clones. Deletions extended in either one or both
directions from the DSB site. Three clones (classes 13 and 14; Fig. 2)
displayed a net deletion of one nucleotide that was one position
removed from the actual I-SceI cut site, and two of these
clones (class 14; Fig. 2) displayed an A-to-G mutation of the
nucleotide immediately upstream from the deleted nucleotide. The three
exceptional clones (classes 13 and 14) may have been produced by
resection of several nucleotides from the DSB in conjunction with the
addition of a nucleotide to a DNA terminus. Of the 51 clones analyzed,
only one (class 12; Fig. 2) displayed a wild-type TK gene sequence with
a restored SstI site (5'-GAGCTC-3'). The rarity
of recovery of a wild-type TK gene sequence from cell line Sce-3
indicated that micro-SSA involving annealing of the 4-bp (5'-AGCT-3')
repeat flanking the I-SceI site (see top of Fig. 2) was not
a common mode for intrachromosomal DSB repair.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Intrachromosomal DSB repair products generated in the
absence of a homologous donor sequence. Presented at the top of the
figure is the parental DNA sequence of the I-SceI
recognition site insertion (uppercase letters) within the TK gene
(lowercase letters) on pTKSce (Fig. 1B). Sites of staggered cleavage by
I-SceI are indicated by arrowheads, and the 4-bp repeats
flanking the I-SceI site are underlined. Presented below the
parental sequence are nucleotide sequences determined for products of
intrachromosomal DSB repair recovered from 51 independent HAT-resistant
clones derived from cell line Sce-3 following the introduction of
I-SceI into cells. All repair products displayed small
deletions ranging from 1 to 22 bp that restored the TK gene reading
frame. No., number of HAT-resistant clones.
|
|
Intrachromosomal DSB repair in the presence of a closely linked
360-bp homologous sequence.
Two cell lines designated 360-1 and
360-2, each stably transfected with a single copy of TKSce-360 (Fig.
1B), were electroporated with pCMV-I-SceI, and HAT-resistant
colonies were selected (Table 1). Genomic DNA was isolated from a total
of 41 DSB-induced HAT-resistant clones. DNA samples from 13 HAT-resistant clones each from cell lines 360-1 and 360-2 were examined
on a Southern blot following digestion with BamHI and
SstI (data not shown), and it was learned that none of the
clones displayed a restored SstI site expected for a
wild-type TK gene sequence. From the genomic DNA isolated from the
remaining 15 HAT-resistant clones, a TK gene fragment which encompassed
the original location of the I-SceI site was amplified by
PCR. Incubation of the 15 PCR products with SstI revealed
that all products were resistant to cleavage with SstI (data
not shown), indicating that a wild-type TK gene had not been restored
in any of the HAT-resistant clones. Thus, in total, none of the 41 HAT-resistant clones analyzed had arisen from either HR or micro-SSA
since either repair pathway would have produced a wild-type TK gene.
The nucleotide sequence surrounding the position of the
I-SceI-induced DSB was determined for six HAT-resistant clones (Fig. 3), and each revealed a 1-bp
deletion at the DSB site equivalent to the class 1 repair product in
Fig. 2. From our analyses, we inferred that intrachromosomal DSB repair
in the presence of a closely linked 360-bp homologous sequence is accomplished almost exclusively by NHEJ.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Intrachromosomal NHEJ products generated in the presence
of a 360-bp or 2.0-kb homologous donor. Presented at the top of the
figure is the parental DNA sequence of the I-SceI
recognition site insertion (uppercase letters) within the recipient TK
gene (lowercase letters) on pTKSce-360 and pTKSce-26 (Fig. 1B). Sites
of staggered cleavage by I-SceI are indicated by arrowheads,
as are the 4-bp repeats flanking the I-SceI site
(underlining). Presented below the parental sequence are nucleotide
sequences determined for the products of intrachromosomal NHEJ products
recovered from 6 independent HAT-resistant clones derived from cell
lines 360-1 and 360-2 and from 11 independent HAT-resistant clones
derived from cell lines 26-1 and 26-2 following the introduction of
I-SceI into cells. All NHEJ repair products displayed small
deletions ranging from 1 to 16 bp that restored the TK gene reading
frame. It should be noted (see Table 2 and text) that some
HAT-resistant clones derived from lines 26-1 and 26-2 displayed
wild-type TK gene sequences as products of HR but are not shown here.
No., number of HAT-resistant clones.
|
|
Intrachromosomal DSB repair in the presence of a closely linked
2-kb homologous sequence.
Two cell lines designated 26-1 and 26-2, each containing a single integrated copy of pTKSce-26, were
electroporated with pCMV-I-SceI, and HAT-resistant colonies
were selected (Table 1). For cell line 26-1, pCMV-I-SceI
brought about more than a 6-fold induction of colonies relative to mock
electroporations, while for cell line 26-2 induction was about 20-fold
(Table 1). Genomic DNA was isolated from 12 HAT-resistant clones
derived from line 26-1 and from 30 HAT-resistant clones derived from
line 26-2 after transfection with pCMV-I-SceI. The DNA
samples were digested with various combinations of BamHI,
HindIII, XhoI, and SstI and
subjected to Southern blotting analysis using a TK gene-specific probe
(Fig. 4A). Results of the Southern
blotting analysis are summarized below and in Table
2. (Additional digestions not shown in
Fig. 4A were used to confirm the identity of some bands.)

View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Representative Southern blotting analysis of
HAT-resistant clones derived from cell line 26-2. (A) DNA samples (8 µg each) isolated from HAT-resistant clones were digested with
various combinations of BamHI (B), XhoI (X), and
SstI (S), as indicated below the lanes, and were displayed
on a Southern blot by using a TK gene-specific probe. Digestions from
each individual clone are presented in three adjacent lanes (for
example, lanes 1 to 3), with the exception of the clone presented in
lanes 13 and 14. Clones displayed in lanes 1 to 9, 13, and 14 were
recovered from cell line 26-2 following transfection of
pCMV-I-SceI into cells. The HAT-resistant clone displayed in
lanes 10 to 12 arose spontaneously (following a mock transfection). In
total, 42 DSB-induced and 20 spontaneous HAT-resistant clones from cell
lines 26-1 and 26-2 were analyzed by Southern blotting. See text for
details. (B) DNA samples (8 µg each) from six clones exhibiting an
aberrant restriction pattern similar to that exhibited by the clone in
lanes 7 to 9 in panel A were digested simultaneously with
BamHI and I-SceI and displayed on a Southern blot
by using a TK gene-specific probe.
|
|
Six of 12 clones isolated from cell line 26-1 and 5 of 30 clones from
line 26-2 displayed the patterns shown in Fig.
4A, lanes
4 to 6. These
11 clones retained both the 2.5-kb
BamHI fragment
and the
2.0-kb
HindIII fragment (Fig.
4A, lane 4) present in the
parental DNA construct, pTKSce-26 (see Fig.
1 for the origin of
fragments). The 2.0-kb
HindIII sequence retained the
XhoI linker
insertion and was cleavable by
XhoI
into predicted 1.5- and 0.5-kb
fragments (Fig.
4A, lane 5). (The 0.5-kb
fragment is not visible.)
The 2.5-kb
BamHI fragment which
originally contained the I-
SceI-disrupted
TK gene was
cleaved in half by
SstI (Fig.
4A, lane 6). The 2.0-kb
HindIII fragment was also cleavable by
SstI
into expected 1.3-
and 0.7-kb fragments (Fig.
4A, lane 6), although the
0.7-kb fragment
is difficult to see on the blot. Most notably,
restoration of
the
SstI site on the 2.5-kb
BamHI
fragment was diagnostic for
reconstruction of a wild-type TK gene.
Since only 1 of 51 HAT-resistant
clones recovered in the absence of a
homologous donor sequence
and none of the 41 HAT-resistant clones
recovered in the presence
of a 360-bp homologous donor contained a
wild-type TK gene sequence
(see above), it was clear that the wild-type
TK gene sequences
recovered from cell lines 26-1 and 26-2 had arisen as
products
of HR or, more specifically, gene conversion eliminating the
I-
SceI
recognition site on the broken TK gene sequence. One
clone from
cell line 26-1 displayed the pattern seen in Fig.
4A, lanes
13
and 14. This clone displayed a single fragment upon digestion
with
BamHI and
HindIII (lane 13), which was
cleavable with
SstI
(lane 14) and most likely arose from a
crossover between the two
TK genes on pTKSce-26.
Five HAT-resistant clones isolated from cell line 26-1 and 12 HAT-resistant clones from cell line 26-2 displayed the pattern
shown in
Fig.
4A, lanes 1 to 3. These clones contained a 2.5-kb
BamHI
fragment that resisted cleavage with
SstI (lane 3) but
retained
a 2.0-kb
HindIII fragment (lane 1) that was
cleavable with
XhoI
(lane 2), suggesting no change to the
parental
HindIII fragment
(Fig.
1B). Such a pattern was
expected for NHEJ of the DNA termini
at the
I-
SceI-induced DSB. The sequence in the vicinity of the
I-
SceI site was determined for 11 of these putative NHEJ
events
(Fig.
3), confirming that each of the HAT-resistant clones
displayed
a small deletion at the original location of the
I-
SceI site,
consistent with NHEJ. Seven of the 11 HAT-resistant clones analyzed,
comprising classes 1, 2, 13, and 15 in
Fig.
3, displayed a deletion
of only a single nucleotide, which was
similar to the observation
of a predominance of single-nucleotide
deletions for NHEJ in the
absence of any donor (Fig.
2). Repair classes
1, 2, and 13 (Fig.
3) also had been recovered in the absence of a donor
(Fig.
2).
The unique class 15 clone (Fig.
3) was interesting in that
the
single deleted G was two nucleotides away from the closest DNA
terminus produced by cleavage with I-
SceI. Repair classes 16 through
18 (Fig.
3) were not previously recovered in the absence of a
donor (Fig.
2). Class 18 (Fig.
3) displayed an A-to-T mutation
at the
position immediately downstream from the 16-bp deletion
and may have
arisen from the addition of the aberrant T residue
to a DNA
terminus.
Thirteen HAT-resistant segregants from cell line 26-2 displayed a
pattern similar to that shown in Fig.
4A, lanes 7 to 9.
These clones
displayed a loss of the 2.0-kb
HindIII fragment with
the
concomitant gain of a novel fragment of about 3.9 kb as well
as a
marked increase in the hybridization signal of the 2.5-kb
BamHI fragment (Fig.
4A, lane 7). These clones displayed
various
degrees of amplification of the 2.5-kb
BamHI
fragment, with phosphorimager
analysis indicating that some clones
contained as many as six
copies of the
BamHI fragment (data
not shown). The 2.5-kb
BamHI
fragments in these clones were
insensitive to digestion with
XhoI
(lane 8) or
SstI (lane 9). Additional Southern blotting and sequencing
analysis (not shown) corroborated that these clones had undergone
NHEJ
as well as an amplification of a portion of the integrated
pTKSce-26
construct. In several clones, some copies of the 2.5-kb
BamHI fragment were cleavable with I-
SceI while
the remaining
copies resisted such cleavage (Fig.
4B, lanes 1, 2, and
4).
Southern blotting analysis was also performed on 20 HAT-resistant
clones recovered following mock electroporations of cell
line 26-2. These clones had presumably arisen from spontaneous
HR events, and this
supposition was confirmed by Southern blotting
analysis (Table
2). One
clone, displayed in Fig.
4A, lanes 10
to 12, displayed a 2.0-kb
HindIII fragment that resisted cleavage
with
XhoI (lane 11) and a 2.5-kb
BamHI fragment
resistant to cleavage
with
SstI (lane 12). This clone likely
arose from a gene conversion
eliminating the
XhoI linker
insertion mutation in the TK gene
on the 2.0-kb
HindIII
fragment on pTKSce-26 (Fig.
1B). One spontaneously
arising
HAT-resistant clone displayed a pattern similar to that
for the clone
displayed in Fig.
4A, lanes 13 and 14, and likely
arose from a
crossover between TK genes. The remaining 18 HAT-resistant
clones all
displayed a pattern similar to that displayed by the
clone in Fig.
4A,
lanes 4 to 6, and likely arose from a gene conversion
eliminating the
I-
SceI recognition site insertion mutation from
the TK gene
on the 2.5-kb
BamHI fragment, restoring the
SstI
site.
Of note was the absence among the 20 spontaneously arising
HAT-resistant
clones of any clone displaying the aberrant pattern shown
in Fig.
4A, lanes 7 to 9. This strongly suggested that the aberrant
rearrangements
and amplifications seen in some HAT-resistant clones
recovered
after transfection with pCMV-I-
SceI were indeed
DSB
induced.
Precise religation as a mode of DSB repair.
The experiments
described above indicated that intrachromosomal DSB repair can be
accomplished by either NHEJ or by HR if a potential genetic donor has a
suitable amount of homology with the broken sequence. It remained
unclear how often DSB repair is accomplished by simple, precise
religation of DNA termini with no alteration of sequence information.
To address this issue we established cell lines containing a single
integrated copy of pTKSce2 (Fig. 1B). At the SstI site of
the TK gene in pTKSce2 was inserted a 47-bp insert containing two
I-SceI sites flanking an XbaI site (Fig.
5). As illustrated in Fig. 5, cleavage at
the two I-SceI sites followed by ligation of the outermost
pair of sticky ends produced a functional TK gene containing a 24-bp
insert harboring a single I-SceI site. Four cell lines
containing a single copy of pTKSce2 and designated Sce2-1, Sce2-2,
Sce2-3, and Sce2-4 were electroporated with pCMV-I-SceI, and
HAT-resistant colonies were selected (Table
3). DNA was isolated from several
HAT-resistant clones from each cell line (Table 3) and initially
analyzed by amplifying a TK gene segment encompassing the position of
the original I-SceI sites by PCR and testing the PCR
products for sensitivity to cleavage by XbaI since, as
indicated in Fig. 5, precise religation removes the XbaI
site. Clones that lost the XbaI site were further analyzed
by DNA sequencing. As indicated in Table 3, despite the wide range in
the overall frequencies of recovery of HAT-resistant colonies from the
four cell lines, a significant portion (ranging from 33 to 65%) of
HAT-resistant clones isolated from all four cell lines had arisen via
precise religation and the majority of clones that had lost the
XbaI site had undergone precise religation. All clones
analyzed retained one I-SceI site (data not shown),
indicating that degradation from DSBs was limited. The fact that every
clone retained an I-SceI site also suggested that precise
religation was a frequent event since, in any given clone, had two
I-SceI-induced DSBs existed simultaneously and had
degradation from both DSBs occurred prior to religation (NHEJ), then
both I-SceI sites would have been lost. Southern blotting
analysis (not shown) revealed no additional rearrangements or
amplifications in clones that underwent precise religation.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Substrate for monitoring precise religation. Shown at
the top of the figure is the 47-bp oligonucleotide inserted into the TK
gene on pTKSce2. The oligonucleotide causes a frameshift mutation in
the TK gene and contains two I-SceI recognition sites
(5'-TAGGGATAACAGGGTAAT-3') flanking an XbaI site
(5'-TCTAGA-3'). The actual sites of cleavage by
I-SceI and XbaI on the top strand of the
construct are indicated. As illustrated, simultaneous cleavage of the
substrate at both I-SceI sites followed by loss of the
intervening 23-bp fragment and precise religation of the two outermost
I-SceI sticky ends produces a functional, and thus
recoverable, TK gene containing a 24-bp insert harboring a single
I-SceI site.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this report, we examined several aspects of DSB repair in
mammalian chromosomes. We have demonstrated that mammalian cells enjoy
several pathways for healing DSBs, while producing little or no
concomitant genetic alteration.
In studies of intrachromosomal DSB repair using cell line Sce-3
containing pTKSce (Fig. 1B), only 1 of 51 HAT-resistant clones analyzed
in detail displayed a wild-type TK gene sequence (Fig. 2, class 12),
suggesting that micro-SSA is not an important pathway for
intrachromosomal DSB repair in our cell lines. Production of a
wild-type TK gene by micro-SSA required that DNA termini be degraded
back by as much as 13 bp to the left and 17 bp to the right of the DSB
in order to expose the complementary 4-bp SstI overhang
sequences. Fifty of 51 HAT-resistant segregants from line Sce-3
displayed small deletions that were produced by loss of fewer than 13 bp from either side of the DSB, with loss of only 1 bp being the most
commonly recovered deletion (Fig. 2). In recent experiments in which we
monitored intrachromosomal DSB repair by selecting for mutations
involving loss of TK gene function (16), we also recovered a
preponderance of small deletions. We thus infer that intrachromosomal
DSB repair in our cell lines often proceeds with little strand
degradation from the DNA termini and that NHEJ is not dependent on the
uncovering of sequence microhomologies. Our precise religation
experiments, discussed below, imply that terminal microhomologies may
play a role in DSB repair in our cell lines as long as strand
degradation is not required to expose the complementary sequences.
Experiments with cell lines 360-1 and 360-2 containing pTKSce-360, with
a 360-bp donor, corroborated the relative infrequency of micro-SSA
(involving nucleotide loss) as a means for intrachromosomal DSB repair.
None of the 41 HAT-resistant clones contained a wild-type TK gene
sequence, indicating that none of the clones were produced by
micro-SSA. The six HAT-resistant clones from cell lines 360-1 and 360-2 that were sequenced each displayed a 1-bp deletion (Fig. 3), again
indicating that often only a small degree of degradation of DNA termini
occurs prior to intrachromosomal NHEJ. The lack of any wild-type TK
gene sequence among the 41 HAT-resistant clones analyzed also revealed
that none of the clones had arisen from HR. The lack of
intrachromosomal DSB repair by HR in the presence of a 360-bp donor
suggests that the length of homology shared by recipient and donor
sequences on one or both sides of the DSB may have been insufficient
for intrachromosomal HR and that perhaps the general homology length
requirements observed for spontaneous HR (18, 47) are
preserved for DSB-induced recombination. In related preliminary work,
we have been unable to detect DSB induction of homeologous
recombination between two TK genes having 80% homology (16), suggesting that requirements for a high degree of
homology observed for spontaneous recombination (18, 46, 47)
may not be compromised during DSB repair.
In light of reports (5, 19, 23-25, 28, 32, 33, 43) that
NHEJ in eukaryotes may be facilitated by small (1- to 5-bp) homologies,
it seems striking that in our present study only one of a total of 92 recovered NHEJ events (combining results from cell lines Sce-3, 360-1, and 360-2) was associated with a deletion spanning the 4-bp homologous
repeats flanking the I-SceI site to produce a wild-type TK
gene sequence (Fig. 2, class 12). This result suggests that in our
system the joining of noncognate DNA ends occurs more rapidly than
strand degradation and/or homology searching. It was fortuitous that,
due to the nature of the TK protein, accurate reconstruction of
wild-type TK gene sequence at the site of the I-SceI DSB was
not required for restoration of TK gene function, and thus we could
recover almost any NHEJ event associated with a small deletion as long
as the correct TK gene reading frame had been restored. In some other
reports (4, 7, 22, 31, 35, 42) recovery of certain NHEJ events may have been restricted by stringent selection for the accurate
reconstruction of a wild-type marker gene sequence.
Experiments with cell lines 26-1 and 26-2 containing pTKSce-26
demonstrated that, in the presence of a suitably long donor sequence,
intrachromosomal DSB repair in mammalian cells can indeed be
accomplished by HR as reported by others (4, 7, 14, 22, 31, 35,
36, 42). Seven of 12 and 5 of 30 HAT-resistant segregants from
26-1 and 26-2, respectively, were produced by HR (Table 2). Since
electroporation with pCMV-I-SceI induced the overall number
of HAT-resistant colonies recovered from cell lines 26-1 and 26-2 about
7-fold and 20-fold, respectively, it was clear that a significant
portion of the induced colonies were produced by HR. However, we note
that while DSBs can stimulate intrachromosomal HR, the presence of a
closely linked homologous partner sequence does not stimulate DSB
repair, as evidenced by the similar frequencies of recovery of
DSB-induced HAT-resistant segregants from the various cell lines listed
in Table 1. This observation would appear to represent a fundamental
difference between DSB repair in higher and lower eukaryotes since DSB
repair in yeast has been found to be highly dependent on the presence of an HR partner (8, 11, 20).
In previous studies (19, 45) we were unable to recover any
DSB-induced gene targeting in mouse L cells by using DNA constructs similar to the ones used in this study despite the fact that in some
targeting experiments the transfected DNA molecule had over 8 kb of
homology with the broken locus. Our collective results may reflect a
fundamental difference between the rate-limiting step and/or mechanism
for gene targeting and intrachromosomal HR in our cell lines. We note
that others (4, 6, 7, 35) have reported substantial
stimulation of gene targeting by a genomic DSB introduced by
I-SceI, and these differing results may reflect differences
in the cell lines or DNA sequences used.
Only one of the analyzed DSB-induced HR events recovered from cell
lines 26-1 and 26-2 following transfection with pCMV-I-SceI was a crossover event (Fig. 4, lanes 13 and 14), while the remaining 11 HR events analyzed appeared to be gene conversions correcting the
I-SceI recognition site insertion mutation. A preferential induction of gene conversions (versus crossovers) by DSBs has been
previously observed (42) and may be mechanistically related to the recently reported (31) suppression of DSB-induced
translocations. Suppression of DSB-induced crossovers and
translocations may be viewed as additional safeguards against
deleterious genetic rearrangements. We have also observed a marked
preferential recovery of gene conversions during spontaneous HR in our
system (2, 17, 48, 50, 51) (Table 2), so it is not clear
that there is need to invoke a distinct mechanism for the reduction of
crossover specifically during DSB-induced recombination. It
is reasonably clear, however, that DSBs do not induce gene conversions
exclusively, since others (6) have observed a substantial
induction of intrachromosomal crossovers between direct repeats when
substrates designed specifically to recover intrachromosomal crossovers
were used.
Richardson et al. (31) proposed a mechanism for preferential
recovery of gene conversions during DSB repair by suggesting that
DSB-induced HR is coupled to replication. The amplification events that
we recovered (Fig. 4) also suggest a possible coupling of replication
to DSB repair since it seems likely that amplification results from
reiterated replication through all or part of the integrated construct.
Others have also observed sequence duplications or amplifications that
appeared to be associated with repair of I-SceI-induced DSBs
(22, 29, 31), and it has been reported that DNA breakage can
play a critical role in initiating gene amplifications in general
(12, 21, 26). One intriguing and speculative possibility is
that a DSB may function as a cryptic replication origin. In unpublished
work (16) we have observed that illegitimate integration of
transfected plasmid sequences into a genomic DSB occurs preferentially
at replication origins on the plasmid. One might imagine that such
integration is mediated by proteins that have affinity for replication
origins as well as DSBs, raising the prospect that a replication
complex may be able to assemble on a DSB. The cell line used in this
study has been reported to express functional p53 (40), and
it is not yet clear what role p53 plays in the observed amplifications
or in any of the other DSB repair events we have recovered.
We have found that precise religation with no alteration of sequence is
a viable pathway for repair of DSBs in a mammalian genome (Table 3). It
would seem that such a mode for repair provides an effective and simple
means for preventing unwanted rearrangements during repair. The benefit
of an efficient pathway for precise religation is all the more apparent
if reported estimates of nine genomic DSBs per mammalian cell per day
(1) are accurate. Our findings are also similar to the
recent report (39) of the addition of new telomeric
sequences directly onto the end of a broken chromosome without the loss
of a single nucleotide. Because our scheme for recovery of precise
religation events required that two DSBs exist simultaneously, it is
likely that our results represent an underestimate of the frequency of
simple religation. We recognize that our substrate for precise
religation includes 4-bp complementary overhang sequences which
possibly facilitate religation. Complementary overhangs would be
generated in naturally occurring DSBs only if staggered breaks were
made. In any case, our experiments raise the real possibility that
multiple, and perhaps many, rounds of breakage and religation occur
prior to the occurrence of HR or NHEJ in these and other studies.
Therefore, the true frequency with which a DSB is repaired in a
mammalian cell by HR or NHEJ remains elusive.
Our present work and reports from others (4, 5, 14, 19, 22, 31,
35, 36, 42) make it reasonably clear that mammals have evolved
several pathways for repairing DSBs while producing minimal change to
the genome. At the same time, observations made by us and by others
(22, 29, 31) of DSB-induced sequence amplification hint at
the potential for deleterious genomic rearrangement in response to
damage. In consideration of the association of cancer with altered
cellular responses to DNA damage and the genesis of genomic
instability, it is of considerable interest to explore how various
modes of DSB repair may be influenced by genetic mutations that have
been implicated in carcinogenesis.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Barbara Criscuolo Waldman for helpful comments on the manuscript.
This work was supported by grants from the American Cancer Society
(NP-949) and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences
(GM47110) to A.S.W.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Dept. of
Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, 700 Sumter St.,
Columbia, SC 29208. Phone: (803) 777-8405. Fax: (803) 777-4002. E-mail: awaldman{at}sc.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bernstein, C., and H. Bernstein.
1991.
Aging, sex, and DNA repair.
Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, Calif
|
| 2.
|
Bollag, R. J.,
A. S. Waldman, and R. M. Liskay.
1989.
Homologous recombination in mammalian cells.
Annu. Rev. Genet.
23:199-225[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Camerini-Otero, R. D., and P. Hsieh.
1995.
Homologous recombination proteins in prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
Annu. Rev. Genet.
29:509-552[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Choulika, A.,
A. Perrin,
B. Dujon, and J.-F. Nicolas.
1995.
Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:1963-1973.
|
| 5.
|
Derbyshire, M. K.,
L. H. Epstein,
C. S. H. Young,
P. L. Munz, and R. Fishel.
1994.
Nonhomologous recombination in human cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:156-169[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Donoho, G.,
M. Jasin, and P. Berg.
1998.
Analysis of gene targeting and intrachromosomal homologous recombination stimulated by genomic double-strand breaks in mouse embryonic stem cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:4070-4078[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Elliot, B.,
C. Richardson,
J. Winderbaum,
J. A. Nickoloff, and M. Jasin.
1998.
Gene conversion tracts from double-strand break repair in mammalian cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:93-101[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Fairhead, C., and B. Dujon.
1993.
Consequences of unique double-strand breaks in yeast chromosomes: death or homozygosis.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
240:170-178[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Haber, J. E.
1995.
In vivo biochemistry: physical monitoring of recombination induced by site-specific endonucleases.
Bioessays
17:609-620[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Jackson, S. P., and P. A. Jeggo.
1995.
DNA double-strand break repair and V(D)J recombination: involvement of DNA-PK.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
20:412-415[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Kramer, K. M.,
J. A. Brock,
K. Bloom,
J. K. Moore, and J. E. Haber.
1994.
Two different types of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are repaired by similar RAD52-independent, nonhomologous recombination events.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:1293-1301[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Kuo, M. T.,
S. Sen,
W. N. Hittelman, and T. C. Hsu.
1998.
Chromosomal fragile sites and DNA amplification.
Biochem. Pharmacol.
56:7-13[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Letsou, A., and R. M. Liskay.
1987.
Effect of the molecular nature of mutation on the efficiency of intrachromosomal gene conversion in mouse cells.
Genetics
117:759-769[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Liang, F.,
M. Han,
P. J. Romanienko, and M. Jasin.
1998.
Homology-directed repair is a major double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:5172-5177[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Lin, F.-L., and N. Sternberg.
1990.
Intermolecular recombination between DNAs introduced into mouse L cells is mediated by a nonconservative pathway that leads to crossover products.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10:103-112[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
| Lin, Y., and A. S. Waldman. Unpublished data.
|
| 17.
|
Liskay, R. M.,
J. L. Stachelek, and A. Letsou.
1984.
Homologous recombination between repeated chromosomal sequences in mouse cells.
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
49:183-189[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Lukacsovich, T., and A. S. Waldman.
1999.
Suppression of intrachromosomal gene conversion in mammalian cells by small degrees of sequence divergence.
Genetics
151:1559-1568[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Lukacsovich, T.,
D. Yang, and A. S. Waldman.
1994.
Repair of a specific double-strand break generated within a mammalian chromosome by yeast endonuclease I-SceI.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:5649-5657[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Moore, J. K., and J. E. Haber.
1996.
Capture of retrotransposon DNA at the sites of chromosomal double-strand breaks.
Nature
383:644-646[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Morgan, W. F.,
J. P. Day,
M. I. Kaplan,
E. M. McGhee, and C. L. Limoli.
1996.
Genomic instability induced by ionizing radiation.
Radiation Res.
146:247-258[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Moynahan, M. E., and M. Jasin.
1997.
Loss of heterozygosity induced by a chromosomal double-strand break.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:8988-8993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Nicolas, A. L., and C. S. H. Young.
1994.
Characterization of DNA end-joining in a mammalian cell nuclear extract: junction formation is accompanied by nucleotide loss, which is limited and uniform but not site specific.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:170-180[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Nicolas, A. L.,
P. L. Munz, and C. S. H. Young.
1995.
A modified single-strand annealing model best explains the joining of DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells and cell extracts.
Nucleic Acids Res.
23:1036-1043[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
North, P.,
A. Ganesh, and J. Thaker.
1990.
The rejoining of double-strand breaks in DNA by human cell extracts.
Nucleic Acids Res.
18:6205-6210[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Paulson, T. G.,
A. Almasan,
L. L. Brody, and G. M. Wahl.
1998.
Gene amplification in a p53-deficient cell line requires cell cycle progression under conditions that generate DNA breakage.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:3089-3100[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Petes, T. D.,
R. E. Malone, and L. S. Symington.
1991.
Recombination in yeast, p. 407-521.
In
J. R. Broach, J. R. Pringle, and E. W. Jones (ed.), The molecular and cellular biology of the yeast Saccharomyces. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y
|
| 28.
|
Pfeiffer, P.,
S. Thode,
J. Hanke, and W. Vielmetter.
1994.
Mechanisms of overlap formation in nonhomologous DNA end-joining.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:888-895[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Pipiras, E.,
A. Coquelle,
A. Bieth, and M. Debatisse.
1998.
Interstitial deletions and intrachromosomal amplification initiated from a double-strand break targeted to a mammalian chromosome.
EMBO J.
17:325-333[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Resnick, M. A.
1976.
The repair of double-strand breaks in DNA; a model involving recombination.
J. Theor. Biol.
59:97-106[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Richardson, C.,
M. E. Moynahan, and M. Jasin.
1998.
Double-strand break repair by interchromosomal recombination: suppression of chromosomal translocation.
Genes Dev.
12:3831-3842[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Roth, D., and J. Wilson.
1988.
Illegitimate recombination in mammalian cells, p. 621-653.
In
R. Kucherlapati, and G. R. Smith (ed.), Genetic recombination. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
|
| 33.
|
Roth, D. B., and J. Wilson.
1986.
Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells: role of short sequence homologies in the joining reaction.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
6:4295-4304[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Rouet, P.,
F. Smith, and M. Jasin.
1994.
Expression of a site-specific endonuclease stimulates homologous recombination in mammalian cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:6064-6068[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Rouet, P.,
F. Smith, and M. Jasin.
1994.
Introduction of double-strand breaks into the genome of mouse cells by expression of a rare-cutting endonuclease.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:8096-8106[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Sargent, R. G.,
M. A. Brenneman, and J. H. Wilson.
1997.
Repair of site-specific double-strand breaks in a mammalian chromosome by homologous and illegitimate recombination.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:267-277[Abstract].
|
| 37.
|
Shinohara, A., and T. Ogawa.
1995.
Homologous recombination and the roles of double-strand breaks.
Trends Biol. Sci.
20:387-391.
|
| 38.
|
Southern, P. S., and P. Berg.
1982.
Transformation of mammalian cells to antibiotic resistance with a bacterial gene under control of the SV40 early promoter.
J. Mol. Appl. Genet.
1:327-341[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Sprung, C. N.,
G. E. Reynolds,
M. Jasin, and J. P. Murnane.
1999.
Chromosome healing in mouse embryonic stem cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:6781-6786[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Sun, X.,
H. Shimizu, and K.-I. Yamamoto.
1995.
Identification of a novel p53 promoter element involved in genotoxic stress-inducible p53 gene expression.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:4489-4496[Abstract].
|
| 41.
|
Szostak, J. W.,
T. L. Orr-Weaver,
R. J. Rothstein, and F. W. Stahl.
1983.
The double-strand-break repair model for recombination.
Cell
33:25-35[Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Taghian, D. G., and J. A. Nickoloff.
1997.
Chromosomal double-strand breaks induce gene conversion at high frequency in mammalian cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:6386-6393[Abstract].
|
| 43.
|
Thode, S.,
A. Schafer,
P. Pfeiffer, and W. Vielmetter.
1990.
A novel pathway of DNA end-to-end joining.
Cell
60:921-928[Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Wagner, M. J.,
J. A. Sharp, and W. C. Summers.
1981.
Nucleotide sequence of the thymidine kinase gene of herpes simplex virus type 1.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
78:1441-1445[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
| Waldman, A. S., and T. Lukacsovich.
Unpublished data.
|
| 46.
|
Waldman, A. S., and R. M. Liskay.
1987.
Differential effects of base-pair mismatch on intrachromosomal versus extrachromosomal recombination in mouse cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
84:5340-5344[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Waldman, A. S., and R. M. Liskay.
1988.
Dependence of intrachromosomal recombination in mammalian cells on uninterrupted homology.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8:5350-5357[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Waldman, A. S., and B. C. Waldman.
1991.
Stimulation of intrachromosomal homologous recombination in mammalian cells by an inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribosylation).
Nucleic Acids Res.
19:5943-5947[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Wood, R. D.
1996.
DNA repair in eukaryotes.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
65:135-167[Medline].
|
| 50.
|
Yang, D., and A. S. Waldman.
1997.
Fine-resolution analysis of products of intrachromosomal homeologous recombination in mammalian cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:3614-3628[Abstract].
|
| 51.
| Yang, D., and A. S. Waldman. Unpublished data.
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, December 1999, p. 8353-8360, Vol. 19, No. 12
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Majumdar, A., Muniandy, P. A., Liu, J., Liu, J.-l., Liu, S.-t., Cuenoud, B., Seidman, M. M.
(2008). Targeted Gene Knock In and Sequence Modulation Mediated by a Psoralen-linked Triplex-forming Oligonucleotide. J. Biol. Chem.
283: 11244-11252
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tanaka, H., Cao, Y., Bergstrom, D. A., Kooperberg, C., Tapscott, S. J., Yao, M.-C.
(2007). Intrastrand Annealing Leads to the Formation of a Large DNA Palindrome and Determines the Boundaries of Genomic Amplification in Human Cancer. Mol. Cell. Biol.
27: 1993-2002
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Luo, M. H., Rosenke, K., Czornak, K., Fortunato, E. A.
(2007). Human Cytomegalovirus Disrupts both Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Protein (ATM)- and ATM-Rad3-Related Kinase-Mediated DNA Damage Responses during Lytic Infection. J. Virol.
81: 1934-1950
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Weinstock, D. M., Jasin, M.
(2006). Alternative Pathways for the Repair of RAG-Induced DNA Breaks. Mol. Cell. Biol.
26: 131-139
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhang, J., Powell, S. N.
(2005). The Role of the BRCA1 Tumor Suppressor in DNA Double-Strand Break Repair. Mol Cancer Res
3: 531-539
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Smith, J. A., Waldman, B. C., Waldman, A. S.
(2005). A Role for DNA Mismatch Repair Protein Msh2 in Error-Prone Double-Strand-Break Repair in Mammalian Chromosomes. Genetics
170: 355-363
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bill, C. A., Summers, J.
(2004). Genomic DNA double-strand breaks are targets for hepadnaviral DNA integration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
101: 11135-11140
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ward, I. M., Reina-San-Martin, B., Olaru, A., Minn, K., Tamada, K., Lau, J. S., Cascalho, M., Chen, L., Nussenzweig, A., Livak, F., Nussenzweig, M. C., Chen, J.
(2004). 53BP1 is required for class switch recombination. JCB
165: 459-464
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Read, L. R., Raynard, S. J., Ruksc, A., Baker, M. D.
(2004). Gene repeat expansion and contraction by spontaneous intrachromosomal homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res
32: 1184-1196
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kuhne, C., Tjornhammar, M.-L., Pongor, S., Banks, L., Simoncsits, A.
(2003). Repair of a minimal DNA double-strand break by NHEJ requires DNA-PKcs and is controlled by the ATM/ATR checkpoint. Nucleic Acids Res
31: 7227-7237
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rong, Y. S., Golic, K. G.
(2003). The Homologous Chromosome Is an Effective Template for the Repair of Mitotic DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Drosophila. Genetics
165: 1831-1842
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ballif, B. C., Yu, W., Shaw, C. A., Kashork, C. D., Shaffer, L. G.
(2003). Monosomy 1p36 breakpoint junctions suggest pre-meiotic breakage-fusion-bridge cycles are involved in generating terminal deletions. Hum Mol Genet
12: 2153-2165
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Raynard, S. J., Baker, M. D.
(2002). Incorporation of Large Heterologies Into Heteroduplex DNA During Double-Strand-Break Repair in Mouse Cells. Genetics
162: 977-985
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhong, Q., Chen, C.-F., Chen, P.-L., Lee, W.-H.
(2002). BRCA1 Facilitates Microhomology-mediated End Joining of DNA Double Strand Breaks. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 28641-28647
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lo, A. W. I., Sprung, C. N., Fouladi, B., Pedram, M., Sabatier, L., Ricoul, M., Reynolds, G. E., Murnane, J. P.
(2002). Chromosome Instability as a Result of Double-Strand Breaks near Telomeres in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells. Mol. Cell. Biol.
22: 4836-4850
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Digweed, M., Rothe, S., Demuth, I., Scholz, R., Schindler, D., Stumm, M., Grompe, M., Jordan, A., Sperling, K.
(2002). Attenuation of the formation of DNA-repair foci containing RAD51 in Fanconi anaemia. Carcinogenesis
23: 1121-1126
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Allen, C., Kurimasa, A., Brenneman, M. A., Chen, D. J., Nickoloff, J. A.
(2002). DNA-dependent protein kinase suppresses double-strand break-induced and spontaneous homologous recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
99: 3758-3763
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Willers, H., McCarthy, E. E., Hubbe, P., Dahm-Daphi, J., Powell, S. N.
(2001). Homologous recombination in extrachromosomal plasmid substrates is not suppressed by p53. Carcinogenesis
22: 1757-1763
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lin, Y., Waldman, A. S.
(2001). Promiscuous patching of broken chromosomes in mammalian cells with extrachromosomal DNA. Nucleic Acids Res
29: 3975-3981
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lin, Y., Waldman, A. S.
(2001). Capture of DNA Sequences at Double-Strand Breaks in Mammalian Chromosomes. Genetics
158: 1665-1674
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Vasquez, K. M., Marburger, K., Intody, Z., Wilson, J. H.
(2001). Manipulating the mammalian genome by homologous recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
98: 8403-8410
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Quintana, P. J. E., Neuwirth, E. A. H., Grosovsky, A. J.
(2001). Interchromosomal Gene Conversion at an Endogenous Human Cell Locus. Genetics
158: 757-767
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
El-Awady, R. A., Dikomey, E., Dahm-Daphi, J.
(2001). Heat effects on DNA repair after ionising radiation: hyperthermia commonly increases the number of non-repaired double-strand breaks and structural rearrangements. Nucleic Acids Res
29: 1960-1966
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Clikeman, J. A., Khalsa, G. J., Barton, S. L., Nickoloff, J. A.
(2001). Homologous Recombinational Repair of Double-Strand Breaks in Yeast Is Enhanced by MAT Heterozygosity Through yKU-Dependent and -Independent Mechanisms. Genetics
157: 579-589
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Takata, M., Sasaki, M. S., Sonoda, E., Fukushima, T., Morrison, C., Albala, J. S., Swagemakers, S. M. A., Kanaar, R., Thompson, L. H., Takeda, S.
(2000). The Rad51 Paralog Rad51B Promotes Homologous Recombinational Repair. Mol. Cell. Biol.
20: 6476-6482
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jakupciak, J. P., Wells, R. D.
(2000). Gene Conversion (Recombination) Mediates Expansions of CTG{middle dot}CAG Repeats. J. Biol. Chem.
275: 40003-40013
[Abstract]
[Full Text]