Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 1999, p. 1002-1015, Vol. 19, No. 2
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Phosphorylation of Human Estrogen Receptor
by
Protein Kinase A Regulates Dimerization
Dongsheng
Chen,
Paul E.
Pace,
R. Charles
Coombes, and
Simak
Ali*
CRC Laboratories, Department of Cancer
Medicine, Division of Medicine, Imperial College of Science,
Technology and Medicine, London W6 8RP, United Kingdom
Received 18 September 1998/Accepted 29 October 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Phosphorylation provides an important mechanism by which
transcription factor activity is regulated. Estrogen receptor
(ER
) is phosphorylated on multiple sites, and stimulation of a
number of growth factor receptors and/or protein kinases leads to
ligand-independent and/or synergistic increase in transcriptional
activation by ER
in the presence of estrogen. Here we show that
ER
is phosphorylated by protein kinase A (PKA) on serine-236 within
the DNA binding domain. Mutation of serine-236 to glutamic acid
prevents DNA binding by inhibiting dimerization by ER
, whereas
mutation to alanine has little effect on DNA binding or dimerization.
Furthermore, PKA overexpression or activation of endogenous PKA
inhibits dimerization in the absence of ligand. This inhibition is
overcome by the addition of 17
-estradiol or the partial agonist
4-hydroxy tamoxifen. Interestingly, treatment with the complete
antagonist ICI 182,780 does not overcome the inhibitory effect of PKA
activation. Our results indicate that in the absence of ligand ER
forms dimers through interaction between DNA binding domains and
that dimerization mediated by the ligand binding domain only
occurs upon ligand binding but that the complete antagonist ICI 182,780 prevents dimerization through the ligand-binding domain.
Heterodimer formation between ER
and ER
is similarly affected by
PKA phosphorylation of serine 236 of ER
. However, 4-hydroxytamoxifen
is unable to overcome inhibition of dimerization by PKA. Thus,
phosphorylation of ER
in the DNA binding domain provides a mechanism
by which dimerization and thereby DNA binding by the estrogen receptor
is regulated.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Estrogen receptor
(ER
)
mediates the effects of estrogens on cell growth and differentiation.
ER
is a member of a superfamily of transcription factors that
includes receptors for steroid (androgen, ecdysone, glucocorticoid,
mineralocorticoid, estrogen, and progesterone) and thyroid hormones;
vitamin D3; retinoic acid; and peroxisome proliferator-,
farnesoid-, and arachidonic acid-activated receptors, as well as
"orphan" receptors for which no ligands have as yet been
identified. These receptors are characterized by highly conserved DNA
and ligand-binding domains (LBDs) and regulate transcription by binding
to cis-acting enhancer elements in promoters of responsive genes as monomers or as homo- or heterodimers (12, 13, 55, 56,
83). Comparison of the amino acid sequences of ER
from different species shows that the sequences can be divided into six
regions, A to F, on the basis of differing amino acid sequence homologies (49). This division can be extended to all other members of the nuclear receptor superfamily. Region C encodes two zinc
fingers comprising the DNA-binding domain (DBD). A region N-terminal to
the DBD (regions A/B) contains a transcription activation function
(AF-1) which can act in a ligand-independent manner when isolated from
the LBD. The LBD (region E) contains a ligand-dependent transcription
activation function (AF-2). AF-1 and AF-2 activate transcription
independently and synergistically and act in a promoter- and
cell-specific manner (14, 50-52, 79, 84). Antiestrogens such as tamoxifen and ICI 164,384 antagonize the effects of estrogens by competing with estrogen for binding to ER
. Tamoxifen or its derivative 4-hydroxytamoxifen is a partial antagonist; it inhibits transcriptional activation by AF-2 but enables transcription through AF-1 (14, 58, 59). ICI 164,384, on the other hand, is a complete antagonist which inhibits transcriptional activation by both
AF-1 and AF-2 (57, 60). No known antiestrogens prevent DNA
binding by hER
, although ICI 164,384 treatment reduces the half-life
of ER
(24, 29, 71) and results in the progressive loss of
ER
from the nucleus (23). Furthermore, in vivo or in vitro treatment with ICI 164,384 results in a loss in the ability of
hER
to bind DNA in vitro at elevated temperatures through a
mechanism which is at present unclear (60).
Phosphorylation is a common covalent modification of proteins which
provides an important mechanism by which the activity of transcription
factors is regulated. Cell surface receptors for polypeptide hormones,
cytokines, etc., stimulate signal transduction pathways, leading to
phosphorylation and/or dephosphorylation of substrate proteins,
including transcription factors (40, 43, 46). The steroid
receptors for androgen, glucocorticoids and progesterone, the vitamin
D3 receptor, c- and v-erbA, the retinoic acid receptors,
and NGFI-B (Nur77) have all been shown to be phosphoproteins.
Phosphorylation of these receptors is often ligand induced, although
constitutive phosphorylation sites are frequently present in vivo
(10, 12, 82, 83), and modulation of the activity of some of
these receptors by phosphorylation has been demonstrated. The
c-erbA-encoded thyroid hormone receptor and its homologue, v-erbA,
found in the genome of the avian erythroblastosis virus, are
phosphorylated by protein kinase A (PKA) and PKC (32). Mutation of the PKA and PKC phosphorylation sites abolishes the ability
of v-erbA to inhibit erythroid differentiation (31). Modulation of transcriptional activation of the vitamin D3
(36, 37) and progesterone receptors (e.g., see references
11 and 77) by phosphorylation has
been demonstrated, whereas phosphorylation of the glucocorticoid
receptor appears to be important for nuclear translocation and for cell
cycle regulation of its activity (for a review and additional
references, see references 25, 38, and
39). The involvement of cell cycle-dependent kinases
in regulating nuclear receptor function has recently been described for
the progesterone receptor, which is phosphorylated by cdk2 (88). Retinoic acid receptor
is phosphorylated by cdk7,
the kinase activity associated with the basal transcription factor TFIIH, the consequence of which is increased transcriptional activation (72).
The possible importance of phosphorylation for ER
function was
indicated by the finding that dopamine can activate ER
in the
absence of ligand (69). Other groups have since shown that epidermal growth factor, heregulin, insulin, and the insulin-like growth factor TGF
, as well as cyclic AMP (cAMP) and phorbol esters, can also activate ER
(9, 19, 41, 54, 61, 64, and 68).
Phosphorylation of ER
on serine 104 and/or serine 106, serines 118 and 167, and on tyrosine 537 has been demonstrated by using deletional
or point mutation analyses (1, 20, 44, 53) or by
purification and high-pressure liquid chromatography analysis
(3-6). Mutation of serine 118 to alanine reduces its transcriptional activation ability (1, 53). Phosphorylation of human ER
at serine 118 is mediated by the RAS/MAPK pathway (19, 47); activation of the MAPK pathway enables
ligand-independent transactivation by human ER
(19).
Mutation of tyrosine 537 (tyrosine 541 of mouse ER
) enables,
variously, ligand-independent transcriptional activation (85,
86) or altered sensitivity to estrogen, and it affects DNA
binding and dimerization (7, 8, 20). Phosphorylation of
ER
by casein kinase II and pp90rsk1 on serine 167 in
vitro has also been demonstrated (3, 45), while tyrosine 537 is phosphorylatable by members of the Src family of tyrosine kinases in
vitro (6).
Several studies have shown that upregulation of PKA activity results in
ligand-independent activation of ER
(see references 9 and 19), as well as increased
phosphorylation (21, 42, 53). We decided to investigate the
mechanisms underlying PKA regulation of ER
activity. In vitro
phosphorylation of human ER
(hER
) by PKA indicated the presence
of at least two phosphorylation sites. Examination of the hER
amino
acid sequence showed that there are two potential PKA phosphorylation
sites, one within the DBD (serine 236) and a second at the N-terminal
boundary of region E (serine 305) (53). Mutation of serine
236 gave reduced phosphorylation by PKA in vitro and in vivo. We
further show that mutation of serine 236 to glutamic acid, but not to
alanine, dramatically reduced hER
dimerization in the absence of
ligand or in the presence of ICI 182,780 but had little effect on
dimerization in the presence of estrogen or 4-hydroxytamoxifen.
Stimulation of PKA activity also led to the inhibition of ER
dimerization in the absence or in the presence of ICI 182,780 but not
in the presence of estrogen or 4-hydroxytamoxifen.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Recombinants.
The expression vector pSG5 and constructs
expressing human ER
(HEG0), deletion mutants expressing N- or
C-terminal portions of hER
(HE15 and HEG19), GAL-VP16, and hER
containing the FLAG epitope at the N terminus (hER
1) have been
described previously (33, 63, 78, 79), as has pSG5-PKA
(73). Site-directed mutagenesis of serine 236 to alanine,
glutamic acid, and threonine was performed for HEG0, HE15, and HEG19 by
using oligonucleotides with the sequences
5'-AAAAACAGGAGGAAGGCCTGCCAGGCGTGTCGGCTC-3', 5'-AAAAACAGGAGGAAGGAGTGCCAGGCGTGTCGGCTC-3',
and
5'-AAAAACAGGAGGAAGACCTGCCAGGCGTGTCGGCTC-3', respectively, where changes from the wild-type hER
sequence
are underlined. Positive clones were identified by loss of
StuI and NaeI sites and confirmed by sequencing.
The ERE-driven chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene reporter
plasmids have all previously been described (14, 79, 84).
In vitro synthesis of hER
and hER
polypeptides.
pSG5,
HEG0, mutants in which the serine 236 has been altered, and hER
1
were linearized with SalI. RNA was synthesised with 10 µg
of linearized DNA template by using T7 RNA polymerase according to the
manufacturer's protocol (Promega). The RNA synthesized was quantified
by spectroscopy at A260/280. Then 5 µg of the
synthesized RNA was translated in the presence of
35S-labeled methionine (Amersham International) with rabbit
reticulocyte lysate in a final volume of 50 µl according to
manufacturer's protocols (Promega). The synthesized proteins were
analyzed by fractionation by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-10%
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE); the gels were then dried and autoradiographed.
Cell transfection, in vivo labeling, and extraction.
COS-1
cells were maintained in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM)
supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum (FCS). Cells were plated in 9-cm
petri dishes 16 to 24 h prior to transfection by the calcium
phosphate coprecipitation technique with 5 µg of each expression
plasmid, made up to a total of 20 µg of DNA with human placental DNA
as the carrier. The precipitate was removed 16 h after
transfection by a washing in DMEM supplemented with 5% FCS. The cells
were harvested after a further 48 h. For experiments in which E2
or antiestrogens were added, the cells were cultured in DMEM without
phenol red but supplemented with 5% dextran-coated charcoal-treated
FCS (15). Ligands (E2, 10 nM; OHT, 100 nM; ICI, 100 nM),
prepared in ethanol, were added 2 h before harvesting. The PKA
activators 8-bromo-cAMP (8-Br-cAMP; 100 nM) and the PKA inhibitor H89
(150 nM final) were added at the same time as E2 or the antiestrogens.
For harvesting, transfected cells were washed with chilled
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), harvested in PBS, pelleted, and resuspended in HS buffer (400 mM KCl; 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 2 mM
dithiothreitol (DTT); 20% glycerol [vol/vol]; 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF]; protease inhibitor cocktail
[2.5 µg each of leupeptin, pepstatin, chymostatin, antipain, and
aprotinin per ml]). Whole-cell extracts (WCE) were prepared by three
cycles of freezing (
80°C) and thawing (0°C), and centrifugation
was done at 10,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C. The
supernatants were stored at
80°C. The protein concentrations of the
WCE were determined with the Bio-Rad protein assay kit (Bio-Rad).
For in vivo labeling with [
35S]methionine transient
transfections were carried out as described above. Cells were starved
for
20 min in DMEM without phenol red or methionine but containing
5%
dialyzed and charcoal-stripped FCS, followed by the addition
of 150 µCi of
35S-labeled methionine and ligands. Cells were
harvested after 1
h in high salt
buffer.
For in vivo
32P-labeling of transfected cells, the medium
was replaced with phosphate-free DMEM supplemented with 5% dialyzed
FCS 64 h after transfection. After 4 h in the absence of
phosphate,
1 mCi of [
32P]orthophosphate (Amersham
International) was added. The cells
were labeled for 1 h,
harvested, and processed as described above.
8-Br-cAMP (100 nM) was
added at the same time as the [
32P]orthophosphate.
Immunoprecipitations.
Immunoprecipitations of in vitro
translation products or in vivo 35S- or
32P-labeled cell extracts were carried out with 500 µg of
protein from WCEs or 50 µl of in vitro translation products; these
were added to 1 ml of buffer A (1% Triton X-100; 400 mM NaCl; 1 mM DTT; 40 mM Tris-acetate, pH 7.5; 0.18 mg of PMSF per ml; 1.25 µg each
of leupeptin, aprotinin, pepstatin, antitrypsin and chymostatin per
ml). The samples were rotated at 4°C for 45 min with 2 mg of protein
A-Sepharose, followed by incubation with 2 µg of B10, F3
(2), or M2 (IBI) monoclonal antibodies and incubation at 4°C for 30 min, when 2 µg of rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulin G
(IgG; Sigma, UK) was added and a further incubation at 4°C for 30 min
was carried out. Then 2 mg of protein A-Sepharose was added, and the
samples were rotated at 4°C for 45 min, followed by four washes with
buffer A containing 0.2% SDS. The retained complexes were resolved by
SDS-PAGE. The gels were either dried for autoradiography or transferred
to nitrocellulose, and immunoblotting was performed prior to
autoradiography. For in vitro kinase assays, the immunoprecipitates were processed as described below.
In vitro protein kinase assays.
Immunoprecipitates were
washed twice with PKA buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2; 6.25 mM
MgCl2) or with PKC buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2; 6.25 mM
MgCl2; 0.625 mM CaCl2). PKA reactions were
carried out in a total volume of 50 µl of PKA buffer containing 25 mM [
-32P]ATP (specific activity, 1.5 Ci/mmol) and 2 µg/ml of the catalytic subunit of PKA (Promega) at 30°C for 30 min.
PKC reactions were performed according to manufacturer's protocols
(Promega). Two washes with 1 ml of the PKA or PKC buffer were carried
out after labeling, and the samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE; the gels were then dried and autoradiographed.
Phosphopeptide mapping by two-dimensional separation on thin-layer
cellulose plates was performed essentially as described
previously
(
16) with the Hunter thin-layer electrophoresis system
(HTLE-7000; CBS Scientific). In brief, in vitro phosphorylated
immunoprecipitates were separated by SDS-PAGE; the gels were then
dried
and autoradiographed. The labeled bands were excised and
eluted from
gel slices by incubation in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate
with 5%

-mercaptoethanol and 0.1% SDS for 16 to 20 h, followed
by
precipitation with trichloroacetic acid, oxidation with performic
acid,
and digestion with 10 µg of TPCK (tolylsulfonyl phenylalanyl
chloromethyl ketone)-treated trypsin (Sigma) for 8 h at 37°C and
a further 8-h digestion with a second 10 µg of trypsin. After
three
lyophilization steps, the pelleted peptides were resolved
in the first
dimension by electrophoresis in pH 1.9 buffer (formic
acid-glacial
acetic acid-water [1:3.1:35.9]) at 1.5 kV for 25
min and in the
second dimension by chromatography in pH 7.42 buffer
(
n-butanol-pyridine-glacial acetic acid-water
[5:3.3:1:4]). Phosphopeptides
were visualized by
autoradiography.
Immunoblot analysis.
WCEs were fractionated by SDS-10%
PAGE, and immunodetection was performed with monoclonal antibodies B10
or F3 directed against regions B and F, respectively, to detect hER
(2), except that immunodetection was carried out by
incubation with alkaline phosphatase-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG and
revelation with BCIP/NTB (Promega). For detection of hER
1, blots
were incubated with M2 monoclonal antibody (IBI) at 1 µg/ml for
2 h at room temperature, followed by three 15-min washes with
0.05% Tween 20-PBS. The immunoblots were then incubated with alkaline
phosphatase-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG for 2 h at room
temperature; this was followed by further washing and revelation with
BCIP/NTB.
Gel retardation and shift assay.
Gel shift assays (15 µl)
contained 1 to 10 µg of WCE, 2.0 µg of poly(dI-dC), and 20,000 cpm
of 5'-32P-end-labeled double-stranded estrogen response
element (ERE; 5'-TCGAGCAAAGTCAGGTCACAGTGACCTGATCAAT-3') in
80 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.5 mM DTT, 5% glycerol (vol/vol),
0.5 mM PMSF, and protease inhibitor cocktail (1.25 µg each of
leupeptin, pepstatin, chymostatin, antipain, and aprotinin per ml). The
mixtures were preincubated at 4°C for 15 min, followed by addition of
ERE and incubation at 25°C for 15 min. Receptor-DNA complexes were
separated on 5% polyacrylamide gels (30% acrylamide and 1%
bisacrylamide, containing 0.5× TBE). Gels were electrophoresed in
0.5× TBE at 150 V and dried before autoradiography.
-Galactosidase and CAT assays.
COS-1 cells were
maintained as described above, split into 9-cm plates in DMEM without
phenol red, supplemented with 5% dextran-coated charcoal-stripped FCS,
and transfected by the calcium phosphate coprecipitation technique
(78). The cells were transfected with 2 µg of the CAT
reporter gene, along with 0.5 µg of the
-galactosidase reference
plasmid pCH110 (Pharmacia) and 0.5 µg of pSG5, HEG0, HEG0236A, or HEG0236E expression plasmids,
together with 1 µg of pSG5-PKA and 10 ng of GAL-VP16 where
appropriate. Bluescribe vector M13+ DNA (BSM+; Stratagene) was used as
a carrier DNA to make a total of 20 µg of DNA. Ligands (E2, 10 nM;
OHT, 100 nM; ICI, 100 nM), prepared in ethanol, were added 30 min after
the addition of the precipitates. The precipitates were removed 16 h after transfection by a washing in DMEM without phenol red but
supplemented with 5% dextran-coated charcoal-stripped FCS, and fresh
ligands were added. Cells were harvested after a further 24 h in
100 µl of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), and extracts were prepared by
freeze-thaw three cycles and centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C.
-Galactosidase and CAT assays were
performed as described previously (1).
 |
RESULTS |
Serine 236 of hER
is phosphorylated by PKA.
Previous
studies have indicated that phosphorylation of hER
is increased by
the activation of PKA (see references 21 and 53). In order to directly determine whether PKA can
phosphorylate hER
in vitro, we transfected COS-1 cells with an
expression vector (pSG5) containing the open reading frame encoding
hER
(HEG0). At 48 h after transfection the cells were
harvested, WCEs were prepared, and 100 µg of the WCEs were
immunoprecipitated with monoclonal antibody F3. Immunoprecipitates were
incubated with the purified catalytic subunit of PKA in the presence of
[
-32P]ATP, followed by resolution by SDS-PAGE and
autoradiography. Incubation of the immunoprecipitates with PKA resulted
in phosphorylation of HEG0 (Fig. 2A, lane 2).
hER

deletion mutants lacking either the N-terminal A/B region
(HEG19) or the LBD and region F (HE15) (Fig.
1A) were transfected
into COS-1 cells,
and WCEs were immunoprecipitated with monoclonal
antibodies F3 or B10,
respectively, and phosphorylated with the
catalytic subunit of PKA.
Both HEG19 and HE15 were phosphorylated
by PKA in vitro (Fig.
2A, lanes 1 and 3), indicating either
that
PKA phosphorylates hER

within or near the DBD and/or that
hER
is phosphorylated by PKA at sites in the A/B region and in the
LBD.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Schematic representation of hER . (A) Regions A to F,
as initially described by Krust et al. (49) are depicted,
the numbers below referring to amino acid positions of the boundaries
for the different regions. Also shown are the positions of the epitopes
for monoclonal antibodies B10 and F3. The portion of hER coding
region contained within HEG0, HE15, and HEG19 are also shown. (B) The
amino acids comprising the core DBD and their involvement in DNA
binding, as determined crystallographically, is represented. The amino
acids marked in boldface participate in the hydrophobic core. Asterisks
mark the residues which interact with base pairs; those making
phosphate contacts (squares) or participating in the dimer interface
(circles) are also indicated. Closed and open circles and squares
denote direct interactions and interactions via ordered water
molecules, respectively (75). The position of serine 236 is
marked by an arrow.
|
|

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Serine 236 is phosphorylated by PKA. (A) WCEs of COS-1
cells transiently transfected with HEG0, HEG19, or HE15 were
immunoprecipitated with F3 (lanes 1 and 2) and B10 (lane 3) monoclonal
antibodies, phosphorylated with PKA, and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and
autoradiography. The solid triangle marks the position of an irrelevant
68-kDa polypeptide observed with the F3 monoclonal antibody and
previously described (2). Another triangle at 40 kDa marks
the presumed position of the catalytic subunit of PKA used for in vitro
phosphorylation. (B) Phosphorylation of HE15 and HE15236A
by PKA and PKC. Immunoprecipitates were resolved by SDS-PAGE,
transferred to nitrocellulose, immunoprobed with B10, and revealed by
the alkaline phosphatase method to determine the levels of HE15 and
HE15236A (lower panel). The nitrocellulose membrane was
autoradiographed for the phosphorylation signal (upper panel). The
filled triangle shows the position of the catalytic subunit of PKA. The
positions of molecular size markers (in kilodaltons) are shown. (C and
D) Two-dimensional phosphopeptide maps of HE15 and
HE15236A, respectively, following in vitro phosphorylation
by PKA as in panel B. (D) The empty circles highlight the spots present
in the HE15 map but missing from PKA phosphorylation of
HE15236A. (E) COS-1 cells transiently transfected with pSG5
(lane 1), HEG0 (lanes 2, 3, and 6), or HEG0236A (lanes 4, 5, and 7) in the absence (lanes 1, 2, 4, 6, and 7) or the presence
(lanes 3 and 5) of pSG5-PKA were labeled with
[32P]orthophosphate. 8-Br-cAMP (100 nM) was added as
appropriate (lanes 6 and 7). Immunoprecipitations were resolved by
SDS-PAGE and autoradiographed (upper panel). Immunoblotting with
monoclonal antibody B10 was used to control for hER protein levels
(lower panel).
|
|
Examination of the amino acid sequence of hER

showed that two serine
residues, serine 236 (NRRK
SC) in the DBD (Fig.
1B) and
serine 305 (SKKN
SL) in the LBD could be potential PKA
phosphorylation
sites (
53). Only one of these sites (serine
236) is present
in both HE15 and HEG19 and was mutated to the
nonphosphorylatable
residue alanine. Immunoprecipitates were incubated
with PKA as
described above, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to
nitrocellulose.
Immunoblotting with B10 was performed to compare levels
of HE15
and HE15
236A protein, and autoradiography of the
nitrocellulose membrane showed
levels of phosphorylation.
HE15
236A was phosphorylated to a lower level than HE15,
indicating that
serine 236 is a substrate for PKA in vitro (Fig.
2B).
HE15 was
also phosphorylatable by PKC in vitro, albeit to a much lower
degree. HE15 and HE15
236A were phosphorylated to a similar
extent by PKC (Fig.
2B, lanes
5 and 6, and data not shown). No signal
was obtained when PKA
or PKC were omitted from the kinase assay (data
not
shown).
Two-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping of in vitro-phosphorylated
immunoprecipitates showed the absence of three spots (dotted)
from
HE15
236A (Fig.
2D) compared with HE15 (Fig.
2C), indicating
that serine
236 is phosphorylated by PKA in vitro. The two strong spots
in
both the HE15 and HE15
236A phosphopeptide maps suggest
the presence of at least one other
major PKA site resides within amino
acids 1 to 281 of hER
(HE15).
We next examined the ability of PKA to alter the phosphorylated
state of wild-type hER

(HEG0) in vivo. COS-1 cells
transiently
transfected with HEG0 were labelled with
[
32P]orthophosphate and subjected to
immunoprecipitation, SDS-PAGE,
and autoradiography. Immunoblotting with
monoclonal antibody B10
was used to control for equivalent levels of ER
protein (Fig.
2E). A single band at 67 kDa in HEG0- but not in
pSG5-transfected
cells shows that hER

is phosphorylated in untreated
cells (Fig.
2E, lanes 1 and 2). Cotransfection of pSG5-PKA resulted in
a 5.6-fold
increase in the intensity of the phosphorylated band (lane
3).
8-Br-cAMP treatment similarly increased hER

phosphorylation
3.65-fold
(lane 6). HEG0
236A was phosphorylated to a lower
extent than was HEG0 (lane 4),
and cotransfection of pSG5-PKA (lane 5)
or the addition of 8-Br-cAMP
(lane 7) resulted in lower increases (2.7- and 1.44-fold, respectively)
in phosphorylation intensities compared to
HEG0; 2.0- and 2.5-fold-lower
signals were obtained for
HEG0
236A than for HEG0 with pSG5-PKA and 8-Br-cAMP,
respectively.
Comparison of in vitro DNA binding by wild-type and mutant
hER
.
Since serine 236 lies within the second zinc finger (CII)
of the DBD (Fig. 1B) we wished to investigate the effect of its mutation on DNA binding by hER
. The mutants in which serine 236 was
replaced by alanine in HEG0, HE15, and HEG19 were used to investigate
DNA binding when phosphorylation at this position is prevented.
Mutants in which serine 236 of HEG0, HE15, and HEG19 were replaced by
glutamic acid were also created in order to examine the effect of
a "constitutive" negative charge at this position. As PKA
is a serine-threonine kinase, serine 236 was also mutated to threonine.
HEG0, HE15, and the serine 236 mutants were overexpressed in
COS-1 cells by transient transfection; cells were then harvested,
and
extracts were prepared in a high salt buffer. Gel shifts were
performed by preincubation of the extracts in gel shift buffer
(containing 80 mM KCl) at 4°C for 15 min, followed by the addition
of
radiolabeled ERE and incubation at 25°C for 15 min, before
the
receptor-ERE complexes were analyzed by PAGE as previously
described
(
59,
63). A specific retarded complex was observed
for HEG0,
and faster-migrating complexes were seen for HE15 and
HEG19 (Fig.
3A, lanes 2, 6, and 10). Mutation of
serine 236 to
alanine or threonine had no obvious effect on complex
formation
(Fig.
3A, lanes 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13). Interestingly,
replacement
of serine 236 with glutamic acid drastically reduced the
amount
of complex seen (Fig.
3A, lanes 4, 8, and 12).
Immunoblotting
showed that the reduced DNA binding by
HEG0
236E, HE15
236E, and
HEG19
236E was not due to the absence of protein or to its
degradation during
incubation (Fig.
3A, lower panel). These results
suggest that
the phosphorylation of serine 236 may adversely affect DNA
binding
by hER

.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Comparison of the in vitro DNA binding by wild-type
hER and mutants of serine 236. (A) COS-1 cells were transiently
transfected with pSG5 (lane 1), HEG0 (lane 2), mutants of HEG0 (lanes 3 to 5), HE15 and its mutants (lanes 6 to 10), or HEG19 and its mutants
(lanes 10 to 13) in the presence of 10 7 M E2. Lysates
were prepared in HS buffer, and gel shifts were performed as described
in Materials and Methods. (B) COS-1 cells were transiently transfected
with pSG5 (lane 1), HEG0 (lanes 2 to 5), HEG0236A (lanes 6 to 9), or HEG0236E (lanes 10 to 13). Carrier (ethanol) or
the ligands E2, OHT, or ICI (prepared in ethanol) were added to a final
concentration of 10 7 M 2 h before harvesting.
Western blot analysis of the extracts was performed with monoclonal
antibodies B10 (panel A, lanes 1 to 9; panel B) or F3 (panel A, lanes
10 to 13) to control for the levels of receptor proteins.
|
|
In order to investigate the effect of ligand on DNA binding by
the wild-type and mutant ER

, COS-1 cells grown in DMEM lacking
phenol red and containing 5% charcoal-stripped FCS were transfected
with HEG0, HEG0
236A, or HEG0
236E, and
ligands were added 1 h prior to harvesting. No differences
in DNA
binding were observed between HEG0 and HEG0
236A in the
absence of ligand or in the presence of 17

-estradiol
(E2), the
partial agonist 4-hydroxytamoxifen (OHT), or the complete
antagonist
ICI 182,780 (ICI) (Fig.
3B lanes 2 to 9). As described
above (Fig.
3A),
little binding was evident for HEG0
236E in the absence of
ligand (Fig.
3B, lane 10). In the presence
of E2 and OHT, however, some
DNA binding was seen (lanes 11 and
12), although no DNA binding was
observed with ICI (lane 13),
suggesting that the inhibition of DNA
binding can be prevented,
at least partially, by some ligands. Again,
immunoblotting was
used to control for levels of protein and
degradation (Fig.
3B,
lower
panel).
In order to demonstrate that the apparent inhibition of DNA binding is
due to phosphorylation of serine 236 and to evaluate
its ligand
dependence, cells were transfected with HEG0 or HEG0
236A,
as well as the expression vector pSG5 containing the open reading
frame
encoding the catalytic subunit of PKA (pSG5-PKA) (
73).
Gel
shifts performed under standard conditions demonstrated that
the
overexpression of PKA had little effect on DNA binding by
HEG0 in the
presence of E2 or OHT (Fig.
4A, lanes 4 to 7). In
the absence of ligand (Fig.
4A, lanes 2 and 3) or in the
presence
of ICI (Fig.
4A, lanes 8 and 9), however, in vitro DNA binding
was dramatically reduced when HEG0 was cotransfected with pSG5-PKA.
No
reduction in DNA binding was observed when HEG0
236A was
cotransfected with pSG5-PKA in the presence or absence of
any of the
ligands (Fig.
4A, lanes 10 to 17).

View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
DNA binding by hER is inhibited by phosphorylation of
serine 236. (A to D) COS-1 cells were transiently transfected with
pSG5, HEG0, or HEG0236A. E2, OHT, and ICI were added 2 h prior to harvesting. (A and C) An expression plasmid encoding the
catalytic subunit of PKA (63) was transfected, along with
the pSG5, HEG0, or HEG0236A. (B and D) Carrier
(NH4OH) or 8-Br-cAMP was added at the same time as E2, OHT,
or ICI. (C and D) The PKA inhibitor H89 was also added at the same time
as E2, OHT, or ICI. Immunoblotting with B10 was performed to control
for levels of receptor protein (A to D, lower panels).
|
|
Activation of endogenous PKA by 8-Br-cAMP resulted in a similar loss of
DNA binding by HEG0 in the absence of ligand (Fig.
4B, compare lanes 2 and 6) or in the presence of ICI (Fig.
4B,
compare lanes 5 and 9) but
not in the presence of E2 or OHT (Fig.
4B, lanes 3, 4, 7, and 8). As
seen when PKA was overexpressed,
no differences in DNA binding were
evident for HEG0
236A in the absence or presence of
8-Br-cAMP (Fig.
4B, lanes 10 to
17). Similar results were obtained when
forskolin was used (data
not shown). Overexpression of the catalytic
subunit of PKA or
activation of PKA with 8-Br-cAMP did not result in
altered protein
levels in transfections, nor did they increase the
degradation
of wild-type or mutant ER

(Fig.
4A and B, lower
panels).
H89 is a specific inhibitor of PKA (
35). Treatment with H89
prevented the loss of DNA binding by HEG0, a result observed
in the
absence of ligand when PKA was overexpressed (Fig.
4C,
compare lanes 2 and 3 with lane 4). The loss of DNA binding observed
in the presence of
ICI was also prevented when H89 was added (Fig.
4C, compare lanes 8 and
9 with lane 10). The reduction in DNA
binding induced by 8-Br-cAMP was
similarly prevented by H89 (Fig.
4D). There was no effect of H89 on the
DNA binding by HEG0 in
the presence of E2 or OHT (Fig.
4C and
4D, lanes
5 to 8) or on
the DNA binding by HEG0
236A in the absence of
ligand or in the presence of E2, OHT, or ICI
(Fig.
4C and
4D, lanes 11 to
20).
Replacement of serine 236 by glutamic acid inhibits dimerization by
hER
.
ER
binds DNA as a homodimer or as a heterodimer with
ER
(63). Inability of the receptor to dimerize would
result in the loss of DNA binding. In order to investigate the effect
of the mutation of serine 236 on dimerization, we analyzed the dimeric status of hER
bound in vitro to an ERE by using extracts of COS-1 cells transfected with HEG0 or HEG19 and cotransfected with the mutants
of serine 236. The HEG19-ERE complex migrates faster than the complex
obtained with HEG0 (Fig. 3A; Fig. 5A
compare lanes 2 and 7). A weak lower band observed for HEG0 probably
corresponds to a degradation product (see also Fig. 3 and 4) and has
also previously been observed (60). When coexpressed in
COS-1 cells, an additional complex migrating at a position intermediate
between those observed for HEG0 and HEG19 is observed, corresponding to the binding of HEG0-HEG19 heterodimers (Fig. 5A, lane 3). HEG0 and
either HEG19236A or HEG19236T formed similar
amounts of heterodimer as HEG0 and HEG19 (Fig. 5A, lanes 3 to 5).
Heterodimer formation was similar when HEG0236A or
HEG0236T were cotransfected with HEG19 (Fig. 5A, lanes 8 to
9). When HEG0 was cotransfected with HEG19236E, however, a
complex corresponding to HEG19236E was not observed, nor
was a heterodimeric complex seen while the HEG0 homodimeric
complex was present at levels similar to those seen with HEG0 alone
(Fig. 5A, compare lanes 2 and 6). The reciprocal event was
observed when HEG0236E was cotransfected with HEG19 (Fig.
5A, compare lanes 7 and 10). The fact that the amount of HEG0
and HEG19 complexes observed when cotransfected with
HEG19236E and HEG0236E, respectively, is
similar to levels observed for HEG0 and HEG19 alone suggests that
dimerization is impaired by mutation of serine 236 to glutamic acid.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Loss of hER DNA binding is due to inhibition of
dimerization. (A) Gel shifts were performed with extracts prepared from
COS-1 cells transfected with HEG0 alone (lane 2) or together with
wild-type HEG19 or serine 236 mutants (lanes 3 to 6) and HEG19
alone (lane 7) or together with serine 236 mutants of HEG0 (lanes 8 to
10). (B) HEG0, HEG19, HEG0236E, and
HEG19236E were synthesised in vitro either separately or
together in the presence of [35S]methionine. The in vitro
translation products were divided in two and immunoprecipitated with
the B10 monoclonal antibody (lanes 1 to 7). Immunoprecipitation with
the F3 (lanes 8 to 14) monoclonal antibody was used to show that HEG0,
HEG19, and the 236E mutants are present in the appropriate in vitro
translations. (C) HEG0, HEG0236E, and hER 1 were
synthesized in vitro either separately or together in the presence of
[35S]methionine. The in vitro translation products were
divided in two and immunoprecipitated with B10 (lanes 1 to 5) or M2
(lanes 6 to 10) monoclonal antibodies.
|
|
The effect of mutation of serine 236 to glutamic acid upon dimerization
was ascertained directly by using an assay in which
HEG0, HEG19, and
their respective glutamic acid mutants were synthesised
by in vitro
transcription followed by in vitro translation with
a rabbit
reticulocyte lysate system in the presence of
35S-labeled
methionine, followed by immunoprecipitation of one-half
of the lysates
with the monoclonal antibody B10, which recognizes
an epitope in the
A/B region and does not therefore, recognize
HEG19 (or its mutants)
(Fig.
1A). Immunoprecipitation of HEG0
gave a band at 67 kDa, whereas
HEG19 was not immunoprecipitated
by B10 (Fig.
5B, compare lanes 1 and
3). Immunoprecipitation of
HEG0 and HEG19 cotranslated with B10
resulted in the detection
of HEG0 and HEG19, showing that they can
dimerize. Only one band,
at 67 kDa, was observed when
HEG0
236E and HEG19 (Fig.
5B, lane 5) or HEG0 and
HEG19
236E (Fig.
5B, lane 6) were cotranslated and
immunoprecipitated with
B10, indicating that the mutation of serine 236 to glutamic acid
impairs dimerization by hER

. Immunoprecipitation of
the second
half of all of the lysates with F3, which recognizes an
epitope
present in both HEG0 and HEG19 (Fig.
1A), was also performed to
show that HEG19 and HEG19
236E were not absent in lysates in
which they were not coprecipitated
with HEG0
236E (Fig.
5B,
lanes 8 to
14).
We and others have previously shown that hER

and hER

can
heterodimerize (
22,
62,
63,
65). Given the almost complete
amino acid sequence identity between hER

and

in the DBD
and
their ability to heterodimerize, we investigated whether hER
and

can heterodimerize in solution and whether heterodimerization
between hER

and

is impaired by mutation of serine 236 of hER
to glutamic acid. HEG0, HEG0
236E, and hER

1 (pSG5
containing the hER

open reading frame with
the FLAG tag at the 5'
end, enabling immunodetection with the
M2 monoclonal antibody
[
63]) were in vitro translated in the
presence of
35S-labeled methionine, and immunoprecipitations were
performed
with B10 and M2 monoclonal antibodies as shown (Fig.
5C).
Immunoprecipitation
of HEG0 with hER

1 by using B10 or M2 resulted in
immunoprecipitation
of both polypeptides (Fig.
5C, lanes 2 and 7),
whereas when HEG0
236E and hER

1 were immunoprecipitated
with B10 only HEG0
236E was seen (Fig.
5C, lane 4).
Immunoprecipitation with M2 resulted
in the coprecipitation of HEG0 but
not of HEG0
236E with hER

1 (Fig.
5C), indicating that
serine 236 is important
for the dimerization of hER

and -

, as
well as for homodimerization
of hER

.
Phosphorylation on serine 236 inhibits dimerization by hER
in
the absence of ligand.
E2 and OHT can overcome the inhibitory
effect on DNA binding of mutating serine 236 to glutamic acid or
activation of PKA (Fig. 3 and 4). The gel shift and immunoprecipitation
results described above show that the 236E mutants fail to dimerize
(Fig. 5). In order to determine whether the inhibition of dimerization is overcome by ligand treatment, COS-1 cells were transiently transfected with HEG0 and HEG19 or their respective mutants, either separately or together. The cells were labelled with
[35S]methionine, and WCEs were immunoprecipitated
with B10. Immunoblotting of extracts with F3 established that HEG0
and/or HEG19 (and their mutants) were present in the appropriate
extracts (Fig. 6B, lower panel). In order
to investigate the effects of phosphorylation of serine 236, the cells
were transfected with pSG5 or pSG5-PKA in addition to the ER
constructs.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Inhibition of dimerization by PKA is prevented by
17 -estradiol and 4-hydroxytamoxifen but not by ICI 182,780. COS-1
cells were transiently transfected with HEG0, HEG19,
HEG0236A, HEG19236A, HEG0236E,
and HEG19236A and pSG5-PKA as shown. The cells were
labelled for 1 h with [35S]methionine in the
presence or absence of E2, OHT, or ICI (final concentrations,
10 7 M). The extracts were divided in two and
immunoprecipitated with B10 (upper panels) or F3 (lower panels) as
shown. Triangles indicate the position of a nonspecific band
(2). The molecular size markers are shown (in kilodaltons)
on the right.
|
|
Monoclonal antibody B10 immunoprecipitated HEG0,
HEG0
236A, and HEG0
236E (Fig.
6A, lanes 2, 8, and 18, respectively) but not HEG19 or
HEG19
236A
(lanes 3 and 9). As expected, immunoprecipitation of WCEs from
cells transfected with HEG0 and HEG19 resulted in precipitation
of
HEG19 along with HEG0 in the presence or absence of E2 (Fig.
6A, lanes
4 and 5). When HEG0 and HEG19 were transfected along
with
pSG5-PKA, however, HEG19 was not brought down in the absence
of ligand
(Fig.
6A, lane 6). HEG19 was brought down when E2 was
added in
vivo (lane 7), indicating that phosphorylation of hER
by PKA
inhibits dimerization in vivo in the absence but not in
the presence of
E2. In agreement with this, immunoprecipitation
of WCEs containing
HEG0
236A, HEG19, and pSG5-PKA or containing
HEG0
236A, HEG19
236A, and pSG5-PKA resulted in
the coprecipitation of HEG19 and HEG19
236A, respectively,
in the presence or absence of E2 (Fig.
6A, lanes
10 to 17).
Immunoprecipitation of WCEs from cells transfected
with
HEG0
236E and HEG19 resulted in coprecipitation of HEG19 in
the presence
but not in the absence of E2 (Fig.
6A, lanes 19 and
20).
Similar experiments performed in the presence of OHT or ICI showed that
the PKA-mediated inhibition of dimerization is prevented
by OHT (Fig.
6B, lanes 2 and 4). OHT also enabled the dimerization
between
HEG0
236E and HEG19 (lane 10). The addition of ICI, however,
did not prevent
inhibition of dimerization by PKA (Fig.
6B, lanes 3 and
5), nor
did HEG0
236E and HEG19 dimerize in the presence of
ICI (lane
11).
The importance of ligands for heterodimerization of hER

and -

was
also investigated. COS-1 cells were transiently transfected
with HEG0,
HEG0
236A, or HEG0
236E in the presence or
absence of hER

1 and pSG5-PKA and labeled
with
[
35S]methionine. The lysates were divided into three
equal fractions,
and immunoprecipitations were performed with B10 (Fig.
7A) or
M2 (Fig.
7B) monoclonal
antibodies. As expected, hER

1 was coimmunoprecipitated
with HEG0 in
the presence or absence of ligand (Fig.
7A, lanes
4 to 7).
Overexpression of the catalytic subunit of PKA (pSG5-PKA),
however,
inhibited dimer formation in the absence of ligand (Fig.
7A, lane 8),
and addition of ICI did not prevent the inhibition
(Fig.
7A, lane 11),
as found for hER

. Addition of E2 enabled
heterodimer formation (Fig.
7A, lane 9). However, whereas the
addition of OHT allowed dimerization
between HEG0 and HEG19, dimer
formation between HEG0 and hER

1
in the presence of OHT was undetectable
when the catalytic
subunit of PKA was overexpressed (Fig.
7A,
lane 10). Dimer
formation between HEG0
236A and hER

1 was ligand
independent and was not inhibited by PKA
(Fig.
7A, lanes 13 to 20).
Furthermore, in contrast to the observations
with hER

, no
heterodimer formation between HEG0
236E and hER

1 was seen
in the presence of E2 or OHT (Fig.
7A, lanes
22 to 29).
Immunoprecipitations performed with M2 to immunoprecipitate
hER

1
gave results similar to those obtained for HEG0 with B10
(Fig.
7B).
Immunoblotting of the remainder of these lysates with
B10 and M2 served
to control for the presence of HEG0 (or mutants
of serine 236) and
hER

1, respectively, in the appropriate lysates
(Fig.
7C).

View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Dimerization between hER and - is inhibited by
PKA. COS-1 cell extracts were immunoprecipitated with B10 (A) or M2 (B)
after transient transfection with HEG0, HEG0236A,
HEG0236E, and/or hER 1, as well as pSG5-PKA (as
appropriate), and [35S]methionine labeling in the
presence or absence of ligands as described in Fig. 6. (C)
Immunoblotting with the B10 and M2 monoclonal antibodies, used
together, served to control for the presence of HEG0,
HEG0236A, HEG0236E, and hER 1 in the
appropriate cell lysates. The molecular size markers are shown (in
kilodaltons) on the right.
|
|
Stimulation of hER
-mediated transcriptional activation by PKA is
modulated in a promoter-specific manner.
The results described
above indicate that phosphorylation of serine 236 inhibits hER
dimerization in the absence of ligand or in the presence of ICI. In
order to determine whether overexpression of PKA results in the
prevention of transcriptional activation by hER
in a serine
236-dependent manner, we examined the ability of wild-type and mutant
hER
to activate ERE-containing reporter genes. Previous studies have
shown that stimulation of PKA results in a synergistic increase in
transcriptional activation by hER
in the presence of E2 or OHT in a
cell type-specific and promoter-independent manner, whereas PKA-induced
transactivation by ER
in the absence of ligand is not observed in
MCF7 cells (21) and in other cell types is promoter context
dependent (42).
We examined transcriptional activation by HEG0,
HEG0
236A, and HEG0
236E in COS-1 cells
with a number of CAT-based reporters driven by
minimal promoters
containing one or three EREs (ERE-TATA-CAT and
ERE-3-TATA-CAT) or more
complex promoters comprising one or three
EREs and the thymidine kinase
(ERE-1-tk-CAT and ERE-3-tk-CAT)
or the globin promoter (ERE-G-CAT)
(Fig.
8). HEG0
activated each
promoter in the presence of E2 and to a lesser extent in
the presence
of the partial agonist OHT (Fig.
8A to F, lanes 2 to 5).
Little
transactivation was observed in the presence of ICI or in the
absence of ligand. In the case of each reporter levels of activation
were similar for HEG0
236A and HEG0 (Fig.
8A to F, compare
lanes 2 to 5 with lanes 10 to
13). Transactivation by
HEG0
236E was lower than that observed for HEG0, although
transcriptional
activation in the presence of E2 and OHT was evident in
the presence
of E2 ranging between 23% (Fig.
8A) and 60% (Fig.
8F)
relative
to HEG0. Similar differences in the levels of trans-activation
were observed for HEG0
236E compared to HEG0 in the presence
of OHT (Fig.
8A to F, compare
lanes 2 to 5 with lanes 18 to 21).

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Comparison of the transcriptional activities of
hER mutants on various estrogen-responsive reporter genes. (A to F)
Transcriptional stimulation in COS-1 cells of six reporter genes by the
wild-type human ER (HEG0) and the serine 236 mutants
HEG0236A and HEG0236E, together with pSG5 or
pSG5-PKA, in the presence or absence of E2 (10 nM), OHT (100 nM),
and ICI (100 nM) as indicated. The results are displayed in the form of
a bar chart. The average values of at least three independent
experiments (±10%) are given in each case. Transcriptional activation
was determined with ERE-TATA-CAT (A), ERE-3-TATA-CAT (B), ERE-tk-CAT
(C), ERE-3-tk-CAT (D), vit-tk-CAT (E), and ERE-G-CAT (F). For each
reporter gene the level of transactivation by HEG0 in the presence of
E2 was taken as 100%. In panel G COS-1 cells were cotransfected with
the reporter gene 17M-ERE-TATA-CAT, HEG0, HEG0236A, or
HEG0236E, together with either pSG5 or pSG5-PKA and
GAL-VP16, as indicated. Ligands were added as described above. The
results are displayed in the form of a bar chart. The average values of
at least three independent experiments (±10%) are given in each case.
The level of transactivation by GAL-VP16 was taken as 100%.
|
|
Cotransfection of HEG0 with pSG5-PKA resulted in a 1.6- to 14-fold
increase (relative to the activity observed in the absence
of PKA) in
transactivation in the presence of E2 depending on
the reporter gene
used (Fig.
8A to F, compare lanes 3 and 7).
PKA resulted in a 1.0- to
4.7-fold increase in OHT-induced transactivation
by HEG0 (Fig.
8A to F,
compare lanes 4 and 8). In the absence
of ligand, cotransfection of
pSG5-PKA did not yield any increase
in transactivation in the case of
the ERE-TATA-CAT, ERE-1-tk-CAT,
ERE-3-tk-CAT, or the vit-tk-CAT
reporter genes (Fig.
8A, C, D,
and E), whereas 1.4- and 4.9-fold
increases were observed for
ERE-3-TATA-CAT and ERE-G-CAT (Fig.
8B and
F), respectively. PKA
also caused 1.5- and 2.2-fold increases in
transactivation in
the presence of the pure antiestrogen ICI in the
case of ERE-3-TATA-CAT
and ERE-G-CAT, respectively (Fig.
8B and F,
compare lanes 5 and
9), but no stimulation was observed with the other
reporter
genes.
These results show that PKA synergizes with E2 and OHT to increase the
transactivational ability of hER

. PKA-mediated transactivation
in
the absence of ligand is promoter dependent and, furthermore,
PKA can
also stimulate transactivation by hER

in the presence
of the
"pure" antiestrogen ICI, again in a promoter-specific manner.
Similarly, in MCF7 cells transfection of PKA or the addition of
8-Br-cAMP resulted in increased transactivation in the presence
of E2
and OHT from all of the reporter genes described above.
However, no
increase in transactivation in the presence of ICI
or the absence of
ligand was observed with any reporter gene,
thus confirming previous
reports indicating that ligand-independent
transactivation mediated by
PKA is cell type specific (data not
shown) (
9,
21,
42).
For HEG0
236A, PKA-mediated increases in transactivation
were similar to those observed for HEG0 in the presence of E2 and OHT
(Fig.
8A to F, compare lanes 11 and 15 and lanes 12 and 16). Whereas
PKA stimulated transactivation by HEG0 in the absence of ligand
only
when the ERE-G-CAT reporter was used, in the case of
HEG0
236A, increased transactivation by PKA was evident for
all reporter
genes (3.2- to 4.8-fold) (Fig.
8A to E, compare lanes 10 and 14).
Similar increases were observed in the presence of ICI (Fig.
8A
to F, lanes 13 and
17).
PKA also increased transactivation by HEG0
236E in the
presence of E2 and to a lesser extent in the presence of OHT (Fig.
8A
to
F, compare lanes 19 and 20 with lanes 23 and 24). As expected,
no
increase in transactivation was observed in the presence of
ICI or in
the absence of ligand, except that ERE-G-CAT (which
gave a
ligand-independent increase in transactivation of HEG0
by PKA) was
stimulated to a similar extent (3.2-fold) in the absence
of ligand
(compare lanes 18 and 22) and in the presence of E2
or OHT (Fig.
8F,
compare lanes 19 and 20 and lanes 23 and 24).
Some increase (twofold)
was also obtained in the presence of ICI
(Fig.
8F, compare lanes 21 and
25).
Collectively, the above data indicate that phosphorylation of serine
236 does indeed inhibit the transcriptional activation
by hER

in the
absence of E2 or OHT. In order to directly show
that PKA can inhibit
DNA binding by hER

in vivo, we exploited
a transcriptional
interference assay which has previously been
used to show that hER

can bind to an ERE in vivo in the presence
of ICI (
60). We
used a reporter gene containing a binding site
for the yeast
transcriptional activator GAL4 (17M), an ERE, and
the adenovirus major
late promoter TATA box driving the CAT gene
(
79).
Cotransfection of this reporter gene (17M-ERE-TATA-CAT)
and GAL-VP16,
in which the DBD (amino acids 1 to 147) of GAL4
is fused to the
transcription activation function of the herpes
simplex virus VP16
resulted in transcriptional activation (taken
as 100%), which was
unaffected by the coexpression of PKA (Fig.
8G lanes 2 and 3).
Cotransfection of HEG0 and GAL-VP16 resulted
in a 4-fold increase in
CAT gene expression in the presence of
E2 (lane 9) and a 1.8-fold
increase in the presence of OHT (lane
10). In the presence of ICI,
however, a fourfold decrease in expression
was observed, a finding
indicative of repression due to the specific
DNA binding of IC-bound
HEG0 (lane 11). It is not clear why the
inhibition of expression is not
seen in the absence of ligand
(lane 8), but it may be a reflection of
residual estrogens in
the culture medium (see reference
60). Cotransfection of pSG5-PKA
resulted in a
further increase in transactivation in the presence
of E2 and OHT but a
repression of expression in the presence of
ICI was lost (lane 15),
thus showing that PKA inhibits DNA binding
by HEG0 in the presence of
ICI.
In the case of HEG0
236A, ICI inhibited expression even in
the presence of PKA (lane 27), indicating that DNA binding by
HEG0
236A is not inhibited by PKA. HEG0
236E
cotransfection with GAL-VP16 had little effect on expression
in the
absence or presence of PKA, suggesting that there is little
DNA binding
by HEG0
236E (Fig.
8G, lanes 32 to 39), a finding in
agreement with the results
presented
above.
 |
DISCUSSION |
hER
is phosphorylated on serine 236 by PKA.
Several studies
have shown that the activation of PKA can increase transcriptional
activation by ER
in an estrogen-independent manner (9, 19,
42) or in synergism with estrogen (21, 26, 42), as
well as in the presence of antiestrogens (42). We have now
shown that hER
(HEG0) is phosphorylated by PKA in vitro on at least
two sites. Examination of the hER
amino acid sequence indicates that
serine 236 is a potential substrate for PKA phosphorylation and that
its mutation to alanine reduced, but did not abolish, phosphorylation
of hER
by PKA, suggesting that serine 236 is a substrate for PKA phosphorylation.
Mutation of serine 236 to glutamic acid inhibits dimerization by
hER
.
Serine 236 is located in the second zinc finger (CII)
within the DBD. Although mutation of serine 236 to alanine had little effect on DNA binding, a mutation to glutamic acid dramatically reduced
DNA binding by hER
, suggesting that phosphorylation of serine 236 inhibits DNA binding. Like other steroid receptors, ER
binds to
specific EREs as a homodimer (12, 13, 34, 55, 56, 83).
Recent studies have further shown that ER
can bind to EREs as a
heterodimer with the newly discovered ER
(22, 62, 63,
65). Extensive deletional and mutational analyses have shown that
homodimerization by ER
is mediated by sequences in the DBD and the
LBD, and determination of the crystal structures of the ER
DNA and
LBDs have further delineated the amino acid residues involved in
dimerization (17, 75). Since phosphorylation of serine 236 inhibits DNA binding, we investigated whether this is due to the
inhibition of dimerization by hER
. Gelshifts performed with WCE of
COS-1 cells transfected with full-length (HEG0, HEG0236A,
or HEG0236E) and N-terminally deleted (HEG19,
HEG19236A, or HEG19236E) receptors suggested
that the wild-type and 236A receptors can heterodimerize, whereas
the 236E mutants are unable to dimerize.
Inhibition of dimer formation was further demonstrated by using
immunoprecipitations. HEG19 could be immunoprecipitated with
HEG0 with
an antibody recognizing an epitope absent in HEG19.
HEG19 could not be
coprecipitated with HEG0
236E, nor was HEG19
236E
coprecipitated with HEG0, clearly showing that dimerization by
the 236E
mutant is impaired when compared to the wild-type and
236A mutant
receptors.
As stated above, dimerization by ER

is mediated by sequences in the
DNA and LBDs. Using the glutamic acid mutants, we have
shown that
sequences in the DBD are necessary for ER

dimerization
and that
serine 236 plays an important role in this dimerization.
In the
presence of E2, however, the 236E mutants bound DNA and
could dimerize,
albeit to a lower extent when compared to wild-type
or 236A mutants.
These results indicate that dimerization by ER
in the absence of
ligand is mediated largely by the DBD and that
the addition of estrogen
enables dimerization by the LBD. Our
results further suggest that the
DBD or the LBD (in the presence
of E2) is sufficient for dimerization,
thereby promoting binding
to an
ERE.
Dimerization by HEG0
236E could also be obtained by the
addition of the partial agonist OHT. Addition of the pure antiestrogen
ICI 182,780, however, did not enable dimerization by
HEG0
236E, indicating that ICI prevents the activation of
dimerization
by the LBD. This is in agreement with a previous report
showing
that dimerization by mouse ER

synthesized in insect cells
was
inhibited by ICI (
27).
Dimerization of hER
is inhibited by PKA in a ligand-dependent
manner.
Inhibition of ER
dimerization by the replacement of
serine 236 with negatively charged glutamic acid suggested that PKA
phosphorylation inhibits dimer formation. This was confirmed by the
finding that DNA binding by wild type but not by the 236A mutant was
inhibited after treatment with activators of PKA and, indeed,
overexpression of the catalytic subunit of PKA or activation of
endogenous PKA resulted in reduced dimerization as determined by
immunoprecipitations for HEG0 but not HEG0236A, indicating
that the reduction in DNA binding results from the inhibition of
dimerization by PKA-mediated phosphorylation of serine 236. The
inhibition of dimerization could be prevented by the addition of the
specific PKA inhibitor H89. As observed for HEG0236E, E2
and OHT prevented inhibition of dimerization by PKA, whereas ICI
treatment did not relieve the inhibition. Replacement of serine 236 with alanine prevented inhibition of dimerization by PKA and obviated
the need for ligand, further demonstrating the inhibitory effect of
phosphorylation on dimerization.
Phosphorylation of serine 236 of hER
regulates
heterodimer formation with hER
.
As with
homodimerization by hER
, heterodimerization between hER
and
hER
was prevented by a mutation of serine 236 of hER
to glutamic
acid or by overexpression of PKA in an estrogen-dependent manner,
indicating that similar mechanisms operate for the heterodimerization by hER
and hER
as for the homodimerization by hER
. However, while heterodimer formation between HEG0 and hER
1 was not observed in the absence of ligand or in the presence of ICI, heterodimers also
did not form in the presence of OHT when PKA was overexpressed. These
results suggest that while OHT enables the dimerization of the hER
LBD, it also inhibits or prevents the conformational changes required
for the activation of the LBD dimerization function. In the case of
hER
, tamoxifen and its metabolite OHT have been shown to have
partial agonistic activity which correlates with activation of AF-1 but
with inhibition of AF-2. Our findings are indicative of mechanistic
differences between hER
and hER
with regard to the action of OHT.
Indeed, Tremblay et al. (80, 81) found that OHT had no
agonistic activity with mouse ER
in a cell line in which it had
agonistic activity with mouse ER
, although it is clearly possible
that OHT acts as a partial agonist with hER
in other cell types or
in activating promoters other than the ones used in these studies.
PKA modulates transcriptional activation by hER
.
Previous
studies have shown that PKA synergizes with estrogen to increase
transcriptional activation by ER
. However, the ligand-independent
increase in transcription activation by PKA appears to be promoter and
cell type specific (9, 21, 42). The results presented here
confirm those findings. We show that in COS-1 cells PKA increases
transactivation by hER
in the presence of E2 and OHT. A PKA-mediated
increase in transactivation in the absence of ligand or in the presence
of ICI was, however, restricted to two reporter genes, ERE-G-CAT and,
to a lesser extent, ERE-3-TATA-CAT. Perhaps interactions with other
transcription factors can stabilize DNA binding by hER
and overcome
the inhibition of dimerization caused by phosphorylation of serine 236. The results with ERE-3-TATA-CAT suggest that multiple EREs may also be
sufficient to provide some stabilization of DNA binding, although this
was not observed in the case of ERE-3-tk-CAT.
Mutation of serine 236 to alanine, which stabilizes dimerization in the
absence of ligand or in the presence of ICI, led to
PKA-mediated
ligand-independent transactivation in the case of
all the reporter
genes studied, whereas HEG0
236E was only activated in the
absence of ligand or in the presence
of ICI in the case of ERE-G-CAT.
These results provide evidence
to support our findings that
phosphorylation of serine 236 of
hER

results in inhibition of
dimerization.
Transcriptional interference of GAL-VP16-induced expression of the
17M-ERE-TATA-CAT reporter gene by HEG0 (but not HEG0
236A)
in the presence of ICI and its prevention by PKA are further
indicative
of a role for serine 236 phosphorylation in regulating
dimerization and
thereby DNA binding by hER

. The inability to
determine the loss of
DNA binding by the unliganded receptor in
this assay system may be the
result of residual E2 in the E2-stripped
cell culture medium and does
not allow an unequivocal determination
of the inhibitory effect of
serine 236 phosphorylation on hER
function in the absence of
ligand.
Conclusion.
Our results demonstrate that hER
is
phosphorylated by PKA on serine 236. Phosphorylation at this site can
inhibit dimerization in the absence of estrogen, and the addition of
estrogen can overcome this inhibition. Crystallization of the hER
DBD showed the DBD dimers to be present in two forms (75).
In one form of DBD dimers, ordered water molecules provide bridging
contacts between serine 236 in one DBD molecule and methionine 220 in
the other molecule (see Fig. 1B). Phosphorylation of serine 236 would
inhibit the formation of the dimerization interface by disrupting the
network of water molecules at the dimer interface due to the steric
hindrance between monomers at the interface by the presence of
phosphates and/or by electrostatic repulsion between monomers, since
the phosphates would be brought close together in the dimer. The
second, "loose" dimer type seen would probably be able to
accommodate the phosphorylation but might nevertheless not be as
stable. The fact that the 236A mutant does not disrupt dimerization but
would not support the same water network as seen in the crystal and the
finding that a larger charged glutamic acid residue blocks dimerization
suggest that either the steric and/or the electrostatic factors are
important, rather than simply the disruption of favorable networks of
water molecules. In any case, ligand binding would be likely to allow
dimer formation independently of the DBD, perhaps by enabling the
"loose" DBD conformation (74a).
Whilst ER binding to ERE
in vitro does not require ligand, a
number of studies indicate that DNA binding by the estrogen receptor
is
ligand-dependent
in vivo. In yeast ligand binding is
required
for DNA binding and induction of changes in chromatin
structure
by hER

(
30,
48,
66) and in chickens
in
vivo footprinting
of the vitellogenin II and apoVLDL II genes
demonstrated protection
in the presence of E2 (
67,
87). In
vivo, phosphorylation of
serine 236 could be important in preventing
estrogen receptor
binding to EREs in gene promoters and in preventing
interference
with gene transcription in the absence of ligand, since
the binding
of the transcriptionally inactive estrogen receptor could
repress
the estrogen receptor-independent transcription of responsive
genes (e.g., see reference
28) in a manner similar
to the inhibition
by hER

of transcriptional activation by GAL4-VP16
described here.
Alternatively, inhibition of DNA binding may be
important for
preventing alteration of chromatin structure in the
absence of
ligand (
48).
Interaction of the estrogen receptor with several transcriptional
regulators, including AP1, NF-kB, and Brn-3a and -3b, leading
to
modulation of their activity or that of the estrogen receptor,
has been
described. In some cases the DBD is dispensable for the
interaction
(e.g., AP1 [
74]). The repression of the interleukin-6
promoter by the estrogen receptor is mediated by NF-kB and C-EBP
beta
and requires the presence of the ER

DBD, although high-affinity
DNA
binding by ER

is not required (
70,
76). Interaction
between
the DBD of ER

and the POU domain of Brn-3a and Brn-3b is
ligand
independent and modulates transcription activation by ER

(
18).
It is possible that phosphorylation of serine 236 is
important
for the regulation of these
interactions.
In summary, we have shown that hER

is phosphorylatable on serine 236 within the CII zinc finger of the DBD. Phosphorylation
by PKA or
mutation of serine 236 to glutamic acid impairs dimerization
by the
DBD, indicating that the DBD is important for ER

dimerization.
In
the presence of E2 or OHT, however, dimer formation occurs
despite PKA
overexpression, showing that the estrogen receptor
contains two
dimerization domains, one in the DBD and one in the
LBD. Dimerization
by the LBD is ligand dependent, whereas dimerization
mediated by the
DBD is ligand independent. Our results further
indicate that sequences
within the DBD or the LBD are sufficient
for dimerization, although
there are likely to be mechanistic
differences between
dimerization by the DBD and/or the LBD. Our
results are in
agreement with previous studies which have indicated
that the
antagonistic activity of tamoxifen (and OHT) is not mediated
in any
part by inhibition of dimerization and/or DNA binding but
is mediated
solely through inhibition of AF-2. However, we show
that ICI, which
inhibits both AF-1 and AF-2 and reduces the half-life
of ER

, also
prevents dimerization by the LBD, the dimer formation
being mediated,
in the presence of ICI solely by the DBD. Finally,
phosphorylation of
serine 236 provides a mechanism for E2 regulation
of DNA binding by the
estrogen receptor and may modulate its association
with other
transcription
factors.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank P. Chambon, D. Metzger, S. Mader, and J. White for the
ER plasmids and M.-P. Gaub and C. Rochette-Egly for the pSG5-PKA plasmid. We are particularly grateful to J. W. R. Schwabe for his evaluation of our findings with reference to the crystal structure of the ER
DBD.
This work was supported by the Cancer Research Campaign.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: CRC
Laboratories, Department of Cancer Medicine, Division of Medicine,
Imperial College of Science, Technology, and Medicine, Charing Cross
Campus, St. Dunstan's Rd., London W6 8RP, United Kingdom. Phone:
44-0181-846-1413. Fax: 44-0181-846-1413. E-mail:
simak.ali{at}ic.ac.uk.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Ali, S.,
D. Metzger,
J.-M. Bornert, and P. Chambon.
1993.
Phosphorylation of the human oestrogen receptor: identification of a phosphorylation site required for trans-activation.
EMBO J.
12:1153-1160[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Ali, S.,
Y. Lutz,
J.-P. Bellocq,
M.-P. Chenard-Neu,
N. Rouyer, and D. Metzger.
1993.
Production and characterisation of monoclonal antibodies recognising defined regions of the human oestrogen receptor.
Hybridoma
12:391-405[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Arnold, S. F.,
J. D. Obourn,
H. Jaffe, and A. C. Notides.
1994.
Serine 167 is the major estradiol-induced phosphorylation site on the human estrogen receptor.
Mol. Endocrinol.
8:1208-1214[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Arnold, S. F.,
J. D. Obourn,
H. Jaffe, and A. C. Notides.
1995.
Phosphorylation of the human estrogen receptor by mitogen-activated protein kinase and casein kinase II: consequence on DNA binding.
J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.
55:163-172[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Arnold, S. F.,
J. D. Obourn,
M. R. Yudt,
T. H. Carter, and A. C. Notides.
1995.
In vivo and in vitro phosphorylation of the human estrogen receptor.
J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.
52:159-171[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Arnold, S. F.,
J. D. Obourn,
H. Jaffe, and A. C. Notides.
1995.
Phosphorylation of the human estrogen receptor on tyrosine 537 in vivo and by src family tyrosine kinases in vitro.
Mol. Endocrinol.
9:24-33[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Arnold, S. F.,
D. P. Vorojeikina, and A. C. Notides.
1995.
Phosphorylation of tyrosine 537 on the human estrogen receptor is required for binding to an estrogen response element.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:30205-30212[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Arnold, S. F.,
M. Melamed,
D. P. Vorojeikina,
A. C. Notides, and S. Sasson.
1997.
Estradiol-binding mechanism and binding capacity of the human estrogen receptor is regulated by tyrosine phosphorylation.
Mol. Endocrinol.
11:48-53[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Aronica, S. M., and B. S. Katzenellenbogen.
1993.
Stimulation of estrogen receptor-mediated transcription and alteration in the phosphorylation state of the rat uterine estrogen receptor by estrogen, cyclin adenosine monophosphate and insulin-like growth factor-1.
Mol. Endocrinol.
7:743-752[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Auricchio, F.
1989.
Phosphorylation of steroid receptors.
J. Steroid Biochem.
32:613-622[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Bai, W., and N. L. Weigel.
1996.
Phosphorylation of Ser-211 in the chicken progesterone receptor modulates its transcriptional activity.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:12801-12806[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Beato, M.
1989.
Gene regulation by steroid hormones.
Cell
56:335-344[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Beato, M.,
P. Herlich, and G. Schutz.
1995.
Steroid hormone receptors: many actors in search of a plot.
Cell
83:851-857[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Berry, M.,
D. Metzger, and P. Chambon.
1990.
Role of the two activating domains of the oestrogen receptor in the cell-type and promoter-context dependent agonistic activity of the anti-oestrogen 4-hydroxytamoxifen.
EMBO J.
9:2811-2818[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Berthois, Y.,
J. A. Katzenellenbogen, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen.
1986.
Phenol red in tissue culture media is a weak estrogen: implications concerning the study of estrogen-responsive cells in culture.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:1218-1222.
|
| 16.
|
Boyle, W. J.,
P. van der Geer, and T. Hunter.
1991.
Phosphopeptide mapping and phosphoamino acid analysis by two-dimensional separation on thin-layer cellulose plates.
Methods Enzymol.
201:110-148[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Brzozowski, A. M.,
A. C. W. Pike,
Z. Dauter,
R. E. Hubbard,
T. Bonn,
O. Engstrom,
L. Ohman,
G. L. Green,
J.-A. Gustafsson, and M. Carlquist.
1997.
Molecular basis of agonism and antagonism of the oestrogen receptor.
Nature
389:753-758[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Budhram-Mahadeo, V.,
M. Parker, and D. S. Latchman.
1998.
POU transcription factors Brn-3a and Brn-3b interact with the estrogen receptor and differentially regulate transcriptional activity via an estrogen response element.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:1029-1041[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Bunone, G.,
P.-A. Briand,
R. J. Miksicek, and D. Picard.
1996.
Activation of the unliganded estrogen receptor by EGF involves the MAP kinase pathway and direct phosphorylation.
EMBO J.
15:2174-2183[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Castoria, G.,
A. Migliaccio,
S. Green,
M. Di-Domenico,
P. Chambon, and F. Aurrichio.
1993.
Properties of a purified estradiol-dependent calf uterus tyrosine kinase.
Biochemistry
32:1740-1750[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Cho, H., and B. S. Katzenellenbogen.
1993.
Synergistic activation of estrogen receptor-mediated transcription by estradiol and protein kinase activators.
Mol. Endocrinol.
7:441-452[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Cowley, S. M.,
S. Hoare,
S. Mosselman, and M. G. Parker.
1997.
Estrogen receptor and form heterodimers on DNA.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:19858-19862[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Dauvois, S.,
P. S. Danielian,
R. White, and M. G. Parker.
1993.
The antiestrogen ICI 182780 disrupts estrogen receptor nucleocytoplasmic shuttling.
J. Cell Sci.
103:1377-1388.
|
| 24.
|
Dauvois, S.,
P. S. Danielian,
R. White, and M. G. Parker.
1992.
Antiestrogen ICI 164,384 reduces cellular estrogen receptor content by increasing its turnover.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:4037-4041[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
DeFranco, D. B.,
M. Qi,
K. C. Boffor,
M. J. Garabedian, and D. L. Brautigan.
1991.
Protein phosphatase types 1 and/or 2A regulate nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of glucocorticoid receptors.
Mol. Endocrinol.
5:1215-1528[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
El-Tanani, M. K., and C. D. Green.
1997.
Two separate mechanisms for ligand-independent activation of the estrogen receptor.
Mol. Endocrinol.
11:928-937[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Fawell, S. E.,
R. White,
S. Hoare,
M. Sydenham,
M. Page, and M. G. Parker.
1990.
Inhibition of estrogen receptor-DNA binding by the "pure" antiestrogen ICI 164,384 appears to be mediated by impaired receptor dimerization.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
8:6883-6887.
|
| 28.
|
Gaub, M.-P.,
M. Bellard,
I. Scheuer,
P. Chambon, and P. Sassone-Corsi.
1990.
Activation of the ovalbumin gene by the estrogen receptor involves the fos-jun complex.
Cell
63:1267-1276[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Gibson, M. K.,
L. A. Nemmers,
W. C. Beckman,
V. L. Davis,
S. W. Curtis, and K. S. Korach.
1991.
The mechanism of ICI 164,384 antiestrogenicity involves rapid loss of estrogen receptor in uterine tissue.
Endocrinology
129:2000-2010[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Gilbert, D. M.,
R. Losson, and P. Chambon.
1992.
Ligand dependence of estrogen receptor induced changes in chromatin structure.
Nucleic Acids Res.
20:4525-4531[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Glineur, C.,
M. Zenke,
H. Beug, and J. Ghysdael.
1990.
Phosphorylation of the v-erbA protein is required for its function as an oncogene.
Genes Dev.
4:1663-1676[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Goldberg, Y.,
C. Glineur,
J. C. Gesquiere,
A. Ricouart,
J. Sap,
B. Vennstrom, and J. Ghysdael.
1988.
Activation of protein kinase C or cAMP-dependent protein kinase increases phosphorylation of the c-erbA-encoded thyroid hormone receptor and of the v-erbA-encoded protein.
EMBO J.
7:2425-2433[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Green, S.,
I. Isseman, and E. Sheer.
1988.
A versatile in vivo and in vitro eukaryotic expression vector for protein engineering.
Nucleic Acids Res.
10:369-370.
|
| 34.
|
Gronemeyer, H.
1991.
Transcription activation by estrogen and progesterone receptors.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
25:89-123.
|
| 35.
|
Hidaka, H.,
M. Watanabe, and R. Kobayashi.
1991.
Properties and use of H-series compounds as protein kinase inhibitors.
Methods Enzymol.
201:328-339[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Hsieh, J.-C.,
P. W. Jurutka,
M. A. Galligan,
C. M. Terpenning,
C. A. Haussler,
D. S. Samuels,
Y. Shimizu,
N. Shimizu, and M. R. Haussler.
1991.
Phosphorylation of the human vitamin D receptor by protein kinase C. Biochemical and functional evaluation of the serine 51 recognition site.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:9315-9319[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Hsieh, J.-C.,
P. W. Jurutka,
N. Shigeo,
M. A. Galligan,
C. A. Haussler,
Y. Shimizu,
N. Shimizu,
G. K. Whitfield, and M. R. Haussler.
1993.
Human vitamin D receptor is selectively phosphorylated by protein kinase C on serine 51, a residue crucial to its transactivation function.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:15118-15126[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Hsu, S. C., and D. B. de Franco.
1995.
Selectivity of cell cycle regulation of glucocorticoid receptor function.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:3359-3364[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Hu, J. M.,
J. E. Bodwell, and A. Munck.
1994.
Cell cycle-dependent glucocorticoid receptor phosphorylation and activity.
Mol. Endocrinol.
8:1709-1713[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Hunter, T., and M. Karin.
1992.
The regulation of transcription by phosphorylation.
Cell
70:375-387[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Ignar-Trowbridge, D.,
C. T. Teng,
K. A. Ross,
M. G. Parker,
K. S. Korach, and J. A. McLachlan.
1993.
Peptide growth factors elicit estrogen receptor-dependent transcriptional activation of an estrogen-responsive element.
Mol. Endocrinol.
7:992-998[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Ince, B. A.,
M. M. Montano, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen.
1994.
Activation of transcriptionally inactive human estrogen receptors by cyclin adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate and ligands including antiestrogens.
Mol. Endocrinol.
8:1397-1406[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Jackson, S. P.
1992.
Regulating transcription factor activity by phosphorylation.
Trends Cell Biol.
2:104-108.
|
| 44.
|
Joel, P. B.,
A. M. Traish, and D. A. Lannigan.
1995.
Estradiol and phorbol ester cause phosphorylation of serine 118 in the human estrogen receptor.
Mol. Endocrinol.
9:1041-1052[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Joel, P. B.,
J. Smith,
T. W. Sturgill,
T. L. Fisher,
J. Blenis, and D. A. Lannigan.
1998.
pp90rsk1 regulates estrogen receptor-mediated transcription through phosphorylation of Ser-167.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:1978-1984[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Karin, M.
1994.
Signal transduction from the cell surface to the nucleus through phosphorylation of transcription factors.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
6:415-424[Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Kato, S.,
E. Endoh,
Y. Masuhiro,
T. Kitamoto,
S. Uchiyama,
H. Sasaki,
S. Masushige,
Y. Gotoh,
E. Nishida,
H. Kawashima,
D. Metzger, and P. Chambon.
1995.
Activation of the estrogen receptor through phosphorylation by mitogen-activated protein kinase.
Science
270:1491-1494[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Kladde, M. P.,
M. Xu, and R. T. Simpson.
1996.
Direct study of DNA-protein interactions in repressed and active chromatin in living cells.
EMBO J.
15:6290-6300[Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Krust, A.,
S. Green,
P. Argos,
V. Kumar,
P. Walter,
J.-M. Bornert, and P. Chambon.
1986.
The chicken oestrogen receptor sequence: homology with v-erbA and the human oestrogen and glucocorticoid receptors.
EMBO J.
5:891-897[Medline].
|
| 50.
|
Kumar, V.,
S. Green,
A. Staub, and P. Chambon.
1986.
Localisation of the oestradiol-binding and putative DNA-binding domains of the human oestrogen receptor.
EMBO J.
5:2231-2236[Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Kumar, V.,
S. Green,
G. Stack,
M. Berry,
J. R. Jin, and P. Chambon.
1987.
Functional domains of the human estrogen receptor.
Cell
51:941-951[Medline].
|
| 52.
|
Lees, J. A.,
S. E. Fawell, and M. G. Parker.
1989.
Identification of two transactivation domains in the mouse oestrogen receptor.
Nucleic Acids Res.
17:5477-5488[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Le Goff, P.,
M. M. Montano,
D. J. Schodin, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen.
1994.
Phosphorylation of the human estrogen receptor. Identification of hormone-regulated sites and examination of their influence on transcriptional activity.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:4458-4466[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 54.
|
Ma, Z. Q.,
S. Santagati,
C. Patrone,
G. Pollio,
E. Vegeto, and A. Maggi.
1994.
Insulin-like growth factors activate estrogen receptor to control the growth and differentiation of the human neuroblastorna cell line SK-ER3.
Mol. Endocrinol.
8:910-918[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 55.
|
Mangelsdorf, D. J., and R. M. Evans.
1995.
The RXR heterodimers and orphan receptors.
Cell
83:841-850[Medline].
|
| 56.
|
Mangelsdorf, D. J.,
C. Thummel,
M. Beato,
P. Hefflich,
G. Schutz,
K. Umesono,
B. Blumberg,
P. Kastner,
M. Mark,
P. Chambon, and R. M. Evans.
1995.
The nuclear receptor superfamily: the second decade.
Cell
8:835-839.
|
| 57.
|
McDonnell, D. P.,
D. L. Clemm,
T. Hermann,
M. E. Goldman, and J. W. Pike.
1995.
Analysis of estrogen receptor function in vitro reveals three distinct classes of antiestrogens.
Mol. Endocrinol.
9:659-669[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 58.
|
McInerney, E. M., and B. S. Katzenellenbogen.
1996.
Different regions in activation function-1 of the human estrogen receptor required for antiestrogen- and estradiol-dependent transcription activation.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:24172-24178[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 59.
|
Metzger, D.,
S. Ali,
J.-M. Bornert, and P. Chambon.
1995.
Characterization of the N-terminal transcriptional activation function (AF-1) of the human oestrogen receptor in animal and yeast cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:9535-9542[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 60.
|
Metzger, D.,
M. Berry,
S. Ali, and P. Chambon.
1995.
Effect of antagonists on DNA binding properties of the human oestrogen receptor in vitro and in vivo.
Mol. Endocrinol.
9:579-591[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 61.
|
Newton, C. J.,
R. Buric,
T. Trapp,
S. Brockmeier,
U. Pagotto, and G. K. Stalla.
1994.
The unliganded estrogen receptor (ER) transduces growth factor signals.
J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.
48:481-486[Medline].
|
| 62.
|
Ogawa, S.,
S. Inoue,
T. Watanabe,
H. Hiroi,
A. Orimo,
T. Hosoi,
Y. Ouchi, and M. Muramatsu.
1998.
The complete primary structure of human estrogen receptor (hER ) and its heterodimerization with ER in vivo and in vitro.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
243:122-126[Medline].
|
| 63.
|
Pace, P. E.,
J. Taylor,
S. Suntharalingam,
R. C. Coombes, and S. Ali.
1997.
Human estrogen receptor beta binds DNA in a manner similar to and dimerises with estrogen receptor alpha.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:25832-25838[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 64.
|
Patrone, C.,
Z. Q. Ma,
G. Pollio,
P. Agrati,
M. G. Parker, and A. Maggi.
1996.
Cross-coupling between insulin and estrogen receptor in human neuroblastoma cells.
Mol. Endocrinol.
10:499-507[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 65.
|
Pettersson, K.,
K. Grandien,
G. G. Kuiper, and J. A. Gustafsson.
1997.
Mouse estrogen receptor forms estrogen response element-binding heterodimers with estrogen receptor .
Mol. Endocrinol.
11:1486-1496[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 66.
|
Pham, T. A.,
J. F. Elliston,
Z. Nawaz,
D. P. McDonnell,
M.-J. Tsai, and B. W. O'Malley.
1991.
Antiestrogens can establish nonproductive receptor complexes and alter chromatin structure at target enhancers.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:3125-3129[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 67.
|
Philipsen, J. N. J.,
B. C. Hennis, and G. Ab.
1988.
In vivo footprinting of the estrogen-inducible vitellogenin II gene from chicken.
Nucleic Acids Res.
16:9663-9676[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 68.
|
Pietras, R. J.,
J. Arboleda,
D. M. Reese,
N. Wongvipat,
M. D. Pelgram,
L. Ramos,
C. M. Gorman,
M. G. Parker,
M. X. Sliwkowski, and D. J. Slamon.
1995.
HER-2 tyrosine kinase pathway targets estrogen receptor and promotes hormone-independent growth in human breast cancer cells.
Oncogene
10:2435-2446[Medline].
|
| 69.
|
Power, R. F.,
S. K. Mani,
J. Codina,
O. M. Conneely, and B. W. O'Malley.
1991.
Dopaminergic and ligand-independent activation of steroid hormone receptors.
Science
254:1636-1639[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 70.
|
Ray, A.,
K. E. Prefontaine, and P. Ray.
1994.
Down-modulation of interleukin-6 gene expression by 17 beta-estradiol in the absence of high affinity DNA binding by the estrogen receptor.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:12940-12946[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 71.
|
Reese, J. C., and B. S. Katzenellenbogen.
1992.
Examination of the DNA-binding ability of estrogen receptor in whole cells: implications for hormone-independent transactivation and the actions of antiestrogens.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:4531-4538[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 72.
|
Rochette-Egly, C.,
S. Adam,
M. Rossignol,
J.-M. Egly, and P. Chambon.
1997.
Stimulation of RAR activation function AF-1 through binding to the general transcription factor TFIIH and phosphorylation by CDK7.
Cell
90:97-107[Medline].
|
| 73.
|
Rochette-Egly, C.,
M. Oulad-Abdelghani,
A. Staub,
V. Pfister,
I. Scheuer,
P. Chambon, and M.-P. Gaub.
1995.
Phosphorylation of the retinoic acid receptor a by protein kinase A.
Mol. Endocrinol.
9:860-871[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 74.
|
Saha, S.,
J. M. Brickman,
N. Lehming, and M. Ptashne.
1993.
New eukaryotic transcriptional repressors.
Nature
363:648-652[Medline].
|
| 74a.
| Schwabe, J. W. R. Personal communication.
|
| 75.
|
Schwabe, J. W. R.,
L. Chapman,
J. T. Finch, and D. Rhodes.
1993.
The crystal structure of the estrogen receptor DNA-binding domain bound to DNA: how receptors discriminate between their response elements.
Cell
70:567-578.
|
| 76.
|
Stein, B., and M. X. Yang.
1995.
Repression of the interleukin-6 promoter by estrogen receptor is mediated by NF-kappa B and C-EBP beta.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:4971-4979[Abstract].
|
| 77.
|
Takimoto, G. S.,
A. R. Hovland,
D. M. Tasset,
M. Y. Melville,
L. Tung, and K. B. Horwitz.
1996.
Role of phosphorylation on DNA binding and transcriptional functions of human progesterone receptors.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:13308-13316[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 78.
|
Tora, L.,
A. Mullick,
D. Metzger,
M. Ponglikitmongkol,
I. Park, and P. Chambon.
1989.
The cloned human oestrogen receptor contains a mutation which alters its hormone binding properties.
EMBO J.
8:1981-1986[Medline].
|
| 79.
|
Tora, L.,
J. White,
C. Brou,
D. Tasset,
N. Webster,
E. Scheer, and P. Chambon.
1989.
The human estrogen receptor has two independent nonacidic transcriptional activation functions.
Cell
59:477-487[Medline].
|
| 80.
|
Tremblay, G. B.,
A. Tremblay,
N. G. Copeland,
D. J. Gilbert,
N. A. Jenkins,
F. Labrie, and V. Giguere.
1997.
Cloning, chromosomal localization and functional analysis of the murine estrogen receptor .
Mol. Endocrinol.
11:353-365[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 81.
|
Tremblay, A.,
G. B. Tremblay,
C. Labrie,
F. Labrie, and V. Giguere.
1998.
EM800, a novel antiestrogen, acts as a pure antagonist of the transcriptional functions of estrogen receptors and .
Endocrinology
139:111-118[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 82.
|
Truss, M., and M. Beato.
1993.
Steroid hormone receptors: interaction with deoxyribonucleic acid and transcription factors.
Endocrine Rev.
14:459-479[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 83.
|
Tsai, M. J., and B. W. O'Malley.
1994.
Molecular mechanisms of action of steroid/thyroid/receptor superfamily members.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
63:451-486[Medline].
|
| 84.
|
Webster, N. J. G.,
S. Green,
J. R. Jin, and P. Chambon.
1988.
The hormone-binding domains of the estrogen and glucocorticoid receptors contain an inducible transcription activation function.
Cell
54:199-207[Medline].
|
| 85.
|
Weis, K. E.,
K. Ekena,
J. A. Thomas,
G. Lazenneac, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen.
1996.
Constitutively active human estrogen receptors containing amino acid substitutions for tyrosine 537 in the receptor protein.
Mol. Endocrinol.
10:1388-1398[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 86.
|
White, R.,
M. Sjoberg,
E. Kalkhoven, and M. G. Parker.
1997.
Ligand-independent activation of the oestrogen receptor by mutation of a conserved tyrosine.
EMBO J.
16:1427-1435[Medline].
|
| 87.
|
Wijnholds, J.,
J. N. J. Philipsen, and G. Ab.
1988.
Tissue-specific and steroid-dependent interaction of transcription factors with the oestrogen-inducible apoVLDL II promoter in vivo.
EMBO J.
7:2757-2763[Medline].
|
| 88.
|
Zhang, Y.,
C. A. Beck,
A. Poletti,
J. P. Clement IV,
P. Prendergast,
T.-Y. Yip,
T. W. Hutchens,
D. P. Edwards, and N. L. Weigel.
1997.
Phosphorylation of human progesterone receptor by cyclin-dependent kinase 2 on three sites that are authentic basal phosphorylation sites in vivo.
Mol. Endocrinol.
11:823-832[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 1999, p. 1002-1015, Vol. 19, No. 2
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Pondugula, S. R., Brimer-Cline, C., Wu, J., Schuetz, E. G., Tyagi, R. K., Chen, T.
(2009). A Phosphomimetic Mutation at Threonine-57 Abolishes Transactivation Activity and Alters Nuclear Localization Pattern of Human Pregnane X Receptor. Drug Metab. Dispos.
37: 719-730
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Atsriku, C., Britton, D. J., Held, J. M., Schilling, B., Scott, G. K., Gibson, B. W., Benz, C. C., Baldwin, M. A.
(2009). Systematic Mapping of Posttranslational Modifications in Human Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} with Emphasis on Novel Phosphorylation Sites. Mol. Cell. Proteomics
8: 467-480
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Weigel, N. L., Moore, N. L.
(2007). Steroid Receptor Phosphorylation: A Key Modulator of Multiple Receptor Functions. Mol. Endocrinol.
21: 2311-2319
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sun, K., Montana, V., Chellappa, K., Brelivet, Y., Moras, D., Maeda, Y., Parpura, V., Paschal, B. M., Sladek, F. M.
(2007). Phosphorylation of a Conserved Serine in the Deoxyribonucleic Acid Binding Domain of Nuclear Receptors Alters Intracellular Localization. Mol. Endocrinol.
21: 1297-1311
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zwart, W., Griekspoor, A., Rondaij, M., Verwoerd, D., Neefjes, J., Michalides, R.
(2007). Classification of anti-estrogens according to intramolecular FRET effects on phospho-mutants of estrogen receptor {alpha}. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
6: 1526-1533
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yamamoto, T., Shimano, H., Inoue, N., Nakagawa, Y., Matsuzaka, T., Takahashi, A., Yahagi, N., Sone, H., Suzuki, H., Toyoshima, H., Yamada, N.
(2007). Protein Kinase A Suppresses Sterol Regulatory Element-binding Protein-1C Expression via Phosphorylation of Liver X Receptor in the Liver. J. Biol. Chem.
282: 11687-11695
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sanchez, M., Sauve, K., Picard, N., Tremblay, A.
(2007). The Hormonal Response of Estrogen Receptor beta Is Decreased by the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt Pathway via a Phosphorylation-dependent Release of CREB-binding Protein. J. Biol. Chem.
282: 4830-4840
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Vasudevan, N., Pfaff, D. W.
(2007). Membrane-Initiated Actions of Estrogens in Neuroendocrinology: Emerging Principles. Endocr. Rev.
28: 1-19
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Al-Dhaheri, M. H., Rowan, B. G.
(2007). Protein Kinase A Exhibits Selective Modulation of Estradiol-Dependent Transcription in Breast Cancer Cells that Is Associated with Decreased Ligand Binding, Altered Estrogen Receptor {alpha} Promoter Interaction, and Changes in Receptor Phosphorylation. Mol. Endocrinol.
21: 439-456
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Medina, F. A., de Almeida, C. J., Dew, E., Li, J., Bonuccelli, G., Williams, T. M., Cohen, A. W., Pestell, R. G., Frank, P. G., Tanowitz, H. B., Lisanti, M. P.
(2006). Caveolin-1-Deficient Mice Show Defects in Innate Immunity and Inflammatory Immune Response during Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Infection. Infect. Immun.
74: 6665-6674
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Likhite, V. S., Stossi, F., Kim, K., Katzenellenbogen, B. S., Katzenellenbogen, J. A.
(2006). Kinase-Specific Phosphorylation of the Estrogen Receptor Changes Receptor Interactions with Ligand, Deoxyribonucleic Acid, and Coregulators Associated with Alterations in Estrogen and Tamoxifen Activity. Mol. Endocrinol.
20: 3120-3132
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lucey, M. J., Chen, D., Lopez-Garcia, J., Hart, S. M., Phoenix, F., Al-Jehani, R., Alao, J. P., White, R., Kindle, K. B., Losson, R., Chambon, P., Parker, M. G., Schar, P., Heery, D. M., Buluwela, L., Ali, S.
(2005). T:G mismatch-specific thymine-DNA glycosylase (TDG) as a coregulator of transcription interacts with SRC1 family members through a novel tyrosine repeat motif. Nucleic Acids Res
33: 6393-6404
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Boerner, J. L., Gibson, M. A., Fox, E. M., Posner, E. D., Parsons, S. J., Silva, C. M., Shupnik, M. A.
(2005). Estrogen Negatively Regulates Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF)-Mediated Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 5 Signaling in Human EGF Family Receptor-Overexpressing Breast Cancer Cells. Mol. Endocrinol.
19: 2660-2670
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cui, X., Schiff, R., Arpino, G., Osborne, C. K., Lee, A. V.
(2005). Biology of Progesterone Receptor Loss in Breast Cancer and Its Implications for Endocrine Therapy. JCO
23: 7721-7735
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zheng, F. F., Wu, R.-C., Smith, C. L., O'Malley, B. W.
(2005). Rapid Estrogen-Induced Phosphorylation of the SRC-3 Coactivator Occurs in an Extranuclear Complex Containing Estrogen Receptor. Mol. Cell. Biol.
25: 8273-8284
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Donald, J. E., Shakhnovich, E. I.
(2005). Predicting specificity-determining residues in two large eukaryotic transcription factor families. Nucleic Acids Res
33: 4455-4465
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhao, X., Lorenc, H., Stephenson, H., Wang, Y. J., Witherspoon, D., Katzenellenbogen, B., Pfaff, D., Vasudevan, N.
(2005). Thyroid hormone can increase estrogen-mediated transcription from a consensus estrogen response element in neuroblastoma cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
102: 4890-4895
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bryant, W., Snowhite, A. E., Rice, L. W., Shupnik, M. A.
(2005). The Estrogen Receptor (ER){alpha} Variant {Delta}5 Exhibits Dominant Positive Activity on ER-Regulated Promoters in Endometrial Carcinoma Cells. Endocrinology
146: 751-759
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cui, Y., Zhang, M., Pestell, R., Curran, E. M., Welshons, W. V., Fuqua, S. A. W.
(2004). Phosphorylation of Estrogen Receptor {alpha} Blocks Its Acetylation and Regulates Estrogen Sensitivity. Cancer Res.
64: 9199-9208
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Herynk, M. H., Fuqua, S. A. W.
(2004). Estrogen Receptor Mutations in Human Disease. Endocr. Rev.
25: 869-898
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lauber, S. N., Ali, S., Gooderham, N. J.
(2004). The cooked food derived carcinogen 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b] pyridine is a potent oestrogen: a mechanistic basis for its tissue-specific carcinogenicity. Carcinogenesis
25: 2509-2517
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tsai, H.-W., Katzenellenbogen, J. A., Katzenellenbogen, B. S., Shupnik, M. A.
(2004). Protein Kinase A Activation of Estrogen Receptor {alpha} Transcription Does Not Require Proteasome Activity and Protects the Receptor from Ligand-Mediated Degradation. Endocrinology
145: 2730-2738
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ikeda, K., Ogawa, S., Tsukui, T., Horie-Inoue, K., Ouchi, Y., Kato, S., Muramatsu, M., Inoue, S.
(2004). Protein Phosphatase 5 Is a Negative Regulator of Estrogen Receptor-Mediated Transcription. Mol. Endocrinol.
18: 1131-1143
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tujague, M., Thomsen, J. S., Mizuki, K., Sadek, C. M., Gustafsson, J.-A.
(2004). The Focal Adhesion Protein Vinexin {alpha} Regulates the Phosphorylation and Activity of Estrogen Receptor {alpha}. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 9255-9263
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Blaustein, J. D.
(2004). Minireview: Neuronal Steroid Hormone Receptors: They're Not Just for Hormones Anymore. Endocrinology
145: 1075-1081
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Leong, H., Riby, J. E., Firestone, G. L., Bjeldanes, L. F.
(2004). Potent Ligand-Independent Estrogen Receptor Activation by 3,3'-Diindolylmethane Is Mediated by Cross Talk between the Protein Kinase A and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Pathways. Mol. Endocrinol.
18: 291-302
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chen, D., Lucey, M. J., Phoenix, F., Lopez-Garcia, J., Hart, S. M., Losson, R., Buluwela, L., Coombes, R. C., Chambon, P., Schar, P., Ali, S.
(2003). T:G Mismatch-specific Thymine-DNA Glycosylase Potentiates Transcription of Estrogen-regulated Genes through Direct Interaction with Estrogen Receptor {alpha}. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 38586-38592
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Martin, L.-A., Farmer, I., Johnston, S. R. D., Ali, S., Marshall, C., Dowsett, M.
(2003). Enhanced Estrogen Receptor (ER) {alpha}, ERBB2, and MAPK Signal Transduction Pathways Operate during the Adaptation of MCF-7 Cells to Long Term Estrogen Deprivation. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 30458-30468
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bjornstrom, L., Sjoberg, M.
(2002). Mutations in the Estrogen Receptor DNA-binding Domain Discriminate between the Classical Mechanism of Action and Cross-talk with Stat5b and Activating Protein 1 (AP-1). J. Biol. Chem.
277: 48479-48483
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Du, X.-J.
(2002). Clues to understanding the role of estrogen receptors in mediating cardiovascular protection. Cardiovasc Res
56: 4-7
[Full Text]
-
Lee, H., Bai, W.
(2002). Regulation of Estrogen Receptor Nuclear Export by Ligand-Induced and p38-Mediated Receptor Phosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Biol.
22: 5835-5845
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gay, F., Barath, P., Desbois-Le Peron, C., Metivier, R., Le Guevel, R., Birse, D., Salbert, G.
(2002). Multiple Phosphorylation Events Control Chicken Ovalbumin Upstream Promoter Transcription Factor I Orphan Nuclear Receptor Activity. Mol. Endocrinol.
16: 1332-1351
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Song, R. X.-D., McPherson, R. A., Adam, L., Bao, Y., Shupnik, M., Kumar, R., Santen, R. J.
(2002). Linkage of Rapid Estrogen Action to MAPK Activation by ER{alpha}-Shc Association and Shc Pathway Activation. Mol. Endocrinol.
16: 116-127
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nilsson, S., Makela, S., Treuter, E., Tujague, M., Thomsen, J., Andersson, G., Enmark, E., Pettersson, K., Warner, M., Gustafsson, J.-A.
(2001). Mechanisms of Estrogen Action. Physiol. Rev.
81: 1535-1565
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Demay, F., De Monti, M., Tiffoche, C., Vaillant, C., Thieulant, M. L.
(2001). Steroid-Independent Activation of ER by GnRH in Gonadotrope Pituitary Cells. Endocrinology
142: 3340-3347
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schreihofer, D. A., Resnick, E. M., Lin, V. Y., Shupnik, M. A.
(2001). Ligand-Independent Activation of Pituitary ER: Dependence on PKA-Stimulated Pathways. Endocrinology
142: 3361-3368
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sun, M., Paciga, J. E., Feldman, R. I., Yuan, Z.-q., Coppola, D., Lu, Y. Y., Shelley, S. A., Nicosia, S. V., Cheng, J. Q.
(2001). Phosphatidylinositol-3-OH Kinase (PI3K)/AKT2, Activated in Breast Cancer, Regulates and Is Induced by Estrogen Receptor {alpha} (ER{alpha}) via Interaction between ER{alpha} and PI3K. Cancer Res.
61: 5985-5991
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Klinge, C. M.
(2001). Estrogen receptor interaction with estrogen response elements. Nucleic Acids Res
29: 2905-2919
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Vigushin, D. M., Ali, S., Pace, P. E., Mirsaidi, N., Ito, K., Adcock, I., Coombes, R. C.
(2001). Trichostatin A Is a Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor with Potent Antitumor Activity against Breast Cancer in Vivo. Clin. Cancer Res.
7: 971-976
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lu, D., Giguere, V.
(2001). Requirement of Ras-Dependent Pathways for Activation of the Transforming Growth Factor {beta}3 Promoter by Estradiol. Endocrinology
142: 751-759
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lamb, J., Ladha, M. H., McMahon, C., Sutherland, R. L., Ewen, M. E.
(2000). Regulation of the Functional Interaction between Cyclin D1 and the Estrogen Receptor. Mol. Cell. Biol.
20: 8667-8675
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lazennec, G., Canaple, L., Saugy, D., Wahli, W.
(2000). Activation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (PPARs) by Their Ligands and Protein Kinase A Activators. Mol. Endocrinol.
14: 1962-1975
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Laxminarayana, D., Kammer, G. M.
(2000). mRNA mutations of type I protein kinase A regulatory subunit {alpha} in T lymphocytes of a subject with systemic lupus erythematosus. Int Immunol
12: 1521-1529
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Doucas, V., Shi, Y., Miyamoto, S., West, A., Verma, I., Evans, R. M.
(2000). Cytoplasmic catalytic subunit of protein kinase A mediates cross-repression by NF-kappa B and the glucocorticoid receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
10.1073/pnas.220413297v1
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mishra, N., Khan, I. U., Tsokos, G. C., Kammer, G. M.
(2000). Association of Deficient Type II Protein Kinase A Activity with Aberrant Nuclear Translocation of the RII{beta} Subunit in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus T Lymphocytes. J. Immunol.
165: 2830-2840
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Resnick, E. M., Schreihofer, D. A., Periasamy, A., Shupnik, M. A.
(2000). Truncated Estrogen Receptor Product-1 Suppresses Estrogen Receptor Transactivation by Dimerization with Estrogen Receptors alpha and beta. J. Biol. Chem.
275: 7158-7166
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lobenhofer, E. K., Huper, G., Iglehart, J. D., Marks, J. R.
(2000). Inhibition of Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Activity in MCF-7 Cells Prevents Estrogen-induced Mitogenesis. Cell Growth Differ.
11: 99-110
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Duan, R., Xie, W., Burghardt, R. C., Safe, S.
(2001). Estrogen Receptor-mediated Activation of the Serum Response Element in MCF-7 Cells through MAPK-dependent Phosphorylation of Elk-1. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 11590-11598
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hansen, J. B., Zhang, H., Rasmussen, T. H., Petersen, R. K., Flindt, E. N., Kristiansen, K.
(2001). Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor delta (PPARdelta )-mediated Regulation of Preadipocyte Proliferation and Gene Expression Is Dependent on cAMP Signaling. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 3175-3182
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cheng, X., Hart, G. W.
(2001). Alternative O-Glycosylation/O-Phosphorylation of Serine-16 in Murine Estrogen Receptor beta . POST-TRANSLATIONAL REGULATION OF TURNOVER AND TRANSACTIVATION ACTIVITY. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 10570-10575
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Doucas, V., Shi, Y., Miyamoto, S., West, A., Verma, I., Evans, R. M.
(2000). Cytoplasmic catalytic subunit of protein kinase A mediates cross-repression by NF-kappa B and the glucocorticoid receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97: 11893-11898
[Abstract]
[Full Text]