Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 1999, p. 1002-1015, Vol. 19, No. 2
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
by
Protein Kinase A Regulates Dimerization
CRC Laboratories, Department of Cancer Medicine, Division of Medicine, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London W6 8RP, United Kingdom
Received 18 September 1998/Accepted 29 October 1998
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Phosphorylation provides an important mechanism by which
transcription factor activity is regulated. Estrogen receptor
(ER
) is phosphorylated on multiple sites, and stimulation of a
number of growth factor receptors and/or protein kinases leads to
ligand-independent and/or synergistic increase in transcriptional
activation by ER
in the presence of estrogen. Here we show that
ER
is phosphorylated by protein kinase A (PKA) on serine-236 within
the DNA binding domain. Mutation of serine-236 to glutamic acid
prevents DNA binding by inhibiting dimerization by ER
, whereas
mutation to alanine has little effect on DNA binding or dimerization.
Furthermore, PKA overexpression or activation of endogenous PKA
inhibits dimerization in the absence of ligand. This inhibition is
overcome by the addition of 17
-estradiol or the partial agonist
4-hydroxy tamoxifen. Interestingly, treatment with the complete
antagonist ICI 182,780 does not overcome the inhibitory effect of PKA
activation. Our results indicate that in the absence of ligand ER
forms dimers through interaction between DNA binding domains and
that dimerization mediated by the ligand binding domain only
occurs upon ligand binding but that the complete antagonist ICI 182,780 prevents dimerization through the ligand-binding domain.
Heterodimer formation between ER
and ER
is similarly affected by
PKA phosphorylation of serine 236 of ER
. However, 4-hydroxytamoxifen
is unable to overcome inhibition of dimerization by PKA. Thus,
phosphorylation of ER
in the DNA binding domain provides a mechanism
by which dimerization and thereby DNA binding by the estrogen receptor
is regulated.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Estrogen receptor
(ER
)
mediates the effects of estrogens on cell growth and differentiation.
ER
is a member of a superfamily of transcription factors that
includes receptors for steroid (androgen, ecdysone, glucocorticoid,
mineralocorticoid, estrogen, and progesterone) and thyroid hormones;
vitamin D3; retinoic acid; and peroxisome proliferator-,
farnesoid-, and arachidonic acid-activated receptors, as well as
"orphan" receptors for which no ligands have as yet been
identified. These receptors are characterized by highly conserved DNA
and ligand-binding domains (LBDs) and regulate transcription by binding
to cis-acting enhancer elements in promoters of responsive genes as monomers or as homo- or heterodimers (12, 13, 55, 56,
83). Comparison of the amino acid sequences of ER
from different species shows that the sequences can be divided into six
regions, A to F, on the basis of differing amino acid sequence homologies (49). This division can be extended to all other members of the nuclear receptor superfamily. Region C encodes two zinc
fingers comprising the DNA-binding domain (DBD). A region N-terminal to
the DBD (regions A/B) contains a transcription activation function
(AF-1) which can act in a ligand-independent manner when isolated from
the LBD. The LBD (region E) contains a ligand-dependent transcription
activation function (AF-2). AF-1 and AF-2 activate transcription
independently and synergistically and act in a promoter- and
cell-specific manner (14, 50-52, 79, 84). Antiestrogens such as tamoxifen and ICI 164,384 antagonize the effects of estrogens by competing with estrogen for binding to ER
. Tamoxifen or its derivative 4-hydroxytamoxifen is a partial antagonist; it inhibits transcriptional activation by AF-2 but enables transcription through AF-1 (14, 58, 59). ICI 164,384, on the other hand, is a complete antagonist which inhibits transcriptional activation by both
AF-1 and AF-2 (57, 60). No known antiestrogens prevent DNA
binding by hER
, although ICI 164,384 treatment reduces the half-life
of ER
(24, 29, 71) and results in the progressive loss of
ER
from the nucleus (23). Furthermore, in vivo or in vitro treatment with ICI 164,384 results in a loss in the ability of
hER
to bind DNA in vitro at elevated temperatures through a
mechanism which is at present unclear (60).
Phosphorylation is a common covalent modification of proteins which
provides an important mechanism by which the activity of transcription
factors is regulated. Cell surface receptors for polypeptide hormones,
cytokines, etc., stimulate signal transduction pathways, leading to
phosphorylation and/or dephosphorylation of substrate proteins,
including transcription factors (40, 43, 46). The steroid
receptors for androgen, glucocorticoids and progesterone, the vitamin
D3 receptor, c- and v-erbA, the retinoic acid receptors,
and NGFI-B (Nur77) have all been shown to be phosphoproteins.
Phosphorylation of these receptors is often ligand induced, although
constitutive phosphorylation sites are frequently present in vivo
(10, 12, 82, 83), and modulation of the activity of some of
these receptors by phosphorylation has been demonstrated. The
c-erbA-encoded thyroid hormone receptor and its homologue, v-erbA,
found in the genome of the avian erythroblastosis virus, are
phosphorylated by protein kinase A (PKA) and PKC (32). Mutation of the PKA and PKC phosphorylation sites abolishes the ability
of v-erbA to inhibit erythroid differentiation (31). Modulation of transcriptional activation of the vitamin D3
(36, 37) and progesterone receptors (e.g., see references
11 and 77) by phosphorylation has
been demonstrated, whereas phosphorylation of the glucocorticoid
receptor appears to be important for nuclear translocation and for cell
cycle regulation of its activity (for a review and additional
references, see references 25, 38, and
39). The involvement of cell cycle-dependent kinases
in regulating nuclear receptor function has recently been described for
the progesterone receptor, which is phosphorylated by cdk2 (88). Retinoic acid receptor
is phosphorylated by cdk7,
the kinase activity associated with the basal transcription factor TFIIH, the consequence of which is increased transcriptional activation (72).
The possible importance of phosphorylation for ER
function was
indicated by the finding that dopamine can activate ER
in the
absence of ligand (69). Other groups have since shown that epidermal growth factor, heregulin, insulin, and the insulin-like growth factor TGF
, as well as cyclic AMP (cAMP) and phorbol esters, can also activate ER
(9, 19, 41, 54, 61, 64, and 68).
Phosphorylation of ER
on serine 104 and/or serine 106, serines 118 and 167, and on tyrosine 537 has been demonstrated by using deletional
or point mutation analyses (1, 20, 44, 53) or by
purification and high-pressure liquid chromatography analysis
(3-6). Mutation of serine 118 to alanine reduces its transcriptional activation ability (1, 53). Phosphorylation of human ER
at serine 118 is mediated by the RAS/MAPK pathway (19, 47); activation of the MAPK pathway enables
ligand-independent transactivation by human ER
(19).
Mutation of tyrosine 537 (tyrosine 541 of mouse ER
) enables,
variously, ligand-independent transcriptional activation (85,
86) or altered sensitivity to estrogen, and it affects DNA
binding and dimerization (7, 8, 20). Phosphorylation of
ER
by casein kinase II and pp90rsk1 on serine 167 in
vitro has also been demonstrated (3, 45), while tyrosine 537 is phosphorylatable by members of the Src family of tyrosine kinases in
vitro (6).
Several studies have shown that upregulation of PKA activity results in
ligand-independent activation of ER
(see references 9 and 19), as well as increased
phosphorylation (21, 42, 53). We decided to investigate the
mechanisms underlying PKA regulation of ER
activity. In vitro
phosphorylation of human ER
(hER
) by PKA indicated the presence
of at least two phosphorylation sites. Examination of the hER
amino
acid sequence showed that there are two potential PKA phosphorylation
sites, one within the DBD (serine 236) and a second at the N-terminal
boundary of region E (serine 305) (53). Mutation of serine
236 gave reduced phosphorylation by PKA in vitro and in vivo. We
further show that mutation of serine 236 to glutamic acid, but not to
alanine, dramatically reduced hER
dimerization in the absence of
ligand or in the presence of ICI 182,780 but had little effect on
dimerization in the presence of estrogen or 4-hydroxytamoxifen.
Stimulation of PKA activity also led to the inhibition of ER
dimerization in the absence or in the presence of ICI 182,780 but not
in the presence of estrogen or 4-hydroxytamoxifen.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recombinants.
The expression vector pSG5 and constructs
expressing human ER
(HEG0), deletion mutants expressing N- or
C-terminal portions of hER
(HE15 and HEG19), GAL-VP16, and hER
containing the FLAG epitope at the N terminus (hER
1) have been
described previously (33, 63, 78, 79), as has pSG5-PKA
(73). Site-directed mutagenesis of serine 236 to alanine,
glutamic acid, and threonine was performed for HEG0, HE15, and HEG19 by
using oligonucleotides with the sequences
5'-AAAAACAGGAGGAAGGCCTGCCAGGCGTGTCGGCTC-3', 5'-AAAAACAGGAGGAAGGAGTGCCAGGCGTGTCGGCTC-3',
and
5'-AAAAACAGGAGGAAGACCTGCCAGGCGTGTCGGCTC-3', respectively, where changes from the wild-type hER
sequence
are underlined. Positive clones were identified by loss of
StuI and NaeI sites and confirmed by sequencing.
The ERE-driven chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene reporter
plasmids have all previously been described (14, 79, 84).
In vitro synthesis of hER
and hER
polypeptides.
pSG5,
HEG0, mutants in which the serine 236 has been altered, and hER
1
were linearized with SalI. RNA was synthesised with 10 µg
of linearized DNA template by using T7 RNA polymerase according to the
manufacturer's protocol (Promega). The RNA synthesized was quantified
by spectroscopy at A260/280. Then 5 µg of the
synthesized RNA was translated in the presence of
35S-labeled methionine (Amersham International) with rabbit
reticulocyte lysate in a final volume of 50 µl according to
manufacturer's protocols (Promega). The synthesized proteins were
analyzed by fractionation by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-10%
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE); the gels were then dried and autoradiographed.
Cell transfection, in vivo labeling, and extraction. COS-1 cells were maintained in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum (FCS). Cells were plated in 9-cm petri dishes 16 to 24 h prior to transfection by the calcium phosphate coprecipitation technique with 5 µg of each expression plasmid, made up to a total of 20 µg of DNA with human placental DNA as the carrier. The precipitate was removed 16 h after transfection by a washing in DMEM supplemented with 5% FCS. The cells were harvested after a further 48 h. For experiments in which E2 or antiestrogens were added, the cells were cultured in DMEM without phenol red but supplemented with 5% dextran-coated charcoal-treated FCS (15). Ligands (E2, 10 nM; OHT, 100 nM; ICI, 100 nM), prepared in ethanol, were added 2 h before harvesting. The PKA activators 8-bromo-cAMP (8-Br-cAMP; 100 nM) and the PKA inhibitor H89 (150 nM final) were added at the same time as E2 or the antiestrogens.
For harvesting, transfected cells were washed with chilled phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), harvested in PBS, pelleted, and resuspended in HS buffer (400 mM KCl; 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 2 mM dithiothreitol (DTT); 20% glycerol [vol/vol]; 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF]; protease inhibitor cocktail [2.5 µg each of leupeptin, pepstatin, chymostatin, antipain, and aprotinin per ml]). Whole-cell extracts (WCE) were prepared by three cycles of freezing (
80°C) and thawing (0°C), and centrifugation
was done at 10,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C. The
supernatants were stored at
80°C. The protein concentrations of the
WCE were determined with the Bio-Rad protein assay kit (Bio-Rad).
For in vivo labeling with [35S]methionine transient
transfections were carried out as described above. Cells were starved
for 20 min in DMEM without phenol red or methionine but containing 5%
dialyzed and charcoal-stripped FCS, followed by the addition of 150 µCi of 35S-labeled methionine and ligands. Cells were
harvested after 1 h in high salt buffer.
For in vivo 32P-labeling of transfected cells, the medium
was replaced with phosphate-free DMEM supplemented with 5% dialyzed FCS 64 h after transfection. After 4 h in the absence of
phosphate, 1 mCi of [32P]orthophosphate (Amersham
International) was added. The cells were labeled for 1 h,
harvested, and processed as described above. 8-Br-cAMP (100 nM) was
added at the same time as the [32P]orthophosphate.
Immunoprecipitations. Immunoprecipitations of in vitro translation products or in vivo 35S- or 32P-labeled cell extracts were carried out with 500 µg of protein from WCEs or 50 µl of in vitro translation products; these were added to 1 ml of buffer A (1% Triton X-100; 400 mM NaCl; 1 mM DTT; 40 mM Tris-acetate, pH 7.5; 0.18 mg of PMSF per ml; 1.25 µg each of leupeptin, aprotinin, pepstatin, antitrypsin and chymostatin per ml). The samples were rotated at 4°C for 45 min with 2 mg of protein A-Sepharose, followed by incubation with 2 µg of B10, F3 (2), or M2 (IBI) monoclonal antibodies and incubation at 4°C for 30 min, when 2 µg of rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG; Sigma, UK) was added and a further incubation at 4°C for 30 min was carried out. Then 2 mg of protein A-Sepharose was added, and the samples were rotated at 4°C for 45 min, followed by four washes with buffer A containing 0.2% SDS. The retained complexes were resolved by SDS-PAGE. The gels were either dried for autoradiography or transferred to nitrocellulose, and immunoblotting was performed prior to autoradiography. For in vitro kinase assays, the immunoprecipitates were processed as described below.
In vitro protein kinase assays.
Immunoprecipitates were
washed twice with PKA buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2; 6.25 mM
MgCl2) or with PKC buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2; 6.25 mM
MgCl2; 0.625 mM CaCl2). PKA reactions were
carried out in a total volume of 50 µl of PKA buffer containing 25 mM [
-32P]ATP (specific activity, 1.5 Ci/mmol) and 2 µg/ml of the catalytic subunit of PKA (Promega) at 30°C for 30 min.
PKC reactions were performed according to manufacturer's protocols
(Promega). Two washes with 1 ml of the PKA or PKC buffer were carried
out after labeling, and the samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE; the gels were then dried and autoradiographed.
-mercaptoethanol and 0.1% SDS for 16 to 20 h, followed by
precipitation with trichloroacetic acid, oxidation with performic acid,
and digestion with 10 µg of TPCK (tolylsulfonyl phenylalanyl chloromethyl ketone)-treated trypsin (Sigma) for 8 h at 37°C and a further 8-h digestion with a second 10 µg of trypsin. After three
lyophilization steps, the pelleted peptides were resolved in the first
dimension by electrophoresis in pH 1.9 buffer (formic acid-glacial
acetic acid-water [1:3.1:35.9]) at 1.5 kV for 25 min and in the
second dimension by chromatography in pH 7.42 buffer (n-butanol-pyridine-glacial acetic acid-water
[5:3.3:1:4]). Phosphopeptides were visualized by autoradiography.
Immunoblot analysis.
WCEs were fractionated by SDS-10%
PAGE, and immunodetection was performed with monoclonal antibodies B10
or F3 directed against regions B and F, respectively, to detect hER
(2), except that immunodetection was carried out by
incubation with alkaline phosphatase-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG and
revelation with BCIP/NTB (Promega). For detection of hER
1, blots
were incubated with M2 monoclonal antibody (IBI) at 1 µg/ml for
2 h at room temperature, followed by three 15-min washes with
0.05% Tween 20-PBS. The immunoblots were then incubated with alkaline
phosphatase-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG for 2 h at room
temperature; this was followed by further washing and revelation with
BCIP/NTB.
Gel retardation and shift assay. Gel shift assays (15 µl) contained 1 to 10 µg of WCE, 2.0 µg of poly(dI-dC), and 20,000 cpm of 5'-32P-end-labeled double-stranded estrogen response element (ERE; 5'-TCGAGCAAAGTCAGGTCACAGTGACCTGATCAAT-3') in 80 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.5 mM DTT, 5% glycerol (vol/vol), 0.5 mM PMSF, and protease inhibitor cocktail (1.25 µg each of leupeptin, pepstatin, chymostatin, antipain, and aprotinin per ml). The mixtures were preincubated at 4°C for 15 min, followed by addition of ERE and incubation at 25°C for 15 min. Receptor-DNA complexes were separated on 5% polyacrylamide gels (30% acrylamide and 1% bisacrylamide, containing 0.5× TBE). Gels were electrophoresed in 0.5× TBE at 150 V and dried before autoradiography.
-Galactosidase and CAT assays.
COS-1 cells were
maintained as described above, split into 9-cm plates in DMEM without
phenol red, supplemented with 5% dextran-coated charcoal-stripped FCS,
and transfected by the calcium phosphate coprecipitation technique
(78). The cells were transfected with 2 µg of the CAT
reporter gene, along with 0.5 µg of the
-galactosidase reference
plasmid pCH110 (Pharmacia) and 0.5 µg of pSG5, HEG0, HEG0236A, or HEG0236E expression plasmids,
together with 1 µg of pSG5-PKA and 10 ng of GAL-VP16 where
appropriate. Bluescribe vector M13+ DNA (BSM+; Stratagene) was used as
a carrier DNA to make a total of 20 µg of DNA. Ligands (E2, 10 nM;
OHT, 100 nM; ICI, 100 nM), prepared in ethanol, were added 30 min after
the addition of the precipitates. The precipitates were removed 16 h after transfection by a washing in DMEM without phenol red but
supplemented with 5% dextran-coated charcoal-stripped FCS, and fresh
ligands were added. Cells were harvested after a further 24 h in
100 µl of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), and extracts were prepared by
freeze-thaw three cycles and centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C.
-Galactosidase and CAT assays were
performed as described previously (1).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Serine 236 of hER
is phosphorylated by PKA.
Previous
studies have indicated that phosphorylation of hER
is increased by
the activation of PKA (see references 21 and 53). In order to directly determine whether PKA can
phosphorylate hER
in vitro, we transfected COS-1 cells with an
expression vector (pSG5) containing the open reading frame encoding
hER
(HEG0). At 48 h after transfection the cells were
harvested, WCEs were prepared, and 100 µg of the WCEs were
immunoprecipitated with monoclonal antibody F3. Immunoprecipitates were
incubated with the purified catalytic subunit of PKA in the presence of
[
-32P]ATP, followed by resolution by SDS-PAGE and
autoradiography. Incubation of the immunoprecipitates with PKA resulted
in phosphorylation of HEG0 (Fig. 2A, lane 2).
deletion mutants lacking either the N-terminal A/B region
(HEG19) or the LBD and region F (HE15) (Fig.
1A) were transfected into COS-1 cells,
and WCEs were immunoprecipitated with monoclonal antibodies F3 or B10,
respectively, and phosphorylated with the catalytic subunit of PKA.
Both HEG19 and HE15 were phosphorylated by PKA in vitro (Fig.
2A, lanes 1 and 3), indicating either
that PKA phosphorylates hER
within or near the DBD and/or that
hER
is phosphorylated by PKA at sites in the A/B region and in the LBD.
|
|
showed that two serine
residues, serine 236 (NRRKSC) in the DBD (Fig. 1B) and serine 305 (SKKNSL) in the LBD could be potential PKA
phosphorylation sites (53). Only one of these sites (serine
236) is present in both HE15 and HEG19 and was mutated to the
nonphosphorylatable residue alanine. Immunoprecipitates were incubated
with PKA as described above, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to
nitrocellulose. Immunoblotting with B10 was performed to compare levels
of HE15 and HE15236A protein, and autoradiography of the
nitrocellulose membrane showed levels of phosphorylation.
HE15236A was phosphorylated to a lower level than HE15,
indicating that serine 236 is a substrate for PKA in vitro (Fig. 2B).
HE15 was also phosphorylatable by PKC in vitro, albeit to a much lower degree. HE15 and HE15236A were phosphorylated to a similar
extent by PKC (Fig. 2B, lanes 5 and 6, and data not shown). No signal
was obtained when PKA or PKC were omitted from the kinase assay (data
not shown).
Two-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping of in vitro-phosphorylated
immunoprecipitates showed the absence of three spots (dotted) from
HE15236A (Fig. 2D) compared with HE15 (Fig. 2C), indicating
that serine 236 is phosphorylated by PKA in vitro. The two strong spots
in both the HE15 and HE15236A phosphopeptide maps suggest
the presence of at least one other major PKA site resides within amino
acids 1 to 281 of hER
(HE15).
We next examined the ability of PKA to alter the phosphorylated
state of wild-type hER
(HEG0) in vivo. COS-1 cells
transiently transfected with HEG0 were labelled with
[32P]orthophosphate and subjected to
immunoprecipitation, SDS-PAGE, and autoradiography. Immunoblotting with
monoclonal antibody B10 was used to control for equivalent levels of ER
protein (Fig. 2E). A single band at 67 kDa in HEG0- but not in
pSG5-transfected cells shows that hER
is phosphorylated in untreated
cells (Fig. 2E, lanes 1 and 2). Cotransfection of pSG5-PKA resulted in
a 5.6-fold increase in the intensity of the phosphorylated band (lane
3). 8-Br-cAMP treatment similarly increased hER
phosphorylation
3.65-fold (lane 6). HEG0236A was phosphorylated to a lower
extent than was HEG0 (lane 4), and cotransfection of pSG5-PKA (lane 5)
or the addition of 8-Br-cAMP (lane 7) resulted in lower increases (2.7- and 1.44-fold, respectively) in phosphorylation intensities compared to
HEG0; 2.0- and 2.5-fold-lower signals were obtained for
HEG0236A than for HEG0 with pSG5-PKA and 8-Br-cAMP, respectively.
Comparison of in vitro DNA binding by wild-type and mutant
hER
.
Since serine 236 lies within the second zinc finger (CII)
of the DBD (Fig. 1B) we wished to investigate the effect of its mutation on DNA binding by hER
. The mutants in which serine 236 was
replaced by alanine in HEG0, HE15, and HEG19 were used to investigate
DNA binding when phosphorylation at this position is prevented.
Mutants in which serine 236 of HEG0, HE15, and HEG19 were replaced by
glutamic acid were also created in order to examine the effect of
a "constitutive" negative charge at this position. As PKA
is a serine-threonine kinase, serine 236 was also mutated to threonine.
.
|
, COS-1 cells grown in DMEM lacking phenol red and containing 5% charcoal-stripped FCS were transfected with HEG0, HEG0236A, or HEG0236E, and
ligands were added 1 h prior to harvesting. No differences in DNA
binding were observed between HEG0 and HEG0236A in the
absence of ligand or in the presence of 17
-estradiol (E2), the
partial agonist 4-hydroxytamoxifen (OHT), or the complete antagonist
ICI 182,780 (ICI) (Fig. 3B lanes 2 to 9). As described above (Fig. 3A),
little binding was evident for HEG0236E in the absence of
ligand (Fig. 3B, lane 10). In the presence of E2 and OHT, however, some
DNA binding was seen (lanes 11 and 12), although no DNA binding was
observed with ICI (lane 13), suggesting that the inhibition of DNA
binding can be prevented, at least partially, by some ligands. Again,
immunoblotting was used to control for levels of protein and
degradation (Fig. 3B, lower panel).
In order to demonstrate that the apparent inhibition of DNA binding is
due to phosphorylation of serine 236 and to evaluate its ligand
dependence, cells were transfected with HEG0 or HEG0236A,
as well as the expression vector pSG5 containing the open reading frame
encoding the catalytic subunit of PKA (pSG5-PKA) (73). Gel
shifts performed under standard conditions demonstrated that the
overexpression of PKA had little effect on DNA binding by HEG0 in the
presence of E2 or OHT (Fig. 4A, lanes 4 to 7). In the absence of ligand (Fig. 4A, lanes 2 and 3) or in the
presence of ICI (Fig. 4A, lanes 8 and 9), however, in vitro DNA binding was dramatically reduced when HEG0 was cotransfected with pSG5-PKA. No
reduction in DNA binding was observed when HEG0236A was
cotransfected with pSG5-PKA in the presence or absence of any of the
ligands (Fig. 4A, lanes 10 to 17).
|
(Fig. 4A and B, lower panels).
H89 is a specific inhibitor of PKA (35). Treatment with H89
prevented the loss of DNA binding by HEG0, a result observed in the
absence of ligand when PKA was overexpressed (Fig. 4C, compare lanes 2 and 3 with lane 4). The loss of DNA binding observed in the presence of
ICI was also prevented when H89 was added (Fig. 4C, compare lanes 8 and
9 with lane 10). The reduction in DNA binding induced by 8-Br-cAMP was
similarly prevented by H89 (Fig. 4D). There was no effect of H89 on the
DNA binding by HEG0 in the presence of E2 or OHT (Fig. 4C and 4D, lanes
5 to 8) or on the DNA binding by HEG0236A in the absence of
ligand or in the presence of E2, OHT, or ICI (Fig. 4C and 4D, lanes 11 to 20).
Replacement of serine 236 by glutamic acid inhibits dimerization by
hER
.
ER
binds DNA as a homodimer or as a heterodimer with
ER
(63). Inability of the receptor to dimerize would
result in the loss of DNA binding. In order to investigate the effect
of the mutation of serine 236 on dimerization, we analyzed the dimeric status of hER
bound in vitro to an ERE by using extracts of COS-1 cells transfected with HEG0 or HEG19 and cotransfected with the mutants
of serine 236. The HEG19-ERE complex migrates faster than the complex
obtained with HEG0 (Fig. 3A; Fig. 5A
compare lanes 2 and 7). A weak lower band observed for HEG0 probably
corresponds to a degradation product (see also Fig. 3 and 4) and has
also previously been observed (60). When coexpressed in
COS-1 cells, an additional complex migrating at a position intermediate
between those observed for HEG0 and HEG19 is observed, corresponding to the binding of HEG0-HEG19 heterodimers (Fig. 5A, lane 3). HEG0 and
either HEG19236A or HEG19236T formed similar
amounts of heterodimer as HEG0 and HEG19 (Fig. 5A, lanes 3 to 5).
Heterodimer formation was similar when HEG0236A or
HEG0236T were cotransfected with HEG19 (Fig. 5A, lanes 8 to
9). When HEG0 was cotransfected with HEG19236E, however, a
complex corresponding to HEG19236E was not observed, nor
was a heterodimeric complex seen while the HEG0 homodimeric
complex was present at levels similar to those seen with HEG0 alone
(Fig. 5A, compare lanes 2 and 6). The reciprocal event was
observed when HEG0236E was cotransfected with HEG19 (Fig.
5A, compare lanes 7 and 10). The fact that the amount of HEG0
and HEG19 complexes observed when cotransfected with
HEG19236E and HEG0236E, respectively, is
similar to levels observed for HEG0 and HEG19 alone suggests that
dimerization is impaired by mutation of serine 236 to glutamic acid.
|
. Immunoprecipitation of
the second half of all of the lysates with F3, which recognizes an
epitope present in both HEG0 and HEG19 (Fig. 1A), was also performed to show that HEG19 and HEG19236E were not absent in lysates in
which they were not coprecipitated with HEG0236E (Fig. 5B,
lanes 8 to 14).
We and others have previously shown that hER
and hER
can
heterodimerize (22, 62, 63, 65). Given the almost complete amino acid sequence identity between hER
and
in the DBD
and their ability to heterodimerize, we investigated whether hER
and
can heterodimerize in solution and whether heterodimerization between hER
and
is impaired by mutation of serine 236 of hER
to glutamic acid. HEG0, HEG0236E, and hER
1 (pSG5
containing the hER
open reading frame with the FLAG tag at the 5'
end, enabling immunodetection with the M2 monoclonal antibody
[63]) were in vitro translated in the presence of
35S-labeled methionine, and immunoprecipitations were
performed with B10 and M2 monoclonal antibodies as shown (Fig. 5C).
Immunoprecipitation of HEG0 with hER
1 by using B10 or M2 resulted in
immunoprecipitation of both polypeptides (Fig. 5C, lanes 2 and 7),
whereas when HEG0236E and hER
1 were immunoprecipitated
with B10 only HEG0236E was seen (Fig. 5C, lane 4).
Immunoprecipitation with M2 resulted in the coprecipitation of HEG0 but
not of HEG0236E with hER
1 (Fig. 5C), indicating that
serine 236 is important for the dimerization of hER
and -
, as
well as for homodimerization of hER
.
Phosphorylation on serine 236 inhibits dimerization by hER
in
the absence of ligand.
E2 and OHT can overcome the inhibitory
effect on DNA binding of mutating serine 236 to glutamic acid or
activation of PKA (Fig. 3 and 4). The gel shift and immunoprecipitation
results described above show that the 236E mutants fail to dimerize
(Fig. 5). In order to determine whether the inhibition of dimerization is overcome by ligand treatment, COS-1 cells were transiently transfected with HEG0 and HEG19 or their respective mutants, either separately or together. The cells were labelled with
[35S]methionine, and WCEs were immunoprecipitated
with B10. Immunoblotting of extracts with F3 established that HEG0
and/or HEG19 (and their mutants) were present in the appropriate
extracts (Fig. 6B, lower panel). In order
to investigate the effects of phosphorylation of serine 236, the cells
were transfected with pSG5 or pSG5-PKA in addition to the ER
constructs.
|
by PKA
inhibits dimerization in vivo in the absence but not in the presence of
E2. In agreement with this, immunoprecipitation of WCEs containing
HEG0236A, HEG19, and pSG5-PKA or containing
HEG0236A, HEG19236A, and pSG5-PKA resulted in
the coprecipitation of HEG19 and HEG19236A, respectively,
in the presence or absence of E2 (Fig. 6A, lanes 10 to 17).
Immunoprecipitation of WCEs from cells transfected with
HEG0236E and HEG19 resulted in coprecipitation of HEG19 in
the presence but not in the absence of E2 (Fig. 6A, lanes 19 and 20).
Similar experiments performed in the presence of OHT or ICI showed that
the PKA-mediated inhibition of dimerization is prevented by OHT (Fig.
6B, lanes 2 and 4). OHT also enabled the dimerization between
HEG0236E and HEG19 (lane 10). The addition of ICI, however,
did not prevent inhibition of dimerization by PKA (Fig. 6B, lanes 3 and
5), nor did HEG0236E and HEG19 dimerize in the presence of
ICI (lane 11).
The importance of ligands for heterodimerization of hER
and -
was
also investigated. COS-1 cells were transiently transfected with HEG0,
HEG0236A, or HEG0236E in the presence or
absence of hER
1 and pSG5-PKA and labeled with
[35S]methionine. The lysates were divided into three
equal fractions, and immunoprecipitations were performed with B10 (Fig.
7A) or M2 (Fig. 7B) monoclonal
antibodies. As expected, hER
1 was coimmunoprecipitated with HEG0 in
the presence or absence of ligand (Fig. 7A, lanes 4 to 7).
Overexpression of the catalytic subunit of PKA (pSG5-PKA), however,
inhibited dimer formation in the absence of ligand (Fig. 7A, lane 8),
and addition of ICI did not prevent the inhibition (Fig. 7A, lane 11),
as found for hER
. Addition of E2 enabled heterodimer formation (Fig.
7A, lane 9). However, whereas the addition of OHT allowed dimerization
between HEG0 and HEG19, dimer formation between HEG0 and hER
1
in the presence of OHT was undetectable when the catalytic
subunit of PKA was overexpressed (Fig. 7A, lane 10). Dimer
formation between HEG0236A and hER
1 was ligand
independent and was not inhibited by PKA (Fig. 7A, lanes 13 to 20).
Furthermore, in contrast to the observations with hER
, no
heterodimer formation between HEG0236E and hER
1 was seen
in the presence of E2 or OHT (Fig. 7A, lanes 22 to 29).
Immunoprecipitations performed with M2 to immunoprecipitate hER
1
gave results similar to those obtained for HEG0 with B10 (Fig. 7B).
Immunoblotting of the remainder of these lysates with B10 and M2 served
to control for the presence of HEG0 (or mutants of serine 236) and
hER
1, respectively, in the appropriate lysates (Fig. 7C).
|
Stimulation of hER
-mediated transcriptional activation by PKA is
modulated in a promoter-specific manner.
The results described
above indicate that phosphorylation of serine 236 inhibits hER
dimerization in the absence of ligand or in the presence of ICI. In
order to determine whether overexpression of PKA results in the
prevention of transcriptional activation by hER
in a serine
236-dependent manner, we examined the ability of wild-type and mutant
hER
to activate ERE-containing reporter genes. Previous studies have
shown that stimulation of PKA results in a synergistic increase in
transcriptional activation by hER
in the presence of E2 or OHT in a
cell type-specific and promoter-independent manner, whereas PKA-induced
transactivation by ER
in the absence of ligand is not observed in
MCF7 cells (21) and in other cell types is promoter context
dependent (42).
|
. PKA-mediated transactivation in
the absence of ligand is promoter dependent and, furthermore, PKA can
also stimulate transactivation by hER
in the presence of the
"pure" antiestrogen ICI, again in a promoter-specific manner. Similarly, in MCF7 cells transfection of PKA or the addition of 8-Br-cAMP resulted in increased transactivation in the presence of E2
and OHT from all of the reporter genes described above. However, no
increase in transactivation in the presence of ICI or the absence of
ligand was observed with any reporter gene, thus confirming previous
reports indicating that ligand-independent transactivation mediated by
PKA is cell type specific (data not shown) (9, 21, 42).
For HEG0236A, PKA-mediated increases in transactivation
were similar to those observed for HEG0 in the presence of E2 and OHT (Fig. 8A to F, compare lanes 11 and 15 and lanes 12 and 16). Whereas PKA stimulated transactivation by HEG0 in the absence of ligand only
when the ERE-G-CAT reporter was used, in the case of
HEG0236A, increased transactivation by PKA was evident for
all reporter genes (3.2- to 4.8-fold) (Fig. 8A to E, compare lanes 10 and 14). Similar increases were observed in the presence of ICI (Fig.
8A to F, lanes 13 and 17).
PKA also increased transactivation by HEG0236E in the
presence of E2 and to a lesser extent in the presence of OHT (Fig. 8A
to F, compare lanes 19 and 20 with lanes 23 and 24). As expected, no
increase in transactivation was observed in the presence of ICI or in
the absence of ligand, except that ERE-G-CAT (which gave a
ligand-independent increase in transactivation of HEG0 by PKA) was
stimulated to a similar extent (3.2-fold) in the absence of ligand
(compare lanes 18 and 22) and in the presence of E2 or OHT (Fig. 8F,
compare lanes 19 and 20 and lanes 23 and 24). Some increase (twofold)
was also obtained in the presence of ICI (Fig. 8F, compare lanes 21 and 25).
Collectively, the above data indicate that phosphorylation of serine
236 does indeed inhibit the transcriptional activation by hER
in the
absence of E2 or OHT. In order to directly show that PKA can inhibit
DNA binding by hER
in vivo, we exploited a transcriptional
interference assay which has previously been used to show that hER
can bind to an ERE in vivo in the presence of ICI (60). We
used a reporter gene containing a binding site for the yeast
transcriptional activator GAL4 (17M), an ERE, and the adenovirus major
late promoter TATA box driving the CAT gene (79).
Cotransfection of this reporter gene (17M-ERE-TATA-CAT) and GAL-VP16,
in which the DBD (amino acids 1 to 147) of GAL4 is fused to the
transcription activation function of the herpes simplex virus VP16
resulted in transcriptional activation (taken as 100%), which was
unaffected by the coexpression of PKA (Fig. 8G lanes 2 and 3).
Cotransfection of HEG0 and GAL-VP16 resulted in a 4-fold increase in
CAT gene expression in the presence of E2 (lane 9) and a 1.8-fold
increase in the presence of OHT (lane 10). In the presence of ICI,
however, a fourfold decrease in expression was observed, a finding
indicative of repression due to the specific DNA binding of IC-bound
HEG0 (lane 11). It is not clear why the inhibition of expression is not
seen in the absence of ligand (lane 8), but it may be a reflection of
residual estrogens in the culture medium (see reference
60). Cotransfection of pSG5-PKA resulted in a
further increase in transactivation in the presence of E2 and OHT but a
repression of expression in the presence of ICI was lost (lane 15),
thus showing that PKA inhibits DNA binding by HEG0 in the presence of ICI.
In the case of HEG0236A, ICI inhibited expression even in
the presence of PKA (lane 27), indicating that DNA binding by
HEG0236A is not inhibited by PKA. HEG0236E
cotransfection with GAL-VP16 had little effect on expression in the
absence or presence of PKA, suggesting that there is little DNA binding
by HEG0236E (Fig. 8G, lanes 32 to 39), a finding in
agreement with the results presented above.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
hER
is phosphorylated on serine 236 by PKA.
Several studies
have shown that the activation of PKA can increase transcriptional
activation by ER
in an estrogen-independent manner (9, 19,
42) or in synergism with estrogen (21, 26, 42), as
well as in the presence of antiestrogens (42). We have now
shown that hER
(HEG0) is phosphorylated by PKA in vitro on at least
two sites. Examination of the hER
amino acid sequence indicates that
serine 236 is a potential substrate for PKA phosphorylation and that
its mutation to alanine reduced, but did not abolish, phosphorylation
of hER
by PKA, suggesting that serine 236 is a substrate for PKA phosphorylation.
Mutation of serine 236 to glutamic acid inhibits dimerization by
hER
.
Serine 236 is located in the second zinc finger (CII)
within the DBD. Although mutation of serine 236 to alanine had little effect on DNA binding, a mutation to glutamic acid dramatically reduced
DNA binding by hER
, suggesting that phosphorylation of serine 236 inhibits DNA binding. Like other steroid receptors, ER
binds to
specific EREs as a homodimer (12, 13, 34, 55, 56, 83).
Recent studies have further shown that ER
can bind to EREs as a
heterodimer with the newly discovered ER
(22, 62, 63,
65). Extensive deletional and mutational analyses have shown that
homodimerization by ER
is mediated by sequences in the DBD and the
LBD, and determination of the crystal structures of the ER
DNA and
LBDs have further delineated the amino acid residues involved in
dimerization (17, 75). Since phosphorylation of serine 236 inhibits DNA binding, we investigated whether this is due to the
inhibition of dimerization by hER
. Gelshifts performed with WCE of
COS-1 cells transfected with full-length (HEG0, HEG0236A,
or HEG0236E) and N-terminally deleted (HEG19,
HEG19236A, or HEG19236E) receptors suggested
that the wild-type and 236A receptors can heterodimerize, whereas
the 236E mutants are unable to dimerize.
is mediated by sequences in the
DNA and LBDs. Using the glutamic acid mutants, we have shown that
sequences in the DBD are necessary for ER
dimerization and that
serine 236 plays an important role in this dimerization. In the
presence of E2, however, the 236E mutants bound DNA and could dimerize,
albeit to a lower extent when compared to wild-type or 236A mutants.
These results indicate that dimerization by ER
in the absence of
ligand is mediated largely by the DBD and that the addition of estrogen
enables dimerization by the LBD. Our results further suggest that the
DBD or the LBD (in the presence of E2) is sufficient for dimerization,
thereby promoting binding to an ERE.
Dimerization by HEG0236E could also be obtained by the
addition of the partial agonist OHT. Addition of the pure antiestrogen ICI 182,780, however, did not enable dimerization by
HEG0236E, indicating that ICI prevents the activation of
dimerization by the LBD. This is in agreement with a previous report
showing that dimerization by mouse ER
synthesized in insect cells
was inhibited by ICI (27).
Dimerization of hER
is inhibited by PKA in a ligand-dependent
manner.
Inhibition of ER
dimerization by the replacement of
serine 236 with negatively charged glutamic acid suggested that PKA
phosphorylation inhibits dimer formation. This was confirmed by the
finding that DNA binding by wild type but not by the 236A mutant was
inhibited after treatment with activators of PKA and, indeed,
overexpression of the catalytic subunit of PKA or activation of
endogenous PKA resulted in reduced dimerization as determined by
immunoprecipitations for HEG0 but not HEG0236A, indicating
that the reduction in DNA binding results from the inhibition of
dimerization by PKA-mediated phosphorylation of serine 236. The
inhibition of dimerization could be prevented by the addition of the
specific PKA inhibitor H89. As observed for HEG0236E, E2
and OHT prevented inhibition of dimerization by PKA, whereas ICI
treatment did not relieve the inhibition. Replacement of serine 236 with alanine prevented inhibition of dimerization by PKA and obviated
the need for ligand, further demonstrating the inhibitory effect of
phosphorylation on dimerization.
Phosphorylation of serine 236 of hER
regulates
heterodimer formation with hER
.
As with
homodimerization by hER
, heterodimerization between hER
and
hER
was prevented by a mutation of serine 236 of hER
to glutamic
acid or by overexpression of PKA in an estrogen-dependent manner,
indicating that similar mechanisms operate for the heterodimerization by hER
and hER
as for the homodimerization by hER
. However, while heterodimer formation between HEG0 and hER
1 was not observed in the absence of ligand or in the presence of ICI, heterodimers also
did not form in the presence of OHT when PKA was overexpressed. These
results suggest that while OHT enables the dimerization of the hER
LBD, it also inhibits or prevents the conformational changes required
for the activation of the LBD dimerization function. In the case of
hER
, tamoxifen and its metabolite OHT have been shown to have
partial agonistic activity which correlates with activation of AF-1 but
with inhibition of AF-2. Our findings are indicative of mechanistic
differences between hER
and hER
with regard to the action of OHT.
Indeed, Tremblay et al. (80, 81) found that OHT had no
agonistic activity with mouse ER
in a cell line in which it had
agonistic activity with mouse ER
, although it is clearly possible
that OHT acts as a partial agonist with hER
in other cell types or
in activating promoters other than the ones used in these studies.
PKA modulates transcriptional activation by hER
.
Previous
studies have shown that PKA synergizes with estrogen to increase
transcriptional activation by ER
. However, the ligand-independent
increase in transcription activation by PKA appears to be promoter and
cell type specific (9, 21, 42). The results presented here
confirm those findings. We show that in COS-1 cells PKA increases
transactivation by hER
in the presence of E2 and OHT. A PKA-mediated
increase in transactivation in the absence of ligand or in the presence
of ICI was, however, restricted to two reporter genes, ERE-G-CAT and,
to a lesser extent, ERE-3-TATA-CAT. Perhaps interactions with other
transcription factors can stabilize DNA binding by hER
and overcome
the inhibition of dimerization caused by phosphorylation of serine 236. The results with ERE-3-TATA-CAT suggest that multiple EREs may also be
sufficient to provide some stabilization of DNA binding, although this
was not observed in the case of ERE-3-tk-CAT.
results in inhibition of dimerization.
Transcriptional interference of GAL-VP16-induced expression of the
17M-ERE-TATA-CAT reporter gene by HEG0 (but not HEG0236A)
in the presence of ICI and its prevention by PKA are further indicative
of a role for serine 236 phosphorylation in regulating dimerization and
thereby DNA binding by hER
. The inability to determine the loss of
DNA binding by the unliganded receptor in this assay system may be the
result of residual E2 in the E2-stripped cell culture medium and does
not allow an unequivocal determination of the inhibitory effect of
serine 236 phosphorylation on hER
function in the absence of ligand.
Conclusion.
Our results demonstrate that hER
is
phosphorylated by PKA on serine 236. Phosphorylation at this site can
inhibit dimerization in the absence of estrogen, and the addition of
estrogen can overcome this inhibition. Crystallization of the hER
DBD showed the DBD dimers to be present in two forms (75).
In one form of DBD dimers, ordered water molecules provide bridging
contacts between serine 236 in one DBD molecule and methionine 220 in
the other molecule (see Fig. 1B). Phosphorylation of serine 236 would
inhibit the formation of the dimerization interface by disrupting the
network of water molecules at the dimer interface due to the steric
hindrance between monomers at the interface by the presence of
phosphates and/or by electrostatic repulsion between monomers, since
the phosphates would be brought close together in the dimer. The
second, "loose" dimer type seen would probably be able to
accommodate the phosphorylation but might nevertheless not be as
stable. The fact that the 236A mutant does not disrupt dimerization but
would not support the same water network as seen in the crystal and the
finding that a larger charged glutamic acid residue blocks dimerization
suggest that either the steric and/or the electrostatic factors are
important, rather than simply the disruption of favorable networks of
water molecules. In any case, ligand binding would be likely to allow
dimer formation independently of the DBD, perhaps by enabling the
"loose" DBD conformation (74a).
(30, 48, 66) and in chickens in
vivo footprinting of the vitellogenin II and apoVLDL II genes
demonstrated protection in the presence of E2 (67, 87). In
vivo, phosphorylation of serine 236 could be important in preventing
estrogen receptor binding to EREs in gene promoters and in preventing
interference with gene transcription in the absence of ligand, since
the binding of the transcriptionally inactive estrogen receptor could
repress the estrogen receptor-independent transcription of responsive genes (e.g., see reference 28) in a manner similar
to the inhibition by hER
of transcriptional activation by GAL4-VP16
described here. Alternatively, inhibition of DNA binding may be
important for preventing alteration of chromatin structure in the
absence of ligand (48).
Interaction of the estrogen receptor with several transcriptional
regulators, including AP1, NF-kB, and Brn-3a and -3b, leading to
modulation of their activity or that of the estrogen receptor, has been
described. In some cases the DBD is dispensable for the interaction
(e.g., AP1 [74]). The repression of the interleukin-6 promoter by the estrogen receptor is mediated by NF-kB and C-EBP beta
and requires the presence of the ER
DBD, although high-affinity DNA
binding by ER
is not required (70, 76). Interaction
between the DBD of ER
and the POU domain of Brn-3a and Brn-3b is
ligand independent and modulates transcription activation by ER
(18). It is possible that phosphorylation of serine 236 is
important for the regulation of these interactions.
In summary, we have shown that hER
is phosphorylatable on serine 236 within the CII zinc finger of the DBD. Phosphorylation by PKA or
mutation of serine 236 to glutamic acid impairs dimerization by the
DBD, indicating that the DBD is important for ER
dimerization. In
the presence of E2 or OHT, however, dimer formation occurs despite PKA
overexpression, showing that the estrogen receptor contains two
dimerization domains, one in the DBD and one in the LBD. Dimerization
by the LBD is ligand dependent, whereas dimerization mediated by the
DBD is ligand independent. Our results further indicate that sequences
within the DBD or the LBD are sufficient for dimerization, although
there are likely to be mechanistic differences between
dimerization by the DBD and/or the LBD. Our results are in
agreement with previous studies which have indicated that the
antagonistic activity of tamoxifen (and OHT) is not mediated in any
part by inhibition of dimerization and/or DNA binding but is mediated
solely through inhibition of AF-2. However, we show that ICI, which
inhibits both AF-1 and AF-2 and reduces the half-life of ER
, also
prevents dimerization by the LBD, the dimer formation being mediated,
in the presence of ICI solely by the DBD. Finally, phosphorylation of
serine 236 provides a mechanism for E2 regulation of DNA binding by the
estrogen receptor and may modulate its association with other
transcription factors.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank P. Chambon, D. Metzger, S. Mader, and J. White for the
ER plasmids and M.-P. Gaub and C. Rochette-Egly for the pSG5-PKA plasmid. We are particularly grateful to J. W. R. Schwabe for his evaluation of our findings with reference to the crystal structure of the ER
DBD.
This work was supported by the Cancer Research Campaign.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: CRC Laboratories, Department of Cancer Medicine, Division of Medicine, Imperial College of Science, Technology, and Medicine, Charing Cross Campus, St. Dunstan's Rd., London W6 8RP, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-0181-846-1413. Fax: 44-0181-846-1413. E-mail: simak.ali{at}ic.ac.uk.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|