Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 1999, p. 1038-1048, Vol. 19, No. 2
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

andDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
Received 22 September 1998/Returned for modification 16 October 1998/Accepted 2 November 1998
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At the nonpermissive temperature the fission yeast
cdc24-M38 mutant arrests in the cell cycle with incomplete
DNA replication as indicated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. The
cdc24+ gene encodes a 501-amino-acid protein
with no significant homology to any known proteins. The
temperature-sensitive cdc24 mutant is effectively rescued
by pcn1+, rfc1+ (a
fission yeast homologue of RFC1), and
hhp1+, which encode the proliferating cell
nuclear antigen (PCNA), the large subunit of replication factor C
(RFC), and a casein kinase I involved in DNA damage repair,
respectively. The Cdc24 protein binds PCNA and RFC1 in vivo, and the
domains essential for Cdc24 function and for RFC1 and PCNA binding
colocalize in the N-terminal two-thirds of the molecule. In addition,
cdc24+ genetically interacts with the gene
encoding the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase
, which is
stimulated by PCNA and RFC, and with those encoding the fission yeast
counterparts of Mcm2, Mcm4, and Mcm10. These results indicate that
Cdc24 is an RFC- and PCNA-interacting factor required for DNA
replication and might serve as a target for regulation.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chromosomal DNA is replicated by
cooperation of a number of factors and enzymes. In the budding yeast
Saccharomyces cerevisiae they include the origin recognition
complex, which is composed of the six subunits called Orc1 to Orc6
(4); Cdc6 (8); minichromosome maintenance (MCM)
proteins (56); and at least three DNA polymerases. The
origin recognition complex recognizes and binds origins of replication
throughout the cell cycle. When cells enter S phase, MCM proteins are
loaded onto the origins in a Cdc6-dependent manner (2, 53),
and finally DNA polymerase
(Pol
), Pol
, and Pol
are
recruited to start DNA synthesis. A recent analysis indicates that not
only these polymerases but also some MCM proteins are components of
replication forks (2).
The roles of Pol
, Pol
, and other factors in DNA replication
were initially elucidated by studies with a cell-free simian virus 40 (SV40) DNA replication system (reviewed in references 51 and 58). In this system, Pol
with its primase subunits synthesizes RNA primers and elongates
them to short initiator DNAs, which in turn serve as primers for the
leading- and lagging-strand synthesis that is catalyzed by Pol
.
Thus, during DNA replication, the polymerase used for synthesis is
switched from
to
. This switch requires two accessory proteins,
replication factor C (RFC) and proliferating cell nuclear antigen
(PCNA) (55). RFC binds the primer ends and thereby recruits
and loads PCNA onto them (29, 54). Subsequently, Pol
binds the complex and elongates the DNA strands with high processivity
(54). RFC is composed of five related subunits, one large
and four small ones. By contrast, PCNA forms homotrimers to act as a
sliding clamp (27). This factor is essential for the high
processivity of Pol
(47, 48). These polymerases and
accessory proteins are highly conserved throughout eukaryotes. The
replication of chromosomal DNA, however, requires another type of DNA
polymerase called Pol
(3, 63), although its exact role
still remains unclear. This polymerase also requires PCNA and RFC for
its full activity (7, 30). Both Pol
and Pol
also
play roles in damage repair DNA synthesis (41, 50).
The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe is another good
model organism to study DNA replication and cell cycle control mechanisms. Fission yeast counterparts of many of the factors essential
for chromosomal DNA replication have been identified. Orp1 and Orp2 are
the counterparts of Orc1 and Orc2, respectively (28, 38).
Cdc19/Nda1, Cdc21, Nda4, and Mis5 are MCM proteins (10, 15, 36,
52), and Cdc18 is the counterpart of Cdc6 (26, 42).
pol1+/swi7+,
pol3+/cdc6+,
cdc20+, and pcn1+,
encoding the catalytic subunits of Pol
, Pol
, Pol
, and PCNA,
respectively, have also been identified (12, 14, 23, 46,
61).
The onset and progression of DNA replication are controlled by a
variety of extra- and intracellular conditions that favor or disfavor
cell proliferation. When cellular DNA is damaged, progression of DNA
synthesis is temporarily halted by a cell cycle checkpoint mechanism
(45) until the damage is repaired by DNA synthesis with
either Pol
or Pol
(41, 50). In fission yeast, a
casein kinase called Hhp1 participates in repair synthesis after damage
by chemicals or irradiation (13). Cells lacking this kinase
are sensitive to DNA damage due to reduced repair synthesis.
In this paper we describe the identification of a new PCNA- and
RFC-interacting factor that is essential for DNA replication in the
cell cycle, namely, Cdc24, which has long been known to be required for
S-phase progression (40). In concert with this biochemical
interaction, cdc24+ genetically interacts with
cdc20+, cdc19+,
cdc21+, and cdc23+, which
encode fission yeast counterparts of the catalytic subunit of Pol
,
Mcm2, Mcm4, and Mcm10 (10, 15, 25a), which are essential for
origin activation (35, 62). Interestingly, a temperature-sensitive cdc24 mutant is rescued by
hhp1+, suggesting that Cdc24 might serve as, or
be closely linked to, a target for the regulation of damage repair DNA synthesis.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Strains and media.
Special strains of S. pombe
used in this study are listed in Table 1.
Media were prepared as described previously (18, 37, 44).
|
Libraries and vectors. An S. pombe cDNA library was constructed by the Okayama-Berg method (43) with the SV40-based pcD expression vector and mRNA prepared from a wild-type strain (L972) growing logarithmically in YEL medium (37). S. pombe genomic libraries were constructed by inserting restriction enzyme-digested wild-type DNA into the pALSK+ vector. The pALSK+ vector used for genomic DNA expression, the SV40 promoter-driven pcL, and the thiamine-repressible pREP vectors were described previously (22, 33, 39).
Temperature shift analysis.
The h+S
cdc24-M38 and h+S wild-type cells
were cultured in PM+N medium to mid-log phase at 23°C. These cells
were nitrogen starved for 24 h in PM
N medium (37) and
then incubated at 36°C for 4 h and reinoculated in PM+N medium
(37) preincubated at 36°C. Cell aliquots were taken every
hour, fixed in 70% ethanol, and analyzed by flow cytometry.
Flow cytometry. Flow cytometry was performed as described previously (9) by using the FACScan system, the CellFIT cell cycle analysis program, and the software LYSIS II (Becton Dickinson).
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.
Chromosomes in agarose
plugs were prepared as described previously (32) with slight
modifications. Cells (5 × 108) were washed with CSE
(20 mM citrate-phosphate [pH 5.6], 1.2 M sorbitol, 40 mM EDTA, and
150 mM
-mercaptoethanol) and resuspended in 10 ml of CSE containing
30 mM
-mercaptoethanol and 0.3 mg of Zymolyase 100T (Seikagaku
Kogyo) per ml. After digestion at 37°C for 1 h, the cells were
pelleted and resuspended at 8 × 108 cells/ml in TSE
(10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 0.9 M sorbitol, 45 mM EDTA). The cell
suspension was warmed to 37°C, added to an equal volume of 1%
low-melting-point agarose in TSE, and dispensed in plug molds. Cells in
agarose plugs were lysed first in 0.25 M EDTA-50 mM Tris-HCl (pH
7.5)-1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) for 90 min at 55°C and then in
NDS (0.5 M EDTA [pH 9.5], 1% lauryl sarcosine) containing 0.5 mg of
proteinase K per ml for 48 h. The plugs were stored at 4°C and
equilibrated with TE (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 1 mM EDTA) before
electrophoresis. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was carried out in a
0.6% agarose gel with a Gene Navigator (Pharmacia) apparatus for
83 h in 0.5 × TAE buffer at 50 V with a switching time of 30 min.
Isolation of the cdc24+ gene and
multicopy suppressors of the cdc24 mutant.
The
cdc24+ gene and multicopy suppressors were
isolated by rescue of the temperature-sensitive cdc24-M38
mutant as described previously (44). The
h
cdc24-M38 leu1-32 cells were cultured at
23°C to mid-log phase in MB medium containing 0.015% leucine and
cotransfected with the S. pombe cDNA library and the
PstI-digested transducing vector pAL19 (44). The
cells were incubated on MMA plates at 23°C for 24 h and at
33°C for 4 days (44). Plasmids were recovered from transformants and confirmed for their suppression activity. Isolated cDNAs were classified by hybridization analysis and subcloned into the
pcL vector for further analysis. Similarly, a
cdc24+ genomic DNA was isolated from the genomic
DNA library by rescue of the cdc24-M38 mutant.
DNA sequencing. DNA sequencing was performed by the dideoxy chain termination method with 373S DNA sequencer (ABI).
Gene disruption.
A null mutant of the
cdc24+ gene was constructed as follows. The
internal 1.9-kb BglII-HindIII fragment
containing 97% of the cdc24+ coding region was
replaced with the 1.8-kb HindIII-excised
ura4+ gene. The 3.9-kb
BamHI-SalI fragment containing the disrupted cdc24 gene was transfected into a diploid strain
(h
/h+N leu1-32/leu1-32
ura4-D18/ura-D18 ade6-M210/ade6-M216). Eleven stable transformants
were obtained, and successful disruptants were identified by Southern
blot analysis with the SalI-BamHI 1.4-kb fragment
as a probe.
Analysis of germinating spores.
Spores were isolated by
treatment with helicase (31, 37). Diploid strains were
sporulated on MEA plates for 7 days (37). Spores formed were
washed with water and incubated at 30°C for 18 h in 40 ml of
water containing 0.1 ml of helicase (IBF). After being washed with
water three times, the spores were cultured in PM medium containing
adenine and leucine at 30 or 35°C to induce preferential germination
of
cdc24 (ura+) cells. Germinating
cells were collected every 2 h and fixed with 70% ethanol,
followed by 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining and
fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis.
Construction of epitope-tagged genes. The entire cdc24+ open reading frame (ORF) sequence was amplified by PCR with primers containing an NdeI (for the 5' primer [5' GCGCCATATGGATTTTCCAGGTCTG 3']) or BamHI (for the 3' primer [5' GGCCGGATCCTATTCACACGGCAGAGAG 3']) restriction enzyme recognition site and a FLAG epitope-coding sequence (for 5' FLAG tagging, 5' GCGCCATATGGACTACAAGGACGACGATGACAAGATGGATTTTCCAGGTCTGAT 3'; for 3' FLAG tagging, 5' GGCCGGATCCTCACTTGTCATCGTCGTCCTTGTAGTCTTCACACGGCAGAGAGTTT 3') just before and after the cdc24+ ORF, respectively. Amplified fragments were digested with NdeI and BamHI and inserted between the NdeI and BamHI sites of the pREP41-X vector. cdc24+ gene deletion mutants were constructed by PCR with the pREP41-cdc24-FLAG or pREP41-FLAG-cdc24 plasmids as templates. The primers (5' GGCCGGATCCTACAATACTGGAACAAAGCTAG 3', 5' GGCCGGATCCTAGCTAATGCATAGCAAATCTC 3', 5' GCGCCATATGCAATATGCTGCATCAAAAA 3', and 5' GCGCCATATGCCAATCAATCATTCTTCTGA 3') were designed and used to obtain N-terminally deleted or C-terminally deleted, FLAG-tagged cdc24+ sequences, which were then digested with NdeI and BamHI and inserted into the pREP41 vector. Consequently, N-terminally deleted cdc24+ sequences were translated from the ATG codon at NdeI restriction enzyme recognition sites. The FW253AA mutant, which contains alanine and alanine substitutions of phenylalanine and tryptophan at amino acid residues 253 and 254, was constructed by site-directed mutagenesis (TTT TGG to GCT GCG) with PCR.
For hemagglutinin (HA) tagging, pcn1+ and rfc1+ were amplified by PCR with primers (5' TCTAGAGCGGCCGCTATGCTTGAAGCTAGATTT 3', 5' GGCCGGATCCCTACTCCTCATCCTCCTCA 3', 5' CGCGCATATGGCAAAGTCCCGACTTG 3', and 5' GGCCTCTAGAGCGGCCGCTAGCTGTCTTTTTTCTGGATC 3') containing an appropriate restriction enzyme recognition site. After digestion with the corresponding restriction enzyme, DNA was inserted into the N-terminal or C-terminal three-HA-epitope-containing version of the pREP42 and pREP2 vectors, respectively. The initially isolated 5'-truncated form of rfc1+ was used for construction (the expected translation start site is marked with an asterisk in Fig. 4). All of the sequences amplified by PCR were confirmed by DNA sequencing. Several of these tagged genes were digested with NdeI and BamHI, purified, and subcloned into the weakest version of pREP81/82 vectors.Protein extraction and immunoprecipitation.
The
h
ura4-D18 leu1-32 cells were transformed with
FLAG-tagged and HA-tagged plasmids. The cells transformed with the two distinct plasmids were first grown to mid-log phase at 30°C in PM
medium containing 5 µg of thiamine per ml and then cultured for
16 h in thiamine-free PM medium to induce the expression of epitope-tagged proteins. Cell extracts were made with glass beads and H
buffer as described previously (5). The tagged proteins were
immunoprecipitated from the lysates with the anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody M2 covalently attached to agarose beads (IBI) (2.5 mg of
protein in 1 ml of H buffer) pretreated with bovine serum albumin. Immunoprecipitates were washed four times with H buffer containing 0.15 M NaCl and 2.5 mg of bovine serum albumin per ml and two times with H
buffer containing 0.15 M NaCl.
Immunoblot analysis. Crude cell extracts (50 or 100 µg of protein) and immunoprecipitates from 5 times more crude cell extracts were separated by SDS-10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to a polyvinylidine difluoride filter. Epitope-tagged proteins were detected with 1:300-diluted M2 anti-FLAG antibody (IBI) or 1:1,000-diluted 12CA5 anti-HA antibody (Boehringer Mannheim) and enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham).
Analysis of temperature sensitivity of S. pombe
mutants.
The h
cdc20 cdc24 leu1-32,
h
cdc23 cdc24 leu1-32,h
cdc19
cdc24 leu1-32, and h
cdc21 cdc24 leu1-32
double mutants were constructed by crossing corresponding single
mutants followed by tetrad analysis at 23°C. The double mutants were
streaked on YEA plates and incubated for 3 days at the indicated temperatures.
Nucleotide sequence accession number. The DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank accession number for cdc24+ is AB015436.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The cdc24-M38 mutant arrests with incomplete DNA synthesis. The cdc24-M38 mutant was initially isolated as a cdc (cell division cycle) mutant (40). This mutant was judged to arrest in S phase at the nonpermissive temperature based on transition point analysis (40). We investigated the arrest point by other methods. When cdc24-M38 mutant cells were arrested in G1 by nitrogen starvation, shifted to the nonpermissive temperature, and released to start cell cycling by the addition of a nitrogen source, they entered S phase without any significant delay, just like wild-type cells, and arrested with a 2C DNA content as shown by flow cytometric analysis (Fig. 1A). To characterize this arrest point further, chromosomal DNA was analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, in which only completely replicated chromosomes are allowed to enter the gel (19). As shown in Fig. 1B, unlike those of wild-type and cdc25 (G2 mutant) cells, but just like those of the cells arrested in S by a cdc18 mutation or hydroxyurea block, chromosomes of cdc24-M38 cells incubated at 36°C failed to enter the gel. These results show that despite having a 2C DNA content, cdc24-M38 cells arrested without completion of DNA replication. This was confirmed by another experiment. Generally, S-phase mutants enter premature mitosis upon a shift to the restrictive temperature if they also carry a checkpoint rad mutation (1, 49). The cdc24 mutant behaved similarly. When cultured for 4 h at the nonpermissive temperature of 36°C, cdc24-M38 rad1-1 double mutant cells prematurely entered mitosis as indicated by the production of anucleate cells and cells with the "cut" phenotype (Fig. 1C) (20). Thus, we concluded that the cdc24+ gene product is required for completion of DNA replication.
|
Isolation of the cdc24+ gene.
An
S. pombe cDNA library was screened for clones that could
suppress the temperature sensitivity of cdc24-M38 cells.
After extensive screening, four distinct cDNA clones were isolated, all
of which had the ability to rescue the mutant (Table
2), but the extent to which the clones
rescued the mutant phenotype varied. One clone was found to rescue the
mutant even at 36°C (Fig. 2), and the
rescued cells were nearly identical to wild-type cells in length (data
not shown). Therefore, this clone was characterized first, and it was
found to be the cdc24+ gene itself (see below).
Genomic DNA clones of this gene were also isolated by phenotypic
complementation of cdc24-M38 cells and were found to contain
an ORF with six introns and capable of encoding a 501-amino-acid
protein with an estimated molecular mass of 58 kDa (Fig. 3A and
B); a FLAG-tagged protein migrated as an
approximately 60-kDa protein in SDS gel
electrophoresis (see below). An amino acid homology search of the DNA
databases revealed that the predicted protein has no significant
homology to any known proteins. However, the predicted Cdc24 protein
does contain a sequence similar to the PCNA binding motif (QXXLXXFF) found in the p21 cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, Fen1 nuclease, and
DNA ligase I (25, 60) (Fig. 3B; underlined). This sequence is located within the region essential for Cdc24 function (highlighted in Fig. 3B; see Fig. 5B and Table 3).
|
|
|
putative-cdc24
diploid cells demonstrated that two viable and two inviable spores
were present in each ascus and that all viable spores were uracil
auxotrophic. Microscopic observation revealed that spores with
putative-cdc24 deleted germinated but, after three or four
divisions, arrested with cell elongation and one nucleus (Fig. 3C and
D). The growth inability of the disruptant was effectively rescued
by the putative cdc24+ gene or its cDNA, showing
that this phenotype was indeed generated by the deletion of this
gene. To obtain definitive evidence for the authenticity of
the isolated gene as cdc24+,
putative-cdc24/cdc24-M38 diploid cells were
constructed by conjugation of the plasmid-rescued
putative-cdc24 cells with the cdc24-M38 mutant
followed by selection of diploid cells that had lost the plasmid. The
diploid cells were still temperature sensitive for growth (Fig. 3E) and
failed to yield any haploid spores that could grow at 36°C (data not
shown). These results led us to conclude that the cloned gene was
indeed cdc24+ itself.
Cdc24 is dispensable for bulk DNA synthesis.
As shown in Fig.
1A and B, cdc24+ was required for the completion
of DNA synthesis, although cdc24-M38 cells released from G1 arrest did not have an obvious delay in DNA synthesis at
the nonpermissive temperature. We therefore determined whether
cdc24+ is required for bulk DNA synthesis by
examining the S-phase progression of the
cdc24 spores
germinated in medium lacking uracil. For this experiment, spores
generated from the
cdc24/cdc24+ and
cdc24/cdc24-M38 diploid cells were used. As shown in Fig. 3F, there was no obvious delay in DNA synthesis in
cdc24
cells even when they were derived from
cdc24/cdc24-M38
cells. Thus, cdc24+ seems to be dispensable for
bulk DNA synthesis.
The multicopy suppressors of cdc24-M38 are rfc1+, pcn1+, and hhp1+. The remainder of the multicopy suppressors were next characterized by DNA hybridization, DNA sequencing, and DNA database searching. Two of them were pcn1+, which encodes PCNA (61), and hhp1+, which encodes a casein kinase I involved in DNA repair (13). The third gene was capable of encoding a protein homologous with the large subunit of RFC identified in other organisms but was truncated at the 5' region (Fig. 4). This gene was recently sequenced by the S. pombe Sequencing Project at Sanger Center and was contained in the S. pombe chromosome II cosmid clone c23E6 (EMBL accession number AL023287). Amino acid alignments with the budding yeast and human counterparts (6, 21) were made. The amino acid sequences are particularly conserved in the RFC homology boxes (11). Based on such structural similarity, we tentatively assigned this gene as a fission yeast homologue of RFC1, encoding the large subunit of RFC, and named it rfc1+. The amino acid identity between rfc1+ and homologues from other species ranged from 30 to 40%. Further characterization is required to conclude that this gene product is a large subunit of RFC in fission yeast.
|
and Pol
. On the other hand, the Hhp1 casein kinase I plays
a role in DNA repair by promoting damage repair DNA synthesis (13). The abilities of these suppressors to rescue
cdc24-M38 varied as indicated by percent suppression at the
minimum restriction temperature (Table 2) and the maximum temperatures
that allowed rescued cells to grow. rfc1+ (5'
truncated) was able to rescue the mutant at up to 35°C, whereas pcn1+ and hhp1+ rescued
at up to 34°C (Fig. 2).
Cdc24 binds Pcn1 and Rfc1 in vivo via its N-terminal two-thirds. The relatively strong suppression of cdc24-M38 by pcn1+ and rfc1+ suggests that Cdc24 might cooperate with these factors for S-phase progression or completion. To gain insight into the function of Cdc24, we examined possible physical interactions between Cdc24 and PCNA or the large subunit of RFC. To this end, Cdc24, Rfc1 (5' truncated), and Pcn1 were tagged with the FLAG or HA epitope, inserted into the repressible, relatively weak pREP expression vectors, and expressed in wild-type cells. Lysates were prepared from the cells expressing each combination of the genes, immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody, and analyzed by gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting with anti-FLAG or anti-HA antibodies. As shown in Fig. 5A, Rfc1 and Pcn1 coprecipitated with Cdc24. A rough estimation by densitometric reads of the bands of coprecipitated Rfc1-HA and HA-pcn1 indicated that approximately 10 to 30% and 5 to 20% of these molecules were coprecipitated with Cdc24, respectively. Negative controls expressing an empty vector with no insert gave no coprecipitation, eliminating possible artifacts caused by antibody cross-reactions. To confirm these results, all of these tagged genes were inserted into the weakest version of the pREP vectors pREP81/82 (10-fold weaker than pREP41/42) and similarly analyzed. As shown in Fig. 5A (right panel), tagged Pcn1 and Rfc1 coprecipitated with Cdc24 with efficiencies similar to those obtained with expression from the stronger promoters. These results indicate that Cdc24 forms complexes with Rfc1 and Pcn1 in vivo.
|
|
Cdc24 genetically interacts with Pol
and MCM proteins.
The
suppression and coprecipitation assays indicated that Cdc24
functionally and physically interacts with RFC and PCNA, both of which
are required for full activities of Pol
and Pol
. If RFC and
PCNA were physiological targets of Cdc24 action, genetic interaction
between cdc24+ and at least one of the genes
encoding these polymerases might be expected. Indeed, the
cdc24-M38 mutant combined with cdc20-M10, a
temperature-sensitive mutation in the catalytic subunit of Pol
,
displayed a 0.5 to 1°C drop in the restrictive temperature from the
lower temperature for each single mutant (Fig.
6). However, contrary to expectation,
double mutants containing cdc24-M38 and the
temperature-sensitive cdc6-23, cdc1-7, or
cdc27-K3 gene, which encode the catalytic and noncatalytic
subunits of Pol
(23, 31, 64), did not show a detectable
drop in the restrictive temperature (data not shown). This result
suggests that there is a genetic interaction at least between
cdc24+ and cdc20+, albeit
a marginal one.
|
.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All of the genetic and biochemical data presented indicate that Cdc24 plays an essential role in DNA synthesis, a role likely achieved through cooperation with PCNA and RFC. Three lines of evidence suggest that PCNA and RFC are likely to be critical targets for the action of Cdc24. First, expression of pcn1+ and rfc1+ efficiently rescued the cdc24-M38 mutant. Second, Cdc24 physically interacted with PCNA and the large subunit of RFC as shown by coimmunoprecipitation. Third, the regions responsible for the physical interaction with PCNA and Rfc1 and for cdc24+ function are located within the N-terminal two-thirds of the molecule. These lines of evidence allow us to propose that Cdc24 is a factor acting closely with RFC and PCNA at a certain stage of DNA replication.
The motif responsible for PCNA and Rfc1 binding is unclear at present. The N-terminal two-thirds contains a sequence similar to the PCNA binding motif (QXXLXXFF) that was found in the p21 cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, Fen1 nuclease, and DNA ligase I (25, 60). However, this motif does not significantly contribute to Cdc24's ability to bind PCNA and Rfc1. The same mutations in the motif that inactivate p21's ability to bind PCNA failed to impair Cdc24 binding to PCNA and Rfc1 or to impair Cdc24 function.
Cells with cdc24+ deleted or inactivated
completed bulk DNA synthesis with no significant delay in S phase (Fig.
3F) and arrested cell cycling without completion of chromosomal
replication (Fig. 1B). However, this result does not necessarily
exclude the possibility that Cdc24 is still required for bulk DNA
synthesis, because residual temperature-sensitive Cdc24 protein might
be sufficient for completion of bulk DNA synthesis. Beside this, three
possibilities seem to be suggested by this result. First, PCNA and RFC
are the only targets for Cdc24, but during bulk DNA synthesis, they are
regulated by a molecule similar to Cdc24. Second, PCNA and RFC require
Cdc24 for their activity only at a certain stage late in DNA synthesis. Third, PCNA and RFC are not the critical targets for Cdc24. The genetic
interaction of Cdc24 with Pol
tends to support the first two
possibilities, and the lack of any report of copurification of a
Cdc24-like protein with PCNA or RFC (47, 64) or even with
Pol
(64) is consistent with the functional interaction of Cdc24 with these replication factors only at a certain stage of S phase.
PCNA and RFC are required for full activity of both Pol
and Pol
. We detected a genetic interaction of Cdc24 with the Pol
catalytic subunit but not with catalytic and small subunits of Pol
.
The reason for this is unclear. The Pol
mutant alleles tested might
not have been the appropriate ones to reveal interaction, or,
alternatively, Cdc24 might preferentially function with Pol
.
Interestingly, cdc24+ also showed genetic
interactions with the fission yeast counterparts of
MCM2, MCM4, and MCM10 (Fig. 6).
The corresponding MCM proteins are essential for the activation of
replication origins (35, 62). Recent findings show that some
MCM proteins have intrinsic DNA helicase activity (24) and,
like Pol
,
, and
, are also components of replication forks
(2). Therefore, such seemingly peculiar genetic
interactions seem to be consistent with the suggested function of
Cdc24. However, because the genetic interactions between cdc24-M38 and these DNA replication gene mutations are
modest, they might be reflections of additive effects by indirect interactions.
Cdc24 might serve as a target for regulation. hhp1+, encoding a casein kinase I involved in damage repair DNA synthesis, was isolated as a multicopy suppressor of the cdc24-M38 mutant. Although much work needs to be done to reach a definite conclusion, this fact is certainly consistent with the possibility that Cdc24 might serve as, or be closely linked to, a target for the regulation of damage repair DNA synthesis.
The early characterization of cdc24-M38 mutant cells revealed the production of fragmented DNA (1/20 the size of chromosomes) by alkaline sucrose gradient centrifugation (40). We could not detect broken chromosomes by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis under our experimental conditions. Fragmented DNA may be produced by impaired DNA replication fork movement caused by inactivation of Cdc24 protein.
Most recently, cloning of the cdc24+ gene and characterization of cdc24-M38 and a new mutant allele of this gene were reported, while this paper was in preparation (17). The isolation of the replicative DNA helicase gene dna2+ as a multicopy suppressor of a cdc24 mutant (17) is also consistent with our conclusion that Cdc24 is a PCNA- and RFC-interacting factor.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank P. Nurse for the strains.
This work was supported by grants from Department of Education, Science and Culture of Japan and from HFSP.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan. Phone: 81-3-5689-0876. Fax: 81-3-3815-1490. E-mail: okayama{at}m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Present address: Department of Hygiene and Oncology, The Tokyo
Medical and Dental University School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo
113-8519, Japan.
Present address: Cell Cycle Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research
Fund, London WC2A 3PX, England.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Al-Khodairy, F., and A. M. Carr. 1992. DNA repair mutants defining G2 checkpoint pathways in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. EMBO J. 11:1343-1350[Medline]. |
| 2. | Aparicio, O. M., D. M. Weinstein, and S. P. Bell. 1997. Components and dynamics of DNA replication complexes in S. cerevisiae: redistribution of MCM proteins and Cdc45p during S phase. Cell 91:59-69[Medline]. |
| 3. |
Araki, H.,
R. K. Hamatake,
L. H. Johnston, and A. Sugino.
1991.
DPB2, the gene encoding DNA polymerase II subunit B, is required for chromosome replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:4601-4605 |
| 4. | Bell, S. P., and B. Stillman. 1992. ATP-dependent recognition of eukaryotic origins of DNA replication by a multiprotein complex. Nature 357:128-134[Medline]. |
| 5. | Booher, R. N., C. E. Alfa, J. S. Hyams, and D. H. Beach. 1989. The fission yeast cdc2/cdc13/suc1 protein kinase: regulation of catalytic activity and nuclear localization. Cell 58:485-497[Medline]. |
| 6. |
Bunz, F.,
R. Kobayashi, and B. Stillman.
1993.
cDNAs encoding the large subunit of human replication factor C.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:11014-11018 |
| 7. |
Burgers, P. M.
1991.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication factor C. II. Formation and activity of complexes with the proliferating cell nuclear antigen and with DNA polymerases and .
J. Biol. Chem.
266:22698-22706 |
| 8. | Cocker, J. H., S. Piatti, C. Santocanale, K. Nasmyth, and J. F. Diffley. 1996. An essential role for the Cdc6 protein in forming the pre-replicative complexes of budding yeast. Nature 379:180-182[Medline]. |
| 9. | Costello, G., L. Rodgers, and D. Beach. 1986. Fission yeast enters the stationary phase G0 state from either mitotic G1 or G2. Curr. Genet. 11:119-125. |
| 10. |
Coxon, A.,
K. Maundrell, and S. E. Kearsey.
1992.
Fission yeast cdc21+ belongs to a family of proteins involved in an early step of chromosome replication.
Nucleic Acids Res.
20:5571-5577 |
| 11. | Cullmann, G., K. Fien, R. Kobayashi, and B. Stillman. 1995. Characterization of the five replication factor C genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:4661-4671[Abstract]. |
| 12. |
Damagnez, V.,
J. Tillit,
A.-M. de Recondo, and G. Baldacci.
1991.
The POL1 gene from the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, shows conserved amino acid blocks specific for eukaryotic DNA polymerases .
Mol. Gen. Genet.
226:182-189[Medline].
|
| 13. | Dhillon, N., and M. F. Hoekstra. 1994. Characterization of two protein kinases from Schizosaccharomyces pombe involved in the regulation of DNA repair. EMBO J. 13:2777-2788[Medline]. |
| 14. |
D'Urso, G., and P. Nurse.
1997.
Schizosaccharomyces pombe cdc20+ encodes DNA polymerase and is required for chromosomal replication but not for the S phase checkpoint.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:12491-12496 |
| 15. | Forsburg, S. L., and P. Nurse. 1994. The fission yeast cdc19+ gene encodes a member of the MCM family of replication proteins. J. Cell Sci. 107:2779-2788[Abstract]. |
| 16. | Fotedar, R., R. Mossi, P. Fitzgerald, T. Rousselle, G. Maga, H. Brickner, H. Messier, S. Kasibhatla, U. Hubscher, and A. Fotedar. 1996. A conserved domain of the large subunit of replication factor C binds PCNA and acts like a dominant negative inhibitor of DNA replication in mammalian cells. EMBO J. 15:4423-4433[Medline]. |
| 17. |
Gould, K. L.,
C. G. Burns,
A. Feoktistova,
C. P. Hu,
S. G. Pasion, and S. L. Forsburg.
1998.
Fission yeast cdc24+ encodes a novel replication factor required for chromosome integrity.
Genetics
149:1221-1233 |
| 18. | Gutz, H., V. Heslot, V. Leupold, and N. Leprieno. 1974. Schizosaccharomyces pombe, p. 395-446. In R. C. King (ed.), Handbook of genetics, vol. 1. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 19. |
Hennessy, K. M.,
A. Lee,
E. Chen, and D. Botstein.
1991.
A group of interacting yeast DNA replication genes.
Genes Dev.
5:958-969 |
| 20. | Hirano, T., S. Funahashi, T. Uemura, and M. Yanagida. 1986. Isolation and characterization of Schizosaccharomyces pombe cut mutants that block nuclear division but not cytokinesis. EMBO J. 5:2973-2979[Medline]. |
| 21. |
Howell, E. A.,
M. A. McAlear,
D. Rose, and C. Holm.
1994.
CDC44: a putative nucleotide-binding protein required for cell cycle progression that has homology to subunits of replication factor C.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:255-267 |
| 22. | Igarashi, M., A. Nagata, S. Jinno, K. Suto, and H. Okayama. 1991. Wee1+-like gene in human cells. Nature 353:80-83[Medline]. |
| 23. |
Iino, Y., and M. Yamamoto.
1997.
The Schizosaccharomyces pombe cdc6 gene encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase .
Mol. Gen. Genet.
254:93-97[Medline].
|
| 24. |
Ishimi, Y.
1997.
A DNA helicase activity is associated with an MCM4, -6, and -7 protein complex.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:24508-24513 |
| 25. | Jonsson, Z. O., R. Hindges, and U. Hubscher. 1998. Regulation of DNA replication and repair proteins through interaction with the front side of proliferating cell nuclear antigen. EMBO J. 17:2412-2425[Medline]. |
| 25a. | Kawasaki, Y., et al. Submitted for publication. |
| 26. | Kelly, T. J., G. S. Martin, S. L. Forsburg, R. J. Stephen, A. Russo, and P. Nurse. 1993. The fission yeast cdc18+ gene product couples S phase to START and mitosis. Cell 74:371-382[Medline]. |
| 27. | Krishna, T. S., X. P. Kong, S. Gary, P. M. Burgers, and J. Kuriyan. 1994. Crystal structure of the eukaryotic DNA polymerase processivity factor PCNA. Cell 79:1233-1243[Medline]. |
| 28. | Leatherwood, J., G. A. Lopez, and P. Russell. 1996. Interaction of Cdc2 and Cdc18 with a fission yeast ORC2-like protein. Nature 379:360-363[Medline]. |
| 29. |
Lee, S. H.,
A. D. Kwong,
Z. Q. Pan, and J. Hurwitz.
1991.
Studies on the activator 1 protein complex, an accessory factor for proliferating cell nuclear antigen-dependent DNA polymerase .
J. Biol. Chem.
266:594-602 |
| 30. |
Lee, S. H.,
Z. Q. Pan,
A. D. Kwong,
P. M. Burgers, and J. Hurwitz.
1991.
Synthesis of DNA by DNA polymerase in vitro.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:22707-22717 |
| 31. |
MacNeill, S. A.,
S. Moreno,
N. Reynolds,
P. Nurse, and P. A. Fantes.
1996.
The fission yeast Cdc1 protein, a homologue of the small subunit of DNA polymerase , binds to Pol3 and Cdc27.
EMBO J.
15:4613-4628[Medline].
|
| 32. | Maiorano, D., G. B. Van Assendelft, and S. E. Kearsey. 1996. Fission yeast cdc21, a member of the MCM protein family, is required for onset of S phase and is located in the nucleus throughout the cell cycle. EMBO J. 15:861-872[Medline]. |
| 33. | Maundrell, K. 1993. Thiamine-repressible expression vectors pREP and pRIP for fission yeast. Gene 123:127-130[Medline]. |
| 34. |
McAlear, M. A.,
E. A. Howell,
K. K. Espenshade, and C. Holm.
1994.
Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (pol30) mutations suppress cdc44 mutations and identify potential regions of interaction between the two encoded proteins.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:4390-4397 |
| 35. | Merchant, A. M., Y. Kawasaki, Y. Chen, M. Lei, and B. K. Tye. 1997. A lesion in the DNA replication initiation factor Mcm10 induces pausing of elongation forks through chromosomal replication origins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:3261-3271[Abstract]. |
| 36. | Miyake, S., N. Okishio, I. Samejima, Y. Hiraoka, T. Toda, I. Saitoh, and M. Yanagida. 1993. Fission yeast genes nda1+ and nda4+, mutations of which lead to S-phase block, chromatin alteration, and Ca2+ suppression, are members of the CDC46/MCM2 family. Mol. Biol. Cell 4:1003-1015[Abstract]. |
| 37. | Moreno, S., A. Klar, and P. Nurse. 1991. Molecular genetic analysis of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods Enzymol. 194:795-823[Medline]. |
| 38. |
Muzi-Falconi, M., and T. J. Kelly.
1995.
Orp1, a member of the Cdc18/Cdc6 family of S-phase regulators, is homologous to a component of the origin recognition complex.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:12475-12479 |
| 39. | Nagata, A., M. Igarashi, S. Jinno, K. Suto, and H. Okayama. 1991. An additional homolog of the fission yeast cdc25+ gene occurs in humans and is highly expressed in some cancer cells. New Biol. 3:959-968[Medline]. |
| 40. | Nasmyth, K., and P. Nurse. 1981. Cell division cycle mutants altered in DNA replication and mitosis in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Gen. Genet. 182:119-124[Medline]. |
| 41. |
Nishida, C.,
P. Reinhard, and S. Linn.
1988.
DNA repair synthesis in human fibroblasts requires DNA polymerase .
J. Biol. Chem.
263:501-510 |
| 42. | Nishitani, H., and P. Nurse. 1995. p65cdc18 plays a major role controlling the initiation of DNA replication in fission yeast. Cell 83:397-405[Medline]. |
| 43. | Okayama, H., M. Kawaichi, M. Brownstein, F. Lee, T. Yokota, and K. Arai. 1987. High-efficiency cloning of full-length cDNA; construction and screening of cDNA expression libraries for mammalian cells. Methods Enzymol. 154:3-28[Medline]. |
| 44. |
Okazaki, K.,
N. Okazaki,
K. Kume,
S. Jinno,
K. Tanaka, and H. Okayama.
1990.
High-frequency transformation method and library transducing vectors for cloning mammalian cDNAs by trans-complementation of Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
Nucleic Acids Res.
18:6485-6489 |
| 45. | Paulovich, A. G., and L. H. Hartwell. 1995. A checkpoint regulates the rate of progression through S phase in S. cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Cell 82:841-847[Medline]. |
| 46. |
Pignede, G.,
D. Bouvier,
A.-M. de Recondo, and G. Baldacci.
1991.
Characterization of the POL3 gene product from Schizosaccharomyces pombe indicates inter-species conservation of the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase .
J. Mol. Biol.
222:209-218[Medline].
|
| 47. | Prelich, G., M. Kostura, D. R. Marshak, M. B. Mathews, and B. Stillman. 1987. The cell-cycle regulated proliferating cell nuclear antigen is required for SV40 DNA replication in vitro. Nature 326:471-475[Medline]. |
| 48. |
Prelich, G.,
C. K. Tan,
M. Kostura,
M. B. Mathews,
A. G. So,
K. M. Downey, and B. Stillman.
1987.
Functional identity of proliferating cell nuclear antigen and a DNA polymerase- auxiliary protein.
Nature
326:517-520[Medline].
|
| 49. | Rowley, R., S. Subramani, and P. G. Young. 1992. Checkpoint controls in Schizosaccharomyces pombe: rad1. EMBO J. 11:1335-1342[Medline]. |
| 50. | Shivji, K. K., M. K. Kenny, and R. D. Wood. 1992. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen is required for DNA excision repair. Cell 69:367-374[Medline]. |
| 51. | Stillman, B. 1994. Smart machines at the DNA replication fork. Cell 78:725-728[Medline]. |
| 52. | Takahashi, K., H. Yamada, and M. Yanagida. 1994. Fission yeast minichromosome loss mutants mis cause lethal aneuploidy and replication abnormality. Mol. Biol. Cell 5:1145-1158[Abstract]. |
| 53. | Tanaka, T., D. Knapp, and K. Nasmyth. 1997. Loading of an Mcm protein onto DNA replication origins is regulated by Cdc6p and CDKs. Cell 90:649-660[Medline]. |
| 54. |
Tsurimoto, T., and B. Stillman.
1991.
Replication factors required for SV40 DNA replication in vitro. I. DNA structure-specific recognition of a primer-template junction by eukaryotic DNA polymerases and their accessory proteins.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:1950-1960 |
| 55. |
Tsurimoto, T., and B. Stillman.
1991.
Replication factors required for SV40 DNA replication in vitro. II. Switching of DNA polymerase and during initiation of leading and lagging strand synthesis.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:1961-1968 |
| 56. | Tye, B. K. 1994. The Mcm2-3-5 proteins: are they replication factors? Trends Cell Biol. 4:160-166. |
| 57. |
Uhlmann, F.,
J. Cai,
E. Gibbs,
M. O'Donnell, and J. Hurwitz.
1997.
Deletion analysis of the large subunit p140 in human replication factor C reveals regions required for complex formation and replication activities.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:10058-10064 |
| 58. | Waga, S., and B. Stillman. 1994. Anatomy of a DNA replication fork revealed by reconstitution of SV40 DNA replication in vitro. Nature 369:207-212[Medline]. |
| 59. | Warbrick, E., D. P. Lane, D. M. Glover, and L. S. Cox. 1995. A small peptide inhibitor of DNA replication defines the site of interaction between the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21WAF1 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Curr. Biol. 5:275-282[Medline]. |
| 60. | Warbrick, E., D. P. Lane, D. M. Glover, and L. S. Cox. 1997. Homologous regions of Fen1 and p21Cip1 compete for binding to the same site on PCNA: a potential mechanism to co-ordinate DNA replication and repair. Oncogene 14:2313-2321[Medline]. |
| 61. |
Waseem, N. H.,
K. Labib,
P. Nurse, and D. P. Lane.
1992.
Isolation and analysis of the fission yeast gene encoding polymerase accessory protein PCNA.
EMBO J.
11:5111-5120[Medline].
|
| 62. |
Yan, H.,
A. M. Merchant, and B. K. Tye.
1993.
Cell cycle-regulated nuclear localization of MCM2 and MCM3, which are required for the initiation of DNA synthesis at chromosomal replication origins in yeast.
Genes Dev.
7:2149-2160 |
| 63. |
Zlotkin, T.,
G. Kaufmann,
Y. Jiang,
M. Y. Lee,
L. Uitto,
J. Syvaoja,
I. Dornreiter,
E. Fanning, and T. Nethanel.
1996.
DNA polymerase may be dispensable for SV40- but not cellular-DNA replication.
EMBO J.
15:2298-2305[Medline].
|
| 64. |
Zuo, S.,
E. Gibbs,
Z. Kelman,
T. S. Wang,
M. O'Donnell,
S. A. MacNeill, and J. Hurwitz.
1997.
DNA polymerase isolated from Schizosaccharomyces pombe contains five subunits.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:11244-11249 |
This article has been cited by other articles: