Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 1999, p. 1101-1115, Vol. 19, No. 2
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Complementation of Defective Colony-Stimulating
Factor 1 Receptor Signaling and Mitogenesis by Raf and v-Src
Natasha
Aziz,
Holly
Cherwinski, and
Martin
McMahon*
Department of Cell Signaling, DNAX Research
Institute, Palo Alto, California 94304-1104
Received 17 April 1998/Returned for modification 15 June
1998/Accepted 2 November 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Ras-activated signal transduction pathways are implicated in the
control of cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and
tumorigenesis, but the molecular mechanisms mediating these diverse
functions have yet to be fully elucidated. Conditionally active forms
of Raf, v-Src, and MEK1 were used to identify changes in gene
expression that participate in oncogenic transformation, as well as in
normal growth control. Activation of Raf, v-Src, and MEK1 led to
induced expression of c-Myc and cyclin D1. Induction of c-Myc mRNA by
Raf was an immediate-early response, whereas the induction of cyclin D1
mRNA was delayed and inhibited by cycloheximide. Raf activation also
resulted in the induction of an established c-Myc target gene,
ornithine decarboxylase (ODC). ODC induction by Raf was mediated, in
part, by tandem E-boxes contained in the first intron of the gene.
Activation of the human colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1) receptor in
NIH 3T3 cells leads to activation of the mitogen-activated protein
(MAP) kinase pathway and induced expression of c-Fos, c-Myc, and cyclin
D1, leading to a potent mitogenic response. By contrast, a mutated form
of this receptor fails to activate the MAP kinases or induce c-Myc and
cyclin D1 expression and fails to elicit a mitogenic response. The
biological significance of c-Myc and cyclin D1 induction by Raf and
v-Src was confirmed by the demonstration that both of these protein kinases complemented the signaling and mitogenic defects of cells expressing this mutated form of the human CSF-1 receptor. Furthermore, the induction of c-Myc and cyclin D1 by oncogenes and growth factors was inhibited by PD098059, a specific MAP kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor. These data suggest that the Raf/MEK/MAP kinase pathway plays
an important role in the regulation of c-Myc and cyclin D1 expression
in NIH 3T3 cells. The ability of oncogenes such as Raf and v-Src to
regulate the expression of these proteins reveals new lines of
communication between cytosolic signal transducers and the cell cycle machinery.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The Ras-activated mitogen-activated
protein (MAP) kinase signaling pathway participates in the control of a
variety of biological processes, including cell proliferation,
migration, differentiation, and apoptosis. The importance of this
pathway in metazoan development is emphasized by the fact that
loss-of-function mutations of components of this pathway have severe
consequences on development. Moreover, constitutively activated forms
of Ras proteins are found in approximately 35% of all human cancers
(13, 36, 49, 60, 63, 132).
Cycling of the Ras family of membrane-bound GTPases between
GTP-bound (active) and GDP-bound (inactive) states is regulated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors and GTPase-activating proteins (25). GTP-bound Ras recruits a variety of proteins to the
plasma membrane, including Ral-GDS, Rin1, p120RasGAP, p110
PI3' kinase, and Raf (44, 46), many of which serve to
propagate the signal from activated Ras throughout the cell. Among the
best-characterized effectors of Ras are the Raf family of
serine-specific protein kinases, which play an important role in cell
proliferation, differentiation, and survival (19, 23, 62, 78, 112,
120, 122-124).
The three members of the Raf family of protein kinases, A-Raf, B-Raf,
and Raf-1, share similar structural features and are activated as a
consequence of the engagement of cell surface receptors by their
cognate ligands (114, 125). Although the precise mechanism of Raf-1 activation is not fully elucidated, the favored model suggests
that Raf-1 is recruited to the plasma membrane by direct binding to
activated Ras. Membrane associated Raf-1 is then believed to be
phosphorylated and thereby activated by members of the Src family of
protein tyrosine kinases which have pleiotropic effects on the control
of cell morphology, migration, and the cell cycle (29, 61, 65, 66,
74, 82, 93, 113, 117, 121, 126). However, there are indications
that additional mechanisms for Raf-1 regulation exist (74, 130,
135). Activated Raf-1, in turn, phosphorylates to activate MAP
kinase kinase (MEK), which in turn phosphorylates to activate p42 and
p44 MAP kinase, also known as ERK2 and ERK1, respectively (22, 32,
53, 92). Activated MAP kinases elicit pleiotropic effects on cell
function by phosphorylating a diverse array of cellular proteins,
including a number of transcription factors that influence patterns of
cellular gene expression (73, 77, 118).
Activated forms of Ras, Raf, and MEK can induce DNA synthesis and
cellular transformation in vitro, and dominant-interfering forms of Raf
and MEK can block Ras-induced mitogenesis and transformation (19,
24, 40, 50, 64, 103). In NIH 3T3 cells Raf is competent to induce
DNA synthesis at low levels of activation, whereas at higher levels of
activation it induces cell cycle arrest (128). To understand
the molecular basis of Raf-induced cell proliferation and oncogenic
transformation, we sought to identify changes in gene expression that
occur after Raf activation by using conditionally active forms of these
protein kinases (
Raf:ER) (87, 100).
Raf:ER proteins
are rapidly activated by the addition of estrogen or its analogues to
the cell culture medium, resulting in alterations in gene expression
that lead to oncogenic transformation (87, 100, 128).
Considerable evidence has implicated c-Myc and cyclin D1 as important
regulators of the mammalian cell cycle (5, 42, 54, 67, 136).
Activation of the transcription factor c-Myc in quiescent fibroblasts
induces cell cycle reentry, whereas inhibition of c-Myc function
results in cell cycle arrest (8, 9, 16, 57, 127). The D-type
cyclins are transcriptionally induced in the mid-G1 phase
of the cell cycle and partner with cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK4 and
CDK6) to elicit phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma (Rb) protein. Rb
phosphorylation leads to the release of the transcription factor E2F
that influences the expression of genes required for the progression of
cells into S phase (107). Both c-Myc and cyclin D1 have
oncogenic potential and are overexpressed in a variety of human cancers
(30, 35, 43, 76, 86, 104, 111).
In this study we demonstrate the induction of the genes encoding c-Myc
and cyclin D1 by the Raf/MEK/MAP kinase pathway in NIH 3T3 cells. The
functional significance of the induction of these genes is
substantiated by the apparent ability of Raf to complement a defective
form of the human CSF-1 receptor, which fails to induce DNA synthesis
in NIH 3T3 cells as a consequence of its inability to induce the
expression of c-Myc and cyclin D1. Furthermore, the ability of a
variety of growth factors and oncogenes to induce c-Myc and cyclin D1
is abrogated by a specific and selective inhibitor of MEK activation.
Finally, since Src-family protein tyrosine kinases have been implicated
in the regulation of c-Myc, we describe the ability of a conditionally
active form of v-Src that activates the MAP kinase pathway leading to
induced expression of c-Myc and cyclin D1, to complement the mitogenic defect of the mutated colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1) receptor. These data suggest that, at least in NIH 3T3 cells, the Ras-activated MAP kinase pathway plays an important role in controlling the expression of these crucial cell cycle regulators.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell culture.
NIH 3T3 cells expressing
Raf-1:ER,
B-Raf:ER, and
B-Raf:ER* have been described previously (87,
100, 128). Clonal populations of NIH 3T3 cells expressing either
the human CSF-1 receptor or a mutated version of this receptor
containing a tyrosine-to-phenylalanine mutation at amino acid 809 (CSF-1R[809F]) were a gift of Martine Roussel (97-99).
NIH 3T3 cells expressing Raf-1[DD]:ER and v-Src:ER were
generated by retroviral infection of the appropriate target cells as
described previously (14, 100). All cells were grown in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) containing 10% (vol/vol)
fetal calf serum (FCS) and rendered quiescent in either 0.5% (vol/vol)
FCS, deluxe serum-free medium (DSFM), or DSFM lacking insulin,
selenium, and transferrin (modified DSFM) (128). Cells expressing v-Src:ER were cultured in DMEM containing 10% (vol/vol) charcoal-stripped FCS (Gemini Bioproducts). Recombinant human CSF-1 was
a gift of Steve Clark (Genetics Institute). Raf:ER proteins were
activated with 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-HT; Research Biochemicals International) or ICI 182,780 (gift of Alan Wakeling, Zeneca
Pharmaceuticals). Ethanol was used as a solvent control in all experiments.
Expression of Raf-1[DD]:ER, v-Src:ER, and
MEK1:ER.
To construct conditionally active
Raf-1[DD]:ER, DNA sequences encoding full-length human
Raf-1 containing two activating point mutations (Y340D and Y341D; a
gift from Debbie Morrison) were fused to the hormone binding domain of
the HE14 allele of the human estrogen receptor (hbER) and cloned into
the pBabepuro3 retrovirus expression vector (14, 27, 72). To
generate v-Src:ER, DNA sequences encoding the Schmidt Ruppin A form of
v-Src (a gift from Josh Kaplan) were fused to hbER and cloned into the
pWZLblast3, pBabepuro3, or pLNCX retroviral expression vectors
(45, 100). In the case of pWZLblast3 (a gift from Jay
Morgenstern), expression of a bicistronic mRNA from the murine leukemia
virus long terminal repeat containing the encephalomyocarditis virus
internal ribosome entry site permits the expression of both v-Src:ER
and the blasticidin drug resistance gene (see Fig. 6A). To generate
MEK1:ER, DNA sequences encoding a constitutively active form of MEK1
containing an amino terminal deletion (
N3) and two activating
mutations (S218E and S222D) (a gift from Natalie Ahn) (64)
were fused to hbER and cloned into the pBabepuro3 retroviral expression
vector. Raf-1[DD], v-Src, and
MEK1 DNA sequences were
all amplified by PCR to introduce the appropriate restriction enzyme
sites for cloning (details available upon request).
Retrovirus stocks were prepared by the transfection of retrovirus
vectors into Bosc23 cells as described previously (83, 128).
Cells were infected with retrovirus stocks and cultured in neomycin-,
puromycin-, or blasticidin-containing media as appropriate. After
selection for drug resistance, cells were pooled and tested for
expression of Raf-1[DD]:ER, v-Src:ER, and
MEK-1:ER by
Western blotting. A clonal population of
MEK1:ER expressing cells
was isolated by ring cloning.
Western blotting and antibody detection.
Cell extracts were
prepared, quantitated, and blotted as described previously, except that
280 mM
-mercaptoethanol was used as a reducing agent and lysates
were heated to 70°C prior to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis. Antisera used in this study were raised against
c-Myc and phosphotyrosine (UBI, Inc.); p42 MAP kinase, p44 MAP kinase,
and the human estrogen receptor (Santa Cruz Biotechnology); and
phospho-ERK1/ERK2 (New England Biolabs). Anti-cyclin D1 antiserum was a
kind gift from David Parry. Antigen-antibody complexes were visualized
by using the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection system (Amersham).
Immune-complex kinase assays.
MAP kinase activity was
measured by an in vitro immunoprecipitation-kinase assay by using
myelin basic protein (MBP) as a substrate as described previously
(100).
RNase protections.
RNase protections were conducted as
described previously (68). A mouse c-Myc exon 1 riboprobe
was prepared with a cDNA linearized with BamHI (a gift from
Nissim Hay). This riboprobe protected a P1-initiated c-Myc transcript
of approximately 400 bp and a P2-initiated transcript of approximately
350 bp. A mouse ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) cDNA (nucleotides 729 to
2357; a gift from Philip Coffino) was linearized with
Eco47III, and the resulting riboprobe protected a fragment
of approximately 517 bp. A full-length mouse cyclin D1 cDNA (a gift
from Emma Lees) was linearized with SalI, and the resulting
riboprobe protected a fragment of approximately 250 bp (nucleotides 826 to 1075). A riboprobe prepared from a plasmid containing a 120-bp
fragment of human GAPDH was included in all of the hybridizations and
used as a loading control. Ten micrograms of total RNA (RNeasy kit;
Qiagen) or tRNA (as a negative control) were hybridized overnight at
45°C with both gene-specific and GAPDH riboprobes, treated with RNase
A and RNase T1 to digest the single-stranded RNA, extracted
with phenol, and ethanol precipitated, with the resulting protected
fragments resolved by electrophoresis on 6% (wt/vol) acrylamide
sequencing gels. Results were quantitated with a Molecular Dynamics
Storm PhosphorImager.
Transient transfections.
Reporter constructs, comprising the
c-Myc, ODC, or cyclin D1 promoters linked to luciferase, were
transiently transfected into confluent monolayers of NIH 3T3 cells
cultured in 60-mm tissue culture dishes by using either
DNA-Lipofectamine complexes (Gibco-BRL) or the DEAE-dextran method
(69). The mouse c-Myc promoter-luciferase construct
(pGL2-myc, provided by Mike Ostrowski) was comprised of a 500-bp
PvuII-SstI fragment that included approximately
140 bp upstream and 360 bp downstream of the mouse c-Myc P2 promoter. The ODC promoter-luciferase constructs (ODC
Luc or ODC
LucS-5A) were provided by John Cleveland and were described previously (15). The mouse cyclin D1 promoter-luciferase construct
[mD1(-984)luc; provided by Gordon Peters] was comprised
of 984 bp of DNA located upstream of the transcription initiation site
of the mouse cyclin D1 gene. In all experiments the luciferase reporter
constructs were cotransfected with pSR
-
-Gal (provided by Naoko
Arai), which contains a constitutively active promoter linked to
sequences encoding
-galactosidase as a control for transfection
efficiency (69). After transfection the cells were split
into the wells of a 24-well dish and allowed to adhere in DMEM
containing 10% (vol/vol) FCS for 3 h. The medium was then
replaced with DMEM containing 0.5% (vol/vol) FCS plus ethanol (solvent
control), 4-HT, or ICI 182,750. Cells were harvested 36 to 48 h
later in Reporter lysis buffer (Promega); luciferase activity was
measured by using the luciferase assay system (Promega), and
-galactosidase activity was measured by using the Galacto-Light kit
(Tropix) and quantitated with an AutoLumat LB953 luminometer (EG & G
Berthold). To control for transfection efficiency, all results are
expressed as the ratio of luciferase to
-galactosidase activity. In
bar graphs, each bar represents the average of four samples (c-Myc experiments), three samples (cyclin D1 experiments), or six samples (ODC experiments), and error bars indicate standard deviations.
DNA synthesis assays.
Cells were grown to confluence in
96-well microtiter dishes, held at confluence for 3 days, cultured for
an additional 24 h in DSFM, and then treated with either 10%
(vol/vol) FCS, 300 nM CSF-1, 4-HT, or 300 nM CSF-1 plus 4-HT. Then 1 µCi of [methyl-3H]thymidine was added to
each well simultaneously with the addition of growth stimuli, and the
cells were incubated for a further 36 h prior to harvest with a
Skatron Cell Harvester as described previously (128). Each
measurement was conducted in quadruplicate, and error bars indicate
standard deviations. The absence of a visible error bar indicates that
the standard deviation was too small to register on the graph at the
scale used.
 |
RESULTS |
Transcriptional regulation of c-Myc and cyclin D1 expression by
Raf.
To determine the effects of MAP kinase activation on the
expression of components of the cell cycle machinery, we explored the
consequences of Raf activation on the expression of c-Myc and cyclin
D1. RNA and protein samples were prepared from a pooled population of
NIH 3T3 cells expressing a conditionally active form of oncogenic B-Raf
(
B-Raf:ER*) (87) that was rendered quiescent and then
treated with ICI 182,780 (ICI) to activate
B-Raf:ER* for different
lengths of time as indicated (Fig. 1A). RNase protection analysis indicated that c-Myc mRNA was induced 4- to
15-fold after
B-Raf:ER* activation, with kinetics and magnitude of
induction similar to those observed in response to serum stimulation (Fig. 1A and B) (37). In asynchronously growing NIH 3T3
cells, the basal level of c-Myc expression was significantly higher, such that c-Myc mRNA was induced only two- to threefold after Raf
activation (data not shown). Treatment of parental NIH 3T3 cells or
cells expressing a kinase-inactive form of
Raf-1:ER (
Raf301:ER)
with ICI or 4-HT had no effect on the levels of c-Myc mRNA, indicating
that the induction of c-Myc requires Raf kinase activity (data not
shown).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Induction of c-Myc by Raf in NIH 3T3 cells. (A) c-Myc
mRNA regulation. NIH 3T3 cells expressing B-Raf:ER* were cultured in
0.5% serum for 16 h, and RNA samples were prepared at different
times after the addition of 1 µM ICI to activate B-Raf:ER*. The
expression of c-Myc (upper panel) and GAPDH (lower panel) mRNAs was
detected by simultaneous RNase protection assay. The fold induction of
c-Myc mRNA was quantitated by obtaining the ratio of c-Myc to GAPDH
mRNAs by PhosphorImager analysis. (B) Comparison of c-Myc mRNA
induction by serum versus B-Raf:ER* activation. NIH 3T3 cells
expressing B-Raf:ER* were cultured in 0.5% serum for 16 h, and
RNA samples were prepared at different times after stimulation with
10% FCS (closed diamonds) or the activation of B-Raf:ER* with 1 µM ICI (open squares). c-Myc and GAPDH mRNAs were detected by RNase
protection, and data were quantified by PhosphorImager analysis.
Results are presented as the fold induction over the baseline level of
expression. (C) Activation of the c-Myc promoter. NIH 3T3 cells
expressing B-Raf:ER* were transiently transfected with reporter
constructs consisting of the promoter region of human c-Myc linked to
luciferase (pGL2-myc) and pSR -Gal as a control for transfection
efficiency. Transfected cells were treated with either ethanol (solvent
control, open bar) or 500 nM 4-HT (shaded bar) in 0.5% serum for
36 h, at which time the luciferase and -galactosidase
activities were measured. Results are presented as the ratios of the
luciferase to -galactosidase activities. (D) Induction of c-Myc
protein expression. NIH 3T3 cells expressing B-Raf:ER* were cultured
in 0.5% FCS for 16 h, and cell extracts were prepared at
different times after the addition of 500 nM 4-HT. The expression of
p62c-Myc was detected by Western blotting with a specific
antiserum (upper panel). The same Western blot was reprobed for the
expression of p42 MAP kinase as a control for equal loading in each
lane (lower panel). (E) Effect of increasing B-Raf:ER* activity on
c-Myc expression. NIH 3T3 cells expressing B-Raf:ER* were cultured
in modified DSFM for 24 h and stimulated with different
concentrations of 4-HT, and cell extracts were prepared 4.5 h
later. MAP kinase activity was measured by performing
p42MAPK immune complex kinase assays with MBP as a
substrate (upper panel). c-Myc expression was analyzed by Western
blotting.
|
|
In order to determine if the induction of c-Myc mRNA by

B-Raf:ER*
was mediated by an increase in c-Myc transcription, NIH
3T3 cells were
transiently transfected with a reporter construct
(pGL2-myc) consisting
of a portion of the c-Myc promoter fused
to luciferase. Activation of

B-Raf:ER* led to a ninefold induction
of luciferase activity (Fig.
1C), indicating that Raf activation
leads to transactivation of the
c-Myc promoter. The induction
of c-Myc mRNA in response to serum
stimulation is immediate early
in that it is resistant to the effects
of cycloheximide, an inhibitor
of protein synthesis (
47).
Similarly, activation of

B-Raf:ER*
or treatment of cells with
cycloheximide alone resulted in an
increase in c-Myc mRNA levels (Fig.
2A, top panel). Activation
of

B-Raf:ER* in the presence of cycloheximide led to superinduction
of
c-Myc mRNA, indicating that c-Myc is an immediate-early transcriptional
target of Raf activation.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Regulation of cyclin D1 and c-Myc expression by Raf. (A)
Cycloheximide sensitivity of Raf-induced cyclin D1 and c-Myc mRNA
expression. NIH 3T3 cells expressing B-Raf:ER* were cultured in
0.5% FCS for 24 h and were then either left untreated or treated
with 25 µg of cycloheximide per ml for 1 h. These cells were
then either left untreated (CHX) or treated with 1 µM ICI to activate
B-Raf:ER* for different lengths of time as indicated. The expression
of cyclin D1, c-Myc, and GAPDH mRNAs were quantitated by RNase
protection assays. (B) Cyclin D1 promoter activation. NIH 3T3 cells
expressing B-Raf:ER* were transiently transfected with reporter
constructs consisting of the promoter region of mouse cyclin D1 linked
to luciferase [mD1(-984)Luc] and pSR -Gal as a
control for transfection efficiency. Transfected cells were treated
with either ethanol (solvent control, open bar) or 1 µM 4-HT (closed
bar) for 41 h, at which time luciferase and -galactosidase
activities were measured. Results are presented as the ratios of the
luciferase to the -galactosidase activities.
|
|
Confirmation of the c-Myc mRNA analysis was sought by examining cell
extracts for the expression of p62
c-Myc by Western
blotting. Consistent with the mRNA analysis, activation
of

B-Raf:ER*
resulted in a rapid induction of p62
c-Myc that was readily
detected after 40 min and was sustained at elevated
levels for at least
6 h (Fig.
1D).
We have previously shown that the activity of

Raf:ER proteins can be
titrated by varying the concentration of 4-HT added
to the cell culture
medium. Low levels of Raf activity (up to
2 nM 4-HT in

B-Raf:ER*-expressing cells) promote cell proliferation,
and high
levels of Raf activity (

5 nM 4-HT) promote a G
1
arrest
that is mediated by p21
Cip1 (
128). To
investigate the expression of c-Myc in response to
different
levels of Raf activation, we treated quiescent

B-Raf:ER*-expressing
cells with different concentrations of 4-HT for 4.5 h and examined
MAP kinase activation and c-Myc expression (Fig.
1E). Both
p62
c-Myc expression and MAP kinase activity were maximal at
concentrations
of 4-HT greater than 2 nM, with higher concentrations of
4-HT
having no additional effect on MAP kinase activity or the level
of
p62
c-Myc expression.
Cells transformed by activated Ras express elevated levels of cyclin
D1, and previously we have demonstrated that activation
of

Raf-1:ER
leads to induced cyclin D1 expression (
58,
128).
We
therefore investigated the induction of cyclin D1 mRNA by Raf.
Activation of

B-Raf:ER* led to a sustained induction of cyclin
D1
mRNA, which was maximal between 5 and 7 h after

B-Raf:ER*
activation (Fig.
2A, middle panel). Such induction kinetics are
consistent with the regulation of cyclin D1 expression after either
serum stimulation or

B-Raf:ER* activation (
128). In
contrast
to the induction of c-Myc mRNA by Raf, the induction of cyclin
D1 mRNA was entirely abrogated by pretreatment of the cells with
cycloheximide. These data are consistent with the CSF-1-mediated
induction of cyclin D1 mRNA which occurs in mid-G
1 and is
cycloheximide
sensitive (
67). Given the differences in the
kinetics and cycloheximide
sensitivities of the c-Myc and cyclin D1
genes, it seems likely
that Raf regulates these genes by different
mechanisms.
In order to determine whether the induction of cyclin D1 by Raf was
mediated by transcriptional activation of the cyclin D1
promoter,

B-Raf:ER*-expressing cells were transiently transfected
with a
reporter construct consisting of 984 bp of the mouse cyclin
D1 promoter
linked to luciferase. Activation of

B-Raf:ER* led
to a 17-fold
induction of cyclin D1 promoter activity (Fig.
2B),
a finding in
agreement with previous work indicating that in certain
circumstances
the MAP kinase pathway plays an important role in
the regulation of
cyclin D1 expression (
56). Collectively, these
data suggest
that the cyclin D1 gene is a delayed-early transcriptional
target of
Raf activation in NIH 3T3
cells.
Induction of ODC gene expression by Raf.
The c-Myc
transcription factor has been implicated in the regulation of cell
proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis (5). c-Myc
acts in concert with a heterodimerization partner Max to transactivate
transcription through cis-acting sequences known as E-boxes
(CACGTG) (11, 12, 51, 84). A number of cellular
genes have been identified as potential targets for transactivation by
c-Myc, including ODC, an enzyme that catalyzes the rate-limiting step
in polyamine biosynthesis which is essential for cell proliferation (7, 33, 38). If the induction of c-Myc by Raf is of
functional consequence, it would be predicted that a c-Myc target gene
such as ODC would be induced by Raf in an E-box-dependent manner. We therefore sought to determine whether Raf activation was sufficient to
induce the expression of ODC. Activation of either
Raf-1:ER or
B-Raf:ER* in NIH 3T3 cells led to a 17- to 36-fold induction of ODC
mRNA expression (Fig. 3A and data not
shown). Compared to HB-EGF, which is induced with immediate-early
kinetics, the induction of ODC mRNA was delayed, reaching maximum
levels 4 to 12 h after Raf activation (Fig. 3A) (70).
These data are consistent with a temporal requirement for
intermediate events between Raf activation and ODC mRNA induction.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Induced expression of ODC after Raf activation. (A)
Induction of ODC mRNA by Raf. NIH 3T3 cells expressing Raf-1:ER were
cultured in DMEM containing 0.5% serum for 16 h, and RNA samples
were prepared at different times after the addition of 1 µM ICI.
Expression of the mRNAs encoding ODC (upper panel), heparin-binding
epidermal growth factor (HB-EGF, middle panel), and GAPDH (lower panel)
was quantitated by using RNase protection assays. (B) ODC promoter
activation. NIH 3T3 cells expressing B-Raf:ER* were transiently
transfected with reporter constructs consisting of the promoter region
of human ODC linked to luciferase (ODC Luc) or a form of this
promoter containing a point mutation in each of the two E-boxes located
in the first intron of the gene (ODC LucS-5A). pSR -Gal was
cotransfected with the ODC reporter plasmids as a control for
transfection efficiency. Transfected cells were treated with either
ethanol (solvent control, open bars) or 500 nM 4-HT (shaded bars) for
40 h, at which time the luciferase and -galactosidase
activities were measured. Results are presented as the ratios of the
luciferase to the -galactosidase activities.
|
|
The transcriptional activation of ODC by c-Myc is mediated by tandem
E-boxes located in the first intron of the ODC gene (
7).
To
determine if the induction of ODC transcription by Raf requires
these
E-boxes, we utilized a pair of reporter constructs comprising
either
the wild-type ODC promoter (ODC

Luc) or a reporter in which
the
E-boxes were mutated (CAC
GTG

CAC
CTG),
rendering the reporter
unresponsive to c-Myc (ODC

LucS-5A)
(
80). Activation of

B-Raf:ER*
led to a 3.7-fold
induction of ODC

Luc activity, whereas ODC

LucS-5A
was
activated 2.3-fold (Fig.
3B). This 37% decrease in the ability
of Raf
to activate the ODC

LucS-5A reporter, although modest,
was highly
reproducible in five separate experiments. Moreover,
the residual
transactivation of the ODC

LucS-5A construct by Raf
is consistent
with the prevailing model of ODC transcriptional
regulation that
suggests that c-Myc works in concert with other
regulated transcription
factors to control ODC expression (
1,
52,
75,
80,
81,
129).
These data suggest that c-Myc binding
sites are required for the full
induction of ODC gene transcription
in response to Raf
activation.
Further support for a role for the Ras/Raf pathway in the regulation of
c-Myc and ODC expression came from separate experiments
with human cell
lines. HCT-116 is a tumorigenic colon carcinoma
cell line expressing a
mutationally activated form of Ki-Ras (G13D)
and elevated levels of
c-Myc. Hke-3 cells are a nontumorigenic
derivative of HCT-116 derived
by homologous-recombination-mediated
ablation of the activated Ki-Ras
gene that expresses decreased
levels of c-Myc (
108). In
these cells the wild-type ODC

Luc reporter
was transactivated 90-fold
more efficiently in HCT-116 cells than
in HKe-3 cells (data not shown).
This is consistent with the work
of others showing increased ODC gene
expression in Ha-Ras-transformed
fibroblasts treated with basic
fibroblast growth factor (
39,
41,
71) and suggest that
Ras-activated signaling pathways
may play a role in the regulation of
c-Myc and ODC in the context
of human cancer
cells.
Complementation of defective CSF-1 receptor signaling by Raf.
To further address the significance of c-Myc and cyclin D1 induction by
Raf, we made use of two clonal NIH 3T3 cell lines expressing either the
human CSF-1 receptor (CSF-1R) or a mutated derivative containing a
tyrosine-to-phenylalanine mutation at a site of ligand-dependent
phosphorylation (CSF-1R[809F]) (94, 97, 98). Addition of
CSF-1 to NIH 3T3 cells expressing the human CSF-1 receptor leads to the
induction of c-Fos, c-Jun, c-Myc, and cyclin D1 and elicits a robust
proliferative response. Although the binding of CSF-1 to the mutated
CSF-1 receptor elicits tyrosine phosphorylation of the receptor and
induced expression of c-Jun and c-Fos, it fails to fully induce cyclin
D1 and c-Myc mRNAs, with the consequence that the cells fail to
proliferate in response to CSF-1 (98). The mitogenic defect
of the CSF-1R[809F] is complemented by the ectopic overexpression of
either cyclin D1 or c-Myc (95, 99). Since Raf activation
resulted in the induction of both c-Myc and cyclin D1, we wished to
examine whether the mutated CSF-1 receptor was able to activate the
Raf/MEK/MAP kinase pathway and whether Raf could functionally
complement the biochemical and biological defects in the
CSF-1R[809F]-expressing cells.
To investigate the ability of the normal and mutated CSF-1 receptors to
activate the Raf/MEK/MAP kinase pathway in NIH 3T3
cells, quiescent
cells of both types were treated with CSF-1 for
different periods of
time from 5 to 60 min, and the MAP kinase
activity was measured (Fig.
4A). Activation of the
wild-type CSF-1
receptor led to activation of the p42 and p44 MAP
kinases that
peaked after 5 min of CSF-1 addition (~13-fold
induction) and
remained elevated (~5-fold induction) for up to 60 min
after CSF-1
addition. By contrast, addition of CSF-1 to cells
expressing the
mutated CSF-1 receptor resulted in only a twofold
activation of
the MAP kinases over the same time period. These data
indicate
that despite the apparent inability of the CSF-1R[809F] to
fully
activate the MAP kinase pathway, this receptor retains its
ability
to induce the expression of c-Fos and c-Jun (
98).
Such data
are consistent with a requirement for MAP kinase activation
for
induced expression of c-Myc and cyclin D1 mRNAs.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Complementation of the mitogenic and signaling defect of
the CSF-1R[809F] by Raf. (A) Comparison of CSF-1-dependent MAP kinase
activity in CSF-1R and CSF-1R[809F]-expressing cells. NIH 3T3 cells
expressing either the wild-type human CSF-1 receptor (WT CSF-1R) or a
mutated form of the receptor encoding a single
tyrosine-to-phenylalanine mutation CSF-1R[809F] were cultured in DSFM
for 24 h, at which time 300 nM CSF-1 was added for different
periods of time as indicated. The activities of the p42 and p44 MAP
kinases were measured by an immune complex kinase assay with MBP as a
substrate, and the fold MAP kinase activation was quantified by
PhosphorImager analysis (upper panel). Equal amounts of p42 and p44 MAP
kinases in each immunoprecipitation were confirmed by Western blotting
with an antiserum that recognizes p42 and p44 MAP kinases (lower
panel). (B) Construction of a conditionally active form of full-length
Raf-1. DNA sequences encoding a form of full-length human Raf-1
containing two activating point mutations (Y304D and Y341D) were fused
in frame to sequences encoding the hormone-binding domain of the human estrogen receptor (hbER)
to generate Raf-1[DD]:ER (diagram). NIH 3T3 cells
infected with a replication-defective retrovirus encoding
Raf-1[DD]:ER were treated with ethanol (solvent control)
or 1 µM 4-HT for 48 h as indicated, at which time
photomicrographs were taken. (C) Induced expression of c-Myc and cyclin
D1. NIH 3T3 cells expressing either the wild-type CSF-1 receptor (left
panel) or CSF-1R[809F] (middle panel) were cultured in DSFM for
40 h and treated with 300 nM CSF-1 for different periods of time
as indicated. NIH 3T3 cells expressing both the CSF-1R[809F] and
Raf-1[DD]:ER (right panel) were cultured in DSFM for
40 h, at which time they were treated with 50 nM 4-HT in the
absence or presence of 300 nM CSF-1 for different periods of time as
indicated. Expression of c-Myc and cyclin D1 was detected by Western
blotting. For cyclin D1 detection, ECL exposures were all for the same
length of time; for c-Myc, wild-type CSF-1R, and
Raf-1[DD]:ER/CSF-1R[809F], Western blots were exposed
for the same length of time but the CSF-1R[809F] Western blot was
deliberately overexposed in order to detect the lower level of basal
c-Myc expressed in these cells. (D) Proliferation of CSF-1R-expressing
cell lines. NIH 3T3 cells expressing the wild-type CSF-1 receptor
CSF-1R[809F] (left panel) or both CSF-1R[809F] and
Raf-1[DD]:ER (right panel) were cultured in DSFM for
28 h and then either left untreated (NT) or treated with 10% FCS
(SER), 300 nM CSF-1 (gray bars), 4-HT (2 or 50 nM, open bars), or CSF-1
plus 4-HT (solid bars). Cell proliferation was determined by measuring
the incorporation of [3H]thymidine over a period of
36 h.
|
|
To determine whether Raf could functionally complement the signaling
and mitogenic defects in the CSF-1R[809F]-expressing
cells, we
constructed a conditionally active form of full-length
human Raf-1.
Mutation of two tyrosine residues in full-length
Raf-1 to aspartic acid
(Y340D and Y341D) gives rise to a constitutively
activated form of the
protein that is highly transforming in NIH
3T3 cells (
27).
Sequences encoding this form of Raf-1 (Raf-1
[DD])
were
fused to the hormone-binding domain of the human estrogen
receptor to
generate Raf-1
[DD]:ER (Fig.
4B) (
14).
Activation of Raf-1
[DD]:ER in NIH 3T3 cells led to rapid
activation of the p42 and p44 MAP kinases, induced expression
of c-Myc
and cyclin D1, and oncogenic transformation (Fig.
4B
and data not
shown). We chose to use this form of conditionally
active Raf-1 because
maximal activation of the p42 and p44 MAP
kinases was at least
threefold lower in response to Raf-1
[DD]:ER
activation
than in the previously characterized

Raf-1:ER proteins
that carry a
deletion of the CR1 and CR2 negative regulatory regions.
This allows a
larger range of 4-HT concentrations in which the
activation of Raf
alone is insufficient to induce cell proliferation
(
128). In
addition, since the presence of aspartic acid residues
at these
positions is thought to mimic phosphorylation, this form
of Raf-1 may
be a more accurate mimic of the protein that has
been activated as a
consequence of growth factor receptor engagement.
NIH 3T3 cells
expressing CSF-1R[809F] were infected with a retrovirus
encoding
Raf-1
[DD]:ER, and pooled populations of cells
expressing
both proteins, referred to as
CSF-1R[809F]/Raf-1
[DD]:ER,
were
established.
To determine if Raf activation was able to rescue the biochemical
defects in cells expressing CSF-1R[809F], cells were rendered
quiescent and then stimulated with either CSF-1, 10% (vol/vol)
FCS,
4-HT, or 4-HT plus CSF-1 for different lengths of time, and
the
expression of c-Myc and cyclin D1 proteins was assessed by
Western
blotting. CSF-1 treatment of cells expressing the wild-type
CSF-1
receptor led to a strong induction of both cyclin D1 and
c-Myc, whereas
CSF-1 treatment of CSF-1R[809F]-expressing cells
resulted in poor
induction of both of these proteins even upon
prolonged exposure of the
Western blot (Fig.
4C, left and middle
panels) (
99).
Activation of Raf-1
[DD]:ER in the
CSF-1R[809F]/Raf-1
[DD]:ER
cells either alone or in
combination with CSF-1 treatment led
to induction of both cyclin D1 and
c-Myc (Fig.
4C, right panels).
The combination of 4-HT plus CSF-1 did
not appear to potentiate
the kinetics of cyclin D1 or c-Myc induction
by Raf-1
[DD]:ER.
These data indicate that activation of
Raf-1
[DD]:ER
complemented the signaling defect of cells
expressing the defective
CSF-1 receptor, leading to restoration of
induced c-Myc and cyclin
D1
expression.
To determine if Raf-1
[DD]:ER was able to complement the
mitogenic defect in CSF-1R[809F]-expressing cells, cells
were
rendered quiescent and then treated with either CSF-1, 10%
(vol/vol)
FCS, 4-HT, or CSF-1 plus 4-HT, and reentry into the
cell cycle was
assessed by evaluating [
methyl-
3H]thymidine
incorporation into DNA. Treatment of CSF-1R-expressing
cells with
either serum or CSF-1 led to induction of DNA synthesis,
whereas 4-HT
had no effect (Fig.
4D, left panel). Cells expressing
the defective
CSF-1 receptor responded to serum stimulation but
not to either CSF-1
or 4-HT (Fig.
4D, left panel) (
97). Quiescent
CSF-1R[809F]/Raf-1
[DD]:ER cells displayed a mitogenic
response to serum stimulation but not to CSF-1 or activation of
Raf-1
[DD]:ER alone (Fig.
4D, right panel). However,
concomitant activation of Raf-1
[DD]:ER with CSF-1
treatment
resulted in a synergistic mitogenic response that was not
observed
with either 4-HT or CSF-1 treatment alone. Although activation
of Raf is sufficient to induce mitogenesis in NIH 3T3 cells, these
experiments were conducted at levels of Raf activation (modulated
by
titrating the concentration of 4-HT) that were insufficient
to induce
DNA synthesis (Fig.
4D, right panel, open
bars).
Interestingly, in multiple experiments we noted that the response of
cells expressing the mutated CSF-1 receptor to concomitant
treatment
with CSF-1 and Raf activation was less than that observed
in cells
expressing the wild-type CSF-1 receptor. There are several
possibilities to explain such observations. First, it may be that
the
phosphorylation of tyrosine-809 of the CSF-1 receptor initiates
multiple signaling pathways required for cell cycle progression.
Second, it is possible that the mutated CSF-1 receptor is defective
in
all Ras-activated signaling pathways; hence, Raf may only partially
complement the loss of activated Ras. Third, such differences
may be a
reflection of intrinsic clonal variation between separately
derived
populations of NIH 3T3 cells. Finally, these results may
be a
reflection of the ability of Raf to inhibit cell proliferation
as a
consequence of the induction of p21
Cip1 which could be
occurring in a subpopulation of retrovirus-infected
cells
(
128). Nonetheless, collectively, these data are consistent
with a model that suggests that the defective CSF-1 receptor is
unable
to fully activate the MAP kinase pathway leading to c-Myc
and cyclin D1
induction. Moreover, activation of Raf in conjunction
with CSF-1 is
sufficient to restore, at least in part, the biochemical
and biological
response of these
cells.
MEK activation is necessary and sufficient for the induction of
c-Myc and cyclin D1.
To determine whether MEK activation was
either necessary or sufficient for c-Myc and cyclin D1 induction, we
constructed a conditionally active form of MEK1 (
MEK1:ER) by fusing
sequences encoding a constitutively active form of the protein to the
hormone-binding domain of the human estrogen receptor as described
previously (64, 128). In addition, we used a specific and
selective inhibitor of MEK1 (PD098059) to address whether MEK1 activity
was required for the induction of c-Myc and cyclin D1 by growth factors
and oncogenes.
Activation of

MEK1:ER in NIH 3T3 cells led to activation of the p42
and p44 MAP kinases and elicited morphological transformation,
although
both effects occurred with slower kinetics than was observed
previously
with

Raf-1:ER (Fig.
5B and
5C and data
not shown).
In addition, activation of

MEK1:ER in quiescent NIH 3T3
cells
led to the induction of c-Myc and cyclin D1 that was detected
between 3 and 26 h after the activation of

MEK1:ER. The
expression
of both proteins remained elevated for at least 48 h
after

MEK1:ER
activation (Fig.
5C). The delayed induction of both
proteins,
compared to Raf activation, correlates with the slower
activation
of the MAP kinases observed in response to

MEK1:ER
activation
(Fig.
5C, lower panel). However, c-Myc and cyclin D1 were
induced
to the same extent by

MEK1:ER as by Raf. These data indicate
that MEK1 activation is sufficient for the induction of c-Myc
and
cyclin D1 and are consistent with the ability of activated
forms of
MEK1 to induce DNA synthesis in NIH 3T3 cells (
19,
128).

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
MEK activity is sufficient and necessary for the
induction of c-Myc and cyclin D1. (A) Construction of MEK1:ER. DNA
sequences encoding a constitutively active form of MEK1 ( N3, S218E,
and S222D) were fused to the hormone-binding domain of the HE14 allele
of the human estrogen receptor and cloned into the pBabepuro3
replication-defective retroviral expression vector (64, 72).
(B) Morphological transformation of NIH 3T3 cells after activation of
MEK1:ER. NIH 3T3 cells expressing MEK1:ER were cultured in DSFM
for 24 h and then treated with either ethanol (solvent control) or
1 µM 4-HT for 48 h as indicated, at which time photomicrographs
were taken. (C) MAP kinase activity and expression of c-Myc and cyclin
D1 after MEK1:ER activation. NIH 3T3 cells expressing MEK1:ER
were cultured in DSFM for 24 h and then treated with 1 µM 4-HT
for various lengths of time. Expression of c-Myc (top panel) and cyclin
D1 (middle panel) was detected by Western blotting, and MAP kinase
activity was assessed by p42 and p44 immune complex kinase assay with
MBP as a substrate (lower panel). (D) Effect of inhibiting MEK activity
on Raf induction of c-Myc and cyclin D1 expression. NIH 3T3 cells
expressing B-Raf:ER* were cultured in DSFM for 24 h and then
treated with either DMSO (solvent conrol) or 100 µM PD098059 for 40 min. Different concentrations of 4-HT were then added, and cells were
harvested after either 6 h (top and middle panels) or 25 h
(bottom panel). The activities of the p42 and p44 MAP kinases (top
panel) were measured by immune-complex kinase assay, and expression of
c-Myc and cyclin D1 (middle and bottom panels) was assessed by Western
blotting. (E) Effect of inhibiting MEK activity on CSF-1 induction of
c-Myc and cyclin D1. NIH 3T3 cells expressing the wild-type CSF-1
receptor (WT CSF-1R) were cultured in DSFM for 20 h and then
treated with either DMSO or 100 µM PD098059 for 40 min. Cells were
then treated with 300 or 225 nM CSF-1 and harvested after either 1 h (middle and bottom panels) or 22.5 h (top panel). c-Myc and
cyclin D1 expression (top and middle panels) was assessed by Western
blotting. The c-Myc blot was reprobed with an anti-p42 MAP kinase
antiserum as a control for equal loading. (F) Effect of inhibiting MEK
activity on PDGF induction of c-Myc. Parental NIH 3T3 cells were
cultured in DSFM for 16 h and then treated with either 100 µM
PD098059, 10 nM wortmannin, or DMSO as a solvent control for 40 min.
Cells were then treated with 10 ng of PDGF per ml and harvested 2 h later. c-Myc expression was assessed by Western blotting.
|
|
To address a possible requirement for MEK activity in the induction of
c-Myc and cyclin D1 in response to Raf activation we
pretreated NIH 3T3
cells expressing

B-Raf:ER* with PD098059,
a specific and selective
inhibitor of MEK1 activity or dimethyl
sulfoxide (DMSO) as a solvent
control (
4,
128). Cells were
then treated with increasing
concentrations of 4-HT and harvested
after either 6 h (to measure
c-Myc expression) or 25 h (to measure
cyclin D1 expression) (Fig.
5D). By 6 h after

B-Raf:ER* activation,
p42 and p44 MAP kinase
activation was readily detected with a
phospho-specific anti-active MAP
kinase antiserum (Fig.
5D, top
panel) or by an immune-complex kinase
assay (data not shown).
Activation of the p42 and p44 MAP kinases was
inhibited by treatment
with PD098059, whereas the addition of DMSO had
no effect. Treatment
of cells with PD098059 inhibited the induction of
both c-Myc and
cyclin D1 proteins in response to

B-Raf:ER*
activation. However,
at higher levels of Raf activation (25 nM 4-HT),
the inhibition
of c-Myc and cyclin D1 expression by PD098059 was less
profound.
It is not clear if this incomplete inhibition is a
consequence
of only a partial blockade of MAP kinase activation in
these cells
or if it may reflect that, at higher levels of Raf
activation,
MEK-independent pathways are involved in the regulation of
these
genes. However, these data suggest that MEK activity is required
for the full induction of c-Myc and cyclin D1 in response to Raf
activation.
To determine whether MEK activity is required for the ability of the
CSF-1 receptor to induce c-Myc expression, quiescent
NIH 3T3 cells
expressing the wild-type CSF-1 receptor were treated
with different
concentrations of CSF-1 (300 or 225 nM) in the
absence or presence of
PD098059 (Fig.
5E). Cells were harvested
after either 1 or 22.5 h
of CSF-1 treatment for analysis of c-Myc
and cyclin D1 expression,
respectively. The induction of both
c-Myc and cyclin D1 proteins by
CSF-1 was significantly inhibited
in the presence of PD098059,
indicating that MEK activity is required
for the full induction of
these proteins by CSF-1. These data
are further consistent with a
requirement for MAP kinase activation
for induction of c-Myc and cyclin
D1 by the CSF-1 receptor. As
described above for Raf, it is not clear
if the residual expression
of cyclin D1 and c-Myc is due to incomplete
inhibition of the
MAP kinase pathway or the existence of
MEK1-independent pathways
leading to the control of these
genes.
Finally, we addressed the requirement for MEK activity in NIH 3T3 cells
for the induction of c-Myc in response to the potent
mesenchymal growth
factor, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF).
Quiescent NIH 3T3 cells
were stimulated with PDGF in the absence
or presence of PD098059. The
induction of c-Myc in response to
PDGF was strongly inhibited by
PD098059 (Fig.
5F). Interestingly,
treatment of these cells with
wortmannin, an inhibitor of PI3'
kinase activity, also decreased
PDGF-induced c-Myc expression,
suggesting a potential role for
phosphatidylinositol lipid-regulated
signaling pathways in the
regulation of c-Myc expression (Fig.
5F).
Complementation of defective CSF-1 receptor signaling by
v-Src.
Previous experiments have indicated a potential role for
the Src family of protein tyrosine kinases in the regulation of c-Myc expression in response to growth factor stimulation of mouse
fibroblasts. Further, it has been suggested that a Src-dependent,
Ras-independent pathway may be crucial in the regulation of c-Myc in
such cells (6). We therefore sought to determine if
activated Src could regulate either c-Myc or cyclin D1 expression and,
additionally, if Src could complement the mitogenic defect in NIH 3T3
cells expressing the CSF-1R[809F]. A conditionally active form of
v-Src was constructed by fusing sequences encoding the Schmidt Ruppin A
form of v-Src to the hormone-binding domain of the human estrogen receptor as described above for Raf-1 and MEK1 (Fig.
6A). NIH 3T3 cells expressing v-Src:ER
displayed hormone-dependent morphological transformation (Fig. 6B) and
tyrosine phosphorylation of cellular proteins (Fig. 6C). As shown
previously, treatment of NIH 3T3 cells infected with a control
retrovirus (Neo) with 4-HT had no effect on the low level of tyrosine
phosphorylation found in these cells and no effect on cell morphology
(Fig. 6C) (100).

View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Construction of v-Src:ER. (A) Construction of v-Src:ER.
DNA sequences encoding the SRA form of v-Src were fused in frame to the
hormone-binding domain of the human estrogen receptor and cloned into a
series of replication-defective retrovirus vectors. (B) Morphological
transformation of NIH 3T3 cells after activation of v-Src:ER. NIH 3T3
cells expressing v-Src:ER were cultured in DSFM for 16 h and
treated with either ethanol (solvent control) or 1 µM 4-HT (to
activate v-Src:ER) for 48 h, as indicated, at which time
photomicrographs were taken. (C) Tyrosine phosphorylation of cellular
proteins after activation of v-Src:ER. Control NIH 3T3 cells (control
cells, two left lanes) or NIH 3T3 cells expressing v-Src:ER (three
right lanes) were cultured in 10% FCS and treated with 1 µM 4-HT for
various lengths of time as indicated. Tyrosine phosphorylation of
cellular proteins was assessed by Western blotting with the 4G10
antiphosphotyrosine monoclonal antibody.
|
|
Activation of v-Src:ER in quiescent NIH 3T3 cells resulted in
activation of the p42-p44 MAP kinases within 1 h and the induction
of both c-Myc and cyclin D1 proteins within 1 and 4 h,
respectively
(Fig.
7A). The kinetics of
c-Myc and cyclin D1 induction after
v-Src:ER activation were similar to
those observed in response
to the activation of

Raf-1:ER, suggesting
that v-Src:ER is able
to activate some of the same changes in gene
expression induced
by activation of Raf and MEK. Such results are
consistent with
previous observations that transformation of cells by
v-Src requires
the activity of Ras proteins (
110).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Complementation of the CSF-1R[809F] mitogenic and
signaling defect by v-Src:ER. (A) Activation of the MAP kinases and
induction of c-Myc and cyclin D1 by v-Src:ER. NIH 3T3 cells expressing
v-Src:ER were cultured in DSFM for 2 days and treated with 500 nM 4-HT
for various lengths of time. Expression of c-Myc, cyclin D1, activated
p42 and p44 MAP kinases, and v-Src:ER was assessed by Western blotting.
(B) Proliferation of v-Src:ER-expressing cells. NIH 3T3 cells
expressing the CSF-1R[809F] and v-Src:ER were cultured in DSFM for
24 h and then either left untreated (NT) or treated with 10% FCS,
300 nM CSF-1 (gray bars), 4-HT (0.05 to 1 nM, open bars), or CSF-1 plus
4-HT (solid bars). Cell proliferation was determined by measuring the
incorporation of [methyl-3H]thymidine over a
period of 48 h. (C) Effect of inhibition of MEK activity on the
induction of c-Myc by v-Src:ER. NIH 3T3 cells expressing CSF-1R[809F]
and v-Src:ER were cultured in DSFM for 36 h, treated with 100 µM
PD098059 for 1 h, and then stimulated with 50 nM 4-HT for 4 h. Expression of c-Myc was assessed by Western blotting. (D) Effect of
inhibition of MEK activity on the induction of cyclin D1 by v-Src:ER.
NIH 3T3 cells expressing v-Src:ER were cultured for 36 h in DSFM,
treated with DMSO (solvent control) or 100 µM PD098059 for 40 min,
and then stimulated with various concentrations of 4-HT (0 to 2 nM) for
24 h. Expression of cyclin D1 was assessed by Western blotting.
|
|
To address whether activation of v-Src:ER was sufficient to complement
the mitogenic defect of the mutated CSF-1 receptor,
we generated a
population of cells expressing both the CSF-1R[809F]
and v-Src:ER.
These cells were rendered quiescent and then were
stimulated as
described in Materials and Methods. Serum stimulation
of these cells
led to induced DNA synthesis, whereas treatment
with CSF-1 or
activation of v-Src:ER alone with low concentrations
of 4-HT had no
effect on cell proliferation (Fig.
7B). Activation
of v-Src:ER in the
presence of CSF-1 resulted in a strong synergistic
induction of DNA
synthesis. Like Raf-1
[DD]:ER, high-level
activation of
v-Src:ER alone results in a robust mitogenic response;
hence, this
experiment was performed at levels of v-Src:ER activation
(modulated by
varying the concentration of 4-HT) that were insufficient
to induce DNA
synthesis (Fig.
7B, open bars). These data are consistent
with a role
for Src family protein kinases in the regulation of
the MAP kinase
pathway leading to the induction of cyclin D1 and
c-Myc. It is
interesting to note that the mitogenic response of
these cells to CSF-1
and v-Src:ER activation exceeded the serum
response in a manner
analogous to that of cells expressing the
wild-type CSF-1 receptor.
Such observations may reflect the fact
that v-Src:ER is able to
activate both Ras-dependent and Ras-independent
signal transduction
pathways to support cell
proliferation.
To determine whether the induction of c-Myc and cyclin D1 by v-Src:ER
required the activity of MEK, we assessed the effects
of the MEK
inhibitor PD098059 on the ability of v-Src to induce
the expression of
c-Myc and cyclin D1. Quiescent NIH 3T3 cells
expressing CSF-1R[809F]
and v-Src:ER were treated with either
PD098059 or DMSO prior to the
addition of 4-HT for 1 h to activate
v-Src:ER. Consistent with our
previous observations, the induction
of c-Myc by v-Src:ER was inhibited
by PD098059 (Fig.
7C). Similarly,
in NIH 3T3 cells the induced
expression of cyclin D1, assessed
24 h after v-Src:ER activation,
was inhibited by pretreatment
of the cells with PD098059 (Fig.
7D).
These data suggest that
v-Src requires the activity of MEK to fully
induce the expression
of c-Myc and cyclin
D1.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Considerable effort is currently focused on forging connections
between components of the cytoplasmic signal transduction machinery,
transcription factors, and regulators of the cell cycle. Although the
precise details remain incompletely understood, the prevailing model
suggests that engagement of growth factor receptors by their cognate
ligands results in activation of numerous signaling pathways that
modulate gene expression leading ultimately to an appropriate
biological response. Since activated growth factor receptors influence
a diverse array of cytosolic signal transduction pathways, attempts are
under way to link specific signal transduction pathways with the
activation of particular downstream target genes.
Several lines of evidence have suggested that in mouse fibroblasts Ras
regulates the expression of the Fos and Jun components of the AP-1
transcription factor, whereas a Src-dependent, Ras-independent signaling pathway mediates c-Myc expression (6, 26). First, classical experiments on oncogene cooperation indicated that
ectopically introduced Ras and Myc cooperate efficiently to transform
primary murine cells and to accelerate tumor formation in mice
(10, 90, 105, 133). Second, MAP kinase activation was
implicated in the phosphorylation of the ternary complex factor Elk-1
which binds to the serum response element in the c-Fos promoter and contributes to the activation of c-Fos transcription (85).
Third, activation of the human CSF-1 receptor in NIH 3T3 cells leads to
the induction of c-Fos, c-Jun, c-Myc, and cyclin D1 expression and
reentry into the cell cycle. Cells expressing a mutated form of the
CSF-1 receptor induce c-Fos and c-Jun but do not induce c-Myc and
cyclin D1 and fail to proliferate in response to CSF-1. The fact that
the CSF-1R[809F] is capable of inducing the expression of c-Fos
provided circumstantial evidence for the normal functioning of the
Ras-activated MAP kinase pathway. The failure to induce c-Myc and
cyclin D1 was taken as evidence that a separate pathway leading to the
expression of these genes was compromised by mutation. Since this
mutated receptor fails to associate with c-Src and can be complemented
by the ectopic overexpression of c-Myc or cyclin D1, these results
provided evidence for the possible existence of a Ras-independent
pathway(s) leading to the expression of these proteins (18,
97-99). Finally, microinjection studies of PDGF-induced mitogenesis in NIH 3T3 cells suggested that the effects of
dominant-negative Ras were overcome by ectopic overexpression of AP-1
but not of c-Myc, whereas the effects of dominant-negative c-Src were
overcome by ectopic overexpression of c-Myc but not of AP-1. These data suggested that Ras functions upstream of c-Fos and c-Jun (AP-1), whereas c-Src and its family members function upstream of c-Myc. However, the inability to conduct biochemical analyses of microinjected cells precluded a more definitive analysis of the regulation of the
c-Myc and AP-1 transcription factors in these latter experiments (6).
In these studies we demonstrate a link between the activation of the
Raf/MEK/MAP kinase pathway and the transcriptional activation of c-Myc
and cyclin D1. The kinetics of induction of these genes by Raf is fully
consistent with previously published data on their induction by serum
and growth factors: Raf activation leads to the immediate-early
induction of c-Myc transcription and delayed induction of cyclin D1.
Evidence that the induction of c-Myc by Raf was functionally productive
was inferred from the ability of Raf to induce the expression of a
known c-Myc-responsive gene, ODC, in a manner that is at least partly
dependent on tandem E-boxes in the first intron of the gene
(7). Interestingly, of five c-Myc responsive target genes
that we tested, only ODC was significantly induced after Raf
activation, suggesting that there are additional factors influencing
the expression of c-Myc target genes. These may include the expression
or activity of the transcription factor AP-2, which has been suggested
to influence c-Myc-mediated transcriptional activation (31).
The work of other investigators also supports a connection between the
Ras-activated MAP kinase pathway and the expression of c-Myc. The level
of c-Myc mRNA is decreased after the ablation of activated Ki-Ras in
human colon carcinoma cells. In addition, c-Myc expression is
upregulated in Swiss 3T3 cells transformed by oncogenic Ha-Ras
(59, 108). Furthermore, it has been suggested that Raf is
involved in the induction of c-Myc transcription in response to
v-abl activation and growth factor stimulation (48, 137). It has also been demonstrated that Ras transformation of NIH 3T3 cells is inhibited by the expression of dominant-negative forms
of c-Myc or by the inhibition of c-Myc expression (109). Finally, it is likely that regulation of c-Myc by the MAP kinase pathway is not limited to transcriptional control of c-Myc gene expression. It has been reported that MAP kinase-mediated
phosphorylation of c-Myc modulates its transforming and transactivation
potential and that MAP kinase and c-Myc physically associate with each
other (17, 34, 88, 106). It will be important to fully
characterize the transcriptional and posttranslational interactions
between the MAP kinase pathway and c-Myc in order to properly
understand their functional relationship. It should further be
emphasized that the ability of the MAP kinase pathway to induce the
expression of c-Myc and cyclin D1 in NIH 3T3 cells does not preclude an
important role for other growth factor-activated signaling pathways in
the expression of these proteins in fibroblasts or indeed in other cell
types (102, 116).
Our studies of NIH 3T3 cells expressing the CSF-1R and CSF-1R[809F]
provide additional evidence for a functional connection between the
Raf/MEK/MAP kinase pathway and cyclin D1 and c-Myc. NIH 3T3 cells
expressing CSF-1R[809F] are defective in their ability to activate
the p42 and p44 MAP kinases in response to CSF-1 stimulation, a finding
consistent with a model that places the MAP kinase pathway upstream of
c-Myc and cyclin D1. Importantly, in cells expressing CSF-1R[809F],
activation of the MAP kinase pathway mediated either by activated Raf-1
or v-Src complemented, at least in part, both the biochemical and the
biological defects in these cells. Further evidence for a role for the
MAP kinase pathway in growth factor- and oncogene-induced c-Myc and
cyclin D1 expression was demonstrated by the use of a specific and
selective MEK inhibitor, PD098059, which prevented the induction of
c-Myc and cyclin D1 in response to both growth factors and oncogenes.
Despite the strong connection between the MAP kinase pathway and the
expression of c-Myc and cyclin D1 observed in these experiments, we
cannot rule out the possibility that there are additional signaling
pathways activated as a consequence of the phosphorylation of
tyrosine-809 of the human CSF-1 receptor that participate in the
regulation of these genes.
A possible resolution for some of the apparent discrepancies in the
literature may reflect the mechanism of Raf-1 activation in response to
growth factor stimulation. The current model suggests that activated
Ras recruits Raf-1 to the plasma membrane, where it is phosphorylated
by members of the Src family of protein tyrosine kinases.
Phosphorylation of Raf-1 on these sites (Y340 and Y341) significantly
potentiates its ability to activate the MAP kinase pathway. Indeed, the
form of the conditionally active full-length Raf-1 that we used in
these experiments is thought to be at least a partial mimic of the
tyrosine phosphorylated form of the protein (14, 27, 65,
66). Therefore, inhibitors of both Ras and Src might be expected
to interfere with the normal activation of the Raf/MEK/MAP kinase
pathway and the subsequent induction of c-Myc and cyclin D1. Such a
model is consistent with the observations that the activation of the
wild-type CSF-1 receptor results in activation of c-Src but that the
CSF-1R[809F] fails to associate with c-Src (18).
An important role for the Ras-activated MAP kinase pathway in the
transmission of mitogenic signals from Src is supported by the work of
others. For example, transformation by v-Src is inhibited by
neutralizing anti-Ras antibodies or by overexpression of GAP
(21, 79, 110). Furthermore, the Ras-activated MAP kinase
pathway has been shown to be required for induction of certain Src
transcriptional target genes (20, 89, 131). Finally, the
phenotypic effects of overexpression of a Drosophila
homologue of a Src-family kinase are inhibited by loss of Ras function
(115).
Although we have not defined the cis-acting elements in
either the c-Myc or cyclin D1 promoters that confer Raf responsiveness, there may be a role for Ets-family transcription factors in the transcriptional regulation of these genes. The importance of Ets transcription factors in mediating both growth factor- and
oncogene-induced gene expression is illustrated by the fact that both
Ets-1 and Ets-2 rescue the mitogenic defect in
CSF-1R[809F]-expressing cells (96). In addition,
dominant-negative forms of Ets-2 have been shown to suppress induction
of c-Myc and cyclin D1 by CSF-1 and epidermal growth factor (EGF),
respectively (2, 55). Dominant-negative Ets-2 has also been
shown to suppress morphological transformation induced by v-Raf and
CSF-1 (55, 101). Further, induction of the cyclin D1
promoter has been shown to be suppressed by the ectopic expression of
dominant-negative MEK1 or MAP kinase phosphatase 1 (56).
These results are consistent with the inability of the mutated CSF-1
receptor to activate the MAP kinase-mediated phosphorylation of Ets-2
in NIH 3T3 cells (28, 69, 134).
Since the CSF-1R[809F] is unable to fully activate the MAP kinase
pathway and yet induces the expression of c-Fos, these data call into
question the role of the MAP kinase pathway in c-Fos expression
(119). In separate experiments, we have assessed the effects
of Raf activation on the expression of c-Fos. Unlike c-Myc and cyclin
D1, Raf activation does not mimic the effects of growth factor
stimulation on c-Fos mRNA or protein expression inducing, at best, only
a modest increase in c-Fos expression (17a). However, when
Raf activation is combined with a second signal such as a calcium
agonist, a strong synergistic induction of c-Fos expression is
observed. A requirement for the MAP kinase pathway in the regulation of
c-Fos was inferred from the fact that treatment of cells with PD098059
prevented c-Fos induction by serum or EGF. These data suggest that the
MAP kinase pathway is required for c-Fos induction in response to
mitogens but that maximal induction of c-Fos may require the
cooperation of other signaling pathways. Such conclusions are supported
by studies utilizing transgenic mice containing c-Fos reporter
constructs, as well as by recent studies of the effects of Rho-family
GTPases on c-Fos expression that indicate that c-Fos regulation is
significantly more complex than earlier studies had indicated (3,
91). Clearly, future experiments must be dedicated to gaining a
more precise understanding of the biochemical mechanisms underlying
these transcriptional responses and the ultimate phenotypic
consequences of such changes on cell physiology.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We gratefully acknowledge the members of the McMahon and Lees
laboratories for helpful discussions. In addition we thank Bob Eisenman
and Martine Roussel for critical review of the manuscript. We thank
Natalie Ahn, Naoko Arai, J. Michael Bishop, Steve Clark, John
Cleveland, Simon Cook, Philip Coffino, Bob Eisenman, Gerard Evan,
Nissim Hay, Josh Kaplan, John Lyons, Jay Morgenstern, Debbie Morrison,
Mike Ostrowski, David Parry, Gordon Peters, Martine Roussel, Chuck
Toth, and Alan Wakeling for generously providing reagents, for helpful
discussions, and for communicating unpublished observations.
DNAX Research Institute is supported by the Schering Plough Corporation.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Cancer Research
Institute, UCSF/Mt. Zion Cancer Center, 2340 Sutter St., San Francisco, CA 94115. Phone: (415) 502-5829. Fax: (415) 502-3179. E-mail: mcmahon{at}cc.ucsf.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Abrahamsen, M. S.,
R. S. Li,
W. Dietrich-Goetz, and D. R. Morris.
1992.
Multiple DNA elements responsible for transcriptional regulation of the ornithine decarboxylase gene by protein kinase A.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:18866-18873[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Albanese, C.,
J. Johnson,
G. Watanabe,
N. Eklund,
D. Vu,
A. Arnold, and R. G. Pestell.
1995.
Transforming p21ras mutants and c-Ets-2 activate the cyclin D1 promoter through distinguishable regions.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:23589-23597[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Alberts, A. S.,
O. Geneste, and R. Treisman.
1998.
Activation of SRF-regulated chromosomal templates by Rho-family GTPases requires a signal that also induces H4 hyperacetylation.
Cell
92:475-487[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Alessi, D. R.,
A. Cuenda,
P. Cohen,
D. T. Dudley, and A. R. Saltiel.
1995.
PD 098059 is a specific inhibitor of the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase in vitro and in vivo.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:27489-27494[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Amati, B., and H. Land.
1994.
Myc-Max-Mad: a transcription factor network controlling cell cycle progression, differentiation and death.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
4:102-108[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Barone, M. V., and S. A. Courtneidge.
1995.
Myc but not Fos rescue of PDGF signalling block caused by kinase-inactive Src.
Nature
378:509-512[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Bello-Fernandez, C.,
G. Packham, and J. L. Cleveland.
1993.
The ornithine decarboxylase gene is a transcriptional target of c-Myc.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:7804-7808[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Bennett, M. R.,
S. Anglin,
J. R. McEwan,
R. Jagoe,
A. C. Newby, and G. I. Evan.
1994.
Inhibition of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo by c-myc antisense oligodeoxynucleotides.
J. Clin. Investig.
93:820-828.
|
| 9.
|
Bennett, M. R.,
G. I. Evan, and A. C. Newby.
1994.
Deregulated expression of the c-myc oncogene abolishes inhibition of proliferation of rat vascular smooth muscle cells by serum reduction, interferon-gamma, heparin, and cyclic nucleotide analogues and induces apoptosis.
Circ. Res.
74:525-536[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Birrer, M. J.,
S. Segal,
J. S. De Greve,
F. Kaye,
E. A. Sausville, and J. D. Minna.
1988.
L-myc cooperates with ras to transform primary rat embryo fibroblasts.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8:2668-2673[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Blackwell, T. K.,
L. Kretzner,
E. M. Blackwood,
R. N. Eisenman, and H. Weintraub.
1990.
Sequence-specific DNA binding by the c-Myc protein.
Science
250:1149-1151[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Blackwood, E. M., and R. N. Eisenman.
1991.
Max: a helix-loop-helix zipper protein that forms a sequence-specific DNA-binding complex with Myc.
Science
251:1211-1217[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Bos, J. L.
1989.
ras oncogenes in human cancer: a review.
Cancer Res.
49:4682-4689[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Bosch, E.,
H. Cherwinski,
D. Peterson, and M. McMahon.
1997.
Mutations of critical amino acids affect the biological and biochemical properties of oncogenic A-Raf and Raf-1.
Oncogene
15:1021-1033[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Brabant, M.,
L. McConlogue,
T. van Daalen Wetters, and P. Coffino.
1988.
Mouse ornithine decarboxylase gene: cloning, structure, and expression.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:2200-2204[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Collins, J. F.,
P. Herman,
C. Schuch, and G. C. Bagby, Jr.
1992.
c-myc antisense oligonucleotides inhibit the colony-forming capacity of Colo 320 colonic carcinoma cells.
J. Clin. Investig.
89:1523-1527.
|
| 17.
|
Colman, M. S., and M. C. Ostrowski.
1996.
The transactivation potential of a c-Myc N-terminal region (residues 92-143) is regulated by growth factor/Ras signaling.
Nucleic Acids Res.
24:1971-1978[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17a.
|
Cook, S. J.,
N. Aziz, and M. McMahon.
1999.
The repertoire of Fos and Jun proteins expressed during the G1 phase of the cell cycle is determined by the duration of mitogen-activated protein kinase activation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:330-341[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Courtneidge, S. A.,
R. Dhand,
D. Pilat,
G. M. Twamley,
M. D. Waterfield, and M. F. Roussel.
1993.
Activation of Src family kinases by colony stimulating factor-1, and their association with its receptor.
EMBO J.
12:943-950[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Cowley, S.,
H. Paterson,
P. Kemp, and C. J. Marshall.
1994.
Activation of MAP kinase kinase is necessary and sufficient for PC12 differentiation and for transformation of NIH 3T3 cells.
Cell
77:841-852[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
D'Arcangelo, G., and S. Halegoua.
1993.
A branched signaling pathway for nerve growth factor is revealed by Src-, Ras-, and Raf-mediated gene inductions.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:3146-3155[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
DeClue, J. E.,
K. Zhang,
P. Redford,
W. C. Vass, and D. R. Lowy.
1991.
Suppression of src transformation by overexpression of full-length GTPase-activating protein (GAP) or of the GAP C terminus.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:2819-2825[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Dent, P.,
W. Haser,
T. A. Haystead,
L. A. Vincent,
T. M. Roberts, and T. W. Sturgill.
1992.
Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase by v-Raf in NIH 3T3 cells and in vitro.
Science
257:1404-1407[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Dickson, B.,
F. Sprenger,
D. Morrison, and E. Hafen.
1992.
Raf functions downstream of Ras1 in the Sevenless signal transduction pathway.
Nature
360:600-603[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Downward, J.
1997.
Cell cycle: routine role for Ras.
Curr. Biol.
7:R258-R260[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Downward, J.
1992.
Regulation of p21ras by GTPase activating proteins and guanine nucleotide exchange proteins.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
2:13-18[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Eisenman, R. N., and J. A. Cooper.
1995.
Signal transduction. Beating a path to Myc.
Nature
378:438-439[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Fabian, J. R.,
I. O. Daar, and D. K. Morrison.
1993.
Critical tyrosine residues regulate the enzymatic and biological activity of Raf-1 kinase.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:7170-7179[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Fowles, L. F.,
M. L. Martin,
L. Nelsen,
K. J. Stacey,
D. Redd,
Y. M. Clark,
Y. Nagamine,
M. McMahon,
D. A. Hume, and M. C. Ostrowski.
1998.
Persistent activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases p42 and p44 and ets-2 phosphorylation in response to colony-stimulating factor 1/c-fms signaling.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:5148-5156[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Fumagalli, S.,
N. F. Totty,
J. J. Hsuan, and S. A. Courtneidge.
1994.
A target for Src in mitosis.
Nature
368:871-874[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Garte, S. J.
1993.
The c-myc oncogene in tumor progression.
Crit. Rev. Oncog.
4:435-449[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Gaubatz, S.,
A. Imhof,
R. Dosch,
O. Werner,
P. Mitchell,
R. Buettner, and M. Eilers.
1995.
Transcriptional activation by Myc is under negative control by the transcription factor AP-2.
EMBO J.
14:1508-1519[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Gomez, N., and P. Cohen.
1991.
Dissection of the protein kinase cascade by which nerve growth factor activates MAP kinase.
Nature
353:170-173[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Grandori, C., and R. N. Eisenman.
1997.
Myc target genes.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
22:177-181[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Gupta, S., and R. J. Davis.
1994.
MAP kinase binds to the NH2-terminal activation domain of c-Myc.
FEBS Lett.
353:281-285[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Hall, M., and G. Peters.
1996.
Genetic alterations of cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases, and Cdk inhibitors in human cancer.
Adv. Cancer Res.
68:67-108[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Han, M.,
A. Golden,
Y. Han, and P. W. Sternberg.
1993.
C. elegans lin-45 raf gene participates in let-60 ras-stimulated vulval differentiation.
Nature
363:133-140[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Hann, S. R., and R. N. Eisenman.
1984.
Proteins encoded by the human c-myc oncogene: differential expression in neoplastic cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
4:2486-2497[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Heby, O., and L. Persson.
1990.
Molecular genetics of polyamine synthesis in eukaryotic cells.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
15:153-158[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Holtta, E.,
L. Sistonen, and K. Alitalo.
1988.
The mechanisms of ornithine decarboxylase deregulation in c-Ha-ras oncogene-transformed NIH 3T3 cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
263:4500-4507[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Howe, L. R., and C. J. Marshall.
1993.
Lysophosphatidic acid stimulates mitogen-activated protein kinase activation via a G-protein-coupled pathway requiring p21ras and p74raf-1.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:20717-20720[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Hurta, R. A.,
A. Huang, and J. A. Wright.
1996.
Basic fibroblast growth factor selectively regulates ornithine decarboxylase gene expression in malignant H-ras transformed cells.
J. Cell. Biochem.
60:572-583[Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Johnson, L.,
D. Greenbaum,
K. Cichowski,
K. Mercer,
E. Murphy,
E. Schmitt,
R. T. Bronson,
H. Umanoff,
W. Edelmann,
R. Kucherlapati, and T. Jacks.
1997.
K-ras is an essential gene in the mouse with partial functional overlap with N-ras.
Genes Dev.
11:2468-2481[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Johnston, J. M., and W. L. Carroll.
1992.
c-myc hypermutation in Burkitt's lymphoma.
Leuk. Lymphoma
8:431-439[Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Joneson, T., and D. Bar-Sagi.
1997.
Ras effectors and their role in mitogenesis and oncogenesis.
J. Mol. Med.
75:587-593[Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Kaplan, J. M.,
G. Mardon,
J. M. Bishop, and H. E. Varmus.
1988.
The first seven amino acids encoded by the v-src oncogene act as a myristylation signal: lysine 7 is a critical determinant.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8:2435-2441[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Katz, M. E., and F. McCormick.
1997.
Signal transduction from multiple Ras effectors.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
7:75-79[Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Kelly, K.,
B. H. Cochran,
C. D. Stiles, and P. Leder.
1983.
Cell-specific regulation of the c-myc gene by lymphocyte mitogens and platelet-derived growth factor.
Cell
35:603-610[Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Kerkhoff, E.,
R. Houben,
S. Loffler,
J. Troppmair,
J. E. Lee, and U. R. Rapp.
1998.
Regulation of c-myc expression by Ras/Raf signalling.
Oncogene
16:211-6[Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Khosravi-Far, R., and C. J. Der.
1994.
The Ras signal transduction pathway.
Cancer Metastasis Rev.
13:67-89[Medline].
|
| 50.
|
Kolch, W.,
G. Heidecker,
P. Lloyd, and U. R. Rapp.
1991.
Raf-1 protein kinase is required for growth of induced NIH/3T3 cells.
Nature
349:426-428[Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Kretzner, L.,
E. M. Blackwood, and R. N. Eisenman.
1992.
Myc and Max proteins possess distinct transcriptional activities.
Nature
359:426-429[Medline].
|
| 52.
|
Kumar, A. P.,
P. K. Mar,
B. Zhao,
R. L. Montgomery,
D. C. Kang, and A. P. Butler.
1995.
Regulation of rat ornithine decarboxylase promoter activity by binding of transcription factor Sp1.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:4341-4348[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Kyriakis, J. M.,
H. App,
X. F. Zhang,
P. Banerjee,
D. L. Brautigan,
U. R. Rapp, and J. Avruch.
1992.
Raf-1 activates MAP kinase-kinase.
Nature
358:417-421[Medline].
|
| 54.
|
Lahti, J. M.,
H. Li, and V. J. Kidd.
1997.
Elimination of cyclin D1 in vertebrate cells leads to an altered cell cycle phenotype, which is rescued by overexpression of murine cyclins D1, D2, or D3 but not by a mutant cyclin D1.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:10859-10869[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 55.
|
Langer, S. J.,
D. M. Bortner,
M. F. Roussel,
C. J. Sherr, and M. C. Ostrowski.
1992.
Mitogenic signaling by colony-stimulating factor 1 and ras is suppressed by the ets-2 DNA-binding domain and restored by myc overexpression.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:5355-5362[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 56.
|
Lavoie, J. N.,
G. L'Allemain,
A. Brunet,
R. Muller, and J. Pouyssegur.
1996.
Cyclin D1 expression is regulated positively by the p42/p44MAPK and negatively by the p38/HOGMAPK pathway.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:20608-20616[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 57.
|
Leonetti, C.,
I. D'Agnano,
F. Lozupone,
A. Valentini,
T. Geiser,
G. Zon,
B. Calabretta,
G. C. Citro, and G. Zupi.
1996.
Antitumor effect of c-myc antisense phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotides on human melanoma cells in vitro and in mice.
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
88:419-429[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 58.
|
Li, M.,
H. Lonial,
R. Citarella,
D. Lindh,
L. Colina, and R. Kramer.
1996.
Tumor inhibitory activity of anti-ras ribozymes delivered by retroviral gene transfer.
Cancer Gene Ther.
3:221-229[Medline].
|
| 59.
|
Lloyd, A. C.,
H. F. Paterson,
J. D. Morris,
A. Hall, and C. J. Marshall.
1989.
p21H-ras-induced morphological transformation and increases in c-myc expression are independent of functional protein kinase C.
EMBO J.
8:1099-1104[Medline].
|
| 60.
|
Lu, X.,
T. B. Chou,
N. G. Williams,
T. Roberts, and N. Perrimon.
1993.
Control of cell fate determination by p21ras/Ras1, an essential component of torso signaling in Drosophila.
Genes Dev.
7:621-632[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 61.
|
Luttrell, D. K.,
L. M. Luttrell, and S. J. Parsons.
1988.
Augmented mitogenic responsiveness to epidermal growth factor in murine fibroblasts that overexpress pp60c-src.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8:497-501[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 62.
|
MacNicol, A. M.,
A. J. Muslin, and L. T. Williams.
1993.
Raf-1 kinase is essential for early Xenopus development and mediates the induction of mesoderm by FGF.
Cell
73:571-583[Medline].
|
| 63.
|
Mangues, R.,
I. Seidman,
A. Pellicer, and J. W. Gordon.
1990.
Tumorigenesis and male sterility in transgenic mice expressing a MMTV/N-ras oncogene.
Oncogene
5:1491-1497[Medline].
|
| 64.
|
Mansour, S. J.,
W. T. Matten,
A. S. Hermann,
J. M. Candia,
S. Rong,
K. Fukasawa,
G. F. Vande-Woude, and N. G. Ahn.
1994.
Transformation of mammalian cells by constitutively active MAP kinase.
Science
265:966-970[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 65.
|
Marais, R.,
Y. Light,
H. F. Paterson, and C. J. Marshall.
1995.
Ras recruits Raf-1 to the plasma membrane for activation by tyrosine phosphorylation.
EMBO J.
14:3136-3145[Medline].
|
| 66.
|
Marais, R.,
Y. Light,
H. F. Paterson,
C. S. Mason, and C. J. Marshall.
1997.
Differential regulation of Raf-1, A-Raf, and B-Raf by oncogenic ras and tyrosine kinases.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:4378-4383[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 67.
|
Matsushime, H.,
M. F. Roussel,
R. A. Ashmun, and C. J. Sherr.
1991.
Colony-stimulating factor 1 regulates novel cyclins during the G1 phase of the cell cycle.
Cell
65:701-713[Medline].
|
| 68.
|
McCarthy, S. A.,
N. Aziz, and M. McMahon.
1997.
Identification of immediate-early gene targets of the Raf-1 serine/threonine protein kinase using an estradiol-dependent fusion protein, delta Raf-1:ER.
Methods Mol. Biol.
85:137-151[Medline].
|
| 69.
|
McCarthy, S. A.,
D. Chen,
B. S. Yang,
J. J. Garcia Ramirez,
H. Cherwinski,
X. R. Chen,
M. Klagsbrun,
C. A. Hauser,
M. C. Ostrowski, and M. McMahon.
1997.
Rapid phosphorylation of Ets-2 accompanies mitogen-activated protein kinase activation and the induction of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor gene expression by oncogenic Raf-1.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:2401-2412[Abstract].
|
| 70.
|
McCarthy, S. A.,
M. L. Samuels,
C. A. Pritchard,
J. A. Abraham, and M. McMahon.
1995.
Rapid induction of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor/diphtheria toxin receptor expression by Raf and Ras oncogenes.
Genes Dev.
9:1953-1964[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 71.
|
Mimori, K.,
M. Mori,
T. Shiraishi,
T. Fujie,
K. Baba,
H. Kusumoto,
M. Haraguchi,
H. Ueo, and T. Akiyoshi.
1997.
Analysis of ornithine decarboxylase messenger ribonucleic acid expression in colorectal carcinoma.
Dis. Colon Rectum
40:1095-1100[Medline].
|
| 72.
|
Morgenstern, J. P., and H. Land.
1990.
Advanced mammalian gene transfer: high titre retroviral vectors with multiple drug selection markers and a complementary helper-free packaging cell line.
Nucleic Acids Res.
18:3587-3596[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 73.
|
Moriguchi, T.,
Y. Gotoh, and E. Nishida.
1996.
Roles of the MAP kinase cascade in vertebrates.
Adv. Pharmacol.
36:121-137.
|
| 74.
|
Morrison, D. K., and R. E. Cutler.
1997.
The complexity of Raf-1 regulation.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9:174-179[Medline].
|
| 75.
|
Moshier, J. A.,
D. L. Osborne,
M. Skunca,
J. Dosescu,
J. D. Gilbert,
M. C. Fitzgerald,
G. Polidori,
R. L. Wagner,
S. J. Friezner Degen,
G. D. Luk, et al.
1992.
Multiple promoter elements govern expression of the human ornithine decarboxylase gene in colon carcinoma cells.
Nucleic Acids Res.
20:2581-2590[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 76.
|
Nass, S. J., and R. B. Dickson.
1997.
Defining a role for c-Myc in breast tumorigenesis.
Breast Cancer Res. Treat.
44:1-22[Medline].
|
| 77.
|
Nishida, E., and Y. Gotoh.
1993.
The MAP kinase cascade is essential for diverse signal transduction pathways.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
18:128-131[Medline].
|
| 78.
|
Nishida, Y.,
Y. H. Inoue,
L. Tsuda,
T. Adachi-Yamada,
Y. M. Lim,
M. Hata,
H. Y. Ha, and S. Sugiyama.
1996.
The Raf/MAP kinase cascade in cell cycle regulation and differentiation in Drosophila.
Cell Struct. Funct.
21:437-444[Medline].
|
| 79.
|
Nori, M.,
U. S. Vogel,
J. B. Gibbs, and M. J. Weber.
1991.
Inhibition of v-src-induced transformation by a GTPase-activating protein.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:2812-2818[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 80.
|
Packham, G., and J. L. Cleveland.
1997.
Induction of ornithine decarboxylase by IL-3 is mediated by sequential c-Myc-independent and c-Myc-dependent pathways.
Oncogene
15:1219-1232[Medline].
|
| 81.
|
Palvimo, J. J.,
M. Partanen, and O. A. Janne.
1996.
Characterization of cell-specific modulatory element in the murine ornithine decarboxylase promoter.
Biochem. J.
316:993-998.
|
| 82.
|
Parsons, J. T., and S. J. Parsons.
1997.
Src family protein tyrosine kinases: cooperating with growth factor and adhesion signaling pathways.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9:187-192[Medline].
|
| 83.
|
Pear, W. S.,
G. P. Nolan,
M. L. Scott, and D. Baltimore.
1993.
Production of high-titer helper-free retroviruses by transient transfection.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:8392-8396[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 84.
|
Prendergast, G. C., and E. B. Ziff.
1991.
Methylation-sensitive sequence-specific DNA binding by the c-Myc basic region.
Science
251:186-189[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 85.
|
Price, M. A.,
C. Hill, and R. Treisman.
1996.
Integration of growth factor signals at the c-fos serum response element.
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.
351:551-559[Medline].
|
| 86.
|
Prins, J.,
E. G. De Vries, and N. H. Mulder.
1993.
The myc family of oncogenes and their presence and importance in small-cell lung carcinoma and other tumour types.
Anticancer Res.
13:1373-1385[Medline].
|
| 87.
|
Pritchard, C. A.,
M. L. Samuels,
E. Bosch, and M. McMahon.
1995.
Conditionally oncogenic forms of the A-Raf and B-Raf protein kinases display different biological and biochemical properties in NIH 3T3 cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:6430-6442[Abstract].
|
| 88.
|
Pulverer, B. J.,
C. Fisher,
K. Vousden,
T. Littlewood,
G. Evan, and J. R. Woodgett.
1994.
Site-specific modulation of c-Myc cotransformation by residues phosphorylated in vivo.
Oncogene
9:59-70[Medline].
|
| 89.
|
Qureshi, S. A.,
M. Rim,
J. Bruder,
W. Kolch,
U. Rapp,
V. P. Sukhatme, and D. A. Foster.
1991.
An inhibitory mutant of c-Raf-1 blocks v-Src-induced activation of the Egr-1 promoter.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:20594-20597[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 90.
|
Rapp, U. R.,
J. L. Cleveland,
S. M. Storm,
T. W. Beck, and M. Huleihel.
1986.
Transformation by raf and myc oncogenes.
Princess Takamatsu Symp.
17:55-74[Medline].
|
| 91.
|
Robertson, L. M.,
T. K. Kerppola,
M. Vendrell,
D. Luk,
R. J. Smeyne,
C. Bocchiaro,
J. I. Morgan, and T. Curran.
1995.
Regulation of c-fos expression in transgenic mice requires multiple interdependent transcription control elements.
Neuron
14:241-252[Medline].
|
| 92.
|
Robinson, M. J., and M. H. Cobb.
1997.
Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9:180-186[Medline].
|
| 93.
|
Roche, S.,
S. Fumagalli, and S. A. Courtneidge.
1995.
Requirement for Src family protein tyrosine kinases in G2 for fibroblast cell division.
Science
269:1567-1569[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 94.
|
Roussel, M. F.
1997.
Regulation of cell cycle entry and G1 progression by CSF-1.
Mol. Reprod. Dev.
46:11-18[Medline].
|
| 95.
|
Roussel, M. F.,
J. L. Cleveland,
S. A. Shurtleff, and C. J. Sherr.
1991.
Myc rescue of a mutant CSF-1 receptor impaired in mitogenic signalling.
Nature
353:361-363[Medline].
|
| 96.
|
Roussel, M. F.,
J. N. Davis,
J. L. Cleveland,
J. Ghysdael, and S. W. Hiebert.
1994.
Dual control of myc expression through a single DNA binding site targeted by ets family proteins and E2F-1.
Oncogene
9:405-415[Medline].
|
| 97.
|
Roussel, M. F., and C. J. Sherr.
1989.
Mouse NIH 3T3 cells expressing human colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1) receptors overgrow in serum-free medium containing human CSF-1 as their only growth factor.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:7924-7927[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 98.
|
Roussel, M. F.,
S. A. Shurtleff,
J. R. Downing, and C. J. Sherr.
1990.
A point mutation at tyrosine-809 in the human colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor impairs mitogenesis without abrogating tyrosine kinase activity, association with phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, or induction of c-fos and junB genes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:6738-6742[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 99.
|
Roussel, M. F.,
A. M. Theodoras,
M. Pagano, and C. J. Sherr.
1995.
Rescue of defective mitogenic signaling by D-type cyclins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:6837-6841[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 100.
|
Samuels, M. L.,
M. J. Weber,
J. M. Bishop, and M. McMahon.
1993.
Conditional transformation of cells and rapid activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade by an estradiol-dependent human raf-1 protein kinase.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:6241-6252[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 101.
|
Sapi, E.,
M. B. Flick,
S. Rodov, and B. M. Kacinski.
1998.
Ets-2 transdominant mutant abolishes anchorage-independent growth and macrophage colony-stimulating factor-stimulated invasion by BT20 breast carcinoma cells.
Cancer Res.
58:1027-1033[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 102.
|
Sato, N.,
K. Sakamaki,
N. Terada,
K. Arai, and A. Miyajima.
1993.
Signal transduction by the high-affinity GM-CSF receptor: two distinct cytoplasmic regions of the common beta subunit responsible for different signaling.
EMBO J.
12:4181-4189[Medline].
|
| 103.
|
Schaap, D.,
J. van der Wal,
L. R. Howe,
C. J. Marshall, and W. J. van Blitterswijk.
1993.
A dominant-negative mutant of raf blocks mitogen-activated protein kinase activation by growth factors and oncogenic p21ras.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:20232-20236[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 104.
|
Schwab, M.
1994.
Human neuroblastoma: amplification of the N-myc oncogene and loss of a putative cancer-preventing gene on chromosome 1p.
Recent Results Cancer Res.
135:7-16[Medline].
|
| 105.
|
Schwartz, R. C.,
L. W. Stanton,
S. C. Riley,
K. B. Marcu, and O. N. Witte.
1986.
Synergism of v-myc and v-Ha-ras in the in vitro neoplastic progression of murine lymphoid cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
6:3221-3231[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 106.
|
Seth, A.,
E. Alvarez,
S. Gupta, and R. J. Davis.
1991.
A phosphorylation site located in the NH2-terminal domain of c-Myc increases transactivation of gene expression.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:23521-23524[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 107.
|
Sherr, C. J.
1995.
Mammalian G1 cyclins and cell cycle progression.
Proc. Assoc. Am. Physicians
107:181-186[Medline].
|
| 108.
|
Shirasawa, S.,
M. Furuse,
N. Yokoyama, and T. Sasazuki.
1993.
Altered growth of human colon cancer cell lines disrupted at activated Ki-ras.
Science
260:85-88[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 109.
|
Sklar, M. D.,
E. Thompson,
M. J. Welsh,
M. Liebert,
J. Harney,
H. B. Grossman,
M. Smith, and E. V. Prochownik.
1991.
Depletion of c-myc with specific antisense sequences reverses the transformed phenotype in ras oncogene-transformed NIH 3T3 cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:3699-3710[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 110.
|
Smith, M. R.,
S. J. DeGudicibus, and D. W. Stacey.
1986.
Requirement for c-ras proteins during viral oncogene transformation.
Nature
320:540-543[Medline].
|
| 111.
|
Snow, E. C.
1997.
The role of c-myc during normal B-cell proliferation, and as B cells undergo malignant transformation.
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
224:211-220[Medline].
|
| 112.
|
Sternberg, P. W., and H. R. Horvitz.
1991.
Signal transduction during C. elegans vulval induction.
Trends Genet.
7:366-371[Medline].
|
| 113.
|
Stokoe, D., and F. McCormick.
1997.
Activation of c-Raf-1 by Ras and Src through different mechanisms: activation in vivo and in vitro.
EMBO J.
16:2384-2396[Medline].
|
| 114.
|
Storm, S. M.,
U. Brennscheidt,
G. Sithanandam, and U. R. Rapp.
1990.
raf oncogenes in carcinogenesis.
Crit. Rev. Oncog.
2:1-8[Medline].
|
| 115.
|
Takahashi, F.,
S. Endo,
T. Kojima, and K. Saigo.
1996.
Regulation of cell-cell contacts in developing Drosophila eyes by Dsrc41, a new, close relative of vertebrate c-src.
Genes Dev.
10:1645-1656[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 116.
|
Terada, K.,
Y. Kaziro, and T. Satoh.
1995.
Ras is not required for the interleukin 3-induced proliferation of a mouse pro-B cell line, BaF3.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:27880-27886[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 117.
|
Thomas, S. M., and J. S. Brugge.
1997.
Cellular functions regulated by Src family kinases.
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
13:513-609[Medline].
|
| 118.
|
Treisman, R.
1996.
Regulation of transcription by MAP kinase cascades.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
8:205-215[Medline].
|
| 119.
|
Treisman, R.
1994.
Ternary complex factors: growth factor regulated transcriptional activators.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
4:96-101[Medline].
|
| 120.
|
Troppmair, J., and U. R. Rapp.
1997.
Apoptosis regulation by Raf, Bcl-2, and R-Ras.
Recent Results Cancer Res.
143:245-249[Medline].
|
| 121.
|
Twamley-Stein, G. M.,
R. Pepperkok,
W. Ansorge, and S. A. Courtneidge.
1993.
The Src family tyrosine kinases are required for platelet-derived growth factor-mediated signal transduction in NIH 3T3 cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:7696-7700[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 122.
|
Umbhauer, M.,
C. J. Marshall,
C. S. Mason,
R. W. Old, and J. C. Smith.
1995.
Mesoderm induction in Xenopus caused by activation of MAP kinase.
Nature
376:58-62[Medline].
|
| 123.
|
Vojtek, A. B.,
S. M. Hollenberg, and J. A. Cooper.
1993.
Mammalian Ras interacts directly with the serine/threonine kinase Raf.
Cell
74:205-214[Medline].
|
| 124.
|
Warne, P. H.,
P. R. Viciana, and J. Downward.
1993.
Direct interaction of Ras and the amino-terminal region of Raf-1 in vitro.
Nature
364:352-355[Medline].
|
| 125.
|
Williams, N. G., and T. M. Roberts.
1994.
Signal transduction pathways involving the Raf proto-oncogene.
Cancer Metastasis Rev.
13:105-116[Medline].
|
| 126.
|
Williams, N. G.,
T. M. Roberts, and P. Li.
1992.
Both p21ras and pp60v-src are required, but neither alone is sufficient, to activate the Raf-1 kinase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:2922-2926[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 127.
| Williams, S. A., E. R. Gillan, E. Knoppel,
J. S. Buzby, Y. Suen, and M. S. Cairo. 1997. Effects of
phosphodiester and phosphorothioate antisense oligodeoxynucleotides on
cell lines which overexpress c-myc: implications for the treatment of
Burkitt's lymphoma. Ann. Oncol.
8(Suppl.):25-30.
|
| 128.
|
Woods, D.,
D. Parry,
H. Cherwinski,
E. Bosch,
E. Lees, and M. McMahon.
1997.
Raf-induced proliferation or cell cycle arrest is determined by the level of Raf activity with arrest mediated by p21Cip1.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:5598-5611[Abstract].
|
| 129.
|
Wrighton, C., and M. Busslinger.
1993.
Direct transcriptional stimulation of the ornithine decarboxylase gene by Fos in PC12 cells but not in fibroblasts.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:4657-4669[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 130.
|
Xia, K.,
N. K. Mukhopadhyay,
R. C. Inhorn,
D. L. Barber,
P. E. Rose,
R. S. Lee,
R. P. Narsimhan,
A. D. D'Andrea,
J. D. Griffin, and T. M. Roberts.
1996.
The cytokine-activated tyrosine kinase JAK2 activates Raf-1 in a p21ras-dependent manner.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:11681-11686[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 131.
|
Xie, W., and H. R. Herschman.
1995.
v-src induces prostaglandin synthase 2 gene expression by activation of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase and the c-Jun transcription factor.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:27622-27628[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 132.
|
Yamauchi, N.,
A. A. Kiessling, and G. M. Cooper.
1994.
The Ras/Raf signaling pathway is required for progression of mouse embryos through the two-cell stage.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:6655-6662[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 133.
|
Yancopoulos, G. D.,
P. D. Nisen,
A. Tesfaye,
N. E. Kohl,
M. P. Goldfarb, and F. W. Alt.
1985.
N-myc can cooperate with ras to transform normal cells in culture.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
82:5455-5459[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 134.
|
Yang, B. S.,
C. A. Hauser,
G. Henkel,
M. S. Colman,
C. Van Beveren,
K. J. Stacey,
D. A. Hume,
R. A. Maki, and M. C. Ostrowski.
1996.
Ras-mediated phosphorylation of a conserved threonine residue enhances the transactivation activities of c-Ets1 and c-Ets2.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:538-547[Abstract].
|
| 135.
|
Yao, B.,
Y. Zhang,
S. Delikat,
S. Mathias,
S. Basu, and R. Kolesnick.
1995.
Phosphorylation of Raf by ceramide-activated protein kinase.
Nature
378:307-310[Medline].
|
| 136.
|
Zornig, M., and G. I. Evan.
1996.
Cell cycle: on target with Myc.
Curr. Biol.
6:1553-1556[Medline].
|
| 137.
|
Zou, X.,
S. Rudchenko,
K. Wong, and K. Calame.
1997.
Induction of c-myc transcription by the v-Abl tyrosine kinase requires Ras, Raf1, and cyclin-dependent kinases.
Genes Dev.
11:654-662[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 1999, p. 1101-1115, Vol. 19, No. 2
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Rovida, E., Spinelli, E., Sdelci, S., Barbetti, V., Morandi, A., Giuntoli, S., Dello Sbarba, P.
(2008). ERK5/BMK1 Is Indispensable for Optimal Colony-Stimulating Factor 1 (CSF-1)-Induced Proliferation in Macrophages in a Src-Dependent Fashion. J. Immunol.
180: 4166-4172
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Takeshita, S., Faccio, R., Chappel, J., Zheng, L., Feng, X., Weber, J. D., Teitelbaum, S. L., Ross, F. P.
(2007). c-Fms Tyrosine 559 Is a Major Mediator of M-CSF-induced Proliferation of Primary Macrophages. J. Biol. Chem.
282: 18980-18990
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cheng, Y., Chaturvedi, R., Asim, M., Bussiere, F. I., Xu, H., Casero, R. A. Jr., Wilson, K. T.
(2005). Helicobacter pylori-induced Macrophage Apoptosis Requires Activation of Ornithine Decarboxylase by c-Myc. J. Biol. Chem.
280: 22492-22496
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mirza, A. M., Gysin, S., Malek, N., Nakayama, K.-i., Roberts, J. M., McMahon, M.
(2004). Cooperative Regulation of the Cell Division Cycle by the Protein Kinases RAF and AKT. Mol. Cell. Biol.
24: 10868-10881
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ishibashi, M., McMahon, A. P.
(2003). A sonic hedgehog-dependent signaling relay regulates growth of diencephalic and mesencephalic primordia in the early mouse embryo. Development
129: 4807-4819
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Weng, Z., Xin, M., Pablo, L., Grueneberg, D., Hagel, M., Bain, G., Muller, T., Papkoff, J.
(2002). Protection against Anoikis and Down-regulation of Cadherin Expression by a Regulatable beta -Catenin Protein. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 18677-18686
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Moon, J. J., Nelson, B. H.
(2001). Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Potentiates, but Does Not Trigger, T Cell Proliferation Mediated by the IL-2 Receptor. J. Immunol.
167: 2714-2723
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Carnesecchi, S., Schneider, Y., Ceraline, J., Duranton, B., Gosse, F., Seiler, N., Raul, F.
(2001). Geraniol, a Component of Plant Essential Oils, Inhibits Growth and Polyamine Biosynthesis in Human Colon Cancer Cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
298: 197-200
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bowman, T., Broome, M. A., Sinibaldi, D., Wharton, W., Pledger, W. J., Sedivy, J. M., Irby, R., Yeatman, T., Courtneidge, S. A., Jove, R.
(2001). Stat3-mediated Myc expression is required for Src transformation and PDGF-induced mitogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
10.1073/pnas.131568898v1
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Woods, D., Cherwinski, H., Venetsanakos, E., Bhat, A., Gysin, S., Humbert, M., Bray, P. F., Saylor, V. L., McMahon, M.
(2001). Induction of {beta}3-Integrin Gene Expression by Sustained Activation of the Ras-Regulated Raf-MEK-Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Signaling Pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol.
21: 3192-3205
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rovida, E., Marra, F., Baccarini, M., Sbarba, P. D.
(2000). Constitutive activation of the MAPK pathway mediates v-fes-induced mitogenesis in murine macrophages. Blood
95: 3959-3963
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mirza, A. M., Kohn, A. D., Roth, R. A., McMahon, M.
(2000). Oncogenic Transformation of Cells by a Conditionally Active Form of the Protein Kinase Akt/PKB. Cell Growth Differ.
11: 279-292
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Park, J.-S., Boyer, S., Mitchell, K., Gilfor, D., Birrer, M., Darlington, G., El Deiry, W., Firestone, G. L., Munger, K., Band, V., Fisher, P. B., Dent, P.
(2000). Expression of Human Papilloma Virus E7 Protein Causes Apoptosis and Inhibits DNA Synthesis in Primary Hepatocytes via Increased Expression of p21Cip-1/WAF1/MDA6. J. Biol. Chem.
275: 18-28
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jaworowski, A., Wilson, N. J., Christy, E., Byrne, R., Hamilton, J. A.
(1999). Roles of the Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Family in Macrophage Responses to Colony Stimulating Factor-1 Addition and Withdrawal. J. Biol. Chem.
274: 15127-15133
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bowman, T., Broome, M. A., Sinibaldi, D., Wharton, W., Pledger, W. J., Sedivy, J. M., Irby, R., Yeatman, T., Courtneidge, S. A., Jove, R.
(2001). Stat3-mediated Myc expression is required for Src transformation and PDGF-induced mitogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
98: 7319-7324
[Abstract]
[Full Text]