Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 1999, p. 1271-1278, Vol. 19, No. 2
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627
Received 21 May 1998/Returned for modification 13 July 1998/Accepted 2 November 1998
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We report the use of a yeast one-hybrid system to isolate a transcriptional regulator of the sea urchin embryo hatching enzyme gene, SpHE. This gene is asymmetrically expressed along the animal-vegetal axis of sea urchin embryos under the cell-autonomous control of maternal regulatory activities and therefore provides an excellent entry point for understanding the mechanism that establishes animal-vegetal developmental polarity. To search for transcriptional regulators, we used a fragment of the SpHE promoter containing several individual elements instead of the conventional bait that contains a multimerized cis element. This screen yielded a number of positive clones that encode a new member of the Ets family, named SpEts4. This protein contains transcriptional activation activity, since expression of reporter genes in yeast does not depend on the presence of the yeast GAL4 activation domain. Sequences in the N-terminal region of SpEts4 mediate the activation activity, as shown by deletion or domain-swapping experiments. The newly identified DNA binding protein binds with a high degree of specificity to a SpHE promoter Ets element and forms a complex with a mobility identical to that obtained with 9-h sea urchin embryo nuclear extracts. SpEts4 positively regulates SpHE transcription, since mutation of the SpEts4 site in SpHE promoter transgenes reduces promoter activity in vivo while SpEts4 mRNA coinjection increases its output. As expected for a positive SpHE transcriptional regulator, the timing of SpEts4 gene expression precedes the transient expression of SpHE in the very early sea urchin blastula.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Strongylocentrotus purpuratus hatching enzyme gene, SpHE, is transcribed transiently only in nonvegetal blastomeres during the cleavage and very early blastula stages of sea urchin development (20). The activation of SpHE is early and cell autonomous and therefore is very likely to be regulated by localized maternal transcription-regulatory activities partitioned asymmetrically along the animal-vegetal (AV) axis. Consequently, the SpHE gene represents an excellent entry point for determining how the AV axis is established, through the identification of trans-acting factors that regulate its transcription.
Previously, we reported that a relatively compact region of the SpHE promoter, consisting of 300 bp upstream of the transcription initiation site, is sufficient to sponsor both high-level transcriptional activity and correct nonvegetal spatial expression (26, 27). Although this regulatory region is small, nine cis-acting elements have been defined within it, which can form complexes with at least six different proteins, as shown by in vitro DNase I footprinting and electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) (26). Most of these cis elements were found to be occupied when the gene is active in vivo but to be unoccupied and in a nucleosome-like configuration when the gene is inactive (28). Extensive mutational dissection of the SpHE regulatory region supports a model in which all of the DNA binding proteins confer positive function in nonvegetal blastomeres (26, 27). This suggests that an important mechanism establishing AV polarity of developmental potential in the early sea urchin embryo is partitioning of positive maternal regulatory activities to nonvegetal blastomeres.
To test this model, we have begun to investigate the SpHE transcriptional regulators. Here we report the cloning of an S. purpuratus egg cDNA encoding a member of the Ets family, using a nontraditional yeast one-hybrid genetic screening approach in which a large portion of the SpHE promoter sequence instead of individual multimerized cis elements was used as bait. Using this method, we isolated 13 strong positive clones containing overlapping segments of the same sequence, which encodes a member of the Ets transcription factor family. Because this protein contains a conserved Ets domain that is much more similar to that of Drosophila Ets4 (6) than to any other Ets domain, we have named it SpEts4. We demonstrate that the SpEts4 gene sequence encodes a protein that binds with the same specificity, and forms a complex of similar mobility in EMSA, as does the native protein found in nuclear protein extracts from very early blastulae. Using SpHE promoter transgenes, we show that the site to which SpEts4 binds confers positive regulatory activity and that exogeneously supplied recombinant SpEts4 augments promoter activity. Consistent with a positive function for SpEts4 in regulating SpHE transcription, SpEts4 transcripts accumulate in the egg and early embryo transiently and just prior to the burst of SpHE mRNA expression.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
S. purpuratus egg cDNA library.
A total of 1 mg
of total RNA from S. purpuratus eggs was used to extract
poly(A)+ RNA by using the FastTrack 2.0 kit (Invitrogen).
The cDNA library was made by using a cDNA library construction kit
supplied by Clontech (Matchmaker Two-Hybrid System). Briefly, 8-µg
aliquots of poly(A)+ RNA were reverse transcribed
separately by using either random or oligo(dT) primers, and the cDNA
products were combined and inserted into a shuttle vector, pGAD10,
containing the GAL4 activation domain. Transformation by
electroporation of Escherichia coli DH5
cells yielded
>6 × 105 independent colonies. The library was
amplified on 20- by 150-mm plates containing ~30,000 colonies/plate.
Yeast one-hybrid screening of the sea urchin egg cDNA
library.
The SpHE promoter sequence from bp
324 to
143 was used as the bait to select DNA binding domains encoded in the
sea urchin egg cDNA library. Within this promoter region are
recognition motifs for Otx, Rel, and Ets as well as three additional
binding sites defined by EMSAs and DNase I footprinting
(26). The bait was inserted into reporter plasmids pHISi and
pLacZi, and the recombinant plasmids were introduced sequentially into
the genome of the yeast strain Y4271. These plasmids and control
plasmids, containing either p53 cis elements, p53blue, or
DNA binding sequences (pGAD53m), were supplied in the Clontech
Matchmaker One-Hybrid System kit. The transformants were tested for
growth on medium lacking His (His
medium) in the presence
of increasing concentrations of 3-aminotriazol (3-AT). Cells whose
growth was inhibited by 5 mM 3-AT were selected as the host for the
library screen. Transformation with the library was carried out by
using LiCl-polyethylene glycol, and transformants grown on
His
and Leu
selective medium were tested
for
-galactosidase activity. Plasmids from putative positive clones
were isolated from the yeast after homogenization with glass beads and
then individually transferred into DH5
cells for amplification. To
eliminate false positives, these plasmids were separately introduced
into yeast cells containing either the SpHE bait or the p53
binding site, and the transformants were tested for
-galactosidase
activity. The plasmids that conferred expression only in the
SpHE host were chosen for further analysis. Inserts were
sequenced by a combination of manual dideoxy sequencing and automated
sequencing. DNA sequences were used to query the GenBank database, and
sequence comparisons were made by using Clustal software
(21).
Transcription activation domain mapping.
The SpEts4
activation domain was identified by using the yeast one-hybrid system.
The GAL4 transcription activation domain in plasmids pGAD10 (for
SpEts4) and pGAD424 (for p53) was removed by internal deletion of
sequences from restriction site KpnI to EcoRI,
and SpEts4 sequences were inserted. To test for activation activity in
SpEts4, constructs encoding proteins with deletions in three separate
regions (Ets
36-123, Ets
126-184 [pointed domain], and
Ets
184-274) were transformed into SpHE bait-containing
yeast cells. To test whether SpEts4 sequences could mediate
activation when linked to a heterologous (p53) DNA binding domain,
four fusion protein constructs, p53E1-275, p53E
126-184,
p53E1-123, and p53E184-275 were prepared and used to transform
p53 bait-containing yeast. SpEts4 transformants were tested
for growth ability on His
plates with 5 mM 3-AT and for
-galactosidase activity. p53 transformants were tested only for
-galactosidase activity by filter lift assay as described in the
Clontech Yeast Protocols Handbook.
In vivo transcription assays.
Measurements of promoter
activity in vivo were made by using chimeric constructs carrying
wild-type or mutated SpHE promoters linked to a bacterial
chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter gene. The mutation
changed CGGAAC at bp
250 in the SpHE promoter to an
EcoRI site, GAATTC. These constructs were microinjected into
fertilized S. purpuratus eggs and assayed exactly as
described previously (26).
Developmental RNase protection assays.
RNA was prepared from
eggs and embryos at selected developmental stages by using the TRIzol
protocol (GIBCO-BRL). The quantity of RNA was determined by
spectrophotometry, and its quality was verified by gel electrophoresis
on denaturing formaldehyde-containing agarose gels. Probes
complementary to SpEts4 mRNA (from bp
102 to +99 relative
to the translation initiation site) and SpHE sequences (from
bp +316 to +543 relative to the transcription start site and containing
exon 1 and intron 1 sequences) were labeled with [
-32P]UTP to specific activities of 6 × 108 and 0.75 × 108 cpm/µg,
respectively. The SpEts4 and SpHE probes protect
202- and 110-nucleotide fragments, respectively. One-half nanogram of
probe was hybridized with 1.5 µg of total RNA to kinetic termination at 50°C for 18 h. RNase protection and electrophoresis of the protected products were conducted as described previously
(30).
In vitro translation of SpEts4 protein. The SpEts4 cDNA was transferred to pGEM Easy plasmid (Promega). The protein was synthesized by using 1 µg of linearized plasmid and the TNT coupled reticulocyte lysate kit (Promega) in the presence of [35S]methionine (40 pmol; 1,000 Ci/mmol). The labeled products (1 µl of the 50-µl reaction mixture) were assayed for size by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Control luciferase protein encoded from a plasmid provided by the manufacturer was synthesized and assayed in the same way.
EMSA.
EMSA was conducted by using in vitro-translated
proteins and 9-h nuclear extracts as described previously
(26). Probes (bp
274 or
261 to
241) containing only
the Ets motif were end labeled with [
-32P]ATP to a
specific activity of ~2.0 × 106 cpm/pmol. For each
reaction, ~4.5 fmol of probe was incubated on ice for 10 min with
either an aliquot of the in vitro translation reaction mixture (see
above) or nuclear extract protein; the latter was prepared as described
previously (5). To test for specificity of binding, various
competitor DNAs, each containing a different variant Ets binding site
sequence, were added in a 200-fold molar excess. The reaction mixtures
were then fractionated by electrophoresis through nondenaturing 5%
acrylamide gels.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Isolation of trans-acting factors that interact with
the SpHE promoter sequence by using a yeast one-hybrid
screen of an egg cDNA library.
In order to identify the
trans-acting factors involved in SpHE promoter
activation, we used a nontraditional version of the yeast one-hybrid
method. In general, this assay selects among cDNA sequences, fused to a
vector-encoded transcriptional activation domain, for those whose
protein products can bind target DNA and activate expression of a
reporter gene in yeast cells (23). According to presently
used methods, the one-hybrid approach is said to require a bait
consisting of a multimerized cis element in order to
increase the probability of protein-DNA interaction. However, because
the SpHE promoter contains a large number of functional
cis elements, and because the exact boundaries of some of
these are difficult to define precisely, we used a single copy of the
native promoter sequence from bp
324 to
143. This region includes
all identified cis elements except two CCAAT sites that were
excluded to avoid possible background resulting from known CCAAT
transcription factors in yeast. Another reason for using this approach
is that among the many cis elements regulating the SpHE promoter, none is detectably more important than the
others for mediating either quantitative or spatial regulation
(26-28). Finally, we wanted to increase the probability of
selecting for strong protein-DNA interactions, which are likely to be
favored by using the natural promoter sequence instead of multimerized elements. Because the SpHE gene is very likely activated by
maternal transcription factors, we used RNA from eggs to build a cDNA
library of fusions to the GAL4 activation domain in plasmid pGAD10.
medium in the presence of 3-AT and expression of
-galactosidase and (ii) elimination of false positives by double
screening of selected transformants with an unrelated promoter bait and
with the bait containing SpHE promoter sequences. First, a
test cell line that contained integrated copies of SpHE
promoter bait linked to either the histidine gene or the
-galactosidase gene was selected for growth on His
medium that was completely inhibited by 5 mM 3-AT. After transformation with the egg cDNA library, of 2 × 106 egg cDNA
transformants of this cell, more than 100 colonies grew under 3-AT
selection, and they all were positive for
-galactosidase activity,
although at variable levels. The plasmid from each transformant was
extracted and individually reintroduced into yeast cells containing either SpHE promoter bait or a p53 bait. Of these, 14 clones
were SpHE specific and conferred the highest levels of
-galactosidase activity. Sequence analysis revealed that 13 clones
shared a 1.8-kb sequence (Fig. 1). Of
these 13 clones, 8 contained inserts of about 1.8 kb, and the remaining
inserts ranged from 2.3 to 2.9 kb. Interestingly, many of these
positive inserts were not linked in frame to a GAL4 activation domain,
raising the possibility that the selected egg cDNA sequences encode a
protein with its own transcription activation function as well as a DNA
binding domain. Furthermore, several strong positive transformants
contained plasmid inserts in opposite orientation with respect to the
ADH1 promoter that drives transcription of fusion proteins. This
observation suggests that sufficient transcription must have occurred
from a downstream cryptic promoter.
|
The selected cDNAs encode a novel sea urchin Ets family
transcription factor.
The longest open reading frame obtained from
the 13 selected egg cDNAs predicts a protein of 363 amino acids (Fig.
1). The translation start site is defined by the codon for the first
methionine residue downstream from an in-frame stop codon, whose local
context conforms to the translation consensus sequence (17).
Comparison of the following open reading frame to sequences in the
GenBank database shows that the C-terminal amino acid region comprises a conserved domain of about 85 amino acids that is related to the DNA
binding domain of the Ets family of transcription factors (Fig. 1). The
consensus core sequence recognized by Ets factors is C/AGGAA/T, which
appears in the SpHE
300 promoter at bp
250 and
107.
Only the
250 site was included in the bait sequence, suggesting that
this Ets site can bind the Ets family member selected in our screen.
|
SpEts4 contains a transcription activation domain.
SpEts4
appears to have transcription activation activity, since, as discussed
above, linkage of the GAL4 activation domain to SpEts4 sequence was not
required for strong expression of reporter genes in the yeast
one-hybrid screen. To eliminate possible activation via GAL4 peptides
binding in trans to SpEts4, positive clones lacking GAL4
sequences were tested for
-galactosidase expression (not shown) and
growth in 3-AT-containing His
medium (Fig.
3C; compare sector 2 [+GAL4] with
sector 3 [
GAL4]). Both assays show that transcription activity was
retained after deletion of GAL4 sequence. In the case shown in Fig. 3C,
GAL4 sequence was in frame with SpEts4 in the parent clone; after GAL4 deletion, a slight but detectable reduction in activity was observed, consistent with both GAL4 and SpEts4 sequences' providing activation activity. In cases in which GAL4 and SpEts4 sequences were not linked
in frame, removal of GAL4 had no effect (data not shown).
|
126-184) did not reduce activity (Fig. 3C, sectors 8 and
9), while Ets
36-123 was completely inactive when tested for growth
under His
selection (Fig. 3C, sectors 4 and 5) or for
-galactosidase activity. These results suggest that the upstream
region, but not the pointed domain, supplies a transactivating
function. The activity of the
184-274 protein was lower than that
of either the full-length protein or pointed-domain deletion mutant
(Fig. 3C, sectors 6 and 7). However, it is unlikely that this reflects
the presence of a second independent activation region, because the
36-123 protein, which contains it, is entirely inactive. Instead,
sequences between amino acids 184 and 274 may be required for optimal
activity of the upstream domain by providing either a coactivation or
structural function.
Since deletion of amino acids 36 to 123 resulted in loss of
transcriptional activation, it was important to determine whether this
sequence was sufficient to provide positive activity when linked to a
heterologous DNA binding domain, p53. Plasmids encoding this fusion
protein as well as those encoding other SpEts4 sequences (diagrammed in
Fig. 3B) were transformed into yeast containing the p53 promoter bait
linked to the reporter
-galactosidase and grown to approximately
equal densities (Fig. 3D). Transcription activation mediated by SpEts4
sequence is reflected by both the time of appearance and intensity of
the blue reaction product (Fig. 3E). By each of these criteria,
p53E1-275 (sector 2) and p53E
126-184 (sector 3) are strongly
positive and comparable to the positive control plasmid, pGAD53m,
containing the GAL4 activation domain (sector 4). Further, sequences
between amino acids 1 and 123 (p53E1-123; sector 6) also confer
promoter activity at a somewhat reduced level compared to the wild
type. A requirement for downstream sequences (amino acids 184 to 275)
for full activity was also observed in the deletion analysis (cf.
growth in sectors 6 and 7 with that in either sectors 8 and 9 or
sectors 2 and 3 in Fig. 3C). In contrast, the activity of the fusion
containing only amino acids 184 to 275 (p53E184-275; sector 5) is
similar to background levels obtained for untransformed p53 bait cells
(sector 1). These results confirm the deletion analysis and lead to the
conclusion that transcriptional activation is mediated by sequences
upstream of the pointed domain in SpEts4.
SpEts4 protein translated in vitro binds specifically to the
250
Ets site in the SpHE promoter.
To test whether SpEts4
protein can bind specifically to the SpHE Ets site, a
plasmid containing the SpEts4 open reading frame was transcribed in
vitro, and the RNA was translated in the presence of
[35S]methionine by using a rabbit reticulocyte lysate. As
shown in Fig. 4A, several labeled
products were obtained; the predominant one of these was about 47 kDa,
as determined by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis. This value is reasonably close to the size predicted
from the inferred amino acid sequence, which is 41 kDa. These proteins
formed a complex with a SpHE probe (bp
274 to
241)
containing the Ets CGGAA core and flanking sequences, as shown by the
EMSA results in Fig. 4B. In contrast, no complex was formed when a
template encoding luciferase was used in parallel reactions.
|
250 Ets cis element, complexes formed with in vitro-translated protein and nuclear extract protein were compared (Fig. 4C). Two characteristics of the complexes formed
with factors from these two sources strongly suggest that they are the
same protein. First, the complexes have the same mobility. Second, when
each of these complexes was competed by a series of different Ets motif
sequence variants, both were competed equally effectively by the
SpHE Ets and E74 motifs, but neither was competed as well by
the PU.1 or the sea urchin Ets2 site (59/60) (8). The
sequences of these competitors are listed in Fig. 5. Although all of the sequences contain
the same GGAA core motif, as expected, residues both 5' and 3' to the
core in the
250 SpHE Ets site and E74 are more similar to
each other than those in elements to which binding is weak or
undetectable. We conclude that SpEts4 and a factor in 9-h nuclear
extracts bind to different Ets elements with similar relative
affinities.
|
107 in the
SpHE promoter for binding to in vitro-translated SpEts4 and
9-h nuclear extracts. In neither case was a complex detected (data not
shown), leading us to conclude that the upstream site is the only site
in the SpHE promoter to which SpEts4 binds. As shown in Fig.
5, this result undoubtedly reflects the fact that the sequences
surrounding the Ets core sequence at bp
107 differ significantly from
those found at the
250 SpHE Ets4 or E74 sites to which
SpEts4 binds.
SpEts4 positively activates the SpHE
promoter-containing transgenes.
Our previous studies led to the
conclusion that most, and probably all, cis elements in the
SpHE promoter bind positively acting factors
(27). Relevant to the present studies is the demonstration
that an Ets site-containing partial promoter from bp
240 to
310
fused to the basal promoter region (bp
90 to +20) retained
significant, spatially correct transcriptional activity (27). We tested whether SpEts4 behaves as a positive
regulator of SpHE promoter-driven transgenes in vivo by
using three independent assays: by mutation of the Ets cis
element, by linking the Ets site to the basal promoter, and by in vivo
transactivation via coinjected SpEts4 mRNA.
240 to
310 region tested previously
contains binding sites for SpOtx and an unidentified factor as well as
SpEts4 (26), we prepared constructs that specifically test
the contribution of the SpEts4 element to SpHE promoter
activity by replacing the CGGAAC core sequence. Linearized constructs
containing SpHE promoter elements driving CAT expression
were microinjected into fertilized S. purpuratus eggs. The
resulting embryos were analyzed for CAT activity and for exogenous
template DNA content as described previously (10, 26). As
shown in Fig. 6A, replacement of the Ets
core binding site in the context of the
310 promoter results in
reduced CAT enzymatic activity. When the
240 to
310 region is
tested directly linked to the
90 to +20 basal promoter region,
promoter activity resulting from replacement of the Ets site also is
decreased to close to the basal promoter levels that we have observed
in previous experiments (26). In a second set of
experiments, we found that a 20-nucleotide fragment containing the Ets
site linked to the SpHE basal promoter could reproducibly mediate a low level of activation (Fig. 6B). As shown in the
transactivation experiment described below, one likely reason that this
effect is modest is that the amount of SpEts4 protein in the embryo is limiting with respect to the transgenes, which are present at about
2,500 copies/expressing cell (18). It is also possible that
the position of the Ets site with respect to the basal promoter is not
optimal in the context of this artificial promoter. In any case, these
results support the Ets site mutation data, which suggest that the
SpHE SpEts cis element binds a factor with a transcriptional activating function. To test directly for
transactivating activity of SpEts4, SpEts4 mRNA was
coinjected with a SpHE promoter transgene into sea urchin
one-cell zygotes. As shown in Fig. 6C, 0.2 pg of mRNA coinjected with
the Ets site-basal promoter transgene increased CAT activity
severalfold compared to that in embryos containing the transgene alone.
This result indicates that endogenous SpEts4 protein is not sufficient
to saturate the transgene target sites. These observations indicate
that SpEts4 supplies a transcriptional activating activity in sea
urchin embryos, as it does in yeast one-hybrid assays.
|
The early expression of the SpEts4 gene is appropriate for its encoding a SpHE regulator. To determine whether expression of SpEts4 is consistent with its encoding a SpHE regulatory protein, an RNase protection assay was performed with combined probes representing SpEts4 and SpHE transcripts and total RNA from unfertilized eggs and selected embryo stages. To avoid possible cross-reaction and the resulting production of additional protected fragments, we used an SpEts4 probe representing sequence outside the conserved regions and likely to be gene specific. As shown in Fig. 7, fragments of the size expected for perfect duplexes were protected for each probe, indicating that these assays are specific for each mRNA, since, under the conditions used, RNase will cleave the hybridized probe at a single mismatched base pair. SpEts4 transcripts are relatively abundant and present at nearly equivalent levels in the unfertilized egg and in embryos through the first six cleavages (8.5 h; 64-cell stage). SpHE transcripts were first detectable in this assay at 8.5 h, reached peak levels at the very early blastula stage (12 h), and then rapidly decayed. In previous similar assays with probes that had higher specific activity, SpHE transcripts could be detected in the four- to eight-cell embryo (3 to 4 h) (20) and, as observed here, rapidly turned over after about 15 h postfertilization. We conclude that the relative patterns of accumulation of these mRNAs are consistent with SpEts4's encoding a positive regulator of SpHE transcription.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study we used a modification of the yeast one-hybrid system to clone a trans-acting factor that can activate the sea urchin SpHE gene. The one-hybrid approach has been successfully used to isolate other transcription factors, but virtually all of those studies utilized as bait a specific multimerized cis element. That kind of construct requires relatively precise mapping of the cis element by mutation and deletion, which is time-consuming. Furthermore, the SpHE regulatory region contains many positively acting sites, and multiple combinations of elements are able to drive expression to high levels in the correct cells (26, 27). Because of this functional redundancy, it was not possible for us to assign primary significance to any individual element. Therefore, we chose to use a major portion of the SpHE regulatory region, containing six different cis elements. To our knowledge, a similar approach has been used only once previously (16); however, in that case, the cis element was essentially naturally multimerized, since it appeared in the promoter several times. A related but converse approach, which utilized expression of DNA binding proteins in yeast to select single target cis elements from genomic DNA, has been successful (29).
Although the bait contained at least six cis elements (26), we only recovered clones encoding the one protein binding at an Ets motif, previously called site IC. Potential reasons for this include the possibilities that some proteins require interaction with other cofactors lacking in yeast for strong DNA binding, that mRNAs encoding some factors may be of relatively low abundance in eggs or underrepresented in our egg library, and that some factors may require posttranslational modification for binding that does not occur in yeast. However, an alternative explanation is that SpEts4 was more easily selected in the yeast screen because of its own transcriptional activation activity that resides in the N-terminal region. Furthermore, this activity appears to be quite strong, since it is nearly equivalent to that obtained with the positive control GAL4-p53 fusion protein.
The activating region of SpEts4 is characterized by a relatively high density of residues that are also found in the activation domains of other transcription factors, which include glutamine, serine, proline, and acidic residues. Different members of the Ets family also contain mapped activation domains that lack a conserved activation sequence but are characterized by similar enrichments for these amino acids (reviewed in reference 9). Which of these are responsible for transcriptional activation by SpEts4 is not known yet.
The selected protein, SpEts4, that binds to a SpHE promoter cis element is a member of the Ets transcription factor family, based on strong conservation in the DNA binding domain as well as similarity to a pointed domain outside this region. Based on the available sequences of the conserved Ets domain, this transcription factor is most closely related to Drosophila Ets4. Although sequence outside the Drosophila Ets4 DNA binding domain is not yet available, it is likely that it also will be more similar to SpEts4 than to other Ets proteins. Phylogenetic comparison of Ets domain sequences suggests that Drosophila Ets4 cannot be assigned to any of the nine known groups, including those with both invertebrate and vertebrate members (13). The identification of SpEts4 suggests that SpEts4 and Drosophila Ets4 constitute a new group within the Ets family. It is interesting that both factors are expressed in oocytes and early embryos (6), but determining whether they mediate conserved developmental functions will require identification of target genes in both species. It would be interesting to know if this group, currently with two invertebrate members, is conserved in vertebrates, as are some other groups of Ets factors. SpHE is a Zn2+-dependent metalloprotease of the stromelysin/collagenase family. Interestingly, Ets transcription factors have also been shown to be important regulators of genes encoding mammalian stromelysin (4, 24) and collagenase (14).
SpEts4 binds effectively to an Ets site in the SpHE promoter and to the Drosophila E74 site from the E74 promoter (22) but not to motifs recognized by the PU.1 Ets class or a sea urchin Ets2-like factor (8). The exact sequence features that determine binding affinities of different Ets factors are not known. However, consistent with our in vitro binding data is the observation that in the sequences immediately flanking the GGAA core, the SpHE SpEts4 site is more similar to the Drosophila E74 competitor sequence than to those of the PU.1 and Ets2 binding site competitors. Random oligonucleotide site selection assays with either E74 (22) or its mammalian homolog, Elf-1 (15), generated a consensus recognition site, AAC/TCC/AGGAAGT, which is an excellent match (10 of 11) to the SpHE SpEts4 site (AACCCGGAACTA) (Fig. 5), although closely related, but somewhat more degenerate, consensus sites have also been obtained for other Ets subfamily members (reviewed in reference 13). As is the case for all Ets factors, binding of SpEts4 to the SpHE promoter results in DNase I hypersensitivity near the core recognition motif (12, 26, 28).
Many Ets proteins interact with other transcription factors, and in
some cases (e.g., AP1, SRF, CBF, Sp-1, and myb), this interaction
facilitates binding and/or activity (reviewed in references 9 and 25). Candidate regions for
binding interacting proteins reside on either side of the SpEts4
binding site in the SpHE promoter. About 15 nucleotides 5'
of the SpEts4 site in the SpHE promoter is a consensus motif
for binding the NF-
B class of transcription factors (GGGTAATCC)
(3), which are known to interact with Ets family
members (2). Immediately downstream of the Ets site is a
large DNase I-protected region produced by a cis element(s) and factor(s) that remain to be defined (26, 28).
The site with which SpEts4 interacts confers positive activity in the SpHE promoter, as demonstrated by assays in vivo on wild-type and mutated SpHE promoter-driven transgenes. Mutation of the Ets site in a partial promoter containing only two other identified upstream cis elements reduces activity nearly to basal levels, indicating that it is at least essential, if not sufficient, for promoter activity in this construct. That the function conferred by the SpEts4 cis element is positive is strongly supported by the observation that transcription activated through the SpHE Ets site could be significantly upregulated by coinjected SpEts4 mRNA. The finding that SpEts4 protein activates SpHE transcription agrees well with our previous in vivo genomic footprinting assays. There is within the cis element to which SpEts4 binds a strong dimethylsulfate-sensitive site at early stages when the SpHE promoter is active but not at later stages when it is inactive (28). Since this site maps to the exact nucleotide position observed in similar assays of an Ets-DNA interaction (1), it likely reflects an in vivo SpEts4-DNA interaction that occurs when the SpHE gene is active. The demonstration that SpEts4 confers positive activity is consistent with our model that it is one of a set of positive factors regulating SpHE transcription.
The timing of SpEts4 gene expression is consistent with its serving as an activator of SpHE transcription. SpEts4 transcripts, which accumulate during oogenesis, persist only until about the 64-cell stage (8 h postfertilization) and turn over rapidly during the next several hours, corresponding to one or two cleavages. SpHE transcription begins in the 4- to 8-cell embryo, mRNA levels are maximal at about 12 h postfertilization (170-cell stage), and then transcription is repressed and mRNA levels decay within the next several hours. SpHE is not transcribed at late embryonic stages when SpEts4 mRNAs reappear, implying that SpEts4 protein regulates other genes during sea urchin embryogenesis.
In the context of a partial SpHE promoter transgene, this Ets cis element mediates binding of an essential positive activity. The same partial promoter also drives expression of a reporter gene appropriately only in nonvegetal cells, as can several different subsets of cis elements in the SpHE regulatory region (27). These results have led us to propose that restriction of SpHE transcription to nonvegetal cells of the early blastula reflects the partitioning of multiple positive activities to this early embryonic domain. The results presented here suggest that SpEts4 is one of those activities. Experiments to characterize the expression patterns of SpEts4 during sea urchin embryogenesis and to test whether SpEts4 function is restricted to cells in nonvegetal blastomeres of the early sea urchin embryo are under way.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Geoff Childs for Ets motif oligonucleotides and for sharing information about their properties, Eric Howard for advice on genetic screening in yeast, and Xiaomei Pan for technical assistance.
This work was supported by an NIH grant (NIGMS 25553) to R.C.A.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627. Phone: (716) 275-0260. Fax: (716) 275-2070. E-mail: langerer{at}la.biology.rochester.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Ahne, B., and W. H. Stratling.
1994.
Characterization of a myeloid-specific enhancer of the chicken lysozyme gene. Major role for an Ets transcription factor-binding site.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:17794-17801 |
| 2. |
Bassuk, A. G.,
R. T. Anandappa, and J. M. Leiden.
1997.
Physical interactions between Ets and NF- B/NFAT proteins play an important role in their cooperative activation of the human immunodeficiency virus enhancer in T cells.
J. Virol.
71:3563-3573[Abstract].
|
| 3. | Boulikas, T. 1994. A compilation and classification of DNA binding sites for protein transcription factors from vertebrates. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 4:117-321[Medline]. |
| 4. |
Buttice, G., and M. Kirkinen.
1993.
A polyoma virus enhancer A-binding protein-3 site and Ets-2 protein have a major role in the 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate response of the human stromelysin gene.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:7196-7204 |
| 5. |
Calzone, F. J.,
N. Thèzè,
P. Thiebaud,
R. L. Hill,
R. J. Britten, and E. H. Davidson.
1988.
Developmental appearance of factors that bind specifically to cis-regulatory sequences of a gene expressed in the sea urchin embryo.
Genes Dev.
2:1074-1088 |
| 6. | Chen, T., M. Buntine, F. D. Karim, and C. S. Thummel. 1992. Isolation and characterization of five Drosophila genes that encode an ets-related DAN binding domain. Dev. Biol. 151:176-191[Medline]. |
| 7. | Chen, Z.-Q., M. C. Kan, L. Pribyl, J. A. Lautenberger, E. Moudrianakis, and T. Papas. 1988. Molecular cloning of the ets protooncogene of the sea urchin and analysis of its developmental expression. Dev. Biol. 125:432-440[Medline]. |
| 8. | Childs, G. 1996. Personal communication. |
| 9. | Crepieux, P., J. Coll, and D. Stehelin. 1994. The Ets family of proteins: weak modulators of gene expression in quest for transcriptional partners. Crit. Rev. Oncogenet. 5:615-638. |
| 10. | Gan, L., W. Zhang, and W. H. Klein. 1990. Repetitive DNA sequences linked to the sea urchin Spec genes contain transcriptional enhancer-like elements. Dev. Biol. 139:186-196[Medline]. |
| 11. | Golub, T. R., A. Goga, G. F. Barker, D. E. Afar, J. McLaughlin, S. K. Bohlander, J. D. Rowlet, O. N. Witte, and D. G. Gilliland. 1996. Oligomerization of the ABL tyrosine kinase by the Ets protein TEL in human leukemia. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:4107-4116[Abstract]. |
| 12. | Graves, B. J., M. E. Gillespie, and L. P. McIntosh. 1996. DNA binding by the ETS domain. Nature 384:322[Medline]. |
| 13. | Graves, B. J., and J. M. Petersen. 1998. Specificity within the ets family of transcription factors. Adv. Cancer Res. 75:1-55[Medline]. |
| 14. | Gutman, A., and B. Wasylyk. 1990. The collagenase gene promoter contains a TPA and oncogene-responsive unit encompassing the PEA3 and AP-1 binding sites. EMBO J. 9:2241-2246[Medline]. |
| 15. |
John, S.,
R. Marais,
R. Child,
Y. Light, and W. G. Leonard.
1996.
Importance of low affinity Elf-1 sites in the regulation of lymphoid-specific inducible gene expression.
J. Exp. Med.
183:743-750 |
| 16. | Kim, S. Y., H. J. Chung, and T. L. Thomas. 1997. Isolation of a novel class of bZIP transcription factors that interact with ABA-responsive and embryo-specification elements in the Dc3 promoter using a modified yeast one-hybrid system. Plant J. 11:1237-1251[Medline]. |
| 17. |
Kozak, M.
1989.
The scanning model for translation: an update.
J. Cell Biol.
108:229-241 |
| 18. | McMahon, A. P., C. N. Flytzanis, B. R. Hough-Evans, K. S. Katula, R. J. Britten, and E. H. Davidson. 1985. Introduction of cloned DNA into sea urchin egg cytoplasm: replication and persistence during embryogenesis. Dev. Biol. 108:420-430[Medline]. |
| 19. | Rao, S. K., and G. Childs. 1993. GenBank accession no. LL19541. |
| 20. | Reynolds, S. D., L. M. Angerer, J. Palis, A. Nasir, and R. C. Angerer. 1992. Early mRNAs, spatially restricted along the animal-vegetal axis of sea urchin embryos, include one encoding a protein related to tolloid and BMP-1. Development 114:769-786[Abstract]. |
| 21. |
Thompson, J. D.,
D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson.
1994.
CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:4673-4680 |
| 22. | Urness, L. D., and C. S. Thummel. 1990. Molecular interactions within the ecdysone regulatory hierarchy: DNA binding properties of the Drosophila ecdysone-inducible E74A protein. Cell 63:47-61[Medline]. |
| 23. | Wang, M. M., and R. R. Reed. 1993. Molecular cloning of the olfactory neuronal transcription factor Olf-1 by genetic selection in yeast. Nature 364:121-126[Medline]. |
| 24. | Wasylyk, B., A. Gutman, R. Nicholson, and B. Wasylyk. 1991. The c-ets oncoprotein activates the stromelysin promoter through the same elements as several non-nuclear oncoproteins. EMBO J. 10:1127-1134[Medline]. |
| 25. | Wasylyk, B., S. L. Hahn, and A. Giovane. 1993. The Ets family of transcription factors. Eur. J. Biochem. 211:7-18[Medline]. |
| 26. | Wei, Z., L. M. Angerer, M. L. Gagnon, and R. C. Angerer. 1995. Characterization of the SpHE promoter that is spatially regulated along the animal-vegetal axis of the sea urchin embryo. Dev. Biol. 171:195-211[Medline]. |
| 27. | Wei, Z., L. M. Angerer, and R. C. Angerer. 1997. Multiple positive cis-elements regulate the asymmetric expression of the SpHE gene along the sea urchin embryo animal-vegetal axis. Dev. Biol. 187:71-78[Medline]. |
| 28. | Wei, Z., L. M. Angerer, and R. C. Angerer. 1997. The SpHE gene is down-regulated in sea urchin late blastulae despite persistence of multiple positive factors sufficient to activate its promoter. Mech. Dev. 67:171-178[Medline]. |
| 29. |
Wilson, T. E.,
T. J. Fahrner,
M. Johnston, and J. Milbrandt.
1991.
Identification of the DNA binding site for NGFI-B by genetic selection in yeast.
Science
252:1296-1299 |
| 30. | Yang, Q., L. M. Angerer, and R. C. Angerer. 1989. Structure and tissue-specific developmental expression of a sea urchin arylsulfatase gene. Dev. Biol. 135:53-65[Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|