Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 1999, p. 1416-1426, Vol. 19, No. 2
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Homologue
of Mammalian Translation Initiation Factor 6 Does Not Function as a
Translation Initiation Factor
Kausik
Si and
Umadas
Maitra*
Department of Developmental and Molecular
Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University,
Bronx, New York 10461
Received 11 August 1998/Returned for modification 12 October
1998/Accepted 27 October 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 6 (eIF6) binds to the 60S
ribosomal subunit and prevents its association with the 40S ribosomal
subunit. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene that encodes the
245-amino-acid eIF6 (calculated Mr 25,550),
designated TIF6, has been cloned and expressed in
Escherichia coli. The purified recombinant protein prevents
association between 40S and 60S ribosomal subunits to form 80S
ribosomes. TIF6 is a single-copy gene that maps on
chromosome XVI and is essential for cell growth. eIF6 expressed in
yeast cells associates with free 60S ribosomal subunits but not with
80S monosomes or polysomal ribosomes, indicating that it is not a
ribosomal protein. Depletion of eIF6 from yeast cells resulted in a
decrease in the rate of protein synthesis, accumulation of half-mer
polyribosomes, reduced levels of 60S ribosomal subunits resulting in
the stoichiometric imbalance in the 40S/60S subunit ratio, and
ultimately cessation of cell growth. Furthermore, lysates of yeast
cells depleted of eIF6 remained active in translation of mRNAs in
vitro. These results indicate that eIF6 does not act as a true
translation initiation factor. Rather, the protein may be involved in
the biogenesis and/or stability of 60S ribosomal subunits.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
An obligatory intermediate step in
initiation of protein synthesis in eukaryotic cells is the initial
positioning of the 40S ribosomal subunit containing bound initiator
Met-tRNAf at the AUG codon of an mRNA to form the 40S
initiation complex. Subsequently a 60S ribosomal subunit joins the 40S
initiation complex to form an 80S initiation complex
(Met-tRNAf · 80S · mRNA) that is competent to
undergo peptide bond synthesis during the elongation phase of protein
synthesis (for reviews, see reference 16 and
17). Thus, the assembly of the 80S initiation
complex during initiation of protein synthesis requires a cellular pool
of free 40S and 60S ribosomal subunits. Two eukaryotic translation
initiation factors, eIF3 and eIF6, have been implicated in maintaining
a pool of free ribosomal subunits (16, 17). eIF3, a
multisubunit protein complex with Mr > 500,000, binds to the 40S ribosomal subunit (3) and prevents its
association with the 60S ribosomal subunit (10, 34-36).
eIF6, a monomeric protein of about 26 kDa, binds to the 60S ribosomal
subunit and prevents its association with the 40S ribosomal subunit
(21, 26, 27, 37). This ribosomal subunit anti-association
property was used originally as an assay to purify eIF6 from wheat germ
(26, 27), mammalian liver (37), and rabbit
reticulocyte lysates (21, 32). However, unlike eIF3, whose
requirement in the formation of the 40S initiation complex is firmly
established (16, 17), the requirement of eIF6 in translation
of mRNAs has not been defined.
We have recently cloned a human cDNA that encodes eIF6, which is 245 amino acids long (calculated Mr, 26,558)
(32). The open reading frame (ORF) of the cDNA was expressed
in Escherichia coli. The purified recombinant protein
exhibited biochemical properties that are similar to eIF6 isolated from
mammalian cell extracts (32). When the predicted amino acid
sequence of human eIF6 was used to search the yeast genomic sequence
for homologous yeast eIF6 sequence, an ORF (YPR016C) that encodes a
protein of 245 amino acids, with 72% identity to human eIF6, was
identified in chromosome XVI of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
(32).
In this paper, we describe the cloning and characterization of the
yeast gene TIF6 (translation initiation factor 6), which encodes eIF6. Yeast eIF6 is a protein of 245 amino acids (calculated Mr, 25,550) with 72% identity to human eIF6
(32). Expression of eIF6 protein in E. coli
confirms that the gene singled out on phylogenetic grounds
(32) is indeed the structural gene of yeast eIF6. We also
show that TIF6 is essential for cell growth. Additionally,
we have constructed a haploid yeast strain in which a functional but a
rapidly degradable form of eIF6 fusion protein was synthesized from a
glucose-repressible GAL promoter. The effects of depletion
of eIF6 from this strain on cell growth as well as protein synthesis in
vivo and in vitro were then analyzed. The results of these experiments
show that eIF6 plays a role in translation of mRNAs by maintaining the
steady-state level of a pool of 60S ribosomal subunits. The protein
does not function as a bona fide translation initiation factor.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Media, growth conditions, and DNA analysis.
Yeast
strains were grown at 30°C in either rich YPD medium (1% [wt/vol]
yeast extract, 2% [wt/vol] Bacto Peptone, 2% [wt/vol] dextrose)
or in YPGal medium, where 2% (wt/vol) galactose replaced dextrose as
the carbon source. Where indicated, haploid yeast cells were also grown
in synthetic complete medium (0.67% Bacto Yeast Nitrogen Base without
amino acids, 0.2% amino acid mixture supplemented with nutrients
required for auxotrophic deficiencies). This synthetic complete medium
contained either 2% galactose (SGal) or 2% dextrose (SD) as the
carbon source. For in vivo [35S]methionine incorporation,
the 0.2% amino acid mixture in either the SGal or the SD medium did
not contain methionine. These methionine-lacking media were designated
SGal-Met and SD-Met, respectively. Yeast genetic methods were performed
by standard methods (22). Standard methods were used for
plasmid and genomic DNA isolation, cloning, and bacterial
transformation (30). The following primers were used for PCR
amplification of DNA: Yf65, 5'-CGGGATCC
CATATGGCTACCAGGACTCAA (EcoRI, NdeI);
yf63, 5'-GGGAATTCCTATGAGTAGGTTTCAATCAA
(BamHI); Yf6G5,
5'-CGGGATCCAAGGTGCAAGATCAGAC (BamHI);
yF6G3, 5'-GGGAATTCCTGCCAAGAGATACTACT (EcoRI); Yf6Ub5,
5'-GCTCTAGAATGGCTACCAGGACTCAA (XbaI);
and Yf6Ub3, 5'-AACTGCAGCTATGAGTAGGTTTCAATCAA
(PstI) (restriction enzyme sites are underlined).
Cloning, expression, and purification of yeast eIF6.
A
735-bp yeast genomic fragment that corresponds to the putative yeast
eIF6 ORF based on sequence similarity to human eIF6 (32) was
amplified by PCR with Pyrococcus DNA polymerase (Stratagene) and two primer sequences, Yf65 and Yf63, that correspond to the N-terminal and C-terminal ends of putative yeast eIF6 protein, respectively. The PCR product was digested with BamHI and
EcoRI, cloned into the same sites of pBluescript SK(+)
vector (Stratagene), and sequenced to ensure error-free DNA synthesis.
For expression of the eIF6 protein in E. coli, the PCR
product was cloned into the NdeI-EcoRI sites of
the expression vector pET-5a (Novagen) to yield the recombinant plasmid
pET-TIF6. The recombinant plasmid was transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3) cells, and the expression of the plasmid-encoded
eIF6 protein was induced by the addition of 1 mM
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) to an
exponentially growing bacterial culture (2 liters). The cells were
harvested by centrifugation at 3 h postinduction. The frozen cells
(10 g) were suspended in 30 ml of 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.5)-5 mM
EDTA-100 mM KCl-10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol-0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, treated with 300 µg of lysozyme for 30 min at 4°C, and
then disrupted by sonication. After centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 20 min, the supernatant was adjusted to 0.5 M KCl by the
addition of 2 M KCl and centrifuged at 150,000 × g for
2 h. The postribosomal supernatant (250 mg of protein) was
dialyzed against buffer A (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 0.2 mM EDTA, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 10% glycerol) containing 150 mM KCl and then loaded
onto a 60-ml bed volume of a DEAE-cellulose column equilibrated against
buffer A-150 mM KCl. After the column was washed with 300 ml of the
same buffer, the bound proteins were eluted with buffer A-280 mM KCl, dialyzed against buffer A-150 mM KCl, and then applied to a 6.5-ml volume of a column of DEAE-Sephacel equilibrated against the same buffer. After the column was washed with 30 ml of buffer A-150 mM KCl,
bound proteins were eluted with a 50-ml linear gradient of KCl (0.15 to
0.5 M) in buffer A. Fractions containing yeast eIF6, detected by
Western blotting with anti-yeast eIF6 antibodies, were pooled, and the
proteins were precipitated by addition of solid ammonium sulfate to
70% saturation. The precipitated proteins were dissolved in 1 ml of
buffer A-500 mM KCl and dialyzed against the same buffer. The
concentrated protein fraction (10 mg) was applied to a 33-ml bed volume
column of Sephadex G-75 (superfine) equilibrated in buffer A-500 mM
KCl. The column was developed with the same buffer, and fractions of 1 ml were collected. Fractions 21 to 26 containing eIF6 protein were
pooled and stored in small aliquots at
70°C. The total yield was
about 720 µg of purified eIF6 protein.
Disruption of the TIF6 gene in the chromosome.
The one-step gene disruption method of Rothstein (24) was
used to construct the null allele of the TIF6 gene. For this
purpose, the TIF6 ORF present in the vector pET-TIF6 was
digested with XbaI and EcoRI and the resulting
775-bp XbaI-EcoRI fragment was cloned into the
EcoRI-XbaI sites of pGEM7Zf(+) to yield the
plasmid pKS60. A 1.0-kb EcoRV-SmaI fragment
carrying the entire HIS3 gene was inserted into a unique
EcoRV site within the TIF6 ORF (at position +362)
present in pKS60 to yield the plasmid pKS601. This plasmid was
linearized by digestion with SmaI and used to transform his3 homozygous W303 (a/
) cells. Stable
diploid His+ transformants, designated KSY601, were
selected. The disruption of one of the genomic TIF6 genes in
these transformants was verified by Southern blot analysis of total DNA
with a 32P-labeled 735-bp TIF6 ORF fragment of
the TIF6 gene as a probe. Spores obtained from several
transformants were subjected to tetrad analysis as described by
Rothstein (24).
Construction of haploid yeast strains for expression of yeast
eIF6.
The haploid yeast strain KSY602 (Table
1), containing the chromosomal copy of
the TIF6 gene inactivated by insertion of HIS3 marker gene and harboring a centromeric expression plasmid that expresses yeast eIF6 from its own natural promoter, was constructed as
follows. A 1.752-kb yeast genomic fragment containing the entire TIF6 gene was amplified from yeast genomic DNA by PCR by
using a 5' end primer, Yf6G5, and a 3'-end primer, Yf6G3. The PCR
product was digested with BamHI and EcoRI and
cloned into the same sites of a centromeric plasmid, pRS315
(LEU2 based) (33), to yield plasmid pRS315-TIF6.
In this plasmid, the expression of eIF6 is under the control of its
natural promoter present in the inserted 1.752-kb fragment. This
plasmid was then used to transform the diploid strain KSY601
(a/
) (tif6::HIS3/TIF6),
transformants were sporulated at 30°C, and the resulting tetrads were
dissected and spores were germinated on YPD plates followed by
selection on SD-His-Leu plates. Only spores containing the
tif6::HIS3 gene and harboring the
pRS315-TIF6 plasmid will germinate to yield His+
Leu+ colonies. The genotype of the TIF6 loci on
the chromosome and on the plasmid of KSY602 was confirmed by Southern
blot analysis with a 32P-labeled 735-bp TIF6 ORF
DNA fragment as a probe. For expression of yeast eIF6 under the control
of the galactose-inducible GAL10 promoter, we first isolated
a 0.6-kb-BamHI-EcoRI fragment containing the
GAL1-GAL10 promoter from plasmid pBM272 (12) and
cloned it at the same sites of pRS315 to generate pTM100
(15). A 735-bp TIF6 coding region was excised
from plasmid pKS60 (see above) by digestion with BamHI and
XbaI and cloned into the same sites of the pTM100 vector to
generate the eIF6 expression plasmid pTM100-TIF6. We also constructed a
plasmid for conditional expression of a rapidly degradable form of
yeast eIF6 fusion protein (see Fig. 3A). For this purpose, the coding
region of TIF6 was first fused in frame to a
lacI-flu segment present in plasmid pGEM-flu (20) as follows. The ORF of TIF6 was amplified by PCR with
primers Yf6Ub5 and Yf6Ub3, which were flanked by XbaI and
PstI, respectively, and cloned into the same sites of the
plasmid pGEM-flu to make an in-frame fusion of TIF6 to the
lacI-flu fragment. This plasmid was then digested with
BamHI and SphI, and the resulting
lacI-flu-TIF6 fragment was fused in frame to the
ubiquitin gene, UBI4, under the control of GAL10
promoter, as follows. Plasmid pUB23, containing the UBI4
gene under the control of the GAL10 promoter, was cut with
BamHI and EcoRI, and the resulting 2.2-kb
BamHI-EcoRI fragment that contains
URA3 and the upstream activation sequence of the GAL promoter (UASGal)-ubiquitin
(Ub)-X (where X is the trinucleotide codon for arginine) was ligated with the
BamHI-SphI fragment that encodes the
lacI-flu-TIF6 gene derived from the pGEM-flu vector (see
above). The resulting 3.1-kb EcoRI-SphI fragment
was then cloned into the EcoRI-SphI site of the
centromeric HIS3 vector pSE362 (20) to generate
pUB-TIF6R (GAL10::Ub-lacI-flu-TIF6) (see Fig.
3A). For construction of a haploid yeast strain for conditional
expression of ubiquitinylated eIF6 fusion protein, the haploid yeast
strain KSY602, which has the disrupted chromosomal copy of
TIF6 but harbors the LEU2-based centromeric
pRS315-TIF6 as the complementing plasmid (see above and Table 1), was
transformed with plasmid pUB-TIF6R and His+
Leu+ Ura+ transformants were selected. These
transformants were then grown in SGal
His
Ura medium to
promote the loss of the LEU2 plasmid, pRS315-TIF6. The newly
generated yeast strain, which has the disrupted chromosomal copy of the
TIF6 gene but harbors only plasmid pUB-TIF6R, was selected
on appropriate SGal media. This strain, designated KSY603, expresses
yeast eIF6 from GAL10 promoter initially as an N-terminal
ubiquitinylated eIF6 fusion protein, which is rapidly processed in
yeast cells by a deubiquitination enzyme to yield free ubiquitin and an
eIF6 fusion protein having arginine (R) as the
NH2
terminal amino acid.
Polysome profile analysis and isolation of ribosomal
subunits.
The haploid yeast strains W303
and KSY603 were grown
in YPGal or YPD medium to early logarithmic phase (absorbance at 600 nm
[A600]
0.2). The cells were harvested, and
4 A600 units of cells was resuspended in 100 ml of YPGal or
YPD medium and grown at 30°C. At the indicated time, 50 ml of
cultures was withdrawn, treated with 50 µg of cycloheximide per ml,
rapidly chilled in an ice-water bath, and then harvested. The cells
were washed twice with LHB buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 100 mM
NaCl, 30 mM MgCl2, 50 µg of cycloheximide per ml). The
washed cells were then suspended in 0.5 ml of LHB buffer, lysed by
vortexing with an equal volume of glass beads, and then treated with an
additional 0.5 ml of LHB buffer. The lysates were clarified by
centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 15 min, and
equivalent amounts of A254-absorbing material (approximately 10 A254 units) were layered on 11 ml of 7 to 47% (wt/vol) sucrose gradients in a low-salt buffer (10 mM
Tris acetate [pH 7.0], 12 mM MgCl2, 50 mM
NH4Cl) and centrifuged at 40,000 rpm for 2.5 h at
4°C in a Beckman SW41 rotor. The gradients were fractionated in an
ISCO density gradient fractionator, and the A254
profile was analyzed in an ISCO UA-5 absorbance monitor.
Ribosomal subunits were isolated from mid-exponential-phase cultures of
W303

(wild type) or KSY603 grown in YPD or YPGal
medium. Harvested
cells were washed twice with buffer B (50 mM
Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 10 mM
MgCl
2, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 800 mM KCl,
0.1% Triton
X-100, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). Cell
extracts were then
prepared in buffer B, as described above, and
clarified by
centrifugation. Approximately 2
A254 units of
the
supernatant was layered over an 11-ml 10 to 40% (wt/vol) sucrose
gradient containing buffer B and centrifuged at 40,000 rpm for
3.5 h at 4°C in a Beckman SW41 rotor. Gradient fractionation and
analysis
were carried out as described above for the polysome
profile
analysis.
Cell-free translation.
Strain KSY603 was grown overnight at
30°C (A600
1.0) in YPGal supplemented with
adenine sulfate (0.4 mg/ml). Cells were harvested and suspended in 2 liters of YPD medium containing adenine sulfate (0.4 mg/ml) so that the
initial A600 was about 0.03 unit and grown at
30°C for about 11 h, when growth was considerably inhibited and
the presence of eIF6 could not be detected by immunoblot analysis of
cell lysates. The cells were then harvested, cell-free translation
extracts were prepared, and mRNA-dependent cell-free translation was
performed with [35S]methionine as the labeled amino acid,
as described by Hussain and Leibowitz (11).
Measurement of the protein synthesis rate in vivo.
The rate
of protein synthesis was measured by pulse-labeling 1.0
A600 unit of yeast cells with
[35S]methionine for 5 min and measuring the incorporation
of 35S radioactivity into total cellular proteins as
follows. Exponentially growing cultures (A600
0.6) of W303
or KSY603 growing in YPGal were harvested, and
approximately 10 A600 units of cells was
resuspended in 150 ml of either YPD or YPGal medium and allowed to grow
at 30°C. At the indicated times, 2 A600 units
of cells was removed, centrifuged, resuspended in 300 µl of either
YPGal or YPD, and labeled for 5 min with 50 µCi of
[35S]methionine (Dupont-NEN) at 30°C. Following the
addition of 1 ml of stop buffer (1.2 mg of unlabeled methionine per ml,
0.5 mg of cycloheximide per ml), the cells were chilled rapidly. The amount of [35S]methionine incorporated into total
cellular proteins was then measured by an adaptation of the method of
Kang and Hershey (13) as follows. The cells were lysed in
1.8 N NaOH containing 0.2 M 2-mercaptoethanol, and proteins were
precipitated by the addition of hot 10% trichloroacetic acid. After
centrifugation, the precipitate was washed twice in acetone, dissolved
in 100 µl of 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-containing buffer, and
heated at 95°C for 10 min. An aliquot of the SDS extract was counted
in Aquasol for 35S radioactivity in a liquid scintillation
spectrometer to determine the amount of [35S]methionine
incorporated into proteins, while another aliquot containing about 100 µg of proteins was analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(PAGE) (15% polyacrylamide) followed by autoradiography.
Other methods.
Total and poly(A)+ RNAs of
S. cerevisiae were isolated essentially as described by Rose
et al. (22). Northern and Southern blot analyses were
performed by standard methods (30). Immunoglobulin G
antibodies specific for yeast eIF6 were isolated from specific rabbit
antisera raised against purified recombinant yeast eIF6 by affinity
purification with purified recombinant yeast eIF6 blotted onto
aminophenyl thioether paper (Schleicher & Schuell) as an antigen as
described previously (9). The procedure used for preparation
of yeast cell lysates for immunoblot analysis was adapted from that
described by Sachs and Davis (28). Yeast eIF6 was assayed by
the ribosomal subunit anti-association assay as described for mammalian
eIF6 (37). Antibodies against 60S ribosomal protein L3
(38) were kindly provided by Jonathan Warner of this institution.
 |
RESULTS |
Identification of the S. cerevisiae gene, designated
TIF6, encoding eIF6.
We have previously reported
(32) the cloning of a human cDNA that encodes eIF6, with 245 amino acids (calculated Mr, 26,558). When we
used the predicted amino acid sequence of human eIF6 to search the
yeast genomic database for homologous yeast eIF6 sequence, we
identified a hypothetical translation product in chromosome XVI of
S. cerevisiae (YPR016C) that encodes a protein of 245 amino acids, with 72% identity to human eIF6 (32). The 735-bp
YPR016C ORF was amplified by PCR from yeast genomic DNA and cloned into the E. coli expression vector pET-5a under the control of
the phage T7 RNA polymerase promoter. Transformation of the resulting construct into E. coli BL21(DE3) resulted, after induction
with IPTG, in the production of a polypeptide of about 26 kDa (Fig. 1A, lane 2). This polypeptide reacted
specifically with the well-characterized monospecific anti-mammalian
eIF6 antibodies (Fig. 1B), indicating that the expressed protein shared
antigenic determinants with mammalian eIF6. When the E. coli
extract was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min, a
major fraction (>90%) of the expressed protein was found in the
insoluble pellet fraction while only a small fraction (about 5 to 10%)
was in the soluble fraction (data not shown).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Analysis of the protein and the mRNA encoded by the
TIF6 gene. (A) Expression of yeast eIF6 in E. coli. Cell extracts, prepared from IPTG-induced cultures of
E. coli BL21(DE3) cells harboring either the parental
plasmid pET-5a (lane 1) or pET-TIF6 (lane 2), were electrophoresed in
an SDS-15% polyacrylamide gel and subjected to Coomassie blue
staining. The position of migration of the expressed protein of about
26 kDa is shown by an arrowhead. (B) Immunoblot analysis of the
bacterially expressed 26-kDa protein with mammalian anti-eIF6
antibodies as probes. Cell extracts of IPTG-induced cultures of
BL21(DE3) cells harboring either the parental vector (lane 1) or the
pET-TIF6 recombinant expression plasmid (lane 2) were subjected to
Western blot analysis with monospecific anti-mammalian eIF6 antibodies
(32) as probes. (C) Immunoblot analysis with anti-TIF6p
(eIF6) antibodies as probes. The protein samples used in lanes 1 and 2 were the same as those used in lanes 1 and 2 of panel B, while lane 3 contained 100 µg of a partially fractionated protein fraction derived
from cell extracts of S. cerevisiae W303 (a/ ).
Immunoblot analysis was carried out with anti-yeast 26-kDa Tif6p
antibodies as probes. A set of molecular weight marker proteins was run
in a separate lane of each gel (data not shown). The position of eIF6
is shown by an arrowhead. (D) Northern blot analysis of mRNA expressed
from the TIF6 gene. A Northern blot containing 2 µg of
electrophoretically separated yeast poly(A)+ RNA was
hybridized to a 32P-labeled 735-bp TIF6 ORF. The
blot also contained a set of RNA size markers, of which the position of
1.35-kb RNA is indicated. The blot was analyzed by autoradiography.
|
|
The recombinant 26-kDa protein was purified initially from the
insoluble pellet fraction and used as an antigen for the preparation
of
specific antisera in rabbits (see Materials and Methods). These
polyclonal antibodies reacted specifically with the recombinant
26-kDa
protein present in the
E. coli lysates. (Fig.
1C, lane
2).
In contrast, no immunoreactive polypeptide band was observed
in
E. coli cell lysates containing the parental non-recombinant
pET-5a vector (lane 1). Furthermore, preimmune immunoglobulin
G did not
react with the 26-kDa protein (data not shown). These
results indicated
that these antibodies are monospecific. These
monospecific antibodies
were then used as a specific probe in
Western blot analysis to monitor
the purification of the 26-kDa
protein from the soluble fraction of the
bacterial cell lysates,
as described in Materials and Methods. The
elution profile of
the recombinant protein in the Sephadex G-75 gel
filtration column
was identical to that of purified natural or
recombinant human
eIF6 (data not
shown).
The biochemical properties of the recombinant 26-kDa protein with
regard to its ability to interact with 60S ribosomal subunits
and
prevent their association with 40S ribosomal subunits at 5
mM
Mg
2+ concentration were investigated (Fig.
2). As reported previously
(
37), ribosomes washed in high-salt buffer and incubated at
1 mM Mg
2+ in the absence of any protein fraction
dissociated into 40S and
60S ribosomal subunits as determined by
sucrose gradient centrifugation
(Fig.
2A). If, however, the
Mg
2+ concentration of the incubation mixture was then
raised to 5
mM in a second incubation, a major fraction of the subunits
reassociated
to form 80S ribosomes (Fig.
2B). In contrast, when the 40S
and
60S ribosomal subunits were first incubated with the purified
recombinant 26-kDa protein at 1 mM Mg
2+ and the
Mg
2+ concentration was then raised to 5 mM, a major
fraction of the
subunits failed to reassociate to form 80S ribosomes
(Fig.
2C).
These results demonstrate that the recombinant 26-kDa
protein
can act as a ribosomal subunit anti-association factor. Thus,
the 735-bp hypothetical ORF, designated YPR016C in the yeast genomic
database, encodes the yeast homologue of mammalian eIF6. The derived
amino acid sequence of yeast eIF6 is as predicted previously
(
32)
based on its homology to human eIF6.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Ribosomal-subunit anti-association activity of
bacterially expressed recombinant yeast eIF6. eIF6 activity was
measured by the ability of the protein to prevent the association of
40S and 60S ribosomal subunits at 5 mM Mg2+ to form 80S
ribosomes, as described previously (37). Three reaction
mixtures, each of 100 µl and containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 100 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 1.0
A260 unit of Artemia salina 80S ribosomes,
were prepared. Two of the reaction mixtures, A and B, contained no
protein factors, while mixture C contained 1.25 µg of purified
recombinant yeast eIF6 (Sephadex G-75 fraction). After incubation at
30°C for 5 min, the Mg2+ concentration of mixtures B and
C was raised to 5 mM while that of mixture A was kept at 1 mM, and the
incubation was continued for another 5 min at 37°C. Each reaction
mixture was then chilled in an ice-water bath, loaded onto a 5-ml
linear 5 to 30% (wt/vol) sucrose gradient containing 20 mM Tris-HCl
(pH 7.5), 100 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 5 mM MgCl2
(for mixtures B and C) or 1 mM MgCl2 (for mixture A), and
centrifuged for 90 min in an SW50.1 rotor at 48,000 rpm. Each gradient
was fractionated and the A254 profile was
analyzed by using an UA-5 absorbance monitor. (A) No yeast eIF6 added,
reaction at 1 mM Mg2+; (B) no yeast eIF6 added, reaction at
5 mM Mg2+; (C) yeast eIF6 added, reaction at 5 mM
Mg2+.
|
|
To obtain evidence that
TIF6 is indeed expressed in yeast
cells, we carried out Western blot analysis of a fractionated yeast
cell extracts with affinity-purified anti-yeast eIF6 antibodies
as a
probe. Two distinct immunoreactive polypeptide bands were
observed
(Fig.
1C, lane 3). One of the immunoreactive polypeptides
migrated with
the same mobility as purified recombinant yeast
eIF6, while the other
migrated with a slightly lower mobility.
The possibility exists that
the slower-migrating polypeptide was
derived from the faster-migrating
one by posttranslational modifications,
e.g.,
phosphorylation.
Characterization of the TIF6 gene.
The yeast
genomic database search indicated that TIF6 is a single-copy
gene. This observation was confirmed by Southern blot analysis of
HindIII- or EcoRI-digested yeast genomic DNA
with the 32P-labeled 735-bp TIF6 ORF fragment as
a probe (data not shown). TIF6 is transcribed, yielding a
single-size class of RNA of about 1.2 kb (Fig. 1D).
Analysis of the nucleotide sequence of the yeast genomic DNA
surrounding the
TIF6 ORF indicates that the initiating ATG
codon
at +1, which is preceded by a translational stop codon TGA at
position

12, satisfies the consensus rule of translational start
sites,
3AUA
AUGG
+4 (the start
codon is underlined) (
14). There are several TATA
sequences
upstream of the start ATG codon which may serve as promoters
for
transcription of
TIF6 mRNA. Based on this analysis, a
1,742-bp
yeast genomic fragment that extends from 500 bp upstream of
the
translational start codon ATG of
TIF6 ORF (position +1)
to 507
bp downstream of the translation stop codon TAG (at position
+735)
was amplified by PCR and cloned into the
LEU2-based
centromeric
expression plasmid pRS315. This plasmid-borne genomic
fragment
was sufficient to complement a null allele of
TIF6,
indicating
that this 1,742-bp fragment can act as a transcriptional
unit
and contains the promoter elements of
TIF6.
TIF6 is an essential gene.
To determine if
TIF6 is essential for mitotic cell growth and viability, we
constructed a null allele of the TIF6 gene as described in
Materials and Methods. The yeast HIS3 gene was inserted into
a unique EcoRV site located at position +362 of the
TIF6 ORF, and the resulting construct was introduced into a
diploid yeast strain, W303 (Mat
/Mata), by
homologous recombination. Stable His+ transformants were
isolated, and the genomic DNAs of several transformants were subjected
to Southern blot and PCR analyses to screen for
tif6::HIS3/TIF6 heterozygous diploid
yeast cells (data not shown). The resulting diploid strain, KSY601, was
then sporulated for tetrad analysis. Of the 18 tetrads, 15 yielded two
viable spores and 3 tetrads produced only one viable spore (data not
shown). All the viable spores were His
. We conclude that
TIF6 is essential for germination and/or cell growth. To
determine that TIF6 was the only gene that was disrupted in
strain KSY601, the strain was transformed with a centromeric LEU2-plasmid pRS315 containing the TIF6 ORF under
the control of glucose-repressible GAL10 promoter,
pTM100-TIF6. A Leu+ transformant was then sporulated, and a
Leu+ His+ haploid strain was selected. The
growth of the Leu+ His+ haploid strain
(tif6::HIS3, pTM100-TIF6) was then
examined on galactose- and glucose-containing plates. The strain grew
on galactose plates but not on glucose plates after a 3-day incubation
at 30°C, whereas W303
grew well on both (data not shown). Thus,
extrachromosomal expression of TIF6 was sufficient to
complement genomic disruption of the TIF6 locus. Taken
together, these results show that TIF6 is an essential gene.
Construction and expression of a rapidly degradable form of eIF6 in
S. cerevisiae.
To understand the effect of depletion of
endogenous eIF6 on cell growth and protein synthesis in yeast cells, we
constructed a haploid yeast strain, KSY603, in which the chromosomal
copy of the TIF6 gene was inactivated by insertion of
HIS3 marker gene and the essential eIF6 function was
provided by maintenance of a centromeric plasmid harboring a
conditional eIF6 expression system. In this expression system, eIF6 was
expressed from a transcription unit containing a protein-destabilizing
ubiquitin gene cassette consisting of
GAL-UAS-UBI4-R-lacI-HA (20) fused
to the NH2 terminus of the TIF6 ORF under the
transcriptional control of GAL10 promoter (Fig.
3A). The eIF6 fusion protein synthesized
from this construct should contain ubiquitin (Ub) at the
NH2 terminus followed by an arginine residue and a
31-amino-acid segment of the lacI repressor that acts as a
recognition element for ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation and
finally an HA tag. Deubiquitination of the eIF6 fusion protein in yeast
cells exposes arginine (R) as the NH2-terminal amino acid
and should lead to rapid degradation of eIF6 protein on the basis of
the N-end rule (2). As expected, strain KSY603 (GAL10::UbTIF6) grew well on plates
containing galactose as the carbon source but did not form detectable
colonies on plates containing glucose as the sole carbon source (data
not shown). In liquid cultures containing galactose, both the wild-type
W303
and strain KSY603 grew with a doubling time of about 2.5 h
(Fig. 3B, left). However, when an exponentially growing culture of the
KSY603 (GAL10::UbTIF6) was shifted from
galactose- to glucose-containing medium to repress transcription of the
TIF6 gene from the GAL10 promoter, the growth rate of KSY603 began to decrease after about 5 h and growth ceased after about 20 h (Fig. 3B, right). The growth inhibition at the earlier stages were reversible, since cells grown in glucose for about
8 h were still able to form colonies on galactose-containing plates (data not shown).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Analysis of eIF6 depletion in yeast cells and its effect
on cell growth. (A) Schematic representation of the plasmid pUB-TIF6.
The plasmid was constructed as described under Materials and Methods.
Abbreviations: UAS, the upstream activation sequence of the
GAL10 promoter; Ub, ubiquitin gene; X, the codon
for arginine; lacI, a restriction fragment that encodes
amino acid residues 318 to 346 of the lac repressor; HA, an
epitope from the influenza virus hemagglutinin protein. (B)
Exponentially growing cultures of W303 ( ) and KSY603 ( ) were
diluted to an A600 of about 0.03 in either YPGal
(galactose) medium or YPD (glucose) medium. Cell growth was monitored
by measuring the A600. To keep cultures in
exponential growth, they were diluted in fresh medium whenever the
A600 reached 0.8 U. (C) At the indicated times
following the shift from YPGal to either YPGal (left) or YPD (right),
cell lysates were prepared from KSY603 as described in Materials and
Methods. Approximately 50 µg of protein from each cell lysate was
electrophoresed through an SDS-15% polyacrylamide gel and
electrophoretically transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride
membrane. The blot was then probed with peroxidase-coupled anti-HA
monoclonal antibodies to detect eIF6 fusion protein. The decrease in
the amount of eIF6 observed at the 6-h time point in YPGal is due to a
gel loading error.
|
|
To determine whether the arrest of cell growth of KSY603 correlated
with the depletion of eIF6, we carried out immunoblot
analysis of the
level of eIF6 protein in cell lysates following
the shift from
galactose to glucose medium. As shown in Fig.
3C
(left), the level of
eIF6 in cell lysates prepared from nonrepressed
KSY603 cells remained
fairly similar during the growth period.
In contrast, there was a rapid
decline of eIF6 fusion protein
in KSY603 cells after transfer to
glucose medium. After about
4 h, there was virtually no detectable
eIF6 fusion protein in
these cell lysates (Fig.
3C, right). Correlation
of the growth
of KSY603 cells in glucose-containing medium with the
level of
eIF6 in these cells thus clearly shows that depletion of eIF6
resulted in a growth defect in KSY603. However, even after eIF6
levels
were reduced to barely detectable in 4 h, cell growth did
not come
to an immediate halt. Rather, there was a progressive
increase in the
doubling time until about 20 h, when cell growth
was nearly
completely
arrested.
Analysis of protein synthesis in vivo upon depletion of eIF6.
The effect of depletion of eIF6 on protein synthesis in yeast cells was
investigated with strain KSY603
(GAL10::UbTIF6). An exponentially
growing culture of this strain was transferred from galactose- to
glucose-containing medium, and the rate of protein synthesis was
monitored by measuring the rate of incorporation of
[35S]methionine into cellular proteins over the growth
period. Figure 4A shows that after about
2 h following the shift from galactose- to glucose-containing
medium, the rate of protein synthesis in this strain was reduced to
nearly 50% of the initial rate, and that after about 8 h, the
rate of protein synthesis was about 25% of the initial rate. This
inhibition of protein synthesis in KSY603 cells following the shift
from galactose- to glucose-containing medium seemed to be general,
because the production of most, if not all, of the polypeptides
appeared to be equally reduced (Fig. 4B). These results show that eIF6
plays a role in translation of mRNAs in yeast cells.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Inhibition of protein synthesis in eIF6-depleted cells.
Exponentially growing cultures of W303 or KSY603 growing in
galactose medium lacking methionine (SGal-Met medium) were harvested,
and approximately 10 A260 units of cells was
suspended in 150 ml of either SD-Met (glucose) or SGal-Met medium and
grown at 30°C. At the indicated times, 1 A260
unit of cells from each culture was harvested and suspended in 300 µl
of either SD-Met or SGal-Met medium containing 50 µCi of
[35S]methionine (1175 Ci/mmol). (A) Protein synthesis
rates were determined as described in Materials and Methods. The rate
of protein synthesis at each time point was calculated as counts of
35S radioactivity incorporated per microgram of protein per
minute. (B) Each yeast strain, as indicated, were pulse-labeled for 5 min with [35S]methionine in SD-Met medium, chased for 3 min with 1.5 mM nonradioactive methionine, and lysed. Similar amounts
of total protein were separated by SDS-PAGE and autoradiographed.
|
|
To investigate whether the inhibition of protein synthesis observed in
eIF6-depleted cells was due to a defect in the initiation
step, we
analyzed the polyribosome profile of exponentially growing
cultures of
wild-type W303

as well as KSY603 cells growing in
galactose- or
glucose-containing medium (Fig.
5). The
eIF6-depleted
KSY603 cells growing in glucose-containing medium showed
a marked
reduction in the number of large polyribosomes compared with
that
in wild-type W303

cells growing in glucose-containing medium
(compare Fig.
5E and F with Fig.
5A and B) or KSY603 cells growing
in
galactose-containing medium (Fig.
5C and D). However, in contrast
to
cells depleted of an essential initiation factor, where a reduction
in
the size of polysomes is accompanied by an increase in the
number of
80S ribosomes and of free ribosomal subunits, the decrease
in
polyribosome content in eIF6-depleted KSY603 cells was accompanied
by a
decrease in the number of both 80S monosomes and 60S ribosomal
subunits. Furthermore, there was concomitant accumulation of half-mer
polyribosomes (compare Fig.
5E and F with Fig.
5B and C).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Analysis of the polyribosome profiles of eIF6-depleted
yeast cells. Exponentially growing cultures of KSY603 or W303 in
YPGal medium were harvested and resuspended in either glucose (YPD) or
YPGal medium such that the initial A600 of each
culture was about 0.04 U. At about 5 h (E) and 10 h (B, C,
and F) after the shift, 50 ml of each culture was treated with 50 µg
of cycloheximide per ml and chilled cells were harvested, washed, and
lysed as described in Materials and Methods. About 10
A260 units of each cell lysate was subjected to 7 to
47% (wt/vol) sucrose gradient centrifugation. Each gradient was
fractionated in an ISCO gradient fractionator, and the
A254 profile was analyzed in an ISCO UA-5
absorbance monitor. The positions of the half-mer polysomes are
indicated by arrowheads ( ) in panels E and F.
|
|
We also analyzed the relative amounts of 40S and 60S ribosomal subunits
in KSY603 cells depleted of eIF6 (Fig.
6). In these
cells, the level of 60S
ribosomal subunits was significantly reduced
relative to that of 60S
subunits in KSY603 growing in YPGal or
W303

shifted to YPD for
10 h (Fig.
6). Determination of the 60S-to-40S
subunit
A254 ratio showed that this ratio was about 2.0 for wild-type
W303

or KSY603 in YPGal but decreased to about 1.3 for
eIF6-depleted
KSY603 in YPD.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
eIF6 depletion results in a decrease in 60S subunits
levels. Total ribosomes were isolated from strains W303 and KSY603
after 10 h of growth in either YPD or YPGal, dissociated into 40S
and 60S ribosomal subunits, and sedimented through 15 to 40% sucrose
gradients as described in Materials and Methods.
|
|
In agreement with these results, in a separate study (results not
shown), we carried out an immunoblot analysis of the levels
of 60S
ribosomal proteins L3 and L32 and 40S ribosomal protein
S12 in cell
lysates following the shift of KSY603 from YPGal to
YPD medium. We
observed that after about 5 to 6 h there was a
progressive decline
in the levels of both L3 and L32 proteins
in these cells with time.
After about 15 h, there was no detectable
L3 or L32 protein in
these cell lysates. In contrast, the level
of 40S ribosomal protein S12
in the cell lysates remained relatively
constant during the entire
growth period following the shift from
galactose- to glucose-containing
medium.
These results indicated that depletion of eIF6 causes a deficiency in
60S ribosomal subunits, resulting in a stoichiometric
imbalance between
40S and 60S ribosomal subunits. This stoichiometric
imbalance causes a
subunit-joining defect, resulting in the accumulation
of half-mer
polysomes in eIF6-depleted
cells.
Effect of depletion of eIF6 on translation of mRNAs in vitro.
We used eIF6-depleted KSY603 cells to prepare a yeast cell-free
translation system to investigate the effect of eIF6 depletion on
translation of mRNAs in vitro (Fig. 7).
Cell-free translation extracts prepared from exponentially growing
cultures of wild-type W303
cells in glucose-containing medium were
active in translation of total yeast poly(A)+ RNA without
any exogenously added protein factors (Fig. 7A, left). When similar
cell extracts were prepared from KSY603
(GAL10::UbTIF6) cells that were grown
in glucose medium for about 11 h until eIF6 was virtually depleted
from the cells (Fig. 7B), they remained active in translation of yeast
poly(A)+ RNA (Fig. 7A, right). Similar results were
obtained when luciferase mRNA was translated in wild-type and
eIF6-depleted KSY603 extracts (Fig. 8).
Additionally, analysis of the 35S-labeled translation
products formed in the experiments in Fig. 7 by SDS-PAGE followed by
autoradiography showed that similar polypeptides were synthesized in
both the wild-type W303
and the eIF6-depleted cell extracts (data
not shown). Taken together, these results show that eIF6 does not
function as a translation initiation factor in vitro. If eIF6 is a bona
fide translation initiation factor, its absence would have caused the
cell extracts to be nearly totally inactive in translation, as was
observed in eIF5-depleted cell extracts (15) or in cell
extracts containing an inactive translation initiation factor,
e.g., eIF4E(1) or eIF4A(5). Translation in these extracts was
restored by the addition of the depleted initiation factor. It should
be noted, however, that the translation efficiency of eIF6-depleted
cell extracts was somewhat reduced compared to that of wild-type
extracts (Fig. 7A, compare the [35S]methionine
incorporation observed when comparable amounts of the two extracts were
used). This is in agreement with the decrease in the rate of
translation observed in eIF6-depleted cells (Fig. 4). Addition of
functionally active eIF6 to eIF6-depleted lysates did not significantly
increase the translation efficiency (Fig. 7A, right). Furthermore, when
these extracts were supplemented with either additional 60S ribosomal
subunits or 60S subunits plus eIF6, there was no effect on translation
efficiency.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
In vitro translation of total yeast poly(A)+
RNA in eIF6-depleted cell extracts. (A) Exponentially growing cultures
of KSY603 or W303 cells in YPGal medium were harvested and suspended
in glucose (YPD) medium such that the initial
A600 was about 0.03 U. At about 11 h after
the shift, the cells were harvested and translation cell extracts were
prepared, incubated, and analyzed for [35S]methionine
incorporation into proteins as described in Materials and Methods.
Where indicated, 5 µg of total yeast poly(A)+ RNA (mRNA)
and 0.5 µg of recombinant yeast eIF6 were added to 50 µl of
reaction mixtures containing 25 µCi of [35S]methionine
and all the other components required for translation including
micrococcal nuclease-treated cell extracts containing approximately 150 µg of proteins. Aliquots (8 µl) from 50-µl reaction mixtures were
withdrawn at the indicated times and analyzed for
[35S]methionine incorporation into proteins as described
in Materials and Methods. (B) At the indicated times following the
shift from YPGal to YPD medium, cell lysates were prepared and 200 µg
of protein from each lysate was subjected to Western blot analysis with
either anti-HA monoclonal antibodies or anti-L3 antibodies as probes.
It should be noted that a relatively large amount of cell lysates was
analyzed in the Western blot to ensure that the lysates had no
detectable levels of eIF6. Under these conditions, the level of the 60S
ribosomal protein L3 was also decreased. However, no change in the
level of L3 in cell lysates between 0 and 11 h was apparent in the
immunoblot analysis, presumably because the amount of L3 in cell
lysates analyzed was still large.
|
|

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Translation of luciferase mRNA in cell extracts.
Translation cell extracts were prepared from W303 (TIF6)
or KSY603 (GAL10::UbTIF6) cells grown
in glucose-containing medium for 11 h as described in Materials
and Methods. Where indicated, 2 µg of capped luciferase mRNA was
added to 50-µl reaction mixtures along with all the other components
necessary for in vitro translation. The reactions were carried out at
25°C. At the indicated times, an aliquot of each reaction mixture was
assayed for luciferase activity as described by Russel et al.
(25).
|
|
It is not surprising that extracts prepared from eIF6-depleted KSY603
cells were rather inefficient in translation of mRNAs.
In such cell
extracts, concomitant with a twofold reduction in
the level of total
60S ribosomal subunits, the synthesis of all
cellular proteins
including the proteins required for translation
of mRNAs (e.g.,
aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases; initiation, elongation,
and termination
factors; and ribosomal proteins) will be significantly
reduced.
However, the amount of all translations components including
60S
ribosomal subunits remaining was presumably still sufficient
to carry
out in vitro translation of exogenously added mRNAs.
It should be noted
that while these extracts were depleted of
eIF6, a significant level of
60S ribosomal protein L3 (Tcm1p)
was still present (Fig.
7B).
Association of eIF6 with free 60S ribosomal subunits in yeast
cells.
Mammalian eIF6 has been shown to bind to the 60S ribosomal
subunit in an approximately 1:1 ratio (37) and to prevent
its association with the 40S ribosomal subunit. To investigate whether eIF6 associates with 60S ribosomal subunits in yeast cells, lysates of
an exponentially growing culture of yeast strain KSY603 were subjected
to sucrose gradient centrifugation. Aliquots from the gradient
fractions were then analyzed by Western blotting with anti-HA
antibodies to identify the location of the HA-eIF6 fusion protein (Fig.
9). A 60S ribosomal protein, L3 (Tcm1p),
detected by anti-L3 antibodies (38) was used as a marker to
identify the positions of 60S ribosomal proteins in the gradient (Fig. 9). As expected, 60S ribosomal protein L3 was found in the regions of
the gradient containing free 60S ribosomal subunits, 80S monosomes, and
polysomal ribosomes but was absent from fractions containing free 40S
ribosomal subunits. In contrast, a major fraction of the expressed eIF6
fusion protein cosedimented only with free 60S ribosomal subunits but
was absent from fractions containing 80S ribosomes, polysomes, or 40S
ribosomal subunits (Fig. 9). The association of eIF6 with 60S ribosomal
subunits is sensitive to high KCl concentration (Fig. 9). When sucrose
gradient centrifugation of cell extracts was carried out with buffers
containing 0.7 M KCl, eIF6 fusion protein was not associated with 60S
ribosomal subunits. The protein was found in the lighter fractions
(fractions 2 and 3) (Fig. 9, bottom). These results suggest that eIF6
is not a component of the 60S ribosomal particle but, rather, is a
protein that associates with the 60S ribosomal subunit.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
Association of eIF6 with 60S ribosomal subunits in yeast
cells. An exponentially growing culture of KSY603 was harvested, the
cells were washed and lysed, and the cell lysate was subjected to 5 to
30% sucrose gradient centrifugation to separate polysomes, free 80S
ribosomes, and ribosomal subunits as described in the legend to Fig. 5
and Materials and Methods. Fractions from the gradient were collected,
and proteins were precipitated with 10% trichloroacetic acid, analyzed
by SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with either anti-L3 antibodies or
anti-HA antibodies as probes. Fractions containing 40S and 60S
subunits, 80S monosomes, and polysomes are indicated. Protein L3 was
used as a marker for 60S subunit sedimentation.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
It is now generally accepted that after termination of mRNA
translation, 80S ribosomes are released from the polysomal complex and
are then in equilibrium with their subunits. Since a pool of free
ribosomal subunits is necessary for initiation of protein synthesis, a
mechanism must exist for maintaining a pool of both subunits or for
generating them from 80S ribosomes (16, 17). Two protein
factors, eIF3 and eIF6, have been implicated as being responsible for
maintaining a pool of ribosomal subunits required for initiation of
protein synthesis in eukaryotic cells (17). The multisubunit
initiation factor eIF3 was originally isolated from rabbit reticulocyte
lysates on the basis of its near-absolute requirement for translation
of globin mRNA by a protein-synthesizing system with partially purified
reconstituted proteins (3, 29, 31). Purified eIF3 was shown
(3) to specifically bind to the 40S ribosomal subunit in the
absence of other components of translation initiation and to prevent
its association with the 60S ribosomal subunit. In addition to the
ribosomal subunit anti-association property, eIF3 plays a direct role
at multiple steps in initiation of translation of mRNA (17).
In contrast to eIF3, which was isolated based on a direct translation
assay, eIF6, a 26-kDa monomeric protein, was isolated from both wheat
germ (26, 27) and mammalian (21, 32, 37) cell
extracts based on an in vitro assay that measured the ability of the
factor to bind specifically to the 60S ribosomal subunit and prevent
its association with the 40S ribosomal subunit. Because of this
ribosomal-subunit anti-association property, eIF6 was thought to play a
direct role in the generation of ribosomal subunits required for
initiation of protein synthesis. The protein was therefore classified
as a eukaryotic translation initiation factor (17),
although, unlike eIF3, its role in translation of mRNA has never been
demonstrated. Thus, it was important to show that the 26-kDa eIF6,
purified on the basis of an in vitro partial reaction, is indeed
involved in the translation of natural mRNAs before it can be regarded
as a bona fide translation factor.
Data presented in this paper clearly show that as yeast cells were
depleted of eIF6, the rate of protein synthesis was also inhibited.
However, analysis of the polysome profiles of eIF6-depleted cells
showed a reduction not only in the amounts of polysomes but also in the
amounts of both 80S monosomes and free 60S ribosomal subunits. The
selective reduction of total 60S ribosomal subunits with respect to 40S
ribosomal subunits in eIF6-depleted cells caused a stoichiometric
imbalance between 60S and 40S ribosomal subunits, resulting in the
formation of half-mer polysomes. The formation of half-mer
polyribosomes was presumably due to lack of joining of 60S ribosomal
subunits to the stalled 43S preinitiation complexes on the 5' UTR of
mRNA templates. Such polysome-ribosome profiles are not characteristic
of cells either containing an inactive translation initiation factor or
depleted of a translation initiation factor. If eIF6 plays an essential
role in the initiation phase of protein synthesis, its depletion from
yeast cells would have caused not only a reduction in polysome content
but also a simultaneous increase (not decrease) in the amounts of both 80S monosomes and free 60S and 40S ribosomal subunits, as was observed
in yeast cells depleted of an essential initiation factor, e.g., eIF5
(15). Furthermore, we observed that lysates of yeast cells
depleted of detectable levels of eIF6 but still containing a
significant concentration of 60S ribosomal subunits were still active
in translation of mRNA in vitro. Taken together, these results strongly
suggest that eIF6 is not a bona fide translation initiation factor.
Decreased protein synthesis rates and accumulation of half-mer
polysomes observed in eIF6-depleted cells were most probably due
primarily to selective reductions in the amount of 60S ribosomal
subunits. It is also likely that reduction in the level of 60S
ribosomal subunits will be accompanied by a decrease in the rate of
synthesis of all cellular proteins, including the proteins involved in
translation of mRNAs. This may explain the decrease in the rate of
protein synthesis observed in vivo and in vitro in eIF6-depleted cells.
If eIF6 is not a translation factor, what essential cellular functions
does it perform? More specifically, how does eIF6 maintain the
steady-state level of 60S subunits in cells? Reductions in the level of
60S subunits with respect to 40S subunits and concomitant accumulation
of half-mer polysomes have previously been observed for depletion or
mutation of several 60S ribosomal proteins (6-8, 18, 19,
23) as well as nonribosomal proteins like Nip7p (39)
and Sqt1p (7). These proteins, like eIF6, which are not
constituents of 60S ribosomal subunits, were found to be associated with free 60S ribosomal subunits but not with 80S monosomes or with
polysomes. The depletion of Nip7p from yeast cells has been shown to
cause a significant defect in pre-rRNA processing in the nucleolus,
which presumably leads to the depletion of 60S subunits
(39). Sqt1p, on the other hand, appears to be involved in a
late step in 60S subunit assembly or modification in the cytoplasm
(7). The association of eIF6 with mature free 60S subunits
(Fig. 9) suggests a role for this protein in some aspects of the late
60S subunit maturation step in the cytoplasm. On the other hand, recent
immunofluorescence studies (data not shown) have indicated the presence
of eIF6 also in the nucleus, supporting a role for this protein in
pre-rRNA processing or ribosome assembly, as has been shown for Nip7p
(39). The possibility also exists that the binding of eIF6
to free 60S ribosomal subunits in the cytoplasm is required for the
stability of the 60S particle. Furthermore, although eIF6 does not act
directly as a translation initiation factor, its binding to 60S
ribosomal subunits may regulate the subunit-joining step during the
initiation phase of protein synthesis. It has been reported
(37) that 60S ribosomal subunits containing bound mammalian
eIF6 are incapable of joining the 40S initiation complex to form the
80S initiation complex. Clearly, a mechanism must exist for the release
of eIF6 from the 60S subunit either prior to or concomitant with the
joining of the subunit to the 40S initiation complex. Further work is
now directed toward understanding the cellular function(s) of eIF6.
Recently a novel
4 integrin-binding protein, designated
p27BBP, has been identified through yeast two-hybrid
screening (4). Sequence analysis of p27BBP
revealed that the protein is identical to mammalian eIF6 reported from
our laboratory (32). However, although
4 integrin is
expressed mostly in epithelial cells, eIF6 is present in every cell
type of higher eukaryotes (32) as well as in unicellular
yeasts, where no
4 homologue has yet been found. It is likely that
the primary function of eIF6 is in the biogenesis and/or maintenance of
the stable population of 60S ribosomal subunits in all cell types. It
may, however, perform additional functions in higher eukaryotes in
coupling protein synthesis with the cellular signalling pathway through
its effect on ribosome biogenesis.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We are particularly grateful to Jonathan Warner and Tomohiro
Matsumoto of this institution for many stimulating discussions on yeast
methodologies. We are also indebted to Jonathan Warner, Stewart Shuman
of Sloan Kettering Cancer Research Center, New York, and our former
colleague, Jayanta Chaudhuri, now of Harvard Medical School, for
critically reading the manuscript. We also acknowledge gratefully the
assistance of Uttiya Basu of this laboratory for carrying out the
experiment on the growth curves of yeast strains presented in Fig. 3.
Finally, we thank Lyn Broccoli and Leona Connolly for their patience in
the preparation of the manuscript.
This work was supported by grant GM15399 from the National Institutes
of Health and by Cancer Core Support Grant P30CA 13330 from the
National Cancer Institute.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Developmental and Molecular Biology, Albert Einstein College of
Medicine of Yeshiva University, Jack and Pearl Resnick Campus, 1300 Morris Park Ave., Bronx, NY 10461. Phone: (718) 430-3505. Fax: (718) 430-8567. E-mail: maitra{at}aecom.yu.edu.
This paper is dedicated to Jerard Hurwitz on the occasion of his 70th
birthday for his enormous original scientific contributions in the
field of nucleic acid biosynthesis.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Altman, M.,
N. Sonenberg, and H. Trachsel.
1989.
Translation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: initiation factor 4E-dependent cell-free system.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9:4467-4472[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Bachmair, A., and A. Varshavsky.
1989.
The degradation signal in a short-lived protein.
Cell
56:1019-1032[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Benne, R., and J. W. B. Hershey.
1976.
Purification and characterization of initiation factor IF-E3 from rabbit reticulocytes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
73:3005-3009[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Biffo, S.,
F. Sanvito,
S. Costa,
L. Preve,
R. Pignatelli,
L. Spinardi, and P. C. Marchisio.
1997.
Isolation of a novel beta 4 integrin-binding protein (p27BBP) highly expressed in epithelial cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:30314-30321[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Blum, S.,
M. Mueller,
S. R. Schmid,
P. Linder, and H. Trachsel.
1989.
Translation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: initiation factor 4A-dependent cell-free system.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:6043-6046[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Deshmukh, M.,
Y-F. Tsay,
A. G. Paulovich, and J. L. Woolford, Jr.
1993.
Yeast ribosomal protein L1 is required for the stability of newly synthesized 5S rRNA and the assembly of 60S ribosomal subunits.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:2835-2845[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Eisinger, D. P.,
F. A. Dick,
E. Denke, and B. L. Trumpower.
1997.
SQT1, which encodes an essential WD domain protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, suppresses dominant-negative mutations of the ribosomal protein gene QSR1.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:5146-5155[Abstract].
|
| 8.
|
Eisinger, D. P.,
F. A. Dick, and B. L. Trumpower.
1997.
Qsr1p, a 60S ribosomal subunit protein, is required for joining of 40S and 60S subunits.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:5136-5145[Abstract].
|
| 9.
|
Ghosh, S.,
J. Chevesich, and U. Maitra.
1989.
Further characterization of eukaryotic initiation factor 5 from rabbit reticulocytes. Immunochemical characterization and phosphorylation by casein kinase II.
J. Biol. Chem.
264:5134-5140[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Goss, D. J.,
D. Rounds,
T. Harrigan,
C. L. Woodley, and A. J. Wahba.
1988.
Effects of eucaryotic initiation factor 3 on eucaryotic ribosomal subunit equilibrium and kinetics.
Biochemistry
27:1489-1494[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Hussain, I., and M. J. Leibowitz.
1986.
Translation of homologous and heterologous messenger RNAs in a yeast cell-free system.
Gene
46:13-23[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Johnston, M., and R. W. Davis.
1984.
Sequences that regulate the divergent GAL1-GAL10 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
4:1440-1448[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Kang, H. A., and J. W. B. Hershey.
1994.
Effect of initiation factor eIF-5A depletion on protein synthesis and proliferation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:3934-3940[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Kozak, M.
1991.
Structural features in eukaryotic mRNAs that modulate the initiation of translation.
J. Biol. Chem.
266:19867-19870[Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Maiti, T., and U. Maitra.
1997.
Characterization of translation initiation factor 5 (eIF5) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Functional homology with mammalian eIF5 and the effect of depletion of eIF5 on protein synthesis in vivo and in vitro.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:18333-18340[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Maitra, U.,
E. A. Stringer, and A. Chaudhuri.
1982.
Initiation factors in protein biosynthesis.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
51:869-900[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Merrick, W. C., and J. W. B. Hershey.
1996.
The pathway and mechanism of eukaryotic protein synthesis, p. 31-69.
In
J. W. B. Hershey, M. B. Matthews, and N. Sonenberg (ed.), Translational control. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 18.
|
Moritz, M.,
A. G. Paulovich,
Y. F. Tsay, and J. L. Woolford, Jr.
1990.
Depletion of yeast ribosomal proteins L16 or rp59 disrupts ribosome assembly.
J. Cell Biol.
111:2261-2274[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Moritz, M.,
B. A. Pulaski, and J. L. Woolford, Jr.
1991.
Assembly of 60S ribosomal subunits is perturbed in temperature-sensitive yeast mutants defective in ribosomal protein L16.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:5681-5692[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Park, E-C.,
D. Finley, and J. W. Szostak.
1992.
A strategy for the generation of conditional mutations by protein destabilization.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:1249-1252[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Raychaudhuri, P.,
E. A. Stringer,
D. M. Valenzuela, and U. Maitra.
1984.
Ribosomal subunit antiassociation activity in rabbit reticulocyte lysates. Evidence for a low molecular weight ribosomal subunit antiassociation protein factor (Mr = 25,000).
J. Biol. Chem.
259:11930-11935[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Rose, M. D.,
F. Winston, and P. Hieter.
1989.
Methods in yeast genetics: a laboratory course manual.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 23.
|
Rotenberg, M. O.,
M. Moritz, and J. L. Woolford, Jr.
1988.
Depletion of Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribosomal protein L16 causes a decrease in 60S ribosomal subunits and formation of half-mer polyribosomes.
Genes Dev.
2:160-172[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Rothstein, R. J.
1983.
One-step gene disruption in yeast.
Methods Enzymol.
101:202-211[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Russel, P. J.,
S. J. Hambridge, and K. Kirkegaard.
1991.
Direct introduction and transient expression of capped and non-capped RNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Nucleic Acids. Res.
19:4949-4953[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Russell, D. W., and L. L. Spremulli.
1979.
Purification and characterization of a ribosome dissociation factor (eukaryotic initiation factor 6) from wheat germ.
J. Biol. Chem.
254:8796-8800[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Russell, D. W., and L. L. Spremulli.
1980.
Mechanism of action of the wheat germ ribosome dissociation factor: interaction with the 60 S subunit.
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
201:518-526[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Sachs, A. B., and R. W. Davis.
1989.
The poly(A) binding protein is required for poly(A) shortening and 60S ribosomal subunit-dependent translation initiation.
Cell
58:857-867[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Safer, B.,
S. L. Adams,
W. M. Kemper,
K. W. Berry,
M. Lloyd, and W. C. Merrick.
1976.
Purification and characterization of two initiation factors required for maximal activity of a highly fractionated globin mRNA translation system.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
73:2584-2588[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 31.
|
Schreier, M. H.,
B. Erni, and T. Staehelin.
1977.
Initiation of mammalian protein synthesis. I. Purification and characterization of seven initiation factors.
J. Mol. Biol.
116:727-753[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Si, K.,
J. Chaudhuri,
J. Chevesich, and U. Maitra.
1997.
Molecular cloning and functional expression of a human cDNA encoding translation initiation factor 6.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:14285-14290[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Sikorski, R. S., and P. Hieter.
1989.
A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genetics
122:19-27[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Thomas, A.,
H. Goumans,
H. O. Voorma, and R. Benne.
1980.
The mechanism of action of eukaryotic initiation factor 4C in protein synthesis.
Eur. J. Biochem.
107:39-45[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Thompson, H. A.,
I. Sadnik,
J. Scheinbuks, and K. Moldave.
1977.
Studies on native ribosomal subunits from rat liver. Purification and characterization of a ribosome dissociation factor.
Biochemistry
16:2221-2230[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Trachsel, H., and T. Staehelin.
1979.
Initiation of mammalian protein synthesis. The multiple functions of the initiation factor eIF-3.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
565:305-314[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Valenzuela, D. M.,
A. Chaudhuri, and U. Maitra.
1982.
Eukaryotic ribosomal subunit anti-association activity of calf liver is contained in a single polypeptide chain protein of Mr = 25,500 (eukaryotic initiation factor 6).
J. Biol. Chem.
257:7712-7719[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Vilardell, J., and J. W. Warner.
1997.
Ribosomal protein L32 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae influences both the splicing of its own transcript and the processing of rRNA.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:1959-1965[Abstract].
|
| 39.
|
Zanchin, N. I. T.,
P. Roberts,
A. DeSilva,
F. Sherman, and D. S. Goldfarb.
1997.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nip7p is required for efficient 60S ribosome subunit biogenesis.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:5001-5015[Abstract].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 1999, p. 1416-1426, Vol. 19, No. 2
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Parnell, K. M., Bass, B. L.
(2009). Functional Redundancy of Yeast Proteins Reh1 and Rei1 in Cytoplasmic 60S Subunit Maturation. Mol. Cell. Biol.
29: 4014-4023
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Benelli, D., Marzi, S., Mancone, C., Alonzi, T., la Teana, A., Londei, P.
(2009). Function and ribosomal localization of aIF6, a translational regulator shared by archaea and eukarya. Nucleic Acids Res
37: 256-267
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ray, P., Basu, U., Ray, A., Majumdar, R., Deng, H., Maitra, U.
(2008). The Saccharomyces cerevisiae 60 S Ribosome Biogenesis Factor Tif6p Is Regulated by Hrr25p-mediated Phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem.
283: 9681-9691
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Meyer, A. E., Hung, N.-J., Yang, P., Johnson, A. W., Craig, E. A.
(2007). The specialized cytosolic J-protein, Jjj1, functions in 60S ribosomal subunit biogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
104: 1558-1563
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hung, N.-J., Johnson, A. W.
(2006). Nuclear Recycling of the Pre-60S Ribosomal Subunit-Associated Factor Arx1 Depends on Rei1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol.
26: 3718-3727
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lebreton, A., Saveanu, C., Decourty, L., Rain, J.-C., Jacquier, A., Fromont-Racine, M.
(2006). A functional network involved in the recycling of nucleocytoplasmic pre-60S factors. JCB
173: 349-360
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dong, J., Lai, R., Jennings, J. L., Link, A. J., Hinnebusch, A. G.
(2005). The Novel ATP-Binding Cassette Protein ARB1 Is a Shuttling Factor That Stimulates 40S and 60S Ribosome Biogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol.
25: 9859-9873
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
HORSEY, E. W., JAKOVLJEVIC, J., MILES, T. D., HARNPICHARNCHAI, P., WOOLFORD, J. L. JR.
(2004). Role of the yeast Rrp1 protein in the dynamics of pre-ribosome maturation. RNA
10: 813-827
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Basu, U., Si, K., Deng, H., Maitra, U.
(2003). Phosphorylation of Mammalian Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 6 and Its Saccharomyces cerevisiae Homologue Tif6p: Evidence that Phosphorylation of Tif6p Regulates Its Nucleocytoplasmic Distribution and Is Required for Yeast Cell Growth. Mol. Cell. Biol.
23: 6187-6199
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhao, Y., Sohn, J.-H., Warner, J. R.
(2003). Autoregulation in the Biosynthesis of Ribosomes. Mol. Cell. Biol.
23: 699-707
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
DAHLBERG, J. E., LUND, E., GOODWIN, E. B.
(2003). Nuclear translation: What is the evidence?. RNA
9: 1-8
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ramesh, V., Kohrer, C., RajBhandary, U. L.
(2002). Expression of Escherichia coli Methionyl-tRNA Formyltransferase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Leads to Formylation of the Cytoplasmic Initiator tRNA and Possibly to Initiation of Protein Synthesis with Formylmethionine. Mol. Cell. Biol.
22: 5434-5442
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Valasek, L., Hasek, J., Nielsen, K. H., Hinnebusch, A. G.
(2001). Dual Function of eIF3j/Hcr1p in Processing 20 S Pre-rRNA and Translation Initiation. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 43351-43360
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Basu, U., Si, K., Warner, J. R., Maitra, U.
(2001). The Saccharomyces cerevisiae TIF6 Gene Encoding Translation Initiation Factor 6 Is Required for 60S Ribosomal Subunit Biogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol.
21: 1453-1462
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Oh, C. K., Filler, S. G., Cho, S. H.
(2001). Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor-6 Enhances Histamine and IL-2 Production in Mast Cells. J. Immunol.
166: 3606-3611
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Minami, N., Sasaki, K., Aizawa, A., Miyamoto, M., Imai, H.
(2001). Analysis of Gene Expression in Mouse 2-Cell Embryos Using Fluorescein Differential Display: Comparison of Culture Environments. Biol. Reprod.
64: 30-35
[Abstract]
[Full Text]