Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, March 1999, p. 1651-1660, Vol. 19, No. 3
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Epstein-Barr Virus Regulates c-MYC, Apoptosis, and
Tumorigenicity in Burkitt Lymphoma
Ingrid K.
Ruf,1
Paul W.
Rhyne,1
Hui
Yang,2
Corina M.
Borza,3
Lindsey M.
Hutt-Fletcher,3
John L.
Cleveland,2,4 and
Jeffery T.
Sample1,5,*
Program in Viral Oncogenesis and Tumor
Immunology, Department of Virology and Molecular
Biology,1 and Department of
Biochemistry,2 St. Jude Children's Research
Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105; School of Biological
Sciences, University of Missouri
Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
641103; and Department of
Biochemistry4 and Department of
Pathology,5 University of Tennessee Health
Sciences Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38163
Received 11 June 1998/Returned for modification 16 July
1998/Accepted 30 November 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Loss of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) genome from Akata Burkitt
lymphoma (BL) cells is coincident with a loss of malignant phenotype,
despite the fact that Akata and other EBV-positive BL cells express a
restricted set of EBV gene products (type I latency) that are not known
to overtly affect cell growth. Here we demonstrate that reestablishment
of type I latency in EBV-negative Akata cells restores tumorigenicity
and that tumorigenic potential correlates with an increased resistance
to apoptosis under growth-limiting conditions. The antiapoptotic effect
of EBV was associated with a higher level of Bcl-2 expression and an
EBV-dependent decrease in steady-state levels of c-MYC protein.
Although the EBV EBNA-1 protein is expressed in all EBV-associated
tumors and is reported to have oncogenic potential, enforced expression
of EBNA-1 alone in EBV-negative Akata cells failed to restore
tumorigenicity or EBV-dependent down-regulation of c-MYC. These data
provide direct evidence that EBV contributes to the tumorigenic
potential of Burkitt lymphoma and suggest a novel model whereby a
restricted latency program of EBV promotes B-cell survival, and thus
virus persistence within an immune host, by selectively targeting the expression of c-MYC.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a
ubiquitous human herpesvirus that establishes a life-long latent
infection within B lymphocytes. Latency is associated with the
expression of as many as ten viral proteins, including a family of six
nuclear proteins (EBNAs), three integral membrane proteins (LMPs) and
the recently identified polypeptide RK-BARF0 (17, 24).
Several of these, most notably the EBNA-3 proteins, elicit a strong
EBV-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte immune response (23, 38,
43). Through differential expression of EBV proteins that are
immunogenic, potentially oncogenic and those necessary for sustaining
infection, an equilibrium is established between infected B cells and
the host's immune surveillance. As a consequence, a relatively stable
pool of latently infected cells is maintained by the host (31, 36,
56). Thus, EBV is particularly well adapted for persistence
within B lymphocytes of an immune host, and though the virus encodes
the oncogenic protein LMP-1, its association with human malignancy is
rare, especially considering the high incidence of EBV infection worldwide.
As a result of the balanced relationship that exists between EBV and
its host, pathogenesis associated with EBV latency is generally a
consequence of either an immune deficiency, leading to EBV-induced
immunoblastic lymphoma, or a known or suspected secondary genetic or
environmental event that promotes full oncogenic transformation of
latently infected cells (43). Nevertheless, expression of
LMP-1 in some tumors, most notably in EBV-positive Hodgkin's lymphoma
and nasopharyngeal carcinoma, strongly suggests that EBV indeed
actively contributes to the oncogenic potential of these malignancies
(5, 11, 14, 22, 41, 53, 61).
In contrast to tumors such as Hodgkin's lymphoma and nasopharyngeal
carcinoma, LMP-1 is not expressed in EBV-positive Burkitt lymphoma
(BL), in which the pattern of viral gene expression, referred to as
type I latency, is restricted to the proteins EBNA-1 (required for EBV
DNA maintenance) and RK-BARF0 and to two small noncoding but highly
expressed RNA polymerase III transcripts, EBER-1 and EBER-2 (2, 6,
17, 18, 46). Neither RK-BARF0 or the EBERs are required for
EBV-mediated immortalization of B cells in vitro (44, 54).
Furthermore, although EBNA-1 has been linked to development of B-cell
lymphomas in some transgenic mice (59, 60), there is as yet
no evidence that EBNA-1 directly contributes to tumorigenicity in
EBV-associated malignancies. Overall, these findings argue against a
significant contribution by EBV to tumorigenic potential in established
BL. Thus, the dominant factor responsible for maintenance of
tumorigenicity in BL is believed to be the deregulated expression of
the c-MYC proto-oncogene (in this paper, c-MYC
refers to the gene and c-myc refers to the mRNA and cDNA),
which occurs as the result of characteristic chromosomal translocations
that juxtapose the c-MYC gene and immunoglobulin loci
(reviewed in reference 29). Indeed, programmed
expression of c-MYC in the B-cell compartment of transgenic mice
predisposes these animals to protracted development of lymphoma
(1).
The assumption that EBV does not directly contribute to tumorigenicity
in BL, however, has been challenged by the finding that a loss in
tumorigenic potential is associated with spontaneous loss of the EBV
genome in the Akata BL cell line, which in culture maintains the type I
latency program characteristic of primary BL tumors (52).
Here we report that EBV-associated tumorigenicity of Akata BL cells
correlates with an increased resistance to apoptosis that is coincident
with a down-regulation of c-MYC protein, but not mRNA, and increased
expression of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2. Reinfection of
EBV-negative Akata cells, but not stable expression of EBNA-1 alone,
restored EBV-dependent regulation of c-MYC and tumorigenicity. These
data therefore provide direct evidence that EBV can significantly
contribute to tumorigenic potential in BL. The data also indicate that
the type I latency program of EBV gene expression contributes to
long-term survival of latently infected cells and suggest a novel model
whereby EBV suppresses apoptosis by selectively down-regulating c-MYC
protein expression under limiting growth conditions.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell culture and EBV infection.
Cell lines were maintained
in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine and
10% defined fetal bovine serum (HyClone); the exceptions were HL60 and
K562, which were maintained in media containing 20% serum. Akata,
SavI, KemI, and MutuI are human group I BL cell lines that maintain a
type I EBV latency. IB4 is an EBV-immortalized human B-lymphoblastoid
cell line (LCL) that expresses all known EBV latency-associated genes
(type III latency). HL60 and K562 are human promyelocytic and
erythroleukemic cell lines, respectively. Clonal EBV-positive Akata
cells were derived from colonies isolated in soft agar (see below) and
designated A.1, A.3, A.5, etc. The clonal EBV-negative Akata cell lines
3F2, 2C1, and 2A8 (gift of J. Sixbey) were isolated by single-cell
sorting (FACStar Plus; Becton Dickinson) following treatment of
parental EBV-positive Akata cells with 50 µM hydroxyurea
(9). Loss of the EBV genome in these cells was confirmed by
the lack of EBNA-1 expression as determined by immunoblot analysis and
by the inability to amplify EBV DNA by PCR with primers specific for
the large internal (BamHI-W) repeat of the EBV genome and/or
the inability to detect EBV DNA by fluorescence in situ hybridization
(FISH) using a cosmid DNA probe containing the EBV SalI B
fragment (9).
EBV-negative Akata cells were reinfected with wild-type EBV (Akata
strain) produced from parental (EBV-positive) Akata cells treated with
1% (vol/vol) anti-immunoglobulin G for 48 h to induce production
of virus (55). Cells were removed by centrifugation, and the
supernatant was prefiltered through a 0.8-µm-pore-size nitrocellulose
membrane (Nalgene). Virus was then concentrated approximately 100-fold
by positive-pressure filtration through a membrane with a molecular
weight cutoff of 500. To infect, 2 × 106 cells were
pelleted by centrifugation, resuspended in 1 ml of concentrated virus,
and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. The cells were then washed with
and resuspended in fresh growth medium (8 ml), and were reinfected
approximately 5 days later when the cells required feeding.
Alternatively, cells were infected once with a recombinant virus,
derived from the Akata strain of EBV, that contained a neomycin
resistance gene at the site of the BDLF3 (gp150) open reading frame
(4). Clonal lines of reinfected Akata cells were then
isolated by single-cell sorting followed by confirmation of EBNA-1
expression by immunoblotting. In some instances, Akata cells reinfected
with the recombinant EBV were maintained in medium containing 400 µg
of G418 (Geneticin; Gibco BRL) per ml to ensure that all cells in the
culture contained the EBV genome.
Cell death assays.
Cultures were seeded at 2.5 × 105 cells per ml in standard growth medium (containing 10%
serum), and cell numbers were determined daily to assess growth rate.
On days 2 through 6, an aliquot of cells was removed, washed three
times in growth medium that contained 0.1% serum, and then resuspended
in this reduced-serum medium at 5 × 105 cells per ml.
Viability was then determined daily, using trypan blue dye exclusion to
monitor cell survival. For cytospin preparations, cells from 100 µl
of culture were pelleted onto a glass slide in a Cyto-Tek chamber
holder (Sakura), air dried, fixed in methanol for 5 min at room
temperature, air dried, stained in 0.02% (wt/vol) modified Giemsa
stain (Sigma) for 45 min at room temperature, rinsed several times in
distilled water, air dried, and then mounted in Permount (Fisher).
Immunoblotting.
For the detection of EBNA-1, LMP-1, c-MYC,
and Bcl-2 by immunoblotting, 106 cells were washed once in
phosphate-buffered saline, lysed in sodium dodecyl sulfate
(SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) sample buffer (100 mM
Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 200 mM dithiothreitol [DTT], 4% SDS, protease
inhibitor cocktail [Sigma], 20% glycerol, 0.2% bromophenol blue),
immediately heated at 100°C for 5 min, and sonicated. Proteins were
fractionated by SDS-PAGE in 10% acrylamide gels, transferred to an
Immobilon P membrane (Millipore), and immunoblotted by using an
enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Amersham). Primary
antibodies used for immunoblotting were mouse monoclonal antibodies to
c-MYC (9E10 [13]), Bcl-2 (M0887; Dako), and LMP-1 (S12
[30]) and a polyclonal rabbit antiserum to EBNA-1
(gift of J. Hearing). Immunoreactive proteins were detected with
secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. All blots
were subsequently stripped of antibody in 62.5 mM Tris-HCl (pH
6.8)-100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol-2% SDS (50°C for 30 min) and
reprobed with a mouse monoclonal antibody to actin (N350; Amersham) as
a control for protein loading. For analysis of protein expression in
SCID mouse tumors, approximately equal amounts of tumor tissue were
solubilized in SDS-PAGE sample buffer and processed as described above.
For detection of EBNA-1 and LMP-1 in Fig. 7, 107 cells were
lysed in 200 µl of 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0)-150 mM NaCl-1 mM EDTA-1%
Triton X-100-protease inhibitor cocktail-0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) and then centrifuged at 12,000 × g for
5 min to remove insoluble material. The protein concentration of the
supernatant was determined by the Bradford method (Bio-Rad), and 50 µg of protein was then subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting.
Measurement of c-MYC stability and synthesis.
For
cycloheximide-chase experiments, protein synthesis was inhibited in
cells that were in either mid-log- or stationary-phase growth by
addition of cycloheximide (Calbiochem-Novabiochem) to the cell culture
at a final concentration of 25 µg/ml. An aliquot of 3 × 106 cells was harvested at 0, 15, 30, 60, 120, and 240 min
after addition of cycloheximide, washed once in phosphate-buffered
saline, resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 5 mM
EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40 [NP-40], 1 mM PMSF), and
incubated for 20 min at 4°C. Lysate containing protein from the
equivalent of 106 cells from each chase point was then
analyzed for c-MYC expression by immunoblotting with anti-c-MYC
antibody (9E10) as described above. For pulse-chase analysis,
EBV-negative and -positive Akata cells (108) in log- or
stationary-phase growth were washed twice in methionine- and
cysteine-free RPMI 1640 medium (BioWhittaker) containing
L-glutamine and 10% serum. Cells were then incubated at
37°C in this medium for 30 min, followed by a pulse-labeling period
of 15 min in the same medium containing 1 mCi of
Tran35S-label (ICN). Cells were then washed twice in medium
containing a fivefold excess of methionine and cysteine and incubated
in this medium for up to 240 min. At chase times of 0, 15, 30, 60, 120, and 240 min, 1.25 × 107 cells were removed, pelleted,
resuspended in 1 ml of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 5 mM
EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, 1 mM PMSF), and incubated for 20 min at
4°C. All lysates were then precleared with Protein G Plus-Agarose
(Oncogene Research Products) to remove nonspecific adsorbents. Lysate
containing protein from the equivalent of 107 cells was
processed by immunoprecipitation with 2 µg of antibody to c-MYC
(Ab-3; Oncogene Research Products) and 20 µl of Protein G
Plus-Agarose. Immunoprecipitates were washed three times in SNNTE
buffer (5% sucrose, 1% NP-40, 500 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5],
5 mM EDTA) and once in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (50 mM
Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, 1%
sodium deoxycholate), resuspended in 30 µl of loading buffer (100 mM
Tris-HCl, 200 mM DTT, 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 0.2% bromophenol blue),
boiled for 4 min, and then subjected to SDS-PAGE in a 10% acrylamide
gel. Gels were fixed in 10% acetic acid-30% methanol for 30 min,
washed three times in distilled water for 10 min, soaked in fluor
solution (1 M sodium salicylate, 5% glycerol) for 20 min, dried, and
exposed to Kodak BioMax MR film. To calculate protein half-life,
immunoprecipitated c-MYC from each chase point was quantified by
phosphorimage analysis (Molecular Dynamics) and normalized for total
protein, and the resulting data were subjected to linear regression analysis.
Analysis of RNA.
Total cellular RNA was isolated from
107 cells with RNAzol B as recommended by the manufacturer
(Tel-Test), followed by extraction with an equal volume of
phenol-chloroform and then chloroform prior to ethanol precipitation.
For Northern blot analysis, 10 µg of RNA per sample was fractionated
by electrophoresis in a 1.2% agarose-2.2 M formaldehyde gel
(48) and blotted onto a GeneScreen Plus membrane (DuPont).
RNA blots were prehybridized for 4 h at 45°C followed by
hybridization at the same temperature to a 32P-labeled
human c-myc cDNA probe under conditions described previously (39). Following hybridization, blots were washed at 62°C
(49) and processed by autoradiography. Blots were then
stripped and rehybridized to a probe specific for 28S rRNA to control
for differences in RNA loading of the gel.
Generation of EBV
/EBNA-1+ cell
lines.
To generate EBV-negative Akata cells that stably expressed
EBNA-1, the EBNA-1 open reading frame was inserted into the
BamHI restriction site of the retroviral expression vector
pLXSN (33) to yield pLE1SN, in which expression
of EBNA-1 is under control of the retroviral 5' long terminal repeat.
Ten micrograms of pLE1SN or pLXSN (to generate control cell
lines) was used to transfect 8 × 106 EBV-negative
Akata cells by electroporation as described previously (50).
At 48 h posttransfection, cells were placed in 24-well tissue
culture plates (104 cells per well) in medium containing
200 µg of G418 per ml. To generate clonal
EBV
/EBNA-1+ cell lines, single cells were
isolated from pools of G418-resistant EBNA-1-positive cells by cell
sorting (FACStar Plus; Becton Dickinson) into 96-well plates containing
conditioned medium. Following expansion of these cells under selection
with G418, clones that expressed EBNA-1 were identified by immunoblotting.
Growth in soft agar and tumorigenicity assays.
For the
analysis of growth potential in soft agar, 104 cells were
suspended in 3 ml of 0.33% agarose (SeaPlaque; FMC Corporation) in
standard growth medium (without phenol red) and plated onto a 3-ml
layer of solidified 0.66% agarose in the same medium in a
6-cm-diameter tissue culture dish. Once the top layer of agarose had
solidified, the cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 for 4 weeks and fed weekly with 1 ml
of liquid medium containing 0.33% agarose. Each cell line tested was
plated in triplicate.
Tumorigenicity of Akata BL cells was assessed by the ability to induce
tumors in SCID mice. Male SCID mice (C.B-17/lcr//SJ scid/scid),
obtained from the colony maintained by the St. Jude Children's
Research Hospital Animal Resource Center, were injected subcutaneously
in each hind flank with 2 × 107 cells in
phosphate-buffered saline (200 µl). Each mouse received an injection
in the right flank of either EBV-positive Akata, reinfected
EBV-negative Akata, or EBV
/EBNA-1+ Akata
cells and an injection in the left flank of the appropriate EBV-negative Akata cells as a control. Animals were monitored for 8 weeks for tumor growth and then sacrificed, and their tumors were
excised for analysis of EBV protein expression when approximately 1 cm
in diameter (5 to 7 weeks postinjection).
 |
RESULTS |
Enhanced growth potential of BL is associated with type I EBV
latency.
EBV-negative Akata BL cells are nontumorigenic relative
to their EBV-positive counterparts when assayed for growth in soft agar
and tumor induction in athymic nude mice (52). Akata BL cells may therefore provide an ideal system to address the contribution of EBV to tumorigenicity in BL. However, the low plating efficiency of
EBV-positive Akata cells in soft agar (1 to 3% [52])
raised the possibility that enhanced growth potential associated with EBV infection in Akata BL cells was not a stable phenotype. We therefore initially addressed whether EBV-positive Akata cells and
several clones of EBV-negative Akata cells had consistent and
measurably different growth properties. The EBV-negative clones analyzed either had lost the EBV genome spontaneously (two clones) or
were generated by treatment with hydroxyurea (three clones), which
hastens the loss of EBV episomes in these cells (9). Under
the low dose of hydroxyurea used (50 µM), which is approximately 40-fold lower than that used therapeutically, no toxic effects were
observed, nor did we observe any increase in genomic instability as a
result of treatment with hydroxyurea (9). Loss of the EBV
episome was confirmed by failure to detect EBV DNA by PCR and/or
fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (data not shown). As
illustrated by representative data presented in Fig.
1A, EBV-positive Akata cells consistently
exhibited a greater growth potential in soft agar relative to
EBV-negative cells. Although an EBV-negative cell line would
occasionally exhibit a plating efficiency similar to those of
EBV-positive cells (1 to 3%), the resulting colonies from these cells
were always markedly smaller than those derived from EBV-positive cells
(see below). Thus, our findings were consistent with previous
observations suggesting that EBV contributes to the growth potential of
Akata BL cells (52).

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Enhanced growth potential of EBV-positive Akata cells is
independent of LMP-1. (A) Clonal EBV-negative and parental EBV-positive
Akata cells were plated in 0.33% agarose at a density of
104 cells per 6-cm-diameter dish. Colonies were
photographed 4 weeks after plating. (B) Individual colonies derived
from the EBV-positive parental Akata cells were transferred from
agarose to liquid culture, briefly expanded, and analyzed for
expression of EBNA-1 and LMP-1 by immunoblotting. Each lane contained
protein from 106 cells. IB4 is an EBV-immortalized LCL used
as a control for detection of LMP-1 expression.
|
|
Because of the low plating efficiency of EBV-positive cells in soft
agar and the potential of some BL cells to drift to a
type III latency
(full expression of latency-associated genes)
and become LMP-1 positive
(
18,
45), the enhanced growth potential
of EBV-positive
Akata cells may have been due to the induction
of LMP-1 expression
under the restrictive growth conditions of
this assay. We therefore
isolated a number of colonies from soft
agar and evaluated EBV gene
expression in these cells. Whereas
all six Akata BL clones examined
expressed EBNA-1, none expressed
detectable levels of LMP-1 (Fig.
1B),
and at no time after culture
in liquid growth medium have these
EBV-positive Akata cell clones
exhibited intercellular adhesion that is
characteristic of type
III latency. Thus, the greater growth potential
of EBV-positive
than of EBV-negative Akata BL cells is associated with
a type
I latency program and is independent of LMP-1. Finally, when
these
clonal EBV-positive Akata cell lines were reassayed for growth
in
soft agar (see below), their plating efficiencies were identical
to
that of the parental EBV-positive Akata line. Therefore, clonal
lines
derived in this manner do not represent a subpopulation
of cells that
have growth potentials greater than that of the
general pool of
parental EBV-positive
cells.
Type I EBV latency in BL confers resistance to apoptosis under
growth-limiting conditions.
Although EBV-positive Akata cells
demonstrated a greater growth potential than their EBV-negative
counterparts in soft agar, we did not observe a significant difference
in growth properties during standard culture in liquid medium, as
EBV-positive and -negative Akata cells exhibited identical growth rates
and reached similar saturation densities (Fig.
2A). However, EBV-negative cells rapidly
lost viability after 5 to 6 days in culture without feeding, whereas
EBV-positive cells often remained viable for an additional 2 to 3 days
(data not shown). This finding suggested that the mechanism(s)
responsible for the increased growth potential associated with EBV in
Akata BL cells was manifest only under growth-limiting conditions, such
as would occur in soft agar or in vivo.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
The type I EBV latency program promotes BL cell survival
following serum deprivation. (A) Clonal EBV-positive (shaded symbols)
and EBV-negative (open symbols) Akata cells were seeded at 2.5 × 105 cells per ml in standard growth medium containing 10%
serum, and cell concentration was monitored daily for 6 days to assess
growth rate. (B) Cells from the log (day 2) and stationary (day 5)
phases of growth were washed and transferred to growth medium
containing 0.1% serum, in triplicate, at a density of 5 × 105 cells per ml. Cell viability was determined daily by
trypan blue dye exclusion. Results are representative of seven
independent experiments.
|
|
Activation of c-
MYC in BL augments the endogenous apoptotic
program (
35). We therefore reasoned that under
growth-limiting
conditions, EBV might enhance cell survival by
suppressing c-MYC-induced
apoptosis. To address this issue, we shifted
cells from the logarithmic
and stationary phases of the growth cycle
into medium containing
0.1% serum and assessed cell viability over a
4-day period. When
cells from log-phase growth were shifted to low
serum, EBV-positive
and -negative Akata cells died at the same rate
(Fig.
2B, left
panel). However, when EBV-positive Akata BL cells from
stationary-phase
growth were shifted to low serum, following an initial
10 to 20%
loss in viability, there was a pronounced delay in the rate
of
cell death. By contrast, EBV-negative BL stationary-phase cells
died
at rates comparable to rates for these cells at log phase
(Fig.
2B,
right panel). Furthermore, when taken from stationary-phase
cultures,
EBV-positive but not EBV-negative Akata BL cells continued
to
proliferate at a low rate for the first 3 days in 0.1% serum.
This was
not observed when these cells were taken from log-phase
growth.
Previous studies have demonstrated that BL cells die by apoptosis in
response to the withdrawal of survival factors (serum
deprivation)
(
21). To confirm that the death of Akata BL cells
in our
assays was due to apoptosis, we examined cytospin preparations
of
stationary-phase EBV-negative and -positive cells that had
been
maintained in 0.1% serum for 3 days. As demonstrated in Fig.
3, EBV-negative cells displayed changes
typical of apoptosis,
including condensation of chromatin into
micronuclei, vacuolation,
and cell debris. By contrast, the majority of
EBV-positive cells
appeared relatively healthy. Thus, as predicted, the
greatest
difference in sensitivity to apoptosis of EBV-positive versus
-negative Akata cells occurred under growth-limiting conditions.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Serum deprivation induces morphological changes in BL
cells that are characteristic of apoptosis. EBV-positive (A.3) and
-negative (2C1) Akata cells were maintained in medium containing 0.1%
serum for 3 days after reaching the stationary phase of the growth
cycle. Cytospin preparations shown here indicate that the EBV-negative
cells displayed changes typical of apoptotic cells, including
condensation of chromatin into micronuclei and vacuolation. By
contrast, EBV-positive cells appeared relatively healthy.
|
|
Suppression of apoptosis by EBV is associated with down-regulation
of c-MYC expression.
To determine if altered
expression of c-MYC might account for EBV-mediated
suppression of apoptosis, we examined c-MYC protein levels in
EBV-positive and EBV-negative Akata cells at specific intervals of the
cell growth cycle. Additionally, we examined the expression of several
anti- and proapoptotic proteins of the Bcl-2 family. During log-phase
growth (Fig. 4, days 1 to 3), there were
no detectable differences in the levels of c-MYC protein between
EBV-positive and EBV-negative cells. However, consistent with their
fate when deprived of survival factors, c-MYC was dramatically down-regulated in EBV-positive cells as they entered the stationary phase of growth. By contrast, EBV-negative cells expressed c-MYC at
levels comparable to those observed during log-phase growth. Both
EBV-positive and EBV-negative Akata cells showed increased expression
of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 as they approached the stationary
phase of growth, and EBV-positive Akata BL cells generally had higher
steady-state levels of Bcl-2 protein than the EBV-negative Akata cells
(Fig. 4). We did not observe any EBV- or growth phase-associated
differences in the expression of the antiapoptotic proteins Mcl-1 and
Bcl-XL or the proapoptotic protein Bax (data not shown).

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
EBV- and growth phase-associated expression of c-MYC and
Bcl-2. Clonal EBV-positive (A.3 and A.15) and EBV-negative (3F2, 2C1,
and 2A8) Akata BL cells were seeded (2.5 × 105 per
ml) in complete growth medium, and 106 cells were harvested
daily from the experiment presented in Fig. 2A for the first 5 days in
culture to monitor expression of c-MYC and Bcl-2 by immunoblot
analysis. Detection of actin served as a loading control. Results are
representative of three independent experiments.
|
|
Because growth phase-associated regulation of c-MYC levels clearly
correlated with EBV infection in Akata BL cells, we examined
whether
this phenomenon was also characteristic of other BL cell
lines that
maintain type I latency. Although we lacked paired
EBV-positive and
-negative group I BL lines as for the Akata BL,
the same growth
phase-associated down-regulation of c-MYC was
evident in the
three other EBV-positive BL lines examined (Fig.
5). Thus, this regulation of
c-
MYC is a common property of BL
cells that maintain type I
EBV latency.

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
c-MYC is a common target for down-regulation in group I
BL cell lines. The group I BL cell lines KemI, SavI, and MutuI were
seeded in complete growth medium (2.5 × 105 per ml),
and cell samples were harvested on days 1 through 5 to monitor
expression of c-MYC as for Fig. 4.
|
|
To determine the mechanism whereby c-
MYC expression was
down-regulated in EBV-positive cells, we initially examined effects
of
growth phase on c-
myc mRNA levels. Unlike c-MYC protein in
EBV-positive cells, c-
myc transcripts did not diminish in
stationary-phase
cells (Fig.
6A),
suggesting that the effect on c-
MYC expression
was
translational or posttranslational in nature. To address potential
effects on c-MYC protein half-life, (
t1/2), we
performed cycloheximide-chase
experiments with EBV-negative and
-positive Akata cells from both
log- and stationary-phase growth. As
demonstrated in Fig.
6B (upper
two panels), the
t1/2 of c-MYC was equivalent in EBV-negative
and
-positive Akata cells and did not differ with respect to the
growth
phase of the cells. However, as expected, the steady-state
levels of
c-MYC were significantly decreased in EBV-positive cells
in stationary
phase relative to EBV-negative cells or either cell
type in log phase.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
EBV down-regulates c-MYC expression through a
posttranscriptional mechanism. (A) Northern blot analysis of
c-myc mRNA and 28S rRNA (loading control) levels in
EBV-negative (3F2 and 2A8) and EBV-positive (A.3 and KemI) BL cells at
2, 3, 5, and 6 days after seeding in complete growth medium at 2.5 × 105 cells per ml. Each lane contained 10 µg of total
cellular RNA. (B) Cycloheximide (CHX)- and pulse-chase analysis of
c-MYC t1/2 in EBV-negative (3F2) and
EBV-positive (A.3) Akata BL cells during the log and stationary phases
of the cell growth cycle. At chase times of 0, 15, 30, 60, 120, and 240 min, c-MYC levels were analyzed by immunoblotting (CHX-chases) or by
immunoprecipitation and SDS-PAGE of pulse-labeled protein. Following
quantification by phosphorimage analysis of immunoprecipitated c-MYC at
each chase point, the data were subjected to linear regression analysis
to determine the t1/2 of c-MYC (see text). (C)
Half-lives of c-MYC during log-phase growth in the human promyelocytic
and erythroleukemia cell lines HL60 and K562, respectively, and two
additional group I BL cell lines (KemI and SavI), were analyzed by
CHX-chase experiments as in panel B.
|
|
To determine whether EBV-dependent regulation of c-MYC levels in Akata
cells was occurring at the level of translation, as
well as to more
accurately measure the
t1/2 of c-MYC,
pulse-chase
analyses were performed. As demonstrated in Fig.
6B (lower
panels),
the rate of c-MYC synthesis did not differ between
EBV-negative
and -positive cells during log phase, consistent with the
equivalent
steady-state levels of c-MYC observed in these cells during
exponential
growth (Fig.
4). Surprisingly, when the rate of c-MYC
synthesis
was examined in cells within stationary phase, we did not
observe
a lower level of c-MYC synthesis in EBV-positive versus
EBV-negative
Akata cells, as one would expect if EBV-dependent
repression of
c-MYC expression was translational. However, when we
analyzed
total c-MYC levels by immunoblotting of these stationary-phase
cell lysates, it was evident that in response to being placed
in fresh
medium (containing 10% serum) during the initial washing,
preincubation, and pulse-labeling steps of the procedure, EBV-positive
cells had begun to synthesize c-MYC, and this occurred at a rate
higher
than in EBV-negative cells (data not shown). This finding
is consistent
with our observations that EBV-positive Akata cells
reenter the growth
cycle much faster than the EBV-negative cells
once they have reached
stationary phase. Thus, although the EBV-associated
decrease in c-MYC
levels during stationary phase is likely due
to an inhibition of
translation (as neither c-
myc mRNA levels
or protein
half-life is reduced), rapid de novo synthesis of c-MYC
in EBV-positive
relative to EBV-negative Akata cells during the
pulse-chase procedure
prevents direct measurement of translation
rates.
The cycloheximide- and pulse-chase experiments indicated that the
t1/2 of c-MYC in Akata BL cells is on the order
of 120 min
(Fig.
6B), severalfold greater than previously reported
c-MYC
t1/2 values of 20 to 30 min
(
20). To our knowledge the
t1/2 of
c-MYC in BL cells has not been reported; to address if the
relatively
long
t1/2 of c-MYC in Akata cells is
representative
of other BL cells, we performed cycloheximide-chase
analyses of
c-MYC stability in KemI and SavI group I BL cells, as well
as
in two non-BL lines, HL60 and K562. As shown in Fig.
6C, the
t1/2 of c-MYC in each of these cell lines is in
agreement with previously
reported values of 20 to 30 min. Thus,
although the
t1/2 of c-MYC
in Akata BL cells is
longer than that of c-MYC in the two other
BL cell lines examined, this
difference in c-MYC half-life does
not account for the shared
down-regulation of steady-state levels
of c-MYC observed as Akata and
other group I BL cell lines approach
stationary phase (compare Fig.
4
to Fig.
5).
EBV infection, but not EBNA-1, restores resistance to apoptosis and
tumorigenicity to EBV-negative BL.
It was possible that the
parallel loss of the EBV genome and tumorigenic potential in some Akata
cells was merely coincidental or that a propensity to lose the EBV
genome was an effect, rather than the cause, of the spontaneous loss of
tumorigenicity. To directly test the contribution of EBV to
tumorigenicity, we reinfected EBV-negative Akata cells and assessed the
consequences of a restored EBV latency on tumorigenic potential.
Moreover, since it had been suggested that EBNA-1 alone might directly
contribute to the oncogenic potential of EBV (59, 60), we
also established several Akata cell lines that constitutively expressed
EBNA-1 in an EBV-negative background.
Attempts to reestablish type I latency in clonal EBV-negative Akata
cells revealed that infection was not equally sustained
in all Akata
clones. Although the EBV-negative cells were infectable
as indicated by
the expression of EBNA-1 protein and detection
of EBV DNA by PCR during
the first 2 weeks postinfection, over
a period of several weeks to
months the number of infected cells
in the culture decreased. One
EBV-negative Akata BL clone, 2A8,
maintained a relatively stable
infection and was therefore chosen
for analysis. EBV-positive clones
were isolated from the pool
of reinfected 2A8 cells, and three clonal
lines (2A8.1, 2A8.2,
and 2A8.3) were evaluated. All three lines
expressed EBNA-1 at
levels comparable to those for wild-type
EBV-positive cells and,
as expected for type I latency, failed to
express LMP-1 (Fig.
7A). Similarly,
several EBV-negative Akata lines stably transfected
with an EBNA-1
expression construct expressed moderate to high
levels of EBNA-1 (Fig.
7B).

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Restoration of restricted EBV latency and establishment
of EBV-independent EBNA-1 expression in EBV-negative Akata cells. (A)
2A8 Akata cells reinfected with EBV (lines 2A8.1, 2A8.2, and 2A8.3)
express normal levels of EBNA-1 but, like their EBV-positive
counterparts A.15 and A.17, do not express detectable LMP-1. The IB4
LCL provides a positive control and reference for detection of LMP-1.
(B) Stable expression of EBNA-1 in EBV-negative Akata cells. A.3 and
A.11 are EBV-positive Akata cells; LXSN.1, LXSN.2, and LXSN.3 are
G418-resistant EBV-negative Akata cell lines that contain the
expression vector pLXSN without DNA encoding EBNA-1; E1.3,12 and E1.2,9
are clonal EBV /EBNA-1+ Akata cells derived
from the nonclonal E1.3 and E1.2 lines, respectively. All lanes
contained 50 µg of total cellular protein.
|
|
To determine whether EBV reinfection or EBNA-1 alone could restore the
ability of EBV-negative Akata cells to down-regulate
c-MYC protein and
survive under growth-limiting conditions, cells
were analyzed
throughout the growth cycle as described above.
To ensure that all
cells harbored EBV, the reinfected 2A8 cells,
which contained a
recombinant EBV carrying a neomycin resistance
gene, were placed under
selection with G418. Reinfected cells
did indeed down-regulate c-MYC in
a manner similar to that observed
in wild-type EBV-positive cells
(compare the left panel of Fig.
8A to
Fig.
4). By contrast, enforced overexpression of EBNA-1
alone in
EBV-negative Akata cells was not sufficient to mediate
down-regulation
of c-MYC (Fig.
8A, right panel). Interestingly,
reinfection with EBV
did not further enhance Bcl-2 expression
as cells approached stationary
phase, nor did reinfected cells
express notably higher levels of Bcl-2
relative to the EBV-negative
2A8 cells (data not shown). Nonetheless,
as expected from their
ability to down-regulate c-MYC, the reinfected
2A8 cells were
more resistant to apoptosis than were the EBV-negative
2A8 cells
(Fig.
8B, left panel). By contrast, cells engineered to
express
EBNA-1 in an EBV-negative Akata cell background were not
protected
from apoptosis following serum deprivation (Fig.
8B, right
panel).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
EBV infection, but not EBNA-1 alone, regulates c-MYC
levels and sensitivity to apoptosis. (A) Immunoblot analysis of c-MYC
throughout the cell growth cycle in reinfected and
EBV /EBNA-1+ Akata cells. Cells were seeded as
described in Fig. 2 and harvested at the indicated day postseeding. (B)
EBV infection, but not EBNA-1 alone, protects Akata cells from
apoptosis during stationary-phase growth. The indicated cells were
deprived of serum, and percent viability was determined at the
indicated intervals by trypan blue dye exclusion. Results are
representative of two independent experiments.
|
|
To determine whether reinfection with EBV conferred enhanced growth
potential in assays more indicative of tumorigenicity,
we analyzed the
EBV-negative and reinfected Akata cells for growth
in soft agar and for
tumor induction in SCID mice (representative
results are presented in
Fig.
9). Although EBV-negative 2A8 cells
exhibited a limited ability to produce colonies in soft agar,
reinfection of 2A8 cells clearly enhanced growth potential, as
indicated by the formation of larger colonies. Most importantly,
although the reinfected 2A8 cells produced colonies somewhat smaller
than those of the EBV-positive A.15 control cells, reinfected
2A8 cells
always produced tumors when injected into SCID mice,
whereas the
parental 2A8 line and another EBV-negative line analyzed
(3F2) never
induced tumors (Fig.
9B and Table
1).
Tumors resulting
from reinfected 2A8 cells developed approximately 1 week later
than those derived from the EBV-positive A.15 cells, which
correlated
with the augmented rate of growth of A.15 cells in soft agar
relative
to reinfected 2A8 cells (Fig.
9A). It should be noted that the
reinfected cells had, on average, a lower EBV genome copy number
relative to A.15 as determined by FISH, which may be in part
responsible
for their lower rate of growth in these assays. When
analyzed
by immunoblotting for EBV gene expression, each tumor
expressed
EBNA-1 but not LMP-1 (Fig.
10
and Table
1), characteristic of
the cells prior to injection.

View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
EBV infection restores tumorigenic potential to
EBV-negative Akata cells. (A) Growth of EBV-positive (A.15),
EBV-negative (2A8), and reinfected 2A8 (2A8.2) Akata cells in soft
agar. Shown are low- and high-magnification micrographs of cell
colonies resulting from growth in 0.33% agarose. (B) Tumorigenicity of
Akata BL cells assayed by tumor induction in SCID mice (representative
results). Each mouse received an injection of EBV-negative cells (3F2
or 2A8) in the left hind flank and EBV-positive (A.15) or reinfected
2A8 (2A8.2) cells in the right flank (2 × 107 cells
per injection). The mouse that received the 3F2 and A.15 cells was
photographed 5 weeks postinjection; the mouse that received the 2A8 and
2A8.2 cells was photographed 7 weeks postinjection. The results from
all SCID mouse assays are presented in Table 1.
|
|

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 10.
Tumors in SCID mice express EBNA-1 but not LMP-1.
Representative results from immunoblot analysis of EBNA-1 and LMP-1
expression in tumors that resulted from injection of EBV-positive A.15
and reinfected 2A8 Akata cells are shown. Protein from IB4 cells was
used as a positive control; tissue harvested from a site of injection
of EBV-negative Akata cells served as a negative control (lane 1).
Results of the analysis of all 13 tumors obtained are presented in
Table 1.
|
|
An additional reinfected EBV-negative Akata cell clone, 3F2, which did
not readily maintain EBV upon reinfection in vitro,
was also injected
into a SCID mouse several weeks after reinfection,
at a time when
EBNA-1 expression was no longer detectable by immunoblotting.
These
cells, like the reinfected 2A8 cells, induced tumor formation,
and
analysis of the tumor cells indicated that they were indeed
EBNA-1
positive and LMP-1 negative (Table
1). Interestingly,
analysis of the
EBV genome status in these cells by FISH revealed
a lack of episomal
EBV DNA and integration of the viral genome
into the host genome at two
sites. Therefore, there is clearly
a strong in vivo selection for EBV
in establishment of tumorigenic
BL. By contrast, EBV-negative Akata
cells that stably expressed
EBNA-1 did not exhibit greater growth
potential in soft agar (data
not shown) and were never capable of
inducing tumors in SCID mice
(Table
1). Thus, establishment of a type I
latency in EBV-negative
Akata BL cells, but not EBNA-1 alone, was
clearly sufficient to
restore tumorigenic potential, a finding which
correlates with
EBV's ability to inhibit c-MYC expression under
growth-limiting
conditions.
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have demonstrated that EBV can directly contribute to the
tumorigenic potential of BL in the context of a type I latency program.
With the possible exception of EBNA-1 (see below), EBV genes expressed
during type I latency have not been directly linked to either B-cell
immortalization or oncogenic transformation associated with EBV
infection (24). In fact, the EBER and RK-BARF0 genes are
dispensable for EBV-induced immortalization of B lymphocytes in vitro
(44, 54). B-cell immortalization by EBV, however, occurs in
the context of a type III latency (expression of all 12 EBV
latency-associated genes), and thus one cannot exclude a possible role
for EBNA-1, RK-BARF0, or the EBERs in growth-related functions of the
type I latency program. The reservoir of EBV in healthy infected
individuals consists of B lymphocytes that, like BL cells, preclude the
expression of known growth-promoting EBV proteins (7, 37, 42,
57). Thus, one or more of the EBV genes expressed during the type
I latency program may perform a critical role in modulating B-cell
growth or survival in vivo.
The concept that the type I latency program of EBV promotes BL cell
growth and survival is strongly supported by data presented here
demonstrating that (i) EBV-positive Akata BL cells are more resistant
to apoptosis than are EBV-negative Akata cells under growth-limiting
conditions; (ii) under conditions that favor increased sensitivity to
apoptotic stimuli, there is an EBV-dependent reduction in c-MYC, an
oncoprotein known to augment the apoptotic program in BL
(35) and other cell lineages (3, 12, 40); (iii) EBV-positive Akata BL cells generally, but not always, express higher
levels of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 than do their EBV-negative
counterparts throughout all stages of the cell growth cycle; and (iv)
tumorigenicity in Akata BL cells is strictly dependent on a latent EBV
infection characteristic of BL tumors. Based on these observations, we
propose that EBV contributes to tumorigenicity in BL by inhibiting
c-MYC-induced apoptosis through at least two mechanisms: a modest
up-regulation of Bcl-2 expression and, most importantly, a concomitant
decrease in c-MYC expression, apparently at the level of translation,
under growth-limiting conditions.
Although earlier studies failed to detect Bcl-2 expression in BL cells
that maintain type I latency (21, 34), our results clearly
indicate that Bcl-2 is expressed in Akata and other group I BL cell
lines (Fig. 4 and data not shown). However, the level of Bcl-2
expression needed to effectively inhibit apoptosis in group I BL cells
equals or exceeds the much higher levels of Bcl-2 observed in LCLs and
BL cells that maintain type III latency (34). Because
EBV-negative Akata cells express only slightly lower levels of Bcl-2
than their EBV-positive counterparts, Bcl-2 levels characteristic of
EBV-positive BL cells that maintain type I latency seem unlikely to be
sufficient alone to fully restore tumorigenicity to EBV-negative Akata
BL cells.
The striking finding that EBV targets the down-regulation of c-MYC
protein under growth-limiting conditions in BL suggests that this is
the principal mechanism by which EBV promotes cell survival,
particularly given that c-MYC is the primary mediator of apoptosis in
BL (35) and that Akata BL cells are null for p53
(15). To determine if down-regulation of c-MYC is indeed responsible for the increased survival of BL cells, we have attempted to repress expression of c-MYC in EBV-negative Akata cells during stationary phase, using antisense c-myc oligonucleotides
that have been successfully used in BL (35). Unfortunately,
we were unable to demonstrate a repression of c-MYC by such means and therefore have been unable to directly test whether repression of c-MYC
is sufficient to promote group I BL cell survival. Interestingly, our
observations regarding BL cells contrast those for EBV-transformed lymphoblastoid cells, in which expression of c-MYC protein is sustained
under growth-restrictive conditions (8), most likely through
an EBV-dependent stabilization of c-myc mRNA that occurs during type III latency (26, 27). Although these opposing effects of EBV on c-MYC expression likely result from the
dominant influence of the respective EBV latency program maintained by a cell, we cannot exclude the possibility that the EBV-dependent decrease in c-MYC protein observed here is unique to BL. Presumably, the documented ability of cells that maintain type III latency to
substantially up-regulate the antiapoptotic proteins Bcl-2 and A20
would protect such cells having sustained c-MYC expression (16, 19, 21, 28, 47).
Although expression of the EBV EBNA-1 protein may be responsible for
the protracted development of B-cell lymphoma in some lines of
transgenic mice (59, 60), our observations indicate that
neither EBV-dependent tumorigenicity nor regulation of c-MYC and Bcl-2
expression in BL can be attributed to EBNA-1 alone. Other EBV gene
products that are consistently expressed in BL are the small RNAs
EBER-1 and EBER-2 and the more recently identified RK-BARF0 protein
(2, 17). Whereas the function of RK-BARF0 is unknown, at
least two functions have been ascribed to the EBER RNAs: first, EBERs
bind to the double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase PKR and
disrupt the ability of PKR, a protein with potential tumor suppressor
activity, to inhibit translation (10, 25, 32, 51); second,
EBER RNAs bind to the ribosomal protein L22 and sequester L22 to the
nucleus (58). Given that the EBERs are capable of targeting
two proteins associated with the translational process and our data
suggesting that down-regulation of c-MYC expression is most likely
mediated at the level of translation, the possibility that the EBERs
contribute to cell survival as defined here is particularly attractive.
Although our observations provide important insights into the
long-standing debate over the role of EBV in BL, equally important are
the implications of these findings with respect to the maintenance of
EBV latency in the healthy EBV-immune host. Because the EBV-dependent down-regulation of c-MYC in BL appears to occur through a
posttranscriptional mechanism, this type of regulation may also be
operational within normal latently infected B cells in vivo. Thus, EBV
may contribute to its persistence by promoting the survival of
proliferating latently infected B cells. Although a major reservoir of
EBV in the peripheral blood appears to be resting B cells that lack
EBNA-1 mRNA but which express LMP-2A transcripts (37), cells
that express EBNA-1 mRNA in the absence of transcripts that encode the
other EBNA proteins and LMP-1 are detectable as well (7,
57). This finding suggests that there is a subpopulation of
infected B cells in vivo that maintains a pattern of EBV gene
expression similar or identical to that observed in BL. Such B cells
may be actively dividing in response to physiological signals and
essential to maintain a critical pool of latently infected B cells that
is necessary to sustain long-term infection (reviewed in reference 56). The potential of EBV to usurp physiological
pathways of cell proliferation, coupled with its ability to limit cell
death under growth-restrictive conditions as shown here, would enable EBV to circumvent the need for virus-induced proliferation and the
associated expression of the LMP-1 oncoprotein and other EBV proteins,
such as the EBNA-3 family, that are capable of evoking a strong
cellular immune response.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank J. Hearing for EBNA-1 antiserum, C. Sample for S12
antibody, J. Sixbey for the 3F2, 2C1, and 2A8 cell lines, J. Downing for HL60 and K562 cells, D. Henson, E. White, and C. Yang for excellent
technical assistance, and G. Zambetti and C. Sample for advice and
critical reading of the manuscript. E. Kieff and B. Tomkinson each
provided an EBV-negative Akata cell line used in preliminary studies.
This work was supported by Public Health Service grants DE-11116 (to
L.M.H.-F.), CA-76379 and DK44158 (to J.L.C.), and CA-73544 and CA-56639
(to J.T.S.), Cancer Center (CORE) grant CA-21765, and the American
Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities. I.K.R. was supported by PHS grant
T32-AI-07372.
 |
ADDENDUM IN PROOF |
Similar data indicating that resistance to apoptosis and
tumorigenic potential in Akata BL cells is dependent on EBV was
recently reported by K. Komano et al. (J. Virol.
72:9150-9156, 1998).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Virology and Molecular Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 332 North Lauderdale, Memphis, TN 38105. Phone: (901) 495-3467. Fax:
(901) 523-2622. E-mail: jeff.sample{at}stjude.org.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Adams, J. M.,
A. W. Harris,
C. A. Pinkert,
L. M. Corcoran,
W. S. Alexander,
S. Cory,
R. D. Palmiter, and R. L. Brinster.
1985.
The c-myc oncogene driven by immunoglobulin enhancers induces lymphoid malignancy in transgenic mice.
Nature
318:533-538[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Arrand, J. R., and L. Rymo.
1982.
Characterization of the major Epstein-Barr virus-specific RNA in Burkitt lymphoma-derived cells.
J. Virol.
41:376-389[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Askew, D. S.,
R. A. Ashmun,
B. C. Simmons, and J. L. Cleveland.
1991.
Constitutive c-myc expression in an IL-3-dependent myeloid cell line suppresses cell-cycle arrest and accelerates apoptosis.
Oncogene
6:1915-1922[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Borza, C. M., and L. M. Hutt-Fletcher.
1998.
Epstein-Barr virus recombinant lacking expression of glycoprotein gp150 infects B cells normally but is enhanced for infection of the epithelial cells.
J. Virol.
72:7577-7582[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Brooks, L.,
Q. Y. Yao,
A. B. Rickinson, and L. S. Young.
1992.
Epstein-Barr virus latent gene transcription in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells: coexpression of EBNA1, LMP1, and LMP2 transcripts.
J. Virol.
66:2689-2697[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Brooks, L. A.,
A. L. Lear,
L. S. Young, and A. B. Rickinson.
1993.
Transcripts from the Epstein-Barr virus BamHI A fragment are detectable in all three forms of virus latency.
J. Virol.
67:3182-3190[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Chen, F.,
J. Z. Zou,
L. di Renzo,
G. Winberg,
L. F. Hu,
E. Klein,
G. Klein, and I. Ernberg.
1995.
A subpopulation of normal B cells latently infected with Epstein-Barr virus resembles Burkitt lymphoma cells in expressing EBNA-1 but not EBNA-2 or LMP-1.
J. Virol.
69:3752-3758[Abstract].
|
| 8.
|
Cherney, B. W.,
K. Bhatia, and G. Tosato.
1994.
A role for deregulated c-Myc expression in apoptosis of Epstein-Barr virus-immortalized B cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:12967-12971[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Chodosh, J.,
V. P. Holder,
Y. Gan,
A. Belgaumi,
J. Sample, and J. W. Sixbey.
1998.
Eradication of latent Epstein-Barr virus by hydroxyurea alters the growth-transformed cell phenotype.
J. Infect. Dis.
177:1194-1201[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Clarke, P. A.,
M. Schwemmle,
J. Schickinger,
K. Hilse, and M. J. Clemens.
1991.
Binding of Epstein-Barr virus small RNA EBER-1 to the double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase DAI.
Nucleic Acids Res.
19:243-248[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Deacon, E. M.,
G. Pallesen,
G. Niedobitek,
J. Crocker,
L. Brooks,
A. B. Rickinson, and L. S. Young.
1993.
Epstein-Barr virus and Hodgkin's disease: transcriptional analysis of virus latency in the malignant cells.
J. Exp. Med.
177:339-349[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Evan, G.,
C. S. Wyllie,
C. S. Gilbert,
H. Land,
M. Brooks,
T. Littlewood,
C. Waters, and D. Hancock.
1992.
Induction of apoptosis in fibroblasts by c-myc protein.
Cell
69:119-128[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Evan, G. I.,
G. K. Lewis,
G. Ramsay, and J. M. Bishop.
1985.
Isolation of monoclonal antibodies specific for human c-myc proto-oncogene product.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
5:3610-3616[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Fahraeus, R.,
H. Li-Fu,
I. Ernberg,
J. Finke,
M. Rowe,
G. Klein,
K. Falk,
E. Nilsson,
M. Yadaf,
P. Busson,
T. Tursz, and B. Kallin.
1988.
Expression of the Epstein-Barr virus genome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Int. J. Cancer
42:329-338[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Farrell, P. J.,
G. J. Allan,
F. Shanathan,
K. H. Vousden, and T. Crook.
1991.
p53 is frequently mutated in Burkitt's lymphoma cell lines.
EMBO J.
10:2879-2887[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Fries, K. L.,
W. E. Miller, and N. Raab-Traub.
1996.
Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 blocks p53-mediated apoptosis through induction of the A20 gene.
J. Virol.
70:8653-8659[Abstract].
|
| 17.
|
Fries, K. L.,
T. B. Sculley,
J. Webster-Cyriaque,
P. Rajadurai,
R. H. Sadler, and N. Raab-Traub.
1997.
Identification of a novel protein encoded by the BamHI A region of the Epstein-Barr virus.
J. Virol.
71:2765-2771[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
Gregory, C. D.,
M. Rowe, and A. B. Rickinson.
1990.
Different Epstein-Barr virus-B cell interactions in phenotypically distinct clones of a Burkitt's lymphoma cell line.
J. Gen. Virol.
71:1481-1495[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Gregory, C. D.,
C. Dive,
S. Henderson,
C. A. Smith,
G. T. Williams,
J. Gordon, and A. B. Rickinson.
1991.
Activation of Epstein-Barr virus latent genes protects human B cells from death by apoptosis.
Nature
349:612-614[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Hann, S. R., and R. N. Eisenman.
1984.
Proteins encoded by the human c-myc oncogene: differential expression in neoplastic cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
4:2486-2497[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Henderson, S.,
M. Rowe,
C. Gregory,
D. Croom-Carter,
F. Wang,
R. Longnecker,
E. Kieff, and A. Rickinson.
1991.
Induction of bcl-2 expression by Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 protects infected B cells from programmed cell death.
Cell
65:1107-1115[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Herbst, H.,
F. Dallenbach,
M. Hummel,
G. Niedobitek,
S. Pileri,
N. Muller-Lantzsch, and H. Stein.
1991.
Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein expression in Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:4766-4770[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Khanna, R.,
S. R. Burrows,
M. G. Kurilla,
C. A. Jacob,
I. S. Misko,
T. B. Sculley,
E. Kieff, and D. J. Moss.
1992.
Localization of Epstein-Barr virus cytotoxic T cell epitopes using recombinant vaccinia: implications for vaccine development.
J. Exp. Med.
176:160-176.
|
| 24.
|
Kieff, E.
1996.
Epstein-Barr virus and its replication, p. 2343-2396.
In
B. N. Fields, et al. (ed.), Fields virology, 3rd ed., vol. 2. Raven Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 25.
|
Koromilas, A. E.,
S. Roy,
G. N. Barber,
M. G. Katze, and N. Sonenberg.
1992.
Malignant transformation by a mutant of the IFN-inducible dsRNA-dependent protein kinase.
Science
257:1685-1689[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Lacy, J.,
W. P. Summers,
M. Watson,
P. M. Glazer, and W. C. Summers.
1987.
Amplification and deregulation of MYC following Epstein-Barr virus infection of a human B-cell line.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
84:5838-5842[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Lacy, J.,
W. P. Summers, and W. C. Summers.
1989.
Post-transcriptional mechanisms of deregulation of MYC following conversion of a human B cell line by Epstein-Barr virus.
EMBO J.
8:1973-1980[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Laherty, C. D.,
H. M. Hu,
A. W. Opipari,
F. Wang, and V. M. Dixit.
1992.
The Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 gene product induces A20 zinc finger protein expression by activating NF- B.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:24157-24160[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Magrath, I.
1990.
The pathogenesis of Burkitt's lymphoma.
Adv. Cancer. Res.
55:133-270[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Mann, K. P.,
D. Staunton, and D. A. Thorley-Lawson.
1985.
Epstein-Barr virus-encoded protein found in plasma membranes of transformed cells.
J. Virol.
55:710-720[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Masucci, M., and I. Ernberg.
1994.
Epstein-Barr virus: adaptation to a life within the immune system.
Trends Microbiol.
2:125-130[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Meurs, E. F.,
J. Galabru,
G. N. Barber,
M. G. Katze, and A. G. Hovanessian.
1993.
Tumor suppressor function of the interferon-induced double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:232-236[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Miller, A. D., and G. Rosman.
1989.
Improved retroviral vectors for gene transfer and expression.
BioTechniques
7:980-990[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Milner, A. E.,
G. D. Johnson, and C. D. Gregory.
1992.
Prevention of programmed cell death in Burkitt lymphoma cell lines by bcl-2-dependent and -independent mechanisms.
Int. J. Cancer
52:636-644[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Milner, A. E.,
R. J. A. Grand,
C. M. Waters, and C. D. Gregory.
1993.
Apoptosis in Burkitt lymphoma cells is driven by c-myc.
Oncogene
8:3385-3391[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Miyashita, E. M.,
B. Yang,
K. M. C. Lam,
D. H. Crawford, and D. A. Thorley-Lawson.
1995.
A novel form of Epstein-Barr virus latency in normal B cells in vivo.
Cell
80:593-601[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Miyashita, E. M.,
B. Yang,
G. J. Babcock, and D. A. Thorley-Lawson.
1997.
Identification of the site of Epstein-Barr virus persistence in vivo as a resting B cell.
J. Virol.
71:4882-4891[Abstract].
|
| 38.
|
Murray, R.,
M. Kurilla,
J. Brooks,
W. Thomas,
M. Rowe,
E. Kieff, and A. Rickinson.
1992.
Identification of target antigens for the human cytotoxic T cell response to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV): implications for the immune control of EBV positive malignancies.
J. Exp. Med.
176:157-168[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Nonkwelo, C.,
E. B. D. Henson, and J. Sample.
1995.
Characterization of the Epstein-Barr virus Fp promoter.
Virology
206:183-195[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Packham, G., and J. L. Cleveland.
1995.
c-Myc and apoptosis.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1242:11-28[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Pallesen, G.,
S. J. Hamilton-Dutoit,
M. Rowe, and L. S. Young.
1991.
Expression of Epstein-Barr virus latent gene products in tumour cells of Hodgkin's disease.
Lancet
337:320-322[Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Qu, L., and D. T. Rowe.
1992.
Epstein-Barr virus latent gene expression in uncultured peripheral blood lymphocytes.
J. Virol.
66:3715-3724[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Rickinson, A. B., and E. Kieff.
1996.
Epstein-Barr virus, p. 2397-2446.
In
B. N. Fields, et al. (ed.), Fields virology, 3rd ed., vol. 2. Raven Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 44.
|
Robertson, E. S.,
B. Tomkinson, and E. Kieff.
1994.
An Epstein-Barr virus with a 58-kilobase-pair deletion that includes BARF0 transforms B lymphocytes in vitro.
J. Virol.
68:1449-1458[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Rooney, C. M.,
C. D. Gregory,
M. Rowe,
S. Finerty,
C. Edwards,
H. Rupani, and A. B. Rickinson.
1986.
Endemic Burkitt's lymphoma: phenotypic analysis of tumor biopsy cells and of derived tumor cell lines.
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
77:681-687.
|
| 46.
|
Rowe, D. T.,
M. Rowe,
G. I. Evan,
L. E. Wallace,
P. J. Farrell, and A. B. Rickinson.
1986.
Restricted expression of EBV latent genes and T-lymphocyte-detected membrane antigen in Burkitt's lymphoma cells.
EMBO J.
5:2599-2607[Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Rowe, M.,
M. Peng-Pilon,
D. S. Huen,
R. Hardy,
D. Croom-Carter,
E. Lundgren, and A. B. Rickinson.
1994.
Upregulation of bcl-2 by the Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein LMP1: a B-cell-specific response that is delayed relative to NF B activation and to induction of cell surface markers.
J. Virol.
68:5602-5612[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 49.
|
Sample, J., and E. Kieff.
1990.
Transcription of the Epstein-Barr virus genome during latency in growth-transformed lymphocytes.
J. Virol.
64:1667-1674[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Sample, J.,
E. B. D. Henson, and C. Sample.
1992.
The Epstein-Barr virus nuclear protein 1 promoter active in type I latency is autoregulated.
J. Virol.
66:4654-4661[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Sharp, T. V.,
M. Schwemmle,
I. Jeffrey,
K. Laing,
H. Mellor,
C. G. Proud,
K. Hilse, and M. J. Clemens.
1993.
Comparative analysis of the regulation of the interferon-inducible protein kinase PKR by Epstein-Barr virus RNAs EBER-1 and EBER-2 and adenovirus VAI RNA.
Nucleic Acids Res.
21:4483-4490[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 52.
|
Shimizu, N.,
A. Tanabe-Tochikura,
Y. Kuroiwa, and K. Takada.
1994.
Isolation of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-negative cell clones from the EBV-positive Burkitt's lymphoma (BL) line Akata: malignant phenotypes of BL cells are dependent on EBV.
J. Virol.
68:6069-6073[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Smith, P., and B. Griffin.
1991.
Differential expression of Epstein-Barr viral transcripts for two proteins (TP1 and LMP) in lymphocyte and epithelial cells.
Nucleic Acids Res.
19:2435-2440[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 54.
|
Swaminathan, S.,
B. Tomkinson, and E. Kieff.
1991.
Recombinant Epstein-Barr virus with small RNA (EBERS) genes deleted transforms lymphocytes and replicates in vitro.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:1546-1550[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 55.
|
Takada, K., and Y. Ono.
1989.
Synchronous and sequential activation of latently infected Epstein-Barr virus genomes.
J. Virol.
63:445-449[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 56.
|
Thorley-Lawson, D. A.,
E. M. Miyashita, and G. Khan.
1996.
Epstein-Barr virus and the B cell: that's all it takes.
Trends Microbiol.
4:204-208[Medline].
|
| 57.
|
Tierney, R. J.,
N. Steven,
L. S. Young, and A. B. Rickinson.
1994.
Epstein-Barr virus latency in blood mononuclear cells: analysis of viral gene transcription during primary infection and in the carrier state.
J. Virol.
68:7374-7385[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 58.
|
Toczyski, D. P.,
A. G. Matera,
D. C. Ward, and J. A. Steitz.
1994.
The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) small RNA EBER1 binds and relocalizes ribosomal protein L22 in EBV-infected human B lymphocytes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:3463-3467[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 59.
|
Wilson, J. B., and A. J. Levine.
1992.
The oncogenic potential of Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 in transgenic mice.
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
182:325-384[Medline].
|
| 60.
|
Wilson, J. B.,
J. L. Bell, and A. J. Levine.
1996.
Expression of Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen-1 induces B cell neoplasia in transgenic mice.
EMBO J.
15:3117-3126[Medline].
|
| 61.
|
Young, L. S.,
C. W. Dawson,
D. Clark,
H. Rupani,
P. Busson,
T. Tursz,
A. Johnson, and A. B. Rickinson.
1988.
Epstein-Barr virus gene expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
J. Gen. Virol.
69:1051-1065[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, March 1999, p. 1651-1660, Vol. 19, No. 3
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Garrison, S. P., Jeffers, J. R., Yang, C., Nilsson, J. A., Hall, M. A., Rehg, J. E., Yue, W., Yu, J., Zhang, L., Onciu, M., Sample, J. T., Cleveland, J. L., Zambetti, G. P.
(2008). Selection against PUMA Gene Expression in Myc-Driven B-Cell Lymphomagenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol.
28: 5391-5402
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kang, M.-S., Soni, V., Bronson, R., Kieff, E.
(2008). Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear Antigen 1 Does Not Cause Lymphoma in C57BL/6J Mice. J. Virol.
82: 4180-4183
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kelly, G. L., Rickinson, A. B.
(2007). Burkitt Lymphoma: Revisiting the Pathogenesis of a Virus-Associated Malignancy. ASH Education Book
2007: 277-284
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kelly, G. L., Milner, A. E., Baldwin, G. S., Bell, A. I., Rickinson, A. B.
(2006). Three restricted forms of Epstein-Barr virus latency counteracting apoptosis in c-myc-expressing Burkitt lymphoma cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
103: 14935-14940
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ruf, I. K., Lackey, K. A., Warudkar, S., Sample, J. T.
(2005). Protection from Interferon-Induced Apoptosis by Epstein-Barr Virus Small RNAs Is Not Mediated by Inhibition of PKR. J. Virol.
79: 14562-14569
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kelly, G. L., Milner, A. E., Tierney, R. J., Croom-Carter, D. S. G., Altmann, M., Hammerschmidt, W., Bell, A. I., Rickinson, A. B.
(2005). Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear Antigen 2 (EBNA2) Gene Deletion Is Consistently Linked with EBNA3A, -3B, and -3C Expression in Burkitt's Lymphoma Cells and with Increased Resistance to Apoptosis. J. Virol.
79: 10709-10717
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kang, M.-S., Lu, H., Yasui, T., Sharpe, A., Warren, H., Cahir-McFarland, E., Bronson, R., Hung, S. C., Kieff, E.
(2005). Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 does not induce lymphoma in transgenic FVB mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
102: 820-825
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ricci, M. S., Jin, Z., Dews, M., Yu, D., Thomas-Tikhonenko, A., Dicker, D. T., El-Deiry, W. S.
(2004). Direct Repression of FLIP Expression by c-myc Is a Major Determinant of TRAIL Sensitivity. Mol. Cell. Biol.
24: 8541-8555
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Thompson, M. P., Kurzrock, R.
(2004). Epstein-Barr Virus and Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res.
10: 803-821
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Karajannis, M. A., Hummel, M., Oschlies, I., Anagnostopoulos, I., Zimmermann, M., Stein, H., Parwaresch, R., Reiter, A.
(2003). Epstein-Barr virus infection in Western European pediatric non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Blood
102: 4244-4244
[Full Text]
-
Kennedy, G., Komano, J., Sugden, B.
(2003). Epstein-Barr virus provides a survival factor to Burkitt's lymphomas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
100: 14269-14274
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sheng, W., Decaussin, G., Ligout, A., Takada, K., Ooka, T.
(2003). Malignant Transformation of Epstein-Barr Virus-Negative Akata Cells by Introduction of the BARF1 Gene Carried by Epstein-Barr Virus. J. Virol.
77: 3859-3865
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Leoncini, L, Lazzi, S, Bellan, C, Tosi, P
(2002). Cell kinetics and cell cycle regulation in lymphomas. J. Clin. Pathol.
55: 648-655
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Maruo, S., Nanbo, A., Takada, K.
(2001). Replacement of the Epstein-Barr Virus Plasmid with the EBER Plasmid in Burkitt's Lymphoma Cells. J. Virol.
75: 9977-9982
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Trivedi, P., Spinsanti, P., Cuomo, L., Volpe, M., Takada, K., Frati, L., Faggioni, A.
(2001). Differential Regulation of Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) Latent Gene Expression in Burkitt Lymphoma Cells Infected with a Recombinant EBV Strain. J. Virol.
75: 4929-4935
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Komano, J., Takada, K.
(2001). Role of bcl-2 in Epstein-Barr Virus-Induced Malignant Conversion of Burkitt's Lymphoma Cell Line Akata. J. Virol.
75: 1561-1564
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Swart, R., Ruf, I. K., Sample, J., Longnecker, R.
(2000). Latent Membrane Protein 2A-Mediated Effects on the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt Pathway. J. Virol.
74: 10838-10845
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hecht, J. L., Aster, J. C.
(2000). Molecular Biology of Burkitt's Lymphoma. JCO
18: 3707-3721
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ruf, I. K., Rhyne, P. W., Yang, C., Cleveland, J. L., Sample, J. T.
(2000). Epstein-Barr Virus Small RNAs Potentiate Tumorigenicity of Burkitt Lymphoma Cells Independently of an Effect on Apoptosis. J. Virol.
74: 10223-10228
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Takada, K
(2000). Epstein-Barr virus and gastric carcinoma. Mol. Pathol.
53: 255-261
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gregory, M. A., Hann, S. R.
(2000). c-Myc Proteolysis by the Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway: Stabilization of c-Myc in Burkitt's Lymphoma Cells. Mol. Cell. Biol.
20: 2423-2435
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wade, M., Allday, M. J.
(2000). Epstein-Barr Virus Suppresses a G2/M Checkpoint Activated by Genotoxins. Mol. Cell. Biol.
20: 1344-1360
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Komano, J., Maruo, S., Kurozumi, K., Oda, T., Takada, K.
(1999). Oncogenic Role of Epstein-Barr Virus-Encoded RNAs in Burkitt's Lymphoma Cell Line Akata. J. Virol.
73: 9827-9831
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ruf, I. K., Sample, J.
(1999). Repression of Epstein-Barr Virus EBNA-1 Gene Transcription by pRb during Restricted Latency. J. Virol.
73: 7943-7951
[Abstract]
[Full Text]