Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, March 1999, p. 1901-1909, Vol. 19, No. 3
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
A New Element within the T-Cell Receptor
Locus
Required for Tissue-Specific Locus Control Region Activity
Benjamin D.
Ortiz,
Dragana
Cado, and
Astar
Winoto*
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology,
Cancer Research Laboratory and Division of Immunology, University
of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3200
Received 25 August 1998/Returned for modification 14 October
1998/Accepted 9 December 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Locus control regions (LCRs) are cis-acting regulatory
elements thought to provide a tissue-specific open chromatin domain for
genes to which they are linked. The gene for T-cell receptor
chain
(TCR
) is exclusively expressed in T cells, and the chromatin at its
locus displays differentially open configurations in expressing and
nonexpressing tissues. Mouse TCR
exists in a complex locus containing three differentially regulated genes. We previously described an LCR in this locus that confers T-lineage-specific expression upon linked transgenes. The 3' portion of this LCR contains
an unrestricted chromatin opening activity while the 5' portion
contains elements restricting this activity to T cells. This
tissue-specificity region contains four known DNase I hypersensitive sites, two located near transcriptional silencers, one at the TCR
enhancer, and another located 3' of the enhancer in a 1-kb region of
unknown function. Analysis of this region using transgenic mice reveals
that the silencer regions contribute negligibly to LCR activity. While
the enhancer is required for complete LCR function, its removal has
surprisingly little effect on chromatin structure or expression outside
the thymus. Rather, the region 3' of the enhancer appears responsible
for the tissue-differential chromatin configurations observed at the
TCR
locus. This region, herein termed the "HS1' element," also
increases lymphoid transgene expression while suppressing ectopic
transgene activity. Thus, this previously undescribed element is an
integral part of the TCR
LCR, which influences tissue-specific
chromatin structure and gene expression.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The locus control region (LCR),
first described in the
-globin gene cluster (18, 23), is
defined by its ability to impart position-independent and high-level
tissue-specific expression of a linked transgene in chromatin (recently
reviewed in references 19 and
32). An LCR protects a transgene from "position
effect variegation," which could silence its transcription if it
integrates into inactive chromatin (46). LCRs are thought to
provide an open chromatin environment, which is necessary for
physiological expression of a linked transgene at any integration site
(17, 42). LCRs are frequently associated with loci that
maintain tissue-restricted expression. Accordingly, it has been
observed that the activity of an LCR is restricted to the tissues in
which its locus of origin is normally expressed (2, 3, 5, 23, 31,
35, 38), even when it is linked to heterologous transgenes (22, 45, 53). What provides tissue specificity to LCR
activity is not completely clear. Mutational analyses of LCRs have led to the conclusion that the chromatin opening activity of an LCR is
inherently tissue specific in nature (11, 47, 53).
The T-cell receptor
(TCR
) gene is exclusively expressed in
T-lineage cells. Prerearranged TCR
transgenes under endogenous controls are expressed only in T-cell-bearing tissues, such as thymus
and spleen, but not in other organs, such as liver and heart
(9). Mouse TCR
exists in a complex locus on mouse
chromosome 14 that also includes the genes for the TCR
chain and
Dad1 (1, 26). TCR
and TCR
genes are
mutually exclusively expressed by the 
and 
subpopulations
of T cells, respectively. In contrast, the Dad1 gene, which
is 3' of TCR
, is expressed ubiquitously. We have described an LCR in
this locus that, in T-cell lines, manifests itself as eight DNase I
hypersensitive sites (HS) extending from the TCR
chain constant
region exons to 5' of the Dad1 gene. HS1 maps to the
well-characterized TCR
enhancer (25, 36, 58). HS2 to HS6
lie 3' of HS1 in the locus. HS7 and -8 are 5' of HS1. Fragments
containing HS7 and -8 also contain transcriptional silencers defined in
transient transfection assays (59). Additionally, a ninth
HS, named HS1', has been discovered in a 1-kb region of unknown
function between HS1 and HS2 (26, 45). The chromatin at the
endogenous LCR exists in differential configurations in TCR
-expressing and nonexpressing tissues (26, 45). In
normal thymocytes, HS1 and HS6 are the strongest HS in the LCR region. These HS are either weak or are not present in non-T-cell-bearing organs. HS2 to -5 and HS7 and -8, are weak in all organs, while HS1' is
predominantly present in nonlymphoid tissues.
The 9-kb region containing all nine HS of the LCR has been shown to
direct high-level, position-independent, copy number-dependent, and
T-cell compartment-specific expression of a linked TCR
transgene and
a heterologous human
-globin transcription unit (9, 45). Our initial characterization of the LCR (45) revealed that
it contained an unrestricted chromatin opening activity located in the
3' HS2 to HS6 region. This fragment drives widespread transgene expression and adopts an abnormal, wide-open chromatin configuration in
which all of HS2 to -6 are equally prominent in both lymphoid and
nonlymphoid organs. The 5' LCR region containing HS7, -8, -1, and 1'
confers cell-type specificity to the chromatin opening activity. This
is marked by a restoration of T-cell-specific expression and the
naturally occurring tissue-differential chromatin structures observed
at the TCR
locus. The unique arrangement of a 3' unrestricted chromatin opening activity and a 5' T-cell-specificity region in the
TCR
LCR is noteworthy. It suggested that, endogenously, the
Dad1 gene, residing 3' of the LCR, and the TCR
gene,
localized 5' of the LCR, may be sharing some of the LCR elements
(26). How the regulation of T-cell-specific and ubiquitously
expressed genes is coordinated within the same locus is a question of
considerable interest.
Our previous work showed for the first time that the chromatin-opening
and tissue-specific functions of LCRs can, at least in some cases, be
separated (45). The presence of a T-cell-specific enhancer
and silencers in the 5' tissue-specificity region would suggest a role
for these elements in the restriction of LCR activity. While the 1-kb
region containing HS1' is highly conserved between mouse and human loci
(33), to date, no activity has been ascribed to it. To
determine the contributions of activities in HS7 and -8, HS1, and HS1'
to tissue-specific LCR function, we report here further deletion
analysis of the mouse TCR
LCR. We find that the silencer region
containing HS7 and -8 has a very minor inhibitory effect on transgene
expression in T-cell-bearing organs and appears dispensable for
complete LCR activity. The T-cell-specific enhancer (HS1) increases
transcription in thymus and has no other apparent effect on expression
in other organs. In addition, HS1 contributes to copy-number-dependent
expression of the reporter and is thus an integral part of the LCR.
Surprisingly, removal of these silencer- and enhancer-containing
regions has no severe effect on the chromatin structure of the
remaining LCR sequences. Rather, the HS1' region appears to be
responsible for maintaining the cell-type-specific chromatin structures
observed at the 3' chromatin opening region. Although no
transcriptional activity has ever been described in the HS1' region, we
find that this region increases transcription in thymus and spleen and
suppresses ectopic expression of our reporter transgene. Thus, this
previously undescribed control element plays an important role in
tissue-specific functions of the TCR
LCR. The location of this novel
activity, which we term the "HS1' element," between the
T-cell-specific enhancer and the region containing unrestricted
chromatin opening activity may also suggest a potential role for it in
separating the regulation of the TCR
and Dad1 genes.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Transgenic mice.
DNA fragments for microinjection were
double purified by gel electrophoresis on low-melting-point agarose
(Seaplaque-FMC) followed by digestion with
-agarase (New England
Biolabs). DNA was microinjected into the pronucleus of (C57BL/6 × CBA)F2 fertilized mouse eggs, and transferred into
pseudopregnant CD1 foster mothers. Transgenic founders were identified
by Southern blot analysis on tail DNA. The founders were outcrossed to
C57BL/6 mice, and offspring from these crosses were analyzed.
Transgenic offspring were identified by Southern blotting and/or PCR of
ear-punch DNA. Relative copy number was determined for each line by
analysis of at least two Southern blots by PhosphorImager (Molecular
Dynamics). All lines directly compared in this work were analyzed for
relative copy number on the same Southern blot by using the same probe (to the HS6 region) and enzyme digestion, with endogenous TCR
locus
signal used as a normalizing control.
DNA constructs.
The construction of the 9-kb HS1 to -8 fragment, 5.9-kb HS2 to -6 fragment, and the
:1-8 and
:2-6
transgenes has been previously described (45). For the
:1-6 construct, a 7.4-kb XhoI-SacI fragment of
the HS1 to -8 region was excised from the pSP72:HS1-8 vector by using
XhoI and ClaI. This fragment was cloned into the previously described pSP72 vector (Promega) containing the 4.9-kb BglII human
-globin fragment (22, 45) in a
position 3' of the transcription unit.
:1'-6 was similarly
constructed by using a 6.8-kb PmlI-SacI fragment
of the LCR. Transgenic inserts for microinjection were liberated from
vector DNA by using SalI and ClaI.
RNA analysis.
RNA was prepared according to the one-step
protocol (7) from transgenic mouse tissues that were
dissected of fat, minced (except for thymus and spleen), and rinsed
extensively with phosphate-buffered saline to minimize contaminating
blood. Five micrograms of RNA samples was used in each of the RNase
protection assays (21). RNA probes were labeled with
[32P]GTP and SP6 RNA polymerase as follows. For
-globin, a 2.0-kb BamHI fragment spanning exons 1 and 2 was cloned into pSP72 in the opposite orientation with respect to the
SP6 promoter. The plasmid was linearized with AvaII to
generate an RNA probe to exon 2. For
-actin, plasmid was made and
linearized with HinfI (14). For the TCR
constant region probe, a fragment representing C
exon 1 was cloned
into pGEM-3 (Promega) antisense to the SP6 promoter and linearized with
either NcoI to generate a 450-bp probe or with
AvaII to generate a 135-bp probe by using SP6 RNA polymerase. The resulting RNA probes were purified by acrylamide gel
electrophoresis prior to hybridization. Absolute numbers reported for
mRNA expression levels are normalized to those of internal loading
controls and quantified within the experiment presented. Because
differences in RNA probe preparation and RNase digestion conditions are
sometimes unavoidable between separate experiments, comparison of
absolute expression levels between individual points in different
experiments is not valid.
DNase hypersensitivity assays.
Nuclei from liver
(60) and thymus (15) were prepared and
resuspended in DNase digestion buffer (51) at
108 nuclei/ml. Nuclei were digested for 10 min on ice.
Digestion was stopped with 1/10 volume 5% sodium dodecyl sulfate-100
mM EDTA. T cells of the 
lineage were isolated from 30 TCR
mutant mice (43). Lymph nodes were dissected, and B cells
were depleted by panning with antimouse immunoglobulin (Caltag M30800)
(39). The remaining cells were purified by
fluorescence-activated cell sorting with fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-
TCR monoclonal antibody (GL3;
Pharmingen). Nuclei were isolated from 
T cells in the same
manner as thymocytes. For transgene analysis, genomic DNA was digested
with SwaI and SacI to generate a fragment extending from the
-globin coding region on the 5' end to HS6 on the
3' end. A 32P-labeled SwaI-PstI
fragment of the
-globin reporter was used as a probe. For the
endogenous LCR, a 9-kb EcoRV fragment from 3' of C
exon 1 to the area near HS2 was analyzed by probing with a
32P-labeled EcoRV-NcoI fragment of
the LCR. The digested, DNase I-treated DNA samples were subjected to
electrophoresis through 0.8% agarose. Southern blots were prepared on
Hybond-N+ membrane (Amersham). Hybridization was performed by using
Quickhyb solution (Stratagene).
 |
RESULTS |
Deletion analysis of the TCR
LCR tissue distribution-determining
region.
For our LCR analyses, we utilized a 4.9-kb
BglII fragment of the human
-globin locus as a reporter
gene. This fragment has been extensively used in the analysis of LCRs,
because on its own, it is subject to severe position effects in
transgenic mice (6, 22, 23, 54). It has been used in the
analysis of the LCRs for the human
-globin (23), human
CD2 (22), and mouse TCR
genes (45). In the
latter two systems, the T-cell-specific activity of the heterologous
LCR dominates the
-globin regulatory elements, resulting in T-cell
compartment-specific expression of the reporter. In our previous
analyses of mice transgenic for the
:1-8 and
:2-6 constructs (see
reference 45 and Fig.
1), we showed that removal of the four 5'
proximal HS of the TCR
LCR abolishes its T-cell-specific expression
pattern and chromatin structure. To define the contribution of each of
these HS regions to tissue-specific LCR activity, two additional
transgenic constructs were made in which the human
-globin reporter
was linked to either HS1 to -6 or HS1' to -6 of the LCR. Transgenic
mice were generated with these new transgenes, called
:1-6 (a
deletion of HS7 and -8 from
:1-8) and
:1'-6 (a further deletion
of HS1 from
:1-6) (Fig. 1). Transgenic mouse lines derived from
multiple independent founders were analyzed for each construct. Four
lines for the
:1-6 transgene and 10 lines for the
:1'-6 construct
were generated. All four of the former and eight of the latter lines
are analyzed here. These lines were compared to three representative
lines of previously generated
:1-8 and
:2-6 transgenic mice
(45) to assess the activities present in the HS clusters.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Diagram of the transgenic constructs used in this study.
Four transgenic constructs are depicted with DNase I hypersensitive
sites of the TCR locus (as observed in T-cell lines) labeled with
vertical arrows. Large arrows above the line indicate the predominant
HS found in normal thymocytes. A horizontal arrow indicates the
transcriptional orientation of the -globin reporter gene, which is
present in all four constructs. Tissue distribution and chromatin
opening regions were described in reference 45.
|
|
Transcriptional contributions of TCR
silencer and enhancer
regions.
Expression of the reporter transgenes was assayed by
RNase protection as described in Materials and Methods. Figure
2A shows that all four
independent lines of
:1-6 mice of various copy numbers efficiently
expressed the human
-globin mRNA in the thymus. PhosphorImager
analysis, with endogenous TCR
or actin mRNA as an internal loading
control, showed that transgene expression per copy was high and stable
(only varying over a 2.3-fold range) across the independent lines.
Expression levels range from one- to twofold of the endogenous mRNA
control level (Fig. 2B). These data demonstrate that deletion of HS7
and -8 does not compromise the ability of the LCR to generate
high-level, copy number-dependent transgene expression. Because
silencer elements previously characterized by transient transfection
reside in the deleted region (59), we compared the
expression levels in organs of
:1-8 to
:1-6 transgenic mice in
three pairs. Figure 2C shows PhosphorImager analysis of thymic and
splenic expression in the three experiments. All three pairs display a
minor to negligible negative effect of the HS7 and -8 region on
transgene expression in thymus. Splenic expression of these transgenes
shows a more reproducible but minor negative effect of this region
ranging from 1.6- to 2.5-fold.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Copy number dependence of :1-6 transgene
transcription. (A) RNase protection assay with thymus RNA from four
independent :1-6 transgenic lines. Line numbers and their estimated
relative copy number are indicated. Arrows indicate the signals from
the human -globin reporter transgene and endogenous TCR signal.
Migration of the full-length probes is shown in the probe lane. Non-Tg,
nontransgenic. (B) PhosphorImager analysis of :1-6 expression in
thymus. RNase protection from experiment 1 is shown in panel A. Transgene expression was normalized to TCR signal (defined as 1.0).
Experiment 2 is a repeat of the previous experiment with different
members of the same lines. Here, the transgene expression was
normalized to the endogenous actin signal (see Materials and Methods),
which is defined as 1.0 for this experiment. The ratio of transgene to
endogenous control expression was then divided by the relative copy
number to obtain the values presented. (C) Deletion of HS7 and -8 has a
minor to negligible effect on transgene expression. PhosphorImager
analysis of RNase protection assays. Thymus and spleen transgene
expression was examined for three pairs of :1-8 and :1-6
transgenic mice. The relative :1-8 and :1-6 copy numbers are,
respectively, as follows: pair 1, 2 and 16; pair 2, 21 and 17; and pair
3, 16 and 22. Transgene signal was normalized to endogenous actin
signal (defined as 1.0) and divided by the copy number. Representative
RNase protections are shown in Fig. 5A.
|
|
Eight lines of
:1'-6 mice were analyzed. All lines expressed the
transgene in thymus (Fig. 3A). Longer
exposures show low levels of transcripts (0.4 to 1.0% of the TCR
signal by PhosphorImager analysis) in the two single-copy lines (data
not shown). Only one of the eight lines (no. 13) showed an expression
level comparable to that of the
:1-6 transgene. Five others express
between 14 and 60% of the endogenous TCR
signal per copy (Fig. 3).
Among the multicopy lines, this construct has a 16-fold range of
variation in expression level per copy. This indicates that copy
number-dependent expression in thymus is compromised when the TCR
enhancer (HS1) is deleted. The much lower levels of expression of the
two single-copy
:1'-6 lines further indicate an increased
sensitivity to position effects in the absence of HS1 (11).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
:1'-6 transgene expression is present in all
founders, but is not as copy number dependent as the :1-6 construct.
(A) RNase protection assay with thymus RNA from eight independent
:1'-6 transgenic lines. Line numbers and their estimated relative
copy numbers are indicated. Arrows indicate the signals from the human
-globin reporter transgene and endogenous TCR signal (defined as
1.0). (B) PhosphorImager analysis of the experiment shown in panel A. Transgene signal was normalized to endogenous TCR signal and then
divided by the copy number.
|
|
Analysis of the tissue distribution of
:1-6 and
:1'-6 transgene
expression (Fig. 4) indicated that
high-level expression of the former transgene was still restricted to
thymus and spleen, as was the case for the full-length LCR transgene
:1-8 (45). Therefore the HS7 and -8 region does not
appear to play a major role in the T-cell compartment specificity of
TCR
LCR activity. However, deletion of the TCR
enhancer (HS1)
results in a drop in thymic expression of the transgene. Surprisingly,
splenic expression does not appear to be affected by the HS1 deletion.
Nor is the silent to low-level expression in nonlymphoid organs altered
by removal of the TCR
enhancer. Taken together, these data
demonstrate that the silencer regions, containing HS7 and -8, participate negligibly in LCR activity at the whole-organ level.
However, the HS1 (TCR
enhancer) region contributes to copy
number-dependent expression and high-level thymic transgene expression.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Tissue distribution of :1-6 and :1'-6 transgene
expression. (A) RNase protection assay on RNA from the indicated
tissues of :1-6 line 41 (16 copies) and :1'-6 line 13 (8 copies)
transgenic mice. Arrows indicate signals from the -globin and
endogenous actin control. (B) PhosphorImager analysis of the experiment
shown in panel A and an additional experiment using other :1-6 (line
2, 17 copies) and :1'-6 (line 47, 10 copies) transgenic lines (lower
panel). Transgene mRNA signal was normalized to that of endogenous
actin control (defined as 1.0) and then divided by the copy number.
|
|
The HS1' region profoundly alters tissue distribution of transgene
expression.
Expression of the previously described
:2-6
transgene appears to be much more widespread than that of
:1'-6
(45). This indicates the presence of an important regulatory
function in the HS1' region. Indeed, comparison of expression levels in
pairs of
:1'-6 and
:2-6 lines in some organs showed dramatic
differences in transgene activity. Figure
5A shows an RNase protection assay done
with thymus and spleen RNA of representative lines for each transgenic
construct. In both organs, the negligible difference between
:1-8
and
:1-6 is evident (shown graphically in Fig. 2C). The drop in
thymic expression and unaltered splenic expression (discussed above in
the description of Fig. 4) between
:1-6 and
:1'-6 is also
reproduced. Deletion of HS1' causes a further, severe drop in thymic
expression and a less severe, but significant, lowering of splenic
transcription of the transgene. Because neither of these transgenes is
perfectly copy number dependent in its expression, three separate pairs
of lines were similarly analyzed to confirm these results. Figure 5B
shows PhosphorImager analysis of these experiments. The drop in thymic
expression resulting from HS1' deletion ranges from 15- to 80-fold per
copy, while splenic expression is lowered approximately 3- to 10-fold.
These results are consistent regardless of how the lines are paired. Conversely, expression of the transgene in the heart rose due to HS1'
deletion (Fig. 5C). PhosphorImager analysis of the same three pairs of
lines showed a 4- to 20-fold rise in the levels of heart transgene
expression per copy. Again, the results are the same no matter how the
strains are grouped. Expression of these transgenes in other organs was
also investigated. Levels of transgene expression in liver, kidney, and
lung were either inconsistently or not significantly affected by any of
the deletions made in the multiple pairs of transgenic mice analyzed
(data not shown). Nevertheless, together these data show that the
removal of the HS1' region results in a major alteration of the tissue distribution of transgene activity.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
LCR HS deletion analysis. (A) RNase protection assays of
the indicated organs of representative transgenic lines. The constructs
are indicated. Relative copy numbers are as follows: :1-8, 16;
:1-6, 22; :1'-6, 43; and :2-6, 28. Arrows indicate signals
from human -globin transgene mRNA and the endogenous actin control.
(B) PhosphorImager analysis of RNase protection assays. Thymus and
spleen transgene expression was examined for three pairs of :1'-6
and :2-6 transgenic mice. The relative :1'-6 and :2-6 copy
numbers are, respectively, as follows: pair 1, 8 and 8; pair 2, 10 and
9; and pair 3, 43 and 28. Transgene signal was normalized to endogenous
actin signal (defined as 1.0) and divided by the copy number. (C)
PhosphorImager analysis of RNase protections performed with heart RNA
from the same three pairs of transgenic mice used in panel B. Normalized transgene expression numbers were obtained as in panel B.
|
|
Tissue-differential chromatin structure is maintained in the
:1'-6 transgene.
As described in the introduction, our previous
work demonstrated that full-length LCR transgenes exhibit
cell-type-specific chromatin structures similar to that of the
endogenous TCR
locus (26, 45). To investigate the roles
of the HS regions in the maintenance of tissue-differential chromatin
structure, we analyzed the
:1-6 and
:1'-6 transgene loci by using
the DNase I hypersensitivity assay. Figure
6 shows the results from a representative
experiment with a
:1-6 transgenic line (left panel). As expected,
this transgene contains a stronger HS6 in thymus than in liver. With
the increased resolution afforded by smaller transgene fragments (4 kb
less than in our study of the
:1-8 transgene [45]),
it is now possible to see that HS1, which preferentially forms in
thymus, is actually an HS cluster. HS1' also appears to be a cluster of
discrete HS. A small amount of hypersensitivity in the HS1' region can
be seen in thymic chromatin as well. Similar assays with
:1'-6
transgenic mice (Fig. 6, right panel) show that the differential DNase
I hypersensitivity at HS6 is preserved in this transgene, despite the
absence of HS1. The only minor difference between the HS patterns of
:1-6 and
:1'-6 is in the relative intensities of the individual members of the HS1' cluster. The wide-open chromatin configuration in
both thymus and liver that was evident in the
:2-6 transgene (45) does not materialize in either of the new transgenes.
These data, together with those from our earlier studies, indicate that the HS1' region contains an activity that maintains the
tissue-differential chromatin structure at the HS2 to -6 region of the
TCR
locus.

View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Chromatin structure analysis at transgene loci. (Left
panel) DNase I hypersensitivity assay of the indicated organs of
:1-6 line 41 transgenic mice. The parent band is a
SwaI-SacI restriction fragment of the transgene.
The probe is to the 5' end of the fragment. The positions of HS
clusters are indicated by brackets or arrows. (Right panel) DNase I
hypersensitivity assay of the indicated organs of :1'-6 line 14 transgenic mice. The parent fragment was generated as in panel A and
detected with the same probe. Slopes indicate increasing DNase I
concentration (general range, 0.0 to 4.0 µg/ml).
|
|
HS1' in the endogenous TCR
/
gene locus.
We previously
had no evidence of HS1' formation in thymic chromatin (26,
45). Therefore, we wanted to determine if this new detection of
HS1' was the direct result of a loss of some activity in HS7 and -8, or
was merely a result of the increased resolution that arises from
examination of smaller restriction fragments. Given its apparent
activity in our transcription assays, it became important to us to
establish if HS1' could form in the endogenous TCR
LCR. We examined
this by performing a higher-resolution DNase I hypersensitivity assay
with a restriction enzyme and a probe that detects the HS1 and HS1'
region on a smaller fragment (approximately 3 kb). Figure
7A shows that, in thymic chromatin, HS1
forms preferentially, but HS1' does appear at higher DNase titration
points. This HS1' appears equivalent to that formed in liver chromatin.
Because 
T cells rearrange and express the TCR
chain gene
while 
T cells rearrange and express the TCR
chain gene, it
then became of interest to determine if these two HS clusters had any
differential activity in these two populations. Figure 7B shows that
the DNase I hypersensitivity pattern in thymocytes (99% 
T
cells) is equivalent to that formed in 
T cells isolated from
mouse lymph nodes. HS1 forms first, followed by HS1' forming at higher
DNase concentrations. This indicates that both of these HS clusters may
have a common role to play in both TCR
and TCR
chain expression
in 
and 
T cells, respectively.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Analysis of chromatin structure at the endogenous
TCR LCR. (A) DNase I hypersensitivity assay of the indicated organs
from nontransgenic C57BL6/J mice. The parental band is an
EcoRV restriction fragment of the TCR LCR region. The
probe is to the 3' end of the fragment. HS clusters are indicated with
brackets. (B) Similar assay with  thymocytes and  T cells
isolated as described in Materials and Methods (99% purity). Slopes
indicate increasing DNase I concentration. The middle lane (labeled
BglII) contains EcoRV-BglII codigested
genomic DNA. The BglII site is 15 nucleotides 5' of the
PmlI site and marks the junction of the HS1 and HS1'
clusters.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The examination of gene expression in the context of chromatin in
both transgenic mice and in cell culture has led to the identification
of cis-acting elements that do not necessarily have activity
in transient reporter gene transcription assays. LCRs are perhaps
the most obvious example of this, but activities in chromatin
have also been ascribed to enhancer elements (4, 56),
matrix-attachment regions (28), facilitator elements (2), boundary elements (8, 37, 62), and CpG
methylation islands (61). The HS1' element described
here is yet another example of a cryptic cis-acting control
element revealed through the study of gene expression in chromatin.
Characterization of activities such as these is essential to
understanding the molecular mechanisms governing tissue-specific gene
expression and cell type differentiation in vivo.
Besides TCR
, LCRs have been described in many other
tissue-specifically expressed gene loci (reviewed in references
19 and 32). These LCRs have all
been shown to drive tissue-specific expression of linked transgenes in
mice and/or cell lines. Thus, LCRs are thought to be important to the
development of tissue-specific gene expression. What provides tissue
specificity to LCR function is not clear, although many of these LCRs
contain within them elements with tissue-restricted classical enhancer
activity (3, 5, 31, 34, 38, 55). Several studies have
documented the ability of enhancer elements to counteract repressive
chromatin structures as a component of their action (4, 29,
56). Therefore, a reasonable presumption would be that these
enhancer elements have a role to play in tissue-specific chromatin
opening and LCR function. The TCR
LCR, with its apparently unique
layout of separable chromatin opening and tissue-specificity regions (the latter containing a T-cell-specific enhancer), has afforded us an
excellent opportunity to examine this question.
The HS1-to-6 region is the TCR
LCR.
Deletion analysis of the
full-length, HS1 to -8-containing LCR has demonstrated that the TCR
silencer containing the HS7 and -8 region is not required for LCR
activity and only has a minor to negligible effect on lymphoid organ
reporter gene expression. Because the silencer activity is postulated
to have a role in silencing the TCR
enhancer in the rare
subpopulation of 
T cells, it is not too surprising that its
effect seems minimal at the whole-organ level (59). The
TCR
enhancer contained in HS1, however, is part of the LCR. It
contributes to high-level thymic expression and copy-number-dependent
transcription. The range of variation in expression levels per copy
increases significantly in multicopy lines upon HS1 deletion.
Furthermore, because single-copy transgenes are very sensitive to
position effects without a complete LCR (11), the severe
drop in thymic expression from single-copy
:1'-6 transgenes further
indicates a requirement for the activity in HS1 for LCR function.
Curiously, HS1 appears to be nonfunctional in the spleen, which is
roughly 30% mature T cells. It is possible that the TCR
enhancer is
not required for expression of the reporter gene in mature T cells.
There is ample precedent for such a finding. The mouse CD8
(12,
27), CD4 (49), and p56lck (57) genes all
have transcriptional control elements that are functional in immature,
thymic T cells, but not in peripheral, mature T cells. However, formal
demonstration of TCR
inactivity in peripheral T cells would require
examination of isolated peripheral T cells from
:1-6 and
:1'-6
mice. From these data, we conclude that the 7.4-kb HS1 to -6 fragment
contains the full-length T-cell compartment-specific LCR.
HS1': a region influencing T-cell compartment-specific LCR
activity.
Given the wealth of data suggesting a role for enhancers
in remodeling chromatin, it was surprising to find that deletion of the
TCR
enhancer had no gross effect on the cell-type-specific chromatin
structures observed in
:1'-6 mice. These structures are similar to
those formed at the endogenous LCR. Further deletion of the activity in
the HS1' region abolishes these chromatin configurations in favor of
the wide-open, non-tissue-specific structures observed in
:2-6
transgenic mice (45). This HS1' element increases thymic and
splenic expression while suppressing ectopic expression of the reporter
gene in the heart. Altogether, the data in the present study clarify
the difference in observed expression patterns between the
:1-8 and
:2-6 transgenes reported in our previous work (45). The
change consists of a rise in expression in the heart and a severe drop
in expression in the thymus and spleen, to levels at or below that of
basal activity in the other nonlymphoid organs. This results from the
deletion of the T-cell-specific enhancer in HS1 and the removal of the
complex activity in HS1'. Why does the suppressive aspect of HS1'
element activity only manifest itself in the heart, and not the other
nonlymphoid organs, in this system? One likely possibility is that it
is due to the organ bias of the
-globin reporter gene. Our previous
work has shown that
:2-6-driven transgene expression in the heart is
10- to 20-fold higher than that in the other nonlymphoid organs
(45). Since the
-globin transcription unit is considered
to be erythrocyte specific in its expression (6, 23, 54),
the expression we see in other organs under the influence of HS2 to -6 is most likely due to the wide-open state of the transcription unit
(45). This would allow the transcriptional regulatory
machinery of the various organs maximum access to the
-globin
regulatory sequences. The heart appears to have a higher capacity than
the other organs for taking advantage of this open state of the
transgene to drive expression. This may be due to differences the in
abundance of transcription factors able to act on the
-globin
fragment. There is evidence that changes in chromatin structure can
occur without a concomitant increase in transcription if the nuclear
factor environment does not favor it. Several studies suggest that
changes in chromatin structure can precede transcriptional activation (30, 50). It is possible that, were the reporter gene
naturally ubiquitously expressed, HS1' deletion would have caused more
widespread ectopic expression. Formal demonstration of the full
suppressive potential of the HS1' element would require the use of a
more uniformly expressed transcription unit than
-globin as a
reporter gene. Nevertheless, it is clear that removal of the HS1'
element from the LCR dramatically alters the tissue distribution of
transgene expression.
The TCR
enhancer region and its vicinity have been extensively
studied both in vitro (4, 20, 41) and in vivo (24, 25,
48, 58). No enhancer or silencer activity has ever been detected
in the HS1' region. Furthermore, the HS1' region was demonstrated to
not contain an enhancer activity independent of the HS1 region (see
Fig. 1A, construct J21-3'C
, in reference 58).
This makes the mechanism of action of the element contained therein an
interesting question for investigation. There is extensive sequence
homology in the HS1 and HS1' regions between mouse and human loci
(33). In one report, the human sequence which partially corresponds to the HS1 and HS1' areas seemed to restrict V-D-J rearrangement of a transgenic recombination substrate to 
T cells. The substrate containing the core TCR
enhancer (HS1
equivalent) was rearranged in both 
and 
T cells
(48). Although transcription and chromatin structure were
not examined in that report, this finding does suggest that the human
TCR
locus may have an enhancer flanking activity similar to that
which we describe here.
The role of the HS1' region in the endogenous TCR
Dad1 locus.
Having determined that HS1' does form in
thymocyte chromatin along with HS1, it was tempting to speculate that
perhaps some differential activity of these regions in 
versus

T cells might play a role in the differential development of the
two populations. However, our finding that both regions are
hypersensitive to DNase in both primary 
and 
T cells
suggests that both of these elements are active in both cell types and
may play a common role in either lineage. TCR
enhancer region
knockout mice have been generated and analyzed (52). This
mutation affected both TCR
and TCR
expression in 
and

T cells, respectively. Our data are in agreement with this
finding. However, the deleted region includes both the HS1 and HS1'
regions of the LCR, and it is difficult to discern the roles of the
individual HS clusters from this knockout strain. The work of Roberts
et al. (48), as discussed above, does raise the possibility
that the HS1' region may function in restricting TCR
rearrangement
to 
T cells. Generation of an HS1'-knockout mouse strain will be
necessary to address this question.
The activity of the HS1' element and its position between the
T-cell-specific enhancer (HS1) and the chromatin opening activity (HS2
to -6) suggest that it may play a role in separating TCR
and
Dad1 gene regulation. It could accomplish this if it
contained a boundary-like element capable of blocking and/or directing
transcriptional control activities (8, 37, 62). However, the
complex activity contained in HS1' suggests that this 1-kb region
constitutes more than simply a boundary between the two genes. TCR
also needs access to the chromatin opening activity in the HS2 to -6 region to drive its high-level expression (9, 26, 45).
Therefore, some mechanism of tissue-specific bypassing of a boundary
element would be necessary in the locus. Further studies of this
unusual control element may shed light on the molecular entities that separate the regulation of juxtaposed genes in the mammalian genome.
Comparisons and contrasts with other tissue-specific LCRs.
The
-globin LCR is the best-characterized LCR to date (reviewed in
references 10, 13, 40, and 44).
It consists of four HS located 6 to 22 kb upstream of the fetal
-globin gene. LCR activity has been mapped to a combination of four
core fragments of each HS (19). HS2 contains the classical
enhancer activity, while HS3 contains the dominant chromatin opening
activity responsible for position independence (11). We have
sought to identify the activities of the HS clusters of the TCR
LCR.
The HS1' element appears to contribute to tissue-differential chromatin
structure and expression of the reporter transgene. Could a similar
element exist in other LCRs? The
-globin HS3 core element appears to be tissue specific in function, at least in fetal life (53). An HS1'-like element may coexist with chromatin opening elements in
this small region. It is also possible that the TCR
LCR's proximity to the ubiquitously expressed Dad1 gene creates a special
requirement for separable chromatin opening and tissue-specific
functions in this LCR that might not be necessary at other loci.
Further mutational analysis, in vivo identification of factors
interacting with the HS1' region, and comparison to other systems
should lead to a better understanding of tissue-specific LCR function.
This, in turn, should illuminate molecular mechanisms involved in the development of tissue-specific gene expression.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank D. Kioussis for the human
-globin reporter gene
fragment, Peter Schow for expert flow cytometry services, and Buyung Santoso for technical assistance. We thank Bill Sha, Jeanne Baker, Herb
Kasler, and Jeff Wallin for critical reading of the manuscript.
B.D.O. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the National
Science Foundation. A.W. is an NSF Presidential Faculty Fellow. This
work was supported by NIH grant AI-31558 to A.W.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Molecular and Cell Biology, Cancer Research Laboratory and Division of Immunology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3200. Phone:
(510) 642-0217. Fax: (510) 642-0468. E-mail:
winoto{at}uclink4.berkeley.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Apte, S. S.,
M. G. Mattei,
M. F. Seldin, and B. R. Olsen.
1995.
The highly conserved defender against the death 1 (DAD1) gene maps to human chromosome 14q11-q12 and mouse chromosome 14 and has plant and nematode homologues.
FEBS Lett.
323:304-306.
|
| 2.
|
Aronow, B. J.,
C. A. Ebert,
M. T. Valerius,
S. S. Potter,
D. A. Wiginton,
D. P. Witte, and J. J. Hutton.
1995.
Dissecting a locus control region: facilitation of enhancer function by extended enhancer-flanking sequences.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:1123-1135[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Aronow, B. J.,
R. N. Silbiger,
M. R. Dusing,
J. L. Stock,
K. L. Yager,
S. S. Potter,
J. J. Hutton, and D. A. Wiginton.
1992.
Functional analysis of the human adenosine deaminase gene thymic regulatory region and its ability to generate position-independent transgene expression.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:4170-4185[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Bagga, R., and B. M. Emerson.
1997.
An HMG I/Y-containing repressor complex and supercoiled DNA topology are critical for long-range enhancer dependent transcription in vitro.
Genes Dev.
11:629-639[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Bonifer, C.,
N. Yannoutsos,
G. Kruger,
F. Grosveld, and A. E. Sippel.
1994.
Dissection of the locus control function located on the chicken lysozyme gene domain in transgenic mice.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:4202-4210[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Chada, K.,
J. Magram,
K. Raphael,
G. Radice,
E. Lacy, and F. Costantini.
1985.
Specific expression of a foreign beta-globin gene in erythroid cells of transgenic mice.
Nature
314:377-380[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Chomczynski, P., and N. Sacchi.
1987.
Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction.
Anal. Biochem.
162:156-159[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Chung, J. H.,
M. Whiteley, and G. Felsenfeld.
1993.
A 5' element of the chicken beta-globin domain serves as an insulator in human erythroid cells and protects against position effect in Drosophila.
Cell
74:505-514[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Diaz, P. W.,
D. Cado, and A. Winoto.
1994.
A locus control region in the T cell receptor alpha/delta locus.
Immunity
1:207-217[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Dillon, N., and F. Grosveld.
1993.
Transcriptional regulation of multigene loci: multilevel control.
Trends Genet.
9:134-137[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Ellis, J.,
K. C. Tan-Un,
A. Harper,
D. Michalovich,
N. Yannoutsos,
S. Philipsen, and F. Grosveld.
1996.
A dominant chromatin-opening activity in 5' hypersensitive site 3 of the human beta-globin locus control region.
EMBO J.
15:562-568[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Ellmeier, W.,
M. J. Sunshine,
K. Losos,
F. Hatam, and D. R. Littman.
1997.
An enhancer that directs lineage-specific expression of CD8 in positively selected thymocytes and mature T cells.
Immunity
7:537-547[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Engel, J. D.
1993.
Developmental regulation of human beta-globin gene transcription: a switch of loyalties?
Trends Genet.
9:304-309[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Enoch, T.,
K. Zinn, and T. Maniatis.
1986.
Activation of the human -interferon gene requires an interferon-inducible factor.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
6:801-810[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Enver, T.,
A. C. Brewer, and R. K. Patient.
1985.
Simian virus 40-mediated cis induction of the Xenopus beta-globin DNase I hypersensitive site.
Nature
318:680-683[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Felsenfeld, G.
1992.
Chromatin as an essential part of the transcriptional mechanism.
Nature
355:219-224[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Festenstein, R.,
M. Tolaini,
P. Corbella,
C. Mamalaki,
J. Parrington,
M. Fox,
A. Miliou,
M. Jones, and D. Kioussis.
1996.
Locus control region function and heterochromatin-induced position effect variegation.
Science
271:1123-1125[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
Forrester, W. C.,
E. Epner,
M. C. Driscoll,
T. Enver,
M. Brice,
T. Papayannopoulou, and M. Groudine.
1990.
A deletion of the human -globin locus activating region causes a major alteration in chromatin structure and replication across the entire -globin locus.
Genes Dev.
4:1637-1649[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Fraser, P., and F. Grosveld.
1998.
Locus control regions, chromatin activation and transcription.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
10:361-365[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Giese, K.,
C. Kingsley,
J. R. Kirshner, and R. Grosschedl.
1995.
Assembly and function of a TCR enhancer complex is dependent on LEF-1 induced DNA bending and multiple protein-protein interactions.
Genes Dev.
9:995-1008[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Gilman, M.
1991.
Ribonuclease protection assay, p. 4.7.1-4.7.8.
In
F. M. Ausubel, R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl (ed.), Current protocols in molecular biology John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
|
| 22.
|
Greaves, D. R.,
F. D. Wilson,
G. Lang, and D. Kioussis.
1989.
Human CD2 3'-flanking sequences confer high-level, T cell-specific, position-independent gene expression in transgenic mice.
Cell
56:979-986[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Grosveld, F.,
G. Blom van Assendelft,
D. R. Greaves, and G. Kollias.
1987.
Position independent, high-level expression of the human -globin gene in transgenic mice.
Cell
51:975-985[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Hernandez-Munain, C.,
J. L. Roberts, and M. S. Krangel.
1998.
Cooperation among multiple transcription factors is required for access to minimal T-cell receptor -enhancer chromatin in vivo.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:3223-3233[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Ho, I. C.,
L. H. Yang,
G. Morle, and J. M. Leiden.
1989.
A T-cell specific transcriptional enhancer element 3' of C alpha in the human T-cell receptor alpha locus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:6714-6718[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Hong, N. A.,
D. Cado,
J. Mitchell,
B. D. Ortiz,
S. N. Hsieh, and A. Winoto.
1997.
A targeted mutation at the T-cell receptor / locus impairs T-cell development and reveals the presence of the nearby antiapoptosis gene Dad1.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:2151-2157[Abstract].
|
| 27.
|
Hostert, A.,
M. Tolaini,
K. Roderick,
N. Harker,
T. Norton, and D. Kioussis.
1997.
A region in the CD8 gene locus that directs expression to the mature CD8 T cell subset in transgenic mice.
Immunity
7:525-536[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Jenuwein, T.,
W. C. Forrester,
L. A. Fernandez-Herrero,
G. Laible,
M. Dull, and R. Grosschedl.
1997.
Extension of chromatin accessibility by nuclear matrix attachment regions.
Nature
385:269-272[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Jenuwein, T.,
W. C. Forrester,
R. G. Qiu, and R. Grosschedl.
1993.
The immunoglobulin mu enhancer core establishes local factor access in nuclear chromatin independent of transcriptional stimulation.
Genes Dev.
7:2016-2032[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Jimenez, G.,
S. D. Griffiths,
A. M. Ford,
M. F. Greaves, and T. Enver.
1992.
Activation of the beta-globin locus control region precedes commitment to the erythroid lineage.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:10618-10622[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Jones, B. K.,
B. R. Monks,
S. A. Liebhaber, and N. E. Cooke.
1995.
The human growth hormone gene is regulated by a multicomponent locus control region.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:7010-7021[Abstract].
|
| 32.
|
Kioussis, D., and R. Festenstein.
1997.
Locus control regions: overcoming heterochromatin-induced gene inactivation in mammals.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
7:614-619[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Koop, B. F.,
L. Rowen,
K. Wang,
C. L. Kuo,
D. Seto,
J. A. Lenstra,
S. Howard,
W. Shan,
P. Deshpande, and L. Hood.
1994.
The human T-cell receptor TCRAC/TCRDC (C /C ) region: organization, sequence and evolution of 97.6 kb of DNA.
Genomics
19:478-493[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Lake, R. A.,
D. Wotton, and M. J. Owen.
1990.
A 3' transcriptional enhancer regulates tissue-specific expression of the human CD2 gene.
EMBO J.
9:3129-3136[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Lang, G.,
D. Wotton,
M. J. Owen,
W. A. Sewell,
M. H. Brown,
D. Y. Mason,
M. J. Crumpton, and D. Kioussis.
1988.
The structure of the human CD2 gene and its expression in transgenic mice.
EMBO J.
7:1675-1682[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Leiden, J. M.
1993.
Transcriptional regulation of T cell receptor genes.
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
11:539-570[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Li, Q., and G. Stamatoyannopoulos.
1994.
Hypersensitive site 5 of the human beta globin locus control region functions as a chromatin insulator.
Blood
84:1399-1401[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Madisen, L., and M. Groudine.
1994.
Identification of a locus control region in the immunoglobulin heavy-chain locus that deregulates c-myc expression in plasmacytoma and Burkitt's lymphoma cells.
Genes Dev.
8:2212-2226[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Mage, M. G.
1994.
Fractionation of T cells and B cells, p. 3.5.1-3.5.6.
In
J. E. Coligan, A. M. Kruisbeek, D. H. Margulies, E. M. Shevach, and W. Strober (ed.), Current protocols in immunology, vol. 1. John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
|
| 40.
|
Martin, D. I. K.,
S. Fiering, and M. Groudine.
1996.
Regulation of beta-globin gene expression: straightening out the locus.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
6:488-495[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Mayall, T. P.,
P. L. Sheridan,
M. R. Montminy, and K. A. Jones.
1997.
Distinct roles for P-CREB and LEF-1 in TCR enhancer assembly and activation on chromatin templates in vitro.
Genes Dev.
11:887-899[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Milot, E.,
J. Strouboulis,
T. Trimborn,
M. Wijgerde,
E. de Boer,
A. Langeveld,
K. Tan-Un,
W. Vergeer,
N. Yannoutsos,
F. Grosveld, and P. Fraser.
1996.
Heterochromatin effects on the frequency and duration of LCR-mediated gene transcription.
Cell
87:105-114[Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Mombaerts, P.,
A. R. Clarke,
M. A. Rudnicki,
J. Iacomini,
S. Itohara,
J. J. Lafailee,
L. Wang,
Y. Ichikawa,
R. Jaenish,
M. L. Hooper, and S. Tonegawa.
1992.
Mutations in T-cell antigen receptor genes alpha and beta block thymocyte development at different stages.
Nature
360:225-231[Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Orkin, S. H.
1995.
Regulation of globin gene expression in erythroid cells.
Eur. J. Biochem.
231:271-281[Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Ortiz, B. D.,
D. Cado,
V. Chen,
P. W. Diaz, and A. Winoto.
1997.
Adjacent DNA elements dominantly restrict the ubiquitous activity of a novel chromatin-opening region to specific tissues.
EMBO J.
16:5037-5045[Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Palmiter, R. D., and R. L. Brinster.
1986.
Germ-line transformation of mice.
Annu. Rev. Genet.
20:465-499[Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Philipsen, S.,
S. Pruzina, and F. Grosveld.
1993.
The minimal requirements for activity in transgenic mice of hypersensitive site 3 of the beta globin locus control region.
EMBO J.
12:1077-1085[Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Roberts, J. L.,
P. Lauzurica, and M. S. Krangel.
1997.
Developmental regulation of VDJ recombination by the core fragment of the T-cell receptor alpha enhancer.
J. Exp. Med.
185:131-140[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Salmon, P.,
O. Boyer,
P. Lores,
J. Jami, and D. Klantzmann.
1996.
Characterization of an intronless CD4 minigene expressed in mature CD4 and CD8 T cells, but not expressed in immature thymocytes.
J. Immunol.
156:1873-1879[Abstract].
|
| 50.
|
Siebenlist, U.,
D. B. Durand,
P. Bressler,
N. J. Holbrook,
C. A. Norris,
M. Kamoun,
J. A. Kant, and G. R. Crabtree.
1986.
Promoter region of interleukin-2 gene undergoes chromatin structure changes and confers inducibility on a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene during activation of T cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
6:3042-3049[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Siebenlist, U.,
L. Hennighausen,
J. Battey, and P. Leder.
1984.
Chromatin structure and protein binding in the putative regulatory region of the c-myc gene in Burkitt lymphoma.
Cell
37:381-391[Medline].
|
| 52.
|
Sleckman, B. P.,
C. G. Bardon,
R. Ferrini,
L. Davidson, and F. W. Alt.
1997.
Function of the TCR enhancer in  and  T cells.
Immunity
7:505-515[Medline].
|
| 53.
|
Tewari, R.,
N. Gillemans,
A. Harper,
M. Wijgerde,
G. Zafarana,
D. Drabek,
F. Grosveld, and S. Philipsen.
1996.
The human -globin locus control region confers an early embryonic, erythroid-specific expression pattern to a basic promoter driving the bacterial lacZ gene.
Development
122:3991-3999[Abstract].
|
| 54.
|
Townes, T. M.,
J. B. Lingrel,
H. Y. Chen,
R. L. Brinster, and R. D. Palmiter.
1985.
Erythroid-specific expression of human -globin genes in transgenic mice.
EMBO J.
4:1715-1723[Medline].
|
| 55.
|
Tuan, D. Y. H.,
W. B. Solomon,
I. M. London, and D. P. Lee.
1989.
An erythroid-specific, developmental-stage-independent enhancer far upstream of the human ` -like globin' genes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:2554-2558[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 56.
|
Walters, M. C.,
W. Magis,
S. Fiering,
J. Eidemiller,
D. Scalzo,
M. Groudine, and D. I. K. Martin.
1996.
Transcriptional enhancers act in cis to suppress position-effect variegation.
Genes Dev.
10:185-195[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 57.
|
Wildin, R. S.,
A. M. Garvin,
S. Pawar,
D. B. Lewis,
K. M. Abraham,
K. A. Forbush,
S. F. Ziegler,
J. M. Allen, and R. M. Perlmutter.
1991.
Developmental regulation of lck gene expression in T lymphocytes.
J. Exp. Med.
173:383-393[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 58.
|
Winoto, A., and D. Baltimore.
1989.
A novel, inducible and T cell-specific enhancer located at the 3' end of the T cell receptor alpha locus.
EMBO J.
8:729-733[Medline].
|
| 59.
|
Winoto, A., and D. Baltimore.
1989.
Alpha beta lineage-specific expression of the alpha T cell receptor gene by nearby silencers.
Cell
59:649-655[Medline].
|
| 60.
|
Wu, C.
1989.
Analysis of hypersensitive sites in chromatin.
Methods Enzymol.
170:269-289[Medline].
|
| 61.
|
Wutz, A.,
O. W. Smrzka,
N. Schweifer,
K. Schellander,
E. F. Wagner, and D. P. Barlow.
1997.
Imprinted expression of the Igf2r gene depends on an intronic CpG island.
Nature
389:745-749[Medline].
|
| 62.
|
Zhong, X. P., and M. S. Krangel.
1997.
An enhancer blocking element between and gene segments within the human T-cell receptor / locus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:5219-5224[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, March 1999, p. 1901-1909, Vol. 19, No. 3
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Gomos-Klein, J., Harrow, F., Alarcon, J., Ortiz, B. D.
(2007). CTCF-Independent, but Not CTCF-Dependent, Elements Significantly Contribute to TCR-{alpha} Locus Control Region Activity. J. Immunol.
179: 1088-1095
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Harr