Division of Basic Immunology, Department of
Medicine, National Jewish Medical and Research Center, Denver, Colorado
802061; Department of
Immunology2 and Cancer
Center,3 University of Colorado Health Sciences
Center, Denver, Colorado 80262; and Department of Biochemistry
and Molecular Biology, and Department of Chemistry, University of
British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3,
Canada4
Received 19 August 1998/Returned for modification 14 October
1998/Accepted 11 November 1998
Pax family transcription factors bind DNA through the paired
domain. This domain, which is comprised of two helix-turn-helix motifs
and a
-hairpin structure, is a target of mutations in congenital
disorders of mice and humans. Previously, we showed that Pax-5
(B-cell-specific activator protein) recruits proteins of the Ets
proto-oncogene family to bind a composite DNA site that is essential
for efficient transcription of the early-B-cell-specific mb-1 promoter. Here, evidence is provided for specific
interactions between Ets-1 and the amino-terminal subdomains of Pax
proteins. By tethering deletion fragments of Pax-5 to a heterologous
DNA-binding domain, we show that 73 amino acids (amino acids 12 to 84)
of its amino-terminal subdomain can recruit the ETS domain of Ets-1 to
bind the composite site. Furthermore, an amino acid (Gln22) within the
highly conserved
-hairpin motif of Pax-5 is essential for efficient
recruitment of Ets-1. The ability to recruit Ets proteins to bind DNA
is a shared property of Pax proteins, as demonstrated by cooperative
DNA binding of Ets-1 with sequences derived from the paired domains of
Pax-2 and Pax-3. The strict conservation of sequences required for
recruitment of Ets proteins suggests that Pax-Ets interactions are
important for regulating transcription in diverse tissues during
cellular differentiation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The highly conserved Pax family of
transcriptional regulators is important for the control of gene
expression during cellular differentiation and diversification in
species ranging from Drosophila to jellyfish to humans
(13). Naturally occurring mutations in mice and humans have
identified Pax proteins as important for the control of cellular
differentiation and organogenesis. For example, mutations in the
pax-1 (undulated) or pax-3
(splotch) gene result in the impaired development of the
vertebral column or neural crest cell-derived tissues, respectively, in
mutant mice (10, 15). Mutations in pax-6 genes in
mice (Small eye) cause a loss of the eye lens placode,
changes in the forebrain, and impaired pancreas function (27,
39), and mutation of the pax-6 gene in humans results
in aniridia (44). Mutations in human pax-3 genes
have been linked to Waardenburg syndrome type I (WS-I) (4, 42,
43) WS-III (28) and to craniofacial-deafness-hand syndrome (2). In other studies, the lack of Pax-5
(B-cell-specific activator protein) in pax-5
/
knockout mice caused the developmental arrest of B lymphocytes at
an early stage of differentiation and altered morphogenesis of the
midbrain (47). In Drosophila, the
eyeless mutation defined an evolutionarily conserved
requirement for this Pax-6 homolog for normal eye development, and
overexpression of the Eyeless protein directed the formation of ectopic
eyes in transgenic flies (38).
The defining feature of the Pax family is the paired domain (or paired
box), a 128-amino-acid DNA-binding motif comprising two distinct
subdomains that function together to coordinately recognize specific
DNA sequences. X-ray crystallographic analysis of the paired domain of
the Drosophila Paired protein (which regulates expression of
the even-skipped gene) identified amino-terminal and
carboxy-terminal subdomains, as well as a linker region that interacts
directly with DNA (53). The two subdomains, which do not
contact one another, are each comprised of three
-helices that
assemble into helix-turn-helix motifs typical of homeodomains and Hin
recombinase. However, side chains of the recognition helix (
3)
within the amino-terminal subdomain dock into the major groove of DNA
in a manner that is more reminiscent of the interaction of
repressor with its operator DNA. Although the carboxy-terminal subdomain was not bound to DNA in the crystal structure of the Drosophila Paired domain, it is clear that it resembles
conformationally the amino-terminal subdomain. Biochemical studies
indicate that the carboxy-terminal subdomain of other Pax proteins,
e.g., Pax-5, directly contacts DNA on other binding sites
(12). In addition to connecting the amino- and
carboxy-terminal subdomains, DNA binding is further facilitated by
residues within the linker that make significant contacts with the
phosphodiester backbone along the minor groove. DNA binding is also
assisted by a
-hairpin and type II
-turn motif in the
amino-terminal subdomain that precede the helical region. The
-hairpin is formed by two small antiparallel
-strands linked by a
type I
-turn. One of the most notable features of the crystal
structure was the novel use of the type II
-turn by Paired for
base-specific minor groove recognition and of the
-hairpin for
contacts to the sugar-phosphate backbone. A number of developmental
anomalies result from missense mutations that are in or near the
-hairpin and
-turn motifs of paired domains, suggesting their
importance for Pax protein function. In addition to protein-DNA
contacts mentioned above, side chain interactions between various parts
of the paired domain, e.g., between the
-turn motif and the linker,
were identified.
The recognition of specific DNA sequences by paired domains reflects
the presence of two functional DNA-binding motifs. In general, paired
domains recognize two half-sites separated by approximately one turn of
the DNA helix (12, 17). These observations are consistent
with DNA recognition by both of the two subdomains within the major
groove on one face of the double helix. However, other sites are
efficiently bound by paired domain polypeptides lacking the
carboxy-terminal subdomain, suggesting that Pax proteins can interact
with DNA in multiple ways (12). Another important feature of
paired domain-DNA interactions is their relatively relaxed nucleotide
sequence specificity. The various Pax proteins exhibit preferences for
binding different sets of nucleotide sequences that can be very
degenerate. In this regard, it has been estimated that a binding site
for Pax-5 occurs every 1 kb or so throughout the mouse genome
(9). To account for the regulation of specific genes by
Pax-5, other mechanisms, including interactions with partner proteins,
have been proposed to increase the specificity of Pax-5 (and other Pax
proteins) for their targets in vivo.
As one mechanism that enhances the target gene specificity of Pax
proteins, we have described ternary complexes (B-cell-specific ternary
complexes [BTCs]) comprised of Pax-5, Ets proto-oncogene family
proteins, and specific DNA (20). Pax-5 is expressed in a
restricted fashion in early B cells prior to terminal differentiation to the plasma cell stage (1). Pax-5 can recruit at least
three Ets proteins, Fli-1, Ets-1, and GABP
(together with the
ankyrin-repeat protein GABP
), to bind a functionally important
composite site in the early B-cell-specific mb-1
(immunoglobulin alpha-chain [Ig
]) promoter in vitro. A role for
this site for mb-1 transcription in vivo was directly
confirmed by mutations in either the Pax-5 or Ets binding sites that
similarly reduce mb-1 promoter function in transfected B
cells. This observation is supported by the 10-fold downregulation of
mb-1 expression in pax-5
/
knockout mice (35). The recruitment of Ets proteins by Pax-5 has a number of novel features. First, although the sequence recognized by Ets proteins in the promoter (5'CCGGAG) resembles the
consensus site for Ets-1 DNA binding (5'CCGGAA/T
[19, 26, 36,
52]), the promoter sequence is not bound detectably by most Ets proteins in the absence of Pa
ax-5. Intriguingly, the last base in the core Ets site in the
mb-1 promoter (5'CCGGAG) is also an
important DNA contact for Pax-5. Second, ternary complex assembly
requires only the paired and ETS DNA-binding domains. Third,
recruitment by Pax-5 is dependent on an aspartic acid (Asp398 in Ets-1)
that follows immediately the DNA recognition
-helix (
3) of the
ETS domain. Together, these data suggest that Pax-5 and Ets bind the mb-1 promoter in close association and are likely to
directly contact each other.
Here, we show that the
-hairpin, which is predicted by homology to
form in Pax-5, is required both for binding of mb-1 promoter DNA and for efficient recruitment of Ets proteins. Our results suggest
that the very high degree of sequence conservation of this motif in
different Pax proteins and across species reflects its functional roles
for DNA recognition and protein-protein interactions. Additional
evidence supporting this hypothesis is provided by the recruitment of
Ets-1 by Pax-2, or by amino-terminal sequences from Pax-3, which
represents a distinct subfamily of Pax proteins. Together, these
results support the hypothesis that interactions with other factors
increase the specificity of Pax DNA binding in vivo, and they implicate
Ets proteins as evolutionarily conserved partners of Pax proteins for
regulating transcription.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Model for Pax-Ets interactions.
Figure 2 was generated with
the graphic program SETOR (18) to represent (i) the nuclear
magnetic resonance (NMR)-derived structure of the murine Ets-1 ETS
domain and flanking carboxy-terminal
-helix (14, 51)
(Brookhaven Protein Data Bank [PDB] code, 1ETC) docked on idealized
B-DNA in an orientation similar to that observed in the crystal
structure of the PU.1 ETS domain-DNA complex (30) (PDB code;
1PUE) and (ii) the amino-terminal subdomain of Drosophila
Paired (53) (PDB) code, 1PDN) docked by alignment of the
mb-1 promoter and optimized Paired binding site sequences.
Plasmids and in vitro mutagenesis.
All PCR amplifications
were performed with Pfu DNA polymerase (Stratagene, La
Jolla, Calif.). For expression of human Pax-5 (hPax-5) in
Escherichia coli, plasmid pbPax-5(1-149) was constructed by
amplification of DNA encoding the first 149 amino acids of human Pax-5
from the pBLKS+-
P5 template plasmid (kindly provided by Peter
Gruss), using oligonucleotides 5'-TGGATTTAGAGAAAAATTATCCG (5' sense) and 5'-GGCGGCAAGCTTATTGGTTGGGTGGCTGCT (3'
antisense), and ligating the fragment into the blunted (Klenow
fragment) NdeI site of plasmid pET-11a (Novagen, Madison,
Wis.). DNA segments encoding other truncated hPax-5 polypeptides were
generated by using PCR amplification of pbPax5(1-149) with the 5'
sense primer described above and downstream primers as follows: 1-107,
5'-AAGCTTTCAGGGATTTTGGCGTTTATATTCAGCG; 1-93,
5'-TCAGGGTGTGGCGACCTTTGGTTTGGA; 1-89,
5'-TCACTTTGGTTTGGATCCTCCAAT; and 1-84,
5'-TCATCCAATTACCCCAGGCTTGAT. Resulting inserts were ligated
into pET-11a prepared as described above.
PCR mutagenesis was performed as described previously (20).
For Pax-5 mutants, pbPax-5(1-149) was used as the template. Fragments
were generated from two pairs of primers for each mutation, using PCR
for the Q22A construct, 5' sense primer and
5'-CCCAAGAGCATTCACTCCTCCATGTCCTG (hPax-5 Q22A, antisense),
plus 5'-GTGAATGCTCTTGGGGGGGTTTTTGTGAA (hPax-5 Q22A, sense)
and 3' antisense primer. Amplified fragments were purified and combined
in subsequent PCRs using the 5' sense and 3' antisense oligonucleotides
described above. Resulting fragments were ligated into the
NdeI site of pET-11a. All constructs were sequenced by using
an ABI PRISM Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction kit (PE
Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.).
Lymphoid enhancer factor 1 (LEF-1) high-mobility-group (HMG)
domain-Pax-5 fusion proteins were generated by amplifying the HMG
domain (amino acids 296 to 381) of murine LEF-1 (the kind gift of
Rudolf Grosschedl), using oligonucleotides
5'-TGCATATTAAGAAGCCTCTGAATGCT (LEF-1 5' sense) and
5'-TCAAAGCTTCTCTCTCTTCCTCTTCTTC. The fragment was inserted
into a pET-11a vector (in which the downstream HindIII site was destroyed by filling in and religating to make
pET-11H
) to make pET-LEF-1-HMG. A double-stranded
oligonucleotide encoding the (Gly3Ser/Thr)4
linker was assembled by annealing
5'-AGCTTGGTGGCGGTAGCGGCGGTGGCACCGGCGGTGGCAGCGGTGGCGGTACCTG) and
5'-AGCTCAGGTACCGCCACCGCTGCCACCGCCGGTGCCACCGCCGCTACCGCCACCA and ligating into the HindIII site of
pET-LEF-1-HMG. The resulting pET-LEF-1-linker construct was digested
with Asp718 and blunted for ligation with Pax-5 fragments.
Oligonucleotides used to generate Pax-5 segments to make LEF-1-Pax-5
hybrid proteins were identical to those used for preparation of the
Pax-5 truncations, except that the upstream sense primer was
5'-CAGCAGGACAGGACATGGAGGAGTG (from Thr12). All constructs
were sequenced as described above.
Plasmids with Pax-2 or Pax-3 cDNA were the generous gifts of P. Gruss.
For production of Pax-2(1-148) protein in reticulocyte lysates, a
segment encoding the paired domain was generated by PCR using primers
5' CTCACCATGGATATGCACTGCAAAGCAGA and
5'-ATCATGGGTGGAAAGGCTGCTGAACTTT along with pC31A(murine
Pax-2) DNA. The amplified Pax-2 fragment was ligated into the filled
HindIII site of pBluescript KS+ (Stratagene) to make
BSPax-2(1-148). Pax-3 and Pax-6 sequences were ligated into the
Asp718 site of pET-LEF-LK. The murine Pax-3 insert was generated by using Pax3 cDNA pBH3.2 as a template and primers 5'-CACCCCTCTTGGCCAGGGCCGAGT (Pax-3 sense) and
5'-CTACTTGGGTTTGCTGCCGCCGATGGC (Pax-3 antisense). The
resulting plasmid was termed pLEF-LK-P3. Fragments for generation of
the Q40A mutation in Pax-3 pLEF-LK-P3 were generated by using the
pLEF-LK-P3 template, Pax-3 Q40A sense primer
5'-5CACCCCTCTTGGCCAGGGCCGAGTCAACGCGCTCGGAGGAGTATTT, and the
Pax-3 antisense primer described above. The resulting fragment was
ligated into pET-LEF-LK to make pLEF-LK-P3Q40A.
BSEts-1(333-440) was made by inserting the AccI restriction
fragment including murine Ets-1 carboxy-terminal sequences from SK-c-ets-1.6 into BSEts-1(333-420) (20) linearized with
AccI.
Production of recombinant proteins.
Pax and LEF-1-Pax hybrid
proteins were overexpressed in E. coli BL21(
DE3)pLysS
(Novagen). Expression was significantly increased by including the
plasmid dnaY (21) (generously provided by Peter Love) for
coexpression of E. coli Arg tRNAs. Single colonies were picked from plates of freshly transformed bacteria and inoculated into
50-ml cultures of Luria broth supplemented with carbenicillin (250 to
500 µg/ml), chloramphenicol (34 µg/ml), and kanamycin (50 µg/ml).
Bacteria were grown at 37°C to an optical density at 600 nm of 0.4 and induced by adding isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) to 1 mM, and growth was continued for 2 h. Bacteria were harvested by centrifugation, and pellets were stored at
80°C. Pellets were resuspended in ice-cold buffer Z (25 mM HEPES [pH 7.7],
100 mM KCl, 12.5 mM MgCl2, 20% glycerol, 0.1% nonidet
P-40, 1 mM dithiothreitol) supplemented with aprotinin (2 µg/ml),
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (100 µg/ml), leupeptin (2 µg/ml), and
pepstatin A (1 µg/ml). Pellets were sonicated 10 s and
centrifuged for 20 min in a Sorvall SS34 rotor at 12,000 rpm to remove
bacterial debris. Protein concentrations of supernatants were
determined by the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.). Relative
protein expression was determined by sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis. Protein
concentrations were normalized relative to wild-type Pax-5(1-149); 1 to 5 µg of total bacterial lysate proteins was used in each binding assay.
To generate Pax-2 or Ets-1 DNA-binding domain protein, plasmid
BSPax-2(1-148) or BSEts-1(333-440) was linearized and transcribed with T7 RNA polymerase, and RNAs were purified and translated as
reported previously (20).
DNA probes and EMSA.
Annealing, labeling of DNA probes, and
electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) were performed as described
previously (20). The wild-type mb-1 promoter
probe (mb-1 probe) was assembled by using
5'-TCGAAGGGCCACTGGAGCCCATCTCCGGCACGGC and
5'-TCGAGCCGTGCCGGAGATGGGCTCCAGTGGCCCT. Oligonucleotides
comprising the various probes were as follows: mut 1 probe,
5'-TCGAAGGGCCACTGGAGCCCATCTAAGGCACGGC and
5'-TCGAGCCGTGCCTTAGATGGGCTCCAGTGGCCCT; mut 2 probe,
5'-TCGAAGGGCAAATTGAGCCCATCTCCGGCACGGC and
5'-TCGAGCCGTGCCGGAGATGGGCTCAATTTGCCCT; and G
A probe,
5' TCGAAGGGCCACTGGAGCCCATTTCCGGCACGGC and
5'-TCGAGCCGTGCCGGAAATGGGCTCCAGTGGCCCT. The S
2a probe was
assembled by using 5'-TCGAGATCAGAATTGTGAAGCGTGACCATAGAAA and
5'-TCGATTTCTATGGTCACGCTTCACAATTCTGATC. LEF-1-Pax-5-Ets
(LPE) phasing probes were made by annealing each of the following
oligonucleotides with 5'GCCGTGCCGGAGATGGGCTCCA and extending
the gap with Klenow enzyme, [
-32P]dCTP, and unlabeled
dATP, dCTP, and TTP: 5'GACACCCTTTGAAGCTTCTGGAGCCCATCTCCGGCACGGC (+1), 5'GACACCCTTTGAAGCTCTGGAGCCCATCTCCGGCACGGC (0),
5'GACACCCTTTGAAGTCTGGAGCCCATCTCCGGCACGGC (
1),
5'GACACCCTTTGAAGCTGGAGCCCATCTCCGGCACGGC (
2), and
5'GACACCCTTTGAAGTGGAGCCCATCTCCGGCACGGC (
3). The LPE (
1)
mut 1 probe was made by annealing 5'GCCGTGCCTTAGATGGGCTCCA with 5'GACACCCTTTGAAGTCTGGAGCCCATCTAAGGCACGGC and
filling in with Klenow enzyme as described for the wild-type LPE
probes. Relative levels of DNA binding were estimated by using a
Molecular Dynamics (Sunnyvale, Calif.) PhosphorImager.
 |
RESULTS |
Requirements for Pax-5-Ets-1 ternary complex assembly.
In our
previous study (20), we defined DNA sequences required for
the assembly of ternary complexes comprised of full-length Pax-5 and
Ets proteins together with mb-1 promoter DNA. Although we
identified residues in the ETS domain required for interaction with
Pax-5, we did not identify amino acids within the Pax-5 paired domain
that participate in the recruitment of Ets proteins. To begin to
address this question, we first confirmed that BTCs assembled in vitro
by using recombinant DNA-binding domains exhibit the cooperative DNA
binding observed with full-length proteins. Polypeptides comprising the
paired domain of Pax-5 (amino acids 1 to 149, synthesized in E. coli) and ETS domain of murine Ets-1 (amino acids 333 to 440, translated in vitro by using rabbit reticulocyte lysates), which
together comprise the BTC2 complex identified previously, were used in
our studies. In an EMSA with 32P-labeled probe DNA
comprising wild-type mb-1 promoter sequences, Pax-5(1-149)
bound the promoter probe in the absence of the Ets-1 ETS domain (Fig.
1B, lane 1), while ETS domain binding by
itself was detected only weakly (lane 2). When combined, the two
DNA-binding domains efficiently assembled ternary complexes that
include both polypeptides (lane 3). Assembly of the complex requires an
intact Ets core nucleotide sequence, because mutation of this sequence (5'CCGGAG to 5'CCttAG) in
the mut 1 probe prevents ternary complex formation (lanes 4 to 6).
Mutation of three bases in the mut 2 probe (lanes 7 to 9) results in
greatly reduced but detectable levels of DNA binding by Pax-5(1-149)
by itself (less than 2% of binding to the wild-type probe), supporting
the previous observation that the substitutions delete important base
contacts for this protein (as determined by methylation interference
[20]). Although Pax-5 binding to the mut 2 probe is
greatly diminished, a low level of ternary complex was observed with
the addition of Ets-1(333-440). Thus, the recruitment of Ets proteins
does not require DNA contacts for Pax-5 that are mutated in the mut 2 probe. In contrast, a single base mutation within the Ets recognition
sequence to form a consensus core sequence (CCGGAG
to CCGGAa on the antisense strand) greatly
reduces Pax-5 binding by itself (to 5% of wild-type binding [lane
10]) and allows Ets-1(333-440) to bind efficiently in the absence of
Pax-5 (increases by >100-fold [lane 11]). This finding confirms the
importance of the last base at the wild-type G position to the binding
of Pax-5 and Ets-1. Combining the two polypeptides results in a level
of ternary complex formation similar to that observed with the
wild-type promoter probe (lane 12). We conclude that, depending on the
nucleotide sequence of the labeled probe, the Pax-5 paired domain can
recruit the ETS domain of Ets-1, or in reciprocal fashion, the ETS
domain can recruit the paired domain. These data suggest that
interactions between the two proteins contribute to ternary complex
assembly.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
The Pax-5 paired domain (residues 1 to 149) and the ETS
domain of Ets-1 (residues 333 to 440) exhibit cooperative binding to
the wild type mb-1 promoter. (A) Double-stranded
oligonucleotide probe sequences used in this study. Only the sense
sequence is shown, numbered relative to +1 of the wild-type
mb-1 promoter (45). Nucleotides contacted by
Pax-5 and those contacted by Ets-1, as estimated by methylation
interference and footprinting studies (20, 24a), are
highlighted at the top. Boxed lowercase letters represent mutations.
(B) Relative DNA binding by Pax-5 and ETS DNA-binding domains. DNA
probes and inclusion of proteins are indicated at the top. wt, wild
type; TC, ternary complexes; F, free probe.
|
|
We hypothesized that Pax-5 and Ets-1 physically interact upon binding
DNA, but our results did not distinguish between various potential
mechanisms for assembling the complex. Although it is likely that Ets-1
binds the promoter site in much the same manner that Ets-1 binds
closely related nucleotide sequences (51), insufficient
information precluded making similar assumptions for Pax-5. For
example, the structural features of the Pax-5 paired domain on the
mb-1 promoter, including whether the amino-terminal or
carboxy-terminal subdomain of the paired domain is oriented toward the
adjacently bound ETS domain in the ternary complex, are not known. In
this regard, a preliminary experiment suggested that the amino-terminal
subdomain of Pax-5 is oriented toward the ETS domain (data not shown):
a mutation in the putative recognition
-helix of the
carboxy-terminal subdomain (
6) greatly decreased the binding of
Pax-5 to the wild-type promoter probe (to 1 to 2% of the wild-type
level), but levels of binding of wild-type or
6 mutant Pax-5 to the
mut 2 probe were nearly equivalent. These results suggested that the
bases changed in the mut 2 probe are recognized by the carboxy-terminal
subdomain and that the amino-terminal subdomain binds DNA nearest the
Ets recognition site.
A structural model for Pax-Ets interactions.
To make
predictions concerning the interaction of Pax-5 with Ets-1 on specific
DNA, we constructed a model using previously determined X-ray
crystallographic and NMR structures of several related proteins bound
to their cognate sites. Although structural determinations were not
available for Pax-5 itself, a crystallographic analysis of the highly
homologous paired domain (77% identity) of Drosophila
Paired bound to an optimal binding site has been reported
(53). In this crystal structure, the amino-terminal subdomain and linker of the paired domain contact an optimized site,
while the carboxy-terminal subdomain does not interact with DNA.
Preliminary data suggested that the amino-terminal subdomain of Pax-5
is oriented toward the Ets binding site (see above). Therefore, in our
model (Fig. 2), only the amino-terminal
subdomain, including the
-hairpin,
-turn, and linker, were docked
onto an ideal B-form DNA corresponding to the mb-1 sequence.
For the ETS domain, the recently determined structures of the Ets-1 and PU.1 DNA-binding domains bound to their recognition sites were readily
appropriated for the ternary complex model (14, 30, 51).
Relative positioning and orientation of the ETS domain was suggested by
the obvious relationship between the mb-1 and consensus
Ets-1 binding sites (5'CCGGAG and 5'CCGGA[A/T],
respectively). Positioning of the amino-terminal subdomain of
Paired was based on the assumption that the G common to the Ets-1 and
Pax-5 sites (5'CCGGAG) is, by analogy with
Paired DNA binding, contacted by the first residue of its DNA
recognition
-helix (
3). Small distortions of the DNA observed in
the structures of the Paired-DNA and ETS domain-DNA complexes were
neglected for this modeling.

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
A model of the Pax-5 and Ets-1 DNA-binding domains bound
to a portion of the mb-1 promoter sequence. The murine Ets-1
ETS domain and flanking carboxy-terminal -helix (red) and
amino-terminal subdomain of Drosophila Paired (blue) are
shown docked on idealized B-DNA (yellow). The guanosine common to the
Pax-5 and Ets-1 binding sites in mb-1 is indicated as Gua.
Positions of the aspartic acid (Asp) following the recognition helix in
Ets-1 and the glutamine (Gln) in the -hairpin of Pax-5 are
indicated. These residues are identified as playing a key role in
ternary complex formation. The amino termini of the two protein
fragments are identified by N.
|
|
The model suggests that, indeed, Pax and Ets proteins can bind the
mb-1 promoter in very close proximity to one another.
Furthermore, the model is consistent with previous studies indicating
that Asp398 of Ets-1 is important for Ets-Pax interactions and suggests that this amino acid may contact the paired domain. If this view is
correct, recruitment of Ets proteins would be a function of the
amino-terminal subdomain alone, with the linker of the paired domain
functioning to stabilize the conformation of the amino-terminal subdomain, or binding of the domain to DNA. As one caveat, our data
show that the carboxy-terminal subdomain is required for high-affinity
binding of the mb-1 promoter by Pax-5, and the model cannot
address the role of this subdomain. However, the model suggests that
the contribution of the carboxy-terminal subdomain in the ternary
complex may be the stabilization of Pax-5 binding through additional
contacts with DNA, not through contacts with the ETS domain.
Amino acid sequences required for Ets recruitment by Pax-5.
Our model suggests that the amino-terminal subdomain of Pax-5 should
include sequences for recruiting Ets proteins to bind DNA. To test this
hypothesis, we prepared a set of progressively truncated paired domain
polypeptides (Fig. 3A) expressed in
E. coli. To examine the relative abilities of these
polypeptides to bind DNA, we used probes derived either from the switch
region promoter of the Ig
2a heavy-chain gene (S
2a) or from the
mb-1 promoter in the absence or presence of the Ets-1 ETS
domain. With the exception of the shortest polypeptide tested (amino
acids 1 to 84), each of the truncated Pax-5 polypeptides bound the
S
2a probe in the absence of Ets-1 (Fig. 3B), suggesting that this sequence is bound by the amino-terminal subdomain and linker alone. In
contrast, relative to binding of the full-length paired domain (Fig.
3C, lane 2), a very large decrease in binding to the mb-1 promoter was observed following deletion of sequences including helices
5 and
6 (lane 4), consistent with recognition of the mb-1 promoter by both of the two subdomains. Addition of the
Ets-1 ETS domain still resulted in cooperative assembly of ternary
complexes with the truncated Pax-5 polypeptide (lane 5). Binding of
probe DNA by the ETS domain alone, which was included at a limiting concentration in this experiment, was detected due to the extended autoradiography necessary for detection of weak ternary complex formation. With further truncation, binding of the Pax-5 paired domain
in the absence of Ets-1 was not detected (lanes 6, 8, and 10). With the
addition of the ETS domain, a very low level of ternary complex was
observed for either Pax-5(1-93) or Pax-5(1-89) but not Pax-5(1-84)
(lanes 7, 9, or 11, respectively). These data suggest that Pax-5(1-89)
comprises minimal sequences for interactions with the ETS domain on the
mb-1 promoter. However, the lack of detection of ternary
complexes with Pax-5(1-84) could be due either to deletion of
sequences that are required for recruitment or to the general
impairment of DNA binding by the truncation of Pax-5.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
DNA binding by truncated Pax-5 polypeptides. (A)
Schematic representation of truncated polypeptides used for panels B
and C. The secondary structure of Pax-5 was predicted from the crystal
structure of Drosophila Paired (53). Arrows are
regions of -sheet, boxes are -helices, and 1 and 2 are
turns. The -hairpin is formed by 1- 1- 2, and the type II
turn ( -turn) is 2. Relative to the diagram, Pax-5(1-149)
includes six additional carboxy-terminal amino acids. (B) Control EMSA
showing binding of truncated Pax-5 polypeptides to the S 2a probe.
The lysate in lane pET was prepared from E. coli transformed
with empty pET-11a vector. The gel was exposed to X-ray film for
15 h. F, free probe. (C) EMSA showing binding of truncated Pax-5
polypeptides to the mb-1 probe with or without added Ets-1 ETS domain.
The concentration of Pax-5(1-149) used in lanes 2 and 3 is
approximately one-fourth that of other Pax-5 polypeptides used in this
experiment. Binding of the Ets-1 ETS domain by itself was detected due
to the extended period of autoradiography (3 days) necessary for
detection of weak ternary complex formation. Lane pET is as in panel B. TC, ternary complexes; F, free probe.
|
|
As shown in Fig. 3, our studies of Pax-5-Ets interactions were
dependent on the detection of DNA binding. To further address requirements for Pax-5-Ets interactions, we sought to reduce the dependence of our studies on the affinity of Pax-5 for DNA. To achieve
this end, we tethered the amino-terminal subdomain of Pax-5 to a
heterologous DNA-binding domain derived from LEF-1, which encodes an
HMG domain protein that binds as a monomer to a short nucleotide
sequence with high affinity (KD
1 nM)
(22). The HMG domain (85 amino acids) was placed amino
terminal to Pax-5 in the hybrid proteins because the crystallographic
structure of Paired suggested that its amino terminus (and therefore
that of Pax-5) points back toward sequences recognized by its
carboxy-terminal subdomain (53). With this configuration, we
reasoned that replacement of sequences recognized by the
carboxy-terminal subdomain of Pax-5 with a LEF-1 binding site would
allow for simultaneous DNA binding by both domains of a LEF-1-Pax-5
hybrid protein. Moreover, this configuration is predicted to maintain
the orientation of Pax sequences in the hybrid protein relative to an
ETS domain bound at the adjacent Ets binding site, which should allow
for progressive carboxy-terminal deletions in paired domain sequences
without otherwise changing the hybrid polypeptides. A linker consisting of four repeats of Gly3Ser/Thr was inserted between LEF-1
and Pax-5 sequences to act as a flexible tether. As a potential
complication to these experiments, it has been reported that LEF-1
induces a very sharp bend in bound DNA (23, 33). However,
effects of the bend upon an LEF-1-Pax-5-Ets ternary complex should be minimal, because the interaction between Pax and Ets sequences would
take place entirely on one side of the DNA bend.
To examine DNA binding by LEF-1-Pax-5 hybrid proteins, we used EMSA
and five probes (LEF-1-Pax-Ets or LPE probes) that vary the position
of the LEF-1 binding site through one-half turn of the double helix
relative to the downstream Pax-5 and Ets recognition sequences (Fig.
4A). A hybrid protein comprising the HMG
domain, linker, and Pax-5(12-84) was synthesized in E. coli
and demonstrated to have the appropriate molecular mass when analyzed
by SDS-PAGE (data not shown). Amino acids 1 to 11, which precede sheet
1, are not included in the paired domain and are dispensable for DNA
binding (12, 51a). Probe DNAs were labeled with
32P and incubated with LEF-1-Pax-5(12-84) before analysis
by EMSA. By itself, the hybrid protein bound each of the five helically phased LPE probes (Fig. 4B, lanes 2, 5, 8, 11, and 14). Variations in
levels of binding by the five probes were observed, suggesting that
optimal spacing between the LEF-1 and Pax-5 recognition sites in a
subset of the probes allows for simultaneous DNA contacts by both the
LEF-1 HMG and Pax-5 domains. This ability would suggest that paired
domain sequences in the hybrid protein can dock with DNA in a manner
that approximates complexes assembled with the intact paired domain. In
support of this conclusion, the LEF-1-Pax(12-84) polypeptide recruited
the Ets-1 ETS domain to bind three of the five LPE probes (lanes 3, 6, and 9) similarly and less well to bind probes with fewer nucleotides
between the LEF-1 and Ets binding sites (lanes 12 and 15). This result
is particularly striking because Pax-5(1-84) did not bind either the
S
2a (Fig. 3B) or mb-1 probe and was not recruited detectably by the
Ets-1 ETS domain (Fig. 3C). Similar results were obtained with a second
hybrid polypeptide, LEF-1-Pax-5(1-89) (data not shown). Our studies
suggest that Pax-5(12-84), although not sufficient for DNA binding by itself, includes minimal sequences for recruiting Ets-1 to bind the
mb-1 promoter.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
DNA binding and recruitment of the Ets-1 ETS domain by
LEF-1-Pax-5 amino-terminal subdomain hybrid polypeptides. (A) DNA
probes used in these assays. Pax-5 and Ets-1 binding sites in the
wild-type (wt) probe are highlighted as in Fig. 1A. LEF-1 recognition
sequences are circled. LPE (0) was the sequence predicted by molecular
modeling to be optimal for LEF-1-Pax-5 binding. (B) EMSA of
LEF-1-Pax-5(12-84) binding to the five LPE probes. TC, ternary
complexes; F, free probe. (C) Control experiments. EMSA of LEF-1-HMG
(residues 296 to 381 of murine LEF-1), LEF-1-linker [the HMG domain
of LEF-1 and the (Gly3Ser/Thr)4 linker], or
LEF-1-Pax-5(12-84) binding to the wild-type mb-1 or LPE ( 1) probe.
Ternary complexes are detected only with Pax-5, Ets-1, and the
wild-type mb-1 probe. F, free probe. (D) Ternary complex assembly with
the hybrid protein requires the Ets-1 binding site. EMSA was performed
with the wild-type or mut 1 (Fig. 1A) version of the LPE ( 1) probe
together with the LEF-1-Pax-5(12-84) protein and Ets-1 ETS domain.
TC, ternary complexes; F, free probe. The gels in panels B to D were
exposed to X-ray film for 12 to 15 hours.
|
|
It was important to show that recruitment of Ets-1 by LEF-1-Pax-5
hybrid proteins mimics aspects of Ets recruitment by intact Pax-5 on
the mb-1 promoter. Binding of either the HMG domain of LEF-1
or the LEF-1-linker polypeptide alone was readily detected with the LPE
(
1) probe (Fig. 4C, lanes 3 and 5). Neither of these polypeptides
recruited Ets proteins to bind the probe (lanes 4 and 6). Consistent
with experiments with Pax-5(1-84), the LEF-1-Pax-5(12-84) polypeptide did not bind detectably to the wild-type mb-1
promoter probe without or with added Ets-1 (lanes 7 and 8). Recruitment of Ets proteins by the hybrid polypeptide also requires an intact Ets
binding site in the LPE (
1) probe, as shown by the lack of Ets-1
recruitment when the Ets core sequence is mutated (Fig. 4D, lane 8),
and Asp398 in the ETS domain, which is essential for efficient ternary
complex assembly (data not shown). Therefore, Ets-1 interacts with
LEF-1-Pax-5(12-84) and with intact Pax-5 in very similar manners.
To further localize sequences in Pax-5 that are required for ternary
complex assembly, we introduced additional deletions in the Pax-5
segment of the hybrid protein and tested their binding to the LPE (
1)
probe by EMSA. An additional truncation removed five amino acids of the
linker region. The hybrid polypeptide, LEF-1-Pax-5(12-79), bound the
LPE (
1) probe but did not recruit Ets-1 detectably (data not shown).
This result is consistent with the observation that intramolecular
interactions within the amino-terminal subdomain and linker region
stabilize its overall structure (53).
The paired domain
-hairpin is a highly conserved protein-DNA and
protein-protein interaction motif.
In our previous analysis, we
showed that an aspartic acid (Asp398) carboxy terminal to the major DNA
recognition
-helix in Ets-1 (
3) is required for its recruitment
by Pax-5 (20). Our model for Pax-5-Ets-1 interactions
suggests that sequences within the paired domain nearest the aspartic
acid of Ets-1 include the
-hairpin motif (Fig. 2). Mutations in the
-hairpin and adjacent
-turn have profound effects on the function
of Pax proteins in vivo (5, 43, 48). Previously, X-ray
crystallographic analysis showed that a glutamine located within the
turn (
1) of the
-hairpin of Paired (corresponding to Gln22 of
Pax-5) interacts with one strand of the sugar-phosphate backbone of DNA
(53). In our model, this amino acid is also positioned close
to Asp398 in the Ets-1 ETS domain (Fig. 2B). Therefore, we used
oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis to convert the glutamine to
alanine in the context of the intact paired domain of Pax-5(1-149).
This substitution is not expected to affect the structure of the
-hairpin. Wild-type and Q22A polypeptides were expressed in E. coli at similar levels and were used in an EMSA with labeled DNA
probes comprising binding sites from the CD19 or
mb-1 promoter (Fig. 5). DNA
binding by the Q22A polypeptide to either the CD19 or
mb-1 probe was equivalent to binding by the wild-type
polypeptide (lanes 3 versus 2 and 7 versus 5). However, although Gln22
is not critical for DNA binding by Pax-5, the mutation decreased
recruitment of the Ets-1 ETS domain to one-fourth (determined by
phosphorimaging) of that observed with the wild-type paired domain
(lane 8 versus 6). These data indicate that Gln22 plays an important
role in the recruitment of Ets-1 by Pax-5. However, the residual
recruitment of Ets proteins observed with the Q22A mutant suggests that
other amino acids in Pax-5 may participate in Pax-5-Ets-1
interactions.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Gln22 of Pax-5 is required for efficient assembly of
ternary complexes with Ets-1. EMSA was performed with wild-type (wt) or
mutated Pax-5(1-149) polypeptide and either the CD19 or mb-1 DNA
probe, as indicated. Lysates in lanes pET were prepared from E. coli transformed with empty pET-11a vector. TC, ternary complexes;
F, free probe.
|
|
Interactions of other Pax proteins with Ets-1.
Our studies
confirmed that the
-hairpin is a likely candidate for an Ets
interaction motif. Provocatively, alignment of a large number of Pax
protein sequences shows that a stretch of five amino acids from the
-hairpin (including Gln22 of Pax-5) is absolutely conserved (Fig.
6). The comparison includes sequences of
the nine Pax proteins identified in mice and humans along with sequences from Drosophila, Caenorhabditis
elegans, Aromphioxus, ribbonworms, jellyfish, and coral
polyps. The strict conservation of the sequence and, by inference,
structure of the
-hairpin between Pax proteins of animals as
divergent as humans and jellyfish suggests that the function(s) of
these structures evolved prior to the extensive duplication and
diversification of pax genes at the Cambrian radiation of
species (3). Indeed, the sequence has been conserved as well
as or better than Pax sequences involved in recognition of the major
groove (
3).

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
The glutamine required for efficient recruitment of Ets
proteins (and four flanking amino acids) has been perfectly conserved
throughout the evolution of Pax proteins. Amino acid sequences
comprising the amino-terminal subdomains and linker regions of Pax
proteins were aligned for comparison as shown. Secondary structure of
Drosophila Paired is shown with arrows indicating
-strands, boxes indicating -helical regions, and 1 and 2
indicating turns identified in the crystal structure of Paired
(53). The -hairpin is formed by strands 1 and 2 and
the type I -turn 1, while 2 is a type II -turn. Shaded
vertical bar indicates the completely conserved region of the
-hairpin, including the glutamine residue analyzed in this report.
Sequences were derived from Homo sapiens Pax-1 (EMBL/GenBank
accession no. P15863), Pax-3 (P23760), Pax-5 (M96944), Pax-6 (M77844),
Pax-7 (Z35141), Pax-8 (L19606), and Pax-9 (S36115); Mus
musculus Pax-2 (280984) and Pax-4 (P32115); Branchiostoma
floridae (amphioxus) AmphiPax-6 (AJ223440); Halocynthia
roretzi (ascidian) Pax-37 (D84254) and HRPax-258 (AB006675);
Lineus sanguineus (ribbonworm) Ls-Pax-6 (X95594);
Acropora millepora (coral) Pax-C (AF053459); Chrysaora
quinquecirrha (sea nettle) Pax-A1 (U96195) and Pax-B (U96197);
Drosophila melanogaster Paired (P06601), Gooseberry proximal
(Gsb-p; P09083), Gooseberry distal (Gsb-d; P09082), Sparkling
(AF010256), Eyeless (X79492), Pox-meso (P23757), and Pox-neuro
(P23758); and C. elegans Pax homologs C04G2.7 (Z70718) and
F27E5.2 (Z48582) and Pax-6 homolog vab-3 (U31537). The dot in the Pax-4
sequence represents a gap in the alignment.
|
|
The high degree of sequence conservation of the
-hairpin suggests
that recruitment of Ets proteins may be a common function of the paired
domain. To address this hypothesis, we translated other Pax paired
domains in vitro, using reticulocyte lysates, and examined their
ability to bind the mb-1 probe and recruit the Ets-1 ETS domain. Of
those tested, only Pax-2(1-148) bound the probe efficiently by itself
(Fig. 7A, lane 2), and the Pax-2 paired
domain recruited Ets-1 (lane 4). This result is not surprising, considering that the sequences of the Pax-2 and Pax-5 paired domains exhibit only one and three amino acid differences between their amino-terminal and carboxy-terminal subdomains. In contrast, DNA binding by the paired domain of Pax-3 was detected only very weakly, and binding of Pax-6 was not observed (data not shown). The lack of DNA
binding by these proteins is due to their divergent DNA-binding specificities, which are significantly different from those of the
Pax-2/5/8 subfamily.

View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Recruitment of the Ets-1 ETS domain by Pax-2. (A) The
paired domain of Pax-2 (residues 1 to 148) binds the mb-1 probe and
recruits Ets-1. EMSA was performed with the mb-1 probe. Binding assays
were performed with rabbit reticulocyte lysates programmed with
synthetic RNA encoding the Pax-2 paired or Ets-1 ETS domain or with a
translation without added RNA (No RNA). Both, Pax-2 and Ets-1 were both
added after their separate translation; TC, ternary complexes; F, free
probe.
|
|
We have shown that polypeptides comprising the amino-terminal subdomain
of Pax-5 can recruit Ets proteins to bind the mb-1 promoter
when tethered to a heterologous DNA-binding domain. As observed with
the amino-terminal subdomain of Pax-5, the lack of detectable binding
of the paired domains of Pax-3 or Pax-6 to the mb-1 promoter
is likely due to inadequate contacts with the DNA probe. Therefore, we
reasoned that the amino-terminal subdomains of these proteins may
functionally substitute for Pax-5 sequences in the context of
LEF-1-Pax-5 hybrid polypeptides. We tethered the amino-terminal
subdomains of Pax-3(31-107) to the LEF-1-linker polypeptide and
expressed the hybrid protein in E. coli. As observed with
LEF-1-Pax-5(12-84), the hybrid polypeptides bound the LPE(
1) probe
(Fig. 8, lanes 1 and 2). Moreover, the hybrid polypeptide recruited the Ets-1 ETS domain to bind the probe
(lanes 2). Recruitment of ETS domains by LEF-1-Pax-3(31-107) likely
involved the same mechanism as observed for Pax-5, because binding was
similarly decreased by a Gln-to-Ala mutation (Q40A; homologous to Q22A
in Pax-5). We also observed recruitment of the ETS domain by the
amino-terminal subdomain of Pax-6 (data not shown). We conclude that
recruitment of Ets proteins is a capability of many, if not all, Pax
proteins, and is due to the
-hairpin.

View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
DNA binding and recruitment of Ets-1 by
LEF-1-Pax-3(31-107) fusion protein. EMSA was performed with the LPE
( 1) probe. Faster-migrating bands are likely due to limited
proteolysis during preparation of proteins from E. coli. TC,
ternary complexes; F, free probe; wt, wild type.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Partnerships between transcription factors form the basis of the
combinatorial control of gene expression in eukaryotic cells (reviewed
in reference 24). Cooperative interactions between factors enhance the specificity of DNA binding by increasing their relative affinity for sites comprised of recognition sequences for each
partner. Two major types of protein-protein interactions contribute to
combinatorial gene regulation. First, the assembly of stably associated
multimers in solution (e.g., to form homo- or heterodimers) is a common
mechanism that increases the affinity and specificity of proteins that
do not fold and/or bind DNA as monomers (e.g., assembly of AP-1 by Fos
and Jun). In the other general case, partner transcription factors that
recognize adjacent promoter sites assemble into multimeric complexes
via protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions. Assembly of these
complexes may also be dependent on protein-induced changes in the
conformation of DNA, e.g., by bending. Interactions with partner
proteins are often obligatory for specific binding to one set of sites
but not to others. Although interactions of this type are quite common, the structural basis for complex formation of this type has only been
determined for a small number of examples (e.g., AP-1-NFAT [11]). Therefore, it is significant that our studies
identify specific amino acids involved in the interaction of Pax-5 and Ets-1 and thereby support the basic aspects of the model presented in
Fig. 2. Further confirmation of this model will require direct structural studies of the Pax-5-Ets-1-DNA ternary complex by NMR spectroscopic or X-ray crystallographic methods.
Our studies increase the number of possible combinations of Pax and Ets
proteins. Previously, we showed that Pax-5 can assemble complexes in
vitro with at least five Ets proteins (20). In this report,
we show that in addition to Pax-5, other Pax proteins including Pax-2
and Pax-3 (and tentatively Pax-6) can recruit Ets proteins to bind DNA
through interactions with the
-hairpin of their paired domains.
Because all Pax proteins have the potential to form similar
-hairpins, we hypothesize that interactions between Pax and Ets
proteins are a common function that contributes to the combinatorial
regulation of gene expression in organisms that express these factors.
Studies suggest that interactions with Ets, and potentially other
proteins, are an important feature of Pax functions in vivo. Mutation
of either the Pax-5 or Ets binding sites in the mb-1 promoter results in a similar decrease in promoter function in transfected mb-1-expressing cells (20). In
support of these data, targeted deletion of genes encoding Pax-5 in
mice resulted in the reduction of mb-1 expression to 1/10 of
that of wild-type mice (35). Moreover, in an elegant study,
pax-5
/
pre-B cells were expanded ex vivo
with interleukin-7 and infected with a retrovirus for expression of a
Pax-5-estrogen receptor hybrid protein (34). Upon treatment
with 17-
-estradiol, the cells upregulated expression of the
CD19, N-myc, mb-1, and
LEF-1 genes. Intriguingly, the transcriptional activation
domain of Pax-5 was not required for the upregulation of
mb-1 transcription. The authors concluded that the role of
Pax-5 for mb-1 activation likely involves its ability to
recruit partner proteins to bind the mb-1 promoter, which in
turn leads to promoter activation. The activation domain was also not
required for upregulation of the LEF-1 gene.
Requirements for ternary complex assembly.
Our studies
revealed new information concerning DNA binding by Pax-5. Pax-5
exhibits multiple modes of DNA binding on different nucleotide
sequences. A number of sites, including those in the Ig S
2a and I
promoters, as well as a site identified in the p53 gene, are
bound equally well by the intact paired domain of Pax-5 or a truncated
polypeptide that lacks the putative recognition
-helix (
6) of the
carboxy-terminal subdomain (this study and reference
51a). In contrast, both subdomains of the paired
domain are required to bind other sites, including those in the sea
urchin histone H2A-2.2 and murine mb-1 promoters as well as
the murine Ig 3' C
enhancer (12, 51a). Truncation of
Pax-5 to amino acids 1 to 107 resulted in nearly
2-orders-of-magnitude-lower binding to the wild-type mb-1
promoter site. Similar results were obtained for the binding of the
intact paired domain to the mut 2 probe, which includes mutations in
putative recognition sequences for the carboxy-terminal subdomain.
Evidence was also obtained for a role for the linker region in binding
the mb-1 probe, because significantly lower binding was obtained with
truncated polypeptides that lacked this region.
Although we cannot rule out a role for the carboxy-terminal subdomain
of Pax-5 for recruitment of Ets-1, this recruitment appears to be
largely a function of its amino-terminal subdomain. Amino acids 12 to
84 of Pax-5 can recruit the ETS domain, but only when tethered to a
heterologous DNA-binding domain bound to DNA. Ternary complexes were
not detected when additional amino acids of the linker region were
deleted. These data can be interpreted in two ways. Amino acids of the
linker region may be involved directly in interactions with Ets
proteins; however, our model suggests that the linker is on the
opposite side of the paired domain relative to DNA-bound Ets-1. It is
more likely that the truncation to amino acid 79 removes amino acids
that contact DNA or contribute to the structure of the paired domain
such that its affinity for DNA and/or Ets-1 is severely reduced. In the Paired-DNA structure, amino acids within the linker region interact with the DNA backbone and make intramolecular contacts with residues within helix
1 and near the type II
-turn. These contacts may be
important for folding of the
-hairpin and
-turn and/or their positioning relative to the minor groove of DNA (53).
Physical studies of isolated paired domain polypeptides have shown that they are largely structureless in solution in the absence of DNA (21a) and assume a more structured conformation on DNA
(16). In the absence of the linker, it is plausible that the
amino-terminal subdomain of Pax-5 will not assume an appropriate
conformation for binding DNA and/or for interaction with Ets proteins.
A key amino acid for Ets-1 recruitment is an invariant glutamine
residue present in the
-hairpin of all paired domains (Fig. 6). In
our model for the ternary complex, this residue is near the region of
the ETS domain that comprises the recognition helix and Asp398,
suggesting that it plays a direct role in interactions between these
two proteins. However, we cannot exclude an indirect structural role
for this residue in ternary complex formation. In the Paired-DNA
structure, Gln7 of Paired contacts a phosphate of DNA (53).
By analogy with Paired, Gln22 of Pax-5 also is likely to lie near DNA
in Pax-5-mb-1 promoter complexes and could contact it
directly. The observation that Q22A does not alter the affinity of
Pax-5 for the mb-1 promoter suggests that this contact, if
present, does not contribute significantly to the stability of the
Pax-5-DNA complex. This is in agreement with the Paired-DNA
structure, which suggests that contacts between the glutamine and a DNA
phosphate are likely to be weak and may be dispensable for DNA binding.
Mutation of Gln22 to alanine reduces but does not eliminate detection
of ternary complexes, indicating that additional contacts between the
proteins contribute to ternary complex assembly. The two amino acids
required for Pax-5-Ets-1 interactions do not have reciprocal
functions, because Pax-5 Q22D did not recruit Ets-1 D398Q to bind DNA
(51a). Further structural and biochemical studies will be
required to define the precise mechanism for the assembly of the
Pax-5-Ets-1 ternary complex.
Interaction with Pax-5 somehow overcomes obstacles to Ets-1 DNA binding
by stabilizing both proteins in the ternary complex (25a).
First, interaction with Pax-5 allows for the binding of Ets-1 to a
suboptimal recognition sequence (5'CCGGAG). Second, as
reported previously, autoinhibitory sequences flanking either side of
the ETS domain of Ets-1 further decrease its affinity for DNA (25,
31, 36, 49). The fragment of Ets-1 used in this study (amino
acids 333 to 440) exhibits high-affinity DNA binding (to most Ets
binding sites) due to the absence of inhibitory sequences
amino-terminal to the ETS domain (29, 37, 40). Interactions
between Pax-5 and Ets proteins requires Asp398 of the ETS domain
(20), which is immediately carboxy terminal to its major
recognition
-helix (
3). Recently, we determined that either
aspartic acid or glutamic acid at this key position can support ternary
complex assembly with Pax-5 (19a). We cannot predict the
consequences of ternary complex formation on the inhibitory domains but
note that the fourth helix of Ets-1(333-440), which corresponds to the
carboxy-terminal inhibitory sequence, is positioned adjacent the Pax-5
paired domain in our model (Fig. 2). This raises the intriguing
possibility that formation of the Pax-5-Ets-1 ternary complex leads to
derepression of Ets-1 DNA binding by protein-protein interactions with
residues within its amino- or carboxy-terminal inhibitory domains.
Interactions with other proteins on specific DNA sequences are common
among Ets proteins (reviewed in reference 24). The consequences of Ets-1 interactions with Pax-5 include enhanced specificity and stabilization of DNA binding. A well-characterized example of a ternary complex involving Ets proteins is that of GABP
,
which interacts with the ankyrin repeats of GABP
via sequences carboxy-terminal to its ETS domain (7). Interestingly, Pax-5 can assemble complexes with GABP
and GABP
simultaneously
(20), suggesting the presence of two protein-protein
interfaces in the GABP
ETS domain. Other Ets proteins possess
protein-protein interaction motifs outside their ETS domains. For
example, the Ets protein PU.1 recruits the PU.1 interaction partner
protein to bind a composite site through a single phosphorylated serine
residue that is amino terminal to its ETS domain (8). In Ets
proteins of the ternary complex factor subfamily, a specialized
-helical region has evolved for cooperative interactions with the
MADS domain protein serum response factor (32). The
adaptation of different mechanisms for protein-protein interactions
reflects the structural diversity of partners for Ets proteins, e.g.,
of paired, ankyrin repeat, interferon response factor, or MADS domain proteins.
Importance of the
-hairpin motif.
Evidence for the
functional importance of sequences in and around the conserved
-hairpin motif has been gathered from congenital diseases that
affect mice and humans. A number of mutations in the mouse Pax-3 locus
have been linked to the splotch phenotype, which is
characterized by defects in neural crest cell migration and closure of
the neural tube. One allele of splotch, termed splotch-delayed (Spd), presents a less severe
phenotype due to a glycine-to-arginine substitution (Gly9 in Fig. 6)
within the
-hairpin (48). Analysis of DNA binding by
Pax-3 (Spd) showed that the mutated polypeptide binds a
site in the Drosophila even-skipped promoter only 1/17 as
well as does wild-type Pax-3 (46). In humans, autosomal
dominant mutations in pax-3 genes have been linked to
disorders that exhibit similarities with splotch. WS-I
typically presents piebald-like abnormalities of the skin and hair,
pigmentary anomalies of the iris, displacement of the inner canthi of
the eyes (dystopia canthorum), and sensorineural deafness due to
defects of neural crest-derived tissues (reviewed in reference
41). pax-3 mutations in WS-I include
missense substitutions, small in-frame deletions, and nonsense,
frameshift, and splice junction mutations. In two groups of WS-I
patients, phenylalanine (Phe12 in Fig. 6)-to-leucine or proline (Pro17
in Fig. 6)-to-leucine mutations were identified within or just past the
second
-turn (4, 43). In other patients, mutation of an
asparagine (Asn14 in Fig. 6) to histidine in the
-hairpin was
detected in individuals diagnosed with the related Klein-Waardenburg
syndrome (WS-III) (28). Mutation of the same amino acid in
Pax-3 to lysine was identified as the probable cause of
craniofacial-deafness-hand syndrome (2), suggesting that
different amino acids (histidine versus lysine) at a single position
result in distinct phenotypes. In mice, the undulated
mutation results in distortions of the vertebral column and sternum due
to a glycine (Gly15 in Fig. 6)-to-serine mutation that occurs at the
end of the type II
-turn in Pax-1 (5). It is unclear how
these mutations affect the expression of Pax-regulated genes, but it
has been suggested that DNA binding affinity and specificity are likely
to be perturbed, similar to data obtained with the Pax-3
(Spd) protein.
In conclusion, we speculate that pressures to maintain the
-hairpin
and
-turn sequences may have included a requirement(s) for
functional interactions with Ets proteins, which have been detected in
a similar spectrum of species (reviewed in reference 24). It is interesting that the ability to recruit
Ets proteins has been conserved, even though the various Pax proteins
(e.g., Pax-2/5 versus Pax-3) have diversified to recognize different sets of nucleotide sequences. Although evidence has accumulated for at
least a limited role for Pax-Ets complexes in vivo, the question arises
as to whether any of the phenotypes associated with expression of
abnormal Pax proteins result from altered interactions with Ets
proteins. In addition to the congenital disorders, overexpression of
Pax and Pax hybrid proteins resulting from chromosomal translocations has been linked to oncogenesis in multiple tissue types (reviewed in
reference 6). It is intriguing to speculate that a
role exists for Ets proteins in Pax-mediated oncogenesis, because the Ets family includes many proto-oncogenes and can activate transcription as nuclear effectors of the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway (50). Addressing these questions will be
important to determine whether Pax-Ets interactions are a point for
pharmaceutical intervention in cancer and other diseases.
We thank Larry Borish, Barbara J. Graves, Arthur
Gutierrez-Hartmann, and Robert Scheinman for helpful discussions and
comments. We thank Klaus Giese, Rudolf Grosschedl, and John Love for
supplying reagents and for helpful discussions. We are greatly indebted to Peter Gruss for supplying cDNAs encoding Pax proteins. We also thank
Julie Negri for excellent technical support, Leigh Landskroner for
illustration, Carolyn Slupsky, Nancy Wilson, and John Kappler for help
with figures, and Amy Marrs and Randal Anselment, (Molecular Resource
Center at National Jewish Medical and Research Center) for
oligonucleotide synthesis and support.
W.W. was supported by National Institutes of Health training grant
AI00048, by a generous grant from the Cancer League of Colorado, and by
funds from NJMRC. D.F. was supported by NJMRC. S.R.K.
received a University of Colorado Cancer Center Summer Student
Fellowship supported (in part) by research grants from NCI Cancer
Education grant R25 CA49981 and ACS Colorado Division, Brooks Trust.
L.N.G. was the recipient of a postdoctoral fellowship from the Jane
Coffin Childs Memorial Fund for Medical Research. L.P.M. was supported
by the National Cancer Institute of Canada with funds from the Canadian
Cancer Society. This work was supported by generous awards to J.H. from
the American Cancer Society (DB-8309) and National Institutes of Health
(R01 AI37574 and P01 AI22295) and by a grant from the Rocky Mountain
Chapter of the Arthritis Foundation.
| 1.
|
Adams, B.,
P. Dorfler,
A. Aguzzi,
Z. Kozmik,
P. Urbanek,
I. Maurer-Fogy, and M. Busslinger.
1992.
Pax-5 encodes the transcription factor BSAP and is expressed in B lymphocytes, the developing CNS, and adult testis.
Genes Dev.
6:1589-607[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Asher, J. H., Jr.,
A. Sommer,
R. Morell, and T. B. Friedman.
1996.
Missense mutation in the paired domain of PAX3 causes craniofacial-deafness-hand syndrome.
Human Mutat.
7:30-35[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Balczarek, K. A.,
Z.-C. Lai, and S. Kumar.
1997.
Evolution and functional diversification of the paired box (Pax) DNA-binding domains.
Mol. Biol. Evol.
14:829-842[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Baldwin, C. T.,
C. F. Hoth,
J. A. Amos,
E. O. daSilva, and A. Milunsky.
1992.
An exonic mutation in the HuP2 paired domain gene causes Waardenburg's syndrome.
Nature
355:637-638[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Balling, R.,
U. Deutsch, and P. Gruss.
1988.
undulated, a mutation affecting the development of the mouse skeleton, has a point mutation in the paired box of Pax-1.
Cell
55:531-535[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Barr, F. G.
1997.
Chromosomal translocations involving paired box transcription factors in human cancer.
Int. J. Biochem. Cell. Biol.
29:1449-1461[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Batchelor, A. H.,
D. E. Piper,
F. C. de la Brousse,
S. L. McKnight, and C. L. Wolberger.
1998.
The structure of GABP / : an ETS domain-ankyrin repeat heterodimer bound to DNA.
Science
279:1037-1041[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Brass, A. L.,
E. Kehrli,
C. F. Eisenbeis,
U. Storb, and H. Singh.
1996.
Pip, a lymphoid-restricted IRF, contains a regulatory domain that is important for autoinhibition and ternary complex formation with the Ets factor PU.1.
Genes Dev.
10:2335-2347[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Busslinger, M., and P. Urbánek.
1995.
The role of BSAP (Pax-5) in B-cell development.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
5:595-601[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Chalepakis, G.,
R. Fritsch,
H. Fickenscher,
U. Deutsch,
M. Goulding, and P. Gruss.
1991.
The molecular basis of the undulated/Pax-1 mutation.
Cell
66:873-884[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Chen, L.,
J. N. Glover,
P. G. Hogan,
A. Rao, and S. C. Harrison.
1998.
Structure of the DNA-binding domains from NFAT, Fos, and Jun bound specifically to DNA.
Nature
392:42-48[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Czerny, T.,
G. Schaffner, and M. Busslinger.
1993.
DNA sequence recognition by Pax proteins: bipartite structure of the paired domain and its binding site.
Genes Dev.
7:2048-2061[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Dahl, E.,
H. Koseki, and R. Balling.
1997.
Pax genes and organogenesis.
Bioessays
19:755-765[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Donaldson, L. W.,
J. M. Petersen,
B. J. Graves, and L. P. McIntosh.
1996.
Solution structure of the ETS domain from murine Ets-1: a winged helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif.
EMBO J.
15:125-134[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Epstein, D. J.,
M. Vekemans, and P. Gros.
1991.
Splotch (Sp2H), a mutation affecting development of the mouse neural tube, shows a deletion within the paired homeodomain of Pax-3.
Cell
57:767-774.
|
| 16.
|
Epstein, J. A.,
J. Cai,
T. Glaser,
L. Jepeal, and R. Maas.
1994.
Identification of a Pax paired domain recognition sequence and evidence for DNA-dependent conformational changes.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:8355-8361[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Epstein, J. A.,
T. Glaser,
J. Cai,
L. Jepeal,
D. S. Walton, and R. L. Maas.
1994.
Two independent and interactive DNA-binding subdomains of the Pax6 paired domain are regulated by alternative splicing.
Genes Dev.
8:2022-2034[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Evans, S.
1993.
SETOR: hardware lighted three-dimensional solid representation of macromolecules.
J. Mol. Graph.
11:134-138[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Fisher, R. J.,
G. Mavrothalassitis,
A. Kondoh, and T. S. Papas.
1991.
High affinity DNA-protein interactions of the cellular ETS1 protein: the determination of the ETS binding motif.
Oncogene
6:2249-2254[Medline].
|
| 19a.
| Fitzsimmons, D. Unpublished data.
|
| 20.
|
Fitzsimmons, D.,
W. Hodsdon,
W. Wheat,
S.-M. Maira,
B. Wasylyk, and J. Hagman.
1996.
Pax-5 (BSAP) recruits Ets proto-oncogene family proteins to form functional ternary complexes on a B-cell-specific promoter.
Genes Dev.
10:2198-2211[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Ford, K. G.,
A. J. Whitmarsh, and D. P. Hornby.
1994.
Overexpression and purification of eukaryotic transcription factors as glutathione-S-transferase fusions in E. coli.
Methods Mol. Biol.
30:185-197[Medline].
|
| 21a.
| Gentile, L. N., and L. P. McIntosh.
Unpublished data.
|
| 22.
|
Giese, K.,
A. Amsterdam, and R. Grosschedl.
1991.
DNA-binding properties of the HMG domain of the lymphoid-specific transcriptional regulator LEF-1.
Genes Dev.
5:2567-2578[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Giese, K.,
J. Cox, and R. Grosschedl.
1992.
The HMG domain of lymphoid enhancer factor 1 bends DNA and facilitates assembly of functional nucleoprotein structures.
Cell
69:185-195[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Graves, B. J., and J. M. Petersen.
1998.
Specificity within the ets family of transcription factors.
Adv. Cancer Res.
75:1-55[Medline].
|
| 24a.
| Hagman, J. Unpublished data.
|
| 25.
|
Hagman, J., and R. Grosschedl.
1992.
An inhibitory carboxyl-terminal domain in Ets-1 and Ets-2 mediates differential binding of ETS family factors to promoter sequences of the mb-1 gene.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:8889-8893[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25a.
| Hagman, |