Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, March 1999, p. 2251-2264, Vol. 19, No. 3
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Progesterone Inhibits Estrogen-Induced Cyclin D1
and cdk4 Nuclear Translocation, Cyclin E- and Cyclin A-cdk2 Kinase
Activation, and Cell Proliferation in Uterine Epithelial Cells
in Mice
Wei
Tong and
Jeffrey W.
Pollard*
Departments of Developmental and Molecular
Biology and Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Albert
Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461
Received 7 July 1998/Returned for modification 17 August
1998/Accepted 24 November 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
The response of the uterine epithelium to female sex steroid
hormones provides an excellent model to study cell proliferation in
vivo since both stimulation and inhibition of cell proliferation can be
studied. Thus, when administered to ovariectomized adult mice
17
-estradiol (E2) stimulates a synchronized wave of DNA synthesis and cell division in the epithelial cells, while pretreatment with progesterone (P4) completely inhibits this
E2-induced cell proliferation. Using a simple method to
isolate the uterine epithelium with high purity, we have shown that
E2 treatment induces a relocalization of cyclin D1 and, to
a lesser extent, cdk4 from the cytoplasm into the nucleus and results
in the orderly activation of cyclin E- and cyclin A-cdk2 kinases and
hyperphosphorylation of pRb and p107. P4 pretreatment did
not alter overall levels of cyclin D1, cdk4, or cdk6 nor their
associated kinase activities but instead inhibited the
E2-induced nuclear localization of cyclin D1 to below the
control level and, to a lesser extent, nuclear cdk4 levels, with a
consequent inhibition of pRb and p107 phosphorylation. In addition, it
abrogated E2-induced cyclin E-cdk2 activation by
dephosphorylation of cdk2, followed by inhibition of cyclin A
expression and consequently of cyclin A-cdk2 kinase activity and
further inhibition of phosphorylation of pRb and p107. P4 is used therapeutically to oppose the effect of E2 during
hormone replacement therapy and in the treatment of uterine
adenocarcinoma. This study showing a novel mechanism of cell cycle
inhibition by P4 may provide the basis for the development
of new antiestrogens.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Estrogen exposure is the major risk
factor in the genesis of breast and endometrial cancers
(29), with the majority of tumors initially dependent on
estrogen for their proliferation before becoming hormone independent
(4). Thus, treatment of these tumors at early stages with
antiestrogens has proven therapeutic value. In the normal uterus,
17
-estradiol (E2) synthesized at every estrus or
menstrual cycle causes the epithelial cells to undergo a wave of cell
proliferation (20). In contrast, progesterone (P4) inhibits this estrogen-induced cell proliferation and
stimulates epithelial differentiation in preparation for embryo
implantation (21). Consequently, P4 is used
therapeutically to inhibit the proliferation of estrogen-dependent
endometrial cancers and to oppose estrogen action in postmenopausal
women during hormone replacement therapy (9, 25).
The uterine cellular dynamics observed during the estrous cycle and
early pregnancy can be faithfully reproduced in adult ovariectomized
mice by administration of exogenous female sex steroid hormones. A
single injection of E2 dramatically shortens G1
in the epithelial cells with the result that they undergo a synchronized wave of cell proliferation, with DNA synthesis in essentially all the cells commencing 6 to 9 h after hormone
administration and peaking at 12 to 15 h, followed by a wave of
cell division (22, 40, 41, 56). Cells thereafter enter into
a second round of cell proliferation (40, 41).
P4 completely inhibits the E2-induced DNA
synthesis and cell proliferation and reduces the basal level of
epithelial cell proliferation to zero (13, 36). In addition,
both E2 and P4 inhibit apoptosis in the uterine epithelial cells (41, 54, 66). In contrast to its effects on
epithelial cell proliferation, P4 treatment permits the
uterine stromal cells to respond to E2 with a single round
of cell proliferation that shows kinetics similar to those of, but with
a lower amplitude than, that observed in the uterine epithelium
following E2 treatment alone (38, 39). These
hormonal actions are receptor mediated because estrogen receptor (ER)
nullizygous mice have hypoplastic uteri in response to
E2 stimulation (34) while P4's
action on both epithelial and stromal cell proliferation can be
completely blocked by the progesterone receptor (PR) antagonist RU 486 (11), and in ovariectomized PR-null mutant mice, the uterine
epithelium is hyperplastic in response to E2 and
P4 treatment (35).
Studies in which P4 was administered to ovariectomized mice
at varying times after E2 treatment indicated that it acts
within the first 3 h of G1 after E2
administration (13). P4 does not inhibit the
binding of E2 to the ER (57, 58), nor in the
mouse does it influence the uterine metabolism of E2
(8). Furthermore, P4 pretreatment does not block
the E2-induced increase in protein and rRNA synthesis; the
induction of early-response genes including c-fos,
c-myc, and Ha-ras; the expression of
cell-cycle-associated genes, such as that for ornithine decarboxylase;
or epithelial cell hypertrophy (6, 7, 12, 51), although it
does alter lipid metabolism (64). These data show that
P4 inhibits epithelial hyperplasia without affecting
hypertrophy and suggest that P4 does not interfere
generally with E2-induced signaling but specifically inhibits some event(s) in the E2-induced cell proliferation
signaling pathway.
The orderly progression through the cell cycle is regulated by the
activation of specific cyclin-dependent kinases (cdk's) that bind to
their appropriate cyclin partners. These include the cyclin D-cdk4 and
-cdk6 complexes acting in G1 and the cyclin E-cdk2 complex
acting at the G1-to-S transition. Both kinase complexes hyperphosphorylate and inactivate members of the Rb family of proteins,
with the result that the negative control over transcription factors
such as the E2Fs is released. These transcription factors promote
expression of genes required for S phase and the expression of S-phase
cyclin A, which together with its partner, cdk2, is required for
initiation and maintenance of S-phase progression (reviewed in
references 26 and 59-62).
The cdk activities are regulated positively by their assembly with
cyclins and their phosphorylation by cdk-activating kinases (CAKs)
(47) and negatively by their association with cdk inhibitors (CKIs) (59, 62). Two families of CKIs play a major role in regulating cyclin-cdk activities. One is the Ink4 family, which specifically inhibits cyclin D-cdk4 and -cdk6 activities, while the
other one, the Cip/kip family, binds to and inhibits a broad range of
cyclin-cdk complexes (42, 62).
The basic mechanisms for cell cycle regulation appear to be universal
and may also apply in E2-induced epithelial cell
proliferation. The effects of E2 and P4 have
been studied in breast cancer cells in culture. In these cases,
E2 stimulates cyclin D1 expression, cdk4 and cdk6 activity,
and cyclin E-cdk2 activity and induces hyperphosphorylation of pRb
(48, 53, 55), while P4 alone can inhibit these
events (49). However, little has been done to study hormonal
regulation of epithelial cells in vivo. Following the hormonal
treatment of ovariectomized mice, the mouse uterine epithelium can be
isolated with a high degree of purity (up to 95%) in a state suitable
for biochemical analysis (16). This, together with the
E2-induced proliferation and the P4-induced inhibition of cell proliferation, means that both "on" and
"off" switches of cell proliferation can be studied in uterine
epithelial cells in vivo. Using this system, we have shown that
E2 first stimulates the nuclear localization of cyclin D1
and cdk4 and phosphorylation of pRb and p107, followed by activation of
cyclin E- and cyclin A-cdk2-dependent kinases and hyperphosphorylation of pRb and p107. In contrast, P4 prohibited cyclin D1 and
to a lesser extent cdk4 translocation into the nucleus and abrogated E2-induced cyclin E-cdk2-associated kinase activation,
followed by inhibition of cyclin A synthesis and its associated cdk2
kinase activity and dephosphorylation of pRb and p107. The
identification of a novel mechanism of cyclin D1 regulation through
controlling its access to nuclear substrates may have significant
implication for studies of therapy designed to interfere with
estrogen-induced carcinogenesis.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Animals and treatments.
Female CD1 mice, obtained from
Charles River (Wilmington, Mass.), were maintained on 12-h light-12-h
dark cycles. Female mice containing a null mutation in the
p27Kip1 gene (30) were derived from crosses of
heterozygous founders with nullizygous male mice obtained from A. Koff
(Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y.). Mice were
ovariectomized at 10 to 12 weeks of age via a dorsal incision under
tribromoethanol (2.5% Avertin) anesthesia. After resting for 2 to 3 weeks, mice were "primed" for 2 days by subcutaneous (s.c.)
injection of 100 ng of 17
-estradiol in 0.1 ml of peanut oil 6 days
prior to the experiment. In most experiments, groups of two to five
mice were killed by cervical dislocation at different time points after one of the following treatments: (a) no treatment (control), (b) one
s.c. injection of 50 ng of E2 in 0.05 ml of peanut oil
(E2 treatment), (c) 4 days of s.c. injection of 1 mg of
P4 in 0.1 ml of peanut oil (P4 treatment), or
(d) 4 days of s.c. injections of 1 mg of P4 with one s.c.
injection of 50 ng of E2 at the same time as the last
P4 injection (P4E2 treatment). All
experiments were repeated at least three times with similar results.
Hormones and antibodies.
17
-Estradiol and progesterone
were purchased from Sigma. Rabbit polyclonal anti-p27 antibody was a
generous gift from Andrew Koff (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center). Polyclonal antibodies for cdk2 (sc-163), cdk4 (sc-260), cdk6
(sc-177), p27 (sc-528), p107 (sc-318), cyclin A (sc-597), and cyclin E
(sc-481), with their competitive peptides when available, were obtained
from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, Calif. Monoclonal antibodies for pRb (G3-245) were obtained from Pharmingen, San Diego,
Calif.; those for cyclin D1 (DCS-6, DCS-11, and Ab-3) were obtained
from Neomarkers, Fremont, Calif.; and that for proliferating cell
nuclear antigen (PCNA) (PC10) was obtained from Boehringer Mannheim.
Preparation of epithelial cell extracts.
Uteri were excised,
trimmed of fat, and slit lengthwise. Uterine luminal epithelial cells
were removed by the method of Fagg et al. (16). Briefly, two
to six uterine horns were vortexed in round-bottomed 15-ml tissue
culture tubes with five Teflon balls in 1 ml of vortexing buffer for 3 to 4 min, with intervals on ice. Homogenates were filtered through
205-µm-pore-size nylon mesh to remove residual tissues and balls, and
the tissues were washed with 1 ml of washing buffer. The lysates were
then sonicated and clarified by centrifugation. The vortexing buffer
was either 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4)-0.1 M NaCl-1 mM NaF-0.1 mM
Na3VO4-0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride-10 µg of aprotinin per ml-10 µg of leupeptin per ml-10
µg of pepstatin A per ml or 10 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.5)-0.1 M NaCl-10
mM
-glycerophosphate-1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT)-1 mM NaF-0.1 mM
Na3VO4-0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride-10 µg of aprotinin per ml-10 µg of leupeptin per ml-10
µg of pepstatin A per ml. The former was combined with a washing
buffer to constitute a final Nonidet P-40 (NP-40) immunoprecipitation
(IP) buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.25 M NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.5%
(vol/vol) NP-40, 50 mM NaF, and proteinase inhibitors as described
above. The latter was adjusted to a final Tween 20 IP buffer: 50 mM
HEPES-KOH (pH 7.5), 0.15 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 2.5 mM EGTA, 0.1%
(vol/vol) Tween 20, 10% (vol/vol) glycerol, 10 mM
-glycerophosphate, and proteinase inhibitors.
Western blot analysis and IP.
Equal amounts of protein or
cell number equivalents were separated by sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred
to Immobilon P membranes (Millipore). The membranes were blocked in
Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% (vol/vol) Tween 20 and 5% (wt/vol)
nonfat dry milk for 3 h. They were then incubated for 1 to 2 h with a dilution of the specific antibody in blocking solution and
subsequently incubated for 0.5 to 1 h with a 1:5,000 dilution of
horseradish peroxidase-linked secondary antibody (Amersham).
Immunodetection was achieved with an enhanced chemiluminescence system
(ECL; Amersham). For all the Western blots, cell lysates from the
BAC1.2F5 macrophage cell line either unstimulated or stimulated with
colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1) were used as the positive control,
and for every antibody used, titrations were performed to ensure that
detection of the specific protein was on the linear portion of the curve.
For IP, the lysates were incubated with 1 to 2 µg of antibody for 1 to 2 h on ice and then precipitated with 30 µl of 50% slurry-protein A beads (Zymed or Santa Cruz). The beads were washed three times with the IP buffer and subjected to kinase assays or boiled
in SDS sample buffer for electrophoresis.
Kinase assay.
For histone H1 phosphorylation, the protein
lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-cyclin E, anti-cyclin A, or
anti-cdk2 antibodies in NP-40 IP buffer. The beads were washed three
times in IP buffer and twice with kinase buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 7.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT). The reactions were
performed in 50 µl of kinase mix (kinase buffer containing 30 µM
ATP with 2 µg of histone H1 [Boehringer Mannheim] and 10 µCi of
[
-32P]ATP) for 30 min at 37°C. The reactions were
stopped by addition of SDS sample buffer, and the mixtures were
separated by SDS-PAGE. The gels were fixed and dried, followed by
autoradiography. Specificity was confirmed by the loss of signal when
IPs were performed in the presence of a competitive peptide.
The Rb kinase assay was performed as described by Matsushime et al.
(
43). The cells were lysed in Tween 20 IP buffer, and
total
cell extracts were precipitated with anti-cdk4 or anti-cdk6
antibodies.
The beads were washed three times with IP buffer and
twice with kinase
buffer (50 mM HEPES-KOH [pH 7.5], 10 mM MgCl
2,
1 mM DTT,
2.5 mM EGTA, 10 mM glycerophosphate, 0.1 mM
Na
3VO
4,
1 mM NaF). The kinase reaction was
started by the addition of
30 µl of Rb-kinase mix (kinase buffer with
20 µM ATP, 0.3 µg of
glutathione
S-transferase
[GST]-Rb [769; Santa Cruz] or recombinant
truncated Rb protein
[p56
Rb; amino acids 379 to 928; QED Bioscience, San Diego,
Calif.],
and 10 µCi of [

-
32P]ATP). The reaction
mixtures were incubated for 30 min at 30°C,
reactions were stopped
with SDS sample buffer, and reaction mixtures
were analyzed by SDS-PAGE
followed by
autoradiography.
Isolation of nuclear fraction from uterine epithelium.
Uterine epithelial cell lysates were extracted as described above
except for the use of sucrose vortexing buffer: 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.5),
50 mM NaCl, 0.5 M sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 0.25 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.6 mM
spermidine, and proteinase inhibitors. NP-40 was added to the
homogenates to a final concentration of 0.7% after filtration. The
lysates were vortexed vigorously for 10 s and then passed through
22-gauge needles. The nuclei were isolated by centrifugation at
800 × g for 10 min at 4°C and washed once with
sucrose vortexing buffer plus 0.7% NP-40. The nuclei were resuspended
in SDS sample buffer and prepared for Western blotting.
Immunohistochemistry.
Uteri were removed, fixed overnight in
Bouin's solution or peroxidate-lysine-2% paraformaldehyde-0.05%
glutaraldehyde (PLPG), and processed for paraffin embedding. Cross
sections (5-µm thickness) were stained for bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU)
incorporation with the cell proliferation kit from Oncogene Science or
processed by the following procedure. The sections were deparaffinized
and subjected to microwaves in 0.01 M sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0)
for 10 to 30 min (for cdk4, cdk6, p27, and cyclin D1 staining).
Nonspecific immunoglobulin binding was blocked by incubating sections
in 10% normal goat serum for 20 min. The primary antibodies were added at appropriate dilutions. The sections were washed and incubated with
biotin-conjugated secondary antibodies for 30 min, followed by
incubation with avidin DH-biotinylated horseradish peroxidase H complex
for 30 min (Vector Laboratories). Lastly, the sections were detected
with the Metal Enhanced diaminobenzidine (DAB) substrate kit (Pierce)
and counterstained with hematoxylin (Sigma), followed by Permount
mounting (Sigma). Controls included incubation with normal serum
corresponding to the antibody used and omission of the primary
antibody. In all cases, these controls were consistently negative.
 |
RESULTS |
17
-Estradiol stimulated, while progesterone inhibited, uterine
epithelial cell proliferation.
E2 treatment of
ovariectomized adult mice results in uterine luminal and glandular
epithelial cell proliferation. DNA synthesis commences about 6 h
after E2 administration and peaks at 12 to 15 h with a
consequent doubling of cell number at about 24 h (40, 41). P4 completely suppresses this
E2-induced proliferation as well as the basal rate of
epithelial cell proliferation but sensitizes the uterine stromal cells
to respond to E2 with a wave of cell proliferation
following a time course similar to those observed in the epithelium
(13, 36-39). In the present studies, in order to confirm
this cell cycle regulation and to determine the efficiency of the
hormonal regimens used in adult CD1 mice, incorporation of BrdU as an
index of DNA synthesis was measured by immunohistochemistry following a
2-h pulse in vivo. In untreated ovariectomized mice, there was a low
basal rate of DNA synthesis in the luminal and glandular epithelium
with 0 to 5% of the cells in S phase depending on the individual mouse
(Fig. 1A). Consistent with previous
results with [3H]thymidine labeling (40, 41),
immunostaining for BrdU following 15 h of E2 treatment
showed a dramatic increase in the number of BrdU-positive luminal and
glandular epithelial cells (Fig. 1A). P4 pretreatment
completely abolished this E2-induced BrdU incorporation as
well as the basal rate of DNA synthesis in the uterine epithelium (Fig.
1A). For underlying stromal cells, E2 treatment alone had
no significant effect on stromal cell proliferation, but P4
pretreatment induced about 30 to 40% of the underlying stromal cells
to enter into DNA synthesis in response to E2 (Fig. 1A).
These data confirmed the hormonally regulated switch in
E2-induced uterine proliferation in response to
P4 in this strain of mice.

View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Cell proliferation in response to E2 and
P4 treatment in the mouse uterus. Shown are the results of
immunohistochemistry studies of transverse sections of uteri from
ovariectomized mice given BrdU intraperitoneally 2 h before
killing and 15 h after the following hormone treatments: control
(no treatment), 50 ng of E2 (E2 15hrs), 1 mg of
P4 for 4 days (P4), and 1 mg of P4
for 4 days and 50 ng of E2 on the fourth day
(P4E2 15hrs). (A) Bouin's fixed uteri
immunostained for BrdU; (B) PLPG-fixed uteri immunostained for PCNA. In
the immunohistochemistry studies, the figures shown are representative
of five mice analyzed per group (magnification, ×400).
|
|
The expression of PCNA was also analyzed by immunostaining. PCNA is a
component of DNA polymerase

, which is required for
entry into S
phase, and its nuclear localization is used as a
marker for DNA
replication (
27). Consistent with the BrdU labeling,
strong
PCNA nuclear staining involving over 90% of the cells was
detected at
15 h after E
2 administration. P
4
pretreatment completely
prevented this E
2-induced PCNA
nuclear localization in epithelial
cells but greatly increased its
nuclear localization in stromal
cells (Fig.
1B). In both
E
2- and P
4E
2-treated uteri, a
higher
percentage of cells were positive for PCNA staining than for
BrdU
staining. This may be due to the fact that the nuclear
accumulation
of PCNA begins in G
1 and is cumulative
throughout S phase, while
BrdU staining is a result of a short period
of incorporation during
S
phase.
Progesterone inhibited 17
-estradiol-induced pRb and p107
hyperphosphorylation and differentially regulated their cellular
localization.
Central to the regulation of the
G1-to-S-phase transition are the pocket proteins, pRb,
p107, and p130. The hypophosphorylated forms of these proteins are
potent inhibitors of E2F-mediated transcriptional transactivation and
S-phase entry (60). To explore functional roles of pocket
proteins in P4-mediated inhibition of DNA synthesis in
uterine epithelial cells, we determined the phosphorylation status of
these proteins in epithelial cells following sex steroid hormone
treatment. The uterine epithelial cells were isolated as described in
Materials and Methods. This method has been extensively characterized
elsewhere (6, 12a, 16, 64) and gives a highly enriched (up
to 95%) epithelial fraction with minimal contamination by stromal
cells. The same cell number equivalents of protein were processed for
Western blot analysis. E2 induced gradual
hyperphosphorylation of pRb and p107 detectable within 4 h of
treatment as was shown by a slower-migrating band on the SDS-PAGE gel,
with intense phosphorylation being detected at 8 to 12 h after
treatment, coincident with entry into S phase (Fig. 2A). Pretreatment with P4
abolished the hyperphosphorylation of pRb and p107 in response to
E2 (Fig. 2A). The protein levels of pRb and p107 were also
significantly increased at 8 to 12 h following E2
treatment, while their concentration remained low after P4 pretreatment, with the reduction being greatest for p107 levels. Analysis of p130 phosphorylation by Western blotting with anti-p130 antibodies (sc-317; Santa Cruz) failed to detect any specific changes
in either the concentration or the phosphorylation state of this
protein (data not shown).

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Phosphorylation status and localization of pRb and p107
following E2 or P4E2 treatment. (A)
Uterine epithelial lysates from the same numbers of cells were prepared
from control (C) mice at the indicated times after E2 or
P4E2 treatment and analyzed for pRb (top) and
p107 (bottom) proteins by Western blotting. The hypophosphorylated
(pRb) and hyperphosphorylated (ppRb) bands are indicated, as are p107
and its phosphorylated form (pp107). (B) Immunohistochemical
localization of p107 following 15 h of E2 and
P4E2 treatment. Note the strong nuclear
localization following E2 treatment (magnification, ca.
×900). (C) Western blot showing nuclear localization of pRb
preferentially in the epithelial nuclear fraction from
P4E2 at 15 h (PE15) compared to the fraction
from E2 at 15 h (E15) and that of p107 preferentially in
the nuclear fraction from E2 at 15 h compared to the
fraction from P4E2 at 15 h. PCNA
immunodetection acts as a control for the E2 effect.
|
|
In order to determine the cellular localization of these pocket
proteins, their distribution 15 h after treatment was determined
by Western blotting and immunohistochemistry for p107 and, as
our
anti-pRb antibodies do not function in immunohistochemical
applications, by Western blotting of a nuclear fraction for pRb.
Following E
2 treatment, hyperphosphorylated p107 was
largely nucleus
associated, but even given its lower concentration in
the P
4E
2-treated
epithelium, p107 appeared to
be largely retained in the cytoplasm
following this hormone treatment
(Fig.
2B and C). In contrast,
the hypophosphorylated form of pRb was
nucleus associated following
P
4E
2 treatment,
while this form is significantly lower in concentration
in the nuclei
of E
2-treated luminal epithelial cells (Fig.
2C).
The
absence of the hyperphosphorylated forms in these preparations
is due
to the well-documented leaching of these forms from the
nuclei during
isolation (
44,
45) and is entirely consistent
with the
E
2-induced phosphorylation status of pRb. In these
experiments,
PCNA acts as a control for the nuclear fraction, since it
is found
predominantly in the nucleus following E
2 treatment.
Progesterone and 17
-estradiol differentially regulated the
expression and localization of cyclins and CKIs.
Phosphorylation of pRb and p107 is known to be driven by cdk's.
We next characterized the changes in the cellular content of cyclin D1,
cyclin E, and cyclin A proteins following E2 or P4E2 treatment.
In these epithelial cells, of the three different cyclins D, cyclin D2
was not detected and D3 was found only at very low
and unchanging
concentrations, but cyclin D1 was readily detected.
Over five
independent experiments, there was no significant change
in cyclin D1
protein concentration in total cell lysates of uterine
epithelial cells
following E
2 administration over the first 8
h with
only a very slight increase of ~70% at 12 h, compared to
untreated ovariectomized control mice (Fig.
3A). In
the P
4-treated
uterine epithelium, the cyclin D1
concentration also does not
change over this time course following
E
2 treatment (Fig.
3A).
Given the importance of cyclin D1
in cell cycle regulation and
the fairly small magnitude of its change
together with the absence
of effect by P
4, we further
explored its regulation by determining
its subcellular localization by
immunohistochemistry with anti-cyclin
D1 antibodies following the
different hormonal treatments (Fig.
3B). Cyclin D1 protein is
predominantly, although not exclusively,
cytoplasmic in the epithelium
of untreated control mice (Fig.
3B). However, E
2 induced a
nuclear accumulation of cyclin D1 by
4 h after treatment (early
G
1 phase), and the signal in the cytoplasm
was
proportionately reduced (Fig.
3B and C). By 15 h (S phase),
cyclin
D1 had largely left the nucleus and appeared dispersed
again in the
cytoplasm (Fig.
3B). In a kinetic study with immunohistochemistry,
cyclin D1 nuclear accumulation was apparent by 2 h and reached
a
plateau between 4 and 8 h after E
2 treatment followed
by a progressive
loss until 15 h (data not shown). P
4
completely inhibited this
nuclear localization of cyclin D1 in early
G
1, and cyclin D1 proteins
remained in the cytoplasm
throughout the G
1-S phase (Fig.
3B and
C). Interestingly,
E
2 also induced cyclin D1 nuclear accumulation
in stromal
cells pretreated with P
4 (Fig.
3C).



View larger version (197K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Levels and localization of cyclin D1 in mouse uterus
influenced by E2 and P4. (A) Western blotting
of cyclin D1 with equivalent amounts of protein from total epithelial
cell lysates with the DCS-6 mouse monoclonal anti-cyclin D1 antibody.
The histogram indicates densitometric determination of cyclin D1
expression for four independent determinations (means ± standard
errors of the means) (lane B, BAC1.2F5 cell lysates; lane C, untreated
control epithelial cell lysates). (B) Localization of cyclin D1
determined by immunohistochemistry of transverse sections of uteri from
ovariectomized mice after the following hormone treatments: control (no
treatment), 50 ng of E2 (E2 4hrs), 50 ng of
E2 (E2 15hrs); 1 mg of P4 for 4 days (P4), 1 mg of P4 for 4 days and 50 ng of
E2 on the fourth day (P4E2 4hrs),
and the treatment designated P4E2 15hrs.
(magnification, ×400). (C) Immunohistochemistry of cyclin D1 in
transverse sections of mouse uteri after the treatments designated
E2 4hrs and P4E2 4hrs
(magnification, ca. ×800). The lower portion shows concentrations of
cyclin D1 in the nuclear fraction of the epithelial cells determined by
Western blotting with the Ab-3 rabbit polyclonal anti-cyclin D1
antibody. It should be noted that this polyclonal antibody recognizes
the upper D1 band with greater sensitivity than that of the mouse
monoclonal antibody used in panel A. As loading controls, the
expression levels of lamins A and C (constitutively expressed) are
shown. (BAC1 , BAC1.2F5 cells without CSF-1 stimulation; BAC1 +,
BAC1.2F5 cells 6 h after CSF-1 stimulation).
|
|
The nuclear translocation of cyclin D1 at 4 h following
E
2 treatment was also demonstrated by Western blotting with
a nuclear
fraction isolated from uterine epithelial cells (Fig.
3C).
The
cyclin D1 level in the nuclear fraction was significantly increased
4 h following E
2 treatment, while pretreatment with
P
4 completely
inhibited this nuclear accumulation (Fig.
3C), consistent with
the immunohistochemistry also shown in Fig.
3C.
The expression
of nuclear lamins A and C was the same under all
hormonal treatments
and acted as a loading control in these Western
blotting experiments
(Fig.
3C). In BAC1.2F5, a macrophage cell line
(
46), from which
the cyclin D1 cDNA was originally isolated
(
43), CSF-1 dramatically
stimulates cyclin D1 protein
expression in total cell lysates.
These lysates from unstimulated and
CSF-1-stimulated BAC1.2F5
cells were used as a positive control for the
cyclin D1 antibodies
and our ability to detect cell-cycle-associated
changes in cyclin
D1 concentration (Fig.
3A and C) as well as for other
cyclins
and cdk's (data not
shown).
Cyclin E protein accumulation in the total cell lysates of uterine
epithelial cells was gradually induced by E
2 (Fig.
4A).
It was significantly increased
twofold at 9 h after treatment,
and this increase continued until
12 h (Fig.
4A). Cyclin E levels
remained relatively constant,
perhaps even showing a small decline,
throughout G
1-S phase
following P
4E
2 administration (Fig.
4A).


View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
E2 and P4 effects on the levels
of cyclin E and cyclin A in mouse uterine epithelial cells. (A and B)
Uterine epithelial cell extracts, prepared at the indicated times, were
analyzed for cyclin E (A) and cyclin A (B) protein expression by
Western blotting. Lanes C, epithelial cell lysates from untreated
control mice. Relative values are shown for three to five
determinations per time point in the bar figures underneath (means ± standard errors of the means). (C) Immunohistochemistry with
anti-cyclin A antibodies of uterine transverse sections from
ovariectomized mice after the hormone treatments, as described for Fig.
1 (magnification, ×400).
|
|
In contrast to these small effects on cyclin D1 and E concentrations,
cyclin A protein accumulation in the epithelial cells
was induced
fourfold at 9 h after E
2 treatment, followed by an
acute increase to 13-fold at 12 to 15 h. P
4 completely
abrogated
this E
2 induction of cyclin A such that it was
barely detected
in the uterine epithelium (Fig.
4B). This result was
confirmed
by immunohistochemical staining of transverse sections of
uteri
with anti-cyclin A antibodies (Fig.
4C). In untreated control
uteri, cyclin A protein levels in the cytoplasm of the epithelial
cells
remained proportional to the low level of basal cell proliferation.
Fifteen hours following E
2 treatment, cyclin A protein
accumulated
at a high concentration in the nucleus of almost all
epithelial
cells and was also significantly increased in the cytoplasm
of
these cells (Fig.
4C). P
4 treatment resulted in very
little cyclin
A expression being detected, with the protein being
retained in
the cytoplasm of the epithelial cells. Interestingly,
P
4 pretreatment
caused the accumulation of cyclin A in the
nuclei of a proportion
of the underlying stromal cells following
E
2 treatment, suggesting
a similar involvement of cyclin A
in the proliferation of these
cells (Fig.
4C). The correlation of the
Western blot results and
immunohistochemical results of cyclin A
expression confirmed the
high purity of the uterine epithelial cell
isolation.
The cyclin-cdk complexes are subject to inhibition by the binding of
various CKIs. The expression levels of p21
Cip/Waf1,
p57
Kip2, and p15
Ink4b, if present, are below
the level of detection with currently
available antibodies. The
expression of p16
Ink4a, p18
Ink4c, and
p19
Ink4d is also minimal and shows little change under
different hormone
treatments (data not shown). However,
p27
Kip1 is expressed at high levels in uterine epithelial
cells (Fig.
5A), suggesting that
p27
Kip1 could be the major CKI involved in cell cycle
control in the
uterus. Western blot analysis showed that E
2
treatment resulted
in a reduction of about 50% of the
p27
Kip1 level in uterine epithelial cells in both
E
2 and P
4E
2 treatments
(Fig.
5A and
B). Similar results could be shown by immunohistochemistry
with a
rather greater reduction in signal following
P
4E
2 treatment
(Fig.
5C). Thus,
p27
Kip1 levels seem to be hormonally regulated, either
directly or indirectly,
but the reduced level is not correlated with
S-phase progression
(see below).

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Levels and localization of p27Kip1 in the
mouse uterus influenced by E2 and P4. (A)
Western blotting of uterine epithelial cell lysates at different time
points following E2 and P4E2
treatments with anti-p27 antibodies. Lane C, epithelial cell lysates
from untreated control mice. (B) Densitometric quantitation of
p27Kip1 concentrations; three to five independent
determinations per time point (means ± standard errors of the
means). (C) Immunohistochemical determination of p27Kip1
distribution in the uterine epithelium (magnification, ×400).
|
|
Progesterone suppresses 17
-estradiol-induced cyclin E-cdk2
and cyclin A-cdk2 kinase activities.
E2-induced
cyclin E-associated activity gradually increased in the total cell
lysates of the epithelial cells, with elevated levels being detected at
4 h and a peak at 12 h, while P4 abolished this
induction (Fig. 6A). E2 also
induced cyclin A-associated kinase activity significantly in the
epithelial cells, with levels being dramatically elevated at 12 h,
while P4 decreased this activity to below the control level
(Fig. 6B). We observed that E2 induction of cyclin
E-associated kinase activity started as early as mid-G1, while E2 stimulated cyclin A-associated kinase activity
acutely at the border of G1 and S phases. This is
correlated with phosphorylation of pRb and p107 (Fig. 2).

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Suppression of E2-induced cyclin E- and
cyclin A-cdk2-associated kinase activities by P4. Cyclin E
(A)-, cyclin A (B)-, or cdk2 (C [top])-associated kinase activities
were assessed with histone H1 as a substrate. The total cell lysates
were analyzed for cdk2 protein by Western blotting (C [bottom]). Thr
160-P indicates the threonine-160-phosphorylated active form of cdk2,
and Thr 160 indicates the nonphosphorylated form. Also shown are cyclin
E- and cyclin A-cdk2 kinase activities in extracts from uterine
epithelial cells of p27Kip1 nullizygous mice (p27KO)
12 h after E2 or P4E2
treatment (D). Details are as described for panels A to C. Abbreviations: NRS, normal rabbit immunoglobulin G; WT, wild type; C,
control; HH1, histone H1; WB, Western blot.
|
|
Direct measurements of cdk2-associated kinase activities confirmed the
above findings. In uterine epithelial cells, E
2 gradually
stimulated cdk2 kinase activity, with a peak at 12 h, while
P
4 completely inhibited this induction and reduced it to
below the
control level (Fig.
6C). The regulation of cdk2 kinase
activity
was demonstrated by Western blot analysis of cdk2 protein
expression
from the same cell lysates in which the total cell lysates
from
E
2-induced proliferating epithelial cells exhibited a
faster-migrating
form of cdk2 (Fig.
6C), corresponding to the
Thr-160-phosphorylated,
active form of cdk2 (
47). In
untreated control mice, there was
a very low level of the active form
of cdk2. E
2 acutely stimulated
this active form so that it
was as abundant as the inactive slow-migrating
form of cdk2 at 12 h. In contrast, the inactive form of cdk2 was
the major form detected
in P
4-induced cell-cycle-arrested cells
over the 12-h
course of E
2 stimulation (Fig.
6C). The active form
of cdk2
was significantly reduced to even below the control level
following
P
4 treatment (Fig.
6C). These results suggest that
P
4 exerts its inhibition of cell proliferation by
inhibiting E
2-induced
cdk2 activity through the
dephosphorylation of
cdk2.
Role of p27Kip1 in regulating cdk2 kinase
activity.
To ascertain the role of p27Kip1 in the
uterine epithelial cells, cyclin E- and cyclin A-cdk2 kinase activities
were compared in extracts isolated following the different hormonal
treatments of mice having a null mutation in the p27Kip1
gene (19, 30, 50). In a similar fashion as in wild-type littermate mice, in p27Kip1
/
mice P4
treatment resulted in a significant inhibition of these kinase
activities compared to the activity in extracts from mice treated
solely with E2 (Fig. 6D). This suggests that
p27Kip1 is not regulating this inhibition. However, of
interest is the consistent observation that the specific activity of
the kinases is considerably enhanced in the p27Kip1
/
extracts compared to those from wild-type littermates even though the
cyclin E, cyclin A, and cdk2 protein levels were not enhanced (Fig.
6D). This indicates that p27Kip1 does play a role in
determining the overall level of activity of these kinases.
Progesterone and 17
-estradiol differentially regulated cdk4 and
cdk6 cellular distribution.
Over several independent experiments,
we could not detect any changes in cdk4 protein concentration in total
cell lysates of the epithelial cells over a 12-h course after either
E2 or P4E2 administration (Fig.
7A). The cdk4-associated kinase activity was also indistinguishable between E2 and
P4E2 treatment at 4 h (Fig. 7C) and over
the entire 12-h course of treatment (Fig. 7A). cdk6 protein levels in
total cell lysates of the epithelial cells remained approximately
constant following the different hormone treatments (Fig. 7B). cdk6
concentrations did not change following P4E2
treatment. We noticed that there were consistently two bands on cdk6
Western blots. The lysates from BAC1.2F5 cells showed only one
slower-migrating band while MEF (passage 5) cell lysates showed two
bands comigrating with those from the uterine epithelial cell lysates
(Fig. 7B). We do not know whether these two bands represent differently
modified cdk6 proteins, nor do we know their functional difference.
cdk6-associated kinase activities from the same lysates were increased
gradually over a 12-h course following E2 or
P4E2 administration (Fig. 7B). However, no
significant difference was observed in activities at the same time
points between any of the different hormone treatments (Fig. 7B). cdk4 and cdk6 proteins are stably expressed in excess in most cell types.
Their regulation is believed to be imposed through the regulation of
their partners, the D-type cyclins (47). Our data suggest
that this may also be the case in uterine epithelial cells. However, it
seems contradictory that P4 can abolish pRb and p107 hyperphosphorylation but does not inhibit the kinases, cdk4 and cdk6,
which are thought to be responsible for Rb family phosphorylation. In
order to confirm that the condition we used for kinase assay is in the
linear range, we performed titration experiments to ensure that the
amount of the lysates we used could detect differences in activities
(Fig. 7C). cdk4 kinase assays of BAC1.2F5 cells with or without CSF-1
stimulation were used as positive controls, and in our hands, as
reported before (15), they showed dramatic stimulation of
cdk4 activity in response to CSF-1 (Fig. 7C). However, in more than
five independent experiments performed under conditions that detected
the kinase over a linear range as shown by titration (Fig. 7C) and that
were positively controlled by BAC1.2F5 lysates, no significant
differences could be detected between the E2 and P4E2 extracts, three of which are shown in Fig.
7C. Thus, we are confident that, had there been a difference in
activity, we would have detected it. Furthermore, we could detect a
similar amount of cdk4 associated with cyclin D1 by IP of lysates with
anti-cyclin D1 antibodies followed by detection of cdk4 by Western
blotting (Fig. 7D), consistent with the equivalence in cdk4 kinase
activities between these two treatment groups.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Concentrations and kinase activities of cdk4 and cdk6
following E2 or P4E2 treatment. (A)
cdk4 levels and associated kinase activities remain unchanged following
different hormonal treatments as determined by Western blotting (WB)
(top) and IP kinase assay with GST-Rb (769) as substrate (bottom). (B)
cdk6 levels and associated kinase activities are comparable between
E2 and P4E2 treatments as
determined by Western blotting (WB) (top) and IP kinase assay with
GST-Rb (769) as substrate (bottom). (Abbreviations: B, BAC1.2F5; M,
MEF; C, control; NRS, normal rabbit immunoglobulin G). (C) (upper
panel) Left, titration of kinase activity with increasing
concentrations of uterine epithelial cell lysate. Middle, three
independent experiments (1 to 3) with cdk4 activities 4 h after
E2 and P4E2 treatment with
recombinant truncated Rb (p56Rb) as substrate. Total
epithelial cell lysates with protein concentrations in the middle of
the linear portion of the titration were used in the experiments.
Right, BAC1.2F5 cells either unstimulated or stimulated with CSF-1 for
9 h were used as positive controls. (Lower panel) As described for
the upper panel, except that cdk6 kinase activities were determined.
(D) Coimmunoprecipitation of cdk4 with cyclin D1, at 4 h following
E2 and P4E2 treatments. NMS, normal
mouse immunoglobulin G; WB, Western blot.
|
|
P
4 did not inhibit the overall activation of cdk4 or cdk6
but did inhibit cyclin D1 nuclear translocation. Thus, P
4
might
influence the substrate accessibility of cyclin D1-cdk4 or -cdk6
complexes, or E
2 signaling through cyclin D1 is cdk4 or
cdk6 independent.
Therefore, we studied the distribution of cdk4 and
cdk6 following
the various hormonal treatments. The cdk6 level remained
high
in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm of uterine epithelial cells
under both E
2 and P
4E
2 treatments
over a 15-h course (data not
shown) as illustrated for the 4-h point
(Fig.
8). cdk4 was present
at a high
level and was distributed in both the nucleus and the
cytoplasm in
control uterine epithelial cells (Fig.
8). The nuclear
association of
cdk4 was increased following E
2 treatment, with
a maximal
level being observed at 4 h (Fig.
8). cdk4 was also
present in a
proportion of underlying stromal cells. Treatment
with P
4
alone severely reduced cdk4 accumulation in the nucleus
of epithelial
cells, while the cdk4 level remained high in the
cytoplasm (Fig.
8).
P
4 pretreatment also prevented cdk4 mobilization
into the
nucleus following E
2 treatment (Fig.
8). Therefore,
E
2 and P
4 differentially regulate cdk4, but not
cdk6, distribution.
The redistribution of cdk4 to the nucleus and the
prevention of
this accumulation by P
4 parallel that of
cyclin D1 and are correlated
with the phosphorylation of the nuclear
substrates pRb and p107.

View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Immunostaining of uterine transverse sections for cdk4
(0 and 4 h) and cdk6 (4 h) after E2 and
P4E2 treatments. Magnification, ×1,000.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
17
-Estradiol synthesized during every estrous cycle acts
through the ER to selectively stimulate uterine luminal and glandular epithelial cell proliferation. Progesterone inhibits this
E2-induced epithelial cell proliferation while preparing
the underlying stromal cells to respond to E2 with a single
wave of cell proliferation. P4 causes the epithelial cells
to differentiate in preparation for implantation which is initiated at
day 4.5 of pregnancy by a nidatory surge of E2 acting upon
the epithelium and causing it to become receptive to blastocyst
attachment. The correct interplay of these hormones is essential for
pregnancy, and any inhibition of their actions terminates this process.
These hormones are also involved in tumorigenesis, with estrogen being
the primary risk factor for adenocarcinoma of the breast and
endometrium. It is important, therefore, to determine the mechanism of
action of sex steroid hormones in regulating epithelial cell
proliferation in vivo. Physiological concentrations of E2
and P4 given exogenously to ovariectomized mice can
recapitulate the cell cycle kinetics of the estrous cycle and early
pregnancy. Taking advantage of the fact that uterine epithelial cells
can be isolated with high purity for biochemical studies, we have
exploited the E2 and P4 regulation of uterine
epithelial cell proliferation in ovariectomized mice in this study.
Estrogen stimulates and progesterone blocks cyclin D1-cdk4 nuclear
accumulation.
The cyclin D-, E-, and A-dependent kinases are
central to the regulation of cell proliferation. They act to
phosphorylate pRb, thereby alleviating transcriptional repression of
important cell cycle genes and allowing cell cycle progression. Of
these cdks, the D cyclins in association with cdk4 and cdk6 are thought to act first, early in G1. E2 shortens the
G1 phase of the cell cycle, while P4 is
inhibitory only if administered within the first 3 h of
G1 (13). Thus, cyclin D1 would appear to be a
likely target for regulation by these steroid hormones. Regulation of cyclin D1-cdk4 and cyclin D1-cdk6 complexes by growth factors has been
shown at several different levels. These include (i) increased
transcription (43) of the cyclin D1 mRNA, (ii) stabilization of cyclin D1 protein (15), (iii) association with cdk's,
(iv) increased phosphorylation of an associated cdk through CAKs or inhibition of the cyclin-dependent phosphatases (47), and
(v) association with CKIs (26, 62). In this report, we
demonstrate another mechanism whereby regulation of nuclear
accumulation of cyclin D1 provides access to its nuclear substrates.
Thus, E2 does not stimulate overall cellular cyclin D1-cdk4
or cyclin D1-cdk6 activities but instead causes a significant
redistribution of cyclin D1 and, to a lesser extent, cdk4 to the
nucleus. This process begins within 2 h of E2
administration at the peak of uterine ER occupancy (41), is
maximal within 3 to 5 h coincident with significantly enhanced
phosphorylation of pRb and p107, and returns to basal levels by 15 h when DNA synthesis is maximal. These data are consistent with those
for cultured cycling fibroblasts that showed cyclin D1 entering the
nucleus during G1 and disappearing during S phase
(3). This nuclear association of cyclin D1 may also activate
other cyclin D1-dependent functions, such as the recently reported
ligand-independent transcriptional activation of the ER by cyclin D1
association (52, 68).
P
4 does not inhibit cyclin D1-cdk4 or -cdk6 activities in
total cell lysates even while it completely suppresses cell
proliferation.
A similar lack of regulation of cdk4 and cdk6 kinase
activity
has been reported during fibrillar collagen inhibition of
arterial
smooth muscle proliferation (
31) and during
anchorage-induced
cell proliferation in fibroblasts (
17).
However, the access
of cyclin D1-cdk4 and cyclin D1-cdk6 to nuclear
substrates or
targets following E
2 treatment is inhibited
by P
4 pretreatment,
which completely blocks the
E
2-induced nuclear accumulation of
cyclin D1 and, to a
lesser extent, cdk4, although not cdk6. This
exclusion results in the
observed absence of phosphorylation of
pRb and p107. Interestingly,
p107 concentration is increased following
E
2 treatment, and
in the former case, the p107 is largely nucleus
localized. In contrast,
the hypophosphorylated form of pRb is
found at a higher concentration
in the nucleus following P
4E
2 treatment, and
this hypophosphorylated form may act as a transcriptional
repressor of
cell cycle gene expression. These data are consistent
with the
P
4 inhibition of both the E
2-stimulated
epithelial cell
proliferation and the complete suppression of the basal
sex steroid
hormone-independent rate of cell proliferation by
P
4. This nuclear
translocation of cyclin D1 is the earliest
E
2-induced event that
P
4 has been shown to
inhibit and strongly suggests that it is
central to the regulation of
cell proliferation by these steroid
hormones.
The mechanism of cyclin D1 and cdk4 translocation into the nucleus by
E
2 or the inhibition of this translocation by
P
4 is
currently unknown. It could be due to either
inhibition of translocation
or stimulation of nuclear export.
Coimmunoprecipitation experiments
have shown that cyclin D1 forms
complexes with cdk4 in the presence
or absence of P
4
following E
2 treatment. This suggests that they
cotranslocate as a complex following E
2 treatment. Since
cyclin
D1 and cdk4 lack obvious nuclear localization sequences, it is
likely that other cellular proteins may provide this function.
A
dominant-negative mutant of cyclin D1 (T156A) can still bind
to cdk4,
but the complex is not imported into the nucleus (
14),
suggesting that a conformational state is recognized by such a
carrier
protein. p50
Cdc37/Hsp90, acting as a protein kinase
chaperon, can bind to and stabilize
cdk4 (
65). However, the
cytoplasmic property of this chaperon
probably excludes it from being a
nuclear transporter, but it
could be involved in retention of cyclin
D1-cdk4 complexes in
the cytoplasm by P
4. The Cip/kip
inhibitors p21
Cip/Waf1, p27
Kip1, and
p57
Kip2 can also target cyclin D1-cdk4 to the nucleus
(
32). However,
we were unable to detect
p21
Cip/Waf1 or p57
Kip2 in the uterine
epithelial lysates. In contrast, p27
Kip1 could readily be
detected. However, both epithelial cell proliferation
(
67) and nuclear translocation of cyclin D1 occur in
p27
Kip1
/
ovariectomized mice following
E
2 treatment (unpublished data),
and the inhibition of
these events by P
4 also occurred in these
null mutant mice
(
67). These data are similar to those found
in MEFs
null for p21
Cip1 and p27
Kip1 where cyclin D1
was still nucleus associated (
5). Thus, these
inhibitors are
unlikely to be involved in the regulation of cyclin
D1
translocation, although the presence of another adapter and/or
inhibitor whose identity is unknown cannot be ruled out. Overall,
these
data suggest that transport of an active cyclin D1-cdk4
complex could
be targeted to the nucleus in response to E
2 via
novel
nuclear
transporters.
A caveat to the role of cyclin D1 as a central regulator of uterine
cell cycle in response to E
2 is the findings obtained
from
cyclin D1 null mutant mice (
18,
63). Although the status
of
uterine cell proliferation has not been assessed in these mice,
they
are fertile, suggesting that the hormonally induced uterine
cell
proliferation is unaffected by the absence of cyclin D1.
In vitro
studies have shown that cyclin D1 is essential for fibroblast
proliferation because inhibition of cyclin D1 by microinjection
of
anti-cyclin D1 antibody or cyclin D1 antisense plasmids into
fibroblasts results in inhibition of DNA synthesis (
3).
However,
both in vivo and in vitro fibroblast proliferation is also
apparently
normal in these cyclin D1 null mutant mice (
63).
These results,
although clearly indicating that the function of cyclin
D1 is
not required in these cells in vivo, may suggest some regulative
development to compensate for the absence of cyclin D1, perhaps
through
the expression of cyclin D2 or D3, which could interact
with cdk4 once
this molecule has become preferentially associated
with the nucleus
after E
2 treatment.
P4 inhibits E2-induced cdk2 phosphorylation
and kinase activity.
Following the cyclin D1-cdk4 translocation,
E2 induces, in an orderly sequence, a small but significant
elevation in cyclin E protein concentration, increased cyclin E-cdk2
activity, pRb and p107 phosphorylation, elevated cyclin A protein
expression, and dramatically elevated cyclin A-cdk2 activity that
results in hyperphosphorylation of the pRb family proteins. This
presumably releases transcriptional repression of the E2F family of
transcription factors, resulting in the activation of genes that encode
proteins required for DNA synthesis. Of note here is that the
hypophosphorylated form of pRb remains high in the nuclei of
P4-treated epithelial cells, suggesting a tight
down-regulation of these cell cycle genes. In a recent study,
E2 treatment of rats was reported to have no effect on cdk2
activity (2) in total uterine cell lysates. However,
epithelial cells represent only ~5% of total uterine cells, and it
is only these epithelial cells that undergo proliferation directly in
response to E2 (40). Thus, it is very likely
that the residual, nonproliferating 95% of uterine cells obscured the detection of E2-induced cdk2 activity in these experiments.
Our results are consistent with those reported for E2
stimulation of the MCF7 and T47D human mammary carcinoma cell lines,
where estrogen stimulates cyclin E-cdk2 activation and
hyperphosphorylation of pRb within 6 h of treatment (53,
55).
P
4 inhibits cyclin E-cdk2 activity and cyclin A protein
expression and consequently cyclin A-cdk2 activity and thus suppresses
the phosphorylation of pRb and p107 throughout G
1.
P
4 also inhibits
arterial smooth muscle cell proliferation
acting through the PR,
and this is correlated with a decrease in cyclin
A and cyclin
E mRNA levels in these cells (
33).
P
4 does not significantly
reduce cyclin E or cdk2 protein
concentration in uterine epithelial
cells but instead acts through
inhibition of cdk2 phosphorylation.
The phosphorylation of cdk2 on
Thr-160 and dephosphorylation on
Tyr-15 and Thr-14 are required for its
catalytic activity. The
former is catalyzed by CAK, consisting of cdk7
and its regulatory
partner, cyclin H, while the latter is regulated by
the tyrosine
phosphatase cdc25A (
47). Given the fact that
CAK activity is
expressed throughout the cell cycle and is not rate
limiting in
fibroblasts (
47), it is unlikely to be the
target for P
4 action.
However, cdc25A could be a
target for P
4 in a manner analogous
to that seen during
transforming growth factor

inhibition of
cell proliferation
(
28).
The activity of cdk2 is also regulated by its association with
inhibitors, the CKIs. We were unable to detect in uterine
epithelial
cells significant expression of most of the known CKIs
except
p27
Kip1. However, the E
2-induced
down-regulation of p27
Kip1 in luminal epithelial cells is
not reversed by P
4 pretreatment.
P
4 also
down-regulates the E
2-induced increase in cdk2 activity
in
p27
Kip1 nullizygous mice. Interestingly, in this case, the
specific activity
of the cdk2 and the cyclin E- and cyclin A-associated
kinase activities
are proportionately increased such that the
inhibited level is
equal to the stimulated level in mice wild type for
the p27
Kip1 gene. This suggests that p27
Kip1
does have an effect upon the overall level of kinase activity
in
uterine cells consistent with its association in equal amounts
with
cyclin D-cdk4 and cyclin E-cdk2 complexes in both E
2- and
P
4-treated mice (data not shown). However, in the absence
of p27
Kip1 the cells compensate for the higher activities
and respond to
the proportional reduction in kinase activity induced by
P
4. This
study of uterine cell proliferation regulation by
E
2 and P
4 in
the uteri of p27
Kip1
null mutant mice demonstrates that P
4 can still inhibit
E
2-induced
cell proliferation in uterine epithelial cells
even in the absence
of p27
Kip1 (
23), suggesting
that p27
Kip1 is not a nonredundant regulator of
P
4 action in these cells.
These data also suggest that it
is possible that a novel CKI is
present in uterine epithelial
cells.
Recent evidence with heterotypic tissue recombinants exploiting ERKO
and PRKO mice suggests that, in both the mammary gland
and the uterus
in vivo, the actions of sex steroid hormones on
cell proliferation are
exerted though the stromal cells, causing
them to send a paracrine
signal to the epithelial cells (
10).
Given these data, it is
feasible that P
4 blocks release or synthesis
of this
stromal paracrine factor(s) or interferes with E
2-ER
interactions.
However, P
4 does not down-regulate ER levels
or prevent metabolism
of E
2 in the mouse uterus, nor does
it inhibit E
2 in binding to
the ER (
8,
58).
Furthermore, in the uterine epithelium, P
4 does not inhibit
the E
2-induced hypertrophy (
6) or the
E
2-induced
expression of immediate-early genes
(
12) and some later cell
cycle genes, such as that for
ornithine decarboxylase (
7),
suggesting that P
4
does not inhibit the early responses induced
by E
2 and that
the expression of these genes is correlated with
cell growth and
survival rather than with cell proliferation.
Instead,
P
4 selectively targets the cell-cycle-regulatory machinery,
suggesting that it, perhaps through the synthesis of a paracrine
factor, acts to inhibit this pathway by inhibiting cyclin D1 nuclear
association and cdk2 phosphorylation specifically within the epithelial
cells.
Implications for sex steroid hormone involvement in
tumorigenesis.
Cell proliferation in subclones of the mammary
tumor cell lines MCF7 and T47D is regulated by direct actions of sex
steroid hormones acting through their receptors within the epithelial cells (1, 23, 49, 53). In these cell lines, E2
stimulates the expression of cyclin D1 together with their
corresponding cdk4 and cdk6 kinase activities (1, 53). In
the progesterone-responsive T47D subclone, P4, although
initially stimulating cell proliferation, after 24 h of exposure
inhibits it, and this is correlated with the inhibition of cyclin D, E,
and A expression; increased CKI expression; and a consequent reduction
in their associated kinase activity (23, 49). Although the
inhibition of cdk2 activity by P4 is similar to the results
presented in this report, the effects on cyclin D1-cdk4 and cyclin
D1-cdk6 protein expression and activities and induction of CKIs are
different. Furthermore, the data contrast with the actions of these
steroid hormones in vivo since, in contrast to normal mammary
epithelial cells (24), this cell line proliferates readily
in the absence of any steroid hormone (49). Furthermore,
while P4 does not inhibit epithelial cell proliferation in
the mammary gland (24), it does so completely without any
prior stimulation of cell proliferation in the uterus (13,
36). These data, together with the results with the heterotypic tissue recombinants described above (10), suggest that
acquisition of epithelial cell responsiveness to direct cell cycle
regulation by these steroid hormones either is a result of selection
during tissue culture or, of greater interest, may be an important step in the transition of normal epithelial cells to the neoplastic state.
P
4 is used therapeutically to oppose the effect of
E
2 on cell proliferation both in hormone replacement
therapy and in the
treatment of uterine adenocarcinoma. Since
P
4 is a well-defined
cell cycle inhibitor in vivo, the
present insights into its mode
of action in the normal uterus
indicating a novel regulation of
cyclin D1 cellular localization might
provide better opportunities
for intervention strategies for opposing
the effects of E
2 in
tumor growth and in the understanding
of the transition of tumors
to hormone
independence.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank L. Zhu, P. E. Cohen, A. Iavarone, and A. Koff for
helpful discussion and A. Koff for kindly providing us with
heterozygous breeding pairs of the p27Kip1 null mutant mice.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Departments of
Developmental and Molecular Biology and Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park
Ave., Bronx, NY 10461. Phone: (718) 430-2090. Fax: (718) 430-8567. E-mail: pollard{at}aecom.yu.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Altucci, L.,
R. Addeo,
L. Cicatiello,
S. Dauvois,
M. G. Parker,
M. Truss,
M. Beato,
V. Sica,
F. Bresciani, and A. Weisz.
1996.
17 -Estradiol induces cyclin D1 gene transcription, p36D1-p34cdk4 complex activation and p105Rb phosphorylation during mitogenic stimulation of G1-arrested human breast cancer cells.
Oncogene
12:2315-2324[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Altucci, L.,
R. Addeo,
L. Cicatiello,
D. Germano,
C. Pacilio,
T. Battista,
M. Cancemi,
V. B. Petrizzi,
F. Bresciani, and A. Weisz.
1997.
Estrogen induces early and timed activation of cyclin-dependent kinases 4, 5, and 6 and increases cyclin messenger ribonucleic acid expression in rat uterus.
Endocrinology
138:978-984[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Baldin, V.,
J. Lukas,
M. Marcote,
M. Pagano, and G. Draetta.
1993.
Cyclin D1 is a nuclear protein required for cell cycle progression in G1.
Genes Dev.
7:812-821[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Castles, C. G., and S. A. W. Fuqua.
1996.
Alterations within the estrogen receptor in breast cancer, p. 81-105.
In
J. R. Pasqualini, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen (ed.), Hormonal-dependent cancer. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 5.
|
Cheng, M.,
J. A. Diehl,
M. Fero,
P. Olivier,
E. Randel,
J. M. Roberts,
C. J. Sherr, and M. F. Roussel.
1998.
Cdk inhibitors p27Kip1 and p21Cip1 are required for assembly of active cyclin D-dependent kinases in mouse fibroblasts, p. 39.
In
Fourteenth Annual Meeting on Oncogenes. (Abstract.).
|
| 6.
|
Cheng, S. V. Y.,
B. S. MacDonald,
B. F. Clark, and J. W. Pollard.
1985.
Cell growth and cell proliferation may be dissociated in the mouse uterine luminal epithelium treated with female sex steroids.
Exp. Cell Res.
160:459-470[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Cheng, S. V. Y., and J. W. Pollard.
1986.
C-rasH and ornithine decarboxylase are induced by oestradiol-17 in the mouse uterine luminal epithelium independently of the proliferative status of the cell.
FEBS Lett.
196:309-314[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Clark, B. F.
1980.
Absence of oestradiol-17 beta dehydrogenase from the progesterone-dominated mouse uterus.
J. Endocrinol.
85:155-159[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Cohen, C. J.,
H. W. Bruckner, and G. Deppe.
1984.
Multidrug treatment of advanced and recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study.
Obstet. Gynecol.
63:719-726[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Cooke, P. S.,
D. L. Buchanan,
T. Kurita,
D. B. Lubahn, and G. R. Cunha.
1998.
Stromal-epithelial cell communication in the female reproductive tract, p. 491-506.
In
F. W. Bazer (ed.), Endocrinology of pregnancy. Humana Press, Totowa, N. J.
|
| 11.
|
Cullingford, T. E., and J. W. Pollard.
1988.
RU 486 completely inhibits the action of progesterone on cell proliferation in the mouse uterus.
J. Reprod. Fertil.
83:909-914[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Cullingford, T. E., and J. W. Pollard.
1994.
Growth factors as mediators of sex-steroid hormone action in the uterus during the pre-implantation period, p. 13-30.
In
S. A. Khan, and G. M. Stancel (ed.), Protooncogenes and growth factors in steroid hormone-induced growth differentiation. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla.
|
| 12a.
| Cullingford, T. E., and J. W. Pollard. Unpublished observations.
|
| 13.
|
Das, R. M., and L. Martin.
1973.
Progesterone inhibition of mouse uterine epithelial proliferation.
J. Endocrinol.
59:205-206[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Diehl, J. A., and C. J. Sherr.
1997.
A dominant-negative cyclin D1 mutant prevents nuclear import of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) and its phosphorylation by CDK-activating kinase.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:7362-7374[Abstract].
|
| 15.
|
Diehl, J. A.,
F. Zindy, and C. J. Sherr.
1997.
Inhibition of cyclin D1 phosphorylation on threonine-286 prevents its rapid degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasone pathway.
Genes Dev.
11:957-972[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Fagg, B.,
L. Martin,
L. A. Rogers,
B. F. Clark, and V. E. Quarmby.
1979.
A simple method for preparing pure samples of uterine epithelial cells.
J. Reprod. Fertil.
57:335-345[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Fang, F.,
G. Orend,
N. Watanabe,
T. Hunter, and E. Ruoslahti.
1996.
Dependence of cyclin E-CDK2 kinase activity on cell anchorage.
Science
271:499-502[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
Fantl, V.,
G. Stamp,
A. Andrews,
I. Rosewell, and C. Dickson.
1995.
Mice lacking cyclin D1 are small and show defects in eye and mammary gland development.
Genes Dev.
9:2364-2372[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Fero, M. L.,
M. Rivkin,
M. Tasch,
P. Porter,
C. E. Carow,
E. Firpo,
K. Polyak,
L.-H. Tsai,
V. Broudy,
R. M. Perlmutter,
K. Kaushansky, and J. M. Roberts.
1996.
A syndrome of multiorgan hyperplasia with features of gigantism, tumorigenesis, and female sterility in p27Kip1-deficient mice.
Cell
85:733-744[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Finn, C. A., and L. Martin.
1970.
The role of the oestrogen secreted before oestrus in the preparation of the uterus for implantation in the mouse.
J. Endocrinol.
47:431-438.
|
| 21.
|
Finn, C. A., and D. G. Porter.
1975.
Handbooks in reproductive biology, vol. 1. The uterus.
Elek Science, London, United Kingdom.
|
| 22.
|
Galand, P., and V. de Maertelaer.
1992.
Models of oestrogen action: a cell kineticist's view.
Epithelial Cell Biol.
1:177-188[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Groshong, S. D.,
G. I. Owen,
B. Grimison,
I. E. Schauer,
M. C. Todd,
T. A. Langan,
R. A. Sclafani,
C. A. Lange, and K. B. Horwitz.
1997.
Biphasic regulation of breast cancer cell growth by progesterone: role of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, p21 and p27Kip1.
Mol. Endocrinol.
11:1593-1607[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Haslam, S. Z.
1989.
The ontogeny of mouse mammary gland responsiveness to ovarian steroid hormones.
Endocrinology
125:2766-2772[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Henderson, B. E.,
R. K. Ross, and M. C. Pike.
1993.
Hormonal chemoprevention of cancer in women.
Science
259:633-638[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Hunter, T., and J. Pines.
1994.
Cyclins and cancer II: cyclin D and CDK inhibitors come of age.
Cell
79:573-582[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Hyde-Dunn, J., and G. E. Jones.
1997.
Visualization of cell replication using antibody to proliferating cell nuclear antigen, p. 341-349.
In
J. W. Pollard, and J. M. Walker (ed.), Basic cell culture protocols. Humana Press, Totowa, N.J.
|
| 28.
|
Iavarone, A., and J. Massagué.
1997.
Repression of the CDK activator Cdc25A and cell-cycle arrest by cytokine TGF- in cells lacking the CDK inhibitor p15.
Nature
387:417-422[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Key, T. J. A., and M. C. Pike.
1997.
The role of oestrogen and progestagens in the epidemiology and prevention of breast cancer.
Eur. J. Cancer Clin. Oncol.
24:29-43.
|
| 30.
|
Kiyokawa, H.,
R. D. Kineman,
K. O. Manova-Todorova,
V. C. Soares,
E. S. Hoffman,
M. Ono,
D. Khanam,
A. C. Hayday,
L. A. Frohman, and A. Koff.
1996.
Enhanced growth of mice lacking the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor function of p27Kip1.
Cell
85:721-732[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Koyama, H.,
E. W. Raines,
J. M. Bornfeldt,
J. M. Roberts, and R. Ross.
1996.
Fibrillar collagen inhibits arterial smooth muscle proliferation through regulation of Cdk2 inhibitors.
Cell
87:1069-1078[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
LaBaer, J.,
M. D. Garrett,
L. F. Stevenson,
J. M. Slingerland,
C. Sandhu,
H. S. Chou,
A. Fattaey, and E. Harlow.
1997.
New functional activities for the p21 family of CDK inhibitors.
Genes Dev.
11:847-862[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Lee, W.-S.,
J. A. Harder,
M. Yoshizumi,
M.-E. Lee, and E. Haber.
1997.
Progesterone inhibits arterial smooth muscle cell proliferation.
Nat. Med.
3:1005-1008[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Lubahn, D. B.,
J. S. Moyer,
T. S. Golding,
J. F. Couse,
K. S. Korach, and O. Smithies.
1993.
Alteration of reproductive function but not prenatal sexual development after insertional disruption of the mouse estrogen receptor gene.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:11162-11166[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Lydon, J. P.,
F. J. DeMayo,
C. Funk,
S. K. Mani,
A. R. Hughes,
C. A. Montgomery,
G. Shyamala,
O. M. Conneely, and B. W. O'Malley.
1995.
Mice lacking progesterone receptor exhibit pleiotropic reproductive abnormalities.
Genes Dev.
9:2266-2278[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Martin, L.,
R. M. Das, and C. A. Finn.
1973.
The inhibition by progesterone of uterine epithelial proliferation in the mouse.
J. Endocrinol.
57:549-554[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Martin, L., and C. A. Finn.
1970.
Interactions of oestradiol and progestins in the mouse uterus.
J. Endocrinol.
48:109-115[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Martin, L., and C. A. Finn.
1971.
Oestrogen-gestagen interactions on mitosis in target tissues, p. 172-188.
In
P. O. Hubinont, et al. (ed.), Basic actions of sex steroids on target organs. S. Karger, Basel, Switzerland.
|
| 39.
|
Martin, L.,
C. A. Finn, and G. Trinder.
1973.
DNA synthesis in the endometrium of progesterone-treated mice.
J. Endocrinol.
56:303-307[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Martin, L.,
C. A. Finn, and G. Trinder.
1973.
Hypertrophy and hyperplasia in the mouse uterus after oestrogen treatment: an autoradiographic study.
J. Endocrinol.
56:133-144[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Martin, L.,
J. W. Pollard, and B. Fagg.
1976.
Oestriol, oestradiol-17 and the proliferation and death of uterine cells.
J. Endocrinol.
69:103-115[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Massagué, J., and K. Polyak.
1995.
Mammalian antiproliferative signals and their targets.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
5:91-96[Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Matsushime, H.,
M. F. Roussel,
R. A. Ashmun, and C. J. Sherr.
1991.
Colony-stimulating factor 1 regulates novel cyclins during the G1 phase of the cell cycle.
Cell
65:701-713[Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Mittnacht, S.,
J. A. Lees,
D. Desai,
E. Harlow,
D. O. Morgan, and R. A. Weinberg.
1994.
Distinct sub-populations of the retinoblastoma protein show a distinct pattern of phosphorylation.
EMBO J.
13:118-127[Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Mittnacht, S., and R. A. Weinberg.
1991.
G1/S phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein is associated with an altered affinity for the nuclear compartment.
Cell
65:381-393[Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Morgan, C.,
J. W. Pollard, and E. R. Stanley.
1987.
Isolation and characterization of a cloned growth factor dependent macrophage cell line, BAC-1.2F5.
J. Cell. Physiol.
130:420-427[Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Morgan, D. O.
1995.
Principles of CDK regulation.
Nature
374:131-134[Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Musgrove, E. A.,
C. S. L. Lee,
M. F. Buckley, and R. L. Sutherland.
1994.
Cyclin D1 induction in breast cancer cells shortens G1 and is sufficient for cells arrested in G1 to complete the cell cycle.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:8022-8026[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Musgrove, E. A.,
A. Swarbrick,
C. S. L. Lee,
A. L. Cornish, and R. L. Sutherland.
1998.
Mechanisms of cyclin-dependent kinase inactivation by progestins.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:1812-1825[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Nakayama, K.-I.,
N. Ishida,
M. Shirane,
A. Inomata,
T. Inoue,
N. Shishido,
I. Horii, and D. Y. Loh.
1996.
Mice lacking p27Kip1 display increased body size, multiple organ hyperplasia, retinal dysplasia, and pituitary tumors.
Cell
85:707-720[Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Nephew, K. P.,
G. A. Peters, and S. A. Khan.
1995.
Cellular localization of estradiol-induced c-fos messenger ribonucleic acid in the rat uterus: c-fos expression and uterine cell proliferation do not correlate strictly.
Endocrinology
136:3007-3015[Abstract].
|
| 52.
|
Neuman, E.,
M. H. Ladha,
N. Lin,
T. M. Upton,
S. J. Miller,
J. DiRenzo,
R. G. Pestell,
P. W. Hinds,
S. F. Dowdy,
M. Brown, and M. E. Ewen.
1997.
Cyclin D1 stimulation of estrogen receptor transcriptional activity independent of cdk4.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:5338-5347[Abstract].
|
| 53.
|
Planas-Silva, M., and R. A. Weinberg.
1997.
Estrogen-dependent cyclin E-cdk2 activation through p21 redistribution.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:4059-4069[Abstract].
|
| 54.
|
Pollard, J. W.,
J. Pacy,
S. V. Y. Cheng, and E. G. Jordan.
1987.
Estrogens and cell death in the mouse uterine luminal epithelium.
Cell Tissue Res.
249:533-540[Medline].
|
| 55.
|
Prall, O. W. J.,
B. Sarcevic,
E. A. Musgrove,
C. K. W. Watts, and R. L. Sutherland.
1997.
Estrogen-induced activation of Cdk4 and Cdk2 during G1-S phase progression is accompanied by increased cyclin D1 expression and decreased cyclin-dependent kinase inhibition association.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:10882-10894[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 56.
|
Quarmby, V. E., and K. S. Korach.
1984.
The influence of 17 -estradiol on patterns of cell division in the uterus.
Endocrinology
114:694-702[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 57.
|
Quarmby, V. E., and L. Martin.
1982.
Effects of progesterone on uptake and metabolism of 17 -estradiol by mouse uterine luminal epithelium.
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
27:317-330[Medline].
|
| 58.
|
Quarmby, V. E., and L. Martin.
1982.
Qualitative effects of progesterone on estrogen binding in mouse uterine luminal epithelium.
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
27:331-342[Medline].
|
| 59.
|
Ravitz, M. J., and C. E. Wenner.
1997.
Cyclin-dependent kinase regulation during G1 phase and cell cycle regulation by TGF- .
Adv. Cancer Res.
71:165-207[Medline].
|
| 60.
|
Sherr, C. J.
1994.
G1 phase progression: cycling on cue.
Cell
79:551-555[Medline].
|
| 61.
|
Sherr, C. J.
1996.
Cancer cell cycles.
Science
274:1672-1677[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 62.
|
Sherr, C. J., and J. M. Roberts.
1995.
Inhibitors of mammalian G1 cyclin-dependent kinases.
Genes Dev.
9:1149-1163[Free Full Text].
|
| 63.
|
Sicinski, L. P.,
J. L. Donaher,
S. B. Parker,
T. Li,
A. Fazeli,
H. Gardner,
S. Z. Haslam,
R. T. Bronson,
S. J. Elledge, and R. A. Weinberg.
1995.
Cyclin D1 provides a link between development and oncogenesis in the retina and breast.
Cell
82:621-630[Medline].
|
| 64.
|
Stacey, K.,
B. Beasley,
P. A. Wilce, and L. Martin.
1991.
Effects of female sex hormones on lipid metabolism in the uterine epithelium of the mouse.
Int. J. Biochem.
23:371-376[Medline].
|
| 65.
|
Stepanova, L.,
X. Leng,
S. B. Parker, and J. W. Harper.
1996.
Mammalian p50Cdc37 is a protein kinase-targeting subunit of Hsp90 that binds and stabilizes Cdk4.
Genes Dev.
10:1491-1502[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 66.
|
Terada, N.,
R. Yamamoto,
T. Takada,
T. Miyake,
N. Terakawa,
H. Wakimoto,
H. Taniguchi,
W. Li,
Y. Kitamura, and K. Matsumoto.
1989.
Inhibitory effect of progesterone on cell death of mouse uterine epithelium.
J. Steroid Biochem.
33:1091-1096[Medline].
|
| 67.
|
Tong, W.,
H. Kiyokawa,
T. J. Soos,
M. S. Park,
V. C. Soares,
K. Manova,
J. W. Pollard, and A. Koff.
1998.
The absence of p27Kip1, an inhibitor of G1 cyclin-dependent kinases, uncouples differentiation and growth arrest during the granulosa luteal transition.
Cell Growth Differ.
9:787-794[Abstract].
|
| 68.
|
Zwijsen, R. M. L.,
E. Wientjens,
R. Klompmaker,
J. van der Sman,
R. Bernards, and R. J. A. M. Michalides.
1997.
CDK-independent activation of estrogen receptor by cyclin D1.
Cell
88:405-415[Medline].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, March 1999, p. 2251-2264, Vol. 19, No. 3
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Lartey, J, Lopez Bernal, A
(2009). RHO protein regulation of contraction in the human uterus. Reproduction
138: 407-424
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Polotsky, A. J., Zhu, L., Santoro, N., Pollard, J. W.
(2009). Lithium chloride treatment induces epithelial cell proliferation in xenografted human endometrium. Hum Reprod
24: 1960-1967
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Das, S. K
(2009). Cell cycle regulatory control for uterine stromal cell decidualization in implantation. Reproduction
137: 889-899
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ray, S., Xu, F., Wang, H., Das, S. K.
(2008). Cooperative Control via Lymphoid Enhancer Factor 1/T Cell Factor 3 and Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} for Uterine Gene Regulation by Estrogen. Mol. Endocrinol.
22: 1125-1140
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Girling, J. E., Lederman, F. L., Walter, L. M., Rogers, P. A. W.
(2007). Progesterone, But Not Estrogen, Stimulates Vessel Maturation in the Mouse Endometrium. Endocrinology
148: 5433-5441
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Niklaus, A. L., Aubuchon, M., Zapantis, G., Li, P., Qian, H., Isaac, B., Kim, M. Y., Adel, G., Pollard, J. W., Santoro, N. F.
(2007). Assessment of the proliferative status of epithelial cell types in the endometrium of young and menopausal transition women. Hum Reprod
22: 1778-1788
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ivanga, M., Labrie, Y., Calvo, E., Belleau, P., Martel, C., Luu-The, V., Morissette, J., Labrie, F., Durocher, F.
(2007). Temporal analysis of E2 transcriptional induction of PTP and MKP and downregulation of IGF-I pathway key components in the mouse uterus. Physiol. Genomics
29: 13-23
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rider, V., Isuzugawa, K., Twarog, M., Jones, S., Cameron, B., Imakawa, K., Fang, J.
(2006). Progesterone initiates Wnt-{beta}-catenin signaling but estradiol is required for nuclear activation and synchronous proliferation of rat uterine stromal cells. J Endocrinol
191: 537-548
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pan, H., Deng, Y., Pollard, J. W.
(2006). Progesterone blocks estrogen-induced DNA synthesis through the inhibition of replication licensing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
103: 14021-14026
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
O'Brien, J. E., Peterson, T. J., Tong, M. H., Lee, E.-J., Pfaff, L. E., Hewitt, S. C., Korach, K. S., Weiss, J., Jameson, J. L.
(2006). Estrogen-induced Proliferation of Uterine Epithelial Cells Is Independent of Estrogen Receptor {alpha} Binding to Classical Estrogen Response Elements. J. Biol. Chem.
281: 26683-26692
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ray, S., Hou, X., Zhou, H.-E., Wang, H., Das, S. K.
(2006). Bip Is a Molecular Link between the Phase I and Phase II Estrogenic Responses in Uterus. Mol. Endocrinol.
20: 1825-1837
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Shao, R., Weijdegard, B., Ljungstrom, K., Friberg, A., Zhu, C., Wang, X., Zhu, Y., Fernandez-Rodriguez, J., Egecioglu, E., Rung, E., Billig, H.
(2006). Nuclear progesterone receptor A and B isoforms in mouse fallopian tube and uterus: implications for expression, regulation, and cellular function. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.
291: E59-E72
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Velarde, M. C., Geng, Y., Eason, R. R., Simmen, F. A., Simmen, R. C.M.
(2005). Null Mutation of Kruppel-Like Factor9/Basic Transcription Element Binding Protein-1 Alters Peri-Implantation Uterine Development in Mice. Biol. Reprod.
73: 472-481
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chen, B., Pan, H., Zhu, L., Deng, Y., Pollard, J. W.
(2005). Progesterone Inhibits the Estrogen-Induced Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase->AKT->GSK-3{beta}->Cyclin D1->pRB Pathway to Block Uterine Epithelial Cell Proliferation. Mol. Endocrinol.
19: 1978-1990
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Walter, L. M, Rogers, P. A W, Girling, J. E
(2005). The role of progesterone in endometrial angiogenesis in pregnant and ovariectomised mice. Reproduction
129: 765-777
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yue, L., Daikoku, T., Hou, X., Li, M., Wang, H., Nojima, H., Dey, S. K., Das, S. K.
(2005). Cyclin G1 and Cyclin G2 Are Expressed in the Periimplantation Mouse Uterus in a Cell-Specific and Progesterone-Dependent Manner: Evidence for Aberrant Regulation with Hoxa-10 Deficiency. Endocrinology
146: 2424-2433
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Skildum, A., Faivre, E., Lange, C. A.
(2005). Progesterone Receptors Induce Cell Cycle Progression via Activation of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases. Mol. Endocrinol.
19: 327-339
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lahav-Baratz, S., Ben-Izhak, O., Sabo, E., Ben-Eliezer, S., Lavie, O., Ishai, D., Ciechanover, A., Dirnfeld, M.
(2004). Decreased level of the cell cycle regulator p27 and increased level of its ubiquitin ligase Skp2 in endometrial carcinoma but not in normal secretory or in hyperstimulated endometrium. Mol Hum Reprod
10: 567-572
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Carta, L., Sassoon, D.
(2004). Wnt7a Is a Suppressor of Cell Death in the Female Reproductive Tract and Is Required for Postnatal and Estrogen-Mediated Growth. Biol. Reprod.
71: 444-454
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Spencer, T. E., Johnson, G. A., Burghardt, R. C., Bazer, F. W.
(2004). Progesterone and Placental Hormone Actions on the Uterus: Insights from Domestic Animals. Biol. Reprod.
71: 2-10
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Furlow, J. D., Yang, H. Y., Hsu, M., Lim, W., Ermio, D. J., Chiellini, G., Scanlan, T. S.
(2004). Induction of Larval Tissue Resorption in Xenopus laevis Tadpoles by the Thyroid Hormone Receptor Agonist GC-1. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 26555-26562
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Davison, E. A., Lee, C. S. L., Naylor, M. J., Oakes, S. R., Sutherland, R. L., Hennighausen, L., Ormandy, C. J., Musgrove, E. A.
(2003). The Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p27 (Kip1) Regulates Both DNA Synthesis and Apoptosis in Mammary Epithelium But Is Not Required for Its Functional Development during Pregnancy. Mol. Endocrinol.
17: 2436-2447
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rider, V., Thomson, E., Seifert, C.
(2003). Transit of Rat Uterine Stromal Cells through G1 Phase of the Cell Cycle Requires Temporal and Cell-Specific Hormone-Dependent Changes on Cell Cycle Regulators. Endocrinology
144: 5450-5458
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hewitt, S. C., Deroo, B. J., Hansen, K., Collins, J., Grissom, S., Afshari, C. A., Korach, K. S.
(2003). Estrogen Receptor-Dependent Genomic Responses in the Uterus Mirror the Biphasic Physiological Response to Estrogen. Mol. Endocrinol.
17: 2070-2083
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lee, W.-S., Liu, C.-W., Juan, S.-H., Liang, Y.-C., Ho, P.-Y., Lee, Y.-H.
(2003). Molecular Mechanism of Progesterone-Induced Antiproliferation in Rat Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells. Endocrinology
144: 2785-2790
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lobenhofer, E. K., Bennett, L., Cable, P. L., Li, L., Bushel, P. R., Afshari, C. A.
(2002). Regulation of DNA Replication Fork Genes by 17{beta}-Estradiol. Mol. Endocrinol.
16: 1215-1229
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Buchanan, D. L., Ohsako, S., Tohyama, C., Cooke, P. S., Iguchi, T.
(2002). Dioxin Inhibition of Estrogen-Induced Mouse Uterine Epithelial Mitogenesis Involves Changes in Cyclin and Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Expression. Toxicol Sci
66: 62-68
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dolci, S., Pellegrini, M., Di Agostino, S., Geremia, R., Rossi, P.
(2001). Signaling through Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase Is Required for Spermatogonial Proliferative Response to Stem Cell Factor. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 40225-40233
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Marcantonio, D., Chalifour, L. E., Alaoui-Jamali, M. A., Alpert, L., Huynh, H. T.
(2001). Cloning and Characterization of a Novel Gene That Is Regulated by Estrogen and Is Associated with Mammary Gland Carcinogenesis. Endocrinology
142: 2409-2418
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Foster, J. S., Henley, D. C., Bukovsky, A., Seth, P., Wimalasena, J.
(2001). Multifaceted Regulation of Cell Cycle Progression by Estrogen: Regulation of Cdk Inhibitors and Cdc25A Independent of Cyclin D1-Cdk4 Function. Mol. Cell. Biol.
21: 794-810
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Santoro, N., Goldsmith, L. T., Heller, D., Illsley, N., McGovern, P., Molina, C., Peters, S., Skurnick, J. H., Forst, C., Weiss, G.
(2000). Luteal Progesterone Relates to Histological Endometrial Maturation in Fertile Women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
85: 4207-4211
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Swarbrick, A., Lee, C. S. L., Sutherland, R. L., Musgrove, E. A.
(2000). Cooperation of p27Kip1 and p18INK4c in Progestin-Mediated Cell Cycle Arrest in T-47D Breast Cancer Cells. Mol. Cell. Biol.
20: 2581-2591
[Abstract]
[Full Text]