Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, April 1999, p. 2690-2698, Vol. 19, No. 4
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
NF-
B Function in Growth Control: Regulation of
Cyclin D1 Expression and G0/G1-to-S-Phase
Transition
Michael
Hinz,1
Daniel
Krappmann,2
Alexandra
Eichten,1
Andreas
Heder,1
Claus
Scheidereit,2 and
Michael
Strauss1,3,*
Molekulare Zellbiologie, Humboldt
Universität zu Berlin,
Max-Delbrück-Haus,1 and
Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular
Medicine,2 13122 Berlin, Germany, and
Institute of Cancer Biology, Danish Cancer Society, DK-2100
Copenhagen, Denmark3
Received 27 July 1998/Returned for modification 18 September
1998/Accepted 30 December 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Nuclear factor kappa B (NF-
B) has been implicated in the
regulation of cell proliferation, transformation, and tumor
development. We provide evidence for a direct link between NF-
B
activity and cell cycle regulation. NF-
B was found to stimulate
transcription of cyclin D1, a key regulator of G1
checkpoint control. Two NF-
B binding sites in the human cyclin D1
promoter conferred activation by NF-
B as well as by growth factors.
Both levels and kinetics of cyclin D1 expression during G1
phase were controlled by NF-
B. Moreover, inhibition of NF-
B
caused a pronounced reduction of serum-induced cyclin D1-associated
kinase activity and resulted in delayed phosphorylation of the
retinoblastoma protein. Furthermore, NF-
B promotes
G1-to-S-phase transition in mouse embryonal fibroblasts and
in T47D mammary carcinoma cells. Impaired cell cycle progression of
T47D cells expressing an NF-
B superrepressor (I
B
N) could be
rescued by ectopic expression of cyclin D1. Thus, NF-
B contributes to cell cycle progression, and one of its targets might be cyclin D1.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The inducible transcription factor
NF-
B participates in the regulation of numerous genes, many of which
are involved in inflammation and the immune response. The NF-
B/Rel
family consists of five members (p50, p52, p65 [RelA], c-Rel, and
RelB) which can form various homo- or heterodimeric complexes. NF-
B
is activated by the release from cytoplasmic I
B proteins and
subsequently translocates into the nucleus (3, 5, 34).
Activation is triggered by signal-induced phosphorylation of I
B,
which targets the inhibitor for rapid degradation by the proteasome
(49).
Several observations have suggested a role of the NF-
B and I
B
gene products in cell proliferation, transformation, and tumor development (47, 53). NF-
B controls the expression of a
number of growth-promoting cytokines. In fact, a nuclear NF-
B-like
DNA binding activity is induced during the
G0-to-G1 transition after serum stimulation in
mouse fibroblasts and in regenerating liver (6, 13-15, 18,
54). Interestingly, the NF-
B transactivation potential appears
to be linked to signaling that controls cell cycle progression (9,
41).
The first evidence for a connection between NF-
B and cell death came
from studies with mice lacking the RelA unit of NF-
B as a result of
targeted mutation of the relA gene. These mice die before
birth and show massive degeneration of liver cells caused by apoptosis
(10). The antiapoptotic function of NF-
B is supported by
several studies demonstrating that NF-
B activity prevents the
induction of apoptosis by tumor necrosis factor alpha, ionizing
radiation, and anticancer agents (4) and that c-Rel prevents
spontaneous apoptosis of B cells (52). Recent data indicate
that constitutive NF-
B activation is essential for apoptosis resistance of different types of tumor cells (7, 48).
Interestingly, constitutive NF-
B is required for cell cycle
progression of Hodgkin's lymphoma cells (7). However, a
direct link between NF-
B activity and cell cycle progression remains
to be established.
The control of mammalian cell proliferation by extracellular signals
takes place in mid- to late G1 phase of the cell cycle. D-type cyclins, in association with cyclin-dependent kinases CDK4 and
CDK6, promote G1-to-S-phase transition by phosphorylating the retinoblastoma protein (pRB), thereby releasing the transcription factor E2F, which is required for the activation of S-phase-specific genes (8, 11, 21, 27, 39, 44, 46, 51).
The D-type cyclins are induced as part of the delayed early response to
mitogenic stimulation by growth factors, form active holoenzymes with
CDK4 or CDK6 by mid-G1, and are able to bind directly to
pRB via their N-terminal L-X-C-X-E motifs. Furthermore, they have a
substrate preference for pRB over histone H1, and they phosphorylate
pRB in vitro on residues which are physiologically phosphorylated in
G1 in vivo (44, 46, 51). Consistent with a major
role in positive regulation of G1 progression, the D-type cyclins are required for S-phase entry, and their overexpression accelerates G1 and reduces dependency on exogenous growth
factors (8). These data suggest that cyclin D-associated
kinases and their pRB substrate are the central players of the
G1 checkpoint control. In fact, it could be demonstrated
that mitogenic signal transduction pathways from three classes of
receptors converge and strictly require the cyclin D-CDK activity to
induce S phase (31). In addition, members of different
signal transduction pathways regulate cyclin D expression positively
(e.g., the transforming mutant p21ras and
p42/p44MAPK) or negatively (e.g., p38) (1, 2, 28,
40). However the transcriptional mechanisms that link mitogenic
signal transduction to cyclin D expression are poorly understood.
Our data indicate that NF-
B transmits growth signals directly to key
regulators of the cell cycle. NF-
B activates transcription of the
cyclin D1 promoter primarily through a proximal binding site. The
NF-
B binding sites that were identified are required for serum
induction of cyclin D1 transcription. Inhibition of NF-
B activity in
mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEF), T47D mammary carcinoma cells, or HeLa
cells stably expressing a dominant negative I
B
mutant led to a
delayed and reduced expression of cyclin D1 during G1
phase. Furthermore, inhibition of NF-
B resulted in retarded pRB
phosphorylation and in impeded G1-to-S-phase transition. The impaired G1-to-S-phase transition caused by NF-
B
inhibition could be overcome by ectopic expression of cyclin D1. These
observations suggest that NF-
B directly contributes to stimulation
of cell cycle progression by regulating the RB pathway.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell culture.
Primary MEF (32), COS-7 cells, HeLa
cells, and NIH 3T3 cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 100 U of
penicillin-streptomycin per ml, and 1 mM sodium pyruvate.
T47D
MTcycD1 cells (37) (donated by E. Musgrove) were
grown in RPMI 1640 phenol red-free medium supplemented with 10% FCS,
100 U of penicillin-streptomycin per ml, and 200 µg of G418 (Gibco
BRL) per ml. These cells contain a stably integrated cyclin D1
expression vector driven by a zinc-inducible metallothionein promoter
(37). Transient transfections into COS-7 and NIH 3T3 cells
were carried out with Lipofectin (Gibco BRL). For stable transfections
in MEF and T47D
MTcycD1 cells, Superfect (Qiagen) was used. Stable
clones were selected with G418 or hygromycin. All transfections were
done according to the manufacturer's protocols.
DNA constructs.
The cyclin D1 promoter-containing construct
pD1luc was described previously (36). We generated mutant
promoter constructs D1-
B1M and D1-
B2M, harboring two point
mutations in the D1-
B1 (CGCGACCCCC)
or the D1-
B2 (CGCGAGTTTT)
binding site (introduced point mutations are underlined),
respectively, by site-directed mutagenesis with the Clontech
Transformer mutagenesis kit. For D1-
B1/2M, the mutant D1-
B1 sites
were cloned as a SpeI/PmlI fragment into
D1-
B2M.
The p50 and p65 expression plasmids pECEp50 and pECEp65 (38)
and the I
B
N expression plasmid (25) were described
previously. For stable transfections of T47D
MTcycD1 cells, I
B
N
was cloned as an NruI/EcoRV fragment in
ppIXIhygM4. Plasmid c-jun-His6 was kindly provided by D. Bohmann; plasmid pBS-SP1 was provided by R. Tjian. Plasmid pGL2HIV was
constructed by inserting the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) core
promoter as a BglII/HindIII fragment into
pGL2 (Promega). pGL2HIVD1
B2 was constructed by cloning a
double-stranded oligonucleotide containing cyclin D1 promoter sequence
position from
37 to
19 into the MluI site of pGL2HIV.
EMSA.
For electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA),
cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), scraped
off the plate, and lysed in EBL buffer (25) for 30 min at
4°C. The extracts were centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C
in a Sigma 2K15 centrifuge. The supernatant was used for further
analysis. EMSA were performed as described previously (37).
NF-
B-containing complexes were determined by adding p50 antibody
(Rockland) or p65 antibody (no. sc109x; Santa Cruz) to the reaction mixture.
Western blotting.
Cells were washed twice with PBS, scraped
off the plate, and lysed with extraction buffer (32) for
2 h at 4°C with occasional vortexing. The extracts were
centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C in a Sigma 2K15
centrifuge. The supernatant was used for further analysis. Extracted
proteins (30 to 50 µg) were separated on sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gels. Gels were blotted onto nitrocellulose
(Amersham) by a semidry method, and immunodetection was performed with
the ECL enhanced chemiluminescence system. The primary antibodies used
were mouse monoclonal antibodies against pRB (G3245; Pharmingen) or p16
(no. sc-1661; Santa Cruz), goat polyclonal antibody against p15 (no.
sc-1429; Santa Cruz), and rabbit polyclonal antibodies against CDK4
(no. sc-260), CDK2 (no. sc-163), cyclin E (no. sc-481), p21 (no.
sc-397), p27 (no. M-197), and I
B
(no. C-21) (all from Santa
Cruz). Mouse monoclonal antibodies against cyclin D1 and cyclin D3 were
donated by J. Bartek. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antimouse,
antigoat, or antirabbit antibodies (Santa Cruz) were used for secondary detection.
pRB kinase assay.
For the pRB kinase assay, 200 µg of
protein extracts (see "Western blotting" above) per
immunoprecipitation was used with monoclonal anti-cyclin D1 antibody
(5D4; donated by J. Bartek). Immunoprecipitation and pRB kinase assay
were carried out as described previously (32), using as a
substrate glutathione S-transferase-RB pocket (pRB amino
acids 379 to 928).
Histone H1 kinase assay.
Cells were lysed in kinase
extraction buffer (50 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 250 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA,
0.1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10 mM
-glycerophosphate, 1 mM NaF, 0.1 mM Na3VO4, 5 µg of leupeptin per
ml, 2 µg of aprotinin per ml, and 0.1 M phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and incubated for 30 min on ice with vigorous vortexing every
5 min. Two hundred micrograms of total extracted protein per assay was
used. Following immunoprecipitation with polyclonal anti-CDK2 antibody
(no. sc-163), the protein A-Sepharose beads were washed three times in
kinase extraction buffer and twice in kinase assay buffer (50 mM HEPES
[pH 7.5], 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10 mM
-glycerophosphate, 1 mM NaF, 0.1 mM Na3VO4, 5 µg of leupeptin per ml, 2 µg of aprotinin per ml, and 0.1 M phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). The final pellet (15 µl of solid beads) was resuspended in 25 µl of kinase assay buffer with 2.5 µg
of the histone H1 substrate (Boehringer), 50 µM ATP, and 5 µCi of
[
-32P]ATP and incubated at 30°C for 20 min. The
reaction was stopped by adding 10 µl of 4× concentrated Laemmli
sample buffer, and the products were separated on a sodium dodecyl
sulfate-12% polyacrylamide gel.
Cell cycle analysis.
MEF cells were synchronized in
G0 by serum starvation for 3 days (in DMEM without serum),
followed by stimulation in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS.
T47D
MTcycD1 cells were synchronized in early G1 by
treatment with lovastatin (20 µM; Calbiochem) for 30 to 36 h and
subsequent stimulation by removal of lovastatin and addition of
mevalonate (2 mM; Sigma). For ectopic cyclin D1 expression, cells were
additionally treated with 75 µM ZnSO4. Progression
through the cell cycle was monitored by detection of the DNA content.
Cells were washed twice with PBS, trypsinized, and fixed in 70%
methanol for 2 h at
20°C. Subsequently, cells were
precipitated (5 min of centrifugation at 500 × g at 4°C
in a Sigma 6K15 centrifuge), washed with PBS, and resuspended in 1 ml
of PBS containing 40 U of RNase A per ml and 40 µg of propidium iodide per ml. After incubation for 30 min at 37°C, DNA flow
cytometric analysis was performed with an EPICS XL-MCL flow cytometer
(Coulter). For quantification we used Multicycle AV software (Phoenix
Flow Systems).
 |
RESULTS |
Transcription factor NF-
B activates the human cyclin D1
promoter.
To investigate if NF-
B is directly connected with
G1 checkpoint control, we searched for potential
transcriptional targets involved in the regulation of the cell cycle.
The human cyclin D1 promoter contains two putative NF-
B binding
sites, termed D1-
B1 and D1-
B2 (Fig.
1A). Expression of p50 and p65 in COS-7 cells led to a 12-fold stimulation of a luciferase reporter gene under
the control of the cyclin D1 promoter (Fig. 1B). Transcriptional activation of the cyclin D1 promoter by NF-
B was also observed in
Huh-7 and C33A cells (data not shown). In contrast, transfection of
either Sp1 or c-Jun, two other potential regulators of cyclin D1
expression (2, 22, 50), only weakly activated transcription in COS-7 cells.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Transcriptional regulation of the cyclin D1 promoter by
NF- B. (A) Schematic map of the cyclin D1 promoter. Sequences of
NF- B binding sites are shown and are designated D1- B1 and
D1- B2. (B) NF- B activates the cyclin D1 promoter. COS-7 cells
were cotransfected with 200 ng of pD1luc and 100 ng of either SP1,
c-Jun, p50/p65 expression constructs, or pUC18 to give a total of 400 ng. Luciferase activity was measured and standardized by cotransfection
of -galactosidase expression vectors. Results represent the means
and standard deviations from three individual experiments. RLU,
relative light units. (C) Specific binding of NF- B to the cyclin D1
promoter. Protein extracts from COS-7 cells, transfected with p50/p65
expression constructs, were incubated either with a specific NF- B
oligonucleotide probe (H2K) or with oligonucleotide probes containing
NF- B binding sites of the cyclin D1 promoter (D1- B1 and
D1- B2). The identity of NF- B-containing complexes was determined
by adding anti-p50 or anti-p65 antibodies to the reaction mixture, as
indicated. In lanes 4, 8, and 12, a 50-fold excess of unlabeled H2K
oligonucleotide was added to the reaction mixture. ns, nonspecific.
|
|
To test if the transcriptional activation of the cyclin D1 promoter by
NF-
B was due to direct DNA binding, an EMSA was performed (Fig. 1C).
Double-stranded oligonucleotides containing D1-
B1 and D1-
B2
sequences were generated and used to analyze DNA binding activity with
protein extracts of COS-7 cells cotransfected with p50 and p65
expression constructs. As a control, a bona fide NF-
B binding site
probe (H2K) was used. NF-
B binds to the D1-
B1, D1-
B2, and H2K
sites with comparable efficiencies (Fig. 1C, lanes 1, 5, and 9),
although D1-
B1 and D1-
B2 are not perfect NF-
B consensus
sequences. The identity of the NF-
B-DNA complex was proven by
reactivity towards antibodies against p50 and p65 (lanes 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, and 11). These results demonstrate that NF-
B can bind to the
human cyclin D1 promoter and activate transcription.
The proximal NF-
B binding site D1-
B2 is necessary for
NF-
B-dependent activation.
To investigate the transcriptional
activation of the cyclin D1 promoter by NF-
B in more detail, we
tested promoter constructs containing point mutations of the D1-
B1
and D1-
B2 sites. We cotransfected these constructs either with p50
and p65 expression constructs or with a control plasmid into COS-7
cells and measured luciferase expression (Fig.
2A, left panel). Mutation of the distal NF-
B binding site (D1-
B1M) did not interfere with NF-
B
activation of the promoter. In contrast, mutation of the proximal
NF-
B binding site (D1-
B2M), or of both, caused a significant
reduction in the NF-
B responsiveness of the cyclin D1 promoter. The
point mutations introduced into both sites prevented NF-
B binding to these sequences (data not shown). To test if NF-
B binding sites contribute to serum responsiveness of the cyclin D1 promoter (45, 51), we transfected wild-type and mutant promoters into NIH 3T3
cells and measured luciferase activity (Fig. 2A, right panel). Serum
induction of the cyclin D1 promoter was completely dependent on a
functional D1-
B2 site. By EMSA analysis (Fig. 2A, right panel,
inset), we could demonstrate that growth factor addition activated
NF-
B, confirming previous findings that NF-
B is induced upon
G0-to-G1-phase transition (6, 15).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Functional characterization of NF- B-responsive
elements in the cyclin D1 promoter. (A) Reporter gene activation of
wild-type (WT) and mutant constructs by p50/p65 was determined in COS-7
cells (left panel) as described for Fig. 1B. The graphs represent the
means and standard deviations from three individual experiments. Serum
induction of the cyclin D1 promoter was measured in NIH 3T3 cells as
described previously (22) (right panel). Luciferase activity
was measured as described for Fig. 1B. An EMSA was performed to show
serum-induced NF- B activation (inset). ns, nonspecific. (B)
Induction of the cyclin D1 promoter by serum is reduced by I B N
expression. NIH 3T3 cells were transiently transfected with the cyclin
D1 promoter-luciferase construct and increasing amounts of the
I B N expression vector, as indicated. Luciferase activity was
measured after readdition of serum to the starved cells. (C) Activation
of a heterologous promoter through the D1- B2 sequence. A single copy
of a cyclin D1 promoter fragment containing the D1- B2 site was
cloned in front of an HIV core promoter luciferase construct (pGL2HIV).
The luciferase reporter gene assay was carried out as described for
Fig. 1B. RLU, relative light units.
|
|
To confirm that growth factor induction of the cyclin D1 promoter
depends on NF-
B activity, the cyclin D1 promoter construct was
cotransfected with increasing amounts of I
B
N expression vector
(Fig. 2B). In fact, repression of endogenous NF-
B activity caused a
reduction in serum-induced promoter activity.
We next investigated the potential of the D1-
B2 sequence to mediate
NF-
B-dependent transcriptional activation in a heterologous promoter
context. The sequence was inserted into a luciferase expression
construct which contains only the HIV core promoter (pGL2). pGL2 or
pGL2D1
B2 was transfected together with p50 and p65 or with a control
plasmid into COS-7 cells (Fig. 2C). A single copy of the D1-
B2
sequence could activate the core promoter threefold in the presence of
NF-
B, demonstrating that this NF-
B element is functional in a
different context. Taken together, these results suggest that NF-
B
activates transcription of the cyclin D1 promoter primarily through the
proximal binding site D1-
B2.
A stably expressed dominant negative I
B mutant abrogates
serum-induced activation of NF-
B in MEF.
Primary MEF were used
as a model system to investigate whether NF-
B regulates endogenous
cyclin D1 expression and hence influences the RB pathway. To inhibit
NF-
B activity, we stably expressed a superrepressor form of I
B
(I
B
N) (7, 25). As a control, the empty expression
plasmid was transfected. The expression level of I
B
N was
comparable to that of endogenous I
B
for clones I3 and I4 (Fig.
3A). In contrast, in clone I5 expression
of I
B
N was much lower.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
I B N expression reduces serum-induced NF- B
activity. (A) Expression of I B N in primary MEF. MEF were
transfected with an I B N expression construct or an empty vector,
and stable clones were selected with G418 (Gibco BRL). Control and
I B N-transfected MEF cells were lysed with extraction buffer and
analyzed by Western blotting with anti-I B antibody. The positions
of wild-type (WT) and mutant I B are indicated. Lanes 1 and 2, control clones (C1 and C2); lanes 3, 4, and 5, I B N-expressing
clones (I3, I4, and I5, respectively). (B) Serum induction of NF- B
DNA binding activity. MEF cells were synchronized in G0 by
serum starvation for 3 days, followed by stimulation with DMEM plus
10% FCS. Serum-deprived and -stimulated C1 and I3 cells were extracted
at the indicated time points and analyzed by EMSA. The NF- B-DNA
complex containing p50/p65 as determined by antibody supershifting and
inhibition (data not shown) is indicated.
|
|
Serum-induced activation of NF-
B was analyzed by EMSA (Fig. 3B).
Serum-deprived and -stimulated cells were extracted at the indicated
time points and incubated with the H2K probe. NF-
B binding activity
was induced in control cells but not in cells expressing the
superrepressor (Fig. 3B). The NF-
B complex consisted of
heterodimeric p50-p65 as determined by antibody supershifting and
inhibition (data not shown).
NF-
B inactivation causes reduced and delayed cyclin D1
expression in G1 phase.
The effect of NF-
B
inactivation on cyclin D1 expression during G1 phase was
analyzed in synchronization experiments. Cells were starved of serum
and then released from G0 by readdition of serum. Cells
were extracted at the indicated time points, and protein extracts were
analyzed by Western blotting (Fig. 4A). Cyclin D1 expression was delayed in cells expressing the NF-
B superrepressor compared to control cells (Fig. 4A, upper panel). The
blots were stripped and analyzed for CDK4 expression. Consistent with
the fact that CDK4 expression is not cell cycle dependent, CDK4 levels
were not influenced by serum stimulation (Fig. 4A, upper panel). The
difference in the kinetics of cyclin D1 induction was quantified by
using multiple Western blots (Fig. 4A, bottom panel). To prove that the
effect of NF-
B on cyclin D1 expression was not cell type specific,
the same experiments were performed with synchronized HeLa cells either
stably expressing the superrepressor or containing the empty vector
(Fig. 4B). Again, inhibition of NF-
B caused delayed and reduced
cyclin D1 expression.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
NF- B regulates serum-induced cyclin D1 expression.
(A) Western blots of MEF protein extracts, prepared at the indicated
times after serum induction of C1 and I3 cells (upper panel). Cyclin D1
was detected with the monoclonal antibody DCS-6. The blot was stripped
and reprobed with polyclonal anti-CDK4 antibody. Three individual
experiments were performed, and relative intensities of the cyclin D1
bands were quantified with Quantity One software (PDI Inc.) (lower
panel). Error bars indicate standard deviations. Similar results were
obtained with C2 and I4 cells (data not shown). (B) NF- B-dependent
cyclin D1 expression in HeLa cells. Protein extracts of control and
I B N-transfected cells were prepared at the indicated times after
serum induction. Cyclin D1 expression was analyzed by Western blotting
(upper panel). A nonspecific band which cross-reacts with the antibody
served as loading control (data not shown). Serum-induced cyclin D1
expression was quantified as described for panel A, lower panel.
|
|
NF-
B inactivation leads to reduced cyclin D1-associated kinase
activity and delayed pRB phosphorylation in mid- to late G1
phase.
Defective cyclin D1 expression implies that NF-
B
inactivation may have further consequences for the RB pathway, since
cyclin D1 forms complexes with cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK4 and CDK6) which subsequently phosphorylate the retinoblastoma protein in mid- to
late G1 phase. Hence, we assayed cyclin D1-associated pRB
kinase activity at different times after release from serum starvation.
In control cells, cyclin D1-associated kinase activity increased faster
and reached a higher level than in cells expressing the NF-
B
superrepressor (Fig. 5A). The specificity
of the antibody was confirmed in a previous report (32).
Surprisingly, cyclin D1-associated kinase activity was even more
affected by I
B
N than would be predicted from the more modest
modulation of cyclin D1 expression (Fig. 4).

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
I B N expression results in a delay of pRB
phosphorylation (A) NF- B inactivation affects cyclin D1-associated
kinase activity. pRB phosphorylation by cyclin D1-associated kinase
activity from synchronized C1 (control) and I4 (I B N) cells was
analyzed as described in Materials and Methods. Similar results were
obtained with C2 and I3 cells (data not shown). (B) NF- B
inactivation causes a delay in phosphorylation of endogenous pRB.
Western blots of protein extracts prepared after serum induction of
either control (C1 and C2) or I B N-expressing (I3 and I4) cells
are shown. Hypophosphorylated (pRB) and hyperphosphorylated (ppRB) RB
proteins were detected with the monoclonal antibody G3-245
(Pharmingen). (C) Expression of various cell cycle-regulatory proteins
in either control (C1) or I B N-expressing (I3) cells. Western
blots of protein extracts prepared at the indicated times after serum
induction are shown. Cyclin E, cyclin D3, CDK2, p27, p21, p16, and p15
were detected as described in Materials and Methods. Similar results
were obtained with C2 and I4 cells (data not shown). (D) Histone H1
kinase activity of anti-CDK2 immunoprecipitates (IP) from synchronized
C1 and I3 cells. Similar results were obtained with C2 and I4 cells
(data not shown).
|
|
The subsequent analysis of the endogenous pRB phosphorylation status
during G1 phase revealed that inactivation of NF-
B
caused a delay in pRB phosphorylation (Fig. 5B). Whereas in control
cells hyperphosphorylated RB (ppRB) was already observed at 12 h
after serum stimulation, in I
B
N-expressing cells pRB
phosphorylation did not appear before 16 h.
To investigate if NF-
B would control expression of other components
of the cell cycle machinery, we analyzed additional G1 cyclins, kinases, and inhibitors by Western blotting. NF-
B
inactivation did not significantly interfere with the expression of
cyclin E, cyclin D3, CDK2, p27, p21, p16, and p15 in synchronized cells (Fig. 5C). We also tested whether NF-
B inactivation would interfere with CDK2 kinase activity. Histone H1 phosphorylation by CDK2 was
assayed at different times after release from serum starvation. In
control cells CDK2 activity reached maximum levels after 16 h,
while in I
B
N-expressing cells full activity was observed only
after 24 h (Fig. 5D). Thus, NF-
B inactivation interferes with
both CDK4 and CDK2 kinase activities.
I
B
N expression affects G1-to-S-phase
transition.
Since pRB phosphorylation is a prerequisite for
G1-to-S-phase transition, NF-
B activity should influence
progression of the cell cycle. The progression of synchronized MEF
through the cell cycle was determined by fluorescence-activated cell
sorter (FACS) analysis (Fig. 6) and
quantified (Table 1). NF-
B
inactivation indeed strongly delayed cell cycle
progression. Control cells (C1) started to enter S phase at 16 h
after serum stimulation, reached a maximum in S phase at 20 h, and
passed into G2/M phase after 24 h. In contrast, in
cells expressing I
B
N (I1), significant S-phase entry was not
observed before 20 h after serum readdition, and the maximum was
still not reached after 24 h.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
NF- B inactivation causes retardation of
G1-to-S-phase transition. FACS analysis of progression into
S phase of C1 and I3 cells at 0, 16, 20, or 24 h after readdition
of serum is shown. Progression through the cell cycle was monitored by
detection of the DNA content by using propidium iodide staining.
Similar results were obtained with C2 and I4 cells.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Cell cycle quantification for synchronized control (C1
and C2) and I B N-expressing (I3, I4, and I5) MEF clones
|
|
In another experiment, using different control and I
B
N-expressing
clones (Table 1, experiment 2), again at 20 h after serum stimulation more control cells (C2) than I
B
N-expressing cells (I4) had entered S phase. While after 24 h control cells began to
enter G2/M phase, I
B
N-expressing cells still were
undergoing G1-to-S-phase transition. Finally, in a third
experiment (Table 1, experiment 3), control cells (C16) were compared
with a third I
B
N clone (I5), where only low I
B
N expression
was observed (Fig. 3A). In this case differences in cell cycle
progression were weak. Only slightly more control cells than
inhibitor-expressing cells had entered S phase at 16 h after serum
stimulation. While most of the I
B
N-expressing cells were in S
phase at 20 h after serum stimulation, some of the control cells
had reached G2/M phase or had even entered the next cell
cycle. At 24 h after serum stimulation, synchronization in both
populations was lost.
We also analyzed the effect of NF-
B inactivation on cell cycle
progression in a T47D mammary carcinoma cell line modified to inducibly
express cyclin D1 from a stably integrated zinc-responsive expression
vector (37). These cells were stably transfected with
I
B
N or empty vector (Fig. 7A). As
observed for MEF and HeLa cells, I
B
N expression resulted in a
pronounced delay of cyclin D1 induction during early to
mid-G1 phase of the synchronized cells (Fig. 7B).
Furthermore, as in MEF cells, inhibition of NF-
B activity in the
T47D cells resulted in retarded G1-to-S-phase transition
(Fig. 7C, compare first and third rows of panels). The
I
B
N-mediated delay of cell cycle progression could be overcome by
zinc-induced ectopic cyclin D1 expression (Fig. 7C). However, ectopic
cyclin D1 expression also led to somewhat accelerated cell cycle
progression in control cells, perhaps due to the elevated cyclin D1
levels.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Retardation of G1-to-S-phase transition in
T47D MTcycD1 cells, caused by NF- B inactivation, was rescued by
ectopic cyclin D1 expression. (A) Expression of I B N in
T47D MTcycD1 cells. Cells were transfected with an I B N
expression construct or an empty vector, and stable clones were
selected with hygromycin (Sigma). Control and I B N-transfected
cells were lysed with extraction buffer and analyzed by Western
blotting with anti-I B antibody. The positions of wild-type (WT)
and mutant I B are indicated. Lanes 1 and 2, control clones (TC1
and TC2); lanes 3 and 4, I B N-expressing clones (TI3 and TI4). (B)
NF- B-dependent cyclin D1 expression in T47D MTcycD1 cells. Western
blots of protein extracts prepared from presynchronized TC1 and TI4
cells at the indicated time points after lovastatin removal and
mevalonate addition are shown. Cyclin D1 was detected with the
monoclonal antibody DCS-6. (C) FACS analysis of progression into S
phase of TC1 and TI4 cells at 0, 18, or 22 h after lovastatin
removal and mevalonate addition. Ectopic expression of cyclin D1 was
induced by the addition of Zn2+ (+) or was not induced
( ), as indicated. Progression through the cell cycle was monitored by
detection of the DNA content. TC2 and TI3 cells (data not shown) gave
similar results.
|
|
In summary, our data show that NF-
B inactivation led to delayed
G1-to-S-phase transition in MEF and T47D cells. The
observation that this can be rescued by ectopic cyclin D1 expression is
consistent with the hypothesis that NF-
B regulates the RB pathway
and that one of its targets could be cyclin D1, although other targets cannot be ruled out.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The present study provides evidence that the pleiotropic
transcription factor NF-
B transmits growth signals directly to key regulators of the cell cycle. Our results suggest that NF-
B
stimulates cyclin D1 transcription in G1 phase and thereby
subsequently affects both pRB phosphorylation and
G1-to-S-phase transition. The impaired cell cycle
progression following NF-
B inhibition could be rescued by ectopic
cyclin D1 expression, indicating that either cyclin D1 or another
component of the RB pathway is controlled by NF-
B.
Interestingly, we observed that cyclin D1-associated kinase activity
was even more affected upon NF-
B inactivation than would be expected
from the modest modulation of cyclin D1 expression. However, narrow
individual threshold levels are critical for key cell cycle regulators
to exert their effects (46). Hence, subtle changes in their
expression level can interfere with cell cycle progression.
Alternatively, our results may indicate that NF-
B regulates cyclin
D1-associated kinase activity through another pathway. So far we cannot
identify any further cell cycle regulators whose expression levels were
affected by NF-
B inactivation (Fig. 5C). However, we do not rule out
that NF-
B could control expression or activity of additional
components. The observation that ectopic expression of cyclin D1 can
overcome the delay of G1-to-S-phase transition caused by
NF-
B inactivation makes it unlikely that NF-
B controls an event
late in G1 or S phase. In this respect, the observed delay
in CDK2 activity (Fig. 5D) could be due to delayed pRB phosphorylation.
NF-
B activates transcription of the cyclin D1 promoter primarily
through a proximal binding site. Weak residual NF-
B responsiveness after mutation of two identified major binding sites indicates the
presence of further cryptic NF-
B elements. NF-
B binding sites as
well as cellular NF-
B activation are required for serum induction of
cyclin D1 transcription (Fig. 2). Even though the appropriate
expression of cyclin D1 depended on NF-
B, activation of NF-
B,
e.g., by tumor necrosis factor alpha, in serum-deprived cells was not
sufficient to induce cyclin D1 (not shown). Thus, further growth
factor-activated regulators must contribute in parallel to ensure
efficient cyclin D1 induction in G1 phase. Recent data
indicate that NF-
B can functionally interact with other
transcription factors, such as c-Fos/c-Jun, SP1, or E2F-1 (26,
47). Since the cyclin D1 promoter has been shown to be regulated
by these transcription factors (2, 22, 50), maximal activation might result from multiple functional interactions. The fact
that the cyclin D1 promoter contains binding sites for all of these
transcription factors indicates the possibility of multiple cooperative
interactions. Such cooperativity could form the basis for the suggested
function of cyclin D1 to integrate diverse mitogenic stimuli (31,
45, 51).
In agreement with previous findings, we observed growth factor
activation of NF-
B DNA binding activity in early G1
phase (6, 15). The activation level varied between different
cell types analyzed (Fig. 2A and 3B and data not shown). A relatively weak induction of NF-
B DNA binding activity in response to serum may
indicate that growth factor signaling additionally leads to RelA
phosphorylation, ultimately increasing the transactivation potential of
NF-
B. Recently, it has been demonstrated that phosphorylation of the
RelA subunit stimulates NF-
B transcriptional activity by promoting
an interaction with CBP/p300 (55, 56). The observation that
even cyclin-dependent kinases may regulate RelA through interaction with the coactivator CBP/p300 indicates a possible further link between
NF-
B and cell cycle control (41).
The data presented here raise the question of how NF-
B is linked to
mitogenic signal transduction. Activation of NF-
B involves the
phosphorylation of I
B
at its regulatory N terminus, subsequent conjugation with ubiquitin, and degradation of the inhibitor mediated by the proteasome (3, 49). Recently an I
B
-specific
kinase activity was identified as part of a 700-kDa complex
(12), which can be activated by MEKK1 (29).
Interestingly, MEKK1 can interact with Ras (42), a component
of one major mitogenic signaling cascade, the
Ras-Raf-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway (20, 23,
33). Another interesting link is provided by the observation that
the ribosomal S6 kinase pp90rsk, a downstream target of the
Ras-Raf-MAPK pathway, phosphorylates I
B
(19, 43).
Furthermore, it has been shown that the transforming mutant
p21ras can activate cyclin D1 expression (1, 2).
Consistently, Ras inactivation causes a decline in cyclin D1 protein
levels, accumulation of hypophosphorylated pRB, and G1
arrest (1, 40). Finally, Raf kinase activates NF-
B
(16, 24, 30), and NF-
B activity is required for
Ras-mediated oncogenesis (17, 35). Taken together, these
observations provide a connection between the mitogenic Ras-Raf-MAPK
pathway, NF-
B activation, and cell cycle progression.
Recent data have indicated a role of the NF-
B and I
B gene
products in cell proliferation, transformation, and tumor development (47, 53). Constitutive NF-
B activation is essential for
survival and progression of Hodgkin's lymphoma and breast cancer cells (7, 48). The direct link between NF-
B activity and the
central pathway of G1 checkpoint control presented here
provides a basis for understanding how NF-
B/Rel deregulation may
result in tumorigenesis.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Alexandra Bohne, Uta Fischer, Heidi Riedel, and Heidrun
Peter for excellent technical assistance.
This work was supported in part by grants from the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB344) to C.S. and M.S. and by a grant from
the Fond der Chemischen Industrie to M.S.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Humboldt
Universität zu Berlin, Molekulare Zellbiologie,
Max-Delbrück-Haus, Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, 13122 Berlin,
Germany. Phone: 49 30 94 06 33 07. Fax: 49 30 94 06 33 06. E-mail:
mstraus{at}mdc.berlin.de.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Aktas, H.,
H. Cai, and G. M. Cooper.
1997.
Ras links growth factor signaling to the cell cycle machinery via regulation of cyclin D1 and the Cdk inhibitor p27KIP1.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:3850-3857[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Albanese, C.,
J. Johnson,
G. Watanabe,
N. Eklund,
D. Vu,
A. Arnold, and R. G. Pestell.
1995.
Transforming p21ras mutants and c-Ets-2 activate the cyclin D1 promoter through distinguishable regions.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:23589-23597[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Baeuerle, P. A., and D. Baltimore.
1996.
NF- B: ten years after.
Cell
87:13-20[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Baichwal, V. R., and P. A. Baeuerle.
1997.
Activate NF- B or die?
Curr. Biol.
7:R94-R96[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Baldwin, A. S., Jr.
1996.
The NF- B and I B proteins: new discoveries and insights.
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
14:649-683[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Baldwin, A. S., Jr.,
J. C. Azizkhan,
D. E. Jensen,
A. A. Beg, and L. R. Coodly.
1991.
Induction of NF- B DNA-binding activity during the G0-to-G1 transition in mouse fibroblasts.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:4943-4951[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Bargou, R. C.,
F. Emmerich,
D. Krappmann,
K. Bommert,
M. Y. Mapara,
W. Arnold,
H. D. Royer,
E. Grienstein,
A. Greiner,
C. Scheidereit, and B. Dörken.
1997.
Constitutive nuclear factor- B-RelA activation is required for proliferation and survival of Hodgkin's disease tumor cells.
J. Clin. Invest.
100:2961-2969[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Bartek, J.,
J. Bartkova, and J. Lukas.
1996.
The retinoblastoma protein pathway and the restriction point.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
8:805-814[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Bash, J.,
W. X. Zong, and C. Gelinas.
1997.
c-Rel arrests the proliferation of HeLa cells and affects critical regulators of the G1/S-phase transition.
Mol. Cell Biol.
17:6526-6536[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Beg, A. A.,
W. C. Sha,
R. T. Bronson,
S. Ghosh, and D. Baltimore.
1995.
Embryonic lethality and liver degeneration in mice lacking the RelA component of NF- B.
Nature
376:167-170[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Beijersbergen, R. L., and R. Bernards.
1996.
Cell cycle regulation by the retinoblastoma family of growth inhibitory proteins.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1287:103-120[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Chen, Z. J.,
L. Parent, and T. Maniatis.
1996.
Site-specific phosphorylation of I B by a novel ubiquitination-dependent protein kinase activity.
Cell
84:853-862[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Cressman, D. E.,
L. E. Greenbaum,
B. A. Haber, and R. Taub.
1994.
Rapid activation of post-hepatectomy factor/nuclear factor B in hepatocytes, a primary response in the regenerating liver.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:30429-30435[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Cressman, D. E., and R. Taub.
1994.
Physiologic turnover of nuclear factor B by nuclear proteolysis.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:26594-26597[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Duckett, C. S.,
N. D. Perkins,
K. Leung,
A. B. Agranoff, and G. J. Nabel.
1995.
Cytokine induction of nuclear factor B in cycling and growth-arrested cells. Evidence for cell cycle-independent activation.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:18836-18840[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Finco, T. S., and A. S. Baldwin, Jr.
1993.
B site-dependent induction of gene expression by diverse inducers of nuclear factor B requires Raf-1.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:17676-17679[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Finco, T. S.,
J. K. Westwick,
J. L. Norris,
A. A. Beg,
C. J. Der, and A. S. Baldwin, Jr.
1997.
Oncogenic Ha-Ras-induced signaling activates NF- B transcriptional activity, which is required for cellular transformation.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:24113-24116[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
FitzGerald, M. J.,
E. M. Webber,
J. R. Donovan, and N. Fausto.
1995.
Rapid DNA binding by nuclear factor B in hepatocytes at the start of liver regeneration.
Cell Growth Differ.
6:417-427[Abstract].
|
| 19.
|
Ghoda, L.,
X. Lin, and W. C. Greene.
1997.
The 90-kDa ribosomal S6 kinase (pp90rsk) phosphorylates the N-terminal regulatory domain of I B and stimulates its degradation in vitro.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:21281-21288[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Heldin, C. H.
1995.
Dimerization of cell surface receptors in signal transduction.
Cell
80:213-223[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Helin, K., and E. Harlow.
1993.
The retinoblastoma protein as a transcriptional repressor.
Trends Cell Biol.
3:43-46.
|
| 22.
|
Herber, B.,
M. Truss,
M. Beato, and R. Muller.
1994.
Inducible regulatory elements in the human cyclin D1 promoter.
Oncogene
9:2105-2107[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Hill, C. S., and R. Treisman.
1995.
Transcriptional regulation by extracellular signals: mechanisms and specificity.
Cell
80:199-211[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Kanno, T., and U. Siebenlist.
1996.
Activation of nuclear factor- B via T cell receptor requires a Raf kinase and Ca2+ influx. Functional synergy between Raf and calcineurin.
J. Immunol.
157:5277-5283[Abstract].
|
| 25.
|
Krappmann, D.,
F. G. Wulczyn, and C. Scheidereit.
1996.
Different mechanisms control signal-induced degradation and basal turnover of the NF- B inhibitor I B alpha in vivo.
EMBO J.
15:6716-6726[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Kundu, M.,
M. Guermah,
R. G. Roeder,
S. Amini, and K. Khalili.
1997.
Interaction between cell cycle regulator, E2F-1, and NF- B mediates repression of HIV-1 gene transcription.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:29468-29474[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
LaThangue, N. B.
1994.
DRTF1/E2F: an expanding family of heterodimeric transcription factors implicated in cell-cycle control.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
19:108-114[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Lavoie, J. N.,
G. L'Allemain,
A. Brunet,
R. Muller, and J. Pouyssegur.
1996.
Cyclin D1 expression is regulated positively by the p42/p44MAPK and negatively by the p38/HOGMAPK pathway.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:20608-20616[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Lee, F. S.,
J. Hagler,
Z. J. Chen, and T. Maniatis.
1997.
Activation of the I B kinase complex by MEKK1, a kinase of the JNK pathway.
Cell
88:213-222[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Li, S., and J. M. Sedivy.
1993.
Raf-1 protein kinase activates the NF- B transcription factor by dissociating the cytoplasmic NF- B-I B complex.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:9247-9251[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Lukas, J.,
J. Bartkova, and J. Bartek.
1996.
Convergence of mitogenic signalling cascades from diverse classes of receptors at the cyclin D-cyclin-dependent kinase-pRb-controlled G1 checkpoint.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:6917-6925[Abstract].
|
| 32.
|
Lukas, J.,
J. Bartkova,
M. Rohde,
M. Strauss, and J. Bartek.
1995.
Cyclin D1 is dispensable for G1 control in retinoblastoma gene-deficient cells independently of cdk4 activity.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:2600-2611[Abstract].
|
| 33.
|
Marshall, C. J.
1996.
Ras effectors.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
8:197-204[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
May, M. J., and S. Ghosh.
1997.
Rel/NF- B and I B proteins: an overview.
Semin. Cancer Biol.
8:63-73[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Mayo, M. W.,
C. Y. Wang,
P. C. Cogswell,
K. S. Rogers Graham,
S. W. Lowe,
C. J. Der, and A. S. Baldwin, Jr.
1997.
Requirement of NF- B activation to suppress p53-independent apoptosis induced by oncogenic Ras.
Science
278:1812-1815[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Muller, H.,
J. Lukas,
A. Schneider,
P. Warthoe,
J. Bartek,
M. Eilers, and M. Strauss.
1994.
Cyclin D1 expression is regulated by the retinoblastoma protein.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:2945-2949[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Musgrove, E. A.,
C. S. L. Lee,
M. F. Buckley, and R. L. Sutherland.
1994.
Cyclin D1 induction in breast cancer cells shortens G1 and is sufficient for cells arrested in G1 to complete the cell cycle.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:8022-8026[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Naumann, M.,
F. G. Wulczyn, and C. Scheidereit.
1993.
The NF- B precursor p105 and the proto-oncogene product Bcl-3 are I B molecules and control nuclear translocation of NF- B.
EMBO J.
12:213-222[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Nevins, J. R.
1992.
E2F: a link between the Rb tumor suppressor protein and viral oncoproteins.
Science
258:424-429[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Peeper, D. S.,
T. M. Upton,
M. H. Ladha,
E. Neuman,
J. Zalvide,
R. Bernards,
J. A. DeCaprio, and M. E. Ewen.
1997.
Ras signalling linked to the cell-cycle machinery by the retinoblastoma protein.
Nature
386:177-181[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Perkins, N. D.,
L. K. Felzien,
J. C. Betts,
K. Leung,
D. H. Beach, and G. J. Nabel.
1997.
Regulation of NF- B by cyclin-dependent kinases associated with the p300 coactivator.
Science
275:523-527[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Russell, M.,
C. A. Lange Carter, and G. L. Johnson.
1995.
Direct interaction between Ras and the kinase domain of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase (MEKK1).
J. Biol. Chem.
270:11757-11760[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Schouten, G. J.,
A. C. Vertegaal,
S. T. Whiteside,
A. Israel,
M. Toebes,
J. C. Dorsman,
A. J. van der Eb, and A. Zantema.
1997.
I B is a target for the mitogen-activated 90 kDa ribosomal S6 kinase.
EMBO J.
16:3133-3144[Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Sherr, C. J.
1993.
Mammalian G1 cyclins.
Cell
73:1059-1065[Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Sherr, C. J.
1996.
Cancer cell cycles.
Science
274:1672-1677[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Sherr, C. J., and J. M. Roberts.
1995.
Inhibitors of mammalian G1 cyclin-dependent kinases.
Genes Dev.
9:1149-1163[Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Siebenlist, U.,
G. Franzoso, and K. Brown.
1994.
Structure, regulation and function of NF- B.
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
10:405-455.
|
| 48.
|
Sovak, M. A.,
R. E. Bellas,
D. W. Kim,
G. J. Zanieski,
A. E. Rogers,
A. M. Traish, and G. E. Sonenshein.
1997.
Aberrant nuclear factor- B/Rel expression and the pathogenesis of breast cancer.
J. Clin. Invest.
100:2952-2960[Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Verma, I. M.,
J. K. Stevenson,
E. M. Schwarz,
D. Van Antwerp, and S. Miyamoto.
1995.
Rel/NF- B/I B family: intimate tales of association and dissociation.
Genes Dev.
9:2723-2735[Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Watanabe, G.,
C. Albanese,
J. Lee,
A. Reutens,
G. Vario,
B. Henglein, and R. G. Pestell.
1998.
Inhibition of cyclin D1 kinase activity is associated with E2F-mediated inhibition of cyclin D1 promoter activity through E2F and Sp1.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:3212-3222[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Weinberg, R. A.
1995.
The retinoblastoma protein and cell cycle control.
Cell
81:323-330[Medline].
|
| 52.
|
Wu, M.,
H. Lee,
R. E. Bellas,
S. L. Schauer,
M. Arsura,
D. Katz,
M. J. FitzGerald,
T. L. Rothstein,
D. H. Sherr, and G. E. Sonenshein.
1996.
Inhibition of NF- B/Rel induces apoptosis of murine B cells.
EMBO J.
15:4682-4690[Medline].
|
| 53.
|
Wulczyn, F. G.,
D. Krappmann, and C. Scheidereit.
1996.
The NF- B/Rel and I B gene families: mediators of immune response and inflammation.
J. Mol. Med.
74:749-769[Medline].
|
| 54.
|
Yamada, Y.,
I. Kirillova,
J. J. Peschon, and N. Fausto.
1997.
Initiation of liver growth by tumor necrosis factor: deficient liver regeneration in mice lacking type I tumor necrosis factor receptor.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:1441-1446[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 55.
|
Zhong, H.,
H. SuYang,
H. Erdjument Bromage,
P. Tempst, and S. Ghosh.
1997.
The transcriptional activity of NF- B is regulated by the I B-associated PKAc subunit through a cyclic AMP-independent mechanism.
Cell
89:413-424[Medline].
|
| 56.
|
Zhong, H.,
R. E. Voll, and S. Ghosh.
1998.
Phosphorylation of NF- B p65 by PKA stimulates transcriptional activity by promoting a novel bivalent interaction with the coactivator CBP/p300.
Mol. Cell
1:661-672[Medline].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, April 1999, p. 2690-2698, Vol. 19, No. 4
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Miyake, T., Aoki, M., Morishita, R.
(2008). Inhibition of anastomotic intimal hyperplasia using a chimeric decoy strategy against NF{kappa}B and E2F in a rabbit model. Cardiovasc Res
79: 706-714