Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, April 1999, p. 2887-2894, Vol. 19, No. 4
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Expression of Mutated Paramecium Telomerase
RNAs In Vivo Leads to Templating Errors That Resemble
Those Made by Retroviral Reverse Transcriptase
Amanda J.
Ye,1
W.
John
Haynes,2 and
Daniel P.
Romero1,*
Department of Pharmacology, University of
Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota
55455,1 and Laboratory of Molecular
Biology, Department of Genetics, University of Wisconsin, Madison,
Wisconsin 537062
Received 27 July 1998/Returned for modification 21 September
1998/Accepted 14 December 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Telomeric DNA consists of short, tandemly repeated sequences at the
ends of chromosomes. Telomeric DNA in the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia is synthesized by an error-prone telomerase with an RNA template specific for GGGGTT repeats. We have previously
shown that misincorporation of TTP residues at the telomerase
RNA templating nucleotide C52 accounts for the 30% GGGTTT
repeats randomly distributed in wild-type telomeres. To more
completely characterize variable repeat synthesis in P. tetraurelia, telomerase RNA genes mutated at C52 (A, U,
and G) were expressed in vivo. De novo telomeric repeats from
transformants indicate that the predominant TTP misincorporation error
seen in the wild-type telomerase is dependent on the presence of a C residue at template position 52. Paradoxically, the effects of
various other telomerase RNA template and alignment region mutations on de novo telomeres include significant changes in fidelity,
as well as the synthesis of aberrant, 5-nucleotide telomeric repeats.
The occurrence of deletion errors and the altered fidelity of mutated
P. tetraurelia telomerase, in conjunction with
misincorporation by the wild-type enzyme, suggest that the
telomerase RNA template domain may be analogous to
homopolymeric mutational hot spots that lead to similar errors by the
human immunodeficiency virus proofreading-deficient reverse transcriptase.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Telomeres, the specialized
DNA-protein structures found at the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes, are
necessary for chromosome stability and to facilitate the complete
replication of chromosomal termini. In the absence of a proper
telomere "cap," chromosomes may be recognized as damaged DNA,
leading to cell cycle arrest (50, 22), as well as
illegitimate fusions, degradation, and aneuploidy (reviewed in
reference 7).
Telomeric DNA from most eukaryotes consists of a variable number of
short, tandemly repeated sequences. The sequences invariably have
a strand bias, with a typically G-rich strand oriented 5' to 3'
toward the chromosome terminus. The telomeric G-rich strand is
synthesized by the ribonucleoprotein enzyme telomerase.
Telomerase RNA (TER) subunits, which have been isolated from a number
of ciliates, yeast, and mammals, all share the characteristic feature of a templating domain that dictates the species-specific telomeric repeat added to the 3' end of the chromosome (reviewed in references 17 and 46).
Protein components associated with telomerase from
ciliates, yeasts, and mammals have been isolated. A 123-kDa
protein from the ciliate Euplotes aediculatus
(35) and its homologs from Tetrahymena
thermophila, Oxytricha trifallax, Saccharomyces
cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, and humans
(9, 13, 43, 44) all have the sequence and functional
characteristics of a reverse transcriptase related to retrotransposon
and retroviral reverse transcriptases (reviewed in reference
10). Mutational studies of the S. cerevisiae gene EST2 (34, 36) and in vitro
reconstitution experiments with the human and Tetrahymena
recombinant proteins (3, 13, 53) have confirmed a catalytic
function for these Ea p123 homologs. Two other proteins that copurify
with Tetrahymena thermophila telomerase, p80 and p95
(15), have also been described. It has been postulated that
a p80-p95 complex functions to position the DNA substrate at the RNA
template for extension by the telomerase holoenzyme
(21). Mammalian homologs to T. thermophila p80
have also been identified (45, 27).
A nucleolytic activity associated with T. thermophila and
Euplotes crassus telomerase cleaves the 3'
termini of primers in vitro (14, 42). This activity either
is an intrinsic property of telomerase or is catalyzed by a
factor that remains tightly associated with telomerase through
extensive purification. It has been postulated that the in vitro
endonucleolytic removal of nontelomeric sequences from primers by
telomerase may be part of a proofreading system in which
mismatched nucleotides are removed prior to elongation (25).
Such a proofreading mechanism may have evolved to ensure high fidelity
for telomerase, since deviation from species-specific telomeric
repeats can have severe consequences on cell viability and nuclear
division (31, 38, 41, 48, 54). Alternatively, the associated
nucleolytic activity may be involved in de novo telomere addition to
restructured chromosomes during macronuclear development in the late
stages of conjugation (reviewed in reference 16).
Naturally occurring variable telomeres have been documented for the
yeast Saccharomyces spp., the malarial protozoan
Plasmodium falciparum (8), and many species of
the ciliate Paramecium (2, 12, 20, 40). Irregular
repeat synthesis in Saccharomyces is a consequence of
partial translocation and stuttering along the RNA template, which
results in duplicate copying of one or more nucleotides during each
round of polymerization (11). Despite a single
telomerase RNA consistent with G4T2
repeat synthesis, wild-type telomeres in most Paramecium
spp. consist of a random mixture of G4T2 and
G3T3 repeats at 70 and 30%, respectively
(40). This variability in Paramecium telomeres is
due to a stereotypical misincorporation of TTP at templating nucleotide
C52 (39). Paradoxically, Paramecium caudatum
telomerase faithfully synthesizes invariant G4T2 repeats as dictated by its RNA template.
The high fidelity exhibited by the P. caudatum enzyme
is not solely a property of the telomerase RNA, since
expression and utilization of the P. caudatum
telomerase RNA in P. tetraurelia transformants
do not impart high fidelity to the telomerase of that species
in vivo (39).
To further characterize variable telomeric repeat synthesis by
P. tetraurelia telomerase, we have extended our
mutational analysis of the P. tetraurelia
telomerase RNA template and alignment domains. Mutated genes
were introduced into P. tetraurelia macronuclei by
microinjection, and de novo telomeric repeats from transformant clonal
lines were analyzed. We show that misincorporation of TTP by the enzyme
at templating nucleotide 52 is dependent on a C residue at that
position, part of a homopolymeric tract of four C residues. The effects
of various other mutations on de novo telomere synthesis include
significant increased and decreased fidelity, as well as the occurrence
of aberrant, 5-nucleotide telomeric repeats. The patterns of altered
fidelity and the appearance of novel, high-frequency deletion errors by
mutated P. tetraurelia telomerase suggest that
the telomerase RNA template domain may represent a
homopolymeric mutational hot spot, similar to those documented for the
human immunodeficiency virus type 1 proofreading-deficient reverse transcriptase.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Materials.
P. tetraurelia (nd6/nd6 and
cam2/cam2 [29, 33])
was maintained at room temperature in a monoxenic wheat grass infusion, containing Enterobacter aerogenes (51).
Restriction enzymes and other molecular biology reagents were purchased
from New England Biolabs (Beverly, Mass.). The antibiotic G-418 was
purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, Mo.).
General methods.
Conventional PCR methods and molecular
techniques (49) were used for plasmid constructions. Genomic
DNA was isolated from P. tetraurelia, and radiolabeled
telomerase RNA gene probe was generated by a PCR strategy that
was described previously (40). Oligonucleotides were
radiolabeled at the 5' end with T4 polynucleotide kinase and
[
-32P]ATP (7,000 Ci/mmol; ICN). DNA sequencing was
performed with either Sequenase (U.S. Biochemical Corp., Cleveland,
Ohio) or the CircumVent thermal cycle DNA-sequencing kit (New England Biolabs).
Transformation vector modification.
To facilitate the
efficient sequencing of de novo telomeric repeats from transformants,
unique XhoI and SalI restriction sites flanking
one of the "seed" telomeres were introduced into plasmid pPXVI
(39). A 1.2-kb BsaI-BssHII fragment
from pPXVI, which includes one of the seed telomeres and a portion of
the
-lactamase gene, was subcloned into a modified version of
pLITMUS 28 (New England Biolabs). The modified pLITMUS 28 had the M13
intergenic region cloned in a clockwise orientation, opposite that of
the commercially available phagemid (47a). The
XhoI site was introduced by oligonucleotide site-directed
mutagenesis (32). This construct was linearized at a unique
SfiI site, the termini were blunted with T4 DNA polymerase,
and the following linker sequence introduced by ligation with T4 DNA
ligase: 5'-GGG TCG ACG GGG TTG GGG TTG GGG CTG CAG GCC TAC GTG GCC
CG-3'. This linker includes unique SalI and PstI
sites, separated by 16 bp of telomeric sequence. The SfiI
cloning site, destroyed as part of the cloning strategy, was
reintroduced at the 3' end of this linker. The modified 1.2-kb BsaI-BssHII fragment was subcloned back into
pPXVI, to yield the transformation vector pPXVII (see Fig. 2).
P. tetraurelia telomerase RNA
mutagenesis.
Oligonucleotide site-directed mutagenesis of the TER
gene in plasmid pPTER (39) was performed by the method of
Kunkel et al. (32). The TER genes were cloned into pPXVII by
virtue of unique SacI and XbaI sites. The
sequence of the modified genes in the resultant pPXVII-TER constructs
(see Fig. 2) were confirmed by double-stranded DNA sequencing.
Transformation of P. tetraurelia by
microinjection.
Plasmids suitable for microinjection were prepared
with the Wizard DNA purification system (Promega, Madison, Wis.).
Plasmids pPXV-NEO (28), pPXVII, and various pPXVII-TER
constructs were linearized by SfiI digestion, and
microinjection of P. tetraurelia was performed
precisely as previously described (39). Transformant clonal
lines were maintained at a density of 200 cells/ml and expanded for 20 to 22 fissions following microinjection.
Southern blot hybridizations.
Preparation of total DNA from
transformant clonal lines, DNA transfer from agarose gels onto Nytran
membranes, hybridization of radiolabeled DNA probes, and blot-washing
conditions were all as previously described (40). A
Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager was used to quantitate the relative
ratio of the plasmid-encoded to endogenous TER genes present in total
DNA from transformants.
Cloning de novo telomeres from P. tetraurelia
transformants.
Total DNA (5 µg) extracted from transformants 20 to 22 fissions after microinjection was digested with XbaI
in a 50-µl reaction mixture, effectively removing one telomeric end
from the microinjected pPXVII-TER plasmids. The
XbaI-digested DNA was treated with 6 U of T4 DNA polymerase
(New England Biolabs) in a standard reaction buffer (0.1 mM
deoxynucleoside triphosphates [dNTPs]) at 12°C for 15 min to
generate blunt ends suitable for ligation. Following phenol-chloroform
(1:1) extraction and ethanol precipitation, 0.5 µg of the DNA was
incubated overnight at 16°C with T4 DNA ligase (100-µl reaction
volume). Competent Escherichia coli DH10B was transformed by
electroporation with the ligation products. DNA prepared from
ampicillin-resistant clones was screened for the TER gene by Southern
blot hybridization.
Positive clones were screened for the presence of a unique
SalI site situated between the remaining seed telomere and
any de novo telomeric repeats added by telomerase in
transformants. The seed telomere was removed from rescued plasmids by a
restriction digestion with XhoI and SalI,
followed by a ligation of the resultant compatible, cohesive ends with
T4 DNA ligase. The secondary-rescue ligation products were used to
transform competent E. coli (DH10B) by electroporation.
The C strands of cloned, de novo telomeric repeats were sequenced by
using a primer complementary to plasmid vector sequence (5'-TAA CTT TTA
CTC AAT GTC AAA G-3') that is adjacent to the
XhoI-SalI site. The identities of TER genes on rescued plasmids were also confirmed by sequencing through the plasmid-encoded genes with the minus strand primer (5'-GCG TCT AGA AAT
AAC TAT TTA GAG C-3'), complementary to nucleotides +209 to +191,
inclusive, of the TER gene.
 |
RESULTS |
Telomerase RNA mutations.
We have previously reported that the
naturally occurring variability in P. tetraurelia
telomeres is due to misincorporation of TTP at telomerase RNA
templating nucleotide C52. Expression of a C52A TER template mutation
in P. tetraurelia transformants leads to a dramatic
increase in the number of de novo G3T3 repeats (39). To address whether the stereotypical misincorporation observed for the wild-type telomerase is dependent on a novel rC · dT base pair during the polymerization cycle, we have
included single C52U and C52G substitutions in a parallel analysis
(Fig. 1A).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
(A) P. tetraurelia telomerase
RNA nucleotide substitutions. A schematic of the Paramecium
telomerase RNA secondary structure and nucleotide positions is
taken from reference 40. Alignment nucleotides
(1) are underlined and templating nucleotides are
double-underlined. The 3' end of a de novo telomere is shown (lowercase
letters) base paired with the alignment nucleotides prior to elongation
by telomerase. The various mutations analyzed are identified by
the wild-type telomerase RNA position followed by the altered
nucleotide. (B) Base-pairing potential of telomeric repeats with
mutated telomerase RNAs. Only the telomerase RNA
alignment (underlined) and templating (doubly underlined) nucleotides
are shown. Substituted nucleotides are circled, and the 3' end of the
predicted de novo telomere is shown in lowercase letters, base paired
with the alignment region prior to elongation. Dashes represent
Watson-Crick base pairs, solid circles represent rG · dT pairs,
and open circles represent mismatched nucleotides.
|
|
We had also observed inefficient utilization of an A50G template
mutation by transformants. Only two G
4TC telomeric repeats
(the predicted sequence for an A50G template) were detected in
10 de
novo telomeres isolated from this class of transformants
(
39). One consequence of G
4TC repeat synthesis
from the A50G
template is a diminished base-pairing potential of de
novo repeats
with the telomerase RNA alignment region (Fig.
1B). Therefore,
we have introduced an alignment nucleotide mutation,
A56G, both
singly and in combination with the A50G template
substitution.
Introduction of this alignment mutation tests whether
A56G can
compensate for the A50G template, the net effect being
efficient
G
4TC repeat synthesis in A50G A56G transformants.
We have also
constructed an A51G template mutation, predicted to give
rise
to G
4CT repeats. In direct contrast to the A50G
mutation, de novo
repeats from the A51G template should have the
potential to form
three Watson-Crick base pairs with the alignment
region (Fig.
1B).
P. tetraurelia transformation by
microinjection.
Mutated telomerase RNA genes were cloned
into pPXVII, a plasmid suitable for Paramecium
transformation (39). Prior to comicroinjection, both
pPXVII-TER (Fig. 2) and pPXV-NEO
(28) were digested with SfiI. The resultant
linearized molecules have tracts of approximately 45 G4T2 telomeric repeats at their termini (Fig.
2), which increases the efficiency of transformation. Plasmid pPXV-NEO
provides resistance to the antibiotic G-418, a selectable marker for
transformants. Approximately 2 × 106 copies of each
linearized plasmid were comicroinjected into the macronuclei of
postautogamous P. tetraurelia.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Plasmid for P. tetraurelia
transformation. Plasmid pPXVII-TER was constructed as described in
Materials and Methods. Wild-type and mutated TER genes, including
nucleotides 240 through +325, were cloned so that the direction of
transcription is toward the terminus of linearized plasmids.
Shaded regions are indicative of transcribed nucleotides. A
bacterial origin of replication (ORI) and ampicillin resistance marker
(Ampr) are as indicated. Solid arrows represent tandem
G4T2 telomeric repeats, located at the termini
when plasmids are linearized by SfiI digestion. Restriction
sites: Sa, SalI; Sc, SacI; Sf, SfiI;
Xb, XbaI (Xb); Xh, XhoI. The approximate size of
the pPXVII-TER construct is 4.3 kb (figure not drawn to scale).
|
|
Following microinjection, single-cell isolates were fed and allowed to
expand to approximately 100 cells over 3 to 4 days
at room temperature,
at which time they were tested for G-418
resistance. Resistant clonal
lines were maintained at 200 cells/ml
for an additional 7 to 10 days, and total DNA and RNA were isolated
approximately 20 to 22 fissions after microinjection. There were
no obvious growth or
morphological phenotypes for any of the various
pPXVII-TER
transformants compared to uninjected controls or cells
transformed with
pPXV-NEO alone (data not
shown).
Total DNA from transformants was digested with
SacI and
XbaI to determine the relative amounts of the plasmid-borne
TER gene
(0.7-kb fragment) and the endogenous gene (4.5-kb fragment)
present
in clonal cell lines. Quantitation of Southern blots probed
with
the TER gene (Fig.
3) by
PhosphorImager analysis indicates that
the plasmid-borne gene accounts
for no less than 98% of the telomerase
RNA gene present in
transformants (data not shown). Northern blot
analyses indicate that
the amount of TER transcribed from the
plasmid-borne gene relative to
that from the endogenous gene is
directly proportional to
the gene dosage (reference
39 and data
not shown).

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Endogenous and plasmid-encoded telomerase RNA
genes in transformants. Southern blots of total DNA (1 µg), isolated
from transformants and digested with SacI plus
XbaI, were probed with the radiolabeled P. tetraurelia TER gene. The endogenous and plasmid-encoded gene
fragments migrate to 4.4 and 0.7 kb, respectively. All
transformants analyzed included the TER gene as indicated.
Analyses of C52A and C52U transformants are not shown. w.t., wild
type.
|
|
De novo telomere synthesis in transformants.
The fixed length
of microinjected plasmid termini represent a convenient reference point
in determining de novo repeat synthesis by transformant
telomerase (39). In vivo extension of a
SacI telomeric fragment that contains the
plasmid-encoded TER gene (1.2 kb; Fig. 2) was measured for all classes
of transformants 20 to 22 cell divisions after microinjection (Fig.
4). De novo telomeres in C52A and C52U
transformants were on average 200 to 250 bp longer than those in cells
transformed with the wild-type telomerase RNA gene. In
contrast, the same telomeric fragment was consistently shorter than the
1.2-kb input length in cells expressing the C52G template mutation.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Southern blot analyses of a defined telomeric fragment
from P. tetraurelia transformants. Digestion of the
pPXVII-TER series of linearized, microinjected plasmids with
SacI generates a telomeric fragment of approximately 1.2 kb
that includes the telomerase RNA gene (arrow; see Fig. 2).
Southern blots of total DNA (1 µg) from transformants digested with
SacI and probed with the radiolabeled P. tetraurelia telomerase RNA gene are shown. uninj., DNA
from uninjected cells; PXVII, DNA from clones coinjected with pPXVII
(without TER) and pPXV-NEO. All other samples were from clones
coinjected with pPXV-NEO and pPXVII-TER, with the telomerase
RNA substitutions as indicated. w.t., wild type.
|
|
De novo telomere synthesis in A50G transformants was similar to
that of the C52G mutants, with minimal telomere extension
in these
cells. The relative efficiency of telomere extension
was greater in the
A50G A56G double mutation, approaching that
of the wild-type
control (Fig.
4). Finally, the average lengths
of de novo
telomeres in A56G and A51G transformants exceeded those
of
wild-type transformants, although not to the same degree as
those from
cells expressing the C52A and C52U template
mutations.
Telomere extension in five different transformants was also gauged by
Southern blot hybridization of total DNA to various
telomeric
oligonucleotides (Fig.
5). There was a
very low level
of (G
4TC)
2 hybridization to A50G
telomeres (lane 3), in contrast
to the strong hybridization of this
probe to A50G A56G transformant
DNA (lane 4). Telomeres from the A51G
transformant (lane 2) hybridized
strongly to the
(G
4CT)
2 probe and somewhat weakly to
(G
3CT
2)
2 (see Discussion). The
C52G transformant DNA hybridized to the
wild-type
telomeric repeat (G
4T
2)
2, but
not at all to the sequence
G
3CT
2, which was
predicted for this template mutation (lane 5).

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Southern blots of telomeres from transformants. Total
DNA (8 µg) was digested with DraI and separated on 0.8%
agarose gels (in quadruplicate) prior to capillary transfer of the DNA
to Nytran filters. The radiolabeled oligonucleotides used as probes are
as indicated. Telomerase RNAs expressed in transformants are as
follows: lane 1, wild type; lane 2, A51G; lane 3, A50G; lane 4, A50G
A56G; lane 5, C52G.
|
|
Telomere addition to the microinjected plasmid termini has made it
possible to routinely clone and sequence the de novo telomeric
repeats
shown in Fig.
4 from
P. tetraurelia cells expressing
mutated
telomerase RNA. Briefly, total DNA from transformants
is digested
to completion with
XbaI, effectively removing
one telomere from
the linearized pPXVII-TER plasmids (Fig.
2). The
XbaI-treated
DNA is incubated with T4 DNA polymerase and
dNTPs, resulting in
blunt ends that facilitate the circularization
of molecules with
T4 DNA ligase. Transformation of competent
E. coli with the ligation
products and selection for
ampicillin resistance leads to the
rescue of circular plasmids from
transformant DNA containing de
novo telomeric repeats. Due to the
exonucleolytic activity associated
with T4 DNA polymerase, the most
distal telomeric repeats may
be lost during blunt end
formation.
Cloned telomeric repeats were sequenced as described in Materials and
Methods; representative examples from various transformants
are shown
in Fig.
6 and a compilation of de novo
repeats is presented
in Table
1.
Wild-type transformants produced a mixture of
G
4T
2 and G
3T
3 repeats,
consistent with the composition of wild-type
Paramecium
telomeres (
2,
20). As previously reported (
39),
the vast majority of de novo telomeric DNAs dictated by the C52A
template mutation consist of G
3T
3 repeats. The
C52U substitution
leads to an equally high percentage of
G
3AT
2 repeats, indicative
of an enzyme that
does not misincorporate TTP at template position
52. Finally, there was
no extension of seed telomeres on the microinjected
plasmids recovered
from cells expressing the C52G template. This
was somewhat anticipated,
given the lack of de novo telomere extension
in these cells (Fig.
4 and
5). There was also the apparent loss
of distal repeats from the
microinjected plasmid telomeres in
C52G transformants, since none of
the rescued plasmids retained
a unique
SalI restriction site
30 bp proximal to the telomere
end (see Materials and Methods) (Fig.
2). Further evidence of
telomere attrition in C52G transformants is
that the number of
repeats per seed telomere from rescued plasmids was
smaller than
that initially present during transformation (data not
shown).

View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Representative telomere sequences from P. tetraurelia transformants. The C-rich strand of de novo telomeres
cloned from transformants were sequenced as described in the text. The
mutated telomerase RNAs expressed in transformants are as
indicated. w.t., wild type.
|
|
De novo telomeric repeats were not detected in plasmids rescued from
cells expressing the A50G template mutation. In contrast,
cells
expressing the A50G A56G double mutation efficiently synthesized
G
4TC repeats, as well as novel G
3TC
repeats (66 and 24%, respectively).
Five-nucleotide repeats
(G
3T
2) have been documented for wild type
Paramecium telomeres, albeit at less than 3%
(
39) (Table
1).
There was an apparent increase in
telomerase fidelity in cells
expressing telomerase RNA
with the A56G mutation alone. The percentage
of de novo
G
4T
2 repeats increased from 72% in wild type
transformants
to 85% in cells with the A56G mutation (Table
1).
Finally, the
A51G template substitution leads to a surprisingly
high percentage
of 5-nucleotide G
3CT repeats (62%). The
6-nucleotide repeat predicted
for this template mutation,
G
4CT, accounts for 31% of the de novo
telomeric DNA
sequenced.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Error discrimination by DNA polymerases can occur at a number of
steps along the polymerization cycle (reviewed in reference 19). Binding of the correct dNTP to a
template-primer complex is favored over that of the incorrect dNTPs,
due to hydrogen bonding and the geometry of the base-pair and
base-stacking interactions at the catalytic site. The rate of
phosphodiester bond formation is presumably higher for the cognate
dNTP, and subsequent extension is more efficient with a correctly
paired 3'-hydroxyl terminus. Crystallographic studies of Bacillus
stearothermophilus and bacteriophage T7 DNA polymerases complexed
with their substrates reveal that the basis for error discrimination is
the steric complementarity between the enzyme and a correctly formed
Watson-Crick base pair at the active site (18, 30).
Mismatched nucleotides cannot bind with the same geometry, resulting in
misalignment of the primer 3'-OH terminus, which effectively prevents misincorporation.
DNA polymerases, with the exception of retroviral reverse
transcriptases, can also preferentially remove misincorporated
nucleotides with an associated nucleolytic activity. Subsequently,
error rates for proofreading DNA polymerases, which range from
10
7 to 10
11 error per nucleotide, are
orders of magnitude lower than those for reverse transcriptase
(37). Misincorporation error frequencies as high as
10
2 have been documented for spleen necrosis virus
reverse transcriptase (47). Studies with avian
myeloblastosis virus and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse
transcriptases have also shown that certain template sequences
constitute mutational hot spots, where misincorporation, insertion, and
deletion errors occur more frequently (reviewed in reference
6). These hot spots all have a common feature: they
are homopolymeric nucleotide sequences (4). Furthermore, single-nucleotide substitutions within and adjacent to the hot spots
can significantly decrease polymerization error frequencies (5).
Our in vivo data on both wild-type and mutated P. tetraurelia telomerase suggest that the telomerase
RNA residues C52 to C55 comprise a homopolymeric mutational hot spot,
similar to those described for retroviral reverse transcriptases.
Substitutions within and adjacent to these template and alignment
nucleotides have a direct effect on telomerase fidelity in
vivo. A net effect of the P. tetraurelia
telomerase RNA templating nucleotide C52 substitutions was to
reduce the homopolymeric tract of C residues from four to three.
Coincident with two of these mutations (C52A and C52U) was a decrease
in misincorporation of TTP at this templating position. As anticipated,
the C52A substitution simply changes the template to specify
G3T3 repeats, with greater than 90% of the de
novo repeats synthesized the cognate G3T3
(39) (Fig. 6 and Table 1). The importance of C52 in TTP
misincorporation was clearly demonstrated by telomere sequences from
C52U transformants. The composition of de novo telomeres from cells
expressing the C52U template was 93% G3AT2
repeats. If TTP addition were independent of an rC residue at this
template position, a substantial percentage of de novo
G3T3 repeats would have been detected in
telomeres from C52U transformants.
In contrast to the C52A and C52U transformants, plasmids rescued from
cells expressing the C52G mutation lacked de novo telomeric repeats.
There was a cumulative net loss from the input seed telomere over the
approximately 26 fissions following microinjection (Fig. 4), and the
predicted G3CT2 repeats from this template
mutation were not detected (Fig. 5 and data not shown). Although
telomere attrition was also seen with the A50G mutation (Fig. 4),
two cognate G4TC repeats dictated by this template
were detected in a previous study (39) and are present at
low levels in transformants (Fig. 5). Whereas the A50G template
mutation results in an inefficient telomerase, the effect of
the C52G substitution appears to be somewhat more
severe. There is efficient incorporation of dC residues in
other telomeric repeats in vivo (see below), and so the
inclusion of dC in the 3' strand of a Paramecium
telomere per se cannot be the sole reason for a block of activity. Some
Tetrahymena telomerase RNA template mutations are
also apparently nonfunctional in vivo (54). It is formally
possible that telomeres from C52G transformants include
G3CT2 repeats that are not protected by
telomeric proteins from degradation. The exact nature of the apparent
block in telomere maintenance by C52G transformants cannot be
determined at this level of analysis.
A single nucleotide substitution in the TER alignment region (G57A)
increases the incidence of G3T3 errors from 30 to 50% in P. tetraurelia transformants
(39). Paradoxically, an A56G substitution that decreases the
base-pairing potential between de novo repeats and the alignment region
(5'-GGGTTG-3' base paired to
3'-GGC-5', where boldface type indicates the base-paired
nucleotides [Fig. 1]) increases telomerase fidelity, leading
to a decrease in G3T3 misincorporation that is
statistically significant (
2 = 12.4; P < 0.005). This phenotype is reminiscent of that previously characterized for P. tetraurelia expressing a C49A
template substitution. The predominant telomeric repeat synthesized by
C49A transformants was G4T3. There was a
complete absence of G3T4 repeats detected in
these cells, although it was the predicted sequence if there had been
continued TTP misincorporation at C52 (39).
Inefficient maintenance of telomeres by A50G transformants is not due
to the failure of telomeric proteins to recognize and protect the
mutated telomere. The A50G template mutation, coupled with a
compensatory A56G substitution in the alignment region, results in
efficient extension of telomeres with G4TC repeats (Fig. 5
and 6; Table 1). The Watson-Crick base-pairing potential between the 3'
end of the de novo telomeric repeat (5'-GGGTCG-3') and the mutated alignment region (3'-GGC-5') is
restored in these transformants and approximates that of the wild-type interaction (5'-GGGTTG-3' base pairing with
3'-GAC-5'). Similarly, there is perfect base-pairing
potential of de novo repeats from A51G transformants with the wild-type
alignment region (5'-GGGCTG-3' base-paired to
3'-GAC-5'); the cognate G4CT repeats were easily
detected in telomeres from transformants (Fig. 5 and Table 1). These
data support the conclusion of an in vitro study with
Tetrahymena telomerase that correct positioning and
efficient elongation of primers is largely dependent on an analogous
interaction with the alignment domain (23).
Telomeres from P. tetraurelia expressing wild-type
telomerase RNA include a small percentage of 5-nucleotide
repeats, G3T2 (39) (Table 1).
Surprisingly, both A50G A56G and A51G transformants synthesized
high percentages of G3TC and G3CT de novo
repeats (24 and 62%, respectively). This high incidence of
G3CT repeats accounts for the observed hybridization of a
(G3CT2)2 probe to DNA from A51G
transformant DNA under low-stringency wash conditions (Fig. 5): only 2 of 12 bp are mismatched between this probe and the 12-nucleotide
telomeric sequence (G3CT)(G4CT)G.
Taken together, our results demonstrate that substitutions within or
adjacent to the homopolymeric tract from C52 to C55 of the
Paramecium telomerase RNA template can either
increase or decrease TTP misincorporation in vivo or can promote
stereotypical deletion errors at greater than 50%. Errors by
retroviral reverse transcriptase at homopolymeric mutational hot spots
are also affected by changes at neighboring nucleotides, with error
rates at particular hot spots never being greater than 2%
(5). Experiments with Tetrahymena
telomerase also indicate that altered TERs can promote misincorporation and premature disassociation of primers, although error frequencies for mutated telomerase were not monitored in these in vitro studies (23, 24). Together, these data
support the paradigm of a complex catalytic site for
telomerase, with a role for the telomerase RNA beyond
that of a passive template. In the case of wild-type and mutated
P. tetraurelia telomerase, templating
nucleotide C52 appears to be at the center of both misincorporation and
deletion errors that can occur at a high frequency.
Based on the sequence of cloned telomeres and the analysis of reaction
products from activity assays, the error frequency of
Tetrahymena telomerase has been estimated at no
greater than 10
2 (24). Nucleolytic activities
associated with both the Tetrahymena and the equally precise
Euplotes enzyme (14, 42) have been postulated to
be part of a proofreading system, in which misincorporated nucleotides
are removed from de novo repeats prior to elongation (25).
It is conceivable that telomerase from most
Paramecium species lack an efficient mechanism to prevent or
correct TTP misincorporation, resulting in a high percentage of
G3T3 errors. A notable exception may be the
P. caudatum telomerase, whose telomeres consist
solely of G4T2 repeats (40). A
comparison of a precise P. caudatum telomerase
with an imprecise P. tetraurelia enzyme in vitro may
determine whether a proofreading nucleolytic activity contributes to
ciliate telomerase fidelity. Interestingly, telomerase from the malarial parasite Plasmodium falciparum, whose
telomeres consist of G3T3A and
G3T2CA repeats (52), lacks an
associated nucleolytic activity (8).
The current model for telomere length regulation is that of a
competitive relationship between telomere binding proteins and telomerase for access to the telomere end (reviewed in
reference 26). There is an apparent loss of length
regulation in P. tetraurelia transformants that do not
synthesize high percentages of both G4T2 and
G3T3 (39) (Fig. 4 and Table 1). When
the vast majority of repeats are G3T3 (C52A) or
when G4T2 repeats predominate (A56G), there is
a concomitant increase in telomere length. However, telomere extension
did not differ from that in the wild type when the ratio of the two
naturally occurring repeats was shifted from 70:30 to 50:50 in G57A
transformants (39). It is possible that the juxtaposition of
G4T2 and G3T3 repeats
at regular intervals is necessary for efficient binding by
P. tetraurelia telomere binding proteins. It follows
that the affinity of the P. tetraurelia telomere binding protein for
(G4T2G3T3)n
would be greater than that for either
(G4T2)n or
(G3T3)n. Conversely, a P. caudatum telomere binding protein would be predicted to have a
higher affinity for (G4T2)n. A more
complete comparative analysis of the various factors that dictate
telomere synthesis and regulation in P. tetraurelia and
P. caudatum may shed light on the determinants that
dictate telomerase precision.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Thomas Marsh for critical reading of and helpful
comments on the manuscript.
This research was supported by Public Health Service grant GM-50861
from the National Institutes of Health (to D.P.R.).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Pharmacology, University of Minnesota Medical School, 435 Delaware St. S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455. Phone: (612) 624-8997. Fax: (612) 625-8408. E-mail: romero{at}lenti.med.umn.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Autexier, C., and C. W. Greider.
1995.
Boundary elements of the Tetrahymena telomerase RNA template and alignment domains.
Genes Dev.
9:2227-2239[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Baroin, A.,
A. Prat, and F. Caron.
1987.
Telomeric site position heterogeneity in macronuclear DNA of Paramecium primaurelia.
Nucleic Acids Res.
15:1717-1728[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Beattie, T. L.,
W. Zhou,
M. O. Robinson, and L. Harrington.
1998.
Reconstitution of human telomerase activity in vitro.
Curr. Biol.
8:177-180[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Bebenek, K.,
J. Abbotts,
J. D. Roberts,
S. H. Wilson, and T. A. Kunkel.
1989.
Specificity and mechanism of error-prone replication by human immunodeficiency virus-1 reverse transcriptase.
J. Biol. Chem.
264:16948-16956[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Bebenek, K.,
J. Abbotts,
S. H. Wilson, and T. A. Kunkel.
1993.
Error-prone polymerization by HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. Contribution of template-primer misalignment, miscoding, and termination probability to mutational hot spots.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:10324-10334[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Bebenek, K., and T. A. Kunkel.
1993.
The fidelity of retroviral reverse transcriptases, p. 85-102.
In
A. M. Skalka, and S. P. Goff (ed.), Reverse transcriptase. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 7.
|
Blackburn, E. H., and C. W. Greider (ed.).
1995.
Telomeres.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 8.
|
Bottius, E.,
N. Bakhsis, and A. Scherf.
1998.
Plasmodium falciparum telomerase de novo telomere addition to telomeric and nontelomeric sequences and role in chromosome healing.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:919-925[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Bryan, T. M.,
J. M. Sperger,
K. B. Chapman, and T. R. Cech.
1998.
Telomerase reverse transcriptase genes identified in Tetrahymena thermophila and Oxytricha trifallax.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:8479-8484[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Cech, T. R.,
T. M. Nakamura, and J. Lingner.
1997.
Telomerase is a true reverse transcriptase a review.
Biochemistry (Moscow)
62:1202-1205.
|
| 11.
|
Cohn, M., and E. H. Blackburn.
1995.
Telomerase in yeast.
Science
269:396-400[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Cohn, M.,
M. J. McEachern, and E. H. Blackburn.
1998.
Telomeric sequence diversity within the genus Saccharomyces.
Curr. Genet.
33:83-91[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Collins, K., and L. Gandhi.
1998.
The reverse transcriptase component of the Tetrahymena telomerase ribonucleoprotein complex.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:8485-8490[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Collins, K., and C. W. Greider.
1993.
Tetrahymena telomerase catalyzes nucleolytic cleavage and nonprocessive elongation.
Genes Dev.
7:1364-1376[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Collins, K.,
R. Kobayashi, and C. W. Greider.
1995.
Purification of Tetrahymena telomerase and cloning of genes encoding the two protein components of the enzyme.
Cell
81:677-686[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Coyne, R. S.,
D. L. Chalker, and M. C. Yao.
1996.
Genome downsizing during ciliate development nuclear division of labor through chromosome restructuring.
Annu. Rev. Genet.
30:557-578[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Dokudovskaya, S. S.,
A. V. Petrov,
O. A. Dontsova, and A. A. Bogdanov.
1997.
Telomerase is an unusual RNA-containing enzyme a review.
Biochemistry (Moscow)
62:1206-1215.
|
| 18.
|
Doublie, S.,
S. Tabor,
A. M. Long,
C. C. Richardson, and T. Ellenberger.
1998.
Crystal structure of a bacteriophage T7 DNA replication complex at 2.2 Å resolution.
Nature
391:251-258[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Echols, H., and M. F. Goodman.
1991.
Fidelity mechanisms in DNA replication.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
60:477-511[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Forney, J. D., and E. H. Blackburn.
1988.
Developmentally controlled telomere addition in wild-type and mutant Paramecia.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8:251-258[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Gandhi, L., and K. Collins.
1998.
Interaction of recombinant Tetrahymena telomerase proteins p80 and p95 with telomerase RNA and telomeric DNA substrates.
Genes Dev.
12:721-733[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Garvik, B.,
M. Carson, and L. Hartwell.
1995.
Single-stranded DNA arising at telomeres in cdc13 mutants may constitute a specific signal for the RAD9 checkpoint.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:6128-6138[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Gilley, D., and E. H. Blackburn.
1996.
Specific RNA residue interactions required for enzymatic functions of Tetrahymena telomerase.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:66-75[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Gilley, D.,
M. S. Lee, and E. H. Blackburn.
1995.
Altering specific telomerase RNA template residues affects active site function.
Genes Dev.
9:2214-2226[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Greene, E. C.,
J. Bednenko, and D. E. Shippen.
1998.
Flexible positioning of the telomerase-associated nuclease leads to preferential elimination of nontelomeric DNA.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:1544-1552[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Greider, C. W.
1996.
Telomere length regulation.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
65:337-365[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Harrington, L.,
T. Mcphail,
V. Mar,
W. Zhou,
R. Oulton,
M. B. Bass,
I. Arruda, and M. O. Robinson.
1997.
A mammalian telomerase-associated protein.
Science
275:973-977[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Haynes, W. J.,
K. Y. Ling,
Y. Saimi, and C. Kung.
1995.
Induction of antibiotic resistance in Paramecium tetraurelia by the bacterial gene APH-3'-II.
J. Eukaryot. Microbiol.
42:83-91[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Kanabrocki, J. A.,
Y. Saimi,
R. R. Preston,
W. J. Haynes, and C. Kung.
1991.
Efficient transformation of cam2, a behavioral mutant of Paramecium tetraurelia, with the calmodulin gene.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:10845-10849[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Kiefer, J. R.,
C. Mao,
J. C. Braman, and L. S. Beese.
1998.
Visualizing DNA replication in a catalytically active Bacillus DNA polymerase crystal.
Nature
391:304-307[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Kirk, K. E.,
B. P. Harmon,
I. K. Reichardt,
J. W. Sedat, and E. H. Blackburn.
1997.
Block in anaphase chromosome separation caused by a telomerase template mutation.
Science
275:1478-1481[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Kunkel, T. A.,
J. D. Roberts, and R. A. Zakour.
1987.
Rapid and efficient site-directed mutagenesis without phenotypic selection.
Methods Enzymol.
155:166-178[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Lefort-Tran, M.,
K. Aufderheide,
M. Pouphile,
M. Rossignol, and J. Beisson.
1981.
Control of exocytotic processes: cytological and physiological studies of trichocyst mutants in Paramecium tetraurelia.
J. Cell Biol.
88:301-311[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Lendvay, T. S.,
D. K. Morris,
J. Sah,
B. Balasubramanian, and V. Lundblad.
1996.
Senescence mutants of saccharomyces cerevisiae with a defect in telomere replication identify three additional est genes.
Genetics
144:1399-1412[Abstract].
|
| 35.
|
Lingner, J., and T. R. Cech.
1996.
Purification of telomerase from Euplotes aediculatus requirement of a primer 3' overhang.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:10712-10717[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Lingner, J.,
T. R. Hughes,
A. Shevchenko,
M. Mann,
V. Lundblad, and T. R. Cech.
1997.
Reverse transcriptase motifs in the catalytic subunit of telomerase.
Science
276:561-567[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Litvak, S.
1996.
Retroviral reverse transcriptases.
Chapman & Hall, New York, N.Y.
|
| 38.
|
Marusic, L.,
M. Anton,
A. Tidy,
P. Wang,
B. Villeponteau, and S. Bacchetti.
1997.
Reprogramming of telomerase by expression of mutant telomerase RNA template in human cells leads to altered telomeres that correlate with reduced cell viability.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:6394-6401[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
McCormick-Graham, M.,
W. J. Haynes, and D. P. Romero.
1997.
Variable telomeric repeat synthesis in Paramecium tetraurelia is consistent with misincorporation by telomerase.
EMBO J.
16:3233-3242[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
McCormick-Graham, M., and D. P. Romero.
1996.
A single telomerase RNA is sufficient for the synthesis of variable telomeric DNA repeats in ciliates of the genus Paramecium.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:1871-1879[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
McEachern, M. J., and E. H. Blackburn.
1995.
Runaway telomere elongation caused by telomerase RNA gene mutations.
Nature
376:403-409[Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Melek, M.,
E. C. Greene, and D. E. Skippen.
1996.
Processing of nontelomeric 3' ends by telomerase default template alignment and endonucleolytic cleavage.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:3437-3445[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Meyerson, M.,
C. M. Counter,
E. N. Eaton,
L. W. Ellisen,
P. Steiner,
S. D. Caddle,
L. Ziaugra,
R. L. Beijersbergen,
M. J. Davidoff,
Q. Y. Liu,
S. Bacchetti,
D. A. Haber, and R. A. Weinberg.
1997.
Hest2, the putative human telomerase catalytic subunit gene, is up-regulated in tumor cells and during immortalization.
Cell
90:785-795[Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Nakamura, T. M.,
G. B. Morin,
K. B. Chapman,
S. L. Weinrich,
W. H. Andrews,
J. Lingner,
C. B. Harley, and T. R. Cech.
1997.
Telomerase catalytic subunit homologs from fission yeast and human.
Science
277:955-959[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Nakayama, J.,
M. Saito,
H. Nakamura,
A. Matsuura, and F. Ishikawa.
1997.
TLP1: a gene encoding a protein component of mammalian telomerase is a novel member of WD repeats family.
Cell
88:875-884[Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Nugent, C. I., and V. Lundblad.
1998.
The telomerase reverse transcriptase components and regulation.
Genes Dev.
12:1073-1085[Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Pathak, V. K., and H. M. Temin.
1990.
Broad spectrum of in vivo forward mutations, hypermutations, and mutational hotspots in a retroviral shuttle vector after a single replication cycle: substitutions, frameshifts, and hypermutations.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:6019-6023[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47a.
| Romero, D. Unpublished data.
|
| 48.
|
Romero, D. P., and E. H. Blackburn.
1995.
Circular rDNA replicons persist in Tetrahymena thermophila transformants synthesizing GGGGTC telomeric repeats.
J. Eukaryot. Microbiol.
42:32-43[Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 50.
|
Sandell, L. L., and V. A. Zakian.
1993.
Loss of a yeast telomere: arrest, recovery, and chromosome loss.
Cell
75:729-739[Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Sonneborn, T. M.
1970.
Methods in Paramecium research.
Methods Cell Physiol.
4:242-339.
|
| 52.
|
Vernick, K. D., and T. F. McCutchan.
1988.
Sequence and structure of a Plasmodium falciparum telomere.
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
28:85-94[Medline].
|
| 53.
|
Weinrich, S. L.,
R. Pruzan,
L. B. Ma,
M. Ouellette,
V. M. Tesmer,
S. E. Holt,
A. G. Bodnar,
S. Lichtsteiner,
N. W. Kim,
J. B. Trager,
R. D. Taylor,
R. Carlos,
W. H. Andrews,
W. E. Wright,
J. W. Shay,
C. B. Harley, and G. B. Morin.
1997.
Reconstitution of human telomerase with the template RNA component hTR and the catalytic protein subunit hTRT.
Nat. Genet.
17:498-502[Medline].
|
| 54.
|
Yu, G.-L.,
J. D. Bradley,
L. D. Attardi, and E. H. Blackburn.
1990.
In vivo alteration of telomere sequences and senescence caused by mutated Tetrahymena telomerase RNAs.
Nature
344:126-132[Medline].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, April 1999, p. 2887-2894, Vol. 19, No. 4
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Drosopoulos, W. C., DiRenzo, R., Prasad, V. R.
(2005). Human Telomerase RNA Template Sequence Is a Determinant of Telomere Repeat Extension Rate. J. Biol. Chem.
280: 32801-32810
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Forstemann, K., Lingner, J.
(2001). Molecular Basis for Telomere Repeat Divergence in Budding Yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol.
21: 7277-7286
[Abstract]
[Full Text]