Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, May 1999, p. 3506-3514, Vol. 19, No. 5
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
The One-Kilobase DNA Fragment Upstream of the
ardC Actin Gene of Physarum polycephalum Is Both
a Replicator and a Promoter
Gérard
Pierron,1,*
Dominick
Pallotta,2 and
Marianne
Bénard1
Laboratoire Organisation Fonctionnelle du
Noyau, UPR-9044, CNRS, Institut de Recherches sur le Cancer, 94801 Villejuif, France,1 and
Département de Biologie, Université Laval,
Québec, Québec G1K 7P4, Canada2
Received 28 September 1998/Returned for modification 18 November
1998/Accepted 8 February 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
The 1-kb DNA fragment upstream of the ardC actin gene
of Physarum polycephalum promotes the transcription of a
reporter gene either in a transient-plasmid assay or as an integrated
copy in an ectopic position, defining this region as the
transcriptional promoter of the ardC gene
(PardC). Since we mapped an origin of replication activated
at the onset of S phase within this same fragment, we examined the
pattern of replication of a cassette containing the PardC
promoter and the hygromycin phosphotransferase gene, hph,
integrated into two different chromosomal sites. In both cases, we show
by two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis that an efficient, early
activated origin coincides with the ectopic PardC fragment.
One of the integration sites was a normally late-replicating region.
The presence of the ectopic origin converted this late-replicating domain into an early-replicating domain in which replication forks propagate with kinetics indistinguishable from those of the native PardC replicon. This is the first demonstration that
initiation sites for DNA replication in Physarum correspond
to cis-acting replicator sequences. This work also confirms
the close proximity of a replication origin and a promoter, with both
functions being located within the 1-kb proximal region of the
ardC actin gene. A more precise location of the replication
origin with respect to the transcriptional promoter must await the
development of a functional autonomously replicating sequence assay in
Physarum.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Replication origins can be detected
either as genetic elements that confer autonomous replication to
plasmids or as physically mapped sites of initiation (40).
However, in recent years, it has been shown that both these
complementary approaches are needed to define eukaryotic replication
origins. It is now well established that some of the autonomously
replicating sequences isolated from the yeast Saccharomyces
cerevisiae are not active as origins of replication in their
native chromosomal context (27, 30, 46). On the other hand,
mapping an initiation site does not give information on the spatial
distribution of the genetic determinants encoding or controlling origin
activity. It has been shown that the amplification control element of
the chorion genes in Drosophila does not coincide with the
main sites of initiation of DNA replication (21, 38), whereas the locus control region has been implicated in the remote control of an origin located in the promoter region of the
-globin gene in human cells (2, 39). Nevertheless, in
Escherichia coli, simian virus 40, or S. cerevisiae, there is a coincidence between the replicator, defined
by a specific cis-acting sequence, and the origin, which is
the initiation site of DNA replication (40, 55). In each
case, the replicator is recognized by a trans-acting protein
complex, the initiator. It is believed that the binding of the
initiator induces torsional stress that unwinds flanking sequences,
leading to local melting of the double helix and to sequential
recruitment of the various components of the replication forks
(45, 55). This provides a mechanistic justification of the
coincidence between the sequence recognized by the initiator and the
actual site of initiation. Under these conditions, the priming of the
leading strands is confined to the boundary of the initiator binding
site, as recently demonstrated for the origin ARS1 of S. cerevisiae (10).
Thus far, eukaryotic chromosomal origins have been characterized in
detail only in S. cerevisiae (44, 54, 56). They are characterized by a modular organization with a short 11-bp consensus sequence that is the binding site for the initiator proteins
called the origin recognition complex (5, 23). In turn, the
origin recognition complex nucleates the cell cycle-dependent assembly
of a large prereplicative protein complex (pre-RC) (24, 45).
Although, it is clear that the components of the pre-RC are conserved
and play a role in DNA replication of multicellular organisms like
Drosophila, Xenopus, and humans (34,
45), the organization of the replication origins in these
organisms is not known and is a subject of controversy. Conflicting
results have been generated by studies aimed at defining either the
genetic elements (18, 61) or the specificity of the
initiation sites (14, 48, 58, 60) at various loci in
mammalian cells. These uncertainties have precluded a detailed
description of the relative distribution of genes and replication
origins within eukaryotic genomes. This aspect of the functional
organization of the genome is central to our work on the slime mold
Physarum polycephalum.
Chromosomal DNA replication is highly regulated, both temporally and
spatially, in the multinucleated, naturally synchronous plasmodium of
Physarum (32, 49). Specific genes replicate in a
strictly defined temporal order, and two-dimensional (2D) agarose gel
electrophoresis studies (13) have pinpointed replication initiation sites within defined restriction fragments (6-8, 50, 51). This control extends to the simultaneous activation of allelic origins (6). Thus far, the five replication origins that we mapped were located within the promoter regions of abundantly transcribed genes (6, 8, 9). This is in agreement with previous electron microscopic observations on chromatin spreads that
show transcribed genes located at the central part of nascent replicons
(52).
One of these five origins is situated within the promoter region of the
ardC actin gene. A 2D gel electrophoresis analysis showed
that the replication initiation site is located about 500 nucleotides
(nt) upstream of the transcription initiation site (6). The
transcriptional promoter, PardC, was defined in standard chloramphenicol acetyltransferase and luciferase assays as a 1.1-kb piece of DNA upstream of the gene (4, 15). It was further shown that the ectopic integration of one copy of the hph
gene (encoding hygromycin phosphotransferase), under the control of this promoter, is sufficient to confer hygromycin resistance to uninucleated Physarum amoebae (16, 17). However,
in these experiments, circular plasmids containing the
PardC-hph cassette were not maintained as stable episomes,
suggesting that the transcription promoter is not efficient in
sustaining DNA replication. This could indicate that the genetic
determinants specifying the origin activity are located away from the
actual site of initiation. To address this question, we studied the
pattern of replication of two different ectopic copies of
PardC, stably integrated at heterologous sites and promoting
the transcription of the hygromycin resistance gene (16,
17). In both cases, we found 2D gel electrophoresis patterns
consistent with the firing, at the proper time in S phase, of a
replication origin associated with the displaced copy of PardC. These results demonstrate that the 1.1 kb upstream of
the actin C gene controls both the transcription of the gene and its timely replication.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Strains and determination of S-phase time points.
Strain
41T1 is haploid and corresponds to transformant 1 generated by
electroporation of amoebae with recombinant plasmid pTB41
(16). Strain 44T28 corresponds to hygromycin-resistant transformant 28 generated by electroporation of amoebae with plasmid pTB44 (17). In both cases, the amoebal strain LU352, which
carries a gad mutation (for "greater asexual
differentiation") that permits asexual differentiation (selfing) into
haploid plasmodia (20), was used to obtain the
transformants. Frozen amoebal strains 41T1 and 44T28 were thawed and
grown on agar plates with live bacteria at 26°C until haploid
plasmodia formed. These plasmodia were then transferred to shaken
axenic liquid cultures and grown by standard procedures in the absence
of hygromycin selection (20).
Synchronous plasmodia were cultured on Whatman paper filters. Mitosis
was observed under a phase-contrast microscope. Stages of the cell
cycle are identified with respect to telophase, e.g., a +5-min DNA
sample corresponds to a preparation extracted from a plasmodium
harvested 5 min after the synchronous division of the nuclei. Wild-type
(WT) strains were M3CIV for gene dosage experiments or TU291 for
bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR) incorporation; both are diploid strains
usually used for DNA replication studies (32, 50-52).
Probes.
Vector-free inserts were used as probes. The
hph DNA probe was the 1.3-kb BamHI fragment from
pLG83 (36). The DNA probe for the promoter of the actin C
gene (PardC) was the BglII-HindIII 1.1-kb genomic fragment (16). The recipient site of the
ectopic copy of the PardC-hph cassette in strain 41T1 was
detected by using a 501-bp KpnI-NheI DNA fragment
spanning the junction between the integration site and the 5' end of
the ectopic copy of PardC. It was obtained from a 700-bp PCR
product (see Fig. 2B). The probes were labelled by random priming (NEN
kit) with [32P]dCTP as a tracer.
PCR amplification of the 5' and 3' junctions of the inserted DNA
in strain 41T1.
To characterize the junctions between the
recipient site and the exogenous DNA in the 41T1 transformant, relevant
restriction fragments were size selected on agarose gel. For the 5'
junction, 150 µg of KpnI- and BamHI-digested
DNA was electrophoresed on a 0.5% agarose gel. Restriction fragments
of about 1.5 kb were eluted from the gel by centrifugation, purified by
phenol-chloroform extraction, and ligated for 2 h at 15°C to a
KpnI-BamHI pBluescript II KS+ plasmid. A 10-fold
excess of the inserts with respect to the plasmid was used. The 5'
junction was then amplified with primers complementary to M13
(5'-CAGGAAACAGCTATGACCAT-3') and to PardC
(5'-AGCCACATACATCCCTAACC-3', nt 333 to 314 of accession no.
M73459) (see Fig. 2, 5' junction). As expected, a 700-bp DNA fragment
was the main product of the amplification reaction (results not shown).
This product was reamplified with a second, partly overlapping set of
primers (5'-TGACCATGATTACGCCAAGC-3' and
5'-TAACCACGTTTCCCATTGCC-3'). The 700-bp fragment spanning the 5' junction was the only amplified product (results not shown). It
was further digested with KpnI and NheI (see Fig.
2), and the 501-bp resulting fragment was ligated into a
KpnI-XbaI-double-digested pBluescript II KS+
plasmid. A recombinant plasmid was selected following transformation of
competent "sure" bacteria (Stratagene), and the sequence of the
insert was determined. It is composed of 198 nt from PardC,
with only one change from the published sequence, and 288 nt from the
chromosomal insertion site, separated by 15 nt of a polylinker
originating from plasmid pTB41 (see Fig. 2B and C).
For the 3' junction, a 2.8-kb fraction of
BamHI-
KpnI-double-digested total DNA of strain
41T1 was size selected and ligated
into the corresponding pBluescript
II KS+ vector. A 1-µl volume
of the ligation reaction mixture was
used as a substrate for PCR
with a forward primer from the hygromycin
gene (5'-GGCTCTCGATGAGCTGATGC-3',
nt 757 to 776 of
V01499)
and a reverse primer from within pBluescript
(M13 reverse primer). The
expected 2.2-kb fragment was the main
amplification product. It was
reamplified with an internal
hph-specific
primer
(5'-AGCAGACGCGCTACTTGGAG-3', nt 960 to 979 of
V01499).
The
resulting 2.0-kb fragment was
SacII-
HindIII
digested (see
Fig.
2A) and subcloned into pBluescript IIKS+. The
junction between
the
hph gene and the recipient site was
determined by sequencing:
156 nt identical to the
hph gene
and 100 nt of the insertion site
were read. The junction occurs at the
second nucleotide of the
unique
ScaI site of the
hph gene, truncating the gene such that
the last 18 amino
acids of the protein are missing (data not
shown).
DNA isolation.
For Southern blotting, including gene dosage
experiments, soluble DNA preparations were obtained following
phenol-chloroform extractions of isolated nuclei (7, 8). For
2D gel electrophoresis analysis, isolated nuclei were embedded into
agarose plugs as described previously (6). Density shift
experiments with BUdR-substituted DNA were carried out as described
previously (50, 51).
RT-PCR.
Total RNA was extracted following solubilization of
a plasmodium in guanidium hydrochloride and overnight centrifugation
onto a CsCl cushion (50). The pellet was resuspended in
diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water, ethanol precipitated, and frozen.
Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was carried out with a commercial
kit from Stratagene. A 10-µg sample of total RNA was subjected to RT
with random primers. A 1-µl volume of the cDNA was used as a
substrate for RT-PCRs primed with two sets of specific primers
(coamplification) and catalyzed by a Taq+ long polymerase
(Stratagene). The hph-specific primers,
5'-GGCTCTCGATGAGCTGATGC and 5'-TCTACACAGCCATCGGTCCA
(nt 757 to 776 and 1197 to 1177, respectively, of V01489), direct
the amplification of a 440-bp product, whereas, as a control, the
profilin P primers, 5'-ACCCCCGCCAATGTCTTTGC and
5'-CTCAATGAGGTAGTCGGCTAG (nt 703 to 722 and 987 to
967, respectively, of M38038), specify a 211-bp intron-minus band in
RT-PCRs and a 284-bp intron-plus product in PCRs (11). The
reaction mixture was heated at 91°C for 5 min and cooled to 55°C
for 5 min, and the Taq polymerase was added. The reaction
mixtures were covered with mineral oil, and 35 cycles of amplification
were performed with the schedule 91°C for 1 min, 54°C for 1 min,
and 72°C for 1 min. Finally, the reaction mixtures were incubated for
another 10 min at 72°C. A 100-ng portion of genomic DNA was used as
the substrate in PCR amplification of DNA.
2D gel electrophoresis and hybridization.
2D gel
electrophoresis and hybridization were performed as previously
described (6-8). Fuji X-ray films were scanned with an Agfa
Studioscan IIsi.
 |
RESULTS |
Production of transformed synchronous plasmodia of
Physarum.
We chose two transformed strains of
Physarum amoeba, 41T1 and 44T28, generated by
electroporation with plasmids that had in common the
PardC-hph selectable cassette (pTB41 [see Fig. 1] and pTB44 [see Fig. 6]). It was shown that only one copy of the
transforming DNA was integrated into an ectopic position, leaving the
endogeneous PardC intact in both strains (16,
17). To compare the replication pattern of the endogenous and
ectopic copies of PardC within the same synchronous cell,
transformed amoebae were differentiated into haploid plasmodia (Fig.
1A). Southern blotting with genomic DNA
extracted from synchronous plasmodia (Fig. 1B) reproduced the
restriction pattern previously obtained with DNA from the transformed
amoebae (16, 17). The 1:1 ratio of the hybridization signals
from the ectopic (5.6- and 2.1-kb HindIII fragments in strains 41T1 and 44T28, respectively) and endogenous (6.6-kb fragment in WT and transformed strains) PardC copies indicates that
the many nuclei of the plasmodium have inherited one copy of the
integrated DNA and that this DNA is replicated once per cell cycle
(Fig. 1B). Finally, such a transformed plasmodium shows resistance to 200 µg of hygromycin per ml (data not shown), suggesting that the
hph expression is maintained during the amoebal-plasmodial transition, even in the absence of hygromycin selection for many cell
generations. To ascertain the expression of the hph gene, RT-PCR experiments were conducted with RNA extracted from transformed plasmodia, and in both strains amplification of an hph cDNA
was obtained (Fig. 1C). We then studied the two transformed strains individually, determining first which part of the electroporated plasmid was integrated.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Production of a transformed haploid plasmodium
containing only one expressed copy of the PardC-hph
construct. (A) A linear plasmid containing the PardC-hph
cassette is shown. Following electroporation into haploid amoebae
(zigzag arrow), cells were grown on hygromycin to select for resistant
colonies (16, 17). Transformed amoebae, because they carry a
gad mutation (for "greater asexual differentiation"),
can differentiate spontaneously (selfing) into haploid plasmodia
(20). The origin previously mapped by 2D gel electrophoresis
(6) within the genomic copy of PardC is
schematized. (B) HindIII-digested plasmodial genomic DNA
preparations were probed with PardC, revealing the
endogeneous copy of the promoter in a 6.6-kb fragment in WT and
transformed strains and the ectopic copy at 5.6 kb in strain 41T1 and
at 2.1 kb in strain 44T28. (C) Expression of the hph gene in
the plasmodia of strains 41T1 and 44T28, as shown by RT-PCR. Total RNAs
subjected to RT and extracted from plasmodia of strains 41T1 and 44T28
were used as substrates for RT-PCR amplifications (lanes 2 and 3).
Since the hph gene has no intron, as an internal control the
profilin proP cDNA was coamplified with a set of primers
spanning intron 2 of the gene. In both strains, the expected 440-bp
product of the hph cDNA was coamplified with a 211-nt
intronless proP cDNA (proP i ). No bands
corresponding to the intron-plus proP gene at 284 nt were
seen by RT-PCR, ruling out the possibility of an amplification
resulting from contaminating genomic DNA. In contrast, only the 284-nt
band (proP i+) was amplified with the proP
primers in a PCR with genomic DNA from strain 41T1 and 44T28 (lanes 1 and 4, respectively). This confirms that the expression of the
hph gene under the control of PardC is maintained
during the amoebal-plasmodial transition in strains 41T1 and 44T28.
|
|
Molecular analysis of the integration event in strain 41T1.
In
the 8.4-kb plasmid pTB41 (Fig. 2A), the
hygromycin gene was bracketed by the PardC and
TardC elements (16). The 1.1-kb PardC
fragment was previously shown to be efficient as a transcriptional promoter in standard CAT and luciferase assays (4, 15). The 0.6-kb TardC fragment contains the 3' untranslated region of
the actin C gene and provides a polyadenylayion site (37). A
2.1-kb XbaI fragment of Physarum that contains a
repetitive element was added downstream of TardC in an
attempt to stimulate integration of the electroporated DNA
(16). To determine which of these genetic elements are
inserted at the ectopic site in strain 41T1, we established a
restriction map of the integrated DNA (Fig. 2A) by standard Southern
blotting. Using a PCR approach (see Materials and Methods), we then
sequenced the junctions between the exogenous DNA and the recipient
site. Sequence analysis of the 5' junction (Fig. 2C) reveals that
PardC was integrated in its entirety into the 41T1
transformant. We used the probe generated in this experiment that spans
the junction between the recipient site and the integrated DNA (5'-JCT,
Fig. 2B) to measure the length of the inserted DNA. As expected, this
composite probe recognizes both the ectopic (5.6-kb
HindIII fragment) and the endogenous (6.6-kb
HindIII fragment) copies of PardC in strain
41T1. By contrast, in a WT strain, the probe recognizes, in addition to
the endogenous promoter, a 3.5-kb HindIII fragment that
served as a recipient site for the integration (Fig. 2B). This Southern
analysis demonstrates that only 2.1 kb of the 8.4-kb electroporated
plasmid was inserted by recombination, converting the WT 3.5-kb
HindIII fragment into a 5.6-kb fragment. Since the
PardC element is 1.1 kb long, our results suggest that the
DNA located downstream of the hph gene in the pTB41 plasmid was not integrated. This was verified by sequencing the 3' junction. A
similar strategy to the one used for the 5' junction was used (see
Materials and Methods). This experiment shows that the hph gene is truncated and is missing the coding sequence for the last 18 amino acids (data not shown). The deletion does not inactivate the
enzyme since strain 41T1 is hygromycin resistant. These results indicate that we can determine whether the genetic determinants of the
replication origin are confined to the 1.1-kb promoter-containing PardC fragment, since no other piece of Physarum
DNA has been integrated into strain 41T1 (Fig. 2A).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Analysis of the transformation event in strain 41T1. (A)
Structure of the HindIII-digested 8.4-kb pTB41 plasmid
(pTB41). The plasmid DNA (pGEM7Zf; Promega) is represented by a dashed
line. For a description of the Physarum elements, see the
text. Below, a partial restriction map of the ectopic copy of
PardC in plasmodial DNA of strain 41T1 is shown (41T1). The
first pair of arrows indicates the inserted fragment. Restriction sites
relevant for sequence analysis of the 5' and 3' junctions of the
insertion are shown. The second pair of arrows indicates the genomic
fragment isolated for sequencing the 5' junction between the
PardC-hph cassette and the recipient site. Genomic 1.5-kb
KpnI-BamHI fragments were selected on an agarose
gel and ligated into a KpnI-BamHI-digested
pBluescript plasmid, represented by a dashed line (5' Junction). The
convergent arrows represent primers used to amplify a 700-bp fragment
spanning the 5' junction of the integrated DNA. A 501-bp
KpnI-NheI fragment was purified, subcloned, and
sequenced to delineate the border of the ectopic copy of
PardC. (B) This 501-bp fragment (5'-JCT probe) was used to
measure the size of the inserted DNA. Southern blotting with
HindIII-digested samples shows that this composite probe
is specific for the endogeneous PardC copy (6.6-kb fragment)
and for a fragment present only in the WT strain (at 3.5 kb) whereas,
as expected, it also recognizes the integrated copy of PardC
in strain 41T1 (5.6-kb fragment). This demonstrates that the 3.5-kb
HindIII fragment of the recipient site was converted
into a 5.6-kb fragment, suggesting that only 2.1 kb of the transforming
pTB41 plasmid has been integrated. This was confirmed by sequencing the
3' junction of the insertion (see Materials and Methods). (C) Sequence
of the 5' junction in strain 41T1. (Top) Sequence of the 5' end of the
pTB41 plasmid linearized by HindIII. The first
nucleotide from PardC is the G · C base pair
following the dash. Nucleotides shown in bold originated from plasmid
engineering. (Bottom) Sequence of the 5' junction. The recombination
has taken place precisely at the HindIII site,
eliminating the protruding 5' single-stranded DNA.
|
|
Pattern of replication of the PardC-hph unit in strain
41T1.
The synchrony of S phase within the plasmodium permits 2D
gel replication analysis of single-copy genes by using total nuclear DNA (6, 7), despite the complexity of the
Physarum genome (3 × 108 bp). On the other
hand, it requires that the replication timing of the DNA fragment of
interest be known precisely. So far, the timing of replication of
specific genes of Physarum has always been determined in
diploid strains (49). First, we verified that the early
replication of genes like the endogenous actin C gene and the profilin
P gene is maintained in the haploid strain 41T1 (data not shown). In
doing these experiments, we observed that the ectopic copy of
PardC is replicated concomitantly with the endogenous copies
of actin C (see below) and profilin P (results not shown) at the onset
of S phase. We therefore studied the pattern of replication of the
translocated copy of PardC in a synchronous DNA preparation
obtained 5 min after the onset of S phase. As revealed by 2D gel
electrophoresis analysis, the 5.6-kb HindIII fragment
containing the integrated copy of PardC in its center is
replicated actively (Fig. 3A). The clear
transition from a bubble to a Y-arc signal is indicative of a
bidirectional, efficient, site-specific origin located close to the
center of the restriction fragment. These conclusions are reinforced by
the shape of the replication intermediates within partially overlapping
restriction fragments. Accordingly, a 4.4-kb KpnI
restriction fragment in which the hph gene is centrally
located is replicated mainly by one fork, giving rise to a Y-arc signal
(Fig. 3B), ruling out the possibility of an initiation taking place
within the hph sequence. Similarly, the 4.0-kb
BamHI fragment spanning the upstream junction is replicated
as a Y-arc when hybridized with the PardC probe (Fig. 3C).
This suggests very strongly that the origin detected within the
HindIII fragment is located between the KpnI
and BamHI restriction sites (Fig. 3). These results are
compatible with active initiation from within PardC at the
appropriate time in S phase. To estimate the size of the nascent,
ectopic replicon at this early stage in S phase, the BamHI
blot of Fig. 3C was rehybridized with the hph probe. This
generated an incomplete Y-arc that illustrates the partial replication
of this 8-kb downstream fragment (Fig. 3D). In the nuclei that were the
most advanced into the cell cycle, the forks have not yet reached the
center of the fragment as deduced from the absence of the inflexion
point in the Y-arc signal. This indicates a degree of dispersion of the
rightward forks of at most 3 or 4 kb within this fragment (Fig. 3D). If
we consider that the origin is most probably located 500 nt upstream of
this BamHI fragment, we can estimate that the largest
nascent replicons were about (3.5 + 0.5) × 2 = 8 kb. We then
compared these results with the size of the endogenous replicon of the
native PardC in the same DNA preparation.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Replication of the translocated PardC-hph
cassette in strain 41T1: a 2D gel electrophoresis analysis. Genomic DNA
was extracted from a synchronous plasmodium of strain 41T1 at the onset
of S phase (+5 min), restricted with the appropriate enzyme, and
electrophoresed on agarose gels. A map of the relevant restriction
sites is shown below the 2D gel patterns. The sizes of the fragments
analyzed are indicated next to interpretative drawings of the results.
In one fragment, the portion that possibly contains a replication
origin is in white whereas portions in which the location of an origin
is excluded are in black. The distribution of the forks on only half of
fragment D is depicted by arrows. For an analysis of the 2D gel
patterns generated by replicating molecules, see the original paper of
Brewer and Fangman (13). (A) A 5.6-kb HindIII
fragment was probed with the hph probe. The clear
bubble-to-Y-arc transition demonstrates the presence of a
bidirectional, site-specific origin within the central one-third of
that fragment (white portion in bar A). (B) A Y-arc was obtained by
probing with hph the 4.4-kb KpnI fragment
spanning the 3' end of the hph gene. (C) Similarly, the
4.0-kb BamHI upstream fragment probed with PardC
generated a Y-arc. These results restrict the position of the origin to
the upstream and downstream extremities of the KpnI and
BamHI fragments, respectively (white portions), confirming
that it is confined to the central one-third of the
HindIII fragment. (D) The BamHI blot shown in
panel C was rehybridized with the hph probe. The 8.0-kb
downstream fragment is only partially replicated in this synchronous
DNA sample, as revealed by the presence of a partial Y-arc. This
illustrates the limited dispersion of the replication forks, estimated
at about 0 to 3.5 kb in the BamHI fragment (arrowheads),
since no forks have reached the inflexion point of the Y-arc at this
time point. Taking the position of the origin about 500 nt upstream of
the 8.0-kb BamHI fragment, this would correspond to a
replicon size distribution from about 0 to 8 kb in that particular DNA
preparation.
|
|
Simultaneous activation in strain 41T1 of the origins contained
within the endogenous and ectopic copies of PardC.
The
HindIII blot of Fig. 3A was reprobed with the
PardC probe (Fig. 4). Under
these conditions, branched DNA molecules generated by the activation of
the endogenous and ectopic copies of the PardC origin are
revealed on the same blot, demonstrating the simultaneous firing of the
two replicons. However, different patterns of hybridization signals are
observed because the origins occupy different positions in their
respective restriction fragments (see the restriction maps and
schematic representation of the fork movements in Fig. 4). The
bubble-to-Y-arc transition seen with the hph probe (Fig.
3A) is again revealed by the PardC probe in the recombinant
5.6-kb fragment. This is consistent with the central location of the
ectopic copy of PardC in this fragment. In contrast, in its
6.6-kb native restriction fragment, the PardC origin is
located at one extremity, about 0.5 kb from the downstream site, such
that this fragment is replicated mainly by one fork. At this early
stage in S phase (+5 min), the incomplete Y-arc signals the ongoing
replication of the fragment by the leftward fork of the replicon. From
the presence of the inflexion point in the Y-arc signal, it can be
deduced that some forks progressed beyond the middle of the fragment,
at about 4 kb away from the origin. Since we know that the rightward
fork of that particular replicon diverges from the origin with a
similar rate of elongation (6), we concluded that the size
distribution of this replicon extends up to 8 kb in this DNA
preparation. This size is similar to the estimated size of the ectopic
replicon (Fig. 3) and further demonstrates a simultaneous firing, at
the onset of S-phase and with a high level of temporal resolution, of
the two, nonallelic copies of the PardC origin in the
transformed strain 41T1. To find whether the early replication of the
integrated copy of PardC is brought about by the displaced
origin or is an intrinsic property of the recipient locus, we defined
the timing of replication of the recipient site in a WT strain.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Simultaneous activation of the endogenous and ectopic
copies of the PardC replication origin. The 2D gel in Fig.
3A was reprobed with the PardC probe. This reveals
simultaneously the endogenous copy of PardC in its native
6.6-kb fragment and the ectopic copy in its 5.6-kb recombinant fragment
(left). The detection of replication intermediates within both
fragments at this cell cycle time point (+5 min after the onset of
S-phase) demonstrates their simultaneous replication. The schematic
representation illustrates the pattern of replication of each fragment
as deduced from the 2D gel electrophoresis result. The 5.6-kb fragment
(right) is replicated from within the ectopic copy of PardC,
generating the bubble-to-Y-arc transition seen in Fig. 3. Arrows
below the restriction map illustrate bidirectional replication of the
fragment. The 6.6-kb fragment (middle) is replicated from within the
endogenous copy of PardC. It is therefore replicated mainly
by the leftward fork (arrow). The replication of this fragment is
slower, since it is being carried out mainly by only one fork. It is
incomplete at this time point, generating a partial Y arc, from which
we can deduce the size distribution of the endogenous PardC
replicon at about 0 to 8 kb in the sample (see the text). This value is
similar to the size distribution measured for the ectopic replicon as
seen in Fig. 3D.
|
|
Intrinsic timing of replication of the recipient site of
integration in strain 41T1.
The 5'-JCT probe (Fig. 2A), which
encompasses the 5' junction of the inserted DNA in strain 41T1, detects
in WT HindIII-digested DNA the
PardC-containing 6.6-kb fragment, known to replicate at the
onset of S phase, and the 3.5-kb HindIII fragment of the
recipient site, whose timing of replication is unknown. We took
advantage of this property to compare the replication timing of these
two loci. First, we studied the distribution of these two fragments in
HindIII-digested light-light (LL) and heavy-light (HL)
DNA fractions obtained from a WT plasmodium treated with BUdR for the
first 40 min of S phase. As expected, the early-replicating 6.6-kb
fragment was found almost exclusively in the HL, density-shifted fraction (Fig. 5A). In contrast, the
3.5-kb fragment was found in the LL fraction, suggesting that it had
not been replicated by 40 min in S phase. To confirm this result, we
further compared the timing of replication of the two loci by gene
dosage analysis, a procedure that does not require any treatment of the
syncytial plasmodium (7, 50, 51). In this case, a Southern
blot made with WT HindIII-digested DNA preparations
obtained at specific time points of the cell cycle was probed with the
5'-JCT probe. As seen in Fig. 5B, in the three samples from the
G2-phase DNA preparation, a cell cycle stage at which the
two loci are replicated, the two restriction fragments produce
hybridization signals of similar intensities. This defines the relative
ratio of hybridization of the probe with its two targets. However, in
early-S-phase samples, the relative copy number has changed such that
the 6.6-kb signal is twice as intense as the 3.5-kb signal, indicating
that the 6.6-kb fragment replicates first, in agreement with the BUdR
density shift experiment. This unbalanced ratio persists in S phase as long as the second fragment has not replicated. As shown in Fig. 5B, a
comparable intensity for the two bands is attained at +120 min in S
phase, a cell cycle stage at which about 80% of the genome is
duplicated. This gene dosage analysis demonstrates unambiguously that
the PardC-hph construct has inserted into a very
late-replicating compartment of the genome. Therefore, as a result of
this integration, the timing of replication of the recipient site has
been advanced by about 2 h, becoming replicated at the onset of S
phase, like the endogenous ardC actin gene replicon, as
previously shown in Fig. 4.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Late replication of the recipient locus in which DNA was
inserted in strain 41T1. The 5'-JCT probe derived from strain 41T1
(Fig. 2) was used to determine the timing of replication of the
recipient site of the PardC-hph cassette. As shown in Fig.
2B, this probe recognizes, in DNA extracted from a WT strain, both the
6.6-kb HindIII fragment of the endogeneous
PardC and the recipient 3.5-kb HindIII
fragment. (A) This probe was first hybridized to LL and HL fractions
separated on a CsCl gradient after BUdR incorporation for the first 40 min of S phase of a synchronous plasmodium (about one-third of genome
replication). As expected, the early-replicating 6.6-kb fragment was
density shifted and enriched in the HL DNA fraction. In contrast, the
3.5-kb fragment is enriched in the LL fraction, showing that it is not
replicated during the first 40 min of S phase. (B) To expand these
results, a gene dosage experiment was carried out.
HindIII-digested genomic DNA samples extracted from
M3CIV plasmodia at distinct stages of the cell cycle were
electrophoresed on a 0.7% agarose gel, blotted, and hybridized to the
5'-JCT probe. Hybridization signals were recorded on a PhosphorImager
(Molecular Dynamics) and quantified with ImageQuant. The ratio of the
intensities of the 6.6- and 3.5-kb bands at one time point is indicated
below each lane. In G2-phase samples, in which the two
fragments are expected to be replicated, the hybridization signals are
of similar intensities. However, in S-phase DNA samples, the 6.6-kb
band becomes roughly twice as intense as the 3.5-kb band. This
corresponds to early replication of the endogeneous PardC
and confirms the late replication of the 3.5-kb fragment. This
unbalanced ratio persists up to the cell cycle stage where the 3.5-kb
band is duplicated, between 90 and 120 min in S phase (about 80%
genome replication). This establishes the intrinsic late replication of
the locus in which the PardC-hph cassette was integrated in
strain 41T1.
|
|
These data demonstrate that the
PardC-hph construct acts as
a dominant replicator with respect to the chromosomal DNA context
in
transformant 41T1. To further establish this property, we analyzed
another independent heterologous integration of
PardC
resulting
from electroporation of amoebae with a plasmid, pTB44, that
had
a different genetic makeup (
17).
Replication pattern of the inserted PardC origin in
strain 44T28.
As shown in Fig. 6,
the 8.7-kb plasmid pTB44 contained, upstream of the selectable
PardC-hph cassette, a 2.3-kb genomic fragment from a mutated
allele of the actin-like ardD gene. This gene, which is
weakly expressed and replicated early in the plasmodium, encodes a
protein that is 84% homologous to the actin encoded by the
ardC gene (1). The fragment inserted into pTB44
begins at codon 83 of the gene, contains a deletion spanning most of intron 5 and the first 128 bp of the last exon, and ends with a 1.2-kb
3' noncoding region (17). The recombinant plasmid was electroporated into haploid amoebae as a linear
NotI-digested DNA fragment (Fig. 6A). We chose a
transformant, 44T28, in which the unique integration event took place
neither at the ardD locus nor at the endogenous
PardC site (17). Amoebae of the transformed strain were allowed to differentiate spontaneously into haploid plasmodia that were further grown in the absence of hygromycin selection. This provided us with another possibility to study the
pattern of replication of a copy of PardC in an ectopic
position.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Simultaneous replication of the endogenous and ectopic
copies of PardC in strain 44T28. (A) The structure of the
8.7-kb transforming plasmid pTB44, linearized by NotI, is
shown above a restriction map of the inserted DNA in strain 44T28.
Sequential probing with ardD, PardC, and
hph probes showed that these three elements are adjacent
within a single 5.6-kb KpnI fragment. The upstream
KpnI site is provided by the inserted DNA, whereas the
downstream site belongs to the recipient locus. A
HindIII chromosomal site found 1.1 kb downstream of the
initiation site of the hph sequence marks the truncated 3'
end of the plasmid DNA. (B) 2D gel electrophoresis analysis was
performed on DNA preparations extracted from synchronous plasmodia of
strain 44T28 either shortly after the onset of S phase (+5 min) or
after about one-third of genome replication (+40 min). From each DNA
preparation, a KpnI digest and a HindIII
digest were probed with the hph and the PardC
probe, respectively. The KpnI digest (left) allows the
detection of the 5.6-kb fragment that contains the ectopic copy of
PardC. A bubble-to-Y-arc transition indicates that the
fragment is actively replicated from a bidirectional origin located
within the central one-third of the fragment (white portion of the bar
below the restriction map). This pattern is consistent with activation
of the origin contained within the ectopic copy of PardC.
The HindIII digest (right) allows the detection of the
endogenous promoter in a 6.6-kb fragment already analyzed in Fig. 4
(see the restriction map). A complete Y-arc is found, indicating a
complete dispersion of the leftward fork of the replicon on the
fragment at +5 min (arrow). This demonstrates a simultaneous activation
of the endogenous and ectopic copies of the PardC origin.
Later in S phase (+40 min), only hybridization spots corresponding to
linear restriction fragments are seen, demonstrating a temporally
controlled replication of the two loci.
|
|
We analyzed the replication pattern of a 5.6-kb
KpnI
fragment that, except for the last 1 kb close to the downstream site,
is composed of DNA derived from the transforming plasmid (Fig.
6A). A
2D gel electrophoresis analysis demonstrates that this
fragment is
replicated actively, from a bidirectional origin,
located within the
central one-third of the fragment i.e., a position
that is compatible
with the firing of the
PardC origin (Fig.
6B,
top left).
Furthermore, this ectopic origin is activated at the
onset of S phase.
This is demonstrated by the simultaneous replication
of the
ardC actin gene (Fig.
6B, top right). The firing of the
ectopic origin at the very beginning of S phase suggests that
the
inserted DNA replicates earlier than its flanking sequences.
This
assumption is also supported by the absence, in the bubble-to-Y-arc
transition shown in Fig.
6B, of a complete Y-arc or of a termination
signal that would have resulted from forks entering the region
from
neighboring origins. Finally, it is shown that at +40 min
in S phase,
neither the endogenous nor the ectopic copy of
PardC is
replicating (Fig.
6B, lower panels), providing evidence that
both are
under the control of the genome temporal order of replication.
Together, these results suggest strongly that the ectopic
PardC element is also acting as a dominant replicator in
strain
44T28.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Ectopic activity of the PardC origin.
In this
study, we established that the PardC-hph cassette is
sufficient, as a translocated piece of DNA, to promote early replication of the recipient locus, even when integrated into a
late-replicating chromosomal fragment of the Physarum
plasmodium. Our study exploits several advantages. First, only one copy
of the exogenous DNA was integrated in each of the two transformants and was found in a different location (Fig. 1B). Second, the 1.1-kb PardC fragment is the only piece of exogenous
Physarum DNA in common between the two inserted fragments.
Third, a gad mutation allowed us to differentiate the
transformed amoebae into plasmodia and hence to compare the replication
of the endogenous and ectopic copies of PardC within the
same synchronous, untreated cell (Fig. 1A).
Our results confirm the presence of a replication origin within the
1.1-kb promoter-containing
PardC fragment. This origin
was
mapped within the promoter region of the gene by 2D gel
electrophoresis,
at about 500 nt upstream of the transcription
initiation site
(
6). In the two independent transformants,
prominent bubble
structures were observed when the ectopic
PardC element was in
the central one-third of the
restriction fragment analyzed (Fig.
3 and
6). This identifies the
active replication of the inserted
DNA. The absence of a complete Y-arc
below the bubble arc is typical
of a localized and efficient initiation
and mimics the results
obtained for the
PardC origin in its
native genomic site. In the
same vein, partial simple Y-arcs,
reflecting the distribution
of forks on only part of a restriction
fragment, were found on
regions flanking the ectopic and the endogenous
origin as well
(Fig.
3D and
4, respectively). Finally, cutting on
either side
of the ectopic copy of
PardC in strain 41T1
converts the bubble-shaped
molecules into simple Y-arcs, as predicted
if the nascent bubble
structures and the restriction sites were
coincident (Fig.
3).
We conclude that DNA replication initiates within
the transferred
PardC fragment. Therefore, within the limit
of resolution of this
study, the initiation site of DNA replication and
the replicator
coincide within the 1.1-kb
PardC element. In
turn, this demonstrates
that sequences upstream and downstream of
PardC, including the
introns and the 3' end of the gene, are
dispensable for the origin
activity of the endogenous
ardC gene.
However, in previous work, it was shown that circular plasmids,
containing the selectable
PardC-hph cassette, were not
maintained
as stable episomes when electroporated into haploid amoebae
of
Physarum. Stable transformants were obtained only
following linearization
of the vector and resulted, with a low
frequency, from integration
of the plasmid DNA into chromosomal DNA
(
16,
17). In other
words, in the amoebae, these
PardC-hph containing plasmids behave
as genetic elements
lacking a replication origin. The
PardC element
is fully
functional as a transcription promoter in amoebae (
37),
but
it is not known whether it acts as a chromosomal replication
origin in
this cell type. Alternatively, the failure to maintain
plasmids in
amoebae could be explained by the inability of these
cells to replicate
circular DNA or by the instability of acentric
extrachromosomal DNA. As
an example, in the yeast
Yarrowia lypolitica,
a chromosomal
origin of replication displays ARS activity only
when linked to a
centromeric element which, in this organism,
is as essential as the
origin for the establishment of a replicative
plasmid (
59).
Firing at the onset of S phase of the displaced PardC
origins.
Our data also show that the ectopic copies of
PardC are replicated at the onset of S phase. This timing of
replication was confirmed by comparison to the endogenous
ardC actin gene, known to be duplicated in the first minutes
of the 3-h S phase (6). The detection of replicating
structures on 2D gels unambiguously demonstrates that in both strains,
the two unlinked replicons containing a copy of PardC are
firing simultaneously (Fig. 4 and 6). At this cell cycle stage,
initiation events are spaced, on the average, every 150 kb in the
plasmodium genome (49). The very early replication of the
inserted DNA suggests that it is replicated earlier than its flanking
sequences. This assumption is supported by the absence of a complete
simple Y-arc beneath the bubble arc in Fig. 3 and 6, ruling out the
possibility of a passive replication by invading forks originating from
nearby origins. Similarly, the absence of termination signals in Fig. 3
and 6 further argues against forks approaching in a direction opposite
the direction used by the ones derived from the ectopic PardC origin. Finally, in one case, strain 41T1, our
determination of the intrinsically very late timing of replication of
the acceptor site (Fig. 5) verifies this point. These findings imply
that not only the origin activity but also the timing of activation of the ectopic replicons is controlled by the exogenous
PardC-hph DNA.
PardC is a discrete genetic element that dictates the
temporal order of replication of flanking sequences.
In a WT
diploid plasmodium, the two allelic origins of PardC are
firing simultaneously at the onset of S phase (6). Here we
show that in a haploid plasmodium, the unique copy of the endogenous origin is still activated at the same cell cycle stage. Furthermore, when an ectopic copy of PardC is introduced into the haploid
genome, the two nonallelic copies are again firing simultaneously (Fig. 4 and 6). We conclude that the simultaneous activation of the allelic
origins is the result of independent events driven by the presence, in
cis, of the PardC replicator.
Numerous studies in the Brewer and Fangman laboratory have shown the
importance of the chromosomal context on the timing of
activation of a
replication origin in
S. cerevisiae (
28,
29,
31).
It is apparent from these studies that in yeast, early
activation is
the default state of an origin. Late activation
is not an intrinsic
property of the corresponding origins and
is controlled by separable
cis-acting flanking sequences (
31).
Although the
mechanisms by which the chromosomal context influences
the origin
activation time are not understood, it has been shown
that the late
activation pattern imposed at ARS501 by proximity
to the telomere is a
cell cycle event taking place in each G
1 phase
(
53). Moreover, recent reports indicate that the temporal
order of replication and the cell cycle progression are coordinated
through the sequential action of cyclin-dependent protein kinases
and
of the related Cdc7/Dbf4 kinase on the early and late origins
(
25,
26). The data presented in this paper suggest either
that
PardC behaves as an element insensitive to the chromosomal
context or that the integration sites are neutral with respect
to
origin activity in the two transformants analyzed. Such potentially
neutral chromosomal domains have not been demonstrated in yeast,
where
targeted, homologous integration is always used to exchange
early and
late origins. At any rate, our data suggest that the
late-replicating
chromatin of
Physarum, in which the 41T1 integration
has
taken place, has no structural feature that prevents its early
replication. It is simply the lack of a nearby early origin that
explains the delayed replication. The insertion of the
PardC-hph cassette converts a late-replicating domain (Fig.
5) into an early
one in which the forks propagate with kinetics that
are indistinguishable
from the ones of the native early-replicating
domain (Fig.
3 and
4).
PardC controls both the replication and the
transcription of the ardC actin gene.
The two
transformants analyzed were selected on the basis of their hygromycin
resistance, suggesting that hph expression is under the
control of PardC. For strain 41T1, it was further shown that
the hygromycin resistance phenotype was maintained in plasmodia even in
the absence of selection (16). Our results extend these conclusions to the transformant 44T28 and demonstrate the presence of
an hph transcript in plasmodia of both strains by RT-PCR.
Therefore, the displaced copy of PardC acts not only as an
origin of DNA replication and a timer for the newly created replicons
but also as a transcriptional promoter. In this context, it is
noteworthy that our results do not exclude the possibility that the
downstream transcription of either the reporter gene or the endogenous
ardC actin gene plays a role in the replicator activity
located within the promoter-containing DNA fragment. However, it is
unlikely that the early replication of the reporter gene is simply the consequence of its transcriptional activity, since we previously identified two genes that, although actively transcribed within the
plasmodium, are replicated late in S phase (50, 52).
A physical linkage between active genes and origins of DNA replication
has been found in various eukaryotic loci (
3,
21,
33,
35,
38,
39,
43,
57), raising a number of questions
concerning the functional
relationship between the two processes.
In several instances,
transcription is known to induce DNA replication
by providing a RNA
primer in the form of a truncated transcript
(
40). Primer
extension of the
ardC actin gene mRNA has revealed
only one
transcription start site, located 33 nt upstream of the
ATG
(
37). This short mRNA leader is present at the downstream
extremity of the translocated
PardC element and is probably
used
for the
hph transcription. No other transcriptional
event in the
origin region of
PardC is currently
known.
Preferential DNA unwinding upstream of transcribed genes, due to
negative supercoiling generated by RNA polymerase elongation,
has also
been postulated to play a role in DNA replication (
47).
Since there is no G
1 phase in the
Physarum
plasmodium, it is tempting
to speculate that the resumption of
transcription that follows
mitosis could play a role in the activation
of the origins found
in the promoter regions of abundantly transcribed
genes. However,
on early-S-phase chromatin spreads, nascent bubbles
were always
seen on chromatin regions devoid of transcriptional
activity whereas
transcripts appeared on both sides of some of the
replicons once
they have reached a few kilobases (
52). These
direct observations
suggest that initiation of DNA replication precedes
transcription
at these
loci.
It is also known that transcription factors, rather than transcription
per se, can facilitate DNA replication. Studies on
viral origins have
shown the importance of auxiliary sequences
that are found adjacent to
the core origin with which the initiator
protein interacts. These
auxiliary sequences contain binding sites
for transcription factors and
act synergistically to increase
initiation frequency (
22). A
similar situation has been found
at the ARS1 origin of
S. cerevisiae (
42). It has been postulated
that resident
transcription factors prevent nucleosome repression
of an origin in the
same way that they prevent nucleosome repression
of a promoter
(
19,
22,
41,
42). In that respect, replication
origins and
transcriptional promoters are sharing chromatin structure
requirements
that might provide a selective advantage to a colocalization
of these
two controlling elements. Such a genomic organization
would also ensure
a codirectional replication and transcription
of the genes
(
12). This property is seen in other
Physarum
genes.
The actin
ardB gene and the profilin
proP
gene are actively transcribed
and duplicated at the onset of S phase
from an origin located
in their promoter regions (
6,
8).
Likewise, the two unliked
histone H4 genes of
Physarum are
simultaneously replicated at
the onset of S phase from a bidirectional
origin located in the
immediate 5' region of these genes
(
9). Clearly, a mutational
analysis is required to determine
whether the genetic elements
controlling the replication and the
transcription of these genes
are coincident or whether they can
function independently, as
it is the case for the origin found in the
promoter of the rRNA
genes of
Tetrahymena (
33).
So far, we have mapped five different origins of replication that are
activated at the onset of S phase in the plasmodium
and are associated
with abundantly transcribed genes (
6,
8,
9). We have been
unable, however, to identify an origin consensus
sequence. It should be
pointed out that origins mapped by 2D gel
electrophoresis are generally
localized with a resolution of about
1 kb. As pointed out by Bielinsky
and Gerbi (
10), in simian
virus 40 and
S. cerevisiae, the transition between the leading
and lagging strands
is closely associated with the
cis-acting
binding site of
the
trans-acting initiator protein. In
Physarum,
too, the site of initiation of the different origins, if mapped
with a
high resolution, might lead to the identification of a
consensus
cis-acting sequence that has so far escaped our
scrutinity.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Yvette Florentin for providing dedicated technical
assistance, Tim Burland for kindly providing the transformed amoebal strains, Claire Lagnel for performing their differentiation into plasmodia, and Helmut Sauer for critically reading the manuscript.
This work was supported by general funding from the CNRS; by grant 1301 from the "Association de la Recherche sur le Cancer", Villejuif,
France; by the CRSNG of Canada; and by the Cancer Research Society of
Canada. This study was initiated during a France-Québec cooperation project.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratoire
Organisation Fonctionnelle du Noyau, UPR-9044, CNRS, IFR 1221, Institut de Recherches sur le Cancer, 7 rue Guy Moquet, 94801 Villejuif Cedex,
France. Phone: (33) 01 49 58 33 73. Fax: (33) 01 49 58 33 81. E-mail:
pierron{at}infobiogen.fr.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Adam, L.,
A. Laroche,
A. Barden,
G. Lemieux, and D. Pallotta.
1991.
An unusual actin-encoding gene in Physarum polycephalum.
Gene
106:79-86[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Aladjem, M. I.,
M. Groudine,
L. L. Brody,
E. S. Dieken,
R. E. Fournier,
G. M. Wahl, and E. M. Epner.
1995.
Participation of the human beta-globin locus control region in initiation of DNA replication.
Science
270:815-819[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Aladjem, M. I.,
L. W. Rodewald,
J. L. Kolman, and G. M. Wahl.
1998.
Genetic dissection of a mammalian replicator in the human beta-globin locus.
Science
281:1005-1009[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Bailey, J.,
M. Bénard, and T. G. Burland.
1994.
A luciferase expression system for Physarum that facilitates analysis of regulatory elements.
Curr. Genet.
26:126-131[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Bell, S. P.,
R. Kobayashi, and B. Stillman.
1992.
ATP-dependent recognition of eukaryotic origins of DNA replication by a multiprotein complex.
Nature
357:128-134[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Bénard, M.,
C. Lagnel,
D. Pallotta, and G. Pierron.
1996.
Mapping of a replication origin within the promoter region of two unlinked, abundantly transcribed actin genes of Physarum polycephalum.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:968-976[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Bénard, M.,
D. Pallotta, and G. Pierron.
1992.
Structure and identity of a late replicating and transcriptionally active gene.
Exp. Cell Res.
201:506-513[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Bénard, M., and G. Pierron.
1992.
Mapping of a Physarum chromosomal origin of replication tightly linked to a developmentally-regulated profilin gene.
Nucleic Acids Res.
20:3309-3315[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
| Bénard, M., and G. Pierron. Early activated
replication origins within the cell cycle-regulated histone H4 genes in
Physarum. Nucleic Acids Res., in press.
|
| 10.
|
Bielinsky, A.-K., and S. A. Gerbi.
1998.
Discrete start sites for DNA synthesis in the yeast ARS1 origin.
Science
279:95-98[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Binette, F.,
M. Bénard,
A. Laroche,
G. Pierron,
G. Lemieux, and D. Pallotta.
1990.
Cell-specific expression of a profilin gene family.
DNA Cell Biol.
9:323-334[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Brewer, B. J.
1988.
When polymerases collide: replication and the transcriptional organization of the E. coli chromosome.
Cell
53:679-686[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Brewer, B. J., and W. L. Fangman.
1987.
The localisation of replication origins in ARS plasmids in S. cerevisiae.
Cell
51:463-471[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Burhans, W. C.,
L. T. Vassilev,
M. S. Caddle,
N. H. Heintz, and M. L. DePamphilis.
1990.
Identification of an origin of bidirectional DNA replication in mammalian chromosomes.
Cell
62:955-965[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Burland, T. G.,
J. Bailey,
L. Adam,
M. J. Mukhopadhyay,
W. F. Dove, and D. Pallotta.
1992.
Transient expression in Physarum of a chlorophenicol acetyltransferase gene under the control of actin gene promoters.
Curr. Genet.
21:393-398[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Burland, T. G.,
J. Bailey,
D. Pallotta, and W. F. Dove.
1993.
Stable, selectable, integrative DNA transformation in Physarum.
Gene
132:207-212[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Burland, T. G., and D. Pallotta.
1995.
Homologous gene replacement in Physarum.
Genetics
139:147-158[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
Caddle, M. S., and M. P. Calos.
1992.
Analysis of the autonomous replication behavior in human cells of the DHFR putative chromosomal origin of replication.
Nucleic Acids Res.
20:5971-5978[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Cheng, L.,
J. L. Workman,
R. E. Kingston, and T. J. Kelly.
1992.
Regulation of DNA replication in vitro by the transcriptional activation domain of GAL4-VP16.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:589-593[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Dee, J.,
J. L. Foxon, and R. W. Anderson.
1989.
Growth, development and genetic characteristics of Physarum polycephalum amoeba able to grow in liquid, axenic medium.
J. Gen. Microbiol.
135:1567-1588.
|
| 21.
|
Delidakis, C., and F. C. Kafatos.
1989.
Amplification enhancers and replication origins in the autosomal chorion gene cluster of Drosophila.
EMBO J.
8:891-901[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
DePamphilis, M. L.
1996.
DNA replication in eukaryotic cells, p. 45-86.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 23.
|
Diffley, J. F. X., and J. H. Cocker.
1992.
Protein-DNA interaction at a yeast replication origin.
Nature
357:169-172[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Diffley, J. F. X.,
J. H. Cocker,
S. J. Dowell, and A. Rowley.
1994.
Two steps in the assembly of complexes at yeast replication origins in vivo.
Cell
78:303-316[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Donaldson, A. D.,
W. L. Fangman, and B. J. Brewer.
1998.
Cdc7 is required throughout the yeast S phase to activate replication origins.
Genes Dev.
12:491-501[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Donaldson, A. D.,
M. K. Raghuraman,
K. L. Friedman,
F. R. Cross,
B. J. Brewer, and W. L. Fangman.
1998.
CLB5-dependent activation of late replication origins in S. cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell
2:173-182[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Dubey, D. D.,
L. R. Davis,
S. A. Greenfeder,
L. Y. Ong,
J. G. Zhu,
J. R. Broach,
C. S. Newlon, and J. A. Huberman.
1991.
Evidence suggesting that the ARS elements associated with silencers of the yeast mating-type locus HML do not function as chromosomal DNA replication origins.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:5346-5355[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Ferguson, B. M.,
B. J. Brewer,
A. E. Reynolds, and W. L. Fangman.
1991.
A yeast origin of replication is activated late in S phase.
Cell
65:507-515[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Ferguson, B. M., and W. L. Fangman.
1992.
A position effect on the time of replication origin activation in yeast.
Cell
68:333-339[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Friedman, K. L.,
B. J. Brewer, and W. Fangman.
1997.
Replication profile of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome VI.
Genes Cells
11:667-678.
|
| 31.
|
Friedman, K. L.,
J. D. Diller,
B. M. Ferguson,
S. V. Nyland,
B. J. Brewer, and W. L. Fangman.
1996.
Multiple determinants controlling activation of yeast replication origins late in S phase.
Genes Dev.
10:1595-1607[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Funderud, S.,
R. Andreassen, and F. Haugli.
1978.
Size distribution and maturation of newly replicated DNA through the S and G2 phases of Physarum polycephalum.
Cell
15:1519-1526[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Gallagher, R. C., and E. H. Blackburn.
1998.
A promoter region mutation affecting replication of the Tetrahymena ribosomal DNA minichromosome.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:3021-3033[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Gavin, K. A.,
M. Hidaka, and B. Stillman.
1995.
Conserved initiator proteins in eukaryotes.
Science
270:1667-1671[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Giacca, M.,
L. Zentilin,
P. Norio,
S. Diviacco,
D. Dimitrova,
G. Contreas,
G. Biamonti,
G. Perini,
F. Weighardt,
S. Riva, and A. Falaschi.
1994.
Fine mapping of a replication origin of human DNA.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:7119-7124[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Gritz, L., and J. Davies.
1983.
Plasmid-encoded hygromycin resistance: the sequence of the hygromycin B phosphotransferase gene and its expression in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Gene
25:179-188[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Hamelin, M.,
L. Adam,
G. Lemieux, and D. Pallotta.
1988.
Expression of the three unlinked isocoding actin genes of Physarum polycephalum.
DNA
7:317-328[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Heck, M. S., and A. C. Spradling.
1990.
Multiple replication origins are used during Drosophila chorion gene amplification.
J. Cell Biol.
110:903-914[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Kitsberg, D.,
S. Selig,
I. Keshet, and H. Cedar.
1993.
Replication structure of the human -globin gene domain.
Nature (London)
366:588-590[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Kornberg, A., and T. A. Baker.
1992.
DNA replication, 2nd ed.
W. H. Freeman & Co., New York, N.Y.
|
| 41.
|
Li, R., and M. R. Botchan.
1994.
Acidic transcription factors alleviate nucleosome-mediated repression of DNA replication of bovine papillomavirus type 1.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:7051-7055[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Li, R.,
D. S. Yu,
M. Tanaka,
L. Zheng,
S. L. Berger, and B. Stillman.
1998.
Activation of chromosomal DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by acidic transcriptional activation domains.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:1296-1302[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Liang, C.,
J. D. Spitzer,
H. S. Smith, and S. A. Gerbi.
1993.
Replication initiates at a confined region during DNA amplification in Sciara DNA puff II/9A.
Genes Dev.
7:1072-1084[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Marahrens, Y., and B. Stillman.
1992.
A yeast chromosomal origin of DNA replication defined by multiple functional elements.
Science
255:817-823[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Newlon, C. S.
1997.
Putting it all together: building a prereplicative complex.
Cell
91:717-720[Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Newlon, C. S., and J. F. Theis.
1993.
The structure and function of yeast ARS elements.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
3:752-758[Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Ohba, R.,
K. Matsumoto, and Y. Ishimi.
1996.
Induction of DNA replication by transcription in the region upstream of the human c-myc gene in a model replication system.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:5754-5763[Abstract].
|
| 48.
|
Pelizon, C,
S. Diviacco,
A. Falaschi, and M. Giacca.
1996.
High-resolution mapping of the origin of DNA replication in the hamster dihydrofolate reductase gene domain by competitive PCR.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:5358-5364[Abstract].
|
| 49.
|
Pierron, G., and M. Bénard.
1996.
DNA replication in eukaryotic cells, p. 933-946.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 50.
|
Pierron, G.,
M. Bénard,
E. Puvion,
R. Flanagan,
H. W. Sauer, and D. Pallotta.
1989.
Replication-timing of 10 developmentally-regulated genes in Physarum polycephalum.
Nucleic Acids Res.
17:553-566[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Pierron, G.,
D. Durica, and H. W. Sauer.
1984.
Invariant temporal order of replication of four actin gene loci during the naturally synchronous mitotic cycle of Physarum polycephalum.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
81:6393-6397[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 52.
|
Pierron, G.,
H. W. Sauer,
B. Toublan, and R. Jalouzot.
1982.
Physical relationship between replicons and transcription units in Physarum polycephalum.
Eur. J. Cell Biol.
29:104-113[Medline].
|
| 53.
|
Raghuraman, M. K.,
B. J. Brewer, and W. J. Fangman.
1997.
Cell cycle-dependent establishment of a late replication program.
Science
276:806-809[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 54.
|
Rashid, M. B.,
K. Shirahige,
N. Ogasawara, and H. Yoshikawa.
1994.
Anatomy of the stimulative sequences flanking the ARS consensus sequence of chromosome VI in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Gene
150:213-220[Medline].
|
| 55.
|
Stillman, B.
1996.
DNA replication in eukaryotic cells, p. 435-460.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 56.
| Theis, J. F., and C. S. Newlon. Domain B
of ARS307 contains two functional elements and contribute to
chromosomal replication origin function. Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:7652-7659.
|
| 57.
|
Vassilev, L., and E. M. Jonhson.
1990.
An initiation zone of chromosomal DNA replication located upstream of the c-myc gene in proliferating HeLa cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10:4899-4904[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 58.
|
Vaughn, J. P.,
P. A. Dijkwel, and J. L. Hamlin.
1990.
Replication initiates in a broad zone in the amplified CHO dihydrofolate reductase domain.
Cell
61:1075-1087[Medline].
|
| 59.
|
Vernis, L.,
A. Abbas,
M. Chasles,
C. M. Gaillardin,
C. Brun,
J. A. Huberman, and P. Fournier.
1997.
An origin of replication and a centromere are both needed to establish a replicative plasmid in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:5931-5942[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 60.
|
Wang, S.,
P. A. Dijkwel, and J. L. Hamlin.
1998.
Lagging-strand, early-labelling, and two-dimensional gel assays suggest multiple potential initiation sites in the Chinese hamster dihydrofolate reductase origin.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:39-50[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 61.
|
Zannis-Hadjopoulos, M.,
T. O. Nielsen,
A. Todd, and G. Price.
1995.
Autonomous replication in vivo and in vitro of clones spanning the region of the DHFR origin of bidirectional replication (ori ).
Gene
151:273-277.
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, May 1999, p. 3506-3514, Vol. 19, No. 5
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Gomez, M., Brockdorff, N.
(2004). Heterochromatin on the inactive X chromosome delays replication timing without affecting origin usage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
101: 6923-6928
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ghosh, S., Satish, S., Tyagi, S., Bhattacharya, A., Bhattacharya, S.
(2003). Differential use of multiple replication origins in the ribosomal DNA episome of the protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica. Nucleic Acids Res
31: 2035-2044
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chen, P.-H., Tseng, W.-B., Chu, Y., Hsu, M.-T.
(2000). Interference of the Simian Virus 40 Origin of Replication by the Cytomegalovirus Immediate Early Gene Enhancer: Evidence for Competition of Active Regulatory Chromatin Conformation in a Single Domain. Mol. Cell. Biol.
20: 4062-4074
[Abstract]
[Full Text]