Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, June 1999, p. 4219-4230, Vol. 19, No. 6
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-Stimulated
Expression of the MCP-1 Immediate-Early Gene Involves an
Inhibitory Multiprotein Complex
Padma
Sridhar,1
Yu
Liu,1
Lisa D.
Chin,1
Charlene E.
Borja,1
Mana
Mann,1
Hal A.
Skopicki,2 and
Rolf R.
Freter1,*
Division of Medical
Oncology1 and Division of Circulatory
Physiology,2 Department of Medicine,
Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New
York 10032
Received 10 December 1998/Returned for modification 5 February
1999/Accepted 24 March 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
We have demonstrated previously that the seven-nucleotide (nt)
motif TTTTGTA (the heptamer) that is present within the
proximal 3' untranslated sequences of numerous immediate-early genes is essential for platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-stimulated induction of the MCP-1 immediate-early gene. On this basis,
the heptamer was suggested to be a conserved regulatory element
involved in immediate-early gene expression, although its mechanism of action was unknown. Herein, we demonstrate that the heptamer functions to remove an inhibition of PDGF induction of MCP-1
maintained by two independently acting inhibitory elements present in
the MCP-1 5' flanking sequences (designated I* elements).
PDGF treatment relieves the I*-mediated inhibition of MCP-1
expression only if the heptamer is also present. One inhibitory element
is contained within a 59-nt portion of MCP-1 5' flanking
sequences and functions in an orientation-independent and
heptamer-regulated manner. Significantly, proteins binding to two DNA
sequences contribute to the formation of a single multiprotein complex
on the 59-nt I* element. The I*-binding complex contains Sp3, an
Sp1-like protein, and a novel DNA-binding protein. Moreover, the
complex does not form on two 59-nt sequences containing mutations that
reverse the inhibition of PDGF induction maintained by the wild-type I*
element. We propose to call the multiprotein I*-binding complex a
repressosome and suggest that it acts to repress PDGF-stimulated
transcription of MCP-1 in the absence of the heptamer TTTTGTA.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Immediate-early genes (IEGs) are a
functionally diverse family of genes that have in common induction by
growth factors, cytokines, and serum. By definition, they are induced
at the transcriptional level in response to a stimulus, and induction
is not dependent on new protein synthesis (1, 29, 42, 43,
65). A potentially useful means of subclassifying the growing set
of IEGs, and one with apparent mechanistic implications, is to divide
the group into genes with fast or slow kinetics of induction. A
well-characterized example of a fast-kinetics IEG is c-fos.
Serum or platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) added to quiescent 3T3
cells stimulates transcription of c-fos within 10 min.
c-fos expression reaches peak levels within 30 min and
returns to baseline levels within 2 h (24, 38). A
cluster of three cis-acting regulatory elements contained
within the proximal 350 nucleotides (nt) of 5' flanking sequences of c-fos mediate serum- and growth factor-stimulated induction
of c-fos and have proven to be of general interest in
problems of growth factor signal transduction. The three functionally
distinct c-fos elements include a serum response element, a
cyclic AMP response element, and an element responsive to
platelet-derived growth factor B-B homodimers known as the
sis-inducible element (3, 17, 21-23, 30, 67, 70-73).
Furthermore, nuclear trans-acting proteins interacting with
each of these cis-acting regulatory elements have been
isolated and characterized (14, 31-33, 48, 51, 56, 57, 69).
By both sequence analysis and functional analysis, the transcriptional
regulatory elements defined initially within c-fos have also
been detected within other fast-kinetics IEGs (8, 54, 58).
The c-fos gene, however, does not stand as a prototype for
all members of the IEG set. A second subgroup of IEGs exists that is
induced with slower kinetics than c-fos and by apparently
different mechanisms (27, 28). Included in the slow-kinetics
subset of IEGs are the clinically important c-myc oncogene
(37) and the CC chemokine gene JE/MCP-1 (for
monocyte chemoattractant protein 1; hereafter referred to as
MCP-1) (5, 9, 25, 61, 63, 64). In contrast to the
rapid but transient response exhibited by c-fos, slow IEGs
like c-myc and MCP-1 display a greater than 60-min lag time before initiation of transcription (13, 26, 38). Significantly, no fos-like regulatory elements
are found within several kilobases of 5' or 3' flanking sequences of
the MCP-1 gene or within its coding sequences. The distinct
induction kinetics of the MCP-1 gene, and other slow IEGs
such as c-myc, therefore reflect the likely action of
cis-acting genomic elements distinct from the trio described
for c-fos.
We have reported previously that a discontiguous pair of
cis-acting elements are both essential for regulated
expression of MCP-1. One element, detected initially as a
240-bp fragment found 2.3 kb upstream of the MCP-1 start of
transcription, contains four distinct PDGF-regulated elements and acts
as a PDGF-regulated enhancer sequence (18-20). The second
element required for serum and PDGF induction of MCP-1 was
shown to be the seven-base motif TTTTGTA (or heptamer)
located in the proximal 3' MCP-1 untranslated sequences. No
single control element has been shown to function in regulated
expression of both the fast and slow subclasses of IEGs. Interestingly,
identical heptamers are found in the proximal 3' untranslated sequences
of c-myc and at least 25 additional IEGs (20),
suggesting that the heptamer could be a novel regulatory sequence
playing an essential role in serum-, growth factor-, and
cytokine-stimulated expression of both fast- and slow-kinetics IEGs.
Until recently, the mechanism of action of the heptamer was unknown.
We have shown more recently that readdition to two non-MCP-1
reporter genes of (i) the PDGF-regulated distal 5' 240-bp fragment and
(ii) a proximal 5' sequence fragment that does not contain the
MCP-1 TATA or CAAT box results in a PDGF-inducible construct in transfection experiments in the absence of the heptamer
(68a). These data highlight an apparent paradox, namely,
that the TTTTGTA motif is essential for PDGF induction of
tagged MCP-1 reporter genes (20) but is
apparently dispensable for PDGF induction of two different
non-MCP-1 reporter genes. One explanation for this paradox
would be if the heptamer functioned to remove an inhibition of PDGF
induction of MCP-1. The proposed inhibition of induction by
PDGF could be maintained by an inhibitory element(s) present within the
MCP-1 sequences (coding or flanking). Heterologous reporter
genes lacking the inhibitory element sequence(s) would, in this model,
not require the presence of the heptamer for induction by PDGF to occur.
In this report, we demonstrate that (i) a pair of distinct and
independently acting inhibitory elements are present within the
MCP-1 5' flanking sequences, (ii) inhibition of PDGF
induction of MCP-1 is maintained by an inhibitory element in
the absence of the heptamer, and (iii) the more potent of the
inhibitory elements is present within a 59-nt portion of
MCP-1 5' sequences and binds a single multiprotein
regulatory complex. We demonstrate further that the inhibitory
element-binding complex contains the Sp3 transcription factor, an
Sp1-like protein, and an apparently novel DNA-binding protein that bind
to two distinct DNA-binding sequences within the overall 59-nt
inhibitory element sequence. We propose to call the multiprotein,
multi-DNA-binding site inhibitory element-binding complex a repressosome.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Growth factors and reagents.
The recombinant B-B isoform of
PDGF was obtained from Intergen. RNase A was from Pharmacia. Proteinase
K, RNase T1, calf intestinal phosphatase, and poly(dI-dC) were from
Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals. Bovine calf serum was obtained from
Hyclone. Human defibrinogenated platelet-poor plasma was prepared as
previously described (55). Recombinant Sp1 was obtained from
Promega. A monoclonal antibody to Sp1 (1C6, designated anti-Sp1-2 in
Fig. 6) and polyclonal antibodies to Sp1 (PEP2, designated anti-Sp1-1
in Fig. 6), Sp2, Sp3, and Sp4 were obtained from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology. Rabbit immunoglobulin G was obtained from Sigma.
Synthetic oligonucleotides were obtained from Life Technologies.
Cell culture, DNA transfections, stimulation assays, and RNA
preparation and analysis.
NIH 3T3 cells were maintained in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (GIBCO Laboratories) supplemented
with 10% bovine calf serum. NIH 3T3 cells were used for transient
transfections because of their significantly greater transfection
efficiency compared with BALB/c-3T3 cells and were transfected as
previously described (18, 19). Transfection mixtures
included 4 to 5 µg of tagged MCP-1 reporter constructs
together with 4 µg of an
-globin reference construct (pSV
-1)
per 15-cm-diameter tissue culture plate. After transfection, cells were
maintained for 40 to 44 h in 5% platelet-poor plasma and then
exposed to the B-B isoform of PDGF (30 ng/ml) for the times indicated
in the figure legends. Total RNA was prepared by using Tripure reagent
(Boehringer Mannheim) and following the manufacturer's instructions.
Total RNA samples were analyzed by RNase protection assay as previously
described (18). The probe for tagged MCP-1
expression is a 272-bp HincII MCP-1 cDNA fragment
spanning portions of the second and third exons. The fragment is
elongated by addition of a 33-bp tag into a blunted SauI
site and inserted into the SmaI site of pGEM7
(20). The length of the unprotected probe is 377 bases. As a
control for equal transfection efficiencies between groups of cells, 15 µg of total RNA was subjected to an RNase protection assay for the
presence of a constitutively active cotransfected alpha-globin
construct (20). Exposure and quantitation of gels for all
experiments were performed on a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics).
The statistical significance of differences in PDGF induction obtained
with transfected constructs was analyzed, after normalization for
differences in induction of the endogenous MCP-1 gene and
differences in transfection efficiency, by using the Wilcoxon
two-sample test or the Kruskal-Wallis test, as indicated in the figure legends.
Oligonucleotides.
Double-stranded oligonucleotides
containing 5' overhanging GG (top strand) and CC (bottom strand) ends
were used. All of the sequences shown are of the top strand. Mutations
of the I*, I*5', and I*3' sequences are underlined. The I*m1 and I*5'm
oligonucleotides include the 12-nt mutation discussed in Results. The
I*m2 and I*3'm oligonucleotides include the 8-nt mutation discussed in Results. The sequences are as follows: I*,
GCACCAGCCCCACCCCCACCCCGTGTCACCTGTGTTACCTATGGGTAATTAGGTTTTTG; I*m1,
GCACCAATGAAGTTGATCCCCCGTGTCACCTGTGTTACCTATGGGTAATTAGGTTTTTG; I*m2,
GCACCAGCCCCACCCCCACCCCGTTGGCTAGTTGTTACCTATGGGTAATTAGGTTTTTG; I*5', GCACCAGCCCCACCCCCACCCCGTG; I*5'm,
GCACCAATGAAGTTGATCCCCCGTG; I*3',
ACCCCGTGTCACCTGTGTTACCTA; I*3'm,
ACCCCGTTGGCTAGTTGTTACCTA; 4×7,
5'-TTTTGTATTTTGTATTTTGTATTTTGTA.
Preparation of nuclear extracts, electrophoretic mobility shift
assays, and DNase I footprinting.
Nuclear extracts from BALB/c-3T3
(clone A31) and NIH 3T3 fibroblasts were prepared as described by
Dignam et al. (16). Chemically synthesized oligonucleotides
were annealed and labeled with 32P-labeled nucleotides by
filling in with the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I. Radiolabeled
double-stranded oligonucleotides were gel purified prior to use as
probes in electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Electrophoretic
mobility shift assays were performed as previously described (18,
19). Following 30-min incubations on ice, DNA-protein complexes
were electrophoresed on 4% native polyacrylamide gels at 150 V in
0.25× Tris-borate-EDTA buffer for 4.5 h at 4°C. For antibody
supershift or competition experiments, antibodies or the indicated
excesses of unlabeled double-stranded oligonucleotides were added for a
30-min incubation on ice prior to the addition of a radiolabeled
oligonucleotide probe. DNase I footprinting was performed as previously
described (19).
Immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis.
Immunodepletions were performed in the presence of protease inhibitors
on ice. After supernatants were cleared, supernatant was transferred to
a fresh tube containing 15 µl of a rabbit polyclonal anti-Sp3
antibody. After incubation for 1 h at 4°C, 50 µl of
preincubated 10% protein A-Sepharose (Zymed) was added and the mixture
was rotated at 4°C for 30 to 60 min. Samples were then centrifuged, and the supernatant was removed for further analysis. Immunoblot analysis, using 30 µg of protein per lane and transfer to Immobilon polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore), was performed as
previously described (68).
Plasmid construction and site-directed mutagenesis.
Site-directed mutagenesis was performed by using a commercially
available kit (Quik Change; Stratagene) in accordance with the
manufacturer's instructions. Construct 1 (see Fig. 1, 2, 4, and 5), a
33-bp-tagged MCP-1 reporter gene containing 2.8 kb of MCP-1 5' flanking sequences and 104 bp of MCP-1
3' untranslated sequences, has been described previously
(20). Construct 2 (see Fig. 1) was created by site-directed
mutagenesis of the heptamer into the 3' untranslated sequences of
construct 1 (104 bp 3' to the translational stop codon). Constructs 3 to 5 (see Fig. 1) were derived from construct 1 following
AocI digestion and removal of the 5' 707-bp
AocI-EcoRI, 1,402-bp
AocI-SpeI, and 1,936-bp AocI-HincII fragments, respectively, with
subsequent religation. Constructs 3 and 4 (see Fig. 2A) are derived
from construct 2 by removal of the 1,936-bp
AocI-HincII fragment as described above, followed
by ligation of the 707-bp AocI-EcoRI and 695-bp
SpeI-EcoRI MCP-1 5' sequence
fragments, respectively, into the opened AocI site.
Constructs 5 and 6 (see Fig. 2A and B) were created by insertion of the
heptamer into construct 4 by site-directed mutagenesis into the 3'
untranslated sequences (104 bp 3' to the translational stop codon) or
5' flanking sequences (at
2766 relative to the start of
transcription), respectively. Constructs 5m1, m2, and m3 (see Fig. 2B)
were created by insertion of mutant heptamer sequences into construct 4 by site-directed mutagenesis into the 3' untranslated sequences (104 bp
3' to the translational stop codon). Constructs 5m1 and 5m2 (see Fig.
4) were created by site-directed mutation of nonoverlapping 12- and
8-nt portions of the 695-bp SpeI-EcoRI fragment
in construct 3, respectively. The sequences of the 12- and 8-nt
mutations are given in the oligonucleotide paragraph. Constructs 4, 5, and 6 (see Fig. 5A) are derived from construct 2 by removal of the
1,936-bp AocI-HincII fragment (see Fig. 1)
(construct 5), followed by ligation of the oligonucleotides shown into
the opened AocI site. Construct 4(7) (see Fig. 5B) was
created by insertion of the wild-type heptamer into construct 4 by
site-directed mutagenesis into the 3' untranslated sequences (104 bp 3'
to the translational stop codon). All constructs were checked for
accuracy by DNA sequencing (66).
 |
RESULTS |
PDGF induction of MCP-1 involves interactions between
the heptamer TTTTGTA and two 5' inhibitory elements.
Progressive deletion of portions of a 1,936-bp
AocI-HincII segment of MCP-1 5'
flanking sequences results in heptamerless tagged MCP-1
reporter constructs that are PDGF inducible in transfection experiments
(Fig. 1). Deletion of a 707-bp
EcoRI-AocI 5' sequence fragment or readdition of
the heptamer to a heptamerless, non-PDGF-inducible MCP-1
reporter gene results in a PDGF-inducible construct in these transfection experiments (compare the PDGF inducibilities of constructs 3 and 2, respectively, with that of construct 1 in Fig. 1). Deletion of
an additional 695-bp SpeI-EcoRI 5' fragment
significantly increases the PDGF inducibility of the resulting deletion
construct (compare the PDGF inducibilities of constructs 4 and 3 in
Fig. 1). In contrast, further deletion of a 534-bp
SpeI-HincII 5' fragment only slightly increases
the PDGF inducibility of the resulting deletion construct (compare the
PDGF inducibilities of constructs 5 and 4 in Fig. 1). The deletions
created did not include portions of any PDGF-regulated cis-acting elements that we have reported previously
(18-20).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Deletion of 5' flanking sequences results in
heptamerless PDGF-inducible MCP-1 reporter genes. At the top
is a schematic of the structures of five tagged MCP-1
reporter constructs. Open rectangles represent exons, and introns are
represented by the dark lines between the exons. The lengths of 5'
flanking MCP-1 sequences contained within constructs are
given in kilobases. The start of transcription is shown by the bent
arrow. The 33-bp tag is represented by the dark band in the third exon.
Constructs 1, 3, 4, and 5 contain 104 bp of 3' untranslated sequences
(that include the polyadenylation signal but not the heptamer). Only
construct 2 contains the heptamer within its 3' untranslated sequences.
The relative positions of AocI (A), EcoRI (E),
SpeI (S), and HincII (H) sites, located in the
MCP-1 5' flanking sequences and defining the endpoints of
three MCP-1 5' sequence fragments, are shown. The overall
AocI-HincII 5' fragment includes 1,936 bp.
Construct 2 is derived from construct 1 by readdition of the heptamer
TTTTGTA to the 3' untranslated sequences of construct 1. Construct 3 is derived from construct 1 by deletion of the 707-bp
EcoRI-AocI fragment. Construct 4 is derived from
construct 3 by deletion of the 695-bp SpeI-EcoRI
fragment. Construct 5 is derived from construct 4 by deletion of the
534-bp HincII-SpeI fragment. The PDGF-regulated
5' I* elements are indicated. The PDGF inducibilities of the five
constructs in transfection experiments are summarized on the right. In
the middle are RNase protection assays of 40 µg of total cellular RNA
that was prepared from NIH 3T3 fibroblasts transiently transfected with
5 µg of the constructs shown, allowed to become quiescent, and then
not exposed ( ) or exposed (+) to the B-B isoform of PDGF (30 ng/ml)
for 3 h. The numbers refer to the tagged MCP-1
constructs diagrammed at the top. The positions of the 305- and 241-nt
protected fragments corresponding to expression of the transfected and
tagged (T) and endogenous (E) MCP-1 genes, respectively, are
shown. The experiment was performed four times with similar results.
The PDGF inductions obtained with constructs 4 and 5 were 2.6 to 4.0 and 3.0 to 8.1 times greater, respectively, than those obtained with
construct 1 in these transfections. The PDGF induction increases
observed with constructs 2, 3, 4, and 5, compared to construct 1, are
all significant (P < 0.05 by the Wilcoxon two-sample
test). At the bottom are RNase protection assays of 15 µg of total
cellular RNA taken from the transfections shown above and analyzed with
an alpha-globin riboprobe.
|
|
Readdition of the 707-bp EcoRI-AocI or 695-bp
SpeI-EcoRI 5' fragment, individually, to a
heptamerless MCP-1 reporter gene lacking the 1,936-bp
AocI-HincII 5' fragment results in 55 or 82%
inhibition of PDGF inducibility, respectively (compare the PDGF
inducibilities of constructs 3 and 4 with that of construct 2 in Fig.
2A, arbitrarily setting
the PDGF induction obtained with construct 2 at 100%). Readdition of
other MCP-1 5' sequence fragments similar in size did not
affect the PDGF inducibility of construct 2 (data not shown),
suggesting that the inhibitory effects of the 707- and 695-bp 5'
fragments on PDGF induction are specific. Addition of the heptamer
TTTTGTA to the 3' untranslated sequences of a minimally
inducible tagged MCP-1 reporter construct containing the
SpeI-EcoRI inhibitory fragment restores PDGF
inducibility in transfections (compare the PDGF inducibilities of
constructs 5 and 4 with that of construct 2 in Fig. 2A). Similarly,
addition of the heptamer to the 3' untranslated sequences of an
MCP-1 reporter construct containing the
EcoRI-AocI inhibitory fragment restores PDGF
inducibility in transfections (data not shown).

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
PDGF induction of MCP-1 involves interactions
between the heptamer TTTTGTA and a 5' I* element. (A) At the
top is a schematic of the structures of six tagged MCP-1
reporter constructs. Constructs 1 through 4 and 6 contain 104 bp of 3'
untranslated sequences (that include the polyadenylation signal but not
the heptamer). Only construct 5 contains the heptamer within its 3'
untranslated sequences. The details of the MCP-1 schematics
are otherwise as described in the legend to Fig. 1. Constructs 1 and 2 in this figure are identical to constructs 1 and 5, respectively, in
Fig. 1. Construct 3 is derived from construct 2 by readdition of the
707-bp EcoRI-AocI fragment. Construct 4 is
derived from construct 2 by readdition of the 695-bp
SpeI-EcoRI fragment. Construct 5 is derived from
construct 4 by readdition of the heptamer to the proximal 3'
untranslated sequences. Construct 6 is derived from construct 4 by
readdition of the heptamer to the distal 5' flanking sequences. The
PDGF-regulated 5' I* elements are indicated. The PDGF inducibilities of
the six constructs in transfection experiments are summarized on the
right. At the middle are RNase protection assays of 40 µg of total
cellular RNA that was prepared from NIH 3T3 fibroblasts transiently
transfected with 5 µg of the constructs shown, allowed to become
quiescent, and then not exposed ( ) or exposed (+) to the B-B isoform
of PDGF (30 ng/ml) for 3 h. The numbers refer to the tagged
MCP-1 constructs diagrammed at the top. The 305- and 241-nt
protected fragments corresponding to expression of the transfected and
tagged (T) or endogenous (E) MCP-1 genes, respectively, are
indicated. The experiment was performed four times with similar
results. The PDGF inductions obtained with constructs 3 and 4 were 10 to 64 and 10 to 15%, respectively, of those obtained with construct 2 in these transfections. The PDGF inductions obtained with construct 5 were 2.1 to 9.7 times greater than those obtained with construct 4 in
these transfections. The PDGF induction decreases observed with
constructs 3 and 4, compared to construct 2, are both statistically
significant (P < 0.05 by the Wilcoxon two-sample
test). The PDGF induction increases observed with construct 5, compared
to construct 4, are significant (P < 0.05 by the
Wilcoxon two-sample test). At the bottom are RNase protection assays of
15 µg of total cellular RNA taken from the transfections shown above
and analyzed with an alpha-globin riboprobe. (B) At the top are RNase
protection assays of 40 µg of total cellular RNA that was prepared
from NIH 3T3 fibroblasts transiently transfected with 4 µg of the
constructs shown, allowed to become quiescent, and then not exposed
( ) or exposed (+) to the B-B isoform of PDGF (30 ng/ml) for 3 h. The
numbers refer to the tagged MCP-1 constructs described at
the top, except for constructs 5m1, 5m2, and 5m3. The latter constructs
are derived from construct 4 by addition of the mutant heptamers
TTTTATG, GGGGGTA,
and TTTTGGA, respectively, to the 3'
untranslated sequences. Mutations of the wild-type heptamer sequence
are underlined. The 305- and 241-nt protected fragments corresponding
to expression of the transfected and tagged (T) and endogenous (E)
MCP-1 genes, respectively, are indicated. The experiment was
performed four times with similar results. The decreased PDGF
inductions obtained with constructs 5m1, 5m2, and 5m3 varied from 6 to
15%, 8 to 25%, and 50 to 60% of those obtained with construct 5, respectively, in these transfections. The PDGF induction differences
obtained with constructs 5m1, 5m2, and 5m3, compared to construct 5, are all statistically significant (P < 0.05 by the
Wilcoxon two-sample test). The PDGF induction increases observed with
constructs 5 and 6, compared to construct 4, are statistically
significant (P < 0.05 by the Wilcoxon two-sample
test). At the bottom are RNase protection assays of 15 µg of total
cellular RNA taken from the transfections shown above and analyzed with
an alpha-globin riboprobe.
|
|
Readdition of the heptamer to the 3' untranslated or 5' flanking
MCP-1 sequence restores PDGF inducibility to an inhibitory fragment-containing reporter gene with equal effectiveness (compare the
PDGF inducibilities of constructs 6 and 5 with that of construct 4 in
Fig. 2B). Three distinct mutations of the heptamer, TTTTATG, GGGGGTA, and TTTTGGA, decrease the PDGF
inducibilities of the resulting mutant heptamer-containing
MCP-1 reporter gene in transfections by 94, 80, and 43%,
respectively (compare the PDGF inducibilities of constructs 5m1, 5m2,
and 5m3 with that of construct 5 in Fig. 2B).
Taken together, these data are consistent with the existence of
independently functioning inhibitory elements present within two
nonoverlapping MCP-1 5' fragments. These data further
suggest that PDGF-regulated interactions occur between the wild-type
heptamer, TTTTGTA, and the 695-bp
SpeI-EcoRI inhibitory element-containing fragment
that relieve the inhibition of PDGF induction of MCP-1. Furthermore, these data demonstrate that the inhibitory
element-heptamer interactions are heptamer sequence specific. The more
potent of the two inhibitory elements is contained within the 695-bp
SpeI-EcoRI fragment (construct 4 in Fig. 2A). For
these reasons, we will focus on the identity and properties of this
inhibitory element in the rest of this report. Throughout this report,
the inhibitory element will be designated I*.
A single DNase I-protected sequence is detected within the 695-bp
SpeI-EcoRI inhibitory fragment.
DNase I
footprinting assays were performed to locate a potential I* element
sequence(s) within the 695-bp SpeI-EcoRI
inhibitory fragment. A single footprinted region was detected in these
assays (Fig. 3). The overall footprint,
with endpoints at
1468 and
1434 relative to the start of
transcription of the MCP-1 gene, consists of two DNase
I-protected regions separated by an apparent DNase I-hypersensitive
site (arrow in Fig. 3). The distal (5') and proximal (3') protected
subregions will be referred to here as the 5' and 3' (footprinted)
subregions, respectively. Similar footprinted regions are observed with
extracts prepared from quiescent and PDGF-treated 3T3 cells (Fig. 3).
No additional DNase I-protected sequences are apparent within the rest
of the 695-bp fragment (data not shown). A similar footprint was
detected by using a bottom-strand labeled probe (data not shown).

View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
A single DNase I-protected sequence is detected within
the 695-bp SpeI-EcoRI inhibitory fragment. A
top-strand-labeled probe corresponding to the 695-bp inhibitory
element-containing SpeI-EcoRI MCP-1 5'
fragment was used in DNase I footprinting assays. Nuclear protein
extracts for these assays were prepared from two groups of quiescent
fibroblasts (lanes Q) and fibroblasts treated with 30 ng of the B-B
isoform of PDGF per ml for 2 h (lanes B). Lanes 0 contained no
protein, and lane G+A contained the purine sequence of the
top-strand-labeled probe. The nucleotide sequence of the overall
protected region is given on the right. The arrow highlights a DNase
I-hypersensitive site separating the 5' and 3' protected subregions.
The 12-nt (m1) and 8-nt (m2) sequences mutated in this study are
highlighted by the bars on the right.
|
|
A 59-nt sequence is sufficient for inhibition of MCP-1
induction and contains an I* element.
Mutation of 12 nt within the
5' subregion or 8 nt within the 3' subregion (bars in Fig. 3) reverses
the inhibition maintained by the wild-type
SpeI-EcoRI fragment (compare the PDGF
inducibilities of constructs 3 and 5m1 or 5m2 in Fig.
4A and B).
MCP-1 reporter genes containing either the heptamer within
their 3' untranslated sequences or the 12-nt mutation within the 695-bp
inhibitory fragment exhibit similar PDGF inducibilities in these
transfection experiments (compare the PDGF inducibilities of constructs
4 and 5m1 in Fig. 4A). Introduction of an identical 12-nt mutation
within the 5' subregion of construct 1 (i.e., a minimally
PDGF-inducible reporter gene containing both inhibitory fragments in
their proper contexts within the MCP-1 5' sequences, Fig.
4A) partially reverses the inhibition of PDGF induction observed with
wild-type construct 1 (data not shown). In the latter experiments, the
reversal of inhibition of PDGF induction is only partial, likely due to
the presence and unopposed action of the second
(EcoRI-AocI) inhibitory fragment in mutated
construct 1.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Necessity of 12-nt (5') and 8-nt (3') footprinted
sequences for inhibition of MCP-1 induction. (A) At the top
is a schematic of the structures of five tagged MCP-1
reporter constructs. Constructs 1 through 3 and 5 contain 104 bp of 3'
untranslated sequences (that include the polyadenylation signal but not
the heptamer). Only construct 4 contains the heptamer within its 3'
untranslated sequences. The details of the MCP-1 schematics
are otherwise as described in the legend to Fig. 1. Construct 2 is
derived from construct 1 by removal of the 1,936-bp
AocI-HincII 5' fragment. Construct 3 is derived
from construct 2 by readdition of the 695-bp
SpeI-EcoRI fragment. Construct 4 is derived from
construct 3 by addition of the heptamer TTTTGTA to the 3'
untranslated sequences. Constructs 5m1 and m2 are derived from
construct 3 by site-directed mutation of nonoverlapping 12-nt (5'
subregion) and 8-nt (3' subregion) portions, respectively, of the
footprinted region shown in Fig. 3 (i.e., mutating the 12-base sequence
GCCCCACCCCCA to ATGAAGTTGATC and the 8-base
sequence GTCACCTG to TGGCTAGT within the
otherwise unaltered 695-bp SpeI-EcoRI fragment).
The PDGF-regulated 5' inhibitory I* elements are indicated. The PDGF
inducibilities of the constructs in transfection experiments are
summarized on the right. At the middle are RNase protection assays of
40 µg of total cellular RNA that was prepared from NIH 3T3
fibroblasts transiently transfected with 5 µg of the constructs
shown, allowed to become quiescent, and then not exposed ( ) or
exposed (+) to the B-B isoform of PDGF (30 ng/ml) for 3 h. The
numbers refer to the tagged MCP-1 constructs described at
the top. The 305- and 241-nt protected fragments corresponding to
expression of the transfected and tagged (T) and endogenous (E)
MCP-1 genes, respectively, are indicated. The experiment was
performed four times with similar results. The PDGF inductions obtained
with construct 5m1 were 1.6 to 5.2 times greater than those obtained
with construct 3 in these transfections. The PDGF induction increases
observed with construct 5m1, compared to construct 3, are statistically
significant (P < 0.05 by the Wilcoxon two-sample
test). At the bottom are RNase protection assays of 15 µg of total
cellular RNA taken from the transfections shown above and analyzed with
an alpha-globin riboprobe. (B) At the top are RNase protection assays
of 40 µg of total cellular RNA prepared from NIH 3T3 fibroblasts
transiently transfected with 4 µg of the constructs shown, allowed to
become quiescent, and then not exposed ( ) or exposed (+) to the B-B
isoform of PDGF (30 ng/ml) for 3 h. The numbers refer to the
tagged MCP-1 constructs described at the top. The 305- and
241-nt protected fragments corresponding to expression of the
transfected and tagged (T) and endogenous (E) MCP-1 genes,
respectively, are indicated. The experiment was performed four times
with similar results. The PDGF inductions obtained with construct 5m2
were 1.8 to 2.7 times greater than those obtained with construct 3 in these
transfections. The PDGF induction increases observed with construct
5m2, compared to construct 3, are statistically significant
(P < 0.05 by the Wilcoxon two-sample test). At the
bottom are RNase protection assays of 15 µg of total cellular RNA
taken from the transfections shown above and analyzed with an
alpha-globin riboprobe.
|
|
Readdition of a 25-nt oligonucleotide containing the 5' footprinted
subregion to an I*-lacking PDGF-inducible MCP-1 reporter gene does not recapitulate the inhibitory effect of the 695-bp SpeI-EcoRI fragment in transfections (compare the
PDGF inducibilities of constructs 6 and 2 with that of construct 3 in
Fig. 5A). In contrast,
readdition of a 59-nt oligonucleotide that contains the complete
footprinted region highlighted in Fig. 3 to the same reporter gene
restores the inhibition of PDGF induction maintained by the 695-bp
inhibitory fragment in an orientation-independent manner (compare the
PDGF inducibilities of constructs 4 and 5 with that of construct 3 in
Fig. 5A). Readdition of the 695-bp inhibitory fragment (construct 3) or
the 59-nt oligonucleotide in either orientation (constructs 4 and 5)
resulted in 86, 81, or 85% inhibition of the PDGF induction observed
with construct 2 in these transfection experiments, respectively
(arbitrarily setting the PDGF induction obtained with construct 2 at
100%). Readdition of the heptamer to the 3' sequences of a
59-nt-containing MCP-1 reporter gene restores PDGF
inducibility in transfection experiments [compare the PDGF
inducibilities of constructs 4 and 4(7) in Fig. 5B].

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
A 59-nt sequence is sufficient for inhibition of PDGF
induction of MCP-1. (A) At the top is a schematic of the
structures of six tagged MCP-1 reporter constructs. All of
the constructs contain 104 bp of 3' untranslated sequences (that
include the polyadenylation signal but not the heptamer). The details
of the MCP-1 schematics are otherwise as described in the
legend to Fig. 1. Construct 2 is derived from construct 1 by removal of
the 1,936-bp AocI-HincII 5' fragment. Construct 3 is derived from construct 2 by readdition of the 695-bp
SpeI-EcoRI fragment. Constructs 4 and 5 are
derived from construct 2 by readdition of a 59-nt subfragment of the
695-bp SpeI-EcoRI fragment in the in vivo
(construct 4) and reverse (construct 5) orientations. The 59-nt
subfragment includes the complete footprinted region shown in Fig. 3
and a short stretch of additional MCP-1 sequences
immediately 3' to the footprinted region. Construct 6 is derived from
construct 2 by readdition of a 25-nt oligonucleotide (I*5') containing
the 5' footprinted subregion shown in Fig. 3. The 25-nt sequence is
entirely contained within the 59-nt sequences. The PDGF-regulated 5' I*
elements are indicated. The PDGF inducibilities of the six constructs
in transfection experiments are summarized on the right. Below the
schematic are results from RNase protection assays of 40 µg of total
cellular RNA that was prepared from NIH 3T3 fibroblasts transiently
transfected with 4 µg of the constructs shown, allowed to become
quiescent, and then not exposed ( ) or exposed (+) to the B-B isoform
of PDGF (30 ng/ml) for 3 h. The numbers refer to the tagged
MCP-1 constructs described at the top. The 305- and 241-nt
protected fragments corresponding to expression of the transfected and
tagged (T) and endogenous (E) MCP-1 genes, respectively, are
indicated. The experiment was performed three times with similar
results. The PDGF inductions obtained with constructs 3, 4, and 5 varied from 3.5 to 24% of those obtained with construct 2 in these
transfections. Differences among the PDGF inductions observed with
constructs 3, 4, and 5 are not statistically significant (P = 0.49 by the Kruskal-Wallis test). The PDGF induction decreases
observed with constructs 3, 4, and 5, compared to construct 2, are all statistically significant
(P < 0.05 by the Wilcoxon two- sample test). At the
bottom are RNase protection assays of 15 µg of total cellular RNA
taken from the transfections shown above and analyzed with an
alpha-globin riboprobe. (B) At the top are RNase protection assays of
40 µg of total cellular RNA that was prepared from NIH 3T3
fibroblasts transiently transfected with 4 µg of the constructs
shown, allowed to become quiescent, and then not exposed ( ) or
exposed (+) to the B-B isoform of PDGF (30 ng/ml) for 3 h. The
numbers refer to the tagged MCP-1 constructs described at
the top, except for construct 4(7), which is derived from construct 4 by addition of the heptamer TTTTGTA to the 3' untranslated
sequences. The 305- and 241-nt protected fragments corresponding to
expression of the transfected and tagged (T) and endogenous (E)
MCP-1 genes, respectively, are indicated. The experiment was
performed four times with similar results. The PDGF inductions obtained
with construct 4(7) were 2.5 to 4.2 times greater than those obtained
with construct 4 in these transfections. The PDGF induction increases
observed with construct 4(7), compared to construct 4, are
statistically significant (P < 0.05 by the Wilcoxon
two-sample test). At the bottom are RNase protection assays of 15 µg
of total cellular RNA taken from the transfections shown above and
analyzed with an alpha-globin riboprobe.
|
|
In total, these data demonstrate that sequences in both the 5' and 3'
subregions of the overall footprinted region shown in Fig. 3 are
necessary for inhibition of PDGF induction. Furthermore, a 59-nt
oligonucleotide containing the complete footprinted region shown in
Fig. 3 is sufficient to mediate inhibition of PDGF induction of
MCP-1 in an orientation-independent and heptamer-regulated manner; i.e., it appears to contain a functional I* element. By extension, these data suggest that the 5' and 3' footprinted subregions act together to effect inhibition of PDGF induction.
A slowly migrating protein complex binds to the I* element.
To
detect and characterize potential regulatory proteins binding to the I*
element, we performed a series of mobility shift assays using seven
oligonucleotide probes. The sequences of the probes and their relative
positions within the overall 59-nt I* element are shown in Fig.
6G. A predominant and constitutively binding protein complex was found to bind to a radiolabeled I* probe in
mobility shift assays (lanes 1 and 2 in Fig. 6A). Significantly, mutant
I* probes containing either of the nonoverlapping 12-nt (5') or 8-nt
(3') mutations described in Fig. 4 do not bind the slowly migrating
complex (compare the greatly diminished binding in lanes 3 and 4 or 5 and 6, respectively, with that in lanes 1 and 2 in Fig. 6B). The
all-or-nothing binding exhibited by the wild-type and mutant I* probes
suggests that cooperative interactions between the two sites altered in
these mutant probes are involved in the formation of the complex on the
wild-type I* sequence. Furthermore, since both mutations significantly
decreased the inhibition of PDGF induction maintained by the wild-type
695-bp fragment in transfection experiments (constructs 5m1 and 5m2 in Fig. 4), these data suggest that a causal relationship exists between
formation of the I* element-binding complex and inhibition of
PDGF-stimulated expression of MCP-1 in intact cells.

View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
A slowly migrating protein complex binds to the 59-nt I*
element-containing sequence. (A) Nuclear extracts (20 µg) prepared
from quiescent fibroblasts ( ) or fibroblasts treated with the B-B
isoform of PDGF (30 ng/ml) for 2 h (+) were used in mobility shift
assays along with the radiolabeled double-stranded
oligonucleotide probes shown. The large arrowhead highlights the
predominant complex that binds to the 59-nt fragment (I*) probe. The
small arrowhead highlights an additional protein complex, of unclear
significance, that also binds to the 59-nt fragment probe. (B) Nuclear
extracts (15 µg) prepared from quiescent fibroblasts were used in
mobility shift assays along with the radiolabeled double-stranded
oligonucleotide probes shown. The arrowhead highlights the predominant
complex that binds to the I* probe. (C) Nuclear extracts (15 µg) prepared from quiescent fibroblasts were used in mobility shift
assays along with the radiolabeled double-stranded
oligonucleotide probe shown. Unlabeled double-stranded oligonucleotides
(300-fold excesses) were used as competitors where indicated. The 4×7
competitor is a double-stranded oligonucleotide containing four copies
of the heptamer TTTTGTA. The arrow highlights the
predominant complex that binds to the I* probe. Compet, competitor. (D)
Nuclear extracts (15 µg) prepared from quiescent fibroblasts were
used in mobility shift assays along with the radiolabeled
double-stranded oligonucleotide probes shown. Unlabeled double-stranded
oligonucleotides (300-fold excesses) were used as competitors where
indicated. The arrowhead highlights the predominant complex that binds
to the 59-nt fragment (I*) probe. The upper and lower arrows show
the positions of two complexes that bind specifically to the I*5'
probe. (E) Nuclear extracts (20 µg) prepared from quiescent
fibroblasts were used in mobility shift assays along with the
radiolabeled double-stranded oligonucleotide probes shown. Unlabeled
double-stranded oligonucleotides (200-fold excesses) were used as
competitors where indicated. The arrowhead highlights the predominant
complex that binds to the 59-nt fragment (I*) probe. The arrow
shows the position of a complex that binds specifically to the I*3'
probe. (F) Nuclear extracts (15 µg) prepared from quiescent
fibroblasts (Q) and recombinant Sp1 (rSp1, 1fpu) were used in mobility
shift assays along with the radiolabeled double-stranded
oligonucleotide probes shown. Antibodies specific for
individual members of the Sp1 family of transcription factors (5 µg)
were added where indicated. The Sp1-1 and Sp1-2 antibodies bind to
distinct, nonoverlapping portions of the Sp1 transcription factor
(amino acids 436 to 454 and 520 to 538, respectively). Prot, protein.
The arrowhead on the left highlights the predominant complex that binds
specifically to the 59-nt fragment (I*) probe. The arrows on the left
show the positions of the two complexes that bind specifically to
the 5' subregion (I*5') probe. The arrows on the right show the
positions of complexes supershifted by the anti-Sp1 and anti-Sp3
antibodies (Ab). (G) The sequences of seven oligonucleotides and the
relative position of each oligonucleotide within the overall 59-nt
footprinted (I*) region are shown. These oligonucleotides were used as
double-stranded probes or competitors in the six mobility shift assays
whose results are shown here and correspond to the 25-nt (5'
subregion), 24-nt (3' subregion), and 59-nt (full-length) footprinted
regions shown in Fig. 3 (designated I*5', I*3', and I*, respectively).
Mutant 25- and 24-nt probes, containing the 12- and 8-nt mutations
described in the legend to Fig. 4 are designated I*5'm and I*3'm,
respectively. Mutant I* probes containing the same 12- and 8-nt
mutations are designated I*m1 and I*m2, respectively. The mutated
sequences are boldfaced and underlined for each oligonucleotide. Free
probe is not shown in these mobility shift assays. No complexes
were observed with any of the probes alone in the absence of extract
(data not shown).
|
|
Binding of the single predominant complex to the I* probe is specific,
as it is competed by an excess of an unlabeled wild-type I*
oligonucleotide (lane 3 in Fig. 6C) but is not competed by an unrelated
oligonucleotide (lane 7 in Fig. 6C). Binding to the I* probe was also
quantitatively competed by an excess of a wild-type, but not a mutant,
5' subregion oligonucleotide (compare binding in lanes 4 and 5, respectively, in Fig. 6C), again demonstrating that protein binding to
the I* probe in these mobility shift assays is specific. Finally,
binding to the I* probe is partially competed by both a mutant I*
oligonucleotide (I*m1) containing the 12-nt mutation of the 5'
subregion sequences (lane 6 in Fig. 6C) or by an oligonucleotide
containing the 3' subregion sequences (the I*3' oligonucleotide; data
not shown). If proteins binding to distinct sequences within the 5' and
3' subregions of the overall footprinted (I*) region participate in or
are required for the formation of the I* element-binding complex, then
using an excess of an unlabeled oligonucleotide corresponding to either
the 5' or 3' subregion would be expected to bind these proteins,
thereby depleting the 3T3 cell nuclear extracts of the free forms of
this 5' or 3' subregion-binding protein. As was observed in the
competition experiments (Fig. 6C), this would result in decreased
binding to a labeled I* element probe. Hence, the oligonucleotide
competition experiments suggest that sequences within both the 5' and
3' subregions of the I* element are required for the formation of the
I* element-binding complex. We then sought to detect and identify the
proteins binding to the 5' and 3' subregions of the I* element.
Distinct and more rapidly migrating constitutively binding complexes
bound to the 5' and 3' subregion probes (compare the binding in lanes 3 and 4 or 7 and 8, respectively, with that in lanes 1 and 2 in Fig. 6A).
Mutant 5' or 3' subregion probes containing the 12- and 8-nt mutations
described in Fig. 4 did not bind the complexes that bound the two
wild-type probes (Fig. 6A). Binding of the two complexes to a 5'
subregion (I*5') probe is specific, as it was competed by an excess of
a wild-type 5' subregion oligonucleotide but was not competed by a
mutant 5' subregion oligonucleotide or unrelated oligonucleotides
(compare the binding in lane 3 or lanes 4 through 6, respectively, with
the binding in lane 2 in Fig. 6D). Likewise, binding of a single
complex to the 3' subregion (I*3') probe is specific, as it was
competed by an excess of the wild-type 3' subregion oligonucleotide but
was not competed by a mutant 3' subregion oligonucleotide or unrelated
oligonucleotides (compare the binding in lane 4 or lanes 5 through 7, respectively, with the binding in lane 3 in Fig. 6E). Note that the
complexes binding to the 5' subregion probe are not competed by an
excess of an oligonucleotide corresponding to the 3' subregion (lane 5 in Fig. 6D) and vice versa (lane 6 in Fig. 6E). These data suggest that
the single protein complex binding specifically to the 3' footprinted
subregion probe (Fig. 6E) is distinct from the proteins binding to the
5' subregion probe. Computer database searches did not turn up a
binding site match for the 3' subregion sequences, suggesting that the
3' subregion-binding protein is a novel DNA-binding factor. In these
mobility shifts, binding to the I*3' probe is significantly weaker than
binding to the I* or I*5' probe (Fig. 6A and E). No significant
increase in binding intensity was noted when a labeled I*3' probe
including an additional 5 nt of the 5' or 3' flanking sequence was used
(data not shown), suggesting that the I*3' probe used in these
experiments does not lack sequences required for binding of the complex.
The 5' footprinted subregion includes potential binding sites for the
Sp1 and Sp3 transcription factors (i.e., the repeated sequence
CCCCACCCC) (35), suggesting that one or both of
the complexes binding to the wild-type 5' subregion probe could be these transcription factors. To address this question, antibody supershift mobility shift assays were performed by using a panel of
antibodies to individual members of the Sp1 family of transcription factors. Two anti-Sp1 antibodies recognizing different portions of Sp1
were used in these experiments. Only one of the anti-Sp1 antibodies
(anti-Sp1-1 recognizing amino acids 436 to 454 of the Sp1 protein)
supershifts the more slowly migrating (upper) complex binding to the 5'
subregion probe. In contrast, the anti-Sp1-2 antibody (recognizing
amino acids 520 to 538 of the Sp1 protein) does not supershift the
upper complex binding to the 5' subregion probe (lanes 3 and 4 in Fig.
6F). Recombinant Sp1 protein is supershifted quantitatively by both
anti-Sp1 antibodies (lanes 9 and 10 in Fig. 6F), demonstrating that
both anti-Sp1 antibodies are functional in these experiments. The
additional three anti-Sp family antibodies did not supershift the upper
complex binding to the 5' subregion probe (lanes 5 to 7 in Fig. 6F).
Additional mobility shift assays were performed by using a series of
labeled mutant I*5' probes, each mutant containing a 4- to 7-base
mutation of the sequence immediately 5' or 3' of the Sp1 and Sp3
DNA-binding sites present in the wild-type probe. Binding of the upper
complex and recombinant Sp1 to this series of mutant I*5' probes was
identical and undiminished compared to their binding to a wild-type
I*5' probe (data not shown). Taken together, these data suggest that
the upper complex binding the 5' subregion probe is an Sp1-like protein
that lacks at least the epitope recognized by the Sp1-2 antibody but
has a DNA-binding domain in common with recombinant Sp1. Alternatively, the epitope recognized by the Sp1-2 antibody could be masked either by
a posttranslational modification of the Sp1 protein or as a result of
the binding of another protein to Sp1 in the 3T3 cell nuclear extracts.
The anti-Sp1-2 antibody is specific for amino acids 520 to 538 within
the C domain of the Sp1 transcription factor, a region that has been
shown to be sufficient, but not necessary, to mediate transcriptional
activation of a reporter gene (12).
The more rapidly migrating (lower) complex binding to the 5' subregion
probe is supershifted by the anti-Sp3 antibody but not by the
anti-Sp1-2, anti-Sp2, or anti-Sp4 antibody, suggesting that it is
antigenically related to the Sp3 transcription factor (lanes 4 to 7 in
Fig. 6F). All supershifts were abolished by addition of the peptides
used to generate the various antibodies (data not shown). The lower
complex binding to the 5' subregion probe was also supershifted by the
anti-Sp1-1 antibody (lane 3 in Fig. 6F). The anti-Sp1-1 antibody did
not recognize immunoprecipitated Sp3 in a Western blot analysis (data
not shown). It is possible that addition of the anti-Sp1-1 antibody
distorts the Sp1-like protein-probe complex, thereby allowing
concurrent binding of Sp3 and the Sp1-like proteins together on the
I*5' probe.
Taken together, these mobility shift assays suggest that the I*5'
sequences, containing Sp1- and Sp3-binding sites, also bind Sp3 and an
Sp1-like protein (Fig. 6F). In transfection experiments, an
MCP-1 reporter gene in which just the I*5' sequences have
been added back is strongly PDGF inducible, in contrast to the
significantly decreased PDGF inductions observed with reporter
constructs containing the complete I* element (compare the PDGF
inducibilities of constructs 6 and 2 with those of constructs 4 and 5 in Fig. 5A). Hence, adding back only the I*5' portion of the
full-length I* element to an I*-lacking, PDGF-inducible reporter gene
(in these experiments effectively tethering Sp1 and Sp3 to the
MCP-1 reporter gene) does not restore inhibition of PDGF
induction. Rather, the complete I* element is necessary for inhibition
of PDGF induction of MCP-1, suggesting that cooperative
interactions occur among the I*-binding proteins and 5' and 3' binding
sites in vivo in transfection experiments. These findings raise the
question of whether the I*5'-binding Sp3 protein, the Sp1-like protein,
or both are components of the I* element-binding complex that appears
to maintain inhibition of PDGF induction of MCP-1 in the
absence of the heptamer.
The I* element-binding complex appears to contain both the Sp3
transcription factor and the Sp1-like protein.
All of the mobility
shift assays in this study were performed under conditions of free
probe excess (data not shown). Hence, the identification of Sp3 and an
Sp1-like protein as both binding to the 5' subregion (I*5') probe, but
only a single more slowly migrating complex binding to the I* probe
(Fig. 6A), suggests that Sp3 and the Sp1-like protein are both
contained within the larger complex. Were this not the case, one would
have expected to observe either three complexes binding to the I* probe
or a single complex binding to the 5' subregion probe. To address this question further, antibody supershift mobility shift assays were performed to determine the effects of the anti-Sp1 family antibodies on
binding to the I* probe. Only the addition of the anti-Sp1-1 antibody
greatly diminished the binding of the single complex to the I* element
probe (compare binding in lane 2 with that in lane 1 or lanes 3 to 6 in
Fig. 7A), consistent with steric
hindrance of the formation of the complex or its binding to the I*
element in the setting of antibody binding to the Sp1-like protein. The anti-Sp1-1 result was reversed by concurrent addition of the peptide used to generate the antibody (data not shown).

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
The I* element-binding complex contains the Sp3
transcription factor and an Sp1-like protein. (A) Nuclear extracts
(12.5 µg) prepared from quiescent fibroblasts were used in mobility
shift assays along with the radiolabeled double-stranded
oligonucleotide probe shown. The sequence of the probe is given in Fig.
6G. Antibodies (Ab) specific for individual members of the Sp1 family
of transcription factors (2 µg) were added where indicated. The Sp1-1
and Sp1-2 antibodies are as described in the legend to Fig. 6F. The
arrowhead on the left highlights the predominant complex that binds
specifically to the I* probe. Free probe is not shown. No complexes
were observed with the probe alone in the absence of extract (data not
shown). (B) Nuclear extracts (12.5 µg) prepared from quiescent
fibroblasts were used in mobility shift assays along with the
radiolabeled double-stranded oligonucleotide probes shown. The
sequences of the probes are given in Fig. 6G. Extracts were
immunodepleted initially with anti-Sp3 antibodies (+), mock
immunodepleted with rabbit immunoglobulin G (M), or not treated ( ).
The arrowhead on the left highlights the predominant complex that binds
specifically to the I* probe. The arrows on the right highlight the
positions of the two complexes that bind specifically to the 5'
subregion (I*5') probe. Free probe is not shown. No complexes were
observed with the probes alone in the absence of extract (data
not shown). (C) Immunoblot of an aliquot (30 µg) of the extracts used
for panel B with the anti-Sp3 antibody. The designations +, M, and are as described for panel B. Molecular sizes are given in
kilodaltons.
|
|
No effect on binding to the I* probe was noted after addition of
anti-Sp3 antibody or any of the other anti-Sp1 family antibodies (lanes
3 to 6 in Fig. 7A). The latter data suggest either that Sp3 is not a
component of the I*-binding complex or that the Sp3 epitope recognized
by the antibody is inaccessible to the antibody by virtue of its being
contained within the I*-binding complex. As an alternative means of
assessing whether Sp3 is a component of the I* probe-binding complex,
anti-Sp3 antibody was used to immunodeplete fibroblast nuclear extracts
of Sp3 prior to the use of these extracts in mobility shift assays. A
single immunoprecipitation step, using the anti-Sp3 antibody, was
sufficient to remove detectable lower complex binding to the 5'
subregion probe in mobility shift assays compared to mock-treated or
untreated extracts (compare the lower complex binding in lane 5 to that
in lanes 4 and 6 in Fig. 7B), again suggesting that the lower complex
binding to the 5' subregion probe is the Sp3 protein. In contrast,
upper complex binding to the 5' subregion probe was relatively
unaffected by the Sp3 immunodepletion procedure (lanes 4 to 6 in Fig.
7B). Western blot analysis was unable to detect residual Sp3 in nuclear
extracts after immunodepletion using the anti-Sp3 antibody (Fig. 7C).
Immunodepletion of detectable, free Sp3 in fibroblast nuclear extracts
greatly reduced the formation or binding of the protein complex to the I* element in mobility shift assays (compare the binding in lane 2 with
that in lanes 1 and 3 in Fig. 7B), suggesting that Sp3 is required for
the formation of the complex or its binding to the I* probe.
 |
DISCUSSION |
A pair of I* elements are present in the MCP-1 5'
flanking sequences and are heptamer regulated.
We have shown
previously that PDGF induction of the MCP-1 IEG requires the
presence of the 7-nt motif TTTTGTA within the 3' untranslated sequences of MCP-1. Moreover, MCP-1
reporter genes lacking the heptamer were not PDGF inducible in previous
transfection experiments (20). In this study, we have
created MCP-1 reporter genes lacking the heptamer that are
strongly PDGF inducible through the deletion of a 1,936-bp segment of
the MCP-1 5' flanking sequences (Fig. 1). Hence, while the
heptamer is essential for PDGF induction of an intact MCP-1
reporter gene (20), the function of the heptamer is
dispensable upon the removal of a defined stretch of 5' flanking MCP-1 sequences. These data suggest that the apparent
positive effect on PDGF inducibility of readdition of the heptamer to
the 3' untranslated sequences results from the heptamer functioning to
remove an inhibition of PDGF induction of MCP-1 maintained by what we have termed an inhibitory element(s) present within the
5' sequences.
Finer 5' deletional analysis detected the existence of two
independently acting inhibitory elements. Although the more potent inhibition of PDGF induction was maintained by a 695-bp
SpeI-EcoRI MCP-1 5' sequence fragment,
inhibition maintained by either fragment is reversed by readdition of
the heptamer to the 3' untranslated sequences. These findings
demonstrate directly that PDGF-regulated interactions occur between the
3'-located heptamer and the two inhibitory elements present within the
MCP-1 5' flanking sequences in a heptamer sequence-specific
manner (Fig. 2B). Since the heptamer is also fully functional when
located upstream of the MCP-1 transcription start site, it
likely functions as a DNA-regulatory element, presumably as the binding
site for a regulatory factor(s). Consistent with this prediction are
the results of mobility shift assays detecting a single protein complex
binding specifically to a wild-type heptamer probe and not binding to
mutant heptamer probes containing the three mutations described in Fig.
2B (data not shown). Computer-aided sequence comparisons suggested that
there are no significant regions of sequence homology between the two
inhibitory element-containing fragments (data not shown). In total,
these data are consistent with the existence of two distinct inhibitory
elements present in the MCP-1 5' flanking sequences that
interact with the heptamer TTTTGTA in a PDGF-regulated manner.
Several laboratories have employed nuclear runon assays to demonstrate
that PDGF-stimulated expression of the MCP-1 IEG is the
result of new transcription (26, 36, 59, 62). Hence, the
mechanism whereby the 695-bp SpeI-EcoRI 5'
fragment inhibits PDGF-stimulated expression of MCP-1 in the
absence of the heptamer appears to be at the level of repression of
transcription. Conversely, the mechanism(s) whereby the heptamer
relieves inhibition, in a PDGF-regulated manner, likely occurs through
heptamer-mediated reversal of the transcriptional repression of
MCP-1 maintained by the 695-bp inhibitory fragment. Other
theoretical mechanisms of action for the inhibitory fragment or
inhibitory element, e.g., diminished processivity of the RNA polymerase
through the MCP-1 coding sequences and/or changes in
MCP-1 RNA stability, are rendered unlikely, given the normal
position of the SpeI-EcoRI inhibitory fragment
within the distal 5' flanking sequences of the MCP-1 gene,
i.e., with endpoints at
1764 and
1069 relative to the MCP-1 start of transcription.
One I* element is contained within a 59-nt MCP-1
sequence and binds a multiprotein complex including Sp3 and an Sp1-like
protein.
Evidence presented in this report demonstrates that a
59-nt portion of MCP-1 5' flanking sequences recapitulates
the properties of the full-length 695-bp inhibitory fragment, strongly
suggesting that the 59-nt sequence contains one of the I* elements
detected in our initial experiments. Significantly, the 59-nt
I*-containing sequence was demonstrated to bind a single predominant
protein complex with greatly decreased binding or formation of the
single complex observed to either of two mutant 59-nt oligonucleotides. Since both mutations significantly decrease the repression of PDGF
induction maintained by the wild-type 695-bp fragment in transfection
experiments (Fig. 4), these data strongly suggest that a causal
relationship exists between the formation or binding of the 59-nt I*
element-binding complex and repression of PDGF-stimulated transcription
of MCP-1 in intact cells. Note that the 59-nt I* element-binding complex is competed by oligonucleotides corresponding to either the 5' footprinted subregion alone, a 59-nt oligonucleotide containing a mutation of just the 5' subregion (I*m1), or the 3'
footprinted subregion alone (Fig. 6C). In total, these data suggest
that at least two distinct DNA sequences, contained within the 5' and
3' footprinted subregions, comprise the overall 59-nt I* element. By
extension, regulatory or architectural proteins binding to the two DNA
sites would be predicted to be components of the 59-nt I*-binding
complex. In the remainder of this discussion, the designation I*
element will refer to the 59-nt oligonucleotide.
Antibody supershift mobility shift assays and immunodepletion
experiments suggest that both Sp3 and the Sp1-like protein that we have
identified as binding independently to the 5' subregion probe are
contained within the I* element-binding complex (Fig. 7). The apparent
coexistence in a multiprotein complex of a transcriptional activator
like Sp1 (7, 11, 44, 45, 52) and Sp3, a transcription factor
that often antagonizes Sp1 function or binding, thereby effectively
repressing transcription (10, 15, 40, 46), is an uncommon
occurrence. Transcriptional activation of the neuronal nicotinic
acetylcholine receptor
4 subunit gene has been reported to involve
interactions between Sp1 and Sp3 on a single Sp1-Sp3 DNA-binding
sequence (4). For MCP-1, the apparent
juxtaposition of antagonistic transcription factors suggests that the
I*-binding complex could, in theory, also perform an activating
function in regulating the expression of other genes.
Repressosome model of inhibition of PDGF induction of
MCP-1.
The experiments presented in this report are
consistent with the existence of a multiprotein complex binding to the
I* element that represses PDGF-stimulated transcription of
MCP-1 in the absence of the heptamer. Furthermore, the
evidence suggests that (i) at least three distinct proteins comprise
the I*-binding complex and (ii) regulatory or architectural proteins
binding to at least two distinct DNA-binding sites are involved in the
formation of the I*-binding complex. We propose that the formation of
the I*-binding complex creates a multiprotein repressor surface that
maintains inhibition of MCP-1 transcription. Upon PDGF
stimulation of cells, and in the presence of the heptamer TTTTGTA,
repression of MCP-1 transcription is relieved. A
growing body of literature is lending elegant experimental support to
the concept of an enhanceosome, i.e., a multiprotein complex formed in
a cooperative manner, in which the component proteins bind to
independent sites on a short segment of DNA. This results in the
formation of a multiprotein activation surface that effectively
increases the transcription of a given gene (6, 39, 47, 49).
We propose that the I*-binding complex is the first example of the
opposite of an enhanceosome, i.e., a multiprotein complex mediating
repression of MCP-1 transcription, in which the component
proteins bind to distinct sites within the overall I* element. Our
results suggest that cooperative interactions occur among the
I*-binding proteins and binding sites both in vitro (Fig. 6B) and in
vivo (Fig. 5A). We propose that the I*-binding complex be called a
repressosome. Our current model of the PDGF-regulated MCP-1
repressosome is shown in Fig. 8.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Repressosome model of inhibition of PDGF induction of
MCP-1. (A) A multiprotein complex (repressosome) binds to
the I* element. At least three proteins form the repressosome and bind
to two distinct sites on the I* element, designated I and II and
corresponding to the I*5' and I*3' sequences, respectively. The
proteins include the Sp3 transcription factor, an Sp1-like protein, and
an apparently novel regulatory protein that binds to site II
(represented by oval Y). The net effect is the creation on the I*
element of a repressor surface that represses MCP-1
transcription in the absence of the heptamer TTTTGTA
(denoted by the multiple minus signs). PDGF stimulation does not
result in MCP-1 expression in the absence of the heptamer
due to the unopposed action of the repressosome. (B) After PDGF
stimulation and in the presence of the heptamer, the effect of the
repressor surface is relieved or neutralized and MCP-1
transcription proceeds. An assumption inherent in this model is that
the heptamer-binding protein(s) (represented by rectangle X) is altered
after PDGF stimulation, thereby allowing it to interact with the
repressor surface formed on the I* element. Although Sp3 and the
Sp1-like protein are drawn as interacting, this does not have to
obtain. This model does not exclude the possibility that additional
regulatory or architectural proteins are involved in the formation of
the repressosome.
|
|
Our results highlight a mechanism of transcriptional repression that
differs in several important respects from other reported repression
mechanisms, such as the Mad-Max and unliganded nuclear hormone receptor
systems. In the former case, increasing levels of the Mad protein
appear to titrate the available Myc protein from activator Myc-Max
heterodimers and into repressor Mad-Max heterodimers in the setting of
cellular differentiation (2). In the latter case, addition
of the hormone reverses transcriptional repression by directly binding
to its nuclear receptor. In both cases, transcriptional repression
appears to be maintained by an additional multiprotein complex that
contains a histone deacetylase(s) and that is recruited to proteins
(e.g., Mad-Max) binding to a single DNA-binding site (41, 50, 53,
74, 75). In yeast, repression of a-specific genes appears to
share some mechanistic details with the model presented in Fig. 8;
i.e., repression appears to be maintained by a complex containing the
Tup1 and Ssn6 repressors together with the MCM1 and
2 regulatory
proteins bound to adjacent sites on the a-specific gene operator
(34, 60).
In contrast to the examples cited above, repression of PDGF-stimulated
transcription of MCP-1 is not relieved simply by exposure of
the cells to the growth factor. Rather, PDGF stimulation of the cells
removes the inhibitory effect of the I* sequences only in the presence
of the heptamer TTTTGTA. These results suggest that a
regulatory protein(s) binding to the heptamer relieves the I*-mediated
repression of MCP-1 transcription in response to PDGF
treatment. It remains to be determined whether this occurs through the
opposed actions of histone acetylases and/or deacetylases, possibly
recruited by the heptamer. Other potential mechanisms include
(PDGF-regulated proteins binding to) the heptamer masking the proposed
multiprotein repressor surface and/or posttranslationally modifying a
protein(s) within the repressosome, thereby allowing transcription of
MCP-1. The heptamer does not compete binding to the I*
element (Fig. 6C), suggesting that it is unlikely that the heptamer
functions by ablating repressosome binding to the I* element. Given
that the heptamer motif is present within the 3' untranslated sequences
of numerous IEGs in addition to MCP-1 (20), it is
tempting to speculate that the repressosome-heptamer interaction may be
a shared regulatory mechanism operative for the set of IEGs.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank John Alberta, Mike Carey, Rolf G. Freter, Charles
Stiles, I. Bernard Weinstein, and Howard J. Worman for critical reading
of the manuscript. We also thank Andrea Troxel for help with
statistical analysis, Xiaoqin Qu for assistance with the Western
analyses, and Christine Chen and Roger Lucas for technical assistance.
This research was supported in part by grants from the NIH (Shannon
Award 1R55CA76045-01), the March of Dimes (Basil O'Connor Starter
Scholar Award 5-FY97-0031), and the Council for Tobacco Research (to
R.R.F.). R.R.F. is a Scholar of the V Foundation for Cancer Research
and the James S. McDonnell Foundation. Additional support for this work
was provided by grants from the Elsa U. Pardee Foundation for Cancer
Research, The Milheim Foundation for Cancer Research, and the Ruth
Estrin Goldberg Memorial for Cancer Research (to R.R.F.). H.A.S. is
supported by a grant from the NIH (HL03806-01).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Columbia
University, P+S Bldg., Room 10-432, 630 West 168th St., New York, NY
10032. Phone: (212) 305-3461. Fax: (212) 305-1912. E-mail:
freter{at}cuccfa.ccc.columbia.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Almendral, J. M.,
D. Sommer,
H. Macdonald-Bravo,
J. Burckhardt,
J. Perera, and R. Bravo.
1988.
Complexity of the early genetic response to growth factors in mouse fibroblasts.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8:2140-2148[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Ayer, D. E., and R. N. Eisenman.
1993.
A switch from Myc:Max to Mad:Max heterocomplexes accompanies monocyte/macrophage differentiation.
Genes Dev.
7:2110-2119[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Berkowitz, L. A.,
K. T. Riabowol, and M. Z. Gilman.
1989.
Multiple sequence elements of a single functional class are required for cyclic AMP responsiveness of the mouse c-fos promoter.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9:4272-4281[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Bigger, C. B.,
I. N. Melnikova, and P. D. Gardner.
1997.
Sp1 and Sp3 regulate expression of the neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor beta-4 subunit gene.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:25976-25982[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Boring, L.,
J. Gosling,
M. Cleary, and I. F. Charo.
1998.
Decreased lesion formation in CCR2 / mice reveals a role for chemokines in the initiation of atherosclerosis.
Nature
394:894-897[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Carey, M.
1998.
The enhanceosome and transcriptional synergy.
Cell
92:5-8[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Chen, S.,
C. M. Artlett,
S. A. Jimenez, and J. Varga.
1998.
Modulation of human alpha1 (I) procollagen gene activity by interaction with Sp1 and Sp3 transcription factors in vitro.
Gene
215:101-110[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Christy, B., and D. Nathans.
1989.
Functional serum response elements upstream of the growth factor-inducible gene zif268.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9:4889-4895[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Cochran, B. H.,
A. C. Reffel, and C. D. Stiles.
1983.
Molecular cloning of gene sequences regulated by platelet-derived growth factor.
Cell
33:939-947[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Conn, K. J.,
C. B. Rich,
D. E. Jensen,
M. R. Fontanilla,
M. M. Bashir,
J. Rosenbloom, and J. A. Foster.
1996.
Insulin-like growth factor-I regulated transcription of the elastin gene through a putative retinoblastoma control element.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:28853-28860[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Costa, M. W., and M. L. Atchison.
1996.
Identification of an Sp1-like element within the immunoglobulain kappa 3' enhancer necessary for maximal enhancer activity.
Biochemistry
35:8662-8669[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Courey, A. J., and R. Tjian.
1988.
Analysis of Sp1 in vivo reveals multiple transcriptional domains, including a novel glutamine-rich activation motif.
Cell
55:887-898[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Dean, M.,
R. A. Levine,
W. Ran,
M. S. Kindy,
G. E. Sonenshein, and J. Campisi.
1986.
Regulation of c-myc transcription and mRNA abundance by serum growth factors and cell contact.
J. Biol. Chem.
261:9161-9166[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
De Belle, I.,
P. R. Walker,
I. C. P. Smith, and M. Sikorska.
1991.
Identification of a multiprotein complex interacting with the c-fos serum response element.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:2752-2759[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
De Luca, P.,
B. Majello, and L. Lania.
1996.
Sp3 represses transcription when tethered to promoter DNA or targeted to promoter proximal RNA.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:8533-8536[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Dignam, J. D.,
R. M. Lebovitz, and R. G. Roeder.
1983.
Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei.
Nucleic Acids Res.
11:1475-1489[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Fisch, T. M.,
R. Prywes,
M. C. Simon, and R. G. Roeder.
1989.
Multiple sequence elements in the c-fos promoter mediate induction by cAMP.
Genes Dev.
3:198-211[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Freter, R. R.,
J. A. Alberta,
G. Y. Hwang,
A. L. Wrentmore, and C. D. Stiles.
1996.
Platelet-derived growth factor induction of the immediate-early gene MCP-1 is mediated by NF- B |