Molecular and Cellular Biology, June 1999, p. 4324-4333, Vol. 19, No. 6
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Department of Biochemistry, NYU Medical Center, New York, New York 10016
Received 18 December 1998/Returned for modification 8 February 1999/Accepted 24 March 1999
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Heme plays key regulatory roles in numerous molecular and cellular
processes for systems that sense or use oxygen. In the yeast
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, oxygen sensing and heme signaling are mediated by heme activator protein 1 (Hap1). Hap1 contains seven
heme-responsive motifs (HRMs): six are clustered in the heme domain,
and a seventh is near the activation domain. To determine the
functional role of HRMs and to define which parts of Hap1 mediate heme
regulation, we carried out a systematic analysis of Hap1 mutants with
various regions deleted or mutated. Strikingly, the data show that HRM1
to -6, located in the previously designated Hap1 heme domain, have
little impact on heme regulation. All seven HRMs are dispensable for
Hap1 repression in the absence of heme, but HRM7 is required for Hap1
activation by heme. More importantly, we show that a novel class of
repression modules
RPM1, encompassing residues 245 to 278; RPM2,
encompassing residues 1061 to 1185; and RPM3, encompassing residues 203 to 244
is critical for Hap1 repression in the absence of heme.
Biochemical analysis indicates that RPMs mediate Hap1 repression, at
least partly, by the formation of a previously identified higher-order
complex termed the high-molecular-weight complex (HMC), while HRMs
mediate heme activation by permitting heme binding and the disassembly
of the HMC. These findings provide significant new insights into the
molecular interactions critical for Hap1 repression in the absence of
heme and Hap1 activation by heme.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Heme plays a central role in oxygen
sensing and utilization in all living organisms. It not only serves as
a prosthetic group in numerous enzymes and proteins that use,
transport, and store oxygen, but it also directly regulates various
molecular and cellular processes for systems that use or sense oxygen
(18). For example, heme stimulates erythroid cell
differentiation, hepatic cell differentiation, and nerve cell
differentiation (24, 25). Heme promotes the transcription of
genes encoding globin chains in erythroid cells and genes encoding
cytochromes in hepatic cells (2, 5, 23), controls protein
synthesis through the heme-regulated inhibitor (HRI) kinase in
reticulocytes (3, 4), and regulates the assembly and
degradation of many protein or enzyme complexes, such as hemoglobin,
heme lyase, and
-aminolevulinate (
ALA) synthase (
ALAS)
(13, 14, 18, 26). How does heme regulate these diverse
processes? Recent evidence suggests that heme regulates different
processes through a short sequence motif, the heme-responsive motif
(HRM) (14, 33). HRMs are found in heme-regulated proteins of
diverse functions, such as the Saccharomyces cerevisiae
heme-responsive transcriptional activator Hap1 (33), NF-E2
(16), HRI kinase (3, 4), the leader sequence of
ALAS (14), heme lyase (26) and heme oxygenase
(17).
Hap1 is a transcriptional activator whose activity is directly and
stringently controlled by heme. It activates transcription of genes
encoding functions required for respiration and for controlling oxidative damage in the yeast S. cerevisiae (36).
As the heme concentration rises, Hap1 activity increases accordingly
and reaches its limit at micromolar heme concentrations
(31). Hap1 contains five known functional domains (20,
30, 33, 34): the Zn2-Cys6 cluster, the dimerization
domain, the heme domain, the HRM7 domain, and the activation domain.
Recent experiments show that three of these domains
the dimerization
domain, the heme domain, and the HRM7 domain
are all important for
heme regulation (35). Two of these heme regulatory domains
contain HRMs: six are located in the heme domain, and one is in the
HRM7 domain (33). Deletion of the heme domain renders Hap1
constitutively active and unresponsive to heme (6, 32, 35).
Moreover, a synthetic peptide containing one HRM was shown to bind
directly to heme in vitro (33). These results suggest that
HRMs in Hap1 and other hemoproteins could bind to heme and mediate heme
regulation. However, recent experiments from various laboratories have
generated conflicting results on the functional role of HRMs. For
example, while the HRMs in heme lyase are critical for heme binding and
enzymatic activity (26), the HRMs in heme oxygenase and
NF-E2 are not important for protein functions (16, 17). In
Hap1, the role of HRMs is inferred from the existence of HRM1 to HRM6
in the heme domain, but there is no direct functional evidence to
demonstrate the role of HRMs in vivo. Thus, the role of HRMs in heme
regulation must be rigorously ascertained. In addition, the three heme
regulatory domains span a large internal Hap1 region from amino acid
position 117 to 1308, and one of these domains, the dimerization
domain, does not contain any HRM (35). Therefore, very
likely, unidentified modules in these domains also play important roles
in heme regulation. Furthermore, previous evidence suggests that heme
regulation of Hap1 involves the disassembly of a higher-order complex,
termed the high-molecular-weight complex (HMC) (6, 32, 35).
When the cellular heme concentration falls, Hap1 is bound by proteins,
including Hsp90 and Ydj1, and forms an HMC (35). Heme
disrupts the HMC and allows Hap1 to bind to DNA with high affinity
(6, 32, 35). Two lines of evidence strongly support the idea
that HMC formation is linked to Hap1 repression in the absence of heme.
First, the HMC binds to DNA with very low affinity. As the heme
concentration increases in vitro, the HMC is gradually transformed into
a smaller, dimeric Hap1 complex with high DNA-binding affinity (6,
32). This transformation correlates with the gradual increase of
Hap1 activity in response to higher heme concentrations in vivo
(31, 32, 35). Second, previously characterized Hap1 mutants
defective in HMC formation are also derepressed and gain a high level
of activity in the absence of heme (35). Until now, the Hap1
elements that are critical for HMC formation and Hap1 repression have
been largely unknown.
In this report, we describe a systematic functional analysis aimed at defining Hap1 elements critical for heme regulation. We have also begun to dissect the complex molecular interactions responsible for Hap1 repression in the absence of heme and for subsequent Hap1 activation by heme. We found that two classes of elements are important for heme regulation. One class is composed of three newly identified repression modules that mediate Hap1 repression in the absence of heme. Another class is composed of the previously identified HRMs, in particular HRM7, which mediate heme activation. Analysis of the HMCs formed by Hap1 mutants suggests that the repression modules mediate Hap1 repression, at least in part, by the formation of the HMC. These results provide significant new insights into mechanisms of heme regulation and transcriptional activation.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Yeast strains and reporters.
The yeast strains used in this
study were MHY200 (MATa ura3-52 leu2-3,112 his4-519
ade1-100 hem1-
100 hap1::LEU2) (10), L51
(MATa ura3-52 leu2-3,112 his4-519 ade1-100
hap1::LEU2 trp1::HisG) (31), and
JEL1 (MAT
leu2 trp1 ura3-52 nprbl-1122 pep4-3
His3::pGAL10-GAL4). The UAS1/CYC1-lacZ
reporter plasmid has been described previously (27).
Construction of deletion mutants in the Hap1 heme domain.
To
construct Hap1 heme domain deletion mutants, DNA fragments containing
the coding sequences for amino acid residues in the corresponding
regions of both the DNA-binding domain and the heme domain in HH4-HH
(Fig. 1) were generated by PCR amplification, cleaved with the
BamHI restriction enzyme, and inserted into the BamHI site of the Hap1 expression plasmid
SD5-HAP1 (27). The expression plasmid for
heme
was generated as previously described (35). Correct clones
were identified by restriction digestion and confirmed by sequencing.
Generation of deletion mutants in the HRM7 domain and the
dimerization domain.
To construct the expression plasmids for the
Hap1 mutants with residues 447 to 1309 or 746 to 1309 deleted (H7-d1
and H7-d2, Fig. 2), the plasmid pHAP1(
447-1309) or
pHAP1(
746-1309) (20) was cleaved with
BstEII and KpnI. The fragment containing
HAP1 sequences was then inserted into the
BstEII-KpnI site of SD5-HAP1.
Preparation of yeast extracts and DNA mobility shift assays. Extracts were prepared according to previously established protocols (32, 35). Briefly, yeast L51 or JEL1 cells bearing expression plasmids were grown to an optical density of 0.5 and induced with 2% galactose for specified times (see the figure legends). Cells were harvested and resuspended in 3 packed cell volumes of buffer (20 mM Tris, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.3 M NaCl, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, pepstatin [1 µg/ml], leupeptin [1 µg/ml]). Cells were then permeabilized by agitation with 4 packed cell volumes of glass beads, and extracts were collected as described previously (21). This method consistently generated extracts with protein concentrations of approximately 10 mg/ml.
DNA-binding reactions were carried out in a 20-µl volume with 5% glycerol, 4 mM Tris (pH 8), 40 mM NaCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 10 mM dithiothreitol 3 µg of salmon sperm DNA, 10 µM ZnOAc2, and 300 µg of bovine serum albumin per ml as described previously (32). Approximately 0.01 pmol of labeled UAS1/CYC1 or UAS/CYC7 and 20 µg of protein extracts were used in each reaction. The reaction mixtures were incubated at room temperature for 1 h and then loaded onto 3.5% polyacrylamide gels in 1/3× Tris-borate-EDTA (1/3TBE) for electrophoresis at 4°C. The intensity of bands representing the HMCs and dimeric complexes was quantified by using the PhosphoImage system (Molecular Dynamics).Western blotting. Whole-cell extracts for Western blotting were first separated on sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-7% polyacrylamide gels and then transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride or nitrocellulose membranes. Hap1 was visualized by using a purified antibody against glutathione S-transferase-Hap1 (GST-Hap1) (residues 1 to 171) and a chemiluminescence Western blotting kit (Boehringer Mannheim), as described previously (35).
-Galactosidase assays.
To determine
-galactosidase
levels from reporter genes in cells containing wild-type Hap1 and
mutants in the presence and absence of heme, yeast high-copy-number
2µm replicating plasmids expressing wild-type Hap1 and mutants from
the GAL1-10 promoter were transformed into the strain MHY200
(10) bearing the UAS1/CYC1-lacZ reporter. Cells
were grown in synthetic complete medium containing 2% raffinose with
limiting amounts of heme precursor
ALA (2 µg/ml) or high amounts
of
ALA (250 µg/ml) to an optical density of approximately 0.5. Cells were then induced partially with 0.25% galactose-1.75% glucose
or 1% galactose-1% glucose or completely with 2% galactose for
7 h and harvested for determination of
-galactosidase activity as described previously (32).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Deletion analysis shows that residues 245 to 278, not the HRMs in the heme domain, are responsible for mediating heme regulation. Hap1 contains seven HRMs: six clustered in the heme domain and one near the activation domain. Interestingly, three copies of a 17-amino-acid repeat are found in the heme domain between HRM2 and -3, HRM3 and -4, and HRM4 and -5 (Fig. 1). We postulated that, in vivo, the HRMs are responsible for heme binding, whereas the 17-amino-acid repeats provide interaction surfaces for other components of the HMC to bind and repress Hap1 in the absence of heme. We thought that all these HRMs and the 17-amino-acid repeats would collectively contribute to a high degree of heme regulation. If this model is correct, the extent of Hap1 heme responsiveness would gradually diminish with the progressive deletion of the HRMs and 17-amino-acid repeats. We therefore examined the effect of deletion of the HRMs and 17-amino-acid repeats on Hap1 heme responsiveness. However, in vivo analysis of Hap1 mutants defective in heme regulation is difficult because of their toxicity under heme-deficient conditions (20, 33). None of the previously generated Hap1 deletion mutants was examined under heme-deficient conditions (20, 33), so the extent of heme responsiveness of these mutants could not be determined. To overcome this problem, we expressed wild-type and Hap1 mutants from the inducible GAL1-10 promoter, which is not heme regulated (9). However, the inducible GAL1-10 promoter is a strong promoter. The full induction of this promoter can lead to the overexpression of the Hap1 proteins, which may minimize the effects of mutations on heme regulation. We therefore examined the Hap1 proteins at a low expression level, an intermediate expression level, and a high expression level (27). The low expression level was achieved by adding 0.25% galactose-1.75% glucose to the culture grown on noninducing, nonrepressing raffinose medium. Under this condition, the activity of the GAL1-10 promoter-lacZ reporter is indistinguishable from the basal level (8, 12). Intermediate and high expression levels were achieved by adding 1% galactose-1% glucose and 2% galactose to the cultures, respectively (27). Under the condition for the intermediate expression level, the activity of the GAL1-10 promoter is about 5% of that under the high (full) induction condition.
|
ALA]) (HH4 to HH0 in Fig. 1A), or Hap1 activation by heme (high
[
ALA]). HH2 and HH0 were even more heme responsive: they were much
more repressed than wild-type Hap1 but were activated by heme to nearly the same level as wild-type Hap1. These results suggest that HRM1 to -6 and 17-amino-acid repeats in the heme domain are not responsible for
heme regulation.
However, deletion of residues 245 to 278 (HH in Fig. 1A) outside HRM1
to -6 and 17-amino-acid repeats had a drastic effect on heme
regulation: at all expression levels, HH activity in the absence of
heme was at least as high as that of wild-type Hap1 in the presence of
heme (compare HH and Hap1 in Fig. 1A), suggesting that the mutant was
completely derepressed in the absence of heme. Deletion of the whole
heme domain (
heme) also caused the complete derepression of Hap1. It
is not clear why, at a low expression level, the activity of
heme
was higher in the absence of heme than in the presence of heme. In
fact, all derepressed deletion mutants (Fig. 1; also see Fig. 2 and 3)
were barely stimulated by heme at the low expression level. To rule out
the possibility that different protein levels, caused by variations in
the stability of mutants, contributed to the derepression of HH and
heme and to varying transcriptional activities of other mutants, we
carried out Western blotting analysis. The amounts of wild-type Hap1 or mutants were detectable by Western blotting only at the high expression level, but we expected the relative amounts to remain approximately the
same at all expression levels. As shown in Fig. 1B, fusions from HH4 to
HH0 were expressed at a level identical to wild-type Hap1, suggesting
that the gradual decrease in the activity of these mutants was not
attributable to the difference in protein levels. Furthermore, the
constitutive mutants HH and
heme were produced at a lower level than
that of wild-type Hap1 or other mutants, suggesting that the high
transcriptional activity of HH and
heme was not due to a high
protein level. These results demonstrate that residues 245 to 278, not
the HRMs or 17-amino-acid repeats, are responsible for Hap1 repression
in the absence of heme. The region encompassing residues 245 to 278 is
named repression module 1 (RPM1) (Fig. 1A) hereafter in this work.
Functional analysis of the HRM7 domain shows that the module encompassing residues 1061 to 1185, not HRM7, is critical for Hap1 repression in the absence of heme. Previous studies identified an HRM (HRM7) containing amino acid residue 1192. Mutations of amino acid residues near HRM7 affect Hap1 heme responsiveness (10, 33), suggesting that the domain encompassing HRM7 is important for heme regulation of Hap1. However, this domain contains a large region with very little informative sequence or few structural characteristics, except for HRM7. We therefore determined which parts of this region contribute to heme regulation of Hap1 by systematically testing various deletions and mutations in this domain for their effects on Hap1 activity (Fig. 2). As shown in Fig. 2A, mutants of the HRM7 domain were analyzed under low, intermediate, and high expression levels (Fig. 2A). At the low expression level, H7-d1, with residues 447 to 1309 deleted, and H7-d2, with residues 746 to 1309 deleted, were much less active than wild-type Hap1 or mutants with smaller deletions, probably because these large deletions significantly perturbed the protein structure (note that these proteins were stably expressed as shown by Western analysis [Fig. 2B]). At the intermediate expression level, these mutants showed a moderate level of activity both in the absence and presence of heme, and heme stimulated their activity about four- to sixfold (Fig. 2A). At the high expression level, these two mutants were derepressed in the absence of heme. They showed an activity in the absence of heme higher than that of wild-type Hap1 in the presence of heme (Fig. 2A). Heme hyperstimulated the mutants' activity three- to fivefold. To pinpoint the residues critical for heme regulation, we deleted a smaller region, residues 1061 to 1309 (H7-d3). At all expression levels, H7-d3 was derepressed in the absence of heme. At the intermediate or high expression level, H7-d3 was further stimulated about fourfold by heme. The results show that the residues critical for Hap1 repression in the HRM7 domain are located within the region encompassing residues 1061 to 1309.
|
A module encompassing residues 203 to 244 in the dimerization domain is critical for Hap1 repression in the absence of heme. Previous experiments suggest that the Hap1 dimerization domain is also important for heme regulation (35). However, it is not clear from these experiments whether the entire dimerization domain or just a segment of the domain is important for heme regulation. We therefore divided the dimerization domain into four segments and determined whether deletion of each segment affects Hap1 heme responsiveness. These segments contain residues 203 to 244, 172 to 202, 136 to 171, and 105 to 135, respectively. As shown in Fig. 3A, deletion of residues 203 to 244 (mutant DD1) caused the complete derepression of Hap1. At all expression levels, the activity of DD1 in the absence of heme was nearly as high as or higher than that of wild-type Hap1 in the presence of heme, even though the protein level of DD1 was much lower than that of wild-type Hap1 (Fig. 3). Deletion of residues 172 to 202 (DD2) or 136 to 171 (DD3) did not considerably affect Hap1 repression or activation by heme. Deletion of residues 105 to 135 (DD4) caused Hap1 activity to be lower, both in the presence and absence of heme. Because heme significantly stimulated the activity of DD4 at the intermediate (14-fold) or high (41-fold) expression level, the low activity in heme-sufficient cells was very likely caused by the low transcriptional activity of the mutant, not by deficiency in heme activation. Again, Western blotting analysis showed that all deletion mutants except for the derepressed mutant DD1 were produced at a level similar to the wild-type Hap1 level (Fig. 3B). These results show that the segment containing residues 203 to 244, termed RPM3 hereafter in this work, is critical for Hap1 repression.
|
Some derepressed mutants are defective in forming HMC in the
absence of heme.
Our in vivo functional analysis of Hap1 mutants
identified three new repression modules, RPM1 to -3, that are important
for Hap1 repression in the absence of heme. Previous experiments
suggest that a higher-order complex, termed HMC, plays an important
role in Hap1 repression (6, 32, 35). If RPMs mediate Hap1
repression by permitting HMC formation, then derepressed mutants would
be defective in HMC formation. Therefore, we determined whether the mutants described in Fig. 1 to 3 can form the HMC. Previously, it was
shown that in the absence of heme, Hap1 forms the HMC even when its
expression level is low (but high enough for detecting the HMC)
(6, 32). As the Hap1 concentration increases, the amount of
the HMC gradually increases and reaches the highest level when non-Hap1
proteins in the HMC become limiting. Excess Hap1 forms the dimeric
complex even in the absence of heme (6, 32). Under the
conditions for the low and intermediate expression levels used for
-galactosidase assays, the amounts of wild-type or mutant Hap1
proteins were not sufficient for the detection of the HMC or the
dimeric complex (27). We therefore expressed various amounts
of wild-type and mutant Hap1 proteins by varying the induction times,
as previously described (Fig. 4A)
(6, 32). As shown in previous studies (6, 32) and
in Fig. 4A, when the Hap1 amount was low, the HMC, not the dimeric
complex, was formed in the absence of heme (Fig. 4A, lane 1 [only
three different amounts are shown in Fig. 4A for brevity]). Heme
disrupted the HMC and permitted Hap1 to bind to DNA with much higher
affinity (lane 2). As the Hap1 amount increased, more HMC formed (lanes 3 and 5). The dimeric complex also formed in the absence of heme at the
highest Hap1 level (lane 5).
|
heme mutant, which was derepressed approximately
100-fold relative to wild type Hap1 (Fig. 1A), formed very little HMC
(about 2% of that formed by wild-type Hap1) (compare lanes 1, 3, and 5 in Fig. 4C to those in Fig. 4A). Instead, even in the absence of heme,
a significant amount of the dimeric complex was formed at all
expression levels. Similarly, another derepressed mutant, H7-d6, which
was derepressed approximately 20- to 50-fold relative to wild-type Hap1
(Fig. 2A), formed significantly less HMC (about 10% that of wild-type
formed by Hap1) at all expression levels (compare Fig. 4D to 4A). H7-d6
also formed the dimeric complex in the absence of heme, even when its
amount was low (Fig. 4D, lanes 1 and 2). These titration experiments
show that in the absence of heme, wild-type Hap1 and the repressed
H7-d8 mutant preferentially formed the HMC whereas the derepressed
heme and H7-d6 mutants preferentially formed the dimeric complex.
These and previous experiments (6, 32) show that
overexpressing Hap1 does not interfere with HMC formation but optimizes the sensitivity of detection of the HMC. Therefore, to determine whether other mutants can form the HMC, we analyzed extracts prepared from cells expressing high levels of mutants. Although this approach cannot detect subtle differences in the HMC, it provides the optimum conditions for determining whether a mutant can form the HMC. If a
mutant cannot form the HMC when overexpressed, it is unlikely to form
the HMC when expressed at lower levels. As shown in Fig. 5, several derepressed mutants
HH and
heme (Fig. 5A); H7-d3, H7-d5, and H7-d7 (Fig. 5B); and DD1 and DH1
(Fig. 5C)
did not form a discernible amount of the HMC under the test
condition (the signal at the position of the HMC band for the mutants
was less than 5% of that for wild-type Hap1). Instead, they formed the
dimeric complex and bound strongly to DNA in the absence of heme. Heme
did not stimulate DNA binding by these mutants; it actually weakened
DNA binding by HH and
heme (Fig. 5A). DNA binding by DD1 was
stimulated slightly by heme, but no discernible HMC band was detected
(Fig. 5C, lane 8). (H7-d1 and H7-d2 are not shown here because no
distinctive bands were observed when extracts containing these mutants
were analyzed, whether or not heme was present.) In sum, eight mutants,
seven shown in Fig. 5 and H7-d6 shown in Fig. 4D, appeared to
preferentially form the dimeric complex rather than the HMC. This
suggests that they are defective or partially defective in HMC
formation, although it is still possible that they can form the HMC if
their protein levels in extracts are made as high as that of wild-type
Hap1 (the protein levels of derepressed mutants in extracts were
usually lower than that of wild-type Hap1 [Fig. 1B, 2B, and 3B]). One
derepressed mutant (DH2) (Fig. 5C) formed a stable HMC. All repressed
mutants formed the HMC (see mutants HH4 to HH0 in Fig. 5A; mutants
H7-d4, H7-d8, H7-d9, H7-1, and H7-2 in Fig. 5B; and mutant DD2 in Fig. 5C; other mutants of the dimerization domain behaved identically to DD2
[not shown]). The intensity of HMCs formed by these mutants was about
the same (70 to 120%) as that formed by wild-type Hap1. These results
suggest that repressed mutants always retain the ability to form the
HMC, while many but not all derepressed mutants are defective in
forming the HMC.
|
A higher heme concentration is required to disrupt the HMC when the
HRM7 motif is mutated.
Mutants H7-1 and H7-2 had a much lower
activity than wild-type Hap1 even in heme-sufficient cells, but these
mutants were expressed at an even higher level than wild-type Hap1
(Fig. 2B). Thus, the reduced activity most likely results from
hyperrepression caused by an HMC insensitive to heme or the loss of
transcription-activating activity of the activation domain. Since the
activation domain usually acts independently of other domains and since
mutating amino acid residues to Ala often does not cause drastic
changes in protein conformation (29), it is unlikely that
the mutations in H7-1 and H7-2 weakened the activation domain. However,
HRMs can bind to heme directly in vitro (33), and Fig. 5B
reveals that the HMC formed by H7-2 was not totally disrupted by heme (lane 12). Therefore, it is conceivable that H7-1 and H7-2 might be
defective in heme binding, thereby forming HMCs less sensitive to heme
and, therefore, hyperrepressed. If this line of reasoning is correct,
then H7-1, which was more repressed than wild-type Hap1 (Fig. 2), would
form an HMC that is more resistant to heme than the HMC formed by
wild-type Hap1. Likewise, H7-2, which was more repressed than H7-1,
would form an HMC that is even more resistant to heme than the HMC
formed by H7-1. This is indeed the case as shown in Fig.
6. The HMC formed by wild-type Hap1 required only 0.1 to 0.5 ng of heme per µl for dissociation (Fig. 6,
lanes 1 to 6), and H7-1 required 0.5 to 2 ng/µl (Fig. 6, lanes 7 to
12), while H7-2 required 2 to 10 ng/µl for dissociation (Fig. 6,
lanes 13 to 18). These results suggest that H7-1 forms a more stable
HMC than wild-type Hap1 and H7-2 forms an even more stable HMC than
H7-1. We also attempted to determine whether the activity of H7-1 and
H7-2 can be enhanced by the addition of high levels of the heme
precursor, deuteroporphyrin IX, or
ALA. However, we did not observe
any significant increase under high concentrations of deuteroporphyrin
IX or
ALA, very likely because heme concentration in vivo cannot
reach the same level as in vitro due to the characteristics of enzymes
involved in heme synthesis. Nonetheless, the data on H7-1 and H7-2
shown in Fig. 2 and 6, together with the previous finding that a
peptide containing an HRM can bind heme directly, strongly support the
idea that HRMs can bind to heme and mediate heme activation of Hap1 in
vivo.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This report provides significant new insights into the mechanism by which Hap1 is repressed in the absence of heme and is subsequently activated by heme. Three themes emerge from the analyses of various Hap1 mutants. First, three novel repression modules, RPM1 to -3, located in the previously designated dimerization domain, the heme domain, and the HRM7 domain, are responsible for Hap1 repression in the absence of heme. Second, the repression modules RPM1 to -3 mediate Hap1 repression, at least in part, through the formation of the HMC. Third, HRMs, in particular HRM7, mediate heme activation of Hap1, evidently by permitting heme binding and the disassembly of the HMC. These themes are further discussed below.
Novel modules critical for Hap1 repression in the absence of heme. Three novel repression modules, RPM1 to -3, not the previously identified HRMs, are critical for Hap1 repression in the absence of heme. The first module, RPM1 (Fig. 1), lies within residues 245 to 278 in the previously designated heme domain. The second module, RPM2 (Fig. 2), lies within residues 1061 to 1185 near the HRM7 motif. The third module, RPM3 (Fig. 3A), lies within the previously designated dimerization domain and encompasses residues 203 to 244. RPM1 to -3 act synergistically to repress Hap1 activity in the absence of heme because deletion of any one of these modules caused Hap1 derepression in the absence of heme (see Fig. 1 to 3). Intriguingly, the data show that the distinctive HRM1 to -6 and the three 17-amino-acid repeats in the previously designated heme domain have no effect on Hap1 repression in the absence of heme, although HRM1 to -6 appear to play a minor role in heme activation (see below).
Possible mechanisms by which RPMs mediate Hap1 repression. Previous experiments linked HMC formation to Hap1 repression (35). The data here show that RPM1 to -3 are essential for Hap1 repression. We imagine two possible mechanisms by which RPMs can confer Hap1 repression. One possibility is that RPMs interact with Hap1 DNA-binding and/or activation domains, thereby masking and repressing the DNA-binding and/or activation domains by intramolecular interactions. Deletion of any RPM would therefore disrupt the interactions and result in unmasking of these domains, leading to Hap1 derepression. Alternatively, RPM1 to -3 may be involved in HMC formation and thus repress Hap1. Deletion of any RPM would then disrupt the HMC, causing Hap1 derepression. The data suggest that RPMs are at least partially involved in forming the HMC (see below), but do not rule out the possibility that intramolecular interactions are important for Hap1 repression. These two possibilities are not mutually exclusive. Perhaps both intramolecular interactions and HMC formation play important roles in Hap1 repression.
Previous reports (6, 32) and data shown in Fig. 4 show that in the absence of heme, as the amount of wild-type Hap1 and H7-d8 increased, the HMC was formed first, followed by the dimeric complex, which formed when the HMC became saturated. Unlike wild-type Hap1 and H7-d8, 8 of 11 derepressed mutants
including HH and
heme (Fig. 5A);
H7-d3, H7-d5, and H7-d7 (Fig. 5B); H7-d6 (Fig. 4D); and DH1 and DD1
(Fig. 5C)
preferentially formed the dimeric complex, whether or not
the HMC was observed. Therefore, we conclude that the derepressed
mutants are defective in forming the HMC. One argument against this
idea is that the protein levels of many derepressed mutants may be
lower than those of wild-type Hap1 and repressed mutants. Thus, the
potential HMCs formed by derepressed mutants could be more difficult to
detect. However, in the absence of heme, the derepressed mutants formed
a significant amount of dimeric complex (Fig. 4C and D and 5). For
wild-type Hap1 (6, 32) and the repressed mutant H7-d8 (Fig.
4A and B and 5C), this larger amount of dimeric complex was formed only
when they were overexpressed and when the HMC became saturated.
Although these derepressed mutants may still form the HMC if the
protein levels were higher, they appeared to preferentially form the
dimeric complex and were at least partially defective in forming the
HMC. Another argument is that the derepressed mutants may form
defective HMCs that cannot bind to DNA, making their detection
difficult. Our data cannot totally exclude this possibility, but we do
not think it is likely for the following reasons. First, many
derepressed mutants that showed reduced dimer binding also had a lower
protein level (HH and
heme [Fig. 1B and 5A], H7-d5 and H7-d7
[Fig. 2B and 5B], and DH1 and DD1 [Fig. 3B and 5C]). Therefore, the
reduced dimer binding was very likely due to reduced protein levels,
not due to reduced affinity. Second, previous and recent data show that
Hap1 mutations similarly affect HMC binding and Hap1 dimer binding and
that the HMC and Hap1 dimer recognize various DNA sites in the same
manner (11, 32). It is therefore unlikely that mutations in
the derepressed mutants selectively affected HMC binding but not dimer
binding. On the basis of these arguments, the conclusion that these
derepressed mutants are at least partially defective in forming the HMC
appears to be plausible. This deficiency may be in part responsible for
the loss of repression of these mutants. It is not clear why DH2 (Fig.
5C) is derepressed even though it forms the HMC. Perhaps the HMC formed
by DH2 adopts an altered conformation so that Hap1 can activate
transcription even when associated with other proteins. This occurs in
the Gal4-Gal80 regulatory system in which activated Gal4 is still
associated with its repressor Gal80 (1, 15, 19, 22).
Alternatively, perhaps the DNA-binding and activation domains of DH2
are totally unmasked even though the HMC is intact.
Regardless of whether RPMs act by permitting HMC formation, the data
clearly show that the three RPMs act cooperatively in repressing Hap1.
Interestingly, protein structure analysis indicates that residues 248 to 267 in RPM1 have a high potential of forming an
-helix. The
helical-wheel representation of this module indicates that most of the
hydrophobic residues are clustered on one face of the helix. This
hydrophobic surface may interact with other proteins in the HMC or the
Hap1 DNA-binding and activation domains, thereby repressing Hap1. In
addition, residues 1089 to 1111 and residues 1110 to 1134 in RPM2 have
a strong tendency to form an
-helix. These structural modules may
provide important intramolecular or intermolecular interactions
critical for repressing Hap1.
Role of HRMs in heme regulation. Our data show that HRMs have no impact on Hap1 repression in the absence of heme (Fig. 1 and 2). Rather, the HRMs, in particular HRM7, are important for mediating heme activation. HRM7 appeared to play a predominant role in mediating heme activation. HRM7 alone (HH0 in Fig. 1A), but not HRM1 to -6 (H7-1 in Fig. 2A), was sufficient for mediating efficient activation of Hap1 by heme. HRM1 to -6 appeared to play an auxiliary role in mediating heme activation, which was revealed only when HRM7 was mutated in H7-2 (compare HH0 with wild-type Hap1 in Fig. 1A and H7-2 with H7-1 in Fig. 2A). The analysis of HMCs formed by H7-1 and H7-2 (Fig. 6) further suggests that HRMs mediate heme activation by allowing heme binding and subsequent disassembly of the HMC. H7-1 lacks a functional HRM7, so it would bind to heme less efficiently than wild-type Hap1. Consequently, the mutant HMC required a higher heme concentration to be disrupted (Fig. 6), leading to hyperrepression in vivo (Fig. 2A). H7-2 lacks both HRM7 and the six HRMs in the heme domain, so it would bind to heme even less efficiently than H7-1. As a result, the mutant HMC required an even higher heme concentration to be disrupted (Fig. 6) and was even more repressed than H7-1 (Fig. 2A). HRMs do not appear to be the only element responsible for heme binding and activation, because the mutant H7-2 was still stimulated by heme (Fig. 2A). Perhaps other residues in Hap1 also bind to heme and potentiate Hap1 activation, or perhaps this effect is mediated through heme binding to other proteins in the HMC. Nevertheless, the data shown here strongly suggest that HRMs, in particular HRM7, play an important role in heme binding and in mediating heme activation of Hap1. Further, the data show that not all HRMs are important for heme action although they all have the capability to bind to heme in vitro (33). In the case of Hap1, it is very surprising that deletion of all six HRMs in the heme domain did not diminish Hap1 heme responsiveness (Fig. 1). This surprising finding shows that the functional importance of HRMs in other hemoproteins cannot be inferred from their mere presence but must be determined by functional analysis. This explains why mutating the HRMs in heme lyase and ALAS affects their functions while mutating the HRMs in heme oxygenase and NF-E2 has no effect on the protein functions (14, 16, 17, 26).
New model for heme regulation of Hap1.
Our studies provide a
new model for heme regulation of Hap1. The data show that two distinct
classes of elements
the repression modules RPM1 to -3 and HRMs
are
responsible for heme regulation of Hap1. The functions of both RPMs and
HRMs are linked to the HMC. RPMs appear to permit the formation of the
HMC, thereby allowing Hap1 to be repressed in the absence of heme.
Therefore, deletion of the RPMs can cause disruption or partial
disruption of the HMC, leading to Hap1 derepression (Fig. 1 to 5). HRMs
appear to permit heme binding and the disassembly of the HMC, thereby
leading to Hap1 activation by heme. Therefore, mutating HRMs causes the formation of mutant HMCs insensitive to heme and hyperrepression of the
mutants (see H7-1 and H7-2 in Fig. 2 and 6).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank W. Jelinek, H. Salomon, J. Qin, D. Conrad, J. Borowiec, and H. Lee for critical reviewing and proofreading of the manuscript.
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (GM53453) and the National Science Foundation (MCB-96174720) to L.Z.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biochemistry, NYU Medical Center, 550 First Ave., New York, NY 10016. Phone: (212) 263-8506. Fax: (212) 263-8166. E-mail: zhang102{at}mcrcr0.med.nyu.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Blank, T. E., M. P. Woods, C. M. Lebo, P. Xin, and J. E. Hopper. 1997. Novel Gal3 proteins showing altered Gal80p binding cause constitutive transcription of Gal4p-activated genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:2566-2575[Abstract]. |
| 2. |
Charnay, P., and T. Maniatis.
1983.
Transcriptional regulation of globin gene expression in the human erythroid cell line K562.
Science
220:1281-1283 |
| 3. | Chen, J. J., and I. M. London. 1995. Regulation of protein synthesis by heme-regulated eIF-2 alpha kinase. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20:105-108[Medline]. |
| 4. |
Chen, J. J.,
M. S. Throop,
L. Gehrke,
I. Kuo,
J. K. Pal,
M. Brodsky, and I. M. London.
1991.
Cloning of the cDNA of the heme-regulated eukaryotic initiation factor 2 alpha (eIF-2 alpha) kinase of rabbit reticulocytes: homology to yeast GCN2 protein kinase and human double-stranded-RNA-dependent eIF-2 alpha kinase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:7729-7733 |
| 5. |
Dean, A.,
T. J. Ley,
R. K. Humphries,
M. Fordis, and A. N. Schechter.
1983.
Inducible transcription of five globin genes in K562 human leukemia cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
80:5515-5519 |
| 6. | Fytlovich, S., M. Gervais, C. Agrimonti, and B. Guiard. 1993. Evidence for an interaction between the CYP1 (HAP1) activator and a cellular factor during heme-dependent transcriptional regulation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 12:1209-1218[Medline]. |
| 7. | Gill, G., and M. Ptashne. 1988. Negative effect of the transcriptional activator GAL4. Nature 334:721-724[Medline]. |
| 8. | Guarente, L., B. Lalonde, P. Gifford, and E. Alani. 1984. Distinctly regulated tandem upstream activation sites mediate catabolite repression of the CYC1 gene of S. cerevisiae. Cell 36:503-511[Medline]. |
| 9. | Guarente, L., and T. Mason. 1983. Heme regulates transcription of the CYC1 gene of S. cerevisiae via an upstream activation site. Cell 32:1279-1286[Medline]. |
| 10. | Haldi, M. L., and L. Guarente. 1995. Multiple domains mediate heme control of the yeast activator HAP1. Mol. Gen. Genet. 248:229-235[Medline]. |
| 11. | Hon, T., A. Hach, D. Tamalis, Y.-H. Zhu, and L. Zhang. The yeast heme responsive transcriptional activator HAP1 is a preexisting dimer in the absence of heme. Submitted for publication. |
| 12. |
Johnston, M.,
J. S. Flick, and T. Pexton.
1994.
Multiple mechanisms provide rapid and stringent glucose repression of GAL gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:3834-3841 |
| 13. |
Komar, A. A.,
A. Kommer,
I. A. Krasheninnikov, and A. S. Spirin.
1997.
Cotranslational folding of globin.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:10646-10651 |
| 14. |
Lathrop, J. T., and M. P. Timko.
1993.
Regulation by heme of mitochondrial protein transport through a conserved amino acid motif.
Science
259:522-525 |
| 15. |
Leuther, K. K., and S. A. Johnston.
1992.
Nondissociation of GAL4 and GAL80 in vivo after galactose induction.
Science
256:1333-1335 |
| 16. | Liu, D. 1998. Ph.D. thesis. State University of New York, Health Science Center at Brooklyn. |
| 17. |
McCoubrey, W. K., Jr.,
T. J. Huang, and M. D. Maines.
1997.
Heme oxygenase-2 is a hemoprotein and binds heme through heme regulatory motifs that are not involved in heme catalysis.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:12568-12574 |
| 18. | Padmanaban, G., V. Venkateswar, and P. N. Rangarajan. 1989. Haem as a multifunctional regulator. Trends Biochem. Sci. 14:492-496[Medline]. |
| 19. |
Parthun, M. R., and J. A. Jaehning.
1992.
A transcriptionally active form of GAL4 is phosphorylated and associated with GAL80.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12:4981-4987 |
| 20. | Pfeifer, K., K. S. Kim, S. Kogan, and L. Guarente. 1989. Functional dissection and sequence of yeast HAP1 activator. Cell 56:291-301[Medline]. |
| 21. | Pfeifer, K., T. Prezant, and L. Guarente. 1987. Yeast HAP1 activator binds to two upstream activation sites of different sequence. Cell 49:19-27[Medline]. |
| 22. | Platt, A., and R. J. Reece. 1998. The yeast galactose genetic switch is mediated by the formation of a Gal4p-Gal80p-Gal3p complex. EMBO J. 17:4086-4091[Medline]. |
| 23. |
Rangarajan, P. N., and G. Padmanaban.
1989.
Regulation of cytochrome P-450b/e gene expression by a heme- and phenobarbitone-modulated transcription factor.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
86:3963-3967 |
| 24. | Sassa, S. 1996. Novel effects of heme and heme-related compounds in biological systems. Curr. Med. Chem. 3:273-290. |
| 25. | Sassa, S., and T. Nagai. 1996. The role of heme in gene expression. Int. J. Hematol. 63:167-178[Medline]. |
| 26. |
Steiner, H.,
G. Kispal,
A. Zollner,
A. Haid,
W. Neupert, and R. Lill.
1996.
Heme binding to a conserved Cys-Pro-Val motif is crucial for the catalytic function of mitochondrial heme lyases.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:32605-32611 |
| 27. |
Turcotte, B., and L. Guarente.
1992.
HAP1 positive control mutants specific for one of two binding sites.
Genes Dev.
6:2001-2009 |
| 28. |
Uma, S.,
S. D. Hartson,
J. J. Chen, and R. L. Matts.
1997.
Hsp90 is obligatory for the heme-regulated eIF-2 kinase to acquire and maintain an activable conformation.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:11648-11656 |
| 29. | Wells, J. A. 1991. Systematic mutational analyses of protein-protein interfaces. Methods Enzymol. 202:390-411[Medline]. |
| 30. |
Zhang, L.,
M. O. Bermingham,
B. Turcotte, and L. Guarente.
1993.
Antibody-promoted dimerization bypasses the regulation of DNA binding by the heme domain of the yeast transcriptional activator HAP1.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:2851-2855 |
| 31. | Zhang, L., and L. Guarente. 1994. Evidence that TUP1/SSN6 has a positive effect on the activity of the yeast activator HAP1. Genetics 136:813-817[Abstract]. |
| 32. |
Zhang, L., and L. Guarente.
1994.
HAP1 is nuclear but is bound to a cellular factor in the absence of heme.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:14643-14647 |
| 33. | Zhang, L., and L. Guarente. 1995. Heme binds to a short sequence that serves a regulatory function in diverse proteins. EMBO J. 14:313-320[Medline]. |
| 34. |
Zhang, L., and L. Guarente.
1994.
The yeast activator HAP1 a GAL4 family member binds DNA in a directly repeated orientation.
Genes Dev.
8:2110-2119 |
| 35. |
Zhang, L.,
A. Hach, and C. Wang.
1998.
Molecular mechanism governing heme signaling in yeast: a higher-order complex mediates heme regulation of the transcriptional activator HAP1.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:3819-3828 |
| 36. |
Zitomer, R. S., and C. V. Lowry.
1992.
Regulation of gene expression by oxygen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Microbiol. Rev.
56:1-11 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|