Molecular and Cellular Biology, June 1999, p. 4343-4354, Vol. 19, No. 6
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
timrit Lengthens Circadian
Period in a Temperature-Dependent Manner through Suppression of PERIOD
Protein Cycling and Nuclear Localization
Akira
Matsumoto,1
Kenji
Tomioka,2
Yoshihiko
Chiba,2,
and
Teiichi
Tanimura1,*
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science,
Kyushu University, Ropponmatsu, Fukuoka
810-8560,1 and Department of Physics,
Biology and Informatics, Faculty of Science, Yamaguchi University,
Yamaguchi 753-8512,2 Japan
Received 19 October 1998/Returned for modification 8 December
1998/Accepted 8 February 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
A fundamental feature of circadian clocks is temperature
compensation of period. The free-running period of ritsu
(timrit) (a novel allele of
timeless [tim]) mutants is drastically
lengthened in a temperature-dependent manner. PER and TIM protein
levels become lower in timrit mutants as
temperature becomes higher. This mutation reduces per mRNA
but not tim mRNA abundance. PER constitutively driven by
the rhodopsin1 promoter is lowered in rit
mutants, indicating that timrit mainly affects
the per feedback loop at a posttranscriptional level. An
excess of per+ gene dosage can ameliorate all
rit phenotypes, including the weak nuclear localization of
PER, suggesting that timrit affects circadian
rhythms by reducing PER abundance and its subsequent transportation
into nuclei as temperature increases.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Circadian rhythms are universal
biological phenomena found in eucaryotes and some procaryotes, and they
are thought to be an adaptation to environmental cycles. A circadian
clock governs the rhythms through physiological and endocrinological
processes. The circadian clock keeps its period even when there are no
environmental time cues. In addition, the clock's free-running period
remains relatively constant with a change in temperature of 10°C, and the temperature quotient, Q10, is approximately
1. The biochemical mechanisms underlying circadian rhythms are clearly
distinct from biochemical reactions observed in other physiological and
developmental events, because the Q10 of those
reactions is nearly 2 to 3.
Genetic studies using Drosophila mutants have facilitated
our understanding of the molecular bases of the circadian clock. Five
genes in Drosophila, period (per),
timeless (tim), dClock (dClk), cycle (cyc), and
double-time (dbt), have been identified as clock
genes that contribute to a central oscillator mechanism (1, 31,
36, 40). The abundance of per and tim mRNAs
and their protein levels fluctuate in a circadian manner
(40), and dCLK and CYC are thought to form a heterodimer to
act as transcriptional activators of per and tim
(6). PER interacts with TIM (12), moves from the
cytoplasm into the nucleus (5), and feeds back to repress
the level of the per and tim transcripts
(14, 16).
Although the molecular mechanism used to generate circadian fluctuation
has been extensively studied, there are only a few molecular studies in
Drosophila on the temperature compensation mechanism. At a
behavioral level, per mutants affect not only period length
but also temperature compensation; perT and
perL mutants slightly shorten and lengthen their
periods, respectively, as temperature increases (8, 18, 19).
Several molecular studies suggested that temperature compensation is
closely associated with PER. Huang et al. (15) reported that
PER can undergo a temperature-independent intramolecular dimerization,
while Gekakis et al. (12) showed that PERL
exhibits a temperature-dependent defect in binding to TIM although the
molecular interaction between TIM and PER is temperature compensated. Moreover, an allele of the tim gene,
timSL, can compensate for a
temperature-dependent period lengthening of perL
(35). The length of the Thr-Gly repeat in PER is also
reported to affect the temperature compensation (38).
We previously isolated ritsu (rit), a clock
mutation on the second chromosome, from a natural population
(26). We have now investigated features of rit
and its interaction with per and tim at both the
behavioral and molecular levels. rit mutants show abnormal
temperature compensation of period and reduce PER and TIM levels.
Molecular genetic analyses show that rit has a point mutation in the tim gene that leads to a single amino acid
change, indicating rit is an allele of tim. Since
an excess of the per gene dosage ameliorates the weak and
delayed nuclear localization of PER as well as all other phenotypes of
rit at both the molecular and behavioral levels, PER
abundance in nuclei seems to be a key factor in the temperature
compensation mechanism.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Stocks, locomotor rhythm recording, and mating procedures.
Flies were kept under LD12:12 (12 h of light and 12 h of dark) at
24°C. Canton-S was used as the wild type. per;
rit double mutants were synthesized by standard crosses.
Flies were grown at 24°C. Locomotor activity was recorded as
described elsewhere (25). The period of a locomotor rhythm
was calculated by chi-square periodogram analysis (43).
Mating for the recombination test between tim and
rit (see Fig. 5A) was done as follows. To produce flies
carrying both the rit mutation and the per-lacZ
fusion gene on the second chromosome, we crossed rit; ry
females to per-SG:3; ry males which carry the
per-lacZ fusion gene on the second chromosome. These strains
carried the ry mutation on the third chromosome, and this
eye color should be rescued if a fly has the per-lacZ fusion
gene. After two generations, we selected rit per-lacZ
homozygous flies based on the ry+ eye color and
the long-period rit phenotype. The four lines were selected
as a rit per-lacZ strain. The rit rh-per strain
was produced by standard mating procedures using SM1/Sco;
TM3/Pr (21). +/w+Y;
rit, C(1)DX, y w f/w+Y; rit,
Dp(2;Y)odd4.31; rit, Dp(2;Y)odd2.31; rit
and w; rit strains were produced by mating procedures
described elsewhere (25), with minor changes. The
recombination test was done by two different mating procedures. The
rit/tim females were mated to tim01
males in one cross and mated to SM1/Pm males in the other
crosses. SM1/Pm flies show a normal rhythmicity and are
designated +/+ in Fig. 3A (right). In both cases, progenies from these
crosses were then monitored for locomotor rhythms at 30°C. If
recombination between tim and rit occurs, there
should be rit+
tim+/tim01 progenies whose rhythm is
normal in the former cross. In the latter cross, rit tim/SM1
or rit tim/Pm double mutants whose rhythm is abnormal would
be obtained if recombination occurs.
RNase protection assay.
Flies were entrained in LD12:12 for
5 days before they were collected. Total RNAs were extracted from 50 fly heads in 500 µl of extraction buffer (15 mM sodium acetate, 5 mM
EDTA, 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 0.01% diethyl pyrocarbonate,
50 mM Tris [pH 9.0]). RNase-free DNase (Boehringer) was used to
remove contaminated DNA. RNase protection assays were done as described
elsewhere (14), with minor modifications. We used the per5
and TIMAX1 probes and ribosomal protein 49 (rp49) as a control. The
per5 probe is a genomic fragment of the per gene containing
about 210 bp (bp 5849 to 6060) of the per exon 5. TIMAX1 is
a cDNA fragment of the tim gene from bp 4963 to 5192 (39). We found that the abundance of rp49 in samples
obtained at 30°C was half as much as that at 24°C, although the
reason was unknown. Therefore, each measurement was normalized by the
value of the peak level for wild-type flies at each temperature.
Immunoblot analyses.
Protein extracts were made from 50 fly
heads for each time point as described by Edery et al. (7),
with minor modifications. Each sample was homogenized in 15 µl of
ice-cold extraction buffer, and the tip of the homogenizing pestle was
rinsed twice with another 15 µl of extraction buffer. Amounts of
proteins in a total of 45 µl of extraction buffer were measured by
the Bradford protein assay system (Bio-Rad). After the measurement,
extraction buffer was added to bring the protein concentration to 5 µg/µl in each sample. Five-microliter aliquots of 3× SDS sample
buffer were added to 10-µl samples and boiled for 5 min. Supernatants
were loaded on SDS-5% polyacrylamide gels. Western blotting was done as described previously (7), with minor modifications. We
used anti-TIM antibody (donated by J. Blau) diluted 1:5,000.
Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-rat immunoglobulin G (IgG)
antibody (Cappel) was used as a secondary antibody, diluted 1:3,000.
For quantitating chemiluminescence (SuperSignal CL-HRP substrate
system; Pierce), an exposure on X-ray film (Fuji film) was digitally
imaged by Densito Graph (ATTO) and quantified by NIH Image software. After the exposure, the membrane used was incubated for 3 h in the
substrate buffer to eliminate HRP activity. Then the membrane was used
to detect PER abundance as follows. We used anti-PER antibody (donated
by R. Stanewsky) diluted 1:10,000. HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG
antibody (Cappel) was used as a secondary antibody, diluted 1:3,000.
Exposure and quantification were done as described above.
Histology.
Expression of the per gene in
rit flies was assayed histologically by using the
per-lacZ fusion gene as a reporter. Flies at ZT18
(zeitgebertime 18 h) and ZT6 were frozen in liquid nitrogen and
mounted into O.C.T. compound (Tissue-Tek). Sections of 10 µm were cut
and stained with
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-
-D-galactopyranoside (X-Gal).
The staining procedure was done as described by Liu et al.
(22). Head sections of wild-type and rit flies
were embedded side by side on the same slide to compare the staining
profiles of the two strains. Photographs were taken with a Zeiss
AxioPhot microscope. For fluorescent immunostaining with anti-PER
antibody, the white-eyed strain was used as the wild type to eliminate
background fluorescence of eye pigment. For the same purpose, the
w; rit double mutant was used. Sections (14 µm) of the two
strains were embedded side by side on the same slide to facilitate
comparison of the strengths of signals. Anti-PER antibody was applied
at a dilution of 1:15,000. Anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to
peroxidase-labeled dextran polymer (EnVision +; Dako) was applied as a
secondary antibody. Signals were enhanced with fluorescein
isothiocyanate (FITC)-Tyramide (NEN). The Tyramide signal
amplification reaction was usually done for 7.5 min; to obtain
a maximum sensitivity, it was extended to 15 min. Counterstaining of
nuclei was done with propidium iodide (1 µg/µl; Sigma) after RNase
(10 µg/µl; Boehringer) treatment for 30 min. The double-staining
images were visualized with a Zeiss LSM410 confocal laser scan
microscope equipped with a krypton-argon laser.
Reverse transcription-PCR and cDNA sequence.
Total RNA from
50 heads obtained from rit flies at ZT18 at 24°C were
reverse transcribed by using a Ready-To-Go T-primed first-strand kit
(Pharmacia). Using four tim-specific primer sets
(tim237-258 plus tim1245-1226,
tim914-933 plus tim1835-1816,
tim1813-1834 plus tim3404-3383, and
tim3122-3142 plus tim4474-4453; numbers are based
on the nucleotide position of the tim cDNA
[28]), fragments were amplified and cloned into the
pCRII vector (Invitrogen). Amplified fragments too large to be
sequenced were digested by restriction enzymes and subcloned. Both
strands of each clone were sequenced at least twice with an ALFred DNA
sequencer (Pharmacia). Experiments were repeated at least twice to
avoid PCR errors. Fragments from tim bp 3122 to 4553 amplified from the wild-type or rit strain, a region which
includes the nucleotide change from CCG to GCG, were digested by
EcoRI at 37°C for 3 h. The digestion occurred in the
wild-type fragment but not in the rit fragment.
 |
RESULTS |
rit alters free-running periods in a
temperature-dependent manner.
Locomotor activity rhythms of
individual flies were recorded under LD12:12 for 3 days followed by
constant darkness (DD). The rit strain was entrained to
LD12:12 at 24°C and showed a lengthened circadian rhythm under DD;
its period was about 2 h longer than that of the wild type (Fig.
1A and C). We then measured the period of
rit flies at different temperatures (Fig. 1A). When the
temperature was lower than 24°C, the period of rit flies
was only slightly lengthened, with a Q10 of
0.93, which was comparable to that of wild-type flies
(Q10 = 1). When the temperature was above
24°C, the period of rit flies lengthened remarkably to
about 10 h longer than that of wild-type flies at 30°C (Fig.
1A). Thus, above 24°C, the Q10 of
rit flies was 0.62, which is significantly different from
the wild-type value of 1. This phenotype is recessive since the period
of heterozygous rit/+ flies were well temperature
compensated (Fig. 1C).

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
rit lengthens circadian periods as
temperature increases. (A and B) Locomotor activity records at various
temperatures for rit (A) and perL;
rit (B) flies. Flies were held in LD12:12 for the first 3 days and
then kept in DD. Light regimens (white bars, light; black bars, dark)
are indicated above the tetraplotted (4 days) actograms. (C) Changes in
period at various temperatures. Mean values at 20, 28, and 30°C were
calculated to combine data at 19 and 20, 27 and 28, and 29 and 30°C,
respectively. , strains carrying no mutation on the second
chromosome (Canton-S, perL, and
perS); , strains carrying the rit
mutation (rit, perL; rit and
perS; rit). , heterozygous rit/+
strain. Vertical bars show standard errors of the means. Numbers beside
symbols represent the numbers of rhythmic flies.
Q10 values are separately represented when the
changes in period are different between the temperature ranges below
and above 24°C.
|
|
Genetic interaction between rit and per.
rit strongly interacts with perL with
respect to period lengthening. The double mutant of rit
(25.5 h at 24°C) with perL (28.5 h at 24°C)
showed a period of 32.9 h at 24°C (Fig. 1B). This is ~2 h
longer than the value expected (31 h) on the basis of an additive
effect of the two mutations. At 27°C, perL;
rit flies showed an extremely long period of 44.4 h (Fig.
1B). Although these periods are extraordinary long, the rhythmicity itself was still clear and stable, with a punctual onset and offset of
the active phase. While only 2 of 25 flies were arrhythmic at 27°C,
most rit flies became arrhythmic at 30°C (Table
1). One fly that was rhythmic at 30°C
revealed an extremely long period of 50.4 h (Fig. 1B). Even in
this case, we observed a stable rhythmicity. The
Q10 of the double mutant was drastically lower
(Q10 = 0.46) than that of the
perL mutant (Q10 = 0.88)
above 24°C.
The period lengthening also occurred in the double mutant with
perS (Fig. 1C). The period of
perS; rit flies was 6 h longer than that of
perS flies at 27°C, which corresponds to the
value expected on the basis of an additive effect. Only 2 of 15 flies
were found to be rhythmic at 30°C. The periods were ca. 24 h,
which is 5 h longer than the period in perS
flies at this temperature. The Q10 of
perS; rit flies was 0.92, not significantly
different from that of perS flies. Thus, there
is an allele specificity in the interaction between rit and
per: a drastic effect in perL and a
minimal effect in perS.
rit induces arrhythmicity at higher temperature.
We observed that a majority of rit flies become arrhythmic
at temperatures higher than 24°C (Table 1). When the temperature was
24°C, flies were quite rhythmic in all strains used in this study. At
the lowest and highest temperatures tested (16 and 30°C), a portion
of wild-type flies and of per mutants showed arrhythmicity (Table 1). This is because overall locomotor activity tends to be
reduced at 16°C (data not shown). At high temperatures (30°C), some
flies were statistically arrhythmic, although a weak but stable
rhythmicity could be observed by eye in all plots.
The proportion of arrhythmic flies homozygous for the rit
mutation was not different from that in wild-type and per
mutants in the range from 16 to 24°C. On the contrary, the proportion of arrhythmic flies at 27 and 30°C was remarkably high in all strains
homozygous for the rit mutation (Table 1). While
perL; rit flies exhibited extraordinarily
long periods at 27°C, 29 of 30 flies were arrhythmic at 30°C. Such
arrhythmicity would occur when the period lengthened beyond the
circadian range. Alternatively, the arrhythmicity would be directly
induced by rit at higher temperatures. The latter
possibility is supported by the finding that perS;
rit flies showed a period of ca. 24 h at 30°C, but 76.5%
of these flies were arrhythmic.
An excess of per gene dosage ameliorates the
rit phenotype.
rit males and females, carrying a
per+ gene translocation on the Y chromosome
(w+Y), were produced to test if an additional
per+ dosage affects periodicity in
rit. In +/w+Y; rit male
flies, the per gene dosage is double that of a wild-type male, while attached-X
[C(1)DX]/w+Y; rit
females have 1.5 times more per gene dosage than wild-type males because per is on the X chromosome (3). A
per gene dosage of 2 completely rescued the rit
phenotype behaviorally; its period was normal and temperature
compensated (Fig. 2A). When the per gene dosage was 1.5 in
C(1)DX/w+Y; rit flies, the
rit phenotype was rescued at lower temperature but
incompletely rescued at higher temperature (Fig.
2A).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Duplication of the per+ and
tim+ genes restores the extra long period in
rit flies. (A) The rit phenotype is restored by
the per+ gene translocation in a
dosage-dependent manner. +/w+Y; rit
is the rit male carrying the per+
gene translocation on the Y chromosome; C(1)DX represents
females carrying the attached X chromosome. (B) Complementation test
with tim01. tim01 does not
complement rit, and the tim+ gene
translocation restores the rit phenotype. The
per+ gene translocation also restores the
phenotype shown in rit/tim flies. (C) The rit
phenotype is restored by the tim duplication.
Dp(2;Y)odd4.13 and
Dp(2;Y)odd2.31 carry the
tim+ gene translocation on the Y chromosome.
Numbers beside symbols represent the numbers of flies showing
rhythmicity at each temperature.
|
|
Complementation and recombination tests with tim.
The
rit locus was roughly mapped near the cl gene
(26). Since this position is near the tim locus,
rit could be an allele of tim. To determine if
this is the case, we tested whether rit could complement
tim01 (a null allele of tim
[28]). Locomotor activity rhythms of tim01/rit flies were recorded at various
temperatures from 19 to 30°C (Fig. 2B).
rit/tim01 heterozygotes phenocopied the
rit phenotype. The period in these heterozygotes at each
temperature was, however, about 1 h shorter than the period in
rit homozygotes (t test, P < 0.05). We obtained a similar result in assays using
Df(2L)tim02 (data not shown), which deletes the
entire tim gene (28). Since the temperature
dependency of period in rit/tim heterozygotes phenocopied
rit homozygotes and the phenotype of rit is
rescued by duplication of the per locus as described above,
we expected that the phenotype in rit/tim heterozygotes
would also be rescued by the per duplication. Male flies
having a per gene dosage of 2 showed normal periods at
various temperatures (Fig. 2B).
A duplication of the tim+ gene was tested to
determine if it could complement the temperature-dependent period
lengthening caused by the rit mutation (Fig. 2C).
Dp(2;Y)odd4.31; rit/rit and
Dp(2;Y)odd2.31; rit/rit flies, both of
which carry a tim+ duplication on the Y
chromosome, showed periods of about 26 h at every
temperature (Fig. 2C). Given that null alleles of tim did
not complement rit and duplications bearing tim
corrected the rit phenotype with respect to the temperature
compensation of period, we suspected that rit is an allele
of tim. However, it remains a formal possibility that
trans heterozygotes between a null mutant of tim
and a clock mutant closely mapped near the tim gene will
show similar phenotypes.
We then examined whether recombination occurs between rit
and tim. Females having the rit mutation on one
second chromosome and the tim01 mutation on the
other were mated to tim01 males (Fig.
3A, cross 1). Progenies from this cross
were then monitored for their locomotor rhythms at 30°C. If the
rit mutation is not allelic to tim, there should
be recombinant progenies that show a nearly normal period among the
majority of arrhythmic flies. We tested a total of 546 progenies and
failed to obtain any significant circadian rhythmicity by the
chi-square periodogram (43) ranging from 19 to 29 h.
Furthermore, we crossed tim01/rit females to
males which are phenotypically wild type with respect to circadian
rhythm (Fig. 3A, cross 2). If a recombination between rit
and tim occurs, rit tim01/+ progeny
would be expected to show a very long period or an arrhythmic phenotype
like rit/tim01 flies at 30°C. Circadian
rhythms of about 700 flies obtained were recorded, and none was
categorized as a recombinant. These data support the result of the
complementation test which indicates that rit is an allele
of tim.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
rit is a novel allele of tim. (A)
Mating schemes to test whether recombination occurs between
rit and tim01. All genotypes and
their expected period in the second generation, assuming that
recombination occurs, are listed. Rhythmicities were judged by
chi-square periodogram analysis (43) ranging from 19 to
29 h. The arrhythmic category includes flies showing an extra long
period over the circadian range. See Results for details. (B) Schematic
representation of the coding region in the
timrit cDNA. The coding sequence is indicated by
a box. The arrow lines indicate PCR fragments amplified for sequencing.
Amino acid numbering is as specified by Myers et al. (29);
domains indicated by closed boxes are based on the study by Saez and
Young (37). Met, translation start; NLS, nuclear
localization signal; CLD, cytoplasmic localization domain.
|
|
rit encodes an amino acid substitution in TIM.
The
coding region of tim cDNA in rit flies was
amplified by reverse transcription-PCR. The fragments amplified were
sequenced and compared to the tim+ cDNA
previously described (28, 29). To avoid PCR errors, experiments were independently repeated twice and sequence data were
confirmed for each repeat. There were 16 mutations between rit and tim+ at the nucleotide level.
Among these, 14 were silent mutations that do not cause a change in the
amino acid sequence. We found a single-base deletion at position 294 (numbering according to references 28 and
29) in the noncoding region (Fig. 3B). This deletion
has been described as a mutation which has no effect on circadian
rhythm in three Drosophila species, including
Drosophila melanogaster (33). There is a missense
mutation which produced an amino acid substitution at bp 3492 from the
start point of the tim cDNA (Fig. 3B). At this point, the
nucleotide change from CCG to GCG yields an amino acid change from
proline to alanine (Fig. 3B) at amino acid 1093 in TIM protein
(numbering according to reference 29). Since there
is an EcoRI site at this position (Fig. 3B), we confirmed
that this mutation abolishes the restriction of the
timrit cDNA by EcoRI at this region
(data not shown). Taken together, the results led us to conclude that
rit is an allele of tim. Hereafter, we use
rit as an allele name and timrit to
designate a mutation.
rit lowered expression and protein abundances in
tim and per mRNAs.
We measured
per and tim mRNA cycling in fly heads by RNase
protection assay. Flies entrained in LD12:12 were collected every 4 h. RNA abundance was normalized by the peak value (at ZT13) of
the wild-type per and tim mRNAs at 24°C (Fig.
4A). Wild-type flies at 24°C exhibited
robust mRNA cyclings with the peak at ZT13 to ZT17 and a trough at ZT1,
meaning that these mRNA cyclings are in phase. The tim mRNA
also cycled in rit flies at 24°C but with a delayed peak.
The levels of tim mRNA in rit flies were not
significantly different from those in the wild type at each time, while
the peak value of per mRNA in rit flies was
reduced to about 70% (t test, P < 0.05)
(Fig. 4B). At 30°C, the peak of per and tim
mRNA cyclings in the wild type was delayed compared to that at 24°C
(Fig. 4C). The shape of tim mRNA cycling in rit flies at 30°C was quite similar to that at 24°C (Fig. 4D). The abundance of per mRNA at the peak (ZT17) decreased to 60%
(t test, P < 0.05). Thus, the amplitude of
per mRNA cycling becomes smaller as temperature increases,
while tim mRNA is not affected in rit.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Daily patterns of per and tim mRNA
cyclings under LD. RNase protection assays were performed on total RNAs
from wild-type and rit flies entrained in LD12:12 at 24°C
(A and B) and at 30°C (C and D). See Materials and Methods for
details. Values at each point are means of three to eight experiments.
Vertical bars show standard errors of the means. Light regimens are
indicated (white bars, light; black bars, dark). We defined the
lights-on point as ZT0 and the lights-off point as ZT12. Asterisks
indicate that the mean value for rit flies is significantly
different from that for wild-type flies (t test,
P < 0.05).
|
|
We next analyzed the levels of TIM and PER protein abundance by Western
blotting. PER and TIM abundances cycle in rit flies under
LD12:12 at 24°C, where the peak was at ZT18 and the trough was at ZT6
to ZT10 (Fig. 5A). The shape and phase of
these protein fluctuations were similar to those in wild-type flies
except that the peak level was reduced ~30% (Fig. 5B). At 27°C,
when rit flies show a longer free-running period of
locomotor activity rhythms, the amplitude of PER and TIM cycling was
reduced. These peaks dropped to nearly half of the wild-type level
(Fig. 5A and B). At 30°C, where 80% of rit flies become
behaviorally arrhythmic, rit flies showed two types of
protein cycling with respect to peak levels. One is similar to the
result observed at 27°C; the peak abundance of PER and TIM became
about half of the wild-type level, and their amplitudes were reduced
(Fig. 5A, 30°C-1; Fig. 5B, rit-1). Four of ten experiments
were classified into this type. The remaining six were categorized into
another type (Fig. 5A, 30°C-2). In this type, TIM fluctuated with a
nearly normal shape with the peak level of 80%, while the amplitude of
PER fluctuation was reduced. The peak and trough levels of PER were 80 and 50% of the wild-type peak level, respectively (Fig. 5B,
rit-2). In either case, the amplitude of PER cycling in
rit decreased as the temperature rose. The rhythmic mobility
shift by phosphorylation is reported to occur in the PER band (7,
31, 32). A nearly normal phosphorylation of PER occurs at both 24 and 27°C, while PER usually (but not always) seems to be
hypophosphorylated at 30°C regardless of whether PER abundance
cycled.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
PER and TIM abundance in wild-type and rit
flies at various temperatures. Adult head homogenates were obtained
from flies entrained at 24, 27, and 30°C and subjected to Western
blot analysis using anti-TIM antibody followed by anti-PER antibody as
described in Materials and Methods. TIM and PER bands in panel A were
quantified by densitometry. Measurements obtained at each point were
normalized by the maximum value for wild-type flies under each
condition. (B) Mean abundances of TIM and PER. Values at each point
were means of three to nine experiments. Vertical bars show standard
errors of the means. Asterisks indicate that the mean value for
rit flies is significantly different from that for wild-type
flies (t test, P < 0.05). Data for
rit flies obtained at 30°C were classified into two groups
(bottom row in panel B; see also Results for details). (C and D) Under
constant darkness at 30°C, no or very weak cycling is indicated by
the data from 8 h of sampling in both proteins. Experiments were
independently done two and three times for TIM and PER, respectively
(D). Light regimens are indicated (white symbols, light; black symbols,
dark).
|
|
Since most rit flies were behaviorally arrhythmic in DD at
30°C, we investigated whether the cyclings of PER and TIM were also
abolished in rit flies in DD (Fig. 5C). The levels of these proteins increased to half of the wild-type peaks. TIM and PER levels
do not show rhythmic fluctuations, though some random variability in
their levels is apparent.
rit affects per mRNA abundance at a
posttranscriptional level.
rit appears to lower
per mRNA abundance and amplitude of PER protein cycling,
while tim mRNA abundance is not affected but TIM protein
abundance decreases. One possible reason for this finding is that
rit primarily affects the per mRNA transcription level; another possibility is that rit reduces PER
abundance, which in turn may decrease per mRNA abundance
through the per feedback loop. To solve this problem, we
produced a rit; rh-per strain and measured its PER
abundance. In rh-per flies, per is strongly
driven by rhodopsin1 promoter in eyes independent of the
innate per gene expression (45). If PER is
reduced in rit; rh-per flies, rit should affect
PER at a posttranscriptional level. The PER level in the strain
carrying rh-per was about 80% lower in
rit+ flies than in rit flies. This is
obvious at 30°C (Fig. 6A). This result
suggests that rit affects the per feedback loop
at a posttranscriptional level. PER seemed to be hypophosphorylated in
the rit background at 30°C when the mobility shifts were
examined by side-by-side comparisons at ZT2 (Fig. 6A).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
rit affects PER abundance at a
posttranscriptional level. (A) Constitutive expression of PER, using
the rh1-per fusion gene. Flies were collected at ZT2 except
for one wild-type strain collected at ZT18 as a control. PER bands
detected by Western blot analysis using anti-PER antibody were
quantified and were normalized by the PER level of the wild type. +,
wild-type (Canton-S); rit/+, heterozygous rit;
rh-per, protein extracts were obtained from flies carrying
the rh-per construct. Lysates were obtained from the
following strains: wild type as a control (lane 1), wild type (lanes 2 and 7), rit (lanes 3 and 8), rh-per (lanes 4 and
9), rit; rh-per (lanes 5 and 10), and rit/+;
rh-per (lanes 6 and 12). Values at each point were means of four
experiments. Asterisks indicate that the mean value for rit;
rh-per flies is significantly different from that for
rh-per flies at the same temperature (t test,
P < 0.05). Vertical bars show standard errors of the
means. (B) Daily fluctuation of PER and TIM in rit flies
with an excess per gene dosage. Adult head homogenates were
obtained from flies entrained at 30°C. Values at each point were
normalized by the maximum value for the wild type. Values at each point
were means of four experiments. Vertical bars show standard errors of
the means. Light regimens are indicated (white bars, light; black bars,
dark).
|
|
At a behavioral level, the excess of per gene dosage rescued
the rit phenotype. To determine if PER and TIM protein
cycling is also rescued by the per duplication, we measured
their abundances at 30°C. TIM and PER proteins showed a clear cycling
with peak levels twice and three times the wild-type level,
respectively (Fig. 6B). The lower amplitude of PER cycling shown in
rit flies at 30°C was rescued to normal in
+/w+Y; rit flies. Interestingly, TIM
abundance was also increased in +/w+Y;
rit flies even though only per dosage was increased.
Levels of PER translocated into the nucleus are lowered in a
rit background.
The spatial pattern of per
expression can be monitored by lacZ expression in
transformant flies carrying a per-lacZ fusion gene
(22). This fusion gene contains one-half of the
per coding region, ca. 4 kb of 5' flanking region, and the
entire coding region of the lacZ gene derived from
Escherichia coli. per-lacZ and rit
per-lacZ flies were entrained under LD12:12 at 24 or 30°C for 3 to 5 days. Sections of wild-type and rit flies were
incubated with X-Gal for 2 h at 37°C. In both strains at 24°C
(Fig. 7A and B), there were
lacZ-positive cells in optic lobes (lamina and medulla) and
the central brain. The expression pattern was principally coincident
with the previous study (22). Nuclei in photoreceptor cells
were stained strongly in wild-type but only weakly in rit flies at 24°C.

View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Nuclear localization of PER is impaired in
rit flies. Horizontal section of fly heads stained with
X-Gal (A to D and E). The spatial pattern of per gene
expression was monitored by using the per-lacZ fusion gene.
Horizontal head sections in wild-type and rit flies kept at
24°C (A and B) or 30°C (C and D) were stained for 2 h at
37°C. per was expressed in retina (ret), optic lobes
(lamina [la], medulla [me], and lobula [lo]), and central brain
(br) in wild-type flies (A and C). Nuclei in photoreceptor cells are
clearly stained (arrowheads) in wild-type but not rit flies
at both 24 and 30°C. Staining of LNs is indicated by black arrows.
The expression level in the PER- -Gal fusion protein in
rit flies is lower than that in wild-type flies. Such a weak
PER localization in nuclei was rescued by the excess of
per+ gene dosage in
+/w+Y; rit even at 30°C (E). The
scale bar represents 80 µm.
|
|
While the pattern of per-lacZ expression at 30°C was
similar to that at 24°C in wild-type flies (Fig. 7C), there were few lacZ-positive cells in the optic lobes and brains of
rit flies (Fig. 7D). lacZ expression in nuclei of
the eyes was very weak in rit flies at 30°C (Fig. 7D),
suggesting that PER localization in nuclei is much lower in
rit than in wild-type flies.
We next checked whether the weak staining of PER-
-galactosidase
(
-Gal) could be rescued in the +/w+Y;
rit strain, because not only the aberrant locomotor rhythm but also the weak cycling of PER was rescued by the excess
per gene dosage in rit. The level of staining of
PER-
-Gal in brain and photoreceptors and their nuclear localization
especially in photoreceptor cells were rescued (Fig. 7E).
Nuclear localizations of PER in lateral neurons (LNs) were examined by
anti-PER antibody with fluorescent probes (FITC; green color in Fig.
8) at ZT19, -21, and -23.5 at 30°C.
Counterstaining of nuclei was done with propidium iodide (red color in
Fig. 8). Sections from about 50 heads of each strain were observed at
each time point of day. Nuclei in photoreceptor cells were clearly stained in wild-type flies through ZT19 to ZT23.5 (Fig. 8A to C). PER
was cytoplasmic in LNs at ZT19 and in nuclei at ZT21 and ZT23.5 (Fig.
8D to F). This temporal regulation of PER nuclear entry is consistent
with a previous report (5). The strength of PER signal
increases throughout a time course of a day. Compared with wild-type
signals, signals of PER in photeoreceptors and LNs in rit
flies were weak although the staining pattern is comparable to the
wild-type pattern (Fig. 8G to I). To reveal the cellular localization
of PER in rit, we lengthened the incubation time of the
FITC-Tyramide reaction to 15 min. PER was cytoplasmic in LNs at ZT19
(Fig. 8J and M). At ZT21, the pattern of PER localization in LNs could
be classified into three groups. First, PER is in the cytoplasm, as
shown in the center and right upper corner in Fig. 8N. One-third of LNs
observed were classified in this group. Second, PER was in both
cytoplasm and nucleus (middle left in Fig. 8N). Third, PER was clearly
in nuclei (inset in Fig. 8N). This pattern was observed in less than
10% of all LNs. At ZT23.5, a clear nuclear entry of PER was observed
in about half of LNs (Fig. 8O), while PER stayed in the cytoplasm in
the remaining LNs (inset in Fig. 8O). These variations of PER nuclear
entry at ZT21 and ZT23.5 were found among LNs from the same individual. For example, Fig. 8O and its inset were obtained as different confocal
planes of the same preparation. In summary, the abundance of PER in LNs
of rit flies was lower than for wild-type flies through ZT19
to ZT23.5, supporting the results of assays using a per-lacZ
fusion gene and Western blotting, and the nuclear entry of PER in LNs
is thought to be temporally delayed and/or not to occur in nearly half
of LNs in rit flies.

View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
PER localization in lateral neurons at 30°C.
Horizontal sections of fly heads obtained at ZT19, -21, and -23.5 were
stained with anti-PER antibody coupled to FITC (green color).
Counterstaining of nuclei was done with propidium iodide (red color)
after RNase treatment. When PER staining overlaps nuclear staining,
yellow color is observed. For symbols, see the legend to Fig. 7. In
wild-type flies (A to C), PER signals are comparable to those seen with
X-Gal staining in Fig. 7C. LNs at a magnification of ×8 are
represented in panels D to F. PER signal is observed in the cytoplasm
at ZT19 and in nuclei at both ZT21 and ZT23.5. In rit flies
(G to I), staining similar to that in wild-type flies can be observed,
although the PER signal is weaker especially in the LNs (J to L). Thus,
images in which PER signals were amplified are illustrated (M to O).
PER is in the cytoplasm at ZT19 (J and M). At ZT21, there are three
patterns of PER staining surrounding a nucleus (center and right upper
corner in panel N), overlapping in a nucleus of the center of a broad
PER staining area (middle left in panel N), and just overlapping in
nuclei (inset in panel N). At ZT23.5, PER enters nuclei (O) or stays in
the cytoplasm (inset in panel O).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
rit, a new allele of tim, lengthens or
abolishes circadian locomotor rhythms in a temperature-dependent
manner. Thus, timrit appears to affect a
temperature compensation of period which is one of the most important
features of circadian rhythms. However, rit can be regarded
as a temperature-sensitive (ts) mutation lengthening a
circadian period depending on temperature. Several studies have been
performed to determine the mechanism of temperature compensation in
Drosophila (12, 15, 38; reviewed in
reference 13), but the molecular mechanism has not
been defined. Therefore, at present we cannot distinguish a
ts mutation of period from a temperature compensation
mutation. However, the following results led us to consider how
rit affects the circadian rhythm. A tim
duplication rescues the abnormal phenotype of temperature compensation
in the circadian period of rit, while the period of
rit flies having the duplication of tim was still
2 h longer than in wild-type flies. In addition, rit/+
heterozygotes showed a period 1 h longer at all temperature ranges
tested. These data mean that the timrit mutation
is recessive for the temperature-dependent lengthening of period but
semidominant for the temperature-independent lengthening of period.
Thus, the tim+ gene enables the circadian system
not only to maintain circadian period but also to compensate the period
against temperature such that a half dosage of
tim+ is enough for function. Our point that
tim contributes to the temperature compensation mechanism as
well as the maintenance of period is supported by studies of another
tim allele, timSL. This mutant
restores temperature compensation (or a ts effect of
lengthening period) to perL flies
(35). Since timSL in the
per+ background shows a nearly normal period at
all temperature ranges tested (35),
timSL may affect temperature compensation rather
than keep circadian period constant. In summary, we conclude that
rit is a mutation of temperature compensation rather than a
ts mutation of period.
The mutation site of timrit, where the amino
acid substitution occurs, is separated from that of
timSL with respect to the primary structure of
TIM. The mutation site of timrit is outside
neither the nuclear localization domain nor the dimerization domain
with PER (37). Given the behavior phenotype, the extra long
locomotor period of rit flies at higher temperatures is
similar to that reported for TIM1 transformant flies which lack a
32-amino-acid region in tim cDNA (30). Since our
sequence data indicate that this region of tim cDNA is
intact in rit, the function of the domain where the
timrit mutation occurs is still unknown. Our
preliminary computer simulation indicates that the
timrit mutation may lead to a local conformation
change in secondary structure of TIM from coil to
sheet at the
timrit mutation site (24a). Through
such a change in conformation, the timrit
mutation may alter a protein-protein interaction between TIM and PER.
Since PER abundance is lowered in rit flies and the excess of PER rescues the rit phenotype, it is certain that the
timrit mutation alters circadian rhythm by
affecting PER abundance.
The peak levels of PER and TIM are lowered at 30°C when
rit flies shows arrhythmicity or an extra long period of
locomotor activity rhythm. Thus, lower levels and amplitudes of PER and TIM cycling correlate with behavioral phenotypes. Since TIM not only
acts as a nuclear transporter of PER (44) but also
influences PER stability (16, 32), the low level of PER in
rit flies is probably caused by the low level of
TIMrit. One question arising here is why PER and TIM show
rhythmicity in abundance under LD but are basically arrhythmic under DD
at 30°C. Null mutants of per and tim genes are
arrhythmic at the mRNA and protein levels under both LD and DD
(14, 16, 39). One possibility is that the rhythmicities of
PER and TIM under LD at 30°C are partially driven by the light-dark
cycle itself. Flies kept in LL phenocopy the
tim01 mutant with regard to PER expression
(32) because the abundance of TIM is rapidly reduced by
light (16, 20, 27, 46). Since we confirmed that the level of
TIMrit is reduced under constant-light conditions
(25a), the response of TIM to light seems not to be affected
by the timrit mutation. Another possibility is
that rit affects the mode of PER, especially its
accumulation in nuclei through altering PER phosphorylation, because we
showed that PER is hypophosphorylated in rit at 30°C.
Interestingly, an amorphic allele of the dbt gene, dbtP, shows the rit phenotype that
mRNAs and protein levels of per and tim fluctuate
in a nearly normal manner in LD but not in DD (31). DBT is a
protein closely related to human casein kinase I
(17),
phosphorylating PER, and this phosphorylation is a key step of
circadian fluctuation of PER abundance (31). The dbt locus on the third chromosome is intact in
rit flies because the chromosome was changed to wild type in
rit. Although little is known about the molecular link
between tim and dbt except that the level of
tim mRNA decreased prior to reduction of TIM abundance in
dbtP under DD (31) and that PER
phosphorylation is absent in tim01
(31), our result suggests that TIM and DBT likely cooperate to phosphorylate PER.
If the sole function of TIM is to stabilize PER and to transport PER
into the nuclei, our results for timrit cannot
be explained with certainty. For example, if we think that
arrhythmicity at higher temperature in rit flies is caused by a defect in the interaction between TIMrit and PER, we
cannot explain how the additional per+ dosage
resulted in the complete recovery of arrhythmicity, except by assuming
that PER alone could enter nuclei. Also it is hard to explain why PER
and TIM levels in these flies increased even more than in the wild-type
flies. These considerations lead us to assume that TIM has some
additional role other than binding to PER. So and Rosbash
(42) suggested that a posttranscriptional regulation step is
involved in per mRNA oscillations. Available data do not
support the view that TIM can bind to RNA, but one attractive
hypothesis is that TIM is involved in the stability of per
mRNA. Then TIMrit may destabilize per mRNA in a
temperature-dependent manner, thus lowering the PER level.
The effect of rit on per and tim
transcriptional levels appears to be more severe in per than
in tim. The peak level of per mRNA in
rit flies decreases to 60 to 70% of that in wild-type flies
at both 24 and 30°C. Since the timrit mutation
probably affects the per feedback loop at a
posttranscriptional level, the alteration of per mRNA levels
should be induced through the per feedback loop. Recently,
two Drosophila genes, Jrk (dClk) and
cyc (dBMAL), were identified as transcriptional
activators of per and tim genes (1, 6,
36). These genes are intact in rit because they are
mapped on the third chromosome, which was changed to the wild-type
chromosome in the rit strain. It is believed that
per and tim transcriptions are regulated in a similar way through the regulatory element called the E box
encompassing the per and tim promoters
(6). However, our present results suggest that there are
separate transcriptional regulations for per and for
tim. Thus, we suspect that TIMrit alters
per transcription through interacting with Jrk,
cyc, or other transcription factors which have not been
identified, although the mode of protein-protein interaction among
products of those clock genes is still unknown. Another possibility is
that TIMrit destabilizes the per mRNA through
posttranscriptional regulation. Posttranscriptional regulation in
per mRNA was reported by So and Rosbash (42),
although they provided no evidence that TIM influences such regulation
either in a direct or an indirect way.
We showed here that the excess of per+ gene
dosage ameliorates the temperature dependency not only of period in a
behavior rhythm but also of abundances of PER and TIM and the
amplitudes of their cyclings. This finding suggests that PER abundance
is an important factor in the temperature compensation mechanism. However, because the period of per
/+ flies, in
which per+ gene dosage should be half as much as
in wild-type flies, is well temperature compensated (24a),
it would be hard to say that the reduced PER level alone in
rit directly reflects its abnormal temperature compensation
of period. As PER acts in the nucleus rather than in the cytoplasm, it
is essential to compare the amounts of PER in nuclei between wild-type
and rit flies. Our histological study using anti-PER
antibody and the per-lacZ reporter gene showed that the
abundance of PER expressed in LNs was lowered in rit flies
and the number of LNs in which PER enters varies among rit flies at 30°C. The nuclear entry of PER probably delays in its timing
and/or does not occur in a part of LNs in rit flies. This phenotype can be rescued in +/w+Y;
rit. Taken together, the key feature of the temperature
compensation of period may be the amount of PER transported in nuclei
by TIM. Furthermore, because the nuclear localization of PER and
protein cyclings of PER and TIM are rescued only by the increasing
per+ gene dosage at 30°C, the ability of the
nuclear transportation is virtually normal in TIMrit. The
timrit mutation may first affect the interaction
between PER and TIM and then disrupt their nuclear localization.
Previous reports indicated that the per gene dosage
negatively correlates with period length (4, 41).
Additionally, Curtin et al. (5) reported that PER
accumulates in the cytoplasm for several hours before entering nuclei
in LNs and that the nuclear entry of PER is temperature sensitive in
the perL mutant whose mutation occurs in the PAS
domain, where PER interacts with TIM. It could be concluded that the
temperature-dependent lengthening or abolishment of period by
timrit is presumably induced as follows:
timrit affects the interaction between
TIMrit and PER, thereby decreasing the levels of PER and
disrupting its nuclear localization. The low abundance of PER in nuclei
makes it possible to interpret the long period of rit
mutants based on the negative correlation with a gene dosage of
per. Arrhythmicity observed in locomotor rhythm under DD
might be induced by no or very little entering of PER into nuclei. This
result is inconsistent with the fact that circadian locomotor
rhythmicity can be rescued only if a very few cells in the restricted
nervous system of a brain express the per gene (9,
10), because most of the rit flies lost the circadian
rhythmicity of their locomotor activities while half of the nuclei in
LNs seemed to be stained even at 30°C in many rit flies.
One possible explanation is that the long or arrhythmic phenotype is
caused by weak coupling among circadian oscillators in LNs.
In Neurospora, frq-9, an allele of the
frequency gene, was isolated as a temperature compensation
mutant whose Q10 is about 2 (24). At
a molecular level, it was reported that two initiation codons of the
frq gene are selectively used at different temperatures (11), and a temperature-dependent threshold level of FRQ is required to establish the feedback loop comprising the oscillator (23). Although the possibility that alternative methionines are used as an initiation site in the tim gene has been
proposed (29, 33), such regulation has not yet been reported
in Drosophila clock genes. However, it is significant that
there is a critical temperature at which the lengthening effect is much
more severe in rit. The effect is not so drastic below
24°C, but a drastic change in period is observed above 24°C (Fig.
1C). Furthermore, half a gene dose of per+ was
enough to rescue the rit phenotype at low temperatures. It is thus possible that there is a threshold level of PER required to
establish the clock mechanism in a temperature-dependent manner.
One further issue to examine is whether transformant flies carrying the
timrit point mutation mimic the rit
phenotype in the tim01 background. Such analyses
have been done in studies on the perS mutation
site (2, 34). Another issue is whether the PER-TIM interaction is affected in timrit as a function
of temperature. We believe that these studies should give insights into
the still mysterious molecular mechanism of temperature compensation of
circadian rhythms.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Paul Hardin for use of his laboratory to perform RNase
protection assays and for comments on the manuscript. We thank Michael
Rosbash for the per-lacZ strain, Joan Rutila for the
rh-per strain, Jeffrey C. Hall for per mutants,
and Michael W. Young for tim mutants. Ralf Stanewsky and
Justin Blau kindly provided anti-PER and anti-TIM antibodies,
respectively. Flies for mating procedures and two strains carrying a
tim duplication were provided by the Bloomington stock
center, Bowling Green stock center, and Umeå stock center. We also
thank Dave Allen, Lisa Lyons, and the staff of our lab for the
technical support and advice, as well as HaiPing Hao, Jan Qiu, J. C. Hall, and M. W. Young for comments on the manuscript. A.M.
thanks Ayako Shigenaga and Yoshitaka Kobayakawa for discussion and
continuous encouragement.
This work was supported by a grant-in-aid from the Nakayama Science
Foundation and grants from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports
and Culture of Japan to A.M. and T.T. and by an HFSP grant to T.T.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Biology, Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Ropponmatsu, Fukuoka 810-8560, Japan. Phone: 81-92-726-4759. Fax: 81-92-726-4644. E-mail: tanimura{at}rc.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
Present address: 233-3, Miyanoshita, Yamaguchi 753-0011, Japan.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Allada, R.,
N. E. White,
W. V. So,
J. C. Hall, and M. Rosbash.
1998.
A mutant Drosophila homolog of mammalian Clock disrupts circadian rhythms and transcription of period and timeless.
Cell
93:791-804[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Baylies, M. K.,
L. B. Vosshall,
A. Sehgal, and M. W. Young.
1992.
New short period mutations of the Drosophila clock gene per.
Neuron
9:575-581[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Cooper, M. K.,
M. J. Hamblen-Coyle,
X. Liu,
J. E. Rutila, and J. C. Hall.
1994.
Dosage compensation of the period gene in Drosophila melanogaster.
Genetics
138:721-732[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Cote, G. G., and S. Brody.
1986.
Circadian rhythms in Drosophila melanogaster: analysis of period as a function of gene dosage at the per (period) locus.
J. Theor. Biol.
121:487-503[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Curtin, K. D.,
Z. J. Huang, and M. Rosbash.
1995.
Temporally regulated nuclear entry of the Drosophila period protein contributes to the circadian clock.
Neuron
14:365-372[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Darlington, T. K.,
K. Wager-Smith,
M. F. Ceriani,
D. Staknis,
N. Gekakis,
T. D. L. Steeves,
C. J. Weitz,
J. S. Takahashi, and S. A. Kay.
1998.
Closing the circadian loop: CLOCK-induced transcription of its own inhibitors per and tim.
Science
280:1599-1603[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Edery, I.,
L. J. Zwiebel,
M. E. Dembinska, and M. Rosbash.
1994.
Temporal phosphorylation of the Drosophila period protein.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:2260-2264[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Ewer, J.,
M. Hamblen-Coyle,
M. Rosbash, and J. C. Hall.
1990.
Requirement for period gene expression in the adult and not during development for locomotor activity rhythms of imaginal Drosophila melanogaster.
J. Neurogenet.
7:31-73[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Ewer, J.,
B. Frish,
M. J. Hamblen-Coyle,
M. Rosbash, and J. C. Hall.
1992.
Expression of the period clock gene within different cell types in the brain of Drosophila adults and mosaic analysis of these cells' influence on circadian behavioral rhythms.
J. Neurosci.
12:3321-3349[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Frish, B.,
P. E. Hardin,
M. J. Hamblen-Coyle,
M. Rosbash, and J. C. Hall.
1994.
A promoterless period gene mediates behavioral rhythmicity and cyclical per expression in a restricted subset of the Drosophila nervous system.
Neuron
12:555-570[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Garceau, N. Y.,
Y. Liu,
J. L. Loros, and J. C. Dunlap.
1997.
Alternative initiation of translation and time-specific phosphorylation yield multiple forms of the essential clock protein FREQUENCY.
Cell
89:469-476[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Gekakis, N.,
L. Saez,
A. M. Delahaye-Brown,
M. P. Myers,
A. Sehgal,
M. W. Young, and C. J. Weitz.
1995.
Isolation of timeless by PER protein interaction: defective interaction between timeless protein and long-period mutant PERL.
Science
270:811-815[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Hall, J. C.
1997.
Circadian pacemakers blowing hot and cold but they're clocks, not thermometers.
Cell
90:9-12[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Hardin, P. E.,
J. C. Hall, and M. Rosbash.
1990.
Feedback of the Drosophila period gene product on circadian cycling of its messenger RNA levels.
Nature
343:536-540[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Huang, Z. J.,
K. D. Curtin, and M. Rosbash.
1995.
PER protein interactions and temperature compensation of a circadian clock in Drosophila.
Science
267:1169-1172[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Hunter-Ensor, M.,
A. Ousley, and A. Sehgal.
1996.
Regulation of the Drosophila protein timeless suggests a mechanism for resetting the circadian clock by light.
Cell
84:677-685[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Kloss, B.,
J. K. Price,
L. Saez,
J. Blau,
A. Rothenfluh,
C. S. Wesley, and M. W. Young.
1998.
The Drosophila clock gene double-time encodes a protein closely related to human casein kinase I .
Cell
94:97-107[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Konopka, R. J.,
C. Pittendrigh, and D. Orr.
1989.
Reciprocal behaviour associated with altered homeostasis and photosensitivity of Drosophila clock mutants.
J. Neurogenet.
6:1-10[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Konopka, R. J.,
M. J. Hamblen-Coyle,
C. F. Jamison, and J. C. Hall.
1994.
An ultrashort clock mutation at the period locus of Drosophila melanogaster that reveals some new features of the fly's circadian system.
J. Biol. Rhythms
9:3-4.
|
| 20.
|
Lee, C.,
V. Parikh,
T. Itsukaichi,
K. Bae, and I. Edery.
1996.
Resetting the Drosophila clock by photic regulation of PER and a PER-TIM complex.
Science
271:1740-1744[Abstract].
|
| 21.
|
Lindsley, D. L., and G. G. Zimm.
1992.
The genome of Drosophila melanogaster.
Academic Press, London, England.
|
| 22.
|
Liu, X.,
L. Lorenz,
Q. Yu,
J. C. Hall, and M. Rosbash.
1988.
Spatial and temporal expression of the period gene in Drosophila melanogaster.
Genes Dev.
2:228-238[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Liu, Y.,
N. Y. Garceau,
J. L. Loros, and J. C. Dunlap.
1997.
Thermally regulated translational control of FRQ mediates aspects of temperature responses in the Neurospora circadian clock.
Cell
89:477-486[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Loros, J. J., and J. F. Feldman.
1986.
Loss of temperature compensation of circadian period length in the frq-9 mutant of Neurospora crassa.
J. Biol. Rhythms
1:187-198[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24a.
| Matsumoto, A. Unpublished data.
|
| 25.
|
Matsumoto, A.,
T. Motoshige,
T. Murata,
K. Tomioka,
T. Tanimura, and Y. Chiba.
1994.
Chronobiological analysis of a new clock mutant, Toki, in Drosophila melanogaster.
J. Neurogenet.
9:141-155[Medline].
|
| 25a.
| Matsumoto, A., and T. Tanimura. Unpublished data.
|
| 26.
|
Murata, T.,
A. Matsumoto,
K. Tomioka, and Y. Chiba.
1995.
Ritsu: a rhythm mutant from a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster.
J. Neurogenet.
9:239-249[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Myers, M. P.,
K. Wager-Smith,
A. Rothenfluh-Hilfiker, and M. W. Young.
1996.
Light-induced degradation of TIMELESS and entrainment of the Drosophila circadian clock.
Science
271:1736-1740[Abstract].
|
| 28.
|
Myers, M. P.,
K. Wager-Smith,
C. S. Wesley,
M. W. Young, and A. Sehgal.
1995.
Positional cloning and sequence analysis of the Drosophila clock gene, timeless.
Science
270:805-808[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Myers, M. P.,
A. Rothenfluh,
M. Chang, and M. W. Young.
1997.
Comparison of chromosomal DNA composing timeless in Drosophila melanogaster and D. virilis suggests a new conserved structure for the TIMELESS protein.
Nucleic Acids Res.
25:4710-4714[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Ousley, A.,
K. Zafarullah,
Y. Chen,
M. Emerson,
L. Hickman, and A. Sehgal.
1998.
Conserved region of timeless (tim) clock gene in Drosophila analyzed through phylogenetic and functional studies.
Genetics
148:815-825[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Price, J. L.,
J. Blau,
A. Rothenfluh,
M. Abodeely,
B. Kloss, and M. W. Young.
1998.
double-time is a novel Drosophila clock gene that regulates PERIOD protein accumulation.
Cell
94:83-95[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Price, J. L.,
M. E. Dembinska,
M. W. Young, and M. Rosbash.
1995.
Suppression of PERIOD protein abundance and circadian cycling by the Drosophila clock mutation timeless.
EMBO J.
14:4044-4049[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Rosato, E.,
A. Trevisan,
F. Sandrelli,
M. Zordan,
C. P. Kyriacou, and R. Costa.
1997.
Conceptual translation of timeless reveals alternative initiating methionines in Drosophila.
Nucleic Acids Res.
25:455-457[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Rutila, J. E.,
I. Edery,
J. C. Hall, and M. Rosbash.
1992.
The analysis of new short-period circadian rhythm mutants suggests features of D. melanogaster period gene function.
J. Neurogenet.
8:101-113[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Rutila, J. E.,
H. Zeng,
M. Le,
K. D. Curtin,
J. C. Hall, and M. Rosbash.
1996.
The timSL mutant of the Drosophila rhythm gene timeless manifests allele-specific interactions with period gene mutants.
Neuron
17:921-929[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Rutila, J. E.,
V. Suri,
M. Le,
W. V. So,
M. Rosbash, and J. C. Hall.
1998.
CYCLE is a second bHLH-PAS clock protein essential for circadian rhythmicity and transcription of Drosophila period and timeless.
Cell
93:805-814[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Saez, L., and M. W. Young.
1996.
Regulation of nuclear entry of the Drosophila clock proteins Period and Timeless.
Neuron
17:911-920[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Sawyer, L. A.,
J. M. Hennessy,
A. A. Peixoto,
E. Rosato,
H. Parkinson,
R. Costa, and C. P. Kyriacou.
1997.
Natural variation in Drosophila clock gene and temperature compensation.
Science
278:2117-2120[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Sehgal, A.,
A. Rothenfluh-Hilfiker,
M. Hunter-Ensor,
Y. Chen,
M. P. Myers, and M. W. Young.
1995.
Rhythmic expression of timeless: a basis for promoting circadian cycles in period gene autoregulation.
Science
270:808-810[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Sehgal, A.
1996.
Molecular genetic analysis of circadian rhythms in vertebrates and invertebrates.
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
5:824-831.
|
| 41.
|
Smith, R. F., and R. J. Konopka.
1982.
Effects of dosage alterations at the per locus on the period of the circadian clock of Drosophila.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
185:30-36.
|
| 42.
|
So, W. V., and M. Rosbash.
1997.
Post-transcriptional regulation contributes to Drosophila clock gene mRNA cycling.
EMBO J.
16:7146-7155[Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Sokolove, P. G., and W. N. Bushell.
1978.
The chi square periodogram: its utility for analysis of circadian rhythms.
J. Theor. Biol.
72:131-160[Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Vosshall, L. B.,
J. L. Price,
A. Sehgal,
L. Saez, and M. W. Young.
1994.
Block in nuclear localization of period protein by a second clock mutation, timeless.
Science
263:1606-1609[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Zeng, H.,
P. E. Hardin, and M. Rosbash.
1994.
Constitutive overexpression of the Drosophila period protein inhibits period mRNA cycling.
EMBO J.
13:3590-3598[Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Zeng, H.,
Z. Qian,
M. P. Myers, and M. Rosbash.
1996.
A light-entrainment mechanism for the Drosophila circadian clock.
Nature
380:129-135[Medline].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, June 1999, p. 4343-4354, Vol. 19, No. 6
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.