Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 1999, p. 5036-5049, Vol. 19, No. 7
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Distinct Glucocorticoid Receptor Transcriptional Regulatory
Surfaces Mediate the Cytotoxic and Cytostatic Effects of
Glucocorticoids
Inez
Rogatsky,1
Adam B.
Hittelman,1
David
Pearce,2 and
Michael
J.
Garabedian1,*
Department of Microbiology and the Kaplan
Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York University School of
Medicine, New York, New York 10016,1 and
Departments of Medicine and Cellular and Molecular
Pharmacology, University of California
San Francisco, San
Francisco, California 941432
Received 24 November 1998/Returned for modification 12 January
1999/Accepted 1 April 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Glucocorticoids act through the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), which
can function as a transcriptional activator or repressor, to elicit
cytostatic and cytotoxic effects in a variety of cells. The molecular
mechanisms regulating these events and the target genes affected by the
activated receptor remain largely undefined. Using cultured human
osteosarcoma cells as a model for the GR antiproliferative effect, we
demonstrate that in U20S cells, GR activation leads to irreversible
growth inhibition, apoptosis, and repression of Bcl2. This cytotoxic
effect is mediated by GR's transcriptional repression function, since
transactivation-deficient mutants and ligands still bring about
apoptosis and Bcl2 down-regulation. In contrast, the antiproliferative
effect of GR in SAOS2 cells is reversible, does not result in apoptosis
or repression of Bcl2, and is a function of the receptor's ability to
stimulate transcription. Thus, the cytotoxic versus cytostatic outcome
of glucocorticoid treatment is cell context dependent. Interestingly,
the cytostatic effect of glucocorticoids in SAOS2 cells involves
multiple GR activation surfaces. GR mutants and ligands that disrupt
individual transcriptional activation functions (activation function 1 [AF-1] and AF-2) or receptor dimerization fail to fully inhibit
cellular proliferation and, remarkably, discriminate between the
targets of GR's cytostatic action, the cyclin-dependent kinase
inhibitors p21Cip1 and p27Kip1. Induction of
p21Cip1 is agonist dependent and requires AF-2 but not AF-1
or GR dimerization. In contrast, induction of p27Kip1 is
agonist independent, does not require AF-2 or AF-1, but depends on GR
dimerization. Our findings indicate that multiple GR transcriptional regulatory mechanisms that employ distinct receptor surfaces are used
to evoke either the cytostatic or cytotoxic response to glucocorticoids.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Glucocorticoid hormones regulate a
variety of biological processes, including carbohydrate, lipid, and
protein metabolism, cell growth and proliferation, development, and
reproduction. In most cell contexts, glucocorticoids exert
antiproliferative effects, which has prompted their use clinically as a
part of anticancer therapy for a diverse range of dysplasias, including lymphoproliferative disorders and several solid tumors (20, 30,
71). The molecular basis of the antiproliferative action of these
compounds, however, is not fully understood. Glucocorticoids exert
their effects by activating the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), a
ligand-dependent transcriptional regulator that transduces the hormonal
signal into the nucleus to alter the expression of target genes.
Transcriptional responses triggered by the hormone-activated GR include
both positive (activation) and negative (repression) regulation,
depending on the DNA sequences in the target promoters, termed
glucocorticoid response elements (GREs), to which the receptor binds. A
canonical or simple GRE is an imperfect palindrome (14, 46)
which allows the binding of the GR head-to-head dimer (58), leading to enhanced transcription initiation from the target promoter. Examples of more complex GR-responsive genes include (i) promoters with
composite GREs containing an interacting surface both for the receptor
and for the nonreceptor enhancer-binding factor(s) and (ii) promoters
which lack GR-binding sequences altogether but to which the receptor is
tethered through an interacting protein. At composite and tethering
elements, GR appears to function as a monomer and can either activate
(84, 85) or repress (25, 63, 80) transcription,
depending on the promoter and the receptor-interacting protein(s) bound
at a site.
Like other steroid receptors, GR is composed of three distinct domains,
including an N-terminal transcriptional regulatory region, a central
DNA-binding domain (DBD), and a C-terminal signalling domain involved
in ligand binding. Two parts of the receptor molecule have been shown
to possess an intrinsic ability to activate transcription when tethered
to DNA. A hormone-independent activation function 1 (AF-1) is located
at the receptor N terminus between amino acids 202 and 264 (using the
rat GR numbering scheme); the activity of this domain can be both
positively and negatively regulated by phosphorylation (49, 76,
78). Point mutations in this region severely compromise the
transcriptional activity of AF-1 (4, 43). The second
transcriptional regulatory function, AF-2, maps to the receptor
ligand-binding domain (LBD) and is dependent on agonist for activity.
The transcriptional activity of AF-2 is mediated by a group of steroid
receptor coactivators, including the p160 family (steroid receptor
coactivator 1 [SRC1], GR-interacting protein 1 [GRIP1], and ACTR),
CREB-binding protein/p300, and PCAF, which associate with the GR LBD in
a hormone-dependent manner (7, 17, 41, 68, 82, 91). Thus,
ligand induces the LBD to acquire a conformation promoting the
interaction with coactivators, which in turn facilitates transcription initiation.
In contrast to transcriptional activation domains, the GR regions
responsible for transcriptional repression do not map to a distinct
domain. This can be explained in part by the fact that GR-mediated
repression involves both protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions
between the receptor and a nonreceptor factor, such as AP-1 (25,
101, 103) or NF-
B (11, 23, 53, 99). Therefore,
specific promoter contexts dictate which individual GR domains are
required for these interactions and thus for transcriptional repression.
In many cell types, GR activation leads to a G1 cell cycle
arrest; this cytostatic condition is often reversible, such that upon
withdrawal of glucocorticoid the cells reenter the cell cycle (83,
87). In other cell types, glucocorticoid treatment is cytotoxic
and irreversible and results in programmed cell death (PCD) or
apoptosis (16, 24, 62, 64). The transcriptional regulatory
mechanisms underlying the cytostatic versus the cytotoxic effects of GR
and the target genes affected by the receptor have not been determined.
Regulation of the G1-to-S phase transition in the mammalian
cell cycle can be viewed as a balance between growth-promoting and
growth-inhibitory factors. Mitogenic proteins include cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), CDK regulatory kinase and phosphatase (CAK and CDC25), and transcription factors E2F and cMyc (21, 60,
65, 86). Antimitogenic proteins include Rb (8, 59, 96)
and CDK-inhibitory proteins (CDIs), which comprise two distinct subfamilies based on structural and functional homologies: the INK
subfamily (p15, p16, p18, and p19) and the Cip/Kip subfamily (p21Cip1, p27Kip1, and p57Kip2)
(33). With respect to the antimitogenic effect of GR, it has been demonstrated that receptor activation leads to down-regulation of
several growth-promoting factors, including cMyc, cyclin D3, and CDK4
(75). It has recently been shown that in some cell types,
the level of p21Cip1 (hereafter referred to as p21)
increases in response to GR activation (72, 77). A
GR-responsive element in the p21 promoter has been localized to a
binding site for CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein
(C/EBP
)
(13, 22), whose expression is also GR inducible (73). However, rapid protein synthesis-independent induction of p21 by glucocorticoids suggests a direct transcriptional effect of
GR on the p21 promoter, in addition to C/EBP
-dependent stimulation of p21 expression. The tissue and cell specificities of such regulation and the relationships between individual cell cycle regulatory proteins
affected by GR are not understood.
Cellular apoptosis appears to be a pathway common to many cell types,
including cells of lymphoid and neuronal origin, neutrophils, fibroblasts, and a variety of cultured cell lines (6, 18, 28,
70). GR-induced growth inhibition and apoptosis may result from a
failure to differentiate due to a lack of, for example, essential
cytokines, growth factors, or extracellular matrix (44). The
combined efforts of many laboratories have partially dissected the
complex signalling pathways resulting in PCD. Like other signalling cascades, the cell death program involves several protein families, including the interleukin 1
-converting-like enzymes (ICE proteases), cysteine-containing aspartate-specific proteases termed caspases, and
the Bcl2 family, which function at distinct steps of the apoptotic pathway (19, 89, 102). Adding to this complexity, the Bcl2 family includes both proapoptotic (Bax, Bad, and BclXS) and
antiapoptotic (Bcl2 and BclXL) factors (1).
Thus, Bcl2 overexpression can rescue thymocytes from
glucocorticoid-induced cell death; however, cell survival depends on
the relative abundances of Bcl2 and Bax present in cells (5, 27,
81). With respect to glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis, it has
been demonstrated that eliminating caspase 9, but not caspase 3, activity prevents GR-dependent cell death (32, 100). The
primary targets responsible for initiating the apoptotic cascade in
response to GR activation and transcriptional events that comprise the
GR-induced cytotoxic pathway remain elusive.
We have developed a cultured cell system to study GR-mediated cell
cycle arrest by using two GR-negative human osteosarcoma cell lines,
U2OS and SAOS2. These cell lines provide a powerful tool for dissecting
the mechanisms of GR-mediated cell growth inhibition due to the
inherent differences in G1 regulatory proteins present in
these cells: U2OS cells are p53 and Rb positive and express all three
D-type cyclins (D1, D2, and D3), whereas SAOS2 cells lack Rb and p53
and produce only cyclin D3 (26). Ectopic expression and
activation of the wild-type (wt) rat GR in both cell lines lead to cell
cycle arrest at the G1 stage and morphological alterations,
although distinct subsets of genes appear to be affected. GR activation
in U2OS cells represses the proliferation-promoting factors CDK4,
D-type cyclins, E2F, and cMyc, whereas in SAOS2 cells, it enhances the
expression of the CDIs p21 and p27Kip1 (hereafter referred
to as p27) (77).
To elucidate the transcriptional mechanisms that determine the choice
between the cytostatic and cytotoxic pathways initiated by GR, we
generated U2OS and SAOS2 cell lines stably expressing GR mutants that
uncouple receptor-dependent transcriptional activation from repression.
We examined whether cells were undergoing PCD and assessed the
expression of a variety of apoptosis-related gene products in both cell
types. Using genetic and pharmacological approaches, we analyzed
glucocorticoid induction of p21 and p27 and found that multiple
mechanisms of GR transcriptional activation govern cell cycle arrest in
SAOS2 cells. We demonstrate that enhanced expression of both p21 and
p27, but not either one alone, is necessary to effect GR-mediated cell
cycle arrest. Our findings reveal distinct, previously unexpected modes
of transcriptional activation involved in CDI induction and the
cytostatic effect of glucocorticoids, while the cytotoxic effect of GR
is a function of transcriptional repression. Understanding the
transcriptional regulatory mechanisms triggering the cytotoxic versus
cytostatic effects of GR may ultimately lead to the identification of
novel therapies for cancers that exploit the cytotoxic action of glucocorticoids.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell lines and treatments.
Human osteosarcoma cell lines
U2OS and SAOS2 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection
(ATCC HTB no. 96 and 85, respectively) and maintained in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle medium (DMEM) (Gibco BRL, Grand Island, N.Y.)
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (HyClone Laboratories,
Inc., Logan, Utah), 50 Units each of penicillin and streptomycin per ml
(Gibco BRL), and 2 mM L-glutamine (Gibco BRL). Generation
of U2OS and SAOS2 clones expressing the full length wt rat GR
[U2OS-GR(+) and SAO2-GR(+) cells] and of control GR-negative clones
has been previously described (77). To generate cell lines
ectopically expressing GR derivatives, 50% confluent U2OS and SAOS2
cells were transfected with pCMV-30iiB, pCMV-LS7, or pCMV-dim
expression vectors (15 µg of DNA per 100-mm-diameter dish) by the
calcium phosphate precipitation method. Stable transformants were
selected by culturing transfected cells in the presence of 1 mg of
Geneticin (G418) (Gibco BRL; 70% active compound) per ml for 2 months
and were further maintained in 10% FBS-DMEM supplemented with 500 µg of G418 per ml. The expression of the GR derivatives in selected clones was verified by immunoblotting with GR-specific antibodies (see
"Western blotting" below). Based on the results of indirect immunofluorescence with GR-specific antibodies, only clones
homogeneously expressing GR were selected for the experiments. To
examine the effects of GR activation on cell proliferation, cell death,
protein expression, and steady-state mRNA levels, cells were cultured in 10% FBS-DMEM supplemented with 100 nM dexamethasone (Dex) (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) (dissolved in 100% ethanol), 100 nM RU 486 (dissolved in 100% ethanol), 100 nM ZK 299 (dissolved in 100% ethanol), or an
equal volume of 100% ethanol for the indicated times.
Plasmids and cDNAs.
The 30iiB (E219K/F220L/W234R)
(43), LS7 (P493R/A494S) (31), and
dimerization-deficient (R479D/D481R) (56) mutants of the
full-length rat GR were individually subcloned into the
BamHI site of the pCMV-Neor expression vector.
For transient transfections, an XG46TL reporter plasmid,
containing two consensus GREs upstream of the thymidine kinase promoter
(position
109) linked to a luciferase gene was used to assay GR
transcriptional activity. An XAP1TL reporter plasmid, containing a
single AP-1 binding site upstream of the thymidine kinase promoter
fused to a luciferase gene, was used to assay transcriptional
repression. The pCMV-LacZ plasmid produced
-galactosidase (
-Gal).
For the labeling reaction in Northern blot analysis, full-length human
p21Cip1 cDNA was excised from the Bluescript (pBS)
XhoI site.
Cell proliferation assays.
U2OS and SAOS2 cell lines
ectopically expressing wt GR or receptor substitution derivatives were
seeded into six-well plates (15,000 and 20,000 cells/well,
respectively) on day 0 and cultured in the presence of ethanol vehicle,
100 nM Dex, or 100 nM RU 486 (see "Cell lines and treatments"
above). On the indicated days, cells were trypsinized, resuspended in
DMEM, stained by the trypan blue exclusion method, and counted with a hemocytometer.
Assay for PCD.
Coverslips were placed in 24-well plates,
precoated with 0.5 ml of 0.1-mg/ml poly-D-lysine
(Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals, Indianapolis, Ind.) in
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 5 min, and washed once with PBS.
U2OS and SAOS2 GR-expressing cells were seeded onto coverslips;
cultured in the absence or presence of 100 nM Dex for 24, 48, or
72 h; washed five times with PBS; and fixed in 4%
paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min at room temperature. Cells were then
permeabilized by incubation with 0.2% Triton X-100 (Bio-Rad
Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.) in PBS and subjected to terminal
deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL)
assay (Promega Corporation, Madison, Wis.) as per the manufacturer's
instructions. Coverslips were mounted onto Citifluor (Ted Pella,
Redding, Calif.), and cells were visualized and photographed under a
fluorescence microscope with a standard fluorescein filter set at a
wavelength of 520 nm to view incorporated fluorescein-12-dUTP and at a
wavelength of 620 nm to view red propidium iodide staining.
Transient transfections and reporter activity assays.
U2OS-GR(+) cells were plated on 60-mm-diameter dishes in DMEM-10%
FBS. One hour prior to transfection, cells were refed with fresh medium
and transfected with the indicated plasmids via the calcium phosphate
precipitation method. Five hours later, cells were washed three times
with prewarmed PBS to remove calcium phosphate precipitates, allowed to
recover for 3 h in DMEM-10% FBS, and incubated with fresh medium
containing 100 nM Dex or 100 nM RU 486, where indicated, for an
additional 12 h.
Transfected cells were washed twice in PBS and harvested in 1×
Reporter Lysis Buffer (Promega). Luciferase activity was quantified in
a reaction mixture containing 25 mM glycylglycine (pH 7.8), 15 mM
MgSO4, 1 mM ATP, 0.1 mg of bovine serum albumin per ml, and
1 mM dithiothreitol. A Lumat LB 9507 luminometer (EG&G Berthold) was
used with 1 mM D-luciferin (Analytical Luminescence
Laboratory) as the substrate. Lysates were additionally assayed for
-Gal activity as described elsewhere (2).
Western blotting.
To analyze changes in protein expression,
U2OS and SAOS2 cells were treated for 3 days as described above,
harvested in PBS, and lysed in 25 to 100 µl of the lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 10% glycerol,
1% Triton X-100, 1 mM NaF, 25 µM ZnCl2) supplemented
with protease inhibitors (1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [Sigma]
and 1 µg each of aprotinin, pepstatin A, and leupeptin [Boehringer
Mannheim Biochemicals, Indianapolis, Ind] per ml) for 15 min on ice.
Cell lysates were clarified by centrifugation (10,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C), the total protein concentration was
adjusted with the lysis buffer, and samples were boiled in an equal
volume of 2× sodium dodecyl sulfate sample buffer. For Western
blotting, protein extracts were separated by Tris-glycine-4 to 20%
gradient polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Novex, San Diego, Calif.),
transferred to Immobilon paper (Millipore Corp., Bedford, Mass.), and
probed with mouse monoclonal antibodies against GR (BuGR2)
(29), Bcl2 (B46620), TIAR (T33520), ICH-1L (I29120), Fas
ligand (F37720), p27Kip1 (K25020), p21Cip1
(C24420), and CAS (42920) (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, Ky.)
or rabbit polyclonal antisera against ERK (sc-4024; Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, Calif.) and CDK4 (06-139; Upstate
Biotechnology Inc., Lake Placid, N.Y.). The blots were developed by
using either alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibodies
(Bio-Rad Laboratories) followed by the addition of the
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoyl phosphate-Nitro Blue Tetrazolium phosphatase
substrate (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Inc., Gaithersburg, Md.) or
horseradish peroxidase-coupled goat anti-mouse (Transduction
Laboratories) or donkey anti-rabbit antibodies and the enhanced
chemiluminescence substrate (Amersham International plc, Amersham,
United Kingdom) as per the manufacturer's instructions.
Northern blotting.
Cells were cultured in 100-mm-diameter
dishes for various periods of time with appropriate treatments (see the
figure legends), the media were aspirated, and cells were lysed
directly on the dishes by adding 3 ml of Ultraspec RNA reagent (BIOTEXC
Laboratories, Inc., Houston, Tex.) per dish. Total RNA was isolated
from cell homogenates as per the manufacturer's instructions,
denatured at 65°C for 15 min, chilled on ice, and separated on a
1.2% agarose-6% formaldehyde denaturing gel (5 to 8 µg of
RNA/lane). Equivalent loading was verified by ethidium bromide staining
of rRNA. RNA was transferred to a Duralon membrane (Stratagene, La
Jolla, Calif.) as previously described (79), UV-cross-linked
to the membrane, and hybridized to a cDNA probe for p21 mRNA by using
QuikHyb hybridization mix (Stratagene) as per the manufacturer's
instructions. A cDNA fragment coding for p21 was labeled with
[
-32P]dCTP by using a RediPrime random priming
labeling kit (Amersham) as per the manufacturer's instructions. Blots
were washed and exposed to Kodak BioMax film for 2 to 24 h at
80°C for autoradiography.
 |
RESULTS |
Ectopic expression and activation of wt GR induces PCD in U2OS but
not SAOS2 human osteosarcoma cells.
Activation of the ectopically
expressed wt rat GR by the glucocorticoid Dex (Fig.
1) in U2OS and SAOS2 human osteosarcoma cells inhibits cell proliferation, inducing
G0/G1 cell cycle arrest and morphological
alterations in both cell lines (77). To examine whether the
effects of Dex were cytostatic or cytotoxic, we first addressed whether
cell growth arrest in either cell line was reversible after Dex is
withdrawn from the culture medium. Figure
2A (top panel) demonstrates that in
U2OS-GR(+) cells, 1 day of Dex treatment is sufficient to delay cell
proliferation, whereas longer treatment (2 to 3 days) causes
irreversible cell growth arrest. In contrast, SAOS2-GR(+) cells resume
cell division as soon as Dex is withdrawn, even after a 3-day course of
continuous Dex treatment (Fig. 2B, top panel). These results suggest
that a short-term exposure of U2OS-GR(+) cells to the GR agonist Dex
commits cells to irreversible cell cycle arrest, whereas inhibition of
SAOS2-GR(+) cell proliferation is dependent upon the continuous
presence of Dex in the medium.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Transcriptional regulatory responses of GR derivatives
and ligands. Rat GR derivatives ectopically expressed in U2OS and SAOS2
cells are shown. The GR DBD, LBD, and N-terminal and C-terminal
transcriptional activation functions (AF-1 and AF-2, respectively) are
indicated. The GR 4C1 mutant lacks amino acids 70 to 300. The 30iiB
mutant contains three amino acid substitutions in AF-1 (E219K, F220L,
and W234R). The LS7 mutant contains two point mutations, P493R and
A494S, in the second zinc finger of the GR DBD. The dimer (dim) mutant
contains two mutations, R479D and D481R, which disrupt the GR
dimerization interface. The locations of the point mutations are shown
with stars. The ability of each derivative to activate and repress
transcription is summarized based on previously published studies (see
text for references); +, , and +/ represent a transcriptionally
competent, a transcriptionally inactive, or a context-dependent
phenotype, respectively. A question mark indicates that the phenotype
has not been characterized. The transcriptional regulatory responses of
the wt GR bound by the full agonist Dex, the partial agonist RU 486 (RU), and the antagonist ZK 299 (ZK) are also shown.
|
|

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
GR activation induces apoptosis in U2OS but not SAOS2
cells. (Top panels) U2OS-GR(+) (A) and SAOS2-GR(+) (B) cells were
seeded on day 0 into six-well plates (15,000 and 25,000 cells/well,
respectively) in the presence of 100 nM Dex where indicated. Cells were
refed at 24 (1 day Dex), 48 (2 days Dex), or 72 (3 days Dex) h with
hormone-free medium. Nontreated and continuously (cont.) Dex-treated
cells were cultured in the absence or presence of Dex, respectively,
throughout the experiment. On the indicated days cells were
trypsinized, stained with trypan blue, and counted with a
hemocytometer. (Bottom panels) GR-expressing U2OS (A) and SAOS2 (B)
cells were cultured in the presence of 100 nM Dex for 24, 48, or
72 h and subjected to the TUNEL assay as described in Materials
and Methods. Fluorescence microscopy was performed with a standard
fluorescein filter set at a wavelength of 520 nm to view
fluorescein-12-dUTP incorporated into DNA nicks. Note multiple
apoptotic nuclei in U2OS-GR(+) cells treated with Dex for 24 h. No
apoptotic nuclear morphology was detected in SAOS2-GR(+) cells treated
with Dex for 24, 48 (shown), or 72 h.
|
|
Alternative outcomes of hormone-dependent cell growth inhibition
suggest that different pathways may underlie the antimitogenic
effects
of glucocorticoids in U2OS versus SAOS2 cells. To assess
whether these
cells underwent PCD, U2OS-GR(+) and SAOS2-GR(+)
cells were cultured in
the presence of 100 nM Dex for 0, 24, 48,
and 72 h and subjected
to TUNEL assays. Figure
2B (bottom panel)
illustrates that U2OS-GR(+)
cells undergo apoptosis upon Dex treatment
(up to 30% of cells at
48 h). In contrast, no apoptotic nuclear
morphology was observed
in SAOS2-GR(+) cells (Fig.
2B, bottom
panel). Thus, GR activation in
U2OS but not SAOS2 cells induces
apoptosis.
GR activation in U2OS but not SAOS2 cells results in reduced
expression of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl2.
Since U2OS-GR(+) but
not SAOS2-GR(+) cells undergo apoptosis in response to GR activation,
we compared the expression of proapoptotic and antiapoptotic proteins
that may be differentially regulated in the two cell lines. U2OS-GR(+)
and GR-negative U2OS cells were cultured in the presence or absence of
Dex for 48 h, and the expression of apoptosis-related gene
products was examined by immunoblotting. Figure
3A demonstrates that Dex treatment
results in reduced expression of the antiapoptotic factor Bcl2 and a
cellular apoptosis susceptibility protein (CAS) (9), whereas
the levels of several other apoptosis-associated proteins, such as
cytotoxic TIA-1-related protein (47), FAS ligand, and
caspase 2 (ICH-1L) protease (94) were not altered (Fig. 3C).
We have also observed a slight decrease in the concentration of another
Bcl2 family member, BclXL, in U2OS-GR(+) cells (data not
shown). Interestingly, in SAOS2-GR(+) cells, in which Bcl2 expression
was not affected by Dex treatment, the expression of CAS was reduced
(Fig. 3B). Since SAOS2 cells do not undergo PCD upon GR activation,
decreased CAS expression is apparently not sufficient for apoptosis to
occur. Previous studies have indicated that CAS expression closely
correlates with cell proliferative potential: CAS protein is highly
expressed in actively dividing cells in vivo and in transformed cancer
cell lines, whereas in nondividing cells the expression is low
(10, 97). Consistent with these observations, GR-induced
cell cycle arrest results in a reduction of the CAS level in both cell
lines. We have therefore used CAS expression as a marker for cell
proliferation in our subsequent experiments. In contrast, reduced Bcl2
expression was specific to U2OS-GR(+) cells, suggesting that repression
of antiapoptotic factors may play a role in GR-induced PCD.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Expression of apoptosis-related proteins in U2OS-GR(+)
and SAOS2-GR(+) cells. U2OS (A and C) and SAOS2 (B) cells expressing wt
GR or receptor-deficient control (con) GR-negative cells were cultured
in the absence ( ) or presence (+) of 100 nM Dex for 2 days, and
whole-cell lysates were prepared (see Materials and Methods). Equal
amounts of total protein were resolved on a Tris-glycine-4 to 20%
gradient polyacrylamide gel, transferred to Immobilon paper, and probed
with antibodies against Bcl2, CAS, ERK, TIAR, ICH-1L, and Fas ligand.
Equal loading in each lane is demonstrated by probing with an anti-ERK
antibody. Each blot is representative of two or more independent
experiments.
|
|
The GR transcriptional activation-deficient mutants are competent
for cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in U2OS cells.
To further
elucidate the mechanisms of GR-induced apoptosis in U2OS cells, we
sought to uncouple receptor-mediated transcriptional activation from
transcriptional repression by utilizing several receptor mutants and
ligands. Two GR derivatives that could potentially uncouple activation
from repression were individually introduced into U2OS cells (see
Materials and Methods). The first mutant, termed LS7, contains two
point mutations, P493R and A494S, in the second zinc finger of the GR
DBD (Fig. 1) and has previously been used to characterize receptor
functions responsible for executing glucocorticoid-mediated apoptosis
in human T cells (37). The mutant is competent for
transcriptional repression, whereas its ability to activate
transcription is impaired under conditions of overexpression (31,
52). The second mutant, termed dim (Fig. 1), contains a different
pair of mutated residues in the dimerization loop of the second zinc
finger in the GR DBD, R479D and D481R. wt R479 and D481 form
arginine-to-aspartate salt bridges between the GR monomers, thereby
stabilizing the dimer (56, 58). The R479D/D481R double
mutation reduces dimer formation and cooperative DNA binding at a
consensus single GRE, leading to a decrease in transcriptional
activation relative to that of the wt GR (57). The
mutant takes advantage of the fact that GR is recruited to simple
GREs as a homodimer, whereas at most GR-repressible elements the
receptor functions in its monomeric form. Therefore, partial disruption
of a dimerization interface by a point mutation(s) selectively reduces
transcriptional activation mediated by classical GREs but preserves
transcriptional repression (36, 38). On the basis of the
described phenotypes of the LS7 and dim mutants, we speculated that if
transcriptional repression by GR is indeed responsible for the cell
cycle arrest and apoptosis in U2OS cells, then both mutants should
function like the wt GR in this context.
Multiple clones expressing the LS7 and the dim mutants were generated
in U2OS cells (where both mutants are competent for
GR-mediated
transcriptional repression of an AP-1-responsive reporter
[data not
shown]) and assayed for their ability to proliferate
in the presence
of Dex along with a U2OS-GR(+) clone. Consistent
with our hypothesis,
U2OS-LS7 and U2OS-dim clones underwent hormone-dependent
inhibition of
cell proliferation similar to that in U2OS-GR(+)
cells (Fig.
4A). In addition, within 24 h of Dex
treatment, we
observed morphological alterations in cells expressing
the LS7
or the dim mutant identical to those induced by the wt GR in
U2OS
cells, and TUNEL analysis demonstrated Dex-dependent apoptosis
in
U2OS-LS7 and U2OS-dim cells (data not shown). The expression
of the
cell cycle regulatory proteins and cell death mediators
was assessed in
LS7- and dim-expressing cells and compared to
that in U2OS-GR(+) cells.
As demonstrated for the wt GR (Fig.
3A) (
77), both mutant
derivatives reduce the expression of CAS,
Bcl2, and CDK4 (Fig.
4B and
C), further suggesting that transcriptional
repression of survival
factors by the LS7 or dimerization-deficient
GR mutants is sufficient
to execute cell cycle arrest and apoptosis
in U2OS cells.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
The GR LS7 and dimer mutants function like the wt GR in
U2OS cells. U2OS-LS7 and U2OS-dim clones were generated as described in
Materials and Methods. (A) The GR LS7 and dimerization mutants induce
cell cycle arrest in U2OS cells. U2OS-GR(+) (wt GR), U2OS-LS7 (LS7),
and U2OS-dim (dim) clones were seeded on day 0 into six-well plates in
duplicate and cultured in the absence or presence of 100 nM Dex as
indicated. The total numbers of viable cells were determined on days 2, 4, and 6 by the trypan blue exclusion method. The graph represents cell
counts on day 6. (B and C) The GR LS7 (B) and dim (C) mutants repress
the expression of CAS, Bcl2, and CDK4. U2OS cells expressing the wt GR
or the LS7 or dim mutant were cultured in the absence or presence of
100 nM Dex for 40 h and harvested, and the expression of CAS,
Bcl2, CDK4, and ERK was assessed by immunoblotting as described in
Materials and Methods. Similar results were obtained with at least
three independent clones expressing each GR mutant.
|
|
RU 486 functions as a GR agonist in U2OS-GR(+) cells.
We next
examined whether GR-mediated cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in U2OS
cells were agonist dependent or could also be induced by partial
agonists, such as RU 486 (Fig. 1). RU 486-bound GR translocates to the
nucleus and binds DNA but does not efficiently activate transcription,
whereas its ability to repress transcription is retained in certain
cell type and promoter contexts (35, 53, 55). We asked
whether RU 486 acts as a GR antagonist or as a partial agonist with
respect to the receptor's cell growth-inhibitory properties in
U2OS-GR(+) cells. Interestingly, RU 486 treatment inhibited cell cycle
progression in U2OS-GR(+) cells (Fig. 5A) and induced changes in cell morphology similar to those triggered by
Dex (data not shown). The cell survival marker Bcl2 was repressed in an
RU 486-dependent fashion (Fig. 5B), suggesting that in U2OS-GR(+) cells, this ligand behaves like the GR agonist Dex. In contrast, in the
presence of a pure antagonist, ZK 299 (Fig. 1), GR did not inhibit cell
proliferation (data not shown) or repress Bcl2 (Fig. 5C). Furthermore,
ZK 299 was able to partially counteract the repressive effect of Dex on
Bcl2 expression when both ligands were added to U2OS-GR(+) cells
simultaneously (data not shown). Thus, GR-mediated growth arrest and
apoptosis in U2OS cells occur in the presence of a partial GR agonist,
RU 486, but not a pure antagonist, ZK 299. We then compared the effects
of Dex and RU 486 on GR-mediated transcriptional activation and
repression of transiently introduced GR-inducible and GR-repressible
reporter plasmids in the context of U2OS cells. We found that Dex and
RU 486 differ markedly in their ability to support GR transcriptional activation, with Dex eliciting a 217-fold induction of the
GR-responsive reporter gene, while RU 486 treatment resulted in only a
9-fold induction (Fig. 5D). In contrast, GR-mediated transcriptional repression of the AP-1-responsive reporter gene by RU 486 and that by
Dex were virtually identical (Fig. 5E). These results further support
our hypothesis that GR-mediated transcriptional repression is the
likely mechanism governing receptor-induced apoptosis in U2OS-GR(+)
cells.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
RU 486 functions as a GR agonist in the context of
U2OS-GR(+) cells. (A) RU 486 inhibits proliferation of U2OS-GR(+)
cells. U2OS-GR(+) cells were seeded on day 0 into six-well plates
(15,000 cells/well) in duplicate and cultured in the presence of an
ethanol vehicle, 100 nM Dex, or 100 nM RU 486. The total number of
viable cells was determined on the indicated days. (B) Expression of
Bcl2 is repressed in both Dex-treated and RU 486-treated U2OS-GR(+)
cells. U2OS-GR(+) cells were cultured in the presence of an ethanol
vehicle, 100 nM Dex, or 100 nM RU 486 for 40 h, and expression of
Bcl2 and ERK in whole-cell extracts was examined by immunoblotting as
described in Materials and Methods. (C) ZK 299 is a pure GR antagonist
in U2OS cells. U2OS-GR(+) cells were cultured in the presence of an
ethanol vehicle, 100 nM Dex, or 100 nM ZK 299 for 40 h, and
expression of Bcl2 and ERK in whole-cell extracts was examined by
immunoblotting. (D) RU 486 is a weak agonist with respect to GR
transcriptional activation in U2OS-GR(+) cells. U2OS-GR(+) cells were
seeded in 6-cm-diameter dishes (120,000/dish) and transfected the
following day via the calcium phosphate precipitation method with an
XG46TL reporter plasmid (4 µg/dish) and a pCMV-LacZ
plasmid (0.75 µg/dish) as an internal control for transfection
efficiency. Transfected cells were treated with an ethanol vehicle
( ), 100 nM Dex, or 100 nM RU 486 (RU) for 12 h, and GR
transcriptional activation was assessed via luciferase assay,
normalized to -Gal activity, and expressed as relative luminescence
units (RLU). (E) RU 486 is a potent agonist with respect to GR-mediated
transcriptional repression in U2OS-GR(+) cells. Cells were transfected
with an XAP1TL reporter plasmid and a pCMV-LacZ plasmid, and GR
transcriptional repression was assessed as described for panel D.
|
|
Cell cycle arrest in SAOS2 cells is independent of transcriptional
activation by AF-1.
Our previous studies have suggested that the
integrity of the GR N terminus was essential for the GR-dependent cell
cycle arrest in SAOS2 cells, since deletion of amino acids 70 through 300 (the GR
4C1 mutant [Fig. 1]) abolished the receptor's
cytostatic activity and enhancement of p21 and p27 expression
(77). However, in addition to eliminating AF-1, this large
deletion likely disrupts GR's ability to interact with putative
cofactors necessary for cell cycle arrest in SAOS2 cells. To examine
whether transcriptional activation by the N-terminal AF-1 was required
for CDI induction and cell cycle arrest in SAOS2 cells, we sought to
specifically disrupt the function of AF-1 in the context of the
full-length GR. A GR mutant termed 30iiB (Fig. 1) containing three
amino acid substitutions (E219K, F220L, and W234R) (43) was
previously identified in a genetic screen for GR mutants with reduced
ability to activate transcription. While this mutant is competent for transcriptional repression, its ability to activate transcription through AF-1 is severely compromised in both yeast and mammalian cells
(43). We have generated multiple stable SAOS2-30iiB clones (see Materials and Methods), and those expressing the 30iiB mutant at
levels comparable to the level of the wt GR in SAOS2-GR(+) clones (Fig.
6B, top panel) were analyzed. To evaluate
the effects of the 30iiB mutant on cell proliferation, SAOS2-30iiB
cells were cultured in the presence or absence of Dex, and the total
number of viable cells was determined. Surprisingly, activation of the 30iiB mutant induced complete cell cycle arrest in SAOS2 cells (Fig.
6A). We have also observed the characteristic morphology of Dex-treated
SAOS2-30iiB cells, including a significant increase in size,
"fried-egg" shape, and vacuolization of the cytoplasm (data not
shown), an appearance originally described as "spreading" for
Rb-transfected SAOS2 cells (39, 88, 90) as well as
hormone-arrested SAOS2-GR(+) cells (77). Activation of both
the wt and the mutant receptors results in a decrease of GR protein
concentration (Fig. 6B), a process termed homologous down-regulation
(12, 66). Importantly, the 30iiB mutant induced both p27 and
p21 to levels comparable to those elicited by the wt GR (Fig. 6B); the
magnitude and kinetics of the p21 mRNA induction by the wt GR and the
30iiB mutant were indistinguishable (Fig. 6C). Thus, the presence of the GR N terminus, but not transcriptional activation by AF-1 per
se, is required for the cell cycle arrest and enhanced expression of CDIs in SAOS2 cells. These findings indicate that additional GR
transcriptional regulatory functions are operating to enhance p21 and
p27 expression.

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Transcriptional activation by the GR AF-1 is dispensable
for cell cycle arrest in SAOS2 cells. (A) The GR 30iiB mutant induces
complete cell cycle arrest in SAOS2 cells. SAOS2-30iiB stable
transformants were generated as described in Materials and Methods.
SAOS2-30iiB clones were seeded on day 0 into six-well plates (20,000 cells/well) and cultured in the absence or presence of 100 nM Dex.
Total numbers of viable cells were determined on the indicated days by
using the trypan blue exclusion method. (B) Induction of p21 and p27 by
the GR 30iiB mutant. SAOS2-GR(+) (wt GR) and SAOS2-30iiB (30iiB) cells
were cultured in the presence of 100 nM Dex or ethanol vehicle for 3 days, and whole-cell extracts were prepared and subjected to
immunoblotting for GR, p27, p21, and ERK. Note the induction of p21 and
p27 by both the wt GR and the 30iiB mutant. (C) Time course of p21 mRNA
induction. SAOS2-GR(+) (wt GR) and SAOS2-30iiB (30iiB) cells were
treated with 100 nM Dex for 0, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min, and total RNA
was isolated and subjected to Northern blot analysis with a
32P-labeled p21 cDNA probe (top panels). Equal loading in
each lane is demonstrated by ethidium bromide staining of the 28S rRNA
(bottom panels).
|
|
The GR LS7 mutant is competent for cell cycle arrest and induction
of CDIs in SAOS2 cells.
Since functional AF-1 appeared to be
dispensable for GR-mediated cell cycle arrest and the induction of CDIs
in SAOS2 cells, we examined whether GR transcriptional activation in
general is required for these responses. We first employed the GR LS7
mutant (Fig. 1), whose transcriptional activation is reportedly similar to the activity of the wt GR at low levels of receptor expression; however, under conditions of overexpression, LS7 exhibits a
transactivation-deficient phenotype due to self-squelching
(52). Thus, in the context of stable expression in SAOS2
cells, where the level of ectopically expressed receptor is similar to
physiological levels of endogenous GR in mammalian cells, we expected
the mutant to induce the expression of CDIs and cell cycle arrest as
does the wt GR in SAOS2-GR(+) cells.
The LS7 mutant was stably introduced into SAOS2 cells (see Materials
and Methods), and its expression was demonstrated by
immunoblotting
(Fig.
7B, top panel) and indirect
immunofluorescence
(data not shown). The LS7 mutant was competent for
inhibiting
cell proliferation, down-regulating its own expression, or
inducing
p21 and p27 expression (Fig.
7A and B) and "fried-egg"
morphology
(data not shown). Figure
7C demonstrates similar levels of
p21
mRNA induction by both the wt GR and the activated LS7 mutant
within 2.5 h of Dex treatment. Thus, unlike LS7 stably introduced
into Jurkat T cells which exhibited reduced transcriptional activation
from a transiently transfected reporter construct (
37), in
the
context of SAOS2 cells, the LS7 mutant does not display the
self-squelching
phenotype and is competent for activating endogenous
promoters,
thereby acting like the wt GR.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
The GR LS7 mutant functions like the wt GR when stably
expressed in SAOS2 cells. (A) Inhibition of SAOS2 cell proliferation by
the GR LS7 mutant. Multiple SAOS2-LS7 clones were generated as
described in Materials and Methods. SAOS2-LS7 cells were seeded on day
0 into six-well plates (20,000 cells/well) and cultured in the absence
or presence of 100 nM Dex. Total numbers of viable cells were
determined on the indicated days by using the trypan blue exclusion
method. Similar cell growth kinetics were observed in three independent
LS7-expressing clones. (B) The GR LS7 mutant induces the expression of
p21 and p27 proteins. SAOS2-GR(+) (wt GR), SAOS2-LS7 (LS7), and
GR-negative SAOS2 (con) cells were cultured in the presence of 100 nM
Dex or ethanol vehicle for 3 days, and whole-cell extracts were
prepared and subjected to immunoblotting for GR, p27, p21, and ERK.
Note the increase in p21 and p27 protein in the wt GR- and
LS7-expressing cells but not in the GR-deficient control cells. (C)
Induction of the steady-state p21 mRNA level by the GR LS7 mutant.
SAOS2-GR(+) (wt GR) and SAOS2-LS7 (LS7) cells were treated with 100 nM
Dex for 2 h 30 min where indicated, and total RNA was isolated and
hybridized to a 32P-labeled p21 cDNA probe (top panel).
Equal loading in each lane is demonstrated by ethidium bromide staining
of the 28S rRNA (bottom panel).
|
|
Differential regulation of p21 and p27 in SAOS2 cells as revealed
by the GR dimerization-deficient mutant.
Since the LS7 mutant
failed to uncouple transcriptional activation from repression in SAOS2
cells, we utilized the repression-competent dimerization-deficient
mutant (dim [Fig. 1]). We reasoned that if the induction of p21
and/or p27 in SAOS2 cells is mediated by GR transcriptional activation
through a classical GRE, the dimerization mutant may fail to induce
their expression and halt cell cycle progression. The GR dim mutant was
therefore stably introduced into SAOS2 cells, and its ability to elicit
cell cycle arrest was examined. Interestingly, dim-expressing cells
underwent inhibition of cell proliferation but failed to arrest
completely [Fig. 8A; compare 96% growth
inhibition in SAOS2-GR(+) cells to 76% inhibition in SAOS2-dim cells
at day 9], a finding obtained for multiple independent clones. Thus,
the phenotypic consequences of the dim activation with respect to the
cell growth kinetics were reproducibly milder than those induced by the
wt GR or the 30iiB mutant. These results did not reflect a
heterogeneity of receptor expression within the population, since based
on the results of indirect immunofluorescence with GR-specific
monoclonal antibodies, only the clones homogeneously expressing GR
(over 95%) were selected for the experiments (data not shown).
Furthermore, the expression levels of the dim mutant and the wt GR were
similar (Fig. 8B), suggesting that the inability of the dimerization
mutant to cause the cell cycle arrest is not a function of reduced
expression of the mutant receptor per cell. Since p21 and p27 appeared
to be important mediators of GR-dependent cell growth arrest in SAOS2 cells, we analyzed the possible changes in CDI expression triggered by
the hormone-activated dim mutant compared to the wt GR. Strikingly, the
mutant receptor was fully competent for inducing the expression of p21,
whereas p27 induction was abolished (Fig. 8B). The magnitudes of the
p21 mRNA increases displayed by the dim mutant and the wt GR were
identical (Fig. 8C). To eliminate the possible variability between the
individual clones, we have screened 20 independent lines stably
expressing the dim mutant and found that in all cases the
dimerization-deficient mutant enhanced expression of p21; in contrast,
virtually no increase in p27 expression was detected (data not shown).
Thus, the R479D/D481R (dim) mutation effectively uncouples induction of
p21 from that of p27 in SAOS2 cells, suggesting that (i) enhanced
expression of p21 is likely necessary but not sufficient for complete
cell cycle arrest, (ii) alterations of cellular morphology correlate
with p21 activation, and (iii) induction of p27, but not p21, is
dependent on the intact GR dimerization interface.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Dissociation of p21 induction from p27 induction in
SAOS2 cells through the GR dimerization mutant. (A) Inhibition of cell
proliferation by the GR dimerization-deficient mutant. SAOS2 clones
stably expressing the GR dim mutant were generated as described in
Materials and Methods. SAOS2-GR(+) and SAOS2-dim cells were seeded on
day 0 into six-well plates (20,000 cells/well) and cultured in the
absence or presence of 100 nM Dex. Total numbers of viable cells were
determined on the indicated days. Note incomplete inhibition of cell
proliferation by the dim mutant compared to the wt GR-expressing clone.
Quantitation of cell counts reveals 76% growth inhibition for the dim
mutant and 96% for the wt GR. Identical growth kinetics were
demonstrated for three independent clones expressing the GR dim mutant.
(B) Induction of p21 but not p27 expression by the dim mutant. SAOS2
cells expressing the wt GR or the dimerization-deficient mutant were
cultured in the presence or absence of 100 nM Dex for 3 days, and
whole-cell extracts were prepared and subjected to immunoblotting for
GR, p27, p21, and ERK. Note the increase in p21 but not p27 protein in
the dim-expressing cells. (C) Induction of the steady-state p21 mRNA
level by the dim mutant. Hormone treatment, RNA isolation, and Northern
hybridization were performed exactly as described for Fig. 7C. Potent
Dex-dependent induction of p21 mRNA is observed in both SAOS2-GR(+) (wt
GR) and SAOS2-dim (dim) cells.
|
|
RU 486 uncouples enhanced expression of p27 from the
transcriptional induction of p21 in SAOS2 GR-expressing cells.
Our
data on the GR domains responsible for cell cycle arrest in SAOS2 cells
suggested that although the presence of the receptor N terminus is
essential for cell cycle arrest and CDI induction, transcriptional
activation by AF-1 is not required for either. To evaluate the
importance of the receptor C-terminal transcriptional regulatory
function (AF-2) for the cell cycle arrest and enhanced expression of
the CDIs, we used a pharmacological approach and employed RU 486, which
prevents the productive interaction of the steroid receptor LBD with
the coactivator protein(s) necessary for transcriptional activation via
AF-2 (40, 98). SAOS2-GR(+) cells were cultured in the
presence of an ethanol vehicle, Dex, or RU 486, and cell growth
kinetics in each condition were assessed in a cell proliferation assay.
Interestingly, RU 486 inhibited cell proliferation by only 69% at day
9, compared to 98% inhibition observed in the presence of Dex (Fig.
9A). Consistent with the results of the
cell proliferation studies, ligand-dependent reduction of GR expression
and down-regulation of CAS were still evident in RU 486-treated cells,
but to a lesser extent than in Dex-treated SAOS2-GR(+) cells (Fig. 9B).
Importantly, RU 486-activated GR enhanced the expression of p27 as did
the Dex-activated receptor (Fig. 9B) but failed to efficiently induce
p21 at either the protein (data not shown) or mRNA (Fig. 9C, left
panel) level. Thus, a rapid increase of steady-state p21 mRNA observed
in Dex-treated SAOS2-GR(+) cells was substantially reduced when RU 486 was used as a GR ligand. Furthermore, the receptor LS7 mutant, which
mimicked the wt GR with respect to its potency to enhance the
expression of CDIs in the presence of Dex, also retained its ability to
induce p27 (data not shown), but not p21, when activated with RU 486 (Fig. 9C, right panel). Thus, RU 486 uncoupled p21 induction from p27
induction in the context of both the wt and LS7 GR DBDs, suggesting that the receptor AF-2 and association with coactivator proteins are
required for enhanced expression of p21, but not p27. These results
further emphasize the differences between the regulation of the two CDK
inhibitors: the dimerization mutant was competent for p21 but not p27
induction, whereas wt GR (and LS7) with an antagonist-disabled AF-2
could enhance p27 but not p21 expression.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
Induction of CDI expression by the wt GR in SAOS2 cells
is uncoupled by RU 486. (A) Differential effects of GR ligands on the
proliferation of SAOS2-GR(+) cells. SAOS2-GR(+) cells were seeded on
day 0 into six-well plates (20,000 cells/well) in duplicate and
cultured in the presence of an ethanol vehicle, 100 nM Dex, or 100 nM
RU 486. Total numbers of viable cells were determined on the indicated
days. Note 69% inhibition of cell proliferation in the presence of RU
486, compared to 98% observed in the presence of Dex. (B) Alterations
in protein expression induced by RU 486 in SAOS2-GR(+) cells.
SAOS2-GR(+) cells were cultured in the presence of an ethanol vehicle,
100 nM Dex, or 100 nM RU 486 for 3 days, and expression of GR, CAS,
p27, Bcl2, and ERK in whole-cell extracts was examined by
immunoblotting. Note that comparatively mild repression of GR and CAS
is observed in the presence of RU 486, whereas p27 induction is
retained whether GR is activated with Dex or RU 486. Similar results
were obtained with RU 486 concentrations of 500 nM and 1 µM (data not
shown). (C) RU 486-activated wt GR or LS7 mutant fails to efficiently
induce p21 mRNA expression in SAOS2 cells. SAOS2-GR(+) (wt GR) and
SAOS2-LS7 (LS7) cells were treated with an ethanol vehicle, 100 nM Dex,
or 100 nM RU 486 for 2 h 30 min, and total RNA was isolated and
subjected to Northern hybridization with a 32P-labeled p21
cDNA probe (top panels). Equal loading in each lane is demonstrated by
ethidium bromide staining of 28S rRNA (bottom panels). The results of
autoradiography were quantitated by spot densitometry. The
densitometric value obtained for mock-treated SAOS2-GR(+) or SAOS2-LS7
cells was arbitrarily set as 1×.
|
|
RU 486 loses partial agonist activity in the context of the
dimerization-deficient GR mutant.
Since inhibition of cell
proliferation by RU 486 in SAOS2 GR-expressing cells occurred primarily
through enhanced expression of p27, we speculated that the GR
dimerization-deficient mutant, which has lost the ability to induce
p27, will not display cytostatic activity in RU 486-treated SAOS2
cells. To test this hypothesis, the SAOS2-dim cells were cultured in
the presence of ethanol vehicle, Dex, or RU 486, and the total number
of viable cells was determined. Figure
10A demonstrates that Dex treatment of
the SAOS2-dim cells inhibited cell proliferation compared to that of
their vehicle-treated counterparts (also shown in Fig. 8A), whereas
little growth inhibition was observed in the presence of RU 486. These
results differed dramatically from the strong antiproliferative effect
of this ligand on the SAOS2-GR(+) cells (69% in Fig. 9A). Consistent
with the lack of growth inhibition of the dim-expressing cells by RU 486, no morphological alterations were visible in these cells, although
spreading was readily detectable in their Dex-treated counterparts
(data not shown). To confirm that the dimerization mutant in the
presence of RU 486 was unable to induce either p21 or p27 expression,
protein and mRNA blots were performed on SAOS2-dim cells treated with
an ethanol vehicle, Dex, or RU 486. As shown in Fig. 10B, the protein
concentrations of p27, CAS, and GR in RU 486-treated cells are
identical to those in vehicle-treated controls. Similarly, the
steady-state level of p21 mRNA was strongly induced by the dim mutant
in the presence of Dex but not RU 486 (Fig. 10C). Thus, abolishing
GR's ability to induce (i) p27, through specific mutations in the GR
dimerization interface, and (ii) p21, through pharmacological
manipulation by using a ligand with only partial agonist activity,
virtually eliminates GR's ability to induce cell cycle arrest in SAOS2
cells.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 10.
RU 486 loses partial agonist activity in the context of
the GR dimerization-deficient mutant. (A) The GR dim mutant does not
affect cell proliferation in the presence of RU 486. SAOS2-dim cells
were seeded on day 0 into six-well plates (20,000 cells/well) in
duplicate and cultured in the presence of an ethanol vehicle, 100 nM
Dex, or 100 nM RU 486. Total numbers of viable cells were determined on
the indicated days. (B) The RU 486-activated GR dimerization-deficient
mutant fails to alter the expression of GR, CAS, or p27. SAOS2-dim
cells were cultured in the presence of an ethanol vehicle, 100 nM Dex,
or 100 nM RU 486 for 3 days, and expression of GR, CAS, p27, and ERK in
the whole-cell extracts was examined by immunoblotting. (C) The RU
486-activated dimer mutant does not induce the steady-state level of
p21 mRNA. SAOS2-dim cells were treated with an ethanol vehicle, 100 nM
Dex, or 100 nM RU 486 for 2 h 30 min, and total RNA was isolated
and hybridized to a 32P-labeled p21 cDNA probe (top panel).
Equal loading into each lane is demonstrated by ethidium bromide
staining of 28S rRNA (bottom panel).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this report we demonstrate that the cytostatic
versus cytotoxic outcome of GR-mediated growth inhibition is
cell type dependent. GR activation in U2OS cells is irreversible and
results in apoptosis and the down-regulation of antiapoptotic proteins,
including Bcl2. This cytotoxic effect in U2OS cells is mediated by
GR's repression function, since transactivation-deficient mutants and
ligands also elicit apoptosis. In contrast, GR-mediated cell cycle
arrest in SAOS2 cells is reversible and does not result in apoptosis or
repression of Bcl2. This cytostatic effect of GR in SAOS2 cells is a
function of the receptor's ability to stimulate transcription of the
CDIs p21 and p27, which involves multiple GR transcriptional activation mechanisms.
Why is GR-mediated apoptosis cell type specific?
GR has been
previously shown to cause cell death in developing thymocytes,
lymphocytes, and a variety of cultured cell lines (18, 54);
however, little is known about the molecular mechanisms linking the
activated receptor to the cell death program. Several studies have
demonstrated that the inhibition of specific caspases, the
downstream-most effectors of apoptosis, or ICE-like cysteine proteases,
which are activated at earlier stages of the apoptotic pathway,
prevents Dex-dependent cell death (15, 34, 42). Overexpression of Bcl2, which rescues thymocytes from apoptosis, prevents activation of certain caspases but not ICE-like proteases (34), suggesting that the Dex-dependent cell death cascade
can be interrupted by Bcl2 overexpression only at early stages, before effector caspase activation occurs. It is not clear which proteases are
activated in the course of GR-induced apoptosis. Recent studies demonstrate that thymocytes isolated from caspase 9-deficient mice are
resistant to glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis but not to apoptosis
caused by UV irradiation or Fas and CD3 activation (32, 50).
In contrast, T cells depleted of caspase 3 remain Dex sensitive
(51) but acquire resistance to the effects of Fas and CD3
activation. These results suggest that in the context of the whole
animal, caspase proteases are not redundant and likely perform unique
functions which cannot be compensated for by other family members.
Perhaps, at a specific step of the apoptotic pathway, activated GR uses
caspase 9 as an effector, and this step cannot be bypassed by other
proteases. We demonstrate that the expression of ICH-1L (caspase 2) is
not altered in U2OS-GR(+) cells undergoing PCD compared to the
untreated control cells, consistent with previous findings for
glucocorticoid-sensitive lymphocytes. Furthermore, since the levels of
Bcl2 were reduced in Dex-treated U2OS cells expressing either the wt
GR, LS7, or the dimerization mutant, the same general mechanism appears
to operate to induce apoptosis in human glucocorticoid-sensitive T
cells and human osteosarcoma cells expressing GR. It would be
interesting to examine whether specific inhibition of caspase 9 in U2OS
cells prevents GR-dependent cell death. Interestingly, the intact GR
transcriptional repression function was found to be sufficient for
inducing PCD in human lymphocytes (37, 45). In contrast,
thymocytes isolated from transgenic mice homozygous for
dimerization-deficient GR are glucocorticoid resistant (74),
suggesting that receptor dimerization and transcriptional activation
through palindromic GREs are necessary for GR-mediated PCD in these
cells. This paradigm emphasizes species-specific and, perhaps,
developmental differences responsible for the distinct GR functions
required for executing the cell death program in human lymphocytes
versus developing murine thymocytes. Alternatively, the LS7
mutant used by Helmberg et al. (37) may not have uncoupled activation from repression.
It is unclear which factors determine the susceptibility of individual
cell types to GR-mediated apoptosis. It has been previously
reported
that forced expression of p21 protects developing myocytes
from
apoptosis (
93), and this protective effect is abrogated
in
cells lacking functional Rb protein (
92). Our data, however,
argue that even in the absence of enhanced p21 expression [for
example, when the growth of SAOS2-GR(+) cells is inhibited by
RU 486],
they do not undergo apoptosis but rather retain some
ability to
proliferate (Fig.
9). This suggests that in the context
of SAOS2 cells,
p21 functions as a cell cycle inhibitor but not
as a survival factor.
Clearly, in Rb-negative SAOS2 cells, the
cell death program is
regulated differently from that in mitogen-deprived
myocytes.
Enhanced expression of p21 and p27 in response to GR activation is
accomplished through distinct surfaces.
It has previously been
demonstrated that the GR-mediated cell cycle arrest in SAOS2 human
osteosarcoma cells, rat hepatoma cells, murine fibroblasts, and
lymphocytes involves the induction of p21 (13, 72, 77). In
some but not all of these cell lines, enhanced expression of p27 has
also been observed. In addition, several studies emphasize that
increased levels of p27 frequently reflect reduced degradation of the
p27 protein via the ubiquitination pathway rather than enhanced
expression of the p27 gene (3, 69). In SAOS2-GR(+) cells, we
observe a reproducible increase of the level of p27 mRNA in response to
Dex treatment, suggesting that enhanced transcription is at least in
part responsible for the p27 induction in this cell line.
Interestingly, however, this increase is not detectable until after
24 h of continuous Dex treatment (data not shown), whereas
induction of the p21 mRNA peaks at 2 h of Dex treatment
(77). Such rapid kinetics of p21 induction, combined with
the insensitivity of this effect to inhibitors of protein synthesis
(e.g., cycloheximide), argue that the p21 promoter is under
the direct transcriptional control of GR despite the lack of a
consensus GRE. In contrast, the enhanced transcription of p27 likely
involves one or more intermediates transducing the glucocorticoid
signal from GR to the p27 promoter.
Consistent with the different kinetics of p21 and p27 mRNA induction,
different GR transcriptional activation functions appear
to be
responsible for the enhanced expression of these two CDIs.
The GR 30iiB
mutant with a transcriptionally inactive AF-1 is
competent for
increasing the expression of both p21 and p27 (Fig.
11A, 30iiB+Dex) to the level induced by
the wt GR. Thus, despite
the fact that the presence of the GR N
terminus is required for
cell cycle arrest and increased expression of
CDIs (Fig.
11A,

4C1+Dex),
AF-1 function is not required for
transcriptional induction of
either promoter. This unexpected finding
suggests that increased
CDI expression is accomplished either through
transcriptional
activation by AF-2 or by an as-yet-unidentified GR
transcriptional
regulatory domain(s) which, directly in the case of p21
or through
an intermediary protein in the case of p27, enhances
transcription
from the p21 and p27 promoters. Supporting this idea,
inactivation
of AF-2 by RU 486 largely abolished the induction of p21
(Fig.
11A, wt+RU 486). Interestingly, the GR dimerization-deficient
mutant,
which fails to activate transcription from single consensus
GRE-containing
promoters, was competent for inducing the expression of
p21 (Fig.
11A, dim+Dex). Thus, transcriptional induction of p21 is
likely
mediated by AF-2 in a dimerization-independent manner and is
unlikely
to be driven by a single canonical GRE. Consistent with this
idea,
the p21 promoter lacks a full consensus GRE but contains several
half-GRE-like sequences, which could potentially serve as a platform
for a GR-containing protein complex. The mapping of the p21 promoter
in
hepatoma cells revealed four GR-responsive regions located
between bp

1481 and

1184 from the transcription start site (
13),
one of which corresponds to a C/EBP

binding site whereas the
others
contain no known regulatory elements. Since the level of
C/EBP

is
not altered in hormone-treated SAOS2-GR(+) cells (data
not shown), it
is likely that another element(s) is responsible
for transcriptional
induction of p21 in this cell context.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 11.
Regulation of p21 and p27 in SAOS2 cells by different
GR derivatives. (A) Effects of GR derivatives on p21 and p27
expression. The GR domains and receptor derivatives stably introduced
into SAOS2 cells are described in Fig. 1. The ability of GR derivatives
to induce p21 and p27 expression and to effect growth inhibition in
SAOS2 cells was assessed in the presence of Dex (yellow ovals) or RU
486 (green rectangles). (B) A model for the differential regulation of
CDIs by the wt and mutant GRs in SAOS2 cells. Schematically shown are
two wt GR molecules (wtGR+Dex), which in the presence of the full
agonist Dex (D, yellow ovals) dimerize through the DBD (indicated by a
cross) and recruit a coactivator protein (CoA, blue cubes) to associate
with the C-terminal AF-2 (shown in dark blue). An additional putative
interacting protein (?, pink cubes) may associate with the GR N
terminus and AF-1. Possible communication between the C-terminal
coactivator and an unknown N terminus-interacting factor (indicated
with an arrow) induces expression of p21 and p27. Deletion of the GR N
terminus ( 4C1+Dex) results in a loss of the unknown interactor,
disrupting a putative interaction between the N and the C termini, such
that the induction of both p21 and p27 is abolished. wt GR in the
presence of the partial agonist RU 486 (wtGR+RU 486) is unable to
recruit a C-terminal coactivator due to a conformational change in the
LBD. The induction of p21 is abolished, suggesting a requirement for a
functional AF-2 for this effect, whereas enhanced expression of p27
occurs in an AF-2-independent manner, possibly through the unknown
N-terminal interactor and as-yet-unidentified transcriptional
regulatory function at GR N terminus. Disruption of the GR dimerization
interface (dim+Dex) eliminates p27 but not p21 induction, indicating
that stimulated p27 expression depends on GR dimerization and GRE
binding, whereas p21 induction is accomplished by GR in its monomeric
form.
|
|
In contrast, induction of p27 occurs in the presence of RU 486, suggesting that AF-2 activity is not required for this effect
(Fig.
11A, wt+RU 486). It is conceivable that additional transcriptional
regulatory domains may be involved in regulating p27 expression.
Interestingly, the induction of p27 was sensitive to the mutations
R479D and D481R disrupting the GR dimerization interface (Fig.
11A,
dim+Dex). Thus, one or more protein intermediates induced
by GR to
activate p27 transcription may contain a canonical GRE(s)
in their
promoters, such that the dimerization-deficient mutant
no longer
activates their expression, thereby eliminating p27
induction. The
inability of the dim mutant to efficiently enhance
p27 expression also
argues that protein intermediates transducing
the GR signal to the p27
promoter are GR-induced activators, rather
than GR-repressed
inhibitors, since the dim mutant is competent
for transcriptional
repression but fails to stimulate p27 expression.
It appears, then,
that distinct mechanisms of transcriptional
activation are responsible
for the increased expression of p21
and p27 in SAOS2 cells in response
to GR activation: p21 induction
requires transcriptional activation by
the GR AF-2 but not an
intact dimerization interface, whereas p27 is
stimulated when
AF-2 is rendered inactive, but GR dimerization is
essential.
Requirements for increased expression of p21 and p27 for
GR-mediated cell cycle arrest.
We assessed the importance of each
CDI for the GR-mediated cell cycle arrest in SAOS2 cells by performing
a cell proliferation assay when induction of either p21 (by using RU
486) or p27 (by using the GR dimerization-deficient mutant) was
minimized. Our data indicate that although each CDI separately inhibits
cell proliferation by 65 to 75%, neither one alone can induce complete cell cycle arrest. Thus, increased expression of both CDIs is necessary
for complete growth arrest in SAOS2 cells.
Possible models for differential transcriptional activation of CDIs
by GR.
On the basis of our results, we propose a model that
accounts for the transcriptional induction of p21 and p27 in SAOS2
cells. Activation of the wt GR by an agonist, such as Dex, can result in dimerization, recruitment of coactivator proteins, and induction of
CDIs (Fig. 11B, wt GR+Dex). Previous results also indicate that GR-dependent CDI induction requires the receptor N-terminal residues 70 through 300, since deletion of this region (Fig. 11B,
4C1+Dex) eliminates CDI expression and the cytostatic activity of the receptor in SAOS2 cells. However, the AF-1 domain of GR is not required for CDI
regulation, since a GR mutant containing a transcriptionally inactive
AF-1 (the GR 30iiB mutant) induces CDI expression as efficiently as wt
GR. Thus, the GR N terminus, but not AF-1 per se, is
necessary for CDI induction. These findings suggest that novel surfaces
within the N terminus may interact with another, as-yet-unidentified
protein(s) to facilitate transcriptional activation. For some steroid
receptors, such as the estrogen receptor, the receptor N- and
C-terminal regulatory regions function synergistically to activate
transcription, and the coactivator protein SRC1 further promotes a
transcriptionally productive interaction between the receptor N
terminus and the LBD (48, 61). It has also been shown that
in addition to their interaction with the LBDs of most steroid
receptors and type II nuclear receptors, p160 family members SRC1 and
GRIP1 interact with the estrogen and progesterone receptor N termini
(67, 95). Although such interactions between the GR N
terminus and GRIP1 have not been detected (82a), this domain may interact with other regulatory proteins. Alternatively, the N-terminal sequences may be critical for preserving the structural integrity of the GR protein.
Our results also indicate that in the presence of RU 486, GR fails to
induce p21 expression, whereas p27 induction is preserved
(Fig.
11B, wt
GR+RU 486). The RU 486-bound GR fails to recruit
a coactivator and no
longer supports transcriptional activation
by AF-2 (
40).
Thus, additional and as-yet-uncharacterized transcriptional
regulatory
domains may be involved in enhancing p27 expression.
Our findings also
suggest that GR transcriptional activation of
the p21 promoter is
likely dependent on coactivator function mediated
by AF-2, while
activation of the p27 promoter is not. Finally,
mutations that disrupt
GR dimerization impair GR's ability to
induce p27 but not p21 (Fig.
11B, dim+Dex), suggesting that monomeric
GR is sufficient for inducing
p21 expression. Therefore, the requirements
for the GR-responsive
elements and the promoters responsible for
the CDI induction are
different for these two regulators. p21
is not induced through a
canonical single GRE, and transcriptional
activation likely involves
protein-protein interactions possibly
recruiting GR in its monomeric
form to a multiprotein complex.
In contrast, p27 induction requires GR
dimerization, suggesting
that one or more GR-responsive factors that
are responsible for
enhanced transcription of p27 contain consensus
GREs in their
promoters.
A fuller understanding of the GR transcriptional regulatory mechanisms
and target genes responsible for eliciting the cytotoxic
versus cytostatic outcome of GR activation may ultimately
lead
to the identification of novel compounds that induce the cytotoxic
rather than the cytostatic response to glucocorticoids and thus
may
expand the therapeutic utility of glucocorticoids as chemotherapeutic
agents.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We are grateful to Jorge A. Iñiguez-Lluhí, Paul
Godowski, and Keith Yamamoto for the GR mutant constructs. We thank Len Freedman, Roland Knoblauch, Janet Trowbridge, and Angus Wilson for
critically reading the manuscript.
This work was supported by grants to M.J.G. from the Army Breast Cancer
Research Fund (DAMD17-94-J-4454, DAMD17-96-1-6032) and the Irma T. Hirschl Charitable Trust. We also thank the NIH for its support of I.R.
(5T32AI07180-17), A.B.H. (2T32GM07308), and D.P. (R29-DK51151-03).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Microbiology and the Kaplan Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York
University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016. Phone: (212)
263-7662. Fax: (212) 263-8276. E-mail:
garabm01{at}mcrcr.med.nyu.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Adams, J. M., and S. Cory.
1998.
The Bcl-2 protein family: arbiters of cell survival.
Science
281:1322-1326[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Alam, J., and J. L. Cook.
1990.
Reporter genes: application to the study of mammalian gene transcription.
Anal. Biochem.
188:245-254[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Alessandrini, A.,
D. S. Chiaur, and M. Pagano.
1997.
Regulation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27 by degradation and phosphorylation.
Leukemia
11:342-345[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Almlof, T.,
J. A. Gustafsson, and A. P. Wright.
1997.
Role of hydrophobic amino acid clusters in the transactivation activity of the human glucocorticoid receptor.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:934-945[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Alnemri, E. S.,
T. F. Fernandes,
S. Haldar,
C. M. Croce, and G. Litwack.
1992.
Involvement of Bcl-2 in glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis of human pre-B-leukemias.
Cancer Res.
52:491-495[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Barde, Y. A.
1989.
Trophic factors and neuronal survival.
Neuron
2:1525-1534[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Blanco, J. C.,
S. Minucci,
J. Lu,
X. J. Yang,
K. K. Walker,
H. Chen,
R. M. Evans,
Y. Nakatani, and K. Ozato.
1998.
The histone acetylase PCAF is a nuclear receptor coactivator.
Genes Dev.
12:1638-1651[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Brehm, A.,
E. A. Miska,
D. J. McCance,
J. L. Reid,
A. J. Bannister, and T. Kouzarides.
1998.
Retinoblastoma protein recruits histone deacetylase to repress transcription.
Nature
391:597-601[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Brinkmann, U.,
E. Brinkmann,
M. Gallo, and I. Pastan.
1995.
Cloning and characterization of a cellular apoptosis susceptibility gene, the human homologue to the yeast chromosome segregation gene CSE1.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:10427-10431[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Brinkmann, U.,
M. Gallo,
M. H. Polymeropoulos, and I. Pastan.
1996.
The human CAS (cellular apoptosis susceptibility) gene mapping on chromosome 20q13 is amplified in BT474 breast cancer cells and part of aberrant chromosomes in breast and colon cancer cell lines.
Genome Res.
6:187-194[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Brostjan, C.,
J. Anrather,
V. Csizmadia,
D. Stroka,
M. Soares,
F. H. Bach, and H. Winkler.
1996.
Glucocorticoid-mediated repression of NF B activity in endothelial cells does not involve induction of I B synthesis.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:19612-19616[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Burnstein, K. L.,
C. M. Jewell,
M. Sar, and J. A. Cidlowski.
1994.
Intragenic sequences of the human glucocorticoid receptor complementary DNA mediate hormone-inducible receptor messenger RNA down-regulation through multiple mechanisms.
Mol. Endocrinol.
8:1764-1773[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Cha, H. H.,
E. J. Cram,
E. C. Wang,
A. J. Huang,
H. G. Kasler, and G. L. Firestone.
1998.
Glucocorticoids stimulate p21 gene expression by targeting multiple transcriptional elements within a steroid responsive region of the p21waf1/cip1 promoter in rat hepatoma cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:1998-2007[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Chandler, V. L.,
B. A. Maler, and K. R. Yamamoto.
1983.
DNA sequences bound specifically by glucocorticoid receptor in vitro render a heterologous promoter hormone responsive in vivo.
Cell
33:489-499[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Chandra, J.,
J. Gilbreath,
E. J. Freireich,
K. O. Kliche,
M. Andreeff,
M. Keating, and D. J. McConkey.
1997.
Protease activation is required for glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemic lymphocytes.
Blood
90:3673-3681[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Chapman, M. S.,
D. J. Askew,
U. Kuscuoglu, and R. L. Miesfeld.
1996.
Transcriptional control of steroid-regulated apoptosis in murine thymoma cells.
Mol. Endocrinol.
10:967-978[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Chen, H.,
R. J. Lin,
R. L. Schiltz,
D. Chakravarti,
A. Nash,
L. Nagy,
M. L. Privalsky,
Y. Nakatani, and R. M. Evans.
1997.
Nuclear receptor coactivator ACTR is a novel histone acetyltransferase and forms a multimeric activation complex with P/CAF and CBP/p300.
Cell
90:569-580[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Cidlowski, J. A.,
K. L. King,
R. B. Evans-Storms,
J. W. Montague,
C. D. Bortner, and F. M. Hughes, Jr.
1996.
The biochemistry and molecular biology of glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis in the immune system.
Recent Prog. Horm. Res.
51:457-490.
|
| 19.
|
Cohen, G. M.
1997.
Caspases: the executioners of apoptosis.
Biochem. J.
326:1-16.
|
| 20.
|
Coleman, R. E.
1992.
Glucocorticoids in cancer therapy.
Biotherapy
4:37-44[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Coleman, T. R., and W. G. Dunphy.
1994.
Cdc2 regulatory factors.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
6:877-882[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Cram, E. J.,
R. A. Ramos,
E. C. Wang,
H. H. Cha,
Y. Nishio, and G. L. Firestone.
1998.
Role of the CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-transcription factor in the glucocorticoid stimulation of p21waf1/cip1 gene promoter activity in growth-arrested rat hepatoma cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:2008-2014[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
De Bosscher, K.,
M. L. Schmitz,
W. Vanden Berghe,
S. Plaisance,
W. Fiers, and G. Haegeman.
1997.
Glucocorticoid-mediated repression of nuclear factor- B-dependent transcription involves direct interference with transactivation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:13504-13509[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Dempster, D. W.,
B. S. Moonga,
L. S. Stein,
W. R. Horbert, and T. Antakly.
1997.
Glucocorticoids inhibit bone resorption by isolated rat osteoclasts by enhancing apoptosis.
J. Endocrinol.
154:397-406[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Diamond, M. I.,
J. N. Miner,
S. K. Yoshinaga, and K. R. Yamamoto.
1990.
Transcription factor interactions: selectors of positive or negative regulation from a single DNA element.
Science
249:1266-1272[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Ewen, M. E.,
H. K. Sluss,
C. J. Sherr,
H. Matsushime,
J. Kato, and D. M. Livingston.
1993.
Functional interactions of the retinoblastoma protein with mammalian D-type cyclins.
Cell
73:487-497[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Farrow, S. N., and R. Brown.
1996.
New members of the Bcl-2 family and their protein partners.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
6:45-49[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Frasch, S. C.,
J. A. Nick,
V. A. Fadok,
D. L. Bratton,
G. S. Worthen, and P. M. Henson.
1998.
p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent and -independent intracellular signal transduction pathways leading to apoptosis in human neutrophils.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:8389-8397[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Gametchu, B., and R. W. Harrison.
1984.
Characterization of a monoclonal antibody to the rat liver glucocorticoid receptor.
Endocrinology
114:274-279[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Gaynon, P. S., and R. H. Lustig.
1995.
The use of glucocorticoids in acute lymphoblastic leukemia of childhood. Molecular, cellular, and clinical considerations.
J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol.
17:1-12[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Godowski, P. J.,
D. D. Sakai, and K. R. Yamamoto.
1989.
Signal transduction and transcriptional regulation by the glucocorticoid receptor.
UCLA Symp. Mol. Cell. Biol.
95:197-210.
|
| 32.
|
Hakem, R.,
A. Hakem,
G. S. Duncan,
J. T. Henderson,
M. Woo,
M. S. Soengas,
A. Elia,
J. L. de la Pompa,
D. Kagi,
W. Khoo,
J. Potter,
R. Yoshida,
S. A. Kaufman,
S. W. Lowe,
J. M. Penninger, and T. W. Mak.
1998.
Differential requirement for caspase 9 in apoptotic pathways in vivo.
Cell
94:339-352[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Harper, J. W., and S. J. Elledge.
1996.
Cdk inhibitors in development and cancer.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
6:56-64[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Harvey, K. J.,
J. F. Blomquist, and D. S. Ucker.
1998.
Commitment and effector phases of the physiological cell death pathway elucidated with respect to Bcl-2 caspase and cyclin-dependent kinase activities.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:2912-22[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Heck, S.,
K. Bender,
M. Kullmann,
M. Gottlicher,
P. Herrlich, and A. C. Cato.
1997.
I B -independent downregulation of NF- B activity by glucocorticoid receptor.
EMBO J.
16:4698-4707[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Heck, S.,
M. Kullmann,
A. Gast,
H. Ponta,
H. J. Rahmsdorf,
P. Herrlich, and A. C. Cato.
1994.
A distinct modulating domain in glucocorticoid receptor monomers in the repression of activity of the transcription factor AP-1.
EMBO J.
13:4087-4095[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Helmberg, A.,
N. Auphan,
C. Caelles, and M. Karin.
1995.
Glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis of human leukemic cells is caused by the repressive function of the glucocorticoid receptor.
EMBO J.
14:452-460[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Herrlich, P., and M. Gottlicher.
1998.
Transcriptional cross-talk by steroid hormone receptors, p. 191-207.
In
L. P. Freedman (ed.), The molecular biology of steroid and nuclear hormone receptors. Birkhauser, Boston, Mass.
|
| 39.
|
Hinds, P. W.,
S. Mittnacht,
V. Dulic,
A. Arnold,
S. I. Reed, and R. A. Weinberg.
1992.
Regulation of retinoblastoma protein functions by ectopic expression of human cyclins.
Cell
70:993-1006[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Hong, H.,
K. Kohli,
M. J. Garabedian, and M. R. Stallcup.
1997.
GRIP1, a transcriptional coactivator for the AF-2 transactivation domain of steroid, thyroid, retinoid, and vitamin D receptors.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:2735-2744[Abstract].
|
| 41.
|
Hong, H.,
K. Kohli,
A. Trivedi,
D. L. Johnson, and M. R. Stallcup.
1996.
GRIP1, a novel mouse protein that serves as a transcriptional coactivator in yeast for the hormone binding domains of steroid receptors.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:4948-4952[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Hughes, F. M., Jr., and J. A. Cidlowski.
1998.
Glucocorticoid-induced thymocyte apoptosis: protease-dependent activation of cell shrinkage and DNA degradation.
J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.
65:207-217[Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Iniguez-Lluhi, J. A.,
D. Y. Lou, and K. R. Yamamoto.
1997.
Three amino acid substitutions selectively disrupt the activation but not the repression function of the glucocorticoid receptor N terminus.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:4149-4156[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Jacobson, M. D.,
M. Weil, and M. C. Raff.
1997.
Programmed cell death in animal development.
Cell
88:347-354[Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Karin, M.
1998.
New twists in gene regulation by glucocorticoid receptor: is DNA binding dispensable?
Cell
93:487-490[Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Karin, M.,
A. Haslinger,
H. Holtgreve,
R. I. Richards,
P. Krauter,
H. M. Westphal, and M. Beato.
1984.
Characterization of DNA sequences through which cadmium and glucocorticoid hormones induce human metallothionein-IIA gene.
Nature
308:513-519[Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Kawakami, A.,
Q. Tian,
X. Duan,
M. Streuli,
S. F. Schlossman, and P. Anderson.
1992.
Identification and functional characterization of a TIA-1-related nucleolysin.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:8681-8685[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Kraus, W. L.,
E. M. McInerney, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen.
1995.
Ligand-dependent, transcriptionally productive association of the amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions of a steroid hormone nuclear receptor.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:12314-12318[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Krstic, M. D.,
I. Rogatsky,
K. R. Yamamoto, and M. J. Garabedian.
1997.
Mitogen-activated and cyclin-dependent protein kinases selectively and differentially modulate transcriptional enhancement by the glucocorticoid receptor.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:3947-3954[Abstract].
|
| 50.
|
Kuida, K.,
T. F. Haydar,
C. Y. Kuan,
Y. Gu,
C. Taya,
H. Karasuyama,
M. S. Su,
P. Rakic, and R. A. Flavell.
1998.
Reduced apoptosis and cytochrome c-mediated caspase activation in mice lacking caspase 9.
Cell
94:325-337[Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Kuida, K.,
T. S. Zheng,
S. Na,
C. Kuan,
D. Yang,
H. Karasuyama,
P. Rakic, and R. A. Flavell.
1996.
Decreased apoptosis in the brain and premature lethality in CPP32-deficient mice.
Nature
384:368-372[Medline].
|
| 52.
|
Lefstin, J. A.,
J. R. Thomas, and K. R. Yamamoto.
1994.
Influence of a steroid receptor DNA-binding domain on transcriptional regulatory functions.
Genes Dev.
8:2842-2856[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Liden, J.,
F. Delaunay,
I. Rafter,
J. Gustafsson, and S. Okret.
1997.
A new function for the C-terminal zinc finger of the glucocorticoid receptor. Repression of RelA transactivation.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:21467-21472[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 54.
|
Linette, G. P., and S. J. Korsmeyer.
1994.
Differentiation and cell death: lessons from the immune system.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
6:809-815[Medline].
|
| 55.
|
Liu, W.,
A. G. Hillmann, and J. M. Harmon.
1995.
Hormone-independent repression of AP-1-inducible collagenase promoter activity by glucocorticoid receptors.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:1005-1013[Abstract].
|
| 56.
|
Liu, W.,
J. Wang,
N. K. Sauter, and D. Pearce.
1995.
Steroid receptor heterodimerization demonstrated in vitro and in vivo.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:12480-12484[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 57.
|
Liu, W.,
J. Wang,
G. Yu, and D. Pearce.
1996.
Steroid receptor transcriptional synergy is potentiated by disruption of the DNA-binding domain dimer interface.
Mol. Endocrinol.
10:1399-1406[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 58.
|
Luisi, B. F.,
W. X. Xu,
Z. Otwinowski,
L. P. Freedman,
K. R. Yamamoto, and P. B. Sigler.
1991.
Crystallographic analysis of the interaction of the glucocorticoid receptor with DNA.
Nature
352:497-505[Medline].
|
| 59.
|
Magnaghi-Jaulin, L.,
R. Groisman,
I. Naguibneva,
P. Robin,
S. Lorain,
J. P. Le Villain,
F. Troalen,
D. Trouche, and A. Harel-Bellan.
1998.
Retinoblastoma protein represses transcription by recruiting a histone deacetylase.
Nature
391:601-605[Medline].
|
| 60.
|
Martin-Castellanos, C., and S. Moreno.
1997.
Recent advances on cyclins, CDKs and CDK inhibitors.
Trends Cell Biol.
7:95-98.
[Medline] |
| 61.
|
McInerney, E. M.,
M. J. Tsai,
B. W. O'Malley, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen.
1996.
Analysis of estrogen receptor transcriptional enhancement by a nuclear hormone receptor coactivator.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:10069-10073[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 62.
|
Meagher, L. C.,
J. M. Cousin,
J. R. Seckl, and C. Haslett.
1996.
Opposing effects of glucocorticoids on the rate of apoptosis in neutrophilic and eosinophilic granulocytes.
J. Immunol.
156:4422-4428[Abstract].
|
| 63.
|
Miner, J. N.,
M. I. Diamond, and K. R. Yamamoto.
1991.
Joints in the regulatory lattice: composite regulation by steroid receptor-AP1 complexes.
Cell Growth Differ.
2:525-530[Medline].
|
| 64.
|
Miyoshi, H.,
M. Ohki,
T. Nakagawa, and Y. Honma.
1997.
Glucocorticoids induce apoptosis in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines with A t(8;21) chromosome translocation.
Leuk Res.
21:45-50[Medline].
|
| 65.
|
Muller, R.
1995.
Transcriptional regulation during the mammalian cell cycle.
Trends Genet.
11:173-178[Medline].
|
| 66.
|
Oakley, R. H., and J. A. Cidlowski.
1993.
Homologous down regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor: the molecular machinery.
Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr.
3:63-88[Medline].
|
| 67.
|
Onate, S. A.,
V. Boonyaratanakornkit,
T. E. Spencer,
S. Y. Tsai,
M. J. Tsai,
D. P. Edwards, and B. W. O'Malley.
1998.
The steroid receptor coactivator-1 contains multiple receptor interacting and activation domains that cooperatively enhance the activation function 1 (AF1) and AF2 domains of steroid receptors.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:12101-12108[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 68.
|
Onate, S. A.,
S. Y. Tsai,
M. J. Tsai, and B. W. O'Malley.
1995.
Sequence and characterization of a coactivator for the steroid hormone receptor superfamily.
Science
270:1354-1357[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 69.
|
Pagano, M.,
S. W. Tam,
A. M. Theodoras,
P. Beer-Romero,
G. Del Sal,
V. Chau,
P. R. Yew,
G. F. Draetta, and M. Rolfe.
1995.
Role of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in regulating abundance of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27.
Science
269:682-685[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 70.
|
Perlman, H.,
M. Sata,
A. Le Roux,
T. W. Sedlak,
D. Branellec, and K. Walsh.
1998.
Bax-mediated cell death by the Gax homeoprotein requires mitogen activation but is independent of cell cycle activity.
EMBO J.
17:3576-3586[Medline].
|
| 71.
|
Pirotte, B.,
M. Levivier,
S. Goldman,
J. M. Brucher,
J. Brotchi, and J. Hildebrand.
1997.
Glucocorticoid-induced long-term remission in primary cerebral lymphoma: case report and review of the literature.
J. Neurooncol.
32:63-69[Medline].
|
| 72.
|
Ramalingam, A.,
A. Hirai, and E. A. Thompson.
1997.
Glucocorticoid inhibition of fibroblast proliferation and regulation of the cyclin kinase inhibitor p21Cip1.
Mol. Endocrinol.
11:577-586[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 73.
|
Ramos, R. A.,
Y. Nishio,
A. C. Maiyar,
K. E. Simon,
C. C. Ridder,
Y. Ge, and G. L. Firestone.
1996.
Glucocorticoid-stimulated CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein expression is required for steroid-induced G1 cell cycle arrest of minimal-deviation rat hepatoma cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:5288-5301[Abstract].
|
| 74.
|
Reichardt, H. M.,
K. H. Kaestner,
J. Tuckermann,
O. Kretz,
O. Wessely,
R. Bock,
P. Gass,
W. Schmid,
P. Herrlich,
P. Angel, and G. Schutz.
1998.
DNA binding of the glucocorticoid receptor is not essential for survival.
Cell
93:531-541[Medline].
|
| 75.
|
Rhee, K.,
W. Bresnahan,
A. Hirai,
M. Hirai, and E. A. Thompson.
1995.
C-Myc and cyclin D3 (CcnD3) genes are independent targets for glucocorticoid inhibition of lymphoid cell proliferation.
Cancer Res.
55:4188-4195[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 76.
|
Rogatsky, I.,
S. K. Logan, and M. J. Garabedian.
1998.
Antagonism of glucocorticoid receptor transcriptional activation by the cJun N-terminal kinase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:2050-2055[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 77.
|
Rogatsky, I.,
J. M. Trowbridge, and M. J. Garabedian.
1997.
Glucocorticoid receptor-mediated cell cycle arrest is achieved through distinct cell-specific transcriptional regulatory mechanisms.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:3181-3193[Abstract].
|
| 78.
|
Rogatsky, I.,
C. M. Waase, and M. J. Garabedian.
1998.
Phosphorylation and inhibition of the rat glucocorticoid receptor transcriptional activity by glycogen synthase kinase-3.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:15315-15321.
|
| 79.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 80.
|
Schule, R.,
P. Rangarajan,
S. Kliewer,
L. J. Ransone,
J. Bolado,
N. Yang,
I. M. Verma, and R. M. Evans.
1990.
Functional antagonism between oncoprotein c-Jun and the glucocorticoid receptor.
Cell
62:1217-1226[Medline].
|
| 81.
|
Sentman, C. L.,
J. R. Shutter,
D. Hockenbery,
O. Kanagawa, and S. J. Korsmeyer.
1991.
bcl-2 inhibits multiple forms of apoptosis but not negative selection in thymocytes.
Cell
67:879-888[Medline].
|
| 82.
|
Smith, C. L.,
S. A. Onate,
M. J. Tsai, and B. W. O'Malley.
1996.
CREB binding protein acts synergistically with steroid receptor coactivator-1 to enhance steroid receptor-dependent transcription.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:8884-8888[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 82a.
| Stallcup, M. Personal communication.
|
| 83.
|
Steffen, M.,
U. Scherdin,
C. Duvigneau, and F. Holzel.
1988.
Glucocorticoid-induced alterations of morphology and growth of fibrosarcoma cells derived from 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene rat mammary tumor.
Cancer Res.
48:7212-7218[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 84.
|
Stoecklin, E.,
M. Wissler,
F. Gouilleux, and B. Groner.
1996.
Functional interactions between Stat5 and the glucocorticoid receptor.
Nature
383:726-728[Medline].
|
| 85.
|
Stoecklin, E.,
M. Wissler,
R. Moriggl, and B. Groner.
1997.
Specific DNA binding of Stat5, but not of glucocorticoid receptor, is required for their functional cooperation in the regulation of gene transcription.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:6708-6716[Abstract].
|
| 86.
|
Taya, Y.
1997.
RB kinases and RB-binding proteins: new points of view.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
22:14-17[Medline].
|
| 87.
|
Tchekneva, E., and W. E. Serafin.
1994.
Kirsten sarcoma virus-immortalized mast cell lines. Reversible inhibition of growth by dexamethasone and evidence for the presence of an autocrine growth factor.
J. Immunol.
152:5912-5921[Abstract].
|
| 88.
|
Templeton, D. J.,
S. H. Park,
L. Lanier, and R. A. Weinberg.
1991.
Nonfunctional mutants of the retinoblastoma protein are characterized by defects in phosphorylation, viral oncoprotein association, and nuclear tethering.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:3033-3037[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 89.
|
Thornberry, N. A., and Y. Lazebnik.
1998.
Caspases: enemies within.
Science
281:1312-1316[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 90.
|
Tiemann, F., and P. W. Hinds.
1998.
Induction of DNA synthesis and apoptosis by regulated inactivation of a temperature-sensitive retinoblastoma protein.
EMBO J.
17:1040-1052[Medline].
|
| 91.
|
Torchia, J.,
D. W. Rose,
J. Inostroza,
Y. Kamei,
S. Westin,
C. K. Glass, and M. G. Rosenfeld.
1997.
The transcriptional co-activator p/CIP binds CBP and mediates nuclear-receptor function.
Nature
387:677-684[Medline].
|
| 92.
|
Wang, J.,
K. Guo,
K. N. Wills, and K. Walsh.
1997.
Rb functions to inhibit apoptosis during myocyte differentiation.
Cancer Res
57:351-354[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 93.
|
Wang, J., and K. Walsh.
1996.
Resistance to apoptosis conferred by Cdk inhibitors during myocyte differentiation.
Science
273:359-361[Abstract].
|
| 94.
|
Wang, L.,
M. Miura,
L. Bergeron,
H. Zhu, and J. Yuan.
1994.
Ich-1, an Ice/ced-3-related gene, encodes both positive and negative regulators of programmed cell death.
Cell
78:739-750[Medline].
|
| 95.
|
Webb, P.,
P. Nguyen,
J. Shinsako,
C. Anderson,
W. Feng,
M. P. Nguyen,
D. Chen,
S. M. Huang,
S. Subramanian,
E. McKinerney,
B. S. Katzenellenbogen,
M. R. Stallcup, and P. J. Kushner.
1998.
Estrogen receptor activation function 1 works by binding p160 coactivator proteins.
Mol. Endocrinol.
12:1605-1618[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 96.
|
Weinberg, R. A.
1995.
The retinoblastoma protein and cell cycle control.
Cell
81:323-330[Medline].
|
| 97.
|
Wellmann, A.,
L. Krenacs,
T. Fest,
U. Scherf,
I. Pastan,
M. Raffeld, and U. Brinkmann.
1997.
Localization of the cell proliferation and apoptosis-associated CAS protein in lymphoid neoplasms.
Am. J. Pathol.
150:25-30[Abstract].
|
| 98.
|
Williams, S. P., and P. B. Sigler.
1998.
Atomic structure of progesterone complexed with its receptor.
Nature
393:392-396[Medline].
|
| 99.
|
Wissink, S.,
E. C. van Heerde,
M. L. Schmitz,
E. Kalkhoven,
B. van der Burg,
P. A. Baeuerle, and P. T. van der Saag.
1997.
Distinct domains of the RelA NF- B subunit are required for negative cross-talk and direct interaction with the glucocorticoid receptor.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:22278-22284[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 100.
|
Woo, M.,
R. Hakem,
M. S. Soengas,
G. S. Duncan,
A. Shahinian,
D. Kagi,
A. Hakem,
M. McCurrach,
W. Khoo,
S. A. Kaufman,
G. Senaldi,
T. Howard,
S. W. Lowe, and T. W. Mak.
1998.
Essential contribution of caspase 3/CPP32 to apoptosis and its associated nuclear changes.
Genes Dev.
12:806-819[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 101.
|
Yamamoto, K. R.,
D. Pearce,
J. Thomas, and J. N. Miner.
1992.
Combinatorial regulation at mammalian composite response elements, p. 1169-92.
In
S. L. McKnight, and K. R. Yamamoto (ed.), Transcriptional regulation, vol. 2. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 102.
|
Yang, E., and S. J. Korsmeyer.
1996.
Molecular thanatopsis: a discourse on the BCL2 family and cell death.
Blood
88:386-401[Free Full Text].
|
| 103.
|
Yang-Yen, H.-F.,
J.-C. Chambard,
Y.-L. Sun,
T. Smeal,
T. J. Schmidt,
J. Drouin, and M. Karin.
1990.
Transcriptional interference between c-Jun and the glucocorticoid receptor: mutual inhibition of DNA binding due to direct protein-protein interaction.
Cell
62:1205-1215[Medline].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 1999, p. 5036-5049, Vol. 19, No. 7
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Matthews, L., Berry, A., Tersigni, M., D'Acquisto, F., Ianaro, A., Ray, D.
(2009). Thiazolidinediones Are Partial Agonists for the Glucocorticoid Receptor. Endocrinology
150: 75-86
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yang, J.-Q., Rudiger, J. J., Hughes, J. M., Goulet, S., Gencay-Cornelson, M. M., Borger, P., Tamm, M., Roth, M.
(2008). Cell Density and Serum Exposure Modify the Function of the Glucocorticoid Receptor C/EBP Complex. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.
38: 414-422
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lu, N. Z., Collins, J. B., Grissom, S. F., Cidlowski, J. A.
(2007). Selective Regulation of Bone Cell Apoptosis by Translational Isoforms of the Glucocorticoid Receptor. Mol. Cell. Biol.
27: 7143-7160
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Almawi, W. Y., Melemedjian, O. K., Jaoude, M. M. A.
(2004). On the link between Bcl-2 family proteins and glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis. J. Leukoc. Biol.
76: 7-14
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wang, Z., Garabedian, M. J.
(2003). Modulation of Glucocorticoid Receptor Transcriptional Activation, Phosphorylation, and Growth Inhibition by p27Kip1. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 50897-50901
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rogatsky, I., Wang, J.-C., Derynck, M. K., Nonaka, D. F., Khodabakhsh, D. B., Haqq, C. M., Darimont, B. D., Garabedian, M. J., Yamamoto, K. R.
(2003). Target-specific utilization of transcriptional regulatory surfaces by the glucocorticoid receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
100: 13845-13850
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
De Bosscher, K., Vanden Berghe, W., Haegeman, G.
(2003). The Interplay between the Glucocorticoid Receptor and Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B or Activator Protein-1: Molecular Mechanisms for Gene Repression. Endocr. Rev.
24: 488-522
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tse, R., Marroquin, B. A., Dorscheid, D. R., White, S. R.
(2003). {beta}-Adrenergic agonists inhibit corticosteroid-induced apoptosis of airway epithelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.
285: L393-L404
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kauppi, B., Jakob, C., Farnegardh, M., Yang, J., Ahola, H., Alarcon, M., Calles, K., Engstrom, O., Harlan, J., Muchmore, S., Ramqvist, A.-K., Thorell, S., Ohman, L., Greer, J., Gustafsson, J.-A., Carlstedt-Duke, J., Carlquist, M.
(2003). The Three-dimensional Structures of Antagonistic and Agonistic Forms of the Glucocorticoid Receptor Ligand-binding Domain: RU-486 INDUCES A TRANSCONFORMATION THAT LEADS TO ACTIVE ANTAGONISM. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 22748-22754
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Inoue, H., Furukawa, T., Giannakopoulos, S., Zhou, S., King, D. S., Tanese, N.
(2002). Largest Subunits of the Human SWI/SNF Chromatin-remodeling Complex Promote Transcriptional Activation by Steroid Hormone Receptors. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 41674-41685
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Greenberg, A. K., Hu, J., Basu, S., Hay, J., Reibman, J., Yie, T.-a., Tchou-Wong, K. M., Rom, W. N., Lee, T. C.
(2002). Glucocorticoids Inhibit Lung Cancer Cell Growth through Both the Extracellular Signal-Related Kinase Pathway and Cell Cycle Regulators. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.
27: 320-328
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kucera, T., Waltner-Law, M., Scott, D. K., Prasad, R., Granner, D. K.
(2002). A Point Mutation of the AF2 Transactivation Domain of the Glucocorticoid Receptor Disrupts Its Interaction with Steroid Receptor Coactivator 1. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 26098-26102
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
CROCHEMORE, C., MICHAELIDIS, T. M., FISCHER, D., LOEFFLER, J.-P., ALMEIDA, O. F. X.
(2002). Enhancement of p53 activity and inhibition of neural cell proliferation by glucocorticoid receptor activation. FASEB J.
16: 761-770
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Greenstein, S., Ghias, K., Krett, N. L., Rosen, S. T.
(2002). Mechanisms of Glucocorticoid-mediated Apoptosis in Hematological Malignancies. Clin. Cancer Res.
8: 1681-1694
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Smith, E., Coetzee, G. A., Frenkel, B.
(2002). Glucocorticoids Inhibit Cell Cycle Progression in Differentiating Osteoblasts via Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3beta. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 18191-18197
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhang, H. H., Kumar, S., Barnett, A. H., Eggo, M. C.
(2001). Dexamethasone Inhibits Tumor Necrosis Factor-{{alpha}}-Induced Apoptosis and Interleukin-1{beta} Release in Human Subcutaneous Adipocytes and Preadipocytes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
86: 2817-2825
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tao, Y., Williams-Skipp, C., Scheinman, R. I.
(2001). Mapping of Glucocorticoid Receptor DNA Binding Domain Surfaces Contributing to Transrepression of NF-kappa B and Induction of Apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 2329-2332
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Smith, E., Redman, R. A., Logg, C. R., Coetzee, G. A., Kasahara, N., Frenkel, B.
(2000). Glucocorticoids Inhibit Developmental Stage-specific Osteoblast Cell Cycle. DISSOCIATION OF CYCLIN A-CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE 2 FROM E2F4-p130 COMPLEXES. J. Biol. Chem.
275: 19992-20001
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Singh, P., Chan, S. W., Hong, W.
(2001). Retinoblastoma Protein Is Functionally Distinct from Its Homologues in Affecting Glucocorticoid Receptor-mediated Transcription and Apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 13762-13770
[Abstract]
[Full Text]