Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 1999, p. 5155-5165, Vol. 19, No. 7
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Defects in Components of the Proteasome Enhance
Transcriptional Silencing at Fission Yeast Centromeres and Impair
Chromosome Segregation
Jean-Paul
Javerzat,1,2,*
Gordon
McGurk,1
Gwen
Cranston,1
Christian
Barreau,2
Pascal
Bernard,2
Colin
Gordon,1 and
Robin
Allshire1
Medical Research Council, Human Genetics
Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Scotland, United
Kingdom,1 and Institut de Biochimie et
Génétique Cellulaires, Centre National de la Recherche
Scientifique, Unité Propre de Recherche 9026, 33077 Bordeaux
Cedex, France2
Received 14 December 1998/Returned for modification 9 February
1999/Accepted 19 April 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Fission yeast centromeres are transcriptionally silent and form a
heterochromatin-like structure essential for normal centromere function; this appears analogous to heterochromatin and position effect
variegation in other eukaryotes. Conditional mutations in three genes
designated cep (centromere enhancer of position effect)
were found to enhance transcriptional silencing within centromeres.
Cloning of the cep1+ and
cep2+ genes by functional complementation
revealed that they are identical to the previously described genes
pad1+ and mts2+,
respectively, which both encode subunits of the proteasome 19S cap.
Like Mts2 and Mts4, epitope-tagged Cep1/Pad1 localizes to or near the
nuclear envelope throughout the cell cycle. The cep mutants
display a range of phenotypes depending on the temperature. Silencing
within the central domain of centromeres is increased at 36°C. This
suggests that the proteasome is involved in regulating silencing and
thus centromeric chromatin architecture, possibly by lowering the level
of some chromatin-associated protein by ubiquitin-dependent
degradation. This is the first report of defective proteasome function
affecting heterochromatin-mediated transcriptional silencing. At 36 and
32°C, the cep mutants lose chromosomes at an elevated
rate, and at 18°C, the mutants are cryosensitive for growth.
Cytological analysis at 18°C revealed a defect in sister chromatid
separation while other mitotic events occurred normally, indicating
that cep mutations might interfere specifically with the
degradation of inhibitor(s) of sister chromatid separation. These
observations suggest that 19S subunits confer a level of substrate
specificity on the proteasome and raise the possibility of a link
between components involved in centromere architecture and sister
chromatid cohesion.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Mitosis is the process by which
eukaryotic cells ensure the faithful transmission of their chromosomes.
Many studies have shown that proteolysis governs mitotic progression by
the orderly degradation of key proteins via the ubiquitin-proteasome
pathway (see reference 50 for a recent review).
Substrate specificity is conferred by a ubiquitin-protein ligase called
the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) and associated regulatory
proteins. After maturation-promoting factor drives cells into mitosis,
the APC forms a complex with the substrate-specific activator Cdc20 to
trigger the proteolysis of inhibitors of anaphase (Pds1 in
Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Cut2 in
Schizosaccharomyces pombe), thereby allowing the separation of sister chromatids and anaphase spindle elongation. Subsequently, APC
binds another substrate-specific activator, Hct1/Cdh1, and the complex
directs the destruction of AseI and the mitotic cyclin, thus allowing
spindle disassembly and exit from mitosis. Mitotic progression is also
controlled by a surveillance system, the spindle checkpoint, which
prevents anaphase onset until chromosomes are properly attached to the
spindle. Studies with yeasts and vertebrates indicate that the
checkpoint consists of components able to sense unattached kinetochores
and a signal transduction pathway which delays the onset of anaphase
through inhibition of the APC. When the correct attachment is achieved,
the negative signal disappears, APC is activated, and anaphase proceeds
(for recent reviews, see references 19 and
50).
Proteins ubiquitinated by the APC are degraded by the proteasome, a
large 28S protein complex made of a 20S proteolytic core particle (CP)
and a 19S regulatory particle (RP). The crystal structure of the 20S
complex from budding yeast has been determined previously
(18). It consists of two A and two B rings, each made of
seven different A and seven different B subunits. The active
proteolytic sites are within the CP, and substrates are thought to
enter the CP through the lumens located at each end of the cylinder.
The CP alone can hydrolyze only small peptides and exists predominantly
in a closed state, indicating that the ends of the channel are gated.
Degradation of ubiquitinated proteins necessitates the binding of RP.
In budding yeast, the RP contains at least 18 subunits and can be
dissociated into two subparticles, the base and the lid
(15). The base contains the six ATPase subunits and connects
the RP to the CP. The base activates the CP for degradation of peptides
and nonubiquitinated proteins, whereas the lid is required for
ubiquitin-dependent degradation. It has been proposed that the lid
selects ubiquitinated substrates and that the base gates the CP channel
and unfolds the substrates.
The centromere-kinetochore complex is a key element in the process of
mitosis. It is defined as the nucleoprotein complex containing
chromosomal factors and centromeric DNA. It fulfills mechanical
functions such as sister chromatid cohesion, attachment to the spindle,
and chromosome movement as well as the regulatory function of
monitoring chromosome attachment to the spindle. In most eukaryotes,
centromeric DNA consists of long arrays of repetitive DNA packaged into
transcriptionally silent, recombination cold, late-replicating
heterochromatin. The exact function of heterochromatin is unknown, but
kinetochores in higher eukaryotes generally form within centromeric
heterochromatin (23). In the fission yeast, S. pombe, three regions of the genome are known to be assembled into
heterochromatin. These are the silent mating-type loci, telomeres, and
centromeres (2, 34, 46). Centromeres consist of inner (imr/B) and outer (otr/K+L) repetitive sequences
arranged in a large inverted structure around a central core (44,
45) (see Fig. 1A). As is often the case for heterochromatic
regions in higher eukaryotes, recombination (33) and
transcription (2, 3) are repressed within fission yeast
centromeres, and they are located at the nuclear periphery in
interphase (12). The link between heterochromatin formation
and centromere function has been clearly established for S. pombe. Mutations in clr1, clr2,
clr3, clr4, rik1, and swi6
genes were shown to affect repression at the silent mating-type loci,
at centromeres, and, to a limited extent, at telomeres (3, 11, 26,
47). In particular, mutations in clr4,
rik1, and swi6 strongly affect silencing within the imr and otr regions, but not the central
core, of the centromere and cause an elevated rate of chromosome loss.
The swi6+ gene encodes a protein with similarity
to Drosophila melanogaster HP1 (27). HP1
localizes to pericentric heterochromatin, and mutations in HP1 suppress
repression of marker genes lying in the vicinity of centromeric
heterochromatin and apparently induce chromosome missegregation events
(24). Both Swi6 and HP1 proteins contain a chromodomain and
a chromo-shadow domain. It has been suggested that this class of
proteins could act as adapter molecules to mediate heterochromatin
formation (1, 38). Swi6 localizes to the three known silent
domains of the fission yeast genome, centromeres, telomeres, and the
mating-type region (9), and functional Clr4 and Rik1 are
required for this localization (10). Clearly,
heterochromatin assembly appears to be crucial for fission yeast
centromere function, since the silencing defect caused by the lack of a
functional clr4, rik1, or swi6 gene is
correlated with defective movement of centromeres at anaphase and an
elevated rate of chromosome loss (3, 9). It is very likely
that many other structural components as well as regulatory factors are required to form normal centromeric heterochromatin and kinetochore assembly. Here a genetic screen for mutants which affect centromeric silencing within the central core region of S. pombe
centromeres has been employed. The screen has identified a new class of
mutants called cep (centromere enhancer of position effect).
All cep mutants were found to be defective in mitotic
chromosome segregation. They define three genes designated
cep1, cep2, and cep3. The
cep1+ and cep2+ genes
were cloned and, surprisingly, were found to encode regulatory subunits
of the proteasome complex. The cep3+ gene
remains to be identified and characterized. The results are discussed
with respect to centromeric silencing and regulation of the
metaphase-anaphase transition in fission yeast.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Strains, media, transformation, and genetic techniques.
All
the strains used in this study are listed in Table
1. Media were essentially as described
previously (2, 32). YEA refers to yeast extract medium (YE)
supplemented with adenine; N/S refers to pombe minimum glutamate medium
PMG containing adenine, uracil, histidine, and leucine; FOA is N/S but
with the addition of FOA (5-fluoro-orotic acid) at 1 g/liter and
URA
is N/S medium without uracil. For transformation, a
simplified version of the lithium acetate procedure was used
(32). Standard genetic techniques were used (32).
Comparative plating and serial dilution experiments were performed as
described previously (2). Ch16 loss was measured by the
half-sectoring assay method as previously described (3) with
YE plates supplemented with a limiting amount (12 mg/liter) of adenine.
Isolation of cep mutants.
Strain FY312 was
mutagenized with 2% ethyl methanesulfonate as described previously
(32). Following ethyl methanesulfonate treatment, cells were
washed three times with 0.9% NaCl, resuspended in YEA at a density of
4 × 106 cells/ml, and allowed to grow at 32°C for
21 h, after which time the cell density was around 4 × 107 cells/ml. Cells were plated onto FOA plates at a
density of 105 and 106 cells/plate and
incubated for 4 days at 35°C. From a total of 107 cells
plated, approximately 1,000 FOA-resistant colonies formed. To screen
for cryosensitivity (cs), the 1,000 colonies were grown at 35°C for 3 days and then replica plated onto two N/S plates containing phloxin B
and incubated at 18 and 32°C for 4 days. Six strains grew very poorly
and stained dark pink at 18°C. The six mutant strains were
backcrossed three times. For all mutants, tetrad analysis showed that
FOA resistance and cs cosegregated and segregated 2:2 with wild type.
To exclude marker-specific effects and the possibility that FOA
resistance of the
cep mutants was due to general drug
resistance,
repression of an
ade6+ marker gene
inserted in the central core of centromere 1 (TM1
NcoI::
ade6+) was also
assayed. The
cep1-1,
cep2-10, and
cep3-16 mutations
resulted in red as opposed to pink
wild-type colonies when plated
on appropriate indicator plates (YE plus
1/10 adenine [data not
shown]). On these plates, white colonies fully
express
ade6+ whereas pink and red colonies
indicate intermediate and more
complete states of repression,
respectively (
2).
Cytological techniques.
Immunostaining and fluorescence in
situ hybridization (FISH) were performed as described previously
(10). Antihemagglutinin (anti-HA) monoclonal antibody 12CA5
(Babco) was used at a 1/100 dilution. Polyclonal anti-HA (Babco) was
cleaned up by preabsorption three times against total S. pombe proteins from a strain lacking the HA epitope immobilized on
a membrane filter by Western blotting. The anti-
-tubulin monoclonal
antibody TAT1 (51) was a gift from Keith Gull. A Zeiss
Axioplan fluorescence microscope coupled to a Photometrics camera and
IP Lab Spectrum software with Digital Scientific extensions were used
for the capture and analysis of images.
Western blotting.
Total proteins were extracted in
radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer as described previously
(32). Samples containing 50 µg of total protein were
electrophoresed on duplicate sodium dodecyl sulfate-10%
polyacrylamide gels. One gel was Coomassie blue stained to check for
equal loading, and the other was electroblotted onto a polyvinylidene
difluoride membrane (Bio-Rad). The filter was incubated with a 1:1,000
dilution of the anti-HA monoclonal antibody 16B12 (Babco). Bound
antibody was detected with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated sheep
anti-mouse immunoglobulin G with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl
phosphate-nitroblue tetrazolium as a substrate.
Plasmids.
The S. pombe cDNA library was provided
by C. J. Norbury and B. Edgar (Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Cell
Cycle Group, Oxford, United Kingdom). In this library, cDNAs are
directionally cloned into pREP3X, an S. pombe vector in
which expression is under the control of the thiamine-repressible
nmt1 promoter (29). A fission yeast genomic
library in pUR19 with the S. pombe ura4+ gene as
the selection marker was provided by A. M. Carr (Medical Research
Council Cell Mutation Unit, Brighton, United Kingdom).
Isolation of the cep1+ and
cep2+ genes.
The
cep1+ and cep2+ genes
were isolated by complementation of the cryosensitive phenotype of the
mutant strains. Strain FY1008 (cep1-1) was transformed with
the S. pombe cDNA library. Transformants were selected on
minimal medium without thiamine at 32°C, and colonies were replica
plated onto the same medium and incubated at 18°C for 7 days. Two
colonies formed at 18°C. Plasmid DNA was recovered in
Escherichia coli DH5
by the extraction procedure previously described (5). Sequence data from the ends of the inserts showed that both plasmids contained the same cDNA. Database searches with the BLAST program (4) showed that the
cep1-1-complementing cDNA was derived from the previously
cloned pad1+ gene (41). The
complementing plasmid (pREPcep1+) linearized
within cDNA sequences at the single NruI site was integrated
into FY947 (cep1+). Integration by homologous
recombination was checked by Southern blotting of genomic DNA extracted
from the transformants (data not shown). Genetic analysis of crosses
between integrant strains and FY1007 (cep1-1) showed that
the LEU2 marker from the plasmid was tightly linked (<1
centimorgan [cM]) to the cep1 locus.
The
cep2+ gene was cloned by complementation of
the cs phenotype of FY1013 with a genomic library. All complementing
plasmids
were found to contain the same genomic region. Plasmid
pUR19
cep2+ contained the smallest DNA insert.
The plasmid linearized within
the 5-kb insert at the single
NcoI site was transformed into FY947
(
cep2+). Integration by homologous recombination
was checked by Southern
blotting of genomic DNA extracted from the
transformants. Genetic
analysis of crosses between integrant strains
and FY1011 (
cep2-11)
showed that the
ura4+ marker from the plasmid was tightly linked
to the
cep2 locus.
Several attempts to isolate the
cep3+ gene as described above by complementation
of the cryosensitive
phenotype failed; the
cep3+
gene remains to be
characterized.
A PCR-based strategy was used to identify mutations within the
cep2 coding sequence. Two colonies from the four
cep2 mutants
and a wild-type control strain were picked and
subjected to PCR
with the following primer pair: C699 (top strand, in
the 20-bp
intron starting after A of the initiating codon, ATG) and
D858
(positions 1297 to 1279). PCR products were sequenced on both
strands with primers C699 (as described above), D757 (positions
243 to
262), D790 (positions 613 to 633), K61 (positions 938 to
957), D858
(positions 1297 to 1279), C822 (positions 1137 to 1127),
C657
(positions 711 to 690), and J345 (positions 334 to 311).
Samples were
run on an Applied Biosystems sequencer, and sequences
were compared
with the wild
type.
Generation of HA-tagged cep1 alleles.
The
cep1 locus of strain FY1521 carries a
cep1+ allele extended with three copies of the
HA sequence. The construction of FY1521 is described elsewhere
(37). The same procedure was used to tag the
cep1-1 allele. Plasmid pUC19ura4-cep1-3HA
(37) was linearized at the single SmaI site lying
within cep1 sequences and integrated into FY1008
(cep1-1) to give FY1644 (cep1cs-HA).
 |
RESULTS |
Isolation of enhancer-of-centromere-position-effect mutants.
The overall organization of DNA sequences within fission yeast
centromere 1 (cen1) is shown in Fig.
1A. As previously demonstrated, insertion
of the marker gene ura4+ within centromeric
sequences results in repression of ura4+ gene
expression (2, 3). This can be visualized by assaying the
ability of the marked strains to grow on selective (URA
)
and counterselective (FOA) plates (see Fig. 3). Whatever the site
of ura4+ insertion within cen1, the
reporter gene is always transcriptionally repressed. However,
repression is never complete, since all integrant strains eventually
form colonies on medium lacking uracil. The level of repression is
dependent on the site of insertion, therefore defining domains within
the centromere (3). For example,
ura4+ is more tightly repressed when inserted
within the otr and imr repeats than when inserted
within the central core cnt1. In addition, expression of
ura4+ from within the central core is
temperature sensitive: increased temperature allows more growth on
URA
selective medium, but growth on FOA is inhibited.
These growth characteristics are indicative of increased expression
from the central core at higher temperatures. This property was
exploited to perform a screen for mutations which enhance
transcriptional repression (silencing) within the central core of
fission yeast centromeres.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Strategy utilized to screen for mutants which enhance
transcriptional repression within the central domain of S. pombe centromeres. (A) Schematic representation of S. pombe
cen1. (B) Screening procedure. Details are given in the text. wt,
wild type; EMS, ethyl methanesulfonate.
|
|
The different steps of the screen are depicted in Fig.
1B. The strain
FY312 (
2) carries
ura4+ within
cnt1
[TM1(
NcoI)::
ura4+].
FY312 is able to form colonies on FOA plates at 25°C, whereas
this
ability is lost at 35°C. To screen for enhanced repression,
mutants
conferring FOA resistance (FOA
r) at 35°C were isolated.
From approximately 10
7 cells plated, about 1,000 colonies
formed on FOA plates at 35°C.
Colonies were picked and further
screened for cs for growth at
18°C. Six mutants were obtained.
Mutations affecting spindle integrity
or centromere function might be
expected to be sensitive to microtubule-destabilizing
drugs such as
methyl benzimidazol-2-yl carbamylate (MBC); therefore,
subsequent to
isolation all
cep mutants were tested for the ability
to
grow in the presence of MBC. Surprisingly, the six
cep
mutant
strains were found to be resistant to MBC (Fig.
2). Dissection
of tetrads resulting from
crosses between mutants and FY312 showed
cosegregation of
MBC
r and FOA
r with the cs phenotype and 2:2
segregation versus wild type, thus
demonstrating that, for all six
mutants, a single mutation was
responsible for all phenotypes. All
mutations were found to be
recessive to wild-type alleles in
heterozygous diploids with respect
to the cs phenotype. By the same
criteria, complementation groups
were made by analysis of diploid
strains carrying pairwise combinations
of
cep mutations.
Three complementation groups were found, defining
three loci:
cep1 (one mutant allele,
cep1-1),
cep2
(four mutant
alleles,
cep2-10 to
cep2-13), and
cep3 (one mutant allele,
cep3-16).

View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Cold sensitivity and MBC resistance of cep
mutants. Cells grown at 32°C were harvested, and about
103 cells were spotted onto complete medium (YEA) with or
without MBC (20 mg/liter). Incubation times were 7 days at 18°C and 3 days at 32°C. WT, wild type.
|
|
The serial dilution growth assay shown in Fig.
3 shows the effect of
cep
mutations on the repression exerted in the central
domain of
cen1. In a wild-type background, repression of
ura4+ within
cnt1 allows growth on
FOA at 32°C (Fig.
3, top panel,
FY312). However, this ability is lost
when cells are incubated
at 36°C, showing that repression of
ura4+ expression within the centromere is
alleviated by increased temperatures
(Fig.
3, middle panel, FY312). In
contrast, all
cep mutants can
form colonies on FOA at
36°C. Consistent with enhancement of the
repression within the
centromere, the mutant colonies formed on
URA

plates at
36°C were smaller than wild-type colonies formed on
the same plate,
whereas no difference could be seen on the N/S
plate (Fig.
3, middle
panel). In the presence of a fully expressed
ura4+ gene, all
cep mutants were as
FOA sensitive as were wild-type
cells (data not shown). In addition,
the
cep mutations were also
found to enhance the repression
of the
ade6+ gene from within
cnt1,
giving rise to red rather than pink colonies
(data not shown; see
Materials and Methods). Therefore, FOA resistance
at 36°C does not
result from a general drug resistance phenotype
but is indeed a
consequence of reduced
ura4+ gene expression
from within
cen1 central core. Growth of wild-type
strains
with
ura4+ inserted at the distal end of
otr1 (FY988) or between the Ala
and Gln tRNA genes of
imr1 (FY524) on FOA is also inhibited at
36°C in
comparison to 32°C (Fig.
3, bottom panel) (
3). This
presumably reflects looser repression at these sites. The
cep1-1,
cep2-10, and
cep3-16 mutations
were also found to enhance repression
of these
ura4+ insertions as demonstrated by increased
growth on FOA at 36°C
(Fig.
3, bottom panel). This strengthens
further the link between
centromeric silencing and these
cep
mutants. The effects of
cep mutations are not centromere 1 specific since all six mutations
also showed the same effect on the
expression of
ura4+ from the central domain of
cen3 (data not shown). From the above
results, we concluded
that
cep mutants are enhancers of transcriptional
repression
within fission yeast centromeres.

View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
(Top and middle) Mutations in cep1,
cep2, and cep3 genes enhance repression of the
ura4 gene when placed within the central domain of
cen1. (Bottom) cep mutations also enhance
silencing within the outer (otr) and inner (imr)
repeats of centromere 1. Cells grown at 32°C in N/S medium were
serially diluted (one-fifth); spotted onto URA , FOA, and
N/S plates; and incubated at 32 or 36°C. About 2 × 104 cells were plated in the highest-density spots. Strains
and location of the ura4 gene are as indicated. wt, wild
type.
|
|
Mutations in the cep genes alter the fidelity of
chromosome transmission.
We have previously shown that
clr4, rik1, and swi6 mutants affect
centromeric silencing and the fidelity of transmission of chromosomes,
pointing out the link between centromeric silencing and centromere
function (3, 9, 10). As cep mutations modify centromeric silencing, we asked whether chromosome stability was also
affected. The rate of chromosome loss was estimated by scoring the
mitotic loss rate of the 530-kb Ch16 linear minichromosome (28) at 32 and 36°C (Table
2) by the half-sectoring assay method (3). In wild-type cells, the Ch16 loss rate is less than
0.1% of cell divisions (Table 2) (3, 35). As shown in Table
2, the minichromosome was lost at an elevated rate in all
cep mutants. The most dramatic increase in loss rate is seen
in cep1 and cep3 mutants, where the loss rate per
division is up to 80- to 100-fold higher than that of wild type; a
similar elevated rate was observed for rik1,
clr4, and swi6 mutants (3). For
cep2 mutants, the loss rate is moderate but still
significantly higher than that in wild type (5- to 15-fold
increase). As previously observed for suppressors of centromeric
silencing, enhancers of centromeric repression within the fission
yeast centromere also cause an elevated rate of chromosome loss,
suggesting a role for cep genes in centromere function.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 2.
Effects of cep mutations on the fidelity of
transmission of the Ch16 linear minichromosome at 32 and 36°C
|
|
Mutations in all three cep genes cause defective
mitosis at restrictive temperature.
The cep mutants
lose chromosomes at elevated rates at the permissive temperature and
are cs for growth. It is possible that the cs phenotype results from a
failure in centromere function during mitosis. To investigate this
possibility, we performed cytological analysis of mutant cells upon
shift to the restrictive temperature. Cells were grown to early log
phase at the permissive temperature (32°C) and shifted to 18°C. At
a 1.5-h interval, samples were removed for determination of survival
over time and cytological analysis. 4',6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole
(DAPI) and antitubulin antibody staining was used to visualize nuclear
chromatin and microtubules, respectively. Approximately 200 to 300 cells were observed for each time point. Based on the absence or
presence of the mitotic spindle, cells were classified to be in
interphase, metaphase and early anaphase (spindle < 5 µm) or
late anaphase (spindle > 5 µm). When shifted from 32 to 18°C,
wild-type and mutant cells nearly stopped dividing, as shown by the
very small proportion of metaphase cells (Fig.
4A), but after 4.5 h, the population was composed of about 12 to 16% metaphase cells
(Fig. 4A and D, 4.5 h). Therefore, the shift from 32 to 18°C
appeared to synchronize cells to some extent. For wild type, the
fraction of metaphase cells decreased after 4.5 h but remained
high until 6 h for all three mutants, indicating that mutant cells
spent more time in metaphase than did wild type.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Phenotypes of cep1, cep2,
and cep3 mutants at the restrictive temperature. (A to C)
Wild-type, cep1-1, cep2-12, and
cep3-16 cells were grown to early log phase at 32°C and
transferred at 18°C, and samples were taken for analysis every
1.5 h as described in the text. When shifted to the cold, cells
from wild-type and cep mutants stopped dividing (A), but
after 4.5 h, growth resumed, and a wave of mitosis was observed.
Unlike the wild-type control, cep mutant cells divided only
once at 18°C (B) and lost viability (C). (D) Cytological analysis by
DAPI (red, pseudocolor) and antitubulin staining (green). Row 1 shows
that early mitotic cells (spindle length < 5 µm) were first
observed 4.5 h after transfer at 18°C. Rows 2 and 3 show that
wild-type cells proceeded normally through mitosis (leftmost panels)
but that all three cep mutants experienced defective
chromosome segregation. After 6 h (row 2), about 50% of anaphase
cells displayed lagging and/or aberrantly segregated chromosomes, and
later (9 h [row 3]) abnormal telophase and septated cells were
observed. After 12 h (row 4), cep1 and cep2
mutants eventually arrested as interphase-like cells while
cep3-16 cells attempted a second mitosis but arrested as
metaphase-like cells (rightmost panel). (E) Centromere FISH analysis of
anaphase cells. The leftmost panel shows a wild-type cell with the
centromeres (red signal) separated at both ends of the anaphase spindle
(green). In most cases, the FISH signals in cep mutant cells
were clustered at only one pole or in the midzone of the anaphase
spindle, indicating a defect in sister chromatid separation. (F) rDNA
FISH analysis of anaphase cells showing the absence of separation of
chromosome III sister chromatids in cep mutants. Bars, 5 µm.
|
|
For all mutant strains, this wave of mitosis was characterized by the
presence of abnormal late anaphases (Fig.
4D, 6 h) in
which
chromosomes fail to segregate properly to the spindle poles.
Lagging
chromosomes were not observed in wild-type cells or mutant
cells at the
permissive temperature (data not shown). After 6
h at 18°C, the
frequency of defective anaphases in
cep mutants
was very
high, averaging 52, 46, and 58% of late-anaphase cells
for
cep1,
cep2, and
cep3 mutants,
respectively. At later time
points in the experiment, telophase cells
with lagging chromosomes
were seen, and even septated cells with
micronuclei which presumably
arose from the failure of a chromosome to
reach the pole before
the exit from mitosis (Fig.
4D, 9 h). Twelve
hours after the shift,
mitotic cells became very rare for
cep1-1 and
cep2-12 mutants,
and the population
was mainly composed of septated and interphase
cells (Fig.
4D, 12 h). At a later time point, 24 h, it was confirmed
that
cep1-1 and
cep2-12 were arrested as
interphase-like cells
(data not shown). In contrast,
cep3-16
cells attempted to go through
a second round of mitosis but were
arrested with a short, deformed
spindle. These cells first appeared
12 h after the shift (Fig.
4D, 12 h) and represented 38.5%
of the cell population after 24
h.
For all mutant strains, the cell number increased moderately after the
shift (Fig.
4B), and after 12 h, cells virtually stopped
dividing.
The cell number increased about 1.8-fold for
cep1-1 and
cep2-12 and 2.2-fold for
cep3-16, suggesting that
mutant cells
could complete only a single round of mitosis and
cytokinesis
at the restrictive
temperature.
Cell viability decreased with time for all mutants (Fig.
4C). As shown
by the cytological analysis (Fig.
4D), cell death is
likely to be the
consequence of chromosome missegregation events.
For the
cep3-16 mutant, at an additional time point, 24 h, it
was revealed that survival was close to zero, showing that the
metaphase-like arrest seen for
cep3-16 cells is an
irreversible
event.
Further cytological analysis of the phenotypes of
cep1,
cep2, and
cep3 mutants was performed by examining
the positions of
centromeres by FISH. Cells were refixed and hybridized
with a
probe detecting all three centromeres. As seen in Fig.
4E,
centromeres
lag on late-anaphase spindle in all three mutants. The
behavior
of centromeres was found to be very variable from one cell to
another; in some cells, more than three spots of fluorescence
could be
detected on the spindle, suggesting that sister chromatids
separated
correctly but were deficient in their poleward movement.
However, in
many cells, centromeric DNA remained clustered either
in the middle of
the spindle or at only one pole, suggesting a
defect in sister
chromatid disjunction and/or centromere function
(Fig.
4E). The
abnormal DAPI staining of cells shown in Fig.
4D
(6 h) is also
consistent with a failure in sister chromatid separation.
To further
investigate this point, we asked whether sister chromatids
of a given
chromosome were separated in anaphase cells with lagging
chromosomes.
Tubulin-stained cells from the 6-h point were hybridized
with a
ribosomal DNA (rDNA) probe which specifically decorates
chromosome III.
As shown in Fig.
4F and Table
3, a single
FISH
signal was often detected in anaphase cells with lagging
chromosomes,
indicating that chromosome III sister chromatids have
failed to
separate even though these cells have progressed into mid- to
late anaphase.
The above-described cytological analyses show that
cep
mutants at the restrictive temperature experience a defective mitosis
in which chromosomes fail to separate properly at anaphase while
other
mitotic events such as spindle elongation and mitotic exit
occur
normally. FISH analyses revealed that sister chromatids
of aberrantly
segregating chromosomes were often not separated.
This suggests that
cep mutations cause an inefficient, late, or
delayed
disjunction of sister chromatids, which prevents chromosomes
from
moving toward the poles at
anaphase.
The cep1 and cep2 genes encode regulatory
subunits of the proteasome.
The cep1+ and
cep2+ alleles were cloned by complementation of
the cs phenotype with a cDNA library and a genomic library,
respectively. Strains in which the complementing plasmid was integrated
by homologous recombination within insert sequences were made. Genetic
analyses showed that homologous recombination had occurred at
cep1 and cep2 loci, thus demonstrating that
cloned sequences contained the cep1+ and
cep2+ genes.
Partial sequence determination and database searches revealed that both
complementing DNAs contained known
S. pombe genes.
The
cep1 gene was found to be identical to
pad1+, an essential gene recently shown to
encode a regulatory subunit
of the proteasome (
37,
41).
Similarly, the 5-kb insert containing
the
cep2+
allele was found to contain
mts2+, an essential
gene which encodes another regulatory component
of the proteasome
(
16). Point mutations within the
mts2 coding
sequence were found in all four
cep2 mutant alleles,
resulting
in the following amino acid substitutions: D291N
(
cep2-10), G194D
(
cep2-11), G194D
(
cep2-12), and R353H (
cep2-13). These data
confirm
that
cep2 and
mts2 define a single
gene.
Cellular localization of Cep1.
The cep1 locus of
strain FY1521 carries cep1+-HA, a fully
functional cep1 allele tagged with three copies of the HA
epitope at the C terminus (37). The cs allele of
cep1-1 was also tagged with the three-HA tag
(cep1cs-HA, strain FY1644). As shown in Fig.
5, anti-HA antibodies readily detect a
protein of the expected size (39 kDa) in extracts from FY1521 and
FY1644, whereas no signal was detected in an untagged cep1+ strain. The intensity of the signal
appears lower in cep1cs-HA. A time course
experiment after shifting to the restrictive temperature showed that
the level of Cep1cs-HA remained constant with time, showing
that the cs does not result from the loss of the protein (data not
shown).

View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Western blot detection of HA-tagged Cep1 and
Cep1cs proteins. Equal amounts of total proteins from the
indicated strains were loaded in the lanes. The blot was probed with
monoclonal anti-HA antibody.
|
|
In fixed FY1521 cells, staining with anti-HA antibodies resulted in the
images shown as a montage in Fig.
6. In
interphase
cells, the Cep1-HA protein (in red) is found all around the
nucleus
(left panel). Triple labeling with anti-

-tubulin (green),
anti-Cep1-HA
(red), and DAPI (DNA, blue) allowed the visualization of
Cep1-HA
localization throughout mitosis (Fig.
6A). In early mitosis
(metaphase),
Cep1-HA remained around the nuclear periphery, while
during anaphase,
a bridge of Cep1-HA was seen to extend between the two
separating
chromosome masses. This pattern is consistent with Cep1-HA
being
located at or near the nuclear envelope throughout the entire
cell cycle. Localization of defective Cep1
cs-HA in FY1644
at 18°C was indistinguishable from that of wild-type
Cep1-HA (data
not shown). Thus, the mutant phenotypes of
cep1-1 do not
result from gross mislocalization of Cep1.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Cellular localization of Cep1. Cells from strain FY1521
(cep1+-HA) were grown to early log phase and
then fixed and stained with anti-HA (red), antitubulin (green), and
DAPI (blue). (A) Montage showing the localization of Cep1 through the
cell cycle. For each cell, the corresponding panels are placed one
below the other. From left to right, an example is shown of cells at
various stages of the cell cycle from interphase to cytokinesis. (B)
Anti-HA signal alone. Bar, 5 µm.
|
|
Chromosome segregation in other mutants with defective proteasome
function.
The mts2-1, mts3-1, and
mts5-1 (pad1-1) temperature-sensitive (dead at
36°C) mutations in components of the proteasome have been described
previously (16, 17, 37). To test if elevated rates of
chromosome loss are a general property of defective proteasome function, the minichromosome Ch16 was crossed into mts2-1,
mts3-1, and pad1-1 backgrounds, and the rate of
minichromosome loss was assessed at the permissive temperature (25°C)
and semipermissive temperature (30°C). As can be seen from Table
4, Ch16 stability is not affected at the
permissive temperature and the loss rate remains low at 30°C even
though colony growth was affected. All fission yeast proteasome mutants
isolated confer MBC resistance at permissive temperatures (32°C for
cep mutants and 25°C for mts mutants),
indicating that the gene products are not fully functional even under
permissive conditions. However, only cep alleles show
elevated chromosome loss rates in these conditions. Thus, chromosome
loss is not a general phenotype associated with defective proteasome
function but appears to be specific to the pad1
(cep1-1) and mts2 (cep2) alleles
isolated in this study.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 4.
Loss rates of the Ch16 minichromosome in proteasome
mutants at permissive (25°C) and semipermissive
(30°C) temperatures
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Two cep genes encode structural components of the
proteasome.
In this study, we report the results of a screen for
mutations which enhance silencing from within the central domain of
fission yeast centromeres. The primary screen with silencing as a sole selection gave a large number of putative mutations. An additional screen for cold sensitivity reduced the number to six cep
(centromere enhancer of position effect) mutations. They define three
genes, two of which were cloned and identified by sequence analyses. The cep1+ gene was found to be identical to
pad1+, encoding an essential regulatory subunit
of the proteasome (37, 41). Similarly,
cep2+ is identical to
mts2+, encoding another essential component of
the 19S regulatory cap of the 26S proteasome (16). In
addition to the phenotypes described, the cep1,
cep2, and cep3 mutants were also found to be
resistant to the microtubule poison MBC. This property, MBC resistance, is also shared with fission yeast strains bearing mutations in genes
encoding other components of the proteasome such as mts3 and
mts4 (16, 17, 37, 49), and overexpression of the
human pad1 homolog, POH1, results in similar phenotypes
(43). The similarity in phenotypes of all the cep
mutants and defects in other proteasome subunits strongly suggest that
cep3+ might encode another component of the
proteasome. This hypothesis awaits the isolation of the
cep3+ gene. However, attempts to clone
cep3+ by the normal approach of complementing
cep3-16 cs have so far failed, suggesting that multicopy
cep3+ could be deleterious to the cell.
Mutations in 19S cap proteasome subunits impair chromosome
segregation.
The proteasome is known to degrade critical
regulatory proteins involved in distinct cellular processes. In fission
yeast, temperature-sensitive mutations in mts2+,
mts3+, mts4+, and
pad1+ genes cause cells to be transiently
arrested at the metaphase stage of mitosis. At the restrictive
temperature, cells accumulate with a short spindle and undivided
nucleus. The spindle never elongates to the length of an anaphase
spindle but rather is degraded. Septation occurs without nuclear
division, forming an anucleate cell (16, 17, 37, 49). It has
been shown that cells with defective Mts2 are unable to degrade
ubiquitinated proteins, consistent with the idea that the metaphase
arrest results from a failure to hydrolyze APC substrates
(16). The cs alleles of mts2+ and
pad1+ isolated in this study show somewhat
different mitotic phenotypes. Unlike the heat-sensitive alleles,
cep1-1 and cep2-12 cells did not accumulate with
a short spindle but instead showed a rather normal spindle elongation
process and went through anaphase, telophase, and cytokinesis and
eventually arrested in interphase. However, the segregation of
chromosomes was defective. In roughly half of anaphase cells,
chromosomes were found to lag on the spindle, a situation which is
rarely seen with wild-type cells. FISH analyses revealed that
aberrantly segregating chromosomes had often failed to separate their
sister chromatids even in mid- to late anaphase, indicating that
cep mutants are defective in sister chromatid separation.
Similarly, cells expressing nondegradable Cut2 block sister chromatid
separation, but importantly, spindle elongation is also inhibited
(13, 14, 25). As spindle elongation is clearly not affected
in cep1 and cep2 mutants, it seems likely that
Cut2 proteolysis occurs but that another, unknown target (perhaps
centromeric) is not degraded, leading to the chromatid separation
defect observed in late anaphase (see below). Detection of changes in
Cut2 protein levels is clearly difficult with mutants which are not
completely defective in proteasome function and might just slightly
alter Cut2 dynamics.
This scenario implies that the defect in proteolysis is restricted to
certain APC substrates while others would be correctly
processed,
indicating that 19S subunits confer a level of substrate
specificity in
the degradation pathway, as previously hypothesized
by Rechsteiner et
al. (
39), Dubiel et al. (
8), and McDonald
and
Byers (
30).
In budding yeast, different 19S cap subunits apparently localize to the
nucleus (
30). In mammalian cells, proteasomes are
both
cytoplasmic and nuclear with some cell cycle-specific changes.
In
particular, proteasomes were found to localize around chromosomes
during mitosis (
36). However, a recent study with green
fluorescent
protein-tagged proteasomes in living human fibrosarcoma
cells
indicates that proteasomes are primarily located in the cytoplasm
and the nucleus, are excluded from the nucleoli, and have little
association with the nuclear envelope or perinuclear region
(
40).
This is in sharp contrast with data obtained for
fission yeast
and might reflect the fact that the nuclear envelope does
not
break down during fungal mitosis. The Cep1/Pad1-HA protein
cofractionates
with the 19S proteasome cap (
37) and here was
found to localize
predominantly at or near the nuclear periphery
throughout the
cell cycle. The Mts2p (Cep2) 19S cap subunit also has a
perinuclear
localization and colocalizes with Cep1-HA (
48).
These are the
first reports of proteasome localization in fission
yeast. It
is not known if every 26S proteasome in the cell actually
contains
Pad1 (Cep1) and Mts2 (Cep2) proteins, leaving the possibility
that only a subpopulation of 26S proteasomes is detected with
these
reagents. The existence of distinct subpopulations of proteasomes
was
suggested by experiments showing that levels of 19S ATPases
vary
differentially during development (
7). It is therefore
possible that Pad1 (Cep1)- and Mts2 (Cep2)-containing proteasomes
define a category of 26S complexes with specific mitotic functions.
Immunoelectron microscopy has since indicated that Pad1/Cep1-HA
is
predominantly located at the inner face of the nuclear envelope
(
48). Such a localization allows proteasomes to be in close
proximity to chromosomes and therefore might aid the efficient
in situ
degradation of APC substrates such as proteins involved
in sister
chromatid
cohesion.
Centromeric silencing and the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.
The mutants isolated in this study display different phenotypes
depending on the temperature. At the restrictive temperature, sister
chromatid separation is defective. At the permissive temperature of
36°C, centromeric silencing is enhanced and the Ch16 minichromosome is lost at an elevated rate. As cep1 and cep2
mutations affect components of the proteasome, it seems reasonable to
assume that the mutant phenotypes result from defective proteolysis. A
key question is whether the cep1 and cep2
chromosome segregation and silencing phenotypes result from the altered
degradation of a single protein or whether there are other protein
targets which are not properly processed and cause the enhancement of
silencing and elevated chromosome loss.
In favor of there being a single target, several studies indicate that
ubiquitination of certain chromatin proteins is required
for efficient
silencing and chromosome segregation. Loss of a
deubiquitinating
activity (Ubp3) which associates with the
S. cerevisiae
silencing protein Sir4 in vitro results in an increased
level of
repression of the silent
HML,
HMR, and telomeric
genes
(
31). Similarly, reduced dosage of a gene encoding a
putative
Drosophila deubiquitinating enzyme also acts to
enhance repression
of a variegating gene embedded in centric
heterochromatin (
20).
Conversely, mutation of the
S. cerevisiae RAD6 gene, which encodes
a ubiquitin-conjugating
activity and can ubiquitinate histones
H2A, H2B, and H3 in vitro,
results in defective transcriptional
silencing at
HML and
HMR and at telomeres (
21). Recently, Singh
et al.
(
42) have demonstrated that the putative
S. pombe
Rad6
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme homolog, Rhp6, is required to
maintain
repression of the silent
mat2 and
mat3
loci in mating-type switching-competent
cells. Again in
Drosophila, mutation of the UbcD1 gene, encoding
a putative
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, leads to a high incidence
of visible
telomere-telomere associations during anaphase (
6).
Several
of these alleles of UbcD1 also alleviate silencing phenotypes
associated with centromeric and telomeric heterochromatin
(
14a).
Therefore, ubiquitination of certain chromatin
proteins appears
to be required for silencing and chromosome
segregation. It is
not known, however, if the effect on silencing is
mediated through
the degradation of the ubiquitinated proteins or
whether ubiquitin
serves solely as a regulatory posttranslational
modification of
chromatin proteins without targeting them for
proteolysis. The
finding that proteasome mutants enhance centromeric
repression
implies that silencing might indeed be regulated by
ubiquitination-dependent
proteolysis, and it is clearly of interest to
identify the putative
centromere protein target(s), for example,
through the isolation
of suppressors of the centromeric silencing
phenotypes of
cep mutants. In this context, it is worth
noting that the
S. cerevisiae kinetochore component p58Ctf13
undergoes transient ubiquitination
and proteasome-mediated degradation
during kinetochore assembly
(
22).
In a screen designed to isolate factors affecting centromere
architecture with transcriptional silencing within fission yeast
centromeres as a primary assay, we have identified components
of the
proteasome as being effectors of centromere silencing.
This strongly
suggests that some component of silent centromeric
chromatin is subject
to regulation by proteolytic degradation.
Further investigation will
reveal how defective proteasome function
leads to enhanced repression
of marker genes residing within fission
yeast
centromeres.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank A. Carr and C. Norbury for providing S. pombe libraries, K. Gull for the gift of TAT1 monoclonal antibody,
and M. Yanagida for the gift of FISH probes and the Ch16
minichromosome. Thanks go to P. Perry, N. Davidson for the photographic
work, and A. Pidoux for useful comments on the manuscript.
J.-P.J. was supported by a Travelling Fellowship from The Wellcome
Trust and an EC Human Capital and Mobility Award to R.A. Core support
for this work was provided by the Medical Research Council of Great
Britain to R.A. Work in Bordeaux, France, was supported by the Centre
National de la Recherche Scientifique. P.B. was supported by a grant
from the Ministère de la Recherche et de l'Enseignement
Supérieur.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institut de
Biochimie et Génétique Cellulaires, CNRS UPR 9026, 1 rue
Camille Saint Saëns, 33077 Bordeaux Cedex, France. Phone: (33)
556 99 90 26. Fax: (33) 556 99 90 67. E-mail:
JPaul.Javerzat{at}ibgc.u-bordeaux2.fr.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Aasland, R., and A. F. Stewart.
1995.
The chromo shadow domain, a second chromo domain in heterochromatin-binding protein 1, HP1.
Nucleic Acids Res.
23:3163-3173.
|
| 2.
|
Allshire, R. C.,
J.-P. Javerzat,
N. J. Redhead, and G. Cranston.
1994.
Position effect variegation at fission yeast centromeres.
Cell
76:157-169[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Allshire, R. C.,
E. R. Nimmo,
K. Ekwall,
J.-P. Javerzat, and G. Cranston.
1995.
Mutations derepressing silent centromeric domains in fission yeast disrupt chromosome segregation.
Genes Dev.
9:218-233[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Altshul, S. F.,
W. Gish,
W. Miller,
E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman.
1990.
Basic local alignment search tool.
J. Mol. Biol.
215:403-410[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Beach, D.,
M. Piper, and P. Nurse.
1982.
Construction of a Schizosaccharomyces pombe gene bank in a yeast bacterial shuttle vector and its use to isolate genes by complementation.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
187:326-329[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Cenci, G.,
R. B. Rawson,
G. Belloni,
D. H. Castrillon,
M. Tudor,
R. Petrucci,
M. L. Goldberg,
S. A. Wasserman, and M. Gatti.
1997.
UbcD1, a Drosophila ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme required for proper telomere behavior.
Genes Dev.
11:863-875[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Dawson, S. P.,
J. E. Arnold,
N. J. Mayer,
S. E. Reynolds,
M. A. Billett,
C. Gordon,
L. Colleaux,
P. M. Kloetzel,
K. Tanaka, and R. J. Mayer.
1995.
Developmental changes of the 26 S proteasome in abdominal intersegmental muscles of Manduca sexta during programmed cell death.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:1850-1858[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Dubiel, W.,
K. Ferrell, and M. Rechsteiner.
1995.
Subunits of the regulatory complex of the 26S protease.
Mol. Biol. Rep.
21:27-34[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Ekwall, K.,
J.-P. Javerzat,
A. Lorentz,
H. Schmidt,
G. Cranston, and R. Allshire.
1995.
The chromodomain protein Swi6: a key component at fission yeast centromeres.
Science
269:1429-1431[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Ekwall, K.,
E. R. Nimmo,
J.-P. Javerzat,
B. Borgstrom,
R. Egel,
G. Cranston, and R. Allshire.
1996.
Mutations in the fission yeast silencing factors clr4+ and rik1+ disrupt the localisation of the chromo domain protein Swi6p and impair centromere function.
J. Cell Sci.
109:2637-2648[Abstract].
|
| 11.
|
Ekwall, K., and T. Ruusala.
1994.
Mutations in rik1, clr2, clr3 and clr4 genes asymmetrically derepress the silent mating-type loci in fission yeast.
Genetics
136:53-64[Abstract].
|
| 12.
|
Funabiki, H.,
I. Hagan,
S. Uzawa, and M. Yanagida.
1993.
Cell cycle-dependent specific positioning and clustering of centromeres and telomeres in fission yeast.
J. Cell Biol.
121:961-976[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Funabiki, H.,
H. Yamano,
K. Kumada,
K. Nagao,
T. Hunt, and M. Yanagida.
1996.
Cut2 proteolysis required for sister-chromatid separation in fission yeast.
Nature
381:438-441[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Funabiki, H.,
H. Yamano,
K. Nagao,
H. Tanaka,
H. Yasuda,
T. Hunt, and M. Yanagida.
1997.
Fission yeast Cut2 required for anaphase has two destruction boxes.
EMBO J.
16:5977-5987[Medline].
|
| 14a.
| Gatti, M. Personal communication.
|
| 15.
|
Glickman, M. H.,
D. M. Rubin,
O. Coux,
I. Wefes,
G. Pfeifer,
Z. Cjeka,
W. Baumeister,
V. A. Fried, and D. Finley.
1998.
A subcomplex of the proteasome regulatory particle required for ubiquitin-conjugate degradation and related to the COP9-signalosome and eIF3.
Cell
94:615-623[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Gordon, C.,
G. McGurk,
P. Dillon,
C. Rosen, and N. D. Hastie.
1993.
Defective mitosis due to a mutation in the gene for a fission yeast 26S protease subunit.
Nature
366:355-357[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Gordon, C.,
G. McGurk,
M. Wallace, and N. D. Hastie.
1996.
A conditional lethal mutant in the fission yeast 26 S protease subunit mts3+ is defective in metaphase to anaphase transition.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:5704-5711[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Groll, M.,
L. Ditzel,
J. Lowe,
D. Stock,
M. Bochtler,
H. D. Bartunik, and R. Huber.
1997.
Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 A resolution.
Nature
386:463-471[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Hardwick, K. G.
1998.
The spindle checkpoint.
Trends Genet.
14:1-4[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Henchoz, S.,
F. De Rubertis,
D. Pauli, and P. Spierer.
1996.
The dose of a putative ubiquitin-specific protease affects position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:5717-5725[Abstract].
|
| 21.
|
Huang, H.,
A. Kahana,
D. E. Gottschling,
L. Prakash, and S. W. Liebman.
1997.
The ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Rad6 (Ubc2) is required for silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:6693-6699[Abstract].
|
| 22.
|
Kaplan, K. B.,
A. A. Hyman, and P. K. Sorger.
1997.
Regulating the yeast kinetochore by ubiquitin-dependent degradation and Skp1p-mediated phosphorylation.
Cell
91:491-500[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Karpen, G. H., and R. C. Allshire.
1997.
The case for epigenetic effects on centromere identity and function.
Trends Genet.
13:489-496[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Kellum, R., and B. M. Alberts.
1995.
Heterochromatin protein 1 is required for correct chromosome segregation in Drosophila embryos.
J. Cell Sci.
108:1419-1431[Abstract].
|
| 25.
|
Kumada, K.,
T. Nakamura,
K. Nagao,
H. Funabiki,
T. Nakagawa, and M. Yanagida.
1998.
Cut1 is loaded onto the spindle by binding to Cut2 and promotes anaphase spindle movement upon Cut2 proteolysis.
Curr. Biol.
8:633-641[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Lorentz, A.,
L. Heim, and H. Schmidt.
1992.
The switching gene swi6 affects recombination and gene expression in the mating-type region of Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
233:436-442[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Lorentz, A.,
K. Ostermann,
O. Fleck, and H. Schmidt.
1994.
Switching gene swi6, involved in repression of silent mating-type loci in fission yeast, encodes a homologue of chromatin-associated proteins from Drosophila and mammals.
Gene
143:139-143[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Matsumoto, T.,
S. Murakami,
O. Niwa, and M. Yanagida.
1990.
Construction and characterization of centric and acentric linear minichromosomes in fission yeast.
Curr. Genet.
18:323-330.
|
| 29.
|
Maundrell, K.
1990.
nmt1 of fission yeast.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:10857-10864[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
McDonald, H. B., and B. Byers.
1997.
A proteasome cap subunit required for spindle pole body duplication in yeast.
J. Cell Biol.
137:539-553[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Moazed, D., and D. Johnson.
1996.
A deubiquitinating enzyme interacts with SIR4 and regulates silencing in S. cerevisiae.
Cell
86:667-677[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Moreno, S.,
A. Klar, and P. Nurse.
1991.
Molecular genetic analysis of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
Methods Enzymol.
194:795-823[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Nakaseko, Y.,
Y. Adachi,
S. Funahashi,
O. Niwa, and M. Yanagida.
1986.
Chromosome walking shows a highly homologous repetitive sequence present in all the centromere regions of fission yeast.
EMBO J.
5:1011-1021[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Nimmo, E. R.,
G. Cranston, and R. C. Allshire.
1994.
Telomere-associated chromosome breakage in fission yeast results in variegated expression of adjacent genes.
EMBO J.
13:3801-3811[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Niwa, O.,
T. Matsumoto,
Y. Chikashige, and M. Yanagida.
1989.
Characterization of Schizosaccharomyces pombe minichromosome deletion derivatives and a functional allocation of their centromere.
EMBO J.
8:3045-3052[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Palmer, A.,
G. G. Mason,
J. M. Paramio,
E. Knecht, and A. J. Rivett.
1994.
Changes in proteasome localization during the cell cycle.
Eur. J. Cell Biol.
64:163-175[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Penney, M.,
C. Wilkinson,
M. Wallace,
J. P. Javerzat,
K. Ferrell,
M. Seeger,
W. Dubiel,
S. McKay,
R. Allshire, and C. Gordon.
1998.
The pad1+ gene encodes a subunit of the 26 S proteasome in fission yeast.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:23938-23945[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Platero, J. S.,
T. Hartnett, and J. C. Eissenberg.
1995.
Functional analysis of the chromo domain of HP1.
EMBO J.
14:3977-3986[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Rechsteiner, M.,
L. Hoffman, and W. Dubiel.
1993.
The multicatalytic and 26 S proteases.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:6065-6068[Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Reits, E. A. J.,
A. M. Benham,
B. Plougastel,
J. Neefjes, and J. Trowsdale.
1997.
Dynamics of proteasome distribution in living cells.
EMBO J.
16:6087-6094[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Shimanuki, M.,
Y. Saka,
M. Yanagida, and T. Toda.
1995.
A novel essential fission yeast gene pad1+ positively regulates pap1(+)-dependent transcription and is implicated in the maintenance of chromosome structure.
J. Cell Sci.
108:569-579[Abstract].
|
| 42.
|
Singh, J.,
V. Goel, and A. J. Klar.
1998.
A novel function of the DNA repair gene rhp6 in mating-type silencing by chromatin remodeling in fission yeast.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:5511-5522[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Spataro, V.,
T. Toda,
R. Craig,
M. Seeger,
W. Dubiel,
A. L. Harris, and C. Norbury.
1997.
Resistance to diverse drugs and ultraviolet light conferred by overexpression of a novel human 26 S proteasome subunit.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:30470-30475[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Steiner, N. C.,
K. M. Hahnenberger, and L. Clarke.
1993.
Centromeres of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe are highly variable genetic loci.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:4578-4587[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Takahashi, K.,
S. Murakami,
Y. Chikashige,
H. Funabiki,
O. Niwa, and M. Yanagida.
1992.
A low copy number central sequence with strict symmetry and unusual chromatin structure in fission yeast centromere.
Mol. Biol. Cell
3:819-835[Abstract].
|
| 46.
|
Thon, G.,
A. Cohen, and A. J. Klar.
1994.
Three additional linkage groups that repress transcription and meiotic recombination in the mating-type region of Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
Genetics
138:29-38[Abstract].
|
| 47.
|
Thon, G., and A. J. Klar.
1992.
The clr1 locus regulates the expression of the cryptic mating-type loci of fission yeast.
Genetics
131:287-296[Abstract].
|
| 48.
|
Wilkinson, C. R.,
M. Wallace,
M. Morphew,
P. Perry,
R. Allshire,
J. P. Javerzat,
J. R. McIntosh, and C. Gordon.
1998.
Localization of the 26S proteasome during mitosis and meiosis in fission yeast.
EMBO J.
17:6465-6476[Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Wilkinson, C. R.,
M. Wallace,
M. Seeger,
W. Dubiel, and C. Gordon.
1997.
Mts4, a non-ATPase subunit of the 26 S protease in fission yeast, is essential for mitosis and interacts directly with the ATPase subunit Mts2.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:25768-25777[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Wolf, D. A., and P. K. Jackson.
1998.
Cell cycle: oiling the gears of anaphase.
Curr. Biol.
8:636-639.
|
| 51.
|
Woods, A.,
T. Sherwin,
R. Sasse,
T. H. MacRae,
A. J. Baines, and K. Gull.
1989.
Definition of individual components within the cytoskeleton of Trypanosoma brucei by a library of monoclonal antibodies.
J. Cell Sci.
93:491-500[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 1999, p. 5155-5165, Vol. 19, No. 7
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Horn, P. J., Bastie, J.-N., Peterson, C. L.
(2005). A Rik1-associated, cullin-dependent E3 ubiquitin ligase is essential for heterochromatin formation. Genes Dev.
19: 1705-1714
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Choi, E. S., Kim, H. S., Jang, Y. K., Hong, S. H., Park, S. D.
(2002). Two Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzymes, Rhp6 and UbcX, Regulate Heterochromatin Silencing in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Cell. Biol.
22: 8366-8374
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sig Nielsen, I., Nielsen, O., Murray, J. M., Thon, G.
(2002). The Fission Yeast Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzymes UbcP3, Ubc15, and Rhp6 Affect Transcriptional Silencing of the Mating-Type Region. Eukaryot Cell
1: 613-625
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Huang, Y.
(2002). Transcriptional silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nucleic Acids Res
30: 1465-1482
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Briscoe, A. , Jr., Tomkiel, J. E.
(2000). Chromosomal Position Effects Reveal Different cis-Acting Requirements for rDNA Transcription and Sex Chromosome Pairing in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics
155: 1195-1211
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ekwall, K., Cranston, G., Allshire, R. C.
(1999). Fission Yeast Mutants That Alleviate Transcriptional Silencing in Centromeric Flanking Repeats and Disrupt Chromosome Segregation. Genetics
153: 1153-1169
[Abstract]
[Full Text]