Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology,
Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York 14263
Received 14 December 1998/Returned for modification 29 April
1999/Accepted 10 May 1999
One of the major actions of interleukin-6 (IL-6) is the
transcriptional activation of acute-phase plasma proteins (APP) genes in liver cells. Signaling by the IL-6 receptor is mediated through the
signal transducing subunit gp130 and involves the activation of
Janus-associated kinases (JAKs), signal transducer and activator of
transcription 3 (STAT3), and mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase.
Functional analysis of gp130 in rat hepatoma cells by using transduced
chimeric G-CSFR-gp130 receptor constructs demonstrates that SHP-2, the
Src homology 2 (SH2) domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase,
acts as a negative regulator of the JAK/STAT signaling in part by
downregulating JAK activity, thereby indirectly moderating the
induction of STAT3-dependent APP genes. This study shows that in
hepatoma cells, the recruitment and tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP-2,
but not SHC, is the primary signaling event associated with the
activation of MAP kinases (ERK1/2) by gp130. Overexpression of
truncated SHP-2 that lacks Grb2-interacting sites, but not the
full-length catalytically inactive SHP-2, reduces ERK activation by
IL-6, confirming the signal-mediating role of SHP-2. Activation of
ERK1/2 is correlated with induction of the immediate-early response
genes. Stimulation of the c-fos, c-jun, and
egr-1 genes is essentially absent in cells expressing gp130
with a Y759F mutation, which is unable to recruit SHP-2. Interestingly,
both JAK/STAT and SHP-2 pathways regulate the induction of the
junB gene. Moreover, disengagement of SHP-2 from gp130
signaling not only enhances APP gene induction but also further reduces
cell proliferation, in part correlated with the attenuated expression
of immediate-early response genes. These results suggest that IL-6
regulation of APP genes is affected by SHP-2 in two ways: SHP-2 acts as
a phosphatase on the JAK/STAT pathway and serves as linker to the MAP
kinase pathway, which in turn moderates APP production.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The Src homology 2 (SH2)
domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase, SHP-2, interacts with
many proteins by recognizing the tyrosine-phosphorylated Y(I/V)X(L/V/I)
motifs through its amino-terminal SH2 domain (for a review, see
reference 53). This protein-protein interaction
enhances the tyrosine phosphatase activity of SHP-2 by relieving the
inhibitory intramolecular interaction between the amino-terminal SH2
domain and the catalytic phosphatase domain (26). Upon
tyrosine phosphorylation, several growth factor receptors are detected
in association with SHP-2 (receptors for platelet-derived growth factor
[PDGF], epidermal growth factor [EGF], fibroblast growth factor,
and insulin) (30, 32, 68, 69), cytokine receptors (receptors
for interleukin-2 [IL-2], IL-3, IL-6, and interferon) (1, 13,
17, 64, 77), and adapter molecules (insulin receptor substrate
[IRS], daughter of sevenless [DOS], SHP substrate
1/signal-regulatory protein [SHPS-1/SIRP/BIT], and
platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 [PECAM-1]) (18,
24, 31, 40, 54, 58, 67). Based on cell biological data and
genetic evidence from Drosophila, Caenorhabditis
elegans, and mice, SHP-2 is a positive regulator of cell
proliferation (20, 24, 59, 79). Invariably, SHP-2 has been
linked to the process of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase
activation (45, 68). Two different mechanisms have been
suggested by which SHP-2 activates MAP kinases (ERK1/2). One mechanism,
which appears not to depend on the phosphatase activity of SHP-2, is
through tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP-2 as observed in response to
PDGF, IL-3, and IL-6-type cytokines (19, 45, 77). Among the
possible tyrosine phosphorylation sites that reside primarily in the
C-terminal half of SHP-2, which also harbors the phosphatase domain,
are four sites with the YXNX motifs known to serve as docking element
for Grb2 (growth factor receptor binding protein 2). Grb2 itself is
constitutively associated with SOS (son of sevenless), the GTP exchange
factor for Ras. Activation of Ras by the SHP-2-Grb2-SOS route induces
the phosphorylation and activation of Raf-1/MEK-1/MAP kinases. The
second mechanism is dependent on the substrate binding and/or
phosphatase activity of SHP-2 (47, 53). In the examples of
insulin and EGF signaling, it has been proposed that the phosphatase
activity of SHP-2 is important in the activation of the MAP kinase
pathway by removing inhibitory phosphates in receptor or adapter
molecules. In these cases, overexpression of the catalytically inactive
SHP-2 mutant suppresses the activation of MAP kinases (32,
72).
Initiation of signaling by IL-6R results in a rapid tyrosine
phosphorylation of Janus-associated kinases (JAKs), signal transducers and activators of transcription (STATs), and SHP-2. Activation of JAKs
and STAT3 is essential for the several biological activities of IL-6,
in particular for stimulation or inhibition of proliferation (19,
46, 49, 63, 80) and induction of acute-phase plasma protein (APP)
genes (42). Mutational studies of gp130, the
signal-transducing receptor subunit for IL-6 cytokines, demonstrates
that tyrosine residues Y769, Y814, Y905, and Y915, which are part of
the YXXQ motif, upon phosphorylation, are docking sites for STAT3 or
STAT1 (23, 63), whereas Y759 is the site of SHP-2
interaction (19, 34). Although the role of SHP-2 in
activation of the MAP kinase pathway is recognized, a connection of
this pathway with induction of genes such as the APP genes has not been demonstrated.
Our previous studies suggested that SHP-2 downregulates gp130-mediated
signaling by associating with the phosphorylated Y759 of gp130 and
exerting tyrosine phosphatase activity, possibly onto JAK
(34). By preventing recruitment of SHP-2 by the Y759F mutation in gp130, a prolonged activation of JAK and STAT3 and correspondingly enhanced and more sensitive gene induction of APP was
obtained. However, these studies could not demonstrate the relative
contribution of the SHP-2-dependent downstream signaling pathways to
modulated gene induction.
This report shows that recruitment of SHP-2 by gp130 is primarily
responsible for the activation of ERK1 and ERK2 in rat hepatoma cells.
Moreover, we demonstrate that gp130, through SHP-2 and ERKs, induces a
subset of immediate-early response genes. Enhanced ERK activity did not
affect immediate induction of APP genes by IL-6, but during long-term
treatment it influenced APP expression indirectly by attenuating the
inhibitory effect of IL-6 on cell proliferation.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell lines and cytokines.
Rat hepatoma H-35 cells (clone
T-7-18 [4]), the epidermal growth factor
receptor-positive clone 86-6 (74) of human HepG2 cells
(36), were cultured in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. In general, cell cultures used
for analyzing signaling were maintained for 24 h in serum-free medium prior to extraction. Cells were treated in serum-free minimal essential medium containing 50 ng of human recombinant IL-6 (Genetics Institute, Cambridge, Mass.) per ml, 50 ng of granulocyte
colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; Immunex, Seattle, Wash.) per ml, 500 ng of insulin (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) per ml, 100 ng of EGF
(Calbiochem, San Diego, Calif.) per ml, or PD98059 (Calbiochem) at 25 µM (long term) or 75 µM (short term).
Plasmid constructs and antibodies.
The cDNAs to mouse SHP-2
(EcoRI-NotI fragment from pREP4-SHP-2),
catalytically inactive SHP-2C463S (from pREP4-SHP-2CS)
(54; generously provided by H. Ohnishi), and mouse
SHP-2 (positions 1 to 552) with a variant C-terminal 33-residue
extension (lacking the most C-terminal Grb2 binding site)
(16; generously provided by G.-S. Feng) were
inserted as NotI fragments into the expression vector pDC302
(50), resulting in pDC-SHP-2, pDC-SHP-2CS, and pDC-SHP-2var,
respectively. The corresponding epitope-tagged constructs, containing
the Myc epitope added to the N terminus of SHP-2, SHP-2CS, and the
C-terminally truncated SHP-2
C (positions 1 to 545; lacking the two
potential C-terminal Grb2 binding sites), as well as the Myc epitope
added to the C terminus of the 214-residue amino-terminal segment of
SHP-2 (containing the two tandem SH-2 domains but lacking the entire
catalytic phosphatase domain including the four potential Grb2 binding
sites), SHP-2
, were generated by PCR, verified by sequencing, and
inserted into pDC302. The chimeric receptors containing the
extracellular domains of human G-CSF receptor (G-CSFR) and transmembrane and full-length wild-type or Y259F (=Y2F) cytoplasmic domain of gp130 with the C-terminal FLAG epitope and termed G-gp130(WT) and G-gp130(Y2F), respectively, have been described previously (34). The equivalent FLAG epitope (DYKDDDDK) was also added to the C terminus of truncated versions of G-gp130(133)
(42), yielding G-gp130(133)WT-FLAG and G-gp130(133)Y2F-FLAG.
The chimeric receptor constructs were cloned into the retroviral vector
MINV (22) and used to generate stably transduced H-35 cells
(34). Transduced cells were selected in medium containing 2 mg of G-418 per ml. Primary clones were screened for the level of
chimeric receptor protein by Western blotting, G-CSF binding, and
G-CSF-specific stimulation of sis-inducible element binding
activity of STAT3; expression of haptoglobin,
2-macroglobulin, and thiostatin genes; and attenuated
cell proliferation. Based on the observation that the cell responses
generally correlated with the level of receptor protein, most of the
characterization of signaling has been carried out with two
representative lines of H-35 cells expressing equal amounts of G-gp130
receptor protein. The responsiveness of the pool of transduced cells
and separate primary clones is shown in Fig. 6A and 8B, respectively.
Anti-FLAG monoclonal (M2) antibodies were purchased from Kodak
(Rochester, N.Y.); polyclonal antibodies against FLAG, SHP-2, gp130,
and Grb2 (C-23) and monoclonal antibodies against Myc (9E10) were
obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, Calif.); and
polyclonal antibodies against Myc and the N-terminal epitope of SHP-2
were obtained from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. (Lake Placid, N.Y.).
Phosphorylation-specific anti-STAT3 and anti-ERK1/2 antibodies were
purchased from New England Biolabs (Beverly, Mass.). Phosphotyrosine
antibodies (PY20), and anti-SHC antibodies were purchased from
Transduction Laboratory (Lexington, Ky.).
Isolation of transiently transfected HepG2 cells by FACS.
HepG2 cells in 15-cm-diameter dishes (4 × 106
cells/dish) were transfected by the calcium phosphate method
(33) with a total of 20 µg of DNA per ml including 1 µg
of pEGFP(N1) (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.) per ml and expression
vectors for G-gp130(WT) (0.5 to 5 µg/ml) or SHP-2 forms (5 µg/ml).
At 36 h after transfection, the cells were released by trypsin,
dispersed into a single-cell suspension (7.5 × 106
cells/ml), and subjected to sterile high-speed fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) (7.5 × 104 cells/sec) in a
Vantage instrument with TurboSort option (Becton Dickinson). Green
fluorescent protein (GFP)-positive (~5% of total cell population)
and -negative (control) cells were collected. Post-sort analysis of
GFP-positive cell population by FACScan indicated that >90% of cells
had the gated phenotype. Cells were replated into 24- or 96-well
culture plates and cultured for 24 h prior to analysis.
Immunoprecipitation and Western blotting.
Cells were lysed
in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)-1% Nonidet P-40-150 mM sodium
chloride-0.25% sodium lauroyl sarcosine-1 mM activated sodium
orthovanadate-1 mM sodium fluoride-10% glycerol-protease inhibitors
(34). Cell lysates were incubated with 1 to 2 µg of
antibodies for 2 h. Immune complexes were recovered by binding to
protein G-Sepharose beads. Immunoprecipitated proteins were electrophoresed on sodium dodecyl sulfate-7.5 or 10% polyacrylamide gels, electrotransferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Schleicher & Schuell, Keene, N.H.), and reacted with primary antibodies and secondary antibodies (horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rat goat antibodies [Cappel, West Chester, Pa.])
in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)-150 mM NaCl-0.1% Tween 20 containing 4%
milk or 1% albumin. Immune complexes were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL; Amersham, Piscataway, N.J.). To perform additional antibody reactions, membranes were treated with 0.1 M
glycine (pH 2.7) in 0.1 M sodium chloride for 16 h.
Northern hybridization.
Total cellular RNAs were extracted
by either the Trizol method (Life Technology, Grand Island, N.Y.) or
the guanidine chloride-CsCl method (12). mRNAs were purified
on mini-oligo(dT) cellulose spin column. The RNAs were separated on a
1.5% formaldehyde-agarose gel, transferred onto a nylon membrane
(Schleicher & Schuell), and reacted with 32P-labeled
cDNA probes for egr-1, junB, c-jun,
c-fos, haptoglobin, and triosephosphate isomerase
(3).
Thymidine incorporation assay.
Cells were seeded into
96-well plates (2.5 × 104 cells/well) and cultured
for 24 h. They were then treated for 8 h with serum-free medium followed by the same medium with or without cytokines (six to
eight separate wells per treatment). After 16 h, 0.4 µCi of [3H]thymidine was added to the cultures and incubation
was continued for 8 h. The cells were washed, trypsinized, and
collected onto filter paper with a cell harvester. Incorporation of
3H was measured with a liquid scintillation counter
(Wallac, Gaithersburg, Md.). Statistical evaluation of the data was
performed by Student's t test.
 |
RESULTS |
The G-gp130(Y2F) receptor is deficient in signaling to MAP
kinase.
To study the signaling of gp130 toward APP genes in
hepatic cells that contain endogenous gp130, we resorted to the use of the G-CSFR-gp130 chimeric receptor, in which the extracellular domain
of G-CSFR was recombined with the transmembrane and the cytoplasmic
domain of gp130 (5). This receptor undergoes a G-CSF-mediated dimerization (27), thereby mimicking
IL-6-induced dimerization of the gp130 cytoplasmic domain and
initiation of signaling identical to IL-6R (76). We
established H-35 cells stably transduced with FLAG epitope-tagged
G-CSFR-gp130 wild type [termed G-gp130(WT)] or
G-CSFR-gp130Y759F that contains a mutant SHP-2 docking site [termed
G-gp130(Y2F)] (34). Four independently transduced cultures
indicated that G-gp130(WT) was consistently two to four times more
highly expressed than G-gp130(Y2F) (34; see the
example in Fig. 6A). To assess the proposed role of SHP-2 in connecting
gp130 to the MAP kinase pathway and to identify the effects of MAP
kinase on APP regulation, we selected clonal lines that express
equivalent amounts of chimeric receptors, as determined in a whole-cell
extract by immunoblotting with anti-FLAG polyclonal antibodies and
shown for two representative lines in Fig.
1A. The two cell lines also displayed
comparable 125I-G-CSF binding activity, indicating
approximately 1,500 ligand binding sites per cell (data not shown).
Brief treatment of the cells with G-CSF led to similar levels of
tyrosine phosphorylation of the chimeric receptors recovered by
immunoprecipitation (Fig. 1B). Phosphorylation of the chimeric receptor
was also in a similar range to that for the endogenous gp130 activated
by IL-6 (Fig. 1C, top). As expected, G-gp130(Y2F) cells failed to
recruit SHP-2 to the chimeric receptors (Fig. 1C, right). Moreover, the
analysis demonstrated that activated G-gp130(WT) and endogenous gp130
appeared to interact with SHP-2 (as shown by coimmunoprecipitation) and mediated its tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 1C, top) but that nonappreciable amounts of tyrosine-phosphorylated SHP-2, in contrast to
non-tyrosine-phosphorylated SHP-2, were found in association with
G-gp130 (Fig. 1B and C, bottom).

View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Expression of G-gp130(WT) and G-gp130(Y2F) in H-35
cells. (A) Aliquots of total-cell extracts (30 µg of protein) from
parental H-35 cells, G-gp130(WT) cells, and G-gp130(Y2F) cells were
separated on 7.5% polyacrylamide gels. After being transferred to a
membrane, the proteins were reacted with anti-FLAG polyclonal
antibodies. (B) Confluent monolayers of parental H-35 cells,
G-gp130(WT) cells, and G-gp130(Y2F) cells in 10-cm-diameter dishes were
treated for 10 min with G-CSF and then lysed. Proteins were
immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-FLAG monoclonal antibodies and
analyzed on Western blots (WB) first with antiphosphotyrosine (PY)
antibodies and then with anti-FLAG polyclonal antibodies. Ig,
immunoglobulin. (C) G-gp130(WT) and G-gp130(Y2F) cells were treated for
10 min with G-CSF or IL-6. Half of the cell lysate was reacted with
anti-SHP-2, and the other half was reacted with anti-FLAG.
Immunoprecipitated proteins were analyzed by Western blotting first
with antiphosphotyrosine and then with anti-SHP-2 antibodies.
|
|
Since signaling by gp130 cytoplasmic domains is a function of cytokine
treatment, we established the kinetics of the action by the endogenous
gp130 in parental H-35 cells as a standard for comparison, by
determining the phosphorylation of gp130 and SHP-2 (Fig. 2A and
B) and of STAT3 and ERK1/2 (Fig. 2C).
IL-6 treatment elicited a temporally coordinated tyrosine
phosphorylation of gp130 and SHP-2, with maximum phosphorylation after
5 to 15 min, which returned to close to the basal level by 30 min (Fig.
2A). Of note is that a low-to-trace-level tyrosine phosphorylation of
both gp130 and SHP-2 persisted over the subsequent 4-h treatment period. Moreover, the results in Fig. 2A suggested that phosphorylated gp130 interacted with SHP-2 but not with tyrosine-phosphorylated SHP-2,
forming a complex that would remain intact under the conditions of the
immunoprecipitation procedure. Sequential reactions of cell lysates
with antibodies against gp130 and SHP-2 confirmed that gp130
immunoprecipitation led to a representative recovery of the cellular
receptor subunit (Fig. 2B).

View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Time course of STAT3 and ERK activation. (A) H-35 cells
in 10-cm-diameter dishes were treated with IL-6 for the times indicated
and then lysed. Half of the lysate was reacted with anti-SHP-2
antibodies, and the other half was reacted with anti-gp130 antibodies.
The two series of immunoprecipitates (IP) were analyzed under identical
conditions by immunoblotting with antiphosphotyrosine (PY) antibodies
and subsequently with anti-SHP-2 antibodies (top) or anti-gp130
(bottom). (B) Lysates from control and IL-6-treated culture were
immunoprecipitated (First IP) with anti-gp130 antibodies. The
supernatant lysate fractions were divided into two. Half was
immunoprecipitated (Second IP) with anti-SHP-2 antibodies, and the
other half was immunoprecipitated with anti-gp130 antibodies. In the
latter immunoprecipitation, after binding to protein G-Sepharose, the
resin was not washed but immediately boiled in sodium dodecyl sulfate
buffer. Half of the first and all of the two second immunoprecipitates
were separated on one sodium dodecyl sulfate-7.5% polyacrylamide gel.
The blotted proteins were reacted first with antiphosphotyrosine and
then with anti-gp130 antibodies. (C) Parental H-35, G-gp130(WT), and
G-gp130(Y2F) cells in six-well culture plates were treated with IL-6,
G-CSF, or insulin for the indicated times. Aliquots of whole-cell
lysate (30 µg protein) were analyzed by immunoblotting for
tyrosine-phosphorylated STAT3, STAT3, phosphorylated ERK1/2, and ERK in
the same membrane.
|
|
ERK1/2 and STAT3 were activated in response to IL-6 with a kinetics
that was in part comparable to the phosphorylation of gp130 (Fig. 2C,
top). A notable difference was that the level of phosphotyrosine STAT3
was elevated longer than that of phosphorylated ERK1/2, as seen after
the 30-min treatment. Interestingly, the kinetics of ERK1/2 activation
correlated closely with that of tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP-2 and
gp130 (Fig. 2A). The very transient ERK1/2 activation appears to be
characteristic to IL-6, because treatment of H-35 cells with insulin
produced a significantly prolonged activation of ERKs with minimal
effect on STAT3 (Fig. 2C, bottom).
Since both SHP-2 and SHC have been suggested to be signaling molecules
connecting gp130 with the MAP kinase pathway (41, 55), we
examined the contribution of SHP-2 in G-gp130 cell lines (Fig. 2C). In
separate experiments (results not shown), we established that both
G-gp130 and G-gp130(Y2F) cells responded to IL-6 by an activation of
ERK1/2 that was practically indistinguishable from the parental cells.
Treatment with G-CSF elicited an appreciable activation of ERK1/2 only
in G-gp130(WT) cells. G-gp130(Y2F) cells essentially failed to activate
ERK1/2 (Fig. 2C). The strong phosphorylation of STAT3 in both cell
lines attested to the comparable signaling capabilities of each
chimeric receptor through the JAK/STAT pathway. The activation of
ERK1/2 and STAT3 by G-CSF in G-gp130(WT) cells showed essentially the
same kinetics as did activation by IL-6. In contrast, and in agreement
with previous data (34), G-CSF treatment of G-gp130(Y2F)
cells produced a prolonged STAT3 activation.
To assess the potential involvement of SHC in the gp130 signaling
process, we measured gp130-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of
immunodetectable SHC in both G-gp130(WT) and gp130(Y2F) cells (Fig.
3). Insulin treatment served as a
positive control of SHC activation. IL-6 and G-CSF treatments did not
detectably enhance the phosphorylation of SHC. In contrast, insulin
treatment led to a prominent tyrosine phosphorylation of SHC (52-kDa
isoform) and corresponding association of SHC with Grb2 (Fig. 3, top). The complementary analysis of immunoprecipitated Grb2 demonstrated the
recovery of tyrosine-phosphorylated SHP-2 from IL-6- or G-CSF-treated G-gp130(WT) cells and from only IL-6-treated G-gp130(Y2F) cells (Fig.
3, bottom). In contrast, Grb2 immunoprecipitates from the insulin-treated cells yielded tyrosine-phosphorylated SHC and IRS
protein but a negligible amount of SHP-2. The results suggested that
the activation of the STAT pathway and the MAP kinase pathway by gp130
is separable and that SHP-2 may function as a major mediator of the
gp130 signal to ERK1/2.

View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Interaction of Grb2 with SHP-2 but not with SHC by gp130
signaling. G-gp130(WT) cells and G-gp130(Y2F) cells in 10-cm-diameter
dishes were treated for 10 min with medium alone, G-CSF, IL-6, or
insulin. Half of the cell lysate was immunoprecipitated (IP) with
anti-SHC antibodies, and the other half was immunoprecipitated with
anti-Grb2 antibodies. Immunoprecipitated proteins were separated on a
sodium dodecyl sulfate-10% polyacrylamide gel, and immunoblots were
reacted with antiphosphotyrosine (PY) and then anti-Grb2 and anti-SHC
(top) or antiphosphotyrosine, anti-SHP-2, and anti-Grb2 (bottom). Note
that in H-35 cells the 52-kDa isoform of SHC predominates and the
66-kDa isoform is undetectable.
|
|
Role of SHP-2 in activation of MAP kinases.
We sought an
independent demonstration of the suggested role of SHP-2 in connecting
gp130 to the MAP kinase pathway. We reasoned that the amino-terminal
segment of SHP-2, containing the two SH2 domains but lacking the
phosphorylation domain and the four potential Grb2 binding sites
(SHP-2
), would be sufficient to bind to phosphorylated Y759 of gp130
but would abort subsequent signal propagation in a dominant negative
fashion because of the absence of its phosphorylation sites acting as
Grb2 docking elements. On the other hand, the enzymatically active
SHC-2 variant that lacks the C-terminal binding sequence for Grb2
(16) or the catalytically inactive SHP-2CS should support
the ERK activation process if only presentation of Grb2 docking sites
is required of SHP-2. Moreover, the SHP-2CS could maintain a
wild-type-like signal-transducing role through the process of substrate
trapping (53).
Overexpressed SHP-2
(33a), like SHP-2CS (34,
66), in transiently transfected hepatoma cells yielded a minor
enhancing activity on IL-6-mediated induction of cotransfected IL-6RE
chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter constructs, probably by
preventing endogenous wild-type SHP-2 from acting as a phosphatase on
the JAK/STAT pathway. However, it was not possible to determine whether these SHP-2 mutants would also modify activation of the ERK pathway. Our attempts to establish, by transfection or retroviral transduction, H-35 cells with stable expression of SHP-2 mutants at a level effective
in suppressing the endogenous SHP-2 action were unsuccessful. Therefore, we resorted to an alternative approach. We overexpressed SHP-2CS or SHP-2
in transiently transfected HepG2 cells, which, unlike H-35 cells, have the ability to take up and express plasmid constructs at relatively high levels. The transfected cells in the
culture were isolated by FACS with cotransfected GFP as marker. Coselected GFP-negative cells served as experimental controls. IL-6
treatment of the GFP-positive cells overexpressing SHP-2CS resulted in
an ERK activation as seen with GFP-negative control cells, whereas the
cells overexpressing SHP-2
had a significantly suppressed activation
(Fig. 4A). The equal
tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT3 in both cell types attested to the
proper signaling function of gp130 towards the JAK-STAT pathway.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Effect of overexpressed SHP-2 mutants on the activation
of MAP kinases. HepG2 cells were transfected with expression vectors
for GFP and SHP-2CS or SHP-2 . (A) GFP-negative and GFP-positive
cells were selected by FACS and, after a 24-h reculture period, treated
with IL-6 for 15 min. Equal amounts of cell lysate (30 µg protein)
were separated on one sodium dodecyl sulfate-10% polyacrylamide gel.
After protein transfer, the membrane was cut along the 60-kDa position
(dotted line), the top part was reacted with antiphosphotyrosine (PY)
STAT3, and the bottom part was reacted with antiphosphotyrosine ERK.
Then both sections were reacted with anti-SHP-2 recognizing the
N-terminal epitope, and the bottom section was reacted with anti-ERK.
(B) HepG2 cells were transfected with expression vectors for GFP and
SHP-2CS or SHP-2 . FACS-selected GFP-negative and GFP-positive cells
(2 × 105 per well in 24-well culture plates) were
cultured overnight. After incubation for 8 h in serum-free medium,
the cells were stimulated for 10 min with medium alone or with insulin
or EGF. Equal amounts of whole-cell lysate were analyzed by Western
blotting for phosphorylated ERK. (C) HepG2 cells in 15-cm-diameter
dishes were transfected with expression vector for G-gp130(WT) (5 µg/ml) and Myc SHP-2CS or SHP-2 -Myc (5 µg/ml). After the cultures
were divided into two and allowed to recover for 36 h, the cells were
treated for 15 min with medium alone (control) or G-CSF. G-gp130
protein was immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-FLAG antibodies and
analyzed by Western blotting (WB). The membrane section with proteins
of >100 kDa was reacted first with antiphosphotyrosine (PY) and then
with anti-FLAG antibodies. The membrane section with proteins of <100
kDa was reacted with anti-Myc antibodies. The same ECL exposure for
each section is reproduced; however, the portions showing SHP-2CS and
SHP-2 have been rearranged due to the size difference of the
proteins. (D) HepG2 cells in 10-cm-diameter dishes were transfected
with the expression vectors for the Myc epitope-tagged versions of the
indicated SHP-2 proteins (5 µg/ml). Subcultures were treated for 15 min with medium alone (control) or with IL-6. Proteins were
immunoprecipitated with anti-Myc antibodies (IP:Myc) and analyzed by
Western blotting first for reaction with antiphosphotyrosine antibodies
(WB:PY) and then for reaction with anti-Myc antibodies (WB:Myc). The
composite shows only the sections of the Myc-reacting proteins. Due to
the high level of expressed proteins, the ECL reaction for anti-Myc is
much shorter than for antiphosphotyrosine.
|
|
To identify the specificity of SHP-2 mutants to interfere with receptor
signaling toward the MAP kinase pathway, we applied the same
experimental approach to measure the effects of transiently overexpressed SHP-2CS or SHP-2
on activation of ERKs by insulin and
EGF. In the EGFR+ HepG2 cell line 86-6, insulin and EGF
activated ERK1/2 to a somewhat lower level than IL-6 did (compare Figs.
4A and B). Overexpressed SHP-2CS and SHP-2
did not prevent ERK
activation by growth factors, but both mutant forms appeared to reduce
the magnitude of immunodetectable phosphorylated ERKs (Fig. 4B).
Notable was that SHP-2
did not exert as prominent a suppressive
action on signaling by insulin or EGF as on signaling by IL-6. This
suggests that the growth factor receptors engage alternative pathways,
such as through SHC-Grb2 (Fig. 3 for insulin), which activate MAP
kinase in hepatoma cells independently of SHP-2.
In separate sets of experiments (data not presented), we determined
that the SHP-2 proteins, with a variant C-terminal sequence (SHP-2var)
or with a C-terminal truncation (SHP-2
C) overexpressed in HepG2
cells, did not produce a significantly impaired activation of ERK1/2 by
IL-6 treatment and did not produce a deregulated, transdominant
positive ERK activation. The difference in action of these SHP-2
mutants, as well as SHP-2CS, from SHP-2
was tentatively attributed
to the Grb2 recruiting capability retained by the former SHP-2
proteins. However, the results do not rule out the possibility that
different degrees of substrate trapping (53) and/or
catalytic action by the overexpressed SHP constructs did contribute to
the observed "normal" IL-6 response. Alternatively, the prominent inhibitory effect of SHP-2
but not of the other SHP-2 mutants could
be related to substantially different binding activities of the SHP-2
proteins to gp130, thereby determining the degree of inhibited ERK
activation through termination of signal communication.
Two separate analyses identified gp130 interaction and activation of
SHP-2. Transient overexpression of FLAG-tagged G-gp130(WT) and
Myc-tagged SHP-2 proteins in HepG2 cells permitted the detection of
comparable ligand-induced interaction of G-gp130 with SHP-2CS or
SHP-2
by coimmunoprecipitation (Fig. 4C). Since tyrosine
phosphorylation of receptor-associated SHP-2 proteins was not
detectable (wild-type SHP-2 is shown in Fig. 1C and 2A), we determined
in separate transfection experiments the recovery of SHP-2 proteins
with enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation by the action of the endogenous
IL-6R (Fig. 4D). The results indicate that wild-type SHP-2, SHP-2SC,
and the C-terminally truncated SHP-2
C, which all contain potential
Grb2 binding sites, are sensitive to gp130-dependent tyrosine
phosphorylation. In contrast, no significant modification of SHP-2
protein was detectable (Fig. 4D, bottom), even though SHP-2
protein
was observed in physical association with ligand-activated gp130 (Fig.
4C). Collectively, the results suggest that the gp130-recruited SHP-2
serves as a major mediator to the ERK pathway and that this function
requires the carboxy-terminal half but not the phosphatase activity of the SHP-2 protein.
Modified pattern of gene activation by G-gp130(Y2F) cells.
A
number of immediate-growth-response genes, such as egr-1,
c-fos, c-jun, and junB, are controlled
by the ERK-sensitive serum response factor/ternary complex factor
(SRF/TCF) and/or AP-1 components. This would explain, in part, why
these immediate-response genes are induced in cells treated with IL-6
cytokines (71, 73). Since the role of the gp130-controlled
ERK pathway for induction of immediate-response genes has not been
demonstrated in hepatic cells or related to the induction of APP genes,
the stable G-gp130 H-35 cell lines appeared well suited to define this
connection. Short-term treatment of the cells with IL-6 indicated an
increase in production of mRNAs for Egr-1, c-Fos, and c-Jun, which was maximal after 20 min of treatment (Fig.
5A), and a return to the basal level by
45 min (data not shown). In contrast, JunB mRNA, which also was
immediately induced, reached its maximal level by 45 min (Fig. 5A). In
response to G-CSF, G-gp130(WT) cells exhibited essentially the same
induction profile of immediate-early response genes as seen with IL-6.
G-gp130(Y2F) cells, however, showed a minor induction of Egr-1, c-Fos,
JunB, and c-Jun mRNAs after 20 min of G-CSF treatment. Surprisingly,
the level of JunB mRNA rose dramatically during the subsequent 30 min
of G-CSF treatment, exceeding that achieved by IL-6 treatment. The
regulation of the immediate-response gene differed from that of the APP
genes in that mRNA expression for the latter genes, such as for the
haptoglobin (Hp) gene, was induced with slower kinetics. After 20 min
of G-CSF or IL-6 treatment, only minimal changes relative to the
control cells, if any, were seen. By 45 min of treatment, the enhanced Hp mRNA was apparent, with the higher relative expression already detectable in G-CSF-treated G-gp130(Y2F) cells (Fig. 5A).

View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Activation of immediate-response genes. (A) G-gp130(WT)
and G-gp130(Y2F) cells were cultured in 15-cm-diameter dishes. After a
24-h serum deprivation, the cells were treated for 20 or 45 min with
medium alone, G-CSF, or IL-6. Polyadenylated RNA (5 µg) was analyzed
by Northern blot hybridization with the indicated probes. (B to D)
G-gp130(WT) cells were pretreated with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or
PD98059 (75 µM) and treated for 10 min (B), 20 min (C), or 2 h
(D) with medium alone (Control) or medium containing G-CSF or IL-6 in
the presence of dimethyl sulfoxide or PD98059. (B) Cell extracts were
analyzed by immunoblotting for active STAT3 and ERK1/2 on a single
membrane. The open arrow indicates the nonspecific band that
demonstrates equal amounts of protein loading. (C) Total cellular RNA
(5 µg) was subjected to Northern blot hybridization with the Egr-1
probe. (D) Total RNA (10 µg) was analyzed by Northern blot
hybridization with the haptoglobin (HP) probe. EtBr, ethidium
bromide.
|
|
The mediator role of the MAP kinase pathway in regulating the
expression of immediate-response genes also could be demonstrated by
treating G-gp130(WT) cells with G-CSF or IL-6 in the presence or
absence of the MEK-1 inhibitor PD98059 (14). Whereas
activation of ERK1/2 was prominently suppressed, tyrosine
phosphorylation of STAT3 remained unaffected (Fig. 5B). If gp130
induction of the immediate-early response genes is mediated primarily
through MAP kinases, we would expect that PD98059-inhibited ERK
activation would also result in a loss of immediate-response gene
regulation. Such an inhibition was indeed observed, as demonstrated by
the minimal Egr-1 mRNA accumulation (Fig. 5C). In contrast, treatment of G-gp130(WT) and G-gp130(Y2F) cells for 2 h with G-CSF or IL-6, in the presence or absence of PD98059, did not significantly alter the
induction of haptoglobin mRNA (Fig. 5D). This result suggests that the
transcriptional activation process acting on the Hp gene is not
critically dependent on a PD98059-sensitive pathway.
ERK has the potential to moderate APP gene expression.
Since
the Hp gene is responsive to STAT3, and gp130 signaling activates STAT3
more prominently than it activates ERK1/2 (Fig. 2C), a potential
long-term effect of ERK on Hp or other APP genes may not be readily
apparent. Hence, to assess the effect of gp130-controlled ERK on APP
gene induction, we used an alternative approach. We noted that by
removing the three distal Box3 motifs from the cytoplasmic domain of
gp130, as achieved by the truncation to 133 residues (42),
the level of STAT activation and therefore Hp induction is reduced, but
SHP-2 and ERK activation is retained at the normal level
(43). Because of the altered ratio of STAT to ERK
activation, the signaling by G-gp130(133) constructs with and without
SHP-2 recruitment should more prominently indicate the contribution of
ERK to Hp regulation. We established H-35 cells that were stably transduced with FLAG-tagged G-gp130(133)WT or G-gp130(133)Y2F. The
noncloned cultures expressed the truncated receptors at a slightly
higher level than did the cultures transduced with full-length G-gp130
constructs (Fig. 6A). These cells
responded to G-CSF by increasing their Hp production (Fig. 6B).
However, compared to the response to IL-6, a greater quantitative
difference in the Hp regulation between the wild-type and Y2F mutant
receptors was observed. Induction of Hp by G-gp130(133)WT was
approximately 15% of that by IL-6R, whereas induction by
G-gp130(133)Y2F exceeded that by IL-6R. G-CSF treatment in the presence
of PD98059 revealed that by attenuating ERK activation,
G-gp130(133)WT but not the Y2F mutant produced a
threefold-enhanced Hp induction (Fig. 6C). Due to the limitation
imposed by the use of a chemical inhibitor, the long-term treatment of
cells with PD98059 could not be as effective as the Y2F mutation. The
results nevertheless suggest that gp130-activated ERK1/2 has a
moderating effect on APP expression controlled by the JAK-STAT pathways
and that the manifestation of this effect is dependent on the magnitude
and duration of STAT activation. Moreover, the data indicate that the
regulation of immediate-early genes and that of APP genes is the result
of two separable gp130 signals.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Suppression of ERK activation enhances Hp production.
(A) Lysates of parental H-35 cells and H-35 cells stably transduced
with the G-gp130 constructs were reacted with anti-FLAG antibodies.
Immunoprecipitated proteins were immunoblotted with anti-FLAG
antibodies. (B) Cell cultures transduced with the indicated receptors
were treated for 48 h with IL-6 or G-CSF. The amount of Hp
secreted during the second 24-h period was determined by
immunoelectrophoresis, normalized to the cell number, and expressed
relative to the values of the IL-6-treated cultures in each series
(mean and standard deviation; n = 3 to 6). (C)
G-gp130(133)WT and G-gp130(133)(Y2F) cultures were treated for 48 h with IL-6 or increasing doses of G-CSF in the presence of dimethyl
sulfoxide (DMSO, DM) or 25 µM PD98059 (PD). Hp produced during the
second 24-h treatment period was determined by Western blotting of 5 µl of culture medium. The band represents the immunoreactive Hp subunit.
|
|
Enhanced inhibition of cell proliferation by G-gp130(Y2F).
IL-6 cytokines have been associated with stimulation or inhibition of
proliferation, depending upon the cell type (19, 49). Observing gp130-mediated activation of early response genes in H-35
cells, we asked whether a corresponding effect on DNA synthesis and
proliferation was detectable. We determined [3H]thymidine
incorporation into parental H-35 cells, G-gp130(WT) cells, and
G-gp130(Y2F) cells in response to IL-6 or G-CSF under two separate sets
of culture conditions (Fig. 7A). The
cells were treated either with serum-free medium, to reduce the
potential influence of serum growth factor, or with medium containing
10% serum, to avoid complications due to loss of survival factors, if
these were required for maintaining full viability of the culture. Under both culture conditions, IL-6 lowered, thymidine incorporation by
about 50% in each cell type. G-CSF had a similar inhibitory effect in
G-gp130(WT) cells to that of IL-6 but was somewhat more effective than
IL-6 in G-gp130(Y2F) cells.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Effect of gp130 signals on thymidine incorporation. (A)
Cells in 96-well plates were maintained for 8 h in serum-free
medium and then treated for 16 h with serum-free medium containing
no additives, G-CSF, or IL-6 followed by 8 h with
[3H]thymidine. Values for 3H incorporations
(cpm/culture) are shown (mean and standard deviation; n = 5). (B) HepG2 cells were transfected with expression vector for
GFP and G-gp130(WT) or G-gp130(Y2F) (1 µg/ml each) and plasmid DNA
carrier (18 µg/ml). GFP-positive and GFP-negative cells were selected
by FACS. From each preparation, an aliquot of 105 cells was
plated in one well of 24-well plates and the remaining cells were
distributed in aliquots of 2.5 × 104 cells in 96-well
cluster plates. After overnight recovery, the cells in the 24-well
plates were lysed and equal amounts of whole-cell lysate were analyzed
by Western blotting for anti-FLAG-reactive proteins (top). The cells in
the 96-well plates were treated with medium alone or with G-CSF or IL-6
and processed for [3H]thymidine incorporation as in panel
A. The values determined in each culture were expressed relative to the
mean value calculated for the medium control in each series (set to
100%) (mean and standard deviation; n = 3 to 5). *,
P < 0.05; **, P < 0.005.
|
|
To verify that the inhibitory effect of G-gp130(WT) and G-gp130(Y2F) on
DNA synthesis, as suggested by the response of H-35 cell clones, was
not cell line restricted, expression vectors for the same receptors,
together with the GFP marker, were transfected into HepG2 cells.
FACS-sorted GFP-positive cells showed a prominent expression of the
introduced receptor proteins (Fig. 7B. top) and a G-CSF-specific
inhibition of thymidine incorporation in the range observed for the
endogenous IL-6R (Fig. 7B, bottom). As noted for H-35 cells,
G-gp130(Y2F) was also a more effective inhibitor than G-gp130(WT) in
HepG2 cells.
To confirm that the inhibitory action of these cytokines on thymidine
incorporation is also manifested at the level of cell proliferation,
H-35 cells were cultured first for 48 h in serum-free medium, and
then for 4 days in complete medium containing either G-CSF or IL-6. The
number of cells determined after the treatment period indicated that
IL-6 caused a uniform 30% reduction in the number of cells compared to
the control treated cultures (Fig. 8A).
In response to G-CSF, the G-gp130(WT) cell culture had a similar 30%
reduced cell count whereas the G-gp130(Y2F) cell culture was reduced by
60% (Fig. 8A). Of note is that despite the reduced cell proliferation
in the presence of G-CSF or IL-6, each of the cultures exhibited a net
increase in cell number during the treatment period. As is apparent in
Fig. 8A, there is considerable variability in proliferation rates among
the cultures. Therefore, to rule out clonal variations as major factors
determining the proliferative response, we analyzed additional clonal
lines of receptor-transduced H-35 cells (Fig. 8B). Clones were chosen
that expressed approximately equal levels of immunodetectable receptor
proteins to those in the lines used for this study (Fig. 8B, top). Each
group of clonal lines showed a comparable G-CSF-sensitive reduction in
proliferation, which ranged around 30% for G-gp130(WT) cells and 55%
for G-gp130(Y2F) cells (Fig. 8B, bottom). Although proliferation
was reduced during the long-term treatment, no adverse effect on APP
gene expression was detectable. In fact, the induction of mRNA for
haptoglobin (Fig. 8C) and other APPs (data not shown) was much more
prominent in the more strongly growth-inhibited G-gp130(Y2F) cells than in G-gp130(WT) cells.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Proliferation is reduced by the action of gp130. (A)
Cells (~2 × 104/cm2) were cultured in
six-well dishes for 48 h in serum-free medium. Then they were
treated with medium containing 10% serum alone or G-CSF or IL-6 in
addition. After 2 days, the treatment media were replaced by fresh
media. Two days later, cell numbers were determined and calculated per
10 cm2 of culture area (mean and standard deviation;
n = 3). The cell number at the onset of the experiment
is indicated by a hatched bar. (B) (Top) Extracts of parental H-35
cells and cultures of three independent clonal lines of G-gp130(WT) and
G-gp130(Y2F) cells were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibodies
and analyzed by Western blotting for anti-FLAG reactive proteins.
(Bottom) The same cells were analyzed for proliferation in response to
G-CSF treatment as the cells in panel A. In each series, the values for
the treated cell cultures were calculated relative to the mean cell
number determined for the medium control cultures (set to 100%) (mean
and standard deviation; n = 3). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.005. (C) G-gp130(WT) and G-gp130(Y2F)
cells in six-well dishes were cultured for 0, 24, and 48 h in
medium containing 1% serum in the presence of G-CSF. Total cellular
RNA (10 µg) were analyzed by Northern blot hybridization for
haptoglobin mRNA. An autoradiogram after a 6-h exposure is shown. EtBr,
ethidium bromide.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In hepatic cells the cytoplasmic domain of gp130 engages two
separate signaling pathways, both of which are influenced by SHP-2. As
shown previously (34), gp130-recruited SHP-2 attenuates the
activity of the JAK/STAT pathways, thereby affecting efficacy and
duration of signaling towards induction of APP genes. On the other
hand, as shown above, SHP-2 mobilizes the MAP kinase pathway, which
stimulates immediate-early response genes, influences proliferation of
the cells, and moderates APP production.
Depending upon the experimental model, gp130 signaling has been
characterized in terms of regulated transcription of genes, such as APP
in liver cells (42), or proliferation and differentiation, such as in lymphoid and myeloid cells (19, 49, 79).
Structure-function analysis of gp130 indicated separate regions within
the cytoplasmic domain that are critical for mediating these processes.
The definition of gp130 signaling has focused on the JAK-STAT and
SHP-2/MAPK pathways (29, 42, 60, 80). Other pathways, which
involve members of the Tec, Src and Fes family protein tyrosine
kinases, have been proposed (for a review, see reference
25), but none of these have been recognized as being
critical for mediating APP induction in hepatoma cells
(75a). Data from the different models suggest that the
various gp130-regulated responses are not all dependent on an identical
array of signals. Most prominently, proliferation, as well as
differentiation, requires activation of both STAT and MAP kinase
(19, 49, 80) whereas induction of APPs, but not the tissue
inhibitor for metalloproteinase-1 (7) or collagen
(2), is maximal with activation of STAT3 in the absence of
activated MAP kinase.
gp130 recruitment of SHP-2 correlates with activation of the MAP kinase
pathway and is necessary for obtaining proliferation control (19,
60). SHP-2 is similarly implicated in mediating a proliferative
signal by other receptor systems, such as for insulin, EGF, and PDGF
(45). The functional role of SHP-2 in signal transduction in
hepatoma cells has been assessed indirectly by preventing recruitment
of SHP-2 to gp130 or by overexpressing SHP-2 mutants. The data
indicated that in hepatic cells SHP-2 exerts a signal-communicating
role toward MAP kinase that is more prominent for gp130 than for EGF
receptor and insulin, suggesting that gp130 does not engage as broad a
range of alternative signaling pathways as do the growth factor
receptors. The results also document the relevance of the phosphatase
domain, but not the catalytic function, of SHP-2 in associating with
MAP kinase activation (Fig. 4). The extent to which substrate trapping
or failure to recruit Grb2 mechanistically contributes to this
regulatory phenotype remains to be defined. Even though gp130 signaling
to both the SHP-2/ERK and JAK/STAT pathways are evident in hepatoma
cells (Fig. 2), a growth-inhibitory rather than growth-stimulatory
activity is registered for IL-6 treatment (Fig. 8). The
SHP-2-controlled mechanism appears in part to restrain inhibition,
explaining why gp130 without SHP-2 engagement [i.e., gp130(Y2F)]
exerts a stronger antiproliferative effect (Figs. 7 and 8). The
observation that the very same receptor subunit is more effective in
STAT3 activation suggests that the STAT3-dependent pathways in H-35
cells may have antiproliferative functions, which may also include
modulated expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors. Cha et al.
(11) have observed a growth inhibition of hepatoma cells
following dexamethasone treatment that correlated with increased
expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor
p21cip/WAF-1. The IL-6-suppressed proliferation
of osteoblastic cells has been similarly attributed to an enhanced
expression of p21cip/WAF-1, in part by
gp130-triggered activation of STAT3 and STAT3-sensitive induction of
transcription of the p21cip/WAF-1 gene
(6). Our preliminary immunoblot analysis of H-35 cells (33a) indicated, however, that
p21cip/WAF-1 protein expression is not
appreciably affected by gp130 signaling and that only a minor increase
in the level of p27kip1 protein was detected
after 24 to 48 h of treatment with IL-6 or G-CSF. The molecular
mechanism responsible for attenuated proliferation in cytokine-treated
hepatoma cells is still unknown.
The precise mode by which SHP-2 restricts STAT3 activation is unclear.
As suggested by studies on other hematopoietin receptors, the
receptor-recruited and activated protein tyrosine phosphatase, either
SHP-1 (28, 35) (gp130 does not interact with SHP-1 [34]) or SHP-2 (34, 66), may desensitize
the action of the receptor such as by dephosphorylation of JAK,
receptor subunits, or other receptor-associated proteins. However,
direct interactions of SHP-2 with JAKs or STATs have not been
consistently seen (66, 81). The effects observed with the
phosphatase-inactive SHP-2CS (66) and truncated SHP2
support the notion that phosphatase activity contributes to the
promotion of proliferation (56) and the moderation of gp130
signaling toward gene induction (62, 66). Whether the loss
of catalytic activity alone or also the loss of substrate binding
activity of SHP-2 assists in enhancing the APP regulation in
G-gp130(Y2F) cells remains to be clarified. The experimental approach
involving overexpression of the phosphatase-inactive SHP-2CS or
SHP-2
by transient transfection in hepatoma cells proved
inconclusive. Both SHP-2 forms cause a similarly enhanced gp130
signaling toward transfected APP constructs (33a, 34). In
contrast, overexpressed SHP-2var and SHP-2
C, like wild-type SHP-2,
had minimal modulatory effects on IL-6 regulation of APPs (33a).
The components that establish the link of SHP-2 to the MAP kinase
pathway at the plasma membrane site still remain to be determined. A
number of SHP-2-associated proteins which are considered to be
necessary in orchestrating SHP-2-dependent signal communication have
been described (31, 32, 54). Particular attention has been
paid to the members of the signal regulatory protein (SIRP) family
which, in part, are defined by their interaction with SHP-2 and control
the activation of MAP kinases (31, 67). Analysis of H-35
cells, however, indicated that these cells, in contrast to normal liver
cells, have low levels of SHP-2-interacting proteins and have no
appreciable cytokine-activated association with SHP-2, as defined by
their ability to coprecipitate with SHP-2 under the conditions used in
the experiments in Fig. 1C, 2A, and 2B and by immunoblotting with
broad-specificity anti-SIRP antibodies (33a).
Studies on gp130 signaling in hepatoma cells have focused on the
induction of type 2 APP genes. The role of STAT3 in mediating the
induction of several of such APP genes containing STAT binding elements
has been experimentally confirmed (33, 37, 42, 75, 82). In
addition, the level of sustained STAT3 DNA binding activity may
correlate with APP gene expression (57). The observation that APP gene expression is maintained elevated at maximal level for
days in chronically IL-6-treated hepatoma cells argues against an
effective negative-feedback signaling system, e.g., by using members of
the suppressor-of-cytokine-signaling (SOCS) family as described for
other cell types (15, 51, 65). The phosphatase action of
SHP-2 moderates the STAT3 activation, as seen immediately following
signal initiation (Fig. 2C) (34). During long-term IL-6
treatment, the moderating role of the phosphatase activity of SHP-2 is
less evident. Our experimental analysis was unable to detect
quantitative differences in phosphotyrosine STAT3 or DNA binding
activity of STAT3 at 24 h and later time points during G-CSF
treatment in G-gp130(WT) and G-gp130(Y2F) cells (33a).
A separate mode by which SHP-2 affects APP gene regulation is
suggested. SHP-2, through the activation of ERK1/2 and the subsequent stimulation of immediate-early genes, might moderate the
JAK/STAT-mediated growth inhibitory signal, and the cell proliferation
indirectly lowers APP gene induction. Indeed, several lines of evidence
indicate an inverse relationship between proliferation and APP gene
expression. A higher expression of APP genes was measured in
IL-6-treated cultures of H-35 and HepG2 cells, following a prolonged
period of serum deprivation (10). Similarly, enhanced growth
and reduced APP expression is found in liver during regeneration
following partial hepatectomy (44, 48, 61). Growth factors,
such as EGF or insulin, that are recognized to stimulate the
proliferative potential of hepatic cells exert inhibitory action on APP
gene induction in cultured liver cells (10, 74). The
prominent ERK activation by these factors through transcription factors such as AP-1, SRF, and Ets-related factors may not only control immediate growth response genes but also modify the transcription rate
of APP genes that harbor binding sites for such transcription factors
(21). Although ERK-sensitive transcription factors appear to
be stimulatory on certain genes (TIMP-1) (9, 38), inhibitory action on others, such as rat
-,
-, and
-fibrinogen and
thiostatin, is also detected (33a, 74). Moreover, it is
likely that ERKs also indirectly affect APP expression by their ability
to phosphorylate signal-transducing proteins such as STAT3 (78,
83), C/EBP (52), or glucocorticoid receptors
(39), which have target sequences in certain APP promoters.
Even though those ERK-dependent changes may be relatively minor and
remain largely undetectable by our biochemical analysis of G-gp130(WT)
versus G-gp130(Y2F) cells, their combined effects on APP gene
transcription, accumulation of APP mRNA, and production of APP appear
to be substantial (Fig. 8C).
We are greatly indebted to Immunex Corporation and Genetics
Institute for generously providing cytokines; H. Ohnishi and G.-S. Feng
for providing various SHP-2 constructs; S. Pruitt for providing probes
for Egr-1, JunB, and c-Jun; A. Ullrich for providing anti-SIRP antibodies; Y. Wang and Erin Kinzie for providing assistance in experimental work; R. G. Hawley for generating recombinant G-gp130 retrovirus; C. Stewart and D. C. Sheedy for performing flow
cytometric work; C.-F. Lai and O. Robledo for giving helpful advice;
and L. Scere and M. Held for performing secretarial assistance.
This work was supported by NIH grant CA26122 to H.B. and Roswell Park
grant CA16056.
| 1.
|
Adachi, M.,
M. Ishino,
T. Torigoe,
Y. Minami,
T. Matozaki,
T. Miyazaki,
T. Taniguchi,
Y. Hinoda, and K. Imai.
1997.
Interleukin-2 induces tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP-2 through IL-2 receptor beta chain.
Oncogene
14:1629-1633[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Auble, D. T., and C. E. Brinckerhoff.
1991.
The AP-1 sequence is necessary but not sufficient for phorbol induction of collagenase in fibroblasts.
Biochemistry
30:4629-4635[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Baumann, H.,
R. E. Hill,
D. N. Sauder, and G. P. Jahreis.
1986.
Regulation of major acute-phase plasma proteins by hepatocyte-stimulating factors of human squamous carcinoma cells.
J. Cell Biol.
102:370-383[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Baumann, H.,
K. R. Prowse,
S. Marinokovic,
K.-A. Won, and G. P. Jahreis.
1989.
Stimulation of hepatic acute phase response by cytokines and glucocorticoids.
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
557:280-295[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Baumann, H.,
D. Gearing, and S. F. Ziegler.
1994.
Signaling by the cytoplasmic domain of hematopoietin receptors involves two distinguishable mechanisms in hepatic cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:16297-16304[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Bellido, T.,
C. A. O'Brien,
P. K. Roberson, and S. C. Manolagas.
1998.
Transcriptional activation of the p21(WAF1,CIP1,SDI1) gene by interleukin-6 type cytokines.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:21137-21144[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Botelho, F. M.,
D. R. Edwards, and C. D. Richards.
1998.
Oncostatin M stimulates c-Fos to bind a transcriptionally responsive AP-1 element within the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 promoter.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:5211-5218[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Bromberg, J. F.,
C. M. Horvath,
D. Besser,
W. W. Lathem, and J. E. Darnell, Jr.
1998.
Stat3 activation is required for cellular transformation by v-src.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:2553-2558[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Bugno, M.,
L. Graeve,
P. Gatsios,
A. Koj,
P. C. Heinrich,
J. Travis, and T. Kordula.
1995.
Identification of the interleukin-6/oncostatin M response element in the rat tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1) promoter.
Nucleic Acids Res.
23:5041-5047[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Campos, S. P.,
Y. Wang, and H. Baumann.
1996.
Insulin modulates STAT3 protein activation and gene transcription in hepatic cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:24418-24424[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Cha, H. H.,
E. J. Cram,
E. C. Wang,
A. J. Huang,
H. G. Kasler, and G. L. Firestone.
1998.
Glucocorticoids stimulate p21 gene expression by targeting multiple transcriptional elements within a steroid responsive region of the p21waf1/cip1 promoter in rat hepatoma cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:1998-2007[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Chirgwin, J. M.,
A. E. Przybyia,
R. J. MacDonald, and W. J. Rutter.
1979.
Isolation of biologically active ribonucleic acid from sources enriched in ribonuclease.
Biochemistry
18:5294-5299[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
David, M.,
G. Zhou,
R. Pine,
J. E. Dixon, and A. C. Larner.
1996.
The SH2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatase PTP1D is required for interferon alpha/beta-induced gene expression.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:15862-15865[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Dudley, D. T.,
L. Pang,
S. J. Decker,
A. J. Bridges, and A. R. Saltiel.
1995.
A synthetic inhibitor of the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:7686-7689[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Endo, T. A.,
M. Masuhara,
M. Yokouchi,
R. Suzuki,
H. Sakamoto,
K. Mitsui,
A. Matsumoto,
S. Tanimura,
M. Ohtsubo,
H. Misawa,
T. Miyazaki,
N. Leonor,
T. Taniguchi,
T. Fujita,
Y. Kanakura,
S. Komiya, and A. Yoshimura.
1997.
A new protein containing an SH2 domain that inhibits JAK kinases.
Nature
387:921-924[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Feng, G.-S.,
C.-C. Hui, and T. Pawson.
1993.
SH2-containing phosphotyrosine phosphatase as a target of protein-tyrosine kinases.
Science
259:1607-1611[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Fuhrer, D. K.,
G. S. Feng, and Y. C. Yang.
1995.
Syp associates with gp130 and Janus kinase 2 in response to interleukin-11 in 3T3-L1 mouse preadipocytes.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:24826-24830[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Fujioka, Y.,
T. Matozaki,
T. Noguchi,
A. Iwamatsu,
T. Yamao,
N. Takahashi,
M. Tsuda,
T. Takada, and M. Kasuga.
1996.
A novel membrane glycoprotein, SHPS-1, that binds the SH2-domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2 in response to mitogens and cell adhesion.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:6887-6899[Abstract].
|
| 19.
|
Fukada, T.,
M. Hibi,
Y. Yamanaka,
M. Takahashi-Tezuka,
Y. Fujitani,
T. Yamaguchi,
K. Nakajima, and T. Hirano.
1996.
Two signals are necessary for cell proliferation induced by a cytokine receptor gp130: involvement of STAT3 in anti-apoptosis.
Immunity
5:449-460[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Gutch, M. J.,
A. J. Flint,
J. Keller,
N. K. Tonks, and M. O. Hengartner.
1998.
The Caenorhabditis elegans SH2 domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase PTP-2 participates in signal transduction during oogenesis and vulval development.
Genes Dev.
12:571-585[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Hattori, M.,
A. Tugores,
J. K. Westwick,
L. Veloz,
H. L. Leffert,
M. Karin, and D. A. Brenner.
1993.
Activation of activating protein 1 during hepatic acute phase response.
Am. J. Physiol.
264:G95-G103[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Hawley, R. G.,
F. H. Lieu,
A. Z. Fong,
S. J. Goldman,
J. P. Leonard, and T. S. Hawley.
1996.
Retroviral vectors for production of interleukin-12 in the bone marrow to induce a graft-versus-leukemia effect. Ann. N.Y., Acad.
Sci.
795:341-345.
|
| 23.
|
Hemmann, U.,
C. Gerhartz,
B. Heesel,
J. Sasse,
G. Kurapkat,
J. Grotzinger,
A. Wollmer,
Z. Zhong,
J. E. Darnell, Jr.,
L. Graeve,
P. C. Heinrich, and F. Horn.
1996.
Differential activation of acute phase response factor/Stat3 and Stat1 via the cytoplasmic domain of the interleukin 6 signal transducer gp130.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:12999-3007[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Herbst, R.,
P. M. Carroll,
J. D. Allard,
J. Schilling,
T. Raabe, and M. A. Simon.
1996.
Daughter of sevenless is a substrate of the phosphotyrosine phosphatase Corkscrew and functions during sevenless signaling.
Cell
85:899-909[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Hirano, T.,
K. Nakajima, and M. Hibi.
1997.
Signaling mechanisms through gp130: a model of the cytokine system.
Cytokine Growth Factor Rev.
8:241-252[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Hof, P.,
S. Pluskey,
S. Dhe-Paganon,
M. J. Eck, and S. E. Shoelson.
1998.
Crystal structure of the tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2.
Cell
92:441-450[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Horan, T.,
J. Wen,
L. Narhi,
V. Parker,
A. Garcia,
T. Arakawa, and J. Philo.
1996.
Dimerization of the extracellular domain of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor receptor by ligand binding: a monovalent ligand induces 2:2 complexes.
Biochemistry
35:4886-4896[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Jiao, H.,
K. Berrada,
W. Yang,
M. Tabrizi,
L. C. Platanias, and T. Yi.
1996.
Direct association with and dephosphorylation of Jak2 kinase by the SH2-domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:6985-6992[Abstract].
|
| 29.
|
Kaptein, A.,
V. Paillard, and M. Saunders.
1996.
Dominant negative stat3 mutant inhibits interleukin-6-induced Jak-STAT signal transduction.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:5961-5964[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Kazlauskas, A.,
G. S. Feng,
T. Pawson, and M. Valius.
1993.
The 64-kDa protein that associates with the platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta subunit via Tyr-1009 is the SH2-containing phosphotyrosine phosphatase Syp.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:6939-6943[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Kharitonenkov, A.,
Z. Chen,
I. Sures,
H. Wang,
J. Schilling, and A. Ullrich.
1997.
A family of proteins that inhibit signalling through tyrosine kinase receptors.
Nature
386:181-186[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Kharitonenkov, A.,
J. Schnekenburger,
Z. Chen,
P. Knyazev,
S. Ali,
E. Zwick,
M. White, and A. Ullrich.
1995.
Adapter function of protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1D in insulin receptor/insulin receptor substrate-1 interaction.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:29189-29193[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Kim, H., and H. Baumann.
1997.
The carboxyl-terminal region of STAT3 controls gene induction by the mouse haptoglobin promoter.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:14571-14579[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33a.
| Kim, H., and H. Baumann. Unpublished observation.
|
| 34.
|
Kim, H.,
T. S. Hawley,
R. G. Hawley, and H. Baumann.
1998.
Protein tyrosine phosphatase 2 (SHP-2) moderates signaling by gp130 but is not required for the induction of acute-phase plasma protein genes in hepatic cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:1525-1533[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Klingmuller, U.,
U. Lorenz,
L. C. Cantley,
B. G. Neel, and H. F. Lodish.
1995.
Specific recruitment of SH-PTP1 to the erythropoietin receptor causes inactivation of JAK2 and termination of proliferative signals.
Cell
80:729-738[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Knowles, B. B.,
C. C. Howe, and D. P. Aden.
1980.
Human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines secrete the major plasma proteins and hepatitis B surface antigen.
Science
209:497-499[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Kordula, T.,
J. Ripperger,
K. M. Morella,
J. Travis, and H. Baumann.
1996.
Two separate signal transducer and activator of transcription proteins regulate transcription of the serine proteinase inhibitor-3 gene in hepatic cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:6752-6757[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Korzus, E.,
H. Nagase,
R. Rydell, and J. Travis.
1997.
The mitogen-activated protein kinase and JAK-STAT signaling pathways are required for an oncostatin M-responsive element-mediated activation of matrix metalloproteinase 1 gene expression.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:1188-1196[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Krstic, M. D.,
I. Rogatsky,
K. R. Yamamoto, and M. J. Garabedian.
1997.
Mitogen-activated and cyclin-dependent protein kinases selectively and differentially modulate transcriptional enhancement by the glucocorticoid receptor.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:3947-3954[Abstract].
|
| 40.
|
Kuhne, M. R.,
T. Pawson,
G. E. Lienhard, and G.-S. Feng.
1993.
The insulin receptor substrate 1 associates with the SH-2 containing phosphotyrosine phosphatase Syp.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:11479-11481[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Kumar, G.,
S. Gupta,
S. Wang, and A. E. Nel.
1994.
Involvement of Janus kinases, p52shc, Raf-1, and MEK-1 in the IL-6 induced mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade of growth responsive B cell line.
J. Immunol.
152:4436-4447.
|
| 42.
|
Lai, C. F.,
J. Ripperger,
K. K. Morella,
Y. Wang,
D. P. Gearing,
G. H. Fey, and H. Baumann.
1995.
Separate signaling mechanisms are involved in the control of STAT protein activation and gene regulation via the interleukin 6 response element by the box 3 motif of gp130.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:14847-14850[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Lai, C.-F.,
J. Ripperger,
Y. Wang,
H. Kim,
R. B. Hawley, and H. Baumann.
1999.
The STAT3-independent signaling pathway by glycoprotein 130 in hepatic cells.
J. Biol. Chem.,
274:7793-7802[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Leffert, H. L.,
K. S. Koch,
X. P. Lu,
D. A. Brenner,
M. Karin,
H. F. Skelly,
R. A. Rippe,
G. Fey, and M. Chojkier.
1990.
Cellular and molecular biology of hepatocyte growth, regeneration and gene expression.
Adv. Second Messenger Phosphoprotein Res.
24:352-358[Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Li, W.,
R. Nishimura,
A. Kashishian,
A. G. Batzer,
W. J. Kim,
J. A. Cooper, and J. Schlessinger.
1994.
A new function for a phosphotyrosine phosphatase: linking GRB2-Sos to a receptor tyrosine kinase.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:509-517[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Lutticken, C.,
U. M. Wegenka,
J. Yuan,
J. Buschmann,
C. Schindler,
A. Ziemiecki,
A. G. Harpur,
A. F. Wilks,
K. Yasukawa,
T. Taga,
T. Kishimoto,
G. Barbieri,
S. Pellegrini,
M. Sendtner,
P. Cotteinrich, and F. Horn.
1994.
Association of transcription factor APRF and protein kinase Jak1 with the interleukin-6 signal transducer gp130.
Science
263:89-92[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Milarski, K. L., and A. R. Saltiel.
1994.
Expression of catalytically inactive Syp phosphatase in 3T3 cells blocks stimulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase by insulin.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:21239-21243[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Milland, J.,
A. Tsykin,
T. Thomas,
A. R. Aldred,
T. Cole, and G. Schreiber.
1990.
Gene expression in regenerating and acute-phase rat liver.
Am. J. Physiol.
259:G340-G347[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Minami, M.,
M. Inoue,
S. Wei,
K. Takeda,
M. Matsumoto,
T. Kishimoto, and S. Akira.
1996.
STAT3 activation is a critical step in gp130-mediated terminal differentiation and growth arrest of a myeloid cell line.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. |