Received 28 October 1998/Returned for modification 3 December
1998/Accepted 12 May 1999
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Several transcription factors
orchestrate the adipocyte differentiation process (reviewed in
references 9, 13, and 43). These
include the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
(PPAR
) (46, 47), the family of CCAAT enhancer binding
proteins (C/EBP) (8, 15, 16, 53-55), and the basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper transcription factor adipocyte differentiation and determination factor 1 (ADD-1) (21, 48), which was independently cloned as the sterol regulatory element binding protein 1 (SREBP-1), based on its role in cholesterol homeostasis (56). Current data suggest that C/EBP
and
-
induce the expression of PPAR
(33, 54), which
then triggers the adipogenic program. Terminal differentiation appears
to require the concerted action of PPAR
, C/EBP
, and ADD-1/SREBP-1
(21, 48). Several arguments support the important role of
PPAR
in adipocyte differentiation. First, ectopic expression of
PPAR
is sufficient to induce adipocyte conversion of fibroblasts
(46, 47). In addition, PPAR
together with C/EBP
can
induce transdifferentiation of myoblasts into adipocytes
(19). Second, the description of functional peroxisome
proliferator-responsive elements (PPREs) in the regulatory
sequences of several of the genes which are induced during adipocyte
differentiation, such as the genes coding for adipocyte fatty acid
binding protein aP2 (46), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase
(45), acyl coenzyme A (CoA) synthetase (36, 37), and lipoprotein lipase (35), is consistent with
the crucial role attributed to PPAR
in lipid metabolism.
Finally, prostaglandin J2 derivatives, certain nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs, and antidiabetic thiazolidinediones, which
have been identified as natural and synthetic PPAR
ligands,
respectively (5, 14, 23-25, 51), all induce or enhance
adipocyte differentiation (2, 3, 7, 14, 23, 24, 29, 47).
The identification of thiazolidinediones as PPAR
ligands together
with the central role which adipose tissue plays in the pathogenesis of
important metabolic disorders, such as obesity and
non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, has generated a major drive to
understand the regulation of PPAR
gene expression. Since ADD-1/SREBP-1 and PPAR
both are important during adipocyte
differentiation, we analyzed PPAR
expression in cells ectopically
expressing ADD-1/SREBP-1. Increased levels of PPAR
mRNA and
protein were found under these conditions. SREBP-2 had similar
effects on PPAR
expression. It was furthermore shown that PPAR
expression was influenced by cellular cholesterol levels in cells of
both hepatic and adipocyte origin, an effect mediated by the SREBP
family of transcription factors. The control of PPAR
expression by
the SREBP family of transcription factors is mediated through two
sequence elements. First, there is a functional E-box in the PPAR
1
promoter. In addition, we also describe a functional E-box element
located upstream of the exon A2 of the human PPAR
gene, in the
recently described PPAR
3 promoter (12). These
observations suggest that regulatory interactions between the SREBPs
and PPAR
can coordinate cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Materials and oligonucleotides.
The oligonucleotides used
for various experiments in this report are listed in Table
1. BRL 49,653 and simvastatin were kind gifts of A. Nazdan of Ligand Pharmaceuticals and S. Wright from Merck
Research Laboratories, respectively. All other chemicals, unless stated
otherwise, were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, Mo.).
Cell culture and retroviral infections.
Standard cell
culture conditions were used to maintain 3T3-L1 (obtained from American
Type Culture Collection [ATCC]), HeLa (ATCC), RK-13 (ATCC), CCL-39 (a
kind gift from Claude Sardet), and HepG2 cells (ATCC). BRL 49,653 and
simvastatin were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide, and cholesterol and
25-hydroxycholesterol, linoleic acid, and linolenic acid were dissolved
in ethanol. Prior to addition to cells, the fatty acids were complexed
to bovine serum albumin (37). Control cells received vehicle
only. Retroviral infection of 3T3-L1 cells was performed as described
previously (21). Briefly, the BOSC23 cell line was
transiently transfected with the recombinant retroviral vectors pBabe,
ADD-1 403, and ADD-1 (21) by the calcium phosphate method.
Viral supernatants were collected 48 h after transfection and
titrated. 3T3-L1 cells were incubated with retrovirus for 5 h in
the presence of 4 µg of Polybrene per ml. Cells were then subcultured
(1:3) for 2 days after infection in medium containing puromycin (2 µg/ml) for selection. Differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells was performed
as described previously (26).
RNA isolation and RNase protection assays.
Total cellular
RNA was prepared as described previously (32). Human
and mouse PPAR
(hPPAR
and mPPAR
, respectively) mRNA levels were determined by RNase protection assay with the templates previously described (12).
Western blot analysis of PPAR
.
Protein extraction, sodium
dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and
electrotransfer were performed as described previously (11).
The membranes were blocked overnight in blocking buffer (20 mM Tris,
100 mM NaCl, 1% Tween 20, 10% skim milk). Filters were first
incubated for 4 h at 21°C with either a rabbit immunoglobulin G
(IgG) anti-mPPAR
(10 mg/ml) (11) or a rabbit IgG
anti-mSREBP-1 antibody (Santa Cruz, Biotechnology, Calif.) and then for
1 h at 21°C with a goat anti-rabbit IgG (whole molecule)
peroxidase conjugate diluted at 1/5,000. The complex was visualized
with 4-chloro-1-naphthol as a reagent.
Analysis of promoter activity and transactivation assays.
The PAC clone P-8856 (11), containing the full-length
PPAR
gene, was sequenced with the oligonucleotides LF-60 and LF-63 pointing upstream of exon A2. An 800-bp fragment of the PAC clone 8856 was isolated by PCR with the amplimers LF-60 (binding to the antisense
strand in exon A2) and LF-68 (binding sense at position
800 of the
PPAR
3 promoter). This PCR fragment was sequenced, inserted into the
EcoRV site of pBluescript SK(+) (Stratagene, La Jolla,
Calif.), and, after SpeI and KpnI restriction,
subcloned into pGL3 (Promega, Madison, Wis.), creating the reporter
vector pGL3
3p800. For the construction of the reporter vector
pGL3
1p2000, the previously described pGL3
1p3000 (11)
was shortened by 1 kb at its 5' end by digestion with KpnI
and PmlI. The reporter pGL3
2p1000 was described
previously (11). Site-directed mutagenesis of the E-box in
the PPAR
3 promoter and the E-box in the PPAR
1 promoter was
performed by splicing overlapping ends PCR (18), with the
oligonucleotide pairs LF-106/LF-60 and LF-107/LF-68, to generate the
plasmid pGL3
3p800-E-boxmut, and the oligonucleotide pairs LF-145/LF-143 and LF-146/LF-144, to generate the plasmid pGL3
1p2000-E-boxmut. This changed the three bases
underlined in the sequence of the
3 promoter
5'-ATTCATGTGACAT-3' to
5'-ATTCATGCATCAT-3' and the bases underlined in
the sequence of the
1 promoter 5'AGGATCACTTGAGCCC3' to 5'AGGATGCATTGAGCCC3'. The J3-TK-Luc
(49) and ACO-TK-Luc (30) luciferase reporter
vectors and the expression vectors encoding for ADD-1, a
dominant-negative form of ADD-1, and SREBP-1a (48, 56) were
described before. Transfections, luciferase, and
-galactosidase assays were performed as described previously (37). To
analyze the effect of cholesterol depletion in transfection
experiments, the cells were divided into two pools after transfection.
Half of the transfected cells were incubated with delipidated medium, whereas the other half of the cells were incubated with the same medium
supplemented with a mixture of cholesterol (10 µM) and 25-hydroxycholesterol (1 µM).
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) and oligonucleotide
sequences.
SREBP-1a protein was produced in a baculovirus system,
and ADD-1 was produced by in vitro transcription. The quality of the proteins was verified by SDS-PAGE. Proteins were incubated for 15 min
on ice in a total volume of 20 µl with 2.5 µg of poly(dI-dC), 1 µg of herring sperm DNA, and 1 ng of T4-polynucleotide kinase end-labelled double-stranded oligonucleotide corresponding either to
the PPAR
1-E-box (LF-141) or the PPAR
3-E-box (LF-102) in binding buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.9], 40 mM KCl, 10% glycerol, 0.05% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM dithiothreitol). For competition experiments, increasing amounts of cold double-stranded oligonucleotides (10-, 50-, and 100-fold molar excess) corresponding to the PPAR
1-E-box, the
PPAR
3-E-box, the consensus 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl (HMG)-CoA synthase sterol response element (SRE) site (42), or the
mutated PPAR
1-E-box (LF-143) and PPAR
3-E-box (LF-106) were
included just before addition of labelled oligonucleotide. DNA-protein complexes were separated by electrophoresis on a 4% polyacrylamide gel
in 0.25 × Tris-borate-EDTA buffer at 4°C (17).
 |
RESULTS |
Ectopic expression of ADD-1/SREBP-1 or SREBP-2 induces PPAR
mRNA
expression.
In view of the adipogenic effects of ADD-1/SREBP-1, we
investigated a potential role of ADD-1/SREBP-1 in the expression of the
PPAR
gene. For that purpose, HepG2 cells were electroporated with
vectors expressing either SREBP-1a (56), ADD-1
(48), or SREBP-2 (20). RNA was extracted 48 h after transfection and analyzed by RNase protection assay for the
presence of the PPAR
1 and PPAR
3 mRNAs. PPAR
1 mRNA levels were,
as expected, the most abundant and were eight-, six-, and eightfold
higher in the cells transfected with SREBP-1a, ADD-1, or SREBP-2,
respectively (Fig. 1A, lanes 2 to
4). The same degree of induction was observed when the PPAR
3
mRNA levels were quantified. No induction of either PPAR
1 or
-3 mRNAs was detected in cells transfected with an empty expression
vector (Fig. 1A, lane 1). When a separate probe, designed to
specifically detect PPAR
2 mRNA, was used in RNase protection assays, no changes in its mRNA levels were detected after
transfection with either ADD-1/SREBP-1 or SREBP-2 (data not shown).

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Increased expression of ADD-1, SREBP-1, or SREBP-2
induces PPAR mRNA expression. (A) RNase protection assay of total
RNA from HepG2 cells transfected with either an empty vector (control
[cont]; lane 1), an SREBP-1a expression vector (lane 2), an ADD-1
expression vector (lane 3), or an SREBP-2 expression vector (lane 4) or
from human white adipose tissue (hWAT [as a positive control]; lane
5). Protected fragments corresponding to PPAR 1 and 3 mRNAs are
indicated. Results were normalized with a 36B4 probe. Densitometric
quantification of the results is shown. (B) RNase protection assay of
total RNA from 3T3-L1 preadipocytes (lanes 3 to 5) or differentiated
3T3-L1 adipocytes (lanes 6 to 8) infected with an empty retroviral
vector (lanes 3 and 6) or a retrovirus encoding ADD1-403 (lanes 4 and
7) or the full-length form of ADD-1 (lanes 5 and 8) as indicated. Lanes
1 and 2 show the undigested probes used to analyze PPAR and actin
mRNA. An actin probe was used for normalization in this RNase
protection assay. The fold induction of PPAR mRNA as determined by
densitometric quantification of the results is shown in parentheses
underneath the number of the lane.
|
|
To study the effects of ADD-1 on PPAR
expression in more detail and
in the context of adipocyte differentiation, 3T3-L1 cells were
infected with either an empty retroviral vector, pBabe, or the
same vector encoding full-length ADD-1 or the superactive ADD-1 403. Northern blot analysis showed that retroviral infection, by the virus
encoding ADD-1, resulted in a twofold higher level of
ADD-1 expression (data not shown). Infected cells were then cultured to confluence and consecutively treated with differentiation medium. Total RNA was isolated at confluence (preadipocytes) and at day
6 after confluence (adipocytes). The RNase protection assay indicated
that the expression of PPAR
mRNA was induced in both 3T3-L1
preadipocytes (threefold) and adipocytes (sevenfold) which ectopically
express ADD-1 relative to cells which express the empty pBabe vector
(Fig. 1B). Interestingly, a truncated form, ADD-1 403, equivalent to
the proteolytically activated protein, which lacks the
membrane-anchoring domain, was twofold more active in inducing PPAR
expression in undifferentiated preadipocytes (Fig. 1B). These results
suggest that the adipogenic effects of ADD-1/SREBP-1 previously
demonstrated are at least in part due to an up-regulation of the
PPAR
gene expression.
PPAR
protein expression is induced in cells grown under
conditions which stimulate the activation of the SREBPs.
In order
to evaluate the possibility that PPAR
was induced under more
physiological conditions, associated with activation of the activation
of SREBPs, we quantitated the relative expression of PPAR
protein by
Western blot analysis in undifferentiated 3T3-L1 cells (Fig.
2A) and HepG2 cells (Fig. 2B) grown
in medium containing different cholesterol concentrations
(50). In both cell lines, PPAR
protein was induced at
least ninefold upon cholesterol depletion during 24 h, a condition
known to enhance the production of mature and active ADD-1/SREBP-1
(31, 50) (Fig. 2C). Interestingly, PPAR
protein levels
were decreased acutely by readdition of cholesterol (10 µM) and
25-hydroxycholesterol (1 µM) to the culture medium for 6 h (Fig.
2A and B, lane 3).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Cholesterol depletion induces PPAR expression. (A)
Western blot analysis of nuclear extracts of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes with
an anti-PPAR antibody. Preconfluent cells (lane 1) were incubated
for 24 h (lane 2) in cholesterol-depleted medium. After 24 h
of incubation in cholesterol-depleted medium, a mixture containing 10 µM cholesterol and 1 µM 25-OH-cholesterol was added to the medium
for 6 additional h (24 + 6 chol) (lane 3). The fold induction of
PPAR or SREBP as determined by densitometric quantification of the
results is shown in parentheses underneath the number of the lane. (B)
Similar Western blot experiments as described for panel A, but with
HepG2 nuclear extracts instead of 3T3-L1 nuclear extracts. (C)
Expression of SREBP-1 protein as detected after Western blot analysis
of the 3T3-L1 nuclear extracts used in panel A. Western blotting was
performed with an anti-SREBP-1 antiserum. (D) Western blot analysis of
nuclear extracts of CCL-39 cells transfected with the constitutively
active form of ADD-1, ADD-1 403. Cells were exposed to the same
cholesterol depletion as specified for panel A.
|
|
In order to elucidate if the observed effects of cholesterol depletion
on PPAR
expression were mediated by ADD-1/SREBP-1, the same
experiment was performed with the hamster lung cell line CCL-39
transfected with the constitutively active form of ADD-1, ADD-1 403. As
expected, PPAR
expression was induced sixfold in the cells
transfected with ADD-1 403 (Fig. 2D, lane 2). No further changes in the
expression of PPAR
could be observed when cells were exposed to
cholesterol-depleted medium (Fig. 2D, lane 3). As expected, in view of
the cotransfection of ADD-1 403, no further reduction in PPAR
levels
was observed upon readdition of cholesterol to the medium. PPAR
expression hence seems subject to a tight and fast control by
alterations in intracellular cholesterol levels, and this effect is
mediated by the SREBP family of transcription factors.
PPAR
protein expression is induced in cells treated with HMG-CoA
reductase inhibitors and is not affected by fatty acids.
Treatment
with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, which block the enzyme
responsible for the rate-limiting step of cholesterol synthesis,
provide another way to modify cellular cholesterol levels. Upon
treatment with compounds such as compactin (mevastatin) or simvastatin,
cells will become cholesterol depleted and the production of the active
forms of ADD-1/SREBP-1 will increase (31, 40). Therefore,
the expression of PPAR
protein was evaluated in HepG2 cells before
and after treatment with the potent HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor
simvastatin. Treatment of the cells with simvastatin (5 × 10
7 M) for 6 h resulted in a robust and fast
induction of PPAR
protein levels (eightfold), which was sustained
12 h after addition (Fig. 3A),
further supporting the notion that cellular cholesterol levels influence the expression of PPAR
.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Inhibition of de novo cholesterol synthesis by statins
induces PPAR expression. (A) Analysis of the PPAR protein by
Western blotting of cell extracts from HepG2 cells incubated with
medium supplemented with simvastatin (0.5 µM) for either 6 or
12 h. Fold induction of PPAR protein levels is shown in
parentheses. (B) Quantification of PPAR protein levels in
nuclear extracts from 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. Cells were lipid
starved as in Fig. 2, and a mixture of linoleic acid (150 µM) and
linolenic acid (150 µM) was added to the medium for a period of
12 h. An anti-PPAR specific antibody was used for
Western blot analysis. Fold induction of PPAR protein levels is
shown in parentheses.
|
|
Since polyunsaturated fatty acids have been reported to decrease
the expression of promoters under the control of SREBP
(44, 52), we analyzed whether the induction of PPAR
protein expression upon cholesterol depletion was affected by the
presence of fatty acids in the culture medium. As expected, when 3T3-L1
cells were incubated under lipid-free conditions, a significant
induction of the levels of PPAR
protein was observed (Fig. 3B, lane
2). Surprisingly, and in contrast to previous reports in the literature (44, 52), PPAR
protein levels were not down-regulated
when a mixture of linoleic and linolenic acids (150 µM each) was
added to the lipid-depleted medium (Fig. 3B, lane 3).
Regulatory effect of ADD-1/SREBP-1 and SREBP-2 on the hPPAR
1 and
-3 promoters.
To investigate the possibility of a direct
transcriptional effect of the SREBPs on PPAR
expression, we analyzed
the 5' upstream regulatory sequences of the human PPAR
gene which we
have previously determined (11). Therefore, we transfected
CCL-39 cells with the pGL3
1p2000, pGL3
2p1000, and
pGL3
3p800 reporter plasmids (11), which contain,
respectively 2 kb, 1 kb, and 800 bp of the human PPAR
1, -2, and -3 promoters. The activity of the pGL3
1p2000 and pGL3
3p800 reporter
constructs was induced at least threefold when the ADD-1/SREBP-1
expression vector was cotransfected, suggesting that the increase
in PPAR
mRNA levels mentioned above was mediated by an effect
on the proximal PPAR
1 and -3 promoters (Fig.
4A). Interestingly, whereas the activity
of the pGL3
1p2000 plasmid was significantly induced by
ADD-1/SREBP-1, no such induction was observed with pGL3
1p3000, which
contains an additional 1,000 bp at it's 5' end, which suggests the
presence of an inhibitory element in this region (data not shown). The
activities of the PPAR
1 and -3 promoters were induced to a similar
extent (at least threefold) when an expression vector for SREBP-2 was
cotransfected instead of ADD-1/SREBP-1 or when cells were exposed to
cholesterol-depleted medium (Fig. 4A). Consistent with our mRNA data,
no effect of either cotransfection of ADD-1/SREBP-1 or SREBP-2 or
cholesterol depletion could be observed on PPAR
2 promoter activity.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
ADD-1/SREBP-1 and SREBP-2 transactivate the PPAR 1 and
-3 promoters. (A) ADD-1/SREBP-1 and SREBP-2 transactivate the PPAR 1
and -3 promoters, but not the PPAR 2 promoter. Relative luciferase
activity as determined after transfection of CCL-39 cells with the
reporter constructs pGL3 1p2000, pGL3 2p1000, and pGL3 3p800.
Cells were either cotransfected with an empty expression vector
(control) and exposed to medium containing cholesterol (10 µM) and
25-hydroxycholesterol (1 µM), cotransfected with an empty expression
vector and maintained in cholesterol-depleted medium (Chol depletion),
or cotransfected with an expression plasmid for SREBP-1 (SREBP-1) or
SREBP-2 (SREBP-2) in medium containing cholesterol (10 µm) and
25-hydroxycholesterol (1 µM). Results are expressed as fold induction
and represent the mean ± standard deviation of three independent
experiments. Statistically significant differences by Student's
t test (P < 0.05) are indicated. (B) A
scheme of the genomic structure of the 5' end of the human PPAR gene
and of the approximate location of the response elements. Exons 1 to 6 are shared by all three subtypes. PPAR 1 contains in addition the
untranslated exons A1 and A2; PPAR 2 contains exon B, which is
translated; and PPAR 3 contains only the untranslated exon A2. The
respective hPPAR promoters are indicated by arrows. The approximate
locations of the E-boxes are indicated.
|
|
ADD-1/SREBP-1 controls the hPPAR
expression through E-box motifs
in the
1 and
3 promoters.
In order to investigate whether
the induction of PPAR
1 and -3 expression was the consequence of
direct binding of the SREBPs to the PPAR
1 and -3 promoters, a
detailed computer-assisted sequence homology analysis was performed.
Potential binding sites for the SREBP transcription factor family,
corresponding to putative E-box motifs, were detected in both the
PPAR
1 and PPAR
3 promoters (see Fig. 4B for the scheme). In order
to demonstrate direct binding of ADD-1/SREBP-1 to the putative
PPAR
1-E-box (at position
1535 from the transcription initiation
site 5' of the exon A1) and the PPAR
3-E-box (at position
341 from
the transcription initiation site 5' of the A2 exon), we used
double-stranded oligonucleotides corresponding to the PPAR
1-E-box
(LF-141) and PPAR
3-E-box (LF-102) as probes in EMSAs.
Baculovirus-produced and partially purified SREBP-1a, a different
splice variant of the ADD-1/SREBP-1 gene, is capable of binding
to both sites. Competition gel shift assays using increasing amounts of
cold double-stranded oligonucleotides containing either the sites
mentioned above (PPAR
1-E-box [Fig. 5A] or PPAR
3-E-box [Fig. 5C]), the
consensus SRE of the HMG-CoA synthase gene (42), or the
mutated PPAR
1-E-boxmut (from
AGGATCACTTGAGCCC to
AGGATGCATTGAGCCC) and
PPAR
3-E-boxmut (from
ATTCATGTGACAT to ATTCATGCATCAT), were performed next in
order to demonstrate the specificity of the binding (Fig. 5A and
C). Binding of SREBP-1a to the PPAR
1-E-box is competed by both
the cold PPAR
1-E-box (Fig. 5A, lanes 2 to 3) and by the consensus
SRE oligonucleotides (Fig. 5A, lanes 5 and 6), whereas the mutated
PPAR
1-E-boxmut oligonucleotide was unable to
compete with the PPAR
1-E-box for binding of SREBP-1a (Fig. 5A, lanes
8 and 9). Similarly, cold PPAR
3-E-box and the consensus SRE
oligonucleotides were able to compete for the binding of
SREBP-1a to the PPAR
3-E-box probe (Fig. 5C, lanes 2 to 4 and 5 to
7), whereas the mutated PPAR
3-E-boxmut was not (Fig. 5C,
lanes 8 to 10). Similar EMSA results were obtained when SREBP-2 was
used (data not shown).

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Binding of ADD-1/SREBP-1 to the PPAR 1 and -3 promoters. (A) EMSA with a partially purified baculovirus-produced
SREBP-1a protein, a different splice variant of ADD-1, and a labelled
double-stranded oligonucleotide representing the PPAR 1-E-box.
Competition experiments were performed with cold oligonucleotides
representing either the PPAR 1-E-box ( 1-E-box; LF-141), the
consensus HMG-CoA synthase SRE site (SREcons) (42), or the
mutated PPAR 1-E-box ( 1-E-boxmut; LF-143) at either
10-, 50-, or 100-fold molar excess. (B) Sequence of the wild-type and
mutated PPAR 1-E-box. The consensus E-box is indicated in bold
characters. The three bases which are mutated are indicated underneath
the original bases. (C) EMSA performed under exactly the same
conditions as described for panel A with the PPAR 3-E-box (LF-102) as
a labelled double-stranded oligonucleotide and the mutated
PPAR 3-E-box ( 3 E-boxmut; LF-106) as a competitor
instead of the PPAR 1-E-box and 1-E-boxmut,
respectively. (D) Sequence of the wild-type and mutated PPAR 3
E-boxes. The consensus E-box is underlined, whereas a potential SRE is
indicated in boldface. The three bases mutated are indicated underneath
the original bases.
|
|
To unequivocally demonstrate that it is through binding to the
PPAR
1-E-box and PPAR
3-E-box that ADD-1/SREBP-1 and SREBP-2 stimulate the activity of the hPPAR
1 and -3 promoters, we
substituted, respectively, three bases in the PPAR
1-E-box
(Fig. 5B) and in the PPAR
3-E-box (Fig. 5D) in the context of
the native PPAR
1 and -3 promoters to generate the
pGL3
1p2000-E-boxmut and
pGL3
3p800-E-boxmut reporter plasmids. In contrast to the
wild-type reporter vectors (Fig. 6A),
cotransfected ADD-1/SREBP-1 or SREBP-2 was unable to stimulate the
activity of the mutated pGL3
1p2000-E-boxmut and pGL3
3p800-E-boxmut reporter vectors in the CCL-39
lung-derived cell line (Fig. 6B).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
The PPAR 1-E-box and the PPAR 3-E-box mediate the
induction of the PPAR gene by ADD-1/SREBP-1 and SREBP-2. Relative
luciferase activity as determined after transfection of CCL39 cells
with the reporter constructs pGL3 1p2000,
pGL3 1p2000-E-boxmut, pGL3 3p800, and
pGL3 3p800-E-boxmut. Cells were cotransfected with either
an empty expression vector (control) or an expression plasmid for
SREBP-1 or SREBP-2. Values are the mean ± standard deviation of
three independent experiments. Statistically significant differences
(P < 0.05) by Student's t test are
indicated by asterisks.
|
|
PPAR
activity is stimulated by activation of
ADD-1/SREBP-1.
Next we assessed whether the changes in
endogenous PPAR
expression mentioned above, induced by
modulating the cholesterol concentration in the medium, were
associated with altered expression of a PPRE-driven reporter gene. We
transfected the J3-TK-Luc luciferase reporter gene, which contains
three copies of the PPRE of the apolipoprotein A-II gene J site
(49), into rabbit kidney-derived RK-13 cells and maintained
half of the cells in cholesterol-depleted medium, whereas the other
half were grown in the same medium supplemented with a mixture of
cholesterol and 25-hydroxycholesterol. Under both conditions,
increasing amounts of the synthetic PPAR
ligand BRL 49,653 were
added to the medium, resulting in a dose-dependent activation of
promoter activity by BRL 49,653 (Fig.
7A). Under conditions of cholesterol
depletion, the reporter gene was, however, activated to a
significantly higher level. In fact, the BRL 49,653 dose-response curve
was shifted proportionally, keeping the slope constant and suggesting
that the observed effect of cholesterol depletion was the result of
increased expression of the PPAR
protein. Similar results were
obtained when 3T3-L1 (Fig. 7B) and ob-1771 preadipocyte cells were used
(data not shown). Consistent with the effect of synthetic PPAR
agonists, addition of the fatty acid linolenic acid (C18:3
at 400 µM) to the medium resulted in a roughly similar fold of
induction of the PPRE-driven reporter gene in cholesterol-depleted or
cholesterol-containing medium (Fig. 7C). In order to exclude the
possibility that the observed effect was specific for the
apolipoprotein A-II PPRE, we performed a cotransfection
experiment with a different luciferase reporter driven by a single copy
of the PPRE from the acyl CoA oxidase (ACO) gene (ACO-TK-Luc
[30]). Also, the activity of the ACO-TK-Luc reporter
was significantly induced by cholesterol depletion (Fig. 7D).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Transactivation of PPAR is enhanced under conditions
of cholesterol depletion. (A and B) Promoter activity of the
PPRE-driven luciferase reporter vector J3-TK-Luc after addition of
different doses of BRL 49,653 in cells maintained in medium with
(dashed squares) or without added cholesterol (10 µM) and
25-hydroxycholesterol (1 µM) (open squares). The results in RK-13
cells (A) and in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes (B) are shown. The results
represent the mean ± standard deviation of three independent
experiments. Differences between the two conditions were statistically
significant. RLU, relative light units. (C) Activity of the J3-TK-Luc
reporter gene is stimulated by linolenic acid (C18:3 [400
µM]) in RK-13 cells. Cells were transfected with J3-TK-Luc reporter
constructs and maintained for an additional 16 h in medium with
(open bars; upper part of the graph) or without added cholesterol (10 µM) and 25-hydroxycholesterol (1 µM) (hatched bars; lower part of
the panel). Cells grown under these basal conditions (control
cells [C]) were compared with cells treated with BRL 49653 (1 µM
[BRL]) or linolenic acid (400 µM [FA]). The results
represent the mean ± standard deviation of three independent
experiments. The asterisks are indicative of significant differences
between the stimulated cells and controls by Student's
t test (P < 0.05). (D) Activity of both the
J3-TK-Luc and ACO-TK-Luc reporter genes is stimulated by cholesterol
depletion in undifferentiated 3T3-L1 cells. Cells were transfected with
J3-TK-Luc or ACO-TK-Luc reporter constructs and incubated under the
same conditions than in panel C. The results represent the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. The asterisks are
indicative of significant differences by Student's t test
(P < 0.05).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
PPAR
has been identified as one of the key factors controlling
adipocyte differentiation (6, 13). Full differentiation of
preadipocytes into adipocytes is regulated by a complex interplay of
the C/EBP family, the PPAR
proteins, and ADD-1/SREBP-1
(13). Although it has been reported that C/EBP
,
ADD-1/SREBP-1, and PPAR
by themselves can promote
adipocyte differentiation, an orchestrated action of all these
factors is most likely required to trigger adipocyte differentiation
effectively. We demonstrated here that ADD-1/SREBP-1 and SREBP-2
directly control the expression of the human PPAR
gene at a
transcriptional level.
ADD-1/SREBP-1 and SREBP-2 have a dual specificity in DNA binding and
have been shown to be capable of interacting both with E-box sequences
and SREs (21). EMSAs and cotransfection assays demonstrated
that the ADD-1/SREBP-1 family of transcription factors can stimulate
the expression of the PPAR
1 promoter and the expression of the
recently cloned PPAR
3 promoter through binding to E-box motives
which are present in both promoters. Previously it has been shown that
ectopically expressed ADD-1/SREBP-1 can increase the number of
fibroblasts undergoing adipocyte differentiation (reference
21 and unpublished data). Our data suggest that one of the mechanisms by which ADD-1/SREBP-1 might exert its adipogenic action is through the induction of PPAR
expression, which in its
turn will induce the expression of downstream adipocyte target genes
(Fig. 7). This hence suggests that the ADD-1/SREBP-1 family might
function as proximal regulatory factors relative to PPAR
in the
induction of adipocyte differentiation. Furthermore, the induction of PPAR
expression and consequent stimulation of
lipogenesis could contribute to the massive cholesterol and fatty acid
accumulation seen in the livers of animals overexpressing the mature
form of SREBP-1a (38) and the more moderate fatty acid
accumulation observed in animals overexpressing SREBP-1c
(39). Interestingly, the observation that transgenic mice
overexpressing SREBP-1c, under the control of the adipose
tissue-specific aP2 promoter, are lipodystrophic (41)
appears at odds with the general proadipogenic effect of ADD-1/SREBP-1
(21, 38, 39) and suggests that SREBP-1c under certain
conditions could negatively influence adipogenesis. The differences
between this last study (41) and previous work (21, 38,
39), as well as our present data, are most likely explained by
differential effects SREBP-1c might have at different steps during the
development of adipose tissue (11a).
In addition to the transcriptional induction of PPAR
, ADD-1/SREBP-1
induces the expression of several important genes involved in
lipogenesis in the adipocyte, such as fatty acid synthase
(4, 21, 38), acetyl CoA carboxylase (27,
38), glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase (10),
and the lipoprotein lipase gene (21, 33a, 38). These
ADD-1/SREBP-1 target genes control important steps in fatty acid
metabolism, which may lead to the production of natural fatty
acid-derived PPAR ligands and activators, suggesting a second more
indirect pathway by which ADD-1/SREBP-1 regulates adipocyte
differentiation (i.e., by controlling the production of natural
activators of PPAR
) (22) (Fig.
8). Besides this important regulatory
effect of cholesterol and the ADD-1/SREBP-1 family of transcription
factors on fatty acid metabolism, fatty acids were recently also
reported to inhibit the maturation of ADD-1/SREBP-1 and decrease the
expression of promoters driven by sterol regulatory elements (44,
52). Interestingly, we did not observe an effect of unsaturated
fatty acids on the induction of PPAR
expression by cholesterol
depletion (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, fatty acids were like
thiazolidinediones capable of further inducing expression of a
PPRE-driven reporter gene to a similar level in medium with or without
sterols (Fig. 7C). All of this suggests that in the case of PPAR
,
the inhibitory effects of fatty acids might be insufficient to overcome
the potent stimulatory effects of cholesterol depletion on PPAR
expression or, alternatively, that the addition of fatty acids might
have an independent and direct stimulatory effect on PPAR
expression. In addition, the absence of PPAR
expression in medium
with cholesterol (Fig. 2A and B, lanes 1 and 3) would obscure any
further inhibitory effect fatty acids might have on this regulation.

View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Scheme summarizing the different links between
ADD-1/SREBP activation and PPAR activity. The present report
provides evidence that PPAR expression is induced by ADD-1/SREBP,
whereas the role of ADD-1/SREBP in inducing PPAR ligands was
described before (22).
|
|
Interestingly, the implications of the control of PPAR
expression by
the ADD-1/SREBP-1 family of transcription factors and cholesterol may
extend beyond the control of adipogenesis and affect total body lipid
and glucose metabolism. First, in view of the important insulin
sensitization which accompanies PPAR
activation in vivo, the
regulation of PPAR
expression and activity by changes in cellular
cholesterol concentration suggests that cholesterol homeostasis could
have an impact on whole-body glucose homeostasis. Further in vivo
studies exploring this issue are definitely needed. Second, the
regulation of the expression of PPAR
, a nuclear receptor that is
activated by fatty acid metabolites, by the cholesterol-regulated
transcription factors of the ADD-1/SREBP-1 family, links
transcriptional control by these two important classes of lipids.
Changes in intracellular cholesterol levels will, via modulation of
ADD-1/SREBP-1 and/or SREBP-2 activity (31, 40, 50),
profoundly affect fatty acid and triglyceride metabolism, which is
controlled by PPAR
activity. One interesting example of such an
interrelationship between cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism, is the
observation that powerful HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, such as
simvastatin (28) or atorvastatin (1), not only
reduce circulating cholesterol but also reduce triglyceride levels.
Whereas the reduction in cholesterol levels could be explained by their
inhibitory effect on the key enzyme controlling cholesterol biosynthesis, HMG-CoA reductase, no explanation is available for their
beneficial effect on triglyceride levels. Cholesterol depletion induced
by these agents, however, leads to proteolytic activation of the
ADD-1/SREBP family (31, 40). If this causes an induction in
PPAR
levels, as shown here, the increased PPAR
transcriptional activity would be expected to induce the expression of several genes
involved in triglyceride clearance (for review, see reference 34). Hence, this mode of interaction between
transcription factors controlling different lipid pathways may provide
an explanation for both the somewhat unexpected triglyceride-lowering
effects that have been observed when these cholesterol-lowering agents have been used in this therapeutic context and for the pronounced beneficial effects of the statins in patients with diabetic
hyperlipidemia. This new knowledge could provide a basis for
development of agents which have a broader or more specific ability to
regulate different aspects of lipid metabolism.
The technical help of D. Cayet and C. Haby and the support of
and/or discussion with A. Negro-Villar, R. Heyman, M. Leibowitz, D. Moller, S. Wright, and D. De Chaffoy are kindly acknowledged. We acknowledge the gift of materials from Samuel Wright and
Alex Nadzan.
This work was supported by grants from INSERM, Région
Nord-Pas-de-Calais, Institut Pasteur, Université de Lille II, ARC (no. 6403), and Ligand pharmaceuticals. J.A. is a research
director with the CNRS, and K.S. is a research assistant with
INSERM. L.F. was supported by the Janssen Research Foundation.
| 1.
|
Alaupovic, P.,
T. Heinonen,
L. Shurzinske, and D. M. Black.
1997.
Effect of a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin, on lipids, apolipoproteins and lipoprotein particles in patients with elevated serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels.
Atherosclerosis
133:123-133[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Amri, E.-Z.,
B. Bertrand,
G. Ailhaud, and P. Grimaldi.
1991.
Regulation of adipose cell differentiation. I. Fatty acids are inducers of the aP2 gene expression.
J. Lipid Res.
32:1449-1456[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Aubert, J.,
G. Ailhaud, and R. Negrel.
1996.
Evidence for a novel regulatory pathway activated by (carba)prostacyclin in preadipose and adipose cells.
FEBS Lett.
397:117-121[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Bennet, M. K.,
J. M. Lopez,
H. B. Sanchez, and T. F. Osborne.
1995.
Sterol regulation of fatty acid synthase promoter:coordinate feedback regulation of two major lipid pathways.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:25578-25583[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Berger, J.,
P. Bailey,
C. Biswas,
C. A. Cullinan,
T. W. Doebber,
N. S. Hayes,
R. Saperstein,
R. G. Smith, and M. D. Leibowitz.
1996.
Thiazolidinediones produce a conformational change in peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor- : binding and activation correlate with antidiabetic actions in db/db mice.
Endocrinology
137:4189-4195[Abstract].
|
| 6.
|
Brun, R. P.,
J. B. Kim,
E. Hu, and B. M. Spiegelman.
1997.
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and the control of adipogenesis.
Curr. Opin. Lipidol.
8:212-218[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Chawla, A., and M. A. Lazar.
1994.
Peroxisome proliferator and retinoid signaling pathways co-regulate preadipocyte phenotype and survival.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:1786-1790[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Christy, R. J.,
V. W. Yang,
J. M. Ntambi,
D. E. Geiman,
W. H. Landschulz,
A. D. Friedman,
Y. Nakabeppu,
T. J. Kelly, and M. D. Lane.
1989.
Differentiation-induced gene expression in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes: CCAAT/enhancer binding protein interacts with and activates the promoters of two adipocyte-specific genes.
Genes Dev.
3:1323-1335[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Cornelius, P.,
O. A. MacDougald, and M. D. Lane.
1994.
Regulation of adipocyte development.
Annu. Rev. Nutr.
14:99-129[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Ericsson, J.,
S. M. Jackson,
J. B. Kim,
B. M. Spiegelman, and P. A. Edwards.
1997.
Identification of glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase as an adipocyte determination and differentiation factor 1- and sterol regulatory element-binding protein-responsive gene.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:7298-7305[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Fajas, L.,
D. Auboeuf,
E. Raspe,
K. Schoonjans,
A. M. Lefebvre,
R. Saladin,
J. Najib,
M. Laville,
J. C. Fruchart,
S. Deeb,
A. Vidal-Puig,
J. Flier,
M. R. Briggs,
B. Staels,
H. Vidal, and J. Auwerx.
1997.
Organization, promoter analysis and expression of the human PPAR gene.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:18779-18789[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11a.
| Fajas, L., and J. Auwerx. Unpublished results.
|
| 12.
|
Fajas, L.,
J. C. Fruchart, and J. Auwerx.
1998.
PPAR 3 mRNA: a distinct PPAR mRNA subtype transcribed from an independent promoter.
FEBS Lett.
438:55-60[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Fajas, L.,
J. C. Fruchart, and J. Auwerx.
1998.
Transcriptional control of adipogenesis.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
10:165-173[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Forman, B. M.,
P. Tontonoz,
J. Chen,
R. P. Brun,
B. M. Spiegelman, and R. M. Evans.
1995.
15-Deoxy- 12,14 prostaglandin J2 is a ligand for the adipocyte determination factor PPAR .
Cell
83:803-812[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Freytag, S. O., and T. J. Geddes.
1992.
Reciprocal regulation of adipogenesis by Myc and C/EBP .
Science
256:379-382[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Freytag, S. O.,
D. L. Paielli, and J. D. Gilbert.
1994.
Ectopic expression of the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein promotes the adipogenic program in a variety of mouse fibroblastic cells.
Genes Dev.
8:1654-1663[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Fried, M. G., and D. M. Crothers.
1983.
CAP and RNA polymerase interactions with the lac promoter: binding stoichiometry and long range effects.
Nucleic Acids Res.
11:141-158[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Ho, S. N.,
H. D. Hunt,
N. M. Horton,
J. K. Pullen, and L. R. Pease.
1989.
Side directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction.
Gene
77:51-59[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Hu, E.,
P. Tontonoz, and B. M. Spiegelman.
1995.
Transdifferentiation of myoblasts by the adipogenic transcription factors PPAR and C/EBP .
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:9856-9860[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Hua, X.,
C. Yokoyama,
J. Wu,
M. R. Briggs,
M. S. Brown,
J. L. Goldstein, and X. Wang.
1993.
SREBP-2, a second basic-helix-loop-helix leucine zipper protein that stimulates transcription by binding to a sterol regulatory element.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:11603-11607[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Kim, J. B., and B. M. Spiegelman.
1996.
ADD1/SREBP1 promotes adipocyte differentiation and gene expression linked to fatty acid metabolism.
Genes Dev.
10:1096-1107[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Kim, J. B.,
H. M. Wright,
M. Wright, and B. M. Spiegelman.
1998.
ADD1/SREBP1 activates PPAR through the production of endogenous ligand.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:4333-4337[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Kliewer, S. A.,
J. M. Lenhard,
T. M. Willson,
I. Patel,
D. C. Morris, and J. M. Lehman.
1995.
A prostaglandin J2 metabolite binds peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor and promotes adipocyte differentiation.
Cell
83:813-819[Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Lehmann, J. M.,
J. M. Lenhard,
B. B. Oliver,
G. M. Ringold, and S. A. Kliewer.
1997.
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and are activated by indomethacin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:3406-3410[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Lehmann, J. M.,
L. B. Moore,
T. A. Smith-Oliver,
W. O. Wilkison,
T. M. Willson, and S. A. Kliewer.
1995.
An antidiabetic thiazolidinedione is a high affinity ligand for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR ).
J. Biol. Chem.
270:12953-12956[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Lin, F. T., and M. D. Lane.
1992.
Antisense CCAAT/enhancer binding protein RNA suppresses coordinate gene expression and triglyceride accumulation during differentiation of 3T3-L1 adipocytes.
Genes Dev.
6:533-544[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Lopez, J. M.,
M. K. Bennett,
H. B. Sanchez,
J. M. Rosenfeld, and T. F. Osborne.
1996.
Sterol regulation of acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase: a mechanism for coordinate control of cellular lipid.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:1049-1053[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Mol, M. J. T. M.,
D. W. Erkelens,
J. A. Gevers Leuven,
J. A. Schouten, and A. F. H. Stalenhoef.
1986.
Effects of synvinolin (MK-733) on plasma lipids in familial hypercholesterolemia.
In
Lancet:936-939.
|
| 29.
|
Negrel, R.,
D. Gaillard, and G. Ailhaud.
1989.
Prostacyclin as a potent effector of adipose-cell differentiation.
Biochem. J.
257:399-405[Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Osumi, T.,
J. K. Wen, and T. Hashimoto.
1991.
Two cis-acting regulatory elements in the peroxisome proliferator-responsive element enhancer region of rat acyl-CoA oxidase gene.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
175:866-871[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Sakai, J.,
E. A. Duncan,
R. B. Rawson,
X. Hua,
M. S. Brown, and J. L. Goldstein.
1996.
Sterol-regulated release of SREBP-2 from cell membranes requires two sequential cleavages, one within a transmembrane segment.
Cell
85:1037-1046[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Saladin, R.,
P. De Vos,
M. Guerre-Millo,
A. Leturque,
J. Girard,
B. Staels, and J. Auwerx.
1995.
Transient increase in obese gene expression after food intake and insulin administration.
Nature
377:527-529[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Saladin, R.,
L. Fajas,
S. Dana,
Y. D. Halvorsen,
J. Auwerx, and M. Briggs.
1999.
Differential regulation of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor 1 (PPAR 1) and PPAR 2 mRNA expression in early stages of adipogenesis.
Cell Growth Differ.
10:43-48[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33a.
| Schoonjans, K. Unpublished data.
|
| 34.
|
Schoonjans, K.,
G. Martin,
B. Staels, and J. Auwerx.
1997.
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, orphans with ligands and functions.
Curr. Opin. Lipidol.
8:159-166[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Schoonjans, K.,
J. Peinado-Onsurbe,
A. M. Lefebvre,
R. Heyman,
M. Briggs,
S. Deeb,
B. Staels, and J. Auwerx.
1996.
PPAR and PPAR activators direct a tissue-specific transcriptional response via a PPRE in the lipoprotein lipase gene.
EMBO J.
15:5336-5348[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Schoonjans, K.,
B. Staels,
P. Grimaldi, and J. Auwerx.
1993.
Acyl-CoA synthetase mRNA expression is controlled by fibric-acid derivatives, feeding and liver proliferation.
Eur. J. Biochem.
216:615-622[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Schoonjans, K.,
M. Watanabe,
H. Suzuki,
A. Mahfoudi,
G. Krey,
W. Wahli,
P. Grimaldi,
B. Staels,
T. Yamamoto, and J. Auwerx.
1995.
Induction of the acyl-coenzyme A synthetase gene by fibrates and fatty acids is mediated by a peroxisome proliferator response element in the C promoter.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:19269-19276[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Shimano, H.,
J. D. Horton,
R. E. Hammer,
I. Shimomura,
M. S. Brown, and J. L. Goldstein.
1996.
Overproduction of cholesterol and fatty acids causes massive liver enlargement in transgenic mice expressing truncated SREBP-1a.
J. Clin. Investig.
98:1575-1584[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Shimano, H.,
J. D. Horton,
I. Shimomura,
R. E. Hammer,
M. S. Brown, and J. L. Goldstein.
1997.
Isoform 1c of sterol regulatory element binding protein is less active than isoform 1a in livers of transgenic mice and in cultured cells.
J. Clin. Investig.
99:846-854[Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Shimomura, I.,
Y. Bashmakov,
H. Shimano,
J. D. Horton,
J. L. Goldstein, and M. S. Brown.
1997.
Cholesterol feeding reduces nuclear forms of sterol regulatory element binding proteins in hamster liver.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:12345-12359.
|
| 41.
|
Shimomura, I.,
R. E. Hammer,
J. A. Richardson,
S. Ikemoto,
Y. Bashmakov,
J. L. Goldstein, and M. S. Brown.
1998.
Insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus in transgenic mice expressing nuclear SREBP-1c in adipose tissue: a model for congenital generalized lipodystrophy.
Genes Dev.
12:3182-3194[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Smith, J. R.,
T. F. Osborne,
M. S. Brown,
J. L. Goldstein, and G. Gil.
1988.
Multiple sterol regulatory elements in the promoter for hamster 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A synthase.
J. Biol. Chem.
263:18480-18487[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Spiegelman, B. M., and J. S. Flier.
1996.
Adipogenesis and obesity: rounding out the big picture.
Cell
87:377-389[Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Thewke, D. P.,
S. R. Panini, and M. Sinensky.
1998.
Oleate potentiates oxysterol inhibition of transcription from sterol regulatory element-1-regulated promoters and maturation of sterol regulatory element-binding proteins.
J. Cell. Biochem.
273:21402-21407.
|
| 45.
|
Tontonoz, P.,
E. Hu,
J. Devine,
E. G. Beale, and B. M. Spiegelman.
1995.
PPAR 2 regulates adipose expression of the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase gene.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:351-357[Abstract].
|
| 46.
|
Tontonoz, P.,
E. Hu,
R. A. Graves,
A. I. Budavari, and B. M. Spiegelman.
1994.
mPPAR 2: tissue-specific regulator of an adipocyte enhancer.
Genes Dev.
8:1224-1234[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Tontonoz, P.,
E. Hu, and B. M. Spiegelman.
1994.
Stimulation of adipogenesis in fibroblasts by PPAR 2, a lipid-activated transcription factor.
Cell
79:1147-1156[Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Tontonoz, P.,
J. B. Kim,
R. A. Graves, and B. M. Spiegelman.
1993.
ADD1: a novel helix-loop-helix transcription factor associated with adipocyte determination and differentiation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:4753-4759[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Vu-Dac, N.,
K. Schoonjans,
V. Kosykh,
J. Dallongeville,
J.-C. Fruchart,
B. Staels, and J. Auwerx.
1995.
Fibrates increase human apolipoprotein A-II expression through activation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor.
J. Clin. Investig.
96:741-750.
|
| 50.
|
Wang, X.,
R. Sato,
M. S. Brown,
X. Hua, and J. L. Goldstein.
1994.
SREBP-1, a membrane-bound transcription factor released by sterol-regulated proteolysis.
Cell
77:53-62[Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Willson, T. M.,
J. E. Cobb,
D. J. Cowan,
R. W. Wiethe,
I. D. Correa,
S. R. Prakash,
K. D. Beck,
L. B. Moore,
S. A. Kliewer, and J. M. Lehmann.
1996.
The structure activity relationship between peroxisome proliferator activated receptor agonism and the antihyperglycemic activity of thiazolidinediones.
J. Med. Chem.
39:665-668[Medline].
|
| 52.
|
Worgall, T. S.,
S. L. Sturley,
T. Seo,
T. F. Osborne, and R. J. Deckelbaum.
1998.
Polyunsaturated fatty acids decrease expression of promoters with sterol regulatory elements by decreasing levels of mature sterol regulatory element-binding protein.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:25537-25540[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Wu, Z.,
N. L. R. Bucher, and S. R. Farmer.
1996.
Induction of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor during the conversion of 3T3 fibroblasts into adipocytes is mediated by C/EBP , C/EBP , and glucocorticoids.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:4128-4136[Abstract].
|
| 54.
|
Wu, Z.,
Y. Xie,
N. L. R. Bucher, and S. R. Farmer.
1995.
Conditional ectopic expression of C/EBP in NIH-3T3 cells induces PPAR and stimulates adipogenesis.
Genes Dev.
9:2350-2363[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 55.
|
Yeh, W. C.,
Z. Cao,
M. Classon, and S. McKnight.
1995.
Cascade regulation of terminal adipocyte differentiation by three members of the C/EBP family of leucine zipper proteins.
Genes Dev.
9:168-181[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 56.
|
Yokoyama, C.,
X. Wang,
M. R. Briggs,
A. Admon,
J. Wu,
X. Hua,
J. L. Goldstein, and M. S. Brown.
1993.
SREBP-1, a basic helix-loop-helix-leucine zipper protein that controls transcription of the LDL receptor gene.
Cell
75:187-197[Medline].
|