Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, August 1999, p. 5743-5758, Vol. 19, No. 8
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Notch and Wingless Regulate Expression of Cuticle
Patterning Genes
Cedric Satish
Wesley*
Laboratory of Genetics, The Rockefeller
University, New York, New York 10021
Received 6 April 1999/Accepted 5 May 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
The cell surface receptor Notch is required during
Drosophila embryogenesis for production of epidermal
precursor cells. The secreted factor Wingless is required for
specifying different types of cells during differentiation of tissues
from these epidermal precursor cells. The results reported here show
that the full-length Notch and a form of Notch truncated in the amino
terminus associate with Wingless in S2 cells and in embryos. In S2
cells, Wingless and the two different forms of Notch regulate
expression of Dfrizzled 2, a receptor of Wg;
hairy, a negative regulator of achaete
expression; shaggy, a negative regulator of
engrailed expression; and patched, a negative
regulator of wingless expression. Analyses of expression of
the same genes in mutant N embryos indicate that the
pattern of gene regulations observed in vitro reflects regulations in vivo. These results suggest that the strong genetic interactions observed between Notch and wingless genes
during development of Drosophila is at least partly due to
regulation of expression of cuticle patterning genes by Wingless and
the two forms of Notch.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The transmembrane protein Notch (N)
regulates cell fates in Drosophila melanogaster during the
development of tissues from all three germ layers (6, 11, 14, 24,
42, 83, 88). For example, embryos without zygotically contributed
N produce excess neuroblasts at the expense of epidermoblasts (11,
66, 90). In this instance, N appears to function by suppressing a
default fate in some members of a population of physically interacting cells. Delta (Dl), also a transmembrane protein, has been identified as
the ligand for this function of N, known as lateral inhibition (1,
14, 24, 32, 46, 50, 86).
The extracellular domain of N, where extracellular ligands or factors
regulating intracellular N activities are expected to bind, is made up
of 36 epidermal growth factor-like (EGF-like) repeats (42,
88). In vitro analyses of deletions affecting different segments
of the extracellular domain of N have shown that Dl binds N in the
region of EGF-like repeats 11 and 12 (68). Serrate (Ser),
the only other identified ligand of N but with functions similar to
that of Dl, also binds the same two EGF-like repeats (25, 29,
68). A single-amino-acid substitution in this region can produce
an embryonic lethal phenotype (18). However, these two
repeats are not sufficient for wild-type N function: loss of the
remaining extracellular sequence blocks formation of the embryonic
cuticle (52), and single-amino-acid substitutions affecting
the 2nd (nd3), 14th (spl), 24th
(Ax9, Ax59b,
Ax59d), 25th (Ax1), 27th
(Ax71d), 29th (Ax16,
AxE2), or 32nd (Nts1)
EGF-like repeats or the lin12/Notch repeats
[l(1)NB] produce lethality or aberrant
Notch function (41, 54, 91). Since most of these
mutations alter the structure of N EGF-like repeats, it was likely that
these extracellular regions mediate interactions with alternative
ligands. These alternative ligands could be associated with other N
functions, such as induction of cell fates observed in the development
of the compound eye (2, 13, 28) or differentiation of the
epidermis (15, 36). Therefore, I explored the functional
significance of EGF-like repeats of N other than those involved in
binding of Dl or Ser.
Interspecific sequence comparisons identified two possible ligand
binding sites in the region containing EGF-like repeats 19 to 36. A
cell surface screen of embryonic cDNA-derived peptides identified
Wingless (Wg) as a possible ligand of N. In vitro analysis showed that
Wg associates with N in this region. In vitro and in vivo gene
expression analyses showed that Wg is associated with regulation of
expression of the Dfrizzled2, patched,
shaggy, and hairy genes through two distinct
forms of N: the full-length form and a form of N lacking 18 or more of
the amino-terminal EGF-like repeats (thereby also the Dl binding
repeats). These two forms of N produce different ligand-independent and
ligand-dependent gene activities in cells expressing them.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Sequence analysis.
Extracellular N sequences of
D. virilis and of D. pseudoobscura were
obtained by reverse transcription-PCR with Taq polymerase and degenerate primers. Plots were generated by using the PILEUP and
PLOTSIMILARITY programs in the Genetics Computer Group sequence analysis program (27). There are only 10 single-residue, 4 two-residue, and 1 eight-residue changes in the EGF-like repeats region
between N and human Notch1.
Biopanning.
A 6- to 12-h Drosophila embryonic
cDNA library was constructed in the Surfzap vector (Stratagene).
Biopanning was performed as recommended by the manufacturer.
Approximately 5 × 108 lambda phage (~130 times the
number of primary plaques) were used for mass excision of phagemids.
About 6 × 108 excised phagemids were used for
filamentous phage preparation (in the presence of 1% glucose). Phage
precipitate was resuspended in balanced salt solution (BSS)
(89). A total of 4 × 106 to 6 × 106 heat shock-induced S2-N cells were washed twice with
BSS and blocked first for 30 min at 4°C with 1 ml of BSS-5%
protease-free bovine serum albumin (BSA) and then for 30 min at 4°C
with 1 ml of BSS-5% BSA-100 µl of ~1014 M13mp8 phage
per ml in BSS solution. Approximately 1013 to
1014 biopan-ready filamentous phage, mixed with 60 µl of
M13mp8 phage solution, were added, and the tubes were shaken for 25 min
at 4°C. The cells were washed twice with 10 ml of cold BSS-5% BSA followed by four times with 10 ml of cold BSS. The bound phages were
eluted in 200 µl of 0.1 M triethylamine with protease inhibitors (1 µl each of benzamidine [0.1 mg/ml], trypsin inhibitor [10 mg/ml], pepstatin [10 mg/ml], leupeptin [10 mg/ml], and aprotinin [2.2 mg/ml] and 5 µl of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [10 mg/ml]), the
solution was neutralized with 200 µl of 1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), and
the phagemids were amplified in Escherichia coli. A total of
~1012, ~1010, and ~108
amplified phage were used in the second, third, and fourth rounds of
biopanning, respectively. In the fifth and sixth rounds,
~107 and ~106 phagemids, respectively, were
biopanned four times for 30 min consecutively on ~107
heat shock-induced S2 cells (each time), and the supernatant was
subsequently biopanned once on heat shock-induced S2-N cells. Then
1,000 to 2,000 eluted, biopanned phagemids were screened with probes of
various genes by standard procedures (73). Phages from
purified wg-carrying phagemids were prepared as specified by
the manufacturer (Stratagene).
Immunocytochemistry on cultured cells.
S2, S2-N,
S2-N
I, S2-N
EGF19-36, and
S2-N
EGF1-18 cells were heat shock induced before use.
S2-Dfz2 cells (8) were grown in the presence of copper for
12 to 14 h before use. The cells were washed twice with cold
Shields and Sangs M3 medium (M3 medium; Sigma), resuspended with 400 µl of cold medium conditioned with growth of S2-Wg or S2 cells (see
below), and incubated for 15 min at 4°C. The cells were washed twice
with cold M3 medium, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde-1× phosphate-buffered saline, and processed for immunofluorescence as
described previously (24, 51). pv9 1.1 S2-Wg cells were used
to make Wg conditioned M3 media as described previously
(69). Unconcentrated medium was used for all experiments.
Immunoprecipitations. (i) From cultured cells.
N and Dl
proteins were induced by heat shock. Dfz2 was induced by growing
S2-Dfz2 cells for 12 to 14 h in the presence of copper. For N and
Dl experiments, 107 cells each of S2-N and S2-Dl cells,
respectively, were incubated in M3 medium for 15 min for formation of
aggregates (51) and used for each immunoprecipitation (i.e.,
each lane). The number of S2-N or S2-Dl cells was approximately the
same wherever a mixture of cell lines was used, with the remainder
being made up by the other cell line or S2 cells. For N and Wg
experiments, 3 × 107 S2 or S2-N cells were used per
immunoprecipitation. For experiments with N
EGF1-18,
N
EGF19-36, and S2-Dfz2 cells, 5 × 106
cells were used per immunoprecipitation. The cells were washed twice in
cold serum-free M3 medium and resuspended in 250 µl of cold M3 medium
conditioned with growth of S2 cells (S2 media) or pv9 1.1 S2-Wg cells
(S2-Wg media) plus protease inhibitors (20 ng each of leupeptin,
pepstatin, trypsin inhibitor, and E-64 per ml, 5 ng of aprotinin per
ml, and 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). Where required, EGTA was
added to a final concentration of 15 mM. Then 10 µl of ~1.25 mM
bis(sulfosuccinimidyl suberate) (BS3) cross-linker
resuspended in 1 ml of cold phosphate-buffered BSS (pbBSS: 55 mM NaCl,
40 mM KCl, 15 mM Mg2SO4, 10 mM
CaCl2, 20 mM glucose, 50 mM sucrose, 0.74 mM
KH2PO4, 0.35 mM
Na2HPO4) was added to appropriate samples, and
the cells were incubated for 30 min at 4°C. The cells were pelleted,
resuspended in 1/10 pbBSS-10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) (to quench
cross-linking)-protease inhibitors, and incubated on ice for 10 min.
The membranes were pelleted, resuspended in 400 µl of cold pbBSS-60
mM Tris (pH 7.5)-0.8% Triton X-100-protease inhibitors, and
incubated for 20 min on ice. A 20-µl volume of 10% deoxycholate was
added, and incubation was continued for 90 min to 2 h. The extract
was precleared with GammaBind Plus beads (Pharmacia) for ~2 h at
4°C and incubated overnight at 4°C with the immunoprecipitation
antibody where appropriate [100 µl of the monoclonal anti-Dl
antibody, 1 µl of the polyclonal anti-Wg (rb) antibody, 1 µl of the
polyclonal anti-Hedgehog antibody, 4 µl of the anti-Patched antibody,
or 20 µl of the anti-Dfz2 monoclonal antibody]. Immunocomplexes were
captured with GammaBind Plus beads, and the beads were rinsed four
times with 1 ml of cold pbBSS-protease inhibitors-10 mM Tris (pH
7.5)-0.1% Triton X-100. Bound complexes were eluted with 40 µl of
1× Laemmli buffer-protease inhibitors, boiled for 6 min, and
separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(SDS-PAGE) in 4% polyacrylamide gels (for anti-Dl or anti-Wg
immunoprecipitations) or in 6% polyacrylamide gels (for anti-Dfz2
immunoprecipitations). Western blot analyses were performed by to
standard procedures (30, 73), and signals were detected with
the ECL kit (Amersham).
(ii) From embryos.
Approximately 800 µl of dechorionated
embryos of appropriate ages and strains, laid by circadian
cycle-entrained flies (to minimize age variance in embryos), was
partially crushed, with a loose-fitting pestle in a 1-ml Wheaton Dounce
grinder, in the presence of 400 µl of ice-cold pbBSS-protease
inhibitors, with or without ~2 mM BS3. After 45 min of
incubation on ice, 12 µl of cold 2 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) was added to
quench the cross-linking reaction. Membrane proteins were extracted in
0.75% Triton X-100-0.5% deoxycholate. The rest of the procedure was
identical to that described for immunoprecipitation from cultured
cells. Anti-Dl, anti-Wg, and anti-Ser immunoprecipitates (see Fig. 4A
and B) were separated by SDS-PAGE in 4% polyacrylamide gels; anti-Wg,
anti-Hh, and anti-Ptc immunoprecipitates (see Fig. 4C) were separated
by SDS-PAGE in 6% polyacrylamide gels.
Northern analyses.
Total RNAs were extracted from cultured
cells or embryos by using RNAzol B (Tel-test, Inc.). I used 0- to 20-h
dechorionated embryos, collected at the indicated temperatures (with
appropriate corrections for developmental times). A total of 2 × 107 cells of different cell lines (grown to confluence)
were heat shocked and incubated for 2 h at room temperature before
use. S2-Dfz2 cells were grown in either the presence or absence of copper for 12 to 14 h before use. The cells were washed twice with
serum-free M3 medium with antibiotics, and equal volumes were aliquoted
to two 1.5-ml Eppendorf tubes, pelleted, and resuspended in 600 µl of
S2 medium or S2-Wg medium. After 2 h of gentle shaking at room
temperature, RNAs were extracted. Then 40 µg of total RNA was loaded
in each lane. Standard Northern blot procedures were used
(73). For generation of N
EGF1-18/Ax59d
molecules, the fragment including NheI (nucleotide 4324)
(42) and BglII (nucleotide 5160) was PCR
amplified (with Pfu enzyme) from
Ax59d/FM7 flies, cut with NheI and
BglII, and used to replace the same fragment in
N
EGF1-18. Samples were sequenced fully in the replaced
region, and clones carrying the Ax59d mutation
was transfected into S2 cells. Expression of protein was confirmed by
Western blotting and immunocytochemistry.
Western blot analyses.
For assessment of Armadillo protein
in the cytoplasm, about 3 × 106 heat shock- or
metal-induced cells were processed as described by Bhanot et al.
(8). The same blot was stripped and stained for ~16 h with
India ink. For analyses of proteins from embryos, proteins were
extracted with 0.75% Triton X-100-0.5% deoxycholate or with SDS
lysis buffer (43). The amounts of proteins in different embryonic extracts were standardized by using absorbance values at 280 nm and the Bio-Rad DC protein assay kit. The proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE in 4% polyacrylamide gels. For analysis of S2-N,
S2-N
EGF1-18, S2-N
EGF19-36 and LN rpts,
and S2-N
EGF1-36 proteins, heat shock-induced cells were
dissolved in 1× Laemmli buffer and separated by SDS-PAGE in 4%
polyacrylamide gels. Western blotting in all cases was performed by
standard procedures (30, 73) and signals were detected with
the ECL kit.
In situ RNA hybridization.
Batches of wild-type and mutant
embryos were grown under identical conditions at 25 or 18°C and
processed simultaneously under the same conditions at all steps of the
procedure. For each comparative experiment, the batches of wild-type
and mutant embryos were divided just before addition of probe, and
different probes were added to the divided batches of embryos. A double
RNA-protein hybridization procedure, described by Corbin et al.
(14), was used. An anti-
-galactosidase antibody made in
mouse was used to sort out FM7 or TM6 chromosome carrying embryos laid
by N264-47/FM7, spl Ax59d/FM7,
Ax9B/FM7, Ax59d/FM7, or
DlX/TM6 flies.
 |
RESULTS |
EGF-like repeats 23 to 27 and 31 to 34 are potential ligand binding
sites.
A chimeric Drosophila N protein containing
EGF-like repeats 10 to 13 from Xenopus physically associates
with the Drosophila Dl protein (68). Therefore,
the Dl binding region in N is expected to be conserved between
homologous sequences. If there are additional ligands associated with
different functions of Notch and if they interact with regions other
than the Dl binding region, these regions are expected to be conserved
between homologous sequences also. To determine whether such conserved
regions exist in the extracellular domain of N, the DNA sequences
coding for the extracellular portions of N proteins in D. virilis and D. pseudoobscura were compared by plotting
the running averages of conservation between sequences of these
invertebrate homologs and between sequences of D. melanogaster N and the human homolog, hNotch 1 (Fig.
1A). Figure 1 shows that, as expected, a
peak with high conservation is centered on EGF-like repeats 11, 12, and
13, which include the Dl binding region. Besides that region, there are
two additional regions that are as conserved as EFG-like repeats 11 to
13 in both comparisons. In the D. melanogaster-D. virilis
comparison, the comparison relevant to N function in
Drosophila, one region extends from EGF-like repeats 23 to
27 and encompasses most of the domain affected by the Ax
mutations of N (17, 41). A second conserved
region extends from EGF-like repeats 31 to 34. The functional importance of all these conserved regions is underscored by inclusion of at least one lethal mutation in each (boldface type in Fig. 1A). As
EGF-like repeats 11 and 12 bind Dl (68) and are
evolutionarily conserved (Fig. 1A), the regions containing EGF-like
repeats 23 to 27 and 31 to 34 were hypothesized to be conserved because
they are additional ligand binding regions in the extracellular domain of N.


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Search for new N ligands. (A) Interspecific sequence
comparisons reveal possible ligand binding sites in the extracellular
domain of N. Each plot represents a running average of sequence
conservation between two homologs, over sliding blocks of 40 amino
acids (aa). At the top, the corresponding EGF-like repeats of N are
graphically represented. lin12 = lin12/N repeats (42,
88). The line in the middle of each plot represents average
similarity between the two sequences compared (the maximum value is
1.5). This average would include sequence conservation due to sequence
elements common to all EGF-like repeats. The plot of D. melanogaster N and its D. pseudoobscura homolog is
similar to that of N and the D. virilis homolog (differing
only in the level of overall conservation). The between-lineage
comparison identifies evolutionarily stable conserved regions. dmN,
D. melanogaster N; hN1, human homolog of N (23);
dvN, D. virilis N. Sites of mutations in nd3 and
l(1)NB are from reference 54,
NM1 are from reference 18,
spl and the Ax alleles are from reference
41, and Nts1 are from
91. Lethal alleles are in bold letters. (B)
Schematic representation of the biopanning screen used for
identification of potential N ligands (see Materials and Methods).
|
|
Cell surface biopanning screen suggests a physical affinity between
N and Wg.
The two identified ligands, Dl and Ser, bind N only at
the region including EGF-like repeats 11 and 12 (68). This
specificity suggested that if the regions including EGF-like repeats 23 to 27 and 31 to 34 bound ligands, these are likely to be novel ligands. To identify such novel N ligands, if any, phagemid biopanning (55,
74) was performed on the surfaces of live S2 cells expressing full-length N proteins (S2-N). The procedure used is schematically shown in Fig. 1B. Phagemids encoding the known N ligands, Dl and Ser,
were specifically enriched by this biopanning. Enrichment was also
observed for Wg, N, Big Brain, Pecanex, and Fringe phagemids but not
for Scabrous and Star phagemids (Table
1). Genes encoding these proteins are
known to genetically interact with N (5, 15, 22, 31,
40, 47, 56, 64, 67). Enrichments were not detected for
hedgehog (hh), patched
(ptc), and slit genes, whose products function on
cell surfaces (35, 45, 49, 57, 70, 81), or for several genes
whose products are cytoplasmic proteins (Table 1 footnote). The high
enrichment of Pecanex phagemids (from 0.3/105 before
biopanning to 25,600/105 after biopanning), enrichment of
phagemids of known ligands of N (Dl and Ser), enrichment of phagemids
representing only a subset of genes showing interaction with the
N gene, and lack of enrichment of EGF-like repeat sequence
containing Slit phagemids indicated specificity in the enrichment
process (the after-biopanning phagemid population was estimated to be
composed of phagemids representing only about 15 genes).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Change in frequency of test phagemids following
biopanning of Drosophila embryonic cDNA carrying filamentous
phages on the surfaces of S2-N cellsa
|
|
Among the genes showing enrichment, wg was of particular
interest. wg and Ax alleles of N
genetically interact, and both produce similar "antineurogenic"
phenotypes; N
alleles, or the
NM1 allele carrying a mutation in the Dl binding
region, produce the other phenotypes (10, 15, 17, 18). Thus,
it seemed possible that Wg physically interacts with the conserved Ax
domain of N including EGF-like repeats 23 to 27 (Fig. 1). Therefore, further studies were focused on wg. Six of the Wg phagemids
selected by biopanning were further analyzed by sequencing and Western blotting. The inserts in all six were of wg coding DNA, and
all six phages produced Wg protein as part of their cpIII coat protein (data not shown), suggesting that the enrichment of Wg phagemids was
due to physical interactions between Wg and N.
Soluble Wg proteins form two molecular complexes with N
proteins.
To confirm that enrichment of wg phagemids on
S2-N cells was due to binding of Wg protein (expressed on the surfaces
of phagemids) to the surfaces of S2-N cells, immunocytochemical
analyses was performed with soluble Wg and S2 cells expressing the
following N molecules (see reference 52 for a
complete description of these molecules): full-length N (S2-N), N
lacking EGF-like repeats 19 to 36 (S2-N
EGF19-36), N
lacking EGF-like repeats 1 to 18 (S2-N
EGF1-18), and N
lacking the intracellular domain (S2-N
I). Wg was
detected on the surfaces of S2-N cells (Fig.
2B), S2-N
EGF1-18 cells
(Fig. 2C), and S2-N
I cells (Fig. 2E) but not on surfaces
of S2 cells (Fig. 2A) and S2-N
EGF19-36 cells (Fig. 2D).
More than 2 × 106 cells were processed on each slide,
and several such slides were examined for each cell type.
Immunofluorescence signals were not detected on S2 and
S2-N
EGF19-36 cell slides. Double staining with
antibodies against N and Wg showed that only N-expressing cells bound
Wg (Fig. 2F). Comparable frequencies of Wg-positive cells were obtained
with S2-Dfz2 cells (8) treated in the same way as
N-expressing cells (Fig. 2G). Dfz2 is known to bind Wg (8).

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Soluble Wg binds N in the region containing EGF-like
repeats 19 to 36. Wg binds surfaces of S2-N (B),
S2-N EGF1-18 (C), and S2-N I cells (E) but
not surfaces of S2 (A) and S2-N EGF19-36 cells (D). Only
N-expressing cells bind Wg (F), and the frequency of N-expressing cells
binding Wg is comparable to the frequency of S2-Dfz2 cells binding Wg
(G). (A to E and G) The photograph on the left shows anti-Wg
immunofluorescence in a microscopic field of cells, and the photograph
on the right shows Nomarski illumination of the same microscopic field
of cells. (F) The photograph on the left shows immunofluorescence
generated by the anti-Wg antibody, and the photograph on the right
shows immunofluorescence generated in the same microscopic field of
cells by an anti-N antibody. Cells were treated with unconcentrated
culture medium conditioned by growth of S2-Wg cells. Wg on cell
surfaces was detected immunocytochemically with anti-Wg (rb), an
antibody made in rabbit (69), and a rhodamine-conjugated
secondary antibody. N on cell surfaces was detected with NI
(52) and a fluorescein-conjugated secondary antibody. None
of the cells incubated with culture medium conditioned by growth of S2
cells showed any detectable signals. Only cells expressing high levels
of N are apparent in the photographs. An actual count of all
immunofluorescent cells indicates a Wg-positive frequency of ~40% (N
is expressed by only 50% of the cells stably cotransfected with the
hygromycin gene). A short binding period was used because N was found
to be lost from the cell surfaces within minutes of treatment with
Wg.
|
|
To determine whether Wg bound N or N
EGF1-18 on S2 cells
expressing these proteins, immunoprecipitations were performed. In
experiments with S2-N/S2-Dl cell aggregates, the anti-Dl antibody used
failed to immunoprecipitate either the full-length or the extracellular domain of N. This may have been due to the particular antibody used or
the disruption of N-Dl complexes during lysis and washes. Fehon et al.
(24) considered disruption of the N-Dl complexes, as a
consequence of the disruption of the physiological conformation of the
extremely cysteine-rich extracellular domain of N, the reason for their
low recovery of full-length N in Dl coimmunoprecipitations. To overcome
the disruption of interaction between N and its ligands when cells
are lysed for immunoprecipitation, a membrane insoluble cross-linker,
BS3, was used to covalently link proteins interacting at
the cell surfaces. The activity of cross-linkers was quenched prior to lysis of cells so that cross-linking was limited to proteins
interacting on the cell surfaces. BS3 and related
cross-linkers have been used successfully in studies of several cell
surface protein interactions (80, 81, 87).
Immunoprecipitation of Dl from cross-linked protein extracts of
S2-N/S2-Dl cell aggregates recovered a complex containing N and Dl
(Fig. 3A, lane 4). The Dl-N complex was
not recovered from S2-N cells in the absence of S2-Dl cells (lane 2) or
from S2-Dl cells alone (lane 1). The levels of N in the supernatants of
immunoprecipitates loaded in lanes 2 and 4 were comparable (lanes 3 and
5). Anti-Dl antibody failed to recover N when purified membranes of
S2-N/S2-Dl cell aggregates or lysates of S2-N/S2-Dl cell aggregates
were used, suggesting that the integrity of cells is indeed important
for recovery of the Dl-N complex.

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Two different Wg- and N-containing complexes are
recovered from N-expressing S2 cell surfaces. (A) N- and Dl-containing
complexes are recovered from S2-N and S2-Dl cell aggregates in the
presence of cross-linkers. Dl-containing cross-linked complexes were
immunoprecipitated by the monoclonal anti-Dl antibody, MAb 202 (24) and analyzed by Western blotting with anti-NI antibody.
(B) Wg- and Dfz2-containing cross-linked complexes are recovered from
S2-Dfz2 cells treated with Wg medium containing cross-linkers, in the
presence or absence of EGTA (lanes 1 and 2). A mouse monoclonal
anti-Dfz2 antibody (kindly provided by R. Nusse) was used for
immunoprecipitation (lane 4) and for detection of Wg-Dfz2 complexes by
Western blotting. Wg-Dfz2 complexes were not recovered from S2-Dfz2
cells treated with medium conditioned by growth of S2 cells (not
shown). (C) Two Wg- and N-containing cross-linked complexes (arrows)
are immunoprecipitated from S2-N cells (lanes 7 and 9), and only one is
immunoprecipitated from S2-N EGF1-18 cells (lanes 14 and
16), treated with Wg-containing medium. N- and Wg-containing complexes
were immunoprecipitated with anti-Wg(rb) and detected by Western
blotting with the indicated antibodies (W-Ab). Lanes 7 and 9 and lanes
14 and 16 show reaction of the same blots with anti-Wg(rb) and anti-NI
antibodies. (D) Wg and N containing cross-linked complexes are
recovered from S2-N EGF1-18 cells (lane 3) in the
absence of EGTA (lane 8) but not from S2-N EGF19-36
cells (lane 4). S2-N EGF1-18 or
S2-N EGF19-36 cells were treated with Wg medium
containing cross-linkers, immunoprecipitation was performed with
anti-Wg(rb) antibody, and the Western blots were probed with the
indicated antibodies. ppt, immunoprecipitated complexes eluted from
GammaBind beads; Super, an aliquot of the protein extract after the
last pelleting of the GammaBind beads (see Materials and Methods);
IP-Ab, immunoprecipitation antibody; W-Ab, Western blotting antibody;
cross-linker, BS3. Wg, medium conditioned by growth of
S2-Wg cells; S2, medium conditioned by growth of S2 cells. For panels
A, C, and D, 4% polyacrylamide gels were used; for panel B, 6%
polyacrylamide gels were used. Only proteins or protein complexes
migrating slower than a 120-kDa marker protein are resolved in panels
A, C, and D. The tops of all the blots shown coincide with the top of
the resolving gel of the discontinuous SDS-PAGE gels.
|
|
The capability of the cross-linking and immunoprecipitation procedure
to recover proteins interacting at the cell surface was further tested
with S2-Dfz2 cells treated with Wg. A Wg-Dfz2 complex, migrating at the
rate of a ~100-kDa protein, was recovered (Fig. 3B, lane 2). Unlinked
Dfz2 migrated at ~130 kDa (lane 4). The Wg-Dfz2 complex was not
recovered in the absence of the Wg antibody (lane 3). The same Wg-Dfz2
complex was obtained when EGTA was used to chelate calcium in the
medium (lane 1), indicating that calcium is not required for Wg and
Dfz2 interaction.
The cross-linking and immunoprecipitation procedure that recovered the
Dl-N and Wg-Dfz2 complexes was applied to S2-N and S2-N
EGF1-18 cells treated with Wg. Two N- and
Wg-containing complexes, with different electrophoretic mobilities,
were recovered from S2-N cells (Fig. 3C, lane 7). Only one was
recovered from S2-N
EGF1-18 cells (lane 14). The same
complexes were recognized by both anti-Wg and anti-N antibodies (lanes
7 and 9 and lanes 14 and 16), confirming that they contain both N and
Wg. Wg- and N-containing complexes were not recovered from
immunoprecipitations from S2-N or S2-N
EGF1-18 cells
treated with medium that does not contain Wg (lanes 6 and 13), from S2
cells treated with Wg medium (lane 5), or from S2-N or
S2-N
EGF1-18 cells treated with Wg medium without
cross-linkers (lanes 8 and 15). The levels of N were similar in the
protein extracts used for all these immunoprecipitations (lanes 2 to 4 and lanes 10 to 12). Note also that S2 cells do not produce N (lane 1).
Since proteins or protein complexes analyzed in 4% gels migrate slower than a ~120-kDa protein, neither the ~45-kDa Wg monomers nor the Wg-Dfz2 complex migrating at ~100 kDa are expected to be retained in
the gel. Wg- and N-containing complexes were not recovered from either
S2-N
EGF19-36 cells treated with Wg medium (Fig. 3D,
lanes 1 to 4) or S2-N
EGF1-18 cells treated with Wg
medium containing EGTA (lanes 5 to 8), indicating that Wg associates
with N in the region containing EGF-like repeats 19 to 36 and requires
calcium for this association.
Two Wg- and N-containing complexes were recovered from Wg-treated
S2-N cells (Fig. 3C, lane 7). S2-N cells are designed to produce
full-length N, and most N produced by this cell line is of the
size expected from full-length N (~350 kDa [lanes 2 to 4]). The
Wg-N complex migrating near a ~220-kDa marker protein probably
included a truncated N because S2-N
EGF1-18 cells also
produce it (lane 14). N
EGF1-18 encodes a protein that
lacks about half of the N extracellular domain EGF-like repeats
(52). If N in the faster-migrating Wg-N complex is a
truncated form, it was preferentially enriched or generated by Wg since
a truncated form of N was not detectable in S2-N cell protein extracts
(Fig. 3C, lanes 2 and 3; see also Fig. 6E, lane 4). A faster-migrating
Dl-N complex was not recovered in Dl immunoprecipitations (Fig. 3A).
Wg-N complexes similar to those recovered from cultured cells are
recovered from Canton S embryonic extracts.
To determine whether
the two Wg-N complexes produced in cultured cells treated with Wg are
also produced in vivo, immunoprecipitations were performed with
proteins extracted from Canton S embryos. The most frequent and
predominant Wg-N complex recovered from young embryos (0 to 3 h or
0 to 6 h) was Wg complexed with a truncated N (N lacking the
anti-NT epitope) (Fig. 4A, lanes 10 to
13, see Fig. 4D for epitopes of N antibodies). The electrophoretic
mobility of this complex was similar to that of the faster-migrating
Wg-N complex (i.e., near the ~220-kDa marker protein) recovered from cultured cells (Fig. 3C). From aliquots of the same embryonic extracts,
Dl was found complexed with N recognized by all three N antibodies
(Fig. 4A, lanes 7 to 9). This N in the Dl-N complex is apparently the
full-length N.

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Wg and N form complexes during embryogenesis. (A) Two
Wg- and N-containing cross-linked complexes, similar to those recovered
from cultured cells, are immunoprecipitated from Canton S embryonic
extracts. Anti-Dl, is monoclonal antibody MAb 202; anti-NT is described
in reference 43; anti-NPCR is described in reference
52; and anti-Wg(rt) was kindly provided by A. Martinez-Arias (See panel D for epitope regions for N antibodies). I
used 0- to 3-h embryos for lanes 1 to 16, 6- to 12-h embryos for lane
17, and 10- to 16-h embryos for lanes 18 and 19. Arrow 1 shows Wg
complexed with full-length N (lanes 17, 18, and 19); arrow 2 shows Wg
complexed with a truncated N (lanes 10 to 17). The asterisk marks the
Wg complex not containing N (lanes 10 and 19). A single blot was probed
sequentially with the indicated antibodies to form lanes 10 and 11; 12, 13, and 14; 15 and 16; and 19 and 18 (numbers also indicate the
sequence of probing). The same embryonic extract was used for lanes 1 to 4 and 7 to 14; lanes 5 to 6, 15, 17, and 18 are derived from
different embryonic extracts. (B) Ser-N cross-linked complexes are also
recovered from cross-linked embryonic extracts. Complexes were
immunoprecipitated with anti-Ser antibody (kindly provided by Elizabeth
Knust). Complexes migrating faster than a ~120-kDa marker protein
were not analyzed in panels A and B. (C) The procedure recovering Wg-N,
Dl-N, and Ser-N complexes also recovers Wg-Dfz2 (lane 1) and Hh-Ptc
complexes from cross-linked embryonic extracts (lanes 3 to 6). For
lanes 5 and 6, equal volumes of anti-ptc immunoprecipitate was
separated in two different lanes and probed with the indicated
antibodies. IP-Ab, immunoprecipitation antibody; cross-linker,
BS3; W-Ab, Western blotting antibody; AEL, after egg
laying. For panels A and B, 4% polyacrylamide gels were used; for
panel C, 6% polyacrylamide gels were used. The tops of all the blots
shown in panels A, B, and C coincide with the top of the
resolving gel of the discontinuous SDS-PAGE gels. (D) Diagram showing
the N epitopes used to produce the N antibodies used in the study.
|
|
Wg complexed with the truncated N was also recognized by an
independently generated anti-Wg antibody (Fig. 4A, lane 14). This independent antibody (made in the rat) also immunoprecipitated the same
Wg-N complex (lane 15). Probing of the blots with anti-N and anti-Wg
antibodies showed that this Wg-N complex contains both Wg and N (lanes
10 and 11 and lanes 15 and 16). Similar probings showed that the Dl-N
complex actually contains both N and Dl (lanes 5 and 6). Anti-N
antibodies do not recognize unlinked Wg, Dl, or Ser; anti-Wg antibodies
do not recognize unlinked N, Dl, or Ser; anti-Dl antibodies do not
recognize unlinked N, Wg, or Ser; and anti-Ser antibodies do not
recognize unlinked N, Dl, or Wg (data not shown). Therefore,
recognition of the same complex by two different antibodies indicates
the presence of both of the proteins in the complex. Similar mobilities
of the N-Dl complexes or N-Ser complexes (see below) and unlinked
full-length N might be due to the resolution limitations of SDS-4%
polyacrylamide gels or to anomalous mobilities of cross-linked
complexes (Dfz2-Wg complexes migrate faster than unlinked Dfz2 [Fig.
3B]).
As with cultured cells, Dl was not recovered with truncated N (Fig. 4A,
lanes 7 to 9) suggesting that truncated N specifically associated with
Wg. The slower-migrating Wg-N complex was generally recovered at low
levels in extracts prepared from 0- to 6-h embryos. Higher levels of
the slower-migrating Wg-N complex were recovered from extracts prepared
from 6- to 12-h embryos (lane 17), and this was the only Wg-N complex
recovered from extracts prepared from 10- to 16-h embryos (lanes 18 and
19). Unlike the N-Wg complex migrating near the ~220-kDa marker
protein, this slower-migrating complex reacted with all anti-N
antibodies, anti-NI (lane 17), anti-NT (lane 18), and anti-NPCR (data
not shown), indicating that it contains the full-length N. Neither Dl
nor Wg recovered any N molecules in the absence of cross-linkers (lanes
1 to 4). All immunoprecipitations were repeatedly confirmed. A
Wg-containing complex migrating at the rate of a 250- to 300-kDa
protein was recovered at all times during embryogenesis (lanes 10 and
19). This complex appeared not to contain N, since none of the anti-N antibodies recognized it: lanes 10 and 11 and lanes 18 and 19 are the
same blots probed with an anti-Wg antibody and two different anti-N
antibodies (anti-NPCR also does not recognize it [lane 12]).
The immunoprecipitation procedure used to recover Wg-N and Dl-N
complexes also recovered the expected Ser-N and Patched (Ptc)-Hedgehog (Hh) complexes from Drosophila embryonic extracts (Fig. 4B
and C, lanes 3 and 4). Note that anti-Wg immunoprecipitates fail to recover Hh or Ptc (Fig. 4C, lanes 2, 5, and 6). Anti-Wg
immunoprecipitates separated by SDS-PAGE in 6% polyacrylamide gels
showed the Wg-Dfz2 complex migrating at ~100 kDa, similar to the
complex recovered from S2-Dfz2 cells treated with Wg (Fig. 4C, lane 1).
This complex will not be retained in 4% polyacrylamide gels and
therefore is not seen in Fig. 4A. These results confirm that the
cross-linking and immunoprecipitation procedure used to recover Wg-N
complexes also recovers other complexes expected to be formed during
embryogenesis. All the immunoprecipitation experiments together argue
strongly in favor of the simplest proposal that Wg binds N directly.
The above-described experiments showed that (i) two forms of N
associate with Wg under in vitro and in vivo conditions, (ii) one form
of N lacks a portion of the amino-terminal EGF-like repeats, and (iii)
the association of Wg with N is dependent on the region of N containing
EGF-like repeats 19 to 36.
Wg regulates expression of Dfrizzled2,
hairy, patched, and shaggy genes in
S2 cells expressing N and N
EGF1-18.
The cell
surface binding and immunoprecipitation experiments described above
showed that N and Wg form physical complexes in vitro and in vivo. But
does Wg alter the physiological state of cells through N? This question
is not easily answered for the in vivo case because N is required for
production of epidermal precursor cells through lateral inhibition
functions associated with Dl (11, 66, 79, 90) and is also
subsequently required for production of epidermis from these epidermal
precursor cells (15, 36). Of these two successive
developmental events, Wg is required only for production of epidermis
from the epidermal precursor cells (4, 7). Any perturbation
of the lateral inhibition functions of N (associated with Dl) is
expected to mask epidermal functions of N associated with Wg.
Therefore, I explored the response of N-expressing S2 cells to Wg in
the medium and tested wild-type and mutant N embryos for
comparable responses. Since regulation of endogenous gene activities in
response to exogenous factors in the medium is a good indicator of the
signaling effects of cell surface ligand-receptor interactions, the
expression of a selected sample of genes that are linked to the N and
Wg signaling pathways was assessed in N-expressing S2 cells treated with Wg.
The expression patterns of m5 and m8 genes of the
Enhancer of split Complex [E(spl)C; genes
associated with Dl-mediated functions of N], wg,
ac, en, hh, h,
ptc, Dfz2, sgg, and several
housekeeping genes were tested in S2-N and S2-N
EGF1-18
cells in the presence and absence of Wg. Only Dfz2,
ptc, sgg, and h expression was
affected in these experiments. Interestingly, the full-length N and N
truncated in the amino terminus (N
EGF1-18), the two
types of N molecules found associated with Wg in cultured cells and
embryos, affected the expression of these genes differently. Expression
of full-length N in S2 cells did not affect expression of
Dfz2, ptc, sgg, and h (Fig.
5A to D, lanes 3). However, expression of
N
EGF1-18 in S2 cells strongly induced expression of
these four genes, independent of any ligands (lanes 5). This difference
indicated that the expression of N with a truncated extracellular
domain results in ligand-independent induction of expression of
Dfz2, ptc, h, and sgg.
Treatment of S2-N cells with Wg induced or increased the expression of
ptc and sgg (Fig. 5C and D, lanes 4). Treatment of S2-N
EGF1-18 cells, on the other hand, suppressed the
expression of genes that were induced independently of ligands (Fig. 5A
to D, lanes 6). Among the four genes, expression of Dfz2 and
h were affected solely by N
EGF1-18 (Fig. 5A
and B). The level of sgg and ptc expression
observed in S2-N cells treated with Wg is likely to be the net
expression level due to an increase in expression promoted by the
full-length N- and Wg-containing complex and to a decrease in
expression promoted by the truncated N- and Wg-containing complex (also
formed on S2-N
EGF1-18 cells). However, it is also
possible that there is no contribution from the truncated N formed in
S2-N cells, because Wg is always associated with it under the
experimental conditions and prevented ligand-independent induction
of gene expression.

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
N and N EGF1-18 have different
ligand-independent activities and respond differently to Wg. (A to D)
Expression of Dfz2, h, ptc, and
sgg in S2-N and S2-N EGF1-18 cells are
regulated by Wg. en, wg, ac,
hh, and m5 and m8 of
E(spl)C were not detected in any of the experiments. The
sizes of transcripts of all genes were similar to published reports.
Dfz2 (8), ptc (35),
h (37), rp49 (61), and
sgg (77). The largest sgg RNA
corresponds in size to the embryonic transcript, while the smallest
sgg RNA has a size expected for the ovarian transcript
(77). sgg, wg, ac, and
m5 and m8 of E(spl)C are known to
genetically interact with N (15, 33, 71, 72, 85);
Dfz2, ptc, wg, and sgg, are
involved in epidermal patterning (4, 7, 8, 20, 35, 57, 65);
h is a negative regulator of ac (38, 79,
84). (E) The extracellular domain of N EGF1-18 is
required for regulation of Dfz2, sgg,
ptc, and, to a lesser extent, h expression. (F)
Ax59d mutation in N EGF1-18 abolishes
Wg-mediated down regulation of Dfz2 expression in
S2-N EGF1-18 cells. The two autoradiographs were derived
from the same blot with different exposure times. (G) S2-Dfz2 cells
(S2-pMK 33 cells [8]) do not down regulate expressions
of ptc, sgg, and h in response to Wg,
with or without copper induction. (A to G) Total RNAs were extracted
from the indicated cells treated with M3 medium conditioned by growth
of S2 cells (S2 medium) or S2-Wg cells (Wg medium) and analyzed by
Northern blotting. The same batch of S2 or Wg medium was used for all
of the studies. Gene sequences used as probes are indicated on the
right of each panel. rp49 was used to indicate the relative
levels of RNA in different lanes. The individual blots are exposed to
film for different periods. Exposure times: rp49 < Dfz2 < ptc < sgg < h. (H)
S2-N EGF1-18 cells do not accumulate Arm in the
cytoplasm in response to Wg. The bottom panel (*) shows a India
ink-stained protein band visible in all lanes of the blot to indicate
the amount of samples loaded. An anti-Arm antibody made in rabbits
(kindly provided by Laurent Ruel) was used to detect Arm.
|
|
S2-N cells do not express any other gene(s) known to bind Wg. However,
S2-N
EGF1-18 cells express Dfz2, whose
product is known to bind Wg (8). To determine whether the
downregulation of genes in S2-N
EGF1-18 cells is due to
N
EGF1-18 or Dfz2, Dfz2, sgg,
ptc, and h expression were assessed in
S2-Nintra cells in the presence and absence of Wg.
S2-Nintra cells produce N without the extracellular domain
(52). If association of Wg with N
EGF1-18 is
required for suppression of the activities of these genes, the level of
Dfz2, sgg, ptc, and h
expression in S2-Nintra cells should not be altered by the
presence of Wg in the medium. S2-Nintra cells were found to
express these genes at lower levels than were
S2-N
EGF1-18 cells. However, the levels of
Dfz2, sgg, and ptc expression in these
cells were not affected by Wg in the medium, and the level of
h expression was only slightly reduced (Fig. 5E), indicating that the down regulation of gene expression in Fig. 5A to D, lanes 6, was due to association of Wg with N
EGF1-18.
Nintra behaves as an activated N receptor with respect to
Dl signaling (52, 82). Since N and N
EGF1-18
respond oppositely to Wg, and since N
EGF1-18 has a
strong ligand-independent activity, Nintra activity shown
in Fig. 5E is possibly a combination of N and N
EGF1-18
activities, with and without Wg.
The requirement of the extracellular domain of N
EGF1-18
for suppression of gene activities by Wg was also tested in a stable
cell line transfected with N
EGF1-18 carrying the
Ax59d mutation. Ax59d is
a lethal allele of N because of a mutation in EGF-like
repeat 24 (41). This allele manifests antineurogenic
phenotypes and shows strong genetic interaction with wg
(10, 15, 17, 18). Figure 4F shows that unlike
S2-N
EGF1-18 cells, S2-N
EGF1-18/Ax59d
cells treated with Wg did not suppress expression of Dfz2
(Fig. 5F). Thus, the region containing EGF-like repeat 24 appears to be
important for Wg-mediated suppression of gene activities in S2-N
EGF1-18 cells. This region is as conserved as the
Dl binding region of N (Fig. 1A).
To further clarify the roles of N
EGF1-18 and Dfz2 in
suppression of gene expression in S2-N
EGF1-18 cells,
the gene expression pattern was determined in S2-Dfz2 cells (pMK 33 S2-Dfz2 cells [8]). Expression of endogenous Dfz2 cannot be assessed in this cell line because of
induction of the transfected Dfz2 gene through an ectopic
promoter. Instead, the expression levels of genes that were coregulated
with Dfz2, namely, ptc, sgg, and
h, were determined with and without metal induction of
Dfz2 expression. S2-Dfz2 cells are responsive to Wg both
with and without metal induction (8). The expression of
ptc, sgg, and h in response to Wg was
not reduced in S2-Dfz2 cells (Fig. 5G). The expression of these genes
seemed to be slightly but consistently increased in response to Wg.
Since Wg promotes the accumulation of Armadillo (Arm) in the cytoplasm
of S2-Dfz2 cells (8), the cytoplasmic level of Arm in
S2-N
EGF1-18 cells was also assessed to determine the
level of Dfz2 activity in S2-N
EGF1-18 cells. The level
of Arm in the cytoplasm of S2-N
EGF1-18 cells did not
change in response to Wg (Fig. 5H, lanes 1 to 2). In several
repetitions of the experiment, the response of
S2-N
EGF1-18 cells was no different from that of S2
cells (lanes 5 and 6). On the other hand, S2-Dfz2 cells accumulated Arm
in the cytoplasm (lanes 3 and 4).
The experiments with S2-Nintra,
S2-N
EGF1-18/Ax59d, and S2-Dfz2 cells indicated that the
suppression of Dfz2, ptc, sgg, and
h expression by S2-N
EGF1-18 cells in
response to Wg was mediated by N
EGF1-18 rather than
Dfz2. It is also likely that the increase in ptc and
sgg expression in S2-N cells treated with Wg is due to N and not any other (unknown) receptor induced by N.
N lacking amino-terminal EGF-like repeats is associated with
Dfz2 expression in vivo.
Full-length N and a truncated
N were associated with Wg in S2 cells and embryos (Fig. 3 and 4). In S2
cells, the full-length N and the truncated N
EGF1-18
were active and responsive to Wg in different ways: N did not induce
gene expression in the absence of ligands, whereas
N
EGF1-18 did; N up regulated the expression of genes in
response to Wg, whereas N
EGF1-18 down regulated the
expression of genes in response to Wg (Fig. 5A to D). Thus, the two
N-Wg complexes formed in embryos (Fig. 4) appear to have the potential
to trigger different intracellular activities in vivo. To determine
whether N
EGF1-18 shows the same activity in vivo that
it showed in vitro, expression of Dfz2 was assessed in
embryos expressing the transgenic N
EGF1-18.
Dfz2 expression was assessed because in S2 cells it was
regulated only by N
EGF1-18; S2-N cells did not induce
or regulate Dfz2 expression (Fig. 5A). Figure
6A shows that N
EGF1-18
embryos overexpress Dfz2, indicating that
N
EGF1-18 behaves similarly in vitro and in vivo.

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
N EGF1-18 and
nd3 embryos show increased expression of genes
regulated by N EGF1-18 in vitro, and an endogenous form
of N resembling N EGF1-18 is overproduced in
nd3 embryos. (A) Embryos carrying the heat
shock-inducible N EGF1-18 transgene also overexpress
Dfz2. We heat shocked 0- to 20-h Canton S (CS)
(yw strain) and N EGF1-18 (in Canton S,
yw strain) embryos for 30 min, allowed them to recover at
room temperature for 45 min, and extracted total RNAs for Northern blot
analysis. rp49 indicates relative levels of RNA in different
lanes. (B) Dfz2, h, ptc, and
sgg are overexpressed in nd3 embryos
at 18°C, the temperature at which the overt mutant phenotype is
observed. At 25°C, expression of these genes in
nd3 does not differ from that in Canton S. Levels of expression in Canton S at 25 and 18°C are indistinguishable
(expression at 18°C is shown). Total RNAs were extracted from 0- to
20-h Canton S and nd3 embryos, reared at 25 or
18°C (with appropriate correction for developmental times), and
analyzed by Northern blotting. Gene sequences used as probes are shown
at the right. Exposure times: rp49 < Dfz2 < ptc < sgg < h. (C) nd3 embryos at 18°C
overproduce a ~200-kDa form of N, N200. Because signals
from high-molecular-weight forms of N interfere with assessment of
levels of the less abundant N200, total embryonic proteins
extracted from 0- to 12-h Canton S and nd3
embryos (at 18 or 25°C) were incubated with anti-NT and cleared prior
to SDS-PAGE. Anti-NT does not react with N200 (see below).
Extracts containing equivalent levels of ~350-kDa N were used for
lanes 1 and 2. N is detected with anti-NI. (D) N200 is
truncated in the amino terminus. N was immunoprecipitated from 0- to
12-h Canton S or nd3 embryos (reared at 18°C)
by using anti-NI and separated by SDS-PAGE (4% polyacrylamide), and
the Western blots were probed with the indicated antibodies (W-Ab). See
Fig. 4D for epitopes for N antibodies. nd3
embryos were used to determine missing epitopes because they produce
higher levels of N200 than do Canton S embryos (compare
lanes 1 and 3). (E) Different developmental stages of Canton S flies
express N200, and N200 lacks more than 18 of
the amino-terminal EGF-like repeats. Aliquots of total proteins
extracted from Canton S embryos (0 to 3 h), one Canton S larva,
one Canton S pupa, S2-N cells, S2-N EGF1-18 cells,
S2-N EGF19-36 and LN rpts cells, and
S2-N EGF1-36 cells were separated by SDS-PAGE (4%
polyacrylamide) and analyzed by Western blotting with anti-NI. *1 is
recognized by all of the N antibodies studied and is therefore
considered to be the partially denatured form of N (43);
*2 is not recognized by anti-NT and anti-NPCR (not shown) but is
recognized by anti-NI.
|
|
To find out whether endogenous N affects Dfz2 expression in
embryos, Dfz2 RNA levels were compared between N
mutant and Canton S embryos. Embryos of nd3, a
homozygous viable temperature-sensitive allele of N
(75), were found to overexpress RNA of Dfz2 and
other genes coregulated with Dfz2 in vitro, i.e.,
ptc, sgg, and h. These RNAs were
overexpressed at 18°C (the restrictive temperature) but not at 25°C
(Fig. 6B). The overexpression was specific, since the levels of RNAs of
wg, ac, and the E(spl)C genes
m5 and m8 were not increased in
nd3 embryos at 18°C (data not shown; these
genes were also not regulated by N or N
EGF1-18 in
vitro). That a temperature-sensitive N allele accumulates Dfz2 in a temperature-sensitive manner indicates that
endogenous N also affects Dfz2 expression in embryos.
Since (i) expression of Dfz2 was associated only with
N
EGF1-18 in S2 cell experiments, (ii) expression of
N
EGF1-18 in embryos resulted in overexpression of
Dfz2, and (iii) the mutation in nd3
is not in the region mediating suppression of Dfz2
expression (Fig. 1A and 5), it was likely that
nd3 embryos overproduced the endogenous form of
N affecting Dfz2 expression in vivo. Western blotting
analyses revealed that nd3 embryos indeed
produced higher than Canton S levels of a ~200-kDa form of N. Just
like expression of the Dfz2, ptc, sgg,
and h genes, this ~200-kDa form, designated
N200, was overexpressed in nd3
embryos at 18 but not 25°C (Fig. 6C). spl,
N264-47, spl Ax59d,
Ax59d, Ax9B, and other
N alleles did not show increased level of N200
(data not shown). N200 lacks the amino-terminal EGF-like
repeats, since it is not recognized by anti-NT (Fig. 6D). It is
produced at low levels in embryos (relative to the full-length
~350-kDa form of N) but is expressed at much higher levels in larvae
and pupae (Fig. 6E, lanes 1 to 3). N200 migrates between
N
EGF1-18 and N
EGF1-36 (lanes 4 to 7),
indicating that it is lacking more than 18 of the amino-terminal
EGF-like repeats but includes a significant fraction of the
carboxy-terminal half of the EGF-like repeats. The association of
overexpression of Dfz2 with overexpression of
N200 in nd3 embryos suggests that
N200 is the form of N that affects Dfz2
expression in vivo. A fine-scale developmental analysis indicated that
the full-length N was also overexpressed in nd3
embryos at certain periods of embryogenesis (data not shown). Therefore, overexpression of Dfz2 in
nd3 embryos, and possibly that of h
as well, is most probably due to overproduction of N200
(since full-length N is not associated with Dfz2 expression
in vitro) and overexpression of ptc and sgg is
most probably due to overproduction of both N and N200
(since both N and N
EGF1-18 regulate ptc and
sgg in vitro [Fig. 5A to D]). nd3
embryos show the same level and size of N RNA as Canton S
embryos do (data not shown). Thus, it appears that EGF-like repeat 2 (the site of mutation in the nd3 allele [Fig.
1A]) is important for posttranslational production of N200
from the full-length N or for regulation of the levels of full-length N
during development. However, the actual mechanism of generation of the
truncated N200 is unknown.
If only heterodimeric N receptors are present on cell surfaces of S2
cells and embryos (9, 53, 63; see also reference 43), the cross-linkers used in immunoprecipitations
must have covalently linked the two fragments composing each of the
three cell surface receptors, i.e., the full length N,
N
EGF1-18, and N200, and their ligands (Fig.
3 and 4). The reported ~110-kDa intracellular product is not retained
in the gels used in Fig. 6C to E, and the extracellular product would
not be recognized by anti-NI or anti-NPCR (Fig. 4D).
N
and Ax mutant embryos show altered expression
patterns of epidermal patterning genes that are consistent with
expression patterns observed in vitro.
A further test of
involvement of N in expression of cuticle-patterning genes in vivo
would be that N
and Ax embryos
(which do not overproduce N200) show low and high
expression, respectively, of the same genes. Since
N
and Ax alleles are homozygous
lethal, in situ hybridization rather than Northern blotting was used.
In situ hybridization of nd3 embryos with
Dfz2 and en probes (the latter serving as a
control for levels of RNA in embryo) show that the results are
qualitatively comparable to results obtained by Northern blotting (Fig.
7A to D).

View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Expression of Dfz2 is reduced in
zygotic N embryos, while expression of
en and wg are unaffected. (A to D) In situ
hybridization of Canton S and nd3 embryos
corroborates results from Northern blotting that Dfz2 is
overexpressed in nd3 embryos but en
is not (E to H, G', H') Dfz2 expression is lost in
N264-47/Y embryos but not in comparable stages
of Canton S or DlX/DlX embryos. (I
to L) wg expression is not lost in
N264-47/Y. (M to P) en expression is
similar in Canton S and N264-47/Y embryos. CS,
Canton S; nd3, nd3; N,
N264-47/Y; Dl,
DlX/DlX embryos; genes used as
probes are indicated below the appropriate sets of embryos. Anterior is
to the left of each embryo. N264-47/Y and
DlX/DlX embryos were identified by
lack of -galactosidase staining associated with the FM7 or TM6
balancer chromosomes (see Materials and Methods). Embryos A to D were
processed simultaneously, and so were embryos E to P.
|
|
Stage-specific comparisons of Canton S and zygotic
N
or Ax embryos showed that levels
of Dfz2 and sgg RNA are indeed as expected from
in vitro results. N264-47/Y embryos expressed
lower levels of Dfz2 RNA than did Canton S embryos and
DlX embryos (Fig. 7E to H). The levels of
wg and en RNA did not differ significantly
between N264-47/Y and Canton S embryos (Fig. 7I
to L, wg M-P, en), indicating that the loss of
Dfz2 transcripts is not due to a general suppression of RNA
accumulation in N264-47/Y embryos or loss of
wg expression. Conversely, Ax59d,
Ax9B (both carrying mutations in EGF-like repeat
24 [41]), and spl Ax59d embryos
overproduced Dfz2 RNA but not en RNA (Fig.
8A to L; spl embryos do not overexpress Dfz2 [data not shown]). A
similar pattern of expression was manifest with sgg as well
(Fig. 8M to R).

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Ax embryos overproduce Dfz2
and sgg RNA. (A to L) Ax embryos overproduce
Dfz2 RNA (A, C, E, G, I, and K) but not en RNA
(B, D, F, H, J, and L). (M to R) Ax embryos overproduce
sgg RNA (O to Q) but not Canton S (M and R) and
N264-47/Y embryos (N). Due to low-level of
expression in a general pattern, reduced sgg expression (as
in panel N) and weak sgg overexpression (as in panel O) are
more obvious in pools of embryos than in individual embryos. CS, Canton
S; Ax9, Ax9B/Y; spl
Ax59, spl Ax59d/Y; Ax59,
Ax59d/Y; N, N264-47/Y.
Anterior is to the left of each embryo. Homozygous Ax or
N embryos were identified by the lack of -galactosidase
staining associated with the FM7 balancer chromosomes (see Materials
and Methods). Embryos A to H and M to P were processed simultaneously,
and so were embryos I to L and Q to R.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
N Regions within EGF-like repeats 19 to 36 mediate interactions
with Wg.
Wg was identified as a putative ligand of N in a cell
surface screen with phagemids carrying cDNA sequences from
Drosophila embryos. Further analyses showed that Wg and N
form molecular complexes, both in vitro and in vivo. EGF-like repeats
19 to 36 of N are required for the association of these two proteins
(Fig. 2 to 4). These repeats of N include two strongly conserved
regions, those containing EGF-like repeats 23 to 27 and EGF-like
repeats 31 to 34 (Fig. 1A). Experiments with the
Ax59d allele (Fig. 5F and 8) showed that
EGF-like repeat 24 is important for Wg-mediated down regulation of gene
expression through N
EGF1-18. N200 is
identified as the in vivo equivalent of N
EGF1-18. Since
the nd3 embryos (overproducing
N200), Ax59d embryos, and
S2-N
EGF1-18/Ax59d cells overexpress the same genes down
regulated by Wg and N
EGF1-18 (Fig. 5F and 8), the
region containing EGF-like repeats 23 to 27 might be involved in down
regulation of gene expression by Wg and N molecules in vivo. The
evolutionary conservation of this region in homologous N molecules
might be due to the Wg-associated functions of N. Whether Wg associates
with the same region in full-length N, for induction of sgg
and ptc expression, is not known. Preliminary results
suggest that Wg associates at a second site within the region
containing EGF-like repeats 19 to 36 of N.
Two forms of Notch regulate expression of epidermal patterning
genes.
Immunoprecipitations from cultured cells and embryos
recovered Wg complexed with the full-length N and a form of N lacking EGF-like repeats in the amino terminus (Fig. 3 and 4). In vitro experiments showed that two forms of N regulate expression of cuticle-patterning genes, i.e., sgg and ptc by
the full-length N in response to Wg, and Dfz2,
sgg, h, and ptc by a form of N lacking
18 amino-terminal EGF-like repeats, N
EGF1-18, both
independent of ligands and in response to Wg. Thus, Wg behaves as a
ligand for two different forms of N in vitro, eliciting different
responses from cells expressing these two forms of N. The significant
difference between N and N
EGF1-18 is the lack of the Dl
binding region in N
EGF1-18. This appears to be true of
N200 as well. N and N200 might therefore
regulate genes in vivo in a manner comparable to gene regulations by N
and N
EGF1-18 in vitro. The in vivo relative levels of
the full-length N (capable of associating with Dl and Wg) and
N200 (capable of associating with Wg) may therefore
represent a differential commitment of N to Dl or Wg signaling during
embryogenesis and a differential commitment of N to different kinds of
Wg signaling. Since N is required not only for different
developmental functions but also for sequential developmental functions
(13, 76), it is quite possible that N and N200
constitute important components of the mechanism of N
function at successive steps of differentiation. There is some
indication that the activity of N
EGF1-18 requires the
activity of N in a preceding step: expression of N
EGF1-18 in N264-47/Y embryos
prior to onset of the neurogenic phenotype results in overexpression of
h and sgg (as expected, in the expected
stage-specific pattern for h), but this does not occur in
the neurogenic embryos (data not shown).
The intracellular pathways associated with transduction of signals by N
and N
EGF1-18 do not appear to involve the expression of
the m5 and m8 genes of E(spl)C that
are associated with activation of N by Dl (26, 33, 39, 48,
85) or Wg-mediated stabilization of Arm in the cytoplasm (Fig.
5H) observed with Wg and Dfz2 receptor (8, 34, 60, 65).
Therefore, novel pathways appear to be transducing signals to the
nucleus of S2-N
EGF1-18 or S2-N cells, in both the
presence and absence of Wg.
In conclusion, the strong genetic interaction between N and
wg functions during Drosophila development
(10, 15, 16, 19, 21, 44, 58, 59, 72) could be due to
regulation of wg expression by N (19, 72),
suppression of lateral inhibition signaling of N by Dsh (3),
and physical associations of Wg with the two forms of N for the purpose
of regulation of cuticle patterning genes. Regulation of negative
regulators of en and ac expression by Wg, namely,
sgg and h, respectively (38, 62, 65, 78, 79,
84), and the involvement of two different forms of N with
different activities could explain previous contradictory results
regarding the role of N in Wg signaling. N
EGF1-18
induces the expression of sgg and h in S2 cells
(Fig. 5B and D). Loss of N and therefore loss of N200 (the
putative in vivo equivalent of N
EGF1-18) would result
in loss of sgg and h expression, leading to loss of inhibition of en and ac expression, consistent
with the results of Rulifson and Blair (72) and Cadigan and
Nusse (12). On the other hand, overexpression of
sgg (Fig. 8M to R) and h (not shown) in
Ax mutants could interfere with the stabilization of en and ac expression, consistent with the results
of Couso and Martinez-Arias (15).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
I thank Michael Young for his support, advice, experimental
suggestions, and review of the manuscript. I thank Lino Saez for research materials, technical advice, and critical assessment of data;
Alfonso Martinez-Arias for research materials, advice, encouragement,
and review of the manuscript; Toby Lieber for research materials and
suggestions; Simon Kidd, Frieda Reichsman, Susan Cumberledge, Stephen
Pronovost, Roel Nusse, Armen Manoukian, Vuk Stambolic, Laurent Ruel,
Mark Muskavitch, Keiko Sawai, Claude Desplan, Anthony Brown, and
Michael Caudy for research materials; and Amy Bejsovec for review of
the manuscript.
This work was supported by NIH grant GM 25103 to Michael W. Young.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Mailing address: Laboratory of Genetics, Box 288, The
Rockefeller University, 1230 York Ave., New York, NY 10021. Phone:
(212) 327-8233. Fax: (212) 327-7420. E-mail:
wesleyc{at}rockvax.rockefeller.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alton, A. K.,
K. Fechtel,
C. C. Kopczynski,
S. B. Shepard,
P. J. Kooh, and M. A. T. Muskavitch.
1989.
Molecular genetics of Delta, a locus required for ectodermal differentiation in Drosophila.
Dev. Genet.
10:261-272[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Artavanis-Tsakonas, S.,
K. Matsuno, and M. E. Fortini.
1995.
Notch signaling.
Science
268:225-232[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Axelrod, J. D.,
K. Matsuno,
S. Artavanis-Tsakonas, and N. Perrimon.
1996.
Interaction between Wingless and Notch signaling pathways mediated by Dishevelled.
Science
271:1826-1832[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Baker, N. E.
1987.
Molecular cloning of sequences from wingless, a segment polarity gene in Drosophila: the spatial distribution of a transcript in embryos.
EMBO J.
6:1765-1773[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Baker, N. E.,
M. Mlodzik, and G. M. Rubin.
1990.
Spacing differentiation in the developing Drosophila eye: a fibrinogen-related lateral inhibitor encoded by scabrous.
Science
250:1370-1377[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Bate, M.,
E. Rushton, and M. Frash.
1993.
A dual requirement for neurogenic genes in Drosophila myogenesis.
Dev. Suppl.
119:149-161.
|
| 7.
|
Bejsovec, A., and A. Martinez-Arias.
1991.
Roles of wingless in patterning the larval epidermis of Drosophila.
Development
113:471-485[Abstract].
|
| 8.
|
Bhanot, P.,
M. Brink,
C. H. Samos,
J.-C. Hsieh,
Y. Wang,
J. P. Macke,
D. Andrew,
J. Nathans, and R. Nusse.
1996.
A new member of the frizzled family from Drosophila functions as a Wingless receptor.
Nature
382:225-230[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
|