Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, September 1999, p. 6427-6440, Vol. 19, No. 9
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Functional Analysis of H-Ryk, an Atypical
Member of the Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Family
R. M.
Katso,1
R. B.
Russell,2 and
T. S.
Ganesan1,*
Molecular Oncology Laboratories, Imperial
Cancer Research Fund, Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe
Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DS,1 and
Biomolecular Modelling Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research
Fund, London WC2A 3PX,2 United Kingdom
Received 9 October 1998/Returned for modification 10 December
1998/Accepted 25 May 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
H-Ryk is an atypical receptor tyrosine kinase which differs from
other members of this family at a number of conserved residues in the
activation and nucleotide binding domains. Using a chimeric receptor
approach, we demonstrate that H-Ryk has impaired catalytic activity.
Despite the receptor's inability to undergo autophosphorylation or
phosphorylate substrates, we demonstrate that ligand stimulation of the
chimeric receptor results in activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. The ability to transduce signals is abolished by mutation of the invariant lysine (K334A) in subdomain II of H-Ryk.
Further, by in vitro mutagenesis, we show that the amino acid
substitutions in the activation domain of H-Ryk account for the loss of
catalytic activity. In addition to the essential aspartate residue,
either phenylalanine or glycine is required in the activation domain to
maintain proper conformation of the catalytic domain and thus ensure
receptor autophosphorylation. Homology modelling of the catalytic
domain of H-Ryk provides a rationale for these findings. Thus, the
signalling properties of H-Ryk are divergent from those of other
classical receptor tyrosine kinases.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The need for the coordinated
regulation of cell growth and differentiation in multicellular
organisms has given rise to a complex array of signalling pathways.
Growth factors play pivotal roles in the coordination of these cellular
programs, and their diverse biological effects are mediated primarily
by a large family of cell surface receptors with intrinsic protein
tyrosine kinase activity. Binding of a growth factor to the
extracellular domain of its receptor induces receptor dimerization,
resulting in autophosphorylation and conformational changes in the
receptor that lead to the binding of downstream signalling proteins
(53).
Although receptor protein tyrosine kinases (RPTK) exhibit variability
in their regulation and intracellular signalling pathways, they share a
highly conserved cytoplasmic catalytic domain that is responsible for
kinase activity. Sequence alignments of protein kinases defined 11 distinct subdomains that are found throughout the broad family of
protein kinases (22, 23). The highly conserved and invariant
residues from these subdomains have been implicated in essential roles
in ATP binding, substrate recognition, and phosphate transfer (29,
30, 39). In Ryk (also referred to as Nyk-r, Vik, Nbtk-1, Mrk, and
Derailed [Drl]), a member of the RPTK family, some of the highly
conserved protein kinase sequence motifs display variations (6, 7,
28, 36, 65, 71, 77). In H-Ryk, the human homologue, substitutions
of glutamine (residue 307) for the first glycine of the GxGxxG
(subdomain I) nucleotide binding motif and of asparagine and alanine
(residues 454 and 455) for the highly conserved phenylalanine and
glycine within the DFG activation loop motif represent the most
notable changes (Fig. 1). In addition,
the highly conserved alanine residue close to the essential lysine at
the nucleotide cleft (subdomain II) and the invariant arginine residue
in the catalytic loop (IHRDLAARN) are altered to
phenylalanine and lysine, respectively. These sequence alterations
suggest that the kinase activity of H-Ryk might be impaired (28,
36, 65, 71, 77).

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
ALSCRIPT (2) figure showing alignment of
H-Ryk with other RTKs. The alignment of IRK and FGFR tyrosine kinase
was performed by the STAMP structural alignment package
(61), and the locations of alpha helices (blue cylinders)
and beta strands (magenta arrows) for these two kinases, as assigned by
DSSP (34) are shown at the bottom. Alignment of IRK with the
others was performed using Clustal W (74) and merged with
the STAMP alignment. Numbering above the alignment corresponds to
H-Ryk. Boxed regions indicate approximate location of the 11 kinase
subdomains described by Hanks et al. (22, 23), which are
labelled below the aligned sequences. Residues are colored red if they
show total conservation across the kinases in the alignment, yellow if
they show conservation of hydrophobic character (73), green
for polar character, and blue for small character. Residues in H-Ryk
described in the text are indicated by circles above the H-Ryk
sequence. The National Center for Biotechnology Information protein
accession numbers for H-Ryk, H-Cck4, M-Mep1, H-Ror1, H-ErbB3, IR, and
FGFR are 1710811, 2136061, 1911183, 346351, 119534, 124529, and 120046, respectively; the protein databank codes for IR and FGFR are 1irk and
1fgi, respectively (4).
|
|
In the absence of its ligand, the precise functional implications of
the sequence variations on the catalytic activity and signalling of
H-Ryk are unknown. A chimeric receptor approach in which the
extracellular domain of the orphan receptor is replaced by the
extracellular domain of another well-characterized receptor tyrosine
kinase (RTK) whose ligand is available has been successfully used as a
tool to study the signalling properties of orphan receptors (17,
49, 60). This type of approach permits analysis of the molecular
events involved in the signal transduction pathway of the tyrosine
kinase of interest, even when its ligands are unknown.
To address the effect of the sequence alterations on the catalytic
function of H-Ryk, we constructed a TrkA:Ryk chimeric receptor composed
of the extracellular domain of TrkA (human nerve growth factor [NGF]
receptor) fused to the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of the
H-Ryk receptor. We show that although the TrkA:Ryk chimera is
catalytically impaired, ligand stimulation of the chimeric receptor
results in activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)
pathway. These results imply that the receptor may mediate its
biological activities by recruitment of a signalling-competent auxiliary protein through an as yet uncharacterized mechanism. We also
demonstrate that the Phe and Gly residues in the DFG motif of the
activation domain are essential for catalytic activity of RTKs.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Growth factor, antibodies, and peptides.
The recombinant
human NGF was purchased from R&D Systems. The N-terminal TrkA-specific
monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) 220 and 5C3 were gifts from M. Barbacid
and U. Saragovi, respectively. The H-Ryk polyclonal antibody was raised
against the C-terminal region of H-Ryk (77). The
antiphosphotyrosine (4G10) and Erk1/2 antibodies were purchased from
TCS and Signal Transduction Laboratories, respectively. The p90 Rsk3,
Src, Lck, Jak 1, 2, 3, and phospho-Erk antibodies were purchased from
Santa Cruz Biotechnology. The horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
anti-mouse/rabbit antibodies and the tyrosine kinase synthetic
substrates R-R-L-I-E-D-A-E-Y-A-A-R-G and
poly(Glu80Tyr20) were purchased from Sigma. The
S6 peptide R-R-R-L-S-S-L-R-A was synthesized by the Imperial Cancer
Research Fund peptide synthesis laboratory.
Construction of the chimeric receptors.
The extracellular
ligand binding domain of TrkA was amplified by PCR (1 cycle of 95°C
for 5 min and 72°C for 4 min; 35 cycles of 95°C for 1 min and
72°C for 4 min), using primers V-Famp C (5'-CGC CAG GGT TTT CCC AGT
GAC GAG GTT GTA-3'), which anneals upstream of the 5' untranslated
region, and Trk-Ramp C (5'-CCC ACA GCC ACC GAG ACC CAA AAA CTA GTT
TCG-3'), which anneals to the 3' end of the extracellular domain of Trk
A and also introduces a unique SpeI restriction site to the
amplified PCR fragment. To amplify the Ryk chimeric cDNA, the
gene-specific primer Ryk chimeric Famp (5'-ACT AGT ACG CGT GTC TTT TAT
ATT-3'), which introduces a unique SpeI site into the
amplified chimeric fragment, and the vector-specific primer M13 Rsp
were used in the PCR (95°C for 1 min, 50°C for 1 min, 72°C for 1 min). The wild-type TrkA:Ryk chimera was constructed by fusing the
amplified fragments at the unique SpeI site. A PCR-based
primer extension overlap method (25) was used to introduce
mutations into the H-Ryk catalytic domain. Four mutagenic primers were
designed to create the activation domain mutants: (i) pRamp mut (5'-CTC
CCG TAA CAG CAC CTA GAA TTG GAG GTC ACA-3'), (ii) pN457F Ryk (5'-ACA
CTG CAG GTT AAG ATC ACA GAC TTT GCC CTC-3'), (iii) pA458G Ryk (5'-ACA
CTG CAG GTT AAG ATC ACA GAC TTT GAC CTC-3'), and (iv) pN457F/A458G Ryk
(5'-ACA CTG CAG GTT AAG ATC ACA GAC TTT GAC CTC-3'). PCR (95°C for 1 min, 60°C for 2 min, 72°C for 1 min) was carried with the
proofreading DNA Pwo polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim). To
introduce the relevant mutant Ryk fragments into the chimeric H-Ryk
cDNA fragment, HindIII/XbaI restriction
fragments were used to replace the wild-type
HindIII/XbaI fragment in order to create the
corresponding activation domain chimeras. Two primers, 5'-GTA CTC GGA
GAA GGT ACT TTT GGG-3' and 5'-CCC AAA AGT ACC TTC TCC GAG TAC-3', were
designed to introduce the glycine mutation in the nucleotide binding
domain. The K334A mutation was introduced by amplifying the DNA
template with primers 5'-CAA GCA TTT GTC GCA ACA GTT AAA CAA GCT-3' and
5'-TCG AAC TAG AAA TTG ACA ACG CTG TTT ACG AAC-3'. Primers 5'-GCT TGA
TCT TTA ACT GTT TTG ACA GCT GCT TGT TTT T-3' and 5'-AAA AAC AAG CAG CTG TCA AAA CAG TTA AAG ATC AAG C-3' were designed to introduce the F332A
mutation. The K434R mutation was introduced by amplifying the H-Ryk
cDNA with primers, 5'-GAC ACA GTT CCT GGC AGC CAG GTC TCT GTG GAT
GAC-3' and 5'-GTC ATC CAC AGA GAC CTG GCT GCC AGG AAC TGT GTC-3'. All
chimeric cDNA constructs were cloned downstream of the cytomegalovirus
promoter in the expression plasmid pcDNA3. This was accomplished by
digesting the chimeric constructs with EcoRI/XbaI.
Transfection of chimeras into murine fibroblasts.
The
high-efficiency calcium phosphate method of Chen and Okayama was used
to transfect the cell lines (9, 10). The cells were
maintained under selection (Dulbecco modified Eagle medium [DMEM],
10% fetal calf serum [FCS], 800 µg of neomycin per ml) for 2 weeks. The individual clones were then analyzed further to determine
the expression levels of the chimeric receptor protein.
Dynal selection of the chimera-expressing cell lines.
Dynabeads M-450 (rat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G1 [IgG1] were washed
three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove any traces
of sodium azide prior to coating with TrkA-specific monoclonal antibody
(MAb) 220 at a concentration of 5 µg of MAb per mg of beads. After a
2-h incubation at 4°C, the beads were collected by placement in a
Dynal magnet. After removal of the supernatant, the beads were washed
three times in a solution of PBS supplemented with 0.1% FCS. Adherent
cells were lifted by a 15-min incubation in PBS-2 mM EDTA and then
washed twice with PBSA and resuspended in PBS-6% sodium citrate
before being incubated with the Dynabead-antibody complex. To reach the
plateau in the binding kinetics after 10 min, 107 Dynabeads
per ml were used. The beads were washed three times with PBS-0.1% FCS
to remove unbound cells. The Dynabeads-antibody-cell complexes were
cultured in DMEM supplemented with 800 µg of G418 per ml and 10%
FCS. After the cells had grown to about 70% confluence, the
Dynabead-antibody complex was dissociated from the cells by trypsinization. The clonal population of cells were maintained in
DMEM-800 µg of G418 per ml-10% FCS.
Immunofluorescence analysis of the chimeric constructs.
Adherent cells were lifted by a 15-min incubation at 37°C in PBS-2
mM EDTA and washed with PBS-0.2% bovine serum albumin-2 mM sodium
azide (FACS [fluorescence-activated cell sorting] wash buffer);
106 cells per sample were then incubated in the same sample
buffer in 6-ml round-bottom polypropylene tubes (Falcon-2058) with the primary antibody for 60 min at 4°C. Samples were then washed once in
excess FACS wash buffer and incubated with fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-mouse serum for 60 min at 4°C.
After a further wash in excess FACS wash buffer, stained cells were
fixed in PBS with 0.5 ml 2% formaldehyde for 10 min at 4°C. At least
5,000 cells per sample were analyzed by flow cytometry on a Becton
Dickinson FACSscan. Specific median fluorescence of a sample was
calculated by subtracting the median fluorescence intensity of the
negative control (usually cells labelled with secondary reagent only)
from the median fluorescence intensity of the sample. The receptor density of the chimeras was calculated by extrapolating the median fluorescence intensity to that of the E 25-4-27 cell line
(44).
Induction studies, immunoprecipitation, and immunoblotting.
For the induction studies, cells were grown to 80% confluence, washed
twice with PBSA, and then incubated for 16 h in serum-free medium.
The quiescent cells were stimulated with recombinant human NGF for
different time intervals before being lysed on ice for 30 min in 1.00 ml of lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 150 mM NaCl,
50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM EGTA) containing 2 mM
sodium vanadate and freshly added protease inhibitors (10 µg each of
aprotinin, leupeptin, pepstatin A, and trypsin inhibitor per ml, 100 µg of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride per ml). Insoluble material was
removed by centrifugation for 30 min at 15,000 rpm at 4°C. The total
protein concentration was measured by using the calorimetric
bicinchoninic acid protein assay (Pierce); 800 µg of protein was
incubated with 2 µg of mouse N-terminal TrkA MAb 5C3 preabsorbed onto
50 µl of protein G-agarose beads. After 12 h of incubation at
4°C, the immune complexes were washed three times in ice-cold cell
lysis supplemented with protease inhibitors and twice in ice-cold lysis
buffer supplemented with 1 M NaCl. The immunoprecipitates were eluted
and denatured by boiling for 5 min in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)
sample buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 2% SDS, 10% glycerol, 5%
-mercaptoethanol, 0.25% bromophenol blue). For immunoblotting, the
immunoprecipitates were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (PAGE) according to standard protocols and then
transferred onto nylon membranes. The membrane was blocked for 2 h
in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 5% nonfat milk and 0.1%
Tween 20 and then incubated overnight at 4°C with 1 µg of
antiphosphotyrosine antibody 4G10 (TCS) per ml. Afterwards the blot was
washed with TBS containing 1% milk and 0.1% Tween 20. The blot was
incubated for 1 h with peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse
immunoglobulin (diluted 1:5,000; Sigma). After a wash with TBS (1%
milk, 0.1% Tween 20), antibody binding was localized by the enhanced
chemiluminescence method (Amersham). All other antibodies were used
according to manufacturer's conditions.
In vitro kinase assays.
The NIH 3T3 TrkA:Ryk chimeric
transfectants were incubated in DMEM supplemented with 1% FCS for
24 h and then in DMEM containing 0.1% FCS for another 24 h.
After induction with NGF and lysis, the cell lysates were equalized for
protein content prior to immunoprecipitation with either the C-terminal
anti-p90 Rsk3 antibody (Santa Cruz) or N-terminal TrkA MAb 5C3. A total
of 1.00 mg of cell lysate was used in the immunoprecipitation. The
immune complex kinase assay was initiated by resuspending the final
immune complexes in 25 µl of kinase assay buffer (1 mg of bovine
serum albumin per ml, 30 mM Tris-Cl [pH 7.4], 20 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 200 mM ATP, 100 mM
[
-32P]ATP). The in vitro substrate kinase assays were
initiated by resuspending the immune complexes in 25 µl of kinase
assay buffer supplemented with either 250 mM S6 peptide or 10 mM
tyrosine kinase substrate for the p90 Rsk3 and TrkA:Ryk substrate
assays, respectively. The S6 and Src-related peptide reaction mixtures
were incubated at 30°C for 10 min and then stopped by spotting onto
pieces of P81 phosphocellulose (Whatman), followed by five washes in
150 mM phosphoric acid. The filter was dried, and the picomoles of [
-32P]ATP incorporated into the substrates was
determined by PhosphorImager analysis (Molecular Dynamics) after 4 h. The relative specific activity was calculated by determining the
picomoles of [
-32P]ATP incorporated into the synthetic
peptide substrate. The following conversion factor was used: 1 µCi = 0.33 pmol = 2.2 × 106 cpm. By
considering 1 PhosphorImager unit as equivalent to 1 cpm, the relative
moles of [
-32P]ATP incorporated into the synthetic
peptide substrate can be determined. Mouse IgG was used as control in
the experiment to estimate the background. The
poly(Glu80Tyr20) substrate assay was initiated
by incubating the reaction mixtures at 30°C for 10 min. The reactions
were stopped by spotting the samples onto Whatman 3M paper and
immersion into 10% trichloroacetic acid. The papers were extensively
washed, and the radioactivity incorporated into the substrate was
determined by counting the Whatman 3M paper dry in a scintillation
counter. The specific activity of the [
-32P]ATP in the
kinase reaction was determined by spotting a small sample of the kinase
reaction sample onto a paper and counting directly without washing to
determine the specific activity. The moles of phosphate transferred in
the reaction was determined by dividing the counts per minute obtained
in the kinase reaction (minus blank) by the specific activity.
Comparative modelling of the H-Ryk receptor tyrosine kinase.
The sequence of H-Ryk was aligned to that of the insulin receptor (IR)
tyrosine kinase (IRK; Brookhaven PDB code 1irk) by using the AMPS
package (3), and the alignment was sent to the SWISSMODEL
automated homology modelling server (54). Since the model
was generated automatically, the conformation of most side chains in
H-Ryk resembled the counterparts in IRK closely. Three nonconservative
mutations within H-Ryk were thus modelled manually, using QUANTA
(version 4.0; Molecular Simulations Inc.). Suitable side chain rotamers
were chosen from the database (56) to model a putative
interaction between (Gly 1003, IRK) Gln 307 (H-Ryk, 5th rotamer:
1 = 71,
2 =
166,
3 = 27) and (Phe 1151, IRK) Asn 454 (4th rotamer:
1 = 64,
2 =
7). A suitable
rotamer for Phe 332 (Ala 1028, IRK) was also chosen to accommodate the
Ala-Phe change in H-Ryk.
 |
RESULTS |
Characterization of cells expressing the wild-type and mutant
TrkA:Ryk chimeras.
A TrkA:Ryk chimeric construct consisting of the
extracellular domain of the TrkA receptor (nucleotide residues 1 to
1444 according to accession no. M23102) and encompassing the H-Ryk
transmembrane-to-carboxyl tail region (nucleotide residues 647 to 2300 according to accession no. X96588) was made as shown in Fig.
2A. To analyze the role of the individual
amino acid alterations of the H-Ryk catalytic domain, we used a
PCR-mediated primer extension overlap method to introduce point
mutations into the open reading frame of the H-Ryk receptor. The
resultant mutant fragments were fused to the extracellular domain of
the TrkA receptor in order to create the various chimeric constructs
(Fig. 2A). To allow functional analysis of the TrkA:Ryk chimeras,
constructs encoding the wild-type and mutant receptors were transfected
into NIH 3T3 cells, and stable G418-resistant clones were selected.
Selection of the NIH 3T3 mouse fibroblast cell line was based on the
fact that it does not express TrkA and therefore there is no
interference due to endogenous receptor activity. To confirm the
expression of the chimeras, lysates from the respective stable cell
lines were immunoprecipitated with 15.2, a polyclonal antibody that
recognizes the carboxyl-terminal region of H-Ryk (77).
Immunoprecipitates were separated, transferred, and then immunoblotted
with MAb 5C3, which recognizes the extracellular domain of human TrkA
(41). MAb 5C3 recognizes the TrkA component of the chimeric
receptor only under nonreducing conditions. A protein of approximately
125 kDa was detected in all of the NIH 3T3 cell lines transfected with
wild-type and mutant chimeras but not in the parental NIH 3T3 cell line
(Fig. 2B). The molecular weight of the chimeric receptor determined
under nonreducing conditions is slightly larger than that of the
116-kDa protein that is detected under reducing conditions.


View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Characterization of the TrkA:Ryk chimera-expressing
stable cell lines. (A) Schematic diagram of the chimeric fusion
constructs consisting of the TrkA extracellular domain (nucleotides 1 to 1444) and the H-Ryk transmembrane (T.M.), juxtamembrane (J.M.),
kinase (K.D.), and C-terminal (nucleotides 647 to 2300) domains. The
TrkA:Ryk chimeric mutants are labelled according to amino acid change
and location; thus, mutant Q307G corresponds to a glutamine-to-glycine
change at amino acid 307. (B) Detection of chimeric receptors in NIH
3T3 transfectants. Equal amounts of cell extracts from the NIH 3T3
transfectants were immunoprecipitated (I.P.) with the anti-C-terminal
H-Ryk antibody 15.2 and then resolved on an SDS-7.5% polyacrylamide
gel under nonreducing conditions. The chimeric receptor proteins were
detected by immunoblotting (I.B.) with anti-N-terminal TrkA MAb 5C3.
The observed molecular mass (125 kDa) is slightly higher than that
observed under reducing conditions. Lanes 1 to 9 represent TrkA:Ryk
wild type, TrkA:Ryk Q307G, TrkA:Ryk F332A, TrkA:Ryk K4343R, TrkA:Ryk
N454F, TrkA:Ryk A455G, TrkA:Ryk N454F/A455G, TrkA:Ryk Q307G/N454F/A455G
chimeras, and the parental NIH 3T3 cell line respectively.
|
|
To ensure that the Trk-A:Ryk chimeric receptors were correctly
synthesized and transported to the cell surface, the clonal
cell lines
were analyzed by immunostaining and FACS to determine
receptor density.
Immunostaining of the stable cell lines with
MAb 5C3 indicated that the
chimeric receptors were properly processed
and transported to the cell
surface (data not shown). The receptor
density determinations were
carried out at 4°C to prevent internalization
of receptors. The
number of receptors expressed was comparable
to that for the NIH 3T3
TrkA-derived clone E25-4-27, which expresses
approximately 3.1 × 10
4 receptors per cell (
38,
44) (Table
1).
The TrkA:Ryk chimeric receptor is catalytically inactive.
To
investigate the intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity of H-Ryk, the
TrkA:Ryk immune complex from the TrkA:Ryk chimeric receptor-expressing stable cell line was subjected to an in vitro kinase assay. No phosphorylated band corresponding to the TrkA:Ryk receptor was detected
in the immune complex kinase assay. In contrast, an in vitro kinase
assay of the TrkA immune complex from the NIH 3T3 TrkA-expressing
stable cell line (E25-4-27) revealed an autophosphorylated band of 140 kDa corresponding to the TrkA receptor (Fig.
3A to C). To investigate whether the
TrkA:Ryk receptor had exogenous kinase activity, the TrkA:Ryk immune
complexes before and after NGF induction were subjected to an in vitro
kinase assay in the presence of either a synthetic Src tyrosine kinase
peptide (R-R-L-I-E-D-A-E-Y-A-A-R-G) or
poly(Glu80Tyr20) substrate. There was no
evidence of TrkA:Ryk-mediated tyrosine kinase exogenous activity in the
substrate assay (Fig. 3D and E). Addition of Mn2+ ions to
the reaction had no effect on the exogenous kinase activity of the
TrkA:Ryk chimeric receptor. In contrast, the TrkA immune complex was
able to phosphorylate both substrates, as demonstrated by the
incorporation of [
-32P]ATP in each substrate assay
(Fig. 3D and E).


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
In vitro kinase assay of the TrkA and TrkA:Ryk chimeric
receptors. Cells were incubated in DMEM supplemented with 0.1% FCS for
24 h prior to immunoprecipitation (I.P.) with MAb 5C3. Half of the
sample was used in the in vitro kinase assay (A), while the other half
was used to determine the relative amounts of the receptors by Western
immunoblotting (I.B.) (B and C). Lanes 1 and 2 in panels A and B
represent the TrkA receptor, lanes 3 and 4 in panels A and C represent
the TrkA:Ryk chimeric receptor, and lanes 5 and 6 in panels A and C
represent the immune complex from the NIH 3T3 parental cell line. Lanes
1, 3, and 5 and lanes 2, 4, and 6 represent before and after 30 min of
stimulation with NGF, respectively. The exogenous tyrosine kinase assay
was carried out in the presence of 10 mM synthetic Src peptide (D) and
0.2 mg of poly(Glu80Tyr20) substrate per ml
(E). The assay was carried out in the presence of 10 mM
MgCl2 ions (TrkA and TrkA:Ryk) or 10 mM MgCl2
and 2 mM Mn2+ in the case of the TrkA:Ryk* chimeric
receptor. The relative specific activity was determined by calculating
the nanomoles of ATP transferred per minute of the reaction by 1.00 mg
of total protein.
|
|
To investigate NGF-induced changes in tyrosine phosphorylation, total
cell proteins from the TrkA:Ryk chimera-expressing cell
line were
immunoblotted with the antiphosphotyrosine antibody.
Five major
tyrosine-phosphorylated bands, pp115, pp75, pp60, pp42,
and pp26, were
observed (Fig.
4A). The
tyrosine-phosphorylated
bands corresponding to the pp42 was confirmed
as Erk1/2 by immunoblotting
(data not shown). The pp115 band (which
corresponds to the approximate
molecular weight of the TrkA:Ryk
chimera) was not detected by
either the H-Ryk polyclonal antibody 15.2 or TrkA MAb 5C3. This
analysis indicated that the band did not
represent the TrkA:Ryk
chimera. The identities of the pp115, pp75,
pp60, and pp26 bands
are not known. The intrinsic kinase activity of
the receptor was
further evaluated by stimulating the stable cell line
expressing
the wild-type TrkA:Ryk chimera with NGF in a time-dependent
manner.
There was no detectable autophosphorylation of the TrkA:Ryk
chimera
after 60 min of stimulation of the chimeric receptor with NGF
(Fig.
4B). RTKs usually become rapidly phosphorylated upon stimulation
with their cognate ligand with the exception of the Eph and Discoidin
domain family receptors, which require at least an hour for maximal
receptor phosphorylation (
18,
26,
64,
76). To eliminate
the
possibility that the kinetics of H-Ryk autophosphorylation
are similar
to the kinetics for the Eph and Discoidin domain family
receptors,
stimulation of cells expressing the chimeric receptor
was assayed for
up to 4 h. Autophosphorylation of the receptor
was not detected
after this time period (Fig.
4C). In contrast,
upon stimulation of the
E25-4-27 NIH 3T3 TrkA-expressing stable
cell line with NGF, the gp140
TrkA receptor was stimulated within
5 min, with maximal stimulation
being observed after 25 min (Fig.
4D).



View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
(A) Analysis of total cell proteins for NGF-induced
changes in tyrosine phosphorylation of cells expressing the wild-type
TrkA:Ryk chimera. The TrkA:Ryk chimera-expressing cell line was
cultured in DMEM supplemented with 0.1% for 16 h and then
stimulated with NGF for the time periods indicated. The cells were
lysed with 2× SDS sample buffer, and an aliquot of the lysate was
resolved by SDS-PAGE. Tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins in the total
cell lysate were visualized by immunoblotting (I.B.) with the
antiphosphotyrosine antibody 4G10. The major phosphorylated bands are
indicated by arrows. (B and C) Tyrosine phosphorylation mediated by the
TrkA:Ryk chimeric receptor and the TrkA receptor (D). Cells were
incubated for 16 h in DMEM containing 0.1% FCS prior to
stimulation with NGF (100 ng/ml) for the time period indicated. After
stimulation, the cell extracts were equalized for protein content,
immunoprecipitated with TrkA MAb 5C3, and immunoblotted with
antiphosphotyrosine antibody 4G10. The arrows indicate the
coimmunoprecipitated phosphotyrosine-containing 75-kDa protein. The
blots were stripped and blotted with either the H-Ryk anti-C terminal
antibody (B and C, bottom panel) or the TrkA antibody (D, bottom
panel). (E) Immunoprecipitation analysis of the wild-type TrkA:Ryk
chimeric cell line under denaturing conditions. The chimera-expressing
cells were made quiescent by incubation for 16 h in DMEM-0.1%
FCS for 16 h. The cells were lysed in denaturing buffer (boiling
SDS buffer) prior to immunoprecipitation (I.P.). Immunoblotting
analysis with 4G10 (top panel) and H-Ryk 15.2 (bottom panel) shows
absence of pp75 and presence of the TrkA:Ryk chimeric receptor,
respectively.
|
|
However, despite the lack of TrkA:Ryk receptor autophosphorylation, a
coimmunoprecipitating 75-kDa phosphoprotein (pp75) was
observed after
stimulation of the TrkA:Ryk cell line. pp75 was
observed at the basal
level after 16 h of serum starvation, suggesting
that this
association may be ligand independent. The p75 phosphoprotein
is
unlikely to be an artifact, as two independent TrkA antibodies
(5C3 and
220) (
41,
44) repeatedly coimmunoprecipitated pp75
from the
TrkA:Ryk chimera-expressing cell line. In addition, pp75
was not
observed after immunoprecipitation of the parental NIH
3T3 cell line or
the TrkA-expressing cell line (E25-4-27) with
the TrkA-specific MAb 5C3
(Fig.
4C). It is well established that
NGF binding can be mediated by
both the high-affinity gp140 TrkA
receptor and the low-affinity p75 NGF
receptor (
1,
31). Therefore,
to rule out the possibility
that pp75 observed upon stimulation
of the TrkA:Ryk chimera is the
low-affinity p75 NGF receptor,
the TrkA:Ryk chimeric immunoprecipitates
were immunoblotted with
the p75 low-affinity receptor antibody. No
detectable expression
of the p75 low-affinity receptor was observed
(data not shown).
These observations suggest that pp75 associates with
the Ryk intracellular
part of the TrkA:Ryk chimera. This inference is
further supported
by the inability to immunoprecipitate pp75 from the
TrkA:Ryk chimeric
receptor-expressing cell line after lysis in
denaturing buffer
(Fig.
4E).
The catalytically impaired H-Ryk receptor signals through the MAPK
pathway.
The observation that overexpression of the H-Ryk receptor
leads to in vitro transformation of NIH 3T3 cells and tumor formation in vivo (35) raised the possibility that H-Ryk activates
downstream signalling pathways. The conserved MAPK signal transduction
pathway plays a central role in cell behavior since depending on
cellular context it can induce either cell proliferation or
differentiation (15, 16, 43, 55). Erk kinase is activated by
phosphorylation on both Tyr and Thr residues (43), which can
be used to assess its activation. Upon ligand stimulation of the
TrkA:Ryk chimera, phosphorylation of Erk was first detected after 10 min, with maximal stimulation after 25 min (Fig.
5A). Consistent with the lack of TrkA
receptor expression, no Erk kinase activation was observed in the
parental NIH 3T3 cell line after induction with NGF (data not shown).
To verify the activation of the extracellular regulated kinases, we
assayed the specific activity of p90 Rsk3, one of the ribosomal S6
kinases which lies downstream of the Erk kinases (82). p90
Rsk3 specific activity was stimulated threefold after 20 min of
induction with NGF (Fig. 5B). This is consistent with the expected two-
to fourfold induction of p90 Rsk3 observed after stimulation with other
growth factors such as epidermal growth factor (EGF) as previously
published (82, 83).




View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Activation of the catalytically inactive TrkA:Ryk
chimera stimulates the MAPK pathway. The TrkA:Ryk chimera-expressing
cell line was made quiescent by incubation in DMEM supplemented with
1% FCS for 24 h followed by another 24 h of incubation in
DMEM containing 0.1% FCS prior to stimulation with 100 ng of NGF per
ml. The lysates were immunoprecipitated (I.P.) with the Erk1- or
Rsk3-specific antibodies and subjected to either immunoblotting (I.B.)
with the antiphosphotyrosine antibody (A) or the S6 peptide kinase
assay (B). (C) Tyrosine phosphorylation mediated by the TrkA:Ryk K334A
chimeric receptor. The TrkA:Ryk K334A chimera-expressing cell line was
serum starved for 16 h prior to stimulation with NGF for the time
periods indicated. Immunoblotting with 4G10 indicates significantly
lower levels of coimmunoprecipitating pp75 compared to the wild-type
TrkA:Ryk chimera (prolonged exposure, 30 min). The bottom panel
indicates the relative levels of TrkA:Ryk K334A chimera
immunoprecipitated. The dominant negative K334A mutant abolishes Erk
(D) and p90 Rsk3 (G) activation. Total cellular proteins were resolved
by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with phospho-Erk (D) and Erk (E). This
analysis revealed the absence of Erk activation. (F) Total cellular
lysates were equalized for protein content prior to immunoprecipitation
with the p90 Rsk3 antibody. Half of the immune complex was used for
immunoblot analysis, while the other half was used in the S6 peptide
kinase assay (G). The S6 peptide kinase assay demonstrates that the
TrkA:Ryk K334A chimera abolishes p90 Rsk3 activation.
|
|
To conclusively establish whether residual low H-Ryk catalytic activity
is required for MAPK activation, we mutated the invariant
lysine in
subdomain II to alanine and constructed the TrkA:Ryk
K334A chimera.
There was no autophosphorylation of the chimeric
receptor upon
stimulation with NGF, similar to findings for the
wild-type TrkA:Ryk
receptor. In addition, significantly lower
levels of pp75 were
coimmunoprecipitated from the TrkA-Ryk K334A
chimera-expressing cell
line (Fig.
5C). Further, NGF stimulation
of the TrkA:Ryk K334A chimera
failed to induce phosphorylation
of both Erk1/2 and p90 Rsk3 (Fig.
5D
to
G).
The activation domain residues phenylalanine and glycine are
essential for receptor autophosphorylation.
We next wanted to
determine the relevance of each of the amino acid changes in the
activation loop of H-Ryk. To examine whether H-Ryk catalytic activity
could be restored by alteration of the asparagine residue to
phenylalanine in the DNA motif, the mutant TrkA:Ryk N454F chimera was
constructed by in vitro mutagenesis. Autophosphorylation of the
receptor was detected after 5 min and peaked after 20 min (Fig.
6A). Surprisingly, mutation of the
alanine to glycine (A455G) also restored the kinase activity of the Ryk receptor (Fig. 6B). A double-mutant TrkA:Ryk N454F/A455G chimera was,
as expected, kinase active (Fig. 6C). To determine if activation domain
mutants had exogenous catalytic activity, the immune complexes from the
mutants were subjected to a kinase assay using the substrate poly(Glu80Tyr20). All of the mutants were able
to phosphorylate the exogenous substrate, albeit to different extents
(Fig. 6D). However, no significant differences in specific activities
of the various mutants were observed. In addition, the activation
domain mutants induced Erk MAPK in response to NGF stimulation with
stronger kinetics of activation than the wild-type TrkA:Ryk chimeric
receptor, possibly as a consequence of the reactivated
autophosphorylation activity of the activation domain mutants (Fig. 6E
to G).



View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Analysis of the kinetics of tyrosine phosphorylation of
the TrkA:Ryk activation domain chimeric mutants in response to NGF.
TrkA:Ryk N454F (A), TrkA:Ryk A455G (B), and TrkA:Ryk N454F/A455G (C)
chimera-expressing cell lines were made quiescent by incubation in DMEM
medium supplemented with 0.1% FCS for 16 h and then stimulated
with 100 ng of NGF per ml for the time periods indicated. The
tyrosine-phosphorylated chimeric and associated proteins are indicated
with arrows (top panel). The blots were stripped and immunoblotted
(I.B.) with H-Ryk polyclonal antibody 15.2 (bottom panel). (D)
Phosphorylation of exogenous substrate by the activation domain
mutants. The synthetic substrate polyGlu80Tyr20
was phosphorylated with labelled ATP. Incorporation of ATP into the
substrate was determined by a filter paper assay. The graph represents
the mean of two independent experiments. (E to G) Activation of the Erk
MAPK pathway by the TrkA:Ryk N454F (E), A455G (F), and N454F/A455G (G)
chimeric receptors, respectively.
|
|
Alteration of the glutamine residue to glycine in the nucleotide
binding loop does not restore catalytic activity.
The glycine-rich
loop, GxGxxG, in the ATP binding site is one of the most conserved
sequence motifs in protein kinases. To assess the effect of the
glutamine substitution in H-Ryk, the autophosphorylation activity of
the Q307G mutant TrkA:Ryk chimera was determined by induction with NGF.
Alteration of the glutamine residue to glycine had no detectable effect
on the autophosphorylation activity of the receptor (Fig.
7A). Although the Q307G mutation is a
drastic change in that it replaces a large side chain with hydrogen,
this alteration on its own presumably cannot restore catalytic
activity. A cooperative effect with the DFG tripeptide motif may be
required to restore activity. This possibility is supported by the
kinase activity of the triple-mutant TrkA:Ryk Q307G/N454F/A455G chimera
(Fig. 7B), wherein receptor autophosphorylation is restored. In vitro
tyrosine kinase activity of the chimeric receptors as measured by
phosphorylation of the exogenous
poly(Glu80Tyr20) demonstrated kinase activity
of the TrkA:Ryk Q307/N454F/A455G mutant. In contrast, no tyrosine
kinase activity was observed for the TrkA:Ryk Q307G chimera (Fig. 7C).
However, NGF stimulation of both chimeras resulted in Erk activation,
again reaffirming that H-Ryk autophosphorylation activity does not
appear to be required for activation of the MAPK pathway (Fig. 7D and
E).



View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Stimulation of the TrkA:Ryk Q307G (A) and TrkA:Ryk
Q307G/N454F/A455G (B) chimera-expressing cell lines in response to NGF.
Serum-starved cells (DMEM, 0.1% FCS, 16 h) were stimulated with
NGF (100 ng/ml). After cell lysis, the cell lysates immunoprecipitated
with TrkA MAb 5C3. Immunoprecipitates were analyzed by Western
immunoblotting (I.B.) with the antiphosphotyrosine antibody (top panel)
and blotted with the H-Ryk C-terminal antibody (bottom panel). (C)
Phosphorylation of the synthetic
poly(Glu80Tyr20) substrate by the TrkA:Ryk Q307
and Q307G/N454F/A455G chimeric mutants. The graph represents the mean
of two independent experiments. (D and E) Activation of the Erk MAPK
pathway by the TrkA:Ryk Q307 (D) and Q307G/N454F/A455G (E) chimeric
mutants in response to NGF stimulation for the time period indicated.
|
|
The invariant arginine residue in the catalytic loop and the
conserved phenylalanine in subdomain II are not essential for
catalysis.
The alanine residue in subdomain II
(xVAV/LK, where x represents any amino acid) of the protein
kinase domain represents a semiconserved residue. To determine the
significance of this substitution, the TrkA:Ryk F332A chimera was
stimulated with NGF. No detectable autophosphorylation of the receptor
was observed after 60 min of induction with NGF (Fig.
8A). However, introduction of the F332A
mutation in conjunction with the N454F mutation restored receptor
autophosphorylation, again emphasizing the role of the phenylalanine
residue in the activation domain in catalysis (data not shown).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
The TrkA:Ryk F332A (A) and TrkA:Ryk K434R (B) chimeric
receptors are catalytically inactive. NIH 3T3 cell lines expressing the
various chimeras were made quiescent by incubating them in DMEM
supplemented with 0.1% FCS for 16 h. Immunoprecipitates were
analyzed for tyrosine phosphorylation by immunoblotting (I.B.) with the
antiphosphotyrosine antibody (top panel). The coimmunoprecipitated p75
protein is indicated with an arrow. The blot was stripped and probed
with the H-Ryk C-terminal antibody (bottom panel). (C) Substrate
phosphorylation assay of the TrkA:Ryk F332A and TrkA:Ryk K434R chimeric
receptors. The graph represents the mean of two independent
experiments.
|
|
No receptor autophosphorylation was detected after stimulation of the
TrkA:Ryk K434R chimera (Fig.
8B). The arginine residue
(IH
RDLAARN) represents one of the invariant residues in
the
tyrosine kinase family. In the tertiary structure of the serine
threonine kinase, cyclic AMP (cAMP), this residue is important
in the
stabilization of the phosphorylated threonine residue (
39).
However, in the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) and IRK
structures, arginine does not have a stabilization role in the
phosphorylated forms of the receptors, suggesting that the residue
plays no role in catalysis in the RTK family (
29,
30,
46).
This supports our observation, as restoration of this residue
had no
effect on the kinase activity of the mutant chimeric receptor.
Analysis
of the in vitro protein tyrosine kinase activity of each
chimeric
receptor demonstrated lack of tyrosine kinase activity,
consistent with
lack of intrinsic tyrosine kinase autophosphorylation
activity (Fig.
8C).
Homology modelling of the H-Ryk receptor.
Recently, the
tertiary structures of the IR and FGFR kinase domains were reported
(29, 30, 46). Sequence similarity suggests that gross
structural details of the IRK catalytic domain are likely to hold for
H-Ryk. In the absence of an experimentally determined three-dimensional
structure, an approximate model of the tertiary structure of H-Ryk can
be made via homology modelling. The coordinates of IRK and an alignment
of H-Ryk and IRK were used to build a model (see Materials and
Methods). Regions around the active site were scrutinized to ensure
that automatically assigned residue replacements had reasonable side
chain rotamers and that nonconservative substitutions (e.g.,
hydrophobic for polar) were suitably accommodated in the model (Fig.
9).

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
Homology modelling of the H-Ryk catalytic domain.
Alignment of sequences of H-Ryk and IRK and manual modelling of three
nonconservative mutations within H-Ryk were done as described in
Materials and Methods. Corresponding residues of IRK (A) and H-Ryk (B)
are labelled. The model is magnified to display the cleft between the
two lobes.
|
|
Two unusual features in H-Ryk involve the change of a highly conserved
glycine. The glycine-to-glutamine change in the glycine-rich
loop of
H-Ryk is drastic in that it replaces a hydrogen with a
large side
chain. Glycine, due to its lack of a side chain, is
able to adopt a
wider range of backbone conformations. The glycine
residue 1003 in IRK
has backbone

/

values of

178 and 149°,
respectively, which
occurs in a disallowed region of

/

space
for nonglycine residues
(
5). Thus, the substitution of glycine
for glutamine in
H-Ryk would likely be accompanied by changes
in the backbone (

/

)
conformation (Fig.
9). Gly 1152 in IRK has
backbone

/

values of
50.0 and 112.7° and is also in a region
of

/

space forbidden to
nonglycine residues (
5). The glycine-alanine
mutation in the
highly conserved DFG tripeptide is conservative
in that glycine and
alanine have similar physicochemical properties.
However, the change to
alanine is likely to be accompanied by
some changes in backbone
(

/

)
conformation.
With the exception of the lysine-for-arginine substitution in the
catalytic loop, all of the amino acid changes in H-Ryk cluster
around
the active site of the enzyme. The change of the mostly
conserved Ala
(Ala 1028, IRK) in subdomain II to Phe puts a large
side chain into a
space normally occupied by Phe from the DFG
loop. The Phe-Asn change
seen in H-Ryk replaces a hydrophobic
residue by a polar one, and we
thus predict that this side chain,
which would be partly displaced by
the Ala-Phe substitution, would
be forced into a more solvent exposed
position (Fig.
9). This
would put it closer to the Gln from the glycine
rich loop and
may even form an electrostatic interaction. The
interaction between
the glycine-rich loop and the activation domain is
mediated by
the conserved Gly 1003 and residues Phe 1151 and Gly 1152 in the
IRK structure (
29,
30). In the homology model of
H-Ryk, this
interaction appears to be mediated by Gln 307 (Gly 1003, IRK)
and Asn 454 (Phe 1151, IRK). The net effect of all these changes
would be to add approximately nine noncarbon atoms to the region
around
the kinase active site. Such changes, together with the
alterations of
the highly conserved glycines, would likely disrupt
the precise
association of the two kinase lobes, which is essential
for proper
catalytic
activity.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Recently a number of RPTKs with alterations to conserved and
invariant amino acids in the catalytic domain have been cloned. These
include Cck-4, Mep (Eph-B6), Ror 1, and Ror 2 (21, 45, 48,
80). Similar to H-Ryk, these RPTKs all have sequence alterations in either the nucleotide binding, catalytic, or activation domains (Fig. 1). This subfamily of atypical RPTKs also share a common feature:
they are all non-RD kinases, a category which essentially encompasses
those kinases in which the aspartate in the catalytic loop
(IHRDLAARN) is not preceded by the arginine residue (33). The distinguishing feature of these kinases is that
they do not appear to be regulated by phosphorylation in the activation segment, in direct contrast to the RD kinases (i.e., MAPK, IRK, and
FGFR kinase) (33). The intrinsic protein tyrosine kinase activity of this subfamily and the way in which these putative receptors mediate their biological functions remain undetermined. It
has been demonstrated previously by an in vitro kinase assay that a
FLAG:Ryk fusion protein expressed in bacteria does not have intrinsic
kinase activity (28). This observation is consistent with
the in vitro experimental findings of this study. In the absence of a
ligand, a chimeric receptor approach using the NGF receptor TrkA was
used to analyze the function of H-Ryk. The inability to identify any
detectable autophosphorylation of the chimeric receptor after 4 h
of stimulation with NGF suggests that H-Ryk is catalytically inactive
under these experimental conditions. This possibility is supported by
the inability of H-Ryk to phosphorylate exogenous substrate.
The Ryk RTK has been implicated in a number of developmental processes,
and its conservation across species, as evidenced by its widespread
expression (28, 32, 36, 40, 42, 51, 52, 57, 63, 65, 67, 70, 77,
78, 81), suggests that it plays a fundamental role in
development. H-Ryk expression has been demonstrated to be regulated
during hematopoietic development by lineage commitment and stage
maturation (65). In the ovary, H-Ryk is overexpressed in
malignant epithelial ovarian tumors and NIH 3T3 H-Ryk-overexpressing
stable cell lines are transforming in vivo and in vitro (35,
77). The Drosophila homologue Drl has been implicated
in both neuronal pathway and muscle attachment site selection (6,
7). To carry out these functions, H-Ryk must be able to transduce
a signalling cascade upon stimulation which leads to either
proliferation or differentiation. We demonstrate in this report the
activation of Erk1/2 and the downstream p90 Rsk3 kinase upon
stimulation of the TrkA:Ryk chimera with NGF, which is consistent with
the ability of Ryk to carry out these biological functions. However,
the intriguing question is how the kinase-impaired H-Ryk receptor is
able to transduce its signals to the MAPK pathway. One possibility may
be that H-Ryk uses members of the Src and Jak nonreceptor tyrosine
kinases to propagate its intracellular signals, analogous to the way
cytokine and T-cell receptors mediate their biological functions.
Unlike receptor tyrosine kinases, cytokine and T-cell receptors do not
have intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity but still retain the ability to
activate downstream signalling pathways by coupling to the Jak family
of cytoplasmic kinases and nonreceptor tyrosine kinases, respectively (13, 59, 79). However, analysis of the TrkA:Ryk immune
complexes revealed no presence of coimmunoprecipitating Jak 1, 2, or 3 or the nonreceptor tyrosine kinases Src and Lck after NGF induction of
the chimeric receptor-expressing cell line (data not shown). Further,
there were no temporal changes in phosphoproteins identified in the
chimeric TrkA:Ryk cell lysates upon ligand stimulation (Fig. 4A)
compared to basal levels.
A highly conserved feature of both serine-threonine and tyrosine
kinases is the invariant lysine residue, which is K334 in H-Ryk and is
located carboxyl terminal to the Gly-rich loop. This residue interacts
with the
and
phosphates of ATP and is critical for the proper
alignment of the triphosphate chain in the active site to promote the
in-line phosphotransfer reaction. Mutation of the invariant lysine
abolishes catalytic activity of kinases while only moderately reducing
the ability to bind ATP (19, 72). In our study, we
demonstrate that the K334A mutant chimeric receptor does not induce the
MAPK pathway. The simplest explanation of this result is that H-Ryk
retains very low autophosphorylation activity that is not detectable
under the present experimental conditions, which enables it to
transduce signals through the MAPK pathway. H-Ryk might phosphorylate a
specific substrate(s) which acts as an adapter or auxiliary protein in
the activation of downstream signalling pathways. It is tempting to
speculate that pp75 acts as a conduit between H-Ryk and the downstream
signalling components. This proposition is supported by the inability
of the TrkA:Ryk K334A chimera to coimmunoprecipitate pp75 and the concomitant loss of MAPK activation. However, until pp75 is identified and the nature of its association with H-Ryk is characterized, this
remains mere speculation. Alternatively, H-Ryk may transmit downstream
signals independent of receptor autophosphorylation. This possibility
is supported by the inability of the TrkA:Ryk chimeric receptor to bind
the nonhydrolyzable ATP analogue 5'-p-fluorosulfonylbenzoyl adenosine (FSBA) (data not shown). However, to our knowledge, no RTK
which is capable of inducing downstream signalling in the absence of
receptor autophosphorylation or catalytic activity has been identified.
Recently, the cyclin-dependent kinase-activating kinase in budding
yeast, Cak1p, has been shown to be functionally active in vitro and in
vivo despite mutation of the invariant lysine residue (11, 14,
75). This finding suggests that the invariant lysine residue in
Cak1p is not required for catalysis. It is possible that the effect of
the K334A mutation in the TrkA:Ryk chimera is to alter the compensated
structure of the catalytic domain of H-Ryk, inhibiting any interaction
with putative substrates. Further, for some functions such as the
muscle attachment site selection in the Drosophila homologue
Drl, the catalytic domain is not required (4a).
The impaired TrkA:Ryk catalytic activity suggests that in certain
cellular contexts, Ryk may use nonphosphorylation-dependent mechanisms
in vivo to couple Ryk activation to downstream pathways. The recently
characterized PDZ protein recognition module represents such a
mechanism. PDZ proteins are modular proteins that act as adapters by
selectively attaching through their PDZ domains to the C termini of
membrane receptors while also binding to signalling proteins via PDZ or
other protein modules (12). The C-terminal consensus
sequence X-Ser/Thr-X-Val-COOH, where Val-COOH represents the C-terminal
valine residue, was initially proposed for PDZ domains (37).
However, there appear to be additional determinants for binding, as
different PDZ domains can distinguish between binding partners
containing identical sequence motifs, and additional C-terminal motifs
such as V-K-I and Y-Y-V have also been shown to bind PDZ domains
(27, 66). The consensus sequence motif G-A-Y-V-COOH, which
is conserved in mouse and human Ryk, provides a potential PDZ binding
domain. The recent identification of a potential PDZ domain that binds
to the C terminus of the Drosophila Ryk homologue Drl
(62) in the consensus sequence T-R-Y-V-COOH suggests that a
similar mechanism may exist in mammals. This would either enable the
coupling of the receptor to downstream signalling pathways or cluster
the Ryk receptor in specific subcellular positions which contain its
substrates or are critical for its proper functioning.
Most RTKs are able to directly recruit the Grb2-Sos complex which is
central to the activation of the Ras/MAPK pathway upon stimulation.
However, the recruitment of the Grb2-Sos complex can also occur
indirectly via tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc as is the case for the
EGF receptor (50). Insulin stimulation, on the other hand,
leads to tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc and IRS1, and it is both of
these proteins that recruit the Grb2-Sos complex (58, 68).
The type I family of receptors, in contrast, extend their signalling
diversity by transphosphorylation of the kinase-impaired c-ErbB3, which
leads to the recruitment of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
(8). The kinase-impaired c-ErbB3 receptor therefore modulates signals of the type I family of receptors by
heterodimerization with c-ErbB2 and c-ErbB4, which are kinase active.
The mapping of Ryk to two distinct loci, Ryk-1 and
Ryk-2, on human chromosomes 3q11-22 and 17p13.3,
respectively, raises the possibility that there is a kinase-active
partner for the Ryk-1 locus cDNA analyzed in this study
(20, 69). If the Ryk-2 locus does harbor a
kinase-active partner, one would speculate that heterodimerization of
the two receptors would be sufficient to activate the MAPK pathway.
Whether the coimmunoprecipitating pp75 represents the Ryk-2
locus receptor remains to be determined, as the cDNA for
Ryk-2 has not been isolated. However, the inability of the
pp75 to cross-react with the Ryk polyclonal antibody 15.2 raises doubts
as to whether this protein is closely related to Ryk (data not shown).
Irrespective of the variation in specificity, the activation segment is
important in aligning the catalytic residues in the protein kinase
family. It has been previously demonstrated that the aspartate residue
of the tripeptide DFG motif in the activation segment is critical for
receptor autophosphorylation. Even relatively conservative mutations of
the aspartate residue to glutamate or asparagine in v-Fps yielded an
inactive kinase (47). In this study we have addressed the
role of both the Phe and Gly residues in receptor autophosphorylation.
The interaction between the Phe and Gly residues of the DFG tripeptide
and the second glycine of the nucleotide binding loop are particularly
important for correct orientation of the C- and N-terminal lobes and
hence the high degree of conservation of these residues in the protein
kinase family (29, 30, 46). In H-Ryk, the Asn residue in the
tripeptide motif DNA would probably be accommodated by outward movement
of the polar Asn side chain. This may result in the Asn interacting with the glutamine from the nucleotide binding motif
(QxGxxG). The net effect of the side chain replacements is
thus likely to be a congestion of the active-site cleft (Fig. 9). This
together with the Gly backbone changes is likely to produce a
disruption of the interdomain orientation. Restoration of either the
Phe or the Gly residue is sufficient to induce the catalytic activity of the H-Ryk receptor. Presumably, restoration of these residues allows
for proper orientation of the lobes, thereby enabling the receptor to
autophosphorylate. In particular, the N454F mutant apparently results
in the nonpolar residue Phe being buried in the active-site cleft,
which would correct the disruption of the interdomain orientation
brought about by the Asn residue. We speculate that the N454F mutant
restores the interaction of the Phe residue of the activation domain
with Gly residue of the nucleotide binding motif and subsequently the
proper orientation of this lobe. The Ala-to-Gly amino acid change is
often viewed as a conservative substitution owing to the similarity in
physicochemical properties. However, Gly residues, particularly those
that are highly conserved, play a structurally very important role in
proteins owing to their ability to adopt main chain
/
conformations forbidden to other amino acids, including alanine. The
A455G mutation would result in the adoption of a wider range of
backbone confirmations. Presumably the TrkA:Ryk A455G chimera adopts a
confirmation that results in the proper alignment of the two lobes,
thereby overcoming catalytic constraints brought about by the
alterations in this domain. Therefore, in addition to the critical Asp,
either the Phe or the Gly residue is required to maintain the proper
orientation of the two lobes, as demonstrated by the N454F and A455G
mutants in this study.
We have demonstrated that restoration of the Gly residue in the
nucleotide binding loop of H-Ryk does not restore the catalytic activity of the receptor. Although this mutation on its own is sufficient to affect the catalytic activity of the receptor, it is not
dominant enough to completely abolish its activity. This view is
supported by the study carried out by Hemmer et al., in which they
demonstrated that substitution of the first glycine in protein kinase A
caused a five- to eightfold reduction in ATP binding and a three- to
fivefold drop in catalytic activity (24). This is broadly
supported by sequence analysis and mutational studies which predicts a
gradation of functional importance of the three glycines (Gly 2
Gly
1 > Gly 3). Therefore, although the glutamine substitution is
expected to have an adverse effect on ATP binding and catalysis, this
amino acid alteration on its own does not account for the loss of
intrinsic kinase activity of the H-Ryk RTK. It is possible therefore
that although the Q307G mutant may affect ATP binding, it is unlikely
to have a significant effect on the overall catalytic activity due to
the mutations in the activation segment of the H-Ryk catalytic domain.
The arginine residue in the catalytic loop (IHRDLAARN)
represents one of the most invariant amino acid residues in the
tyrosine kinase family. In the cAMP kinase structure, the residue has
been implicated in the stabilization of the phosphorylated threonine
(39). However in the FGFR structure, stabilization of the
phosphorylated tyrosine is mediated by the conserved Pro residue 663 (Pro 475, H-Ryk) (46). Mutation of this residue to glutamine
in the IRK structure results in impaired kinase activity. In the
crystal structures of both the FGF and IRK receptors, the arginine
residue does not appear to play a role in catalysis. The results of
this study appear to support that finding as the K434R mutant does not
have any effect on the kinase activity of the H-Ryk receptor. The same
applies to the substitution of alanine with phenylalanine in subdomain
II of H-Ryk. In H-Ryk, the Ala-to-Phe change in subdomain II
(VFV/LK) of H-Ryk is likely accommodated by placement of the
Phe side chain in the same location as the Phe from DFG in other
kinases. The presence of the Phe residue in subdomain II appeared to
contribute to the bulking up of the active-site cleft in the
comparative model of the H-Ryk receptor (Fig. 9). However, restoration
of the alanine residue does not have an effect on the kinase activity
of the receptor. This residue does not compensate for the absent Phe
residue in the DFG mutant, as demonstrated by the lack of
phosphorylation of the wild-type TrkA:Ryk chimera.
In conclusion, this first detailed functional analysis of an atypical
receptor tyrosine kinase with impaired catalytic function suggests an
unusual mechanism by which signals can be transduced independent of
receptor autophosphorylation. Further, the results extend the
observation of the requirement of the DFG motif in substrate catalysis.
The focus of future investigations will be on characterizing the
mechanism by which Ryk transduces signals to downstream signalling
proteins and determining the tertiary structure of H-Ryk.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank M. Barbacid for generously providing the TrkA
MAb, TrkA cDNA, and TrkA-expressing stable cell line, E25-4-27. We are
grateful to Uri Saragovi for providing the N-terminal TrkA MAb and to
Mary Gregoriou and Mike Sternberg for helpful discussions on the
crystal model. We also acknowledge Chris Norbury, Julian Downward, and
Elisabeth Trivier for critical reading of the manuscript.
This work was supported by the Imperial Cancer Research Fund. R.M.K. is
a recipient of the Valerie Rosina Howell Fellowship.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Molecular
Oncology Laboratories, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Institute of
Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3
9DS, United Kingdom. Phone: (44) 01865 222 457. Fax: (44) 01865 222 431. E-mail: ganesan{at}icrf.icnet.uk.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Barker, P. A., and R. A. Murphy.
1992.
The nerve growth-factor receptor a multi-component system that mediates the actions of the neurotrophin family of proteins.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
110:1-15.
|
| 2.
|
Barton, G. J.
1993.
"ALSCRIPT" a tool to format multiple sequence alignments.
Protein Eng.
6:47-50.
|
| 3.
|
Barton, G. J.
1990.
Protein multiple sequence alignment and flexible pattern matching.
Methods Enzymol.
183:403-428.
|
| 4.
|
Bernstein, F. C.,
T. F. Koetzle,
G. J. Williams,
E. E. Meyer,
M. D. Brice,
J. R. Rodgers,
O. Kennard,
T. Shimanouchi, and M. Tasumi.
1977.
The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures.
J. Mol. Biol.
112:535-542.
|
| 4a.
| Bonkowsky, J. L., and J. B. Thomas. Personal
communication.
|
| 5.
|
Branden, C., and J. Tooze.
1991.
Introduction to protein structure.
Garland Publishing Inc., New York, N.Y.
|
| 6.
|
Callahan, C. A.,
J. L. Bonkovsky,
A. L. Scully, and B. J. Thomas.
1996.
derailed is required for muscle attachment site selection in Drosophila.
Development
127:2761-2767.
|
| 7.
|
Callahan, C. A.,
M. G. Muralidhar,
S. E. Lundgren,
A. L. Scully, and J. B. Thomas.
1995.
Control of neuronal pathway selection by a drosophila receptor protein-tyrosine kinase family member.
Nature
376:171-174.
|
| 8.
|
Carraway, K. L.,
S. P. Soltoff,
A. J. Diamonti, and L. C. Cantley.
1995.
Heregulin stimulates mitogenesis and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in mouse fibroblasts transfected with erbb2/neu and erbb3.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:7111-7116.
|
| 9.
|
Chen, C., and H. Okayama.
1987.
High-efficiency transformation of mammalian cells by plasmid DNA.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7:2745-2752.
|
| 10.
|
Chen, C., and H. Okayama.
1988.
A high efficient system for stably transforming cells with plasmid DNA.
BioTechniques
6:632-638.
|
| 11.
|
Chun, K. T., and M. G. Goebl.
1997.
Mutational analysis of Cak1p, an essential protein kinase that regulates cell cycle progression.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
256:365-375.
|
| 12.
|
Craven, S., and D. Bredt.
1998.
PDZ proteins organize synaptic signaling pathways.
Cell
93:495-498.
|
| 13.
|
Duplay, P.,
M. Thome,
F. Herve, and O. Acuto.
1994.
p56lck interacts via its src homology 2 domain with the ZAP-70 kinase.
J. Exp. Med.
179:1163-1172.
|
| 14.
|
Enke, D. A.,
P. Kaldis,
J. K. Holmes, and M. J. Solomon.
1999.
The CDK-activating kinase (Cak1p) from budding yeast has an unusual ATP-binding pocket.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:1949-1956.
|
| 15.
|
Fabian, J. R.,
D. K. Morrison, and I. O. Daar.
1993.
Required for Raf and MAP kinase function during the meiotic maturation of Xenopus oocytes.
J. Cell Biol.
122:645-652.
|
| 16.
|
Fabian, J. R.,
A. B. Vojtek,
J. A. Cooper, and D. K. Morrison.
1994.
A single amino acid change in Raf-1 inhibits Ras binding and alters Raf-1 function.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:5982-5986.
|
| 17.
|
Fedi, P.,
J. H. Pierce,
P. P. di Fiore, and M. H. Kraus.
1994.
Efficient coupling with phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, but not phospholipase C gamma or GTPase-activating protein, distinguishes ErbB-3 signaling from that of other ErbB/EGFR family members.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:492-500.
|
| 18.
|
Gale, N. W.,
S. J. Holland,
D. M. Valenzuela,
A. Flenniken,
L. Pan,
T. E. Ryan,
M. Henkemeyer,
M. Strebhardt,
K. Hirai, and D. G. Wilkinson.
1996.
Eph receptors and ligands comprise two major specificity subclasses and are reciprocally compartimentalized during embryogenesis.
Neuron
17:8-19.
|
| 19.
|
Gibbs, C. S., and M. J. Zoller.
1991.
Identification of electrostatic interactions that determine the phosphorylation site specificity of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase.
Biochemistry
30:5329-5334.
|
| 20.
|
Gough, N. M.,
S. Rakar,
C. M. Hovens, and A. Wilks.
1995.
Localization of two mouse genes encoding the protein tyrosine kinase receptor-related protein RYK.
Mamm. Genome
6:255-256.
|
| 21.
|
Gurniak, C. B., and L. J. Berg.
1996.
A new member of the Eph family of receptors that lacks protein tyrosine kinase activity.
Oncogene
13:777-786.
|
| 22.
|
Hanks, S. K., and T. Hunter.
1995.
The eukaryotic protein kinase superfamily: kinase (catalytic) domain structure and classification.
FASEB J.
9:576-596.
|
| 23.
|
Hanks, S. K.,
A. M. Quinn, and T. Hunter.
1988.
Conserved features and deduced phylogeny of the catalytic domains.
Science
241:42-52.
|
| 24.
|
Hemmer, W.,
M. McGlone,
I. Tsigelny, and S. S. Taylor.
1997.
Role of the glycine triad in the ATP-binding site of cAMP-dependent protein kinase.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:16946-16954.
|
| 25.
|
Ho, S. N.,
H. D. Hunt,
R. M. Horton,
J. K. Pullen, and L. R. Pease.
1989.
Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction.
Gene
77:51-59.
|
| 26.
|
Holland, S. J.,
N. W. Gale,
G. D. Gish,
R. A. Roth,
Z. Songyang,
L. C. Cantley,
M. Henkemeyer,
G. D. Yancopoulos, and T. Pawson.
1997.
Juxtamembrane tyrosine residues couple the Eph family receptor AphB2/Nuk to specific SH2 domain proteins in neuronal cells.
EMBO J.
16:3877-3888.
|
| 27.
|
Hoskins, R.,
A. Hajnal,
S. Harp, and S. Kim.
1996.
The C. elegans vulval induction gene lin-2 encodes a member of the MAGUK family of cell junction proteins.
Development
122:97-111.
|
| 28.
|
Hovens, C. M.,
S. A. Stacker,
A. C. Andres,
A. G. Harpur,
A. Ziemiecki, and A. F. Wilks.
1992.
RYK, a receptor tyrosine kinase-related molecule with unusual kinase domain motifs.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:11818-11822.
|
| 29.
|
Hubbard, S. R.
1997.
Crystal structure of the activated insulin receptor tyrosine kinase in complex with peptide substrate and ATP analog.
EMBO J.
16:5572-5581.
|
| 30.
|
Hubbard, S. R.,
L. Wei,
L. Ellis, and W. A. Hendrickson.
1994.
Crystal structure of the tyrosine kinase domain of the human insulin receptor.
Nature
372:746-754.
|
| 31.
|
Huber, L. J., and M. V. Chao.
1995.
A potential interaction of p75 and Trka NGF receptors revealed by affinity cross-linking and immunoprecipitation.
J. Neurosci. Res.
40:557-563.
|
| 32.
|
Iwama, A.,
K. Okano,
T. Sudo,
Y. Matsuda, and T. Suda.
1994.
Molecular cloning of a novel receptor tyrosine kinase gene, STK, derived from enriched hematopoietic stem cells.
Blood
83:3160-3169.
|
| 33.
|
Johnson, L. N.,
M. E. Noble, and D. J. Owen.
1996.
Active and inactive protein kinases: structural basis for regulation.
Cell
85:149-158.
|
| 34.
|
Kabsch, W., and C. Sander.
1983.
Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features.
Biopolymers
22:2577-2637.
|
| 35.
|
Katso, R.,
S. Manek,
S. Biddolph,
R. Whittaker,
F. Charnock,
M. Wells, and T. Ganesan.
1999.
Overexpression of H-Ryk in mouse fibroblasts confers transforming ability in vitro and in vivo: correlation with up-regulation in epithelial ovarian cancer.
Cancer Res.
59:2265-2270.
|
| 36.
|
Kelman, Z.,
D. Simon-Chazottes,
J. L. Guénet, and Y. Yarden.
1993.
The murine vik gene (chromosome 9) encodes a putative receptor with unique protein kinase motifs.
Oncogene
8:37-44.
|
| 37.
|
Kim, E.,
M. Niethammer,
A. Rothchild,
Y. Jan, and M. Sheng.
1995.
Clustering of the Shaker-type K+ channels by interaction with a family of membrane associated guanylate kinases.
Nature
378:85-88.
|
| 38.
|
Klein, R.,
S. Jing,
V. Nanduri,
E. O'Rourke, and M. Barbacid.
1991.
The trk proto-oncogene encodes a receptor for nerve growth factor.
Cell
65:189-197.
|
| 39.
|
Knighton, D. R.,
J. Zheng,
E. L. F. Ten,
V. A. Ashford,
N. H. Xuong,
S. S. Taylor, and J. M. Sowadski.
1991.
Crystal structure of the catalytic subunit of cyclic AMP dependent protein kinase.
Science
253:407-414.
|
| 40.
|
Larsson-Blomberg, L., and E. Dzierzak.
1994.
Isolation of tyrosine kinase related genes expressed in the early hematopoietic system.
FEBS Lett.
348:119-125.
|
| 41.
|
LeSauteur, L.,
S. Maliartchouk,
H. Le Jeune,
R. Quirion, and H. U. Saragovi.
1996.
Potent human p140-TrkA agonists derived from an anti-receptor monoclonal antibody.
J. Neurosci.
16:1308-1316.
|
| 42.
|
Maminta, M. L.,
K. L. Williams,
A. Nakagawara,
K. T. Enger,
C. Guo,
G. M. Brodeur, and T. F. Deuel.
1992.
Identification of a novel tyrosine kinase receptor-like molecule in neuroblastomas.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
189:1077-1083.
|
| 43.
|
Marshall, C. J.
1994.
MAP kinase kinase kinase, MAP kinase kinase and MAP kinase.
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
4:82-89.
|
| 44.
|
Martin-Zanca, D.,
R. Oskam,
G. Mitra,
T. Copeland, and M. Barbacid.
1989.
Molecular and biochemical characterization of the human trk proto-oncogene.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9:24-33.
|
| 45.
|
Masiakowski, P., and D. Carroll.
1992.
A novel family of cell surface receptors with tyrosine kinase-like domain.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:26181-26190.
|
| 46.
|
Mohammadi, M.,
J. Schlessinger, and S. R. Hubbard.
1996.
Structure of the FGF receptor tyrosine kinase domain reveals a novel autoinhibitory mechanism.
Cell
86:577-587.
|
| 47.
|
Moran, M. F.,
C. A. Koch,
I. Sadowski, and T. Pawson.
1988.
Mutational analysis of a phosphotransfer motif essential for v-fps tyrosine kinase activity.
Oncogene
3:665-672.
|
| 48.
|
Mossie, K.,
B. Jallal,
F. Alves,
I. Sures,
G. D. Plowman, and A. Ullrich.
1995.
Colon carcinoma kinase-4 defines a new subclass of the receptor tyrosine kinase family.
Oncogene
11:2179-2184.
|
| 49.
|
Mothe, I.,
S. Tartare,
A. Kowalskichauvel,
P. Kaliman,
E. Vanobberghen, and R. Ballotti.
1995.
Tyrosine kinase-activity of a chimeric insulin-like-growth-factor-1 receptor-containing the insulin-receptor C-terminal domain comparison with the tyrosine kinase-activities of the insulin and insulin-like-growth-factor-1 receptors using a cell-free system.
Eur. J. Biochem.
228:842-848.
|
| 50.
|
Okabayashi, Y.,
Y. Kido,
T. Okutani,
Y. Sugimoto,
K. Sakaguchi, and M. Kasuga.
1994.
Tyrosines 1148 and 1173 of activated human epidermal growth factor receptors are binding sites of Shc in intact cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:18674-18678.
|
| 51.
|
Partanen, J.,
T. P. Makela,
R. Alitalo,
H. Lehvaslaiho, and K. Alitalo.
1990.
Putative tyrosine kinases expressed in K-562 human leukemia cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:8913-8917.
|
| 52.
|
Paul, S. R.,
D. Merberg,
H. Finnerty,
G. E. Morris,
J. C. Morris,
S. S. Jones,
R. Kriz,
K. J. Turner, and C. R. Wood.
1992.
Molecular cloning of the cDNA encoding a receptor tyrosine kinase-related molecule with a catalytic region homologous to c-met.
Int. J. Cell Cloning
10:309-314.
|
| 53.
|
Pawson, T., and G. D. Gish.
1992.
SH2 and SH3 domains from structure to function.
Cell
71:359-362.
|
| 54.
|
Peitsch, M. C.
1995.
Protein modelling by E-mail.
BioTechnology
13:658-660.
|
| 55.
|
Perrimon, N.
1994.
Signalling pathways initiated by receptor protein tyrosine kinases in Drosophila.
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
6:260-266.
|
| 56.
|
Ponder, J. W., and F. M. Richards.
1987.
Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes.
J. Mol. Biol.
193:775-791.
|
| 57.
|
Potworowski, E. F., and C. Beauchemin.
1996.
Expression of protein tyrosine kinases in the murine thymus stroma.
Immunol. Lett.
50:65-69.
|
| 58.
|
Pronk, G. J.,
J. Mcglades,
G. Pelicci,
T. Pawson, and J. L. Bos.
1993.
Insulin-induced phosphorylation of the 46- and 52-kDa Shc proteins.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:5748-5753.
|
| 59.
|
Ravichandran, K. S., and S. J. Burakoff.
1994.
The adapter protein Shc interacts with the interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor upon IL-2 stimulation.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:1599-1602.
|
| 60.
|
Reichman, F. M.,
B. Dickson,
E. Hafen, and B. Z. Shilo.
1994.
Elucidation of the role of breathless, a Drosophila FGF receptor homolog, in tracheal cell migration.
Genes Dev.
8:428-439.
|
| 61.
|
Russell, R. B., and G. J. Barton.
1992.
Multiple protein sequence alignment from tertiary structure comparison: assignment of global and residue confidence levels.
Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet.
14:309-323.
|
| 62.
|
Schneider, S.,
M. Buchert,
O. Georgiev,
B. Catimel,
M. Halford,
S. Stacker,
T. Baechi,
K. Moelling, and C. Hovens.
1999.
Mutagenesis and selection of PDZ domains that bind new protein targets.
Nat. Biotechnol.
17:170-175.
|
| 63.
|
Serfas, M. S., and A. L. Tyner.
1998.
Ryk is expressed in a differentiation-specific manner in epithelial tissues and is strongly induced in decidualizing uterine stroma.
Oncogene
17:3435-3444.
|
| 64.
|
Shrivastava, A.,
C. Radziejewski,
E. Campbell,
L. Kovac,
M. McGglynn,
T. Ryan,
S. Davis,
M. Goldfarb,
D. Glass,
G. Lemke, and G. Yancopoulos.
1997.
An orphan receptor tyrosine kinase family whose members serve as nonintegrin collagen receptors.
Mol. Cell
1:25-34.
|
| 65.
|
Simoneaux, D. K.,
F. A. Fletcher,
R. Jurecic,
H. G. Shilling,
N. T. Van,
P. Patel, and J. W. Belmont.
1995.
The receptor tyrosine kinase-related gene (ryk) demonstrates lineage and stage-specific expression in hematopoietic cells.
J. Immunol.
154:1157-1166.
|
| 66.
|
Simske, J.,
S. Kaech,
S. Harp, and S. Kim.
1996.
Let-23 receptor localisation by the cell junction protein LIN-7 during C. elegans vulval induction.
Cell
85:195-204.
|
| 67.
|
Siyanova, E. Y.,
M. S. Serfas,
I. A. Mazo, and A. L. Tyner.
1994.
Tyrosine kinase gene expression in the mouse small intestine.
Oncogene
9:2053-2057.
|
| 68.
|
Skolnik, E. Y.,
C. H. Lee,
A. Batzer,
L. M. Vicentini,
M. Zhou,
R. Daly,
M. J. Myers,
J. M. Backer,
A. Ullrich, and M. F. White.
1993.
The sh2 sh3 domain-containing protein grb2 interacts with tyrosine-phosphorylated irs1 and shc implications for insulin control of ras signaling.
EMBO J.
12:1929-1936.
|
| 69.
|
Stacker, S. A.,
C. M. Hovens,
A. Vitali,
M. A. Pritchard,
E. Baker,
G. R. Sutherland, and A. F. Wilks.
1993.
Molecular cloning and chromosomal localisation of the human homologue of a receptor related to tyrosine kinases (RYK).
Oncogene
8:1347-1356.
|
| 70.
|
Stark, K. L.,
J. A. McMahon, and A. P. McMahon.
1991.
FGFR-4, a new member of the fibroblast growth factor receptor family, expressed in the definitive endoderm and skeletal muscle lineages of the mouse.
Development
113:641-651.
|
| 71.
|
Tamagnone, L.,
J. Partanen,
E. Armstrong,
J. Lasota,
K. Ohgami,
T. Tazunoki,
S. LaForgia,
K. Huebner, and K. Alitalo.
1993.
The human ryk cDNA sequence predicts a protein containing two putative transmembrane segments and a tyrosine kinase catalytic domain.
Oncogene
8:2009-2014.
|
| 72.
|
Taylor, S. S.,
D. R. Knighton,
J. Zheng,
J. M. Sowadski,
C. S. Gibbs, and M. J. Zoller.
1993.
A template for the protein kinase family.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
18:84-89.
|
| 73.
|
Taylor, W. R.
1986.
The classification of amino acid conservation.
J. Theor. Biol.
119:205-208.
|
| 74.
|
Thompson, J. D.,
D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson.
1994.
CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:4673-4680.
|
| 75.
|
Thuret, J. Y.,
J. G. Valay,
G. Faye, and C. Mann.
1996.
Civ1 (CAK in vivo), a novel Cdk-activating kinase.
Cell
86:565-576.
|
| 76.
|
Vogel, W.,
G. D. Gish,
F. Alves, and T. Pawson.
1997.
The discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinases are activated by collagen.
Mol. Cell
1:13-23.
|
| 77.
|
Wang, X. C.,
R. Katso,
R. Butler,
A. M. Hanby,
R. Poulsom,
T. Jones,
D. Sheer, and T. S. Ganesan.
1996.
H-RYK, an unusual receptor kinase: isolation and analysis of expression in ovarian cancer.
Mol. Med.
2:189-203.
|
| 78.
|
Weiner, H. L.,
M. Rothman,
D. C. Miller, and E. B. Ziff.
1996.
Pediatric brain tumors express multiple receptor tyrosine kinases including novel cell adhesion kinases.
Pediatr. Neurosurg.
25:64-71.
|
| 79.
|
Wilks, A., and A. Harpur.
1994.
Cytokine signal transduction and the Jak family of protein tyrosine kinases.
Bioessays
16:313-319.
|
| 80.
|
Wilson, C.,
C. I. Goberdhan, and H. Steller.
1993.
Dror, apotential neurotrophic receptor gene, encodes a Drosophila homolog of the vertebrate Ror family of Trk-related receptor tyrosine kinases.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:7190-7113.
|
| 81.
|
Yee, K.,
T. R. Bishop,
C. Mather, and L. I. Zon.
1993.
Isolation of a novel receptor tyrosine kinase cDNA expressed by developing erythroid progenitors.
Blood
82:1335-1343.
|
| 82.
|
Zhao, Y.,
C. Bjorbaek, and D. Moller.
1996.
Regulation and interaction of pp90rsk isoforms with mitogen activated protein kinases.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:29773-29779.
|
| 83.
|
Zhao, Y.,
C. Bjorbaek,
S. Weremowicz,
C. Morton, and D. Moller.
1995.
RSK3 encodes a novel pp90rsk isoform with a unique N-terminal sequence: growth factor-stimulated kinase function and nuclear translocation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:4353-4363.
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, September 1999, p. 6427-6440, Vol. 19, No. 9
0270-7306/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Lyu, J., Wesselschmidt, R. L., Lu, W.
(2009). Cdc37 Regulates Ryk Signaling by Stabilizing the Cleaved Ryk Intracellular Domain. J. Biol. Chem.
284: 12940-12948
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wouda, R. R., Bansraj, M. R. K. S., de Jong, A. W. M., Noordermeer, J. N., Fradkin, L. G.
(2008). Src family kinases are required for WNT5 signaling through the Derailed/RYK receptor in the Drosophila embryonic central nervous system. Development
135: 2277-2287
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Castells, E., Casacuberta, J. M.
(2007). Signalling through kinase-defective domains: the prevalence of atypical receptor-like kinases in plants. J Exp Bot
0: erm226v1-erm226
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Palefsky, J.
(2006). Biology of HPV in HIV Infection. ADR
19: 99-105
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Almeida, M., Han, L., Bellido, T., Manolagas, S. C., Kousteni, S.
(2005). Wnt Proteins Prevent Apoptosis of Both Uncommitted Osteoblast Progenitors and Differentiated Osteoblasts by {beta}-Catenin-dependent and -independent Signaling Cascades Involving Src/ERK and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/AKT. J. Biol. Chem.
280: 41342-41351
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chevalier, D., Batoux, M., Fulton, L., Pfister, K., Yadav, R. K., Schellenberg, M., Schneitz, K.
(2005). STRUBBELIG defines a receptor kinase-mediated signaling pathway regulating organ development in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
102: 9074-9079
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cheyette, B. N. R.
(2004). Ryk: Another Heretical Wnt Receptor Defies the Canon. Sci Signal
2004: pe54-pe54
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Llompart, B., Castells, E., Rio, A., Roca, R., Ferrando, A., Stiefel, V., Puigdomenech, P., Casacuberta, J. M.
(2003). The Direct Activation of MIK, a Germinal Center Kinase (GCK)-like Kinase, by MARK, a Maize Atypical Receptor Kinase, Suggests a New Mechanism for Signaling through Kinase-dead Receptors. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 48105-48111
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Murai, K. K., Pasquale, E. B.
(2003). `Eph'ective signaling: forward, reverse and crosstalk. J. Cell Sci.
116: 2823-2832
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Trivier, E., Ganesan, T. S.
(2002). RYK, a Catalytically Inactive Receptor Tyrosine Kinase, Associates with EphB2 and EphB3 but Does Not Interact with AF-6. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 23037-23043
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lee, H., Akita, R. W., Sliwkowski, M. X., Maihle, N. J.
(2001). A Naturally Occurring Secreted Human ErbB3 Receptor Isoform Inhibits Heregulin-stimulated Activation of ErbB2, ErbB3, and ErbB4. Cancer Res.
61: 4467-4473
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Marron, M. B., Hughes, D. P., Edge, M. D., Forder, C. L., Brindle, N. P. J.
(2000). Evidence for Heterotypic Interaction between the Receptor Tyrosine Kinases TIE-1 and TIE-2. J. Biol. Chem.
275: 39741-39746
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yoshikawa, S., Bonkowsky, J. L., Kokel, M., Shyn, S., Thomas, J. B.
(2001). The Derailed Guidance Receptor Does Not Require Kinase Activity In Vivo. J. Neurosci.
21: RC119-RC119
[Abstract]
[Full Text]