Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, January 2000, p. 126-138, Vol. 20, No. 1
0270-7306/0/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
IRS-4 Mediates Protein Kinase B Signaling during
Insulin Stimulation without Promoting Antiapoptosis
Tohru
Uchida,
Martin G.
Myers Jr., and
Morris F.
White*
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Joslin
Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215
Received 15 March 1999/Returned for modification 21 May
1999/Accepted 27 September 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Insulin receptor substrate (IRS) proteins are tyrosine
phosphorylated and mediate multiple signals during activation of the receptors for insulin, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), and various cytokines. In order to distinguish common and unique functions of IRS-1, IRS-2, and IRS-4, we expressed them individually in 32D
myeloid progenitor cells containing the human insulin receptor (32DIR). Insulin promoted the association of Grb-2 with
IRS-1 and IRS-4, whereas IRS-2 weakly bound Grb-2; consequently, IRS-1
and IRS-4 enhanced insulin-stimulated mitogen-activated protein kinase
activity. During insulin stimulation, IRS-1 and IRS-2 strongly bound
p85
/
, which activated phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase, protein
kinase B (PKB)/Akt, and p70s6k, and promoted the
phosphorylation of BAD. IRS-4 also promoted the activation of PKB/Akt
and BAD phosphorylation during insulin stimulation; however, it weakly
bound or activated p85-associated PI 3-kinase and failed to mediate the
activation of p70s6k. Insulin strongly inhibited apoptosis
of interleukin-3 (IL-3)-deprived 32DIR cells expressing
IRS-1 or IRS-2 but failed to inhibit apoptosis of cells expressing
IRS-4. Consequently, 32DIR cells expressing IRS-4
proliferated slowly during insulin stimulation. Thus, the activation of
PKB/Akt and BAD phosphorylation might not be sufficient to inhibit the
apoptosis of IL-3-deprived 32DIR cells unless
p85-associated PI 3-kinase or p70s6k are strongly activated.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Insulin receptor substrate (IRS)
proteins play a central role in signal transduction by the receptors
for insulin, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), and a growing number
of cytokines and integrins (19, 34, 58). IRS proteins are
composed of an NH2-terminal pleckstrin homology (PH) domain
and a phosphotyrosine binding (PTB) domain, followed by a COOH-terminal
tail containing multiple tyrosine phosphorylation motifs
(48). The PH and PTB domains are well conserved in each IRS
protein and have a common tertiary structure but function differently
to couple IRS proteins to the activated insulin receptor (10, 26,
57). PH domains are thought to bind membrane phospholipids or
acidic motifs of various proteins, whereas the PTB domain interacts
with the phosphorylated NPEY motif in the juxtamembrane region of the
insulin receptor
-subunit; both interactions promote tyrosine
phosphorylation of multiple tyrosine residues in the COOH terminus. The
COOH terminus is poorly conserved among the IRS proteins; in IRS-1 (the
first cloned and best-characterized IRS protein) it contains 18 potential tyrosine phosphorylation sites in amino acid sequence motifs
that directly bind to Src homology-2 domains in several proteins,
including phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase regulatory subunits
(p85
, p55
p50
, p85
, and p55PIK), Grb-2, Nck,
c-fyn, and SHP-2 (58). The other IRS proteins contain common
and unique phosphorylation motifs, suggesting that they mediate
overlapping and distinct biological signals. One region of predicted
overlap in the signals mediated by IRS-1, IRS-2, and IRS-4 is the
binding and activation of PI 3-kinase; a conspicuous example of
dissimilarity is the absence of SHP-2 binding motifs in IRS-4.
PI 3-kinase is a heterodimeric signaling enzyme composed of a catalytic
subunit (p110) associated with an SH2 domain-containing regulatory
subunit (e.g., p55PIK, p85
, and p85
) that binds to
tyrosine-phosphorylated YXXM motifs on signaling proteins. Since all of
the IRS proteins contain numerous YXXM motifs, they are all expected to
bind and activate p85-associated PI 3-kinase. The lipid products of PI
3-kinase mediate the activation of several serine/threonine kinases,
including PDK1/PDK2, protein kinase B (PKB)/Akt, PKC
and
PKC
, p70s6k, and others (3, 29, 32, 52, 53).
These serine/threonine kinases play various roles in the regulation of
the many biological responses linked to the activation of PI 3-kinase,
including activation of glucose transport and glycogen synthesis,
protein synthesis, lipogenesis and antilipolysis, and mitogenesis and
antiapoptosis (12, 14, 16, 22, 38).
In vivo and in vitro experiments reveal important differences in the
signaling capacity of IRS-1 and IRS-2. IRS-1 and IRS-2 display
differential sensitivities for binding various SH2 proteins (46). Moreover, IRS-2 expressed in fibroblasts lacking IRS-1 does not reconstitute normal insulin-IGF-1 signaling (9).
Mice lacking IRS-1 are small and mildly insulin resistant but never develop diabetes (5). In contrast, mice lacking IRS-2 are
insulin resistant with abnormal glucose tolerance at birth and
progressively develop fasting hyperglycemia with reduced
-cell mass
(54; D. J. Withers, D. J. Burks, H. H. Towery, S. L. Altamuro, C. L. Flint, and M. F. White,
unpublished data). Together, these results suggest that IRS-2 is
critical for normal carbohydrate metabolism and that IRS-1 is important
for somatic cell growth (55). Previous results suggest that
IRS-4 has similar signaling potential to IRS-1 and IRS-2; however, our
results with 32DIR cells revealed that IRS-4 activates
PKB/Akt and promotes BAD phosphorylation without the activation of
p70s6k or the inhibition of apoptosis. These differences
might have important consequences for the specific tissues that express
IRS-4.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cloning of human IRS-4.
To isolate the gene encoding IRS-4,
a 540-bp DNA fragment of IRS-4 was amplified by RT-PCR with total RNA
extracted from HEK293 cells. The sense and antisense primers were
5'-CCGCTCGAGCCGGGAGGCT-3' (nucleotides 1171 to 1193) and
5'-ATCTCTAGAGCACTGGTTTC-3' (nucleotides 1703 to 1722),
respectively. The nucleotide numbers used here correspond to the
numbering used by Lavan et al. (24). This DNA fragment was
labeled with [
-32P]dCTP and used to screen a human
fibroblast genomic library (Stratagene). Four independent clones were
obtained, and a 4.5-kb portion of EcoRI DNA fragment was
subcloned into pBluescript II for subsequent sequencing. Sequence
analysis revealed that human IRS-4 had no introns like IRS-1 and IRS-2
and that this EcoRI fragment contained the full length of
the coding region.
Cell culture.
32D cell lines were cultured in RPMI 1640 containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 5% WEHI-3-conditioned
RPMI 1640 medium as a source of interleukin-3 (IL-3). 32DIR
cells expressing IRS-1, IRS-2, or IRS-4 cell lines were maintained in
the same medium containing, in addition, 5 mM histidinol (Bachem Bioscience, Inc.). HEK293 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% FBS.
Generation of 32D cell line.
32DIR cells and
32DIR cells expressing IRS-1 and IRS-2 are described
elsewhere (48). A 4.5-kb EcoRI fragment of IRS-4
was inserted into pCMVhis expression vector, and then 10 µg of purified vector was used to transfect 5 × 106
32DIR cells by electroporation. Antibiotic-resistant cells
were selected in the RPMI 1640 containing 5 mM histidinol for 10 days.
Resistant colonies were then expanded and screened for protein
expression by Western blotting.
Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting.
Anti-IRS-4
polyclonal antibodies were raised against the carboxyl-terminal 17 amino acids of human IRS-4 (MDFARRDNQFDSPKRGR) coupled to keyhole
limpet hemocyanin. The antibodies immunoprecipitated and immunoblotted
both endogenous and recombinant IRS-4 from HEK293 cells and
32DIR/IRS-4 cells without any cross-reactivity with IRS-1
or IRS-2 (data not shown). Phospho-PKB/Akt polyclonal antibodies and
phospho-BAD polyclonal antibodies (Ser112) were purchased from New
England Biolabs (numbers 9271 and 9291, respectively). PY20 monoclonal antiphosphotyrosine antibody was purchased from Transduction
Laboratories (P11120). Polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies against
Grb-2 (C-23), PKB/Akt (C-20), BAD (C-20), 14-3-3 (H-8), and Bcl-2 (C-2)
were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Polyclonal antibodies against insulin receptor, p85 PI 3-Kpan, p85 PI 3-K
, p85
PI 3-K
, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and
p70s6k were as described elsewhere (59).
Each cell line (108 cells) was serum starved in 10 ml of
RPMI 1640 in a 50-ml conical tube for 4 h. The cells were treated with or without insulin, and ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)
was added to stop the reaction. The cells were collected by
centrifugation and then lysed in 1 ml of TNE lysis buffer (50 mM
Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 5 mM EDTA, 5% glycerol, 10 µg leupeptin per ml, 10 µg of aprotinin per ml, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF], and 2 mM sodium vanadate).
Then, 10-mm plates of HEK293 cells were serum starved in 10 ml of DMEM
for 4 h, treated with or without insulin, and lysed as described
above. Insoluble material was removed by centrifugation, and the
resulting supernatants were subjected to immunoprecipitation at 4°C
for 2 h. Immune complex was collected and washed with TNE lysis
buffer three times and then resuspended in 2 × sodium dodecyl
sulfate (SDS) sample buffer. Proteins were separated by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and transferred to
Protran nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher & Schuell). The blots were
blocked with 5% skim milk in TBST buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4],
150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20) and then incubated with antibodies in
TBST containing 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA), followed by incubation
with either secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase
or 125I-protein A. The immunoreactive bands were visualized
by either enhanced chemiluminescence or a Bio-Rad Molecular Imager.
PI 3-kinase assay.
32D cell lines treated with or without
insulin for 1 min were lysed in 1 ml of PI 3-kinase lysis buffer (20 mM
Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 137 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM
CaCl2, 10% glycerol, 1% NP-40, 10 µg of leupeptin per
ml, 10 µg of aprotinin per ml, 1 mM PMSF, and 2 mM sodium vanadate)
and immunoprecipitated. The resulting immune complex was washed with
PBS containing 1% NP-40 and 2 mM sodium vanadate (three times); 100 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) containing 500 mM LiCl and 2 mM sodium vanadate
(three times); and 10 mM Tris-HCl containing 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA,
and 1 mM sodium vanadate (twice). The pellets were resuspended in 60 µl of 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) containing 100 mM NaCl and 1 mM EDTA
and then combined with 10 µl of 100 mM MgCl2 and 10 µl
of a 2-µg/ml concentration of PI (Avanti) sonicated in 10 mM Tris-HCl
(pH 7.4) containing 1 mM EGTA. The phosphorylation reaction was started
by adding 5 µl of 65 µM ATP containing 3 µCi of
[
-32P]ATP. After 15 min at room temperature, the
reaction was stopped with 20 µl of 8 N HCl and 160 µl of
CHCl3-methanol (1:1). The samples were centrifuged, and the
lower organic phase was applied to a silica gel thin-layer
chromatography (TLC) plate (Merck). TLC plates were developed in
CHCl3-CH3OH-H2O-NH4OH
(60:47:11.3:2), dried, and visualized and quantified on a Bio-Rad
Molecular Imager.
PKB/Akt kinase activity assay.
32D cell lines were serum
starved 4 h, followed by stimulation with 100 nM insulin for 30 min. Cells were lysed in 1 ml of Akt lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH
7.4], 5 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, 10 mM
Na4P2O7, 100 mM NaF, 2 mM sodium
vanadate, 1 mM PMSF, 10 µg of aprotinin per ml, and 10 µg of
leupeptin per ml). Then, 1.5 mg of total protein was subjected to
immunoprecipitation with anti-Akt polyclonal antibodies for 1 h at
4°C. Immune complexes were washed three times in Akt lysis buffer and
twice in kinase buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 10 mM
MgCl2, and 1 mM dithiothreitol [DTT]). The in vitro
kinase reaction was performed in 30 µl of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4)
containing 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 1 mg of BSA per ml, 50 µM ATP, 1 µM protein kinase inhibitor (Sigma), 0.2 mg of histone
2B, and 3 µCi of [
-32P]dATP at room temperature for
15 min. Reactions were stopped by adding 10 µl of 5 × SDS
sample buffer and then boiled for 5 min. Supernatants were
electrophoresed on SDS-15% gel, and the radioactivity incorporated
into substrate was determined by using a Bio-Rad Molecular Imager.
MAPK and p70s6k activity assay.
The cells were
stimulated with or without insulin for 5 min (MAPK activity) or 30 min
(p70s6k) and then lysed in 10 mM KPO4 (pH 7.05)
containing 0.5% NP-40, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 10 mM MgCl2,
2 mM DTT, 50 mM
-glycerophosphate, 2 mM sodium vanadate, 1 mM PMSF,
10 µg of aprotinin per ml, and 10 µg of leupeptin per ml. The
supernatant was subjected to immunoprecipitation with polyclonal
antibodies against MAPK or p70s6k. After being washed with
buffer A (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.2], 1% NP-40, 0.5% deoxycholate, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM sodium vanadate, 2 mM DTT) twice and buffer B
(10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.2], 0.1% NP-40, 1 M NaCl, 1 mM sodium
vanadate, 2 mM DTT) twice, the immunoprecipitates were incubated for 15 min at room temperature in a reaction mixture (30 µl) containing 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.2), 10 mM MgCl2, 3 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 1 mg of BSA (MAPK) per ml, 50 µM cold ATP, and 3 µCi of
[
-32P]ATP. A total of 67 µg of MBP (MAPK) per ml or
250 µM S6 kinase substrate peptide (Upstate Biotech, Inc.) was used
as a substrate. After the reaction was stopped with 10 µl of 5× SDS
sample buffer (MAPK) or 10 µl of stop buffer (S6 kinase, 1% BSA, 1 mM ATP, 0.6% HCl), the resulting supernatants (20 µl) were resolved
by electrophoresis on an SDS-12% gel (MAPK) or transferred to P81
filter paper (S6 kinase; Whatman, Hillsboro, Oreg.), followed by
extensive washing in 75 mM phosphoric acid. Radioactivity incorporated
into the substrate was determined by using the Bio-Rad Molecular Imager (MAPK) or by scintillation counting (S6 kinase).
[3H]thymidine incorporation assay.
The cells
in log-phase growth were washed twice in RPMI 1640 containing 10% FBS,
and 2 × 105 cells were incubated in 1 ml of RPMI 1640 containing 10% in the absence or presence of various concentration of
insulin or 5% WEHI for 48 h. [3H]thymidine (0.5 mCi; ICN) was spiked into the medium and incubated for 3 h. The
cells were collected onto glass microfiber filters and washed three
times with water to remove unincorporated nucleotide. Incorporation of
labeled thymidine into DNA was quantitated by liquid scintillation counting.
Gel fragmentation assay.
Cells (5 × 106)
in log-phase growth were incubated for 18 h in RPMI 1640 containing either 10% FBS with IL-3 (5% WEHI supplement) or 10% FBS
with the indicated insulin doses. Cells were lysed in 400 µl of Apo
lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 10 mM EDTA, 0.2% Triton
X-100), and then insoluble material was removed by centrifugation. The
resulting supernatant was extracted once with an equal volume of phenol
and once with phenol-chloroform (1:1). Fragmented DNA was collected by
ethanol precipitation in the presence of glycogen carrier and then
treated with RNase at 37°C for 30 min. Samples were loaded onto a
1.5% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. The relative
intensity of DNA bands was determined by using Molecular Analyst
(Bio-Rad).
 |
RESULTS |
Isolation of the human IRS-4 open reading frame (ORF) and
expression in 32DIR cells.
IRS-1, IRS-2, and IRS-4
have similar structures, including an NH2-terminal PH
domain and a PTB domain, and multiple tyrosine phosphorylation sites
that are expected to bind the SH2 domain of various signaling proteins
(Fig. 1). Although the structural similarities suggest that IRS-1, IRS-2, and IRS-4 have certain common
functions, recent observations suggest divergent signaling roles for
each IRS protein. For instance, the number and type of SH2
domain-binding motifs differ among the IRS proteins, and mice null for
IRS-1, IRS-2, or IRS-4 display radically different phenotypes
(54). Moreover, IRS-1 and IRS-2 are expressed ubiquitously in human tissues (8), whereas human IRS-4 is expressed
mainly in pituitary and thyroid glands and detected at lower levels in brain, spinal cord, trachea, and lymph nodes (Fig.
2A). IRS-4 transcripts were almost
undetectable in the major insulin-sensitive tissues, suggesting that
IRS-4 plays a unique physiologic role.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Schematic diagram of various landmarks in the IRS-1,
IRS-2, and IRS-4. The PH domain and the PTB domain are shown. Tyrosine
phosphorylation sites are indicated and, where appropriate, the
sequence around the site is shown to indicate presumed binding sites
for specific SH2 proteins.
|
|

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
IRS-4 mRNA expression in various tissues and protein
expression in HEK293 cells and 32DIR cells. (A) Tissue
distribution of IRS-4 transcripts was analyzed by Northern blotting. A
genomic DNA insert (nucleotides 1714 to 3220) was used as a probe for
analysis of human poly(A)+ RNA blot (Clontech Laboratories)
according to the manufacturer's instructions. (B) 32D cells lysates,
expressing insulin receptor (32DIR) or IRS-4
(32DIR/IRS-4), or HEK293 cell lysates were analyzed by
immunoblotting by using anti-IRS-4 polyclonal antibodies. (C) One clone
of 32DIR or 32DIR/IRS-2 cells, two different
clones of 32DIR/IRS-1 cells, and four different clones of
32DIR/IRS-4 cell lysates were immunoblotted with the
indicated antibodies. (D) The indicated cell lines were incubated with
or without 100 nM insulin for 1 min. Cell lysates were immunoblotted
with antiphosphotyrosine monoclonal antibody PY20.
|
|
Because they contain few insulin receptors and no endogenous IRS
proteins, 32D myeloid progenitor cells provide an ideal system for
comparing the signaling potential of IRS-1, IRS-2, and IRS-4 (51). Stable 32D cell lines expressing insulin receptors
alone (32DIR) or together with IRS-1
(32DIR/IRS-1) or IRS-2 (32DIR/IRS-2) were
described previously (48). We subcloned the human IRS-4 ORF
into the mammalian expression vector pCMVhis and introduced
it into 32DIR cells (32DIR/IRS-4). Following
selection of histidinol-resistant clones, IRS-4 expression was
determined by immunoblotting with
IRS-4 (Fig. 2B). While
32DIR cells expressed no IRS-4, a 160-kDa
IRS-4-reactive
protein, which comigrated with endogenous IRS-4 from HEK293 cells, was detected in 32DIR/IRS-4 cells. Four independent
32DIR/IRS-4 clones were selected for further study based on
apparently equal expression levels compared to IRS-1 and IRS-2 (Fig.
2C). Using the selected cell lines, insulin stimulated approximately equal amounts of tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1, IRS-2, and IRS-4
(Fig. 2D). Since the number of predicted tyrosine phosphorylation sites
of each IRS protein was similar, the protein expression level of each
IRS protein was thought to be comparable.
Insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of IRS proteins in
32DIR cells.
We analyzed specific IRS protein
immunoprecipitates from insulin-stimulated 32DIR cell lines
or HEK293 cells by immunoblotting with PY20 in order to compare their
rates of tyrosine phosphorylation. IRS-1, IRS-2, and IRS-4 were all
maximally tyrosine phosphorylated during the first minute of insulin
stimulation, with half-maximal phosphorylation occurring at or near a 1 nM insulin concentration (Fig. 3A and B).
During prolonged insulin stimulation, the tyrosine phosphorylation of
IRS-1 and IRS-2 decreased somewhat, whereas the tyrosine
phosphorylation of IRS-4 remained elevated during 30 min of stimulation
in both 32DIR and HEK293 cells. Furthermore, the migration
of IRS-1 and IRS-2 during SDS-PAGE was progressively retarded during
insulin stimulation, whereas the migration of IRS-4 did not change in
either 32DIR or HEK293 cells (Fig. 3A). The retarded
migration of IRS-1 and IRS-2 was attributed previously to increased
insulin-stimulated serine phosphorylation, which may inhibit tyrosine
phosphorylation and reduce downstream signaling by IRS proteins
(18, 21). Thus, IRS-4 may be less sensitive to heterologous
serine phosphorylation than IRS-1 and IRS-2.

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Insulin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1,
IRS-2, and IRS-4 and their association with p85 PI-3 kinase. (A)
32DIR/IRS-1, 32DIR/IRS-2,
32DIR/IRS-4, and HEK293 cells were stimulated by 100 nM
insulin for the indicated time intervals. Cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated with the indicated antibodies and immunoblotted with
PY20 (upper panel), anti-IRS protein antibodies (middle panel), and
anti-p85 PI 3-Kpan antibodies (lower panel). (B) Each cell
line was incubated with the indicated dose of insulin for 1 min. Cell
lysates were immunoprecipitated and immunoblotted as described above.
(C and D) Relative increase in p85 associated with each IRS protein was
estimated by phosphorimager analysis. Symbols: ,
32DIR/IRS-1-a; , 32DIR/IRS-2; and ,
32DIR/IRS-4-a and 32DIR/IRS-4-b, respectively;
, HEK293. These results are representative of at least three
experiments.
|
|
Insulin-stimulated association of IRS proteins with PI
3-kinase.
Activation of PI 3-kinase by insulin regulates a variety
of metabolic and mitogenic effects (41). The binding of p85
isoforms to tyrosine phosphorylated YMXM motifs on IRS proteins is a
principal pathway by which insulin activates PI 3-kinase (6,
40). Before insulin stimulation, p85 barely associated with
immunoprecipitates of IRS-1, IRS-2, or IRS-4 (Fig. 3A and B). However,
during the first minute of insulin stimulation, p85 binding to IRS-1 or
IRS-2 increased approximately fivefold and remained elevated for 30 min; half-maximal stimulation occurred at a concentration of ca. 1 nM
insulin (Fig. 3C and D). By contrast, the association between p85 and
IRS-4 in 32DIR or HEK293 cells was less sensitive to
insulin (50% effective dose [ED50] of >10 nM) and
barely increased twofold (Fig. 3C and D). With isoform-specific
antibodies, insulin-stimulated association of p85
with IRS-4 was
10-fold weaker than with IRS-1 or IRS-2, and the association of p85
with IRS-4 was undetectable (Fig. 4A).
Consistent with these results, insulin barely stimulated the
association of IRS-4 with isoform-independent p85 immunoprecipitates (
p85pan), although p85 expression was approximately
equal in each cell line tested (Fig. 4B). Thus, p85
and p85
weakly engage IRS-4 compared to IRS-1 or IRS-2.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Effects of IRS-1, IRS-2, and IRS-4 on the
insulin-induced association of IRS proteins with p85. (A) Each cell
line was incubated with or without insulin for 1 min, and each IRS
protein was immunoprecipitated with the indicated antibodies and then
immunoblotted with anti-p85 or anti-p85 antibodies. (B) Each cell
line was incubated with or without 100 nM insulin for 1 min, and the
cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with
anti-p85pan antibodies and then immunoblotted with anti-IRS
protein or anti-p85pan antibodies.
|
|
Insulin-stimulated activation of PI 3-kinase by IRS proteins.
The binding of p85 to phosphorylated IRS-1 activates the associated PI
3-kinase catalytic subunit p110 (6, 40). Consistent with the
strong association of IRS-1 and IRS-2 with p85
and p85
, insulin
increased the PI 3-kinase activity 7- to 10-fold in
IRS-1 or
IRS-2 immunoprecipitates; by contrast, PI 3-kinase activity in IRS-4
immunoprecipitates increased about 2-fold (Fig.
5A). To ensure that this difference did
not merely reflect differing efficiencies of immunoprecipitation by the
various
IRS protein antibodies, we assessed PI 3-kinase activity in
PY20 immunoprecipitates. Before expression of IRS proteins, PI 3-kinase
activity was barely detected in PY20 immunoprecipitates from untreated
or insulin-stimulated 32DIR cells, which is consistent with
the inability of the insulin receptor to engage PI 3-kinase directly
(Fig. 5B). As expected, PI-3 kinase activity was strongly associated
with PY20 immunoprecipitates from 32DIR cells expressing
IRS-1 or IRS-2, whereas this activity was reduced 60% in
32DIR/IRS-4 cells.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Effects of overexpression of IRS proteins on IRS
protein, phosphotyrosine, and p85 -associated PI 3-K activity. (A) PI
3-kinase activity associated with IRS protein immunocomplexes was
determined by in vitro kinase assay before or after stimulation with
100 nM insulin for 1 min. Phosphorylated PI was quantified (upper
panel) and visualized (lower panel) on a Bio-Rad Molecular Imager. The
data represent the averages and standard errors of the mean from two
independent determinations. (B and C) 32DIR cells were
incubated in the absence or presence of insulin for 1 min. PI 3-kinase
activity associated with PY20 (B) or p85 (C) immunoprecipitates
was determined. Phosphorylated PI was visualized (upper panel) and
quantified (lower panel). Symbols: , 32DIR; ,
32DIR/IRS-1; , 32DIR/IRS-2; ,
32DIR/IRS-4. These results are representative of three
independent experiments.
|
|
To measure directly whether the p85-associated PI 3-kinase was
activated in 32DIR cells expressing IRS-1, IRS-2, or IRS-4,
we prepared specific immunoprecipitates of p85
from control and
insulin-stimulated cells. As expected, PI 3-kinase in p85
immunoprecipitates was strongly activated by insulin in
32DIR cells expressing IRS-1 (Fig. 5C). IRS-2 also mediated
PI 3-kinase activation in 32DIR cells, although the
response was less robust and less sensitive to insulin. Consistent with
the reduced association of p85
with IRS-4, insulin weakly activated
PI 3-kinase in p85
immunoprecipitates from 32DIR cells
expressing IRS-4 (Fig. 5C). Together, these results suggest that
reduced activation of PI 3-kinase is a consequence of the weak
interaction between IRS-4 and p85.
IRS-4 mediates insulin-stimulated PKB/Akt signaling
cascade.
PKB/Akt is an important signaling element
downstream of PI 3-kinase (2). Activation of PI 3-kinase
leads to the formation of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and/or
PtdIns(3,4)P2, thereby recruiting PKB/Akt to membranes and
promoting its phosphorylation by other membrane-associated phospholipid-dependent kinases (PDKs). Phosphorylation of
Ser473 plays an important role in the activation of
PKB/Akt, which is measured directly with a phospho-specific antibody
(
PhosphoAkt). Without IRS proteins, insulin had a negligible effect
on the phosphorylation of Ser473 in PKB/Akt. By contrast,
after 10 min Ser473 was maximally phosphorylated with equal
insulin sensitivity in 32DIR in cells containing IRS-1,
IRS-2, or IRS-4 (Fig. 6A and B).

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Effects of IRS-1, IRS-2, or IRS-4 on phosphorylation and
activation of PKB/Akt. (A) Equal amounts of cell lysates from insulin
(100 nM)-treated 32D cell lines for the indicated times were analyzed
by immunoblotting with phospho-Akt antibodies. (B) Cells were incubated
in the indicated concentrations of insulin for 30 min, and the cell
lysates were analyzed as described above. (C) Cells were incubated in
the absence ( ) or presence ( ) of 100 nM insulin for 30 min.
Whole-cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with PKB/Akt antibodies and
subjected to in vitro kinase assay as described in Materials and
Methods. The results represent averages and standard errors of mean
from three independent experiments. (D) Prior to insulin (100 nM)
stimulation for 30 min, cells were incubated with or without LY294002
(LY) or dimethyl sulfoxide (DM) for 30 min. PKB/Akt was
immunoprecipitated and subjected to in vitro kinase assay.
|
|
Since PKB/Akt activation requires PI 3-kinase activation, we were
initially surprised that IRS-4 mediated activation of PKB/Akt as
robustly as IRS-1 and IRS-2. To confirm this result, we measured PKB/Akt activity with histone H2B in
PKB immunoprecipitates prepared from untreated and insulin-stimulated 32DIR cell lines.
Consistent with Ser473 phosphorylation, insulin strongly
activated PKB/Akt in 32DIR cells expressing IRS-1, IRS-2,
or IRS-4, whereas it failed to stimulate PKB in 32DIR cells
without IRS proteins (Fig. 6C). To confirm that PKB/Akt activation was
mediated by products of the PI 3-kinase, 32DIR cells were
incubated with LY294002, an inhibitor of PI 3-kinase. In each cell line
tested, LY294002 inhibited insulin-stimulated activation of PKB/Akt,
suggesting that the weak PI 3-kinase activation by IRS-4 might be
sufficient to promote stimulation of PKB/Akt (Fig. 6D).
The proapoptotic protein BAD is an important target of PKB/Akt. PKB/Akt
catalyzed phosphorylation of BAD to link extracellular signals to the
inhibition of apoptosis (13, 20). During phosphorylation, BAD associates with 14-3-3, which prevents the formation of a proapoptotic heterodimer between BAD and Bcl-2/Bcl-XL (14,
16). The phosphorylation of BAD was detected in 32DIR
cells with a phosphospecific antibody. In 32DIR cells
lacking IRS proteins, insulin weakly stimulated BAD phosphorylation and
slightly promoted BAD association with Bcl-2 but not with 14-3-3 (Fig.
7A). By contrast, the expression of
IRS-1, IRS-2, or IRS-4 in 32DIR cells promoted strong
insulin-stimulated BAD phosphorylation. Moreover, as expected, insulin
promoted the concurrent association of 14-3-3 and dissociation of Bcl-2
from BAD (Fig. 7A). Moreover, wortmannin inhibited the effects of
insulin on the regulation of BAD in 32DIR cells expressing
IRS-1, IRS-2, or IRS-4, whereas it had no effect in cells lacking an
IRS protein (Fig. 7B).

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Phosphorylation of BAD and association of Bcl-2 and
14-3-3. (A) Each cell line was incubated without or with 100 nM insulin
for the indicated time intervals. The cell lysates were subjected to
immunoprecipitation with BAD antibodies, and immunoblotted with
PhosphoBAD, Bcl-2, 14-3-3, or BAD antibodies. (B) Prior to
insulin (100 nM) stimulation for 10 min, cells were incubated with or
without wortmannin (Wort) for 30 min. BAD was immunoprecipitated and
immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies.
|
|
Activation of p70s6k by 32DIR cells.
The p70s6k is a serine/threonine kinase involved in
insulin-stimulated cell proliferation and protein synthesis which is
activated by PI 3-kinase-dependent phosphorylation of
Thr252 and Thr412 (15, 23, 32, 37, 42, 53,
56, 59). In order to compare the abilities of IRS-1, IRS-2, and
IRS-4 to activate p70s6k, we initially monitored the
migration rate of p70s6k during SDS-PAGE (32).
Insulin stimulation (up to 30 min) reduced the migration rate of
p70s6k from 32DIR cells expressing IRS-1 or
IRS-2 but not from cells expressing IRS-4 (Fig.
8A). These results suggest that insulin
failed to activate p70s6k in 32DIR/IRS-4 cells.
We confirmed these results with immunoprecipitated p70s6k
by using in vitro kinase assays. Robust insulin-stimulated activation of p70s6k was observed in 32DIR cells
expressing IRS-1 or IRS-2 cells but not in cells expressing IRS-4 (Fig.
8B). Thus, during insulin stimulation, IRS-4 differentially activated
p70s6k and PKB/Akt in 32DIR cells.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Effects of overexpression of IRS-1, IRS-2, and IRS-4 on
phosphorylation and activation of p70s6k. (A) Equal amounts
of cell lysates from insulin (100 nM)-treated 32D cell line for the
indicated times were analyzed by immunoblotting with
p70s6k antibodies. (B) The cells were incubated in the
absence ( ) or presence ( ) of 100 nM insulin for 30 min.
Whole-cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with p70s6k
antibodies and subjected to in vitro kinase assay as described in
Materials and Methods. The results represent averages and standard
errors of mean from three independent experiments.
|
|
Differential activation of the MAPK cascade by the various IRS
proteins.
Each IRS protein contains a tyrosine phosphorylation
site in an amino acid sequence motif predicted to bind the SH2 domain of Grb-2 (see Fig. 1, above), an upstream mediator of
p21ras
Erk kinase signaling (33).
While the insulin receptor mediates the insulin-stimulated activation
of Erk kinases in the absence of IRS proteins (likely via the
Shc
Grb-2 pathway), the recruitment of Grb-2 by IRS-1 enhances
insulin-stimulated Erk kinase activation (33, 36, 43). In
order to assess differences in the regulation of this pathway among the
various IRS proteins, we compared the abilities of IRS-1, IRS-2, and
IRS-4 to bind Grb-2 and enhance the insulin-stimulated activity of Erk
kinases in 32DIR cells.
Grb-2 immunoblotting of
IRS
protein immunoprecipitates from insulin-stimulated 32DIR
cell extracts revealed similar amounts of Grb-2 associated with IRS-1
and IRS-4 during maximal insulin stimulation; by contrast, approximately 40% less Grb-2 associated with IRS-2 (Fig.
9A and B). The weak association of IRS-2
with Grb-2 is consistent with previous results (46).

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
Insulin-induced IRS proteins and Grb-2 association and
effects of overexpression of IRS proteins on the activation of MAPK.
(A) 32DIR/IRS-1, 32DIR/IRS-2, and
32DIR/IRS-4 cells were incubated with or without 100 nM
insulin for 2 min. Whole-cell lysates were prepared, immunoprecipitated
with indicated anti-IRS antibodies, and immunoblotted with PY20 (upper
panel), anti-IRS protein antibodies (middle panel), and anti-Grb-2
antibodies (lower panel). (B) Grb-2 associated with each IRS protein
was quantified on a Bio-Rad Molecular Imager. (C and D) Cells were
incubated in the absence or presence of different doses of insulin for
5 min. Whole-cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with MAPK antibodies
and subjected to in vitro kinase assay as described in Materials and
Methods. Radioactivity incorporated into myelin basic protein was
estimated with a phosphorimager. The results represent averages from
two independent experiments. Symbols: , 32DIR; ,
32DIR/IRS-1-b; , 32DIR/IRS-2; ,
32DIR/IRS-4-b.
|
|
We measured Erk kinase activity in
Erk immunoprecipitates prepared
from cells stimulated for 5 min with various insulin concentrations. As
previously shown, the IRS proteins were not required for
insulin-stimulated Erk kinase activation in 32DIR cells,
although expression of IRS-1 or IRS-4 enhanced the insulin response
(Fig. 9C and D). However, IRS-2 failed to enhance insulin-stimulated Erk kinase activity above the level measured in 32DIR cells
lacking IRS proteins (Fig. 9C and D). Similar results were observed
when Erk kinase activity was assessed by immunoblotting cell lysates
with activated Erk-specific antiphosphorylated Erk antibodies (data not
shown). Thus, IRS-1 and IRS-4 associated strongly with Grb-2 and
enhanced insulin-stimulated Erk kinase activity.
Differential signaling by IRS proteins on DNA synthesis and cell
growth.
The activation of both Erk and PI-3 kinase cascades are
essential for insulin-stimulated proliferative signaling
(29). In the 32DIR cells, IRS proteins are
required for insulin-stimulated proliferation; however, previous work
demonstrated that IRS protein-mediated activation of Erk kinases is not
required (33, 59). By contrast, the IRS protein-mediated
activation of PI 3-kinase and its downstream mediators (e.g., PKB/Akt
and p70s6k) are critical for proliferation. Since IRS-4
failed to bind p85-associated PI 3-kinase or activate
p70s6k, it may only weakly promote growth of
32DIR cells. To test this hypothesis, we measured
insulin-stimulated [3H]thymidine incorporation into DNA
(a measure of proliferation) in the 32DIR cell lines (Fig.
10A). As previously shown, insulin had
little or no effect on thymidine incorporation in 32DIR
cells (31, 51). IRS-1 strongly promoted insulin-stimulated thymidine incorporation, with a half-maximal effect at a 0.3 nM insulin
concentration; 32DIR/IRS-2 cells were 10-fold less
sensitive to insulin, but the maximal response was the same (Fig. 10A).
By contrast, [3H]thymidine incorporation in
32DIR/IRS-4 cells was both less sensitive to insulin and
significantly less intense.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 10.
Effects of IRS-1, IRS-2, and IRS-4 on cell growth. (A)
[3H]thymidine incorporation induced by different
concentrations of insulin was determined by a 2-h pulse given 48 h
after removal of IL-3, as described in Materials and Methods. A portion
(2,000 cells/ml) of each cell line was seeded into medium containing
10% FBS without additional growth factor (B) or with IL-3 (C) or 100 nM insulin (D). Cell number was counted by using a Coulter Counter on
days 1, 3, 5, and 7. The same medium was replaced, and the cells were
split 1:10 on day 4. Symbols: , 32DIR; and ,
32DIR/IRS-1-a and -b, respectively; ,
32DIR/IRS-2; , , , and ,
32DIR/IRS-4-a, -b, -c, and -d, respectively. The results
represent the average of two independent experiments.
|
|
In order to confirm that the [3H]thymidine incorporation
data reliably reflected cell proliferation in the 32DIR
cell lines, we measured proliferation by determining the absolute number of cells for each line during a 7-day interval in the presence or absence of IL-3 or insulin (Fig. 10B to D). Consistent with the
induction of apoptosis that occurs upon IL-3 withdrawal
(59), all cells from all cell lines died within 3 to 5 days
in the absence of IL-3 and insulin (Fig. 10B). In the presence of IL-3,
all cell lines increased approximately 1,000-fold over 7 days; however, three independent clones of 32DIR/IRS-4 cells proliferated
slightly more slowly than the other lines (Fig. 10C). As previously
shown, insulin promoted proliferation of IL-3-deprived
32DIR cells expressing IRS-1 or IRS-2, although the
32DIR/IRS-2 cells responded slightly less robustly than the
32DIR/IRS-1 cells; the replication of
32DIR/IRS-4 cells was weakly stimulated by insulin. Thus,
the differing abilities of the IRS proteins to mediate the growth of
32DIR cells correlated strongly with the ability of the
IRS-1 and IRS-2 to activate the p85-associated PI 3-kinase and
p70s6k, rather than the ability to activate PKB/Akt.
IRS-4 fails to mediate antiapoptosis in 32DIR
cells.
The relative rates of cell division and death determine
cell number. To assess the role of apoptosis, we examined the ability of the various IRS proteins to prevent DNA fragmentation in
32DIR cells incubated without IL-3. DNA from apoptotic
cells characteristically displays a ladder of DNA fragments when
analyzed by ethidium bromide-agarose gel electrophoresis, owing to the
cleavage of genomic DNA between the ~200-bp nucleosome repeats
(55). By this assay, all 32DIR cell lines
undergo apoptosis between 8 and 12 h in the absence of IL-3 or
insulin (7, 28, 59). As previously shown, insulin protected
32DIR/IRS-1 and 32DIR/IRS-2 cells from
apoptosis during IL-3 deprivation (59); however, IRS-4
failed to inhibit apoptosis during insulin stimulation (Fig. 11A).

View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 11.
Effects of IRS-1, IRS-2, IRS-4, and IRS-1 PH+PTB (PP)
domain on apoptosis. (A) Each cell line was assayed for apoptosis by
gel fragmentation. Cells were incubated with 10% FBS in the absence or
presence of different doses of insulin or IL-3 for 18 h.
Fragmented DNA was isolated and analyzed by 1.5% agarose gel. (B and
C) The relative intensity of DNA bands was determined by using
Molecular Analyst (Bio-Rad), and the ED50 for each cell
line was determined.
|
|
IL-3 typically prevents apoptosis of 32D cells, but the level of DNA
fragmentation was consistently elevated in four independent clones of
32DIR/IRS-4 cells even during incubation with IL-3; upon
IL-3 withdrawal, DNA fragmentation was not inhibited by insulin (Fig.
11A). Thus, not only did IRS-4 poorly inhibit apoptosis during growth
in insulin, it slightly increased apoptosis during IL-3-dependent
growth. This result is even more striking compared to 32DIR
cells expressing PPIRS-1. PPIRS-1 lacks the
COOH tail of tyrosine phosphorylation sites and contains only the
NH2-terminal PH and PTB domains of IRS-1 (59).
PPIRS-1 fails to bind or activate PI 3-kinase but inhibits
apoptosis of 32DIR cells during insulin stimulation.
Compared to intact IRS-1, PPIRS-1 effectively inhibited
apoptosis of 32DIR cells, although it was about 10-fold
less sensitive to insulin (Fig. 11B and C). Thus, signaling pathways
engaged by the NH2-terminal portion of IRS-1 that prevent
apoptosis during insulin stimulation may not be engaged by the PH and
PTB domains of IRS-4.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Tyrosine phosphorylated IRS proteins bind SH2 domain-containing
proteins to assemble complexes that mediate the insulin response. The
four known IRS proteins share similar overall structure, including an
NH2-terminal PH domain and a PTB domain, as well as a
COOH-terminal tail with numerous tyrosine phosphorylation sites
(17, 25, 47, 48). The common structure suggests some
similarity of function among the IRS proteins. Indeed, each IRS protein
binds various SH2 proteins following tyrosine phosphorylation by the insulin receptor (58). Beyond this basic paradigm, the
details of signaling specificity diverge somewhat. The number,
placement, and even presence of tyrosine phosphorylation motifs within
the tails of IRS proteins differ; the COOH-terminal tail of IRS-3 has
one-third the length of the other IRS proteins; and IRS-4 lacks both
consensus SHP-2 binding motifs present in IRS-1, IRS-2, and IRS-3. In
terms of function, the various IRS proteins appear to differ, as well.
IRS-2 cannot substitute for IRS-1 in fibroblasts lacking IRS-1
(9). Similarly, the phenotypes of mice null for the various
IRS proteins vary widely. The IRS-1 null is small and insulin
resistant, although never diabetic, whereas the IRS-2 null mouse is
diabetic due to insulin resistance and
-cell failure. No phenotype
has yet been ascribed to the IRS-3 and IRS-4 null mice (27).
While IRS-1 and IRS-2 are expressed relatively ubiquitously, expression
of IRS-4 is restricted almost exclusively to the pituitary gland and
brain; such differences in expression pattern provide one possible
explanation for specificity. However, the overlapping expression
pattern suggests that IRS proteins possess distinct functions as well.
Indeed, by contrasting the functions of IRS-1, IRS-2, and IRS-4 in 32D
cells, several differences in the signal transmission emerge. IRS-1 and
IRS-4 strongly bind Grb-2 and enhance the activation of the MAPK during
insulin stimulation; IRS-2 performs these functions weakly. During
insulin stimulation, IRS-1 and IRS-2 mediate antiapoptosis, DNA
synthesis, and replication of IL-3-deprived 32DIR; however,
under these conditions IRS-4 expression fails to inhibit apoptosis of
32DIR cells and, as a consequence, promotes cell
replications weakly. Moreover, in the presence of IL-3, IRS-4
expression promotes apoptosis through an unknown mechanism. Thus, each
IRS protein is a distinct molecular platform coupling insulin receptors
to a unique cohort of regulatory signals.
The class I PI 3-kinase is composed of a catalytic (p110
, p110
,
and p110
) subunit which heterodimerizes with one of many SH2
domain-containing regulatory subunits (p85
, p85
, p55
, and p55PIK). The SH2 domain-containing regulatory subunits
recognize tyrosine phosphorylated YXXM motifs in signaling proteins
such as IRS-1 and IRS-2. Occupancy of the SH2 domains by these motifs
activates the associated p110 catalytic subunit (6). These
interactions cause a strong association of activated PI 3-kinase with
the IRS proteins and mediate the stimulation of PKB/Akt, PKC
, and
p70s6k and other serine/threonine kinases (29, 30,
32, 33, 35, 49; M. G. Myers, Jr., Y. Zhang, L. Yenush,
et al., abstr., Diabetes 44:49A, 1995). PI 3-kinase may also interact
positively with the p21ras pathway, although we
have not detected such an interaction in the 32D cells (32, 33,
39).
IRS-4 contains at least six YXXM motifs that should bind p85
and/or
p85
(17). In contrast to IRS-1 and IRS-2, IRS-4 binding to p85 is barely detected during insulin stimulation; and while IRS-4
binds p85
weakly, it completely fails to bind p85
. Furthermore, IRS-4 lacks the COOH-terminal SHP-2 binding sites, which should enhance
the binding and activation of PI 3-kinase and PI 3-kinase-dependent responses by IRS-4 (31). Thus, the poor activation of PI
3-kinase by IRS-4 may arise from the inability of the insulin receptor to phosphorylate the YXXM motifs in IRS-4. Since YXXM motifs are ideal
phosphorylation sites for the insulin receptor in vitro (44,
45), the tail of IRS-4 may have a conformation that precludes the
phosphorylation of its YXXM motifs by the insulin receptor. In light of
our results, a direct analysis of tyrosine phosphorylation site
utilization in IRS-4 needs to be conducted.
Although IRS-4 weakly binds p85
and fails to bind p85
, it
promotes the PKB/Akt signaling pathway during insulin stimulation. This
effect is sensitive to LY294002, an inhibitor of PI 3-kinase, indicating that products of the PI 3-kinase are required. While we
cannot exclude the possibility that constitutive levels of PI 3-kinase
products in combination with unique IRS-4-mediated signals are
sufficient to promote activation of PKB/Akt during insulin stimulation,
our results suggest that IRS-4 stimulates sufficient PI 3-kinase
activity to activate PKB/Akt. Some PI 3-kinase activity is
immunoprecipitated from insulin-stimulated cells with antibodies
against IRS-4 or phosphotyrosine (PY20), but this does not appear to be
associated with p85
or p85
. The interaction between IRS-4 and p85
is so weak that
p85 immunoprecipitates from insulin-stimulated cells
do not contain increased PI 3-kinase activity, as usually observed in
cells expressing IRS-1 or IRS-2. Perhaps IRS-4 fails to bind to both
SH2 domains in p85, which is ordinarily required for full activation
(40). Nevertheless, the activation of PI 3-kinase by
association with IRS-4 is significantly reduced, although sufficient to
fully stimulate PKB/Akt as evaluated by our in vitro kinase assays and
BAD phosphorylation in cells.
Although IRS-4 mediates insulin-stimulated activation of PKB/Akt and
BAD phosphorylation, it fails promote the activation of
p70s6k. This unexpected result is one of the clearest
demonstrations of the different signaling capacity of IRS-4 compared to
IRS-1 or IRS-2. Previous reports revealed that YMXM motifs in IRS-1 are
required for insulin to stimulated p70s6k, suggesting that
a direct association between PI 3-kinase and IRS-1 is required
(32, 35). Although increased PI 3-kinase activity is
detected in antiphosphotyrosine immunoprecipitates from
IRS-4-expressing 32DIR cells, this is poorly associated
with p85, suggesting that p85-associated PI 3-kinase is essential for
promoting activation of p70s6k during insulin stimulation.
Thus, the regulation of p70s6k diverges early from the
pathways that activate PKB/Akt, which is activated by
non-p85-associated PI 3-kinase and IRS-4.
The regulation of PKB/Akt involves the recruitment of several kinases
to the plasma membrane. The PH domain in PKB/Akt binds to PI 3-kinase
products, recruiting PKB/Akt to the plasma membrane and exposing it to
membrane-associated phospholipid-dependent kinases (1).
Phospholipid-dependent kinase-1 (PDK1) also associates with the plasma
membrane through interaction of its PH domain with PI 3-kinase
products; membrane-associated PDK1 catalyzes phosphorylation of
Thr308 in PKB/Akt (3, 50). The phosphorylation
of Ser473, which is required for full activation, is
thought to be catalyzed by a similar membrane-associated kinase, called
PDK2 (2). Thus, activation of PKB/Akt depends on PI 3-kinase
activity to recruit interacting kinases to the plasma membrane. This
regulatory mechanism may be independent of the exact mechanism that
stimulates the production of phospholipids.
PI 3-kinase activity is also critical for the activation of
p70s6k. The PI 3-kinase-dependent phosphorylation of
Thr252 and Thr412 fully activates
p70s6k, although the exact kinases involved are not well
defined (11, 52). Based on our results with IRS-4,
activation of PKB/Akt is not the only critical step in
p70s6k activation during insulin stimulation. PDK1
partially activates p70s6k by phosphorylating
Thr252 (4). Whether Thr252 is
phosphorylated in 32DIR cells expressing IRS-4 is not
known. There exist several potential explanations for the failure of
IRS-4 to mediate activation of p70s6k while mediating
activation of PKB/Akt normally. It is possible that IRS-1 or IRS-2
mediate PI 3-kinase-independent signals that are not engaged by IRS-4
but which are essential for activation of p70s6k. However,
this mechanism is unlikely because the Drosophila insulin receptor or a chimeric mammalian insulin receptor containing an extended tail of YXXM motifs that bind p85-associated PI 3-kinase and
activate p70s6k without IRS proteins (56, 59).
Full activation of p85-associated PI 3-kinase may be the critical step
in p70s6k activation.
32D cells are ordinarily dependent on IL-3 for long-term growth, since
withdrawal of IL-3 induces apoptosis within 12 h (59). In the absence of IRS proteins, IL3-deprived 32DIR cells
undergo apoptosis and fail to proliferate during insulin stimulation.
In contrast, insulin strongly stimulates DNA synthesis and suppresses
apoptosis in 32DIR cells expressing IRS-1 or IRS-2.
However, both insulin responses are significantly reduced in
32DIR cells expressing IRS-4. The inability of IRS-4 to
form a complex with PI 3-kinase and activate p70s6k may in
part explain the weak insulin-stimulated DNA synthesis promoted by
IRS-4.
Persistent apoptosis in insulin- or IL3-treated 32DIR/IRS-4
cells is unexpected since signaling pathways that promote survival are
thought to be downstream of PKB/Akt. BAD is one of the cellular targets
that PKB/Akt phosphorylates to protect cultured neurons from apoptosis
(13). Consistent with this hypothesis, insulin stimulates
wortmannin-sensitive BAD phosphorylation equally in 32DIR
cells expressing IRS-1, IRS-2, or IRS-4. Moreover, Bcl-2 dissociates from BAD and 14-3-3 associates with BAD in each of these cell lines,
suggesting that BAD phosphorylation may not be the critical step to
inhibit apoptosis in IL-3-deprived 32DIR cells.
IRS-4 fails to activate p70s6k, but the possibility that
this is essential for antiapoptosis is inconsistent with our previous results. Our previous work with 32D cells expressing mammalian insulin
receptor chimeras that directly bind p85 suggests that activation of PI
3-kinase, PKB/Akt, and p70s6k is not sufficient to inhibit
apoptosis during IL-3 withdrawal (56, 59). Moreover, a
truncated IRS-1 molecule (PPIRS1) lacking the entire tail
of tyrosine phosphorylation sites just after the PTB domain inhibits
apoptosis during insulin stimulation (59). In these cells,
p70s6k was not activated after insulin stimulation for up
to 60 min, although PKB/Akt was weakly activated (59).
Therefore, activation of p70s6k is unlikely to be involved
in insulin-induced antiapoptosis. Moreover, like the expression of
IRS-4 in 32DIR cells, direct binding of p85-associated PI
3-kinase to these chimeric insulin receptors promotes apoptosis during
IL-3 stimulation and accelerates apoptosis during IL-3 withdrawal
(56, 59). Interestingly, IRS-1 promotes survival of 32D
cells expressing the chimeric insulin receptors, suggesting that the
presence of IRS-1, but not necessarily the activation of PI
3-kinase-dependent pathways, is a critical element for
insulin-stimulated antiapoptosis.
The signaling pathways regulated by IRS-1 to inhibit apoptosis during
insulin stimulation may be independent of PI 3-kinase. A mutant IRS-1
molecule lacking all 18 tyrosine phosphorylation sites
(IRS-1F18) reduces significantly the ability of insulin to
stimulate proliferation of 32DIR cells; however,
IRS-1F18 inhibits apoptosis of IL-3-deprived
32DIR cells during insulin stimulation (L. Yenush, M. F. White, et al., unpublished data). The replacement of a few PI
3-kinase binding motifs increases the sensitivity of the signal to
insulin, suggesting that products of the PI 3-kinase may amplify the
otherwise phosphotyrosine-independent antiapoptotic signal by
recruiting essential elements to the plasma membrane. However, it
should be kept in mind that p85 binding sites are not required for the
biological response.
In summary, IRS-4 either fails to mediate an antiapoptotic (PI
3-kinase-independent) signal mediated by other IRS-1 or IRS-2 or it
promotes a proapoptotic signal. Given the increased rate of apoptosis
exhibited by 32DIR/IRS-4 cells when grown in IL-3, the
latter explanation might be correct. The phenotypes of IRS-1, IRS-2,
and IRS-4 in 32DIR cells highlight dramatically the
functional differences among the various IRS proteins. The ability of
IRS-4 to mediate activation of PKB/Akt in the absence of
p70s6k activation suggests an antiapoptotic mechanism that
diverges at the level of the IRS proteins. A full understanding of
these pathways has certain physiological significance, since IRS-2 is critical for pancreatic
-cell proliferation and IRS-1 is essential for somatic cell growth.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by DK38712 (M.F.W.) and Juvenile Diabetes
Foundation Research grant 197043 (M.G.M.). T.U. was supported by an
American Diabetes Association Mentor-Based Fellowship and the Nakatomi
Foundation Research Grant from Japan.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Howard Hughes
Medical Institute, Joslin Diabetes Center, 1 Joslin Pl., Boston, MA
02215. Phone: (617) 732-2578. Fax: (617) 732-2593. E-mail:
whitemor{at}joslab.harvard.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alessi, D. R.,
M. Andjelkovic,
B. Caudwell,
P. Cron,
N. Morrice,
P. Cohen, and B. A. Hemmings.
1996.
Mechanism of activation of protein kinase B by insulin and IGF-1.
EMBO J.
15:6541-6551[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Alessi, D. R., and P. Cohen.
1998.
Mechanism of activation and function of protein kinase B.
Curr. Opin. Gene
8:55-62.
|
| 3.
|
Alessi, D. R.,
S. R. James,
C. P. Downes,
A. B. Holmes,
P. R. J. Gaffney,
C. B. Reese, and P. Cohen.
1997.
Characterization of a 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase which phosphorylates and activates protein kinase B .
Curr. Biol.
7:261-269[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Alessi, D. R.,
M. T. Kozlowski,
Q. P. Weng,
N. Morrice, and J. Avruch.
1998.
3-Phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 (PDK1) phosphorylates and activates the p70 S6 kinase in vivo and in vitro.
Curr. Biol.
8:69-81[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Araki, E.,
M. A. Lipes,
M. E. Patti,
J. C. Brüning,
B. L. Haag III,
R. S. Johnson, and C. R. Kahn.
1994.
Alternative pathway of insulin signalling in mice with targeted disruption of the IRS-1 gene.
Nature
372:186-190[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Backer, J. M.,
M. G. Myers, Jr.,
S. E. Shoelson,
D. J. Chin,
X. J. Sun,
M. Miralpeix,
P. Hu,
B. Margolis,
E. Y. Skolnik,
J. Schlessinger, et al.
1992.
Phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase is activated by association with IRS-1 during insulin stimulation.
EMBO J.
11:3469-3479[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Baffy, G.,
T. Miyashita,
J. R. Williamson, and J. C. Reed.
1993.
Apoptosis induced by withdrawal of IL-3 from an IL-3 dependent hematopoietic cell line is associated with repartitioning of intracellular calcium and is blocked by enforced Bcl-2 oncoprotein production.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:6511-6519[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Bernal, D.,
K. Almind,
L. Yenush,
M. Ayoub,
Y. Zhang,
L. Rosshani,
C. Larsson,
O. Pedersen, and M. F. White.
1998.
IRS-2 Amino acid polymorphisms are not associated with random type 2 diabetes among caucasians.
Diabetes
47:976-979[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Bruning, J. C.,
J. Winnay,
B. Cheatham, and C. R. Kahn.
1997.
Differential signaling by insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1) and IRS-2 in IRS-1-deficient cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:1513-1521[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Burks, D. J.,
S. Pons,
H. Towery,
J. Smith-Hall,
M. G. Myers, Jr.,
L. Yenush, and M. F. White.
1997.
Heterologous PH domains do not mediate coupling of IRS-1 to the insulin receptor.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:27716-27721[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Chung, J.,
T. C. Grammer,
K. P. Lemon,
A. Kazlauskas, and J. Blenis.
1994.
PDGF- and insulin-dependent pp70S6k activation mediated by phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase.
Nature
370:71-75[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Collins, M. K.,
G. R. Perkins,
G. Rodriguez Tarduchy,
M. A. Nieto, and A. Lopez-Rivas.
1994.
Growth factors as survival factors: regulation of apoptosis.
Bioessays
16:133-138[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Datta, S. R.,
H. Dudek,
X. Tao,
S. Masters,
H. Fu,
Y. Gotoh, and M. E. Greenberg.
1997.
Akt phosphorylation of BAD couples survival signals to the cell-intrinsic death machinery.
Cell
91:231-241[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
del Peso, L.,
M. Gonzalez-Garcia,
C. Page,
R. Herrera, and G. Nunez.
1997.
Interleukin-3-induced phosphorylation of BAD through the protein kinase Akt.
Science
278:687-689[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Dennis, P. B.,
N. Pullen,
R. B. Pearson,
S. C. Kozma, and G. Thomas.
1998.
Phosphorylation sites in the autoinhibitory domain participate in p70(s6k) activation loop phosphorylation.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:14845-14852[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Dudek, H.,
S. R. Datta,
T. F. Franke,
M. J. Birnbaum,
R. Yao,
G. M. Cooper,
R. A. Segal,
D. R. Kaplan, and M. E. Greenberg.
1997.
Regulation of neuronal survival by the serine-threonine protein kinase Akt.
Science
275:661-665[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Fantin, V. R.,
J. D. Sparling,
J. W. Slot,
S. R. Keller,
G. E. Lienhard, and B. E. Lavan.
1998.
Characterization of insulin receptor substrate 4 in human embryonic kidney 293 cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:10726-10732[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Feinstein, R.,
H. Kanety,
M. Z. Papa,
B. Lunenfeld, and A. Karasik.
1993.
Tumor necrosis factor-alpha suppresses insulin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of insulin receptor and its substrates.
J. Biol. Chem.
268:26055-26058[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Guilherme, A., and M. P. Czech.
1998.
Stimulation of IRS-1-associated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Akt/protein kinase B but not glucose transport by 1-integrin signaling in rat adipocytes.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:33119-33122[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Hemmings, B. A.
1997.
Akt signaling linked membrane events to life and death decisions.
Science
275:628-630[Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Hotamisligil, G. S.,
P. Peraldi,
A. Budvari,
R. W. Ellis,
M. F. White, and B. M. Spiegelman.
1996.
IRS-1 mediated inhibition of insulin receptor tyrosine kinase activity in TNF- - and obesity-induced insulin resistance.
Science
271:665-668[Abstract].
|
| 22.
|
Kapeller, R., and L. C. Cantley, Jr.
1994.
Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase.
Bioessays
16:565-576[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Lane, H. A.,
A. Fernandez,
N. J. C. Lamb, and G. Thomas.
1993.
p70s6k function is essential for G1 progression.
Nature
363:170-172[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Lavan, B. E.,
V. R. Fantin,
E. T. Chang,
W. S. Lane,
S. R. Keller, and G. E. Lienhard.
1997.
A novel 160 kDa phosphotyrosine protein in insulin-treated embryonic kidney cells is a new member of the insulin receptor substrate family.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:21403-21407[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Lavan, B. E.,
W. S. Lane, and G. E. Lienhard.
1997.
The 60-kDa phosphotyrosine protein in insulin-treated adipocytes is a new member of the insulin receptor substrate family.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:11439-11443[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Lemmon, M. A.,
K. M. Ferguson, and J. Schlessinger.
1996.
PH domains: diverse sequences with a common fold recruit signaling molecules to the cell surface.
Cell
85:621-624[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Liu, S. C.,
Q. Wang,
G. E. Lienhard, and S. R. Keller.
1999.
Insulin receptor substrate 3 is not essential for growth or glucose homeostasis.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:18093-18099[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Magnelli, L.,
M. Cinelli,
A. Turchetti, and V. P. Chiarugi.
1993.
Apoptosis induction in 32D cells by IL-3 withdrawal is preceded by a drop in the intracellular calcium level.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
194:1394-1397[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Mendez, R.,
G. Kollmorgen,
M. F. White, and R. E. Rhoads.
1997.
Requirement of protein kinase C zeta for stimulation of protein synthesis by insulin.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:5184-5192[Abstract].
|
| 30.
|
Mendez, R.,
M. G. Myers, Jr.,
M. F. White, and R. E. Rhoads.
1996.
Stimulation of protein synthesis, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E phosphorylation, and PHAS-1 phosphorylation by insulin requires insulin receptor substrate-1 and phosphotidylinositol-3-kinase.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:2857-2864[Abstract].
|
| 31.
|
Myers, M. G. J.,
R. Mendez,
P. Shi,
J. H. Pierce,
R. Rhoads, and M. F. White.
1998.
The COOH-terminal tyrosine phosphorylation sites on IRS-1 bind SHP-2 and negatively regulate insulin signaling.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:26908-26914[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Myers, M. G., Jr.,
T. C. Grammer,
L. M. Wang,
X. J. Sun,
J. H. Pierce,
J. Blenis, and M. F. White.
1994.
IRS-1 mediates PI 3'-kinase and p70s6k signaling during insulin, IGF-1 and IL-4 stimulation.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:28783-28789[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Myers, M. G., Jr.,
L. M. Wang,
X. J. Sun,
Y. Zhang,
L. Yenush,
J. Schlessinger,
J. H. Pierce, and M. F. White.
1994.
The role of IRS-1/GRB2 complexes in insulin signaling.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:3577-3587[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Myers, M. G., Jr., and M. F. White.
1993.
The new elements in insulin signaling. Insulin receptor substrate-1 and proteins with SH2 domains.
Diabetes
42:643-650[Abstract].
|
| 35.
|
Myers, M. G., Jr.,
Y. Zhang,
G. A. I. Aldaz,
T. C. Grammer,
E. M. Glasheen,
L. Yenush,
L. M. Wang,
X. J. Sun,
J. Blenis,
J. H. Pierce, and M. F. White.
1996.
YMXM motifs and signaling by an insulin receptor substrate 1 molecule without tyrosine phosphorylation sites.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:4147-4155[Abstract].
|
| 36.
|
Pruett, W.,
Y. Yuan,
E. Rose,
A. G. Batzer,
N. Harada, and E. Y. Skolnik.
1995.
Association between GRB2/Sos and insulin receptor substrate 1 is not sufficient for activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases by interleukin-4: Implications for ras activation by insulin.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15:1778-1785[Abstract].
|
| 37.
|
Pullen, N.,
P. B. Dennis,
M. Andjelkovic,
A. Dufner,
S. C. Kozma,
B. A. Hemmings, and G. Thomas. |