Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, May 2000, p. 3355-3363, Vol. 20, No. 10
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
On the Mechanism by which Alkaline pH Prevents
Expression of an Acid-Expressed Gene
Eduardo A.
Espeso and
Herbert N.
Arst Jr.*
Department of Infectious Diseases, Imperial
College School of Medicine at Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0NN,
United Kingdom
Received 30 August 1999/Returned for modification 2 November
1999/Accepted 17 February 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Previous work has shown that zinc finger transcription factor PacC
mediates the regulation of gene expression by ambient pH in the fungus
Aspergillus nidulans. This regulation ensures that the
syntheses of molecules functioning in the external environment, such as
permeases, secreted enzymes, and exported metabolites, are tailored to
the pH of the growth environment. A direct role for PacC in activating
the expression of an alkaline-expressed gene has previously been
demonstrated, but the mechanism by which alkaline ambient pH prevents
the expression of any eukaryotic acid-expressed gene has never been
reported. Here we show that a double PacC binding site in the promoter
of the acid-expressed gabA gene, encoding
-aminobutyrate
(GABA) permease, overlaps the binding site for the transcriptional
activator IntA, which mediates
-amino acid induction. Using
bacterially expressed fusion proteins, we have shown that PacC competes
with IntA for DNA binding in vitro at this site. Thus, PacC repression
of GABA permease synthesis is direct and occurs by blocking induction.
A swap of IntA sites between promoters for gabA and
amdS, a gene not subject to pH regulation, makes
gabA expression pH independent and amdS acid expressed.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
A form of gene regulation common in
the microbial world, enabling organisms to adapt to differing
environments, is control of gene expression by ambient pH. Such
regulation tailors the syntheses of molecules operating outside the
protection of the organism's internal pH homeostatic system, such as
permeases, secreted enzymes, and exported metabolites, to the pH of the
growth environment. Thus, for example, the syntheses of molecules which are effective only at acidic pH can be restricted to acidic
environments. In the fungus Aspergillus nidulans, the zinc
finger-containing transcriptional regulator PacC mediates such pH
regulation (17, 18, 34). In response to a signal transduced
by the products of the six pal genes (3, 8, 13, 14, 24,
28, 29) at alkaline ambient pH, the 674-residue full-length form
of PacC is proteolyzed, yielding the functional form, containing the
~249 N-terminal residues, which facilitates the expression of genes expressed at alkaline ambient pH and prevents the expression of genes
expressed under acidic growth conditions (27, 30).
Interactions involving three regions of PacC are responsible for
maintaining the full-length form in a protease-inaccessible
conformation in the absence of signal transduction (16a).
Loss-of-function mutations in the pacC gene and the
pH-signaling pal genes have an acidity-mimicking phenotype,
whereas gain-of-function mutations, designated
pacCc, obviate the need for pH signal
transduction and have an alkalinity-mimicking phenotype (27, 30,
34). pacC is itself an alkali-expressed gene (30,
34).
PacC is able to bind DNA, the consensus site being 5'-GCCARG (18,
27, 30, 34). A direct role for PacC in activating the expression
of the alkali-expressed ipnA gene, encoding isopenicillin N
synthase, has been demonstrated (16). The mechanism by which expression of a eukaryotic acid-expressed gene is prevented at alkaline
pH has, however, never been investigated. An intriguing aspect is that
PacC consensus sites tend to be less frequent in promoters of
acid-expressed genes than in those of alkali-expressed genes (20,
23, 32, 34).
The acid-expressed gabA gene (2, 6, 20), encoding
-aminobutyrate (GABA) permease, is subject to four known forms of
regulation:
-amino acid induction mediated by the zinc binuclear cluster transcription factor IntA (AmdR) (1, 2, 12),
nitrogen metabolite repression mediated by the GATA transcription
factor AreA (4, 21, 36), carbon catabolite repression
mediated by the zinc finger transcription factor CreA (5, 15,
22), and ambient pH regulation mediated by PacC. Here we show
that a double PacC binding site overlaps an IntA binding site and that a PacC fusion protein competes with an IntA fusion protein for DNA
binding in vitro at this site. Thus repression of GABA permease synthesis at alkaline pH occurs through the prevention of induction. We
further show that swapping a hexadeca- or heptadecanucleotide encompassing the IntA sites in the gabA and amdS
(encoding acetamidase) promoters renders gabA expression pH
independent and converts amdS into an acid-expressed gene.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
A. nidulans strains, growth conditions, phenotype
analysis, and genetic techniques.
The relevant genotypes of the
A. nidulans strains used are described in the text and
figures and included otherwise previously described standard markers
(2, 8, 9, 30, 34). Standard media and phenotype testing and
genetic procedures were used (references 8, 9, and
11 and references therein). Standard transformation procedures (34, 35) were used.
Protein extraction, EMSA, probe construction, and DNase I
footprinting.
A. nidulans extracts were prepared as
described previously (30) with the following modifications.
Mycelia were grown in Aspergillus complete medium
(11) containing 3% (wt/vol) sucrose (in place of glucose)
rather than in penicillin production broth. The extraction buffer
contained (final concentration) 4 mM Pefablock (Boehringer) instead of
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Protein extraction was done by
disrupting ~200 mg of wet mycelia in a 2-ml tube with 0.5 ml of 1-mm
beads using an Anachem Fastprep apparatus (FP-120) with six 20-s pulses
at power 6.0. Cell debris was pelleted by centrifugation at
11,600 × g for 30 min at 4°C. The supernatant, whose
protein concentration was determined by the Bradford (7)
method, was used for electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) and footprinting.
Expression and purification protocols for glutathione
S-transferase (GST)- and His-tagged PacC fusion proteins
have been described previously (18, 34), as have polyclonal
antibodies raised against GST and GST::PacC fusion proteins
(30). Standard PCR techniques were used to make the
GST::IntA(2-186) construct. Exon 2 of intA was
amplified from A. nidulans genomic DNA using
oligonucleotides intA1 and intA2 (Table
1) and cloned as a
BamHI-EcoRI fragment into pD1 (for His tagging).
Exon 1 of intA was added by annealing oligonucleotides intA3
and intA4 and introducing exon 1 into the BamHI site of the
His-tagging construct using the compatible 5' overhang sequences. The
resulting construct, encoding residues 2 to 383 of IntA, was used as
template for PCR with oligonucleotides intA5 and intA6, which contain
BamHI and EcoRI sites, respectively. This PCR
product was cloned into pGEX-2T for GST::IntA(2-186) expression, and the resulting construct was verified by sequencing. [The His-tagged IntA(2-383) was not sufficiently soluble for use.] DNA binding assays using GST::IntA(2-186) followed the
procedures used for GST::PacC (18, 34), except
that 1 µM ZnCl2 was added to the reaction mixtures and
poly(dI-dC) was reduced to 1 µg per reaction.
EMSAs using 4 or 8% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide gels followed previously
described procedures (
30,
34).
gabA promoter
fragment
probes were amplified by PCR using primers containing an
XbaI
or
XhoI site that was end filled using
Klenow fragment after digestion.
Oligonucleotides gbA, gbC, gbE, and
gbG contain an
XbaI site,
and gbB, gbD, gbF, and gbH contain
a
XhoI site (Table
1). PCR
amplifications using the
corresponding named primers gave fragments
AB, CD, EF, and GH,
respectively, which were cloned into Bluescript
[pBS SK(+)] using the
XbaI and
XhoI sites and sequenced to confirm
the
absence of mutations. Fragments were excised from the plasmids
by
digestion with
XbaI and
XhoI, labeled with
[

-
32P]dCTP to a final specific activity of ~20
kcpm/ng, and used at
1 ng per EMSA. Binding reactions using crude
extracts and GST
fusion proteins were performed as described in
references
30 and
34,
respectively. The use of antibodies in EMSAs has been
described
previously (
30). Synthetic probes were constructed
and
labeled as described previously (
34).
DNase I footprinting with both strands of probe CD was as described
previously (
34). A 1-µg amount of
GST::PacC(69-168*)
or 15 µg of protein in crude extracts
was
used.
Promoter constructs with lacZ translational
fusion.
pBS
2 (31) was prepared, using standard PCR
techniques, for replacement of ipnA sequences by
gabA or amdS promoter fragments digested with
XbaI plus BamHI or SpeI plus
BamHI, respectively. Oligonucleotides lac1 and lac2 (Table
1) were used to amplify the region including codons 8 to 280 of
lacZ using pBS
2argB
as template.
The PCR fragment was digested with BamHI (for which a site
is located in lac1) plus ClaI and cloned into
pBS
2argB
digested with BamHI
plus ClaI to give pBS
lacZargB
,
which lacks ipnA sequences and the first 7 codons of
lacZ. These argB
plasmids contain a
truncated argB mutant allele that gives rise to a functional
argB+ allele and consequent arginine prototrophy
when transformed into an argB2 strain only if integration
occurs homologously in the argB gene. The recipient strain
had the genotype yA2 argB2 pantoB100. Truncated mutant and
wild-type promoters were fused to lacZ using standard PCR
techniques with oligonucleotides gbATG for gabA and AMDATG
for amdS. Both contain a BamHI site allowing
in-frame fusion of the first 6 codons of gabA and the first
14 codons of amdS to codon 8 of lacZ (see Fig.
8). Successive truncations of the gabA promoter were
constructed by PCR using plasmid pM18 (20) and
oligonucleotides gbATG plus gbUP, gbA, gbC, gbE, or gbG. PCR fragments
were digested with XbaI plus BamHI and ligated to
pBS
lacZargB
digested with SpeI
plus BamHI.
The
amdS promoter was amplified by PCR with genomic DNA of
the recipient strain as template and primers AMDSPRO1 and AMDSPRO2.
The
fragment was digested with
SpeI and
BamHI to give
a fragment
from positions

1008 to +127 (relative to translational
initiation)
of
amdS, cloned into pBS SK(+), and sequenced to
confirm the absence
of PCR-generated mutations. This pBS
amdS promoter clone was amplified
by PCR using AMDATG and
reverse oligonucleotide from pBS SK(+),
giving a fragment which was
digested with
SpeI and
BamHI (for
which a site is
present in AMDATG) and cloned into pBS SK(+).
The recombinant plasmid
was digested with
SpeI and
BssHII (for
which a
site at +35 is adjacent to the
BamHI site in AMDATG),
giving
an
amdS fragment which was substituted for the original
amdS SpeI-
BssHII fragment. The resulting plasmid
was digested
with
SpeI and
BamHI, and the
amdS fragment was cloned into
pBS
lacZargB
.
Point mutant
gabA promoters were obtained by PCR using
promoter A as a template and external primers gbA and gbATG with
internal
mutant primers gb1e and gb2e (for single mutation
A
4
T), gb1b
and gb2b (for double mutation
G
iv
T A
4
T), or gb1c and gb2c (for
triple
mutation G
iv
T G
1
T A
4
T).
The sequences of these internal
oligonucleotide primers are shown in
Fig.
5C.
The strategy for exchanging IntA binding sites in the
gabA
and
amdS promoters is shown in Fig.
8. PCR amplifications
used
gbA and gbATG together with the oligonucleotides shown in Fig.
8C
to construct a
gabA promoter with an
amdS IntA
site. Reverse
and AMDATG primers were used with the oligonucleotides
shown in
Fig.
8B to construct an
amdS promoter with a
gabA IntA/PacC
site.
All promoters were sequenced to ensure the absence of unintended
mutations, and the presence of a single copy of the construct
integrated at
argB was confirmed by Southern blotting as
described
previously (
31).
-Galactosidase assays.
Mycelia were grown from inocula of
1 × 106 to 2 × 106 conidiospores/ml
in appropriately supplemented shaken liquid minimal medium (11) adjusted to pH 8.0 with 25 mM Tris HCl, to pH 6.5 with 25 mM 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid, or to pH 4.0 with
25 mM citric acid. The final pH in each case was within 0.5 U of the
initial pH. Unless otherwise noted, 1% (wt/vol) D-glucose was the carbon source (carbon catabolite-repressing conditions). For
carbon catabolite-derepressing conditions, 0.1% (wt/vol)
D-fructose served as the carbon source. Ammonium [as the
(+)-tartrate] at 10 mM served as nitrogen source for nitrogen
metabolite-repressing conditions, and 100 mg of uric acid per liter was
used for nitrogen metabolite-derepressing conditions. For induction, 5 mM
-alanine was used. After 16 h of growth at 30°C, mycelia
were harvested, washed with distilled water, dried, and frozen in
liquid nitrogen. Protein extraction followed the protocol described
above but using the buffer described previously (31).
-Galactosidase activities were determined as described previously
(31). Values given are the average of at least three
independent experiments for each transformant, and standard errors are indicated.
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Localizing the ambient pH regulatory region in the gabA
promoter.
The positions of consensus binding sites for AreA, CreA,
and PacC and the only near-consensus binding site for IntA within 1,347 bp of the gabA initiation codon are indicated in Fig.
1A. Most of these sites are clustered
between
150 and
450 (relative to the initiation codon). Deletion
analysis to determine which of these sites are physiologically
important for gabA regulation was performed using
transformants in which a single copy of a construct containing a
gabA translational fusion with the Escherichia coli
lacZ gene had been targeted to the argB locus and
assaying reporter
-galactosidase activity (Fig. 1A). Four truncated
promoters, designated A, C, E, and G, were compared with a promoter
containing 1,347 bp upstream of the coding region (Fig. 1). Promoters
A, C, and E, containing
274 bp upstream of the coding region, showed relatively normal responses to nitrogen metabolite repression (Fig. 1B)
and carbon catabolite repression (Fig. 1C). Only promoters A and C,
containing
494 bp upstream of the coding region, responded to
-amino acid induction and ambient pH regulation (Fig. 1B). This
localizes a region required for induction and pH regulation to between
coordinates
274 and
494, within which lie the sole PacC consensus
and IntA near-consensus binding sites (Fig. 1A).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Functional analysis of the gabA promoter. (A)
Diagram of the gabA promoter and the translational fusion to
the E. coli lacZ gene. Consensus binding sequences for CreA,
AreA, and PacC are indicated, along with a near-consensus binding
sequence for IntA. Truncated forms of the promoter, with distances in
base pairs to the initiation codon, are shown. (B) -Galactosidase
activities for each promoter form normalized against promoter A
activity (since most further work was done with promoter A) under
induced, nitrogen metabolite-repressed, carbon catabolite-repressed,
neutral pH growth conditions. N-R indicates nitrogen
metabolite-repressing conditions; N-D indicates nitrogen-derepressing
conditions; +I/ I indicates inducing or noninducing conditions. All
cultures were grown under carbon catabolite-repressing conditions. (C)
Comparison of promoter activities (normalized against promoter A
activity) under carbon catabolite-derepressing (0.1%
D-fructose) and -repressing (1% D-glucose)
conditions. Cultures were grown under inducing, nitrogen
metabolite-repressing, neutral-pH conditions.
|
|
In vitro binding studies using gabA promoter
fragments.
Prior to analyzing the gabA promoter for
PacC binding sites, we wished to establish whether PacC can bind
sequences other than the previously determined GCCARG consensus. Using
bacterially expressed PacC DNA binding domain (DBD) oligohistidine- or
GST-tagged fusion proteins, a random oligonucleotide selection
experiment failed to identify any sequence beyond the known consensus,
even with large amounts of protein (800 ng per reaction) in three
selection cycles (data not shown). EMSA using four probes covering the
region involved in gabA regulation were consistent with this
result (Fig. 2A). Probes AB, EF, and GH
have no detectable PacC binding activity using cell extracts and 50 to
100 times less affinity for the GST::PacC(69-168*) fusion
protein than does probe CD containing the pH regulatory region (data
not shown).

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Gel shift analysis of probe CD containing the ambient pH
regulatory region. (A) Locations of the four overlapping probes with
coordinates relative to the initiation codon assayed for binding
properties. (B) Gel shift using probe CD and extracts of strains
carrying various mutations affecting pH regulation or the
GST::PacC(69-168*) fusion protein. (C) The two retardation
complexes formed using extracts from pacCc
strains. (D) Competition experiments using
pacCc14 extract, 1 ng of probe CD per reaction,
and the amounts shown of the ipnA2 synthetic site (30) or
the 32-bp CCAAT site from the pacA promoter (32)
formed by annealing oligonucleotides CCAAT-1 and CCAAT-2 (Table 1) and
end filling. (E) Gel shifts using CD and extracts of a wild-type strain
grown under different pH conditions and a
pacCc14 strain and supershifts using antibodies
against the PacC DBD and extracts of the two strains grown at neutral
pH. f.p., free probe.
|
|
Probe CD, covering

260 to

494, strongly binds both PacC from cell
extracts and the PacC DBD-containing
GST::PacC(69-168*)
fusion protein (Fig.
2B). A
single major retardation complex is
seen with extracts of a
neutral-pH-grown wild type strain (Fig.
2B). This complex does not form
with extracts of a null
pacC deletion
(
34)
strain, and its level is greatly reduced if extracts of
a
palH17 strain, defective in pH signaling, are used. The
partial-loss-of-function
palH45 mutation (
29) and
the
palI30 mutation (
13), which also
has a less
extreme acidity-mimicking phenotype than
palH17, only
slightly reduce the amount of this complex. The fusion protein
forms
two complexes with probe CD (Fig.
2B), as do extracts of
strains
carrying various
pacCc mutations, whose elevated
PacC levels (
27,
30) are probably
relevant to the formation
of the second complex (Fig.
2C). The
full-length
pacC
translation products for
pacCc14,
pacCc50,
pacCc200, and
pacCc63 contain 488, 262, 575, and 674 residues,
respectively. Thus,
the equivalent mobilities of both complexes for all
four strains
in Fig.
2C establish beyond doubt that neither complex
contains
the full-length form of PacC. The mobility of the
faster-moving
complex corresponds to that of the wild-type complex.
Formation
of both complexes with
pacCc14
extracts can be competed by a 31-mer double-stranded oligonucleotide
containing the ipnA2 high-affinity PacC binding site but not by
a
32-mer fragment from the
pacA promoter (
32) which
contains
a CCAAT sequence (Fig.
2D). The presence of the sequence CAAAT
in probe CD (see below) prompted the latter competition experiment.
Consistent with the presence of processed PacC in the complexes,
the
amount of wild-type complex increased upon raising the growth
pH and
PacC DBD antibodies supershifted both
pacC+ and
pacCc14 complexes (Fig.
2E).
After confirming that the retardation complexes observed with probe CD
involved the PacC consensus site region by using an
EMSA with the
32-mer probe (g


) shown in Fig.
3
(data not shown),
we proceeded to DNase I footprinting. A protected
window was seen
with extracts of wild-type and
pacCc14 strains as well as with the fusion
protein (Fig.
3). The GST
fusion protein protected a 23-nucleotide
region on the
gabA coding
strand and a 26-nucleotide region
on the complementary strand.
pacCc14 extract
alters the cutting pattern, suggesting that very high
levels of PacC
affect the structure of the probe. Adjacent to
the PacC consensus site
is a divergently orientated hexanucleotide
differing from the PacC
consensus only by replacement of A
4 by
G.

View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
DNase I footprinting using probe CD, extracts from
neutral-pH-grown pacC+ and
pacCc14 strains, and the
GST::PacC(69-168*) fusion protein. G+A indicates the Maxam
and Gilbert (26) depurination reaction used to map the
protected sequences. The synthetic g probe, shown between the
gels for the two strands, covers the protected region. The PacC
consensus site is in bold and underlined, and a nonconsensus site is
underlined with dots. Both gels are presented in the 5'-to-3'
orientation. The intensities of the numbered bands in each strand in
tracks containing PacC+ are less than 60% of those of the
bands labeled A, B and C, chosen for their similarity between
protein-lacking ( Protein) and PacC+-containing tracks,
as determined by phosphorimaging with ImageQuant software.
|
|
In vivo analysis of the consensus PacC binding site.
Promoter
C (Fig. 1A) contains all of the sequences necessary for pH regulation
of gabA, but A was chosen as the standard promoter since the
additional 180 bp of upstream sequence would help to ensure the absence
of an effect of vector sequences on reporter gene expression after
integration at the argB locus. Promoter A shows all known
forms of gabA regulation.
The A
4
T change abolishes PacC binding to the
high-affinity ipnA2 single site and the function of PacC sites in the
ipnA promoter
(
16,
18,
34). In the
gabA PacC consensus site, however,
the A
4
T
substitution does not significantly affect reporter gene
expression in
a
pacC+ strain under neutral growth conditions
(Fig.
4, compare lanes
2 and 6). Although
the activity of the mutant promoter is no longer
reduced by the weakly
alkalinity-mimicking mutation
pacCc50 (compare
lanes 6 and 7), it is markedly reduced by the strongly
alkalinity-mimicking
pacCc14 mutation (compare
lanes 8 and 9 with lane 6). In addition to
showing that mutating the
PacC consensus site with A
4
T only partially
alleviates
PacC repression, this experiment shows that mutation
of a PacC-binding
site alters the response to a mutant
pacC allele,
consistent
with a direct effect of PacC binding on
gabA expression.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Effect of the A4 T mutation in the PacC
consensus site on gabA promoter A
(gabAp::lacZ) activity in
pacC+, pacCc14, and
pacCc50 strains. Two progeny are shown for the
pacCc14 background. Strains were grown under
inducing, nitrogen metabolite-repressing, carbon catabolite-repressing
conditions in media buffered at neutral (lanes 2 to 9) or alkaline
(lane 1) pH. -Galactosidase activities are expressed as percentages
of the neutral-pH-grown
gabAp::lacZ
pacC+ strain activity.
|
|
Construction of a triple mutation preventing PacC binding.
The
A4
T substitution reduces the binding of the PacC fusion
protein to the 32-mer g
probe at least fivefold but does not abolish it (Fig. 5A). Reduced but
significant PacC binding to g
(A4
T) is also seen
using cell extracts (Fig. 5B). Although this mutant probe forms
non-PacC complexes of similar mobility to the PacC complex, the
continued predominance of the PacC-containing complex is shown by the
increasing prominence of the main band as the growth pH is increased
for the pacC+ strain and by its even greater
prominence using pacCc14 extract (Fig. 5B), as
well as by a supershift when PacC DBD antibodies are added to the
reaction mixture (data not shown).

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Effects of mutations in the PacC consensus and
nonconsensus sites of the g synthetic probe on in vitro binding
properties. (A) EMSA using the GST::PacC(69-168*) fusion
protein. (B) EMSA using extracts of a wild-type strain grown at acidic,
neutral, or alkaline pH, a neutral-pH-grown pacC null
mutant, and a neutral-pH-grown pacCc14 strain.
f.p., free probe. (C) g probe and positions of mutations. The
PacC consensus site is underlined, and the nonconsensus site has dotted
underlining. (D) Competition experiment using a neutral-pH-grown
pacC+ strain extract and unlabeled wild-type or
mutant forms of probe g . We used 30, 150, or 300 ng of cold
competitor and 0.3 ng of labeled g per reaction.
|
|
Since the A
4
T substitution in the PacC consensus site
neither abolishes PacC regulation of the
gabA promoter (Fig.
4) nor
abolishes PacC binding (Fig.
5A and
5B) and as PacC protects the
near consensus PacC site from DNase I digestion (Fig.
3), a
G
iv
T
(using Roman numerals to number near-consensus-site
positions),
substitution was introduced to give a doubly mutant g


probe
and a G
1
T substitution was also introduced to give
a triply mutant
g


probe (Fig.
5C). Only the triply mutant g


failed to compete
significantly with the wild-type probe (Fig.
5D).
When this triply
mutant g


was used as probe, no retardation
complexes were observed
using a variety of extracts, including all of
those used for the
experiment in Fig.
5B (data not
shown).
It is worth noting that the continued functionality of the
A
4
T singly mutated PacC site shows that PacC can repress
in the
absence of a consensus binding site when two near-consensus
sites
are immediately
adjacent.
PacC and IntA target sequences overlap.
The consensus IntA
binding site is TTCGGCGN7CCAAT (reference
12 and references therein). The binding of IntA
apparently requires the binding of the hap gene product
complex to the CCAAT component (33). There are no IntA
consensus sites in the 1,347 bp upstream of the gabA coding
region, and the only near-consensus site overlaps the double PacC
binding site (Fig. 6A). It differs in
having a C rather than a T at the first position and CAAAT rather than
CCAAT. Although the A4
T substitution in the PacC consensus sequence would not be expected to affect IntA binding, both the Giv
T and G1
T changes would.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Effects of mutations in the PacC consensus and
nonconsensus sites on promoter A activity. (A) IntA consensus binding
site (12) and gabA IntA near-consensus site with
mutational changes shown. PacC site underlining is as in Fig. 5.
Noncritical nucleotides in the IntA consensus site are italicized, and
deviations from the IntA consensus are shown in lowercase type. (B)
Relative -galactosidase activities of wild-type and mutant forms of
promoter A in intA+ (where no intA
allele is indicated), intA 101
(loss-of-function), and intAc2 (constitutive)
backgrounds. Cultures were grown under inducing (except where otherwise
noted), nitrogen metabolite-derepressing, carbon catabolite-repressing,
alkaline conditions.
|
|
Data in Fig.
6B confirm these expectations. Using mutant versions of
promoter A in single-copy
argB-targeted transformants,
the
A
4
T substitution elevates both

-amino acid-induced
and noninduced
levels of reporter gene expression. However, the
additional G
iv
T
or G
iv
T plus
G
1
T considerably reduces both induced and noninduced
levels. Because

-alanine is synthesized as a precursor for coenzyme
A, the "noninduced" levels are likely to be, in effect, partially
induced. An additional endogenous coinducer is likely to be GABA
resulting from glutamate decarboxylation, since at least two other
ascomycetes,
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (see database entries
Z48639.1
and U51031.1) and
Neurospora crassa
(
19), have glutamate decarboxylases.
In the presence of the
intA
101 loss-of-function mutation, the
G
iv
T ± G
1
T substitutions
have
little or no effect. In the presence of the
intAc2 constitutive mutation, which greatly
elevates activity levels
with the wild-type and A
4
T
promoters, G
iv
T ± G
1
T produce a
drastic reduction in expression (Fig.
6B, compare lanes 12 and
16 with
lane 8). These data establish a physiological role for
the IntA
near-consensus site in IntA-mediated induction of GABA
permease
synthesis and strongly support the hypothesis that PacC
repression of
GABA permease synthesis occurs through prevention
of induction, a
consequence of the overlap of PacC and IntA target
sites.
This situation is reminiscent of that in the promoter of
alcR, which encodes the transcriptional regulator of the
A. nidulans alcohol regulon, where there is binding
antagonism between overlapping
CreA and AlcR sites so that carbon
catabolite repression interferes
with induction (
25).
A PacC fusion protein competes with an IntA fusion protein for DNA
binding in vitro in the gabA promoter.
DNA binding by
a bacterially expressed IntA fusion protein has never been reported. We
encountered severe solubility problems in attempting to obtain an IntA
fusion protein expressed in E. coli and had to try a number
of constructs before obtaining soluble GST::IntA(2-186). An
additional problem is that large amounts of this protein are necessary
to detect DNA binding (Fig. 7), possibly
reflecting a requirement for CCAAT binding complex AnCF (33)
for efficient DNA binding. The identity of the
GST::IntA-containing complex was confirmed by the ability of
anti-GST serum to supershift it (data not shown). Competition for IntA
binding by the PacC protein is apparent with both the wild-type probe
and the A4
T mutant probe (Fig. 7). The ability of
increasing amounts of PacC to increase the levels of PacC-containing
complexes at the expense of IntA-containing complexes and the absence
of a supershifted complex indicate that competition rather than
simultaneous binding of both proteins is involved. The
A4
T mutation does not reduce IntA binding, consistent
with the fact that it abolishes neither IntA-mediated
-amino acid
induction nor the effect of the intAc2
constitutive mutation (Fig. 6B). Data in Fig. 7 suggest that PacC
occupancy of the PacC near-consensus site is crucial to the competition, consistent with the overlap between this site and the IntA
consensus site (Fig. 6A) and with the correlation between reduced
gabA expression (Fig. 4) and elevated PacC levels (27, 30) (Fig. 2B and D) in pacCc mutant
strains.

View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Oligohistidine-tagged PacC protein competes with
GST::IntA for binding to g wild-type and
A4 T mutant probes. GST::IntA(2-186) was added
at 900 ng per reaction, whereas
His(10)::PacC(69-168) was added at 12.5, 25, 50, 100, or 200 ng (wild-type probe) or 50 or 100 ng (mutant probe) per
reaction. The binding-site orientation is that shown in Fig. 6A. This
is the only experiment shown in which an 8% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide
gel was used.
|
|
Site swapping: eliminating pH regulation from gabA
expression and installing it in amdS expression.
IntA
binding sites in the gabA and amdS promoters are
compared in Fig. 8A. Figures 8B and C
show the sequence alterations for swapping IntA sites between the two
promoters for translational fusion genes. The wild-type amdS
promoter containing 1,008 bp upstream of the coding region
(10) contains all necessary regulatory elements for
amdS expression and shows normal responses to
-amino acid
induction, nitrogen metabolite repression, and carbon catabolite repression (data not shown). The wild-type gabA promoter is
the 674-bp promoter A (Fig. 1). The wild-type amdS promoter
does not respond to pH regulation of transcript levels (data not shown) or reporter gene expression (Fig. 9A),
whereas the wild-type gabA promoter does (20)
(Fig. 1B and 9B). With the change of 10 bp in the amdS
promoter (Fig. 8B), pH regulation is introduced and the amdS
promoter becomes acid expressed (Fig. 9A). A change of 9 bp in the IntA
site of the gabA promoter (Fig. 8C) virtually abolishes pH
regulation (Fig. 9B). Both IntA site-swapped promoters retain responses
to
-amino acid induction, nitrogen metabolite repression, and carbon
catabolite repression (data not shown). Thus, the 19 bp of the IntA
target site contain the entire region responsible for repression of
GABA permease synthesis at alkaline pH, with the overlap of PacC and
IntA sites enabling PacC to prevent IntA-mediated induction.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Interchange of IntA binding sites between the
gabA and amdS promoters. (A) Comparison of
consensus amdS and gabA IntA binding sites.
Vertical lines indicate identities in the amdS and
gabA promoters. (B) Diagram of
amdS::lacZ translational fusion, with
altered base pairs giving the gabA IntA binding site shown
in capital letters and sequences of oligonucleotides used for PCR
underlined (see Materials and Methods). (C) Diagram of the
gabA::lacZ translational fusion, with
altered base pairs giving the amdS IntA binding site shown
in capital letters and sequences of oligonucleotides used for PCR
underlined.
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
Effects of IntA site exchange on regulation of
amdS and gabA promoters. (A) Effects of
exchanging the gabA IntA/PacC site for the amdS
IntA site in the amdS promoter. (B) Effect of exchanging the
amdS IntA site for the gabA IntA/PacC site in the
gabA promoter. For both panels, -galactosidase activities
are expressed relative to the activity of the wild-type (wt) promoter
under alkaline growth conditions and all cultures were grown under
inducing, nitrogen metabolite-repressing, carbon catabolite-repressing
conditions.
|
|
In conclusion, we show here for the first time that PacC acts as a
genuine repressor for an acid-expressed gene through preventing
the
binding of a positively acting transcription factor. Since
we have
previously shown that PacC acts as a transcriptional activator
for
alkali-expressed genes (
16), this work establishes the dual
role of PacC as activator and repressor in pH
regulation.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Elaine Bignell for technical assistance and Joan
Tilburn, Chris Brown, Miguel Peñalva, Elaine Bignell, Lynne
Rainbow, and Susana Negrete-Urtasun for valuable advice.
E.A.E. holds an EMBO Fellowship. We thank BBSRC (60/P05893 and
60/P11494 to H.N.A.) and the European Commission (BIO4-CT96-0535 to
H.N.A.) for support.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Infectious Diseases, Imperial College School of Medicine at Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Rd., London W12 0NN, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 20 83833436. Fax: 44 20 83833394. E-mail:
h.arst{at}ic.ac.uk.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Andrianopoulos, A., and M. J. Hynes.
1990.
Sequence and functional analysis of the positively-acting regulatory gene amdR from Aspergillus nidulans.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10:3194-3203[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Arst, H. N., Jr.
1976.
Integrator gene in Aspergillus nidulans.
Nature
262:231-234[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Arst, H. N., Jr.,
E. Bignell, and J. Tilburn.
1994.
Two new genes involved in signalling ambient pH in Aspergillus nidulans.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
245:787-790[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Arst, H. N., Jr., and D. J. Cove.
1973.
Nitrogen metabolite repression in Aspergillus nidulans.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
126:111-141[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Bailey, C., and H. N. Arst, Jr.
1975.
Carbon catabolite repression in Aspergillus nidulans.
Eur. J. Biochem.
51:573-577[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Bailey, C. R.,
H. A. Penfold, and H. N. Arst, Jr.
1979.
cis-dominant mutations affecting the expression of GABA permease in Aspergillus nidulans.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
169:79-83[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Bradford, M. M.
1976.
A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.
Anal. Biochem.
72:248-254[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Caddick, M. X.,
A. G. Brownlee, and H. N. Arst, Jr.
1986.
Regulation of gene expression by pH of the growth medium in Aspergillus nidulans.
Mol. Gen. Genet.
203:346-353[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Clutterbuck, A. J.
1993.
Aspergillus nidulans, p. 3.71-3.84.
In
S. J. O'Brien (ed.), Genetic maps. Locus maps of complex genomes, 6th ed., vol. 3. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 10.
|
Corrick, C. M.,
A. P. Twomey, and M. J. Hynes.
1987.
The nucleotide sequence of the amdS gene of Aspergillus nidulans and the molecular characterization of 5' mutations.
Gene
53:63-71[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Cove, D. J.
1966.
The induction and repression of nitrate reductase in the fungus Aspergillus nidulans.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
113:51-56[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Davis, M. A.,
J. M. Kelly, and M. J. Hynes.
1993.
Fungal catabolic gene regulation: molecular genetic analysis of the amdS gene of Aspergillus nidulans.
Genetica
90:133-145[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Denison, S. H.,
S. Negrete-Urtasun,
J.-M. Mingot,
J. Tilburn,
W. A. Mayer,
A. Goel,
E. A. Espeso,
M. A. Peñalva, and H. N. Arst, Jr.
1998.
Putative membrane components of signal transduction pathways for ambient pH regulation in Aspergillus and meiosis in Saccharomyces are homologous.
Mol. Microbiol.
30:259-264[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Denison, S. H.,
M. Orejas, and H. N. Arst, Jr.
1995.
Signaling of ambient pH in Aspergillus involves a cysteine protease.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:28519-28522[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Dowzer, C. E. A., and J. M. Kelly.
1991.
Analysis of the creA gene, a regulator of carbon catabolite repression in Aspergillus nidulans.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:5701-5709[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Espeso, E. A., and M. A. Peñalva.
1996.
Three binding sites for the Aspergillus nidulans PacC zinc-finger transcription factor are necessary and sufficient for regulation by ambient pH of the isopenicillin N synthase gene promoter.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:28825-28830[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16a.
|
Espeso, E. A.,
T. Roncal,
E. Díez,
L. Rainbow,
E. Bignell,
J. Álvaro,
T. Suárez,
S. H. Denison,
J. Tilburn,
H. N. Arst, Jr., and M. A. Peñalva.
2000.
On how a transcription factor can avoid its proteolytic activation in the absence of signal transduction.
EMBO J.
19:719-728[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Espeso, E. A.,
J. Tilburn,
H. N. Arst, Jr., and M. A. Peñalva.
1993.
pH regulation is a major determinant in expression of a fungal biosynthetic gene.
EMBO J.
12:3947-3956[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Espeso, E. A.,
J. Tilburn,
L. Sanchez-Pulido,
C. V. Brown,
A. Valencia,
H. N. Arst, Jr., and M. A. Peñalva.
1997.
Specific DNA recognition by the Aspergillus nidulans three zinc finger transcription factor PacC.
J. Mol. Biol.
274:466-480[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Hao, R., and J. C. Schmit.
1993.
Cloning of the gene for glutamate decarboxylase and its expression during conidiation in Neurospora crassa.
Biochem. J.
293:735-738.
|
| 20.
|
Hutchings, H.,
K.-P. Stahmann,
S. Roels,
E. A. Espeso,
W. E. Timberlake,
H. N. Arst, Jr., and J. Tilburn.
1999.
The multiply-regulated gabA gene encoding the GABA permease of Aspergillus nidulans: a score of exons.
Mol. Microbiol.
32:557-568[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Kudla, B.,
M. X. Caddick,
T. Langdon,
N. M. Martinez-Rossi,
C. F. Bennett,
S. Sibley,
R. W. Davies, and H. N. Arst, Jr.
1990.
The regulatory gene areA mediating nitrogen metabolite repression in Aspergillus nidulans. Mutations affecting specificity of gene activation alter a loop residue of a putative zinc finger.
EMBO J.
9:1355-1364[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Kulmburg, P.,
M. Mathieu,
C. Dowzer,
J. Kelly, and B. Felenbok.
1993.
Specific binding sites in the alcA and alcR promoters of the alcohol regulon for the CREA repressor mediating carbon catabolite repression in Aspergillus nidulans.
Mol. Microbiol.
7:847-857[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
MacCabe, A. P.,
M. Orejas,
J. A. Pérez-Gonzalez, and D. Ramón.
1998.
Opposite patterns of expression of two Aspergillus nidulans xylanase genes with respect to ambient pH.
J. Bacteriol.
180:1331-1333[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Maccheroni, W., Jr.,
G. S. May,
N. M. Martinez-Rossi, and A. Rossi.
1997.
The sequence of palF, an environmental pH response gene in Aspergillus nidulans.
Gene
194:163-167[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Mathieu, M., and B. Felenbok.
1994.
The Aspergillus nidulans CREA protein mediates glucose repression of the ethanol regulon at various levels through competition with the ALCR-specific transactivator.
EMBO J.
13:4022-4027[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Maxam, A. M., and W. Gilbert.
1980.
Sequencing end-labeled DNA with base-specific chemical cleavages.
Methods Enzymol.
65:499-560[Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Mingot, J.-M.,
J. Tilburn,
E. Diez,
E. Bignell,
M. Orejas,
D. A. Widdick,
S. Sarkar,
C. V. Brown,
M. X. Caddick,
E. A. Espeso,
H. N. Arst, Jr., and M. A. Peñalva.
1999.
Specificity determinants of proteolytic processing of Aspergillus PacC transcription factor are remote from the processing site, and processing occurs in yeast if pH signalling is bypassed.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:1390-1400[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Negrete-Urtasun, S.,
S. H. Denison, and H. N. Arst, Jr.
1997.
Characterization of the pH signal transduction pathway gene palA of Aspergillus nidulans and identification of possible homologs.
J. Bacteriol.
179:1832-1835[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Negrete-Urtasun, S.,
W. Reiter,
E. Diez,
S. H. Denison,
J. Tilburn,
E. A. Espeso,
M. A. Peñalva, and H. N. Arst, Jr.
1999.
Ambient pH signal transduction in Aspergillus: completion of gene characterization.
Mol. Microbiol.
33:994-1003[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Orejas, M.,
E. A. Espeso,
J. Tilburn,
S. Sarkar,
H. N. Arst, Jr., and M. A. Peñalva.
1995.
Activation of the Aspergillus PacC transcription factor in response to alkaline ambient pH requires proteolysis of the carboxy-terminal moiety.
Genes Dev.
9:1622-1632[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Pérez-Esteban, B.,
M. Orejas,
E. Gómez-Pardo, and M. A. Peñalva.
1993.
Molecular characterization of a fungal secondary metabolism promoter: transcription of the Aspergillus nidulans isopenicillin N synthetase gene is modulated by upstream negative elements.
Mol. Microbiol.
9:881-895[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Sarkar, S.,
M. X. Caddick,
E. Bignell,
J. Tilburn, and H. N. Arst, Jr.
1996.
Regulation of gene expression by ambient pH in Aspergillus: genes expressed at acid pH.
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
24:360-363[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Steidl, S.,
P. Papagiannopoulos,
O. Litzka,
A. Andrianopoulos,
M. A. Davis,
A. A. Brakhage, and M. J. Hynes.
1999.
AnCF, the CCAAT binding complex of Aspergillus nidulans, contains products of the hapB, hapC, and hapE genes and is required for activation by the pathway-specific regulatory gene amdR.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:99-106[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Tilburn, J.,
S. Sarkar,
D. A. Widdick,
E. A. Espeso,
M. Orejas,
J. Mungroo,
M. A. Peñalva, and H. N. Arst, Jr.
1995.
The Aspergillus PacC zinc finger transcription factor mediates regulation of both acid- and alkaline-expressed genes by ambient pH.
EMBO J.
14:779-790[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Tilburn, J.,
C. Scazzocchio,
G. G. Taylor,
J. H. Zabicky-Zissman,
R. A. Lockington, and R. W. Davies.
1983.
Transformation by integration in Aspergillus nidulans.
Gene
26:205-211[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Wilson, R. A., and H. N. Arst, Jr.
1998.
Mutational analysis of AREA, a transcriptional activator mediating nitrogen metabolite repression in Aspergillus nidulans and a member of the "streetwise" GATA family of transcription factors.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
62:586-596[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, May 2000, p. 3355-3363, Vol. 20, No. 10
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Gardiner, D. M., Osborne, S., Kazan, K., Manners, J. M.
(2009). Low pH regulates the production of deoxynivalenol by Fusarium graminearum. Microbiology
155: 3149-3156
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rolland, S., Bruel, C., Rascle, C., Girard, V., Billon-Grand, G., Poussereau, N.
(2009). pH controls both transcription and post-translational processing of the protease BcACP1 in the phytopathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea. Microbiology
155: 2097-2105
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rodriguez-Galan, O., Galindo, A., Hervas-Aguilar, A., Arst, H. N. Jr., Penalva, M. A.
(2009). Physiological Involvement in pH Signaling of Vps24-mediated Recruitment of Aspergillus PalB Cysteine Protease to ESCRT-III. J. Biol. Chem.
284: 4404-4412
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Penas, M. M., Hervas-Aguilar, A., Munera-Huertas, T., Reoyo, E., Penalva, M. A., Arst, H. N. Jr., Tilburn, J.
(2007). Further Characterization of the Signaling Proteolysis Step in the Aspergillus nidulans pH Signal Transduction Pathway. Eukaryot Cell
6: 960-970
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Baek, Y.-U., Martin, S. J., Davis, D. A.
(2006). Evidence for Novel pH-Dependent Regulation of Candida albicans Rim101, a Direct Transcriptional Repressor of the Cell Wall {beta}-Glycosidase Phr2.. Eukaryot Cell
5: 1550-1559
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tominaga, M., Lee, Y.-H., Hayashi, R., Suzuki, Y., Yamada, O., Sakamoto, K., Gotoh, K., Akita, O.
(2006). Molecular Analysis of an Inactive Aflatoxin Biosynthesis Gene Cluster in Aspergillus oryzae RIB Strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
72: 484-490
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tilburn, J., Sanchez-Ferrero, J. C., Reoyo, E., Arst, H. N. Jr., Penalva, M. A.
(2005). Mutational Analysis of the pH Signal Transduction Component PalC of Aspergillus nidulans Supports Distant Similarity to BRO1 Domain Family Members. Genetics
171: 393-401
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Vicentefranqueira, R., Moreno, M. A., Leal, F., Calera, J. A.
(2005). The zrfA and zrfB Genes of Aspergillus fumigatus Encode the Zinc Transporter Proteins of a Zinc Uptake System Induced in an Acid, Zinc-Depleted Environment. Eukaryot Cell
4: 837-848
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lotz, H., Sohn, K., Brunner, H., Muhlschlegel, F. A., Rupp, S.
(2004). RBR1, a Novel pH-Regulated Cell Wall Gene of Candida albicans, Is Repressed by RIM101 and Activated by NRG1. Eukaryot Cell
3: 776-784
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Eisendle, M., Oberegger, H., Buttinger, R., Illmer, P., Haas, H.
(2004). Biosynthesis and Uptake of Siderophores Is Controlled by the PacC-Mediated Ambient-pH Regulatory System in Aspergillus nidulans. Eukaryot Cell
3: 561-563
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Flaherty, J. E., Pirttila, A. M., Bluhm, B. H., Woloshuk, C. P.
(2003). PAC1, a pH-Regulatory Gene from Fusarium verticillioides. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
69: 5222-5227
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ramon, A. M., Fonzi, W. A.
(2003). Diverged Binding Specificity of Rim101p, the Candida albicans Ortholog of PacC. Eukaryot Cell
2: 718-728
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lamb, T. M., Mitchell, A. P.
(2003). The Transcription Factor Rim101p Governs Ion Tolerance and Cell Differentiation by Direct Repression of the Regulatory Genes NRG1 and SMP1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol.
23: 677-686
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Penalva, M. A., Arst, H. N. Jr.
(2002). Regulation of Gene Expression by Ambient pH in Filamentous Fungi and Yeasts. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
66: 426-446
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Fraser, J. A., Davis, M. A., Hynes, M. J.
(2002). A Gene from Aspergillus nidulans with Similarity to URE2 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Encodes a Glutathione S-Transferase Which Contributes to Heavy Metal and Xenobiotic Resistance. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
68: 2802-2808
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gonzalez-Lopez, C. I., Szabo, R., Blanchin-Roland, S., Gaillardin, C.
(2002). Genetic Control of Extracellular Protease Synthesis in the Yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Genetics
160: 417-427
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mingot, J. M., Espeso, E. A., Díez, E., Peñalva, M. A.
(2001). Ambient pH Signaling Regulates Nuclear Localization of the Aspergillus nidulans PacC Transcription Factor. Mol. Cell. Biol.
21: 1688-1699
[Abstract]
[Full Text]