Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, May 2000, p. 3459-3469, Vol. 20, No. 10
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo,
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033,1 and
Department of Gene Mechanisms, Graduate School of
Biostudies, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto
606-8502,2 Japan
Received 29 November 1999/Returned for modification 10 January
2000/Accepted 28 February 2000
Sister chromatid cohesion is essential for cell viability. We have
isolated a novel temperature-sensitive lethal mutant named eso1-H17 that displays spindle assembly
checkpoint-dependent mitotic delay and abnormal chromosome segregation.
At the permissive temperature, the eso1-H17 mutant shows
mild sensitivity to UV irradiation and DNA-damaging chemicals. At the
nonpermissive temperature, the mutant is arrested in M phase with a
viability loss due to a failure to establish sister chromatid cohesion
during S phase. The lethal M-phase arrest phenotype, however, is
suppressed by inactivation of a spindle checkpoint. The
eso1+ gene is not essential for the onset and
progression of DNA replication but has remarkable genetic interactions
with those genes regulating the G1-S transition and DNA
replication. The N-terminal two-thirds of Eso1p is highly homologous to
DNA polymerase Virtually all eukaryotic cells
propagate through a process called the cell cycle that consists of four
distinct phases, G1, S, G2, and M, whose
principal role is to carry out duplication of the chromosomes and
subsequent faithful distribution into daughter cells. Commitment to the
initiation of the cell cycle is made at a point in late G1
phase called start or restriction point. In the fission yeast,
Schizosaccharomyces pombe, passage through start
requires the execution of at least two regulatory systems, Res-Cdc10-Rep (Res1p-Cdc10p and Res2p-Cdc10p-Rep2p) transcriptional factor complexes and Cdc2p-Cig2p/Cyc17p cyclin-dependent kinase complex (reviewed in references 37 and
54). Res-Cdc10-Rep complexes activate cell cycle
start-specific transcription genes, which contain a cis
regulatory element called the MluI cell cycle box. One of
those target genes is cdc18+, whose product is a
key component of the preinitiation form of origin replication complex
and plays a crucial role in loading origins with the replication
machinery including DNA polymerases in cooperation with minichromosome
maintenance proteins (reviewed in reference 35).
Cdc2p-Cig2p activity is also required for origin firing, but its
critical target(s) has not been identified yet. These initiation
factors and replication factors are highly conserved throughout eukaryotes.
In order to ensure faithful transmission of the duplicated chromosomes
to daughter cells, the duplicated sister chromatids are linked
together along their entire region during S phase until mid-M phase
(13). In fact, the disorder of this linkage, called sister chromatid cohesion, can result in viability loss (10, 14,
29, 42, 50). Sister chromatid cohesion is formed by a set of
proteins that are highly conserved through evolution. In the budding
yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, there is a multiprotein complex called cohesin which contains at least four subunits: Scc1p/Mcd1p (homologous to fission yeast Rad21p), Scc3p, Smc1p, and
Smc3p (reviewed in reference 34). Similarly, cohesin
of Xenopus laevis egg consists of five subunits, three of
which are homologues of Smc1p, Smc3p, and Scc1p/Mcd1p/Rad21p
(23). From late G1 until M phase,
Scc1p/Mcd1p stays bound to chromosomes but is removed in
anaphase by Esp1p (homologous to fission yeast Cut1p)-dependent
cleavage and then degraded in G1 by the anaphase-promoting complex-cyclosome (29, 51). Fission yeast Mis4p, which is homologous to budding yeast Scc2p and also required for
sister chromatid cohesion, is not a cohesin subunit and belongs
to a distinct class of proteins called adherins, which are not degraded in G1 (10). The role of adherin seems to be to
load cohesin complex onto chromosomes in G1
(50). On the other hand, budding yeast Eco1p/Ctf7p, the
third class of factors essential for sister chromatid cohesion, appears
to be required only for the establishment of cohesion during S phase
and not for the loading of adherin or cohesin onto chromosomes or for
the maintenance of cohesion after S phase (42, 50).
In this report, we describe the fission yeast
eso1+ gene, initially identified as the one
responsible for a novel temperature-sensitive lethal
cdc-like mutant that displays cell elongation and abnormal chromosome segregation. The eso1+ gene encodes
an essential protein that contains two domains highly homologous to the
budding yeast Rad30p or DNA polymerase Fission yeast strains, media, and genetic methods.
The
S. pombe mutant strains Libraries and vectors.
The S. pombe genomic
libraries were constructed by inserting restriction enzyme-digested
wild-type (L972) genomic DNA into the pALSK+ vectors. The
S. pombe cDNA library has been described previously (39, 45). The pALSK+ vector used for genomic DNA
expression was constructed by inserting an autonomously replicating
sequence (ars1) and a leucine auxotrophic selection marker gene
(LEU2 of S. cerevisiae) into the pBluescript II
(SK(+) vector (Stratagene) whose plasmid replication origin was
replaced with that of pBR322. The pcL expression vector contains the
LEU2 gene, ars1, and the simian virus 40 promoter to drive the expression of the insert. The pREP81-rad21+
plasmid was described previously (49).
Isolation of eso1+ gene.
The
eso1+ gene was isolated by complementation of
the temperature-sensitive eso1-H17 mutant. The
h Gene disruption.
Gene disruption was performed by one-step
gene replacement. The 1.2-kb EcoRI-PstI fragment
of the eso1+ gene was replaced with a
ura4+ cassette. The linear
SpeI-XhoI fragment carrying the replaced gene was
transformed into the h Deletion analysis and multicopy suppression analysis.
The
eso1+ cDNA clones variously truncated at the 5'
coding region were isolated from the cDNA library and used to construct a series of amino-terminal deletion mutants. A series of
carboxyl-terminally truncated mutants were constructed by gradual
deletion of a full-length eso1+ cDNA with
exonuclease III. All deletion mutants constructed were confirmed for
their structure by DNA sequencing and inserted into the pcL vector. The
full-length eso1+ gene and its deletion mutants
were transformed into h Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The DDBJ-EMBL-GenBank
accession no. for eso1+ is AB039861.
Isolation of the eso1-H17 mutant.
To search for
new genes regulating the cell cycle in fission yeast, we generated
several temperature-sensitive cell division cycle (cdc)
mutants (32, 46). One mutant names eso1-H17
(essential for S-chromatin organization; see below) was chosen for
further study.
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Fission Yeast Eso1p Is Required for Establishing
Sister Chromatid Cohesion during S Phase



![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
of budding yeast and humans, and the C-terminal
one-third is homologous to budding yeast Eco1p (also called Ctf7p),
which is required for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion.
Deletion analysis and determination of the mutation site reveal that
the function of the Eco1p/Ctf7p-homologous domain is necessary and
sufficient for sister chromatid cohesion. On the other hand, deletion
of the DNA polymerase
domain in Eso1p increases sensitivity to UV
irradiation. These results indicate that Eso1p plays a dual role during
DNA replication. The C-terminal region acts to establish sister
chromatid cohesion, and the N-terminal region presumably catalyzes
translesion DNA synthesis when template DNA contains lesions that block
regular DNA replication.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
(18, 27,
40; reviewed in reference 53) and
Eco1p/Ctf7p, respectively; the Eco1p/Ctf7p domain is essential for
establishing sister chromatid cohesion, whereas the DNA polymerase
domain is involved in DNA repair as expected.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
mad2,
mis4-242, and rad21-K1 and the strain used for
visualization of Cen1-green fluorescent protein (GFP) were described
previously (11, 21, 47, 49). Strains were cultured in the
complete medium YE or the minimal medium MM (EMM2/PM) (2). A
nitrogen (ammonium chloride)-free derivative of MM (referred to as
MM-N) was used to synchronize cells in G1. When necessary,
minimal medium was supplemented with leucine (250 µg/ml for MM and 50 µg/ml for MM-N) and adenine sulfate (100 µg/ml). Transformations
were performed using the lithium acetate procedure as described
previously (38), and cells were spread on MMA plates
(15). Double mutant strains were obtained by crossing single
mutants followed by tetrad analysis. 4',6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining was done as described previously (1). Flow cytometry was performed as described previously (48). UV
irradiation was performed with a UV cross-linker (XL-1500; Spectronics
Co. Ltd.). Cell numbers were determined with a particle counter (Z1; Beckman Coulter, Inc.). Other general genetic manipulations of S. pombe have been described previously (2, 31).
eso1-H17 leu1-32 cells were transformed with
S. pombe genomic libraries and selected on MMA plates first
at 23°C for 24 h and then at 33°C for 4 days. Plasmid DNA
clones were recovered in Escherichia coli from candidates
and analyzed by Southern hybridization. The
eso1+ cDNA was isolated from the cDNA library by
colony hybridization and a 5'-RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends)
PCR method.
/h+
ade6-M210/ade6-M216 leu1-32/leu1-32 ura4-D18/ura4-D-18 diploid strain, and stable Ura+ transformants were selected. The
proper replacement of the one wild-type allele with the disrupted
eso1 construct was confirmed by Southern blot analysis.
eso1-H17 leu1-32 cells
and plated on MMA. Plates were incubated at 25°C for 24 h and
then at 32.5 or 36°C for 4 days or at 25°C for 6 days to determine
the numbers of both complemented and stably transfected cells. The
complementation (suppression) activities were calculated by dividing
the number of colonies formed at the restrictive temperature by the
number of colonies formed at 25°C. The ability of various cell cycle
control genes to rescue the eso1-H17 mutant was determined similarly.
![]()
RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
,
orp1, etc.) (7, 12, 32, 41) that are defective in
both DNA replication and S-phase checkpoint. To determine whether
eso1-H17 is a DNA replication mutant or not,
eso1-H17 cells were arrested by culturing them for 6 h
at the nonpermissive temperature and analyzed for the state of
chromosomes by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, in which only
completely replicated chromosomes enter the gel (17). Just like those of wild-type and G2-arrested cdc
mutant cells, the chromosomes of eso1-H17 cells entered the
gel (data not shown). Thus, we concluded that the eso1-H17
mutant is arrested after the completion of chromosome replication.

View larger version (53K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Phenotypes of the eso1-H17 mutant. (A) The
eso1-H17 mutant shows an elongated cell morphology.
Wild-type (h
leu1-32) and eso1-H17
(h
eso1-H17 leu1-32) cells were inoculated on
YEA plates, incubated overnight at the indicated temperatures, and
observed under the microscope. (B) The eso1-H17 mutant is
arrested with a broad peak of G2 DNA content. Cells were
grown to mid-log phase at 23°C in MM medium and shifted up to 34°C.
Cells were sampled at 2, 4, 6, and 8 h after the temperature shift
and analyzed by flow cytometry.
eso1-H17 is defective in chromosome segregation.
The most remarkable phenotype of eso1-H17 cells at the
restrictive temperature was rapid loss of viability (Fig.
2A) and abnormal nuclear morphology (Fig. 2B). We, therefore, examined this phenotype in
depth. At 25°C, wild-type and mutant cells exhibited similar nuclear
morphology. But after a shift to 36°C, the eso1-H17 mutant gradually lost interphase cells and reciprocally accumulated cells with
abnormal chromosome structures. After 3 h of incubation at 36°C,
a number of cells had condensed chromosomes (Fig. 2B, arrowheads within
the eso1-H17 36°C 3-h panel), implying that loss of Eso1p function leads to a mitotic delay. Thereafter, many cells showed cut
(septation in the absence of nuclear division) and missegregation of
chromosomes (Fig. 2B, eso1-H17 36°C 4-h panel).
|
Arrest of eso1-H17 cells is suppressed by inactivation
of a spindle assembly checkpoint.
Mitotic delay and arrest often
arise by activation of a spindle assembly checkpoint. To determine
whether the mitotic arrest-delay of eso1-H17 cells arose by
this mechanism or not, we constructed an eso1-H17
mad2
double mutant strain and examined its behavior. Mad2p is not required
for normal cell growth but is essential for spindle assembly checkpoint
(16, 21). Unlike the eso1-H17 single mutant, the
eso1-H17
mad2 double mutant was viable and continued to
proliferate at 36°C (Fig. 2B, eso1-H17
mad2 36°C 4-h
panel), indicating that the cell cycle arrest of the original eso1-H17 mutant was caused by the execution of a spindle
assembly checkpoint. However, suppression of eso1-H17 by
mad2 was incomplete, and its temperature sensitivity and
missegregation phenotypes persisted to a certain extent in the double
mutant (Fig. 2A and C). These results led us to conclude that Eso1p was
essential for proper chromosome segregation but dispensable for the
step of chromosome segregation per se. Since spindle assembly
checkpoint was activated upon inactivation of Eso1p, this conclusion
indicates that Eso1p may be required for the proper maintenance of
chromosome structure.
eso1-H17 cells are sensitive to DSB.
In addition
to the mitotic defect, the eso1-H17 mutant was sensitive to
UV irradiation (Fig. 3A) and exposure to
methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) or bleomycin (Fig. 3B) even at the
permissive temperature. By contrast, the mutant was slightly resistant
to base-modifying 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4NQO) (Fig. 3B). Since,
unlike 4NQO, UV, MMS, and bleomycin induce double-strand breaks (DSB),
these data show that the eso1-H17 mutant is sensitive to
DSB.
|
Eso1p is required during S phase.
To determine in which phase
of the cell cycle Eso1p is required to function, eso1-H17
cells were synchronized to G1 by nitrogen starvation and
then released to start the cell cycle in nitrogen-rich growth medium at
the nonpermissive temperature. Cells were harvested every hour and
assayed for viability by determining the number of colonies formed at
the permissive temperature. The mutant cells entered and proceeded
through the phase of DNA replication without any significant delay
(Fig. 4A), but their
viability decreased steeply between 3 and 6 h, the period in which
DNA synthesis took place (Fig. 4B). Abnormal nuclear morphologies were
frequently seen between 6 and 8 h, the period of mitosis (Fig.
4B). These results indicate that the function of Eso1p needs to be
executed at least during S phase for proper cell cycling.
|
Premature sister chromatid separation occurs in eso1-H17 cells. The demonstration of spindle assembly checkpoint-dependent mitotic arrest, abnormal chromosome segregation, and increased sensitivity to DSB-inducing reagents as the major phenotypes of the eso1-H17 mutant led us to speculate that Eso1p might be involved in sister chromatid cohesion. To investigate this possibility, we used the Cen1-GFP system to visualize the behavior of the centromere DNA of chromosome I in live eso1-H17 cells (11, 33). Cells were synchronized; released from G1 at the nonpermissive temperature; collected at 2, 4, and 6 h after release; and immediately observed under a fluorescence microscope. DNA replication occurred at around 4 h (Fig. 4A). Unlike wild-type cells, a large number of eso1-H17 interphase cells had two split Cen1-GFP signals at 4 to 6 h, which proves defective sister chromatid cohesion (Fig. 4C). Photos of cells showing two-split Cen1-GFP dots are shown in Fig. 4D. We thus concluded that Eso1p was essential for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion during S phase.
Eso1p function is not required for the maintenance of sister chromatid cohesion in G2-M phase. Sister chromatid cohesion is established during DNA replication and maintained until anaphase. To investigate whether Eso1p function is also required for cohesion maintenance, eso1-H17 cells were grown to saturation in YEL medium. Under these conditions, most of the cells arrested growth with 2n DNA contents (Fig. 4E) with a low septation index (eso1 mutant, 5.6%; rad21 mutant, 9.4%), indicating that more than 80% of cells were arrested in G2 phase. The cells were exposed to 36°C, released 3 h later to resume cell cycling in fresh medium at 36°C, harvested every 30 min, and observed for mitosis. As expected, the majority of the rad21-K1 cells that have a defective cohesin subunit (49) displayed abnormal mitosis as they proceeded through cell cycling, showing that cohesin complexes are also required for the maintenance of sister chromatid cohesion (14) (Fig. 4F, right graph). In contrast, the eso1-H17 mutant cells progressed through M phase without significant abnormalities (Fig. 4F, left graph). Thus, Eso1p is not required for the maintenance of sister chromatid cohesion once it is established in S phase.
The eso1+ gene encodes a fusion between DNA
polymerase
and Eco1p/Ctf7p homologues.
To clone the defective
gene in eso1-H17 cells, S. pombe genomic
libraries were screened for those that rescued the
temperature-sensitive lethality. Two nonoverlapping clones, S1
and Bg1, could rescue the mutant up to 36°C, and further analysis
showed that S1 contained the eso1+ gene (see
below). Characterization of the multicopy suppressor gene on Bg1 will
be described elsewhere.
|
, is a member of a
damage-bypass replication protein family, which includes the UmuC and
DinB proteins in E. coli and the Xeroderma pigmentosum
variant gene product in Homo sapiens (19, 22, 26,
27, 40, 43; reviewed in reference 53). On
the other hand, the carboxyl-terminal one-third of Eso1p shares
significant homology with another protein family conserved among
eukaryotes, which includes Eco1p/Ctf7p in S. cerevisiae and
putative proteins from Arabidopsis thaliana, Mus
musculus, and H. sapiens (42, 50). The genes
encoding Rad30p and Eco1p/Ctf7p are not contiguous and present on
chromosomes IV and VI, respectively, in budding yeast, and there is no
Eco1p/Ctf7p-homologous region in the Xeroderma pigmentosum variant gene
product in H. sapiens.
To obtain definitive evidence for the authenticity of the isolated gene
and to confirm the function of eso1+, cells
lacking the eso1+ gene were constructed by
one-step gene replacement. The sequence in eso1+
corresponding to the carboxyl-terminal half of Eso1p was replaced with
the S. pombe ura4+ gene (Fig. 5A) and
transfected in a diploid strain. Diploid cells disrupted for one
eso1+ allele were identified and confirmed by
genomic Southern hybridization. Tetrad analysis of the sporulated
diploid cells revealed that only two spores were viable and that all
viable spores were uracil auxotrophic (Fig. 5D). Microscopic
observation showed that the
eso1 spores germinated but
arrested cell cycling after two to three divisions (Fig. 5E). Spore
germination analysis showed that the
eso1 cells resembled
eso1-H17 cells and displayed abnormal chromosomes (Fig. 5F).
Furthermore,
eso1/eso1-H17 diploid cells were still
temperature sensitive for growth and failed to yield any haploid spores
that could grow at 36°C (data not shown). Based on these results, we
concluded that the cloned gene was indeed eso1+ itself.
The C-terminal region of Eso1p is necessary and sufficient for
sister chromatid cohesion.
To locate the functional domain of
Eso1p, a series of amino- and carboxyl-terminal deletion mutants were
constructed, and their ability to rescue the eso1-H17 mutant
was determined. As shown in Fig. 6, the
Rad30p-homologous region was totally dispensable, and the gene
truncated in the entire amino-terminal region (
N597) retained nearly
all its ability to suppress the mutant. On the other hand, the
carboxyl-terminal region homologous to Eco1p/Ctf7p was absolutely
essential for function. Even a deletion of only 16 amino acids
from the C terminus (
C16) largely abrogated the activity. Similarly,
the C-terminal Eco1p/Ctf7p domain (
N597), but not
C16,
suppressed the UV sensitivity of eso1-H17 cells (data not
shown), indicating that the UV sensitivity of eso1-H17 cells
results from poor establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Furthermore, the eso1-H17 allele contained a point mutation
that resulted in a change from glycine at position 799 to aspartic acid. These results indicate that loss of the function of the Eco1p/Ctf7p-homologous domain in Eso1p caused the eso1-H17
phenotypes.
|
eso1 cells harboring not only full-length
eso1+ but also the amino-terminal deletion
mutants grew and formed colonies. Nuclear morphology (Fig.
7A), bleomycin sensitivity (Fig. 7B), and
growth rate (Fig. 7C) of the
eso1 cells rescued by
N458 or
N597 were indistinguishable from those of the
eso1 cells rescued by full-length
eso1+. These results indicate that the
C-terminal region of Eso1p is sufficient for sister chromatid cohesion
and is fully functional without the N-terminal Rad30p-homologous
region.
|
Deletion of the DNA polymerase
domain in Eso1p elevates UV
sensitivity.
As mentioned above, expression of the C-terminal
Eco1p/Ctf7p-homologous region completely suppressed the defect of
sister chromatid cohesion of cells lacking
eso1+. However, unlike those rescued by
full-length eso1+, the
eso1 cells
rescued by
N458 or
N597 were still sensitive to UV irradiation
(Fig. 7B and D). Because, in the
eso1 cells, not only the
Eco1p/Ctf7p-homologous region but also about 30% of the
Rad30p-homologous region was deleted, some of this region is likely to
be required for the function of the DNA polymerase
domain (Fig.
5A). We thus concluded that loss of the DNA polymerase
domain elevates UV sensitivity and tentatively identified this domain
as DNA polymerase
itself.
eso1+ genetically interacts with adherin
and cohesin.
The structural and functional similarity of Eso1p to
Eco1p/Ctf7p led us to test the possible genetic interactions between eso1+ and the genes encoding adherin and cohesin
subunits. The eso1-H17 mutant combined with
mis4-242, a temperature-sensitive mutation of adherin
(10), became more thermosensitive. Unlike
eso1-H17 and mis4-242 single mutants, which grow
at temperatures of 32.5 and 31.5°C, respectively, the double mutant
failed to grow at 29°C (Fig. 8A) and
barely grew at 27°C. Moreover, the eso1-H17 mutant was
synthetically lethal with rad21-K1 mutation. Tetrad dissection of spores from the cross between eso1-H17 and
rad21-K1 yielded no viable double mutant cells. Moreover, as
shown in Fig. 8B, the eso1-H17 rad21-K1 double mutant
rescued by the pREP81-rad21+ plasmid did not
grow when rad21+ in the plasmid was repressed.
|
eso1+ genetically interacts with
G1-S regulators also.
The execution of
eso1+ function during S phase suggests that
eso1+ function might be controlled by cell cycle
start factors. We, therefore, examined the ability of various cell
cycle start genes to rescue the eso1-H17 mutant. As shown in
Table 1, the res1+
and rep2+ genes could partially suppress the
temperature sensitivity. The cdc10+,
res2+, and rep1+ genes
also exhibited weak suppression activities (data not shown). These
genes encode a subunit of transcription factor complexes that regulate
the cell cycle start-specific transcription of genes (reviewed
in references 37 and 54). A
major target gene of Res-Cdc10-Rep transcription factor complexes
is cdc18+, which encodes a component of the
prereplicative complex. However, cdc18+ itself
had no detectable activity.
|
(8, 44, 52),
respectively, components of the DNA replication machinery, displayed
partial suppression. The cdc20+ cDNA having the
activity contained only the carboxy-terminal one-third of the coding
region devoid of the catalytic domain.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All the data presented show that eso1+, which we identified as a novel fission yeast cell cycle regulator, is a functional homologue of budding yeast ECO1/CTF7, which is required for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion during S phase (42, 50). Like cohesin and adherin, Eso1p/Eco1p/Ctf7p seems to be evolutionarily conserved at least with respect to structure. cDNA sequence databases from higher eukaryotes contain proteins with significant amino acid homology to this family, though their function is presently unknown.
However, there is a striking difference between Eso1p and other
Eco1p/Ctf7p family members. Eso1p contains a sequence highly homologous
to DNA polymerase
at its N-terminal side. DNA polymerase
performs DNA synthesis on a damaged template, a critical step in
postreplication repair, and in fact synthesizes a DNA strand with
correct bases on cis-syn thymine-thymine dimer-containing DNA templates (18, 25, 26; reviewed in reference
53). We found that deletion of the DNA polymerase
domain of Eso1p did not affect sister chromatid cohesion but
elevated sensitivity to UV damage. This result is consistent with the
possibility that the N-terminal region of Eso1p indeed has a DNA
polymerase
activity.
The elevated DNA damage sensitivity, particularly to DSB, of the eso1 mutant due to defective sister chromatid cohesion is highly consistent with the fact that cohesin and adherin mutants are also sensitive to UV irradiation at the permissive temperature (10, 49). The DSB sensitivity of these mutants suggests that the recombinatorial repair system may require sister chromatid cohesion for its efficient execution. This is quite reasonable, because the distance between the two homologous sequences must influence the efficiency of recombinatorial repair. In fact, the rad21 mutant was originally isolated as a DSB repair-deficient mutant (3).
It is of considerable importance to elucidate how Eso1p interacts with
adherin and cohesin and how Eso1p established sister chromatid cohesion
during S phase. Up to now, little was known about the molecular basis
of the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion during DNA synthesis.
Adherin and cohesin are essential, but not in themselves sufficient,
for sister chromatid cohesion. Sister chromatids are separated
precociously in the eco1-1 mutant though cohesin complexes
stay bound to chromosomes (50). Similarly, we found no
difference in the localization of Mis4GFPp and Rad21GFPp between
wild-type and eso1-H17 mutant cells (K. Tanaka, unpublished data). Thus, the Eso1/Eco1/Ctf7 protein family is perhaps not required
for the loading of adherin and cohesin onto chromosomes but has a role
in connecting nascent sister chromatids that have been duplicated in S
phase. Eso1 protein is present throughout the cell cycle at a constant
level (K. Tanaka, unpublished data), indicating that, if it is, the
activity is regulated at the posttranslational level. As shown in Fig.
6A, the truncation mutant
C16, in which G799, the residue mutated in
eso1-H17, is intact, is partially active at 32.5°C but
totally inactive at 36°C. This result suggests that the C-terminal
region of Eso1p may physically interact with another protein(s). We
found that eso1+ genetically interacts with
pcn1+ (encoding PCNA) and
cdc20+ (encoding a catalytic subunit of DNA
polymerase
). Similarly, POL30 (encoding PCNA) was
isolated as a high-copy suppressor of the ctf7-203 mutant in
budding yeast (42). Interestingly, the Cdc20 protein
truncated at the DNA polymerase domain retained eso1-H17 suppression activity. The carboxyl-terminal
region of Cdc20p is essential for cell viability (8), and
the DNA polymerase domain of polymerase
is dispensable for growth
in budding yeast (20). Although the molecular aspect of
interactions of Eso1p with DNA polymerase
and PCNA is totally
unknown, Eso1p might colocalize with the replication machinery and
thereby be promoted to interact with the nascent DNA loaded with
adherin and cohesin. Polymerase
and PCNA might have a role in
colocalization and/or activation of Eso1p. The presence of the DNA
polymerase
domain in Eso1p is also consistent with this possibility.
One of our remarkable findings is that the eso1-H17 mutant
is partially suppressed by the cell cycle start genes, such as res1+, rep2+, and
cig2+. The effect seems to be indirect because
the expression of eso1+ is not regulated
by the Res-Cdc10-Rep transcriptional activator complexes (T. Yonekawa, unpublished data). Res-Cdc10-Rep may act via the
cig2+ gene, since induction of its mRNA at the
G1-S boundary fully depends on these transcriptional
activators (28, 30, 36; K. Tanaka, unpublished
data), but seemingly not via the rad21+ gene,
because the expression of rad21+ gene is not
Cdc10p dependent though it is cell cycle regulated with a peak
during G1-S transition (4). Interestingly, only cig2+, not the cdc13+ or
the cig1+ gene, was able to suppress the
eso1 mutant, though the cell cycle start function is not
specific to Cig2p and is shared by other B-type cyclins (9).
cig2+ also rescues the temperature sensitivity
of the rad21-K1 mutant. These results raise the possibility
that the Cig2 cyclin has a novel function as an activator of sister
chromatid cohesion, though it is inessential since
cig2
cells are viable (5, 6, 36). Eso1p possesses a single
Cdc2 kinase phosphorylation consensus sequence (SPKR; from
position 505 to 508), but mutations that change the serine residue to
alanine or aspartic acid did not significantly influence Eso1p
activity, suggesting that Eso1p is unlikely to be a direct functional
substrate of Cig2p-Cdc2p kinase (T. Yonekawa, unpublished data).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Tomohiro Matsumoto, Kazuo Tatebayashi, and Koei Okazaki for providing strains, plasmids, and libraries.
This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan and a CREST (Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology) Research Project from JST (Japan Science and Technology Corporation).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan. Phone: 81-3-5689-0876. Fax: 81-3-3815-1490. E-mail: okayama{at}m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Present address: Biochemical Research Laboratory, Eiken Chemical
Co. Ltd., Tochigi, Japan.
Present address: Department of Pathology, School of Medicine,
Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5324.
§ Present address: Cell Cycle Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, London WC2A 3PX, United Kingdom.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Adachi, Y., and M. Yanagida.
1989.
Higher order chromosome structure is affected by cold-sensitive mutations in a Schizosaccharomyces pombe gene crm1+ which encodes a 115-kD protein preferentially localized in the nucleus and its periphery.
J. Cell Biol.
108:1195-1207 |
| 2. | Alfa, C., P. Fantes, J. Hyams, M. McLeod, and E. Warbrick. 1993. Experiments with fission yeast. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 3. |
Birkenbihl, R. P., and S. Subramani.
1992.
Cloning and characterization of rad21, an essential gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe involved in DNA double-strand-break repair.
Nucleic Acids Res.
20:6605-6611 |
| 4. |
Birkenbihl, R. P., and S. Subramani.
1995.
The rad21 gene product of Schizosaccharomyces pombe is a nuclear, cell cycle-regulated phosphoprotein.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:7703-7711 |
| 5. |
Bueno, A., and P. Russell.
1993.
Two fission yeast B-type cyclins, Cig2 and Cdc13, have different functions in mitosis.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:2286-2297 |
| 6. |
Connolly, T., and D. Beach.
1994.
Interaction between the Cig1 and Cig2 B-type cyclins in the fission yeast cell cycle.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:768-776 |
| 7. | D'Urso, G., B. Grallert, and P. Nurse. 1995. DNA polymerase alpha, a component of the replication initiation complex, is essential for the checkpoint coupling S phase to mitosis in fission yeast. J. Cell Sci. 108:3109-3118[Abstract]. |
| 8. |
D'Urso, G., and P. Nurse.
1997.
Schizosaccharomyces pombe cdc20+ encodes DNA polymerase epsilon and is required for chromosomal replication but not for the S phase checkpoint.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:12491-12496 |
| 9. | Fisher, D. L., and P. Nurse. 1996. A single fission yeast mitotic cyclin B p34cdc2 kinase promotes both S-phase and mitosis in the absence of G1 cyclins. EMBO J. 15:850-860[Medline]. |
| 10. |
Furuya, K.,
K. Takahashi, and M. Yanagida.
1998.
Faithful anaphase is ensured by Mis4, a sister chromatid cohesion molecule required in S phase and not destroyed in G1 phase.
Genes Dev.
12:3408-3418 |
| 11. |
Goshima, G.,
S. Saitoh, and M. Yanagida.
1999.
Proper metaphase spindle length is determined by centromere proteins Mis12 and Mis6 required for faithful chromosome segregation.
Genes Dev.
13:1664-1677 |
| 12. |
Grallert, B., and P. Nurse.
1996.
The ORC1 homolog orp1 in fission yeast plays a key role in regulating onset of S phase.
Genes Dev.
10:2644-2654 |
| 13. |
Guacci, V.,
E. Hogan, and D. Koshland.
1994.
Chromosome condensation and sister chromatid pairing in budding yeast.
J. Cell Biol.
125:517-530 |
| 14. | Guacci, V., D. Koshland, and A. Strunnikov. 1997. A direct link between sister chromatid cohesion and chromosome condensation revealed through the analysis of MCD1 in S. cerevisiae. Cell 91:47-57[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 15. | Gutz, H., H. Heslot, U. Leupold, and N. Loprieno. 1974. Schizosaccharomyces pombe, p. 395-446. In R. C. King (ed.), Handbook of genetics, vol. 1. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y. |
| 16. |
He, X.,
T. E. Patterson, and S. Sazer.
1997.
The Schizosaccharomyces pombe spindle checkpoint protein mad2p blocks anaphase and genetically interacts with the anaphase-promoting complex.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:7965-7970 |
| 17. |
Hennessy, K. M.,
A. Lee,
E. Chen, and D. Botstein.
1991.
A group of interacting yeast DNA replication genes.
Genes Dev.
5:958-969 |
| 18. |
Johnson, R. E.,
S. Prakash, and L. Prakash.
1999.
Efficient bypass of a thymine-thymine dimer by yeast DNA polymerase, Poleta.
Science
283:1001-1004 |
| 19. |
Johnson, R. E.,
C. M. Kondratick,
S. Prakash, and L. Prakash.
1999.
hRAD30 mutations in the variant form of xeroderma pigmentosum.
Science
285:263-265 |
| 20. | Kesti, T., K. Flick, S. Keranen, J. E. Syvaoja, and C. Wittenberg. 1999. DNA polymerase epsilon catalytic domains are dispensable for DNA replication, DNA repair, and cell viability. Mol. Cell 3:679-685[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 21. |
Kim, S. H.,
D. P. Lin,
S. Matsumoto,
A. Kitazono, and T. Matsumoto.
1998.
Fission yeast Slp1: an effector of the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint.
Science
279:1045-1047 |
| 22. |
Kim, S. R.,
G. Maenhaut-Michel,
M. Yamada,
Y. Yamamoto,
K. Matsui,
T. Sofuni,
T. Nohmi, and H. Ohmori.
1997.
Multiple pathways for SOS-induced mutagenesis in Escherichia coli: an overexpression of dinB/dinP results in strongly enhancing mutagenesis in the absence of any exogenous treatment to damage DNA.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:13792-13797 |
| 23. |
Losada, A.,
M. Hirano, and T. Hirano.
1998.
Identification of Xenopus SMC protein complexes required for sister chromatid cohesion.
Genes Dev.
12:1986-1997 |
| 24. | Martin-Castellanos, C., K. Labib, and S. Moreno. 1996. B-type cyclins regulate G1 progression in fission yeast in opposition to the p25rum1 cdk inhibitor. EMBO J. 15:839-849[Medline]. |
| 25. | Masutani, C., M. Araki, A. Yamada, R. Kusumoto, T. Nogimori, T. Maekawa, S. Iwai, and F. Hanaoka. 1999. Xeroderma pigmentosum variant (XP-V) correcting protein from HeLa cells has a thymine dimer bypass DNA polymerase activity. EMBO J. 18:3491-3501[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 26. | Masutani, C., R. Kusumoto, A. Yamada, N. Dohmae, M. Yokoi, M. Yuasa, M. Araki, S. Iwai, K. Takio, and F. Hanaoka. 1999. The XPV (xeroderma pigmentosum variant) gene encodes human DNA polymerase eta. Nature 399:700-704[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 27. | McDonald, J. P., A. S. Levine, and R. Woodgate. 1997. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD30 gene, a homologue of Escherichia coli dinB and umuC, is DNA damage inducible and functions in a novel error-free postreplication repair mechanism. Genetics 147:1557-1568[Abstract]. |
| 28. |
McInerny, C.,
P. J. Kersey,
J. Creanor, and P. A. Fantes.
1995.
Positive and negative roles for cdc10 in cell cycle gene expression.
Nucleic Acids Res.
23:4761-4768 |
| 29. | Michaelis, C., R. Ciosk, and K. Nasmyth. 1997. Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell 91:35-45[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 30. | Mondesert, O., C. H. McGowan, and P. Russell. 1996. Cig2, a B-type cyclin, promotes the onset of S in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:1527-1533[Abstract]. |
| 31. | Moreno, S., A. Klar, and P. Nurse. 1991. Molecular genetic analysis of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods Enzymol. 194:795-823[Medline]. |
| 32. | Murakami, H., and H. Okayama. 1995. A kinase from fission yeast responsible for blocking mitosis in S phase. Nature 374:817-819[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 33. |
Nabeshima, K.,
T. Nakagawa,
A. F. Straight,
A. Murray,
Y. Chikashige,
Y. M. Yamashita,
Y. Hiraoka, and M. Yanagida.
1998.
Dynamics of centromeres during metaphase-anaphase transition in fission yeast: Dis1 is implicated in force balance in metaphase bipolar spindle.
Mol. Biol. Cell
9:3211-3225 |
| 34. | Nasmyth, K. 1999. Separating sister chromatids. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24:98-104[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 35. | Nishitani, H., and P. Nurse. 1997. The cdc18 protein initiates DNA replication in fission yeast. Prog. Cell Cycle Res. 3:135-142[Medline]. |
| 36. | Obara-Ishihara, T., and H. Okayama. 1994. A B-type cyclin regulates conjugation via interacting with cell cycle `start' genes in fission yeast. EMBO J. 13:1863-1872[Medline]. |
| 37. | Okayama, H., A. Nagata, S. Jinno, H. Murakami, K. Tanaka, and N. Nakashima. 1996. Cell cycle control in fission yeast and mammals: identification of new regulatory mechanism. Adv. Cancer Res. 69:17-62[Medline]. |
| 38. |
Okazaki, K.,
N. Okazaki,
K. Kume,
S. Jinno,
K. Tanaka, and H. Okayama.
1990.
High-frequency transformation method and library transducing vectors for cloning mammalian cDNAs by trans-complementation of Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
Nucleic Acids Res.
18:6485-6489 |
| 39. |
Okazaki, N.,
K. Okazaki,
K. Tanaka, and H. Okayama.
1991.
The ste4+ gene, essential for sexual differentiation of Schizosaccharomyces pombe, encodes a protein with a leucine zipper motif.
Nucleic Acids Res.
19:7043-7047 |
| 40. | Roush, A. A., M. Suarez, E. C. Friedberg, M. Radman, and W. Siede. 1998. Deletion of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene RAD30 encoding an Escherichia coli DinB homolog confers UV radiation sensitivity and altered mutability. Mol. Gen. Genet. 257:686-692[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 41. | Saka, Y., and M. Yanagida. 1993. Fission yeast cut5+, required for S phase onset and M phase restraint, is identical to the radiation-damage repair gene rad4+. Cell 74:383-393[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 42. |
Skibbens, R. V.,
L. B. Corson,
D. Koshland, and P. Hieter.
1999.
Ctf7p is essential for sister chromatid cohesion and links mitotic chromosome structure to the DNA replication machinery.
Genes Dev.
13:307-319 |
| 43. |
Smith, B. T., and G. C. Walker.
1998.
Mutagenesis and more: umuDC and the Escherichia coli SOS response.
Genetics
148:1599-1610 |
| 44. | Sugino, A., T. Ohara, J. Sebastian, N. Nakashima, and H. Araki. 1998. DNA polymerase epsilon encoded by cdc20+ is required for chromosomal DNA replication in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genes Cells 3:99-110[Abstract]. |
| 45. | Sugiyama, A., K. Tanaka, K. Okazaki, H. Nojima, and H. Okayama. 1994. A zinc finger protein controls the onset of premeiotic DNA synthesis of fission yeast in a Mei2-independent cascade. EMBO J. 13:1881-1887[Medline]. |
| 46. |
Suto, K.,
A. Nagata,
H. Murakami, and H. Okayama.
1999.
A double-strand break repair component is essential for S phase completion in fission yeast cell cycling.
Mol. Biol. Cell
10:3331-3343 |
| 47. | Takahashi, K., H. Yamada, and M. Yanagida. 1994. Fission yeast minichromosome loss mutants mis cause lethal aneuploidy and replication abnormality. Mol. Biol. Cell 5:1145-1158[Abstract]. |
| 48. | Tanaka, K., K. Okazaki, N. Okazaki, T. Ueda, A. Sugiyama, H. Nojima, and H. Okayama. 1992. A new cdc gene required for S phase entry of Schizosaccharomyces pombe encodes a protein similar to the cdc10+ and SWI4 gene products. EMBO J. 11:4923-4932[Medline]. |
| 49. |
Tatebayashi, K.,
J. Kato, and H. Ikeda.
1998.
Isolation of a Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad21ts mutant that is aberrant in chromosome segregation, microtubule function, DNA repair and sensitive to hydroxyurea: possible involvement of Rad21 in ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis.
Genetics
148:49-57 |
| 50. |
Toth, A.,
R. Ciosk,
F. Uhlmann,
M. Galova,
A. Schleiffer, and K. Nasmyth.
1999.
Yeast cohesin complex requires a conserved protein, Eco1p (Ctf7), to establish cohesion between sister chromatids during DNA replication.
Genes Dev.
13:320-333 |
| 51. | Uhlmann, F., F. Lottspeich, and K. Nasmyth. 1999. Sister-chromatid separation at anaphase onset is promoted by cleavage of the cohesin subunit Scc1. Nature 400:37-42[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 52. | Waseem, N. H., K. Labib, P. Nurse, and D. P. Lane. 1992. Isolation and analysis of the fission yeast gene encoding polymerase delta accessory protein PCNA. EMBO J. 11:5111-5120[Medline]. |
| 53. |
Woodgate, R.
1999.
A plethora of lesion-replicating DNA polymerases.
Genes Dev.
13:2191-2195 |
| 54. | Woollard, A., and P. Nurse. 1995. G1 regulation and checkpoints operating around START in fission yeast. Bioessays 17:481-490[CrossRef][Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles: