Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, June 2000, p. 3795-3806, Vol. 20, No. 11
Institute of Molecular Genetics, CNRS UMR
5535 and Université Montpellier II, F-34293 Montpellier cedex
5,1 and Service de Biochimie et de
Génétique Moléculaire, CEA/Saclay, F-91191 Gif-sur
Yvette,2 France
Received 26 August 1999/Returned for modification 1 November
1999/Accepted 28 February 2000
In all eukaryotes, the initiation of DNA synthesis requires the
formation of prereplicative complexes (pre-RCs) on replication origins,
followed by their activation by two S-T protein kinases, an S-phase
cyclin-dependent kinase (S-CDK) and a homologue of yeast Dbf4-Cdc7
kinase (Dbf4p-dependent kinase [DDK]). Here, we show that yeast DDK
activity is cell cycle regulated, though less tightly than that of the
S-CDK Clb5-Cdk1, and peaks during S phase in correlation with Dbf4p
levels. Dbf4p is short-lived throughout the cell cycle, but its
instability is accentuated during G1 by the
anaphase-promoting complex. Downregulating DDK activity is physiologically important, as joint Cdc7p and Dbf4p overexpression is
lethal. Because pre-RC formation is a highly ordered process, we asked
whether S-CDK and DDK need also to function in a specific order for the
firing of origins. We found that both kinases are activated
independently, but we show that DDK can perform its function for DNA
replication only after S-CDKs have been activated. Cdc45p, a protein
needed for initiation, binds tightly to chromatin only after S-CDK
activation (L. Zou and B. Stillman, Science 280:593-596, 1998). We
show that Cdc45p is phosphorylated by DDK in vitro, suggesting that it
might be one of DDK's critical substrates after S-CDK activation.
Linking the origin-bound DDK to the tightly regulated S-CDK in a
dependent sequence of events may ensure that DNA replication initiates
only at the right time and place.
Evolution has selected organisms
that replicate their genomes both rapidly and accurately. To complete S
phase swiftly without loss of accuracy, eukaryotes have subdivided
their large genomes into many replication units. The yeast
Saccharomyces cerevisiae utilizes 250 to 400 origins
distributed along its 16 chromosomes, whereas tens of thousands of
origins are probably needed to replicate the human genome. The firing
of that many origins must be tightly controlled so that each piece of
DNA is duplicated only once per cell cycle (12). To achieve
this feat, the initiation of DNA replication follows strict rules
dictated by cell cycle progression and cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)
activity. For instance, replication-competent origins are formed only
during the G1 phase when the CDK activity level is low, but
they require a high level of CDK activity for firing. As firing
destroys origin competence, reinitiation is prevented until the next
oscillation (drop plus rise) of CDK activity, usually at the
G1-S transition. However, DNA replication is also flexible.
Not all origins are activated at the same time during S phase
(20), and many origins do not fire every cell cycle (23, 74). In metazoans, there is also considerable variation in the number of origins a cell utilizes and thus in S phase length: in
Drosophila, DNA synthesis lasts for about 3 min during the rapid embryonic cell cycles, but in somatic tissues synthesis takes
much longer (about 10 h), mainly because there are fewer initiation events (4). Thus, origin firing is modulated in the realms of time, space, and efficiency, the basis of which modulation is largely unknown. Nonetheless, origins do not fire stochastically but in a predictable manner from one cell cycle to the
next, according to a specific replication program (33). Deviation from this program may lead to incomplete or delayed replication of certain loci and genetic instability (26).
Therefore, there is considerable interest in understanding the
molecular mechanisms that control the initiation and fine-tuning of DNA replication.
The initiation of DNA replication is portrayed as a two-step process
which begins with the formation of replication-competent origins in
G1 (12). This involves the sequential binding of the origin-recognition complex (ORC), Cdc6p, and the minichromosome maintenance complex (MCM) onto autonomously replicating sequences, i.e., the forming of prereplicative complexes (pre-RCs) (2, 14,
72). In the second step, these origins are activated by two sets
of S-T protein kinases, an S-phase CDK (S-CDK) and the Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase
(Dbf4p-dependent kinase [DDK]). How these two kinases trigger the
initiation of DNA replication is currently not clear. One role of
S-CDKs is to load Cdc45p, another protein needed for initiation, onto
chromatin (48, 77). One or more additional steps catalyzed
by S-CDKs and DDK then lead to recruitment of the single-stranded DNA
binding protein RPA and the DNA polymerase- Cyclin-CDK complexes are required for the initiation of DNA replication
in all eukaryotes. In human, frog, and fly, cyclin E (cycE)-Cdk2,
cycA-Cdk2, and cycA-Cdc2 kinases exhibit S-phase-promoting activity
(40, 42, 68). In budding and fission yeast, this activity is
conveyed by the B-type cyclin-CDK complexes Clb5p-Cdc28p, Clb6p-Cdc28p,
and cig2-cdc2 (19, 22, 63). Activation of S-CDKs in late
G1 phase is tightly regulated both transcriptionally and
posttranslationally, in particular by specific CDK inhibitors like
Sic1p and rum1 (46, 62). The destruction of these inhibitors in late G1, mediated by G1 CDKs and
ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis, leads to rapid activation of S-CDKs
and S-phase entry (3, 21, 62). Deletion of SIC1
or CLB5,6 advances or delays S-phase entry, respectively,
indicating that CDKs are the prime temporal regulators of S phase
within the cell cycle (61-63). Cells lacking
CLB5, which rely on Clb6-Cdk1 for DNA replication, fail to
activate late origins (17), suggesting that S-CDKs also act
at the level of origins to regulate firing throughout S phase. This
might occur via delayed deposition of Cdc45p onto late origins
(1).
CDKs are required for but not sufficient to trigger DNA synthesis,
which also involves the S-T kinase composed of the Cdc7p catalytic and
Dbf4p regulatory moieties (DDK; reviewed in references 36 and 64). Structural and
functional homologues of Cdc7p and Dbf4p have now been found in various
eukaryotes, suggesting that DDK function is universally required for
S-phase entry (6, 7, 34, 35, 43, 47, 60). Dbf4p binds to
ARS1 by one-hybrid assay (18) and shows a
punctate nuclear staining resembling replication foci (43,
52). Consistent with this localization, Cdc7p was shown to be
required throughout the S phase for the firing of late origins (5,
16). Confirming earlier proposals (32, 75), recent
reports show that Dbf4p is an unstable protein which peaks during S
phase and confers kinase activity on Cdc7p (7, 10, 50).
Thus both S-CDKs and DDK seem to trigger the initiation of DNA
replication at the level of origins. CDKs phosphorylate many initiation
factors, but thus far a direct demonstration that these events are
causal for initiation is still lacking. Proposed DDK substrates are
less numerous, and Mcm2p is the leading candidate (6, 43, 44,
50). Surprisingly, a single recessive mutation in MCM5
(bob1-1) completely bypasses the requirement of Cdc7p and
Dbf4p for S phase (27, 32). mcm5/bob1 cells
lacking genes for Cdc7p or Dbf4p grow quite normally, suggesting that
DDK might control initiation rather than be intrinsically required for
it. Accordingly, Cdc7p is not essential for premeiotic S phase
(30). It is not currently known why two kinases are needed
for the initiation of DNA replication in the mitotic cycle, in which
order they function, or what their critical molecular targets are.
Here, we show that DDK activity is cell cycle regulated, although less
tightly than that of the S-CDK Clb5-Cdk1. In spite of its moderate
fluctuation, DDK activity is kept in check by both limited Cdc7p
synthesis and high Dbf4p turnover. Increasing DDK activity by
overexpression of both Cdc7p and Dbf4p is lethal. DDK is already active
before S-CDKs are turned on, but, crucially, it cannot trigger DNA
replication until after S-CDKs have been activated. Thus, DDK acts
downstream of S-CDKs for the initiation of DNA replication. Cdc45p
becomes tightly associated with origins after S-CDK activation (1, 77). Consistently, we find that DDK phosphorylates Cdc45p in vitro. Thus, our data support a double-trigger model for the initiation of DNA replication. S-CDKs which are abundant and tightly regulated would act globally to prime DNA replication on many origins. Then the
limiting and origin-bound DDK would act locally, downstream of S-CDKs,
to remove a block of firing at the level of individual origins. By
acting sequentially, S-CDK and DDK would ensure that the initiation of
DNA replication occurs both at the right time and place.
Strains and media.
Yeast strains used in this study are
listed in Table 1. Except for E1004, they
are either congenic or backcrossed at least four times to W303 and they
have been constructed using classical genetic techniques
(37). Strains were grown either in YEP medium supplemented
with 50 mg of adenine per liter and 2% dextrose (YEPD), raffinose
(YEPRaf), or galactose (YEPGal) or in supplemented minimal medium, as
described previously (37). Plates contained 2% agar (Difco). Yeast transformation was performed by the lithium acetate method.
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Hierarchy of S-Phase-Promoting Factors: Yeast
Dbf4-Cdc7 Kinase Requires Prior S-Phase Cyclin-Dependent Kinase
Activation
and
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
-primase complex
(48, 73).
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
TABLE 1.
Strain list
Plasmid and strain constructions. Standard procedures were used for DNA manipulations (58). PCR cloning was performed with Pwo (Boehringer) or Vent (New England Biolabs) DNA polymerases. The Tet-CDC7 plasmid (D577) was constructed by cloning CDC7 into pCM189 (24) and transferring tTA-tetO7-CDC7 into YCplac22 (25). Tet-DBF4-myc6 (D485) was constructed by cloning DBF4 into pCM190/YEplac195 (24), followed by insertion of a myc6 cassette before the stop codon. The same PCR product was cloned behind the GAL1-10 promoter in YIplac211 to produce GAL-DBF4 (D537). A myc6-NotI cassette was then inserted at the C terminus to produce GAL-DBF4-myc6 (D479). To produce Mcm2p in Escherichia coli, MCM2 was cloned in a pET11d-derived vector (70) containing six histidine codons behind the AUG, yielding plasmid D468. The plasmid expressing His6-Cdc45p (D692) was constructed similarly. DBF4 was disrupted in a diploid strain (E622) by replacing a 1.8-kb BglII-BspE1 fragment with HIS3. This strain was then transformed with D537 and sporulated, and His+ Ura+ spores were obtained by tetrad dissection to yield strain E633.
Cell synchronizations.
Centrifugal elutriations were
performed as described previously (63). For synchronization
in late G1 by pheromone, MATa cells
(4 × 106/ml) were arrested for 2 to 3 h at
25°C, with 1 µg of
-factor per ml (0.1 µg/ml for
bar1 strains) added twice to the medium at 1.5-h intervals,
and released either by filtration and washing or by the addition of
pronase (50 µg/ml; Calbiochem). Nocodazole arrest was performed for
2.5 h, with nocodazole at a concentration of 30 µg/ml in 1%
dimethyl sulfoxide, unless stated otherwise. Cell cycle progression was
monitored by flow cytometry (FACScan) according to a method described
previously (19).
RNA analysis.
Total RNA isolation and Northern analysis were
performed as described previously (11), with 10 µg of RNA
per lane. Probes were prepared by random priming of PCR products of
DBF4 (positions
298 to +2112), CLB5 (positions
+1 to +1328), or CMD1 (positions +1 to +442).
Bacterial protein expression and antibody production.
Cdc7p
was produced in Escherichia coli BL21-DE3 containing
pET3a-CDC7 (D433) and induced with 1 mM IPTG
(isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside) for 3 h at
37°C (70). Inclusion bodies were purified, resuspended in
Laemmli buffer, boiled, and resolved by sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The band
containing Cdc7p was used to immunize rabbits. Polyclonal antibodies
were affinity-purified on polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) strips
containing Cdc7p as described previously (58). His6-Mcm2p
and His6-Cdc45p were produced in E. coli BL21-DE3
transformed with D468 and D692, respectively. Cells (volume, 500 ml;
A600 = 0.8) were induced with 1 mM IPTG for
60 min at 25°C, washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and
resuspended in 20 ml of RJD buffer (10 mM HEPES [pH 7.6], 50 mM NaCl,
5 mM MgCl2, 15% glycerol, 0.05% NP-40) supplemented with
Complete protease inhibitor mix (Boehringer). This suspension was
frozen in liquid N2, thawed at 37°C, and sonicated five
times on ice for 30 s each time, at 2-min intervals. The lysate
was clarified at 10,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. A
50% slurry of Talon metal affinity resin (0.8 ml; Clontech) was added
to the supernatant for 90 min at 4°C. Bound proteins were washed with
RJD buffer plus 4 mM imidazole for Mcm2p or 1 mM imidazole for Cdc45p,
and were eluted with 1 ml of RJD buffer plus 300 mM imidazole.
SDS-PAGE and Western blotting.
Protein extracts for Western
blotting were prepared from mid-log-phase cultures (108
cells) that were fixed by adding trichloroacetic acid (TCA) (final concentration, 10%) directly to the medium, harvested by
centrifugation, and washed once in 10% TCA. Cell pellets were frozen
in liquid N2 and stored at
70°C. Yeast pellets were
thawed on ice and resuspended in 200 µl of 10% TCA. Zirconium beads
(1 volume; diameter, 0.5 mm; Biospec Products Inc.) were added, and the
cells were broken by vigorous vortexing for 10 min on a Vibrax (VXR;
Ika Laboratories) multimixer. Total cell lysates were transferred to
new tubes, and the beads were washed twice with 200-µl volumes of
10% TCA. Extracts were pooled, and proteins were precipitated by
centrifugation (10 min at 1,000 × g). Pellets were
resuspended in Laemmli loading dye buffered with 0.17 M Tris base,
boiled for 10 min, and spun for 10 min at 1,000 × g to
remove insoluble material. Protein concentrations were determined using
the Bradford protein assay (Sigma). Routinely, 20 to 100 µg of
proteins were loaded onto an SDS-8% PAGE gel and blotted semidry (3 h
at 1 mA/cm2 in 39 mM glycine, 48 mM Tris base, 0.1% SDS,
20% methanol) onto a PVDF membrane (Millipore). After transfer,
proteins were revealed with 0.2% amido-black. Immunological detection
was performed essentially as described previously (58).
Membranes blocked in PBS, 0.1% Tween, and 3% nonfat milk were
incubated with antibodies in the same solution for 1 h at room
temperature. Antibodies were used at the following dilutions: mouse
anti-Myc (9E10), 1/2,000; anti-polyhistidide (Sigma), 1/2,500; rabbit
polyclonal anti-Cdc7p (affinity-purified), 1/100; anti-Sic1p, 1/5,000;
anti-Swi6p, 1/100,000; anti-Clb2p, 1/2,000; secondary antibodies
coupled to horseradish peroxidase (Sigma), 1/5,000 (anti-mouse) or
1/10,000 (anti-rabbit).
Protein extraction and immunoprecipitations.
Mid-log-phase
cells (108 cells) were harvested by centrifugation, washed
once in ice-cold Stop mix buffer (0.9% NaCl, 1 mM NaN3, 10 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaF), frozen in liquid N2, and stored at
70°C. Cell pellets were thawed and resuspended in 2 volumes of
ice-cold breaking buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl [pH 7.5], 15 mM
MgCl2, 200 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
dithiothreitol) supplemented with an inhibitor cocktail (60 mM
-glycerophosphate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 20 µg of
leupeptin per ml, 40 µg of aprotinin per ml, 0.1 mM Na-orthovanadate,
15 mM paranitrophenylphosphate, 5 mM EGTA). After addition of zirconium
beads (1 volume), cells were lysed by vortexing at 4°C for 8 min on a
multimixer. Extracts were clarified twice by centrifugation at
15,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. Unless stated
otherwise, immunoprecipitations (IPs) were performed on 0.1 mg of
proteins for 1 h at 4°C on a rotating wheel with antibodies
(anti-Myc or anti-Cdc7p) diluted to 1/10, in a total volume of 30 µl.
Immune complexes were then precipitated by incubation for 1 h at
4°C with 16 µl of protein A-Sepharose beads (50% slurry;
Pharmacia) preblocked with 10 mg of bovine serum albumin per ml. Beads
were recovered by spinning for 1 min at 500 × g and
washed five times with 0.5 ml of breaking buffer.
Cdc7p protein kinase assay.
Anti-Myc or anti-Cdc7p immune
complexes were washed twice with 0.5 ml of 25 mM
morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) (pH 7.2) to remove detergents. An
8-µl volume of kinase buffer(25 mM MOPS [pH 7.2], 15 mM
MgCl2, 5 mM EGTA, 5 µCi of [
-32P]ATP at
a specific activity of 5,000 Ci/mmol, with or without 10 µM ATP) and
0.2 µg of the substrate were added to the beads. The reaction mixture
(total volume, 30 µl) was then incubated at room temperature with
slight agitation for 30 min, and the reaction was terminated by the
addition of 14 µl of 3× Laemmli loading buffer. After boiling,
phosphoproteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE, either fixed and dried or
transferred to PVDF membranes, and revealed by autoradiography. Equal
amounts of Cdc7p were present in the immune complexes, and the assay
was linear with respect to enzyme level (data not shown).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Assay to measure endogenous Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase activity.
To
study the regulation of DDK during the cell cycle, we devised an IP
kinase assay able to detect endogenous Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase activity. The
assay uses either an anti-Myc monoclonal antibody (MAb) (9E10) against
Dbf4p tagged at its C-terminus with 6 or 18 myc epitopes (Dbf4-m), or
an affinity-purified polyclonal antibody directed against Cdc7p. Each
antibody recognizes a single band at the expected size in Western blots
of whole-cell extracts (Fig. 1A, lane 1).
These bands correspond to Dbf4-m and Cdc7p, as they are absent in
extracts from untagged and cdc7
bob1 strains,
respectively, and stronger in overproducing strains (Fig. 1A, lanes 2 and 3, and data not shown). Tagged strains which contain a single copy of DBF4-m integrated at the DBF4 locus grow as
wild-type strains do by the criteria of morphology, doubling time, and
fluorescent-activated cell scanner (FACS) profile (data not shown),
suggesting that the Dbf4-m protein is fully functional.
|
Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase is regulated by Dbf4p levels. Akin to cyclins for CDKs, Dbf4p is required to activate the Cdc7p catalytic subunit (7, 32, 50). If Dbf4p were an unstable protein, another means to inactivate the Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase would be to deplete Dbf4p by shutting off its synthesis. Therefore, we constructed a strain in which DBF4 was deleted but kept alive by a pGAL-DBF4 construct integrated at the URA3 locus. This strain proliferates in galactose-containing medium (GAL promoter on) but dies on glucose (GAL promoter off). When cells growing asynchronously in YEPGal medium were transferred to glucose, Dbf4-Cdc7-associated kinase activity dropped to background levels within 30 min (Fig. 1C). This demonstrates that Dbf4p is an unstable activator of Cdc7p with a half-life of less than 30 min. The decrease of kinase activity in vitro was followed by an accumulation of cells with 1C DNA (Fig. 1C), indicating that Dbf4-Cdc7 activity also dropped in vivo and that initiation of DNA replication was impaired. Strikingly, at 4 h after glucose addition many cells showed less than 1C DNA, suggesting that they underwent a reductional anaphase followed by cell division, without replicating their DNA. This resembles Cdc6p depletion (54) and is indicative of a complete failure both to initiate DNA replication and to refrain from the segregation of unreplicated chromosomes (34). In the case of Cdc6p, this is due to the lack of pre-RC formation, but in the case of Dbf4p it is probably because pre-RCs do not fire. This suggests that specific replication structures, and not pre-RCs, refrain from mitosis when DNA replication is incomplete (45).
Thus, depleting Dbf4p in vivo decreases Mcm2p phosphorylation in vitro. To see if the converse is true, i.e., if Cdc7p and/or Dbf4p overexpression leads to an increase in kinase activity, we constructed a strain containing an integrated copy of GAL-DBF4m as well as a centromeric plasmid with CDC7 under the control of a tetracycline-regulatable promoter (24). Because these constructs can be induced independently of each other by galactose addition or doxycycline removal, respectively, we could test the effects of Dbf4p and/or Cdc7p overexpression in the same strain. Figure 1D shows that Dbf4p or Cdc7p induction alone did not increase Mcm2p phosphorylation. In contrast, when both subunits were coexpressed, Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase activity on Mcm2p increased 3.5-fold (Fig. 1D, lanes 4 and 8 and data not shown). This differs from Cdk1 and cyclins (where overexpression of the latter alone causes hyperactivation) and suggests that neither Dbf4p nor Cdc7p is present in large excess over its partner in cycling cells.Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase activity is cell cycle regulated. (i) Northern
analysis.
Having designed a reliable assay, we set out to analyze
Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase regulation during the cell cycle. As transcriptional regulation of cyclins closely mirrors their associated CDK activity, we
first analyzed DBF4 mRNA levels in a synchronous culture of DBF4m cells. Early G1 cells obtained by
centrifugal elutriation were inoculated in fresh medium, and aliquots
were taken at regular intervals for Northern and FACS analysis. DNA
replication began at 60 min and was finished by 105 min; cell division
was completed by 165 min (Fig. 2A). The
strong fluctuation of CLB5 mRNA levels, which peaked at the
initiation of DNA replication and plummeted in G2, denoted
the good synchrony of the culture. In contrast, DBF4 mRNA
was present throughout the cell cycle, with only a very slight increase
at G1-S relative to the CMD1 mRNA used as
loading control. The myc-coding sequence did not alter DBF4
mRNA synthesis or stability, as similar results were obtained with an
untagged strain (data not shown). These data indicate that
DBF4 is not a G1-S-specific transcript, in
contrast to previous suggestions (9). CDC7
transcripts do not fluctuate (65; data not shown).
|
(ii) Western and kinase analysis. To see whether Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase is regulated posttranscriptionally, we performed a similar experiment but monitored Dbf4p and Cdc7p levels as well as their associated kinase activities. Figure 2B shows that Cdc7p was present at constant levels throughout the cell cycle. In contrast, Dbf4p was rare in early G1 cells, and its levels rose in late G1 (60 min), peaked during S phase (90 min) and decreased thereafter (135 min). The low levels of Dbf4p in early G1 cells, despite the presence of its mRNA, indicate that cell cycle-regulated mechanisms, either translational or proteolytic, operate to limit Dbf4p levels in G1. Dbf4p- and Cdc7p-associated kinase activities closely mirrored Dbf4p levels. Elutriated early G1 cells showed little Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase activity, which increases in late G1, reaches a maximum during S phase and decreases moderately during mitosis. We conclude that Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase activity is cell cycle regulated, though less tightly than that of Clb5- or Clb2-associated kinase (see Fig. 4A), most likely via its association with Dbf4p.
To confirm Dbf4p's cell cycle fluctuation using a different synchronization protocol, we released DBF4m cells from
-factor arrest. Dbf4p levels were low but detectable in the
pheromone-arrested cells, peaked during S phase (30 to 40 min after
release) and decreased in G2-M (Fig. 2C). Taken together
with the promoter shutoff and Northern experiments (Fig. 1C and 2A),
these data are consistent with the notion that Dbf4p is synthesized
throughout the cell cycle but is more stable during S phase.
Posttranscriptional regulation of Dbf4p.
To test the idea that
Dbf4p is more unstable at certain cell cycle stages, we analyzed Dbf4-m
levels in cells arrested by various cdc mutations (Fig.
3A). The Dbf4-m protein was detected in
every tagged strain at a permissive temperature (25°C), but at 37°C
only in the wild-type, cdc4, cdc7, and
cdc23 strains. Little or no Dbf4p was seen in
cdc28-4- and cdc15-2-arrested cells. This
suggests that Dbf4p is less stable in pre-Start G1 and in postanaphase cells. We also noticed that Dbf4p tends to break down
rapidly, particularly when cells are incubated at 37°C. This problem
was partly circumvented by rapid TCA fixation of the cells in the
culture medium.
|
-factor) or G2 (nocodazole). If Dbf4p proteolysis depends on APC,
then its levels should decrease less rapidly in cdc23-1
mutant cells. Moreover, Dbf4p should be stable in nocodazole-arrested
cells in which APC is inactive. As an internal control for APC's
inactivation, we used a strain that also expresses Clb2p, a well-known
APC substrate, from the GAL promoter. Wild-type and mutant
cells were arrested for 2 h in
-factor or nocodazole at 25°C,
after which galactose was added and the cultures were shifted to 37°C
to induce Clb2p and inactivate APC. After 30 min at 37°C, glucose and
cycloheximide were added to repress CLB2 transcription and
global protein synthesis, respectively. The amount of Dbf4p in
whole-cell extracts at different times after the addition of
cycloheximide was determined by Western blot analysis, and half-lives
were measured by densitometry. Dbf4p is highly unstable in
G1 (half-life of 5 min) and stabilized by inactivation of
Cdc23p (Fig. 3B and data not shown). Thus, APC contributes to Dbf4p
instability. However, while Clb2p levels do not decrease for the entire
time course, Dbf4p still decays in the cdc23 mutant (15-min
half-life), suggesting that Dbf4p is also degraded independently of
APC. The latter was confirmed with nocodazole, where, in stark contrast
to Clb2p, which is stable, Dbf4p levels still decreased, for both
wild-type and mutant strains. These results, seen on physiological
levels, clearly establish that while APC contributes to Dbf4p turnover,
it cannot solely account for it. SCFCdc4 is not responsible
for this residual instability (data not shown), and further
investigation will be needed to define its nature.
Combined Dbf4p and Cdc7p overexpression is lethal. One way to address the biological significance of Dbf4p's instability during the cell cycle is to see whether its stabilization or overexpression might have any effect on cell division. To this end, cells were transformed with plasmids expressing either DBF4 or CDC7 alone, or both simultaneously from a tetracycline-regulatable promoter. Figure 3C shows that cells overexpressing each protein individually formed colonies like the wild type, but that cells overproducing both Cdc7p and Dbf4p were unable to form colonies on selective plates. In liquid cultures, Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase activity on Mcm2p increased threefold during the first 4 to 6 h of induction and slowly decreased afterwards (data not shown). The inhibition of cell proliferation was maximal after 8 to 12 h of derepression and due, at least in part, to loss of the Tet-DBF4 and Tet-CDC7 plasmids. Currently, we have no explanation for this lethality, which needs to be confirmed with integrated constructs. Toxicity was observed in wild-type cells only when both subunits were coexpressed, suggesting that it might be due to an excess of bona fide Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase activity. Consistent with Dbf4p being an APC substrate, Dbf4p overexpression alone was lethal at 25°C in an apc1-1 mutant (Fig. 3C). This suggests that high Dbf4p levels can also have adverse effects independently of Cdc7p overexpression.
S-CDK and DDK are activated independently.
Both Dbf4-Cdc7 and
Clb-Cdk1 kinases are required for the initiation of DNA replication,
but it is not clear whether one kinase is needed to activate the other.
In a first attempt to address this question, we compared the timing of
activation of both kinases in a synchronous culture of elutriated
wild-type cells. Clb5p and Cdc7p-associated proteins were precipitated
using specific antibodies, and their kinase activities were measured
using histone H1 and Mcm2p, respectively, as the substrates (Fig.
4A). Clb5-Cdk1 kinase activity was
tightly cell cycle regulated, with a sharp increase observable at the
time of S phase (75 to 105 min) and strong downregulation in
M-G1 (135 to 150 min). Like that of Clb5-Cdk1, Dbf4-Cdc7
kinase activity peaked during S phase, but its regulation was less
stringent. Phosphorylation of Mcm2p by Dbf4-Cdc7 increased gradually
during G1 (30 to 60 min) and decreased somewhat in
G2-M (120 to 135 min). Thus, regulation of Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase
activity cannot account for its precise, late-G1 execution
point. Importantly, Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase was already active before
Clb5-Cdk1 activity was detectable, suggesting that the latter is not
needed to activate the former.
|
Clb5-Cdk1 function is independent of Dbf4-Cdc7 activity.
Despite their independent activation, these two kinases may still
function sequentially for the initiation of DNA replication. The order
between two steps in a pathway can be addressed in vivo by the method
of reciprocal shifts (28). Briefly, if two activities A
(e.g., Clb5-Cdk1) and B (e.g., Dbf4-Cdc7) are connected to each other
in a dependent sequence A
B, then it should be possible to complete
step A without prior activation of B, but not step B without prior
activation of A. In a first experiment, we tested if Clb5-Cdk1 was able
to perform its function while Dbf4-Cdc7 was kept inactive (Fig.
5A). This was done by scoring DNA
replication after reactivation of Dbf4-Cdc7 in conditions restrictive
for Clb-Cdk1 (a shift from cdc7
CLB+ to CDC7+
clb
). One kinase was inactivated using a
ts allele (cdc7-1), while the other was turned
off by expression of the Clb-Cdk1 inhibitor Sic1p under the control of
the GAL promoter (seven integrated copies). To allow for
Sic1p accumulation, its induction preceded Dbf4-Cdc7 reactivation.
Specifically, cdc7-1 GAL-SIC1(7×) cells were
presynchronized for 2 h by
-factor in YEPRaf medium
(GAL promoter off) and then released at 38°C by the
addition of pronase, which degrades
-factor. After 1 h, budded
cells began to appear, indicating that cells progressed towards the
cdc7 arrest point. At this time the culture was split in
three parts and maintained at 38°C for a further 2 h to ensure
that most, if not all, cells reached a cdc7
CLB+ status. Glucose was added to the first two
cultures (designated a and b) (Fig. 5A), while galactose was added in
the third (designated c) to induce Sic1p. By the end of these 2 h,
Sic1p levels in the third culture were equivalent to those in
cdc4-arrested cells and therefore sufficient to inactivate
Clb-Cdk1 kinases completely (Fig. 5C). Cultures b and c were then
shifted to 25°C to reactivate Dbf4-Cdc7, while the first was kept at
38°C to show that cells did not replicate without Dbf4-Cdc7
reactivation (Fig. 5B). In contrast, the shift to 25°C led to full
replication within 1 h, indicating reversibility of the
cdc7 arrest (culture b). Notably, the cells in galactose
(culture c) also replicated their DNA despite inhibitory levels of
Sic1p at the time of the shift. This increase in DNA content is not
seen if only one kinase is activated (data not shown), and therefore
represents bona fide DNA replication. Thus, the requirement of
Clb5-Cdk1 for DNA replication had been fulfilled while Dbf4-Cdc7 was
inactive and was no longer necessary after Dbf4-Cdc7 reactivation.
|

CLB+
clb
regimen, two lines of evidence suggest that the appropriate conditions were met. First, cells eventually replicated their DNA, indicating that
Clb-Cdk1 kinases were active at some point of the time course and,
moreover, that the event they triggered was not reversed during their
subsequent inactivation. Second, the vast majority of cells show
elongated, cdc4-like buds after 2 h in the galactose- but not in the glucose-containing medium (data not shown). This strongly suggests that Clb-Cdk1 kinases were inactive at the time of
the shift at 25°C. It is still possible that low levels of Clb-Cdk1
kinases triggered DNA replication, but we find this unlikely because S
phase was equally efficient after the downshift regardless of Sic1p
induction. To circumvent the problems linked to slow Sic1p degradation
and poor induction from the GAL promoter at 38°C, we have
since repeated the experiment using a dbf4
Tet-DBF4 GAL-SIC1(4×) strain. Cells were first
arrested in a cdc7
state by depleting Dbf4p
with doxycycline for 3 h at 25°C; then galactose was added, and
the doxycycline was removed to inhibit Clb-Cdk1 and reactivate
Dbf4-Cdc7, respectively. In this case, Sic1p levels increased rapidly,
but cells still replicated their DNA once Dbf4-Cdc7 was reactivated
(data not shown). These data lead us to conclude that S-CDKs perform
their function for DNA replication independently of Dbf4-Cdc7.
Dbf4-Cdc7 function requires prior Clb-Cdk1 activity.
The
reciprocal experiment (clb
CDC7+
CLB+ cdc7
) was
performed to test if Dbf4-Cdc7 function could be completed before
Clb5-Cdk1 activation. In this case, we used a strain (cdc4-1
dbf4
GAL-DBF4) in which Clb5-Cdk1 kinases can
be inactivated at 35°C by the cdc4-1 mutation, while the
Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase is controlled by galactose-dependent DBF4
expression (Fig. 6A). Cells were grown at
25°C in galactose-containing medium and arrested for 2 h at
35°C in a cdc4 (clb
) state, in
which cells have elongated buds and unreplicated DNA but active
Dbf4-Cdc7 (Fig. 4B). At this time, the culture was again split in three
parts, which all remained at 35°C for a further 30 min, while the
third (culture c) was transferred to glucose-containing medium.
Previous experiments indicated that turning off DBF4
transcription for 30 min was sufficient to deplete cellular Dbf4p (Fig.
1C). At this point, cultures b and c were shifted at 25°C to degrade Sic1p and reactivate Clb5-Cdk1 kinases. As expected, the cells left at
35°C (culture a) did not replicate their DNA, whereas those in
galactose at 25°C (culture b; DBF4 on) did replicate within 60 to 90 min (Fig. 6B). This confirms that cdc4
arrest is both tight and reversible in our conditions. Remarkably
culture c, in which Dbf4p was depleted before Clb-Cdk1 kinases were
reactivated, did not replicate at all for 90 min and replicated only
slightly thereafter. This small increase in DNA content might be due to incomplete Dbf4p depletion or to some Cdc7p-independent origin firing
(55). Thus Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase cannot perform its function unless Clb-Cdk1 kinases are also active or have been previously active.
|
Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase phosphorylates Cdc45p in vitro.
One
explanation for the requirement of Clb-Cdk1 activity prior to the
Dbf4-Cdc7-mediated step would be that the former provides a substrate
for the latter. Dbf4p and Cdc7p are nonabundant proteins which are
recruited to origins via interaction with ORC (18, 52).
Therefore, only proteins bound to origins are likely to be
phosphorylated efficiently by Dbf4-Cdc7. Cdc45p is a good candidate, because it is loaded onto origins in a Clb5-Cdk1 dependent manner (77). We therefore tested if Cdc45p could be phosphorylated by Dbf4-Cdc7. Recombinant Cdc45p (His6-Cdc45p) was purified from bacteria and used as a substrate in our Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase assay. We find
that Cdc45p is phosphorylated by Dbf4-Cdc7 to the same extent as Mcm2p
(Fig. 7, lanes 4 to 7 and 11 to 13).
Interestingly, Dbf4p autophosphorylation decreases when Cdc45p, not
Mcm2p, is added to the reaction (Fig. 7, lanes 2 to 4) and when excess
ATP is present (Fig. 7, lanes 10 to 13). Phosphorylation depends on the
amount of Dbf4p in the extract (Fig. 2 and Fig. 7, lanes 5 to 7 and 11 to 13) and is lost at 37°C in the cdc7-1 ts strain (Fig.
7, lanes 8 and 14). However, arguing that phosphorylation of Cdc45p by
Dbf4-Cdc7 is biologically relevant will require confirmation in vivo
and by mutational analysis. Nonetheless, the observation that Cdc45p is
phosphorylated by Dbf4-Cdc7 in vitro, along with the dependencies of
Cdc45p loading and Dbf4-Cdc7 function upon Clb-Cdk1 activity (reference
77 and this paper) and the interdependence of
CDC7 and CDC45 (51), suggests that
Cdc45p could be Dbf4-Cdc7's critical substrate for the initiation of
DNA replication.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In all eukaryotes, the initiation of DNA replication requires the activation of two protein kinases, an S-phase CDK (S-CDK) (19, 22, 62, 68) and a homologue of the yeast Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase (DDK) (39, 43, 47, 56). While CDKs have received considerable attention, little was known on the regulation of DDK probably because metazoan homologues and physiological substrates were discovered only recently (44, 60). We devised a sensitive and specific assay first to analyze the regulation of Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase during the cell cycle and second to ask whether S-CDK and DDK need to function in a precise order for the initiation of DNA replication. As reported recently (50), we find that Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase activity is cell cycle regulated, low in G1, maximal during S phase, and decreasing thereafter, exactly mirroring Dbf4p levels. However, Dbf4-Cdc7 activity never completely disappeared during vegetative growth, unlike that of Clb5-Cdk1 (the S-CDK), which oscillates with a large amplitude. This comparatively modest fluctuation reflects the weak cell cycle-dependent transcriptional and posttranslational regulation acting on Dbf4p. In contrast to the commonly held view, DBF4 transcripts are not G1-S specific and they fluctuate only slightly, in stark contrast with CLB5 mRNA (Fig. 2A) (50, 67). Strikingly, DBF4 mRNA is abundant in elutriated early G1 cells, indicating either that the MluI cell cycle box (MCB) element in its promoter is not functional or that DBF4 transcripts are stable. The latter is unlikely, because transcriptional shutoff leads to rapid depletion of Dbf4p (Fig. 1C). Thus transcriptional regulation cannot account for the lack of Dbf4p in these early G1 cells. Instead, we find that Dbf4p is very unstable throughout the cell cycle (half-life, 15 min), but even more so during G1 (half-life, 5 min). This increased instability is due to the APC/C (Fig. 3B) (10, 50), which might endow Dbf4p with periodicity.
Is there a biological significance to Dbf4p instability? Unlike critical regulators such as Sic1p, Pds1p, or Clb2p, whose destruction is necessary for cell cycle progression, Dbf4p apparently does not need to be fully degraded each cell cycle. Indeed, DDK activity is detectable throughout the cell cycle and ectopic DBF4 expression has no effect (Fig. 2 and 4 and data not shown). Consistent with this idea, it has been shown that at the time of cytokinesis, cells contain enough Dbf4p for at least two additional divisions (39). But then, why do cells bother to turn over Dbf4p rapidly? It has to be noted that incomplete degradation does not mean that turnover is useless. Overlapping mechanisms might exist to prevent excess Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase from causing adverse effects. For example, Dbf4p binds to replication origins in a regulated fashion which might limit spatially the juxtaposition of Dbf4-Cdc7 with its molecular targets (18, 52). Alternatively, Dbf4p instability might be needed to keep DDK activity at low levels, which could be important for cell homeostasis without immediate effect on cell cycle progression. Interestingly, high Cdc7p levels influence the rate of induced mutagenesis (29, 65). We find that while overexpression of either Cdc7p or Dbf4p alone has little effect on cell proliferation, overexpression of both subunits together markedly increases kinase activity in vitro and is detrimental to cells (Fig. 1D and 3C). This effect requires overexpression of both subunits and is therefore likely to be the consequence of Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase hyperactivation. Moreover, it suggests that at the time of the toxic effect (perhaps S phase) (38), neither Cdc7p nor Dbf4p is in large excess over its partner. We estimated, by comparing signals of purified and endogenous Cdc7p on Western blots, that cells contain roughly 300 to 600 Cdc7p molecules, i.e., not more than twice the number of active origins (R. Nougarède, unpublished data). This limited number is surprising in light of earlier experiments which suggested that cells contain 200 times more Cdc7p than is needed for a single division (65). If both estimates are not grossly incorrect, it would imply that cells could replicate with less than one Cdc7p molecule per origin. As Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase acts throughout S phase at the level of individual origins, this might be possible, for example, by recycling Cdc7p from early to late origins or by regrouping several origins around a single Dbf4-Cdc7 complex. Accordingly, Dbf4p adopts a punctate staining in the nucleus resembling replication foci, unlike Clb5p, which is diffuse (52).
In our hands Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase activity correlates strictly with Dbf4p levels over a 10-fold range, strengthening the notion that Dbf4p controls Dbf4-Cdc7 activation (7, 32, 50). Endogenous Dbf4p (which coimmunoprecipates with Cdc7p) as well as exogenously added Mcm2p is phosphorylated proportionally to the amount of Dbf4p present in the extract. Numerous genetic and physical interactions place the MCM complex as the leading candidate for Cdc7 kinase targets. Of its six subunits, Mcm2p appears to be the preferred substrate (6, 50), although some reports have indicated otherwise (44, 60). We have not tested other MCM subunits but find that Cdc45p purified from bacteria is phosphorylated by Dbf4-Cdc7 in vitro as efficiently as Mcm2p is. This is the first biochemical evidence that Cdc45p might be a target of Dbf4-Cdc7. Support for this notion comes from the observation that Cdc45p is required for the initiation of DNA replication in a step interdependent with that of Dbf4-Cdc7 (51, 76). Cdc45p interacts with Mcm2p and Mcm5p, but their association with chromatin is regulated differently (31, 77). Loading is independent of Dbf4-Cdc7 (77), but dissociation from chromatin occurs with kinetics similar to those of Dbf4p (52). A mutation in Mcm5 (bob1) bypasses the requirement of Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase for DNA replication (27, 32). If Dbf4-Cdc7 and Cdc45 were to mediate a single event (the same event, e.g., a conformational change in the MCM complex), then we would expect that the bob1 mutation also bypasses cdc45 mutants. We find this is not the case (data not shown), indicating that Cdc45p has a role for DNA replication independent of Dbf4-Cdc7, even though their functions were shown to be interdependent (51).
Understanding how eukaryotes initiate DNA replication will require the
identification of S-CDK and DDK targets. In conceptual terms it is also
crucially important to establish whether these two kinases act
independently of each other or in a concerted manner to fire
replication origins. Cell cycle progression results from successive
events that occur in a precise order. Order can be imposed by timing or
dependency mechanisms, but the latter seem to predominate in somatic
cells (49). The formation of replication-competent origins
also obeys such dependency rules, as follows: MCMs bind to origins only
after ORC and Cdc6p, whereas stable Cdc45p association requires MCMs as
well as S-CDK activity (13). The result is the following
order of dependent events: ORC
Cdc6p
MCM
Cdc45p. We
wanted to find out if S-CDK and DDK also have to follow such a strict
order to fire pre-RCs. In their seminal paper, Hereford and Hartwell
(28) proposed that Cdc7p acts downstream of Cdc4. This was
not the result of reciprocal shifts but was inferred from the double
mutant phenotype and from the dependency of the Cdc4 step, but not the
Cdc7p step, on protein synthesis. Since we know that Cdc4 is required
to activate S-CDKs, these results indicate that S-CDKs and DDK differ
in their requirements for activation, but do not address their order of
function. To untangle this issue, we first analyzed when precisely the
two kinases are activated during the cell cycle. We found that
Clb5-Cdk1 activity is more tightly regulated than that of Dbf4-Cdc7
(Fig. 4A). As a consequence, Dbf4-Cdc7 is already active before
Clb5-Cdk1 activity is turned on and is still active after Clb5-Cdk1
activity is turned off. This was expected because precocious or
retarded activation of Clb-Cdk1 kinases is sufficient to advance or
delay initiation, respectively (61-63). Moreover, we show
that Clb5-Cdk1 kinase is fully active in a cdc7 block and
vice versa, which demonstrates that the two kinases are activated
independently. However, a kinase can be active long before it actually
performs its function. We used conditional alleles and regulatable
promoters to control Clb5-Cdk1 (S-CDK) and Dbf4-Cdc7 (DDK) activities
in classical reciprocal shifts experiments in vivo (28).
These show that Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase, in spite of being activated earlier,
cannot perform its function for DNA replication before Clb5-Cdk1 is
turned on. Hence, S phase does not take place when the S-CDK is
activated after DDK has been turned off. In other words, fulfillment of the Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase requirement for S phase necessitates prior Clb5-Cdk1 activation. The converse is not true: S-CDK activity is not
needed any longer for S when it is turned off before DDK is turned on.
Thus, Clb5-Cdk1 can perform its essential function independently of
Dbf4-Cdc7. Taken together, the results establish a dependent pathway
(Clb5-Cdk1
Dbf4-Cdc7
S phase) in which S-CDK must act prior to DDK
for the initiation of DNA replication. What could such a dependency
mean in concrete terms? S-CDKs might be required, for example, to bring
a substrate in proximity to DDK. Cdc45p would fulfill these criteria,
as it is loaded onto origins by S-CDK, phosphorylated (in vitro) by
DDK, and displaced from chromatin at the same time as Dbf4p (52,
77). Alternatively, S-CDKs might alter the conformation of the
pre-RC in such a way as to allow its activation by DDK.
Do our data imply that the sole function of S-CDKs is to prepare the
ground for DDK? We believe this is not the case. Indeed, the
bob1/mcm5 mutation which bypasses DDK function does not
bypass cdc4 mutants for viability (32) or for DNA
replication (F. Della Seta, unpublished data). Because Cdc4p's
sole function for DNA replication is to degrade Sic1p (62),
the bob1 mutation clearly cannot bypass S-CDK function. Thus
S-CDKs are also needed for DNA replication independently of Dbf4-Cdc7.
This is why we favor a sequential model for the roles of S-CDK and DDK,
whereby DDK impinges on the initiation mechanism only after S-CDKs have
performed their function, i.e., concomitantly with or after Cdc45p
loading (Fig. 8). In contrast to that of
S-CDKs (15, 69), DDK activity is dispensable for S phase
under certain circumstances, such as in the mcm5/bob1 mutant
or during meiosis (30, 32). Therefore, we see the role of
DDK more as a regulatory appendage to the core mechanism of initiation
driven by S-CDKs. As DDK is limiting and bound to origins, such a
regulatory step just before the initiation of DNA replication would
allow the controlled firing of individual origins throughout S phase.
It has been shown that DNA damage and stalled replication forks block
the firing of late origins in a Rad53- and Mec1-dependent manner
(59, 66) which involves phosphorylation and displacement of
Dbf4p from chromatin (10, 52). Therefore, we would like to
propose a double-trigger mechanism for the initiation of DNA
replication, whereby S-CDKs that are abundant but tightly regulated act
globally to give the go-ahead signal for S phase, and DDK which is less
cell cycle regulated but limited in amount and concentrated at origins
would act locally to give the pace at which individual origins fire.
These two modes of temporal and spatial regulation would join to ensure
that DNA replication initiates at the right time and place and is
properly modulated under changing physiological conditions.
|
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank C. Hardy, M. Shirayama, B. Stillman, and W. Zachariae for yeast strains, M. Aldea and C. Mann for plasmids, and K. Nasmyth and M. Tyers for antibodies. Suggestions and critical reading of the manuscript by A. Devault, R. Hipskind, and P. Pasero are gratefully acknowledged.
Research was funded by grants from the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM), and Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (ARC). F.D.S. benefited from an exchange program between CNRS and Université de Nancy. R.N. was supported by a Ph.D. fellowship from MENRT.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of Molecular Genetics (IGM), CNRS UMR 5535, 1919 Route de Mende, F-34293 Montpellier cedex 5, France. Phone: 33 467 61 36 79. Fax: 33 467 04 02 31. E-mail: schwob{at}jones.igm.cnrs-mop.fr.
Present address: Imperial Cancer Research Fund (ICRF), London WC2A
3PX, United Kingdom.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Aparicio, O. M.,
A. M. Stout, and S. P. Bell.
1999.
Differential assembly of Cdc45p and DNA polymerases at early and late origins of DNA replication.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:9130-9135 |
| 2. | Bell, S. P., and B. Stillman. 1992. ATP-dependent recognition of eukaryotic origins of DNA replication by a multiprotein complex. Nature 357:128-134[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 3. | Benito, J., C. Martin-Castellanos, and S. Moreno. 1998. Regulation of the G1 phase of the cell cycle by periodic stabilization and degradation of the p25(rum1) CDK inhibitor. EMBO J. 17:482-497[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 4. |
Blumenthal, A. B.,
H. J. Kriegstein, and D. S. Hogness.
1974.
The units of DNA replication in Drosophila melanogaster chromosomes.
Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol.
38:205-223 |
| 5. |
Bousset, K., and J. F. X. Diffley.
1998.
The Cdc7 protein kinase is required for origin firing during S phase.
Genes Dev.
12:480-490 |
| 6. |
Brown, G. W., and T. J. Kelly.
1998.
Purification of Hsk1, a minichromosome maintenance protein kinase from fission yeast.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:22083-22090 |
| 7. |
Brown, G. W., and T. J. Kelly.
1999.
Cell cycle regulation of Dfp1, an activator of the Hsk1 protein kinase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:8443-8448 |
| 8. |
Byers, B., and L. Goetsch.
1974.
Duplication of spindle plaques and integration of the yeast cell cycle.
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
38:123-131 |
| 9. | Chapman, J. W., and L. H. Johnston. 1989. The yeast gene DBF4, essential for entry into S phase, is cell cycle regulated. Exp. Cell Res. 180:419-428[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. |
Cheng, L.,
T. Collyer, and C. F. Hardy.
1999.
Cell cycle regulation of DNA replication initiator factor Dbf4p.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:4270-4278 |
| 11. | Cross, F. R., and A. H. Tinkelenberg. 1991. A potential positive feedback loop controlling CLN1 and CLN2 gene expression at the start of the yeast cell cycle. Cell 65:875-883[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 12. |
Diffley, J. F.
1996.
Once and only once upon a time: specifying and regulating origins of DNA replication in eukaryotic cells.
Genes Dev.
10:2819-2830 |
| 13. | Diffley, J. F. 1998. Replication control: choreographing replication origins. Curr. Biol. 8:R771-R773[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. | Diffley, J. F., J. H. Cocker, S. J. Dowell, and A. Rowley. 1994. Two steps in the assembly of complexes at yeast replication origins in vivo. Cell 78:303-316[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 15. |
Dirick, L.,
L. Goetsch,
G. Ammerer, and B. Byers.
1998.
Regulation of meiotic S phase by Ime2 and a Clb5,6-associated kinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Science
281:1854-1857 |
| 16. |
Donaldson, A. D.,
W. L. Fangman, and B. J. Brewer.
1998.
Cdc7 is required throughout the yeast S phase to activate replication origins.
Genes Dev.
12:491-501 |
| 17. | Donaldson, A. D., M. K. Raghuraman, K. L. Friedman, F. R. Cross, B. J. Brewer, and W. L. Fangman. 1998. CLB5-dependent activation of late replication origins in S. cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 2:173-182[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 18. |
Dowell, S. J.,
P. Romanowski, and J. F. Diffley.
1994.
Interaction of Dbf4, the Cdc7 protein kinase regulatory subunit, with yeast replication origins in vivo.
Science
265:1243-1246 |
| 19. |
Epstein, C. B., and F. R. Cross.
1992.
CLB5: a novel B cyclin from budding yeast with a role in S phase.
Genes Dev.
6:1695-1706 |
| 20. | Fangman, W. L., and B. J. Brewer. 1992. A question of time: replication origins of eukaryotic chromosomes. Cell 71:363-366[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 21. | Feldman, R. M., C. C. Correll, K. B. Kaplan, and R. J. Deshaies. 1997. A complex of Cdc4p, Skp1p, and Cdc53p/cullin catalyzes ubiquitination of the phosphorylated CDK inhibitor Sic1p. Cell 91:221-230[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 22. | Fisher, D. L., and P. Nurse. 1996. A single fission yeast mitotic cyclin B p34cdc2 kinase promotes both S-phase and mitosis in the absence of G1 cyclins. EMBO J. 15:850-860[Medline]. |
| 23. | Friedman, K. L., B. J. Brewer, and W. L. Fangman. 1997. Replication profile of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome VI. Genes Cells 2:667-678[Abstract]. |
| 24. | Gari, E., L. Piedrafita, M. Aldea, and E. Herrero. 1997. A set of vectors with a tetracycline-regulatable promoter system for modulated gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 13:837-848[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 25. | Gietz, R. D., and A. Sugino. 1988. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene 74:527-534[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 26. |
Hansen, R. S.,
T. K. Canfield,
A. D. Fjeld,
S. Mumm,
C. D. Laird, and S. M. Gartler.
1997.
A variable domain of delayed replication in FRAXA fragile X chromosomes: X inactivation-like spread of late replication.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:4587-4592 |
| 27. |
Hardy, C. F.,
O. Dryga,
S. Seematter,
P. M. Pahl, and R. A. Sclafani.
1997.
mcm5/cdc46-bob1 bypasses the requirement for the S phase activator Cdc7p.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:3151-3155 |
| 28. | Hereford, L. M., and L. H. Hartwell. 1974. Sequential gene function in the initiation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA synthesis. J. Mol. Biol. 84:445-461[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 29. | Hollingsworth, R. E., Jr., R. M. Ostroff, M. B. Klein, L. A. Niswander, and R. A. Sclafani. 1992. Molecular genetic studies of the Cdc7 protein kinase and induced mutagenesis in yeast. Genetics 132:53-62[Abstract]. |
| 30. | Hollingsworth, R. E., Jr., and R. A. Sclafani. 1993. Yeast pre-meiotic DNA replication utilizes mitotic origin ARS1 independently of CDC7 function. Chromosoma 102:415-420[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 31. |
Hopwood, B., and S. Dalton.
1996.
Cdc45p assembles into a complex with Cdc46p/Mcm5p, is required for minichromosome maintenance, and is essential for chromosomal DNA replication.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:12309-12314 |
| 32. |
Jackson, A. L.,
P. M. Pahl,
K. Harrison,
J. Rosamond, and R. A. Sclafani.
1993.
Cell cycle regulation of the yeast Cdc7 protein kinase by association with the Dbf4 protein.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:2899-2908 |
| 33. |
Jackson, D. A., and A. Pombo.
1998.
Replicon clusters are stable units of chromosome structure: evidence that nuclear organization contributes to the efficient activation and propagation of S phase in human cells.
J. Cell Biol.
140:1285-1295 |
| 34. | James, S. W., K. A. Bullock, S. E. Gygax, B. A. Kraynack, R. A. Matura, J. A. MacLeod, K. K. McNeal, K. A. Prasauckas, P. C. Scacheri, H. L. Shenefiel, H. M. Tobin, and S. D. Wade. 1999. nimO, an Aspergillus gene related to budding yeast Dbf4, is required for DNA synthesis and mitotic checkpoint control. J. Cell Sci. 112:1313-1324[Abstract]. |
| 35. |
Jiang, W., and T. Hunter.
1997.
Identification and characterization of a human protein kinase related to budding yeast Cdc7p.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:14320-14325 |
| 36. | Johnston, L. H., H. Masai, and A. Sugino. 1999. First the CDKs, now the DDKs. Trends Cell Biol. 9:249-252[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 37. | Kaiser, C., S. Michaelis, and A. Mitchell. 1994. Methods in yeast genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 38. | Kilbey, B. J. 1984. Mutagenesis in yeast-misreplication or misrepair? Mol. Gen. Genet. 197:519-521[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 39. | Kitada, K., L. H. Johnston, T. Sugino, and A. Sugino. 1992. Temperature-sensitive cdc7 mutations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are suppressed by the DBF4 gene, which is required for the G1/S cell cycle transition. Genetics 131:21-29[Abstract]. |
| 40. | Knoblich, J. A., K. Sauer, L. Jones, H. Richardson, R. Saint, and C. F. Lehner. 1994. Cyclin E controls S phase progression and its down-regulation during Drosophila embryogenesis is required for the arrest of cell proliferation. Cell 77:107-120[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 41. | Koch, C., and K. Nasmyth. 1994. Cell cycle regulated transcription in yeast. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6:451-459[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 42. | Krude, T., M. Jackman, J. Pines, and R. A. Laskey. 1997. Cyclin/Cdk-dependent initiation of DNA replication in a human cell-free system. Cell 88:109-119[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 43. |
Kumagai, H.,
N. Sato,
M. Yamada,
D. Mahony,
W. Seghezzi,
E. Lees,
K. I. Arai, and H. Masai.
1999.
A novel growth- and cell cycle-regulated protein, ASK, activates human Cdc7-related kinase and is essential for G1/S transition in mammalian cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:5083-5095 |
| 44. |
Lei, M.,
Y. Kawasaki,
M. R. Young,
M. Kihara,
A. Sugino, and B. K. Tye.
1997.
Mcm2 is a target of regulation by Cdc7-Dbf4 during the initiation of DNA synthesis.
Genes Dev.
11:3365-3374 |
| 45. | Li, J. J., and R. J. Deshaies. 1993. Exercising self-restraint: discouraging illicit acts of S and M in eukaryotes. Cell 74:223-226[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 46. | Martin-Castellanos, C., K. Labib, and S. Moreno. 1996. B-type cyclins regulate G1 progression in fission yeast in opposition to the p25rum1 cdk inhibitor. EMBO J. 15:839-849[Medline]. |
| 47. | Masai, H., T. Miyake, and K. Arai. 1995. hsk1+, a Schizosaccharomyces pombe gene related to Saccharomyces cerevisiae CDC7, is required for chromosomal replication. EMBO J. 14:3094-3104[Medline]. |
| 48. | Mimura, S., and H. Takisawa. 1998. Xenopus Cdc45-dependent loading of DNA polymerase alpha onto chromatin under the control of S-phase Cdk. EMBO J. 17:5699-5707[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 49. |
Murray, A. W., and M. W. Kirschner.
1989.
Dominoes and clocks: the union of two views of the cell cycle.
Science
246:614-621 |
| 50. |
Oshiro, G.,
J. C. Owens,
Y. Shellman,
R. A. Sclafani, and J. J. Li.
1999.
Cell cycle control of Cdc7p kinase activity through regulation of Dbf4p stability.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:4888-4896 |
| 51. |
Owens, J. C.,
C. S. Detweiler, and J. J. Li.
1997.
CDC45 is required in conjunction with CDC7/DBF4 to trigger the initiation of DNA replication.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:12521-12526 |
| 52. |
Pasero, P.,
B. P. Duncker,
E. Schwob, and S. M. Gasser.
1999.
A role for the Cdc7 kinase regulatory subunit Dbf4p in the formation of initiation competent origins of replication.
Genes Dev.
13:2159-2176 |
| 53. | Peters, J. M. 1998. SCF and APC: the Yin and Yang of cell cycle regulated proteolysis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10:759-768[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 54. | Piatti, S., C. Lengauer, and K. Nasmyth. 1995. Cdc6 is an unstable protein whose de novo synthesis in G1 is important for the onset of S phase and for preventing a `reductional' anaphase in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 14:3788-3799[Medline]. |
| 55. |
Reynolds, A. E.,
R. M. McCarroll,
C. S. Newlon, and W. L. Fangman.
1989.
Time of replication of ARS elements along yeast chromosome III.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9:4488-4494 |
| 56. |
Roberts, B. T.,
C. Y. Ying,
J. Gautier, and J. L. Maller.
1999.
DNA replication in vertebrates requires a homolog of the Cdc7 protein kinase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:2800-2804 |
| 57. |
Rowley, A.,
G. C. Johnston,
B. Butler,
M. Werner-Washburne, and R. A. Singer.
1993.
Heat shock-mediated cell cycle blockage and G1 cyclin expression in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:1034-1041 |
| 58. | Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. |
| 59. | Santocanale, C., and J. F. Diffley. 1998. A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication. Nature 395:615-618[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 60. | Sato, N., K. Arai, and H. Masai. 1997. Human and Xenopus cDNAs encoding budding yeast Cdc7-related kinases: in vitro phosphorylation of MCM subunits by a putative human homologue of Cdc7. EMBO J. 16:4340-4351[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 61. | Schneider, B. L., Q. H. Yang, and A. B. Futcher. 1996. Linkage of replication to start by the Cdk inhibitor Sic1. Science 272:560-562[Abstract]. |
| 62. | Schwob, E., T. Böhm, M. D. Mendenhall, and K. Nasmyth. 1994. The B-type cyclin kinase inhibitor p40SIC1 controls the G1 to S transition in S. cerevisiae. Cell 79:233-244[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 63. |
Schwob, E., and K. Nasmyth.
1993.
CLB5 and CLB6, a new pair of B cyclins involved in DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Genes Dev.
7:1160-1175 |
| 64. | Sclafani, R. A., and A. L. Jackson. 1994. Cdc7 protein kinase for DNA metabolism comes of age. Mol. Microbiol. 11:805-810[Medline]. |
| 65. |
Sclafani, R. A.,
M. Patterson,
J. Rosamond, and W. L. Fangman.
1988.
Differential regulation of the yeast CDC7 gene during mitosis and meiosis.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8:293-300 |
| 66. | Shirahige, K., Y. Hori, K. Shiraishi, M. Yamashita, K. Takahashi, C. Obuse, T. Tsurimoto, and H. Yoshikawa. 1998. Regulation of DNA-replication origins during cell-cycle progression. Nature 395:618-621[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 67. |
Spellman, P. T.,
G. Sherlock,
M. Q. Zhang,
V. R. Iyer,
K. Anders,
M. B. Eisen,
P. O. Brown,
D. Botstein, and B. Futcher.
1998.
Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization.
Mol. Biol. Cell
9:3273-3297 |
| 68. | Strausfeld, U. P., M. Howell, P. Descombes, S. Chevalier, R. E. Rempel, J. Adamczewski, J. L. Maller, T. Hunt, and J. J. Blow. 1996. Both cyclin A and cyclin E have S-phase promoting (SPF) activity in Xenopus egg extracts. J. Cell Sci. 109:1555-1563[Abstract]. |
| 69. |
Stuart, D., and C. Wittenberg.
1998.
CLB5 and CLB6 are required for premeiotic DNA replication and activation of the meiotic S/M checkpoint.
Genes Dev.
12:2698-2710 |
| 70. | Studier, F. W., A. H. Rosenberg, J. J. Dunn, and J. W. Dubendorff. 1990. Use of T7 RNA polymerase to direct expression of cloned genes. Methods Enzymol. 185:60-89[Medline]. |
| 71. | Surana, U., H. Robitsch, C. Price, T. Schuster, I. Fitch, A. B. Futcher, and K. Nasmyth. 1991. The role of CDC28 and cyclins during mitosis in the budding yeast S. cerevisiae. Cell 65:145-161[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 72. | Tanaka, T., D. Knapp, and K. Nasmyth. 1997. Loading of an Mcm protein onto DNA replication origins is regulated by Cdc6p and CDKs. Cell 90:649-660[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 73. | Tanaka, T., and K. Nasmyth. 1998. Association of RPA with chromosomal replication origins requires an Mcm protein, and is regulated by Rad53, and cyclin- and Dbf4-dependent kinases. EMBO J. 17:5182-5191[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 74. | Yamashita, M., Y. Hori, T. Shinomiya, C. Obuse, T. Tsurimoto, H. Yoshikawa, and K. Shirahige. 1997. The efficiency and timing of initiation of replication of multiple replicons of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome VI. Genes Cells 2:655-665[Abstract]. |
| 75. | Yoon, H. J., S. Loo, and J. L. Campbell. 1993. Regulation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CDC7 function during the cell cycle. Mol. Biol. Cell 4:195-208[Abstract]. |
| 76. | Zou, L., J. Mitchell, and B. Stillman. 1997. CDC45, a novel yeast gene that functions with the origin recognition complex and Mcm proteins in initiation of DNA replication. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:553-563[Abstract]. |
| 77. |
Zou, L., and B. Stillman.
1998.
Formation of a preinitiation complex by S-phase cyclin CDK-dependent loading of Cdc45p onto chromatin.
Science
280:593-596 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»