Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 2000, p. 4505-4512, Vol. 20, No. 13
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Stat1 as a Component of Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Receptor
1-TRADD Signaling Complex To Inhibit NF-
B Activation
Yingjian
Wang,1
Tong R.
Wu,2
Shiying
Cai,1
Thomas
Welte,1 and
Y. Eugene
Chin1,*
Department of Pathology and Laboratory
Medicine, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode
Island 02912,2 and Department of
Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven,
Connecticut 065101
Received 14 October 1999/Returned for modification 17 November
1999/Accepted 15 March 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Activated tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-
) receptor 1 (TNFR1)
recruits TNFR1-associated death domain protein (TRADD), which in
turn triggers two opposite signaling pathways leading to caspase activation for apoptosis induction and NF-
B activation for
antiapoptosis gene upregulation. Here we show that Stat1 is involved in
the TNFR1-TRADD signaling complex, as determined by employing a novel antibody array screening method. In HeLa cells, Stat1 was
associated with TNFR1 and this association was increased with TNF-
treatment. TNFR1 signaling factors TRADD and Fas-associated death
domain protein (FADD) were also found to interact with Stat1 in a
TNF-
-dependent process. Our in vitro recombinant protein-protein
interaction studies demonstrated that Stat1 could directly interact
with TNFR1 and TRADD but not with FADD. Interaction between Stat1 and
receptor-interacting protein (RIP) or TNFR-associated factor 2 (TRAF2)
was not detected. Examination of Stat1-deficient cells
showed an apparent increase in TNF-
-induced TRADD-RIP and
TRADD-TRAF2 complex formation, while interaction between TRADD and FADD
was unaffected. As a consequence, TNF-
-mediated I-
B
degradation and NF-
B activation were markedly enhanced in
Stat1-deficient cells, whereas overexpression of Stat1 in 293T cells
blocked NF-
B activation by TNF-
. Thus, Stat1 acts as a
TNFR1-signaling molecule to suppress NF-
B activation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Tumor necrosis factor alpha
(TNF-
) is a pleiotropic cytokine that can elicit dual but opposing
reactions from many different cell types: to live or to die (1,
20). Two types of TNF receptors (TNFR1 and TNFR2) have been
characterized; TNFR1 has been found to be responsible for most of
the biological properties of TNF-
. Studies of TNF-
signaling events have revealed that activated TNFR1 forms signaling
complexes with a number of proteins, one of which is TNFR1-associated
death domain protein (TRADD) (11). On the one hand, the
TNFR1-TRADD complex can form the death-initiated signaling complex
(DISC) by recruiting Fas-associated death domain protein (FADD), which
leads to caspase activation and apoptosis (12). On the
other hand, the TNFR1-TRADD complex can recruit receptor-interacting protein (RIP) and/or TNFR-associated factor 2 (TRAF2), leading to NF-
B activation (12, 13). NF-
B
activation will turn on antiapoptotic genes and inhibit TNF-
-induced
cell death (25, 27). Therefore, blocking NF-
B activation
increases TNF-
-induced cell death, whereas enhanced NF-
B activity
protects cells from TNF-
-induced death (2, 24, 26). It is
conceivable that in order to induce apoptosis, TNF-
needs
not only to form the DISC and trigger the caspase activation cascade
but also to minimize the activation of NF-
B as much as possible.
Little is known about the mechanism(s) by which TNFRs suppress the
NF-
B activation pathway while forming the DISC to trigger apoptosis.
Ample evidence suggests that tyrosine phosphorylation
events are involved in TNF-
signal transduction. Tyrosine
phosphorylation of phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase was recently
found to be involved in NF-
B activation by TNF-
(20).
Although the tyrosine kinases responsible for TNF-
-induced protein
phosphorylation remain unidentified, the association of the tyrosine
kinase JAK with TNFR1 was observed (8). In 3T3-L1
adipocytes, Stat1 was tyrosine phosphorylated upon TNF-
stimulation,
but its DNA binding activity was undetectable (8). Previous
studies have indicated that TNF-
triggers less apoptosis in
Stat1-deficient cells (16). Like TNF-
, some growth
factors or cytokines can quickly induce Stat tyrosine phosphorylation
with poor or no DNA binding activity detected (4, 9, 19).
Many SH2-containing enzymes (e.g., SHP-2) have signaling effects in
addition to their catalytic activities. Similarly, Stat proteins are
SH2-containing transcription factors and may function as both signal
transducer and transcription factor, as the name indicates. Through its
association with TNF-
signaling factors, Stat1 may act as a signal
transducer rather than a transcription activator.
In this study, we examined the role of Stat1 in TNF-
signal
transduction. We screened Stat1-interacting proteins using a newly
designed antibody array with which different antibodies against TNF-
signaling factors were immobilized. We have obtained strong evidence
that Stat1 is a component of the TNFR1-TRADD signaling complex. By
binding to TRADD, Stat1 attenuates the interactions of TRADD with RIP
and TRAF2 without disturbing TRADD-FADD interaction. In cells lacking
Stat1, TRADD-RIP or TRADD-TRAF2 interaction was enhanced and led to
markedly enhanced NF-
B transcriptional activation in response to
TNF-
. Consistently in 293T cells, transient overexpression of Stat1
blocked NF-
B activation by TNF-
. Therefore, by binding to
the TNFR1-TRADD signaling complex, Stat1 favors DISC formation for apoptosis induction and prevents the signaling-complex
formation required for NF-
B activation.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell culture and whole-cell-extract preparation.
Cultures of
the epithelial cell lines HeLa, A431, 293T, 2fTGH, U3A, and U3A-S1 were
all grown in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium supplemented with 10%
fetal bovine serum. In U3A-S1 cells, the expression of Stat1 (wild type
or Y701F mutant form) was restored by stable transfection with an
expression vector as described previously (5). Confluent
cells were treated with different cytokines as indicated below for 30 min or left untreated. Whole-cell extracts were then prepared with
radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer containing freshly added
proteinase inhibitors by following the manufacturer's protocol (Santa
Cruz Biotechnology).
Antibodies and antibody array screening.
Antibodies against
TNFR signaling molecules used for making the antibody arrays and for
the immunoprecipitations were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
They were anti-TNFR1 (goat polyclonal immunoglobulin G [IgG], against
the C terminus), anti-TNFR2 (goat polyclonal IgG, against the C
terminus), anti-FADD (goat polyclonal IgG, against the N terminus),
anti-TRADD (goat polyclonal IgG, against the C terminus), anti-RIP
(goat polyclonal IgG, against the C terminus), and anti-TRAF2 (rabbit
polyclonal IgG, against the C terminus). One hundred polyclonal or
monoclonal antibodies, including these against TNFR signaling proteins
(0.5 µg each), were immobilized on polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF)
membranes (5 by 5 cm) at predetermined positions. The antibody array
membranes were then incubated with 5% milk at room temperature for
2 h, followed by incubation with whole-cell lysates from HeLa
cells (2 × 107) treated or not with recombinant human
TNF-
(10 ng/ml) for 30 min. After incubation for 2 h, the
membranes were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline and
blotted with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-Stat1
monoclonal antibody (against the Stat1 N terminus; Transduction
Laboratory) for an additional 2 h, followed by three washes and
enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection.
cDNA constructs.
Full-length Stat1, N-terminal Stat1
fragments (representing N-terminal amino acids 1 to 488), and
C-terminal Stat1 fragments (amino acids 489 to 750) were subcloned into
the pET-28a vector (Novagen) for expression of recombinant
His6-Stat1 proteins. All His6-expressing
proteins were confirmed by Western blotting with anti-His6
antibody. The TNFR1 cytoplasmic domain (TNFR1C), TRADD, and FADD were
subcloned into the pGEX-2T vector (Amersham Pharmacia) for expression
of recombinant glutathione transferase (GST) proteins. GST-expressing
proteins were confirmed by Western blotting with antibodies against
TNFR1, TRADD, and FADD, respectively.
Recombinant GST protein interaction, immunoprecipitation, and
immunoblotting.
GST fusion proteins were purified from bacteria
using glutathione-agarose beads according to the manufacturer's
instructions (Sigma). Whole-cell extracts prepared as described above
were incubated with either GST fusion proteins (2 µg) or different antibodies (1 µg) conjugated with protein G agarose at 4°C from 6 h to overnight. The precipitates were washed three times with lysis buffer and resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-10 to 12% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to PVDF membranes, and
immunoblotted with different antibodies. Immunoblot analyses were
carried out using ECL as instructed (Amersham Pharmacia). Different GST
fusion proteins were incubated with bacterially expressed recombinant
His6-Stat1 proteins at 4°C overnight (see Fig. 2C). The
GST precipitates were immunoanalyzed with anti-His6 monoclonal antibody (Amersham Pharmacia).
NF-
B activity measurements.
For electrophoretic
mobility shift assays (EMSAs), we used a radiolabeled
double-stranded oligonucleotide corresponding to the NF-
B binding
site in the mouse immunoglobulin enhancer. For Northern blotting
assays, blots containing 20 µg of total RNA per lane at various time
points were hybridized with specific probes that were 32P
labeled with a randomly primed DNA labeling kit (Boehringer Mannheim).
All probes were generated by cutting from their cDNA expression
vectors. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA was used
as an equal RNA loading control. For NF-
B reporter gene assays,
cells (2fTGH, U3A, and 293T) were transiently transfected with
luciferase reporter construct 2×
B alone or together with TRADD,
Stat1, and TRADD+Stat1 by the Lipofectamine method (Gibco/BRL). Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were left untreated or
treated with TNF-
(10 ng/ml) for 6 h. Luciferase activities were determined three times and normalized to the basal (untreated) levels.
 |
RESULTS |
Stat1 is a component of the TNFR1-TRADD signaling complex.
To
identify Stat1-interacting molecules, we designed an antibody array
that permits simultaneous detection of multiple protein-protein interactions under physiological conditions. The antibody array designed for this study contained 100 antibodies against different proteins, including TNFRs and their downstream signaling molecules. Individual antibodies were immobilized on PVDF membranes. By using these uniquely designed antibody array membranes, we screened for
possible interactions between Stat1 and molecules involved in TNFR
signaling pathways. Whole-cell extracts from HeLa cells that had been
treated or not with recombinant human TNF-
for 30 min were incubated
with antibody array membranes for 2 h. The arrays were then probed
with HRP-conjugated anti-Stat1 antibody in order to identify
Stat1-associated proteins. As can be seen in Fig.
1, Stat1 proteins were detected at
several spots on the membrane, indicating the presence of
Stat1-interacting proteins. While some interactions were unaffected by
TNF-
treatment, others were either enhanced or reduced by TNF-
treatment (Fig. 1). For instance, Stat1 protein was detected by
immobilized antibodies against TNFR1 and TNFR2 in both
TNF-
-treated and untreated samples (Fig. 1, spots 7d and 8d).
Moreover, Stat1 was detected by antibodies against TNFR1 adapter
protein TRADD and TRADD binding protein FADD in TNF-
-treated cell
lysates (Fig. 1B, spots 9d and 3b). As a positive control, Stat1 was
detected at the position immobilized with antibody against CREB binding
protein (CBP) (also called p300) (Fig. 1, spot 1j), indicating that the
antibody array designed here was able to detect the interaction between
Stat1 and CBP which was shown previously (3, 26). The
protein-protein interactions observed here were also detected with
other cell lines (data not shown).

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Screening of Stat1-interacting proteins using a novel
antibody array. PVDF membranes immobilized with different polyclonal or
monoclonal antibodies were incubated with whole-cell lysates from HeLa
cells (2 × 107) that were left untreated (A) or
treated recombinant human TNF- (10 ng/ml) for 30 min (B). After
incubation for 2 h, the membranes were washed with
phosphate-buffered saline and blotted with HRP-conjugated anti-Stat1
antibody followed by ECL detection. In addition to the antibodies
against TNFR1 (7d), TNFR2 (8d), FADD (3b), and TRADD (9d), antibodies
that also showed up positively in the array were P-CAM polyclonal
antibody (Pharmingen) (9c), EGF receptor polyclonal antibody
(Gibco/BRL) (6c), -catenin monoclonal antibody (Transduction
Laboratory) (10j), PI 3-kinase P85 polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) (7b), and CBP polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) (1j).
|
|
Interactions between Stat1 and individual TNF-
signaling molecules
identified by the antibody array were confirmed by
coimmunoprecipitation and GST fusion protein pulldown assays. In
coimmunoprecipitation assays, we precipitated proteins from lysates of
control and TNF-
-treated HeLa cells with TNFR1-specific antibody and
analyzed them by Western blotting for Stat1. As shown in Fig.
2A, Stat1 was associated with TNFR1 and
this association was greatly enhanced by treating the cells with
TNF-
. Interestingly, although HeLa cells express a low but
detectable level of TNFR2 (10), Stat1 was recovered from the
TNFR2 immunoprecipitates under the same conditions (not shown). We then
examined the interactions between Stat1 and TRADD. Although the same
amounts of TRADD were immunoprecipitated from treated and untreated
cells, only precipitates from TNF-
-treated cells contained Stat1
(Fig. 2A). Similarly, the association of Stat1 with FADD was detected
only in the lysates of TNF-
-treated cells (Fig. 2A). Although a weak
Stat1 signal was detected in the spot immobilized with antibody against
TRAF2 in antibody array screening (Fig. 1A, spot 4f), Stat1 did not
coprecipitate with TRAF2 or RIP in HeLa cells treated or not with
TNF-
(Fig. 2A). Coprecipitation of other Stat family members (e.g.,
Stat3 and Stat5) with TRADD and FADD was not detected (data not shown), although they have previously been shown to be activated by TNF-
in
adipocytes (8). To further confirm the interactions between Stat1 and TNFR signaling proteins, we constructed GST fusion proteins containing the intracellular domains of TNFR1 and TNFR2 (GST-TNFR1C and
GST-TNFR2C) as well as GST fused to full-length TRADD and FADD.
Recombinant GST fusion proteins were purified with glutathione-agarose beads and used to pull down Stat1 from cell lysates. Stat1 of TNF-
-treated HeLa cells was consistently found to interact with GST-TNFR1C, GST-TNFR2C, GST-FADD, and GST-TRADD, but not with GST alone
(Fig. 2B). Thus, Stat1 appears to bind the TNFR1-TRADD-FADD complex as
well as the TNFR2 cytoplasmic domain in cells.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Stat1 is a component of the TNFR1-TRADD complex. (A)
Whole-cell lysates of HeLa cells (2 × 107) treated or
not with TNF- (10 ng/ml) for 30 min were incubated with protein
G-agarose beads conjugated with anti-TNFR1, anti-TRADD, anti-FADD,
anti-RIP, or anti-TRAF2 antibody. After a washing, the bead-associated
proteins were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis followed by Western blotting with anti-Stat1 antibody.
IP, immunoprecipitation. (B) Purified forms of GST-TNFR1C, GST-TNFR2C,
GST-FADD, GST-TRADD, and GST alone on glutathione-agarose beads were
incubated with TNF- -treated HeLa cell lysates for 2 h at room
temperature. After a washing, proteins bound to the beads were
subjected to immunoblot analysis with anti-Stat1 antibody. (C)
Bacterially expressed His6 epitope-tagged full-length Stat1
(WT) or N-terminally truncated (amino acids 1 to 488) and C-terminally
truncated (amino acids 489 to 750) Stat1 proteins were incubated with
GST-TNFR1C, GST-TNFR2C, GST-FADD, GST-TRADD, and GST alone,
respectively. Precipitated proteins were detected by
anti-His6 monoclonal antibody (Amersham Pharmacia).
|
|
In order to determine whether Stat1 directly interacts with these
individual TNFR signaling molecules, we assessed the ability of
purified GST-TNFR1C, GST-TNFR2C, GST-TRADD, and GST-FADD to bind
recombinant histidine epitope (His6)-tagged full-length
Stat1 and N-terminally (1 to 488 residues) and C-terminally (489 to 750 residues) truncated Stat1 in vitro. GST-TNFR1C, GST-TNFR2C, and
GST-TRADD but not GST-FADD could precipitate
His6-Stat1 (Fig. 2C). Interestingly, although only
the C-terminal region of Stat1 could interact with TRADD and TNFR2C,
both C-terminally and N-terminally truncated Stat1 proteins bound
TNFR1C, suggesting that these two regions of Stat1 may cooperate for
maximal binding of TNFR1. Thus, Stat1 interacts directly with TRADD but
indirectly with FADD.
TNF-
-activated Stat1 does not translocate into nuclei and
bind DNA.
Stats recruited to ligand-bound receptors can
be tyrosine phosphorylated and serve as activators of
transcription after translocation into nuclei. The above
results prompted us to investigate whether Stat1 was tyrosine
phosphorylated and transcriptionally active upon TNF-
stimulation.
Stat1 was immunoprecipitated with its specific antibody and
subsequently blotted with antiphosphotyrosine antibody. As shown in
Fig. 3A, TNF-
indeed induced tyrosine
phosphorylation of Stat1 in HeLa cells. By using antibodies that can
specifically recognize phospho-Stat1, we confirmed that the Y701
residue of Stat1 was phosphorylated upon TNF-
treatment in the HeLa
and A431 cell lines (Fig. 3B), whereas Stat1 was constitutively
phosphorylated at the S727 residue in these cells. However, in
EMSA, DNA binding activity was undetectable with either nuclear
extracts or whole-cell lysates prepared from TNF-
-treated HeLa and
A431 cells incubated with the probe for Stat1 binding site M67SIE (data
not shown). Taken together with previous data (8), these
results suggested that Stat1 recruited by TNFR1 might function as a
signal transducer rather than as an activator of transcription. We then
examined Stat1 nuclear translocation in response to TNF-
treatment.
In Fig. 3C, as a control, Stat1 in A431 cells treated with epidermal growth factor (EGF) exclusively translocated into nuclei. With TNF-
treatment, however, Stat1 nuclear translocation was not observed. It
was recently reported that by binding to another protein factor, Stat
protein might lose its DNA binding activity (6).
Preincubation of GST-TRADD, but not GST alone, with whole-cell lysates
of EGF-treated A431 cells reduced the amount of Stat1 bound to DNA
(Fig. 3D). To confirm the role of residue Y701 of Stat1 in this
TRADD-Stat1 interaction, we performed immunoprecipitation by using U3A
cell lines restored with comparable levels of wild-type Stat1 and
Y701F-Stat1. As expected, Stat1 was coimmunoprecipitated with TRADD in
the parental 2fTGH cell line and the U3A cell line, which was restored
with wild-type Stat1 (Fig. 3E), whereas Stat1-TRADD interaction was
greatly reduced in the U3A cell line expressing Y701F-Stat1 (Fig. 3E).
Therefore, tyrosine phosphorylation at the Y701 residue in response to
TNF-
stimulation may be critical for Stat1 to interact with TRADD,
and Stat1-TRADD complex formation may prevent Stat1 from nuclear
translocation and binding to DNA.

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
TNF- -phosphorylated Stat1 does not translocate into
nuclei due to its interaction with TRADD. (A) Stat1 proteins were
immunoprecipitated from whole-cell lysates of HeLa cells that received
TNF- treatment for 30 min or were left untreated. The
immunoprecipitated Stat1 proteins were subjected to Western blotting
with anti-pY20 or anti-Stat1 antibody. (B) Whole-cell lysates prepared
from HeLa and A431 cells treated or not with TNF- . Phospho-Stat1 was
detected by immunoblotting with antibodies against Stat1-pY701 and
Stat1-pS727. (C) A431 cells received no treatment ( ) or were treated
with EGF or TNF- for 1 h and fixed with acetone (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology protocol). Acetone-fixed cells were stained with
anti-Stat1 antibody and examined with a fluorescent microscope. (D)
Whole-cell lysates of EGF-treated A431 cells were preincubated with
increasing amounts of GST-TRADD or GST alone and monitored by
precipitation with SIE oligomer-agarose beads. After being washed, SIE
bead precipitates were analyzed with Stat1 immunoblotting. (E) Parental
2fTGH cells, U3A-S1 WT cells expressing wild-type Stat1, and U3A-S1 YF
cells expressing Y701F-Stat1 were incubated with TNF- for 30 min.
Whole-cell lysates prepared from these cells were incubated with
agarose beads conjugated with anti-TRADD antibody. The TRADD
immunoprecipitates (IP) were then analyzed with Stat1 immunoblotting.
|
|
Stat1-TNFR1-TRADD complex formation inhibits NF-
B activity.
By binding to TNFR1, TRADD bifurcates for both FADD-mediated caspase
activation and RIP- and/or TRAF2-mediated NF-
B activation (11, 12). The observation that Stat1 binds to TRADD
and FADD but not to RIP and TRAF2 raised the possibility that Stat1
plays a role in either stabilizing the death signaling complex
(TRADD-FADD) or preventing TRADD-RIP complex formation. In cells
lacking Stat1 (U3A), although TRADD-FADD complex formation was
unaffected (Fig. 4A), TRADD-RIP and
TRADD-TRAF2 interactions in response to TNF-
were enhanced compared
with those in either parental cells (2fTGH) or cells with Stat1
reconstituted (U3A-S1) (Fig. 4A). Competitive protein binding assays
confirmed these results. In the presence of increasing amounts of
His6-Stat1, the amounts of RIP and TRAF2 precipitated with
GST-TRADD were markedly reduced (Fig. 4B). Under the same conditions,
the level of FADD recovered from GST-TRADD precipitates was not
apparently affected (Fig. 4B). Thus, by binding to the TNFR1-TRADD
complex, Stat1 may inhibit TRADD-RIP and TRADD-TRAF2 interactions
without detriment to TRADD-FADD formation.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Stat1 inhibits TRADD interaction with RIP and TRAF2 but
not with FADD. (A) FADD, RIP, and TRAF2 were immunoprecipitated (IP)
from whole-cell lysates prepared from 2fTGH, U3A, and U3A-S1 cells
treated or not with TNF- . FADD, RIP, and TRAF2 precipitates were
then subjected to TRADD immunoblot analysis. The levels of FADD, RIP,
TRAF2, and TRADD in these cell lysates were examined by blotting with
their specific antibodies as indicated. (B) Whole-cell lysates prepared
from TNF- -treated HeLa cells were incubated with purified GST-TRADD
and different amounts of recombinant His6-Stat1 protein
(0.1 or 0.3 µg). GST-TRADD precipitates were subjected to anti-RIP,
anti-TRAF2, and anti-FADD antibody immunoblot analysis.
|
|
Both RIP and TRAF2 were considered to play roles in NF-
B activation
through their interactions with TRADD. We hypothesized that by blocking
TRADD-RIP and/or TRADD-TRAF2 interactions, Stat1 may inhibit NF-
B
activation. To test this hypothesis, I-
B degradation and NF-
B
activation in response to TNF-
were compared in 2fTGH, U3A, and
U3A-S1 cells. Stat1-deficient U3A cells became more sensitive than
2fTGH cells and U3A-S1 cells to TNF-
in I-
B degradation (Fig.
5A). We then examined the DNA binding
activity of NF-
B in these cells. Nuclear extracts were prepared from
2fTGH, U3A, and U3A-S1 cells treated or not with TNF-
and analyzed
in EMSA with the NF-
B binding site as the probe. As expected,
TNF-
-mediated NF-
B DNA binding activity was enhanced by a factor
of 3 to 3.5 in U3A cells compared to 2fTGH and U3A-S1 cells (Fig. 5B,
left panel). A similar but more striking result was obtained with Stat1 knockout mouse fibroblasts (Fig. 5B, right panel) even though comparable levels of NF-
B (p50 and p65) were present in these cells
(data not shown). We suspected that the enhanced NF-
B DNA binding
activity observed in Stat1-deficient cells might lead to enhanced
NF-
B transcriptional activity. In order to confirm this, we examined
the ability of TNF-
to activate the
B-dependent reporter
construct upon transfection into U3A and 2fTGH cells. A luciferase
reporter construct (pBIIx Luc) containing two copies of the NF-
B
binding sequence was transfected into U3A and 2fTGH cells. TNF-
treatment resulted in an approximately sevenfold induction of
luciferase activity in U3A transfectants but only a threefold induction
in 2fTGH transfectants under the same conditions (Fig. 5C).
Overexpression of Stat1 in 293T cells markedly reduced NF-
B activity
in response to TNF-
, as indicated by the analysis of
NF-
B-dependent luciferase activity (Fig. 5D).

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Stat1 inhibits NF- B activation by TNF- . (A)
Protein immunoblot analysis of I- B- in whole-cell extracts from
2fTGH, U3A, and U3A-S1 cells treated or not with TNF- . (B) EMSA
were performed as described previously (5) with nuclear
extracts prepared from 2fTGH, U3A, and U3A-S1 cells with or without
TNF- treatment. The probe was derived from the NF- B binding site
in the promoter of the I- B gene. The NF- B gel shift complex can
be supershifted (SS) by the antibody against NF- B (p65) as
indicated. WT, wild type. (C) U3A and 2fTGH cells (3 × 105) were transiently transfected with the 2× B
luciferase reporter construct. Twenty-four hours after transfection,
cells were left untreated or treated with TNF- and luciferase
activities were determined. (D) In 293T cells (3 × 105), the 2× B luciferase reporter was cotransfected
with the empty vector ( ) or Stat1 expression construct at different
concentrations (0.5 and 1 µg). Luciferase activities were analyzed
after TNF- treatment. (E) In 293T cells, the 2× B luciferase
reporter was cotransfected with TRADD and Stat1. Luciferase activities
were analyzed after TNF- treatment. Stat1 proteins tested here
include the wild type (WT) and Y701 F mutant (YF), S727 A mutant
(SA), R602 Q mutant (RQ), and E495E496 AA mutant (EEAA) forms. (F)
Cells were treated with TNF- for different periods as indicated.
Total RNA was isolated and subjected (20 µg) to analysis with probes
for the TRAF2, inducible nitric oxide synthase, and interleukin-6
genes. To standardize for the amount of RNA loaded, filters were also
probed with the GAPDH gene.
|
|
The effect of Stat1 on TRADD-mediated NF-
B activation was also
tested. Cotransfection of wild-type Stat1 with TRADD markedly reduced NF-
B activation by TRADD (Fig. 5E). However, SH2 domain mutant Stat1 (R602
Q) completely lost its inhibitory effect on TRADD-dependent NF-
B activation, suggesting that the SH2 domain of
Stat1 may play an important role in its association with TNFR1 and/or
TRADD. Y701F-Stat1 was less effective than S727A-Stat1 in blocking
NF-
B activation by TRADD, further supporting the notion that Y701 of
Stat1 plays an important role in Stat1-TRADD interaction, as
indicated by the immunoprecipitation data shown in Fig. 3E. In
contrast, DNA binding domain mutant Stat1 (E495E496
AA) could
still effectively block TRADD in NF-
B activation.
NF-
B activation by TNF-
can upregulate a variety of genes,
including those involved in antiapoptosis. The gene expression patterns of TRAF2 as well as those of inducible nitric oxide synthase and interleukin-6 in response to TNF-
were evaluated in the 2fTGH, U3A, and U3A-S1 cell lines. As shown in Fig. 5F, U3A cells became more
sensitive to TNF-
stimulation in the expression of all these genes.
NF-
B-dependent TRAF2 expression has been recently shown to play an
important role in antiapoptosis (23). TRAF2
induction was most striking in U3A cells but was modest in both 2fTGH
and U3A-S1 cells. Consequently, less cell death was induced by TNF-
in Stat1-deficient U3A cells than in U3A-S1 cells with Stat1
reintroduced (Fig. 6A), consistent with a
previous report (16). Cell death induced by transfection of
TRADD alone was increased by cotransfection of TRADD with Stat1 in 293T
cells (Fig. 6B) and COS cells (data not shown). Therefore, by binding
to TRADD, Stat1 promotes apoptosis induction, presumably due to
its inhibitory effect on NF-
B pathway activation.

View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Stat1 promotes cell death induction. (A) U3A and U3A-S1
cells were cultured in six-well dishes (106/well) and
treated with TNF- (50 ng/ml) for 12, 24, and 48 h. Cell
viability was determined by trypan blue exclusion. Data reflect the
average of three experiments. (B) 293T cells in six-well plates (3 × 105/well) received transient transfection with an empty
vector (Mock), Stat1, TRADD, or Stat1 plus TRADD. Photographs were
taken 30 h after transfection.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The data presented here demonstrate that Stat1 recruitment by
TNFR1 can block NF-
B activation, serving as an important mechanism for facilitating TNF-
-mediated apoptosis induction. Indeed,
in some cells, the NF-
B pathway is inactive in response to TNF-
(26). TRADD can interact with a number of TNF-
signaling
proteins, and the balance between the TRADD-FADD and TRADD-RIP or
TRADD-TRAF2 signaling complexes decides whether cells live or die.
Although TRADD independently interacted with Stat1, RIP, and
TRAF2, coprecipitation of Stat1 with RIP or TRAF2 was not
detected. This indicates that Stat1 competes with RIP and
TRAF2 to bind TRADD. An enhanced TRAF2 expression level in
Stat1-deficient cells can be responsible for enhanced NF-
B
activation. Nevertheless, in the presence of Stat1, interaction between
TRADD and TRAF2 or between TRADD and RIP was dramatically blocked.
Stat1 may therefore affect NF-
B activation at two levels: (i) by
blocking interaction between TRAF2 and TRADD and (ii) by blocking TRAF2
gene expression in cells. However, NF-
B activation by TNF-
was
not impaired in TRAF2 knockout animals even though TRAF2 has been
considered as one possible link to NF-
B activation (17,
28). Therefore, NF-
B-dependent TRAF2 upregulation by TNF-
may be mainly involved in an NF-
B-independent antiapoptosis
process. RIP is a serine/threonine kinase and has been considered as an
important mediator of NF-
B activation by TRADD. In RIP-deficient
cells, a failure of TNF-
to activate the transcription factor
NF-
B was reported, suggesting that RIP-TRADD interaction plays a
more important role in NF-
B activation by TNF-
(15).
However, Stat1 facilitates TNF-
-mediated apoptosis induction
at the TNFR1-TRADD complex formation-proximal step, either by
displacing RIP and/or TRAF2 from TRADD or by disrupting other
components required to execute the NF-
B activation signals (Fig.
7). Therefore, Stat1 should be a useful
reagent for dissecting NF-
B activation initiated by other events,
without excluding direct or indirect interaction between Stat1 and
NF-
B (22). Although Stat1 and NF-
B can interact in
nuclei with some nuclear factors, such as CBP for gene regulation,
Stat1 does not translocate into nuclei for transcriptional activation
in cells that have received TNF-
stimulation. Moreover, Stat1
suppresses NF-
B activity at a stage above I-
B degradation (Fig.
5A). Therefore, it is unlikely that enhanced NF-
B activity in
Stat1-deficient cells is due to the lack of competition between Stat1
and NF-
B for a common nuclear factor.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Model of Stat1 in TNFR1 signal transduction.
TNFR1-recruited Stat1 can form a complex with TRADD. By binding to
TRADD, Stat1 prevents TRADD from further interacting with RIP and TRAF2
without affecting the association between TRADD and FADD. Consequently,
the TRADD-mediated NF- B activation process is blocked. Thus, Stat1
promotes TNF- -induced apoptosis, presumably due to its
inhibitory effect on NF- B activation.
|
|
Stat1 deficiency on the one hand downregulates proapoptosis
genes, such as caspase genes (5, 16), and on the other hand enhances NF-
B activity leading to the upregulation of
antiapoptosis genes, such as the TRAF2 gene. It therefore
adds an additional mechanism underlying TNF-
-mediated
protection. Although Stat1 undergoes tyrosine
phosphorylation upon TNF-
stimulation, its DNA binding activity is
extremely weak or undetectable. These results are in agreement with a
previous study (8). Some growth factor or cytokine
receptors, such as hepatocyte growth factor receptor, CD40, and
angiotensin II receptor, have been reported to recruit and induce
tyrosine phosphorylation of Stat proteins that exhibit poor or
undetectable DNA binding activity (4, 9, 19). Thus, Stat
proteins may primarily serve as signal transducers when recruited by
these receptors. It has been recently reported that
tyrosine-phosphorylated Stat proteins lose their DNA binding activity
by binding to other protein factors, such as PIAS (6).
Similarly, Stat1 did not translocate into nuclei upon TNF-
stimulation, probably due to its formation of a complex with TRADD in
the cytoplasm. Stat proteins can be recruited by a variety of growth
factor or cytokine receptors in a constitutive or stimulation-dependent
manner (7). Although there is no apparent homology between
TNFR1 and TNFR2 in their cytoplasmic domains, Stat1 coprecipitated with
them both. It is currently unclear which motifs of these receptors are
responsible for recruiting Stat.
The reduced interaction between Y701F-Stat1 and TRADD (Fig. 3E) is
consistent with the reduced effect of Y701F-Stat1 on TRADD-dependent NF-
B activation observed in Fig. 5E. These results suggest that tyrosine phosphorylation at the Y701 residue of Stat1 may be necessary for Stat1 to interact with TRADD. Currently, it is unclear whether tyrosine phosphorylation at residues other than Y701 is involved in
mediating protein-protein interaction. The role of Stat proteins as
adapters mediating signal transduction has been previously observed. In
alpha interferon receptor, for instance, Stat2 serves as the adapter
for Stat1 activation and Stat3 functions to couple another signaling
pathway, i.e., the PI 3-kinase, to the receptor (18, 21).
Our results provide evidence that tyrosine-phosphorylated Stat1 is
involved in TNFR1 signal transduction. Rather than functioning as a
nuclear transcription factor, Stat1 forms complexes with TRADD in the
cytoplasm and regulates TRADD-mediated NF-
B activation.
The antibody array technology applied here allows for massive parallel
protein analysis, a rapid and efficient method for large-scale
protein-protein interaction examination. Antibody arrays can greatly
increase the speed of experimental progress and will be valuable in the
study of functional proteomics.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank D. V. Goeddel for the TNFR1, TNFR2, and TRADD
expression vectors, V. Dixit for the FADD expression vector, X.-Y. Fu
for the Stat1 expression vector, S. Ghosh for the NF-
B site luciferase reporter construct (pBIIx Luc), G. Stark for the
Stat1-deficient human cell line U3A and its parental cell line 2fTGH,
and David Levy for the Stat1 knockout mouse fibroblasts. We also thank
Alicia Chung and Michelle Embree for their critical reading of the manuscript.
Support was provided by Brown University School of Medicine (Y.E.C.).
Y.W. and T.R.W. contributed equally to this work.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI 02912. Phone: (401) 863-2540. Fax: (401) 863-9008. E-mail: Y_Eugene_Chin{at}Brown.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Baker, S. J., and E. P. Reddy.
1996.
Transducers of life and death: TNF receptor superfamily and associated proteins.
Oncogene
12:1-9[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Beg, A. A., and D. Baltimore.
1996.
An essential role for NF-kappaB in preventing TNF-alpha-induced cell death.
Science
274:782-784[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Bhattacharya, S.,
R. Eckner,
S. Grossman,
E. Oldread,
Z. Arany,
A. D'Andrea, and D. M. Livingston.
1996.
Cooperation of Stat2 and p300/CBP in signalling induced by interferon-alpha.
Nature
383:344-347[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Boccaccio, C.,
M. Ando,
L. Tamagnone,
A. Bardelli,
P. Michieli,
C. Battistini, and P. M. Comoglio.
1998.
Induction of epithelial tubules by growth factor HGF depends on the STAT pathway.
Nature
391:285-288[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Chin, Y. E.,
M. Kitagawa,
K. Kuida,
R. A. Flavell, and X.-Y. Fu.
1997.
Activation of the STAT signaling pathway can cause expression of caspase 1 and apoptosis.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:5328-5337[Abstract].
|
| 6.
|
Chung, C. D.,
J. Liao,
B. Liu,
X. Rao,
P. Jay,
P. Bert, and K. Shuai.
1997.
Specific inhibition of Stat3 signal transduction by PIAS3.
Science
278:1803-1805[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Darnell, J. E., Jr.
1997.
STATs and gene regulation.
Science
277:1630-1635[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Guo, D.,
J. D. Dunbar,
C. H. Yang,
L. M. Pfeffer, and D. B. Donner.
1998.
Induction of Jak/STAT signaling by activation of the type 1 TNF receptor.
J. Immunol.
160:2742-2750[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Hanissian, S. H., and R. S. Geha.
1997.
Jak3 is associated with CD40 and is critical for CD40 induction of gene expression in B cells.
Immunity
6:379-387[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Heller, R. A.,
K. Song,
N. Fan, and R. A. Chang.
1992.
The p70 tumor necrosis factor receptor mediates cytotoxicity.
Cell
70:47-56[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Hsu, H.,
J. Xiong, and D. V. Goeddel.
1995.
The TNF receptor 1-associated protein TRADD signals cell death and NF-kappa B activation.
Cell
81:495-504[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Hsu, H.,
H.-B. Shu,
M.-G. Pan, and D. V. Goeddel.
1996.
TRADD-TRAF2 and TRADD-FADD interactions define two distinct TNF receptor 1 signal transduction pathways.
Cell
84:299-308[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Hsu, H.,
J. Huang,
H.-B. Shu,
V. Baichwal, and D. V. Goeddel.
1996.
TNF-dependent recruitment of the protein kinase RIP to the TNF receptor-1 signaling complex.
Immunity
4:387-396[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Karras, J. G.,
Z. Wang,
L. Huo,
D. A. Frank, and T. L. Rothstein.
1997.
Induction of STAT protein signaling through the CD40 receptor in B lymphocytes: distinct STAT activation following surface Ig and CD40 receptor engagement.
J. Immunol.
159:4350-4355[Abstract].
|
| 15.
|
Kelliher, M. A.,
S. Grimm,
Y. Ishida,
F. Kuo,
B. Z. Stanger, and P. Leder.
1998.
The death domain kinase RIP mediates the TNF-induced NF-kappaB signal.
Immunity
8:297-303[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Kumar, A.,
M. Commane,
T. W. Flickinger,
C. M. Horvath, and G. R. Stark.
1997.
Defective TNF-alpha-induced apoptosis in STAT1-null cells due to low constitutive levels of caspases.
Science
278:1630-1632[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Lee, S. Y.,
A. Reichlin,
A. Santana,
K. A. Sokol,
M. C. Nussenzweig, and Y. Choi.
1997.
TRAF2 is essential for JNK but not NF-kappaB activation and regulates lymphocyte proliferation and survival.
Immunity
7:703-713[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Li, X.,
S. Leung,
I. M. Kerr, and G. R. Stark.
1997.
Functional subdomains of STAT2 required for preassociation with the alpha interferon receptor and for signaling.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:2048-2056[Abstract].
|
| 19.
|
Marrero, M. B.,
B. Schieffer,
W. G. Paxton,
L. Heerdt,
B. C. Berk,
P. Delafontaine, and K. E. Bernstein.
1995.
Direct stimulation of Jak/STAT pathway by the angiotensin II AT1 receptor.
Nature
375:247-250[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Ozes, O. N.,
L. D. Mayo,
J. A. Gustin,
S. R. Pfeffer,
L. M. Pfeffer, and D. B. Donner.
1999.
NF-kappaB activation by tumour necrosis factor requires the Akt serine-threonine kinase.
Nature
401:82-85[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Pfeffer, L. M.,
J. E. Mullersman,
S. R. Pfeffer,
A. Murti,
W. Shi, and C. H. Yang.
1997.
STAT3 as an adaptor to couple phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase to the IFNAR1 chain of the type I interferon receptor.
Science
276:1418-1420[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Shen, C.-H., and J. Stavnezer.
1998.
Interaction of Stat6 and NF- B: direct association and synergistic activation of interleukin-4-induced transcription.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:3395-3404[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Smith, C. A.,
T. Farrah, and R. G. Goodwin.
1994.
The TNF receptor superfamily of cellular and viral proteins: activation, costimulation, and death.
Cell
76:959-962[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Van Antwerp, D. J.,
S. J. Martin,
T. Kafri,
D. R. Green, and I. M. Verma.
1996.
Suppression of TNF-alpha-induced apoptosis by NF-kappaB.
Science
274:787-789[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Wang, C. Y.,
M. W. Mayo,
R. G. Korneluk,
D. V. Goeddel, and A. S. Baldwin, Jr.
1998.
NF-kappaB antiapoptosis: induction of TRAF1 and TRAF2 and c-IAP1 and c-IAP2 to suppress caspase-8 activation.
Science
281:1680-1683[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Wang, C. Y.,
M. W. Mayo, and A. S. Baldwin, Jr.
1996.
TNF- and cancer therapy-induced apoptosis: potentiation by inhibition of NF-kappaB.
Science
274:784-787[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Wu, M. X.,
Z. Ao,
K. V. Prasad,
R. Wu, and S. F. Schlossman.
1998.
IEX-1L, an apoptosis inhibitor involved in NF-kappaB-mediated cell survival.
Science
281:998-1001[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Yeh, W. C.,
A. Shahinian,
D. Speiser,
J. Kraunus,
F. Billia,
A. Wakeham,
J. L. de la Pompa,
D. Ferrick,
B. Hum,
N. Iscove,
P. Ohashi,
M. Rothe,
D. V. Goeddel, and T. W. Mak.
1997.
Early lethality, functional NF-kappaB activation, and increased sensitivity to TNF-induced cell death in TRAF2-deficient mice.
Immunity
7:715-725[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Zhang, J. J.,
U. Vinkemeier,
W. Gu,
D. Chakravarti,
C. M. Horvath, and J. E. Darnell, Jr.
1996.
Two contact regions between Stat1 and CBP/p300 in interferon gamma signaling.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:15092-15096[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 2000, p. 4505-4512, Vol. 20, No. 13
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Tliba, O., Amrani, Y.
(2008). Airway Smooth Muscle Cell as an Inflammatory Cell: Lessons Learned from Interferon Signaling Pathways. Proc Am Thorac Soc
5: 106-112
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Smith, M. A., Moylan, J. S., Smith, J. D., Li, W., Reid, M. B.
(2007). IFN-{gamma} does not mimic the catabolic effects of TNF-{alpha}. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.
293: C1947-C1952
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hayashi, T., Ishida, Y., Kimura, A., Iwakura, Y., Mukaida, N., Kondo, T.
(2007). IFN-{gamma} Protects Cerulein-Induced Acute Pancreatitis by Repressing NF-{kappa}B Activation. J. Immunol.
178: 7385-7394
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lui, V. W. Y., Boehm, A. L., Koppikar, P., Leeman, R. J., Johnson, D., Ogagan, M., Childs, E., Freilino, M., Grandis, J. R.
(2007). Antiproliferative Mechanisms of a Transcription Factor Decoy Targeting Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT) 3: The Role of STAT1. Mol. Pharmacol.
71: 1435-1443
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Keslacy, S., Tliba, O., Baidouri, H., Amrani, Y.
(2007). Inhibition of Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha}-Inducible Inflammatory Genes by Interferon-{gamma} Is Associated with Altered Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Transactivation and Enhanced Histone Deacetylase Activity. Mol. Pharmacol.
71: 609-618
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Longman, R. S., Braun, D., Pellegrini, S., Rice, C. M., Darnell, R. B., Albert, M. L.
(2007). Dendritic-cell maturation alters intracellular signaling networks, enabling differential effects of IFN-{alpha}/{beta} on antigen cross-presentation. Blood
109: 1113-1122
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bharhani, M. S., Borojevic, R., Basak, S., Ho, E., Zhou, P., Croitoru, K.
(2006). IL-10 protects mouse intestinal epithelial cells from Fas-induced apoptosis via modulating Fas expression and altering caspase-8 and FLIP expression.. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.
291: G820-G829
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
He, Y., Zhang, W., Zhang, R., Zhang, H., Min, W.
(2006). SOCS1 Inhibits Tumor Necrosis Factor-induced Activation of ASK1-JNK Inflammatory Signaling by Mediating ASK1 Degradation. J. Biol. Chem.
281: 5559-5566
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kramer, O. H., Baus, D., Knauer, S. K., Stein, S., Jager, E., Stauber, R. H., Grez, M., Pfitzner, E., Heinzel, T.
(2006). Acetylation of Stat1 modulates NF-{kappa}B activity.. Genes Dev.
20: 473-485
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chen, J.-T., Liang, J.-B., Chou, C.-L., Chien, M.-W., Shyu, R.-C., Chou, P.-I, Lu, D.-W.
(2006). Glucosamine Sulfate Inhibits TNF-{alpha} and IFN-{gamma}-Induced Production of ICAM-1 in Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells In Vitro. IOVS
47: 664-672
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kim, H. S., Lee, M.-S.
(2005). Essential Role of STAT1 in Caspase-Independent Cell Death of Activated Macrophages through the p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase/STAT1/Reactive Oxygen Species Pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol.
25: 6821-6833
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chung, A. S., Guan, Y.-j., Yuan, Z.-L., Albina, J. E., Chin, Y. E.
(2005). Ankyrin Repeat and SOCS Box 3 (ASB3) Mediates Ubiquitination and Degradation of Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor II. Mol. Cell. Biol.
25: 4716-4726
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cousens, L. P., Goulette, F. A., Darnowski, J. W.
(2005). JAK-Mediated Signaling Inhibits Fas Ligand-Induced Apoptosis Independent of De Novo Protein Synthesis. J. Immunol.
174: 320-327
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Thomas, M., Finnegan, C. E., Rogers, K. M.-A., Purcell, J. W., Trimble, A., Johnston, P. G., Boland, M. P.
(2004). STAT1: A Modulator of Chemotherapy-induced Apoptosis. Cancer Res.
64: 8357-8364
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yuan, Z.-l., Guan, Y.-j., Wang, L., Wei, W., Kane, A. B., Chin, Y. E.
(2004). Central Role of the Threonine Residue within the p+1 Loop of Receptor Tyrosine Kinase in STAT3 Constitutive Phosphorylation in Metastatic Cancer Cells. Mol. Cell. Biol.
24: 9390-9400
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Baran-Marszak, F., Feuillard, J., Najjar, I., Le Clorennec, C., Bechet, J.-M., Dusanter-Fourt, I., Bornkamm, G. W., Raphael, M., Fagard, R.
(2004). Differential roles of STAT1{alpha} and STAT1{beta} in fludarabine-induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human B cells. Blood
104: 2475-2483
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ferreira, C. V., Bos, C. L., Versteeg, H. H., Justo, G. Z., Duran, N., Peppelenbosch, M. P.
(2004). Molecular mechanism of violacein-mediated human leukemia cell death. Blood
104: 1459-1464
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ivanov, S. S., Chung, A. S., Yuan, Z.-l., Guan, Y.-j., Sachs, K. V., Reichner, J. S., Chin, Y. E.
(2004). Antibodies Immobilized as Arrays to Profile Protein Post-translational Modifications in Mammalian Cells. Mol. Cell. Proteomics
3: 788-795
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Marques, L., Brucet, M., Lloberas, J., Celada, A.
(2004). STAT1 Regulates Lipopolysaccharide- and TNF-{alpha}-Dependent Expression of Transporter Associated with Antigen Processing 1 and Low Molecular Mass Polypeptide 2 Genes in Macrophages by Distinct Mechanisms. J. Immunol.
173: 1103-1110
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gao, Q., Hua, J., Kimura, R., Headd, J. J., Fu, X.-y., Chin, Y. E.
(2004). Identification of the Linker-SH2 Domain of STAT as the Origin of the SH2 Domain Using Two-dimensional Structural Alignment. Mol. Cell. Proteomics
3: 704-714
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kimura, A., Naka, T., Nagata, S., Kawase, I., Kishimoto, T.
(2004). SOCS-1 suppresses TNF-{alpha}-induced apoptosis through the regulation of Jak activation. Int Immunol
16: 991-999
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tliba, O., Tliba, S., Da Huang, C., Hoffman, R. K., DeLong, P., Panettieri, R. A. Jr., Amrani, Y.
(2003). Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha} Modulates Airway Smooth Muscle Function via the Autocrine Action of Interferon {beta}. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 50615-50623
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Choi, D.-S., Young, H., McMahon, T., Wang, D., Messing, R. O.
(2003). The Mouse RACK1 Gene Is Regulated by Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B and Contributes to Cell Survival. Mol. Pharmacol.
64: 1541-1548
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wesemann, D. R., Benveniste, E. N.
(2003). STAT-1{alpha} and IFN-{gamma} as Modulators of TNF-{alpha} Signaling in Macrophages: Regulation and Functional Implications of the TNF Receptor 1:STAT-1{alpha} Complex. J. Immunol.
171: 5313-5319
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Battle, T. E., Wierda, W. G., Rassenti, L. Z., Zahrieh, D., Neuberg, D., Kipps, T. J., Frank, D. A.
(2003). In Vivo Activation of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 1 after CD154 Gene Therapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Is Associated with Clinical and Immunologic Response. Clin. Cancer Res.
9: 2166-2172
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ashton, A. W., Ware, G. M., Kaul, D. K., Ware, J. A.
(2003). Inhibition of Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha -mediated NFkappa B Activation and Leukocyte Adhesion, with Enhanced Endothelial Apoptosis, by G Protein-linked Receptor (TP) Ligands. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 11858-11866
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wu, T. R., Hong, Y. K., Wang, X.-D., Ling, M. Y., Dragoi, A. M., Chung, A. S., Campbell, A. G., Han, Z.-Y., Feng, G.-S., Chin, Y. E.
(2002). SHP-2 Is a Dual-specificity Phosphatase Involved in Stat1 Dephosphorylation at Both Tyrosine and Serine Residues in Nuclei. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 47572-47580
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nguyen, K. B., Watford, W. T., Salomon, R., Hofmann, S. R., Pien, G. C., Morinobu, A., Gadina, M., O'Shea, J. J., Biron, C. A.
(2002). Critical Role for STAT4 Activation by Type 1 Interferons in the Interferon-gamma Response to Viral Infection. Science
297: 2063-2066
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schreiber, S, Rosenstiel, P, Hampe, J, Nikolaus, S, Groessner, B, Schottelius, A, Kuhbacher, T, Hamling, J, Folsch, U R, Seegert, D
(2002). Activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 1 in human chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Gut
51: 379-385
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wesemann, D. R., Dong, Y., O'Keefe, G. M., Nguyen, V. T., Benveniste, E. N.
(2002). Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 1 Inhibits Cytokine Induction of CD40 Expression in Macrophages. J. Immunol.
169: 2354-2360
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Xia, L., Wang, L., Chung, A. S., Ivanov, S. S., Ling, M. Y., Dragoi, A. M., Platt, A., Gilmer, T. M., Fu, X.-Y., Chin, Y. E.
(2002). Identification of Both Positive and Negative Domains within the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor COOH-terminal Region for Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT) Activation. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 30716-30723
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cottet, S., Dupraz, P., Hamburger, F., Dolci, W., Jaquet, M., Thorens, B.
(2002). cFLIP Protein Prevents Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha}-Mediated Induction of Caspase-8-Dependent Apoptosis in Insulin-Secreting {beta}Tc-Tet Cells. Diabetes
51: 1805-1814
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Durbin, J. E., Johnson, T. R., Durbin, R. K., Mertz, S. E., Morotti, R. A., Peebles, R. S., Graham, B. S.
(2002). The Role of IFN in Respiratory Syncytial Virus Pathogenesis. J. Immunol.
168: 2944-2952
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kim, H., Lee, T.-H., Hwang, Y. S., Bang, M. A., Kim, K. H., Suh, J. M., Chung, H. K., Yu, D.-Y., Lee, K.-K., Kwon, O-Y., Ro, H. K., Shong, M.
(2001). Methimazole As an Antioxidant and Immunomodulator in Thyroid Cells: Mechanisms Involving Interferon-gamma Signaling and H2O2 Scavenging. Mol. Pharmacol.
60: 972-980
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhu, Y. K., Liu, X. D., Skold, M. C., Umino, T., Wang, H., Romberger, D. J., Spurzem, J. R., Kohyama, T., Wen, F.-Q., Rennard, S. I.
(2001). Cytokine Inhibition of Fibroblast-Induced Gel Contraction Is Mediated by PGE2 and NO Acting Through Separate Parallel Pathways. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.
25: 245-253
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ganster, R. W., Taylor, B. S., Shao, L., Geller, D. A.
(2001). Complex regulation of human inducible nitric oxide synthase gene transcription by Stat 1 and NF-kappa B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
10.1073/pnas.151239498v1
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sahni, M., Raz, R., Coffin, J. D., Levy, D., Basilico, C.
(2001). STAT1 mediates the increased apoptosis and reduced chondrocyte proliferation in mice overexpressing FGF2. Development
128: 2119-2129
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
LANGEN, R. C. J., SCHOLS, A. M. W. J., KELDERS, M. C. J. M., WOUTERS, E. F. M., JANSSEN-HEININGER, Y. M. W.
(2001). Inflammatory cytokines inhibit myogenic differentiation through activation of nuclear factor-{kappa}B. FASEB J.
15: 1169-1180
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ganster, R. W., Taylor, B. S., Shao, L., Geller, D. A.
(2001). Complex regulation of human inducible nitric oxide synthase gene transcription by Stat 1 and NF-kappa B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
98: 8638-8643
[Abstract]
[Full Text]