Molecular and Cellular Biology, August 2000, p. 6105-6113, Vol. 20, No. 16
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia,1 and Glenolden Laboratory, DuPont Pharmaceuticals Company, Glenolden,2 Pennsylvania, and Department of Neurobiology, Columbia University, New York, New York3
Received 9 March 2000/Returned for modification 18 April 2000/Accepted 17 May 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTIs) are in clinical trials, but
how they selectively inhibit malignant cell growth remains uncertain.
One important player in this process appears to be RhoB, an endosomal
Rho protein that regulates receptor trafficking. FTI treatment
elicits a gain of the geranylgeranylated RhoB isoform (RhoB-GG) that
occurs due to modification of RhoB by geranylgeranyltransferase I in
drug-treated cells. Notably, this event is sufficient to mediate
antineoplastic effects in murine models and human carcinoma cells. To
further assess this gain-of-function mechanism and determine whether
RhoB-GG has a necessary role in drug action, we examined the FTI
response of murine fibroblasts that cannot express RhoB-GG due to
homozygous deletion of the rhoB gene. Nullizygous
(
/
) cells were susceptible to cotransformation by adenovirus E1A
plus activated H-Ras but defective in their FTI response, despite
complete inhibition of H-Ras prenylation. Actin cytoskeletal and
phenotypic events were disrupted in
/
cells, implicating RhoB-GG in
these effects. Interestingly,
/
cells were resistant to FTI-induced growth inhibition under anchorage-dependent but not
anchorage-independent conditions, indicating that, while RhoB-GG is
sufficient, it is not necessary for growth inhibition under all
conditions. In contrast,
/
cells were resistant to FTI-induced
apoptosis in vitro and in vivo. Significantly, the apoptotic defect of
/
cells compromised the antitumor efficacy of FTI in xenograft
assays. This study offers genetic proof of the hypothesis that RhoB-GG
is a crucial mediator of the antineoplastic effects of FTIs.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Rho proteins are Ras superfamily
GTPases that regulate the actin cytoskeleton, cell adhesion, motility,
proliferation, and apoptosis (1, 45). RhoB is a member of
the Rho family that is closely related to RhoA, its better-studied
relative, which is a key regulator of actin stress fiber formation and
integrin signaling. However, RhoB differs from RhoA in its localization and regulation and has a unique function in cells. First, RhoB is
located in early-endosome and nuclear membranes and has a specialized function in intracellular trafficking of cytokine receptors such as the
epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (16). Second, RhoB is
short lived and is part of the genetic response to Src activation or
EGF stimulation leading to cell cycle progression (19). RhoB
also has cell cycle inhibitory roles and is upregulated during stress
responses (14, 15) and by the inhibitory growth factor
transforming growth factor
(12). Last, RhoB proteins are
posttranslationally modified by geranylgeranylation or farnesylation, and the different isoforms may have distinct functions in cell growth
control (11, 24).
Rho functions are crucial for malignant transformation, and there is evidence that RhoB alteration is part of the mechanism through which farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTIs) inhibit malignant cell growth (26, 35). Like Ras proteins, Rho proteins are posttranslationally modified by farnesyl (C15) or geranylgeranyl (C20) isoprenoids at their C-terminal CAAX box sequences, where C is cysteine, A is generally an aliphatic amino acid, and X is usually methionine, serine, glutamine, or leucine (6). Where it occurs, protein isoprenylation is crucial for appropriate membrane localization, protein-protein interactions, and physiological functions. There are three protein-isoprenyltransferases in cells, namely, farnesyltransferase (FT), geranylgeranyltransferase I (GGT-I), and GGT-II. Most Rho proteins in cells are geranylgeranylated by GGT-I, but some, including RhoB, are farnesylated by FT (24). Despite some initial confusion about how RhoB becomes isoprenylated in cells, it is now clear that FT is solely responsible for farnesylation and that GGT-I is solely responsible for geranylgeranylation and that other reactions are in vitro artifacts (i.e., nonphysiological reactions). RhoB is unusual among Ras superfamily proteins in its ability to be isoprenylated by either FT or GGT-I, and the mechanistic impact of its differential prenylation remains to be fully understood.
FTIs were developed as anticancer therapeutics to exploit the farnesylation requirement of Ras for its oncogenic activity (17). In support of this potential, FTIs revert Ras-transformed cells to a normal phenotype and cause tumor growth inhibition, stasis, or regression in various animal models without discernible toxicity to normal cells (reviewed in reference 42). However, it has become apparent that inhibition of Ras prenylation is not crucial for FTIs to exert their antineoplastic effects (8, 26). Instead, an alternate model, in which alteration of RhoB prenylation and function is crucial, has been corroborated (26, 35, 37). Specifically, elevation of the geranylgeranylated isoform (RhoB-GG), rather than loss of the farnesylated isoform, appears to be the key step in mediating the biological response to FTI treatment. Thus, the FTI-Rho hypothesis for the mechanism suggests a different target for drug action but also proposes a gain-of-function mechanism involving increased production of RhoB-GG, an event that occurs due to the unencumbered activity of GGT-I in FTI-treated cells (35). The shift in RhoB prenylation pattern is correlated with an apparent depletion from its normal endosomal localization and a loss of growth-potentiating function in fibroblast models (24, 25). Strikingly, elevation of RhoB-GG is sufficient to mediate the effects of FTI treatment in transformed murine fibroblasts or in frank human carcinoma cells (9, 11). One caveat to these studies was that the engineered RhoB-GG isoform used was not exactly identical to cellular RhoB-GG in structure. Moreover, although RhoB-GG was sufficient, it remained to be shown whether it was necessary or whether alteration of other farnesylated proteins by FTIs was also sufficient. To address these questions, we examined the FTI response in cells where the rhoB gene was deleted by homologous recombination, eliminating the ability of FTIs to elevate a bona fide RhoB-GG isoform.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasmid constructions. Hemagglutinin (HA) epitope-tagged RhoB-WT (wild-type) and RhoB-GG expression vectors have been described previously (9, 24). A HindIII-BstXI restriction fragment excised from pCMV-HA-RhoB-WT was blunt-ended by Klenow treatment and subcloned into the HpaI site of the puromycin resistance gene-tagged retroviral vector pacMSCV (18) to generate pacMSCV-HA-RhoB-WT. A HindIII/XbaI restriction fragment excised from pCMV-HA-RhoB-GG was subcloned similarly to generate MSCV-HA-RhoB-GG.
Tissue culture.
The generation and characterization of
rhoB nullizygous (
/
) mice, which lack apparent
developmental abnormalities and which are fertile, will be described
elsewhere. The heads, limbs, and internal organs were removed from a
litter of E16.5 embryos and a litter of E14.5 embryos from pregnant
mice. The carcasses were minced in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium
(DMEM; Life Technologies) and trypsinized for 20 min at 37°C
individually. Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was added to stop the trypsin,
and the cell suspension was seeded into 25-cm2 flasks
containing DMEM and 10% FBS. Cells were maintained in the same media
containing 10 U of penicillin-streptomycin (Cellgro)/ml. Focus
formation assays were performed with murine embryo fibroblasts (MEFs)
using a modified calcium phosphate protocol for DNA-mediated transfection (7). Briefly, 5 × 105 cells
were transfected with 10 µg of the human oncogenic H-Ras vector pT22
and the adenovirus E1A vector p1A/neo (39). Cells were
passaged at a 1:5 split ratio the day after transfection, and
transformed cell foci were scored 10 to 14 days later. Single foci were
cloned and expanded into mass culture for analysis. Derivatives of E1A-
plus Ras-transformed MEFs were generated by infection with filtered
supernatants harvested 48 h after transfection of the ecotropic
packaging cell line Bosc23, essentially as described previously
(34), with 20 µg of recombinant pacMSCV retrovirus vector
DNAs. Cells were selected in 2 µg of puromycin (Sigma), and transgene
expression was confirmed by Western analysis with anti-HA antibody
12CA5 as described previously (9).
Cell morphology, viability, and proliferation assays. To document cell morphology changes, 104 cells were seeded in a 10-cm-diameter dish and treated with 10 µM FTI L-744832 or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) carrier (22). After 48 h cells were photographed on an Olympus microscope with a 35-mm camera attachment. Cell viability was monitored by trypan blue exclusion. Cells (5 × 105) were seeded overnight onto 60-mm-diameter dishes. The next day 10 µM FTI was added in DMEM containing 0.1% FBS. Viable cells excluding trypan blue were counted at 12-h intervals. Anchorage-dependent growth curves and anchorage-independent proliferation in soft-agar culture were determined as described previously (9).
Apoptosis assays.
FTIs have previously been shown to induce
apoptosis of Ras-transformed cells under low-serum conditions (10,
44). For in vitro assays, 5 × 105 cells were
seeded onto 60-mm-diameter dishes and treated 16 h later with FTI
L-744832 or methanol carrier in DMEM containing 0.1% FBS. After 16 to
24 h cells were harvested by trypsinization, washed once with
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), fixed in 70% ethanol, and stained in
PBS containing 5 µg of propidium iodide and 10 µg of RNase A/ml and
0.1% glucose. Flow cytometry was performed using an EPIC/XL cell
analyzer (Coulter). The proportion of cells in the sub-G1
phase DNA fraction, indicating DNA degradation, was taken as the
apoptotic population. The following protocol was used for in vivo
determinations of apoptosis. Severe combined immunodeficient (SCID)
mice were injected in each leg with 106 heterozygous (+/
)
or
/
transformed MEFs and 3 weeks later were dosed once daily for 2 days by intraperitoneal injection with FTI L-744832 (40 mg/kg of body
weight/day) or 30% DMSO carrier in a 0.2-ml total volume. Twenty-four
hours after the second dose, the mice were sacrificed and tumor samples
from each leg were processed for apoptotic determination using a
commercial fluorescence in situ terminal
deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling
(TUNEL) assay kit, following the instructions of the vendor (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals). Positive cells on tumor sections were assessed
by fluorescence microscopy.
Tumorigenicity assay.
E1A- plus Ras-transformed cell clones
were tested for tumorigenic potential in 4- to 6-week-old SCID mice
(Fox Chase CB-17 SCID mouse strain established at The Wistar Institute
by D. Bosma). Mice were injected subcutaneously in the upper thighs of
different legs of the same animal with 106 +/
or
/
cells suspended in 200 ml of DMEM. Palpable tumors appeared at the
injection site within 1 week, and visible nodules of >0.5 cm in
diameter were apparent within 2 weeks. For FTI experiments, when the
tumor reached ~50 to 100 mm3, mice were dosed once daily
essentially as described previously (22) by intraperitoneal
injection with FTI L-744832 (40 mg/kg/day) or 30% DMSO carrier in a
0.2-ml total volume. Tumor volumes were calculated using the formula
width squared × length × 0.52.
Akt kinase assay.
Cells were lysed in extraction buffer
containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 137 mM NaCl, 15% glycerol, 1%
NP-40, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2 µg of aprotinin and
leupeptin/ml, 2 mM benzamidine, 20 mM sodium fluoride, 10 mM sodium
pyrophosphate, and 1 mM sodium vanadate. Lysates were aliquoted for
protein expression and enzyme activity. For in vitro kinase assays,
lysates were first subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-Akt-1
antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; catalog no. sc-1618) in the
presence of 30 µl of protein A-Sepharose beads for 4 h at 4°C
and the precipitate was incubated in 10 µCi of
[
-32P]ATP (NEN)-4 µM cold ATP in a 25-µl reaction
buffer that contained 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM MnCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 1 µg of histone H2B as
the substrate. The reaction mixture was incubated for 30 min at room
temperature and fractionated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Relative incorporation of radioactivity
was determined by gel autoradiography.
Northern analysis.
Endogenous RhoB RNA levels in wild-type
(+/+), +/
, and
/
cells were examined by fractionation of 10 µg
of total cytoplasmic RNA on 1% formaldehyde gels, Northern blotting,
and hybridization with a 32P-labeled rat RhoB cDNA probe,
using standard methods.
Western analysis. Cells were washed in cold PBS and lysed in 1% NP-40 lysis buffer. Cellular protein was quantitated by a Bradford assay, and 50 µg of cellular protein was fractionated by SDS-PAGE. Gels were analyzed by standard Western blotting methods using 1 µg of anti-HA antibody 12CA5 (Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals)/ml or anti-Akt-1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; catalog no. sc-1618). Detection of the primary antibody was carried out using a chemiluminescence system for detection of murine antibodies (Amersham).
Actin immunofluorescence. Cells were seeded onto coverslips in 24-well dishes and treated beginning the next day for 48 h with 10 µM L-744832 or carrier. Cells were fixed and stained with fluorescein-phalloidin (Molecular Probes) as described previously (36) and analyzed using a confocal scanning microscope (Leica).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Similar susceptibilities of embryo fibroblasts lacking RhoB to E1A
and Ras transformation or to FT inhibition.
Elevated levels of
RhoB-GG are sufficient to elicit the effects of FTI treatment in
transformed Rat1 fibroblasts as well as in human carcinoma cell lines
with or without activated K-Ras genes (9, 11). We reasoned
that, if RhoB-GG was also necessary for these effects, then malignantly
transformed cells lacking RhoB should be refractory to FTI treatment,
because RhoB-GG could not be elevated in these cells in response to the
drug. To test this hypothesis, we employed a model system using embryo
fibroblasts isolated from mice in which the single exon carrying the
rhoB gene was targeted for deletion by standard homologous
recombination methodology (the exon was replaced with a neomycin
resistance gene cassette). Generation and characterization of these
mice, which develop apparently normally and are fertile, will be
described elsewhere. MEFs were isolated from E14.5 or E16.5 embryos
that were +/+, +/
, or
/
for the rhoB gene. Northern
analysis confirmed loss of the rhoB message in
/
MEFs
relative to +/
or +/+ cells (Fig. 1).
Where examined +/+ and +/
cells exhibited similar responses, but
/
cells differed in most cases; this report presents observed differences between +/
and
/
cells.
|
/
and +/
cell lines formed colonies under
anchorage-independent conditions in soft-agar culture (Fig. 2) and formed histologically similar
tumors in immunocompromised SCID mice with the same efficiency (data
not shown). We concluded that MEFs lacking RhoB were susceptible to
malignant transformation by E1A and Ras.
|
and
/
cells by the FT-specific peptidomimetic
inhibitor L-744832 (22). Following 24 h of treatment
with FTI or vehicle only, cells were lysed and processed for Western
analysis with anti-Ras antibody Y13-259. Similar shifts in Ras
mobility, which are diagnostic for inhibition of isoprenylation, were
observed in both cell types (Fig. 3).
This result was confirmed in additional clones of each genotype (data
not shown). We concluded that loss of RhoB did not affect the ability
of FTI to suppress cellular FT activity. Furthermore, since Ras
isoprenylation was blocked with identical efficiency in cells
nullizygous for RhoB, we inferred that any differences in biological
response reflected Ras-independent effects.
|
Loss of RhoB abolishes the actin cytoskeletal changes and alters
the phenotypic shift elicited in response to FTI treatment.
When
treated with FTI, Ras-transformed fibroblasts undergo a rapid and
pronounced phenotypic shift that is associated with the appearance of a
flat morphology and an extensive network of actin stress fibers
(36). The stress fiber response was monitored by
immunofluorescence microscopy following cell staining with fluorescein-conjugated phalloidin, which binds specifically to filamentous actin. The results of the experiments are shown in Fig.
4. Stress fibers were induced within
24 h of starting treatment with FTI in +/
cells but not in
/
cells (Fig. 4A). Longer drug treatment times did not elicit any change
in actin structure. In addition, Western analysis confirmed that the
lack of stress fiber response in
/
cells was not caused by reduced
expression of
actin in either untreated or drug-treated cells (data
not shown). To confirm that the effect was due to loss of RhoB rather than some nonspecific effect, we examined the response of
/
cells
that were infected with retroviral vectors expressing no insert or an
HA epitope-tagged wild-type RhoB cDNA (24). Western analysis
confirmed the expression of RhoB in
/
cells infected with the
appropriate vector (Fig. 4B and C, bottom). In three different clones
tested, expression of RhoB complemented the defective actin response
whereas the empty vector had no effect (Fig. 4B). Moreover, results for
cells stably expressing an engineered RhoB-GG isoform (9)
from the same retroviral vector indicated that RhoB-GG was sufficient
to induce stress fibers (Fig. 4C). This observation supported the
notion that the defective actin response was due to the inability of
FTI to elevate RhoB-GG levels. Whether this feature is specific to
RhoB-GG was unclear because of the inability to engineer a RhoB isoform
that is strictly farnesylated (i.e., RhoB-F). However, this issue is
not germane to the FTI mechanism since FTIs abolish rather than elevate
RhoB-F levels. We concluded that RhoB alteration was crucial for the
actin cytoskeletal response to FTI treatment.
|
cells underwent a dramatic phenotypic shift to
an enlarged flat morphology (Fig. 5A),
similar to that seen in other transformed-fibroblast models (20,
30, 36). In contrast,
/
cells exhibited only a partial shift,
suggesting a role for altered isoprenylation of proteins other than
H-Ras and RhoB. To confirm that the partial effect seen was due to loss of RhoB, we examined the response of the cells infected with the retroviral vectors described above. Expression of RhoB complemented the
morphology defect, whereas the empty vector had no effect, and RhoB-GG
mimicked the limited effect of FTI (Fig. 5B). We concluded that RhoB
alteration played a partial role in phenotypic reversion by FTI but
that alteration of other non-Ras proteins was also involved.
|
Loss of RhoB compromises anchorage-dependent but not
anchorage-independent growth inhibition by FTI.
To analyze the
consequences for FTI-induced growth suppression, we treated +/
and
/
cells grown in serum-containing media on plastic dishes or in
soft-agar culture (to monitor anchorage-dependent or
anchorage-independent proliferation, respectively). When serum growth
factors are present, transformed rodent fibroblasts exhibit cytostatic
but not cytotoxic responses to FTI treatment. Interestingly,
/
cells were resistant to growth inhibition when they were cultured on
plastic dishes but sensitive to growth inhibition when they were
cultured in soft agar (Fig. 6). These
results were not due to clonal variation, because three different
/
cell lines tested exhibited the same effect (data not shown). In
contrast, +/
cells were sensitive to growth inhibition under both
conditions. Flow-cytometric analyses indicated that growth inhibition
was not associated with a block to cell cycle transit in a particular
phase of the cell cycle (data not shown). Stable expression of RhoB-GG
achieved by retroviral transfer showed that RhoB-GG was sufficient to
inhibit the growth of
/
cells approximately twofold under
anchorage-dependent conditions (data not shown), consistent with
previous observations of H-Ras-transformed Rat1 fibroblasts
(9). Thus, when taken together, the results indicated that
RhoB alteration was only one of at least two events elicited by FTI
that were sufficient to inhibit anchorage-independent growth. In
addition, the results implied that RhoB-GG was sufficient to mediate
growth inhibition but that it only contributed a partial necessary role
if cells had substratum attachment.
|
Loss of RhoB abolishes the apoptotic response to FTI.
To assay
the effects of rhoB deletion on FTI-induced
apoptosis, we treated cells cultured in suboptimal
concentrations of serum. Under these conditions, the response of
transformed fibroblasts shifts from a cytostatic response to a
cytotoxic response (10, 44). Strikingly, whereas +/
cells
underwent massive apoptosis when treated with FTI,
/
cells
remained fully viable (Fig. 7A). Similar
effects were observed if cells were deprived of substratum attachment,
as seen previously in H-Ras-transformed Rat1 cells (27). A
partial flattening seen in
/
cells under low-serum conditions was
consistent with observations made in growth media, confirming that
additional FTI targets contribute to full phenotypic reversion. In
previous work we established that Akt kinase is not targeted for
inhibition by FTIs in H-Ras-transformed cells (in fact, activated Akt
opposes FTI action [10]). This was confirmed for
apoptosis-sensitive +/
MEFs by the finding that
endogenous Akt-1 activity was not altered during FTI-induced cell death
(Fig. 7B). Neither rhoB deletion nor FTI treatment affected
basal levels of Bcl-2 or Bax expressed in cells, as shown by Western
blotting (data not shown). Flow cytometry performed to quantitate the
extent of DNA degradation showed that cell death occurred rapidly in +/
cells and that
/
cells were as resistant to FTI-induced apoptosis as primary untransformed +/
or
/
MEFs (Fig.
7C). To confirm that the resistance of
/
cells was due to lack of RhoB rather than to some nonspecific cause, we compared the response of
/
cells that were retrovirally transduced with wild-type RhoB with
that of those transduced with engineered RhoB-GG. In three separate
wild-type RhoB-expressing clones tested we observed complementation of
the defect by RhoB, whereas the vector had no effect (Fig. 7D). Ectopic
RhoB-expressing clones exhibited a slight delay in response relative to
parental cells. In cells that stably expressed RhoB-GG, we did not
observe apoptosis upon serum deprivation. However, transient
expression experiments using green fluorescent protein to mark
transfected cells revealed a major population of rounded, apoptotic
cells (data not shown). Thus a negative selection against
overexpressed RhoB-GG appears to occur, even in the presence of
serum, possibly reflecting differences of bona fide and engineered
RhoB-GG or the increased dosage of the retrovirally delivered gene.
Nevertheless, the data supported the interpretation that RhoB-GG was
proapoptotic and that FTIs must elicit RhoB-GG to drive
apoptosis in transformed cells. We concluded that RhoB
alteration was a required part of the mechanism through which FTIs
exert their cytotoxic effects.
|
Loss of RhoB blunts the antitumor efficacy of FTIs due
to reduced apoptotic response.
RhoB-GG was dispensable
for anchorage-independent growth inhibition by FTIs, so one
might predict that
/
cells grown as tumor xenografts would remain
sensitive to FTI treatment. However, RhoB-GG had a crucial role in the
apoptotic response to FTIs, so
/
cells grown as tumor xenografts
might exhibit significant resistance to FTIs. To distinguish these
possibilities, we compared the FTI responses of +/
and
/
cells
grown in SCID mice. Cells (107) of different genotypes were
injected into the opposite thighs of the same animal to control for
nonspecific environmental effects. A total of 16 mice in each group
were treated in this manner. Palpable +/
and
/
tumors in each
animal formed within 7 days of injection. One week after the xenograft
was initiated mice were assigned randomly to control or drug treatment
groups. The drug treatment group was dosed once daily for 16 days by
intraperitoneal injection with 40 mg of L-744832/kg as described
previously (22). Control mice were given vehicle carrier
only. Tumor volumes were calculated every 4 days from caliper
measurements taken at various times during the trial. We noted no
adverse side effects of L-744832 administration consistent with
previous observations (3, 22, 29). At the end of the trial,
mice were euthanized and their tumors were surgically excised for
weighing and examination.
and
/
xenografts grew at similar rates in
control mice they exhibited dramatic differences in their susceptibilities to suppression by FTI treatment (Fig.
8A). Tumors of both genotypes grew at
similar rapid rates in control animals during the trial. +/
xenografts were strongly inhibited by the drug protocol and grew little
relative to controls. By the end of the experiment, +/
tumors in the
drug-treated group were quite small and 2 of 8 were only apparent by
surgical examination. In contrast, the
/
tumors continued to grow
under FTI treatment and by the end of the experiment were grossly
apparent on all mice and had achieved ~50% of the size of control
tumors (Fig. 8B). The approximately twofold suppression in the growth
of
/
tumors was consistent with the susceptibility of
/
cells
to anchorage-independent cell growth inhibition by FTIs, because while
RhoB-GG was sufficient it was not necessary for this effect. However,
the fact that
/
tumors continued to grow during the trial implied
that the blunted apoptotic capacity of
/
cells played a predominant
role in the in vivo response to FTIs.
|
/
tumors were less susceptible to
FTI-induced apoptosis, we performed a second trial in which
four mice were challenged with 106 +/
or
/
cells per
thigh and tumors were allowed to form for 3 weeks before drug treatment
began. As before, mice were then dosed daily except that 24 h
after the second dose mice were euthanized and their tumors were
harvested and processed for in situ TUNEL analysis using a fluorescence
detection assay. Analysis of the sections by immunofluorescence
microscopy revealed a significant difference in the extent of
TUNEL-positive cells in
/
and +/
tumors (Fig.
9). +/
tumors exhibited extensive
apoptosis relative to
/
tumors, consistent with the in
vitro resistance of
/
cells to FTI treatment. Thus, the reduced
apoptotic susceptibility of
/
cells was well correlated
with the blunted antitumor response. We concluded that RhoB alteration
was required for efficient suppression of malignant tumor growth by
FTIs.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This report offers genetic proof of the hypothesis that RhoB alteration is central to the antineoplastic mechanism engaged by FTI treatment. Previous work implicated the increased expression of RhoB-GG elicited by FTIs as a sufficient cause for growth inhibition in transformed rodent cells and human carcinoma cell lines (9, 11). In this study, we showed that RhoB-GG is necessary for FTI-induced apoptosis and crucial for antitumor efficacy in a xenograft model. The results indicated that RhoB-GG also has a necessary role for efficient growth inhibition by FTI under anchorage-dependent conditions. However, RhoB-GG was dispensable for inhibition of anchorage-independent growth, implying that if RhoB is absent the alteration of another protein(s) (possibly H-Ras in this model) could also provide a sufficient event for this process. One question addressed here was whether the engineered RhoB-GG construction previously used to establish RhoB-GG as a sufficient condition for growth inhibition and apoptosis by FTI accurately mimicked a bona fide cellular RhoB-GG (the construction had included a small number of RhoA-derived residues). The finding that loss of cellular RhoB-GG significantly blunts the FTI response argues against the concern that the engineered construct acted through a nonspecific rather than specific gain-of-function mechanism. Some differences in the apoptotic potency of exogenous engineered RhoB-GG versus that of the endogenous isoform were noted. Nevertheless the data supported the conclusion that RhoB-GG has proapoptotic activity in transformed cells.
Despite the close structural similarity between RhoB-GG and RhoA, it was clear that RhoA could not complement losses in RhoB-GG, because RhoA was expressed similarly regardless of rhoB genotype. As mentioned above, the exact basis for the growth-inhibitory and apoptotic properties of RhoB-GG is unclear, but we favor the interpretation that mislocalization of this isoform in FTI-treated cells (25) is key to understanding its action. We previously suggested that loss of the farnesylated RhoB isoform (RhoB-F) may have some role in the FTI response but this study argues strongly against this possibility. In summary, our observations provide direct evidence that RhoB-GG elevation by FTIs is not only sufficient but also necessary for apoptosis and a robust antineoplastic response.
A significant finding of this study was that the apoptotic
defect of
/
cells treated with FTIs was correlated with a loss of
antitumor efficacy in vivo. This observation implied that RhoB-GG was
needed to mediate efficient tumor suppression because it was needed to
drive apoptosis. One question concerns the strength of the
apoptotic response of E1A- plus Ras-transformed MEFs in vivo,
which differed from the more-limited apoptosis that occurs in
other xenograft models that have been published. To our knowledge, this
is the first study in which oncogene-transformed primary cells were
tested. Primary cells have greater sensitivity to apoptosis, especially anoikis (which may be crucial in in vivo settings), than
established lines which have been examined previously in xenograft
assays. Moreover, this greater sensitivity is retained in
oncogene-transformed primary cells (31). In addition, since E1A "epithelializes" cells (13), the more pronounced
apoptotic response to FTI that was seen in the MEF model might
reflect a sensitization of the model to anoikis, which is
characteristic of epithelial cells but not fibroblasts. In any case,
while accentuated, apoptosis of murine tumors in response to
FTI is not unique, insofar as it has been seen in a variety of
transgenic models (3, 22, 28, 29, 33).
Dominant inhibitory genetic methods have argued that Rho functions are required for efficient transformation of Rat1 cells by activated H-Ras (38, 40), but we found that rhoB null MEFs were fully susceptible to cotransformation by adenovirus E1A plus activated H-Ras. This susceptibility could mean either that RhoB is dispensable in this context or that E1A complements a RhoB requirement. An additional possibility is that RhoB may have a Janus or modifier role, perhaps determined by positive- or negative-acting cell surface receptors relevant to different cellular contexts. In any case, it is clear that RhoB has nonredundant functions, insofar as other ubiquitous and even highly related Rho proteins such as RhoA cannot complement the effects of RhoB deficiency. To further investigate the function of RhoB in cell transformation and growth regulation, we are generating 3T3 cells for analysis as well as comparing the susceptibilities of rhoB null mice to 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthracene-induced skin carcinogenesis, which involves Ras activation as the initiating step (41).
Concerning the relevance of genetic context, it is worth noting that mutant K-Ras and mutant H-Ras have similar abilities to sensitize fibroblasts to apoptosis by FTIs (10, 44). Therefore, we believe that the proapoptotic action of FTI and RhoB-GG is unlikely to be a specific feature of H-Ras in the model. Nevertheless, it will be interesting to learn whether loss of RhoB compromises the FTI response in K-Ras-transformed cells and cells with other genetic backgrounds. K-Ras- plus E1A-transformed MEFs might be expected to differ in growth suppression but to remain similarly susceptible to apoptosis, given the observations of Suzuki and colleagues with K-Ras-transformed NRK cells (44). The effects of rhoB deletion on apoptosis in different genetic backgrounds will be important since levels of reliance on Rho signaling pathways may differ in such backgrounds. Crossing rhoB nullizygous animals with animals carrying various oncogenes is one way in which FTI susceptibilities to apoptosis, growth suppression, and tumorigenesis could be addressed in future work.
We observed that RhoB-GG promoted apoptosis in a manner that was not correlated with inhibition of endogenous Akt activity in E1A-plus Ras-transformed MEFs. These observations were consistent with previous evidence that FTI-induced apoptosis is not associated with Akt inhibition (10, 23). However, this issue deserves careful examination in a variety of models because of evidence that FTIs may influence Akt activity in certain settings. The RhoB effector kinase Prk has been found to associate with and regulate the activity of Pdk1, the kinase responsible for activating Akt following its membrane recruitment (2). For reasons that remain unclear, in FTI-treated cells RhoB-GG is mislocalized away from the endosomal site where RhoB is normally found (25). Therefore, RhoB-GG may sequester RhoB effector signaling molecules such as Prk away from the endosome. If so, this sequestration could impact the activity of Pdk1 and Akt, due to the ability of Prk to regulate Pdk1. While this biochemical linkage must be considered tentative at this time, it is interesting that one recent study has suggested that FTI may promote apoptosis in certain human epithelial tumor cell lines by inhibiting the Akt-2 isoform (21). In transient expression assays of COS epithelial cells, we have observed that both FTIs and RhoB-GG can inhibit Akt-1 activation by mutant Ras or epidermal growth factor (A.-X. Liu and G. C. Prendergast, submitted for publication). These observations are consistent with a potential Prk-Pdk1 connection and raise the possibility that cell type or genetic background may dictate the mechanism through which RhoB-GG acts. However, the physiological relevance of these observations remains to be established, since the weight of the evidence to date suggests that FTIs do not influence endogenous Akt-1 activity in transformed Rat1 or MEF cells under conditions where the drugs can induce apoptosis. Recognizing the above caveats, we interpret our findings to mean that RhoB-GG can mediate the proapoptotic effects of FTIs through an Akt-1-independent mechanism.
Apoptosis would be expected to be an important component of any
successful clinical application of FTIs. In this regard, we note that
the results of preclinical experiments and human clinical trials to
date suggest strongly that FTIs will need to be applied combinatorially
with other agents to achieve efficacy (i.e., cell death). We have
reported that inhibitors of cell adhesion or phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase cooperate with FTI to efficiently kill Ras-transformed cells
(10, 27). In addition, others have shown that FTIs synergize with classical cytotoxic cancer therapeutics and irradiation (4, 32, 43). Based on this and other studies, we propose that RhoB-GG
provides a crucial signal(s) needed to mediate the synergistic effect
of FTI when combined with other modalities. In support of this
proposal, we have observed that E1A- plus Ras-transformed
/
cells
are resistant to apoptosis induced by irradiation or doxorubicin treatment and that they lack susceptibility to FTI-induced sensitization to these treatments (A.-x. Liu and G. C. Prendergast, unpublished observations).
In closing, we remain intrigued by the connections between Rho and apoptosis (5) and how the organization of integrins and the actin cytoskeleton regulated by Rho impact the antineoplastic response to FTIs. We have suggested that the means by which FTIs cause cell death ultimately involve partial or abortive responses of the transformed cell to induction of some integrin-dependent process (27). Normal cells would be immune to this process since they already exist in a state where such processes are fully operative. Since RhoB-GG induces actin stress fiber formation, it is tempting to speculate that it acts by facilitating the organization of focal adhesions and integrins in malignant cells, leading to a conflict with oncogene-mediated signals which suppress this organization. As mentioned, since focal adhesions and integrins are already in a highly ordered state in normal cells, this model offers an appealing explanation for why FTIs do not affect normal cells (35).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Allen Oliff for supplying FTI L-744832. Contributions from the Microscopy and Flow Cytometry Core Facilities at The Wistar Institute are gratefully acknowledged.
This research was supported by NIH grants CA65892 and CA82222. W.D. was supported in part by a grant from Merck and Co., Inc. G.C.P. is a Pew Scholar in the Biomedical Sciences.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Glenolden Laboratory, DuPont Pharmaceuticals Company, Glenolden, PA 19036. Phone: (610) 237-7847. Fax: (610) 237-7937. E-mail: george.c.prendergast{at}dupontpharma.com.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Aspenstrom, P. 1999. Effectors for the Rho GTPases. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11:95-102[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 2. | Balendran, A., A. Casamayor, M. Deak, A. Paterson, P. Gaffney, R. Currie, C. P. Downes, and D. R. Alessi. 1999. PDK1 acquires PDK2 activity in the presence of a synthetic peptide derived from the carboxyl terminus of PRK2. Curr. Biol. 9:393-404[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 3. |
Barrington, R. E.,
M. A. Subler,
E. Rands,
C. A. Omer,
P. J. Miller,
J. E. Hundley,
S. K. Koester,
D. A. Troyer,
D. J. Bearss,
M. W. Conner,
J. B. Gibbs,
K. Hamilton,
K. S. Koblan,
S. D. Mosser,
T. J. O'Neill,
M. D. Schaber,
E. T. Senderak,
J. J. Windle,
A. Oliff, and N. E. Kohl.
1998.
A farnesyltransferase inhibitor induces tumor regression in transgenic mice harboring multiple oncogenic mutations by mediating alterations in both cell cycle control and apoptosis.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:85-92 |
| 4. |
Bernhard, E. J.,
W. G. McKenna,
A. D. Hamilton,
S. M. Sebti,
Y. Qian,
J. M. Wu, and R. J. Muschel.
1998.
Inhibiting Ras prenylation increases the radiosensitivity of human tumor cell lines with activating mutations of ras oncogenes.
Cancer Res.
58:1754-1761 |
| 5. | Bobak, D., J. Moorman, A. Guanzon, L. Gilmer, and C. Hahn. 1997. Inactivation of the small GTPase Rho disrupts cellular attachment and induces adhesion-dependent and adhesion-independent apoptosis. Oncogene 15:2179-2189[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 6. |
Casey, P. J., and M. C. Seabra.
1996.
Protein prenyltransferases.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:5289-5292 |
| 7. |
Chen, C., and H. Okayama.
1987.
High-efficiency transformation of mammalian cells by plasmid DNA.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7:2745-2752 |
| 8. | Cox, A. D., and C. J. Der. 1997. Farnesyltransferase inhibitors and cancer treatment: targeting simply Ras? Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1333:F51-F71[Medline]. |
| 9. |
Du, W.,
P. Lebowitz, and G. C. Prendergast.
1999.
Cell growth inhibition by farnesyltransferase inhibitors is mediated by gain of geranylgeranylated RhoB.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:1831-1840 |
| 10. |
Du, W.,
A. Liu, and G. C. Prendergast.
1999.
Activation of the PI3'K-AKT pathway masks the proapoptotic effect of farnesyltransferase inhibitors.
Cancer Res.
59:4808-4812 |
| 11. |
Du, W., and G. C. Prendergast.
1999.
Geranylgeranylated RhoB mediates inhibition of human tumor cell growth by farnesyltransferase inhibitors.
Cancer Res.
59:5492-5496 |
| 12. |
Engel, M. E.,
P. K. Datta, and H. L. Moses.
1998.
RhoB is stabilized by transforming growth factor and antagonizes transcriptional activation.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:9921-9926 |
| 13. | Frisch, S. M. 1997. The epithelial cell default-phenotype hypothesis and its implications for cancer. Bioessays 19:705-709[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. |
Fritz, G., and B. Kaina.
1997.
rhoB encoding a UV-inducible ras-related small GTP-binding protein is regulated by GTPases of the rho family and independent of JNK, ERK, and p38 MAP kinase.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:30637-30644 |
| 15. |
Fritz, G.,
B. Kaina, and K. Aktories.
1995.
The ras-related small GTP-binding protein RhoB is immediate-early inducible by DNA damaging treatments.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:25172-25177 |
| 16. | Gampel, A., P. J. Parker, and H. Mellor. 1999. Regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor traffic by the small GTPase RhoB. Curr. Biol. 9:955-958[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17. | Gibbs, J. B., and A. Oliff. 1997. The potential of farnesyltransferase inhibitors as cancer chemotherapeutics. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 37:143-166[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 18. | Hawley, R. G., F. H. Lieu, A. Z. Fong, and T. S. Hawley. 1994. Versatile retroviral vectors for potential use in gene therapy. Gene Ther. 1:136-138[Medline]. |
| 19. |
Jahner, D., and T. Hunter.
1991.
The ras-related gene rhoB is an immediate-early gene inducible by v-Fps, epidermal growth factor, and platelet-derived growth factor in rat fibroblasts.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:3682-3690 |
| 20. |
James, G. L.,
M. S. Brown,
M. H. Cobb, and J. L. Goldstein.
1994.
Benzodiazepine peptidomimetic BZA-5B interrupts the MAP kinase activation pathway in H-Ras-transformed Rat-1 cells, but not in untransformed cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:27705-27714 |
| 21. |
Jiang, K.,
D. Coppola,
N. C. Crespo,
S. V. Nicosia,
A. D. Hamilton,
S. M. Sebti, and J. Q. Cheng.
2000.
The phosphoinositide 3-OH kinase/AKT2 pathway as a critical target for farnesyltransferase inhibitor-induced apoptosis.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:139-148 |
| 22. | Kohl, N. E., C. A. Omer, M. W. Conner, N. J. Anthony, J. P. Davide, S. J. deSolms, E. A. Giuliani, R. P. Gomez, S. L. Graham, K. Hamilton, L. K. Handt, G. D. Hartman, K. S. Koblan, A. M. Kral, P. J. Miller, S. D. Mosser, T. J. O'Neill, E. Rands, M. D. Schaber, J. B. Gibbs, and A. Oliff. 1995. Inhibition of farnesyltransferase induces regression of mammary and salivary carcinomas in ras transgenic mice. Nat. Med. 1:792-797[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 23. |
Law, B. K.,
P. Norgaard,
L. Gnudi,
B. B. Kahn,
H. S. Poulson, and H. L. Moses.
1999.
Inhibition of DNA synthesis by a farnesyltransferase inhibitor involves inhibition of the p70s6k pathway.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:4743-4748 |
| 24. |
Lebowitz, P.,
P. J. Casey,
G. C. Prendergast, and J. Thissen.
1997.
Farnesyltransferase inhibitors alter the prenylation and growth-stimulating function of RhoB.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:15591-15594 |
| 25. | Lebowitz, P. F., J. P. Davide, and G. C. Prendergast. 1995. Evidence that farnesyl transferase inhibitors suppress Ras transformation by interfering with Rho activity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:6613-6622[Abstract]. |
| 26. | Lebowitz, P. F., and G. C. Prendergast. 1998. Non-Ras targets for farnesyltransferase inhibitors: focus on Rho. Oncogene 17:1439-1447[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 27. |
Lebowitz, P. F.,
D. Sakamuro, and G. C. Prendergast.
1997.
Farnesyltransferase inhibitors induce apoptosis in Ras-transformed cells denied substratum attachment.
Cancer Res.
57:708-713 |
| 28. |
Liu, M.,
M. S. Bryant,
J. Chen,
S. Lee,
B. Yaremko,
P. Lipari,
M. Malkowski,
E. Ferrari,
L. Nielsen,
N. Prioli,
J. Dell,
D. Sinha,
J. Syed,
W. A. Dorfmacher,
A. A. Nomeir,
C.-C. Lin,
L. Wang,
A. G. Taveras,
R. J. Doll,
F. G. Njoroge,
A. K. Mallams,
S. Remiszewski,
J. J. Catino,
V. M. Girijavallabhan,
P. Kirschmeier, and W. R. Bishop.
1998.
Antitumor activity of SCH 6636, an orally bioavailable tricyclic inhibitor of farnesyl protein transferase, in human tumor xenograft models and wap-ras transgenic mice.
Cancer Res.
58:4947-4956 |
| 29. |
Mangues, R.,
T. Corral,
N. E. Kohl,
W. F. Symmans,
S. Lu,
M. Malumbres,
J. B. Gibbs,
A. Oliff, and A. Pellicer.
1998.
Antitumor effect of a farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor in mammary and lymphoid tumors overexpressing N-ras in transgenic mice.
Cancer Res.
58:1253-1259 |
| 30. | Manne, V., N. Yan, J. M. Carboni, A. V. Tuomari, C. S. Ricca, J. G. Brown, M. L. Andahazy, R. J. Schmidt, D. Patel, R. Zahler, R. Weinmann, C. J. Der, A. D. Cox, J. T. Hunt, E. M. Gordon, M. Barbacid, and B. R. Seizinger. 1995. Bisubstrate inhibitors of farnesyltransferase: a novel class of specific inhibitors of ras transformed cells. Oncogene 10:1763-1779[Medline]. |
| 31. |
McGill, G.,
A. Shimamura,
R. C. Bates,
R. E. Savage, and D. E. Fisher.
1997.
Loss of matrix adhesion triggers rapid transformation-selective apoptosis in fibroblasts.
J. Cell Biol.
138:901-911 |
| 32. |
Moasser, M. M.,
L. Sepp-Lorenzino,
N. E. Kohl,
A. Oliff,
A. Balog,
D. S. Su,
S. J. Danishefsky, and N. Rosen.
1998.
Farnesyl transferase inhibitors cause enhanced mitotic sensitivity to taxol and epothilones.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:1369-1374 |
| 33. |
Norgaard, P.,
B. Law,
H. Joseph,
D. L. Page,
Y. Shry,
D. Mays,
J. A. Peitenpol,
N. E. Kohl,
A. Oliff,
R. J. Coffey,
H. S. Poulsen, and H. L. Moses.
1999.
Treatment with farnesyl-protein transferase inhibitor induces regression of mammary tumors in transforming growth factor (TGF) alpha and TGF alpha/neu transgenic mice by inhibition of mitogenic activity and induction of apoptosis.
Clin. Cancer Res.
5:35-42 |
| 34. |
Pear, W.,
G. Nolan,
M. Scott, and D. Baltimore.
1993.
Production of high-titer helper-free retroviruses by transient transfection.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:8392-8396 |
| 35. | Prendergast, G. C. 2000. Farnesyltransferase inhibitors: antineoplastic mechanism and clinical prospects. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12:166-174[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 36. |
Prendergast, G. C.,
J. P. Davide,
S. J. deSolms,
E. Giuliani,
S. Graham,
J. B. Gibbs,
A. Oliff, and N. E. Kohl.
1994.
Farnesyltransferase inhibition causes morphological reversion of ras-transformed cells by a complex mechanism that involves regulation of the actin cytoskeleton.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:4193-4202 |
| 37. | Prendergast, G. C., and W. Du. 1999. Targeting farnesyltransferase: is Ras relevant? Drug Resist. Updates 2:81-84[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 38. | Prendergast, G. C., R. Khosravi-Far, P. Solski, H. Kurzawa, P. Lebowitz, and C. J. Der. 1995. Critical role of Rho in cell transformation by oncogenic Ras. Oncogene 10:2289-2296[Medline]. |
| 39. | Prendergast, G. C., D. Lawe, and E. B. Ziff. 1991. Association of Myn, the murine homolog of Max, with c-Myc stimulates methylation-sensitive DNA binding and Ras cotransformation. Cell 65:395-407[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 40. |
Qiu, R. G.,
J. Chen,
F. McCormick, and M. Symons.
1995.
A role for Rho in Ras transformation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:11781-11785 |
| 41. | Quintanilla, M., K. Brown, M. Ramsden, and A. Balmain. 1986. Carcinogen-specific mutation and amplification of Ha-ras during mouse skin carcinogenesis. Nature 322:78-80[Medline]. |
| 42. |
Rowinsky, E. K.,
J. J. Windle, and D. D. von Hoff.
1999.
Ras protein farnesyltransferase: a strategic target for anticancer therapeutic development.
J. Clin. Oncol.
17:3631-3652 |
| 43. |
Sun, J.,
M. A. Blaskovich,
D. Knowles,
Y. Qian,
J. Ohkanda,
R. D. Bailey,
A. D. Hamilton, and S. M. Sebti.
1999.
Antitumor efficacy of a novel class of non-thiol-containing peptidomimetic inhibitors of farnesyltransferase and geranylgeranyltransferase I: combination therapy with the cytotoxic agents cisplatin, Taxol, and gemcitabine.
Cancer Res.
59:4919-4926 |
| 44. |
Suzuki, N.,
J. Urano, and F. Tamanoi.
1998.
Farnesyltransferase inhibitors induce cytochrome c release and caspase 3 activation preferentially in transformed cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:15356-15361 |
| 45. |
van Aelst, L., and C. D'Souza-Schorey.
1997.
Rho GTPases and signaling networks.
Genes Dev.
11:2295-2322 |
This article has been cited by other articles: